1: %\documentclass[preprint,tightenlines,aps,prd,groupedaddress,showpacs]

2: %\documentclass[twocolumn,aps,prl,groupedaddress,showpacs]{revtex4}

3: %\documentclass[tightenlines,aps,prd,showpacs]{revtex4}

4: 

5: \documentclass[preprint,aps,prd,showpacs,floatfix,nofootinbib,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}

6: %\documentclass[aps,prd,showpacs,nofootinbib]{revtex4}

7: %\documentclass[preprint,tightenlines,aps,prd,showpacs,nofootinbib]{revtex4}

8: %\documentclass[preprint,aps,prd,showpacs]{revtex4}

9: \usepackage{graphicx}

10: \usepackage{amsmath}

11: \usepackage{amssymb}

12: \usepackage{bm}

13: \usepackage{bbm}

14: \begin{document}

15: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

16: %Title of paper

17: \title{\mbox{}\\[10pt]

18: Inclusive Charm Production in $\bm{\Upsilon(nS)}$ Decay

19: }

20: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

21: \author{Daekyoung~Kang}

22: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea}

23: \affiliation{Physics Department, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA}

24: \author{Taewon~Kim}

25: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea}

26: \author{Jungil~Lee}

27: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea}

28: \affiliation{Physics Department, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA}

29: \author{Chaehyun~Yu}

30: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea}

31: 

32: %\date{\today}

33: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

34: \begin{abstract}

35: % insert abstract here

36: Based on the NRQCD factorization formalism, we calculate the inclusive

37: charm production rate in $\Upsilon(nS)$ decay at 

38: leading order in the strong coupling constant $\alpha_s$ and the 

39: relative velocity $v$ of the $b$ quark in the quarkonium rest frame.

40: The branching fractions for $\Upsilon(nS)$ to charm for $n=1$, $2$, and $3$ 

41: are all around $7$--$\,9$\%. About $60$\% of the branching fraction

42: into charm is from annihilation of the color-singlet $b\bar{b}$ pair

43: into $\gamma^*\to c\bar{c}$. Most of the remaining branching fraction

44: is from annihilation of the color-singlet $b\bar{b}$ pair decaying into 

45: $c\bar{c}gg$. We also compute the momentum distributions of the charm 

46: quark and charmed hadrons in the decays. The virtual-photon contribution

47: to the charm quark momentum distribution is concentrated at the end point

48: while the $c\bar{c}gg$ contribution is broad. 

49: The momentum distributions for charmed hadrons are obtained by convolving

50: the charm-quark momentum distribution

51: with charm fragmentation functions. This makes the momentum distributions

52: for charmed hadrons softer than that for the charm quark.

53: This effect is particularly significant in the virtual-photon contribution.

54: \end{abstract}

55: 

56: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

57: % insert suggested PACS numbers in braces on next line

58: \pacs{12.38.-t, 12.39.St, 13.20.Gd, 14.40.Gx}

59: % 12.38.-t   Quantum chromodynamics

60: % 12.39.St  Factorization

61: % 13.20.Gd  Decays of J/psi, Upsilon, and other quarkonia

62: % 14.40.Gx   Mesons with S=C=B=0, mass > 2.5 GeV (including quarkonia)

63: 

64: 

65: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

66: % insert suggested keywords - APS authors don't need to do this

67: %\keywords{}

68: 

69: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

70: %\maketitle must follow title, authors, abstract, \pacs, and \keywords

71: \maketitle

72: 

73: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

74: % body of paper here - Use proper section commands

75: % References should be done using the \cite, \ref, and \label commands

76: 

77: %--------------------------------------------------------------------

78: \section{Introduction 

79: \label{sec:intro}}

80: %--------------------------------------------------------------------

81: 

82: According to the Nonrelativistic QCD (NRQCD) factorization formalism,

83: an annihilation decay rate of a spin-triplet $S$-wave (${}^3S_1$) 

84: bottomonium $\Upsilon$\footnote{

85: Throughout this paper, we suppress the identifier $nS$ in $\Upsilon(nS)$, 

86: where $n$ is the radial quantum number, unless it is necessary.}

87: is expressed as an infinite series of NRQCD matrix elements with 

88: corresponding short-distance coefficients~\cite{Bodwin:1994jh}.

89: The NRQCD matrix elements, which reflect the long-distance nature

90: of the quarkonium, scale as powers of the bottom-quark velocity $v$

91: in the quarkonium rest frame, which is $v^2 \approx 0.1$.

92: At leading order in $v$, the inclusive decay rate of the $\Upsilon$

93: is dominated by the color-singlet spin-triplet contribution

94: whose NRQCD matrix element is

95: $\langle \mathcal{O}_1({}^3S_1) \rangle_{\Upsilon}=%

96: \langle \Upsilon|\mathcal{O}_1({}^3S_1) |\Upsilon\rangle$, which is 

97: defined in Ref.~\cite{Bodwin:1994jh}. The subscript $1$ on the NRQCD

98: four-quark operator $\mathcal{O}_1$ denotes that it is a color-singlet

99: operator. Thus, at leading order in $v$, the inclusive light-hadronic 

100: decay rate of the $\Upsilon$ is expressed in a factorized form:

101: %------------------

102: \begin{equation}

103: %------------------

104: \Gamma[\Upsilon \to X] =

105: C_1\, \frac{\langle \mathcal{O}_1({}^3S_1)\rangle_{\Upsilon}}{m_b^2},

106: \label{Gam-ups}%

107: %------------------

108: \end{equation}

109: %------------------

110: where $X$ represents all possible light hadronic final states

111: into which $\Upsilon$ can decay and $m_b$ is the bottom-quark mass.

112: The short-distance coefficient $C_1$, which

113: is insensitive to the long-distance nature of the $\Upsilon$,

114: can be calculated perturbatively.

115: The dimensions of the matrix element 

116: $\langle \mathcal{O}_1({}^3S_1)\rangle_{\Upsilon}$

117: is $3$ so that $C_1$ is dimensionless.

118: 

119: At leading order in $\alpha_s$, the dominant color-singlet contribution

120: to $C_1$ comes from $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to ggg$ mode, where

121: the three gluons are attached to the bottom-quark line.

122: Here, $\alpha_s$ is the strong coupling constant and $b\bar{b}_1({}^{2s+1}L_J)$

123: is the color-singlet $b\bar{b}$ pair with spin $s$, orbital angular 

124: momentum $L$, and total angular momentum $J$. 

125: The leading contribution

126: of order $\alpha_s^3$ to $C_1$ is

127: known through the orthopositronium decay 

128: rate obtained by Caswell, Lepage, and Sapirstein~\cite{Caswell:1976nx}.

129: The order-$\alpha_s^4$ corrections to $C_1$ were  calculated by Mackenzie

130: and Lepage~\cite{Mackenzie:1981sf}. This result 

131: was confirmed recently

132: by Campbell, Maltoni, and Tramontano~\cite{Campbell:2007ws}.

133: 

134: In addition to the three-gluon mode, $C_1$ may include the virtual-photon

135: contribution from $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to\gamma^*\to q\bar{q}+X$. 

136: The decay rate is of order

137: $e_b^2e_q^2 \alpha^2$, where $\alpha$ is the

138: QED coupling constant 

139: and $e_q$ is the fractional electric

140: charge of the quark $q$: $e_q=\tfrac{2}{3}$ for an up-type quark and 

141: $-\tfrac{1}{3}$ for a down-type quark. That electromagnetic decay rate 

142: may appear to be highly suppressed compared to the three-gluon mode of 

143: order $\alpha_s^3$. However, we can make a rough estimate of the 

144: branching fraction $\textrm{Br}[\Upsilon\to\gamma^*\to q\bar{q}]$ 

145: by using the measured branching fractions for 

146: $\textrm{Br}[\Upsilon\to e^+e^-]$~\cite{Yao:2006px}:

147: $\textrm{Br}[\Upsilon\to \gamma^\ast\to q\bar{q}]\approx%

148: N_c\textrm{Br}[\Upsilon\to e^+e^-]\sum_q e_q^2$, where the sum is over

149: the four flavors of quarks lighter than the bottom

150: and $N_c=3$ is the number of colors.

151: According to this estimate, 

152: $\textrm{Br}[\Upsilon\to \gamma^*\to q \bar{q}]\approx 6$--$\, 8 \%$,

153: which may not be negligible.

154: 

155: At higher orders in $v$, the NRQCD factorization formula (\ref{Gam-ups})

156: must include additional contributions from higher Fock states which 

157: involve

158: color-octet pairs $b\bar{b}_8({}^{2s+1}L_J)$ as well as the color-singlet

159: ones, which are suppressed compared to the leading contribution in 

160: Eq.~(\ref{Gam-ups}). The order-$v^2$ and order-$v^4$ 

161: relativistic corrections to 

162: the color-singlet contributions were calculated 

163: by Keung and Muzinich~\cite{Keung:1982jb} and by 

164: Bodwin and Petrelli~\cite{Bodwin:2002hg}, respectively. 

165: Some of the color-octet contributions were also calculated in 

166: Refs.~\cite{Cheung:1996mh,Maltoni:1998nh,Brambilla:2007cz}.

167: 

168: Because the $\Upsilon$ is heavy enough, the decay products may include

169: a pair of charmed hadrons. However, unlike the light-hadronic decay mode of

170: the $\Upsilon$, there has been little previous work on open-charm

171: production in $\Upsilon$ decay. In 1978, Fritzsch and Streng predicted

172: the branching fraction of the decay of $\Upsilon$ into charm to be a few 

173: percents~\cite{Fritzsch:1978ey}, where they considered 

174: $\Upsilon\to ggg^*$ followed by $g^*\to c\bar{c}$. 

175: In 1979, Bigi and Nussinov took into account

176: a fusion process $\Upsilon\to c\bar{c}g$ of order

177: $\alpha_s^5$, in which a pair of virtual gluons create the $c\bar{c}$ 

178: pair~\cite{Bigi:1978tj}. In 1992, ARGUS experiment searched for charm 

179: production in direct decays of the $\Upsilon(1S)$ to find only an upper

180: limit of $\textrm{Br}^{\textrm{dir}}%

181: [\Upsilon(1S)\to D^*(2010)^{\pm}+X]<0.019$~\cite{Albrecht:1992ap}.

182: 

183: Recent runs of the CLEO III experiment have produced a large amount of

184: data samples at the $\Upsilon(1S)$, $\Upsilon(2S)$, and $\Upsilon(3S)$ 

185: resonances. The $B$-factory experiments BABAR and Belle have 

186: accumulated data for $\Upsilon(2S)$ and $\Upsilon(3S)$ provided by

187: initial-state radiation. The Belle Collaboration has also collected

188: data by running on the $\Upsilon(3S)$ resonance. With these 

189: high-luminosity data, one can now indeed study  

190: open-charm production in $\Upsilon$ decay. 

191: Very recently, some of the authors have calculated the total 

192: production rates and momentum distributions of the charm quark and

193: charmed hadrons, respectively, in the $P$-wave bottomonium decays 

194: $\chi_{bJ}\to c+X$ for $J=0$, 1, and 2 by using the NRQCD factorization

195: formalism~\cite{Bodwin:2007zf}. In order to calculate the momentum

196: distribution of the charmed hadrons they used the momentum distribution 

197: of charmed hadrons measured by the Belle Collaboration in $e^+e^-$ 

198: annihilation~\cite{Seuster:2005tr}. 

199: 

200: 

201: In this work, as an extension of a previous study~\cite{Bodwin:2007zf},

202: we consider inclusive

203: charm production in the spin-triplet $S$-wave bottomonium decay.

204: At leading order in $v$, the dominant mechanism for the decay is

205: a color-singlet channel $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to ggg^*$ 

206: followed by $g^*\to c\bar{c}$. As we have described earlier, 

207: the color-singlet mode may have significant virtual-photon 

208: contribution from

209: $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to \gamma^*$ followed by $\gamma^*\to c\bar{c}$.

210: For inclusive charm production, the virtual-photon contribution may have

211: a larger fraction than that in 

212: the inclusive light-hadronic decay

213: because the rate for $\Upsilon\to c\bar{c}gg$ is 

214: suppressed by order $\alpha_s$ compared to that for $\Upsilon\to ggg$.

215: We consider the virtual-photon contribution as well as the QCD

216: contributions from $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to c\bar{c}gg$ and

217: $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to c\bar{c}g\gamma$ modes.

218: In the current CLEO III analysis on the 

219: charmed-hadron ($h$) momentum distribution in $\Upsilon$ decay,

220: the virtual-photon contribution is subtracted experimentally~\cite{Roy}.

221: We therefore also present the results for the QCD contributions after 

222: excluding the virtual-photon process.

223: 

224: 

225: This paper is organized as follows.

226: In Sec.~\ref{sec:charm}, we present the NRQCD factorization

227: formulas for the inclusive charm production rate and charm 

228: momentum distribution in the spin-triplet $S$-wave bottomonium decay.

229: We also discuss the NRQCD matrix element that appear as a long-distance

230: factor in the factorization formula.

231: We calculate the charm-quark momentum distribution and the total

232: rate for inclusive charm production in the decay in Sec.~\ref{sec:rate}.

233: In Sec.~\ref{sec:meson},

234: in order to provide a theoretical prediction that can be compared

235: with CLEO III data, 

236: we illustrate the charmed-hadron momentum distributions 

237: which are obtained by convolving

238: the charm-quark momentum distribution

239: with fragmentation functions for $c\to h$ that have been fit to

240: $e^+e^-$ annihilation data. 

241: Finally, a brief summary of this work is given in Sec.~\ref{summary}.

242: 

243: 

244: %--------------------------------------------------------------------

245: \section{Charm quark production in $\bm{\Upsilon}$ 

246: decay\label{sec:charm}}

247: %--------------------------------------------------------------------

248: 

249: In this section, we summarize the NRQCD factorization formula for 

250: inclusive charm production in $\Upsilon$ decay. In many

251: aspects there is a large overlap with the formalism for calculating

252: the inclusive charm production rate in the $P$-wave bottomonium 

253: decay~\cite{Bodwin:2007zf}. In this work, we follow the same 

254: strategies that were employed in Ref.~\cite{Bodwin:2007zf}.

255: For details of the formalism, we refer the reader to 

256: Refs.~\cite{Bodwin:1994jh,Bodwin:2007zf}.

257: 

258: %--------------------------------------------------------------------

259: \subsection{NRQCD factorization formula\label{sec:NRQCD}}

260: %--------------------------------------------------------------------

261: 

262: At leading order in $v$, the NRQCD factorization formula 

263: for the inclusive charm production rate in $\Upsilon$ decay has 

264: an analogous form to that for the light-hadronic decay in 

265: Eq.~(\ref{Gam-ups}):

266: %------------------

267: \begin{equation}

268: %------------------

269: \Gamma[\Upsilon \to c + X] =

270: C_1^{(c)} \, 

271: \frac{\langle \mathcal{O}_1({}^3S_1) \rangle_\Upsilon}{m_b^2},

272: %------------------

273: \label{Gam-c}%

274: \end{equation}

275: %------------------

276: where $C_1^{(c)}$ is a dimensionless short-distance coefficient that 

277: depends on the mass ratio $m_c/m_b$ of the charm quark and the bottom

278: quark and $c + X$ represents all possible states containing a charmed

279: hadron, such as $D^+$, $D^0$, $D_s^+$, $\Lambda_c^+$, or their 

280: excited states.

281: 

282: 

283: At leading order in $v$ and $\alpha_s$, the dominant source of 

284: $C_1^{(c)}$ is the decay of a $b\bar{b}_1(^3S_1)$ pair into $ggg^*$,

285: followed by $g^\ast \to c\bar{c}$. One of six Feynman diagrams

286: of the process is shown in Fig.~\ref{figFeyn} and the remaining five

287: diagrams are obtained by permuting the three gluons attached to the 

288: bottom-quark line.

289: The decay of a $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)$ pair into $\gamma g g^\ast$,

290: followed by $g^\ast \to c\bar{c}$ also contributes to $C_1^{(c)}$.

291: We call the two processes involving $g^*\to c\bar{c}$ as QCD processes.

292: 

293: Another similar subprocesses that has the same final state $c\bar{c}gg$

294: as the QCD process is the decay of $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1) \to gg\gamma^\ast$

295: followed by $\gamma^\ast \to c\bar{c}$.

296: Because the $c\bar{c}$ pair created in this subprocess is in a color-singlet

297: state, there is no interference between this and the QCD process whose

298: $c\bar{c}$ pair is created in a color-octet state. The contribution of 

299: the subprocess $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1) \to gg\gamma^\ast$ followed by

300: $\gamma^\ast \to c\bar{c}$ to the $\Upsilon$ decay width is suppressed

301: to the QCD contribution by a multiplicative factor 

302: $8e_b^2 e_c^2 \alpha^2 N_c^2/\alpha_s^2/(N_c^2-4)$.

303: For $\alpha_s (m_\Upsilon/2)\approx 0.215$ 

304: and $\alpha(m_\Upsilon/2)\approx 1/132$,

305: the factor is about $ 0.09\%$.

306: Therefore, we neglect this subprocess.

307: 

308: 

309: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

310: \begin{figure}[tb]

311: \includegraphics*[width=8cm,angle=0,clip=true]{fig1.eps}

312: \caption{

313: One of six Feynman diagrams for $b\bar{b} \to c\bar{c} g g$.

314: The other five diagrams are obtained by permuting the three gluons 

315: attached to the bottom-quark line.

316: }

317: \label{figFeyn}

318: \end{figure}

319: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

320: 

321: In addition to the QCD modes, a virtual-photon mode, 

322: $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to\gamma^*$,

323: followed by $\gamma^*\to c\bar{c}+X$ contributes to $C_1^{(c)}$.

324: A rough estimate of the branching fraction of the virtual-photon

325: channel is about 3\%, which is

326: the product of the measured leptonic width 

327: $\Gamma[\Upsilon \to e^+e^-]$, coupling $e_c^2$, and the color factor

328: $N_c$. This is comparable to the branching fraction 

329: $\textrm{Br}[\Upsilon\to c\bar{c}gg]$  predicted by Fritzsch and 

330: Streng~\cite{Fritzsch:1978ey}. 

331: In this work, we consider the virtual-photon contribution 

332: $C_1^{(c/\gamma^*)}$ from

333: $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to \gamma^\ast \to c\bar{c}$

334: as well as the QCD contribution $C_1^{(c/g^*)}$

335: which is composed of 

336: $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to c\bar{c}gg$ and

337: $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to c\bar{c}g\gamma$.

338: Then the short-distance coefficient $C_1^{(c)}$ is expressed as

339: %------------------

340: \begin{equation}

341: %------------------

342: C_1^{(c)} = C_1^{(c/g^*)} + C_1^{(c/\gamma^*)}.

343: %------------------

344: \label{c1sum}%

345: \end{equation}

346: %------------------

347: 

348: The two QCD contributions to $C_1^{(c/g^*)}$ are essentially

349: the same except for overall factors so that

350: %------------------

351: \begin{equation}

352: %------------------

353: C_1^{(c/g^*)} = C_1^{(c\bar{c}gg)}+C_1^{(c\bar{c}g\gamma)}

354: = F_\gamma C_1^{(c\bar{c}gg)},

355: %------------------

356: \label{c1c}%

357: \end{equation}

358: %------------------

359: where 

360: $C_1^{(c\bar{c}gg)}$ and 

361: $C_1^{(c\bar{c}g\gamma)}$ are contributions of

362: $c\bar{c}gg$ and $c\bar{c}g\gamma$ channels to $C_1^{(c/g^*)}$, respectively.

363: The factor $F_\gamma$ is defined by 

364: %------------------

365: \begin{equation}

366: %------------------

367: F_\gamma = 1+ \frac{2e_b^2 \alpha}{\alpha_s} \frac{4 N_c}{(N_c^2-4)}. 

368: %------------------

369: \label{F1}%

370: \end{equation}

371: %------------------

372: For $\alpha_s(m_\Upsilon/2)\approx 0.215$ 

373: and $\alpha(m_\Upsilon/2)\approx 1/132$,

374: the numerical value for $F_\gamma$ is

375: about $1.02$, which indicates that the $c\bar{c}g\gamma$ contribution

376: is only about $2\%$ of the QCD contributions.

377: Since we are interested in the total decay  rate of $\Upsilon\to c+X$ 

378: and distributions of the charm quark with respect to its kinematic variables,

379: we integrate out the phase spaces for the gluons or the photon. Therefore,

380: the total and the differential width of the QCD mode

381: are the same as those for the $c\bar{c}gg$ final state

382: up to the multiplicative factor $F_\gamma$ in Eq.~(\ref{F1}).

383: 

384: As in the case of light hadronic decay of the $\Upsilon$,

385: inclusive charm production in $\Upsilon$ decay

386: may have contributions from the decay of the color-octet pair $b\bar{b}_8$

387: through $b\bar{b}_8 \to g^\ast$, followed by $g^\ast \to c\bar{c}$. 

388: While the color-octet contribution is suppressed to the color-singlet 

389: contribution by order $v^4$, the short-distance coefficient of the octet

390: process $b\bar{b}_8({}^3S_1)\to g^\ast\to c\bar{c}$ is enhanced by

391: $1/\alpha_s^2$. Therefore, the color-octet channel may have non-negligible

392: contributions, especially for the decay of higher resonances. 

393: In this work, we do not consider the color-octet contributions.

394: 

395: In a recent analysis being carried out

396: by the CLEO Collaboration, as a part of experimental measurement,

397: the virtual-photon contribution is subtracted from the data samples

398: of $\Upsilon\to c+X$ by scaling the continuum data by an extra factor

399: based on the branching fractions $\textrm{Br}[\Upsilon(nS)\to\mu^+\mu^-]$

400: and $R_{\textrm{hadrons}}$ but the data include the contribution

401: from $b\bar{b}_1(^3S_1) \to \gamma gg^*$ followed by

402: $g^* \to c \bar{c}$~\cite{Roy}.

403: The CLEO III data should, therefore, be

404: directly compared with the QCD contributions $C_1^{(c/g^*)}$ which

405: excludes  $C_1^{(c/\gamma^*)}$ from  $C_1^{(c)}$ in Eq.~(\ref{c1sum}).

406: 

407: In the remainder of this paper, we use the same conventions of 

408: superscripts to other variables as those used in the short-distance 

409: coefficients $C_1^{(c)}$, $C_1^{(c/g^*)}$, 

410: $C_1^{(c\bar{c}gg)}$, $C_1^{(c\bar{c}g\gamma)}$,

411: and $C_1^{(c/\gamma^*)}$. For example, 

412: $\Gamma^{(c)}=\Gamma[\Upsilon\to c+X]$ and

413: $\Gamma^{(c\bar{c}gg)}=\Gamma[\Upsilon\to c\bar{c}gg]$.

414: 

415: %------------------------------------------------

416: \subsection{Amplitude for $\bm{b}\bar{\bm{b}}$ annihilation into charm}

417: %------------------------------------------------

418: 

419: The short-distance coefficients $C_1^{(c)}$, $C_1^{(c/g^*)}$,

420: $C_1^{(c\bar{c}gg)}$, $C_1^{(c\bar{c}g\gamma)}$, and $C_1^{(c/\gamma^*)}$

421: are calculable by using perturbative matching, which involves

422: the computation of the amplitudes for the corresponding perturbative

423: short-distance processes such as $bb_1({}^3S_1)\to c\bar{c}gg$.

424: In this section, we summarize a way to calculate the

425: annihilation amplitude for the process $bb_1({}^3S_1)\to c\bar{c}gg$.

426: Computations of the amplitudes for the remaining processes are 

427: analogous to that for $bb_1({}^3S_1)\to c\bar{c}gg$.

428: 

429: At leading order in $\alpha_s$, the short-distance process 

430: for $\Upsilon\to c + X$ is

431: $b(p)\bar{b}(\bar{p}) \to c(p_1)\bar{c}(p_2) g(p_3) g(p_4)$

432: as shown in Fig.~\ref{figFeyn}. 

433: The momenta of the $b$ and the $\bar{b}$ can be expressed in terms of

434: the total momentum $P$ and the relative momentum

435: $q$ of the $b\bar{b}$ pair: 

436: %------------------

437: \begin{subequations}

438: \begin{eqnarray}

439: %------------------

440: p&=&\tfrac{1}{2}P+q,

441: \\

442: \bar{p}&=&\tfrac{1}{2}P-q,

443: %------------------

444: \end{eqnarray}

445: \end{subequations}

446: %------------------

447: where the $p$ and the $\bar{p}$ satisfy the on-shell conditions

448: $p^2=\bar{p}^2=m_b^2$ and $P\cdot q=0$.

449: In the rest frame of the $b\bar{b}$ pair, 

450: $P=(2E_b,0)$ and $q=(0,\bm{q})$, where

451: $E_b=\sqrt{m_b^2+\bm{q}^2}$. 

452: In general, the perturbative amplitude for the $b\bar{b}$ annihilation

453: process is expressed as

454: %------------------

455: \begin{equation}

456: %------------------

457: \bar{v}(\bar{p}) \mathcal{M}[b\bar{b}]  u(p) =

458: \textrm{Tr} \big(\mathcal{M}[b\bar{b}]  u(p) \bar{v}(\bar{p}) \big),

459: %------------------

460: \label{vbarMu}%

461: \end{equation}

462: %------------------

463: where $\mathcal{M}[b\bar{b}]$ is a matrix that acts on spinors with 

464: both Dirac and color indices. The matrix $\mathcal{M}[b\bar{b}]$ 

465: for the short-distance process 

466: $b\bar{b}\to c(p_1)\bar{c}(p_2) g(p_3) g(p_4)$ is given by

467: %------------------

468: \begin{eqnarray}

469: %------------------

470: \mathcal{M}[b \bar{b}] &=&

471: \frac{16 \pi^2 \alpha_s^2}{(p_1+p_2)^2}

472:   \bar{u}(p_1) T^a \gamma_\lambda v(p_2)

473:   \epsilon^{b *}_{1\,\sigma}(p_3)\epsilon^{c *}_{2\,\tau}(p_4)

474: \nonumber

475: \\

476: && 

477: \times 

478: \sum_\textrm{perm}

479: \left[ \gamma^\lambda \Lambda(p-p_3-p_4) \gamma^\sigma

480: \Lambda(p-p_4) \gamma^\tau 

481: \otimes T^a T^b T^c \right],

482: %------------------

483: \label{amp-bb}%

484: \end{eqnarray}

485: %------------------

486: where $\sum_\textrm{perm}$ means the summation over the permutations

487: of the three gluons attached to the bottom-quark line.

488: $T^a$ is a generator of the fundamental representation 

489: for the SU(3) color group and $a$,$b$, and $c$ are color indices

490: for the gluons. $\epsilon_1$ and $\epsilon_2$ are polarization vectors

491: for the external gluons with momenta $p_3$ and $p_4$, respectively.

492: Note that the expression in Eq.~(\ref{amp-bb}) is valid to any order

493: in $v$. The function $\Lambda(k)$ is defined by

494: %------------------

495: \begin{equation}

496: %------------------

497: \Lambda(k)=\frac{/\!\!\!k+m_b}{k^2-m_b^2}.

498: %------------------

499: \end{equation}

500: %------------------

501: 

502: In general, the amplitude (\ref{vbarMu}) contains contributions other

503: than the color-singlet $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)$ state, which we want to 

504: project out. A convenient way to carry out the projection is

505: to replace the spinor product $u(p)\bar{v}(\bar{p})$ in 

506: Eq.~(\ref{vbarMu}) by the direct product of the color-singlet projection

507: operator $\pi_1$ and the spin-triplet projector 

508: $\epsilon_\mu\Pi^\mu_3$~\cite{Kuhn:1979bb,Guberina:1980dc,Bodwin:2002hg},

509: where

510: %------------------

511: \begin{subequations}

512: \begin{eqnarray}

513: %------------------

514: \pi_1 &=& \frac{1}{\sqrt{N_c}} \mathbbm{1},

515: \label{color-projector}% 

516: \\

517: \Pi_3^\mu &=&

518: -\frac{1}{4\sqrt{2}E_b(E_b+m_b)}

519: (/\!\!\!{p}+m_b)(\,/\!\!\!\!P\!+\!2E_b) \gamma^\mu

520: (/\!\!\!\bar{p}-m_b) ,

521: \label{spin-projector}%

522: %------------------

523: \end{eqnarray}

524: \label{projectors}%

525: \end{subequations}

526: %------------------

527: where $\mathbbm{1}$ is 

528: the SU(3) color unit matrix and

529: $\epsilon$ is the polarization four-vector of the $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)$

530: state so that $P \cdot \epsilon  = 0$. The projectors (\ref{projectors})

531: are normalized as $\textrm{Tr}[\pi_1\pi_1^\dagger]=1$ and

532: $\textrm{Tr}[(\epsilon\cdot\Pi_3)%

533: (\epsilon\cdot\Pi_3)^\dagger]=4p_0\bar{p}_0$. At leading order in $v$, 

534: the amplitude for the color-singlet spin-triplet $S$-wave 

535: $b\bar{b}$ pair can be written as

536: $\epsilon_\mu \mathcal{A}_1^\mu[b\bar{b}_1(^3S_1)]$, where

537: %------------------

538: \begin{equation}

539: %------------------

540: \mathcal{A}^\mu_1 =

541: \textrm{Tr} \big( \mathcal{M}[b\bar{b}]\,

542: \Pi_3^\mu \otimes \pi_1  \big) 

543: \Big|_{q=0}.

544: %------------------

545: \label{amp-S}%

546: \end{equation}

547: %------------------

548: Because we are working in the leading order in $v$,

549: we put $q=0$ and, therefore, $E_b=m_b$. 

550: 

551: The amplitude (\ref{amp-S}) is finite in the soft

552: limits of any external gluons. At higher orders in $v$, infrared divergences 

553: arise in this $S$-wave amplitude while a $P$-wave amplitude has an infrared

554: divergence at leading order in $v$.

555: The amplitude (\ref{amp-S}) is sensitive to 

556: the ratio $m_c/m_b$. In the massless charm-quark limit $m_c/m_b\to 0$,

557: the amplitude (\ref{amp-S}) acquires a collinear divergence, which cancels

558: that arising from the charm-quark loop corrections to the gluon wave function

559: for the $\Upsilon\to ggg$ process~\cite{Bodwin:2007zf}.

560: Because the amplitude (\ref{amp-S}) is free of any infrared and

561: collinear divergences for $m_c \neq 0$ and $q=0$, 

562: we do not need any regularization scheme and

563: work in four space-time dimensions.

564: 

565: %------------------------------------------------

566: \subsection{Short-distance coefficients}

567: %------------------------------------------------

568: 

569: We proceed to calculate $C^{(c)}_1$  in the NRQCD factorization formula 

570: (\ref{Gam-c}). The short-distance coefficient $C_1^{(c)}$ is

571: insensitive to the long-distance nature of the $\Upsilon$. 

572: Therefore, $C_1^{(c)}$ is calculable perturbatively. This 

573: can be done by perturbative matching~\cite{Bodwin:1994jh,Bodwin:2007zf}.

574: In order to determine the short-distance coefficients $C_1^{(c)}$,

575: we must calculate the annihilation rate for the color-singlet

576: spin-triplet $b\bar{b}$ state by using perturbative QCD.

577: The perturbative analog of the NRQCD factorization formula in

578: Eq.~(\ref{Gam-c}) for the annihilation rate of the

579: $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)$ pair is

580: %------------------

581: \begin{equation}

582: d\Gamma[b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to c+X]=dC_1^{(c)}

583: \frac{\langle \mathcal{O}_1({}^3S_1)\rangle_{b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)}

584:      }

585: {m_b^2},

586: \label{dGam-c-bb}%

587: \end{equation}

588: %------------------

589: where the factorization formula (\ref{dGam-c-bb}) is written in

590: a differential form. This form is useful for our purpose of

591: calculating the momentum distribution of the charm quark.

592: 

593: %------------------------------------------------

594: \subsubsection{Calculation of $C_1^{(c/g^*)}$}

595: %------------------------------------------------

596: The differential annihilation rate of a color-singlet spin-triplet $S$-wave

597: $b\bar{b}$ state into charm through the process 

598: $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to c\bar{c}gg$ can be expressed as

599: %------------------

600: \begin{equation}

601: d\Gamma[b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to c\bar{c}gg]=

602: \left(

603: \frac{1}{3}I_{\mu\nu}

604: \sum_{c\bar{c}gg}\mathcal{A}_1^{\mu}\mathcal{A}_1^{\nu*}

605: \right)\frac{d\Phi_4}{2!},

606: \label{dGam-c-bb-pert}%

607: \end{equation}

608: %------------------

609: where 

610: $\mathcal{A}_1$ is the perturbative amplitude (\ref{amp-S})

611: for $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to c\bar{c}gg$,

612: $I^{\mu\nu}$ is the spin-$1$ polarization tensor 

613: for the $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)$,

614: %------------------

615: \begin{equation}

616: %------------------

617: I^{\mu\nu}=-g^{\mu\nu}+\frac{P^\mu P^\nu}{P^2},

618: %------------------

619: \label{Imunu}%

620: \end{equation}

621: %------------------

622: $d\Phi_4$ is the four-body phase space for $c\bar{c}gg$,

623: and $\sum_{c\bar{c}gg}$ indicates summation over the spin states 

624: of $c\bar{c}gg$.

625: The factor $1/3$ in Eq.~(\ref{dGam-c-bb-pert}) comes from

626: averaging over the spin states for the $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)$.

627: A factor of $1/2!$ is multiplied to the four-body phase space

628: because there are two identical particles in the $c\bar{c}gg$ 

629: final state, whose phase spaces are integrated out.

630: 

631: In order to complete the matching calculation for 

632: $dC^{(c)}_1$, we need to compute the perturbative NRQCD 

633: matrix element:

634: %------------------

635: \begin{equation}

636: \langle\mathcal{O}_1({}^3S_1) 

637: \rangle_{b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)}

638: =2N_c (2E_b)^2= 8N_cm_b^2+\mathcal{O}(v^2).

639: \label{me-pert-norm}%

640: \end{equation}

641: %------------------

642: Substituting Eqs.~(\ref{dGam-c-bb-pert}) and (\ref{me-pert-norm})

643: into Eq.~(\ref{dGam-c-bb})

644: and multiplying by $F_\gamma$ in order to take into account 

645: the $c\bar{c}g\gamma$ process as well as $c\bar{c}gg$,

646: we find the differential 

647: short-distance coefficient $dC_1^{(c/g^*)}$:

648: %------------------

649: \begin{equation}

650: dC_1^{(c/g^*)}=

651: \frac{F_\gamma}

652:      {8N_c}

653: \left(

654: \frac{1}{3}I_{\mu\nu}

655: \sum_{c\bar{c}gg}\mathcal{A}_1^{\mu}\mathcal{A}_1^{\nu*}

656: \right)\frac{d\Phi_4}{2!}.

657: \label{dC}%

658: \end{equation}

659: %------------------

660: If we replace $F_\gamma$ in Eq.~(\ref{dC}) with unity or

661: $F_\gamma-1$, we get 

662: the expression for $dC_1^{(c\bar{c}gg)}$ or $dC_1^{(c\bar{c}g\gamma)}$,

663: respectively.

664: 

665: A parameterization of the four-body phase space $d\Phi_4$

666: for the $c\bar{c}gg$ final state is derived in Appendix \ref{app}:

667: %------------------

668: \begin{equation}

669: %------------------

670: d\Phi_4

671: =

672: \frac{E_b^4}{2^{12} \pi^7}

673: \frac{r_Y (x_1^2-r_c)^{1/2} \lambda^{1/2}(r_X^2, r_Y^2, r_c)}{r_X^2}

674: dx_1 dr_Y d\Omega_2^* d\Omega_3^*,

675: %------------------

676: \label{dPhi4}%

677: \end{equation}

678: %------------------

679: where $\lambda(a,b,c)=a^2+b^2+c^2-2 a b - 2 b c - 2 c a$.

680: In Eq.~(\ref{dPhi4}),  we have not set $v=0$  so that

681: the expression can be used for a more general case.

682: $x_1$, $r_Y$, and $r_X$ in Eq.~(\ref{dPhi4})

683: are dimensionless variables defined by

684: %------------------

685: \begin{subequations}

686: \begin{eqnarray}

687: %------------------

688: x_1 &=& E_1/E_b, \\

689: r_Y &=& m_Y/E_b, \\

690: r_X &=& m_X/E_b, 

691: %------------------

692: \end{eqnarray}

693: \label{xi-definition}%

694: \end{subequations}

695: %------------------

696: where $E_1$ is the energy of the charm quark in the rest frame of 

697: the $b\bar{b}$ pair and the invariant masses $m_X$ and $m_Y$ are defined 

698: by $m_X^2=X^2=(p_2+p_3+p_4)^2$ and $m_Y^2=Y^2=(p_3+p_4)^2$, respectively.

699: The ranges of the integration variables are

700: %------------------

701: \begin{subequations}

702: \begin{eqnarray}

703: %------------------

704: \label{x1-bound}%

705: \sqrt{r_c}\leq &x_1& \leq1

706: ,

707: \\

708: \label{xY-bound}%

709: 0 \leq &r_Y& \leq \sqrt{4 - 4x_1 + r_c}-\sqrt{r_c},

710: %------------------

711: \end{eqnarray}

712: \label{bound}%

713: \end{subequations}

714: %------------------

715: where 

716: \begin{equation}

717: r_c=m_c^2/E_b^2.

718: \label{rc}%

719: \end{equation}

720: $d\Omega_2^*$ and $d\Omega_3^*$ are solid-angle elements of

721: the charm antiquark with momentum $p_2$ in the $X$-rest frame and

722: the gluon with momentum $p_3$ in the $Y$-rest frame,

723: respectively. 

724: 

725: %------------------------------------------------

726: \subsubsection{Calculation of $C_1^{(c/\gamma^*)}$}

727: %------------------------------------------------

728: The virtual-photon ($\gamma^*$) contribution  

729: $C^{(c/\gamma^*)}_1$ to the short-distance coefficient $C^{(c)}_1$ 

730: in Eq.~(\ref{c1c})

731: is proportional to that for the leptonic decay of the $\Upsilon(nS)$:

732: %------------------

733: \begin{equation}

734: %------------------

735: dC_1^{(\ell^+\ell^-)}=

736: \frac{2\pi}{3}e_b^2\alpha^2

737: \delta(1-x_1)dx_1.

738: %------------------

739: \end{equation}

740: %------------------

741: The short-distance coefficient $C^{(c/\gamma^*)}_1$ is

742: %------------------

743: \begin{eqnarray}

744: %------------------

745: dC_1^{(c/\gamma^*)}&=&e_c^2 N_c \left( 1+\frac{r_c}{2}\right)

746:                   \sqrt{1-r_c}\times dC_1^{\ell^+\ell^-}

747: \nonumber\\

748: &=&

749: \frac{\pi}{3}e_b^2e_c^2N_c\alpha^2 (2+r_c)

750: \sqrt{1-r_c}\,\delta(1-x_1)dx_1,

751: %------------------

752: \label{dcgamma}%

753: \end{eqnarray}

754: %------------------

755: where the factor $\sqrt{1-r_c}$ is the ratio of the 

756: phase space for the $c\bar{c}$ final state to 

757: the massless two-body phase space.

758: The QED coupling $\alpha(\mu)$ in Eq.~(\ref{dcgamma}) is defined by

759: the running coupling constant $\alpha(m_\Upsilon)=1/131$, $1/130.9$, and

760: $1/130.9$ for the radial quantum number $n=1$, $2$, and $3$, respectively.

761: 

762: %------------------------------------------------

763: \subsection{NRQCD matrix elements

764: \label{sec:matrix}}

765: %------------------------------------------------

766: In order to predict the decay widths (\ref{Gam-c}) for the radial

767: quantum numbers $n=1$, 2, and 3,

768: we must know the numerical value of 

769: $\langle \mathcal{O}_1 \rangle_{\Upsilon}$ for each state.

770: In principle, the NRQCD matrix elements may be calculated 

771: in lattice simulations~\cite{Bodwin:1996tg,Bodwin:2001mk}.

772: However, the only available NRQCD matrix element for 

773: an $S$-wave bottomonium

774: is that for the $1S$ state~\cite{Bodwin:2001mk}.

775: Extrapolating the value in Ref.~\cite{Bodwin:2001mk},

776: which is obtained from an unquenched calculation 

777: using two dynamical light quarks, to three light-quark flavors,

778: one obtains $\langle \mathcal{O}_1%

779: \rangle_{\Upsilon(1S)} = 3.95 \pm 0.43~\textrm{GeV}^3$,

780: where we use the same extrapolation method that is given in 

781: Ref.~\cite{Bodwin:2007zf}.

782: 

783: The NRQCD matrix element $\langle \mathcal{O}_1 \rangle_\Upsilon$

784: may also be determined by comparing the NRQCD factorization formula

785: for $\Gamma[\Upsilon\to e^+ e^-]$ with the empirical values,

786: which are measured with uncertainties of order $2\%$.

787: Recently, a method to resum a class of relativistic corrections to 

788: $S$-wave quarkonium processes

789: has been developed~\cite{Bodwin:2006dn,Bodwin:2007fz},

790: where order-$\alpha_s$ and resummed relativistic corrections are included

791: in the NRQCD factorization formula for the leptonic decay width.

792: This method has been used to determine the color-singlet NRQCD 

793: matrix elements for the $S$-wave charmonium 

794: states~\cite{Chung:2007ke,Bodwin:2007fz}

795: and to the calculation of exclusive two-charmonium 

796: production in $e^+e^-$ annihilation~\cite{Bodwin:2006ke,Bodwin:2007ga}.

797: Using the method given in Ref.~\cite{Bodwin:2007fz}, we can determine

798: the NRQCD matrix elements for each $nS$ state:

799: %------------------

800: \begin{subequations}

801: \begin{eqnarray}

802: %------------------

803: \langle \mathcal{O}_1 \rangle_{\Upsilon(1S)} &=&

804: 3.07^{+0.21}_{-0.19}  ~ \textrm{GeV}^3, 

805: \label{ME1S}%

806: \\

807: \langle \mathcal{O}_1 \rangle_{\Upsilon(2S)} &=&

808: 1.62^{+0.11}_{-0.10} ~ \textrm{GeV}^3, \\

809: \langle \mathcal{O}_1 \rangle_{\Upsilon(3S)} &=&

810: 1.28^{+0.09}_{-0.08} ~ \textrm{GeV}^3.

811: %------------------

812: \end{eqnarray}

813: \label{ME}%

814: \end{subequations}

815: %------------------

816: The uncertainties in the matrix elements in Eq.~(\ref{ME}) reflect 

817: the errors in the lattice string tension, the one-loop pole mass of the 

818: bottom quark, the strong coupling constant, and the measured values for

819: the leptonic widths as well as corrections of order $v^2$ that are not

820: included in the potential model~\cite{Bodwin:2007fz}.

821: The central value of the matrix element (\ref{ME1S}) for $\Upsilon(1S)$ 

822: is smaller than the lattice estimate by about 22\%.

823: In our numerical calculations, we use the values for the NRQCD matrix

824: elements given in Eq.~(\ref{ME}).

825: 

826: %------------------------------------------------

827: \section{Decay rate}

828: \label{sec:rate}

829: %------------------------------------------------

830: 

831: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

832: \begin{figure}[tb]

833: \includegraphics*[width=12cm,angle=0,clip=true]{fig2.ps}

834: \caption{

835: Distributions of the scaled momentum fraction $y_1$ for the charm quark 

836: in decays of $\Upsilon(nS)$ for $n=1$ (solid line), 2 (dashed line), 

837: and 3 (dotted line) by using $m_b=4.6$ GeV, 

838: $\alpha_s(m_\Upsilon/2)=0.215$, $0.212$, and $0.210$, and

839: $\langle \mathcal{O}_1 \rangle_{\Upsilon} = 3.07$, $1.62$, and $1.28$ 

840: $\textrm{GeV}^3$ for the $1S$, $2S$, and $3S$ states, respectively.

841: The distributions in the range $y_1<1$ are for the QCD contribution 

842: $d\Gamma^{(c/g^*)}$. There is a delta function at $y_1=1$ from the

843: virtual-photon contribution 

844: $d\Gamma^{(c/\gamma^*)}$ in Eq.~(\ref{dcgamma}),

845: which is not shown in this figure.

846: }

847: \label{fig2}%

848: \end{figure}

849: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

850: 

851: %------------------------------------------------

852: \subsection{Charm-quark momentum distribution}

853: %------------------------------------------------

854: 

855: In the quarkonium rest frame,

856: the NRQCD factorization formula for the differential distribution

857: with respect to the charm-quark energy fraction $x_1$ in 

858: $\Upsilon$ decay is easily deduced from Eq.~(\ref{Gam-c}):

859: %------------------

860: \begin{equation}

861: %------------------

862: \frac{d\Gamma^{(c)}}{dx_1} =

863: \frac{dC_1^{(c)}}{dx_1} \,

864: \frac{\langle \mathcal{O}_1 \rangle_{\Upsilon}}{m_b^2},

865: %------------------

866: \label{dGamdx1}%

867: \end{equation}

868: %------------------

869: where the differential coefficient is defined by 

870: $dC_1^{(c)}=dC_1^{(c/g^*)}+dC_1^{(c/\gamma^*)}$, which is analogous

871: to Eq.~(\ref{c1sum}), and $dC_1^{(c/g^*)}$ and $dC_1^{(c/\gamma^*)}$

872: are given in Eqs.~(\ref{dC}) and (\ref{dcgamma}).

873: Integration over the variables $dr_Y$, $d\Omega_2^*$,

874: and $d\Omega_3^*$ is implicit in $dC_1^{(c/g^*)}\!/dx_1$ 

875: on the right side of Eq.~(\ref{dGamdx1}).

876: 

877: In the $\Upsilon$ rest frame, the magnitude of the three-momentum

878: of the charm quark is determined by the energy fraction $x_1$ as

879: Eq.~(\ref{absp1}). Using this relation, we obtain the 

880: charm-quark momentum distribution from Eq.~(\ref{dGamdx1}).

881: It is convenient to introduce the scaled momentum fraction $y_1$ 

882: that is defined as the momentum of the charm quark divided by

883: the maximum value that is kinematically allowed

884: in  $\Upsilon$ decay~\cite{Bodwin:2007zf}. The physical range

885: of the variable is simple: $0 < y_1 < 1$.

886: By using the relations between $x_1$ and $y_1$

887: %------------------

888: \begin{subequations}

889: \begin{eqnarray}

890: %------------------

891: x_1&=&\sqrt{(1-r_c) y_1^2+r_c},

892: \label{x1inverse}%

893: \\

894: y_1 &=& \sqrt{\frac{x_1^2 - r_c}{1-r_c}},

895: \label{y1-def}%

896: %------------------

897: \end{eqnarray}

898: \end{subequations}

899: %------------------

900: we obtain the distribution for the scaled momentum fraction $y_1$:

901: %------------------

902: \begin{equation}

903: %------------------

904: \frac{d\Gamma^{(c)}}{dy_1} =

905: \frac{(1-r_c) y_1}{\sqrt{(1-r_c)y_1^2 + r_c}} \, 

906: \frac{d\Gamma^{(c)}}{dx_1},

907: \label{dGy1}%

908: %------------------

909: \end{equation}

910: %------------------

911: where $d\Gamma^{(c)}/dx_1$ is given in Eq.~(\ref{dGamdx1}).

912: 

913: In the NRQCD factorization formula (\ref{dGamdx1}), 

914: the bottom-quark mass $m_b$ appears in common for all three

915: $S$-wave states. In order to be consistent with a preceding 

916: work~\cite{Bodwin:2007zf}, we use the one-loop pole mass

917: $m_b=4.6$ GeV for that $m_b$. 

918: The dimensionless short-distance coefficient 

919: $dC_1^{(c)}/dx_1$ depends on the strong coupling $\alpha_s$ and the ratio $r_c$.

920: For the strong coupling, we use 

921: $\alpha_s(m_\Upsilon/2) = 0.215$, $0.212$, and $0.210$ for the ratial 

922: quantum number $1$, $2$, and $3$ of the $\Upsilon$, respectively.

923: The ratio $r_c$ depends on $m_c/E_b$. In the nonrelativistic limit $v\to 0$,

924: which we are taking in this work, $r_c\to r\equiv (m_c/m_b)^2$.

925: Then the bounds (\ref{bound}) of the variables $x_1$ and $r_Y$ are determined 

926: by $r$. 

927: We take $r_c=r=4 m_D^2/m_{\Upsilon}^2$, where $m_D=1.87$ GeV is 

928: the average of the masses of the $D^0$ and $D^+$. 

929: For the $S$-wave spin-triplet bottomonium masses, we use

930: $m_{\Upsilon}=9.46$ GeV, $10.02$ GeV,

931: and $10.36$ GeV, for the radial quantum number $n=1$, 

932: 2, and 3, respectively~\cite{Yao:2006px}.

933: This choice of $r_c$ correctly reflects the physical 

934: kinematics~\cite{Bodwin:2007zf}.

935: We take the numerical values in Eq.~(\ref{ME}) for the color-singlet 

936: NRQCD matrix elements.

937: 

938: Our theoretical prediction for the momentum distribution of the

939: charm quark in the inclusive $\Upsilon$ decay is shown in 

940: Fig.~\ref{fig2} in terms of $d\Gamma^{(c/g^*)}/dy_1$, where

941: the solid, dashed, and dotted lines are

942: the distributions for the $1S$, $2S$, and $3S$ states, respectively.

943: Because the color-singlet $S$-wave amplitudes for the processes

944: are infrared finite, the distributions in Fig.~\ref{fig2}

945: are finite over the whole range of $y_1$. This is different from

946: those for $\chi_{bJ}\to c+X$  $(J=0,1,2)$, which grow rapidly

947: as $y_1\to 1$~\cite{Bodwin:2007zf}.

948: The $y_1$ distributions are broad because of the four-body nature of the

949: $c\bar{c}gg$ ($c\bar{c}g\gamma$)  final state. 

950: The curves have the maximum values

951: $2.44$ keV at $y_1=0.51$,

952: $1.38$ keV at $y_1=0.50$, and

953: $1.12$ keV at $y_1=0.50$ for 

954: $\Upsilon{(1S)}$,

955: $\Upsilon{(2S)}$, and

956: $\Upsilon{(3S)}$, respectively.

957: 

958: As we have stated in Sec.~\ref{sec:NRQCD}, the distributions in

959: Fig.~\ref{fig2} include only 

960: $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to c\bar{c} gg$ and

961: $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to c\bar{c} g \gamma $ contributions to

962: the short-distance coefficient $dC^{(c)}_1$ (\ref{dC}).

963: For $y_1<1$, the leading virtual-photon contribution 

964: $\Upsilon\to\gamma^*\to c\bar{c}$ does not contribute because

965: the distribution is proportional to $\delta(1-y_1)$.

966: The sharp peak from the virtual-photon contribution 

967: $d\Gamma^{(c/\gamma^*)}\!/dy_1$ at the end

968: point has contributions to the total inclusive charm production

969: rate comparable to that of

970: the QCD contributions illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig2}. 

971: 

972: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

973: \begin{table}[t]

974: \caption{\label{table:decayrate}%

975: Inclusive charm production rate $\Gamma^{(c)}$ and

976: partial widths $\Gamma^{(c/g^*)}$ and $\Gamma^{(c/\gamma^*)}$

977: in units of keV for 

978: $m_b=4.6 \pm 0.1$ GeV, and

979: $\langle \mathcal{O}_1 \rangle_{\Upsilon}$ in Eq.~(\ref{ME}).

980: Uncertainties are estimated as stated in the text.

981: The partial widths $\Gamma^{(c\bar{c}gg)}$ and

982: $\Gamma^{(c\bar{c}g\gamma)}$ can be obtained by multiplying

983: $\Gamma^{(c/g^*)}$ by factors $F^{-1}_\gamma\approx 0.982$ and 

984: $1-F^{-1}_\gamma\approx 0.0184$, respectively.

985: }

986: \begin{ruledtabular}

987: \begin{tabular}{lccc}

988: state $\backslash$ $\Gamma$ (keV)

989:  & $\Gamma^{(c/g^*)}$

990:  & $\Gamma^{(c/\gamma^*)}$

991:  & $\Gamma^{(c)}$

992: \\

993: \hline

994: $\Upsilon(1S)$

995: & $1.47\pm 0.36$ 

996: & $2.60\pm 0.65$ 

997: & $4.07\pm 0.75$ 

998: \\

999: $\Upsilon(2S)$

1000: & $0.83\pm 0.20$

1001: & $1.38\pm 0.34$

1002: & $2.21\pm 0.40$

1003: \\

1004: $\Upsilon(3S)$

1005: & $0.68\pm 0.16$

1006: & $1.09\pm 0.27$

1007: & $1.77\pm 0.32$

1008: \end{tabular}

1009: \end{ruledtabular}

1010: \end{table}

1011: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1012: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1013: \begin{table}[t]

1014: \caption{\label{table:br}%

1015: Branching fractions Br$^{(i)}=\Gamma^{(i)}/\Gamma[\Upsilon]$ for

1016: $(i)=(c/g^*)$, $(c/\gamma^*)$, and $(c)$, where 

1017: $\Gamma^{(i)}$'s are given in Table~\ref{table:decayrate} and

1018: $\Gamma[\Upsilon]$ is the measured total width~\cite{Yao:2006px} 

1019: of $\Upsilon$ for radial quantum numbers $n=$1, 2, and 3.

1020: }

1021: \begin{ruledtabular}

1022: \begin{tabular}{lccc}

1023: state $\backslash$ Br (\%)

1024:  & Br$^{(c/g^*)}$

1025:  & Br$^{(c/\gamma^*)}$

1026:  & Br$^{(c)}$

1027: \\

1028: \hline

1029: $\Upsilon(1S)$

1030: & $2.72\pm 0.67$

1031: & $4.81\pm 1.21$

1032: & $7.53\pm 1.39$

1033: \\

1034: $\Upsilon(2S)$

1035: & $2.60\pm 0.67$

1036: & $4.30\pm 1.12$

1037: & $6.90\pm 1.37$

1038: \\

1039: $\Upsilon(3S)$

1040: & $3.34\pm 0.87$

1041: & $5.36\pm 1.41$

1042: & $8.70\pm 1.74$

1043: \end{tabular}

1044: \end{ruledtabular}

1045: \end{table}

1046: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1047: 

1048: 

1049: %--------------------------------------------------------------------

1050: \subsection{Total charm production rate}

1051: \label{sec:totalrate}%

1052: %--------------------------------------------------------------------

1053: 

1054: The inclusive charm production rate in $\Upsilon$ decay

1055: can be calculated by integrating the differential

1056: rate~(\ref{dGamdx1}) over $x_1$ or the differential rate (\ref{dGy1})

1057: over $y_1$. In Table~\ref{table:decayrate} we list 

1058: the partial widths $\Gamma^{(c/g^*)}$ and $\Gamma^{(c/\gamma^*)}$ and

1059: the total width $\Gamma^{(c)}$. The partial width $\Gamma^{(c/g^*)}$

1060: for the QCD process is the sum of $\Gamma^{(c\bar{c}gg)}$ and

1061: $\Gamma^{(c\bar{c}g\gamma)}$, whose values can be obtained by

1062: multiplying  $\Gamma^{(c/g^*)}$ by factors $F^{-1}_\gamma\approx 0.982$ and

1063: $1-F^{-1}_\gamma\approx 0.0184$, respectively.

1064: The theoretical uncertainties in Table~\ref{table:decayrate} are

1065: estimated as follows.

1066: We consider the uncertainties of the pole

1067: mass appearing in the factorization formula (\ref{Gam-c})

1068: as $m_b=4.6\pm 0.1$~GeV. As we have discussed earlier, the $m_c$ dependence

1069: of the dimensionless short-distance coefficients are completely determined

1070: by $r_c=r=4m_D^2/m_\Upsilon^2$. We do not vary $r$ because the measured

1071: values for the hadron masses do not contribute to errors at the level of 

1072: accuracy we take into account.

1073: We use the uncertainties in Eq.~(\ref{ME}) for the NRQCD matrix elements.

1074: We consider the errors from uncalculated order-$v^2$ and order-$\alpha_s$ 

1075: corrections by multiplying the central values shown in 

1076: Table~\ref{table:decayrate} by $v^2\approx 10$\% and 

1077: by $\alpha_s(m_\Upsilon/2)\approx 0.215$,

1078: respectively. The error bars in the widths appearing in

1079: Table~\ref{table:decayrate} are obtained by combining the uncertainties

1080: that are listed above in quadrature.

1081: 

1082: The branching fractions for the decay channels 

1083: $c\bar{c}gg+c\bar{c}g\gamma$, $\gamma^*\to c\bar{c}$, and $c+X$

1084: are listed in Table~\ref{table:br}. The numbers are obtained by

1085: dividing the numbers in  Table~\ref{table:decayrate} by the

1086: measured widths

1087: $\Gamma[\Upsilon(1S)]= 54.02\pm 1.25$ keV,

1088: $\Gamma[\Upsilon(2S)]= 31.98\pm 2.63$ keV, and

1089: $\Gamma[\Upsilon(3S)]= 20.32\pm 1.85$ keV~\cite{Yao:2006px}.  From 

1090: Tables~\ref{table:decayrate} and \ref{table:br}, we conclude

1091: that the virtual-photon contribution is actually greater than

1092: the QCD contribution for all three $S$-wave states.

1093: 

1094: At the next-to-leading order in $\alpha_s$, the virtual-photon

1095: contribution may contribute to the region $y_1<1$ because of

1096: real-gluon emissions. Because the leading-order

1097: contribution to $\Gamma^{(c/\gamma^*)}$ is greater than

1098: $\Gamma^{(c/g^*)}$ by about factors of $1.6\,$--$\,1.8$, the 

1099: order-$\alpha_s$ corrections to $\Gamma^{(c/\gamma^*)}$ may modify 

1100: the shape of the $y_1$ distributions for $y_1<1$ by about $30$\%.

1101: 

1102: 

1103: %--------------------------------------------------------------------

1104: \section{Charmed-hadron momentum distribution}

1105: \label{sec:meson}%

1106: %--------------------------------------------------------------------

1107: 

1108: In Sec.~\ref{sec:rate}, we calculated the momentum distribution

1109: of the charm quark and the inclusive charm production rate

1110: in $\Upsilon$ decay. 

1111: Since the charm quark hadronizes into one of charmed hadrons

1112: with a probability of almost 100\%, the charm production rate can be 

1113: interpreted to be the sum of the production rates for the charmed hadrons $h$.

1114: The charmed hadrons

1115: include the $D^0$, $D^+$, $D^+_s$, and $\Lambda^+_c$, which are stable 

1116: under strong and electromagnetic interactions, and excited

1117: charmed hadrons, whose decay product includes $D^0$, $D^+$, $D^+_s$, or 

1118: $\Lambda^+_c$. As is discussed in Ref.~\cite{Bodwin:2007zf},

1119: the momentum distribution of a charmed hadron produced in $\Upsilon$

1120: decay is softer than that of the charm, because of the effect of

1121: hadronization. The momentum distribution for a charmed hadron $h$ can be

1122: obtained by convolving the charm-momentum distribution with a fragmentation

1123: function for the charm quark to fragment into a $h$. For more details,

1124: we refer the reader to Ref.~\cite{Bodwin:2007zf} and references therein.

1125: 

1126: The fragmentation function $D_{c\to h}(z)$ gives the probability 

1127: density for a charm quark with plus component of light-cone momentum

1128: $E_1+p_1$ to hadronize into a charmed hadron $h$ with 

1129: light-cone momentum $E_h+p_h=z(E_1+p_1)$. The fraction $z$ can be

1130: expressed in terms of scaled light-cone momentum fractions

1131: $z_1$ for the charm and $z_h$ for the charmed hadron, which are

1132: analogous to the scaled momenta $y_1$ and 

1133: $y_h$~\cite{Bodwin:2007zf}, where $z_1$ is

1134: %----------------

1135: \begin{equation}

1136: %------------------

1137: z_1 = \frac{\sqrt{(1-r_c)y_1^2 + r_c} + \sqrt{1-r_c} \, y_1}

1138:            {1 + \sqrt{1-r_c}}.

1139: %------------------

1140: \end{equation}

1141: %----------------

1142: Then, the fraction $z$ is expressed as

1143: %----------------

1144: \begin{equation}

1145: %------------------

1146: z = \frac{z_h}{z_1}\times 

1147: \frac{\left. (E_h+p_{h})\right|_\textrm{max}}

1148:      {\left. (E_1+p_{1})\right|_\textrm{max}},

1149: %------------------

1150: \label{z}%

1151: \end{equation}

1152: %----------------

1153: where the last factor on the right side of Eq.~(\ref{z}) becomes

1154: unity if the difference between the mass of the charm quark

1155: and that of the charmed hadron can be neglected.

1156: Within this approximation the momentum distribution of 

1157: the charmed hadron can be written as~\cite{Bodwin:2007zf}

1158: %----------------

1159: \begin{eqnarray}

1160: %------------------

1161: \frac{d\Gamma}{d y_h}

1162: &=&

1163: \frac{dz_h}{dy_h} \int_{z_h}^{1} \frac{dz_1}{z_1} \,

1164: D_{c\to h}(z_h/z_1)\, \frac{dy_1}{dz_1}

1165: \frac{d\Gamma}{d y_1}

1166: \nonumber\\

1167: &=&

1168: \frac{\sqrt{1-r_c}}{\sqrt{(1-r_c)y_h^2+r_c }}

1169: \int_{y_h}^1 dy_1

1170:   \mathcal{D}_{c\to h}\left(

1171:   \frac{\sqrt{(1-r_c)y_h^2+r_c} +\sqrt{1-r_c}y_h }

1172:        {\sqrt{(1-r_c)y_1^2+r_c} +\sqrt{1-r_c}y_1 }

1173: \right) \frac{d\Gamma}{dy_1},

1174: %------------------

1175: \label{dGamD}%

1176: \end{eqnarray}

1177: %----------------

1178: where $\mathcal{D}_{c\to h}(z)= z D_{c\to h}(z)$.

1179: 

1180: Explicit parameterizations for $D_{c\to h}(z)$ for some

1181: charmed hadrons $h$ 

1182: which are currently available can be found, for example, in 

1183: Refs.~\cite{Artuso:2004pj,Seuster:2005tr}.

1184: Following a previous work on the charm production in the $P$-wave 

1185: bottomonium decay~\cite{Bodwin:2007zf}, we refer to the results 

1186: obtained by the Belle Collaboration~\cite{Seuster:2005tr}. They

1187: determined the optimal values of the parameters for analytic

1188: parameterizations of $D_{c\to h}(z)$ for various charmed hadrons

1189: by comparing their measured momentum distribution in $e^+e^-$ 

1190: annihilation near the center-of-momentum energy $10.6$ GeV with

1191: the distributions predicted by Monte Carlo generators and fragmentation

1192: functions~\cite{Seuster:2005tr}.

1193: 

1194: In our numerical analysis, we consider all the charmed hadrons considered

1195: in Ref.~\cite{Seuster:2005tr}. These cover all the channels being

1196: analyzed by the CLEO Collaboration: 

1197: $\Upsilon(1S)\to h+X$, where $h=D^0$, $D^+$, $D^+_s$, $D^{*+}$, and 

1198: $\Lambda_c^+$. We use the Kartvelishvili-Likhoded-Petrov (KLP) 

1199: fragmentation function~\cite{Kartvelishvili:1977pi}, which was used

1200: in the analysis of charmed-hadron momentum distribution in $\chi_b$

1201: decays. The KLP fragmentation function has a simple parameterization

1202: depending only on the light-cone momentum fraction $z$:

1203: %----------------

1204: \begin{equation}

1205: %------------------

1206: D_{c\to h}(z)= N_h z^{\alpha_c} (1-z).

1207: %------------------

1208: \label{fragment}%

1209: \end{equation}

1210: %----------------

1211: The optimal values for the parameter $\alpha_c$ determined by the Belle 

1212: Collaboration are $\alpha_c=4.6$, $4$, $5.6$, $5.6$, and $3.6$ for 

1213: $D^0$, $D^+$, $D^+_s$, $D^{*+}$, and $\Lambda^+_c$, 

1214: respectively~\cite{Seuster:2005tr}.

1215: 

1216: The normalization $N_h$ is determined by the constraint

1217: $\int_0^1 dz D_{c\to h}(z)=$Br$[c\to h]$.

1218: Using Table~X of Ref.~\cite{Seuster:2005tr},

1219: one can infer that the inclusive fragmentation probabilities are

1220: Br$[c\to h]=0.565$, $0.268$, $0.092$, $0.220$, and $0.075$

1221: for the $D^0$, $D^+$, $D^+_s$, $D^{*+}$, and $\Lambda^+_c$, respectively.

1222: As a result, we determine the normalization factors for various

1223: charmed hadrons as $N_{D^0}=20.9$, $N_{D^+}=8.04$, $N_{D_s^+}=4.59$, 

1224: $N_{D^{*+}}=11.0$, and $N_{\Lambda_c^+}=1.93$. 

1225: Note that the branching fractions for the $c\to D^0$ and $c\to D^+$

1226: include feeddowns from higher resonances $D^{0*}$ and

1227: $D^{*+}$.

1228: Substituting Eq.~(\ref{fragment}) into Eq.~(\ref{dGamD}) and using

1229: the parameters listed above, we evaluate the momentum distributions

1230: for the charmed hadrons. 

1231: In Eq.~(\ref{dGamD}), we use $r_c=r=4 m_h^2/m_\Upsilon^2$ for $z_h$ where  

1232: $h=D_s^+$, $D^{* +}$, and $\Lambda_c^+$

1233: while $r_c=r=4 m_D^2/m_\Upsilon^2$ for $z_1$ and $z_D$

1234: where $D=D^0$ and $D^+$.

1235: We use $m_{D_s^+}=1.97$ GeV, $m_{D^{*+}}=2.01$ GeV, and 

1236: $m_{\Lambda_c^+}=2.29$ GeV~\cite{Yao:2006px}.

1237: 

1238: In Fig.~\ref{fig3}, we show the scaled momentum $y_h$ distributions

1239: of the charmed hadrons in the decays $\Upsilon(nS)\to h+X$, 

1240: where $h=D^0$ (left column) and $D^+$ (right column) for radial quantum

1241: numbers $n=1$, 2, and 3. The distributions for $\Upsilon(nS)\to h+X$, 

1242: where $h=D^+_s$ (left column) and $D^{*+}$ (right column) are illustrated

1243: in Fig.~\ref{fig4} and those for the $\Lambda_c^+$ baryon in Fig.~\ref{fig5}.

1244: In Figs.~\ref{fig3}, \ref{fig4}, and \ref{fig5}, the dotted and dashed curves 

1245: represent the virtual-photon and QCD contributions, respectively. 

1246: The solid lines are the

1247: sums of the two contributions. In contrast to the charm-quark

1248: momentum distribution, which has a virtual-photon contribution only 

1249: at the end point

1250: $y_1=1$, the virtual-photon contribution for a charmed hadron is 

1251: smeared out to the region $y_h<1$. 

1252: The peaks of the virtual-photon, QCD, and total contributions are placed in the

1253: ranges $0.78<y_h<0.84$, $0.28<y_h<0.34$, and $0.75<y_h<0.83$, respectively. 

1254: The softening of the QCD contribution can be seen by comparing the

1255: QCD contribution to the charmed-hadron momentum distributions in Figs.~\ref{fig3},

1256: \ref{fig4}, and \ref{fig5} with the charm-quark momentum distributions in 

1257: Fig.~\ref{fig2}. The softening of the virtual-photon contribution is even

1258: more dramatic, transforming a delta function at $y_1=1$ into the

1259: virtual-photon contributions in Figs.~\ref{fig3}, \ref{fig4}, and 

1260: \ref{fig5}.  Hadronization significantly softens the momentum spectrum 

1261: of charmed hadrons.

1262: 

1263: The charmed-hadron production rates in $\Upsilon$ decay are obtained 

1264: by integrating over $y_h$ in Eq.~(\ref{dGamD}) for each hadron.

1265: The rates are the same as the area under the solid lines 

1266: in Figs.~\ref{fig3}, \ref{fig4}, and \ref{fig5}.

1267: The production rates of $D^0$, $D^+$, $D_s^+$, $D^{* 0}$,

1268: and $\Lambda_c^+$ in $\Upsilon(1S)$ decay are 

1269: $2.25$ keV, $1.06$ keV, $0.37$ keV, $0.87$ keV, 

1270: and $0.28$ keV, respectively,

1271: where the contributions of the virtual-photon processes

1272: amount to about $65$--$\,69\%$ of the production rates.

1273: In $\Upsilon(2S)$ decay, we get

1274: $1.23$ keV, $0.58$ keV, $0.20$ keV, $0.47$ keV, and $0.15$ keV

1275: for each hadron production rate, respectively

1276: while in $\Upsilon(3S)$ decay, 

1277: $0.98$ keV, $0.46$ keV, $0.16$ keV, $0.38$ keV, and $0.12$ keV, respectively.

1278: For the decays of the $2S$ state into charmed hadrons

1279: the virtual-photon contributions add up to about $63$--$\,67 \%$

1280: while for those of the $3S$ state to about $63$--$\,66 \%$.

1281: The fractions of the virtual-photon contributions 

1282: decrease up to about $63\%$ 

1283: as the radial quantum number $n$ of the $\Upsilon(nS)$ increases.

1284: If we compare the momentum distributions of charmed

1285: hadrons with that of the charm quark, we could observe that

1286: hadronization softens the distributions. For the QCD contributions,

1287: whose charm-quark distribution reaches lower end point, the vertical-axis 

1288: intercepts for the charmed-hadron momentum distributions

1289: significantly shift to the positive direction. This results in loss of

1290: probability. Because the loss is minor for the virtual-photon

1291: contributions, whose charm-quark distributions are concentrated at

1292: $y_1=1$, the fractions of the virtual-photon contributions in

1293: the charmed-hadron production rates are greater than that of the

1294: charm quark production rate.

1295: As is discussed in Ref.~\cite{Bodwin:2007zf}, this change in

1296: normalization is of order $r$, which is at the level of the

1297: error in the fragmentation approximation itself,

1298: which is derived from QCD by

1299: neglecting corrections on the order of the square of the quark mass

1300: divided by the hard-scattering momentum \cite{Collins:1989gx}.

1301: 

1302: As we show in Figs.~\ref{fig3},

1303: the production rate of $D^0$ is more than twice as large as

1304: that of $D^+$.

1305: This reflects the fact that the $D^0$ may be produced from the decays of

1306: $D^{* 0}$ and $D^{*+}$ 

1307: while $D^+$ has the contribution only from the feeddown from the decay

1308: of $D^{*+}$ besides direct production from the charm quark.

1309: As we show in Fig.~\ref{fig5}, the shape of the scaled momentum distribution

1310: of the $\Lambda_c^+$ is broader than that of the other charmed hadrons.

1311: Because ${\Lambda_c^+}$ is the heaviest among the charmed hadrons 

1312: that we consider,

1313: the smearing effects from hadronization 

1314: is most significant in $\Lambda_c^+$ production.

1315: 

1316: There are uncertainties in the fragmentation function. 

1317: Part of the uncertainties can be estimated by

1318: comparing the results shown above with those obtained by using

1319: different parameterizations for the fragmentation functions. 

1320: We also carried out the same calculations by using the Collins-Spiller (CS) 

1321: fragmentation functions~\cite{Collins:1984ms} whose parameters are 

1322: determined in Ref.~\cite{Seuster:2005tr}. With

1323: the CS fragmentation functions, the heights of the peaks are smaller

1324: than those from the KLP fragmentation functions 

1325: by about 8\%. This difference is

1326: small enough to be within our theoretical uncertainties of about

1327: 20\%.

1328: Another important source of the uncertainties may come from

1329: the Monte Carlo. The estimate of the uncertainties is out of the

1330: scope of this work.

1331: 

1332: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1333: \begin{figure}[t]

1334: \includegraphics[width=40ex]{fig3a.ps}\hspace{7ex}

1335: \includegraphics[width=40ex]{fig3b.ps}

1336: \\

1337: \includegraphics[width=40ex]{fig3c.ps}\hspace{7ex}

1338: \includegraphics[width=40ex]{fig3d.ps}

1339: \\

1340: \includegraphics[width=40ex]{fig3e.ps}\hspace{7ex}

1341: \includegraphics[width=40ex]{fig3f.ps}

1342: \\[-2.0ex]

1343: \caption{

1344: Distributions of the scaled momentum $y_h$ in $\Upsilon(nS)\to h+X$ 

1345: for $h=D^0$ (left column) and $D^+$ (right column) in units of keV.

1346: KLP parameterization is used for the charm fragmentation 

1347: functions~\cite{Seuster:2005tr}. In each figure, solid, dashed, and dotted

1348: curves represent the total, QCD ($c/g^*$), and virtual-photon ($c/\gamma^*$) 

1349: contributions, respectively.

1350: }

1351: \label{fig3}%

1352: \end{figure}

1353: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1354: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1355: \begin{figure}[t]

1356: \includegraphics[width=40ex]{fig4a.ps}\hspace{7ex}

1357: \includegraphics[width=40ex]{fig4b.ps}

1358: \\

1359: \includegraphics[width=40ex]{fig4c.ps}\hspace{7ex}

1360: \includegraphics[width=40ex]{fig4d.ps}

1361: \\

1362: \includegraphics[width=40ex]{fig4e.ps}\hspace{7ex}

1363: \includegraphics[width=40ex]{fig4f.ps}

1364: \\[-2.0ex]

1365: \caption{

1366: Distributions of the scaled momentum $y_h$ in $\Upsilon(nS)\to h+X$

1367: for $h=D^{+}_s$ (left column) and $D^{*+}$ (right column) in units of keV.

1368: KLP parameterization is used for the charm fragmentation

1369: functions~\cite{Seuster:2005tr}. In each figure, solid, dashed, and dotted

1370: curves represent the total, QCD ($c/g^*$), and virtual-photon ($c/\gamma^*$)

1371: contributions, respectively.

1372: }

1373: \label{fig4}%

1374: \end{figure}

1375: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1376: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1377: \begin{figure}[t]

1378: \includegraphics[width=40ex]{fig5a.ps}

1379: \\

1380: \includegraphics[width=40ex]{fig5b.ps}

1381: \\

1382: \includegraphics[width=40ex]{fig5c.ps}

1383: \\[-2.0ex]

1384: \caption{

1385: Distributions of the scaled momentum $y_h$ in 

1386: $\Upsilon(nS)\to \Lambda_c^++X$ in units of keV.

1387: KLP parameterization is used for the charm fragmentation

1388: functions~\cite{Seuster:2005tr}. In each figure, solid, dashed, and dotted

1389: curves represent the total, QCD ($c/g^*$), and virtual-photon ($c/\gamma^*$)

1390: contributions, respectively.

1391: }

1392: \label{fig5}%

1393: \end{figure}

1394: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1395: 

1396: %------------------------------------------------

1397: \section{Summary}

1398: \label{summary}

1399: %------------------------------------------------

1400: We have studied inclusive charm production in the decay of 

1401: the spin-triplet bottomonium state $\Upsilon(nS)$ 

1402: based on the color-singlet mechanism of the NRQCD factorization

1403: formalism. The branching fractions of the $\Upsilon(nS)$ 

1404: into charm are predicted to be

1405: $(7.5\pm 1.4)\%$,

1406: $(6.9\pm 1.4)\%$, and

1407: $(8.7\pm 1.7)\%$ for $n=1$, $2$, and $3$, respectively.

1408: The dominant contribution comes from the virtual-photon process

1409: $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to\gamma^* \to c\bar{c}$, which contributes

1410: about 60\% of the partial

1411: width for inclusive charm production in each $\Upsilon(nS)$ decay.

1412: The remaining portion of the partial width comes from

1413: the QCD contribution, which is dominated by 

1414: $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to ggg^*$ followed by $g^*\to c\bar{c}$.

1415: The $b\bar{b}_1(^3S_1)\to c\bar{c}g \gamma$ diagrams contribute

1416: only about $0.7\%$ of the total widths of $\Upsilon(nS)$ into charm. 

1417: 

1418: We have also presented the momentum distribution of the charm quark

1419: in the $\Upsilon(nS)$ decays. The virtual-photon contribution is localized at

1420: the end point ($y_1=1$). The QCD contributions, which have

1421: four-body final states, are broad and have peaks near $y_1=0.5$.

1422: By convolving the charm momentum distribution with the fragmentation

1423: function $D_{c\to h}(z)$ that have been fit to the $e^+e^-$ annihilation

1424: data by the Belle Collaboration, we have computed the momentum distribution

1425: of charmed hadrons $h=D^0$, $D^+$, $D_s^+$, $D^{*+}$, and $\Lambda_c^+$

1426: produced in $\Upsilon(nS)\to h+X$.

1427: The resulting momentum distributions of the charmed hadrons are

1428: significantly softer than that of the charm quark.

1429: The large virtual-photon contribution, which is localized at the end

1430: point ($y_1=1$) for the charm quark, is smeared out into a distribution

1431: with a peak near $y_h\approx 0.8$.

1432: The order-$\alpha_s$ corrections to the virtual-photon

1433: contributions may enhance the charm-quark momentum distribution

1434: in the range $y_1<1$. The cancellation of the infrared divergence

1435: at that order may produce a singular distribution at the end point,

1436: which is similar to that of the $P$-wave decays.

1437: 

1438: 

1439: In a recent analysis being carried out by the CLEO Collaboration,

1440: as a part of measurement, the virtual-photon contribution is subtracted from

1441: the data. In order to facilitate comparison with the experimental data,

1442: we have provided all the predictions separately for the QCD, virtual-photon,

1443: and total contributions. Comparison with the experimental results will test

1444: the leading-order approximations employed in this work.

1445: 

1446: %--------------------------------------------------------------------

1447: \begin{acknowledgments}

1448: %--------------------------------------------------------------------

1449: % put your acknowledgments here.

1450: We thank Roy Briere for suggesting this problem and for useful

1451: discussions. We thank Bostjan Golob, Soeren Lange, and Rolf Seuster

1452: for their kind explanation of the analysis given in 

1453: Ref.~\cite{Seuster:2005tr}. We also express our gratitude to Geoff~Bodwin

1454: and Eric~Braaten for valuable comments and suggestions.

1455: We also appreciate Hee Sok Chung for helping us with calculating

1456: the NRQCD matrix elements.

1457: %

1458: JL thanks the High Energy Physics Theory Group at the Ohio State

1459: University for its hospitality while this work was being completed.

1460: %

1461: This work was supported in part by the BK21 program of Ministry of

1462: Education, Korea.

1463: %

1464: D.K., J.L., and C.Y. were supported by the Korea Research Foundation

1465: under grants KRF-2004-015-C00092, KRF-2006-311-C00020, and 

1466: KRF-2005-075-C00008, respectively.

1467: %

1468: J.L. was also supported by a Korea University grant.

1469: %

1470: T.K. was supported by

1471: the Basic Research Program of the Korea Science and Engineering

1472: Foundation (KOSEF) under grant No.~R01-2005-000-10089-0.

1473: 

1474: \end{acknowledgments}

1475: %%  APPENDIX

1476: \appendix

1477: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1478: \section{The four-body phase space\label{app}}

1479: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1480: The four-body phase space $d \Phi_4$ is defined by

1481: %------------------

1482: \begin{equation}

1483: %------------------

1484: d\Phi_4

1485: =(2\pi)^{4}\delta^{(4)}\left(P-\sum_{i=1}^4 p_i\right)

1486: \prod_{i=1}^4

1487: \frac{d^{3}{{p_i}}}{(2\pi)^{3}2E_i},

1488: \label{PS4-def-app}%

1489: %------------------

1490: \end{equation}

1491: %------------------

1492: where $E_i$ and $p_i$ are the energy and momentum 

1493: of the particle $i$ in the final state.

1494: For $\Upsilon(P)\to c(p_1)\bar{c}(p_2) g(p_3)g(p_4)$, $p_1^2=p_2^2=m_c^2$, 

1495: $p_3^2=p_4^2=0$, and $\sqrt{P^2}=2E_b$. 

1496: Since we are interested 

1497: in the momentum distribution of the charm quark in the $P$-rest frame, 

1498: we evaluate

1499: $d\Phi_4$ leaving the three-momentum $\bm{p}_1$ unintegrated:

1500: %------------------

1501: \begin{equation}

1502: %------------------

1503: d{\Phi_4} =

1504: \frac{d^3{p}_1}{(2\pi)^3 2E_1} d{\Phi}_3(X\to p_2+p_3+p_4),

1505: \label{dphi4-1}%

1506: %------------------

1507: \end{equation}

1508: %------------------

1509: where $X=P-p_1$.

1510: The three-body phase space $d{\Phi}_3(X\to p_2+p_3+p_4)$

1511: can be expresses as a chain of two-body phase spaces:

1512: %------------------

1513: \begin{equation}

1514: %------------------

1515: d{\Phi}_3(X\to p_2+p_3+p_4)=

1516: d{\Phi}_2(X\to p_2+Y) \,\frac{dm_Y^2}{2\pi} \,d{\Phi}_2(Y\to p_3+p_4),

1517: \label{dphi3}%

1518: %------------------

1519: \end{equation}

1520: %------------------

1521: where $Y=p_3+p_4$ and $m_Y$ is the invariant mass of $Y$.

1522: When a squared amplitude is summed over spin states of 

1523: all the particles in both initial and final states,

1524: the squared amplitude becomes independent of the solid angle of $\bm{p}_1$. 

1525: Integrating over the solid angle of $\bm{p}_1$,

1526: substituting Eq.~(\ref{dphi3}) into Eq.~(\ref{dphi4-1}), and

1527: expressing the two-body phase spaces $d{\Phi}_2(X\to p_2+Y)$ and

1528: $d{\Phi}_2(Y\to p_3+p_4)$ in the $X$ and $Y$ rest frames,

1529: respectively, we find that

1530: %------------------

1531: \begin{equation}

1532: %------------------

1533: d{\Phi}_4=

1534: \frac{|\bm{p}_1| |\bm{p}_2^*| |\bm{p}_3^*|}{2^{10}\pi^7 m_X}

1535: \,dE_1 dm_Y d\Omega_2^* d\Omega_3^*,

1536: \label{dphi4}%

1537: %------------------

1538: \end{equation}

1539: %------------------

1540: where $m_X=(4 E_b^2 -4 E_b E_1 + m_c^2)^{1/2}$ is the invariant mass of $X$.

1541: The ranges of the integration variables $E_1$ and $m_Y$ are given by

1542: %------------------

1543: \begin{subequations}

1544: \begin{eqnarray}

1545: %------------------

1546: \label{E1-range}%

1547: m_c\leq &E_1& \leq E_b,

1548: \\

1549: \label{mY-range}%

1550: 0 \leq &m_Y& \leq m_X-m_c.

1551: %------------------

1552: \end{eqnarray}

1553: \label{range-em}%

1554: \end{subequations}

1555: %------------------

1556: In Eq.~(\ref{dphi4}), 

1557: $|\bm{p_1}|$ and $E_1$ are the absolute value of the charm-quark momentum 

1558: and energy

1559: in the $P$-rest frame while

1560: $\bm{p}_2^*$ $(\bm{p}_3^*)$ and

1561: $d\Omega_2^*$ $(d\Omega_3^*)$ are the three-momentum

1562: and the solid-angle element of the $\bar{c}$ $(g)$

1563: in the $X$ $(Y)$-rest frame, respectively.

1564: Explicit components of the four-vectors $p_1$, $p_2^*$ and $p_3^*$ are

1565: %------------------

1566: \begin{subequations}

1567: \begin{eqnarray}

1568: %------------------

1569: {p}_1&=&(E_1,0,0,|\bm{p}_1|),

1570: \\

1571: {p}_2^*&=&(E_2^*,|\bm{p}_2^*|\sin\theta_2^*\cos\phi_2^*,

1572:              |\bm{p}_2^*|\sin\theta_2^*\sin\phi_2^*,

1573:              |\bm{p}_2^*|\cos\theta_2^*),

1574: \\

1575: {p}_3^*&=&

1576:            (|\bm{p}_3^*|,|\bm{p}_3^*|\sin\theta_3^*\cos\phi_3^*,

1577:             |\bm{p}_3^*| \sin\theta_3^*\sin\phi_3^*,

1578:             |\bm{p}_3^*|\cos\theta_3^*),

1579: %------------------

1580: \end{eqnarray}

1581: \label{momcomp}%

1582: \end{subequations}

1583: %------------------

1584: where 

1585: ($\theta_2^\ast$, $\phi_2^\ast$) and ($\theta_3^\ast$, $\phi_3^\ast$)

1586: are the polar and azimuthal angles of $\bm{p}_2^\ast$ 

1587: and $\bm{p}_3^\ast$ in the $X$-rest and $Y$-rest frame, respectively.

1588: In Eq.~(\ref{momcomp}), 

1589: %------------------

1590: \begin{subequations}

1591: \begin{eqnarray}

1592: %------------------

1593: E_2^\ast &=& \frac{m_X^2+m_c^2-m_Y^2}{2m_X}, \\

1594: |\bm{p}_1| &=& (E_1^2 - m_c^2)^{1/2}, \\

1595: |\bm{p}_2^\ast| &=& \frac{1}{2 m_X} \lambda^{1/2}(m_X^2,m_Y^2,m_c^2), \\

1596: |\bm{p}_3^\ast| &=& \frac{m_Y}{2},

1597: %------------------

1598: \end{eqnarray}

1599: \end{subequations}

1600: %------------------

1601: where $\lambda(a,b,c)=a^2+b^2+c^2-2 a b - 2 b c - 2 c a$.

1602: Note that in Eq.~(\ref{momcomp}) $p_2^\ast$ and $p_3^\ast$ are 

1603: given in the $X$-rest and $Y$-rest frame

1604: while in order to evaluate Eq.~(\ref{dC}) it is convenient to express

1605: them in the $P$-rest frame.

1606: We introduce the boost matrix ${\Lambda^\mu}_\nu$

1607: transforming an arbitrary vector $k^\ast=(\sqrt{k^2},\bm{0})$ 

1608: into $k=(k^0,\bm{k})$:

1609: %------------------

1610: \begin{subequations}

1611: \begin{eqnarray}

1612: %------------------

1613: k^\mu&=&{\Lambda^\mu}_\nu k^{\ast\nu}, \\

1614: {\Lambda^0}_0&=&\frac{k^0}{\sqrt{k^2}}, \\

1615: ~{\Lambda^0}_i&=&{\Lambda^i}_0=\frac{k^i}{\sqrt{k^2}}, \\

1616: {\Lambda^i}_j&=&\delta^{ij} 

1617: + \frac{k^0-\sqrt{k^2}}{\sqrt{k^2}}\frac{k^i k^j}{|\bm{k}|^2},

1618: %------------------

1619: \end{eqnarray}

1620: \label{boost}%

1621: \end{subequations}

1622: %------------------

1623: where $i$, $j = 1$, 2, 3.

1624: The explicit components of $p_2$ are obtained 

1625: by boosting $p_2^\ast$

1626: from the $X$-rest frame to the $P$-rest frame,

1627: where ${\Lambda^\mu}_\nu$ is determined by 

1628: substituting $X$ into $k$ in Eq.~(\ref{boost}).

1629: To obtain $p_3$, we need two steps.

1630: First, we boost $p_3^\ast$ from the $Y$-rest frame to the $X$-rest frame

1631: where the boost matrix is given by 

1632: replacing $k$ in Eq.~(\ref{boost}) by $Y$.

1633: The components of $Y$ in the $X$-rest frame are easily obtained by using

1634: $Y=X-p_2$ valid in any frame.

1635: Let the obtained four-vector be $p_3^X$.

1636: It is easy to obtain $p_3$ by boosting $p_3^X$ from the $X$-rest frame

1637: to the $P$-rest frame.

1638: Now we can express all the momenta in the $P$-rest frame so that

1639: the Lorentz scalars in Eq.~(\ref{dC}) can be represented in the

1640: $P$-rest frame.

1641: 

1642: It is convenient to introduce dimensionless variables

1643: $x_1$ and $r_Y$ defined by

1644: %------------------

1645: \begin{subequations}

1646: \begin{eqnarray}

1647: %------------------

1648: x_1 &=& E_1/E_b, \\

1649: r_Y &=& m_Y/E_b,

1650: %------------------

1651: \end{eqnarray}

1652: \label{xi-def}%

1653: \end{subequations}

1654: %------------------

1655: where the ranges of the variables are

1656: %------------------

1657: \begin{subequations}

1658: \begin{eqnarray}

1659: %------------------

1660: \label{x1-range}%

1661: \sqrt{r_c}\leq &x_1& \leq1

1662: ,

1663: \\

1664: \label{xY-range}%

1665: 0 \leq &r_Y& \leq \sqrt{4 - 4x_1 + r_c}-\sqrt{r_c}.

1666: %------------------

1667: \end{eqnarray}

1668: \label{range}%

1669: \end{subequations}

1670: %------------------

1671: $r_c$ is the square of the ratio of the charm-quark mass and $E_b$,

1672: $r_c=m_c^2/E_b^2$.

1673: The energy and momenta 

1674: $E_2^\ast$, $|\bm{p}_1|,\,|\bm{p}_2^*|$, and $|\bm{p}_3^*|$

1675: are expressed in terms of the variables $x_1$ and $r_Y$:

1676: %------------------

1677: \begin{subequations}

1678: \begin{eqnarray}

1679: %------------------

1680: E_2^\ast &=& \frac{E_b}{2 r_X} (r_X^2-r_Y^2+r_c), \\

1681: \label{absp1}%

1682: |\bm{p}_1| &=&E_b (x_1^2-r_c)^{1/2},

1683: \\

1684: \label{absp2}%

1685: |\bm{p}_2^*| &=&\frac{E_b}{2 r_X}

1686: \lambda^{\frac{1}{2}}(r_X^2, r_Y^2, r_c),

1687: \\

1688: \label{absp3}%

1689: |\bm{p}_3^*| &=&\frac{r_Y}{2}E_b,

1690: %------------------

1691: \end{eqnarray}

1692: \label{absp}%

1693: \end{subequations}

1694: %------------------

1695: where $r_X=m_X/E_b$.

1696: Substituting Eqs.~(\ref{xi-def}) and (\ref{absp}) into Eq.~(\ref{dphi4}),

1697: we obtain

1698: the four-body phase space $d\Phi_4$ in terms of $x_1$ and $r_Y$:

1699: %------------------

1700: \begin{equation}

1701: %------------------

1702: d\Phi_4

1703: =

1704: \frac{E_b^4}{2^{12} \pi^7}

1705: \frac{r_Y (x_1^2-r_c)^{1/2} \lambda^{1/2}(r_X^2, r_Y^2, r_c)}{r_X^2}

1706: dx_1 dr_Y d\Omega_2^* d\Omega_3^*.

1707: %------------------

1708: \label{PS4}%

1709: \end{equation}

1710: %------------------

1711: 

1712: \begin{thebibliography}{}

1713: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1714: %\cite{Bodwin:1994jh}

1715: \bibitem{Bodwin:1994jh}

1716:   G.~T.~Bodwin, E.~Braaten, and G.~P.~Lepage,

1717: %  ``Rigorous QCD analysis of inclusive annihilation and production of heavy

1718: %  quarkonium,''

1719:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 51}, 1125 (1995)

1720:   [Erratum-ibid.\  D {\bf 55}, 5853 (1997)]

1721:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9407339].

1722:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D51,1125;%%

1723: 

1724: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1725: %\cite{Caswell:1976nx}

1726: \bibitem{Caswell:1976nx}

1727:   W.~E.~Caswell, G.~P.~Lepage, and J.~R.~Sapirstein,

1728:   %``Order (Alpha) Corrections To The Decay Rate Of Orthopositronium,''

1729:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 38}, 488 (1977).

1730:   %%CITATION = PRLTA,38,488;%%

1731: 

1732: 

1733: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1734: %\cite{Mackenzie:1981sf}

1735: \bibitem{Mackenzie:1981sf}

1736:   P.~B.~Mackenzie and G.~P.~Lepage,

1737:   %``QCD Corrections To The Gluonic Width Of The Upsilon Meson,''

1738:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 47}, 1244 (1981).

1739:   %%CITATION = PRLTA,47,1244;%%

1740: 

1741: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1742: %\cite{Campbell:2007ws}

1743: \bibitem{Campbell:2007ws}

1744:   J.~Campbell, F.~Maltoni, and F.~Tramontano,

1745:   %``QCD corrections to J/psi and Upsilon production at hadron colliders,''

1746:   arXiv:hep-ph/0703113.

1747:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH/0703113;%%

1748: 

1749: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1750: %\cite{Yao:2006px}

1751: \bibitem{Yao:2006px}

1752:   W.~M.~Yao {\it et al.}  [Particle Data Group],

1753:   %``Review of particle physics,''

1754:   J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 33}, 1 (2006).

1755:   %%CITATION = JPHGB,G33,1;%%

1756:   

1757:   

1758: 

1759: 

1760: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1761: %\cite{Keung:1982jb}

1762: \bibitem{Keung:1982jb}

1763:   W.~Y.~Keung and I.~J.~Muzinich,

1764:   %``Beyond The Static Limit For Quarkonium Decays,''

1765:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 27}, 1518 (1983).

1766:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D27,1518;%%

1767: 

1768: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1769: %\cite{Bodwin:2002hg}

1770: \bibitem{Bodwin:2002hg}

1771:   G.~T.~Bodwin and A.~Petrelli,

1772:   %``Order v**4 corrections to S-wave quarkonium decay,''

1773:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 66}, 094011 (2002)

1774:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0205210].

1775:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D66,094011;%%

1776: 

1777: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1778: %\cite{Cheung:1996mh}

1779: \bibitem{Cheung:1996mh}

1780:    K.~m.~Cheung, W.~Y.~Keung, and T.~C.~Yuan,

1781: %   ``Color-Octet $J/\psi$ Production in the $\Upsilon$ Decay,''

1782:    Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 54}, 929 (1996)

1783:    [arXiv:hep-ph/9602423].

1784:    %%CITATION = PHRVA,D54,929;%%

1785: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1786: %\cite{Maltoni:1998nh}

1787: \bibitem{Maltoni:1998nh}

1788:   F.~Maltoni and A.~Petrelli,

1789:   %``Colour-octet effects in radiative Upsilon decays,''

1790:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 59}, 074006 (1999)

1791:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9806455].

1792:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D59,074006;%%

1793: 

1794: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1795: %\cite{Brambilla:2007cz}

1796: \bibitem{Brambilla:2007cz}

1797:   N.~Brambilla, X.~Garcia i Tormo, J.~Soto, and A.~Vairo,

1798:   %``Extraction of alpha_s from radiative Upsilon(1S) decays,''

1799:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 75}, 074014 (2007)

1800:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0702079].

1801:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D75,074014;%%

1802: 

1803: 

1804: 

1805: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1806: %\cite{Fritzsch:1978ey}

1807: \bibitem{Fritzsch:1978ey}

1808:   H.~Fritzsch and K.~H.~Streng,

1809: %  ``Quarkonium Decay Into Heavy Quark Flavors,''

1810:   Phys.\ Lett.\  B {\bf 77}, 299 (1978).

1811: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1812: %\cite{Bigi:1978tj}

1813: \bibitem{Bigi:1978tj}

1814:   I.~I.~Y.~Bigi and S.~Nussinov,

1815:   %``Some Comments On Hadronic Y Decays,''

1816:   Phys.\ Lett.\  B {\bf 82}, 281 (1979).

1817:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B82,281;%%

1818: 

1819: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1820: %\cite{Albrecht:1992ap}

1821: \bibitem{Albrecht:1992ap}

1822:   H.~Albrecht {\it et al.}  [ARGUS Collaboration],

1823:   %``Search For Charm Production In Direct Decays Of The Upsilon (1s)

1824:   %Resonance,''

1825:   Z.\ Phys.\  C {\bf 55}, 25 (1992).

1826:   %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C55,25;%%

1827: 

1828: 

1829: 

1830: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1831: %\cite{Bodwin:2007zf}

1832: \bibitem{Bodwin:2007zf}

1833:   G.~T.~Bodwin, E.~Braaten, D.~Kang, and J.~Lee,

1834:   %``Inclusive Charm Production in chi_b Decays,''

1835:   arXiv:0704.2599 [hep-ph].

1836:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0704.2599;%%

1837:   

1838: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1839: %\cite{Seuster:2005tr}

1840: \bibitem{Seuster:2005tr}

1841:   R.~Seuster {\it et al.}  [Belle Collaboration],

1842: %  ``Charm hadrons from fragmentation and B decays in e+ e- annihilation at

1843: %  s**(1/2) = 10.6-GeV,''

1844:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 73}, 032002 (2006)

1845:   [arXiv:hep-ex/0506068].

1846: 

1847: 

1848: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1849: %\cite{Roy}

1850: \bibitem{Roy}

1851:   R.~Briere, private communication.

1852: 

1853: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1854: %\cite{Kuhn:1979bb}

1855: \bibitem{Kuhn:1979bb}

1856:   J.~H.~Kuhn, J.~Kaplan, and E.~G.~O.~Safiani,

1857:   %``Electromagnetic Annihilation Of E+ E- Into Quarkonium States With Even

1858:   %Charge Conjugation,''

1859:   Nucl.\ Phys.\  B {\bf 157}, 125 (1979).

1860:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B157,125;%%

1861: 

1862: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1863: %\cite{Guberina:1980dc}

1864: \bibitem{Guberina:1980dc}

1865:   B.~Guberina, J.~H.~Kuhn, R.~D.~Peccei, and R.~Ruckl,

1866:   %``Rare Decays Of The Z0,''

1867:   Nucl.\ Phys.\  B {\bf 174}, 317 (1980).

1868:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B174,317;%%

1869: 

1870: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1871: %\cite{Bodwin:1996tg}

1872: \bibitem{Bodwin:1996tg}

1873:   G.~T.~Bodwin, D.~K.~Sinclair, and S.~Kim,

1874: %  ``Quarkonium decay matrix elements from quenched lattice QCD,''

1875:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 77}, 2376 (1996)

1876:   [arXiv:hep-lat/9605023].

1877: 

1878: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1879: %\cite{Bodwin:2001mk}

1880: \bibitem{Bodwin:2001mk}

1881:   G.~T.~Bodwin, D.~K.~Sinclair, and S.~Kim,

1882: %  ``Bottomonium decay matrix elements from lattice QCD with two light

1883: %  quarks,''

1884:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 65}, 054504 (2002)

1885:   [arXiv:hep-lat/0107011].

1886: 

1887: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1888: %\cite{Bodwin:2006dn}

1889: \bibitem{Bodwin:2006dn}

1890:   G.~T.~Bodwin, D.~Kang, and J.~Lee,

1891:   %``Potential-model calculation of an order-v**2 NRQCD matrix element,''

1892:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 74}, 014014 (2006)

1893:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0603186].

1894:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D74,014014;%%

1895: 

1896: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1897: %\cite{Bodwin:2007fz}

1898: \bibitem{Bodwin:2007fz}

1899:   G.~T.~Bodwin, H.~S.~Chung, D.~Kang, J.~Lee, and C.~Yu,

1900:   %``Improved determination of color-singlet nonrelativistic QCD matrix elements

1901:   %for S-wave charmonium,''

1902:   arXiv:0710.0994 [hep-ph].

1903:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0710.0994;%%

1904: 

1905: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1906: %\cite{Chung:2007ke}

1907: \bibitem{Chung:2007ke}

1908:   H.~S.~Chung, J.~Lee, and C.~Yu,

1909:   %``Resumming relativistic corrections to Gamma [J/psi $\to$ e+ e-],''

1910:   J.\ Korean Phys.\ Soc.\  {\bf 50} (2007) L357.

1911:   %%CITATION = JKPSD,50,L357;%%

1912:  

1913: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1914: %\cite{Bodwin:2006ke}

1915: \bibitem{Bodwin:2006ke}

1916:   G.~T.~Bodwin, D.~Kang, T.~Kim, J.~Lee, and C.~Yu,

1917:   %``Relativistic corrections to e+ e- --> J/psi + eta/c in a potential model,''

1918:   AIP Conf.\ Proc.\  {\bf 892}, 315 (2007)

1919:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0611002].

1920:   %%CITATION = APCPC,892,315;%%

1921: 

1922: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1923: %\cite{Bodwin:2007ga}

1924: \bibitem{Bodwin:2007ga}

1925:   G.~T.~Bodwin, J.~Lee and C.~Yu,

1926:   %``Resummation of Relativistic Corrections to e+ e- -> J/psi+eta_c,''

1927:   arXiv:0710.0995 [hep-ph].

1928:   %%CITATION = ARXIV:0710.0995;%%

1929: 

1930: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1931: %\cite{Artuso:2004pj}

1932: \bibitem{Artuso:2004pj}

1933:   M.~Artuso {\it et al.}  [CLEO Collaboration],

1934:   %``Charm meson spectra in e+ e- annihilation at 10.5-GeV-cms,''

1935:   Phys.\ Rev.\  D {\bf 70}, 112001 (2004)

1936:   [arXiv:hep-ex/0402040].

1937:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D70,112001;%%

1938: 

1939: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1940: %\cite{Kartvelishvili:1977pi}

1941: \bibitem{Kartvelishvili:1977pi}

1942:   V.~G.~Kartvelishvili, A.~K.~Likhoded, and V.~A.~Petrov,

1943:   %``On The Fragmentation Functions Of Heavy Quarks Into Hadrons,''

1944:   Phys.\ Lett.\  B {\bf 78}, 615 (1978).

1945:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B78,615;%%

1946: 

1947: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1948: %\cite{Collins:1989gx}

1949: \bibitem{Collins:1989gx}

1950:   J.~C.~Collins, D.~E.~Soper and G.~Sterman,

1951:   %``Factorization of Hard Processes in QCD,''

1952:   Adv.\ Ser.\ Direct.\ High Energy Phys.\  {\bf 5}, 1 (1988)

1953:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0409313].

1954:   %%CITATION = 00319,5,1;%%

1955: 

1956: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1957: %\cite{Collins:1984ms}

1958: \bibitem{Collins:1984ms}

1959:   P.~D.~B.~Collins and T.~P.~Spiller,

1960:   %``The Fragmentation Of Heavy Quarks,''

1961:   J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 11}, 1289 (1985).

1962:   %%CITATION = JPHGB,G11,1289;%%

1963: 

1964: \end{thebibliography}

1965: 

1966: 

1967: \end{document}

1968: