1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \begin{document}
3:
4:
5: \title{Tracing PAHs and Warm Dust Emission in the Seyfert Galaxy
6: NGC~1068}
7: \author{
8: Justin H. Howell,\altaffilmark{1}
9: Joseph M. Mazzarella,\altaffilmark{1}
10: Ben H.P. Chan,\altaffilmark{1}
11: Steven Lord,\altaffilmark{2}
12: Jason A. Surace,\altaffilmark{3}
13: David T. Frayer,\altaffilmark{2}
14: P~.N.~Appleton,\altaffilmark{2}
15: Lee Armus,\altaffilmark{3}
16: Aaron S. Evans,\altaffilmark{4}
17: Greg Bothun,\altaffilmark{5}
18: Catherine M. Ishida,\altaffilmark{6}
19: Dong-Chan Kim,\altaffilmark{7}
20: Joseph B. Jensen,\altaffilmark{8}
21: Barry F. Madore\altaffilmark{1,9}
22: David B. Sanders,\altaffilmark{10}
23: Bernhard Schulz,\altaffilmark{2}
24: Tatjana Vavilkin,\altaffilmark{4}
25: Sylvain Veilleux,\altaffilmark{7}
26: Kevin Xu\altaffilmark{2}
27: }
28: \altaffiltext{1}{Infrared Processing \& Analysis Center, MS 100-22,
29: California Institute of Technology,
30: Pasadena, CA 91125; jhhowell,mazz,bchan@ipac.caltech.edu}
31: \altaffiltext{2}{NASA Herschel Science Center, IPAC, MS 100-22,
32: California Institute of Technology,
33: Pasadena, CA 91125; lord,frayer,apple,bschulz,cxu@ipac.caltech.edu}
34: \altaffiltext{3}{Spitzer Science Center, MS 314-6, California Institute
35: of Technology, Pasadena,
36: CA 91125; jason,lee@ipac.caltech.edu}
37: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Physics and Astronomy,
38: State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794-3800;
39: \ aevans@orchid.ess.sunysb.edu, vavilkin@grad.physics.sunysb.edu}
40: \altaffiltext{5}{University of Oregon, Physics Department, Eugene OR, 97402;
41: nuts@bigmoo.uoregon.edu}
42: \altaffiltext{6}{Subaru Telescope, National Astronomical Observatory of
43: Japan, Hilo, HI 96720; cat@subaru.naoj.org}
44: \altaffiltext{7}{Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland,
45: College Park, MD 20742; kim,veilleux@astro.umd.edu}
46: \altaffiltext{8}{Gemini Observatory, 950 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ
47: 85719; jjensen@gemini.edu}
48: \altaffiltext{9}{The Observatories, Carnegie Institution of Washington,
49: 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101; barry@ociw.edu}
50: \altaffiltext{10}{Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 2680
51: Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822; sanders@ifa.hawaii.edu}
52:
53: \begin{abstract}
54:
55: We present a study of the nearby Seyfert galaxy NGC 1068 using mid- and far-
56: infrared data acquired with the IRAC, IRS, and MIPS instruments aboard the
57: Spitzer Space Telescope. The images show extensive $8~\mu$m and $24~\mu$m
58: emission coinciding with star formation in the inner spiral
59: approximately 15\arcsec (1 kpc)
60: from the nucleus, and a bright complex of star formation $\sim$47\arcsec\
61: (3 kpc) SW of the nucleus. The brightest $8~\mu$m PAH emission regions
62: coincide remarkably well with knots observed in an H$\alpha$ image. Strong
63: PAH features at 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, and $11.3~\mu$m are detected in IRS spectra
64: measured at numerous locations inside, within, and outside the inner spiral.
65: The IRAC colors and IRS spectra of these regions rule out dust heated by the
66: AGN as the primary emission source; the SEDs are dominated by starlight and PAH
67: emission. The equivalent widths and flux ratios of the PAH features in the
68: inner spiral are generally consistent with conditions in a typical spiral galaxy
69: ISM. Interior to the inner spiral, the influence of the AGN on the ISM is
70: evident via PAH flux ratios indicative of a higher ionization parameter and a
71: significantly smaller mean equivalent width than observed in the inner spiral.
72: The brightest 8 and $24~\mu$m emission peaks in the disk of the galaxy,
73: even at distances beyond the inner spiral, are located within
74: the ionization cones traced by [O III]/H$\beta$, and they are also
75: remarkably well aligned with the axis of the radio jets. Although it is
76: possible that radiation from the AGN may directly enhance PAH
77: excitation or trigger the formation of OB stars that subsequently excite PAH
78: emission at these locations in the inner spiral, the orientation of collimated
79: radiation from the AGN and star formation knots in the inner spiral could be
80: coincidental. The brightest PAH and $24~\mu$m emitting regions
81: are also located precisely where two spiral arms of molecular
82: gas emerge from the ends of the inner stellar bar; this is consistent with
83: kinematic models that predict maxima in the accumulation and compression of
84: the ISM where gas gets trapped within the inner Lindblad resonance of a
85: large stellar bar that contains a smaller, weaker bar.
86: \end{abstract}
87:
88: \keywords{galaxies: Seyfert --- galaxies: individual (NGC~1068) --- infrared: galaxies
89: }
90:
91: \section{Introduction}
92:
93: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) appear to be ubiquitous in the
94: ISM of massive disk galaxies. PAHs emit copiously near regions of active star
95: formation where molecules are heated by ultraviolet radiation and are
96: usually associated with the photo-dissociation regions in molecular clouds.
97: The infrared spectra of active galaxies generally lack the PAH emission lines
98: characteristic of starburst galaxies \citep{roche91}.
99: \citet*{freudling03} reported the detection of hot dust and weak PAHs
100: in type 1 AGN, and cooler dust and strong PAHs in type 2 AGN, similar to the
101: results of \citet{clavel}, \citet{buchanan06}, and \citet{apple07}.
102: These results are interpreted as an indication
103: that the high energy photons from the AGN destroy PAH molecules exposed to
104: extreme UV radiation from
105: the nucleus, with any observed PAH emission coming from star forming regions
106: shielded by intervening material \citep{voit92, allain96, maloney99,
107: freudling03}.
108: The {\it Spitzer} Space Telescope provides the opportunity to investigate
109: the distribution of PAH emission in a variety of galaxies through its
110: correlation with the zone of influence of the AGN and/or star-forming regions.
111:
112: NGC~1068 is a prototypical nearby Seyfert 2 galaxy \citep{antonucci85},
113: and was the first AGN to be detected \citep{fath09}.
114: With an infrared luminosity $\rm L_{ir} = 10^{11.3}~L_{\odot}$, NGC~1068
115: is a luminous infrared galaxy (LIRG) and is a member of the IRAS
116: Revised Bright Galaxy Sample (RBGS; Sanders et al. 2003) consisting of
117: extragalactic objects with $60\mu$m flux greater than 5.24~Jy.
118: In addition to the AGN, the galaxy contains a bright inner spiral with
119: active star formation approximately 1~kpc from the nucleus; this structure
120: has often been referred to as a ``starburst ring" \citep{scoville, schinnerer,
121: spinoglio05}. \citet{td88} estimated that star formation would consume the
122: available gas within 0.5~Gyr at current star formation rates.
123: \citet{yuankuo98} showed that the inner spiral resides at the
124: outer Lindblad resonance. The inner spiral arms begin at the ends of a
125: stellar bar \citep{schinnerer}, at the location of peak collisional
126: energy dissipation \citep{combes85}.
127: Fabry-Perot imaging of the [OIII]$\lambda5007$ line shows clearly defined
128: ionization cones from the center of NGC~1068, inclined such that the disk
129: of the galaxy is illuminated out to $r\sim11$~kpc
130: \citep[Fig.~\ref{cartoon}, adapted from \citet{bruhweiler01} and
131: \citet{veilleux03};][]{unger92, veilleux03}.
132: The [NII]$\lambda6548,6583$ line profile data of \citet{cecil90}
133: showed that the kinematics of the ionized gas are well fit by a model
134: in which the ionization cones intersect the plane of the galaxy, rather than
135: illuminating halo gas seen in projection onto the disk.
136: The brightest region of [OIII] emission corresponds with the region of
137: peak radio continuum flux, extending $\sim10^{\prime\prime}$ NE of
138: the nucleus \citep{condon90, morganti93}. A knot of [OIII] emission is
139: seen at the distance of the inner spiral, with further [OIII] emission
140: extending several kpc further out into the disk of the galaxy.
141: Kinematics show that the gas in the ionization cones is ionized in situ
142: by the central engine,
143: and is not ejecta from the nuclear region. Spectral line ratios also
144: confirm that the AGN is the ionizing source even at $r\sim11$~kpc
145: \citep{veilleux03}, though the inner spiral itself shows line ratios
146: typical of star forming regions. The opening angle of the
147: ionization cones is $40^{\circ}$, centered at position angle $31^{\circ}$
148: \citep{unger92}.
149: \citet{veilleux03} showed that the [OIII] emission is biconical, though
150: much fainter to the SW than the NE. This is consistent with the
151: conclusion of \citet{cecil90} that the ionization cones are inclined with
152: respect to the plane of the disk, illuminating the near side of the
153: disk to the NE and the far side of the disk to the SW.
154: \citet{bruhweiler01} showed that the [OIII]/H$\beta$ ratio both interior
155: and exterior to the inner spiral along the cones is consistent with
156: photoionization from
157: the AGN without significant contribution from shocks.
158: \citet{usero04} detected the inner spiral in SiO, which is typically
159: interpreted as a signature of shocks. Infrared emission peaks have
160: been detected along the ionization cones at the distance of the inner
161: spiral \citep{td88, lefloch01, marco03}. \citet{bv93} and \citet{bv97} argued
162: that the IR emission results from dust grains near the surface of molecular
163: clouds heated by the X-ray and UV flux from the AGN. Using ISO,
164: \citet{lefloch01} detected the peaks in the $7.7~\mu$m PAH band, indicating
165: that at least some of the emission is from PAHs rather than large dust grains.
166:
167: Is it possible that the inner spiral is not illuminated by the AGN, but
168: simply {\it appears} to be illuminated due to projection effects? If the
169: inner spiral lies in the plane of the disk, the AGN ionization cones
170: would have to be inclined well out of the plane of the disk and have a
171: small opening angle so as not to intersect it. As noted
172: previously, the [NII] and [OIII] data sets provide strong
173: evidence that the ionization cones intersect the disk.
174: \citet{packham97} used near-IR polarimetry to produce a three dimensional
175: model of the electron scattering cone, concluding that it is
176: inclined by $43^{\circ}$ to the plane of the sky, corresponding to
177: an inclination of $\leq10^{\circ}$ to the plane of the galaxy. With
178: an opening half-angle of $40^{\circ}$, it clearly intersects the disk. The
179: remaining possibility is that the inner spiral is inclined relative
180: to the disk such that the inner spiral is not illuminated by the AGN.
181: The \citet{packham97} model requires an inclination of at least
182: $30^{\circ}$ for the inner spiral to lie outside of the ionization cone. Such
183: an inclination is both physically implausible and would have been easily
184: detected in kinematic data (e.~g. CO or H$\alpha$). We therefore
185: conclude that the AGN illuminates the inner spiral in the region of
186: the PAH knots. The fact that optical line ratios characteristic of AGN
187: ionization are seen both immediately interior and exterior to the inner spiral
188: indicates that material in the inner spiral cannot be completely
189: shielded from the AGN by intervening material.
190:
191: In this paper we present the results from analysis of new infrared
192: observations of NGC~1068 from the {\it Spitzer} Space Telescope.
193: Observations with the IRAC \citep{iracref}, IRS \citep{irsref}, and MIPS
194: \citep{mipsref} instruments are discussed in \S~2. Analysis of the data
195: is presented in \S~3, and conclusions are given in \S~4.
196:
197: \section{Observations and Data Analysis}
198:
199: \subsection{Imaging}
200:
201: NGC~1068 was observed with IRAC by the GTO program of Fazio et al.
202: (PID \#32).
203: MIPS observations were carried out as part of the
204: Great Observatories All-sky LIRG Survey
205: (GOALS, GO-1 RBGS LIRG/ULIRG program of Mazzarella et al.; PID \#3672).
206: The general data reduction procedures used on the IRAC and MIPS data were
207: described in detail in \citet{mazz1}. Here we discuss the special
208: processing required for NGC~1068. For reference, the bright star
209: forming regions are at a radius of $15^{\prime\prime}$ (1~kpc).
210:
211: Muxbleed saturation artifacts (see the IRAC Data Handbook\footnote{http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/irac/dh/} for details)
212: in the $5.8~\mu$m and $8~\mu$m images presented challenges
213: in the nuclear region of NGC~1068 within a radius of $15^{\prime\prime}$
214: (1 kpc). A rough correction for this problem consisted
215: of measuring each artifact in a suitable aperture and
216: subtracting off the flux density of an identical aperture measured at
217: the same galaxy surface brightness level in a region outside
218: the artifact. This procedure resulted in a correction (reduction) of the
219: flux density inside a $15^{\prime\prime}$ aperture by
220: 2.74 Jy (16\%) at 8.0~\micron\ and 0.41 Jy (5\%) at 5.8~\micron.
221:
222: Since muxbleed is a result of saturation, an additional correction was
223: needed to account for the lost flux density. Such saturation corrections
224: were estimated by comparison with available data in the literature.
225: The flux density measured within a $6^{\prime\prime}$ diameter aperture was
226: $3.2 \pm 0.2$ Jy at $5.0~\mu$m \citep{rieke1}
227: and $25 \pm 3$ Jy at $10.0~\mu$m \citep{rieke2}.
228: A simple linear interpolation from these values
229: to the IRAC wavelengths predicts $6.2 \pm 0.5$ Jy and $16 \pm 2$ Jy
230: at 5.8 and $8.0~\mu$m, respectively. The blue end of the transmission
231: window of the filter used by \citet{rieke2} extends to $7.6~\mu$m
232: \citep{low71}, so the $10~\mu$m measurement includes the majority of the
233: flux density from the $7.7~\mu$m PAH feature.
234: The {\it Spitzer} flux densities
235: measured in a $6^{\prime\prime}$ diameter aperture centered on the nucleus
236: of NGC 1068 are $7.9$ Jy at $5.8~\mu$m and $7.0$ Jy at $8.0~\mu$m.
237: (We note that the first muxbleed artifact in the $8~\mu$m PSF
238: is located at a radius of about $6^{\prime\prime}$, which is well outside
239: this comparison region with a $6^{\prime\prime}$ {\it diameter}.)
240: The $5.8~\mu$m value measured from our corrected IRAC data
241: agrees with the estimate based on the Rieke \& Low measurements
242: within the uncertainties of our correction method. However, since our
243: $8~\mu$m IRAC estimate is 9 Jy below the estimate based on interpolation
244: of the Rieke \& Low data, we have added 9.0 Jy to the $8~\mu$m
245: IRAC aperture measurements for NGC~1068 to account for the flux density
246: lost to saturation.
247:
248: Photometry of the inner spiral was measured by taking the difference
249: between measurements of $12^{\prime\prime}$ and $18^{\prime\prime}$
250: radius (800--1200~pc). Extended source corrections were applied to
251: each aperture measurement according to the equation derived by
252: T.~Jarrett\footnote{http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/jarrett/irac/calibration/ext\_apercorr.html}.
253: The emission peaks on the inner spiral were measured using small
254: elliptical apertures. The wings of the PSF of the bright AGN would
255: bias the observed flux densities if the emission peaks were measured
256: relative to the sky background, so instead the peaks were measured
257: relative to a local background elsewhere on the inner spiral. In
258: the case of the NE knot, the local background measurements were chosen
259: to also lie along diffraction spikes at $3.6$ and $4.5\mu$m.
260:
261: The MIPS $24~\mu$m image of NGC~1068 is dominated by a
262: bright unresolved central point source (the AGN) which saturated within
263: radius $\sim13^{\prime\prime}$. To measure the spatially
264: resolved features we subtracted a PSF model of the
265: central point source. The IDL package IDP3\footnote{http://mips.as.arizona.edu/mipspage/IDP3/idp3example.html}
266: was used to centroid the galaxy and PSF images; then the scale factor
267: factor of the PSF image was interactively adjusted to best subtract off the
268: point source component of the galaxy image. As recommended by the
269: MIPS Data Handbook\footnote{http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/mips/dh/},
270: an object of similar color was chosen to create the PSF image. The
271: ULIRG IRAS~F05189-2524 served as a satisfactory PSF for this purpose,
272: as it is both very bright and unresolved by {\it Spitzer} at $24\mu$m.
273: IRAS~F05189-2524 is also a Seyfert 2 galaxy, and is the best match to
274: the IRAS $60~\mu$m/$25~\mu$m
275: color of NGC~1068, with a color of 3.82 compared to 2.24 for the latter.
276: The only galaxies in the GOALS sample with colors more closely matching
277: NGC~1068 were spatially resolved in the MIPS $24~\mu$m images.
278: Contours of the PSF-subtracted $24~\mu$m image of NGC~1068 are overlaid
279: on the $8~\mu$m
280: image in Fig.~\ref{n1068i4m1}. The elongation of the masked region on
281: the $8~\mu$m image is due to the muxbleed residuals discussed above.
282:
283: The best fit PSF for NGC~1068 was also used to estimate the total 24 \micron\
284: flux density, which could not be measured directly due to saturation.
285: The point-source component of the total flux density was estimated by
286: taking the flux density of IRAS~F05189-2524 (3.04~Jy) and multiplying by
287: the best fitting PSF scale factor (25), resulting in an estimate of 75.90~Jy.
288: In addition, the extended 24 \micron\ emission from NGC~1068 was measured
289: directly from the PSF-subtracted image. Combining the 0.5~Jy extended
290: component with the point-source component yields an estimated total
291: 24 \micron\ flux density of NGC~1068 (before aperture and color corrections)
292: of 76.4~Jy. The uncertainty in the empirically determined PSF scale factor
293: (25.0) is about 20\%, and this dominates the uncertainty in this
294: 24 \micron\ total flux density measurement.
295:
296: Table~1 presents the {\it Spitzer} flux density measurements and estimated
297: uncertainties. As described in detail in
298: \citet{mazz1}, MIPS color corrections have been applied based on the
299: IRAS and MIPS SEDs. With aperture and color corrections, the
300: total estimated 24~\micron\ flux density using the {\it {\it Spitzer}}
301: data is 79.6 Jy. Comparison with the IRAS $25~\mu$m measurements of
302: $87.6 \pm 0.2$ Jy \citep{rbgs} indicates that
303: this $24~\mu$m estimate from {\it {\it Spitzer}} is low by
304: about 9\%. This is consistent with the systematic mean
305: offset of 20\% (with a $1\sigma$ scatter of 15\%)
306: observed between the $24~\mu$m {\it {\it Spitzer}} measurements and
307: $25~\mu$m IRAS measurements across our entire sample of 203 systems
308: \citep{mazz1}. We are therefore confident in the PSF fitting procedure,
309: from which it can be stated that more than 99\% (75.9/76.4) of the $24~\mu$m
310: emission from NGC~1068 originates within a radius of
311: $\approx30^{\prime\prime}$ (the first Airy ring). Approximately 80\% of
312: the $24~\mu$m emission originates within the saturated region
313: $r<13^{\prime\prime}$.
314: NGC~1068 also saturated the $160~\mu$m array and a flux density estimate could
315: not be recovered.
316:
317: \subsection{Spectroscopy}
318:
319: The nucleus of the galaxy was observed at high spectral
320: resolution by the GTO program of Houck et al. (PID \#14), and mapped at
321: low resolution by the GO-1 program of Gallimore et al. (PID \#3269).
322: The Short-Low (SL) IRS maps consisted of 13 half slit-width
323: (1.8 arcsec) steps for the first and second order slits. The maps
324: were centered on the nucleus. There were no dedicated off (sky)
325: observations, but a local background was subtracted by using
326: the non-primary slit, which is centered approximately 80 arcsec
327: from the nucleus, for both the SL1 and SL2 maps. The IRAC $8~\mu$m surface
328: brightness at the locations selected for the background are typically
329: $10^{-4}$ -- $10^{-3}$ of the level at the nucleus.
330: CUBISM\footnote{http://turtle.as.arizona.edu/jdsmith/cubism.php} was
331: used to perform the local background subtraction and form the SL spectral
332: cubes. From these cubes we were able to identify regions
333: over which to extract 1D spectra, and we used CUBISM to perform
334: this extraction in matched apertures in SL1 and SL2. In addition, we
335: used CUBISM to generate a pure PAH map over the area covered by the IRS slits.
336: Aperture locations and the PAH map are shown in Fig.~\ref{regions}.
337: Fluxes and equivalent widths of the low resolution data were measured
338: using PAHFIT \citep{pahfit}.
339: The regions closest to the nucleus suffered from saturation and did
340: not yield usable spectra; see Fig.~\ref{regions}, lower panel.
341: Table~2 presents the equivalent widths and line
342: fluxes of the emission features measured in each aperture.
343:
344: The Short-High and Long-High IRS observations do not suffer from saturation,
345: but only cover a single position at the center of the galaxy. No background
346: subtraction was performed due to the lack of a background slit observation.
347: Spectra were extracted using
348: SPICE\footnote{http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/postbcd/spice.html}, and
349: lines were measured on the extracted spectra using SMART \citep{smartref}.
350: Our high resolution spectral line measurements are presented in Table~3.
351:
352: \subsection{Separating Non-Stellar from Stellar Emission in Seyfert Galaxies}
353:
354: Although IRS spectra provide the ideal measure of the presence and strength
355: of PAH emission, the available data cover only a portion of the inner spiral.
356: IRAC and MIPS imaging is required to investigate the region outside
357: of the spectral map. There are several possible sources for the IR emission
358: from Seyfert galaxies. The power-law
359: continuum from an AGN can contribute to all IRAC wavelengths. The
360: $3.6~\mu$m and $4.5~\mu$m data are dominated by the Rayleigh-Jeans
361: tail of stellar photospheric emission. The $5.8~\mu$m channel covers the
362: wavelength range which includes the $6.2~\mu$m PAH line, while the
363: $8~\mu$m channel includes the $7.7~\mu$m
364: and $8.6~\mu$m PAH emission features. Hot dust can also be a significant
365: contribution at all IRAC wavelengths. Stellar continuum emission is
366: insignificant compared to PAH emission in the IRAC $8~\mu$m band
367: in nearly all nearby LIRGs \citep{mazz1}. The stellar continuum flux density
368: at $8~\mu$m is estimated to be 19--23\% of the $3.6~\mu$m flux density
369: \citep{pahre04, dalesings}; based on this we estimate that stars contribute
370: only a few percent
371: (for example, NGC~1068 1~kpc aperture: $2.8\times0.23/17 = 0.038$) of the
372: $8~\mu$m flux densities of this galaxy. To test for spatial variations
373: between the starlight and PAH emission in NGC~1068, a scaled $3.6~\mu$m
374: image was subtracted from the $8~\mu$m image. The ratio of this nonstellar
375: emission image to
376: the $8~\mu$m image is constant with little variation across the galaxy
377: (excluding the central region which saturated at $8~\mu$m, as noted previously),
378: showing that starlight accounts for $\sim4~\%$ of the $8~\mu$m emission
379: throughout the disk of NGC~1068.
380:
381: Determining the presence of PAHs using IRAC and MIPS photometry
382: requires the measurement and modeling of the contribution of AGN continuum
383: and hot dust at $8~\mu$m. Several
384: color-color diagnostics have been used to distinguish AGN-dominated
385: systems and starburst-dominated systems in the literature
386: \citep[e.~g.][]{stern05}. The GOALS sample \citep{mazz1} is shown in
387: the [3.6]-[4.5] vs. [4.5]-[8] color-color space in Fig.~\ref{cc}. Also
388: shown are the colors of hot dust and
389: AGN power laws. Since the vertical axis is the ratio of
390: two channels normally dominated by starlight, galaxies without significant
391: AGN or hot dust lie near zero. The horizontal axis separates galaxies with
392: little or no PAH emission (left) from those dominated by PAH emission
393: (right). The [4.5]-[8] color measures the jump from the Rayleigh-Jeans
394: tail of starlight at $4.5~\mu$m (plus AGN continuum, if present) to the
395: bright PAH emission at $8~\mu$m. The better-known Stern~et~al. color-color
396: space uses [5.8]-[8] on the horizontal axis instead of [4.5]-[8].
397: Since both the 5.8 and $8~\mu$m channels include PAH bands, [4.5]-[8]
398: is preferred due to the clearer physical interpretation.
399:
400: Combinations of IRAC images can be used to create spatial maps of different
401: components of IR emission. \citet{pahre04} used 3.6 and $4.5~\mu$m data to
402: estimate the contribution of starlight, which was then scaled down in
403: proportion to a Rayleigh-Jeans tail and subtracted from the $8~\mu$m image
404: to create a map of nonstellar (typically PAH) emission. As noted above,
405: this technique has little effect on LIRG and ULIRG data such as those
406: examined here since the $8~\mu$m images are dominated by nonstellar emission.
407: A similar method can be used to identify nonstellar emission at $4.5~\mu$m.
408: No PAH emission lines are present at such short wavelengths,
409: so the nonstellar emission sources are direct radiation from the AGN and
410: hot dust only. Making an
411: assumption about the form of the nonstellar emission, this technique can
412: be used to quantitatively estimate the emission from stars and the assumed
413: nonstellar source at 3.6 and $4.5~\mu$m. The ratio of stellar emission at
414: $3.6~\mu$m to that at $4.5~\mu$m, $f_*$, is known; using \citet{pahre04}
415: $f_*=1.7$. A similar ratio, $f_{\rm pl}$ is easily calculated for any given
416: power law slope $\alpha$. For typical values
417: $0.84<\alpha<1.4$, $0.83<f_{\rm pl}<0.73$. Image subtraction is then
418: performed, with the power law component of the $4.5~\mu$m image given by
419: $I_{\rm pl}(4.5) = \frac{{f_*}I(4.5)-I(3.6)}{{f_*}-f_{\rm pl}}$, where
420: $I(\lambda)$ is the IRAC image at a given wavelength. Similar equations
421: are easily derived for the stellar components of each image, or the power
422: law component of the $3.6~\mu$m image. Note that if the nonstellar emission
423: arises from hot dust this method will only reveal the locations of such
424: emission and one can simply use $I(4.5)-I(3.6)/f_*$ without attempting to
425: account for the nonstellar contribution to the $3.6~\mu$m flux
426: \citep{engel05}. A quantitative flux density estimate would require an
427: assumed dust temperature from which $f_{\rm dust}$ could be calculated,
428: replacing $f_{\rm pl}$ in the above prescription. In either case, the assumed
429: nonstellar emission can also be extended to $8~\mu$m to better constrain
430: the PAH emission.
431:
432: \section{Discussion}
433:
434: \subsection{Spitzer Data}
435:
436: The IRAC colors of the region within 1~kpc of the nucleus and the total
437: emission from the galaxy place NGC~1068 in the AGN region of the IRAC
438: color-color diagram defined by \citet{stern05}.
439: Emission at IRAC wavelengths is highly concentrated, with 70--80\% of
440: the flux density coming from the central kpc (Table~1).
441:
442: High resolution spectra of the nucleus show strong AGN signatures in a
443: number of diagnostic line ratios. Line fluxes and equivalent widths are
444: presented in Table~3. \\
445: The [O~IV]$25.9~\mu$m/[Ne~II]$12.8\mu$m line ratio is used as a
446: diagnostic for the fractional contribution of the AGN to the luminosity of
447: a galaxy \citep{genzel98,armus}. The NGC~1068 nucleus has a ratio of 4.2 as
448: measured from the IRS spectra, compared to 2.7 as measured from the ISO
449: data of \citet{sturm02}.
450: [Ne~V]$14.3~\mu$m/[Ne~II]$12.8\mu$m is a similar diagnostic ratio;
451: the nucleus of NGC~1068 has a ratio of 2.1, compared to the ISO ratio of 1.4.
452: Although these AGN diagnostic ratios are higher than the ISO measurements
453: of \citet{sturm02}, this is not surprising since the IRS slits are
454: smaller than the corresponding ISO aperture by roughly a factor of two.
455: With less light from the disk of the galaxy, the line ratios might be expected
456: to show higher ionization. Using the [Ne~V]$14.3~\mu$m/[Ne~III]$15.6~\mu$m
457: and [Ne~II]$12.8\mu$m/[Ne~III]$15.6~\mu$m line ratios measured using the high
458: resolution spectrum, the diagnostic diagram of \citet{voit92a} indicates an
459: ionization parameter ${\rm log}~U\sim-2$ and a power law input spectrum of
460: index $\alpha\sim-1.3$. Compared to nearby
461: AGNs, starbursts, and ULIRGs \citep{armus}, the line ratios in the
462: nucleus of NGC~1068 are in excellent agreement with the AGN sample,
463: consistent with a 100\% AGN contribution to the observed mid-IR nuclear
464: spectrum.
465:
466: The IRAC images show bright $8~\mu$m peaks (also detected in the other
467: IRAC channels) along the NE and SW arcs at ${\rm PA}\sim45^{\circ}$ in
468: the inner spiral (Fig.~\ref{n1068i4m1}) at the
469: locations first detected by \citet{td88}. Of the total $8~\mu$m
470: flux density within the annulus $800 < R < 1200$~pc from the nucleus,
471: 52\% is emitted by these two knots. The surface brightness of the knots
472: (400--500~MJy/sr) is more than twice that seen elsewhere in the inner spiral
473: ($\sim200$~MJy/sr). Compared to the central kpc of the galaxy,
474: these knots are bluer by more than half a magnitude in [3.6]-[4.5] and redder
475: by 0.55-0.85~mag in [4.5]-[8]. Since the wavelength range of the $8~\mu$m
476: channel includes both the $7.7~\mu$m and $8.6~\mu$m PAH features,
477: the latter color strongly suggests that the
478: knots are dominated by PAH emission.
479:
480: The low resolution IRS data confirm the predominance of PAH emission in
481: the knots observed in the IRAC $8\mu$m image. The $6.2~\mu$m, $7.7~\mu$m,
482: and $11.2~\mu$m PAH features,
483: plus the PAH$12.7\mu$m$+[{\rm Ne~II}]12.8\mu$m blend, are clearly visible
484: throughout the inner spiral. Figure~\ref{pahspec} shows representative
485: spectra, including the inner spiral, the region interior to the inner spiral,
486: and the region outside of the inner spiral. Fluxes and equivalent widths
487: of each measured emission feature are presented in Table~2. The PAH
488: features are strongest in the inner spiral (apertures 1--5, 9--11; top
489: panel of Fig.~\ref{pahspec}). However, such features are also
490: present in the innermost usable apertures (apertures 16, 18, \& 19;
491: middle panel of Fig.~\ref{pahspec}). Although the PAH equivalent widths
492: in these innermost apertures are small due to the bright hot dust
493: continuum near the AGN, the fluxes of the PAH lines are several times as
494: bright as in aperture~12 (outside the inner spiral) and typically half
495: as bright as in the inner spiral. These innermost apertures also show the
496: strongest [S~IV]~$10.51~\mu$m emission, while [Ar~II]~$6.98~\mu$m and
497: ${\rm H}_2~9.66~\mu$m emission are strongest on the inner spiral.
498:
499: For comparison, the average starburst galaxy spectrum from \citet{brandl06}
500: was also analyzed using PAHFIT. Line fluxes and equivalent widths
501: measured using PAHFIT cannot be directly compared with measurements made
502: using other techniques because PAHFIT takes into account the flux in the
503: extended wings of the spectral lines; see \citet{pahfit} for details.
504: PAH equivalent widths are
505: $2.36~\mu$m, $7.15~\mu$m, $1.09~\mu$m, $1.36~\mu$m, and $0.97~\mu$m
506: (6.2, 7.7, 8.6, 11.3, and $12.7~\mu$m features, respectively). Though
507: the inner spiral is the source of the strongest PAH emission in NGC~1068,
508: this emission is significantly weaker than that seen in starburst galaxies.
509:
510: With the detection of bright PAH emission lines throughout the inner spiral,
511: the model of \citet{bv93} in which the IR peaks on the inner spiral
512: originate from dust grains heated by the AGN can be ruled out. A composite
513: model in which the IR peaks are due to a combination of PAH emission plus
514: continuum from hot dust heated by the AGN can also be strongly
515: constrained. As shown in Fig.~\ref{regions}, apertures~1 and 9 both lie
516: within the ionization cones and are the closest apertures to the PAH knots
517: on the inner spiral. If hot dust made a significant contribution to
518: the flux in these apertures, the PAH equivalent widths would be lower
519: than in apertures on regions of the inner spiral falling outside the
520: ionization cones (apertures~3--5, 10, and 11). Instead, the PAH equivalent
521: widths measured in apertures~1 and 9 are as high or higher than those
522: measured elsewhere on the inner spiral. Any contribution of continuum
523: flux from hot dust heated by the AGN must be too small to significantly
524: affect the PAH equivalent widths. We estimate the amount of additional
525: continuum flux within the ionization cones compared to the rest of the
526: inner spiral by comparing the flux ratios and equivalent width ratios
527: of the PAH features. PAH fluxes in apertures~1 and 9 are brighter than
528: the average values in the rest of the inner spiral by factors of 20--80\%;
529: equivalent widths are brighter by factors of 10--100\%. The signature of
530: a greater contribution from the continuum is a larger increase
531: in flux than in equivalent width. This is seen in aperture~9, with a
532: flux increase of 31\% and equivalent width increase of $15\%$ in
533: the $11.3\mu$m and $12.7\mu$m features that would be most affected by hot
534: dust continuum. These ratios indicate a continuum increase of $1.31/1.15=14\%$
535: compared to the average value in the rest of the inner spiral. However,
536: in aperture~1 the increase in PAH equivalent width is greater than or equal
537: to the increase in PAH flux for every feature, indicating a continuum
538: level equal to or less than that seen in the rest of the inner spiral.
539: Comparing the aperture~1 and 9 spectra to the average spectrum of the
540: inner spiral apertures outside the ionization cones confirms the
541: conclusion that little or no excess continuum is seen within the
542: ionization cones. Figure~\ref{ringspec} shows the three spectra normalized
543: to a common flux density at $13~\mu$m. The apertures within the ionization
544: cones clearly show brighter PAH features than the average spectrum,
545: while the continuum shows very little variation between the three spectra.
546: Warm dust visible at $24~\mu$m
547: (Fig.~\ref{n1068i4m1}) is present at the locations of the peaks on the
548: inner spiral, though it is unclear whether the AGN or local star formation
549: activity is the primary heating source.
550:
551: Ratios between the $6.2~\mu$m, $7.7~\mu$m, and $11.3~\mu$m PAH features
552: are shown in Fig.~\ref{draine}. Lines adapted from \citet{draineli01}
553: show the locations of PAH emission from a cold neutral medium (CNM) model,
554: a warm ionized medium (WIM) model, and a photodissociation region (PDR)
555: model. Also shown is a portion of the boundary of the region of PAH line
556: ratios which can be reproduced by the composite ISM model of
557: \citet{draineli01}. With the exception of aperture~10, the PAH measurements
558: of the inner spiral all lie above the boundary, within the region
559: consistent with a composite model.
560: Aperture~5 is the outlier in the direction of a colder environment and
561: smaller PAH molecules. The ${\rm H}_2~9.66\mu$m line is nearly a factor of
562: two brighter in this aperture than in the other apertures.
563: Interestingly, aperture~18 --- only 480~pc from the
564: nucleus --- also lies in this cold ISM region of the diagram. It is also
565: interesting that aperture~10 on the inner spiral and aperture~12 outside
566: the inner spiral both lie in the region requiring more ionizing radiation
567: than the composite ISM model, with similar PAH ratios to the majority of the
568: apertures interior to the inner spiral. Since apertures 10 and 12 are
569: both well
570: outside the [OIII] ionization cone, ionization from the AGN is unlikely.
571: Aperture~10 coincides with the location of the peak CO emission in the map
572: of \citet{schinnerer}, suggesting the formation of massive stars as a likely
573: ionization source. The general picture presented by the ratios of PAH
574: features is that PAH molecules in the inner spiral are smaller and lie
575: in a cooler, less ionized environment than PAHs closer to the nucleus.
576:
577: The CNM-like PAH ratios of aperture~18 suggest that radiation from the
578: AGN may be absorbed within a few hundred parsecs along the NE ionization
579: cone. The radio jet of \citet{condon90} ends abruptly near the same
580: location. However, optical line ratios also show that radiation from the
581: AGN is ionizing gas up to 11~kpc from the nucleus within the NE cone
582: \citep[][\S~3.2]{veilleux03}.
583:
584: Although the $24~\mu$m MIPS data are saturated ($r < 13^{\prime\prime}$,
585: 900~pc), the innermost available isophotes are elongated along the same NE-SW
586: axis corresponding to the arcs seen at other wavelengths
587: (Fig.~\ref{n1068i4m1}).
588: In addition to the PAH knots, a weaker feature is visible in both the
589: IRAC and MIPS~$24~\mu$m images, corresponding to the NE tip of the southern
590: arm of the inner spiral ($22^{\prime\prime}$ from the nucleus at
591: ${\rm PA}=64^{\circ}$). Two additional peaks are seen $\sim45^{\prime\prime}$
592: (3~kpc) to the SW of the nucleus at ${\rm PA}=214^{\circ}$.
593: The nonstellar emission map (Fig.~\ref{n1068ns}) shows that
594: hot dust is present in these locations. The subtraction of the nuclear PSF
595: (right panel) suggests that there is little hot dust emission in the inner
596: $\sim20^{\prime\prime}$ outside of the nucleus; widespread heating of dust
597: to $\sim1000$~K can be ruled out.
598: It is curious that every peak of IR emission in the disk of NGC~1068,
599: including the three such locations on the inner spiral as defined by
600: the \citet{schinnerer} CO map, lie within the ionization cones of the AGN.
601:
602: \subsection{Comparison to Other Wavelengths}
603:
604: The radio continuum emission \citep{condon90} comes
605: to an abrupt end at a distance of 500--700~pc from the nucleus, roughly
606: halfway to the inner spiral, as shown in Fig.~\ref{n1068radioco}.
607: The 8~$\mu$m knots on the inner spiral lie $\sim5^{\prime\prime}$ (300~pc)
608: farther along the radio axis. \citet{cecil90} found that the high
609: velocity nuclear outflow ends abruptly at the NE radio lobe and the SW
610: radio hotspot ($4.5^{\prime\prime}$ from the nucleus).
611:
612: The CO observations of \citet{schinnerer} (Fig.~\ref{n1068radioco})
613: show a coherent spiral structure. The $8~\mu$m emission peaks
614: coincide with regions of bright CO emission, though the converse
615: is not true. The two brightest PAH knots are seen at precisely the
616: locations where the radio jet axis intersects the inner spiral
617: (Fig.~\ref{n1068radioco}). The 200--500~pc distance between the
618: ends of the radio jets and the inner spiral indicate that the AGN
619: is unlikely to trigger shock-induced star formation, however.
620:
621: The optical emission line imaging of \citet{veilleux03} provides
622: important insight into the origin of the observed PAH knots. The PAH
623: knots coincide with strong H$\alpha$ emission (Fig.~\ref{n1068line}, left
624: panel) and with small [O~{\sc iii}]/H$\beta$ ratios (0.2--1.7;
625: Fig.~\ref{n1068line}, right panel). The $8~\mu$m and H$\alpha$ images show
626: strikingly similar morphologies, tracing active star forming regions
627: across a wide range in wavelength. The [O~{\sc iii}]/H$\beta$ ratio is
628: an indicator of mean ionization and temperature; high ratios ($>3$, as a
629: rule of thumb) are typical of AGN, while lower ratios are typical of
630: H~{\sc ii} regions \citep{osterbrock}. As \citet{veilleux03} pointed
631: out, high [O~{\sc iii}]/H$\beta$ ratios are seen out to $R\sim11$~kpc
632: in NGC~1068, most visibly in the NE ionization cone. Figure~\ref{n1068line}
633: clearly shows that both the starburst knots and the three fainter IR
634: emission peaks have optical line ratios indicative of star formation.
635: Although the
636: H$\alpha$ and [O~{\sc iii}]/H$\beta$ data confirm the conclusion of
637: \citet{lefloch01} that the PAH knots are due to star formation in those
638: locations on the inner spiral, it is still surprising that bright PAH
639: emission should be present from regions that are being illuminated
640: by ionizing radiation from the AGN.
641:
642: While the galaxy disk is illuminated by the AGN, it is unclear how opaque
643: the PAH emitting regions are to radiation from the AGN (e.g. see
644: Fig.~\ref{galexfig}, left panel). The GALEX data \citep{galex}
645: provide little
646: guidance on this issue. Figure~\ref{galexfig} (right panel) is a GALEX
647: FUV image of NGC~1068 shown
648: with contours of both the Spitzer 8$\mu$m and PSF-subtracted 24$\mu$m
649: emission overlaid. As is apparent in the figure, the regions showing strong
650: PAH and warm dust emission are clearly UV luminous, indicating that (i) the
651: PAH emitting regions are optically thin to UV photons and thus unshielded by
652: the AGN, that (ii) the UV emanates from the optically thin outer envelope of
653: a much more embedded, optically thick starburst responsible for producing the
654: observed PAH emission, or (iii) that the UV emission is AGN light scattered
655: by optically thick clouds. The latter possibility is unlikely --- a simple
656: assumption of a 100~pc spherical cloud with an albedo of one would reflect a
657: flux $\sim10^3$ fainter than the flux of the AGN. Comparing measurements
658: within 6"(GALEX FWHM) radius apertures centered on the nucleus and on each
659: PAH knot,the GALEX data show that the PAH knots are $\sim 10$\% as bright as
660: the nucleus in the FUV and therefore scattering from the AGN is unlikely to
661: be a significant contribution. Thus, the UV emission is associated with
662: stars, but cannot be used to rule out whether the PAH regions are shielded
663: from the AGN.
664:
665: Further interpretation
666: is complicated by the near-coincidence between the axis of the AGN jet
667: and the position angle of the inner stellar bar. Intense star formation
668: is common at the ends of a bar \citep{combes85}, so the AGN may have no
669: effect on the PAH knots at all. It is also possible that the AGN is
670: either triggering increased star formation or directly exciting PAH
671: emission. Either the high energy photons capable of destroying PAHs are
672: absorbed near the AGN while lower energy photons are unobstructed
673: over the entire $\sim11$~kpc of the illuminated disk,
674: or the high energy photon flux within 1~kpc produces
675: a PAH destruction rate less than or equal to the PAH formation rate in
676: the star-forming regions. For details on the parameters governing the
677: formation and destruction of PAH molecules, see \citet{maloney99}.
678: The radiative transfer model of \citet{siebenmorgen}
679: supports the latter hypothesis, finding that even in the optically thin
680: regime PAHs survive exposure to a $10^{11}~{\rm L}_{\odot}$ AGN at distances
681: of 100~pc or more. However, \citet{voit92} calculated that PAHs could
682: only survive direct exposure to a $2.5\times10^{10}~{\rm L}_{\odot}$ AGN
683: at distances $\geq14$~kpc.
684:
685: \section{Conclusions}
686:
687: We have investigated the influence of the AGN on PAH emission in
688: NGC~1068, a LIRG with a Seyfert 2 nucleus.
689: Bright PAH knots are detected in the inner spiral in NGC~1068. These
690: knots lie directly along the axis of the ionization cone, which extends
691: well beyond the inner spiral in the disk of the galaxy. The knots also
692: coincide with the ends of the inner stellar bar. Contrary to
693: the model of \citet{bv93}, the spectra and colors of the PAH knots are
694: consistent with starlight and PAH emission, with very little if any hot dust.
695: Three other star forming regions are also detected: the NE tip of the
696: southern arm of the inner spiral, and two regions 2.5--3~kpc to the SW.
697: All three regions lie within the AGN ionization cones and show PAH emission
698: at $8~\mu$m and a slight excess of $4.5~\mu$m emission relative to
699: starlight, suggesting dust heated by young stars. IRS spectra near the
700: PAH knots indicate that PAHs are the dominant energy source, and show that
701: PAH emission is present within a few hundred parsecs of the AGN. PAH line
702: ratios on the inner spiral are generally consistent with a cool, neutral
703: ISM, while PAH line ratios interior to the inner spiral generally indicate
704: a more ionized medium. These data show that the AGN is not destroying all PAH
705: molecules within the ionization cone. The enhanced PAH emission within the
706: ionization cones indicates that the AGN is either triggering increased star
707: formation, directly exciting the PAHs, or has no effect on the dust
708: properties in the ionization cones.
709:
710: \acknowledgments
711:
712: This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED)
713: which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of
714: Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space
715: Administration. We would like to thank J.~Condon for making his VLA
716: radio continuum maps available to us, P.~Shopbell for H$\alpha$ and
717: [O~{\sc iii}] images of NGC~1068, E.~Schinnerer for the CO image,
718: B.~Brandl for providing his average
719: starburst galaxy spectrum, and J.~D.~Smith for assistance in using
720: the PAHFIT software. We thank the anonymous referee for constructive
721: comments.
722: Support for this work was provided by NASA
723: through contracts 1263752, 1264790, and 1267948 (D.C.K and S.V.)
724: issued by JPL/Caltech.
725:
726: \begin{thebibliography}{DUM}
727: %
728: \bibitem[Allain et al.(1996)]{allain96} Allain, T., Leach, S.,
729: \& Sedlmayr, E.\ 1996, \aap, 305, 602
730: %
731: \bibitem[Antonucci \& Miller(1985)]{antonucci85} Antonucci,
732: R.~R.~J., \& Miller, J.~S.\ 1985, \apj, 297, 621
733: %
734: \bibitem[Appleton et al.(2007)]{apple07} Appleton, P.~N., et al.\ 2007,
735: in preparation
736: %
737: \bibitem[Armus et al.(2007)]{armus} Armus, L., et al.\ 2007,
738: \apj, 656, 148
739: %
740: \bibitem[Bland-Hawthorn \& Voit(1993)]{bv93} Bland-Hawthorn,
741: J., \& Voit, G.~M.\ 1993, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica,
742: vol.~27, 27, 73
743: %
744: \bibitem[Bland-Hawthorn et al.(1997)]{bv97} Bland-Hawthorn,
745: J., Lumsden, S.~L., Voit, G.~M., Cecil, G.~N., \& Weisheit, J.~C.\ 1997,
746: \apss, 248, 177
747: %
748: \bibitem[Brandl et al.(2006)]{brandl06} Brandl, B.~R., et al.\
749: 2006, \apj, 653, 1129
750: %
751: \bibitem[Bruhweiler et al.(2001)]{bruhweiler01} Bruhweiler, F.~C.,
752: Miskey, C.~L., Smith, A.~M., Landsman, W., \& Malumuth, E.\ 2001, \apj,
753: 546, 866
754: %
755: \bibitem[Buchanan et al.(2006)]{buchanan06} Buchanan, C.~L.,
756: Gallimore, J.~F., O'Dea, C.~P., Baum, S.~A., Axon, D.~J., Robinson, A.,
757: Elitzur, M., \& Elvis, M.\ 2006, \aj, 132, 401
758: %
759: \bibitem[Cecil et al.(1990)]{cecil90} Cecil, G., Bland, J., \&
760: Tully, R.~B.\ 1990, \apj, 355, 70
761: %
762: \bibitem[Clavel et al.(2000)]{clavel} Clavel, J., et al.\
763: 2000, \aap, 357, 839
764: %
765: \bibitem[Combes \& Gerin(1985)]{combes85} Combes, F., \& Gerin,
766: M.\ 1985, \aap, 150, 327
767: %
768: \bibitem[Condon et al.(1990)]{condon90} Condon, J.~J., Helou,
769: G., Sanders, D.~B., \& Soifer, B.~T.\ 1990, \apjs, 73, 359
770: %
771: \bibitem[Dale et al.(2005)]{dalesings} Dale, D.~A., et al.\ 2005,
772: \apj, 633, 857
773: %
774: \bibitem[Draine \& Li(2001)]{draineli01} Draine, B.~T., \& Li, A.\
775: 2001, \apj, 551, 807
776: %
777: \bibitem[Engelbracht et al.(2005)]{engel05} Engelbracht, C.~W.,
778: Gordon, K.~D., Rieke, G.~H., Werner, M.~W., Dale, D.~A., \& Latter, W.~B.\
779: 2005, \apjl, 628, L29
780: %
781: \bibitem[Fath(1909)]{fath09} Fath, E.~A.\ 1909, Popular
782: Astronomy, 17, 504
783: %
784: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004)]{iracref} Fazio, G.~G., et al.\
785: 2004, \apjs, 154, 10
786: %
787: \bibitem[Freudling et al.(2003)Freudling, Siebenmorgen, \& Haas]{freudling03}
788: Freudling, W., Siebenmorgen, R., \& Haas, M.\ 2003, \apjl, 599, L13
789: %
790: \bibitem[Genzel et al.(1998)]{genzel98} Genzel, R., et al.\
791: 1998, \apj, 498, 579
792: %
793: \bibitem[Gil de Paz et al.(2006)]{galex} Gil de Paz, A., et
794: al.\ 2006, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0606440
795: %
796: \bibitem[Higdon et al.(2004)]{smartref} Higdon, S.~J.~U., et
797: al.\ 2004, \pasp, 116, 975
798: %
799: \bibitem[Houck et al.(2004)]{irsref} Houck, J.~R., et al.\
800: 2004, \apjs, 154, 18
801: %
802: \bibitem[Le Floc'h et al.(2001)]{lefloch01} Le Floc'h, E.,
803: Mirabel, I.~F., Laurent, O., Charmandaris, V., Gallais, P., Sauvage, M.,
804: Vigroux, L., \& Cesarsky, C.\ 2001, \aap, 367, 487
805: %
806: \bibitem[Low \& Rieke(1971)]{low71} Low, F.~J., \& Rieke,
807: G.~H.\ 1971, \nat, 233, 256
808: %
809: \bibitem[Maloney(1999)]{maloney99} Maloney, P.~R.\ 1999, \apss,
810: 266, 207
811: %
812: \bibitem[Marco \& Brooks(2003)]{marco03} Marco, O., \& Brooks,
813: K.~J.\ 2003, \aap, 398, 101
814: %
815: \bibitem[Mazzarella et al.(2007)]{mazz1} Mazzarella, J., et al. 2007, AJ,
816: submitted
817: %
818: \bibitem[Morganti et al.(1993)]{morganti93} Morganti, R., Killeen,
819: N.~E.~B., \& Tadhunter, C.~N.\ 1993, \mnras, 263, 1023
820: %
821: \bibitem[Myers \& Scoville(1987)]{scoville} Myers, S.~T., \&
822: Scoville, N.~Z.\ 1987, \apjl, 312, L39
823: %
824: \bibitem[Neugebauer et al.(1987)]{neugebauer} Neugebauer, G.,
825: Green, R.~F., Matthews, K., Schmidt, M., Soifer, B.~T., \& Bennett, J.\
826: 1987, \apjs, 63, 615
827: %
828: \bibitem[Packham et al.(1997)]{packham97} Packham, C., Young, S.,
829: Hough, J.~H., Axon, D.~J., \& Bailey, J.~A.\ 1997, \mnras, 288, 375
830: %
831: \bibitem[Pahre et al.(2004)]{pahre04} Pahre, M.~A., Ashby,
832: M.~L.~N., Fazio, G.~G., \& Willner, S.~P.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 229
833: %
834: \bibitem[Rieke \& Low(1972a)]{rieke1} Rieke, G.~H., \& Low,
835: F.~J.\ 1972a, \apjl, 176, L95
836: %
837: \bibitem[Rieke \& Low(1972b)]{rieke2} Rieke, G.~H., \& Low,
838: F.~J.\ 1972b, \apjl, 177, L115
839: %
840: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2004)]{mipsref} Rieke, G.~H., et al.\
841: 2004, \apjs, 154, 25
842: %
843: \bibitem[Roche et al.(1991)]{roche91} Roche, P.~F., Aitken,
844: D.~K., Smith, C.~H., \& Ward, M.~J.\ 1991, \mnras, 248, 606
845: %
846: \bibitem[Sanders et al.(2003)]{rbgs} Sanders, D.~B.,
847: Mazzarella, J.~M., Kim, D.-C., Surace, J.~A., \& Soifer, B.~T.\ 2003, \aj,
848: 126, 1607
849: %
850: \bibitem[Schinnerer et al.(2000)]{schinnerer} Schinnerer, E.,
851: Eckart, A., Tacconi, L.~J., Genzel, R., \& Downes, D.\ 2000, \apj, 533, 850
852: %
853: \bibitem[Siebenmorgen et al.(2004)]{siebenmorgen} Siebenmorgen, R.,
854: Kr{\"u}gel, E., \& Spoon, H.~W.~W.\ 2004, \aap, 414, 123
855: %
856: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2007)]{pahfit} Smith, J.~D.~T., et al.\
857: 2007, \apj, 656, 770
858: %
859: \bibitem[Spinoglio et al.(2005)]{spinoglio05} Spinoglio, L.,
860: Malkan, M.~A., Smith, H.~A., Gonz{\'a}lez-Alfonso, E., \& Fischer, J.\
861: 2005, \apj, 623, 123
862: %
863: \bibitem[Stern et al.(2005)]{stern05} Stern, D., et al.\ 2005,
864: \apj, 631, 163
865: %
866: \bibitem[Sturm et al.(2002)]{sturm02} Sturm, E., Lutz, D.,
867: Verma, A., Netzer, H., Sternberg, A., Moorwood, A.~F.~M., Oliva, E., \&
868: Genzel, R.\ 2002, \aap, 393, 821
869: %
870: \bibitem[Telesco \& Decher(1988)]{td88} Telesco, C.~M., \&
871: Decher, R.\ 1988, \apj, 334, 573
872: %
873: \bibitem[Unger et al.(1992)]{unger92} Unger, S.~W., Lewis,
874: J.~R., Pedlar, A., \& Axon, D.~J.\ 1992, \mnras, 258, 371
875: %
876: \bibitem[Usero et al.(2004)]{usero04} Usero, A.,
877: Garc{\'{\i}}a-Burillo, S., Fuente, A., Mart{\'{\i}}n-Pintado, J., \&
878: Rodr{\'{\i}}guez-Fern{\'a}ndez, N.~J.\ 2004, \aap, 419, 897
879: %
880: \bibitem[Veilleux \& Osterbrock(1987)]{osterbrock} Veilleux, S.,
881: \& Osterbrock, D.~E.\ 1987, \apjs, 63, 295
882: %
883: \bibitem[Veilleux et al.(2003)]{veilleux03} Veilleux, S.,
884: Shopbell, P.~L., Rupke, D.~S., Bland-Hawthorn, J., \& Cecil, G.\ 2003, \aj,
885: 126, 2185
886: %
887: \bibitem[Voit(1992a)]{voit92a} Voit, G.~M.\ 1992, \apj, 399, 495
888: %
889: \bibitem[Voit(1992b)]{voit92} Voit, G.~M.\ 1992, \mnras, 258, 841
890: %
891: \bibitem[Yuan \& Kuo(1998)]{yuankuo98} Yuan, C., \& Kuo, C.-L.\
892: 1998, \apj, 497, 689
893: %
894: \end{thebibliography}
895:
896: %\vfill\eject
897:
898: \clearpage
899:
900: \begin{deluxetable}{lllllllll}
901: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
902: \tablecolumns{9}
903: \tablewidth{0pt}
904: \tablecaption{Spitzer Flux Density Measurements}
905: \tablehead{
906: \multicolumn{1}{l}{} &
907: \multicolumn{4}{c}{IRAC} &
908: \multicolumn{1}{c}{} & %spacer to separate IRAC & MIPS
909: \multicolumn{2}{c}{MIPS} & \\
910: \cline{3-6} \cline{8-9}\\
911: \colhead{Feature} & \colhead{Aperture Radius} & \colhead{$3.6~\mu$m} & \colhead{$4.5~\mu$m} & \colhead{$5.8~\mu$m} & \colhead{$8~\mu$m} & & \colhead{$24~\mu$m} & \colhead{$70~\mu$m} \\
912: \colhead{} & \colhead{arcsec (kpc)} & \colhead{Jy} & \colhead{Jy} & \colhead{Jy} & \colhead{Jy} & & \colhead{Jy} & \colhead{Jy} \\
913: }
914: \startdata
915: NGC 1068: Total & $90^{\prime\prime}$ (6 kpc) & 3.8 & 5.1 & 13 & 23 & & 80 & 180 \\
916: NGC 1068: 1 kpc & $15^{\prime\prime}$ & 2.8 & 4.3 & \phantom{0}9.0 & 17 & & ... & ... \\
917: NGC 1068: NE PAH knot & $4^{\prime\prime}$ (0.26 kpc)$^{\rm a}$ & 0.011 & 0.006 & \phantom{0}0.05 & \phantom{0}0.11 & & ... & ... \\
918: NGC 1068: SW PAH knot & $5^{\prime\prime}$ (0.33 kpc)$^{\rm a}$ & 0.024 & 0.020 & \phantom{0}0.11 & \phantom{0}0.26 & & ... & ... \\
919: NGC 1068: Inner Spiral & $12^{\prime\prime}$--$18^{\prime\prime}$ (0.8--1.2 kpc) & 0.29 & 0.20 & \phantom{0}0.80 & \phantom{0}1.85 & & ... & ... \\
920: \\
921: \enddata
922: \tablenotetext{a}{Effective radius of custom aperture. Flux densities for
923: the PAH knots are relative to the local background elsewhere in the inner
924: spiral.}
925: \tablecomments{The approximate uncertainties are indicated by the number of
926: significant figures; specifically, 10\% at IRAC wavelengths, and 20\% at $70~\mu$m. See text for a discussion of the $24~\mu$m uncertainties.}
927: \end{deluxetable}
928:
929: \begin{deluxetable}{lllllllllll}
930: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
931: \tablecolumns{11}
932: \tablewidth{0pt}
933: \tablecaption{Emission Features (Low Resolution)}
934: \tablehead{
935: \colhead{Aperture} & \colhead {r (kpc)} & \colhead{PAH 6.2} & \colhead{[Ar~II] 6.98} & \colhead{PAH 7.7} & \colhead{PAH 8.6} & \colhead{${\rm H}_2$~9.66} & \colhead{[S~IV] 10.51} & \colhead{PAH 11.3} & \colhead{PAH 12.7} & \colhead{[Ne~II] 12.8} \\
936: \colhead{($\Delta {\rm RA}, \Delta {\rm DEC}$)} & & & & & & & & & & \\
937: }
938: \startdata
939: \multicolumn{11}{c}{Inner Spiral}\\
940: 1 & 0.95 & $328\pm6$ & $12\pm2$ & $1020\pm20$ & $175\pm3$ & $9.0\pm0.8$ & $5.1\pm0.6$ & $285\pm5$ & $170\pm2$ & $35.7\pm0.4$ \\
941: ($4.3^{\prime\prime}, 13.5^{\prime\prime}$) & & 2.04 & 0.042 & 3.91 & 0.65 & 0.066 & 0.032 & 1.08 & 0.60 & 0.19 \\
942: 2 & 0.88 & $250\pm4$ & $9\pm2$ & $780\pm10$ & $118\pm3$ & $7\pm1$ & $6.8\pm0.5$ & $228\pm2$ & $124\pm2$ & $22.0\pm0.4$ \\
943: ($0.4^{\prime\prime}, 13.2^{\prime\prime}$) & & 1.71 & 0.066 & 3.14 & 0.43 & 0.043 & 0.039 & 0.80 & 0.42 & 0.11 \\
944: 3 & 0.87 & $268\pm8$ & $8\pm3$ & $820\pm30$ & $130\pm10$ & $11\pm3$ & $5\pm2$ & $226\pm8$ & $94\pm8$ & $22.9\pm0.9$ \\
945: ($-5.4^{\prime\prime}, 11.9^{\prime\prime}$) & & 0.55 & 0.024 & 1.73 & 0.32 & 0.026 & 0.029 & 0.75 & 0.29 & 0.11 \\
946: 4 & 0.90 & $236\pm4$ & $9\pm2$ & $770\pm10$ & $127\pm4$ & $10\pm1$ & $3.9\pm0.6$ & $245\pm3$ & $112\pm2$ & $24.2\pm0.5$ \\
947: ($-10.1^{\prime\prime}, 9.0^{\prime\prime}$) & & 1.22 & 0.058 & 2.85 & 0.49 & 0.088 & 0.028 & 0.96 & 0.36 & 0.12 \\
948: 5 & 0.98 & $221\pm4$ & $6\pm3$ & $560\pm20$ & $153\pm4$ & $19\pm2$ & $5\pm1$ & $275\pm5$ & $100\pm2$ & $20.8\pm0.4$ \\
949: ($-14.0^{\prime\prime}, 4.5^{\prime\prime}$) & & 1.03 & 0.031 & 1.69 & 0.57 & 0.21 & 0.042 & 1.20 & 0.31 & 0.10 \\
950: 9 & 0.98 & $268\pm3$ & $13\pm2$ & $950\pm10$ & $143\pm3$ & $4.5\pm0.8$ & $7.7\pm0.6$ & $287\pm2$ & $134\pm2$ & $28.5\pm0.4$ \\
951: ($-2.5^{\prime\prime}, -14.4^{\prime\prime}$) & & 2.04 & 0.089 & 3.50 & 0.48 & 0.030 & 0.043 & 0.92 & 0.39 & 0.12 \\
952: 10 & 1.02 & $125\pm3$ & ... & $644\pm9$ & $82\pm2$ & ... & $4.2\pm0.3$ & $143\pm1$ & $55\pm1$ & $10.7\pm0.3$ \\
953: ($4.3^{\prime\prime}, -14.7^{\prime\prime}$) & & 0.93 & ... & 4.84 & 0.47 & ... & 0.021 & 0.42 & 0.13 & 0.038 \\
954: 11 & 1.02 & $148\pm3$ & $5\pm1$ & $570\pm10$ & $79\pm2$ & $2.9\pm0.6$ & $5.6\pm0.4$ & $199\pm1$ & $127\pm1$ & $13.4\pm0.3$ \\
955: ($14.8^{\prime\prime}, -3.8^{\prime\prime}$) & & 0.67 & 0.032 & 2.18 & 0.30 & 0.021 & 0.035 & 0.78 & 0.48 & 0.075 \\
956: \hline
957: \multicolumn{11}{c}{Inside the Inner Spiral}\\
958: 6 & 0.68 & $133\pm3$ & $6\pm2$ & $630\pm20$ & $105\pm3$ & $2.0\pm0.5$ & $4.2\pm0.4$ & $155\pm2$ & $86\pm2$ & $15.0\pm0.4$ \\
959: ($-10.1^{\prime\prime}, -1.8^{\prime\prime}$) & & 0.24 & 0.018 & 1.29 & 0.25 & 0.008 & 0.019 & 0.50 & 0.30 & 0.079 \\
960: 7 & 0.65 & $179\pm6$ & $4\pm2$ & $830\pm20$ & $133\pm4$ & $8.1\pm0.8$ & $12.0\pm0.5$ & $244\pm3$ & $100\pm3$ & $23.7\pm0.4$ \\
961: ($-7.2^{\prime\prime}, -6.5^{\prime\prime}$) & & 0.22 & 0.008 & 1.12 & 0.22 & 0.030 & 0.039 & 0.46 & 0.15 & 0.053 \\
962: 8 & 0.74 & $126\pm4$ & $1.7\pm0.9$ & $660\pm20$ & $137\pm3$ & $4.1\pm0.5$ & $7.2\pm0.4$ & $223\pm2$ & $117\pm2$ & $19.1\pm0.3$ \\
963: ($-5.4^{\prime\prime}, -9.7^{\prime\prime}$) & & 0.20 & 0.004 & 1.20 & 0.29 & 0.016 & 0.029 & 0.60 & 0.29 & 0.069 \\
964: 13 & 0.68 & $157\pm4$ & $5\pm1$ & $670\pm20$ & $120\pm3$ & $4.3\pm0.4$ & $7.2\pm0.4$ & $171\pm2$ & $101\pm2$ & $17.1\pm0.3$ \\
965: ($2.2^{\prime\prime}, 10.0^{\prime\prime}$) & & 0.37 & 0.017 & 1.56 & 0.30 & 0.018 & 0.031 & 0.48 & 0.26 & 0.064 \\
966: 14 & 0.66 & $146\pm5$ & $5\pm2$ & $640\pm20$ & $103\pm3$ & $2.8\pm0.4$ & $6.3\pm0.4$ & $150\pm2$ & $91\pm3$ & $15.5\pm0.4$ \\
967: ($-2.2^{\prime\prime}, 9.7^{\prime\prime}$) & & 0.32 & 0.019 & 1.56 & 0.26 & 0.011 & 0.024 & 0.39 & 0.25 & 0.063 \\
968: 15 & 0.64 & $141\pm5$ & $5\pm2$ & $620\pm20$ & $104\pm4$ & $3.3\pm0.5$ & $5.4\pm0.4$ & $125\pm2$ & $71\pm3$ & $16\pm6$ \\
969: ($-6.8^{\prime\prime}, 6.8^{\prime\prime}$) & & 0.30 & 0.016 & 1.47 & 0.26 & 0.012 & 0.021 & 0.33 & 0.19 & 0.066 \\
970: 17 & 0.78 & $95\pm3$ & $1.8\pm0.7$ & $480\pm10$ & $83\pm2$ & $1.6\pm0.4$ & $4.2\pm0.3$ & $116\pm1$ & $54\pm2$ & $10.6\pm0.3$ \\
971: ($11.5^{\prime\prime}, -1.6^{\prime\prime}$) & & 0.23 & 0.006 & 1.19 & 0.22 & 0.007 & 0.019 & 0.39 & 0.19 & 0.056 \\
972: \hline
973: \multicolumn{11}{c}{Apertures Nearest the Nucleus}\\
974: 16 & 0.54 & $99\pm5$ & $2\pm1$ & $630\pm20$ & $41\pm4$ & $7.4\pm0.3$ & $28.6\pm0.7$ & $187\pm2$ & $48\pm3$ & $18.7\pm0.7$ \\
975: ($-2.2^{\prime\prime}, -7.8^{\prime\prime}$) & & 0.11 & 0.003 & 0.64 & 0.04 & 0.010 & 0.031 & 0.11 & 0.02 & 0.012 \\
976: 18 & 0.48 & $165\pm4$ & $12\pm1$ & $690\pm10$ & $52\pm3$ & $2.5\pm0.6$ & $32.5\pm0.4$ & $296\pm2$ & $306\pm3$ & $34.0\pm0.8$ \\
977: ($6.1^{\prime\prime}, 3.7^{\prime\prime}$) & & 0.24 & 0.024 & 0.84 & 0.05 & 0.003 & 0.030 & 0.16 & 0.14 & 0.023 \\
978: 19 & 0.54 & $119\pm4$ & $6\pm2$ & $600\pm20$ & $88\pm4$ & $2.7\pm0.5$ & $5.3\pm0.5$ & $133\pm2$ & $92\pm2$ & $11.8\pm0.6$ \\
979: ($-7.9^{\prime\prime}, 1.7^{\prime\prime}$) & & 0.18 & 0.015 & 0.98 & 0.18 & 0.011 & 0.022 & 0.34 & 0.19 & 0.035 \\
980: \hline
981: \multicolumn{11}{c}{Outside the Inner Spiral}\\
982: 12 & 1.37 & $35\pm2$ & ... & $173\pm7$ & $26\pm2$ & $0.7\pm0.3$ & ... & $45.8\pm0.8$ & $16\pm1$ & $2.3\pm0.2$ \\
983: ($17.3^{\prime\prime}, -11.1^{\prime\prime}$) & & 0.90 & ... & 2.22 & 0.26 & 0.010 & ... & 0.42 & 0.15 & 0.031 \\
984: \enddata
985: \tablecomments{Fluxes are in units of $10^{-21}~{\rm W~cm^{-2}}$, with
986: the equivalent width in microns below.}
987: \end{deluxetable}
988:
989: \begin{deluxetable}{llc}
990: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
991: \tablecolumns{3}
992: \tablewidth{0pt}
993: \tablecaption{Nuclear Emission Features (High Resolution)}
994: \tablehead{
995: \colhead{Line} & \colhead {Flux} & \colhead{Equivalent width} \\
996: \colhead{} & \colhead{$10^{-21}~{\rm W~cm}^{-2}$} & \colhead{$\mu$m} \\
997: }
998: \startdata
999: [S~IV] 10.51 & $\phantom{0}460\pm60$ & 0.006 \\
1000: ${\rm [Ne~II]}~12.81$ & $\phantom{0}520\pm60$ & 0.008 \\
1001: ${\rm [Ne~V]}~14.3$ & $1110\pm60$ & 0.017 \\
1002: ${\rm [Ne~III]}~15.55$ & $2100\pm200$ & 0.024 \\
1003: ${\rm [S~III]}~18.71$ & $\phantom{0}220\pm20$ & 0.004 \\
1004: ${\rm [Ne~V]}~24.31$ & $\phantom{0}800\pm100$ & 0.023 \\
1005: ${\rm [O~IV]}~25.89$ & $2200\pm200$ & 0.077 \\
1006: ${\rm [S~III]}~33.48$ & $\phantom{0}420\pm60$ & 0.025 \\
1007: ${\rm [Si~II]}~34.81$ & $\phantom{0}620\pm20$ & 0.034 \\
1008: ${\rm [Ne~III]}~36.0$ & $\phantom{0}130\pm20$ & 0.006 \\
1009: \enddata
1010: \end{deluxetable}
1011:
1012: \clearpage
1013:
1014: \begin{figure}
1015: \vbox{
1016: \begin{center}
1017: \mbox{\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f1a.eps}\quad
1018: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f1b.eps}}
1019: \figcaption{\small
1020: Diagram of NGC~1068 ionization cone. Left panel: view in the plane
1021: of the disk, from \citet{bruhweiler01}. Right panel: R0 continuum
1022: image with ionization cones illustrated (adapted from \citet{veilleux03}).
1023: Large tick marks are at $1^{\prime}$ intervals.
1024: \label{cartoon}
1025: }
1026: \end{center}}
1027: \end{figure}
1028:
1029: \begin{figure}
1030: \vbox{
1031: \begin{center}
1032: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=\textwidth]{f2.eps}
1033: \figcaption{\small
1034: The $8~\mu$m image of NGC~1068 (grayscale), with contours of the PSF-subtracted
1035: $24~\mu$m image. The brightest contour levels are shown in light gray for
1036: clarity. The saturated data in the nucleus have been excluded from
1037: both images. Residual banding is visible on the $8~\mu$m image as the streak
1038: running SE-NW. The ring of spots is also an artifact of the $8~\mu$m PSF.
1039: The $24~\mu$m data show many of the features seen at $8~\mu$m, including the
1040: two knots on the inner spiral, the NE tip of the southern arm of the
1041: inner spiral 1.5~kpc ($23^{\prime\prime}$) ENE of the nucleus, and the
1042: peak 3~kpc ($45^{\prime\prime}$) SW of the nucleus.
1043: \label{n1068i4m1}
1044: }
1045: \end{center}}
1046: \end{figure}
1047:
1048: \begin{figure}
1049: \vbox{
1050: \begin{center}
1051: \includegraphics[width=2.5in]{f3a.ps}\\
1052: \includegraphics[width=4in]{f3b.ps}
1053: \figcaption{\small
1054: Extraction apertures for the Short-Low IRS spectra are overlaid on the
1055: $5.8~\mu$m IRAC mosaic (top, green numbered boxes). Also shown are the
1056: area covered by the Short-Low map (blue box) and the position of the
1057: Short-High slit (yellow box). Banding and PSF artifacts are as described
1058: in Fig.~\ref{n1068i4m1}. North is up and east is to the left.
1059: The map of the $6.2~\mu$m PAH feature is shown in the bottom panel.
1060: The center of the galaxy has been masked out.
1061: \label{regions}
1062: }
1063: \end{center}}
1064: \end{figure}
1065:
1066: \begin{figure}
1067: \vbox{
1068: \begin{center}
1069: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{f4.eps}
1070: \figcaption{\small
1071: IRAC colors of the RBGS LIRGs and ULIRGs from \citet{mazz1}. NGC~1068
1072: is marked (1~kpc radius and total apertures; red and black points
1073: respectively), as are the colors of the two bright knots on the inner spiral
1074: and the colors of the galaxy disk ($r>1$~kpc) and the inner spiral.
1075: Small red points indicate the central 1~kpc radius aperture measurements
1076: of the rest of the GOALS sample,
1077: while black points are total magnitudes. Unit vectors indicating the
1078: change in color from the central aperture to the total aperture are shown;
1079: note that there is not a one to one correspondence between central and
1080: total aperture measurements due to a combination of resolution and
1081: multiple interacting galaxies, respectively. The median change in
1082: color from the central 1~kpc aperture to the total aperture is shown
1083: by the arrow in the upper right. Colors
1084: are expressed in the Vega magnitude system, so by definition a pure
1085: starlight SED would appear near zero in both color axes.
1086: %The dashed line in the left panel marks the region defined by \citet{stern05}
1087: %to separate AGN from other galaxies and foreground stars.
1088: Also shown are the colors of a pure AGN power-law spectrum (open squares,
1089: from lower left to upper right: $\alpha = 0.84$, \citet{clavel};
1090: $\alpha = 1.4$, \citet{neugebauer}), and hot dust (blue points for
1091: 1000~K and 900~K).
1092: \label{cc}
1093: }
1094: \end{center}}
1095: \end{figure}
1096:
1097: \begin{figure}
1098: \vbox{
1099: \begin{center}
1100: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{f5.eps}
1101: \figcaption{\small
1102: IRS Short-Low spectra of NGC~1068. The top panel shows the average of
1103: eight apertures on the inner spiral, the middle panel shows the average
1104: of the three apertures nearest the nucleus, and the bottom panel shows
1105: aperture~12, outside the inner spiral.
1106: \label{pahspec}
1107: }
1108: \end{center}}
1109: \end{figure}
1110:
1111: \begin{figure}
1112: \vbox{
1113: \begin{center}
1114: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{f6.eps}
1115: \figcaption{\small
1116: Low resolution spectra of the inner spiral within the ionization cones
1117: (aperture~1, blue; aperture~9, red) are compared with the average spectrum
1118: of the inner spiral outside the ionization cones (black). The three
1119: spectra have been normalized to a common flux density at $13~\mu$m. No
1120: difference is found between the continuum flux density within the ionization
1121: cones compared to outside the ionization cones.
1122: \label{ringspec}
1123: }
1124: \end{center}}
1125: \end{figure}
1126:
1127: \begin{figure}
1128: \vbox{
1129: \begin{center}
1130: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{f7.eps}
1131: \figcaption{\small
1132: Relative strengths of three PAH emission features. Apertures along the
1133: inner spiral are shown as open circles. Apertures inside
1134: the inner spiral are shown as solid circles
1135: The aperture exterior to the inner spiral is shown as an open triangle.
1136: Outliers have been labeled by aperture number.
1137: Uncertainties are $\sim0.01$ in each PAH flux ratio, and are not shown.
1138: The lines are adapted from \citet{draineli01}. The solid line
1139: corresponds to the CNM model, the dashed line corresponds to the WIM
1140: model, and the dotted line corresponds to the PDR model. For all three
1141: models, PAH molecule size increases to the left. The red dotted line
1142: shows part of the boundary of the region above which a simple ISM model
1143: can reproduce observed PAH features. Data below this line require greater
1144: ionization.
1145: \label{draine}
1146: }
1147: \end{center}}
1148: \end{figure}
1149:
1150: \begin{figure}
1151: \vbox{
1152: \begin{center}
1153: \mbox{\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f8a.ps}\quad
1154: \includegraphics[width=3.1in]{f8b.ps}}
1155: \figcaption{\small
1156: Left: Contours of an estimate of the nonstellar emission overlaid on $4.5~\mu$m
1157: grayscale image of NGC~1068. As expected, the AGN dominates the nonstellar
1158: emission, but the PAH emission regions outside the inner spiral (SW and ENE
1159: of the nucleus; marked) are also visible. The method used
1160: to estimate the nonstellar component of the $4.5~\mu$m flux density is
1161: described in \S~2; $\alpha=1$ was used as the power law slope.
1162: Right: The $4.5\mu$m nonstellar emission from the point-like nucleus has
1163: been removed by PSF subtraction. The circle marks the location
1164: of the inner spiral 1~kpc ($15^{\prime\prime}$) from the nucleus. This
1165: image shows that there is
1166: very little detectable emission from hot dust outside of the nucleus.
1167: \label{n1068ns}
1168: }
1169: \end{center}}
1170: \end{figure}
1171:
1172: \begin{figure}
1173: \vbox{
1174: \begin{center}
1175: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{f9.ps}
1176: \figcaption{\small
1177: The $8~\mu$m image of the center of NGC~1068, with 1.49~GHz radio continuum
1178: contours from \citet{condon90} (red) and $^{12}{\rm CO}$~(1-0) contours
1179: from \citet{schinnerer} (white) overlaid. Note that the peaks of $8~\mu$m
1180: emission lie at the locations where the radio jet axis intersects
1181: the inner spiral.
1182: \label{n1068radioco}
1183: }
1184: \end{center}}
1185: \end{figure}
1186:
1187: \begin{figure}
1188: \vbox{
1189: \begin{center}
1190: \mbox{\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f10a.ps}\quad
1191: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f10b.ps}}
1192: \figcaption{\small
1193: Left: H$\alpha$ image of NGC~1068 from \citet{veilleux03} overlaid with
1194: $8~\mu$m contours. Right: [O~{\sc iii}]/H$\beta$ image of NGC~1068 from
1195: \citet{veilleux03} overlaid with $8~\mu$m contours. The orientation of
1196: the ionization cones is shown, and the PAH knots on the inner spiral
1197: are labeled. The [O~{\sc iii}]/H$\beta$ ratio is
1198: low throughout the inner spiral (the light gray regions on the inner spiral
1199: have ratios $\sim1$). Elsewhere in the ionization cone,
1200: particularly to the NE, the [O~{\sc iii}]/H$\beta$ ratio is several times
1201: as large (the dark gray regions have ratios $\sim7$), indicating that
1202: the AGN is the ionizing source.
1203: \label{n1068line}
1204: }
1205: \end{center}}
1206: \end{figure}
1207:
1208: \begin{figure}
1209: \vbox{
1210: \begin{center}
1211: \mbox{\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f11a.ps}\quad
1212: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f11b.ps}}
1213: \figcaption{\small
1214: Left: Diagram showing the optically thick (top) and optically thin (bottom)
1215: scenarios described in the text. The diagram is not to scale. Blue lines
1216: represent UV photons from the AGN or massive stars; red lines represent
1217: PAH emission.
1218: Right: The GALEX FUV (1516\AA; grayscale) data from \citet{galex} is
1219: compared with Spitzer $8\mu$m (blue) and PSF-subtracted $24\mu$m (red)
1220: data. The regions of the inner spiral showing strong PAH and warm dust
1221: emission are also bright in the UV, indicating that these star forming
1222: regions are not optically thick to UV photons. The slight offset
1223: ($\sim3^{\prime\prime}$ NNE) between the GALEX and MIPS emission is real;
1224: the validity of the GALEX WCS solution was confirmed by plotting the
1225: positions of USNO catalog stars on the GALEX image.
1226: \label{galexfig}
1227: }
1228: \end{center}}
1229: \end{figure}
1230:
1231: \end{document}
1232: