1: % Version of 10/11/06

2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

3: \newcommand{\etal}{et al.}

4: \begin{document}

5: \title{The Fifth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey}

6: 

7: 

8: \author{

9: Jennifer K. Adelman-McCarthy\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},

10: Marcel A. Ag\"ueros\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},

11: Sahar S. Allam\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab},\ref{Wyoming}},

12: Kurt S. J. Anderson\altaffilmark{\ref{APO}},

13: Scott F. Anderson\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},

14: James Annis\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},

15: Neta A. Bahcall\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},

16: Coryn A. L. Bailer-Jones\altaffilmark{\ref{MPIA}},

17: Ivan K. Baldry\altaffilmark{\ref{LJMU},\ref{JHU}},

18: J. C. Barentine\altaffilmark{\ref{APO}},

19: Timothy C. Beers\altaffilmark{\ref{MSUJINA}},

20: V. Belokurov\altaffilmark{\ref{Cambridge}},

21: Andreas Berlind\altaffilmark{\ref{NYU}},

22: Mariangela Bernardi\altaffilmark{\ref{Penn}}, 

23: Michael R. Blanton\altaffilmark{\ref{NYU}},

24: John J. Bochanski\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},

25: William N. Boroski\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},

26: D. M. Bramich\altaffilmark{\ref{Cambridge}},

27: Howard J. Brewington\altaffilmark{\ref{APO}},

28: Jarle Brinchmann\altaffilmark{\ref{Porto}},

29: J. Brinkmann\altaffilmark{\ref{APO}},

30: Robert J. Brunner\altaffilmark{\ref{Illinois}},

31: Tam\'as Budav\'ari\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},

32: Larry N. Carey\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},

33: Samuel Carliles\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},

34: Michael A. Carr\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},

35: Francisco J. Castander\altaffilmark{\ref{Barcelona}},

36: A. J. Connolly\altaffilmark{\ref{Pitt}},

37: R. J. Cool,\altaffilmark{\ref{Arizona}},

38: Carlos E. Cunha,\altaffilmark{\ref{Chicago},\ref{CfCP}},

39: Istv\'an Csabai\altaffilmark{\ref{Eotvos},\ref{JHU}},

40: %Paul C. Czarapata\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},

41: Julianne J. Dalcanton\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},

42: Mamoru Doi\altaffilmark{\ref{IoaUT}},

43: %Feng Dong\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},

44: Daniel J. Eisenstein\altaffilmark{\ref{Arizona}},

45: Michael L. Evans\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},

46: N. W. Evans\altaffilmark{\ref{Cambridge}},

47: Xiaohui Fan\altaffilmark{\ref{Arizona}},

48: Douglas P. Finkbeiner\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},

49: Scott D. Friedman\altaffilmark{\ref{STScI}},

50: Joshua A. Frieman\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab},\ref{Chicago},\ref{CfCP}},

51: Masataka Fukugita\altaffilmark{\ref{ICRRUT}},

52: Bruce Gillespie\altaffilmark{\ref{APO}},

53: G. Gilmore\altaffilmark{\ref{Cambridge}},

54: Karl Glazebrook\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},

55: Jim Gray\altaffilmark{\ref{Microsoft}},

56: Eva K. Grebel\altaffilmark{\ref{Basel}},

57: James E. Gunn\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},

58: %Vijay K. Gurbani\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab},\ref{Lucent2}},

59: Ernst de Haas\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},

60: Patrick B. Hall\altaffilmark{\ref{York}},

61: %Frederick H. Harris\altaffilmark{\ref{NOFS}},

62: Michael Harvanek\altaffilmark{\ref{APO}},

63: Suzanne L. Hawley\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},

64: Jeffrey Hayes\altaffilmark{\ref{Catholic}},

65: Timothy M. Heckman\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},

66: John S. Hendry\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},

67: Gregory S. Hennessy\altaffilmark{\ref{USNO}},

68: Robert B. Hindsley\altaffilmark{\ref{NRL}},

69: Christopher M. Hirata\altaffilmark{\ref{IAS}},

70: Craig J. Hogan\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},

71: David W. Hogg\altaffilmark{\ref{NYU}},

72: %Donald J. Holmgren\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},

73: Jon A. Holtzman\altaffilmark{\ref{NMSU}},

74: Shin-ichi Ichikawa\altaffilmark{\ref{NAOJ}},

75: Takashi Ichikawa\altaffilmark{\ref{Tohoku}},

76: \v{Z}eljko Ivezi\'{c}\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},

77: Sebastian Jester\altaffilmark{\ref{Southampton}},

78: David E. Johnston\altaffilmark{\ref{JPL},\ref{Caltech}},

79: Anders M. Jorgensen\altaffilmark{\ref{LANL}},

80: Mario Juri\'{c}\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton},\ref{IAS}},

81: Guinevere Kauffmann\altaffilmark{\ref{MPA}},

82: Stephen M. Kent\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},

83: S. J. Kleinman\altaffilmark{\ref{Subaru}},

84: G. R. Knapp\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},

85: Alexei Yu. Kniazev\altaffilmark{\ref{MPIA}},

86: Richard G. Kron\altaffilmark{\ref{Chicago},\ref{Fermilab}},

87: Jurek Krzesinski\altaffilmark{\ref{APO},\ref{MSO}},

88: Nikolay Kuropatkin\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},

89: Donald Q. Lamb\altaffilmark{\ref{Chicago},\ref{EFI}},

90: Hubert Lampeitl\altaffilmark{\ref{STScI}},

91: Brian C. Lee\altaffilmark{\ref{LBL},\ref{Gatan}},

92: R. French Leger\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},

93: Marcos Lima,\altaffilmark{\ref{ChicagoPhys},\ref{CfCP}},

94: Huan Lin\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},

95: Daniel C. Long\altaffilmark{\ref{APO}},

96: Jon Loveday\altaffilmark{\ref{Sussex}},

97: Robert H. Lupton\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},

98: Rachel Mandelbaum\altaffilmark{\ref{IAS}},

99: Bruce Margon\altaffilmark{\ref{SantaCruz}},

100: David Mart\'{\i}nez-Delgado\altaffilmark{\ref{IAC}},

101: Takahiko Matsubara\altaffilmark{\ref{Nagoya}},

102: Peregrine M. McGehee\altaffilmark{\ref{LANL2}},

103: Timothy A. McKay\altaffilmark{\ref{Michigan}},

104: Avery Meiksin\altaffilmark{\ref{Edinburgh}},

105: Jeffrey A. Munn\altaffilmark{\ref{NOFS}},

106: Reiko Nakajima\altaffilmark{\ref{Penn}},

107: Thomas Nash\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},

108: Eric H. Neilsen, Jr.\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},

109: Heidi Jo Newberg\altaffilmark{\ref{RPI}},

110: %Peter R. Newman\altaffilmark{\ref{APO}},

111: Robert C. Nichol\altaffilmark{\ref{Portsmouth}},

112: %Tom Nicinski\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab},\ref{CMCElectronics}},

113: Maria Nieto-Santisteban\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},

114: Atsuko Nitta\altaffilmark{\ref{Gemini}},

115: %William O'Mullane\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},

116: Hiroaki Oyaizu,\altaffilmark{\ref{Chicago},\ref{CfCP}},

117: Sadanori Okamura\altaffilmark{\ref{DoAUT}},

118: Jeremiah P. Ostriker\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},

119: %Russell Owen\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},

120: Nikhil Padmanabhan\altaffilmark{\ref{Princetonphys},\ref{LBL}},

121: Changbom Park\altaffilmark{\ref{KIAS}},

122: %George Pauls\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},

123: John Peoples Jr.\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},

124: Jeffrey R. Pier\altaffilmark{\ref{NOFS}},

125: Adrian C. Pope\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},

126: Dimitri Pourbaix\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton},\ref{Bruxelles}},

127: Thomas R. Quinn\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},

128: M. Jordan Raddick\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},

129: Paola Re Fiorentin\altaffilmark{\ref{MPIA}},

130: Gordon T. Richards\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU},\ref{Drexel}},

131: Michael W. Richmond\altaffilmark{\ref{RIT}},

132: Hans-Walter Rix\altaffilmark{\ref{MPIA}},

133: Constance M. Rockosi\altaffilmark{\ref{Lick}},

134: David J. Schlegel\altaffilmark{\ref{LBL}},

135: Donald P. Schneider\altaffilmark{\ref{PSU}},

136: %Joshua Schroeder\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton},\ref{Colorado}},

137: Ryan Scranton\altaffilmark{\ref{Pitt}},

138: Uro\v{s} Seljak\altaffilmark{\ref{Princetonphys},\ref{Princeton}},

139: Erin Sheldon\altaffilmark{\ref{Chicago},\ref{CfCP}},

140: Kazu Shimasaku\altaffilmark{\ref{DoAUT}},

141: Nicole M. Silvestri\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},

142: J. Allyn Smith\altaffilmark{\ref{LANL},\ref{APeay}},

143: Vernesa Smol\v{c}i\'{c}\altaffilmark{\ref{MPIA}},

144: Stephanie A. Snedden\altaffilmark{\ref{APO}},

145: Albert Stebbins\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}}

146: Chris Stoughton\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},

147: Michael A. Strauss\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},

148: Mark SubbaRao\altaffilmark{\ref{Chicago},\ref{Adler}},

149: Yasushi Suto\altaffilmark{\ref{TokyoPhys}},

150: Alexander S. Szalay\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},

151: Istv\'an Szapudi\altaffilmark{\ref{Hawaii}},

152: Paula Szkody\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},

153: Max Tegmark\altaffilmark{\ref{MIT}},

154: Aniruddha R. Thakar\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},

155: Christy A. Tremonti\altaffilmark{\ref{Arizona}},

156: Douglas L. Tucker\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},

157: Alan Uomoto\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU},\ref{CarnegieObs}},

158: Daniel E. Vanden Berk\altaffilmark{\ref{PSU}},

159: Jan Vandenberg\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},

160: S. Vidrih\altaffilmark{\ref{Cambridge}},

161: Michael S. Vogeley\altaffilmark{\ref{Drexel}},

162: Wolfgang Voges\altaffilmark{\ref{MPIEP}},

163: Nicole P. Vogt\altaffilmark{\ref{NMSU}},

164: %Lucianne M. Walkowicz\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},

165: David H. Weinberg\altaffilmark{\ref{OSU}},

166: Andrew A. West\altaffilmark{\ref{Berkeley}},

167: Simon D.M. White\altaffilmark{\ref{MPA}},

168: Brian Wilhite\altaffilmark{\ref{Illinois}},

169: %Yongzhong Xu\altaffilmark{\ref{LANLtheory}},

170: Brian Yanny\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},

171: D. R. Yocum\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},

172: Donald G. York\altaffilmark{\ref{Chicago},\ref{EFI}},

173: Idit Zehavi\altaffilmark{\ref{Case}},

174: Stefano Zibetti\altaffilmark{\ref{MPIEP}},

175: Daniel B. Zucker\altaffilmark{\ref{MPIA},\ref{Cambridge}}

176: }

177: 

178: \altaffiltext{1}{

179: Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510.

180: \label{Fermilab}}

181: 

182: \altaffiltext{2}{

183: Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA

184: 98195.

185: \label{Washington}}

186: 

187: \altaffiltext{3}{

188: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071.

189: \label{Wyoming}}

190: 

191: \altaffiltext{4}{

192: Apache Point Observatory, P.O. Box 59, Sunspot, NM 88349.

193: \label{APO}}

194: 

195: \altaffiltext{5}{

196: Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ

197: 08544.

198: \label{Princeton}}

199: 

200: \altaffiltext{6}{

201: Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Astronomie, K\"onigstuhl 17, D-69117 Heidelberg,

202: Germany.

203: \label{MPIA}}

204: 

205: \altaffiltext{7}{

206: Astrophysics Research Institute,

207: Liverpool John Moores University,

208: Twelve Quays House, Egerton Wharf,

209: Birkenhead CH41 1LD, UK

210: \label{LJMU}}

211: 

212: \altaffiltext{8}{

213: Center for Astrophysical Sciences, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns

214: Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218. 

215: \label{JHU}}

216: 

217: \altaffiltext{9}{

218: Department of Physics \& Astronomy and Joint

219: Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, Michigan State

220: University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1116

221: \label{MSUJINA}

222: }

223: 

224: \altaffiltext{10}{

225: Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road,

226: Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK

227: \label{Cambridge}}

228: 

229: \altaffiltext{11}{

230: Center for Cosmology and Particle Physics,

231: Department of Physics,

232: New York University,

233: 4 Washington Place,

234: New York, NY 10003.

235: \label{NYU}}

236: 

237: \altaffiltext{12}{

238: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania,

239: Philadelphia, PA 19104. 

240: \label{Penn}}

241: 

242: \altaffiltext{13}{

243: Centro de Astrof{\'\i}sica da Universidade do Porto, Rua 

244: das Estrelas - 4150-762 Porto, Portugal.

245: \label{Porto}}

246: 

247: \altaffiltext{14}{

248: Department of Astronomy

249: University of Illinois

250: 1002 West Green Street, Urbana, IL 61801.

251: \label{Illinois}}

252: 

253: \altaffiltext{15}{Institut 

254: d'Estudis Espacials de Catalunya/CSIC, Gran Capit\'a 2-4,

255: E-08034 Barcelona, Spain.

256: \label{Barcelona}}

257: 

258: \altaffiltext{16}{

259: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, 3941 O'Hara

260: Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.

261: \label{Pitt}}

262: 

263: \altaffiltext{17}{

264: Steward Observatory, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721.

265: \label{Arizona}}

266: 

267: \altaffiltext{18}{

268: Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Chicago, 5640 South

269: Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637.

270: \label{Chicago}}

271: 

272: \altaffiltext{19}{

273: Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, The University of Chicago,

274: 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637.

275: \label{CfCP}}

276: 

277: \altaffiltext{20}{

278: Department of Physics of Complex Systems, 

279: E\"{o}tv\"{o}s Lor\'and University, Pf.\ 32,

280: H-1518 Budapest, Hungary.

281: \label{Eotvos}}

282: 

283: \altaffiltext{21}{Institute of Astronomy,

284: School of Science, University of Tokyo,

285: Osawa 2-21-1, Mitaka, 181-0015, Japan.

286: \label{IoaUT}}

287: 

288: \altaffiltext{22}{

289: Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD

290: 21218.

291: \label{STScI}}

292: 

293: \altaffiltext{23}{Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwa,

294:  Kashiwa City, Chiba 277-8582, Japan.

295: \label{ICRRUT}}

296: 

297: \altaffiltext{24}{

298: Microsoft Research, 455 Market Street, Suite 1690, San Francisco, CA 94105.

299: \label{Microsoft}}

300: 

301: \altaffiltext{25}{

302: Astronomical Institute of the University of Basel, 

303: Department of Physics and Astronomy, Venusstrasse 7, CH-4102 Basel,

304: Switzerland

305: \label{Basel}}

306: 

307: %\altaffiltext{23}{

308: %Lucent Technologies, 2000 Lucent Lane, Naperville, IL 60566.

309: %\label{Lucent2}}

310: 

311: \altaffiltext{26}{

312: Dept. of Physics \& Astronomy,

313: York University,

314: 4700 Keele St.,

315: Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3,

316: Canada

317: \label{York}}

318: 

319: \altaffiltext{27}{

320: Institute for Astronomy and Computational Sciences

321:      Physics Department

322:      Catholic University of America

323:      Washington DC 20064

324: \label{Catholic}}

325: 

326: \altaffiltext{28}{

327: US Naval Observatory, 3540 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20392.

328: \label{USNO}}

329: 

330: \altaffiltext{29}{

331: Code 7215, Remote Sensing Division

332: Naval Research Laboratory

333: 4555 Overlook Avenue SW

334: Washington, DC 20392.

335: \label{NRL}}

336: 

337: \altaffiltext{30}{

338: Institute for Advanced Study

339: Einstein Drive

340: Princeton, NJ 08540

341: \label{IAS}}

342: 

343: \altaffiltext{31}{

344: Department of Astronomy, MSC 4500, New Mexico State University,

345: P.O. Box 30001, Las Cruces, NM 88003.

346: \label{NMSU}}

347: 

348: \altaffiltext{32}{National Astronomical Observatory, 

349: 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan.

350: \label{NAOJ}}

351: 

352: \altaffiltext{33}{

353: Astronomical Institute, Tohoku University,

354: Aoba, Sendai 980-8578, Japan

355: \label{Tohoku}}

356: 

357: \altaffiltext{34}{

358: School of Physics and Astronomy,

359: University of Southampton,

360: Southampton SO17 1BJ,

361: United Kingdom

362: \label{Southampton}}

363: 

364: \altaffiltext{35}{

365: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109

366: \label{JPL}}

367: 

368: \altaffiltext{36}{

369: California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Blvd, Pasadena, CA

370: 91125

371: \label{Caltech}}

372: 

373: \altaffiltext{37}{

374: ISR-4, MS D448, 

375: Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O.Box 1663, Los Alamos, NM 87545.

376: \label{LANL}}

377: 

378: \altaffiltext{38}{

379: Max Planck Institut f\"ur Astrophysik, Postfach 1, 

380: D-85748 Garching, Germany.

381: \label{MPA}}

382: 

383: \altaffiltext{39}{

384: Subaru Telescope, 650 N. A'ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720, USA

385: \label{Subaru}}

386: 

387: \altaffiltext{40}{

388: Obserwatorium Astronomiczne na Suhorze, Akademia Pedogogiczna w

389: Krakowie, ulica Podchor\c{a}\.{z}ych 2,

390: PL-30-084 Krac\'ow, Poland.

391: \label{MSO}}

392: 

393: \altaffiltext{41}{

394: Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue,

395: Chicago, IL 60637.

396: \label{EFI}}

397: 

398: \altaffiltext{42}{

399: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, One Cyclotron Road,

400: Berkeley CA 94720.

401: \label{LBL}}

402: 

403: \altaffiltext{43}{

404: Gatan Inc., Pleasanton, CA 94588

405: \label{Gatan}}

406: 

407: \altaffiltext{44}{

408: Department of Physics, University of Chicago, 5640 South

409: Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637.

410: \label{ChicagoPhys}}

411: 

412: \altaffiltext{45}{

413: Astronomy Centre, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QJ, UK. 

414: \label{Sussex}}

415: 

416: \altaffiltext{46}{

417: Department of Astronomy \& Astrophysics, University of California, Santa

418: Cruz, CA 95064 

419: \label{SantaCruz}}

420: 

421: \altaffiltext{47}{

422: Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ

423: 08544.

424: \label{Princetonphys}}

425: 

426: \altaffiltext{48}{

427: Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias, La Laguna, Spain

428: \label{IAC}}

429: 

430: %\altaffiltext{37}{

431: %Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia 

432: %(CSIC), Camino Bajo de Huetor, 24 18008 Granada, Spain.

433: %\label{Andalucia}}

434: %

435: 

436: \altaffiltext{49}{

437: Department of Physics and Astrophysics,

438:  Nagoya University,

439:  Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8602,

440:  Japan.

441: \label{Nagoya}}

442: 

443: \altaffiltext{50}{

444: AOT-IC, MS H820, 

445: Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O.Box 1663, Los Alamos, NM 87545.

446: \label{LANL2}}

447: 

448: \altaffiltext{51}{

449: Department of Physics, University of Michigan, 500 East University Avenue, Ann

450: Arbor, MI 48109.

451: \label{Michigan}}

452: 

453: \altaffiltext{52}{

454: SUPA; Institute for Astronomy,

455: Royal Observatory,

456: University of Edinburgh,

457: Blackford Hill,

458: Edinburgh EH9 3HJ,

459: UK.

460: \label{Edinburgh}}

461: 

462: \altaffiltext{53}{

463: US Naval Observatory, 

464: Flagstaff Station, 10391 W. Naval Observatory Road, Flagstaff, AZ

465: 86001-8521.

466: \label{NOFS}}

467: 

468: \altaffiltext{54}{

469: Department of Physics, Applied Physics, and Astronomy, Rensselaer

470: Polytechnic Institute, 110 Eighth Street, Troy, NY 12180. 

471: \label{RPI}}

472: 

473: \altaffiltext{55}{

474: Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation (ICG),

475: Mercantile House, Hampshire Terrace,

476: Univ. of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 2EG, UK.

477: \label{Portsmouth}}

478: 

479: \altaffiltext{56}{

480: Gemini Observatory, 670 N. A'ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720, USA

481: \label{Gemini}}

482: 

483: %\altaffiltext{44}{

484: %    CMC Electronics Aurora,

485: % 84 N. Dugan Rd.

486: %    Sugar Grove, IL 60554.

487: %\label{CMCElectronics}}

488: %

489: 

490: \altaffiltext{57}{Department of 

491: Astronomy and Research Center for the Early Universe, 

492: University of Tokyo,

493:  7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.

494: \label{DoAUT}}

495: 

496: \altaffiltext{58}{

497: Korea Institute for Advanced Study,

498: 207-43 Cheong-Yang-Ni, Dong-Dae-Mun-Gu

499: Seoul 130-722, Korea

500: \label{KIAS}}

501: 

502: \altaffiltext{59}{

503: FNRS

504: Institut  d'Astronomie et d'Astrophysique,

505:  Universit\'e Libre de Bruxelles, CP. 226, Boulevard du Triomphe, B-1050

506:  Bruxelles, Belgium.

507: \label{Bruxelles}}

508: 

509: \altaffiltext{60}{

510: Department of Physics, 

511: Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

512: \label{Drexel}}

513: 

514: \altaffiltext{61}{

515: Department of Physics, Rochester Institute of Technology, 84 Lomb Memorial

516: Drive, Rochester, NY 14623-5603.

517: \label{RIT}}

518: 

519: \altaffiltext{62}{

520: UCO/Lick Observatory, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064.

521: \label{Lick}}

522: 

523: 

524: \altaffiltext{63}{

525: Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 525 Davey Laboratory, 

526: Pennsylvania State

527: University, University Park, PA 16802.

528: \label{PSU}}

529: 

530: \altaffiltext{64}{

531: Department of Physics and Astronomy, Austin Peay State University,

532: P.O. Box 4608, Clarksville, TN 37040

533: \label{APeay}}

534: 

535: %\altaffiltext{50}{

536: %Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy, University of Colorado,

537: %Boulder, CO 80309.

538: %\label{Colorado}}

539: %

540: %\altaffiltext{51}{

541: %International Centre for Theoretical Physics

542: %Strada Costiera 11

543: %I-34014 Trieste, Italy.

544: %\label{Trieste}}

545: %

546: %\altaffiltext{52}{University of Zagreb, 

547: %Department of Physics, Bijeni\v{c}ka cesta 32, 

548: %10000 Zagreb, Croatia.

549: %\label{Zagreb}}

550: 

551: \altaffiltext{65}{

552: Adler Planetarium and Astronomy Museum,

553: 1300 Lake Shore Drive,

554: Chicago, IL 60605.

555: \label{Adler}}

556: 

557: 

558: \altaffiltext{66}{

559: Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan

560: \label{TokyoPhys}}

561: 

562: \altaffiltext{67}{

563: Institute for Astronomy, 2680 Woodlawn Road, Honolulu, HI 96822.

564: \label{Hawaii}}

565: 

566: \altaffiltext{68}{

567: Dept. of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,  

568: MA 02139.

569: \label{MIT}}

570: 

571: \altaffiltext{69}{

572: Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, 

573: 813 Santa Barbara Street, 

574: Pasadena, CA  91101.

575: \label{CarnegieObs}}

576: 

577: \altaffiltext{70}{

578: Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur extraterrestrische Physik, 

579: Giessenbachstrasse 1, D-85741 Garching, Germany.

580: \label{MPIEP}}

581: 

582: \altaffiltext{71}{

583: Department of Astronomy, 

584: Ohio State University, 140 West 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210.

585: \label{OSU}}

586: 

587: \altaffiltext{72}{

588: Astronomy Department, 601 Campbell Hall, University of

589: California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411

590: \label{Berkeley}}

591: 

592: \altaffiltext{73}{

593: Department of Astronomy, Case Western Reserve University,

594: Cleveland, OH 44106

595: \label{Case}}

596: %

597: %\altaffiltext{61}{

598: %Theoretical Division, MS B285, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545.

599: %\label{LANLtheory}}

600: %

601: 

602: 

603: \shorttitle{SDSS DR5}

604: \shortauthors{Adelman-McCarthy \etal}

605: 

606: 

607: \begin{abstract}

608: This paper describes the Fifth Data Release (DR5) of the Sloan Digital Sky

609: Survey (SDSS). DR5 includes all survey quality data taken through June

610: 2005 and represents the completion of the SDSS-I project

611: (whose successor, SDSS-II will continue through mid-2008).

612: It includes five-band photometric data for 217 million

613: objects selected over 8000 deg$^2$, and 1,048,960 spectra of

614: galaxies, quasars, and stars selected from 5713 deg$^2$ of

615: that imaging data.

616: These numbers represent a roughly 20\% increment over those of the

617: Fourth Data Release; all the data from previous data releases are

618: included in the present release.  

619: In addition to ``standard'' SDSS observations,

620: DR5 includes repeat scans of the 

621: southern equatorial stripe, imaging scans across M31 and the

622: core of the Perseus cluster of galaxies, and the first spectroscopic

623: data from SEGUE, a survey to explore the kinematics and 

624: chemical evolution of the Galaxy.

625: The catalog database incorporates several new features, including

626: photometric redshifts of galaxies, tables of matched objects in

627: overlap regions of the imaging survey, and tools that allow precise

628: computations of survey geometry for statistical investigations.

629: \end{abstract}

630: \keywords{Atlases---Catalogs---Surveys}

631: 

632: Submitted to The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, October 12, 2006

633: 

634: \section{Introduction}

635: \label{sec:introduction}

636: 

637: The primary goals of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) are:

638: a large-area, well-calibrated imaging survey of the north Galactic cap,

639: repeat imaging of an equatorial stripe in the south Galactic cap

640: to allow variability studies and deeper co-added imaging, and

641: spectroscopic surveys of well-defined samples of

642: roughly $10^6$ galaxies and $10^5$ quasars

643: (York \etal\ 2000).  The survey uses a dedicated, wide-field, 2.5m

644: telescope (Gunn \etal\ 2006) at Apache Point Observatory, New Mexico.

645: Imaging is carried out in drift-scan mode using a 142 mega-pixel

646: camera (Gunn \etal\ 1998) that gathers data in five broad bands,

647: $u\,g\,r\,i\,z$, 

648: spanning the range from 3000 to 10,000 \AA\ (Fukugita \etal\ 1996),

649: with an effective exposure time of 54.1 seconds per band.

650: The images are processed using specialized software (Lupton \etal\

651: 2001; Stoughton \etal\ 2002; Lupton 2005), 

652: and are astrometrically (Pier

653: \etal\ 2003) and photometrically (Hogg \etal\ 2001; 

654: Tucker \etal\ 2006) calibrated using

655: observations of a set of primary standard stars (Smith \etal\ 2002)

656: observed on a neighboring 20-inch telescope.  

657: 

658: Objects are selected from the imaging data for spectroscopy using a

659: variety of algorithms, including a complete sample of galaxies with

660: Petrosian (1976) 

661: $r$ magnitudes brighter than 17.77 (Strauss \etal\ 2002), a deeper

662: sample of color- and magnitude-selected luminous

663: red galaxies (LRGs) from redshift 0.15 to beyond 0.5 (Eisenstein \etal\

664: 2001), a color-selected sample of quasars with $0 < z < 5.5$

665: (Richards \etal\ 2002), optical counterparts to ROSAT X-ray

666: sources (Anderson \etal\ 2003), and a variety of stellar and

667: calibrating objects (Stoughton \etal\ 2002; Adelman-McCarthy \etal\ 2006).  

668: These targets are observed by a pair of double spectrographs fed

669: by 640 optical fibers, each $3''$ in diameter, 

670: plugged into aluminum plates 2.98$^\circ$ in diameter.

671: The resulting spectra cover the wavelength range $3800-9200$ \AA\ with

672: a resolution of $\lambda/\Delta \lambda \approx 2000$.  

673: The finite size of the fiber cladding means

674: that only one of two objects closer than $55''$ can be targeted on a

675: given plate; this restriction results in a roughly 10\%

676: incompleteness in galaxy spectroscopy, but this incompleteness is

677: well characterized and is generally straightforward to correct in statistical

678: calculations (e.g., Zehavi et al.\ 2002).

679: 

680: This paper presents the Fifth Data Release (DR5) of the SDSS,

681: which follows the Early Data Release of commissioning data

682: (EDR; Stoughton \etal\ 2002) and the regular data releases

683: DR1-DR4 (Abazajian \etal\ 2003, 2004, 2005;

684: Adelman-McCarthy \etal\ 2006).

685: These data releases are cumulative, so all observations in the earlier

686: releases are also included in DR5.  

687: There have been no substantive changes to the imaging or

688: spectroscopic software since DR2, so DR5 includes 

689: data identical to DR2-DR4 in the overlapping regions.

690: Finkbeiner \etal\ (2004) presented a separate

691: (``Orion'') release of imaging data outside the formal SDSS footprint,

692: mostly at low Galactic latitudes.

693: 

694: The Fifth Data Release includes all survey quality data that were

695: taken as part of ``SDSS-I,'' the phase of the SDSS that ran through

696: June 2005, including a variety of imaging scans and spectroscopic

697: observations taken outside of the standard survey footprint or

698: with non-standard spectroscopic target selection.

699: The second ``SDSS-II'' phase, which includes a number of new

700: participating institutions and will continue through mid-2008,

701: consists of three distinct 

702: surveys: the Sloan Legacy Survey, the Sloan Supernova Survey,

703: and the Sloan Extension for Galactic Understanding and Exploration

704: (SEGUE).  The Legacy survey is essentially a continuation of SDSS-I,

705: with the goal of completing imaging and spectroscopy over about

706: 8000 deg$^2$ of the north Galactic cap.

707: The Supernova Survey (J. Frieman \etal\ 2007, in preparation)

708: repeatedly scans a 300 square degree area in

709: the south Galactic cap during the fall months to detect and measure

710: time variable objects, especially Type Ia supernovae 

711: (out to $z\approx 0.4$)

712: that can

713: be used to measure the cosmic expansion history.

714: SEGUE includes 3500 deg$^2$ of new imaging, mostly at 

715: Galactic latitudes below those of the original SDSS footprint,

716: and spectroscopy of about 240,000 selected stellar targets to

717: study the structure, chemical evolution, and stellar content of

718: the Milky Way.  Future SDSS data releases will include data from

719: all three surveys, and some early data from SEGUE are included

720: in DR5.  An initial release of imaging data and uncalibrated

721: object catalogs from the Autumn 2005 season of the Supernova Survey

722: is available at {\tt http://www.sdss.org/drsn1/DRSN1\_data\_release.html},

723: but it is not part of DR5.

724: 

725: Section~\ref{sec:DR5} of this paper describes the contents

726: of DR5, and \S\ref{sec:quality} summarizes information about

727: data quality, including new tests of spectrophotometric accuracy.

728: Section~\ref{sec:features} describes several new features of DR5:

729: photometric redshifts for galaxies, 

730: ``sector/region'' tables

731: for precisely defining the survey geometry, 

732: and tools for matching repeat observations of the same objects.

733: We conclude in \S~\ref{sec:conclusions}.  

734: 

735: \section{What is included in DR5}

736: \label{sec:DR5}

737: 

738: As described by Stoughton \etal\ (2002), public SDSS data are

739: available both as flat files (from the Data Archive Server, or DAS) 

740: and via a flexible web interface to the SDSS database (the 

741: Catalog Archive Server, or CAS).  Information about and entry 

742: points to both interfaces can be found at {\tt http://www.sdss.org/dr5}.  

743: The CAS is a convenient and powerful tool for selecting objects

744: found in the SDSS based on their location, photometric parameters,

745: and (if they were observed spectroscopically) spectroscopic parameters.

746: FITS images and spectra for individual objects and fields

747: are available from the CAS; the DAS should be used for bulk

748: downloads of large quantities of data.

749: Links to extensive documentation and examples

750: are available on the above web site.

751: 

752: The principal SDSS imaging data are taken

753: along a series of great-circle stripes that aim to fill

754: a contiguous area in the north Galactic cap, and along three

755: non-contiguous stripes in the south Galactic cap.  

756: Each filled stripe consists of two interleaved strips

757: because of the gaps between columns of CCDs

758: in the imaging camera (see Gunn \etal\ 1998; York \etal\ 2000).

759: Figure~\ref{fig:skydist} shows the region of sky included in DR5,  

760: in imaging (top) and spectroscopy (bottom).  In contrast to DR4,

761: the imaging available in DR5 covers an essentially contiguous region of

762: the north Galactic cap, with 

763: a few small patches totaling $\sim 200$ square degrees

764: remaining (nearly all of this area will be included in DR6).

765: The area covered by the DR5 primary

766: imaging survey (including the southern stripes but not counting

767: these patches) is 8000 deg$^2$.

768: The great circle

769: stripes in the north overlap at the poles of the survey; 

770: 21\% of this region of sky is covered more than once. 

771: In any region where imaging runs overlap, one run is

772: declared primary and used for spectroscopic target

773: selection, and other runs are declared secondary.  DR5 includes 

774: both the primary and secondary (repeat) observations

775: of each area and source (see \S\ref{sec:match}).

776: 

777: As spectroscopic observations necessarily

778: lag the imaging, the DR5 spectroscopic area still has the gap

779: at intermediate declinations that was present in the DR4 imaging

780: coverage.  The area covered by the spectroscopic

781: survey is 5713 deg$^2$.

782: The spectroscopic data include 1,048,960 spectra,

783: arrayed on 1639 plates of 640 fibers each.  

784: Thirty-two fibers per plate are

785: devoted to measurements of sky. 

786: Automated spectral classification yields

787: approximately 675,000 galaxies,

788: 90,000 quasars, and 216,000 stars.

789: Nearly 99\% of all spectra are of high enough quality to yield an

790: unambiguous classification and redshift; most of the unidentified targets

791: are either faint ($r>20$) or have featureless spectra

792: (hot stars or blazar-like AGN; see Collinge \etal\ 2005).  

793: However, in rare cases the assigned redshift is far from the

794: true redshift, so for an object with unusual

795: properties it is important to

796: examine the spectra and 

797: to check for flags that can indicate data quality or classification

798: problems.

799: As described in the DR4 paper (Adelman-McCarthy \etal\ 2006),

800: a number of plates have duplicate

801: observations, usually just one but in some cases several.

802: DR5 includes 62 duplicates of 53 unique 

803: main survey plates, and ten duplicates of special plates

804: which take spectra outside the standard survey target

805: selection.

806: Some main-survey objects are also reobserved on adjacent

807: plates to check the end-to-end reproducibility of spectroscopy.

808: In total, about 2\% of main-survey objects have one or more repeat spectra.

809: 

810: \begin{figure}

811: \plotone{f1s.eps}

812: \caption{

813: The distribution on the sky of SDSS imaging (upper panel) and

814: spectroscopy (lower panel) included in DR5, shown in J2000 equatorial

815: coordinates.  The regions of sky that are new to DR5 are shaded more lightly.

816: The upper panel includes both those regions included in the CAS

817: (totaling 8000 deg$^2$) and the supplementary imaging runs

818: available only through the DAS, which consist of SEGUE scans

819: at low Galactic latitude and scans through M31 and the Perseus cluster.

820: \label{fig:skydist}}\end{figure}  

821: 

822: In the Fall months, when the southern Galactic cap is visible in the

823: northern hemisphere, the SDSS imaging has been confined to a stripe

824: along the Celestial Equator, plus two ``outrigger'' stripes,

825: centered roughly at $\delta = +15^\circ$ and $\delta = -10^\circ$,

826: respectively (these are visible on the right-hand-side of the 

827: panels of Figure~\ref{fig:skydist}).  We have performed multiple

828: imaging passes of the southern equatorial stripe

829: (a.k.a. Stripe 82, spanning $\rm 22^h\,20^m < \alpha < 3^h\,20^m$, 

830: $-1.25^\circ < \delta < + 1.25$, in J2000 coordinates), 

831: which can be used for variability studies and for 

832: co-addition to create deeper summed images.

833: Previous data releases have included only a single epoch of these

834: observations.  In DR5, we make available 36 runs on the northern

835: strip of this stripe and 29 runs on the southern strip; these are

836: all the observations of Stripe 82 carried out before July 2005 that are

837: of survey quality. 

838: Each individual run covers only part of the full right

839: ascension range of the stripe; Figure~\ref{fig:stripe82} shows the number

840: of passes available along the northern and southern strips, as a

841: function of right ascension.  

842: The central regions of the stripe have typically been covered 10-20

843: times.  The extra runs are available in DR5

844: only through the DR supplemental DAS, described at

845: {\tt http://www.sdss.org/dr5/start/aboutdr5sup.html}. In future data releases, 

846: they will be made 

847: available through the CAS as well.  

848: Note that DR5 does not include

849: those runs on Stripe 82 at larger right ascension, in the region of

850: Orion, as described by Finkbeiner \etal\ (2004).  Those runs

851: continue to be made available through the websites indicated in that

852: paper. 

853: 

854: \begin{figure}

855: \plotone{f2.eps}

856: \caption{

857: Coverage of the southern equatorial stripe in DR5.

858: Solid and dotted lines show the number of photometric runs

859: covering regions of different right ascension, for the

860: northern and southern strips, respectively.

861: \label{fig:stripe82}}

862: \end{figure}  

863: 

864: A combined, deep image of the full equatorial stripe is being prepared

865: and will be made available in a future data release.

866: However, for objects that can be detected in a single pass, 

867: the benefits of co-addition can mostly be realized simply

868: by averaging the photometric measurements from the multiple

869: passes, using the multiple entries in the photometric catalog rather 

870: than analyzing a summed image.  Figure~\ref{fig:colorcolor},

871: based on the Stripe 82 stellar catalog of 

872: Ivezi\'c \etal\ (2007),

873: demonstrates this improvement, 

874: showing the $g-r$ vs. $u-g$ color-color diagram for blue,

875: non-variable point sources (mostly white dwarfs) 

876: in Stripe 82.  

877: Data co-added at the catalog level have been used to search

878: for faint quasars (Jiang \etal\ 2006), to measure the dispersion

879: in galaxy colors on the red sequence (Cool \etal\ 2006),

880: and to improve the signal-to-noise ratio of galaxy 

881: $u$-band Petrosian magnitudes (Baldry \etal\ 2005).

882: The Stripe 82 data have also 

883: been used to search for variable and high proper motion objects

884: (e.g., Ivezi\'c \etal\ 2003) and to test the covariance

885: of photometric errors among bands and among multiple objects

886: in the same fields (Scranton \etal\ 2005).

887: Because the catalogs from the multiple Stripe 82 scans are not

888: yet available in the CAS, averaging or variability searches must

889: be done by downloading object tables from the DAS and 

890: identifying repeat observations of the same object by 

891: positional matching.

892: 

893: In addition to the repeat scans on Stripe 82, several

894: imaging runs outside of the standard footprint are included:

895: \begin{itemize} 

896: \item Two runs that together make a $2.5^\circ$ 

897:   stripe crossing M31, the Andromeda Galaxy.  These imaging data have

898:   been used to search for substructure in M31's halo (e.g., Zucker

899:   \etal\ 2004ab).  

900:  \item Five runs that together cover 78 deg$^2$ centered roughly on

901:    the low-redshift Perseus cluster of galaxies. 

902:  \item Ten runs of imaging data taken as part of the SEGUE survey,

903: 	including stripes at $l=50^\circ\>$ ($-46^\circ < b < -8^\circ$),

904: 	$l=110^\circ\>$ ($-36^\circ < b < 29.5^\circ$), and

905: 	$l=130^\circ\>$ ($-49 < b < -18.6$), and a stripe that

906: 	runs for 20 degrees along $\delta \approx 25^\circ$.

907: \end{itemize}

908: As with the repeat scans of Stripe 82, objects detected in these

909: runs are recorded in the DRsupplemental DAS: 

910: {\tt http://www.sdss.org/dr5/start/aboutdrsup.html}, but they are not, as yet, 

911: available in the CAS.

912: All these runs are in quite crowded fields, as they tend to go to low

913: Galactic latitude, or pass through the center of M31.  The completeness

914: and accuracy of the photometry produced by the automated 

915: SDSS pipeline becomes suspect in crowded fields, so these data should be used

916: with care.  

917: Plots and tables of the field-by-field data

918: quality for these runs may be accessed at 

919: {\tt http://das.sdss.org/DRsup/data/imaging/QA/summaryQA\_analyzePC.html}.

920: 

921: \begin{figure}

922: \epsscale{0.5}

923: \plotone{f3.eps}

924: \caption{

925: The $g-r$ vs. $u-g$ color-color diagram for the blue, non-variable

926: point sources with $u<20$ in the equatorial stripe 

927: (from Ivezi\'c \etal [2007]).

928: The top panel shows results

929: using single-epoch DR5 photometry, while the bottom panel shows

930: the striking improvement obtained by averaging the photometric

931: measurements from all of the imaging passes, allowing clear

932: separation between the sequences of helium white dwarfs

933: (the top side of the ``triangle'') and hydrogen white dwarfs

934: (which lie along the other two sides).  

935: This region of color

936: space also includes white dwarf--M dwarf pairs, hot subdwarfs,

937: and quasars (see, e.g., the discussion of Eisenstein et al.\ [2006]).

938: Main sequence and red giant stars (far more numerous, of course),

939: are mostly off the diagram to the upper right.

940: \label{fig:colorcolor}}

941: \end{figure}  

942: 

943: Because of the relatively small footprint of the imaging in the southern

944: Galactic cap, the spectroscopy of targets selected by

945: our normal algorithms was completed

946: quite early in the survey; most of these data

947: were included already in DR1.  We generally restrict imaging observations

948: to pristine conditions, when the moon is below the horizon, the sky is

949: cloudless, 

950: and the seeing is good.  To make optimal use of the remaining time,

951: we undertook a series of 

952: spectroscopic observing programs, based mostly on the imaging data

953: of the equatorial stripe in the southern Galactic cap, designed to

954: go beyond the science goals of the main survey.  DR5 includes 299

955: plates from these programs, 

956: carried out in the Fall months of 2001--2004,  

957: with a total of 204,160 spectra.

958: The great majority of these plates were already included in DR4;

959: the target selection for them is described in the DR4 paper

960: (Adelman-McCarthy \etal\ 2006), and we will not repeat it here.

961: The science objectives include

962: studies of galactic kinematics, calibration of photometric redshifts,

963: evaluation of the completeness of the quasar survey

964: (Vanden Berk \etal\ 2005),

965: and surveys of galaxies that fall outside of the standard

966: survey selection criteria (Baldry \etal\ 2005).  

967: 

968: DR5 includes a total of 84 special plates that were not included

969: in DR4.  All of these were obtained as early data of the SEGUE program.

970: Each SEGUE pointing includes two 640-fiber plates of different

971: exposure times, with 592 brighter

972: ($13 < g < 18$) and 560 fainter ($18 < g < 20$) stars targeted.

973: The remaining targets are calibration standards and sky fibers.

974: Target selection algorithms, 

975: which are outlined in 

976: Adelman-McCarthy \etal\ (2006) and will be described

977: more fully in a future paper,

978: identify candidate stars in the following categories:

979: white dwarfs (25 per pointing), cool white dwarfs (10),

980: A/BHB stars (150), F turnoff and sub-dwarf stars (150),

981: G stars (375), K giants (100), low metallicity candidates (150),

982: K dwarfs (125), M dwarfs (50), and AGB candidates (10).

983: These plates are listed and described at

984: {\tt http://www.sdss.org/dr5/products/spectra/special.html}.

985: 

986: %For queries from the CAS, it is often most convenient to refer

987: %to ``chunk'' names or numbers, which refer to a region of imaging data

988: %on which target selection was run and spectroscopic tiles

989: %defined (Blanton \etal\ 2003).

990: %The chunk names for the new special plates are

991: %{\tt segue98, seguefaint98, segue101, seguefaint102,

992: %segue104, seguefaint105, segue106, seguefaint107, segue117, seguefaint118},

993: %and the chunk numbers are simply the digits at the ends of these names.

994: 

995: Tables~\ref{table:imaging} and~\ref{table:spectroscopy}

996: summarize the characteristics of the DR5 imaging and spectroscopic

997: surveys, respectively.

998: Note that the ``star'' and ``galaxy'' divisions in 

999: Table~\ref{table:imaging} refer to the 

1000: photometric pipeline classifications; ``stars'' include 

1001: quasars and any other unresolved sources, and

1002: ``galaxies'' are all resolved objects, including

1003: airplane and satellite trails, etc.

1004: Classifications in Table~\ref{table:spectroscopy} are those

1005: returned by the spectroscopic pipeline; note, in particular,

1006: that the ``quasar'' classification (based on the presence

1007: of a securely detected, high excitation emission line with

1008: FWHM broader than 1000~km~sec$^{-1}$) does not include

1009: any explicit luminosity cut.

1010: 

1011: DR5 contains several QSO-related tables and views. The

1012: {\tt QuasarCatalog} table lists the individually inspected, luminosity

1013: and line-width restricted, bonafide quasars from the DR3 sample as

1014: published by Schneider et al. (2005). A similar catalog is now

1015: being created for DR5 (Schneider et al. 2007).  The

1016: {\tt QSOBunch} table contains a record for each ``object'' flagged as a

1017: potential QSO in any of three catalog tables: {\tt Target.PhotoObjAll},

1018: {\tt Best.PhotoObjAll} or {\tt SpecObj}. In such cases a bunch record

1019: describing the primary photo, target, and spectro objects within

1020: 1.5 arcseconds of that object is created.  Identifiers of nearby

1021: objects from each catalog are combined into {\tt QSOConcordanceAll}

1022: records that point to the {\tt QSOBunch} record.  Those identifiers

1023: in turn point to the {\tt QSObest}, {\tt QSOtarget}, and {\tt QSOspec} 

1024: tables that carry more detailed information about each object.

1025: Thus, the {\tt QuasarCatalog} table provides straightforward

1026: access to a set of carefully vetted quasars with well defined

1027: selection criteria, while the {\tt QSOConcordanceAll} table

1028: can be used to identify all objects that were flagged as potential

1029: quasars based on photometry and/or spectroscopy.

1030: 

1031: 

1032: \begin{deluxetable}{lr}

1033: \tablecaption{Characteristics of the DR5 Imaging Survey

1034:               \label{table:imaging}}

1035: 

1036: \startdata

1037: 

1038: \cutinhead{}

1039: %\cutinhead{\bf Imaging} 

1040: 

1041:  Footprint area & 8000\ deg$^2$ (20\% increment over DR4)\\

1042:  Imaging catalog & 217 million unique objects \\

1043:  AB Magnitude limits:\tablenotemark{a} \\

1044: \qquad $u$      & 22.0 mag\\

1045: \qquad $g$      & 22.2 mag\\

1046: \qquad $r$      & 22.2 mag\\

1047: \qquad $i$      & 21.3 mag\\

1048: \qquad $z$      & 20.5 mag\\

1049: Median PSF width     & $1.4^{\prime\prime}$ in $r$ \\

1050:  RMS photometric calibration errors: \\

1051: \qquad   $r$ & 2\% \\

1052: \qquad   $u-g$ & 3\% \\

1053: \qquad   $g-r$ & 2\% \\

1054: \qquad   $r-i$ & 2\% \\

1055: \qquad   $i-z$ & 3\% \\

1056:  Astrometry errors   & $< 0.1^{\prime\prime}$ rms absolute per coordinate \\

1057: Object Counts:\tablenotemark{b}\\

1058: \qquad Stars, primary	& 85,383,971\\

1059: \qquad Stars, secondary & 28,201,858\\

1060: \qquad Galaxies, primary   & 131,721,365\\

1061: \qquad Galaxies, secondary & 33,044,047\\

1062: 

1063: \enddata

1064: 

1065: \tablenotetext{a}{95\% completeness for point sources in

1066: typical seeing; 50\% completeness numbers are generally 0.4 mag

1067: fainter.  The difference between ``asinh'' magnitudes and 

1068: conventional magnitudes is $0.004 - 0.015$ at the 95\% limits

1069: and $0.008 - 0.03$ at the 50\% limits, smaller than the uncertainty

1070: in conversion of magnitudes between surveys used to estimate the

1071: completeness.}

1072: \tablenotetext{b}{Primary imaging objects are those in the primary

1073: imaging area; secondary objects are in repeat imaging, so they

1074: are typically repeats of primary objects.}

1075: \end{deluxetable}

1076: 

1077: \begin{deluxetable}{lr}

1078: \tablecaption{Characteristics of the DR5 Spectroscopic Survey

1079:               \label{table:spectroscopy}}

1080: 

1081: \startdata

1082: \cutinhead{\bf Main Survey}

1083: 

1084: Footprint area  & 5713\ deg$^2$ (19\% increment over DR4)\\

1085: Wavelength coverage & 3800--9200\AA\\

1086:  Resolution $\lambda/\Delta \lambda$    &1800--2100 \\

1087:  Signal-to-noise ratio\tablenotemark{a} &$>4$ per pixel at $g=20.2$\\

1088:  Wavelength calibration errors & $<5$ km sec$^{-1}$\\

1089:  Redshift accuracy & 30 km sec$^{-1}$ rms for Main galaxies\\

1090:                    & $\sim 99\%$ of classifications and redshifts are reliable\\

1091:  Number of plates & 1639 \\

1092:  Number of spectra\tablenotemark{b}& 1,048,960\\

1093:  \qquad  Galaxies   &  674,741 \\

1094:  \qquad\quad  Science primary galaxies&  561,530 \\

1095:  \qquad  Quasars    & 90,596 \\

1096:  \qquad\quad  Science primary quasars&  75,005\\

1097:  \qquad  Stars      & 215,781 \\

1098:  \qquad  Sky        & 55,555 \\

1099:  \qquad  Unclassifiable & 12,287\\ 

1100: 

1101: \cutinhead{\bf Additional Spectroscopy}

1102: 

1103:   Repeat of main survey plates & 62 plates \\

1104:   SEGUE and SEGUE test plates & 80 plates (2 repeated) \\

1105:   Other southern programs & 219 plates (8 repeated) \\

1106: 

1107: \enddata

1108: \tablenotetext{a}{Pixel size is 69 km$\,{\rm s}^{-1}$, 

1109: varying from 0.9\AA\ (blue end)

1110: to 2.1\AA\ (red end).}

1111: \tablenotetext{b}{

1112: Science primary objects define the set of unique science spectra

1113: of objects from main-survey plates (i.e., they exclude repeat observations,

1114: sky fibers, spectrophotometric standards, and objects from special plates).

1115: }

1116: \end{deluxetable}

1117: 

1118: \section{Data Quality}

1119: \label{sec:quality}

1120: 

1121: SDSS imaging data are obtained under photometric conditions,

1122: as determined by observations from the 0.5-m photometric monitoring

1123: telescope and a 10$\mu$m ``cloud camera''

1124: (Hogg \etal\ 2001; Tucker \etal\ 2006).

1125: The median seeing of the imaging data is $1.4''$

1126: in the $r$ band, and essentially all imaging data accepted

1127: as survey quality have seeing better than $2''$ 

1128: (see Figure~\ref{fig:seeing}).

1129: The 95\% completeness limit for detection of point sources in

1130: the $r$ band is 22.2 mag, estimated from comparison to deeper surveys

1131: (COMBO-17 and CNOC-2).  

1132: Constancy of stellar population colors shows that photometric

1133: calibration over the survey area is

1134: accurate to roughly 0.02 mag

1135: in the $g, r$ and $i$ bands, and 0.03 mag in $u$ and

1136: $z$ (Ivezi\'c \etal\ 2004).

1137: Analysis of multiple observations of the southern Equatorial stripe

1138: shows that photometry of bright stars is repeatable at better

1139: than 0.01 mag in all bands and that the photometric pipeline

1140: correctly estimates random photometric errors

1141: (Ivezi\'c \etal 2007).

1142: All magnitudes are roughly on an AB system

1143: (Oke \& Gunn 1983) and use the ``asinh'' scale described by Lupton,

1144: Gunn, \& Szalay (1999).  

1145: The astrometric calibration precision

1146: is better than $0.1''$ rms per coordinate

1147: (Pier \etal\ 2003).  

1148: 

1149: \begin{figure}

1150: \plotone{f4.eps}

1151: \caption{

1152: The distribution of image quality (FWHM of point sources)

1153: in the imaging survey, measured in $r$ band.

1154: \label{fig:seeing}}\end{figure}  

1155: 

1156: The wavelength calibration uncertainty for SDSS spectra is roughly 0.05 \AA. 

1157: Note that spectra in DR5 (and DR2-DR4) are {\it not} corrected for 

1158: Galactic extinction; this is a change relative to DR1.

1159: The spectra are flux-calibrated using observations of F subdwarfs,

1160: which are targeted for this purpose on each spectroscopic plate;

1161: the calibration procedure is described in \S 4.1 of

1162: Abazajian et al.\ (2004).

1163: Wilhite et al.\ (2005) discuss the repeatability of stellar spectra

1164: taken more than 50 days apart. 

1165: Their Figure 4 shows that the distribution of the fractional difference

1166: from one observation to another in the flux summed over all pixels in

1167: non-variable stars has a 68\% full-width of $\sim 5-8\%$, depending on

1168: signal-to-noise ratio.  Their Figure 5 shows that the typical offset

1169: in the calibration between two epochs of a single plate is $1-3$\%

1170: over the full observed wavelength range, with no strong features at

1171: any wavelength.

1172: 

1173: A useful way to test the quality of spectrophotometry on small

1174: scales ($< 500$\AA) is to observe a population of identical

1175: objects at a range of redshifts.  Spectrophotometric

1176: residuals may then be computed by dividing the restframe spectra of

1177: objects in different redshift bins.  While no ideal population

1178: of identical objects

1179: exists, elliptical galaxies have spectra that are similar, on average,

1180: over the redshift range $z=0.04-0.20$, since they are no longer forming stars.

1181: 

1182: We select ellipticals for this test

1183: using their position in the color-magnitude diagram,

1184: with an additional cut on the H$\alpha$ equivalent width of 2\AA\ to

1185: exclude any objects with

1186: on-going star formation.  We average 300 to 1000 spectra in the

1187: restframe in 160 bins of 0.001 in redshift from $z=0.04-0.20$.  To determine

1188: the spectrophotometry residuals we must fit out any

1189: evolution with redshift, which can arise from a combination of true

1190: passive evolution, slight changes in sample selection, and aperture

1191: effects.  This is done by fitting a fourth-order polynomial to flux as

1192: function of redshift for each {\it rest-frame} wavelength.  We divide the

1193: rest-frame spectra by these fits and interpolate back to the observed

1194: frame.  The median of the residual spectra in the observed frame 

1195: provides a measure of the spectrophotometry error, i.e., the mean

1196: factor by which the flux-calibrated spectrum provided by the

1197: spectroscopic pipeline is high or low compared to a perfectly

1198: calibrated spectrum.  Since the evolutionary fits are themselves

1199: affected by the spectrophotometry errors, we apply the estimated

1200: correction to the averaged spectra and iterate the process,

1201: which converges rapidly.

1202: 

1203: Figure~\ref{fig:specphoto} shows the spectrophotometry residuals

1204: inferred from each of the 160 composite spectra, and the

1205: median of these residuals.  There are sharp features associated with 

1206: calcium and sodium absorption, probably originating in the 

1207: Galactic interstellar medium, and with night sky emission lines.

1208: The most worrisome features are the wiggles below 4500 \AA,

1209: with amplitude of $\sim 3\%$,

1210: centered on Ca H and K, H$\delta$, and H$\gamma$.  

1211: The coincidence of these wiggles with known spectral features

1212: suggests that these residuals

1213: are caused by a systematic mismatch between the

1214: spectrophotometric standard stars and the model F-stars used in the

1215: calibration pipeline.  

1216: 

1217: One obvious question is the scale at which we can measure

1218: spectrophotometry errors with this technique.  This scale is set by

1219: our ability to discriminate evolution effects from the

1220: spectrophotometry residuals, which in turn is related to the wavelength shift

1221: between our high- and low-redshift bins.  We have tested the technique

1222: empirically by

1223: adding sine and cosine modulations with different periods to the observed 

1224: frame and the seeing how well we recover them.  Residuals seem

1225: to be well measured on scales less than 500\AA, i.e., 

1226: Figure~\ref{fig:specphoto} should reveal any systematic errors

1227: in SDSS photometry with periods shorter than this.

1228: On larger scales, we must rely on the F star spectral models,

1229: on tests against white dwarf model spectra

1230: (see figure 4 of Abazajian \etal\ 2004),

1231: and on checks of synthesized magnitudes against the photometry.

1232: Collectively, these tests imply that the

1233: flux-calibrated SDSS spectra can be used for spectrophotometry

1234: at the few percent level.

1235: 

1236: \begin{figure}

1237: \plotone{f5s.eps}

1238: \caption{

1239: Test of spectrophotometric accuracy, performed by dividing the

1240: rest-frame spectra of elliptical galaxies observed over the

1241: redshift range $0.04 \leq z \leq 0.2$ (see text).  

1242: Points show the residual inferred from 160 redshift-bin spectra (each an

1243: average of 300-1000 individual galaxies) spaced by $\Delta z=0.01$,

1244: and the central line shows the median residual.

1245: \label{fig:specphoto}}\end{figure}  

1246: 

1247: \section{New Features of DR5}

1248: \label{sec:features}

1249: 

1250: \subsection{Photometric Redshifts for Galaxies}

1251: \label{sec:photoz}

1252: 

1253: DR5 includes two estimates of photometric redshifts for galaxies,

1254: calculated with two independent techniques.\footnote{See

1255: {\tt http://skyserver.elte.hu/PhotoZ/} and

1256: {\tt http://yummy.uchicago.edu/SDSS/} for details.}

1257: The first uses the template fitting

1258: algorithm described by Csabai et al. (2003),

1259: which compares the expected colors of 

1260: a galaxy (derived from template spectral energy distributions) 

1261: with those observed for an individual galaxy. 

1262: A common approach

1263: for template fitting is to take a small number of spectral templates T 

1264: (e.g., E, Sbc, Scd, and Irr galaxies) and choose the best fit by 

1265: optimizing the likelihood of the fit as a function of redshift, type, 

1266: and luminosity, $p(z, T, L)$. We use a variant of this method that 

1267: incorporates a

1268: continuous distribution of spectral templates, enabling the error 

1269: function in redshift and type to be well defined.

1270: Since a representative set of photometrically calibrated spectra in the 

1271: full wavelength range of the filters is not easy to obtain, we have 

1272: started from the empirical templates of Coleman, Wu, \& Weedman (1980),

1273: extended them with spectral synthesis models, and adjusted 

1274: them to fit the colors of galaxies in the training set

1275: (Budavari et al. 2000).

1276: The results are listed in the CAS table {\tt Photoz}, which includes

1277: the estimate of the redshift, spectral type, rest-frame colors,

1278: rest-frame absolute magnitudes, errors on all of these quantities,

1279: and a quality flag.  All photometric objects have an entry in 

1280: the {\tt PhotoZ} table, regardless of whether they are photometrically

1281: classified as galaxies or stars, so it is essential to consult

1282: the quality flag and error characterizations when using the

1283: photometric redshifts.

1284: 

1285: The second photometric redshift estimate

1286: uses a neural network method that is very

1287: similar in implementation to that of Collister \& Lahav (2004).

1288: The training set consists of 140,000 single pass SDSS photometry

1289: measurements with spectroscopic redshifts from various sources:

1290: the SDSS (110,000 redshifts), CNOC2 (Yee \etal\ 2000; 9000 redshifts)

1291: CFRS (Lilly \etal\ 1995; 1000 redshifts),

1292: DEEP and DEEP2 (Weiner \etal\ 2005; 1700 redshifts),

1293: TKRS/GOODS (Wirth \etal\ 2004; 300 redshifts),

1294: and the 2SLAQ LRG survey (Cannon \etal\ 2006; 27,000 redshifts).

1295: The SDSS portion of the training set consists of a representative

1296: sampling of the SDSS Main, LRG, and southern survey spectroscopic data;

1297: the other surveys are used to augment the training set at 

1298: magnitudes fainter than probed by the SDSS spectroscopic samples.

1299: Note that the training set multiply counts independent, repeat SDSS photometric 

1300: measurements of the same objects, in particular on SDSS Stripe 82. 

1301: Photometric redshift errors are computed using the Nearest Neighbor 

1302: Error method (NNE), which assigns to each object an error based

1303: on the photometric redshift error distribution of objects with 

1304: similar magnitude and color in the training set

1305: (for which the true redshifts are known), and this approach is

1306: found to accurately predict the errors (H. Oyaizu \etal, in preparation).

1307: The trained network is tested on a larger validation set consisting of 

1308: 1,700,000 objects with SDSS photometry (counting independent repeat

1309: measurements) and for which spectroscopic redshifts are available.

1310: The input catalogs for these photometric redshift measurements

1311: were derived from the SDSS photo pipeline outputs, but with a few 

1312: additional cuts employed to improve the star-galaxy separation,

1313: using the PSF probability and the lensing smear polarizability 

1314: (Sheldon \etal\ 2004).  The photometric sample was cut at a 

1315: galaxy probability greater than 0.8, which is very stringent, and a

1316: smear polarizability less than 0.8, and further cuts on magnitude were 

1317: also made; hence not all DR5 objects are included.

1318: The {\tt Photoz2} table lists a photometric redshift, an error, and 

1319: a quality flag.  For objects with all five SDSS magnitudes

1320: measured, the flag is set to 0 if $r \leq 20$ or 2 if $r > 20$;

1321: photometric redshifts for flag $=2$ objects are subject to larger

1322: uncertainties.  Objects not satisfying the above conditions have

1323: flag set to 1 or 3 and their photometric redshifts should not be used.

1324: There are 12.6 million objects in the DR5 data set with a

1325: {\tt Photoz2} flag of 0 and another 59.0 million with a flag of 2.

1326: In the validation set, 68\% of flag $=0$ galaxies have photometric redshift

1327: within 0.026 of the measured spectroscopic redshift (in the range

1328: $0.001 \leq z \leq 1.5$).  The rms dispersion between photometric and 

1329: spectroscopic redshifts is higher, $\sigma=0.039$, a consequence of the 

1330: non-Gaussian tails of the error distribution.

1331: 

1332: \begin{figure}

1333: \epsscale{0.4}

1334: \plotone{f6s.eps}

1335: \caption{

1336: Comparison of photometric redshift estimates {\tt PhotoZ} and

1337: {\tt PhotoZ2} to SDSS spectroscopic redshifts, and to each other.

1338: \label{fig:photozcomp}}\end{figure}  

1339: 

1340: Figure~\ref{fig:photozcomp} plots the two photometric redshift

1341: estimates against spectroscopic redshifts, and against each other,

1342: for 20,000 objects selected from the DR5 database.  These are

1343: objects with SDSS spectroscopic redshifts, spectroscopically 

1344: classified as galaxies, {\tt PhotoZ} quality 

1345: flag of 4 or 5, and {\tt PhotoZ2} flag of 0 or 2. 

1346: Both estimates show a tight correlation with spectroscopic redshift

1347: for the great majority of sources, while {\tt PhotoZ} shows a 

1348: somewhat larger fraction of outliers with overestimated 

1349: photometric redshifts.

1350: 

1351: \subsection{Regions and Sectors}

1352: \label{sec:sector}

1353: 

1354: Each survey observation, imaging or spectroscopic, covers a 

1355: certain region of the sky.  Doing statistical calculations with

1356: the SDSS data usually requires performing computations over

1357: these regions and the intersections among them,

1358: e.g., to normalize luminosity functions or calculate

1359: completeness corrections.

1360: Typical questions are: how much area do these regions cover,

1361: how much do they overlap, and which regions contain a

1362: certain point or area of the sky?

1363: The DR5 CAS includes tables that precisely describe each region

1364: and built-in tools for finding

1365: the connections and overlaps between one kind of region and another.

1366: Each {\tt Region} in the CAS is represented

1367: as a union of spherical polygons, and its area

1368: is analytically calculated and stored.

1369: 

1370: The SDSS has many different types of regions; they include the stripes,

1371: camera columns, segments, chunks, and spectroscopic tiles that

1372: are the basis of the SDSS observing and target selection strategy.

1373: The survey stripes overlap at the edges, with the overlap increasing

1374: towards the survey poles, so they are clipped into disjoint

1375: ``staves'' centered on each stripe that uniquely cover the survey

1376: area (like the staves of a barrel).  The union of the staves

1377: within the survey boundaries defines the survey's ``primary''

1378: photometric area.  There are ``holes'' inside the stripes and

1379: staves, consisting of fields that were declared to be of

1380: inferior quality (e.g., because of degraded seeing or 

1381: contamination by the saturated pixels of a bright star and

1382: its wings).  The portions of these holes that lie within

1383: the primary survey area are called {\tt TiHoles} to emphasize

1384: their role in the tiling process, as explained below.

1385: 

1386: As a simple example of the region tables, let us calculate

1387: the photometric survey area.  Imaging data are imported to the database

1388: in ``chunks,'' and the total area of these chunks can be obtained

1389: from the SQL (Structured Query Language) query\footnote{See

1390: {\tt http://cas.sdss.org/dr5/en/help/docs/sql\_help.asp}.

1391: The text follows our standard capitalization conventions;

1392: for example, the various types of entries in the {\tt Region}

1393: table ({\tt CHUNK, TILE}, etc.) are

1394: listed in all capital letters.  However, queries

1395: are not case-sensitive.}

1396: 

1397: \smallskip

1398: $\phantom{xxxxx}$ {\tt select sum(area) from Region where type=`CHUNK'},

1399: 

1400: \smallskip\noindent 

1401: yielding 9560 deg$^2$.  However, this counts overlapping

1402: areas more than once.  To obtain the unique survey imaging footprint,

1403: we select only the ``primary'' region, the intersection of the

1404: chunks with the staves,

1405: 

1406: \smallskip

1407: $\phantom{xxxxx}$ {\tt select sum(area) from Region where type=`PRIMARY'},

1408: 

1409: \smallskip\noindent

1410: yielding 7897 deg$^2$.  The total area

1411: and unique footprint area should be adjusted downwards by the

1412: area of the holes, obtained from the queries

1413: 

1414: \smallskip

1415: $\phantom{xxxxx}$ {\tt select sum(area) from Region where type=`HOLE'}

1416: 

1417: \smallskip\noindent

1418: for the chunks and 

1419: 

1420: \smallskip

1421: $\phantom{xxxxx}$ {\tt select sum(area) from Region where type=`TIHOLE'}

1422: 

1423: \smallskip\noindent

1424: for the primary area.  These queries yield 26 and 23 square

1425: degrees, respectively, making the final precise numbers for the

1426: photometric survey area 9534 deg$^2$ in total and 7875 unique deg$^2$

1427: within the main survey boundaries.

1428: (The 8000 deg$^2$ figure quoted elsewhere includes a small amount

1429: of imaging outside of the ellipse that defines the main survey boundary.)

1430: 

1431: For analyses of spectroscopic samples, the issues are more complex.

1432: The SDSS spectroscopic survey aims to sample quasars and galaxies

1433: uniformly over the sky, with additional spectra for other samples

1434: (not necessarily uniform) of science targets, calibration objects,

1435: and sky.  In practice, after an area has been observed by the

1436: photometric survey, a series of targeting pipelines creates lists

1437: of targets that satisfy the selection criteria.  A ``tiling''

1438: program (Blanton \etal\ 2003) runs over a subset of the observed

1439: area and assigns targets to circular ``tiles'' of diameter

1440: $2.98^\circ$; it also determines which targets are assigned fiber

1441: holes on which spectroscopic plugplate, imposing physical 

1442: constraints such as the $55''$ minimum spacing between fibers.

1443: A given run of the tiling program operates on the union of a set

1444: of ``rectangular'' (in spherical coordinates) {\tt TilingGeometry} areas.

1445: 

1446: For calculations of galaxy or quasar clustering,

1447: one needs to compute the completeness of the

1448: spectroscopic sample as a function of sky position.

1449: The natural scale on which to do this is that of a

1450: {\tt SECTOR}, a region that is covered by a unique set of 

1451: {\tt Tile} overlaps (e.g., by a particular spectroscopic plate,

1452: or by two or more plates that overlap).

1453: These are regions over which the completeness should be nearly

1454: uniform (see, e.g., Figure~1 of Percival \etal\ [2007] and earlier

1455: discussions by Tegmark \etal\ [2004] and Blanton \etal\ [2005]).

1456: The {\tt Target} table lists (in the column {\tt target.regionID})

1457: the {\tt SECTOR} for every object selected

1458: by the spectroscopic target selection algorithms, regardless

1459: of whether or not that object has been spectroscopically observed.

1460: To find the {\tt SECTOR} for an object in the main table of 

1461: spectroscopically observed objects, {\tt SpecObj},

1462: one must first identify the corresponding entry

1463: in the {\tt Target} table.  For example, the following query

1464: 

1465: \smallskip\noindent

1466: $\phantom{xxxxx}$ {\tt select top 10 s.specObjID, t.regionID} \\

1467: $\phantom{xxxxx}$ {\tt from SpecObj s join Target t} \\

1468: $\phantom{xxxxxxx}$ {\tt on s.targetID = t.targetID} \\

1469: 

1470: \smallskip\noindent

1471: returns the spectroscopic ID numbers and the {\tt SECTOR} numbers of

1472: the first ten objects encountered in the {\tt SpecObj} table.

1473: The database function {\tt fRegionsContainingPointEQ}

1474: can be used to find the {\tt SECTOR} that covers a specified point

1475: on the sky.

1476: 

1477: The following practical example illustrates several other

1478: features of these tables.

1479: The SDSS quasar target selection algorithm underwent significant

1480: changes in the early phases of the survey, reaching its final

1481: form (Richards \etal\ 2002) with {\tt targetVersion} 3.1.0,

1482: following DR1.  A calculation of the quasar luminosity function

1483: should therefore be restricted to regions targeted with 

1484: this or subsequent versions of the target selection code,

1485: and it should be normalized using the corresponding area,

1486: which the following query shows to be 4013 deg$^2$:

1487: 

1488: \smallskip\noindent

1489: $\phantom{xxxxx}$ {\tt select sum(area)} \\

1490: $\phantom{xxxxx}$ {\tt from Region} \\

1491: $\phantom{xxxxx}$ {\tt where regionID in (} \\

1492: $\phantom{xxxxxxxxxxx}$ {\tt select b.boxID} \\

1493: $\phantom{xxxxxxxxxxx}$ {\tt from Region2Box b join TilingGeometry g} \\

1494: $\phantom{xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx}$ {\tt on b.id = g.tilingGeometryID} \\

1495: $\phantom{xxxxxxxxxxx}$ {\tt where b.boxType = `SECTOR'} \\

1496: $\phantom{xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx}$ {\tt and b.regionType = `TIPRIMARY'} \\

1497: $\phantom{xxxxxxxxxxx}$ {\tt group by b.boxID} \\

1498: $\phantom{xxxxxxxxxxx}$ {\tt having min(g.targetVersion) >= 'v3\_1\_0' } \\

1499: $\phantom{xxxxx}$ {\tt )} \\

1500: 

1501: \smallskip\noindent

1502: This query uses the {\tt Region2Box} table, which maps between various

1503: types of {\tt Regions} and the {\tt TilingGeometries} in which information

1504: about the target selection is stored.  

1505: The {\tt where} clause selects, from the table of all {\tt Regions},

1506: those which are {\tt SECTOR}s in the primary tiled area and were

1507: targeted with a final version of the quasar target selection 

1508: algorithm.\footnote{This 

1509: query is included as one of the sample queries in the DR5

1510: documentation, under ``Uniform Quasar Sample,'' together with

1511: a longer query that shows how to extract all quasars and

1512: quasar candidates from the corresponding sky area.}

1513: 

1514: In principle, these tables provide all the information needed

1515: for complex clustering calculations --- e.g., determining

1516: local completeness corrections, generating appropriate

1517: catalogs of randomly distributed points, and identifying

1518: targeted objects that were not observed because of the

1519: minimum fiber spacing constraint.  The queries required for

1520: such calculations are rather lengthy, and will be 

1521: presented and documented elsewhere.

1522: 

1523: \subsection{Match Tables}

1524: \label{sec:match}

1525: 

1526: About 50 million photometric objects in the CAS lie in regions

1527: that have been observed more than once, because of stripe overlap

1528: or repeat scans.

1529: These repeat observations can be used to detect variable and

1530: moving objects.  The {\tt MatchHead} and {\tt Match} tables of

1531: the DR5 CAS provide convenient tools to examine the multiple

1532: observations of a single object, identified by positional matches

1533: with a $1''$ tolerance, and collectively referred to as a {\it bundle}.

1534: The {\tt MatchHead} table has the unique ID of the first object

1535: in the bundle (defined by observation date), 

1536: the mean and variance of the coordinates of all

1537: matched detections, the number of matched detections, and the

1538: number of times the object was ``missed'' in other observations

1539: of the same sky area.  

1540: Misses can occur because the object is variable, because it is

1541: moving, because inferior seeing moves it below the detection threshold,

1542: or because the original detection was spurious.

1543: The {\tt Match} table lists all objects in each bundle.

1544: 

1545: As an example, the following query lists information about the 

1546: multiple detections of an object at (ra,dec)=(194,0):

1547: 

1548: \smallskip

1549: $\phantom{xxxxx}$ {\tt select MH.*} \\

1550: $\phantom{xxxxxxxxxxx}$ {\tt from MatchHead MH} \\

1551: $\phantom{xxxxxxxxxxx}$ {\tt join fGetNearbyObjEq(194,0,0.3) N on 

1552:                              MH.objID = N.objID} \\

1553: \smallskip

1554: 

1555: \noindent The {\tt fGetNearbyObjEq} function returns a table (assigned

1556: the name {\tt N})

1557: of all objects found within 0.3 arc-minutes of the desired coordinates.

1558: The {\tt select} command returns all entries in the {\tt matchHead}

1559: table (assigned the name {\tt MH}) which, as a result of the {\tt join}

1560: command, have an object ID that matches one returned by the 

1561: neighborhood search.  In this case, there is just one such match,

1562: hence a single bundle.  One can get information on all the objects

1563: in the bundle with the query

1564: 

1565: \smallskip

1566: $\phantom{xxxxx}$ {\tt select M.*} \\

1567: $\phantom{xxxxxxxxxxx}$ {\tt from Match M} \\

1568: $\phantom{xxxxxxxxxxx}$ {\tt join MatchHead MH on M.matchHead = MH.objID} \\

1569: $\phantom{xxxxxxxxxxx}$ {\tt join fGetNearbyObjEq(194,0,0.3) N on 

1570:                              MH.objID = N.objID} \\

1571: \smallskip

1572: 

1573: \noindent where the new {\tt join} command selects out those

1574: {\tt Match} tables whose {\tt matchHead} agrees with that

1575: returned by the earlier query.

1576: 

1577: The DR5 CAS has 50,627,023

1578: bundles described by {\tt MatchHead} and

1579: 109,441,410 objects in the {\tt Match} table.

1580: When an object is undetected in a repeat observation of

1581: the same area of sky, a surrogate object is placed

1582: in the {\tt Match} table but marked as a ``miss,'' with an additional flag

1583: to indicate if the miss could be caused by masking of the

1584: region in the second observation (e.g., because of a 

1585: satellite trail or cosmic ray hit) or because it lies near

1586: the edge of the overlap region.

1587: A bundle may therefore consist of a single detection and one

1588: or more surrogates (and the object in the {\tt MatchHead} may

1589: be a surrogate).  

1590: There are 9.8 million surrogates in the {\tt Match} table.  

1591: The presence of surrogate objects 

1592: may simplify algorithmic searches for moving or variable objects.

1593: 

1594: Because the multiple imaging scans of the southern equatorial stripe

1595: are not yet in the CAS, the {\tt Match} tables cannot be used

1596: to search for moving or variable objects in these data.

1597: However, this capability will be present in future data releases.

1598: 

1599: \section{Conclusions}

1600: \label{sec:conclusions}

1601: 

1602: The Fifth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey provides access

1603: to 8000 deg$^2$ of five-band imaging data and

1604: over one million spectra.  These data

1605: represent a roughly 20\% increment over

1606: the previous data release (DR4, Adelman-McCarthy \etal\ 2006).  

1607: Both the catalog data and the source imaging data are available

1608: via the Internet.

1609: All the data products have been consistently processed

1610: by the same set of pipelines across several data releases.

1611: The previous data releases remain online and unchanged to

1612: support ongoing science studies.

1613: DR5 includes several qualitatively new features: multiple imaging

1614: scans of the southern equatorial stripe, special imaging scans of

1615: M31 and the Perseus cluster, database access to

1616: QSO catalogs and galaxy photometric redshifts, and database

1617: tools for precisely defining the survey geometry and for

1618: linking repeat imaging observations of matched objects.

1619: More than a thousand scientific publications have been based

1620: on the SDSS data to date, spanning an enormous range of subjects.

1621: Future data releases will increase the survey area, and they

1622: will provide

1623: qualitatively new kinds of data on the stellar kinematics

1624: and populations of the Milky Way and on Type Ia supernovae

1625: and other transient or variable phenomena, further extending

1626: this scientific impact.

1627: 

1628: \bigskip

1629: 

1630: We dedicate this paper to our colleague Jim Gray, who disappeared

1631: in January, 2007, while sailing near San Francisco.

1632: Jim dedicated an enormous amount of his time, his energy, and his

1633: remarkable talents to the SDSS over the course of many years.

1634: He played a critical role in the development of the SDSS database,

1635: including important contributions to the writing of this paper.

1636: 

1637: Funding for the SDSS and SDSS-II has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan 

1638: Foundation, the Participating Institutions, the National Science Foundation, 

1639: the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Aeronautics and Space 

1640: Administration, the Japanese Monbukagakusho, the Max Planck Society, 

1641: and the Higher Education Funding Council for England. The SDSS Web Site 

1642: is http://www.sdss.org/.

1643: 

1644: The SDSS is managed by the Astrophysical Research Consortium for the 

1645: Participating Institutions. The Participating Institutions are the 

1646: American Museum of Natural History, Astrophysical Institute Potsdam, 

1647: University of Basel, University of Cambridge, Case Western Reserve University, 

1648: University of Chicago, Drexel University, Fermilab, the Institute for 

1649: Advanced Study, the Japan Participation Group, Johns Hopkins University, 

1650: the Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, the Kavli Institute for 

1651: Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, the Korean Scientist Group, 

1652: the Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST), Los Alamos National Laboratory, 

1653: the Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA), the Max-Planck-Institute 

1654: for Astrophysics (MPA), New Mexico State University, Ohio State University, 

1655: University of Pittsburgh, University of Portsmouth, Princeton University, 

1656: the United States Naval Observatory, and the University of Washington. 

1657: 

1658: \begin{thebibliography}{dummy}

1659: 

1660: \bibitem[]{} Abazajian, K. \etal\ 2003, AJ, 126, 2018 (DR1)

1661: 

1662: \bibitem[]{} Abazajian, K. \etal\ 2004, AJ, 128, 502 (DR2) 

1663: 

1664: \bibitem[]{} Abazajian, K. \etal\ 2005, AJ, 129, 1755 (DR3)

1665: 

1666: \bibitem[]{} Adelman-McCarthy, J. K. \etal\ 2006, ApJS, 162, 38 (DR4)

1667: 

1668: %\bibitem[Allam et al.(2004)]{2004AJ....127.1883A} Allam, S.~S., Tucker,

1669: %D.~L., Smith, J.~A., Lee, B.~C., Annis, J., Lin, H., Karachentsev, I.~D.,

1670: %\& Laubscher, B.~E.\ 2004, AJ, 127, 1883

1671: 

1672: \bibitem[]{} Anderson, S. \etal\ 2003, AJ, 126, 2209

1673: 

1674: %\bibitem[]{} Bahcall, N. \etal\ 2003, ApJS, 148, 243

1675: 

1676: \bibitem[]{} Baldry, I.K. \etal\ 2005, MNRAS, 358, 441

1677: 

1678: %\bibitem[]{} Becker, R.H., White, R.L., \& Helfand, D.J. 1995, ApJ,

1679: %  450, 559

1680: 

1681: %\bibitem[]{} Blanton, E.L., Gregg, M.D., Helfand, D.J., Becker, R.H.,

1682: %  \& Leighly, K.M. 2001, AJ, 121, 2915

1683: 

1684: \bibitem[]{} Blanton, M.R., Lin, H., Lupton, R.H., Maley, F.M., Young,

1685: N., Zehavi, I., \& Loveday, J. 2003, AJ, 125, 2276

1686: 

1687: %\bibitem[]{} Blanton, M.R. \etal\ 2005a, AJ, 129, 2562

1688: 

1689: \bibitem[]{} Blanton, M.R. \etal\ 2005, AJ, 129, 2562

1690: 

1691: %\bibitem[]{} Brunzendorf, J. \& Meusinger, H. 1999, A\&AS, 139, 141

1692: 

1693: \bibitem[]{} Budavari, T. \etal\ 2000, AJ, 120, 1588

1694: 

1695: \bibitem[Cannon et al.(2006)]{2slaqlrg} Cannon, R., et al. 2006, 

1696: \mnras, 372, 425

1697: 

1698: \bibitem[]{} Coleman, G. D., Wu, C.-C., \& Weedman, D. W. 1980, ApJS, 43, 393

1699: 

1700: \bibitem[]{} Collinge, M. \etal\ 2005, AJ, 129, 2542

1701: 

1702: \bibitem[]{} Collister, A. A. \& Lahav, O. 2004, PASP, 116, 345

1703: 

1704: \bibitem[]{} Cool, R. J. \etal\ 2006, AJ, 131, 73Z

1705: 

1706: \bibitem[]{} Csabai, I. \etal\ 2003, AJ, 125, 580

1707: 

1708: \bibitem[]{} Eisenstein, D.J. \etal\ 2001, AJ, 122, 2267

1709: 

1710: %\bibitem[]{} Eisenstein, D.J. \etal\ 2003, ApJ, 585, 694

1711: 

1712: \bibitem[]{} Eisenstein, D.~J., et al.\ 2006, \apjs, 167, 40

1713: 

1714: \bibitem[]{} Finkbeiner, D.P. \etal\ 2004, AJ, 128, 2577

1715: 

1716: %\bibitem[]{} Frieman, J. \etal\ 2003, AAS, 205, 120.01

1717: 

1718: \bibitem[]{} Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J.E., Doi, M.,

1719: Shimasaku, K., \& Schneider, D.P. 1996, AJ, 111, 1748

1720: 

1721: %\bibitem[]{} Gladders, M.D., \& Yee, H.K.C. 2000, AJ, 120, 2148

1722: 

1723: %\bibitem[]{} Gray, J., Szalay, A.S. Fekete, G., O'Mullane,

1724: %  W. Nieto-Santisteban, M.A., Thakar, A.R., Heber, G., \& Rots,

1725: %  A.H. 2004, ``There Goes the Neighborhood: Relational Algebra for

1726: %  Spatial Data Search", Microsoft Technical Report, MSR-TR-2004-32

1727: 

1728: \bibitem[]{} Gunn, J.E. \etal\ 1998, AJ, 116, 3040

1729: 

1730: \bibitem[]{} Gunn, J.E. \etal\ 2006, AJ, 131, 2332

1731: 

1732: %\bibitem[]{} Hall, P.B. \etal\ 2004, AJ, 128, 534

1733: 

1734: %\bibitem[]{} Helmi, A. \etal\ 2003, AJ, 586, 195

1735: 

1736: \bibitem[]{} Hogg, D.W., Finkbeiner, D.P., Schlegel, D.J., \& Gunn, J.E. 2001,

1737:    AJ, 122, 2129 

1738: 

1739: \bibitem[]{} Ivezi\'c, \v{Z}. \etal\ 2003, MmSAI, 74, 978

1740: 

1741: %\bibitem[]{} Ivezi\'c, \v Z., Juri\'{c}, M., Lupton, R.H., Tabachnick, S.,

1742: %  Quinn, T., \& the SDSS Collaboration 2004a, SDSS Moving Object

1743: %  Catalog V1.0, NASA Planetary Data System, 9, 1

1744: %

1745: \bibitem[]{} Ivezi\'c, \v Z. \etal\ 2004, Astronomische Nachrichten,

1746:   325, 583 

1747: 

1748: \bibitem[]{} Ivezi\'c, \v Z. \etal\ 2007, AJ, submitted, astro-ph/0703157

1749: 

1750: \bibitem[]{} Jiang, L. \etal\ 2006, AJ, 131, 2788

1751: 

1752: %\bibitem[]{} Kleinman, S.J. \etal\ 2004, ApJ, 607, 426

1753: 

1754: %\bibitem[]{} Lee, B.C. \etal\ 2004, AJ, 127, 1811

1755: 

1756: %\bibitem[]{} Loh, Y.S., \& Strauss, M.A. 2005, MNRAS, submitted

1757: 

1758: \bibitem[Lilly et al.(1995)]{cfrs} Lilly, S.J., et al. 1995,

1759: \apj, 455, 50

1760: 

1761: \bibitem[]{} Lupton, R.H. 2005, AJ, submitted

1762: 

1763: \bibitem[]{} Lupton, R.H., Gunn, J.E., \& Szalay, A.S. 1999, AJ, 118, 1406

1764: 

1765: \bibitem[]{} Lupton, R.H., Gunn, J.E., Ivezi\'c, \v{Z}., Knapp, G.R.,

1766: Kent, S., \& Yasuda, N. 2001, in {\it Astronomical Data Analysis

1767: Software and Systems X}, edited by F. R. Harnden Jr., F. A. Primini,

1768: and H. E. Payne, ASP Conference Proceedings, 238, 269

1769: 

1770: \bibitem[]{} Mandelbaum, R. \etal\ 2005, MNRAS, 361, 1287

1771: 

1772: %\bibitem[]{} Miller, C. \etal\ 2005, AJ, 130, 968

1773: 

1774: %\bibitem[Monet et al.(2003)]{monet03}

1775: %   Monet, D. G. \etal\ 2003, \aj, 125, 984

1776: 

1777: %\bibitem[]{} Munn, J.A. \etal\ 2004, AJ, 127, 3043

1778: 

1779: %\bibitem[]{} Newberg, H.J. \& SDSS Collaboration 2003, AAS, 203, 112.11

1780: 

1781: %\bibitem[Oyaizu et al.(2006a)]{photoz2} Oyaizu, H. et al. 2006a, 

1782: %in preparation

1783: 

1784: %\bibitem[Oyaizu et al.(2006b)]{nne} Oyaizu, H. et al. 2006b, 

1785: %in preparation

1786: 

1787: \bibitem[]{} Oke, J.B. \& Gunn, J.E. 1983, ApJ, 266, 713

1788: 

1789: %\bibitem[]{} Padmanabhan, N. \etal\ 2005, MNRAS, 359, 237

1790: 

1791: \bibitem[]{} Percival, W. J. \etal\ 2007, ApJ, 657, 51

1792: 

1793: \bibitem[]{} Petrosian, V. 1976, ApJ, 209, L1

1794: 

1795: \bibitem[]{} Pier, J.R., Munn, J.A., Hindsley, R.B., Hennessy, G.S.,

1796: Kent, S.M., Lupton, R.H., \& Ivezi\'c, \v{Z}. 2003, AJ, 125, 1559

1797: 

1798: \bibitem[]{} Richards, G.T. \etal\ 2002, AJ, 123, 2945

1799: 

1800: %\bibitem[]{} Schlegel, D.J., Finkbeiner, D.P., \& Davis, M. 1998,

1801: %  ApJ, 500, 525 (SFD)

1802: 

1803: \bibitem[]{} Schneider, D.P. \etal\ 2005, AJ, 130, 367

1804: 

1805: \bibitem[]{} Schneider, D.P. \etal\ 2007, AJ, submitted

1806: 

1807: \bibitem[]{} Scranton, R. \etal\ 2005, ApJ, submitted, astro-ph/0508564

1808: 

1809: \bibitem[Sheldon et al.(2004)]{sheldon04} Sheldon, E.S., et al. 2004,

1810: \aj, 127, 2544

1811: 

1812: \bibitem[]{} Smith, J.A. \etal\ 2002, AJ, 123, 2121

1813: 

1814: %\bibitem[]{} Smol\v ci\'c, V. \etal\ 2004, ApJ, 615, L141

1815: 

1816: \bibitem[]{} Stoughton, C. \etal\ 2002, AJ, 123, 485 

1817: 

1818: \bibitem[]{} Strauss, M.A. \etal\ 2002, AJ, 124, 1810

1819: 

1820: \bibitem[]{} Tegmark, M. \etal\ 2004, ApJ, 606, 702

1821: 

1822: \bibitem[]{} Tucker, D. \etal\ 2006, Astronomische Nachrichten, 327, 821

1823: 

1824: \bibitem[]{} Vanden Berk, D.E. \etal\ 2005, AJ, 129, 2047

1825: 

1826: \bibitem[Weiner et al.(2005)]{deep} Weiner, B.J., et al. 2005,

1827: \apj, 620, 595

1828: 

1829: \bibitem[]{} Wilhite, B.C. \etal\ 2005, ApJ, 633, 638

1830: 

1831: \bibitem[Wirth et al.(2004)]{tkrs} Wirth, G.D., et al. 2004,

1832: \aj, 127, 3121

1833: 

1834: \bibitem[Yee et al.(2000)]{cnoc2} Yee, H.K.C., et al. 2000,

1835: \apjs, 129, 475

1836: 

1837: \bibitem[]{} York, D.G. \etal\ 2000, AJ, 120, 1579

1838: 

1839: \bibitem[]{} Zehavi, I.~et al.\ 2002, \apj, 571, 172

1840: 

1841: \bibitem[]{} Zucker, D. \etal\ 2004a, ApJ, 612, L117

1842: 

1843: \bibitem[]{} Zucker, D. \etal\ 2004b, ApJ, 612, L121

1844: 

1845: \end{thebibliography}

1846: 

1847: \end{document}

1848: