1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \documentclass[twocolumn]{emulateapj}
3: %\usepackage{psfig}
4: %\usepackage{amsmath}
5: % v1 DRL 26 Oct 2006 Early notes and rambling
6: % v2 DRL 13 Feb 2007 Approaching a first draft
7: % v3 DRL 23 Feb 2007 Another section re-arrangement, further text
8: % v4 DRL 08 Mar 2007 Rearranged, included DKE stuff, full text
9: % v5 DRL 13 Mar 2007 Revised with CCS comments, fleshed out further
10: % v6 DRL 13 Apr 2007 Major revision of discussion sections, consistency rewrite
11: % v7 DRL 26 Apr 2007 Minor tweaks from CCS comments, CCS text for UV spectra
12: % v8 DRL 16 May 2007 Tweaks from CCS/DKE comments (FINAL SUBMITTED VERSION)
13:
14: \def\plotfiddle#1#2#3#4#5#6#7{\centering \leavevmode
15: \vbox to#2{\rule{0pt}{#2}}
16: \special{psfile=#1 voffset=#7 hoffset=#6 vscale=#5 hscale=#4 angle=#3}}
17: \def\alwaysmath#1{\ifmmode{#1}\else{$#1$}\fi}
18: % \received{}
19: % \accepted{}
20: % \journalid{}
21: % \articleid{}{}
22:
23: \lefthead{Law et al. 2007}
24: \righthead{SPECTROSCOPY OF HIGH REDSHIFT GALAXIES}
25:
26: %\slugcomment{DRAFT: \today}
27:
28: \begin{document}
29:
30: \newcommand{\msun}{\ensuremath{\rm M_\odot}}
31: \newcommand{\msunyr}{\ensuremath{\rm M_{\odot}\;{\rm yr}^{-1}}}
32: \newcommand{\Ha}{\ensuremath{\rm H\alpha}}
33: \newcommand{\Hb}{\ensuremath{\rm H\beta}}
34: \newcommand{\lya}{\ensuremath{\rm Ly\alpha}}
35: \newcommand{\Ntwo}{[\ion{N}{2}]}
36: \newcommand{\kms}{km~s\ensuremath{^{-1}\,}}
37: \newcommand{\ztwo}{\ensuremath{z\sim2}}
38: \newcommand{\zthree}{\ensuremath{z\sim3}}
39:
40: \title{INTEGRAL FIELD SPECTROSCOPY OF HIGH-REDSHIFT STAR FORMING GALAXIES WITH LASER GUIDED ADAPTIVE OPTICS: EVIDENCE
41: FOR DISPERSION-DOMINATED KINEMATICS\altaffilmark{1}}
42: \author{\sc David R. Law\altaffilmark{2}, Charles C. Steidel\altaffilmark{2}, Dawn K. Erb\altaffilmark{3}, James E. Larkin\altaffilmark{4},
43: Max Pettini\altaffilmark{5}, Alice E. Shapley\altaffilmark{6}, and Shelley A. Wright\altaffilmark{4}}
44:
45: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on data obtained at the W. M. Keck Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership among the California Institute of Technology, the University of California, and NASA, and was made possible by the generous financial support of the W. M. Keck Foundation.}
46: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, MS 105-24,
47: Pasadena, CA 91125 (drlaw, ccs@astro.caltech.edu)}
48: \altaffiltext{3}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, MS 20, 60 Garden St, Cambridge, MA 02138 (derb@cfa.harvard.edu)}
49: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095;
50: larkin,saw@astro.ucla.edu}
51: \altaffiltext{5}{Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK (pettini@ast.cam.ac.uk)}
52: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Peyton Hall, Ivy Lane, Princeton, NJ 08544 (aes@astro.princeton.edu)}
53:
54: \begin{abstract}
55:
56: We present early results from an ongoing study of the kinematic structure of star-forming galaxies at
57: redshift $z \sim 2 - 3$ using integral-field spectroscopy of rest-frame optical nebular emission lines
58: in combination with Keck laser guide star adaptive optics (LGSAO).
59: We show kinematic maps of 3 target galaxies Q1623-BX453, Q0449-BX93, and DSF2237a-C2 located at redshifts $z = 2.1820$, 2.0067, and 3.3172
60: respectively, each of which
61: is well-resolved with a PSF measuring approximately 0.11 - 0.15 arcsec ($\sim 900$ - 1200 pc at $z \sim 2-3$) after cosmetic smoothing.
62: Neither galaxy at $z \sim 2$ exhibits substantial kinematic structure
63: on scales $\gtrsim 30$ km s$^{-1}$; both are instead consistent with largely dispersion-dominated velocity fields
64: with $\sigma \sim 80$ km s$^{-1}$ along any given line of sight into the galaxy.
65: While the primary emission component of Q0449-BX93 shows no spatially-resolved kinematic structure, a faint, kinematically distinct emission
66: region is superposed on the primary region at a relative velocity of $\sim 180$ km s$^{-1}$, suggesting the possible presence of a merging
67: satellite galaxy.
68: In contrast, DSF2237a-C2 presents a well-resolved
69: gradient in velocity over a distance of $\sim$ 4 kpc with peak-to-peak amplitude of 140 km s$^{-1}$.
70: This velocity shear was previously
71: undetected in seeing-limited long-slit observations despite serendipitous alignment of the slit with the kinematic major axis,
72: highlighting the importance of LGSAO for understanding velocity structure on subarcsecond scales.
73: It is unlikely that DSF2237a-C2 represents a dynamically cold rotating disk of ionized gas as the local velocity dispersion
74: of the galaxy ($\sigma = 79$ km s$^{-1}$) is
75: comparable to the observed shear.
76: Using extant multi-wavelength spectroscopy and photometry we relate these kinematic data to physical properties such as stellar mass, gas fraction,
77: star formation rate, and outflow kinematics and consider the applicability of current galaxy formation models.
78: While some gas cooling models reproduce the observed kinematics better than a simple rotating disk model, even these provide a poor
79: overall description of the target galaxies, suggesting that our current understanding of gas cooling mechanisms in galaxies in the early universe
80: is (at best) incomplete.
81:
82: \end{abstract}
83:
84: \keywords{galaxies: high-redshift -- galaxies: kinematics and dynamics -- galaxies: starburst}
85:
86: \section{INTRODUCTION}
87:
88: At high redshifts $z \sim 2-3$ galaxies undergo strong and rapid evolution from highly irregular clumps of star-formation
89: into the familiar Hubble sequence of the local universe
90: (Giavalisco et al. 1996, Papovich et al. 2005), during which time they are thought to accumulate the majority of their stellar mass
91: (Dickinson et al. 2003).
92: The evolution of structure and ordered motion in galaxies at such redshifts is therefore of considerable interest
93: in the attempt to understand the process of galaxy formation.
94: As such, numerous authors (e.g. Steidel et al. 2004, Papovich et al. 2006, Reddy et al. 2006a, Erb et al. 2006b,
95: and references therein)
96: have used deep UV-IR photometry and spectroscopy to ascertain such global
97: properties as stellar mass, population age, AGN fraction, star formation rate,
98: and the strength of large-scale gaseous outflows expelled by rapid starbursts.
99:
100: These studies have greatly increased our understanding of the physical nature of these galaxies, indicating
101: (for instance) that the $z \sim 2$ universe contains galaxies in a wide variety of evolutionary states from young and actively
102: star-forming to massive and passively evolving (Glazebrook et al. 2004, Daddi et al. 2005, Papovich et al. 2006, Reddy et al. 2006a, and references therein)
103: and suggesting (based on clustering properties)
104: that typical star-forming galaxies at $z \sim 2$ may evolve into the elliptical galaxy population of the local
105: universe (Adelberger et al. 2005a).
106: However, in general it is unknown
107: whether the majority of star formation in these galaxies occurs in flattened disk-like systems
108: (as anticipated by cosmological models, e.g. Mo, Mau, \& White 1998)
109: or disordered non-equilibrium configurations, and whether this star formation is due primarily to large-scale gravitational
110: instabilities, tidal shocks induced by major mergers, or some other as-yet undetermined physical
111: mechanism. Similarly, it is unknown
112: whether individual regions of star formation within a given galaxy follow a global abundance pattern or exhibit
113: strong variations in chemical enrichment.
114:
115: These questions are most readily investigated by means of
116: optical nebular emission lines (redshifted into the near-IR at $z \gtrsim 1$)
117: such as H$\alpha$, H$\beta$, [O\,{\sc iii}] $\lambda$5007, and [N\,{\sc ii}] $\lambda$6584 which
118: predominantly trace ionized gas in active star forming regions and can provide a kinematic probe of the gravitational
119: potential.
120: Such studies using slit spectroscopy (e.g. Erb et al. 2003,2004,2006a; Weiner et al. 2006)
121: have met with moderate success, enabling the determination of dynamical masses for a large sample of galaxies at $z \gtrsim 1$,
122: but are complicated by uncertainties resulting from slit placement, possible misalignment with the kinematic major
123: axis, and the small angular size of the galaxies (typically less than an arcsecond;
124: see Fig. 2 of Law et al. 2007) relative to the size of the seeing disk.
125: The twin complications of slit placement and alignment have recently been overcome using seeing-limited integral-field unit (IFU) spectroscopy to obtain
126: two-dimensional maps of the ionized gas kinematics within these galaxies.
127: A sample of the largest and brightest galaxies in the rest-frame UV-selected sample has recently been observed by F{\"o}rster Schreiber et al. (2006),
128: who find (in 9 out of 14 cases) smoothly varying velocity shear
129: generally consistent with rotation in a flattened disk-like configuration.
130: However, it is unknown whether atmospheric seeing (typically $\sim$ half the size of the galaxy) masks more complex structure,
131: and to what extent the prevalence of velocity shear in these sources is a product of the selection criteria of the study, which
132: (for observational reasons) preferentially select bright, extended sources many of which exhibited large velocity shear
133: or dispersion in previous long-slit studies (Erb et al. 2003, 2006a).
134:
135: With the aid of laser guide star adaptive
136: optics (LGSAO) technology it is now possible to study high-redshift galaxies on sub-kiloparsec scales, permitting fruitful observation of galaxies
137: either unresolved or barely resolved in previous ground-based observations.
138: Wright et al. (2007) have demonstrated the utility of LGSAO in combination with integral-field spectroscopy for a galaxy at redshift $z \sim 1.5$;
139: in this contribution we present early results from an ongoing study of galaxies in the redshift range $z \sim 2 - 3$.
140: In \S 2 we describe our observational program and basic data reduction techniques. In \S 3 and 4 we describe the morphological properties, globally-integrated
141: spectra, and line ratio diagnostics of these galaxies as derived from the integral-field data. In \S 5 we use extant broadband photometry and UV spectroscopy
142: of the target galaxies to model the stellar populations and baryonic masses of the galaxies. We present
143: spatially resolved maps of the ionized gas kinematics in \S 6, discussing the velocity field of each of our targets
144: in the context of theoretical models and the physical properties given in \S 3-5.
145: Finally, in \S 7 we compare our results to those of F{\"o}rster Schreiber et al. (2006) and other groups and discuss what general conclusions can
146: be drawn about galaxy formation in the early universe.
147:
148: We assume a standard $\Lambda$CDM cosmology in which $H_0 = 71$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.27$,
149: and $\Omega_{\rm \Lambda} = 0.73$.
150:
151: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
152:
153: \section{OBSERVING AND DATA REDUCTION}
154:
155: \subsection{Sample Selection and Observational Strategy}
156:
157: Observations were performed using the OSIRIS (OH Suppressing InfraRed Imaging Spectrograph; Larkin et al. 2006)
158: integral-field spectrograph in conjunction with the Keck II
159: LGSAO system (Wizinowich et al. 2006, van Dam et al. 2006). As described
160: in detail by Larkin et al. (2006), OSIRIS is a lenslet-type spectrograph with a 2048 x 2048 Hawaii II detector array,
161: spectral resolution $R \sim 3600$, and a complement of reimaging optics which permit sampling of the field
162: with spectral pixels (spaxels) ranging in angular size from 20 --- 100 milliarcseconds (mas).
163:
164: We select star forming galaxies at redshifts $z \sim 2 - 3$ (for which H$\alpha$ and [O\,{\sc iii}] $\lambda$5007, hereafter simply [O\,{\sc iii}],
165: respectively fall into the observed-frame $K$-band) from the spectroscopic redshift
166: catalog of Steidel et al. (2003, 2004).
167: Based on the IFU simulations of Law et al. (2006) which explore the flux requirements necessary
168: for reasonable detection within a few hours of integration using OSIRIS,
169: we focus on those galaxies which are known to have either nebular line fluxes greater than $\sim$ 10$^{-16}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$
170: based on previous long-slit observations (Erb et al. 2003, 2006a) or
171: high star formation rates (SFR) as estimated from rest-frame UV photometry (for one galaxy [Q0449-BX93] not targeted with long-slit spectroscopy).
172: Physical constraints also dictate that we preferentially select galaxies which are within 60 arcseconds of a suitably bright ($R \lesssim 17$ mag) tip-tilt reference
173: star (as required by the LGSAO system), and which lie at spectroscopic redshifts such that
174: nebular emission lines fall between the strong spectroscopically unresolved night-sky OH emission features which dominate the near-IR background.
175:
176: At $K$-band wavelengths between the OH-emission features, thermal radiation from warm optical components in the light path
177: is the dominant contributor to the total background flux (see Law et al. 2006).
178: Since successful observation of our target galaxies requires performance at the limit of OSIRIS' capability,
179: we use the second-largest spaxel scale\footnote{Note that 50 mas is approximately the Keck diffraction
180: limit at $\lambda = 2\micron$.} of 50 mas lenslet$^{-1}$, for which the balance between thermal background and detector noise
181: is optimal for detection of extremely faint objects.
182: Using narrow-band order sorting filters ($\Delta\lambda \sim$ 100 nm),
183: the OSIRIS field of view in this configuration is approximately 2 $\times$ 3 arcseconds.
184:
185: Observations were performed on UT 2006 June 5 and 2006 October 4-5; the June data were obtained under exceptional
186: photometric conditions with visual-band seeing estimates varying between 0.4 and 0.6'' while the October data were obtained in moderate
187: conditions with seeing varying between 0.7 and 1.0'' over the duration of the observations.
188: In Table \ref{targets.table} we list the three targets discussed herein as part of our pilot program.
189: Each target was observed with the aid of the Keck LGSAO system, typically using a magnitude $R \sim 15-16$ tip-tilt (TT) reference star with
190: an angular separation from the science target of less than an arcminute for a correction strehl of greater than
191: 30\% at $\lambda = 2 \micron$ and an approximately circular PSF with FWHM $\sim 75$/125 mas for the June/October data respectively.
192: \footnote{The 75 mas measurement is strictly an upper limit since this PSF is undersampled using 50 mas spaxels. Since science observations are
193: performed with the TT star off-axis the PSF of the science observations will not perfectly match that of the TT star; however, this generally
194: does not greatly increase the effective PSF (see Liu et al. 2006).}
195:
196:
197: A typical observing sequence was established as follows. First, we obtained short ($\sim$ 1 minute)
198: observations of the TT reference star for a given science
199: target to refine the pointing model, provide an estimate of the PSF, and serve as an approximate check for later flux
200: calibration. The telescope was then
201: blind-offset to the science target using relative offsets calculated from deep ground based optical imaging
202: of the target fields.
203: The position angle of OSIRIS for these observations was chosen to ensure that the tip-tilt reference star fell within the unvignetted field
204: of view of the LGSAO system.
205: Each target was observed in sets of two 15
206: minute\footnote{Due to the read noise characteristics of OSIRIS, long individual exposures
207: are desirable in order to optimize the S/N ratio of the observations.}
208: integrations with the target galaxy alternately
209: placed 0.7 arcseconds above and below the center of the IFU (positions A and B). Small dithers
210: were introduced around these positions on each successive set of exposures.
211: This 30 minute exposure sequence was repeated for $\sim$ 2-4 hours as necessary to achieve a high-quality detection;
212: typically it was possible to verify detection of target galaxies in the difference of two 15 minute exposures.
213:
214: \begin{deluxetable*}{lcccccccc}
215: \tablecolumns{9}
216: \tablewidth{0pc}
217: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
218: \tablecaption{General Information}
219: \tablehead{
220: \colhead{Name} & \colhead{RA (J2000)} & \colhead{DEC (J2000)} & \colhead{Observed} & \colhead{Time\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{$R_{\rm TT}$\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{$\theta_{\rm TT}$}\tablenotemark{c} & \colhead{$\theta_{\rm seeing}$}\tablenotemark{d} & \colhead{$\theta_{\rm PSF}$}\tablenotemark{e}}
221: \startdata
222: Q1623-BX453 & 16:25:50.854 & +26:49:31.28 & Jun '06 & 2.5 & 15.1 & 32 & 0.4 & 75/110\\
223: Q0449-BX93 & 04:52:15.417 & -16:40:56.88 & Oct '06 & 4.5 & 15.8 & 51 & 0.6 & 125/150\\
224: DSF2237a-C2 & 22:40:08.298 & +11:49:04.89 & Jun '06 & 1.5 & 16.0 & 24 & 0.4 & 75/110\\
225: \enddata
226: \tablenotetext{a}{Total observing time in hours.}
227: \tablenotetext{b}{$R$-band magnitude of TT star for LGSAO correction.}
228: \tablenotetext{c}{Angular separation (arcseconds) of TT star from target.}
229: \tablenotetext{d}{Average $K$-band seeing (arcseconds) during observation.}
230: \tablenotetext{e}{FWHM of the $K$-band PSF (mas) during on-axis TT star observation (before/after spatial smoothing respectively).}
231: \label{targets.table}
232: \end{deluxetable*}
233:
234: \subsection{Reducing IFU Data}
235:
236: Data reduction was performed using a multi-step process consisting of both Keck/OSIRIS data reduction pipeline (DRP) routines
237: and custom IDL scripts tailored for use with faint emission line spectra.
238: Since OSIRIS is a relatively new scientific instrument and standard data reduction methods have yet to
239: be generally accepted, we present our current data reduction method in detail.
240:
241: We divide the exposures into two sets taken at positions A and B, and use DRP routines to median combine each set to produce
242: a sky frame.
243: These sky frames are then subtracted from each of the respective object frames (i.e. the sky produced by stacking
244: observations at position B is subtracted from the observations at position A and vice versa).
245: After sky subtraction, individual exposures are
246: extracted from the raw two-dimensional format into three-dimensional data cubes.
247: This DRP extraction algorithm is complicated and non-intuitive since spectra from individual spaxels physically overlap
248: on the detector; we refer the reader to the OSIRIS user manual for further information.
249: Due to the highly time-variable nature of the IR background the residual flux pedestal in these sky-subtracted data cubes
250: is often unsatisfactorily high and we
251: therefore perform a second-pass background subtraction on each of these cubes as follows.
252: Using custom IDL routines we calculate the median pixel value in each spectral channel
253: and subtract this value from all pixels within the channel to ensure a zero-flux median in all spectral slices throughout the data cube.
254: This effectively removes flux pedestals resulting from variable sky brightness, although
255: small variations in the background persist across the spatial dimensions of each cube.
256: As OSIRIS data reduction algorithms are progressively refined it may prove possible to further suppress background fluctuations,
257: achieving effectively deeper integrations.
258:
259: These sky-subtracted data cubes are spatially registered using the telescope steering system (TSS) offset coordinates contained within
260: the image headers
261: and combined using a 3$\sigma$ clipped mean algorithm.
262: The resulting cube is spatially oversampled by a factor of two in each dimension (i.e. mapped to pixels 25 mas in size),
263: rotated with flux-conserving resampling to a standard (North up, East left) orientation,
264: and the image slice at each spectral channel convolved with a spatial gaussian kernel of
265: FWHM 3.2 oversampled pixels (80 mas, giving an effective PSF FWHM of 110/150 mas for June/October data respectively)
266: in order to increase the S/N ratio of each spectrum.
267: Wavelength calibration is automatically performed by the OSIRIS DRP;
268: we determine that this calibration is generally accurate to within $\sim 0.1\AA$ based on
269: fits to the centroids of strong OH sky lines
270: with regard to fiducial vacuum wavelengths given by Rousselot et al. (2000). Finally, all spectra are
271: converted to the heliocentric rest frame using the relative motion solution given by the IRAF/{\it rvcorrect} package.
272: Based on the measured FWHM of the (unresolved) OH lines, we conclude that the effective spectral resolution of
273: our data is $R \sim 3600$.\footnote{This represents the narrowest OH line observed; many appear to be broader because the OH forest
274: is typically composed of unresolved doublets separated by less than $\sim 1$\AA.}
275:
276:
277: Since we do not dedicate time in each observing sequence to obtaining a clean ``sky'' observation, negative residuals
278: of the target galaxy are located about 1.4'' above and below the positive image in the final stacked data cube, effectively halving our useful field of view.
279: However, given the small size of the target
280: galaxies (UV morphologies indicate that $\sim$ 90\% are less than 1'' in extent; Law et al. 2007)
281: we find this approach preferable for maximization of on-source integration time by eliminating the need to frequently
282: nod off-target
283: in order to adequately characterize the background flux (although c.f. discussion by Davies 2007).
284:
285: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
286:
287: \section{NEBULAR MORPHOLOGIES}
288:
289: We produce maps of the ionized gas morphology of the three target galaxies by
290: collapsing each data cube about the 4-5 spectral channels corresponding to the peak emission wavelength
291: of the spectral line (H$\alpha$ for Q1623-BX453 and Q0449-BX93, [O\,{\sc iii}] for DSF2237a-C2).
292: As illustrated in Figure \ref{resultsfig.fig} (top left panel),
293: Q1623-BX453 consists of an H$\alpha$ bright nucleation\footnote{We adopt the term ``nucleation'' to qualitatively describe a
294: concentrated region of high surface brightness that might naively be described as the ``nucleus'' of a given galaxy (see discussion in Law et al. 2007).}
295: with a lower surface brightness region extending towards the southwest and an extremely faint feature on the western edge.
296: This faint feature is only barely detected and may be an artifact of imperfect sky subtraction.
297: While fairly centrally concentrated, the bright emission region is inconsistent with a point source, having a diameter of 200 mas (1.7 kpc) at the half peak-flux
298: contour compared to (an upper limit of) 110 mas for the PSF of the tip-tilt reference star.
299: Q0449-BX93 (Fig. \ref{resultsfig.fig}; middle left panel) has a morphology quite similar to that of Q1623-BX453, consisting of
300: a bright nucleated region with low surface brightness emission extending towards the northwest. Again, the
301: bright region is inconsistent with a point source, having diameter 180 mas (1.5 kpc) at the half peak-flux contour.
302: In contrast, DSF2237a-C2 (Fig. \ref{resultsfig.fig}; bottom left panel) has a more elongated morphology than either Q1623-BX453 or Q0449-BX93,
303: with flux distributed fairly evenly along the major axis.
304:
305: Given the elongated morphology of DSF2237a-C2, one traditional assumption would
306: be that emission in this galaxy is predominantly from an inclined disk of ionized gas, and that the apparent
307: ellipticity is due to perspective foreshortening of a circularly symmetric disk.
308: Under such an assumption, we fit a 2D gaussian to the H$\alpha$ surface brightness map and conclude that with a major/minor axis
309: ratio of $r_{\rm maj}/r_{\rm min} = 1.53$, such a disk has a position angle of $\theta = 38^{\circ}$ East of North and
310: an inclination of $i = 49^{\circ}$ away from the normal.
311:
312: While it is tempting to draw such physical inferences from the ionized-gas morphologies,
313: these inferences are not necessarily robust given the irregularity of typical star-forming galaxies at redshift $z \sim 2-3$,
314: which typically consist of 1-3 nucleations connected by
315: regions of low surface-brightness emission (as viewed in the rest-frame UV; see Fig. 2 of Law et al. 2007).
316: Since the UV and ionized gas morphologies are strongly correlated (at least in the local universe; Gordon et al. 2004,
317: Kennicutt et al. 2004, Lee et al. 2004, although c.f. Conselice et al. 2000)
318: and trace the brightest regions of star formation unobscured by dust
319: they are therefore a complex product of the strength and distribution of star forming regions,
320: dust, viewing angle, and possible merger-induced irregularities, rendering them unreliable indicators
321: of the galactic potential.
322: Indeed, recent studies have found little to no correlation between morphology and major-axis velocity shear (Erb et al. 2004) or any of an
323: assortment of other parameters such as stellar mass, star formation rate, or the strength of galactic-scale outflows (Law et al. 2007).
324: Even if the rotating gas disk hypothesis were correct, it is not obvious that estimates of the disk size and/or orientation based on the
325: length of the major/minor axes are meaningful since the observed morphology of such a disk will be dominated by the clumpy distribution
326: of star formation (see, e.g., theoretical models by Noguchi 1999 and Immeli et al. 2004b).
327:
328: We quantify an average linear dimension of
329: the nebular line emission region by adopting a segmentation map which includes
330: all spaxels (i.e. lenslets) for which nebular emission can be fit with a gaussian profile with S/N ratio (SNR) $\sim$ 6, and which
331: have a velocity of less than 300 km s$^{-1}$ relative to systemic (see \S 6 for further explanation of these selection criteria).
332: The effective size of this region is determined as follows.
333: Assuming that the $N$ elements in the segmentation map are distributed in an approximately circular arrangement, the radius of this circle is given
334: simply by $r' = \sqrt{N/\pi}$. The corrected radius $r$ is then determined by subtracting off the radius of the stellar PSF
335: in quadrature (Table \ref{targets.table}; this is typically
336: a small correction of less than $\sim$10\%) and converting to physical kpc at the redshift of the source. The PSF-corrected emission area is
337: defined as $I = \pi r^2$.
338: Adopting the non-parametric gini-multiplicity ($G-\Psi$) classification scheme described by Law et al. (2007), we note that the ionized-gas morphologies
339: of our three target galaxies (Table \ref{OSIRISmorphs.table}) closely resemble the typical rest-frame UV morphologies of $z \sim 2-3$ star forming galaxies
340: in the GOODS-N (Law et al. 2007) and Q1700 (Peters et al. 2007) fields as seen by HST-ACS, albeit with limiting star formation rate density roughly five
341: times higher than that of the HST data.
342:
343: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
344: \tablecolumns{5}
345: \tablewidth{0pc}
346: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
347: \tablecaption{OSIRIS Morphologies.}
348: \tablehead{
349: \colhead{Galaxy} & \colhead{$I$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{$r$\tablenotemark{b}} &
350: \colhead{$G$\tablenotemark{c}} & \colhead{$\Psi$\tablenotemark{d}}}
351: \startdata
352: Q1623-BX453 & 9.5 $\pm$ 0.3 & 1.74 $\pm$ 0.03 & 0.33 & 1.48\\
353: Q0449-BX93 & 4.7 $\pm$ 0.6 & 1.23 $\pm$ 0.07 & 0.25 & 1.32\\
354: DSF2237a-C2 & 3.3 $\pm$ 0.3 & 1.03 $\pm$ 0.04 & 0.29 & 3.33\\
355: \enddata
356: \label{OSIRISmorphs.table}
357: \tablenotetext{a}{Area of nebular emission (kpc$^2$). Uncertainty represents half the PSF correction.}
358: \tablenotetext{b}{Radius of nebular emission (kpc). Uncertainty represents half the PSF correction.}
359: \tablenotetext{c}{Gini.}
360: \tablenotetext{d}{Multiplicity.}
361: \end{deluxetable}
362:
363: \begin{figure*}
364: \plotone{f1.eps}
365: \caption{
366: OSIRIS maps of (left to right) nebular emission line flux density (H$\alpha$ for Q1623-BX453 and Q0449-BX93, [O {\sc iii}] for DSF2237a-C2),
367: velocity, and velocity dispersion for the three target galaxies. Stretch on plots of emission
368: line flux density is linear and runs from zero to the peak flux density of each galaxy, linear contours in flux density are overplotted
369: on the velocity and dispersion maps. The FWHM of the PSF after smoothing is 110 mas in Q1623-BX453 and DSF2237a-C2 and 150 mas in Q0449-BX93,
370: indicated by solid lines in the left-hand panels.
371: Individual pixels measure 25 mas, the total field of view (0.75 $\times$ 0.75 arcseconds) is comparable
372: to the seeing-limited spatial resolution of previous work.
373: This field of view corresponds to 6.3, 6.4, and 5.7 physical kpc at the redshift of Q1623-BX453, Q0449-BX93, and DSF2237a-C2 respectively.}
374: \label{resultsfig.fig}
375: \end{figure*}
376:
377: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
378: \section{Global spectra}
379:
380: \subsection{Flux Calibration}
381:
382: Integrated spectra (shown in Fig. \ref{spectra.fig}) were generated for each source by
383: convolving the data cube during reduction with a broad 150 mas spatial
384: gaussian kernel, which considerably improves the S/N ratio (SNR) of each spaxel at the cost of suppressing spatial information. All spaxels
385: with SNR $>$ 6 were combined to produce a ``clean'' integrated spectrum, while all spaxels within a radius of about 2$r$ were combined to produce
386: a ``total flux'' integrated spectrum. The first of these is of higher quality and is used to determine the relative flux in individual emission
387: lines, while the second spectrum better samples the faint flux distribution and is used to fix the absolute flux calibration.
388: We eliminate any residual gradients as a function of wavelength by subtracting off a first-order spline fit to the integrated spectrum
389: using standard IRAF techniques (with iterative rejection to exclude emission lines from the spline fit).
390: We estimate the flux calibration of our integrated emission-line spectrum using
391: detailed modelling of the OSIRIS + Keck LGSAO system + atmospheric throughput as a function of wavelength
392: based on the simulations of Law et al. (2006) and refined to accomodate recent measurements of system throughput parameters.
393: The results of this wavelength-dependent calibration method agree to within $\sim 25$\% with those obtained using the broadband photometric
394: zero-point calibrations published in the OSIRIS manual (roughly as close an agreement as may reasonably be
395: expected since these zero-points average the transmission
396: function throughout the bandpass).
397: The greatest uncertainty in flux calibration arises however in the additional requirement that we correct
398: for the unknown amount of flux lost to the seeing halo of the AO-corrected PSF. For a point source with
399: a 35\% strehl correction approximately 35\% of the total light is contained within the diffraction-limited core of FWHM $\sim 50$ mas while the remaining 65\%
400: is spread throughout a seeing-limited halo. The percentage of total flux measured for a given observation is therefore
401: a complex function of the strehl of the AO correction (which depends in turn upon the magnitude/separation of the TT star and the wavelength of observation),
402: the quality of the seeing, and the physical structure of the source.
403: Based on simulations adopting quantities for these various parameters roughly representative of our observing conditions, we expect to recover $\sim 60$\% of
404: the light from a given target source.
405: This percentage is roughly consistent with that estimated using measurements of the average flux density in
406: narrow-band observations of our TT stars compared to $K_s$ magnitudes drawn from the 2MASS database.
407:
408: Given all of the uncertainties inherent in this bootstrapped flux calibration, we estimate that the systematic flux
409: uncertainty for a given source is $\sim$ 30\%.
410: In contrast, the relative flux uncertainty between two emission lines (i.e. the uncertainty in the line flux ratio)
411: is considerably lower and dominated simply by the root-mean square (RMS) deviation of the integrated spectrum.
412: Formally, we adopt as the 1$\sigma$ uncertainty in each emission line flux the error due to RMS fluctuations per spectral channel
413: compounded over the measured width of the emission line. Similar estimates of the RMS uncertainty may be used to place $3\sigma$
414: upper limits on the strength of undetected emission lines using a reasonable guess at the likely intrinsic width
415: of the undetected line.
416:
417: Based on these calibrations and observations of the three target galaxies we determine that
418: $f_{\rm lim} = 3 \times 10^{-16}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ arcsec$^{-2}$
419: represents the 6$\sigma$ H$\alpha$ surface brightness threshhold for our observations
420: (i.e. the faintest believable feature for two hours of integration at $\lambda \sim 2\mu$).
421: At redshift $z = 2.5$ this is equivalent to a
422: detection threshhold of SFR$_{\rm lim} = 1 M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$ (adopting the H$\alpha$ flux to SFR calibration
423: described in \S 5.2).\footnote{Note that this is the threshhold for \textit{detection}, the threshhold for deriving reliable kinematic information is
424: approximately 4 $M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$. For comparison, the limiting star formation rate density in the rest-UV morphological analysis presented
425: by Law et al. (2007) is $\sim$ 0.2 $M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$.}
426: Given that a star formation rate density of $\sim$ 0.1 $M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$ represents the threshhold between starburst galaxies
427: and the centers of normal galactic disks in the local universe (Kennicutt 1998), we do not expect to detect local-type disk galaxies
428: in the course of our study even if such galaxies existed at high redshift.
429:
430: \begin{figure*}
431: \plotone{f2.eps}
432: \caption{OSIRIS spectra of Q1623-BX453, Q0449-BX93, and DSF2237a-C2 collapsed over the spatial extent of each galaxy.
433: Vertical dotted lines denote the wavelengths of
434: [N {\sc ii}] $\lambda 6550$, H$\alpha$, and [N {\sc ii}] $\lambda 6585$ emission (for Q1623-BX453 and Q0449-BX 93)
435: and [O {\sc iii}] $\lambda 4960$ and $\lambda 5008$ emission (for DSF2237a-C2). Lines for [N {\sc ii}] and [O {\sc iii}] $\lambda 4960$ are drawn at the
436: fiducial wavelengths expected based on the H$\alpha$ and [O {\sc iii}] $\lambda 5008$ emission redshifts.}
437: \label{spectra.fig}
438: \end{figure*}
439:
440: In Table \ref{globals.table} we compile the systemic, UV absorption-line, and Ly$\alpha$ emission redshifts and nebular line fluxes
441: of the target galaxies.
442: In both cases for which previous NIRSPEC observations were obtained (Q1623-BX453 and DSF2237a-C2) the systemic redshifts
443: agree to within $\Delta z = 0.0008$ or about 50 km s$^{-1}$ (i.e. consistent to within roughly one fifth the velocity resolution
444: of NIRSPEC [$R \sim 1400$]).
445: The integrated H$\alpha$ flux of Q1623-BX453 is 1.7 times greater in the OSIRIS data than the NIRSPEC, consistent with the approximately 50\%
446: slit-loss
447: correction factor estimated by Erb et al. (2006a). However, the [O\,{\sc iii}]
448: flux of DSF2237a-C2 appears to be a factor of $\sim$ 2 weaker in the OSIRIS data than the NIRSPEC.
449: The first, and perhaps most likely, explanation for this discrepancy is that the NIRSPEC flux observed is strongly sensitive to
450: differential slit losses between the standard star and target galaxy observations, which can drive flux errors in both directions depending on
451: atmospheric conditions and the quality of the background subtraction in each case.
452: However, it is also possible that this galaxy contains a large fraction of its total
453: flux in the form of extended low surface brightness emission undetected with OSIRIS but detected in the more sensitive long-slit observations.
454:
455:
456: \begin{deluxetable*}{lccccccccccc}
457: \tablecolumns{10}
458: \tablewidth{0pc}
459: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
460: \tablecaption{Primary Spectroscopic Characteristics}
461: \tablehead{
462: \colhead{Galaxy} & \colhead{$\lambda_{\rm neb}$\tablenotemark{a}} &
463: \colhead{$z_{\rm neb}$\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{$z_{\rm abs}$\tablenotemark{c}} & \colhead{$z_{\rm Ly\alpha}$\tablenotemark{d}} & \colhead{$F_{\rm
464: H\alpha}$\tablenotemark{e}} & \colhead{$L_{\rm H\alpha}$\tablenotemark{f}} &
465: \colhead{$F_{\rm [O\,{\sc III}]}$\tablenotemark{e}} &
466: \colhead{$L_{\rm [O\,{\sc III}]}$\tablenotemark{f}} &
467: \colhead{$\sigma_{\rm
468: v}$\tablenotemark{g}} & \colhead{$v_{\rm c}$\tablenotemark{h}} & \colhead{$M_{\rm dyn}$\tablenotemark{i}}}
469: \startdata
470: Q1623-BX453 & 20888.30 & 2.1820 & 2.1724 & 2.1838 & $23.1\pm0.5$ & $18.0 \pm 0.4$ & ... & ... & 92 $\pm$ 8 & ...& 17 $\pm$ 2 \\
471: Q0449-BX93 & 19737.80 & 2.0067 & 2.004 & ... & $9.3\pm0.3$ & $4.1 \pm 0.1$ & ... & ... & 72 $\pm$ 12 & ... & 7 $\pm$ 2\\
472: DSF2237a-C2 & 21621.80 & 3.3172 & 3.319 & 3.333 & ... & ... & $10.1\pm 0.5$ & $2.2 \pm 0.1$ & 101/79 $\pm$ 15 & 70 $\pm$ 10 & 5 $\pm$ 1\\
473: \enddata
474: \label{globals.table}
475: \tablenotetext{a}{Vacuum wavelength of peak emission in Angstroms.}
476: \tablenotetext{b}{Vacuum redshift of nebular emission line: H$\alpha$ for Q1623-BX453 and Q0449-BX93, [O\,{\sc iii}] $\lambda$5007 for DSF2237a-C2.}
477: \tablenotetext{c}{Vacuum heliocentric redshift of rest-frame UV interstellar absorption lines.}
478: \tablenotetext{d}{Vacuum heliocentric redshift of Ly$\alpha$ emission.}
479: \tablenotetext{e}{Emission line flux in units of $10^{-17}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$. Uncertainties quoted are based on random errors,
480: global systematic uncertainty is $\sim 30$\%.}
481: \tablenotetext{f}{Extinction-corrected emission line luminosity in units of $10^{42}$ erg s$^{-1}$. Uncertainties quoted are based on random errors,
482: global systematic uncertainty is $\sim 30$\%.}
483: \tablenotetext{g}{Velocity dispersion in units of km s$^{-1}$. Two values are given for DSF2237a-C2, the overall dispersion of the integrated
484: spectrum and the median velocity dispersion in a given spaxel.}
485: \tablenotetext{h}{Circular velocity in units of km s$^{-1}$.}
486: \tablenotetext{i}{Dynamical mass in units of $10^{9} M_{\odot}$.}
487: \end{deluxetable*}
488:
489: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
490: \tablecolumns{4}
491: \tablewidth{0pc}
492: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
493: \tablecaption{Secondary Spectroscopic Characteristics.}
494: \tablehead{
495: \colhead{Galaxy} & \colhead{$F_{\rm [O\,{\sc III}]}
496: (\lambda 4960)$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{$F_{\rm [N\,{\sc II}]}
497: (\lambda 6549)$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{$F_{\rm [N\,{\sc II}]}
498: (\lambda 6585)$\tablenotemark{a}}}
499: \startdata
500: Q1623-BX453 & ... & $3.3\pm0.4$ & $7.7\pm0.5$\\
501: Q0449-BX93 & ... & $<1.1$ & $<1.1$\\
502: DSF2237a-C2 & $2.5\pm0.5$ & ... & ...\\
503: \enddata
504: \label{globalsOSIRIS2.table}
505: \tablenotetext{a}{Emission line flux in units of $10^{-17}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$. Limits are 3$\sigma$ limits. Uncertainties quoted are stochastic,
506: global systematic uncertainty is $\sim 30$\%.}
507: \end{deluxetable}
508:
509: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
510:
511: \subsection{Global Chemistry}
512:
513: In the case of Q1623-BX453, both
514: [N\,{\sc ii}] $\lambda 6549$ and $\lambda 6584$ (the stronger $\lambda 6584$ line is hereafter simply [N\,{\sc ii}]) are
515: detected reliably in the integrated galaxy spectrum (see Figure \ref{spectra.fig}), allowing us to estimate the average metallicity
516: of the galaxy.
517: Defining the flux ratio $N2 =$ log([N\,{\sc ii}]/H$\alpha$), we follow Pettini \& Pagel (2004) who estimate the
518: oxygen abundance as
519: \begin{equation}
520: 12 + \textrm{log}(O/H) = 8.90 + 0.57 \times N2
521: \label{metallicity.eqn}
522: \end{equation}
523:
524: Adopting the [N\,{\sc ii}] flux tabulated in Table \ref{globalsOSIRIS2.table} we find
525: $N2 = -0.48 \pm 0.03$, and therefore 12 + log(O/H) = $8.63 \pm 0.18$ (this uncertainty is dominated by the 0.18 dex systematic uncertainty
526: in the calibration given in Equation \ref{metallicity.eqn}), consistent with near-solar enrichment
527: (12 + log(O/H)$_{\odot} = 8.66$; Asplund et al. 2004). This is consistent with the results of Shapley et al. (2004), who find
528: 12 + log(O/H) = $8.60 \pm 0.18$ based on long-slit spectroscopy.
529: As noted previously by Shapley et al. (2004) however, the FWHM of the [N\,{\sc ii}] emission line is roughly 30\% larger than that of H$\alpha$, which
530: can be a signature of shock ionization (Lehnert \& Heckman 1996b).
531: Since Q1623-BX453 shows no evidence of AGN activity in either rest-frame UV spectra
532: (\S 4.3) or long-wavelength deviations from simple stellar population models (\S 5.1), and the measured value of $N2$ is
533: consistent with that observed for normal star-forming galaxies (Shapley et al. 2004; Erb et al. 2006c) we see no concrete evidence
534: that this high ratio is due to shock heating or physical processes other than simple enrichment.
535: Erb et al. (2006c) have considered this question in greater detail using a [O\,{\sc iii}]/H$\beta$ vs. [N\,{\sc ii}]/H$\alpha$ diagnostic diagram and find that
536: while the [O\,{\sc iii}]/H$\beta$ ratio is greater for a given [N\,{\sc ii}]/H$\alpha$ ratio in Q1623-BX453 than in local galaxies, this offset may be explained
537: by a harder ionizing spectrum or a higher electron density (see also discussion by Shapley et al. 2005b) and does not provide concrete evidence for a
538: central AGN.
539:
540: Although the spectra are too faint to determine the precise [N\,{\sc ii}] morphology, we note that [N\,{\sc ii}] appears
541: to be coincident with the H$\alpha$ peak and varies slightly in relative strength across the face of the galaxy.
542: Figure \ref{twospec.fig} plots individual spectra of the northeastern and southwestern quadrants and illustrates the stronger [N\,{\sc ii}]
543: lines present in the northeastern region. Taking careful measurements of the respective spectra we find (Table \ref{BX453regional.table})
544: that the flux ratio of the bright core is $N2 = -0.46 \pm 0.03$ (consistent with the overall spectrum;
545: as expected since it dominates the total flux of the source) while the flux ratio of the fainter region is
546: $N2 = -0.67 \pm 0.09$. This $\sim 2.3\sigma$ difference ($\sim 0.1$ dex in log(O/H))offers mild
547: evidence to suggest that the distribution of heavy elements in Q1623-BX453 is not perfectly well-mixed, suggesting either
548: that heavy elements from the latest burst of star formation
549: (produced primarily in the northeastern region) have
550: not yet had time to be fully distributed throughout the galaxy, or that the two regions may have had distinct star formation
551: histories (as might be expected for instance in a merger-type scenario).
552:
553: Since Q0449-BX93 is considerably fainter than Q1623-BX453 it is not
554: possible to detect [N\,{\sc ii}] emission confidently. We place a $3\sigma$ detection limit on $f_{\textrm{[N\,{\sc ii}]}}$ (Table \ref{globals.table})
555: and conclude that an upper bound on the metallicity is 12 + log(O/H) $\lesssim 8.37$ (i.e. less than 1/2 solar).
556: Given the monotonic relation between stellar mass and metallicity found by Erb et al. (2006c) for similar galaxies at $z \sim 2$,
557: this metallicity limit implies that $M_{\star} \lesssim 10^{10} M_{\odot}$.
558: Unfortunately, it is not possible to constrain the metallicity of DSF2237a-C2 as we have only observed the wavelength
559: interval surrounding [O\,{\sc iii}] $\lambda$5007\AA.
560:
561: \begin{figure*}
562: \plotone{f3.eps}
563: \caption{
564: OSIRIS spectra of the northeastern (NE) and southwestern (SW) regions of Q1623-BX453.
565: Vertical dotted lines denote the wavelengths of
566: [N {\sc ii}] $\lambda 6550$, H$\alpha$, and [N {\sc ii}] $\lambda 6585$ emission.}
567: \label{twospec.fig}
568: \end{figure*}
569:
570: \begin{deluxetable}{c|cccc}
571: \tablecolumns{5}
572: \tablewidth{0pc}
573: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
574: \tablecaption{Q1623-BX453 Regional Emission Line Characteristics\tablenotemark{a}.}
575: \tablehead{
576: \colhead{Region} & \colhead{$f_{\rm H\alpha}$} & \colhead {$f_{\rm [N II] \lambda 6549}$} & \colhead {$f_{\rm [N II] \lambda 6585}$} & \colhead {$N2$\tablenotemark{b}}}
577: \startdata
578: NE & $14.8 \pm 0.4$ & $1.9 \pm 0.4$ & $5.1 \pm 0.4$ & $-0.46 \pm 0.03$\\
579: SW & $6.6 \pm 0.4$ & $< 1.0$ & $1.4 \pm 0.4$ & $-0.67 \pm 0.09$\\
580: \enddata
581: \label{BX453regional.table}
582: \tablenotetext{a}{Emission line flux in units of $10^{-17}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$. Limits are 3$\sigma$ limits.}
583: \tablenotetext{b}{$N2 =$ log([N\,{\sc ii}]/H$\alpha$).}
584: \end{deluxetable}
585:
586: \subsection{Outflow Properties: UV Spectroscopy}
587:
588: In Figure \ref{UVspec.fig} we plot the Keck-LRIS UV spectra of the three target galaxies
589: shifted into the rest-frame as defined by the OSIRIS nebular redshifts.
590: The spectrum of DSF2237a-C2 was obtained as part of a survey of $z \sim3$ LBGs (Steidel et al 2003; see also
591: Giallongo et al 2002),
592: while Q1623-BX453 and Q0449-BX93 were obtained more recently using LRIS-B, described by
593: Steidel et al (2004). Q1623-BX453 was included on a slit mask receiving a total of 5.5 hours integration
594: time, whereas the other spectra were obtained using shorter, survey-mode integration times of 1.5-2 hours.
595:
596: The spectra of all three galaxies are broadly similar to high-quality composite spectra of the $z \sim 2 - 3$ star-forming galaxy sample
597: (e.g. Shapley et al. 2003); these spectra exhibit strong interstellar absorption features
598: (e.g. Si {\sc ii}, O {\sc i}, C {\sc ii}, Si {\sc iv}, C {\sc iv}) and Lyman $\alpha$ that may appear in either
599: emission or absorption. It is typical of star forming galaxies at these redshifts for the interstellar
600: lines to be blue-shifted, and Ly$\alpha$ emission red-shifted (when present), by several hundred km s$^{-1}$ with respect to the systemic
601: redshift; these features are generally interpreted as scattered emission from the far-side and absorption in the near-side
602: of an expanding shell of outflowing gas (see, e.g., Steidel et al. 2007).
603: The mean values for a sample of $\simeq 100$ galaxies in the redshift range $1.9 \le z \le 2.6$ are
604: $\Delta v_{\rm abs}=-164$ \kms and $\Delta v_{\rm em} =+445$ \kms for the centroid of the interstellar lines and Ly$\alpha$ emission
605: relative to H$\alpha$ (which tends to trace gas at the systemic redshift), respectively (Steidel et al. 2007).
606:
607: The spectra of Q1623-BX453 and of Q0449-BX93 are typical with regard to the {\it sense} of the velocity offsets observed, as
608: summarized in Table 3. The centroids of the interstellar lines of Q0449-BX93 are blue-shifted by $\simeq -270$ \kms\ with respect
609: to the H$\alpha$ redshift, placing it within the top $\sim 10-15$\% in terms of this quantity, and making it very
610: similar to the well-studied spectrum of cB58 (Pettini et al 2000, 2002). We note in passing that relatively strong Ly$\alpha$, C\,{\sc iv}, and Si\,{\sc iv}
611: absorption lines at $z_{\rm abs} = 2.0074$ are detected in the Keck/HIRES spectrum of the $z_{\rm em} = 2.677$
612: QSO Q0449$-$1645. The difference from the systemic redshift of Q0449-BX93 is only 70\,km~s$^{-1}$, even though the projected separation between
613: the QSO and galaxy sightlines is 44'', or 373 (proper) kpc.
614:
615:
616: The far-UV spectrum of Q1623-BX453 is more remarkable,
617: in that the blue-shifted interstellar lines have a centroid offset of $\Delta v_{\rm abs}\simeq -900$ \kms, and a
618: FWHM of $\simeq 1200$ \kms, both values being by far the
619: largest observed in the sample of $\simeq 100$ mentioned above. The Ly$\alpha$ emission redshift exhibits a relatively
620: modest shift of $\Delta v_{\rm em}=+170$ \kms. The spectrum of Q1623-BX453 also has unusually strong high-ionization
621: interstellar absorption features, including NV $\lambda\lambda 1238$,1242, and many of the absorption features
622: have complex velocity structure, with two dominant components at $-600$ and $-1100$ \kms. These unusual spectral
623: features might lead one to suspect an AGN is involved, but there are no significant emission lines
624: aside from Ly$\alpha$ in the high quality spectrum, and (as discussed further below) there is no evidence from
625: the full spectral energy distribution to suggest the presence of anything but stellar energy.
626: In spite of the rather violent kinematics of the outflowing interstellar gas, the H$\alpha$ emission
627: line kinematics show no hint of being affected, presumably because any H$\alpha$ emission associated with the outflowing
628: material is of much lower surface brightness than what we have detected with OSIRIS.
629:
630: \begin{figure*}
631: \plotone{f4.eps}
632: \caption{Flux calibrated UV spectra of the three target galaxies. Spectra have been shifted to the systemic rest frame using the nebular line redshifts
633: given in Table \ref{globals.table}. The identifications and wavelengths of the strongest spectral features are indicated by vertical dotted lines. Spectra
634: of Q0449-BX93 and DSF2237a-C2 have been smoothed with a 3-pixel boxcar filter.}
635: \label{UVspec.fig}
636: \end{figure*}
637:
638: The spectrum of DSF2237a-C2 has typically strong interstellar absorption lines, but in this case close examination reveals that they are actually
639: {\it redshifted} slightly with respect to the nebular redshift, with $\Delta v_{\rm abs}\simeq +100$ \kms, while the
640: Ly$\alpha$ emission line is redshifted by an unusually large $\simeq 1100$ \kms. It turns out that such kinematics, where
641: the interstellar line centroids are consistent with zero velocity with respect to the nebular systemic velocity,
642: are observed in $\sim 15$\% of $z \sim 2-3$ galaxies (Steidel et al 2007), and it is quite typical for such objects
643: to have unusually large Ly$\alpha$ emission offsets. Of possible significance is that interstellar absorption
644: line centroid velocities consistent with zero occur relatively frequently (5 out of 7) for galaxies in the Erb et al (2006c) sample having
645: measured velocity shear from NIRSPEC H$\alpha$ spectra. As discussed further by Steidel et al (2007),
646: these observations suggest a connection between the presence of velocity shear (as in the case of DSF2237a-C2; see \S 6.3) and increased absorption close to
647: zero systemic velocity, though at present it is not possible to distinguish between orientation effects (e.g., outflows
648: collimated along the rotation axis) and real differences in the dynamical structure of the galaxies. In any case, OSIRIS is much more
649: sensitive to the measurement of velocity shear in the galaxies, and any correlation between the kinematics of
650: gas associated with outflows and the kinematics of the H II regions should become clearer as the sample size increases.
651:
652:
653:
654: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
655:
656: \section{Stellar populations, star formation rates and gas masses}
657:
658: \subsection{Stellar Masses and Stellar Populations from SED Modeling}
659: \label{sec:seds}
660: As part of an ongoing survey program we have obtained broadband
661: photometry (Table \ref{phot.table}) in each of our target
662: fields. The wavelength coverage of these data varies from field to
663: field: all fields (Q1623, Q0449 and DSF2237a) have ground-based optical
664: $U_n G {\cal R}$ photometry which serves as the basis for the
665: optically-selected galaxy catalog (Steidel et al. 2003, 2004); Q1623
666: and DSF2237a have deep near-IR $J$ and $K_s$ photometry, described by
667: Erb et al. (2006b) and Shapley et al. (2001) respectively; and Q1623 has
668: also been imaged in the mid-IR by the \textit{Spitzer Space
669: Telescope}, with both IRAC at 3--8 $\micron$ and MIPS at 24
670: $\micron$.
671:
672: \begin{deluxetable*}{lccccccccccccc}
673: \tablecolumns{10}
674: \tablewidth{0pc}
675: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
676: \tablecaption{Photometric Data and SED Model Parameters}
677: \tablehead{
678: \colhead{Galaxy} &\colhead{$U_n$\tablenotemark{a}} &\colhead{$G$\tablenotemark{a}} &\colhead{${\cal R}$\tablenotemark{a}} &\colhead{$J$\tablenotemark{b}} &\colhead{$K_s$\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{$m_{3.6\mu}$\tablenotemark{c}} & \colhead{$m_{4.5\mu}$\tablenotemark{c}} & \colhead{$m_{5.8\mu}$\tablenotemark{c}} & \colhead{$m_{8.0\mu}$\tablenotemark{c}}
679: & \colhead{$f_{24\mu}$\tablenotemark{d}} &\colhead{$M_{\ast}$\tablenotemark{e}} &\colhead{Age\tablenotemark{f}} &\colhead{$E(B-V)$\tablenotemark{g}}}
680: \startdata
681: Q1623-BX453 & 24.85 & 23.86 & 23.38 & 21.41 & 19.76 [20.00] & 21.38 & 21.37 & 21.33 & 21.92 & 195 & 3.1 & 404 & 0.245\\
682: Q0449-BX93 & 23.62 & 23.17 & 22.99 & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & $\lesssim 1$\tablenotemark{h} & ...& 0.125\\
683: DSF2237a-C2 & ... & 24.68 & 23.55 & 22.08 & 20.53 [20.71] & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & 2.9 & 255 & 0.175\\
684: \enddata
685: \label{phot.table}
686: \tablenotetext{a}{$U_n,G,{\cal R}$ magnitudes are AB.}
687: \tablenotetext{b}{$J,K_s$ magnitudes are Vega. Values in brackets for
688: $K_s$ magnitudes represent continuum magnitudes corrected for line
689: emission.}
690: \tablenotetext{c}{{\it Spitzer}-IRAC magnitudes (AB standard).}
691: \tablenotetext{d}{{\it Spitzer}-MIPS 24$\mu$ flux ($\mu$Jy).}
692: \tablenotetext{e}{Stellar mass ($10^{10} M_{\odot}$)
693: from the best-fitting constant star formation model, using the Chabrier
694: (2003) IMF. Typical uncertainty $<\sigma_{M_{\ast}}/M_{\ast}>
695: = 0.4$.}
696: \tablenotetext{f}{Stellar population age
697: (Myr) from SED fitting, typical uncertainty $<\sigma_{\rm Age}/{\rm
698: Age}> = 0.5$.}
699: \tablenotetext{g}{$E(B-V)$ from the best-fit SED
700: for Q1623-BX453 and DSF2237a-C2; $E(B-V)$ is estimated for
701: Q0449-BX93 from the $G-{\cal R}$ color, assuming an age of 570 Myr.}
702: \tablenotetext{h}{Estimated from the metallicity limit (\S 4.2) using the mass-metallicity
703: relation of Erb et al. (2006c).}
704: \end{deluxetable*}
705:
706:
707: Wavelength coverage from the rest-frame UV to near-IR (in Q1623) or UV
708: to optical (DSF2237a) enables us to model the spectral energy
709: distributions of Q1623-BX453 and DSF2237a-C2 and obtain estimates of
710: these galaxies' stellar masses, ages, reddening and star formation
711: rates (the Q0449 data are restricted to the rest-frame UV and are
712: insufficient for such modeling). Previous modeling of the SEDs of
713: these two galaxies has been presented by Erb et al. (2006b) and
714: Shapley et al. (2001) respectively; we redo the modeling here to add
715: the Spitzer IRAC data in the case of Q1623-BX453 and update the method for
716: consistency in the case of DSF2237a-C2. In both cases the $K_s$ magnitudes
717: have been corrected for line emission according to the values
718: determined in \S 4.1 (the corrections are $\sim0.2$ mag in both cases).
719:
720: \begin{deluxetable*}{lcccccccccc}
721: \tablecolumns{10}
722: \tablewidth{0pc}
723: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
724: \tablecaption{Star Formation Rates and Gas Masses}
725: \tablehead{
726: \colhead{Galaxy} & \colhead{SFR$_{\Ha}$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{SFR$_{\Ha}$\tablenotemark{a}} &
727: \colhead{SFR$_{\rm UV}$\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{SFR$_{\rm UV}$\tablenotemark{b}} &
728: \colhead{SFR$_{\rm IR}$\tablenotemark{c}} &
729: \colhead{SFR$_{\rm SED}$\tablenotemark{d}} & \colhead{$\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$\tablenotemark{e}} &
730: \colhead{$\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$\tablenotemark{e}} &
731: \colhead{M$_{\rm gas}$\tablenotemark{f}} & \colhead{$\mu$\tablenotemark{g}}\\ \colhead{} & \colhead{Uncorrected} & \colhead{Corrected} &
732: \colhead{Uncorrected} & \colhead{Corrected} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{Mean} & \colhead{Peak}}
733: \startdata
734: Q1623-BX453 & 36 & 77 & 8 & 81 & 96 & 77 & 8 & 20 & 2.4 & 0.44\\
735: Q0449-BX93 & 12 & 18 & 12 & 39 & ... & ... & 4 & 7 & 0.7 & $\gtrsim 0.41$\\
736: DSF2237a-C2 & 23 & 49 & 18 & 95 & ... & 112 & 15 & 25 & 1.3 & 0.32\\
737: \enddata
738: \label{gas.table}
739: \tablenotetext{a}{Star formation rate ($M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$)
740: estimated from H$\alpha$ flux. Typical uncertainty $<\sigma_{\rm SFR}/{\rm SFR}>= 0.3$.}
741: \tablenotetext{b}{Star formation rate ($M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$)
742: estimated from rest-frame UV continuum flux.}
743: \tablenotetext{c}{Star formation rate ($M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$)
744: estimated from rest-frame 8$\mu$ flux.}
745: \tablenotetext{d}{Star formation rate ($M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$)
746: derived from SED modeling. Typical uncertainty $<\sigma_{\rm SFR}/{\rm SFR}>= 0.6$.}
747: \tablenotetext{e}{Star formation rate surface density ($M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$).}
748: \tablenotetext{f}{Molecular gas mass ($10^{10} M_{\odot}$). Typical uncertainty $<\sigma_{M}/M>= 0.2$.}
749: \tablenotetext{g}{Gas fraction $\mu = M_{\rm gas}/(M_{\rm gas} + M_{\ast})$. Typical uncertainty $<\sigma_{\mu}/\mu>= 0.35$.}
750: \end{deluxetable*}
751:
752: The modeling procedure has been described in detail by Shapley et
753: al. (2005a). Briefly, we use Bruzual \& Charlot (2003) models with
754: a constant star formation rate, solar metallicity, and a Chabrier (2003) IMF.
755: The resulting stellar masses for Q1623-BX453 and DSF2237a-C2 are
756: $M_\star = 3.1\times10^{10}$ \msun\ and $M_\star = 2.9\times10^{10}$
757: \msun\ respectively. The remaining stellar population parameters are
758: given in Table~\ref{phot.table}, and the best-fit spectral energy
759: distributions are shown in Figure~\ref{SEDplots.fig}.
760:
761: \begin{figure*}
762: \plottwo{f5a.eps}{f5b.eps}
763: \caption{The best-fit constant star formation (CSF) model (solid black line) is overplotted against the observed spectral energy distribution for Q1623-BX453
764: and DSF2237a-C2. Colored points represent ground-based optical and near-IR photometry, black points are based on \textit{Spitzer}-IRAC observations.
765: The $K$-band photometry for both galaxies is shown corrected for nebular line emission (see discussion in \S 5.1).
766: Values given for stellar mass and population age represent the values derived from the best-fit CSF model; typical uncertainties are given
767: in Table \ref{phot.table}.}
768: \label{SEDplots.fig}
769: \end{figure*}
770:
771: \subsection{Star Formation Rates}
772:
773: A direct estimate of the instantaneous star formation rate may be derived
774: from the observed H$\alpha$ luminosity since it traces the
775: ionizing radiation produced by young, massive stars. We adopt the
776: calibration derived by Kennicutt et al. (1994; summarized in
777: Kennicutt 1998) whereby
778: \begin{equation}
779: \textrm{SFR}\;(\msunyr) = \frac{L(\Ha)}{1.26\times 10^{41} \; \textrm {erg s}^{-1}} \; \times 0.56 .
780: \end{equation}
781: where we have introduced the factor of 0.56 to convert to the Chabrier (2003) IMF.
782:
783: This enables direct calculation of the star formation rate from our
784: observed \Ha\ fluxes for Q1623-BX453 and Q0449-BX93; we find
785: SFR$_{\Ha}=36$ \msunyr\ for Q1623-BX453 and SFR$_{\Ha}=12$
786: \msunyr\ for Q0449-BX93. Although H$\alpha$ is redshifted beyond the
787: $K$-band for $z \gtrsim 2.6$, it is nonetheless possible to estimate a
788: star formation rate for DSF2237a-C2 based on the observed
789: [\ion{O}{3}] flux.
790: Using long-slit spectroscopy, Pettini et al. (2001) determined the
791: H$\beta$ flux to be $3.5 \pm 0.4 \times 10^{-17}$ erg s$^{-1}$
792: cm$^{-2}$, and the ratio of the [\ion{O}{3}] and
793: \Hb\ fluxes to be $F_{\Hb}/F_{\rm [O\,III]}=0.19$ (their
794: [\ion{O}{3}]$\lambda 5007$ flux of $18 \times 10^{-17}$ erg s$^{-1}$
795: cm$^{-2}$ is in rough agreement with the OSIRIS value of $10.1
796: \pm 0.5 \times 10^{-17}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$, given the significant
797: uncertainties in the calibration of long-slit spectra).
798: While \Hb \, falls outside the narrow wavelength range which we have observed
799: with OSIRIS, we can use the $F_{\Hb}/F_{\rm [O\,III]}$ ratio observed by Pettini
800: et al.\ (2001) to infer an \Hb\ flux of $2.0\times 10^{-17}$ erg
801: s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ from our observed [\ion{O}{3}] value.
802: We then assume a standard recombination ratio of $F_{\Ha}/F_{\Hb} =
803: 2.75$ (Osterbrock 1989) to find $F_{\Ha} = 5.4 \times 10^{-17}$ erg
804: s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ and SFR$_{\Ha}=23$ \msunyr. These SFRs are
805: uncorrected for dust extinction (which we discuss below) and have
806: typical uncertainties $\sim$ 30\% (dominated by the uncertainty in the flux
807: calibration described in \S 4.1).
808:
809: We use the values of $E(B-V)$ determined by the SED modeling discussed
810: in \S\ref{sec:seds} to correct the observed \Ha\ flux of Q1623-BX453
811: and the inferred \Hb\ flux of DSF2237a-C2 for extinction
812: using a modified Calzetti et al. (2000) starburst
813: attenuation law as described by Erb et al. (2006b).
814: For Q1623-BX453 we
815: find $E(B-V)=0.245$ for a corrected SFR of 77 \msunyr, in agreement
816: with the value of 77 \msunyr\ we obtain from the SED modeling. For
817: DSF2237a-C2 we use the best fit $E(B-V)=0.175$ to correct the \Hb\ flux
818: inferred above, and then assume $F_{\Ha}/F_{\Hb} = 2.75$ to
819: find $F_{\Ha}=11.3 \times 10^{-17}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ and
820: SFR$_{\Ha}=49$ \msunyr. This is somewhat smaller than the value of
821: 112 \msunyr\ we find from the SED modeling, but not inconsistent with
822: the factor of $\sim2$ RMS found by Erb et al. (2006b) for SFRs
823: determined from SED modeling and \Ha\ emission, especially given the
824: additional extrapolations needed to calculate the nebular line SFR.\footnote{Curiously, the original
825: H$\beta$ flux measured by Pettini et al. (2001) gives a better match to SED star formation rate
826: than the extrapolated flux measured using OSIRIS, highlighting the possibility that OSIRIS may
827: sometimes `miss' low surface brightness flux.}
828:
829:
830: Because we lack the IR data to model the SED of Q0449-BX93, we
831: estimate the extinction from the $G-{\cal R}$ color alone, assuming a
832: constant star formation age of 570 Myr, the median age\footnote{The values of $E(B-V)$ allowed by the $G-{\cal R}$ color
833: are relatively insensitive to the age of the galaxy; for reasonable
834: ages ranging from 50 Myr (approximately the dynamical timescale) to
835: 3.2 Gyr (the age of the universe at the redshift of the galaxy),
836: $E(B-V)$ varies from 0.164 to 0.113.} of the
837: \ztwo\ sample as found by Erb et al. (2006a).
838: Assuming this median age we find $E(B-V)=0.125$ and
839: a corrected SFR of 18 \msunyr. The uncertainty in age has a
840: negligible effect on the corrected SFR; for an age of 50 Myr, we find
841: SFR$_{\Ha}=20$ \msunyr, while the maximum age of 3.2 Gyr leads to
842: SFR$_{\Ha}=17$ \msunyr. The corrected and uncorrected SFRs for the
843: three galaxies are summarized in Table~\ref{gas.table}, and for
844: reference we note that the mean extinction-corrected SFR of the
845: \ztwo\ sample, from both \Ha\ and the UV continuum, is $\sim30$
846: \msunyr\ (Erb et al. 2006a).
847:
848: By way of comparison, we also include in Table~\ref{gas.table} estimates of the star
849: formation rate obtained using UV and mid-IR photometry. In the former case,
850: we use the rest-frame monochromatic luminosity at 1500\AA ($L_{\nu}$; based on linear
851: interpolation of the broadband photometry given in Table \ref{phot.table}) and the Kennicutt (1998b) conversion between $L_{\nu}$ and SFR:
852: \begin{equation}
853: \textrm{SFR}\;(\msunyr) = \frac{L_{\nu}}{7.14 \; \times \; 10^{27} \; \textrm{erg s}^{-1} \; \textrm{Hz}^{-1}} \; \times 0.56
854: \end{equation}
855: where the factor of 0.56 has again been introduced to convert to the Chabrier (2003) IMF.
856: After correcting for extinction using the Calzetti et al. (2000) starburst attenuation law, we find
857: SFR$_{\rm UV}$ = 81, 39, 95 \msunyr \, for Q1623-BX453, Q0449-BX93, and DSF2237a-C2 respectively.
858: These values are in good agreement with SFR$_{\rm H\alpha}$ for Q1623-BX453; the factor of $\sim 2$ difference between UV and H$\alpha$ estimates
859: for DSF2237a-C2 and Q0449-BX93 may be due (in the former case) to the uncertainties introduced in our conversion from [O {\sc iii}] flux to H$\alpha$
860: and suggests (in the latter case) that Q0449-BX93 may be a particularly young, blue, dust-free galaxy for which
861: the conversion from $(G-{\cal R})$ color to $E(B-V)$ is imperfect.
862: Using {\it Spitzer}-MIPS 24$\mu$ photometry, it is also possible to estimate the SFR for Q1623-BX453 using the rest-frame 8$\mu$ flux
863: given in Table \ref{phot.table}. Adopting the calibrations discussed in Reddy et al. (2006), we estimate SFR$_{\rm IR} =$ 96 $M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$
864: under the Chabrier (2003) IMF, in good agreement with the UV, SED, and H$\alpha$ estimates.
865:
866: \subsection{Gas Masses and Gas Fractions}
867:
868: We can also use the \Ha\ luminosities in combination with the galaxy
869: sizes measured in \S 3 to estimate the galaxies' gas masses and gas
870: fractions. Such indirect techniques are required because emission from
871: molecular gas is very difficult to detect in all but the most luminous
872: high redshift galaxies with current technology. We follow the
873: procedure described by Erb et al. (2006a), benefitting here from the
874: higher spatial resolution of the OSIRIS data, which provides
875: better constraints on the galaxies' sizes.
876: As described by Erb et al. (2006a), we use the empirical
877: global Schmidt law (Kennicutt 1998), which relates the surface density
878: of star formation to the surface density of molecular gas (in the
879: starburst regime in which our galaxies fall; more quiescent
880: star-forming galaxies at low redshift also have significant amounts of
881: atomic gas).
882:
883: We determine the surface density of H$\alpha$ luminosity ($\Sigma_{\Ha}$) by dividing the extinction-corrected
884: observed (or inferred, in the case of DSF2237a-C2) \Ha\ luminosity by the
885: projected linear area $I$ of the galaxy as determined in \S 3. The
886: gas surface density $\Sigma_{\rm gas}$ is then given by the global Schmidt law, and
887: the total gas mass by $M_{\rm gas}=\Sigma_{\rm gas} I$. Gas masses
888: inferred in this way are subject to significant uncertainties beyond
889: those associated with the measurements of fluxes and sizes and the
890: $\sim0.3$ dex uncertainty introduced by the scatter in the Schmidt law
891: itself. It is not yet known whether the Schmidt law in this form
892: holds at high redshift, although the one galaxy for which it has been
893: tested, the gravationally lensed Lyman break galaxy MS1512-cB58,
894: appears to be consistent with the local form (Baker et al.\ 2004). It
895: is also likely that the Schmidt law, which applies to only the cold
896: gas associated with star formation, does not account for all of the
897: gas; in a typical local disk galaxy, $\sim40$\% of the total gas mass
898: is not included by the Schmidt law (Martin \& Kennicutt 2001).
899:
900: The measured areas of Q1623-BX453, Q0449-BX93, and DSF2237a-C2 are $I =$ 9.5 $\pm$ 0.3,
901: 4.7 $\pm$ 0.6, and 3.3 $\pm$ 0.3 kpc$^2$ respectively. The size of Q1623-BX453 derived
902: here ($r = 1.74 \pm 0.03$ kpc) is considerably smaller than the value of $r = 4.4 \pm 0.4$
903: found by Erb et al. (2006b) from long-slit NIRSPEC observations, reflecting in part the slightly different definitions
904: of $r$ and the difficulty of estimating sizes from
905: seeing-limited long-slit data. However, it is also likely that the luminous
906: area of a given galaxy is genuinely greater in the Erb et al. (2006b) data since NIRSPEC is more sensitive
907: than OSIRIS, and may thus detect lower surface-brightness features at larger radii. Galaxy size
908: $r$ and $I$ as defined here are only meaningful with regard to the
909: detection threshhold of a particular study.
910:
911: Combining these size estimates
912: with the extinction-corrected \Ha\ luminosities, we find
913: gas masses of 2.4 $\times10^{10}$, 6.9 $\times10^{9}$, and 1.3 $\times10^{10}$
914: \msun
915: (each with $\sim$ 20\% statistical uncertainty, but note discussion of systematic uncertainties above) for Q1623-BX453, Q0449-BX93, and DSF2237a-C2
916: respectively. The stellar mass of Q1623-BX453 is
917: 3.1$\times10^{10}$ \msun, for a gas fraction $\mu=0.44$; for
918: DSF2237a-C2 we find $M_{\star}=1.6\times10^{10}$ \msun and $\mu=0.32$.
919: We are unable to determine a gas fraction for Q0449-BX93 because of
920: the lack of near-IR imaging from which to derive a stellar mass, although the mass limit estimated from the
921: mass-metallicity relation (Erb et al. 2006c) suggests that $\mu \gtrsim 0.41$.
922: Combining the typical uncertainties of the stellar ($\sigma_{\rm M_{\star}}/{\rm M_{\star}} = 0.4$)
923: and gas ($\sigma_{\rm M_{\rm gas}}/{\rm M_{\rm gas}} = 0.2$) masses,
924: we estimate the uncertainty in the gas fraction $\sigma_{\mu}/{\mu} = 0.35$.
925: The stellar mass and gas fraction of
926: Q1623-BX453 are close to the mean values ($<M_{\star}> = 3.6 \pm 0.4 \times 10^{10} M_{\odot}$, $<\mu> = 0.37 \pm 0.03$) found for a larger sample
927: of 114 galaxies at $z\sim2$ by Erb et al. (2006b).
928: While there is no similar determination of the mean gas fraction at $z \sim 3$, the stellar mass of DSF2237a-C2
929: is only slightly higher than
930: the median of $1.4\times10^{10}$ \msun found for $z\sim3$ Lyman break galaxies by
931: Shapley et al. (2001; we convert their reported
932: median to our adopted IMF).
933:
934: We also use the extinction-corrected SFRs determined above to estimate
935: the average and peak star formation rate surface density $\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ (Table \ref{gas.table}). Dividing
936: the SFRs by the total areas, we find an average $\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ = 8, 4, and 15
937: \msunyr\ kpc$^{-2}$ for Q1623-BX453, Q0449-BX93 and DSF2237a-C2
938: respectively.
939: These values lie in the middle of the distribution of
940: $\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ found for local starbursts by Kennicutt 1998 (after
941: accounting for the different IMF), and at the upper end of the range
942: for \ztwo\ galaxies found by Erb et al. (2006b).
943: Based on the peak flux densities observed in a given spaxel, we estimate the corresponding peak star formation rate surface densities to be
944: roughly twice the mean, with
945: $\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ = 20, 7, and 25 \msunyr\ kpc$^{-2}$.
946: These values are comparable to the maximal star-formation rate densities observed in the local universe by
947: Lehnert \& Heckman (1996a; $\Sigma_{\rm lim}$ = 11 \msunyr\ kpc$^{-2}$ in our adopted IMF) and Meurer et al. (1997;
948: $\Sigma_{\rm lim}$ = 25 \msunyr\ kpc$^{-2}$ in our adopted IMF), implying that Q1623-BX453 and DSF2237a-C2 may be forming
949: stars at close to the maximal rate in their brightest regions.
950: Given that (in the local universe) a SFR density of $\Sigma_{\ast} = 0.1 M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$ is sufficient for the resulting supernovae
951: to drive a wind into the surrounding ISM (Heckman 2002),
952: it is likely that rapidly star forming galaxies similar to these are quite ``leaky'' systems, with a significant fraction
953: of metal-enriched gas finding its way into the IGM (Erb et al. 2006c; Adelberger et al. 2003,2005b).
954:
955:
956: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
957:
958: \section{SPATIALLY RESOLVED KINEMATICS AND DYNAMICAL MASSES}
959:
960: Using the integrated spectra described in \S 4.1 we estimate the kinematic dispersion of the ionized
961: gas by fitting a gaussian profile (corrected for instrumental resolution) to the observed emission. We obtain values of $\sigma_{\rm v} =
962: 92 \pm 8, 72 \pm 12, 101 \pm 15$ km s$^{-1}$ respectively for Q1623-BX453, Q0449-BX93, and DSF2237a-C2.
963:
964:
965: Although our velocity dispersion for Q1623-BX453
966: is slightly higher than that obtained previously by Erb et al. (2006b; $\sigma_{\rm v} = 61 \pm 4$ km s$^{-1}$)\footnote{This discrepancy
967: appears to be due to the presence of a residual OH sky feature in the NIRSPEC H$\alpha$ spectrum; the OSIRIS velocity dispersion is roughly in agreement with
968: the NIRSPEC velocity dispersion of $\sigma_{\rm v} = 106 \pm 8$ km s$^{-1}$ measured using the [O\,{\sc iii}] emission line.}, the measured dispersion
969: of DSF2237a-C2 agrees
970: with the value $\sigma_{\rm v} = 100 \pm 4$ km s$^{-1}$ observed by Pettini et al. (2001). However, as we demonstrate below
971: in \S 6.3 the
972: velocity shear of DSF2237a-C2 contributes to the line width of the integrated spectrum.
973: Based on examination of
974: the spatially resolved velocity map of the galaxy, we conclude that the central velocity dispersion $\sigma_{\rm v} = 79$ km s$^{-1}$, rising
975: slightly to about $89$ km s$^{-1}$ at larger radii.
976:
977: While the total amplitude of any velocity shear may be an unreliable probe of the dynamical mass of a system, the
978: central velocity dispersion $\sigma$ is predominantly driven by the gravitational potential of the system even in kinematically complex
979: systems such as local ULIRGS
980: (Colina et al. 2005).
981: These $\sigma$ may therefore be used to estimate the dynamical mass of the galaxies using the relation
982: \begin{equation}
983: M_{\rm dyn} = \frac{C \sigma^2 r}{G}
984: \label{dynmass.eqn}
985: \end{equation}
986: where a relatively straight-forward derivation (e.g. Erb et al. 2006b)
987: gives the constant geometric prefactors $C = 5$ appropriate for a uniform sphere and $C = 3.4$ for a thin disk
988: with average inclination.
989: Based on the kinematic data presented in \S 6.1 - 6.3, we adopt $C = 5$ for Q1623-BX453 and Q0449-BX93, and $C = 3.4$ for DSF2237a-C2.
990:
991: While $\sigma$ is reasonably well-determined, $r$ is not and can affect the resulting dynamical mass
992: calculated via Eqn. \ref{dynmass.eqn} significantly.
993: Ideally, we might adopt the virial
994: radius, for which the derived $M_{\rm dyn}$ should be a reasonable estimate of the total gravitational mass.
995: However, the only observationally-determined length scale is that of the much smaller region
996: from which nebular line emission is detected (see Table \ref{OSIRISmorphs.table}).
997: Adopting this nebular emission radius, we calculate dynamical masses of
998: $M_{\rm dyn}$ = 17 $\pm$ 2, 7 $\pm$ 2, and 5 $\pm$ 1 $\times 10^{9} M_{\odot}$ for Q1623-BX453, Q0449-BX93, and DSF2237a-C2
999: (using $\sigma_{\rm v} = 79$ km s$^{-1}$)
1000: within a radius $r =$ 1.74, 1.23, and 1.03 kpc respectively. Unsurprisingly (given that our dynamical masses probe only the central
1001: 1-2 kpc), these masses differ by $\sim$ a factor of 15 from the typical halo
1002: mass within the virial radius calculated for similar galaxies
1003: by Adelberger et al. (2005a) based on clustering statistics. A previous estimate of $M_{\rm dyn}$ has also
1004: been obtained for Q1623-BX453 by Erb et al. (2006b); their value $M_{\rm dyn} = 12 \times 10^{9} M_{\odot}$ is similar to our own, with the predominant
1005: difference arising from the difference in observed $\sigma_{\rm v}$.
1006:
1007: We construct kinematic maps of the three target galaxies by fitting gaussian profiles to the spectra contained within each resampled spaxel.
1008: Generally, single-component models suffice to represent the emission line profiles (although
1009: see discussion in \S 6.2 for Q0449-BX93).
1010: Such maps of the relative radial velocity and velocity dispersion
1011: (Fig. \ref{resultsfig.fig}, center and right panels respectively) are intrinsically noisy;
1012: we reduce the contribution of noisy spaxels to the resulting maps
1013: by considering only those for which the derived velocity is within 300 km s$^{-1}$ of the systemic redshift, the
1014: FWHM is greater than or equal to the instrumental width, and the SNR of the detection is greater than six. These criteria
1015: are not derived from theoretical limits, but rather represent empirical constraints which we have found (based on iterations with various parameters)
1016: to produce the cleanest kinematic maps.
1017: These velocity maps are generally robust to systematic uncertainties (since all spaxels are processed in a similar manner) and
1018: the largest source of uncertainty is from random errors arising from the difficulty in determining
1019: the accurate centroid for an emission line of given S/N ratio.
1020: Given the OSIRIS spectral resolution $R \sim 3600$, the velocity FWHM is about 80 km s$^{-1}$.
1021: We estimate that uncertainties in the velocity maps are
1022: $\sim$ 10 km s$^{-1}$ for bright central regions of a galaxy, tapering to $\sim 20$ km s$^{-1}$ towards the edges.
1023:
1024: \subsection{Q1623-BX453}
1025:
1026: The 2d velocity map of Q1623-BX453 (Fig. \ref{resultsfig.fig}, top middle panel) is largely consistent with a flat velocity field across the entire
1027: galaxy ($\sim$ 4 kpc along the major axis) and does not present any evidence for spatially resolved shear.
1028: Typical deviations from zero relative velocity are
1029: within the uncertainty of our ability to accurately measure
1030: velocity centroids from individual spaxels (i.e. about 10-20 km s$^{-1}$).
1031: The only suggestion of kinematic substructure is a small $\sim$ 100 mas (800 pc) feature at the northeastern edge of the galaxy
1032: which appears to be receding at $\sim$ 50 km s$^{-1}$ relative to systemic and has a sharp discontinuity with the bulk
1033: velocity field (i.e. it does not appear to ``blend in'' by means of a gradual velocity transition).
1034: Given the extremely low flux of this feature (which lies outside the faintest flux contour illustrated on Fig. \ref{resultsfig.fig})
1035: this may be simply a residual noise artifact.
1036:
1037: Although the line-of-sight velocity of the ionized gas is roughly constant across the face of the galaxy, the dispersion of
1038: this gas ($\sigma$) varies slightly with position (Fig. \ref{resultsfig.fig}; top right panel).
1039: In particular, $\sigma$ peaks around 100 km s$^{-1}$ in the northeastern
1040: region approximately coincident with the flux peak, decreases to $\sim$ 70 km s$^{-1}$ in the southwestern region, and drops to below 30 km s$^{-1}$ in the
1041: extremely faint emission region to the west. While there appear to be peaks of $\sigma \sim 120$ km s$^{-1}$ on the northern and eastern edges of the galaxy,
1042: it is uncertain whether these represent real features or are simply noise in the extremely faint surface brightness edges of the galaxy.
1043:
1044: The flat velocity field of this galaxy is particularly intriguing in light of the semi-analytic picture of galaxy formation in the early universe
1045: (e.g. Mo, Mau, \& White 1998, Baugh 2006) in which (in brief) cold gas falls into collapsed dark halos, shock heats, radiatively cools to form a disk
1046: supported by residual angular momentum, and proceeds to form stars within this gaseous disk.
1047: Unless Q1623-BX453 happens to be inclined almost perfectly face-on to our line-of-sight\footnote{In order to mask a 100 km s$^{-1}$ circular velocity
1048: within a 20 km s$^{-1}$ uncertainty a galaxy must have inclination $i \lesssim 10^{\circ}$. This occurs in less than 2\% of cases for a randomly
1049: distributed set of inclinations.}, the absence of a velocity gradient across the galaxy indicates that
1050: the kinematics of the ionized gas are not dominated by ordered rotation.
1051: Clearly, the simplest description of galaxy formation is incomplete.
1052:
1053: One variant on the basic rotating disk
1054: model which provides a reasonable explanation of some of the observed characteristics is that described by Noguchi et al. (1999) and
1055: Immeli et al. (2004; their models A/B), in which
1056: highly-efficient cooling mechanisms lead to early fragmentation of the gas disk into self-gravitating clouds. These clouds are sufficiently massive that
1057: they spiral to the center
1058: of the galaxy via dynamical friction within a few dynamical times, largely dragging the existing stellar population along with the gas.
1059: Immeli et al. (2004)
1060: find that an intense burst of star formation typically occurs in the nuclear region of the galaxy when these massive gas clouds collide,
1061: typically peaking at around 100 $M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ (over twice that expected for ``traditional'' star formation histories in galaxies with less
1062: efficient gas cooling mechanisms) and leading to the rapid formation of a stellar bulge.
1063: Such a theory may provide a natural explanation for Q1623-BX453, which we infer to have a large cold gas fraction, near-peak star formation
1064: rate density, and a sizeable stellar population. Alternatively, such characteristics may also be explained by the merger of two massive,
1065: gas-rich galaxies whose cold gas reservoirs are undergoing rapid star formation in the center of the new gravitational potential.
1066:
1067:
1068: While it might appear surprising that a system with such violent dynamics should show so little evidence for kinematic structure, such systems
1069: are well-known in the local universe.
1070: Local ULIRGS may often have gas masses constituting the bulk of their dynamical mass (Solomon et al. 1997), fueling intense starbursts from the
1071: dense molecular gas in their cores. The common presence of multiple nuclei and tidal features (e.g. Sanders et al. 1988, Bushouse et al. 2002) suggests that
1072: these starbursts may commonly arise from the major merger of two gas-rich systems, and the ionized gas kinematics typically show star formation in
1073: gas flows rapidly forming stars in the center of the gravitational potential.
1074: The velocity fields of ULIRGS are typically dominated by strong, asymmetric gas flows (Colina et al. 2005), although the specific properties of these flows
1075: vary considerably from case to case. The velocity structure of Q1623-BX453 resembles in particular the kinematics of
1076: Mrk 273 and IRAS 15250+3609 (see Fig. 1 of Colina et al. 2005); these galaxies show no strong kinematic substructure in the brightest regions of H$\alpha$
1077: emission within $\sim 2-3$ kpc of the peak H$\alpha$ emission despite
1078: relatively strong ($\sim 200$ km s$^{-1}$) kinematic features in regions with
1079: H$\alpha$ surface brightness lower by a factor $\sim$ 5.
1080: It is an interesting speculation therefore whether deeper observations of Q1623-BX453 will reveal similar kinematic
1081: structure in regions of lower surface brightness.
1082:
1083: \subsection{Q0449-BX93}
1084:
1085: While the integrated spectrum of Q0449-BX93 (Fig. \ref{spectra.fig}) is dominated by a single emission spike defining the systemic redshift, the spectrum
1086: of the northwestern region
1087: of the galaxy shows a faint secondary emission peak blueshifted by $\sim 180$ km s$^{-1}$ from the systemic redshift
1088: (Fig. \ref{bx93_bluebump.fig}). Given that the FWHM of the primary
1089: emission component is $\sim 150$ km s$^{-1}$, these two components in Figure \ref{bx93_bluebump.fig} are blended, motivating the use of a 2-component
1090: gaussian model in order to adequately characterize the emission line profile of the source.
1091:
1092: Considering first the primary spectroscopic component,
1093: the velocity and dispersion structure of Q0449-BX93
1094: (Fig. \ref{resultsfig.fig}, center and middle-right panels respectively)
1095: are similar to those of Q1623-BX453 although
1096: there is mild evidence for velocity shear along the northwest-southeast axis. The peak-to-peak amplitude of this velocity differential
1097: is only $\sim 40$ km s$^{-1}$, and therefore not highly significant with respect to our estimated velocity uncertainty of 10 - 20 km s$^{-1}$.
1098: Even if this shear is genuine, it is not obvious that this implies a rotationally supported system. Assuming a simplistic
1099: model in which the circular velocity at the outer edge of the galaxy (1.23 kpc; see Table \ref{OSIRISmorphs.table})
1100: is 40 km s$^{-1}$ (i.e. with an extremely generous inclination correction
1101: to the observed 20 km s$^{-1}$), we obtain a dynamical mass of only $M_{\rm dyn} = 5 \times 10^{8} M_{\odot}$,
1102: far less than the gas mass alone within the same region as derived
1103: from the H$\alpha$ emission flux. That is, the observed shear is insufficient to provide dynamical
1104: support for the galaxy.
1105: As in the case of Q1623-BX453, the velocity dispersion is considerably larger ($\sigma = 72$ km s$^{-1}$)
1106: than the peak-to-peak velocity shear, suggesting the
1107: physical interpretation that Q0449-BX93 may also represent a merger-induced starburst or
1108: the bright central emission region of a gas-rich disk which has fragmented due to instability.
1109: While insufficient broadband data exist for Q0449-BX93 to be able to reliably fit stellar population models,
1110: estimates of the stellar mass using the mass-metallicity relation of Erb et al. (2006c) suggest that this galaxy
1111: is considerably less massive ($M_{\star} \lesssim 10^{10} M_{\odot}$) than Q1623-BX453.
1112: Coupled with its moderate extinction-corrected H$\alpha$ star formation rate of 18 $M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$
1113: (close to the average for the $z \sim 2$ galaxy sample, Erb et al. 2006a) Q0449-BX93 may be more representative of the general
1114: galaxy population.
1115:
1116:
1117: Selecting next the gaussian fits to the secondary emission line component it is possible to create
1118: velocity and dispersion maps (Fig. \ref{bx93_component2.fig}) of this faint, kinematically distinct sub-component (hereafter KDSC).
1119: To the limiting surface brightness of our study, the KDSC is marginally resolved over only a small ($\sim 200 \times 150$ mas, i.e. $\sim$ 1 kpc) part
1120: of the northwestern region of the galaxy comparable in size to the PSF ($\sim 150$ mas).
1121: The kinematic offset of the KDSC from the systemic redshift is approximately constant across the region of emission and does not smoothly
1122: join to the kinematics of the primary component.
1123: While this may be simply due to the small size of the KDSC (across which we expect only $\sim 1-2$ spatially independent spectra),
1124: an additional interpretation (within the framework of a fragmenting disk model) may be that the KDSC
1125: represents one of multiple starbursting regions in the process of coalescing in the center of the galaxy for which
1126: we happen to see a kinematic differential.
1127: Alternatively, the KDSC may have initially begun star formation as a unit (i.e. satellite galaxy)
1128: distinct from the bright component of Q0449-BX93 which is only
1129: now merging with its host galaxy and is perhaps responsible for the observed burst of star formation.
1130: It is unfortunately beyond the scope of the current data to derive the parameters (e.g. relative mass)
1131: of such a scenario with any pretense of reliability.
1132:
1133: \begin{figure}
1134: \plotone{f6.eps}
1135: \caption{The spectrum of Q0449-BX93 is shown (in units of velocity relative to systemic) integrated over the region in which a secondary H$\alpha$ emission
1136: component is observed blueward of the systemic emission. Vertical dashed lines denote the fiducial galaxy velocity (i.e. 0 km s$^{-1}$)
1137: and the location of the secondary emission peak after deblending. This peak occurs at a relative velocity of -177 $\pm 11$ km s$^{-1}$.}
1138: \label{bx93_bluebump.fig}
1139: \end{figure}
1140:
1141: \begin{figure*}
1142: \plotone{f7.eps}
1143: \caption{As Figure \ref{resultsfig.fig}, shows the H$\alpha$ emission line velocity and velocity dispersion maps for the faint blueshifted component of
1144: Q0449-BX93. Overlaid contours are H$\alpha$ flux density.}
1145: \label{bx93_component2.fig}
1146: \end{figure*}
1147:
1148: \subsection{DSF2237a-C2}
1149:
1150: The kinematic map of ionized gas in DSF2237a-C2
1151: is notably different from those of Q1623-BX453 and Q0449-BX93, presenting clear evidence for resolved
1152: velocity shear along the morphological major axis at redshift $z > 3$.
1153: As illustrated in Figure \ref{resultsfig.fig} (bottom center panel), the velocity of peak [O\,{\sc iii}] emission relative to the systemic redshift
1154: varies smoothly from about $-70$ to $+70$ km s$^{-1}$ over a distance $\sim 2.5$ kpc.
1155: An apparent ridge-line of high velocity (most evident in the southwest corner of the galaxy) presents some evidence
1156: for a flattening in the velocity curve, although this is far from robust.
1157: The velocity dispersion of individual regions within the galaxy is $\sigma \sim 79$ km s$^{-1}$; this is inflated by velocity shear
1158: in the integrated spectrum,
1159: giving $\sigma = 101$ km s$^{-1}$.
1160:
1161: For comparison to previous studies we produce an ``ideal'' long-slit spectrum of DSF2237a-C2 by
1162: extracting spaxels along the major axis (PA $38^{\circ}$, see \S 3) using a 180 mas wide ``slit'' and plot the resulting velocity
1163: curve in Figure \ref{c2_1dspec.fig}. The gradual trend of velocity across the galaxy is clear in this figure, along with the apparent
1164: flattening of the velocity curve in the outskirts of the galaxy.
1165: Although long-slit spectra were previously obtained with Keck-NIRSPEC observations
1166: (Pettini et al. 2001), no shear was observed by
1167: these authors despite close alignment of the NIRSPEC slit (PA 55$^{\circ}$) with the now-known shear axis (PA 38$^{\circ}$). Given that the total
1168: peak-to-peak amplitude of the shear ($\sim$ 140 km s$^{-1}$) should be identifiable with the spectral resolution of
1169: NIRSPEC, we infer that DSF2237a-C2 represents a practical case-example of how seeing-limited studies may miss
1170: velocity structure on spatial scales smaller than that of the seeing halo.
1171: For comparison, in Figure \ref{c2blur.fig} we plot the 2-d velocity map recovered from our OSIRIS observations of DSF2237a-C2 after introducing
1172: a 0.5'' spatial gaussian blur to roughly simulate the smearing effects of atmospheric seeing.
1173: While the overall semblance of shear is retained, the peak-to-peak observed amplitude of this shear is reduced by a factor $\sim 2$.\footnote{We
1174: note that Erb et al. (2004; their Fig. 3) reach a similar general conclusion based on observations of the galaxy Q1700-BX691, for which the apparent
1175: amplitude of velocity shear varied by at least a factor of $\sim 2$ depending on the quality of seeing.}
1176: In concert with the lower spectral resolution of NIRSPEC (in the low-resolution mode used for the Pettini et al. 2001 observations) and slight offsets
1177: in slit placement and orientation from the optimal, it is easy to see why previous observations did not detect shear.
1178:
1179: \begin{figure}
1180: \plotone{f8.eps}
1181: \caption{One-dimensional spectrum of DSF2237a-C2 (solid boxes) extracted from the OSIRIS data using an idealized ``slit''. Uncertainties are conservative estimates
1182: based on the number of spaxels (each with 20 km s$^{-1}$ uncertainty) included in the spectrum at each position along the simulated slit. The solid line
1183: indicates the FWHM of the PSF. Note that this figure underestimates the turnover velocity apparent in 2-d data because
1184: spatial averaging across the simulated slit combines peak ridgeline velocities with lower velocities on either side of the ``v''-shaped pattern
1185: (see Fig. \ref{c2_diskmodel.fig}).}
1186: \label{c2_1dspec.fig}
1187: \end{figure}
1188:
1189: \begin{figure}
1190: \plotone{f9.eps}
1191: \caption{Velocity map recovered from OSIRIS observations of DSF2237a-C2 after convolution with a 0.5'' PSF. The field of view is identical to that
1192: in Figure \ref{resultsfig.fig}.}
1193: \label{c2blur.fig}
1194: \end{figure}
1195:
1196: Adopting the inclination
1197: and position angle derived in \S 3 from the nebular morphology, we create an idealized thin-disk model (i.e. a rotating sheet) which reproduces the
1198: size and orientation of DSF2237a-C2 and adjust the asymptotic velocity and turnover radius as needed to match the observations
1199: shown in Figures \ref{resultsfig.fig} and \ref{c2_1dspec.fig}.
1200: This model is characterized by a radius of 0.21''=1.6 kpc and a deprojected asymptotic velocity of 93 km s$^{-1}$,
1201: implying a dynamical mass of $3.2 \times 10^9 M_{\odot}$ interior to 1.6 kpc.
1202: \footnote{This mass is slightly lower than that calculated on the basis of the velocity dispersion (and quoted in Table \ref{globals.table}),
1203: reflecting in large part the uncertainty in the geometric prefactors used when converting from velocities to estimates of the dynamical mass.}
1204: We plot the velocity map of this model disk in Figure \ref{c2_diskmodel.fig} (left panel), along with
1205: the velocity map recovered from this model using simulated OSIRIS observations which include
1206: convolution with the PSF and extraction of the high surface brightness pixels (right panel).
1207: We have not attempted to match every detail of the observed velocity map by fitting a more complex model,
1208: and some discrepancies remain (the blue-side velocities in particular are imperfectly matched by the simple model).
1209: While more complicated fitting routines could certainly be performed (and indeed have been for galaxies studied by F{\"o}rster Schreiber et al. 2006 and other groups),
1210: the exacting fits of such models frequently belie the large uncertainties inherent to the observations.
1211: For example, the evidence for a turnover in the velocity curve of DSF2237a-C2 largely disappears with only slightly less careful
1212: data reduction, and the salient features of the model are almost indistinguishable from similar models for which the inclination of the disk to the line
1213: of sight differs by over 20$^{\circ}$.
1214:
1215: Given the uncertainties in such quantitative models, what may we conclude about this galaxy with some confidence?
1216: It is unlikely that the shear in DSF2237a-C2 is due primarily to a major merger because the velocity field shows a smooth, gradual transition
1217: rather than any sharp discontinuity as might be expected for two kinematically distinct components. In addition, the flux distribution is smooth
1218: and centrally concentrated; we do not detect multiple nuclei on scales more widely separated than $\sim$ 750 pc (the spatial resolution of the observation).
1219: Adopting the simplest interpretation that the observed shear represents a rotating gaseous disk, it is worth asking whether
1220: the disk is stable against gravitational collapse.
1221: One traditional way of quantifying such stability is via the Toomre `$Q$' parameter (Toomre 1964) which effectively assesses the mass of the disk with respect
1222: to the total gravitating mass of the system:
1223: \begin{equation}
1224: Q = \frac{V^2}{G M_{\rm disk}/r_{\rm disk}} = \frac{M_{\rm dyn}}{M_{\rm disk}}
1225: \end{equation}
1226: Typically, values of $Q < 1$ represent dynamically unstable systems for which the total baryonic mass exceeds that which can be supported by
1227: the observed rotational velocity of the disk, indicating either that the disk itself is unstable or that non-rotational motions contribute a significant
1228: degree of support to the system. In contrast, values $Q > 1$ suggest that the observed baryonic component can be supported by the observed
1229: rotational motion alone, while $Q \sim 1$ represents the case of marginal stability.
1230:
1231: Considering all of the uncertainties involved in determining the baryonic and dynamical masses,
1232: it is not possible to establish a single well-defined value for $Q$, although
1233: realistic estimates for various cases place a limit $Q < 1$.
1234: In the first case, we consider the ratio of masses within the radius probed by the OSIRIS
1235: detections ($r = 1.03$ kpc), for which $M_{\rm disk} = M_{\rm gas} + M_{\star} = 4.2 \times 10^{10} M_{\odot}$ in the limit that the entirety of the stellar mass
1236: lies within this radius, and $M_{\rm disk} = 1.3 \times 10^{10} M_{\odot}$ in the opposite limit for which there is negligible stellar mass within
1237: the central kpc. Similarly, we may elect to use estimates of the dynamical mass based on the central velocity dispersion ($M_{\rm dyn} = 5 \times 10^{9} M_{\odot}$)
1238: or the rotationally-supported thin disk model ($M_{\rm dyn} = 3.2 \times 10^9 M_{\odot}$). Combining these assorted estimates, we obtain
1239: a range of values $0.08 < Q < 0.38$.
1240: In the second case, we calculate the global $Q$ value if we consider the mass within a much larger 10 kpc radius.
1241: At such radii $M_{\rm disk} \geq 4.2 \times 10^{10} M_{\odot}$ (as the contribution of gas mass outside the central kiloparsec is unknown). The dynamical mass
1242: is even more uncertain\footnote{The dynamical mass may be particularly uncertain if the velocity curve continues rising out to larger radii instead of turning
1243: over at $\sim 93$ km s$^{-1}$ as suggested by observations.}: inserting $r = 10$ kpc in
1244: Equation \ref{dynmass.eqn} we find $M_{\rm dyn} = 5 \times 10^{10} M_{\odot}$, while extending the disk model
1245: with asymptotic velocity 93 km s$^{-1}$ out to such radii gives $M_{\rm dyn} = 2 \times 10^{10} M_{\odot}$.
1246: Adopting the highest physically motivated limit, we determine that $Q \leq 1.2$ within 10 kpc.
1247: In both cases (and most noticeably within the central kpc),
1248: the baryonic mass in the system outweighs what could be supported by a simple rotating disk model, highlighting the importance of the
1249: ionized gas velocity dispersion and indicating the improbability that star formation in DSF2237a-C2 occurs predominantly in
1250: a rotationally supported thin disk of gas (see also discussion by F{\"o}rster Schreiber et al. 2006).
1251: Interestingly, the kinematics of this galaxy are quite similar to those of the $z = 1.4781$ galaxy Q2343-BM133 observed by Wright et al. (2007),
1252: which also had dispersion ($\sigma = 73 \pm 9$ km s$^{-1}$) comparable to its velocity shear (one-sided amplitude $v = 67$ km s$^{-1}$).
1253:
1254: \begin{figure*}
1255: \plotone{f10.eps}
1256: \caption{{\it Left panel:} Idealized rotating disk model for DSF2237a-C2. {\it Right panel:} Velocity field which might be observed
1257: with OSIRIS after convolution of the idealized disk model with the real PSF and selection of an appropriate distribution of bright ``emission'' regions.
1258: Compare to the actual recovered velocity map shown in Figure \ref{resultsfig.fig} (bottom center panel). The field of view is identical to that
1259: in Figure \ref{resultsfig.fig}.}
1260: \label{c2_diskmodel.fig}
1261: \end{figure*}
1262:
1263: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1264:
1265:
1266: \section{DISCUSSION}
1267:
1268: We have presented the results of a pilot study of the spatially resolved spectra of galaxies at redshift $z \sim 2 - 3$,
1269: demonstrating that the velocity structure of the ionized gas appears to be inconsistent with
1270: simple rotational support mechanisms.
1271: While there has been some effort to target galaxies with particularly high star formation rates
1272: to ensure detection in these early stages of the observational program,
1273: the H$\alpha$ flux of one of our three galaxies (Q0449-BX93, whose star formation rate was predicted from UV photometry)
1274: is found to be quite close to the average (Erb et al. 2006a,b) of the $z \sim 2$ optically-selected galaxy sample.
1275:
1276: It is, nevertheless, more than a little challenging to attempt to draw general conclusions about the entire $z \sim 2-3$ galaxy population
1277: on the basis of only three galaxies, and therefore interesting to compare our results to integral-field velocity maps obtained recently by
1278: F{\"o}rster Schreiber et al. (2006) for 14 rest-UV selected galaxies at redshift $z \sim 2$
1279: drawn from the catalog of Erb et al. (2006a) and
1280: observed with SINFONI (Eisenhauer et al. 2003) on the VLT.
1281: While selection criteria varied, generally galaxies were known to be large and bright and (in many cases) known to exhibit considerable
1282: velocity shear or dispersion on the basis of previous long-slit observations (Erb et al. 2003, 2006a).
1283: Of these 14 galaxies, 9 show evidence of spatially resolved velocity gradients
1284: with peak-to-peak amplitude ranging from 40 to 410 km s$^{-1}$ over $\sim$ 10 kpc. Certainly, systems with strong kinematic
1285: features appear to exist at $z \sim 2$, some of which may genuinely represent orbital velocities in massive rotating disks.
1286: Indeed, the mean stellar mass of the subsample with shear greater than 50 km s$^{-1}$
1287: is $9.4 \times 10^{10} M_{\odot}$ (based on the 6 galaxies for which $M_{\star}$ is given by Erb et al. 2006b),
1288: almost three times greater than the mean of the Erb et al. (2006b) sample
1289: ($<M_{\star}> = 3.6 \pm 0.4 \times 10^{10} M_{\odot}$).
1290: In contrast, the remaining galaxies in the F{\"o}rster Schreiber et al. (2006) sample which do {\it not}
1291: show such large-scale shear have mean stellar mass
1292: $2.6 \times 10^{10} M_{\odot}$, similar to the masses of Q1623-BX453,
1293: Q0449-BX93, and DSF2237a-C2 ($M_{\star} = 3.1, \lesssim 1$, and $2.9 \times 10^{10} M_{\odot}$ respectively).
1294: Rather than representing
1295: rare cases (such as counter-rotating mergers; F{\"o}rster Schreiber et al. 2006),
1296: the distribution of stellar masses suggests that these non-rotating galaxies may instead be quite
1297: common in the $z \sim 2$ population.
1298:
1299: Unfortunately,
1300: it is difficult to directly compare the detailed kinematics of the F{\"o}rster Schreiber et al. (2006)
1301: observations with our own since these data are seeing-limited
1302: with PSF FWHM $\sim 0.6$'' (therefore smearing kpc-scale kinematics like those discussed in this contribution beyond recognizability; see
1303: Fig. \ref{c2blur.fig}).
1304: A more detailed comparison may be made to the $z = 2.3834$ galaxy BzK-15504 observed by Genzel et al. (2006) using SINFONI in combination
1305: with natural guide-star adaptive optics for an angular resolution of 150 mas (i.e. comparable to the $\sim$ 110 - 150 mas resolution of our target
1306: galaxies after smoothing). While this galaxy exhibits resolved velocity shear in the outer regions of the galaxy
1307: it is not well fit by a simple disk model within 3 kpc of the nucleus (i.e. approximately the region probed in our three target galaxies),
1308: which Genzel et al. (2006) postulate may be due to radial gas flows fueling the central AGN whose presence is inferred
1309: from rest-frame UV spectroscopy.
1310: One possibility may therefore be that disordered nuclear kinematics could generally join to more orderly shear at larger radii, although in our
1311: data we find evidence for neither AGN nor large-radius shear.
1312: Indeed, even in the circum-nuclear regions of BzK-15504 it is not obvious that a simple disk model provides an optimal description of the kinematics
1313: since the line-of-sight velocity dispersion remains high at large radii
1314: ($\sigma \sim 60-100$ km s$^{-1}$, similar to the large values observed in DSF2237a-C2, and in Q2343-BM133 by Wright et al. 2007),
1315: and difference maps of the observed velocity field with the best-fitting
1316: exponential disk model show deviations of greater than $100$ km s$^{-1}$ (see discussion by Wright et al. 2007).
1317:
1318: What, then, may we conclude about the kinematics of these early galaxies and their implications
1319: for galaxy formation? One common explanation for both the unusual kinematics and the high nuclear gas fraction
1320: is that these galaxies may represent major mergers of gas-rich galaxies. While this explanation may suffice for a few cases however
1321: (e.g. perhaps Q0449-BX93), it is unlikely (based on current cosmological models)
1322: that this is the general explanation for the $z \sim 2$ population since the space density
1323: of such galaxies with similar physical properties is far too high.
1324: Alternatively, efficient gas cooling in the early universe could have led to high cold gas fractions in early-stage
1325: galactic disks which then fragmented due to self-gravity and collapsed to form a nuclear starburst (e.g. Immeli et al. 2004a).
1326: In both pictures, considerable kinematic structure should exist in these galaxies although
1327: (similar to local ULIRGS; Colina et al. 2005) the kinematics of the brightest nebular emission regions
1328: may be relatively featureless and quite variable in detail from system to system.
1329: However, it is unknown whether the lack of shear (or indeed any significant velocity structure beyond a high dispersion)
1330: persists to lower surface-brightness ionized gas at larger radii or if the kinematics of this gas are strong and disordered,
1331: ordered with dynamically cold orbital motion, or if indeed
1332: significant nebular line emission exists at all beyond
1333: the radii probed in this study. For one of the galaxies studied here (Q1623-BX453) previous deep long-slit
1334: spectroscopy (Erb et al. 2006b) could have detected any significant shear if it were present at larger radii
1335: (and the kinematic major axis was reasonably well-aligned with the slit), but found no evidence for such a trend.
1336:
1337:
1338: What is perhaps most clear is that we do not yet understand the dynamical state of galaxies during
1339: this period in which they are forming the bulk of their stars.
1340: While traditional theories of galaxy formation posit that the majority of star formation should occur in rotationally supported
1341: gaseous disks, this does not appear to be in good agreement with the accumulating observational evidence,
1342: inviting the construction of new models of gas cooling which can explain the flat, dispersion-dominated kinematic features
1343: of galaxies in the young universe.
1344:
1345: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1346:
1347: \acknowledgements
1348: We would like to thank Andrew Benson and Juna Kollmeier for numerous helpful discussions,
1349: and Naveen Reddy for providing {\it Spitzer} photometry for Q1623-BX453.
1350: The authors also thank Randy Campbell, Al Conrad, David LeMignant, and Jim Lyke
1351: for their invaluable help obtaining the observations presented herein.
1352: D.R.L. and C.C.S. have been supported by grants AST-0606912
1353: and AST-0307263 from the US National Science Foundation.
1354: Finally, we wish to extend thanks to those of Hawaiian ancestry on whose sacred mountain
1355: we are privileged to be guests.
1356:
1357: \begin{thebibliography}
1358:
1359: \bibitem[Adelberger et al.(2003)]{2003ApJ...584...45A} Adelberger, K.~L.,
1360: Steidel, C.~C., Shapley, A.~E., \& Pettini, M.\ 2003, \apj, 584, 45
1361:
1362: %Clustering
1363: \bibitem[Adelberger et al.(2005a)]{2005ApJ...619..697A} Adelberger, K.~L.,
1364: Steidel, C.~C., Pettini, M., Shapley, A.~E., Reddy, N.~A., \& Erb, D.~K.\
1365: 2005a, \apj, 619, 697
1366:
1367: % QSO absorption paper
1368: \bibitem[Adelberger et al.(2005b)]{2005ApJ...629..636A} Adelberger, K.~L.,
1369: Shapley, A.~E., Steidel, C.~C., Pettini, M., Erb, D.~K., \& Reddy, N.~A.\
1370: 2005b, \apj, 629, 636
1371:
1372: \bibitem[Asplund et al.(2004)]{2004A&A...417..751A} Asplund, M., Grevesse,
1373: N., Sauval, A.~J., Allende Prieto, C., \& Kiselman, D.\ 2004, \aap, 417,
1374: 751
1375:
1376: \bibitem[Baker et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...604..125B} Baker, A.~J., Tacconi,
1377: L.~J., Genzel, R., Lehnert, M.~D., \& Lutz, D.\ 2004, \apj, 604, 125
1378:
1379: \bibitem[Baugh(2006)]{2006RPPh...69.3101B} Baugh, C.~M.\ 2006, Reports of
1380: Progress in Physics, 69, 3101
1381:
1382: \bibitem[Bell et al.(2003)]{2003ApJS..149..289B} Bell, E.~F., McIntosh,
1383: D.~H., Katz, N., \& Weinberg, M.~D.\ 2003, \apjs, 149, 289
1384:
1385: %\bibitem[Bouch{\'e} et al. (2007)]{} Bouch{\'e}, N. et al. 2007, in preparation.
1386:
1387: \bibitem[Bruzual \& Charlot(2003)]{2003MNRAS.344.1000B} Bruzual, G., \&
1388: Charlot, S.\ 2003, \mnras, 344, 1000
1389:
1390: \bibitem[Bushouse et al.(2002)]{2002ApJS..138....1B} Bushouse, H.~A., et
1391: al.\ 2002, \apjs, 138, 1
1392:
1393: \bibitem[Calzetti et al.(2000)]{2000ApJ...533..682C} Calzetti, D., Armus,
1394: L., Bohlin, R.~C., Kinney, A.~L., Koornneef, J., \& Storchi-Bergmann, T.\
1395: 2000, \apj, 533, 682
1396:
1397: \bibitem[Colina et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...621..725C} Colina, L., Arribas, S.,
1398: \& Monreal-Ibero, A.\ 2005, \apj, 621, 725
1399:
1400: \bibitem[Conselice et al.(2000)]{2000AJ....119...79C} Conselice, C.~J.,
1401: Gallagher, J.~S., Calzetti, D., Homeier, N., \& Kinney, A.\ 2000, \aj, 119,
1402: 79
1403:
1404: \bibitem[Conselice et al.(2003)]{2003AJ....126.1183C} Conselice, C.~J.,
1405: Bershady, M.~A., Dickinson, M., \& Papovich, C.\ 2003, \aj, 126, 1183
1406:
1407: \bibitem[Daddi et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...631L..13D} Daddi, E., et al.\ 2005,
1408: \apjl, 631, L13
1409:
1410: \bibitem[Davies(2007)]{2007MNRAS.375.1099D} Davies, R.~I.\ 2007, \mnras,
1411: 375, 1099
1412:
1413: \bibitem[Dickinson et al.(2003)]{2003ApJ...587...25D} Dickinson, M.,
1414: Papovich, C., Ferguson, H.~C., \& Budav{\'a}ri, T.\ 2003, \apj, 587, 25
1415:
1416: \bibitem[Eisenhauer et al.(2003)]{2003SPIE.4841.1548E} Eisenhauer, F., et
1417: al.\ 2003, \procspie, 4841, 1548
1418:
1419: \bibitem[Erb et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...612..122E} Erb, D.~K., Steidel, C.~C.,
1420: Shapley, A.~E., Pettini, M., \& Adelberger, K.~L.\ 2004, \apj, 612, 122
1421:
1422: \bibitem[Erb et al.(2006a)]{2006ApJ...647..128E} Erb, D.~K., Steidel, C.~C.,
1423: Shapley, A.~E., Pettini, M., Reddy, N.~A., \& Adelberger, K.~L.\ 2006a,
1424: \apj, 647, 128
1425: % HA observations
1426:
1427: \bibitem[Erb et al.(2006b)]{2006ApJ...646..107E} Erb, D.~K., Steidel, C.~C.,
1428: Shapley, A.~E., Pettini, M., Reddy, N.~A., \& Adelberger, K.~L.\ 2006b,
1429: \apj, 646, 107
1430: % Stellar, Gas and Dynamical
1431:
1432: \bibitem[Erb et al.(2006c)]{2006ApJ...644..813E} Erb, D.~K., Shapley, A.~E.,
1433: Pettini, M., Steidel, C.~C., Reddy, N.~A., \& Adelberger, K.~L.\ 2006c,
1434: \apj, 644, 813
1435: % Mass metallicity paper
1436:
1437: \bibitem[F{\"o}rster Schreiber et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...645.1062F}
1438: F{\"o}rster Schreiber, N.~M., et al.\ 2006, \apj, 645, 1062
1439:
1440: \bibitem[Genzel et al.(2001)]{2001ApJ...563..527G} Genzel, R., Tacconi,
1441: L.~J., Rigopoulou, D., Lutz, D., \& Tecza, M.\ 2001, \apj, 563, 527
1442:
1443: \bibitem[Genzel et al.(2006)]{2006Natur.442..786G} Genzel, R., et al.\
1444: 2006, \nat, 442, 786
1445:
1446: \bibitem[Giallongo et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...568L...9G} Giallongo, E.,
1447: Cristiani, S., D'Odorico, S., \& Fontana, A.\ 2002, \apjl, 568, L9
1448:
1449: \bibitem[Giavalisco et al.(1996)]{1996ApJ...470..189G} Giavalisco, M.,
1450: Steidel, C.~C., \& Macchetto, F.~D.\ 1996, \apj, 470, 189
1451:
1452: \bibitem[Glazebrook et al.(2004)]{2004Natur.430..181G} Glazebrook, K., et
1453: al.\ 2004, \nat, 430, 181
1454:
1455: \bibitem[Gordon et al.(2004)]{2004ApJS..154..215G} Gordon, K.~D., et al.\
1456: 2004, \apjs, 154, 215
1457:
1458: \bibitem[Heckman(2002)]{2002ASPC..254..292H} Heckman, T.~M.\ 2002, ASP
1459: Conf.~Ser.~254: Extragalactic Gas at Low Redshift, 254, 292
1460:
1461: \bibitem[Immeli et al.(2004a)]{2004A&A...413..547I} Immeli, A., Samland, M.,
1462: Gerhard, O., \& Westera, P.\ 2004a, \aap, 413, 547
1463:
1464: \bibitem[Immeli et al.(2004b)]{2004ApJ...611...20I} Immeli, A., Samland, M.,
1465: Westera, P., \& Gerhard, O.\ 2004b, \apj, 611, 20
1466:
1467: \bibitem[Kennicutt et al.(1994)]{1994ApJ...435...22K} Kennicutt, R.~C.,
1468: Jr., Tamblyn, P., \& Congdon, C.~E.\ 1994, \apj, 435, 22
1469:
1470: \bibitem[Kennicutt(1998)]{1998ApJ...498..541K} Kennicutt, R.~C., Jr.\ 1998,
1471: \apj, 498, 541
1472:
1473: \bibitem[Kennicutt(1998b)]{1998ARA&A..36..189K} Kennicutt, R.~C., Jr.\ 1998b,
1474: \araa, 36, 189
1475:
1476: \bibitem[Kennicutt et al.(2004)]{2004AAS...205.6005K} Kennicutt, R.~C.,
1477: Lee, J.~C., Akiyama, S., Funes, J.~G., \& Sakai, S.\ 2004, American
1478: Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 205, 6005L
1479:
1480: \bibitem[Larkin et al.(2006)]{2006SPIE.6269E..42L} Larkin, J., et al.\
1481: 2006, \procspie, 6269, 42
1482:
1483: \bibitem[Law et al.(2006)]{2006AJ....131...70L} Law, D.~R., Steidel, C.~C.,
1484: \& Erb, D.~K.\ 2006, \aj, 131, 70
1485:
1486: \bibitem[Law et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...656....1L} Law, D.~R., Steidel, C.~C.,
1487: Erb, D.~K., Pettini, M., Reddy, N.~A., Shapley, A.~E., Adelberger, K.~L.,
1488: \& Simenc, D.~J.\ 2007, \apj, 656, 1
1489:
1490: \bibitem[Lee et al.(2004)]{2004AAS...205.6004L} Lee, J.~C., Kennicutt,
1491: R.~C., Funes, J.~G., Sakai, S., Tremonti, C.~A., \& van Zee, L.\ 2004,
1492: American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 205, 6004L
1493:
1494: \bibitem[Lehnert \& Heckman(1996a)]{1996ApJ...472..546L} Lehnert, M.~D., \&
1495: Heckman, T.~M.\ 1996a, \apj, 472, 546
1496:
1497: \bibitem[Lehnert \& Heckman(1996b)]{1996ApJ...462..651L} Lehnert, M.~D., \&
1498: Heckman, T.~M.\ 1996b, \apj, 462, 651
1499:
1500: \bibitem[Liu(2006)]{2006SPIE.6272E..14L} Liu, M.~C.\ 2006, \procspie, 6272
1501:
1502: \bibitem[Martin \& Kennicutt(2001)]{2001ApJ...555..301M} Martin, C.~L., \&
1503: Kennicutt, R.~C., Jr.\ 2001, \apj, 555, 301
1504:
1505: \bibitem[Meurer et al.(1997)]{1997AJ....114...54M} Meurer, G.~R., Heckman,
1506: T.~M., Lehnert, M.~D., Leitherer, C., \& Lowenthal, J.\ 1997, \aj, 114, 54
1507:
1508: \bibitem[Mo et al.(1998)]{1998MNRAS.295..319M} Mo, H.~J., Mao, S., \&
1509: White, S.~D.~M.\ 1998, \mnras, 295, 319
1510:
1511: \bibitem[Noguchi(1999)]{1999ApJ...514...77N} Noguchi, M.\ 1999, \apj, 514,
1512: 77
1513:
1514: \bibitem[Osterbrock(1989)]{}Osterbrock, D. E. 1989, Astrophysics of Gaseous Nebulae and Active Galactic
1515: Nuclei (Mill Valley: University Science Books)
1516:
1517: \bibitem[Papovich et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...631..101P} Papovich, C.,
1518: Dickinson, M., Giavalisco, M., Conselice, C.~J., \& Ferguson, H.~C.\ 2005,
1519: \apj, 631, 101
1520:
1521: \bibitem[Papovich et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...640...92P} Papovich, C., et al.\
1522: 2006, \apj, 640, 92
1523:
1524: \bibitem[Peters et al. (2007)]{} Peters, A. et al. 2007, ApJ submitted.
1525:
1526: \bibitem[Pettini et al.(1998)]{1998ApJ...508..539P} Pettini, M., Kellogg,
1527: M., Steidel, C.~C., Dickinson, M., Adelberger, K.~L., \& Giavalisco, M.\
1528: 1998, \apj, 508, 539
1529:
1530: \bibitem[Pettini et al.(2000)]{2000ApJ...528...96P} Pettini, M., Steidel,
1531: C.~C., Adelberger, K.~L., Dickinson, M., \& Giavalisco, M.\ 2000, \apj,
1532: 528, 96
1533:
1534: \bibitem[Pettini et al.(2001)]{2001ApJ...554..981P} Pettini, M., Shapley,
1535: A.~E., Steidel, C.~C., Cuby, J.-G., Dickinson, M., Moorwood, A.~F.~M.,
1536: Adelberger, K.~L., \& Giavalisco, M.\ 2001, \apj, 554, 981
1537:
1538: \bibitem[Pettini et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...569..742P} Pettini, M., Rix,
1539: S.~A., Steidel, C.~C., Adelberger, K.~L., Hunt, M.~P., \& Shapley, A.~E.\
1540: 2002, \apj, 569, 742
1541:
1542: \bibitem[Pettini \& Pagel(2004)]{2004MNRAS.348L..59P} Pettini, M., \&
1543: Pagel, B.~E.~J.\ 2004, \mnras, 348, L59
1544:
1545: \bibitem[Reddy et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...633..748R} Reddy, N.~A., Erb, D.~K.,
1546: Steidel, C.~C., Shapley, A.~E., Adelberger, K.~L., \& Pettini, M.\ 2005,
1547: \apj, 633, 748
1548:
1549: \bibitem[Reddy et al.(2006a)]{2006ApJ...644..792R} Reddy, N.~A., Steidel,
1550: C.~C., Fadda, D., Yan, L., Pettini, M., Shapley, A.~E., Erb, D.~K., \&
1551: Adelberger, K.~L.\ 2006a, \apj, 644, 792
1552:
1553: \bibitem[Renzini(2005)]{2005imf..conf..221R} Renzini, A.\ 2005, ASSL
1554: Vol.~327: The Initial Mass Function 50 Years Later, 221
1555:
1556: \bibitem[Salpeter(1955)]{1955ApJ...121..161S} Salpeter, E.~E.\ 1955, \apj,
1557: 121, 161
1558:
1559: \bibitem[Sanders et al.(1988)]{1988ApJ...325...74S} Sanders, D.~B., Soifer,
1560: B.~T., Elias, J.~H., Madore, B.~F., Matthews, K., Neugebauer, G., \&
1561: Scoville, N.~Z.\ 1988, \apj, 325, 74
1562:
1563: \bibitem[Shapley et al.(2001)]{2001ApJ...562...95S} Shapley, A.~E.,
1564: Steidel, C.~C., Adelberger, K.~L., Dickinson, M., Giavalisco, M., \&
1565: Pettini, M.\ 2001, \apj, 562, 95
1566:
1567: \bibitem[Shapley et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...612..108S} Shapley, A.~E., Erb,
1568: D.~K., Pettini, M., Steidel, C.~C., \& Adelberger, K.~L.\ 2004, \apj, 612,
1569: 108
1570:
1571: \bibitem[Shapley et al.(2005a)]{2005ApJ...626..698S} Shapley, A.~E.,
1572: Steidel, C.~C., Erb, D.~K., Reddy, N.~A., Adelberger, K.~L., Pettini, M.,
1573: Barmby, P., \& Huang, J.\ 2005a, \apj, 626, 698
1574:
1575: \bibitem[Shapley et al.(2005b)]{2005ApJ...635.1006S} Shapley, A.~E., Coil,
1576: A.~L., Ma, C.-P., \& Bundy, K.\ 2005b, \apj, 635, 1006
1577:
1578: \bibitem[Solomon et al.(1997)]{1997ApJ...478..144S} Solomon, P.~M., Downes,
1579: D., Radford, S.~J.~E., \& Barrett, J.~W.\ 1997, \apj, 478, 144
1580:
1581: \bibitem[Steidel et al.(2003)]{2003ApJ...592..728S} Steidel, C.~C.,
1582: Adelberger, K.~L., Shapley, A.~E., Pettini, M., Dickinson, M., \&
1583: Giavalisco, M.\ 2003, \apj, 592, 728
1584:
1585: \bibitem[Steidel et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...604..534S} Steidel, C.~C.,
1586: Shapley, A.~E., Pettini, M., Adelberger, K.~L., Erb, D.~K., Reddy, N.~A.,
1587: \& Hunt, M.~P.\ 2004, \apj, 604, 534
1588:
1589: \bibitem[Steidel et al.(2007)]{steidel07} Steidel, C.~C. et al. 2007,
1590: {\it in preparation}
1591:
1592: \bibitem[Tacconi et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...580...73T} Tacconi, L.~J., Genzel,
1593: R., Lutz, D., Rigopoulou, D., Baker, A.~J., Iserlohe, C., \& Tecza, M.\
1594: 2002, \apj, 580, 73
1595:
1596: \bibitem[Toomre(1964)]{1964ApJ...139.1217T} Toomre, A.\ 1964, \apj, 139,
1597: 1217
1598:
1599: \bibitem[van Dam et al.(2006)]{2006PASP..118..310V} van Dam, M.~A., et al.\
1600: 2006, \pasp, 118, 310
1601:
1602: \bibitem[Weiner et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...653.1027W} Weiner, B.~J., et al.\
1603: 2006, \apj, 653, 1027
1604:
1605: \bibitem[Wizinowich et al.(2006)]{2006PASP..118..297W} Wizinowich, P.~L.,
1606: et al.\ 2006, \pasp, 118, 297
1607:
1608: \bibitem[Wright et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...658...78W} Wright, S.~A., et al.\
1609: 2007, \apj, 658, 78
1610:
1611: \end{thebibliography}
1612:
1613:
1614: \end{document}
1615: