1: % aa.dem
2: % AA vers. 6.1, LaTeX class for Astronomy & Astrophysics
3: % demonstration file
4: % (c) Springer-Verlag HD
5: % revised by EDP Sciences
6: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
7: %
8: %\documentclass[referee]{aa} % for a referee version
9: %\documentclass[onecolumn]{aa} % for a paper on 1 column
10: %\documentclass[longauth]{aa} % for the long lists of affiliations
11: %\documentclass[rnote]{aa} % for the research notes
12: %\documentclass[letter]{aa} % for the letters
13: %
14: \documentclass{aa}
15: %\documentclass[referee]{aa}
16: %
17: \usepackage{graphicx}
18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
19: \usepackage{txfonts}
20: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
21: %\usepackage{aalongtable}
22: \usepackage{natbib}
23: \usepackage{here}
24: \usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
25:
26: %\bibpunct{(}{)}{;}{a}{}{,} % to follow A&A style
27: \newcommand\degree{$^{o}$}
28: %\newcommand\arcmin{$^{'}$}
29: \newcommand\be{\begin{equation}}
30: \newcommand\ee{\end{equation}}
31: \newcommand{\ammonia}{\mbox{NH$_3$}}
32: \newcommand\two{$^{-2}$}
33: \newcommand\three{$^{-3}$}
34: \newcommand\six{$^{-6}$}
35: \newcommand\cmthree{~cm$^{-3}$~}
36: \newcommand\cmsix{~cm$^{-6}$}
37: \newcommand\micron{\mbox{$\mu$m}}
38: %\newcommand\ne{$n_{e}$}
39: \newcommand\te{$T_{e}$}
40: \newcommand\delv{$\Delta$V}
41: %\def\km{km s$^{-1}$}
42: \newcommand\etal{et al.~}
43: \newcommand\sm{$\sim$}
44: \newcommand\para{\hskip 15pt}
45: \newcommand\arcdeg{\mbox{$^\circ$}}%
46: \newcommand\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}
47: \newcommand\eea{\end{eqnarray}}
48: \newcommand\HII{\hbox{H\,{\sc ii}}}
49: \newcommand\CII{\hbox{C\,{\sc ii}}}
50: \newcommand\CI{\hbox{[C\,{\sc i}]}}
51: \newcommand\NII{\hbox{N\,{\sc ii}}}
52: \newcommand\HI{\hbox{H\,{\sc i}}}
53: \newcommand\ovi{\hbox{O\,{\sc vi}}}
54: \newcommand\CO{$^{12}$CO}
55: \newcommand{\msun}{M$_{\rm \odot}$}
56: \newcommand\carbon{C$^0$}
57: \newcommand\lv{\hbox{\em lv}~}
58: \newcommand{\twCO}{$^{12}$CO}
59: \newcommand{\thCO}{$^{13}$CO}
60: \newcommand{\ext}{\mbox{T$_{\rm ex}$}}
61: \newcommand\halpha{H$\alpha$~}
62: \newcommand\ranua{R$_{1}$}
63: \newcommand\ranub{R$_{2}$}
64: \newcommand\RSUN{R$_{\odot}~$}
65: \newcommand\RGC{R$_{\mbox{gc}}$~}
66: \newcommand{\kms}{\mbox{kms$^{-1}$}}
67: \def\cplus{C$^{+}$}
68: \newcommand{\cmcub}{\mbox{cm$^{-3}$}}
69: \newcommand{\cmsq}{\mbox{cm$^{-2}$}}
70: \newcommand{\tdust}{\mbox{$T_{\rm d}$}}
71: \newcommand{\lsun}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{L}_\odot}}
72: \def\phn{\phantom{0}}
73: \newcommand{\ea}{et al.}
74:
75:
76:
77:
78: \begin{document}
79:
80: \title{SCUBA Mapping of Outer Galaxy Protostellar Candidates}
81:
82:
83: \author{B. Mookerjea\inst{1,2}, G. Sandell\inst{3}, J.
84: Stutzki\inst{1}, J. G. A. Wouterloot\inst{4}, }
85:
86: \offprints{bhaswati@tifr.res.in}
87: \institute{KOSMA, I. Physikalisches Institut, Universit\"at zu K\"oln,
88: Z\"ulpicher Strasse 77, 50937 Cologne, Germany
89: \and
90: Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College
91: Park, MD 20742, USA
92: \and
93: SOFIA-USRA, NASA Ames Research Center, MS N211-3, Moffett Field, CA 94035
94: \and
95: Joint Astronomy Centre, 660 N. A'ohoku Place, University Park,
96: Hilo, Hawaii 96720 , USA }
97:
98:
99: \date{Accepted . Received ; in original form }
100: \authorrunning{Mookerjea et al.}
101: \titlerunning{SCUBA studies of Outer Galaxy IRAS sources}
102:
103: %\pagerange{\pageref{firstpage}--\pageref{lastpage}} \pubyear{}
104:
105:
106: \abstract
107: {}
108: {We aim to study dust properties of massive star forming regions in
109: the outer Galaxy, in a direction opposite to the Galactic center.}
110: {We present observations of six outer Galaxy point sources IRAS
111: 01045+6505, 01420+6401, 05271+3059, 05345+3556, 20222+3541 and
112: 20406+4555, taken with the Submillimeter Common-User Bolometer Array
113: (SCUBA) on the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT) at 450 and
114: 850~\micron. Single temperature greybody models are fitted to the
115: Spectral Energy Distribution of the detected sub-mm cores to derive dust
116: temperature, dust emissivity index and optical depth at 250~\micron. The
117: observed radial intensity profiles of the sub-mm cores were fitted with
118: power laws to derive the indices describing the density
119: distribution. }
120: {At a resolution of 15\arcsec\ all six IRAS point sources show multiple
121: emission peaks. Only four out of fourteen detected sub-mm cores show
122: associated mid-infrared emission. For the sub-mm cores we derive dust
123: temperatures of 32$\pm$5~K and dust emissivity indices between 0.9 and
124: 2.5. The density profiles of the sub-mm cores can be fitted by a
125: single power law distribution with indices -1.5$\pm$0.3, with most
126: cores showing an index of -1.5. This is consistent with most
127: observations of massive star forming regions and supports predictions
128: of models of star formation which consider non-thermal support against
129: gravitational collapse.}{}
130:
131:
132: \keywords
133: {stars: formation -- ISM:general -- ISM:\HII\ regions --
134: ISM:dust,extinction -- submillimeter -- ISM:individual: IRAS 05271+3059,
135: 05345+3556, 20222+3541, 20406+4555.}
136: \maketitle
137:
138: \section{Introduction}
139:
140: With the development of high angular resolution millimeter (mm) and
141: sub-millimeter (sub-mm) instrumentation, observations studying the
142: influence of different physical environment on the formation of
143: molecular clouds subsequently developing into protostellar cores has
144: been receiving increased attention. While the inner Galaxy has been
145: extensively studied, lack of instruments with high angular resolution
146: has limited the study of sources in the outer Galactic disk which are
147: in a potentially different physical and chemical environment. Existing
148: observations suggest that in the outer Galactic disk the molecular
149: clouds are more sparsely distributed \citep{wouterloot1990}, the
150: diffuse galactic interstellar radiation field is weaker
151: \citep{cox1989,bloemen1985}, the metallicity is lower
152: \citep{shaver1983,fich1991,rudolph2006} and the cosmic-ray flux
153: density is smaller \citep{bloemen1984}, compared to the solar
154: neighbourhood. Although the efficiency at which molecular clouds form
155: from atomic gas is much lower in the far outer Galaxy, the mass
156: spectrum of molecular clumps is not significantly different from the
157: inner Galaxy \citep{snell2002}. The spectra however show a tendency
158: towards steepening in the far outer Galaxy. The star formation
159: activity in the outer Galaxy clouds is also similar to the inner
160: Galaxy clouds. Thus the observed low global star formation rate in the
161: outer Galaxy is a consequence of the inefficiency of the formation of
162: molecular clouds in this region and not an inefficiency in the star
163: formation process within these clouds \citep{snell2002}. The outer
164: Galaxy star forming regions could thus be better examples of stars
165: and/or stellar clusters forming in isolation in contrast to the
166: crowded fields within the inner Galaxy. It is thus important to
167: study the point sources identified by IRAS in the outer Galactic disk
168: at high angular resolutions to probe their multiplicity, dust
169: properties and kinematics. As a first step towards these goals we
170: present here sub-mm continuum mapping of selected outer Galaxy IRAS
171: sources.
172:
173:
174: %\citet{Wouterloot1989} first used CO
175: %observations to identify and associate a large number of infrared
176: %bright sources with molecular clouds. Subsequent high angular
177: %resolution observations of clumps in
178:
179: We have selected a sample of outer Galaxy (with Galactocentric
180: distances greater than 10~kpc) sources from the IRAS point source
181: catalog (PSC) based on the following criteria: F$_{100\micron}\geq
182: 100$~Jy, F$_{100\micron}>$F$_{60\micron}$, 30\arcdeg$\leq
183: l\leq$330\arcdeg, -5\arcdeg$\leq b\leq$5\arcdeg. The Galactic
184: longitude criterion ensures that source confusion along the line of
185: sight faced towards the inner Galaxy, is avoided. The sample consists
186: of 17 sources, all of which are {\em bona-fide} point sources
187: according to the IRAS PSC. For majority of these sources no continuum
188: maps other than the IRAS images are available. Here we present sub-mm
189: (450 and 850~\micron) observations of six sources in our sample, {\em
190: viz.,} IRAS 01045+6505, IRAS 01420+6401, IRAS 05271+3059, 05345+3556,
191: 20222+3541, and 20406+4555. For the sources IRAS 01045+6505 and IRAS
192: 01420+6401 we have only 850~\micron\ observations, hence in this
193: paper, we present only the basic results for these two sources and
194: discuss the other four sources in detail.
195:
196: The purpose of these observations was primarily to obtain a higher
197: angular resolution view in order to detect the sub-structures within
198: these sources. Using these observations we also derive the dust
199: properties of these regions in order to improve our understanding of
200: the true nature of sources located in the outer Galaxy environments.
201:
202: %Based on the criteria
203: %for identifying protostellar candidates using IRAS fluxes as proposed by
204: %\citet{palla1991} all the four sources which we study in detail qualify as possible sites of star
205: %formation. Only IRAS 05345+3556 and 20406+4555 have associated \HII\
206: %regions \citep{condon1998}. The sources IRAS 05271+3059 and IRAS
207: %05345+3556 qualify as high mass protostellar candidates based on the
208: %criteria proposed by \citet{wood1989}.
209:
210:
211: \section{Observations and data reduction}
212: \label{sec_obs}
213:
214:
215: We present here results of observations made between September 2004
216: and January 2005, using the Submillimeter Common-User Bolometer Array
217: (SCUBA) on the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope \citep{holland1999}. The
218: SCUBA array covers a hexagonal 2\farcm5 field of view with 91 and 37
219: pixels at 450 and 850~\micron\ respectively. Maps are fully sampled
220: using the ``jiggle" mode, in which the telescope is moved around a
221: 64-position pattern by the secondary mirror in order to fully sample
222: the sky with the wider intrinsic beam spacing of the array. A chop
223: throw of 120\arcsec\ in azimuth was used for all observations.
224:
225: %which
226: %was sufficient to chop outside the regions of extended emission
227: %surrounding the IRAS sources in our sample.
228:
229: The data were reduced using the SCUBA User Reduction Facility
230: \citep[SURF;][]{jenness1999} and the STARLINK imaging software
231: following the methods described in the SCUBA mapping cookbook
232: \citep{sandell2001}. The steps of reduction included flat-fielding,
233: extinction correction, sky-subtraction and calibration of images in
234: Jy~beam$^{-1}$. The maps were calibrated using observations of
235: primary calibrators like Uranus, CRL~618 and CRL~2688 observed close
236: to the time of our observations.
237:
238: All the maps were converted to FITS-files and exported to MIRIAD
239: \citep{sault1995} for further analysis. In order to correct for the
240: error lobe contribution, we deconvolved all the maps using CLEAN and a
241: symmetry-sized model beam. The model beam, derived from the 450 and
242: 850~\micron\ observations of Uranus obtained during the same night and
243: under similar conditions, and consistent with repeated observations
244: during the whole observing run, is composed of three symmetric
245: Gaussians. At 850~\micron\ it has HPBWs of 15\farcs2, 58\farcs6 and
246: 140\arcsec, with amplitudes 0.985, 0.013 and 0.002, respectively. At
247: 450~\micron\ it has HPBWs of 8\farcs5, 33\arcsec\ and 140\arcsec\ with
248: amplitudes 0.942, 0.055 and 0.003 respectively. In order to obtain
249: images with good S/N we have restored maps at both 450 and
250: 850~\micron\ to a common resolution of 15\arcsec.
251:
252:
253:
254: \section{Results}
255: \label{sec_results}
256:
257: \begin{figure*}
258: %\includegraphics[width=16.0cm,angle=0]{../../Analysis/fig1new.eps}
259: \includegraphics[width=16.0cm,angle=0]{fig1.eps}
260: \caption{Contours of 450 \& 850~\micron\ emission for the outer
261: Galaxy sources. `+' and $\ast$ indicate positions of MSX and IRAS
262: point sources respectively in the mapped regions. Filled triangles
263: show locations of radio continuum sources. The peak flux densities
264: (rms) are as follows: (1) 05271+3059: F$_{850}$ = 0.6 (0.02) Jy/beam,
265: F$_{450}$ = 4.7 (0.03) Jy/beam; (2) 05345+3556: F$_{850}$ = 1.0 (0.03)
266: Jy/beam, F$_{450}$ = 8.0 (0.04) Jy/beam; (3) 20222+3541: F$_{850}$ =
267: 0.5 (0.02) Jy/beam, F$_{450}$ = 3.2 (0.02) Jy/beam; (4) 20406+4555:
268: F$_{850}$ = 0.5 (0.02) Jy/beam F$_{450}$ = 1.8 (0.01) Jy/beam; (5)
269: 01420+6401: F$_{850}$ = 0.4 (0.02); (6) 01045+6505: F$_{850}$ = 1.2
270: (0.03) Jy/beam. 11 equally spaced logarithmic contours are drawn,
271: with the lowest level at 2$\sigma$ and the highest level at 95\% of
272: the peak value.
273: \label{fig_intmap}}
274: \end{figure*}
275:
276: Figure~\ref{fig_intmap} shows the 450 and 850~\micron\ dust continuum
277: maps of the six outer Galaxy IRAS point sources. We find that all the
278: six sources are resolved into at least two to three emission peaks in
279: the sub-mm images. Comparison with the MSX point source catalog
280: suggests that most of the sub-mm cores do not have any associated MSX
281: source. Given the 4\arcsec\ positional accuracy of the SCUBA maps (see
282: below), we consider a sub-mm core to be associated with an MSX source
283: only if the MSX source is within 5\arcsec\ of the position of the
284: sub-mm core. Given the large distances to the sources,
285: displacement of the young star from its core due to proper motion
286: outside of this association range is rather unlikely. Our
287: interpretation is that the lack of MSX counterparts for the sub-mm
288: sources is due to differences in the evolutionary stages. Based on
289: this criterion we find that only 05271-SMM1, 05271-SMM2 and 01045-SMM1
290: have associated MSX sources. Only IRAS 01045+6505 was observed using
291: IRAC and MIPS instruments on Spitzer. Preliminary results from
292: Spitzer show that both 01045-SMM1 and 01045-SMM2 have sources at
293: 24~\micron\ associated with them, with the IR source at the position
294: of 01045-SMM1 being partially saturated. This indicates that
295: 01045-SMM1 is a reasonably hot source with a dust temperature of 40~K
296: or more. IRAS 20406+4555, 01420+6401 and 01045+6505 have associated
297: radio continuum sources. For IRAS 01420+6401 and 01045+6505 the radio
298: continuum positions are based on high resolution VLA observations
299: \citep{rudolph1996}, whereas for IRAS 20406+4555 the radio data is
300: from the GB6 catalog \citep{gregory1996}. The nominal IRAS position
301: for 05345+3556 is offset with respect to the ridge detected in the
302: sub-mm. We have checked the ISSA images for this source and find that
303: at the position given by the IRAS PSC there is no prominent peak. In
304: Sect.~\ref{sec_targets} we discuss the sources individually in the
305: light of the available limited complementary observations.
306:
307:
308: Given the extended nature of these sources and the 2\arcmin\ chop throw,
309: the observed off positions will not have been completely free of
310: emission, and this will have been subtracted from the fluxes and as a
311: background from the images. However, as we are more interested in the
312: warmer dust corresponding to the warm cores seen by IRAS, rather than
313: the cold diffuse component, the background-subtracted flux measurements
314: are appropriate. In order to derive the parameters of the sub-mm cores
315: detected in the IRAS sources, we have fitted an elliptical Gaussian for
316: the sub-mm source, and a background plane for the surrounding cloud
317: using the task IMFIT in MIRIAD. The fit to the broader component is
318: mainly to provide a good subtraction of the extended emission, and is
319: not to estimate the flux density of the surrounding cloud.
320: Table~\ref{tab_phot} presents results of the fits to the detected
321: sub-mm sources. We estimate the uncertainty in determining the positions
322: of the sub-mm sources based on the Gaussian fitting to be 1\arcsec.
323: Combining this with the pointing accuracy of the observations
324: ($<3$\arcsec) we estimate the final astrometric uncertainty of the
325: positions of the sub-mm cores to be $\sim 4$\arcsec. The sizes are
326: derived from the Gaussian fits to the 450~\micron\ data and the flux
327: densities at 850~\micron\ are derived by constraining the sizes of the
328: Gaussian fits to be the same as the sizes at 450~\micron. For the sub-mm
329: cores not clearly detected at 450~\micron, we have derived the sizes
330: from the 850~\micron\ map and integrated the 450~\micron\ fluxes over an
331: aperture of same size.
332:
333: \begin{table*}
334: \begin{center}
335: \caption{Observed properties of the sub-mm sources identified
336: in the SCUBA maps
337: \label{tab_phot}}
338: \begin{tabular}{cllcccccc}
339: \hline \hline
340: Submillimeter & $\alpha (2000)$ & $\delta (2000)$ &
341: D &$\theta_a\times\theta_b$$^a$&
342: S$_{450}$ & S$_{850}$ & IR & Radio\\
343: Source& & &
344: kpc & (\arcsec$\times$\arcsec)&Jy&Jy & Assoc. & Assoc.\\
345: \hline
346: &&&&&&&\\
347: 05271+3059 SMM-1 & 05:30:20.97 & 31:01:25.8 & 16.5 & $12.9\times12.8$ &
348: 7.92 & 1.08 & MSX & \ldots\\
349: 05271+3059 SMM-2 & 05:30:20.28 & 31:00:50.3 & 16.5 & $15.1\times12.7$ & 2.26
350: & 0.24 & MSX & \ldots\\
351: &&&&&&&\\
352: \hline
353: &&&&&&&\\
354: 05345+3556 SMM-1 & 05:38:00.41 & 35:59:00.2 & 14.0 & $19.2\times14.1$ & 14.18
355: & 1.65 & \ldots & \ldots \\
356: 05345+3556 SMM-2 & 05:38:01.29 & 35:58:21.2 & 14.0 & $13.9\times\phn9.2$ &
357: 12.74 & 1.14 & \ldots & \ldots \\
358: 05345+3556 SMM-3 & 05:38:00.99 & 35:57:45.7 &14.0 & $17.7\times14.5$
359: &$^b$& 0.80 & \ldots & \ldots \\
360: &&&&&&&\\
361: \hline
362: &&&&&&&\\
363: 20222+3541 SMM-1 & 20:24:10.69 & 35:51:10.2 & 2.2 & $20.4\times20.0$ & \phn6.06
364: & 0.33 & \ldots & \ldots \\
365: 20222+3541 SMM-2 & 20:24:11.85 & 35:50:34.8 & 2.2 & $15.0\times13.2$ & \phn5.95
366: & 0.51 & \ldots & \ldots \\
367: &&&&&&&\\
368: \hline
369: &&&&&&&\\
370: 20406+4555 SMM-1 & 20:42:21.75 & 46:06:21.1 & 7.8 & $15.4\times11.0$ & \phn1.79
371: & 0.17 & \ldots & GB6 \\
372: 20406+4555 SMM-2 & 20:42:21.30 & 46:05:42.8 & 7.8 & $12.7\times12.6$ & \phn3.02
373: & 0.30 & \ldots & \ldots \\
374: 20406+4555 SMM-3 & 20:42:19.33 & 46:05:38.3 & 7.8 & $15.7\times11.3$ & \phn2.17
375: & 0.24 & \ldots & \ldots \\
376: &&&&&&&\\
377: \hline
378: &&&&&&&\\
379: 01420+6401-SMM1 & 01:45:39.09 & 64:16:15.9 & 10.1 & 14.8$\times$10.8 &
380: \ldots & 0.44 & \ldots & GB6,VLA\\
381: 01420+6401-SMM2 & 01:45:40.76 & 64:15:57.3 & 10.1 & 16.5$\times$16.3 &
382: \ldots & 0.71 & \ldots & \ldots\\
383: &&&&&&&\\
384: \hline
385: &&&&&&&\\
386: 01045+6505-SMM1 & 01:07:50.99 & 65:21:23.2 & 11.3 & $12.7\times11.6$ &
387: \ldots & 1.81 & MSX,Spitzer & GB6,VLA\\
388: 01045+6505-SMM2 & 01:07:54.99 & 65:20:31.7 & 11.3 & $16.7\times16.5$ &
389: \ldots & 0.46 & Spitzer & \ldots\\
390: &&&&&&&\\
391: \hline
392: \end{tabular}
393: \flushleft
394: $^{a}$ Deconvolved Major ($\theta_a$) and Minor ($\theta_b$) axes
395: derived from elliptical Gaussian fits.\\
396: $^b$
397: Not detected at 450~\micron. $S_{450}$ obtained by integrating at the
398: position of the 850~\micron\ peak is 5.29~Jy.\\
399: % 01045+6505 distance is from Giveon et al. 2002
400: \end{center}
401: \end{table*}
402:
403: \section{Notes on the sources}
404: \label{sec_targets}
405:
406:
407: Here we present details of existing observations of the four sources
408: IRAS 05271+3059, 05345+3556, 20222+3541 and 20406+4555.
409:
410: {\bf IRAS 05271+3059:} This source, WB89~651, is part of the outer
411: Galaxy catalog compiled by \citet{wouterloot1989}. Based on the
412: velocity information from the molecular line observations the distance
413: to the source is estimated to be 16.5~kpc. The luminosity of the
414: source estimated from the 60 and 100~\micron\ IRAS fluxes is
415: 4.2~10$^4$~\lsun. CS(2--1) \citep{bronfman1996} and H$_2$O
416: \citep{valdettaro2001} maser emission was found to be associated with
417: this source, although no methanol maser was detected
418: \citep{slysh1999}. There is no radio continuum source known to be
419: associated with IRAS 05271+3058. We find that both sub-mm sources are
420: associated with MSX point sources (Fig.~\ref{fig_intmap}).
421:
422: {\bf IRAS 05345+3556:} Also known as WB89~673, this source is at a
423: distance of 14~kpc as derived from molecular line observations by
424: \citet{wouterloot1989} and has a luminosity of 1.7~10$^4$~\lsun. The
425: radio continuum source detected in NRAO VLA Sky Survey (NVSS) at
426: 1.4~GHz \citep{condon1998} is coincident with the nominal position of
427: the infrared peak according to the IRAS Point Source Catalog. As noted
428: in Sect.~\ref{sec_results} the dust emission detected in the SCUBA maps
429: is along a ridge which is offset from this nominal infrared peak
430: position. Similar to IRAS 05271+3059, CS(2--1) \citep{bronfman1996},
431: SiO \citep{harju1998} and H$_2$O \citep{valdettaro2001} maser
432: emissions are found to be associated with this source and no methanol
433: was detected \citep{slysh1999}. No MSX point sources were found within
434: a search radius of 20\arcsec\ around the sources SMM-1 and SMM-2, only
435: SMM-3 has a nearby MSX source.
436:
437:
438: {\bf IRAS 20222+3541:} \citet{beck1988} suggested that IRAS
439: 20222+3541, also known as MCG 06-45-001, is a local group galaxy. In a
440: subsequent paper, \citet{shore1990} used CO observations to
441: conclusively show that rather than being an external galaxy, this IRAS
442: source is a Galactic star forming region with an associated \HII\
443: region. Based on the CO observations of \citet{shore1990} we estimate
444: the kinematic distance to the source to be 2.2~kpc for a v$_{\rm
445: lsr}$ of $\sim$7.4 km/s. This is the nearest of the sources in our
446: sample. The luminosity of the source is 1.5~10$^{3}$~\lsun. Only one
447: point source from the MSX catalog is found in the mapped region
448: although the images of almost all MSX bands show an
449: extended emission coincident with the IRAS source. The only identified
450: MSX point source in this region is offset from SMM-1 by $\sim
451: 25$\arcsec. In contrast to \citet{shore1990} we find that the only
452: radio continuum source detected in the NRAO VLA Sky Survey (NVSS) at
453: 1.4~GHz \citep{condon1998} is offset by $\sim 2$\arcmin\ with respect
454: to the dust continuum peaks seen in IRAS, MSX and SCUBA datasets. In
455: %Sect.~\ref{sec_radprof} we explore the density profiles of the two
456: %sub-mm cores in this region.
457:
458: {\bf IRAS 20406+4555:} This source, also known as WB89~4 from the
459: catalog of outer Galaxy sources by \citet{wouterloot1989}, is located
460: at a distance of 7.8~kpc. We have confirmed from our recently concluded
461: and yet unpublished CO observations, as well as from the \thCO\ J=1--0
462: observations of \citet{wu2001} that only the velocity component at
463: $-49$~\kms\ is associated with this source and this corresponds to the
464: aforementioned distance. The luminosity of the source based on the IRAS
465: fluxes is 2.6~10$^{4}$~\lsun. There are no MSX point sources in the
466: MSX6C associated with this region, although both in bands A and E the
467: source is clearly detected. An \HII\ region from the GB6 catalog of
468: radio sources \citep{gregory1996} is centerd at the position of SMM-1,
469: while the IRAS source is located closer to SMM-2. The comparatively
470: compact appearance of SMM-2 \& 3 together with the \HII\ region might
471: suggest that SMM-2/3 contain protostars, formation of which is triggered
472: by the \HII\ region. However so far no \ammonia\ and H$_2$O maser
473: emission were detected from this source \citep{molinari1996}.
474:
475:
476: \section{Spectral Energy Distributions of the sub-mm cores}
477:
478: Several authors \citep{sridharan2002,beuther2002} have shown that two
479: temperature components are present in the SED of luminous YSOs: a
480: compact hot component which dominates the IRAS 12~\micron\ and
481: 25~\micron\ fluxes, and a more extended component arising from colder
482: gas which dominates the IRAS 60~\micron\ and 100~\micron\ fluxes.
483: Here we analyze the spectral energy distributions (SED) of the sub-mm
484: cores detected at both SCUBA wavelengths, between 60 and 850~\micron\
485: in order to derive order of magnitude estimates of the dust
486: temperature and mass of the cold component. Since the sub-mm cores
487: are not resolved in the mid and far-infrared, we apportion the 60 and
488: 100~\micron\ flux densities for the IRAS sources to the sub-mm cores
489: in the same ratio as the observed 450~\micron\ fluxes.
490:
491:
492: The greybody functions have the form \citep[e.g.,][]{dent1998},
493:
494: \begin{equation}
495: F_\nu = \Omega B_\nu(T_{dust})(1-e^{-\tau_\nu}),
496: \end{equation}
497:
498: where F$_\nu$ is the flux measured at a frequency $\nu$, $\Omega$ is
499: the solid angle subtended by the cloud, B$_\nu(T_{dust})$ is the
500: Planck function evaluated at the dust temperature \tdust and $\nu$,
501: and $\tau_\nu$ is the optical depth at $\nu$. The optical depth
502: $\tau_\nu$ scales as $\tau_0 \nu^\beta$, where $\beta$ is the grain
503: emissivity index and $\tau_0$ is the optical depth at a reference
504: frequency ($\nu_0$).
505:
506: Fitting was performed such that $\chi^2$ was minimized, with $\chi^2$
507: defined as,
508:
509: \begin{equation}
510: \chi^2 = \sum
511: \left[1-\left(\frac{F_{\nu,model}}{F_{\nu,obs}}\right)\right]^2
512: \end{equation}
513:
514:
515: This definition of $\chi^2$ gives equal weighting to the different
516: wavelength regimes \citep{hunter2000}. We have constrained the angular
517: sizes of the sub-mm cores to those measured in the SCUBA observations
518: (Table~\ref{greytab}). Three free parameters were used: the
519: temperature, the optical depth at 250~\micron\ and the grain
520: emissivity index ($\beta$).
521:
522:
523: Figure~\ref{greyfit} shows the greybody models fitted to the SEDs and
524: Table~\ref{greytab} also presents the parameters like mass, luminosity
525: etc. calculated for the best fit model. The mass has been estimated
526: from the fitted values of $\tau_{250}$, \tdust\ and $\beta$, adopting
527: the ``Hildebrand'' mass opacity, ${\rm \kappa_o}$, defined at 250
528: $\mu$m (1200 GHz), i.e. $\kappa_{\rm 1200GHz}$ = 0.1 cm$^{2}$g$^{-1}$
529: \citep{hildebrand1983} and a gas-to-dust ratio of 100. The main
530: uncertainty in calculating the dust masses here lie in the use of
531: inner Galaxy dust properties as well as gas-to-dust ratio for these
532: outer Galaxy sources. Observationally there is evidence of reduced
533: metallicity towards the outer Galaxy \citep{rudolph2006} and the
534: dust-to-gas ratio depends almost linearly on metallicity
535: \citep{boselli2002}. The assumed gas-to-dust ratio of 100 does not
536: take the metallicity gradient into account. In addition, the
537: calculated dust mass opacities depend on the grain composition and
538: even for inner Galaxy sources the commonly used values differ by as
539: much as factors of 3. Overall, we estimate that the calculated mass
540: can deviate from the real value by up to a factor of 10. For the
541: sub-mm sources in IRAS 01045+6505 and 01420+6401 in the absence of the
542: 450~\micron\ fluxes greybody SED fitting was not possible. We have
543: estimated the mass of these sub-mm cores assuming \tdust\ to be 32~K,
544: average value of \tdust\ found from the SED fits and $\beta=2$. As
545: discussed in Sect.~\ref{sec_dustprop} a choice of $\beta=2$ can be
546: reasonably justified based on both theoretical and observational
547: results.
548:
549: %\begin{equation} % total mass calculation
550: %M_{tot} = 1.88 \times 10^{-2} \biggl({1200\over\nu}\biggr)^{3+\beta}S_\nu
551: %(e^{0.048\nu/T_d}-1)d2,
552: %\end{equation}
553: %
554: %where d is the distance in $[$kpc$]$, S$_\nu$ is the total flux (in Jy) at
555: %frequency $\nu$, T$_d$ and $\beta$ are the fitted dust temperature and
556: %$\beta$-index. M$_{\rm tot}$ is given in $[$\msun$]$. In this equation
557: %we have adopted
558:
559: %The spectral type of a single
560: %ZAMS star required to explain the total luminosity of the source is
561: %also given in Table~\ref{greytab}. In the event of a star cluster
562: %illuminating the source, the most massive star of the cluster is
563: %expected to be one or two subclasses lower than the estimated spectral
564: %type for a single star.
565:
566:
567: \begin{figure}
568: %\includegraphics[width=8cm,angle=0]{../../Analysis/Greybody/greyfit.eps}
569: \includegraphics[width=8cm,angle=0]{fig2.eps}
570: \caption{Single temperature greybody fits to the Spectral Energy
571: Distribution (SED) of sub-mm cores. Fitted parameters are presented in
572: Table~\ref{greytab}\label{greyfit}}
573: \end{figure}
574:
575:
576: \begin{table*}
577: \caption{Parameters of the SED Models for the sub-mm cores
578: \label{greytab}}
579: \begin{tabular}{llccccc}
580: \hline
581: Source & Dia & T & $\tau_{250}$& $\beta$ & L & M \\
582: & pc & K & & & \lsun & \msun\\
583: \hline
584: \hline
585: 05271-SMM1 & 1.03 & 36.9 & 0.01 & 1.2 & 42272 & \phn711\\
586: 05271-SMM2 & 1.10 & 28.6 & 0.01 & 1.9 & 15184 & \phn814\\
587: &&&&&&\\
588: 05345-SMM1 & 1.12 & 30.7 & 0.01 & 0.9 & 13192 & \phn595\\
589: 05345-SMM2 & 0.77 & 28.6 & 0.03 & 1.2 & 12270 & \phn778\\
590: 05345-SMM3 & 1.09 & 28.6 & 0.01 & 1.0 & \phn6477 & \phn398\\
591: &&&&&&\\
592: 20222-SMM1 & 0.22 & 26.6 & 0.02 & 2.5 & 1091 & \phn\phn86 \\
593: 20222-SMM2 & 0.15 & 28.6 & 0.03 & 2.2 & 1083 & \phn\phn61 \\
594: &&&&&&\\
595: 20406-SMM1 & 0.49 & 28.6 & 0.01 & 2.4 & 6448 & \phn320 \\
596: 20406-SMM2 & 0.48 & 30.7 & 0.02 & 2.4 & 12463 & \phn422 \\
597: 20406-SMM3 & 0.50 & 32.8 & 0.01 & 2.4 & 15387 & \phn334 \\
598: &&&&&&\\
599: 01420-SMM1 & \ldots & 32$^{a}$ & \ldots & \dots & \ldots & 1041$^{b}$ \\
600: 01420-SMM2 & \ldots & 32$^{a}$ & \ldots & \dots & \ldots & \phn350$^{b}$ \\
601: &&&&&&\\
602: 01045-SMM1 & \ldots & 40$^{a}$ & \ldots & \dots & \ldots & \phn267$^{b}$ \\
603: 01045-SMM2 & \ldots & 32$^{a}$ & \ldots & \dots & \ldots & \phn432$^{b}$ \\
604: &&&&&&\\
605: \hline
606: \hline
607: \end{tabular}
608: \flushleft
609: $^a$ Assumed \tdust.\\
610: $^b$ Mass calculated from S$_{850}$ assuming the \tdust\ given
611: in the table and \\ dust emissivity index $\beta=2$.
612: \end{table*}
613:
614:
615: Except for the sub-mm cores in IRAS 05345+3556, the greybody models
616: produce reasonable fits to the SEDs of the sub-mm cores in IRAS
617: 05271+3059, 20222+3541 and 20406+4555. The SED models for the cores in
618: IRAS 05345+3556 do not reproduce the 450~\micron\ fluxes. A somewhat
619: less constrained two dust temperature greybody model fit to the SED of
620: the sub-mm cores in IRAS 05345+3556 yields better fits. This indicates
621: that additional observations between 100 and 450~\micron\ are
622: essential to fully constrain the fits to the SEDs.
623:
624: \section{Dust Properties from the SED fits}
625: \label{sec_dustprop}
626:
627: The temperatures of the cold components for all the sub-mm cores are
628: $\sim 32\pm5$~K and the dust emissivity indices vary between
629: 0.9 and 2.5. While the sub-mm cores within IRAS 05271+3059 show very
630: different dust emissivity indices ($\beta$; Table~\ref{greytab}), the
631: three sub-mm cores in IRAS 20406+4555 show almost identical values of
632: $\beta$.
633:
634:
635: The dust grain emissivity index is crucial in determining many source
636: parameters, including the dust temperature, as well as providing
637: information about the grain structure and the dielectric
638: characteristics of the grains \citep{schwartz1982,hildebrand1983}.
639: Knowledge of $\beta$ improves estimates of the dust opacity and
640: subsequently of the dust mass of the star forming clouds. Various
641: estimates of $\beta$ from both laboratory and theoretical models have
642: been proposed and so far there is little consensus between these
643: studies. \citet{draine1984} derived $\beta \sim 2$ for 40$\leq
644: \lambda \leq 1000$~\micron, using the available laboratory data to
645: measure optical constants of a mixture of naked graphite and silicate
646: grains. A dust grain emissivity index of $\sim 2$ has also been
647: supported by the calculations of
648: \citet{knacke1973,mathis1989,kruegel1994}. \citet{miyake1993} however
649: derived values of $\beta$ in excess of 2 for large grain sizes, while
650: \citet{wright1987} calculated 0.6$\leq \beta\leq1.4$ for fractal
651: grains. \citet{aannestad1975} predicted $\beta$ up to 3.5 for olivine,
652: fused quartz, and lunar rock grains covered with ice mantles.
653: \citet{mennella1995} concluded that more evolved cores have a higher
654: emissivity index ($\beta$).
655:
656: Observationally there is an equally large scatter in the derived
657: values of dust emissivity index, $\beta$, as in theoretical studies.
658: There are several instances of observations of circumstellar disks
659: around young PMS stars \citep{beckwith1991,sandell2001b,natta2004},
660: low mass protostars \citep{hogerheijde2000,stark2004} as well as high
661: mass protostars \citep{sandell2000,sandell2004} for which $\beta<2$
662: were derived. Larger values of $\beta$, i.e., in excess of 2 have
663: also been reported \citep{kuan1996,goldsmith1997,lis1998}. We note
664: here that the derived values of $\beta$ is always to some extent
665: affected by the temperature and density variations as long as there is
666: some optically thick portion of dust and detailed radiation transfer
667: models can achieve a good fit to observations using $\beta=2$
668: \citep{mueller2002,shirley2002}. In addition,
669: uncertainties and artifacts due to ignored error-lobe pickup,
670: calibration uncertainties, optical thickness of \HII\ regions,
671: unequal beamsizes at the two wavelengths under consideration etc. have
672: often contributed to observationally determined higher values of
673: $\beta$.
674:
675:
676: The values of $\beta$ derived from the SCUBA observations of the outer
677: Galaxy sources lie within the limits of the different values seen in
678: the inner Galaxy sources. Based on the present estimates we conclude
679: that the overall dust properties shown by the outer Galaxy sources, do
680: not differ significantly from the properties of the inner Galaxy star
681: forming regions, and show no indication of the substantially higher
682: values of $\beta$ as found in a few extreme regions in the Galactic
683: Center environment. The protostellar sources observed here are rather
684: distant, hence the dust emission is dominated by the extended dense
685: cloud envelopes surrounding the young high mass protostellar objects,
686: rather than being dominated by the emission from the accretion disk,
687: which are always found to show a lower apparent $\beta$.
688:
689:
690:
691: \section{Radial Profiles }
692: \label{sec_radprof}
693:
694:
695: \subsection{Fits to the radial intensity profiles}
696:
697: \begin{figure}
698: %\includegraphics[width=9.0cm,angle=0]{../../Analysis/Profiles/modprof.eps}
699: \includegraphics[width=9.0cm,angle=0]{fig3.eps}
700: \caption{Normalized, azimuthally averaged radial profiles for the
701: intensities of the sub-mm cores at 850~\micron\ ({\em points}). {\em
702: Solid line} shows the best fit power-law model corresponding to the
703: index $\gamma$. The dashed line shows the model beam profile. The
704: errorbars indicate the rms values within the annuli.
705: \label{fig_radprof}}
706: \end{figure}
707:
708:
709: Figure~\ref{fig_radprof} shows the radial intensity profiles at
710: 850~\micron\ of all the sub-mm cores with the exception of 05345-SMM3
711: and 20406-SMM3. These radial profiles have been derived by averaging
712: all datapoints within a 2\arcsec\ wide circular annulus at a radius
713: $r$ from the center of the core, with $r$ ranging from 0 to 30\arcsec.
714: The observations were done with a chop throw of 2\arcmin\ in the
715: azimuth. Based on the derived angular sizes of the sub-mm cores we
716: conclude that the effect of chopping on the derived radial intensity
717: profiles is negligible.
718:
719: We have created model intensity distribution by assuming an
720: analytical two-dimensional power-law intensity distribution of the form
721: $I(r)\propto \theta^\gamma$ and convolving it with the synthetic
722: beam profile at 850~\micron\ which we used to deconvolve the intensity
723: maps. We derived the model radial intensity profile by azimuthally
724: averaging exactly in the same manner in which we have created the
725: observed intensity profile. We have performed a $\chi^2$ fitting of a
726: family of such model profiles corresponding to different power law
727: indices to the observed model profile. Keeping in mind the angular
728: resolution of the 850~\micron\ images we have restricted the fitting
729: procedure to radii $8$\arcsec$<r<30$\arcsec, so as to have a reliable
730: estimate of the nature of the intensity distribution at spatial scales
731: unaffected by the resolution of the observations.
732: Figure~\ref{fig_radprof} shows the resultant fits and
733: Table~\ref{tab_index} presents the fitted values of $\gamma$.
734:
735: For most of the cores it is possible to derive acceptable fits to the
736: radial intensity profiles of the outer envelopes ($r>8$\arcsec) using
737: a single power law. The fits, though not constrained by the inner
738: regions, are reasonably good at radii $<$8\arcsec\ as well and we
739: derive $\gamma=-0.9\pm0.3$ for the 8 sub-mm cores.
740:
741:
742:
743: \subsection{Density Profiles of the sub-mm cores}
744:
745: Here we consider a model with a spherically symmetric envelope and use
746: the intensity distribution of the dust emission in the SCUBA images at
747: 850~\micron\ to derive a first estimate of the radial density profile
748: in the envelope. The density profile is a power law, $n \propto r^p$,
749: the value of $p$ derived using this method depending upon the assumed
750: temperature distribution.
751:
752:
753: For optically thin dust emission, assuming the Rayleigh-Jeans
754: approximation to be valid, spherical cores and temperature and density
755: distribution following a power law, the intensity index $\gamma$
756: depends to first order on the density index $p$ and the temperature
757: index $q$ ($T \propto r^{q}$) through \citep{motte2001,adams1991}:
758:
759: \begin{equation}
760: \gamma = 1 - p - q
761: \end{equation}
762:
763: \begin{table}
764: \caption{Power law indices for radial intensity \& density profile
765: \label{tab_index}}
766: \begin{center}
767: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
768: \hline
769: \hline
770: Source & $\gamma$ & $p$\\
771: \hline
772: 05271-SMM1 & -1.2 & -1.8 \\
773: 05271-SMM2 & -0.9 & -1.5 \\
774: 05345-SMM1 & -0.9 & -1.5 \\
775: 05345-SMM2 & -1.0 & -1.6 \\
776: 20222-SMM1 & -0.5 & -1.1 \\
777: 20222-SMM2 & -0.9 & -1.5 \\
778: 20406-SMM1 & -0.7 & -1.3 \\
779: 20406-SMM2 & -0.9 & -1.5 \\
780: \hline
781: \end{tabular}
782: \end{center}
783: \end{table}
784:
785: Thus to derive the density index $p$ it is necessary to have some
786: knowledge about the temperature distribution. Based on the grey-body
787: fitting of the SEDs it is apparent that the sub-mm cores are
788: centrally heated (accretion and/or stellar burning) so that the
789: temperature decreases with increasing distance from the center.
790: Theoretical calculations of massive star forming regions suggest
791: that steeper indices for the temperature distribution are expected in
792: the inner regions ($<$2000 AU). However beyond, the inner 2000 AU,
793: the temperature distribution flattens again and runs asymptotically
794: into a $r^{-0.4}$ distribution \citep{vandertak2000}. For the large
795: distances to our sources, the typical resolution of the 850~\micron\
796: maps are well beyond 20,000 AU. This implies that we can safely assume
797: the asymptotic solution of $q=0.4$ for our sources. Thus, for parts of
798: the sub-mm cores at radii larger than 20,000 AU we derive density
799: indices varying between -1.1 and -1.8, with most cores showing indices
800: of -1.5 (Table~\ref{tab_index}).
801:
802:
803: Analytic and numerical studies show that the mass infall rate during
804: the protostellar phase is dependent on the radial density profile at
805: the onset of collapse, and on the equation of state of the material.
806: \citet{motte2001} studied isolated and clustered protostellar
807: envelopes, and found that isolated protostellar envelopes exhibit
808: density profiles like $n \propto r^{-2}$, as predicted by the standard
809: model of star formation by \citet{shu1987}. In contrast, protostellar
810: envelopes in clusters are found to be induced in compact condensations
811: resembling more finite-sized Bonnor-Ebert spheres than singular
812: isothermal spheres, which suggests that dynamical protostellar models
813: are more appropriate \citep{motte2001,whitworth1985}. ISO based
814: mid-infrared absorption studies of low-mass prestellar cores revealed
815: a flattening of the inner parts of the radial profiles as well as a
816: steepening of the profiles farther outside \citep{bacmann2000}. In the
817: high mass regime studies of ultracompact \HII\ regions and/or hot
818: cores indicate that the overall density profiles are more like $n
819: \propto r^p$ with $-1.0<p<-1.5$ as predicted by logatropic equations
820: of state \citep{hatchell2000,vandertak2000}. Based on the study of a
821: large sample of high mass protostellar objects (HMPOs)
822: \citet{beuther2002} derived a much wider range of density indices $n
823: \sim r^{-1.6\pm0.5}$. A possible physical interpretation of the
824: flattened density profile for massive objects could be that in
825: low-mass objects the support against gravitational collapse is
826: thermal, while for massive objects nonthermal support plays a major
827: role \citep{myers1992,mclaughlin1996}.
828:
829:
830: Based on the luminosity estimates (Table~\ref{greytab}) the sources we
831: consider here are all intermediate to massive star forming regions,
832: some of them having \HII\ regions associated with them
833: (Fig.~\ref{fig_intmap}). The derived value of density indices for the
834: 8 sub-mm cores is $-1.5\pm0.3$ and is thus consistent with
835: observations of massive star forming regions and agree with
836: theoretical models with significant non-thermal support against
837: gravitational collapse.
838:
839:
840:
841: \section{Summary}
842:
843: The high angular resolution (15\arcsec) sub-mm dust continuum maps of
844: the outer Galaxy IRAS point sources show that all of them contain
845: multiple emission peaks. Only four of the fourteen detected sub-mm
846: sources have associated mid-infrared emission as seen from the MSX
847: point source catalog and/or Spitzer IRAC and MIPS observations. SEDs
848: for individual sub-mm cores between 60 and 850~\micron\ have been
849: generated by apportioning the unresolved IRAS fluxes at 60 and
850: 100~\micron\ in the same ratio as the observed 450~\micron\ fluxes.
851: Single temperature greybody models were fitted to the observed SEDs of
852: the sub-mm cores to derive the dust temperature, emissivity index
853: ($\beta$) and optical depth at $\tau_{250}$. The derived dust
854: temperature of the sub-mm cores is 32$\pm$5~K and the emissivity index
855: ranges between 0.9 and 2.5. The two sub-mm cores in IRAS 05271+3059
856: show largely different emissivity indices. In spite of the known
857: radial gradients in metallicity within the Milky Way, the dust
858: properties derived here do not show any significant difference from
859: the inner Galaxy star forming regions.
860:
861:
862: An analysis of the radial intensity profiles (for $r>$ 8\arcsec) at
863: 850~\micron\ for the sub-mm cores shows that it is possible to fit the
864: profiles reasonably well using a single power law with indices
865: -0.9$\pm0.3$. Deriving density distributions from the radial indices
866: we get density power laws -1.5$\pm$0.3, with most cores showing an
867: index of -1.5. This density profile is similar to the profile
868: observed in many massive star forming regions in the inner Galaxy and
869: generally agree with models of star formation which invoke non-thermal
870: support against gravitational collapse
871: \citep{myers1992,mclaughlin1996}.
872:
873: Thus, except for their isolated occurence in the outer Galaxy, in most
874: other respects the sources studied here look very simiilar to star
875: formation cores in the inner parts of the Galaxy which have similar
876: range of masses.
877:
878:
879: \section*{Acknowledgments}
880:
881: The James Clerk Maxwell Telescope is operated by The Joint Astronomy
882: Centre on behalf of the Science and Technology Facilities Council of
883: the United Kingdom, the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific
884: Research, and the National Research Council of Canada. Data in this
885: paper were obtained under the program ID M04BN04. This material is
886: based upon work supported by the Deutsche Forschungs Gemeinschaft
887: (DFG) via grant SFB494 and the National Science Foundation under Grant
888: No. AST-0228974. This research has made use of NASA's Astrophysics
889: Data System.
890:
891:
892: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
893: \bibitem[Aannestad(1975)]{aannestad1975} Aannestad, P.~A. 1975,
894: \apj, 200, 30
895: \bibitem[Adams(1991)]{adams1991} Adams, F.~C.\ 1991, \apj, 382,
896: 544
897: \bibitem[Bacmann et al.(2000)]{bacmann2000} Bacmann, A., Andr{\'e},
898: P., Puget, J.-L. \ea\
899: 2000, \aap, 361, 555
900: \bibitem[Beck \& Brosch(1988)]{beck1988}Beck S., Brosch N.,
901: 1988, MNRAS, 232, 27P
902: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Beckwith \&
903: Sargent}{1991}]{beckwith1991} Beckwith, S.~V.~W., Sargent, A.~I.
904: 1991, ApJ, 381, 250
905: \bibitem[Bloemen et al.(1984)]{bloemen1984} Bloemen, J.~B.~G.~M.,
906: Bennett, K., Bignami, G.~F., \ea\
907: 1984, \aap, 135, 12
908: \bibitem[Bloemen(1985)]{bloemen1985} Bloemen, J.~B.~G.~M. 1985,
909: \aap, 145, 391
910: \bibitem[Boselli et al.(2002)]{boselli2002} Boselli, A., Lequeux,
911: J., \& Gavazzi, G.\ 2002, \aap, 384, 33
912: \bibitem[Bronfman et al.(1996)]{bronfman1996} Bronfman, L., Nyman,
913: L.-A., May, J. 1996, \aaps, 115, 81
914: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Beuther et al.}{2002}]{beuther2002}
915: Beuther, H., Schilke, P., Menten, K.~M., \ea\
916: 2002, ApJ, 566, 945
917: \bibitem[Condon et al.(1998)]{condon1998} Condon, J.~J., Cotton,
918: W.~D., Greisen, E.~W., \ea\
919: 1998, \aj, 115, 1693
920: \bibitem[Cox \& Mezger(1989)]{cox1989} Cox, P., Mezger, P.~G.
921: 1989, \aapr, 1, 49
922: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Dent, Matthews, \&
923: Ward-Thompson}{1998}]{dent1998} Dent, W.~R.~F., Matthews, H.~E.,
924: Ward-Thompson, D. 1998, MNRAS, 301, 1049
925: \bibitem[Draine \& Lee(1984)]{draine1984} Draine, B.~T., Lee,
926: H.~M. 1984, \apj, 285, 89
927: \bibitem[Fich \& Silkey(1991)]{fich1991} Fich, M.,\& Silkey, M.
928: 1991, \apj, 366, 107
929: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Goldsmith, Bergin, \&
930: Lis}{1997}]{goldsmith1997} Goldsmith, P.~F., Bergin E.~A., Lis D.~C.
931: 1997, ApJ, 491, 615
932: \bibitem[Gregory et al.(1996)]{gregory1996} Gregory, P.~C., Scott,
933: W.~K., Douglas, K., Condon, J.~J.\ 1996, \apjs, 103, 427
934: \bibitem[Harju et al.(1998)]{harju1998} Harju, J., Lehtinen, K.,
935: Booth, R.~S., Zinchenko, I.\ 1998, \aaps, 132, 211
936: \bibitem[Hatchell et al.(2000)]{hatchell2000} Hatchell, J., Fuller,
937: G.~A., Millar, T.~J., Thompson, M.~A., Macdonald, G.~H.\ 2000, \aap,
938: 357, 637
939: \bibitem[Hildebrand(1983)]{hildebrand1983} Hildebrand, R.~H. 1983,
940: Royal Astron. Soc. Quart. J., 24, 267
941: \bibitem[Hogerheijde \& Sandell (2000)]{hogerheijde2000} Hogerheijde,
942: M.~R., \& Sandell, G. 2000, ApJ, 534, 880
943: \bibitem[Holland et al.(1999)]{holland1999} Holland, W.~S., Robson, E.~I.,
944: Gear, W.~K, et al. 1999, \mnras, 303, 659
945: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Hunter et al.}{2000}]{hunter2000}
946: Hunter, T.~R., Churchwell, E., Watson, C., \ea\ 2000, AJ, 119, 2711
947: \bibitem[Jenness \& Economou(1999)]{jenness1999} Jenness, T.,
948: Economou, F., 1999, ASP Conf.~Ser.~172: Astronomical Data Analysis Software
949: and Systems VIII, 172, 171
950: \bibitem[Knacke \& Thomson(1973)]{knacke1973} Knacke, R.~F. \&
951: Thomson, R.~K.\ 1973, PASP, 85, 341
952: \bibitem[Kr\"ugel \& Siebenmorgen(1994)]{kruegel1994} Kr\"ugel, E., \&
953: Siebenmorgen, R.\ 1994, \aap, 288, 929
954: \bibitem[Kuan et al.(1996)]{kuan1996} Kuan, Y.-J., Mehringer, D.~M., \&
955: Snyder, L.~E. 1996, \apj, 459, 619
956: \bibitem[Lis \& Menten(1998)]{lis1998} Lis, D.~C., \& Menten, K.~M.
957: 1998, \apj, 507, 794
958: \bibitem[Mathis \& Whiffen(1989)]{mathis1989} Mathis, J.~S., \&
959: Whiffen, G. 1989, \apj, 341, 808
960: \bibitem[McLaughlin \& Pudritz(1996)]{mclaughlin1996} McLaughlin,
961: D.~E., \& Pudritz, R.~E. 1996, \apj, 469, 194
962: \bibitem[Mennella et al.(1995)]{mennella1995} Mennella, V.,
963: Colangeli, L., \& Bussoletti, E. 1995, \aap, 295, 165
964: \bibitem[Miyake \& Nakagawa(1993)]{miyake1993} Miyake, K., \&
965: Nakagawa, Y. 1993, Icarus, 106, 20
966: \bibitem[Molinari et al.(1996)]{molinari1996} Molinari, S., Brand,
967: J., Cesaroni, R., \& Palla, F. 1996, \aap, 308, 573
968: \bibitem[Motte \& Andr{\'e}(2001)]{motte2001} Motte, F., \&
969: Andr{\'e}, P.\ 2001, \aap, 365, 440
970: \bibitem[Mueller et al.(2002)]{mueller2002} Mueller, K.~E.,
971: Shirley, Y.~L., Evans, N.~J., II, \& Jacobson, H.~R.\
972: 2002, \apjs, 143, 469
973: \bibitem[Myers \& Fuller(1992)]{myers1992} Myers, P.~C., \&
974: Fuller, G.~A.\ 1992, \apj, 396, 631
975: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Natta et al.}{2004}]{natta2004}
976: Natta, A., Testi, L., Neri, R., Shepherd, D.~S., \& Wilner, D.~J.
977: 2004, A\&A, 416, 179
978: \bibitem[Palla et al.(1991)]{palla1991} Palla, F., Brand, J.,
979: Comoretto, G., Felli, M., \& Cesaroni, R. 1991, \aap, 246, 249
980: 94
981: \bibitem[Rudolph et al.(1996)]{rudolph1996} Rudolph, A.~L., Brand,
982: J., de Geus, E.~J., \& Wouterloot, J.~G.~A.\
983: 1996, \apj, 458, 653
984: \bibitem[Rudolph et al.(2006)]{rudolph2006} Rudolph, A.~L., Fich,
985: M., Bell, G.~R., \ea\
986: 2006, \apjs, 162, 346
987: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Sandell}{2000}]{sandell2000}
988: Sandell, G. 2000, A\&A, 358, 242
989: \bibitem[Sandell \& Weintraub(2001)]{sandell2001b}Sandell, G.~and
990: Weintraub, D.A. 2001, \apjs, 134, 115.
991: \bibitem[Sandell, Jessop \& Jenness (2001)]{sandell2001} Sandell, G.,
992: Jessop, N., \& Jenness, T.
993: 2001, ``The SCUBA map reduction Cookbook", Starlink Cookbook 11.2,
994: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Particle Physics \& Astronomy Research
995: Council
996: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Sandell \&
997: Sievers}{2004}]{sandell2004} Sandell, G., \& Sievers, A., 2004, ApJ,
998: 600, 269
999: \bibitem[Sault et al.(1995)]{sault1995} Sault, R.~J., Teuben,
1000: P.~J., \& Wright, M.~C.~H. 1995, ASP Conf.~Ser.~ 77: Astronomical Data
1001: Analysis Software and Systems IV, 77, 433
1002: \bibitem[Schwartz(1982)]{schwartz1982} Schwartz, P.~R. 1982, \apj,
1003: 252, 589
1004: \bibitem[Shaver et al.(1983)]{shaver1983} Shaver, P.~A., McGee,
1005: R.~X., Newton, L.~M., Danks, A.~C., \& Pottasch, S.~R.
1006: 1983, \mnras, 204, 53
1007: \bibitem[Shirley et al.(2002)]{shirley2002} Shirley, Y.~L., Evans,
1008: N.~J., II, \& Rawlings, J.~M.~C.\
1009: 2002, \apj, 575, 337
1010: \bibitem[Shore \& Sage(1990)]{shore1990} Shore, S.~N., Sage, L.~J.,
1011: 1990, \apjl, 362, L9
1012: \bibitem[Shu et al.(1987)]{shu1987} Shu, F.~H., Adams, F.~C.,
1013: Lizano, S.\ 1987, \araa, 25, 23
1014: \bibitem[Slysh et al.(1999)]{slysh1999} Slysh, V.~I., Val'tts,
1015: I.~E., Kalenskii, S.~V., \ea\
1016: 1999, \aaps, 134, 115
1017: \bibitem[Snell et al.(2002)]{snell2002} Snell, R.~L., Carpenter,
1018: J.~M., \& Heyer, M.~H. 2002, \apj, 578, 229
1019: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Sridharan et
1020: al.}{2002}]{sridharan2002} Sridharan, T.~K., Beuther, H., Schilke, P.,
1021: Menten, K.~M., \& Wyrowski, F. 2002, ApJ, 566, 931
1022: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Stark et al.}{2004}]{stark2004}
1023: Stark R., et al. 2004, ApJ, 608, 341
1024: \bibitem[Valdettaro et al.(2001)]{valdettaro2001} Valdettaro, R., et
1025: al. 2001, \aap, 368, 845
1026: \bibitem[van der Tak et al.(2000)]{vandertak2000} van der Tak,
1027: F.~F.~S., van Dishoeck, E.~F., Evans, N.~J., II, \& Blake, G.~A.\ 2000,
1028: \apj, 537, 283
1029: \bibitem[Whitworth \& Summers(1985)]{whitworth1985} Whitworth, A.,
1030: \& Summers, D. 1985, \mnras, 214, 1
1031: \bibitem[Wood \& Churchwell(1989)]{wood1989} Wood, D.~O.~S.,
1032: \& Churchwell, E., 1989, \apj, 340, 265
1033: \bibitem[Wouterloot \& Brand(1989)]{wouterloot1989} Wouterloot,
1034: J.~G.~A., \& Brand, J.,\ 1989, \aaps, 80, 149
1035: \bibitem[Wouterloot et al.(1990)]{wouterloot1990} Wouterloot,
1036: J.~G.~A., Brand, J., Burton, W.~B., \& Kwee, K.~K.
1037: 1990, \aap, 230, 21
1038: \bibitem[Wright(1987)]{wright1987} Wright, E.~L. 1987, \apj, 320,
1039: 818
1040: \bibitem[Wu et al.(2001)]{wu2001} Wu, Y., Wu, J., \& Wang, J.
1041: 2001, \aap, 380, 665
1042: \end{thebibliography}
1043:
1044: %\label{lastpage}
1045:
1046: \end{document}
1047: