1: \documentclass[oldversion, letterpaper]{aa}         

2: %\documentclass[referee,oldversion]{aa}   

3: 

4: \usepackage{aalongtable}

5: \usepackage{natbib}\usepackage{graphicx}      

6: \bibpunct{(}{)}{;}{a}{}{,}                % refs A&A style

7: 

8: \newcommand{\kms}{km\,s$^{-1}$}     

9: \newcommand{\sqcm}{cm$^{-2}$}  

10: \newcommand{\mfu}{M$_\odot$\,yr$^{-1}$}

11: \newcommand{\msun}{M$_\odot$}

12: \newcommand{\lya}{Lyman-$\alpha$}

13: \newcommand{\hi}{\ion{H}{i}} 

14: \newcommand{\hw}{\ion{H}{ii}} 

15: \newcommand{\os}{\ion{O}{vi}} 

16: \newcommand{\cf}{\ion{C}{iv}}

17: \newcommand{\sif}{\ion{Si}{iv}}

18: \newcommand{\nf}{\ion{N}{v}}

19: \newcommand{\cts}{\ion{C}{ii}$^*$} 

20: \newcommand{\cw}{\ion{C}{ii}} 

21: \newcommand{\ncts}{30} %*

22: \newcommand{\ntot}{74} %*

23: \newcommand{\ndla}{63} %*

24: \newcommand{\nsub}{11} %*

25: \newcommand{\ndlaigm}{58} %*

26: 

27: \begin{document}

28: 

29: \title{\cf\ absorption in damped and sub-damped \lya\ systems}

30: \subtitle{Correlations with metallicity and implications for galactic winds at

31:   $z\approx2-3$\thanks{Based on observations taken with the Ultraviolet

32:   and Visual Echelle Spectrograph (UVES) on the Very Large Telescope (VLT)

33:   Unit 2 (Kueyen) at Paranal, Chile, operated by ESO.}}

34: 

35: \author{Andrew J. Fox\inst{1},  C\'edric Ledoux\inst{2}, Patrick

36:   Petitjean\inst{1, 3}, \& Raghunathan Srianand\inst{4}}

37: \institute{Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, UMR7095 CNRS,

38:   Universit\'e Pierre et Marie Curie, 98bis Blvd Arago, 75014

39:   Paris, France \and

40:   European Southern Observatory, Alonso de C\'ordova 3107, Casilla

41:   19001, Vitacura, Santiago 19, Chile \and 

42:   LERMA, Observatoire de Paris,

43:   61 Avenue de l'Observatoire, 75014 Paris, France \and

44:   IUCAA, Post Bag 4, Ganesh Khind, Pune 411 007, India}

45: 

46: \date{Received April 13, 2007 / Accepted July 27, 2007}  

47: 

48: \authorrunning{Fox et al.}

49: \titlerunning{\cf\ in DLAs and sub-DLAs} 

50: 

51: \abstract{

52: We present a study of \cf\ absorption in a sample of \ndla\ damped 

53: \lya\ (DLA) systems and \nsub\ sub-DLAs in the redshift range 

54: $1.75\!<\!z_{\rm abs}\!<\!3.61$, using a dataset of high-resolution 

55: (6.6\,\kms\ FWHM), high signal-to-noise VLT/UVES spectra.

56: Narrow and broad \cf\ absorption line components indicate the presence

57: of both warm, photoionized and hot, collisionally ionized gas.

58: We report new correlations between the metallicity (measured in the

59: neutral-phase) and each of the \cf\ column density, the

60: \cf\ total line width, and the maximum \cf\ velocity.

61: We explore the effect on these correlations of the sub-DLAs, 

62: the proximate DLAs (defined as those within 5\,000\,\kms\ of the quasar), 

63: the saturated absorbers, and

64: the metal line used to measure the metallicity,

65: and we find the correlations to be robust.

66: There is no evidence for any difference between the measured properties of DLA

67: \cf\ and sub-DLA \cf.

68: In 25 DLAs and 4 sub-DLAs, covering 2.5\,dex in [Z/H], %*

69: we directly observe \cf\ moving above the escape speed, 

70: where $v_{\rm esc}$ is derived from the total line width of the

71: neutral gas profiles. These high-velocity \cf\ clouds, unbound from the central

72: potential well, can be interpreted

73: as highly ionized outflowing winds, which are

74: predicted by numerical simulations of galaxy feedback.

75: The distribution of \cf\ column density in DLAs and sub-DLAs is similar to

76: the distribution in Lyman Break galaxies, where winds are

77: directly observed, supporting the idea that supernova feedback 

78: creates the ionized gas in DLAs.

79: The unbound \cf\ absorbers show a median mass flow rate of

80: $\sim$22\,($r$/40\,kpc)\mfu, where $r$ is the characteristic \cf\ radius. %* 

81: Their kinetic energy fluxes are large

82: enough that a star formation rate (SFR) of $\sim2$\,\mfu\

83: is required to power them.

84: }

85: \keywords{quasars: absorption lines -- cosmology: observations --

86:   galaxies: high-redshift -- galaxies: halos -- galaxies: ISM } 

87: \maketitle

88: 

89: \section{Introduction}

90: To study the properties of high-redshift galaxies in a

91: luminosity-independent manner, one can

92: analyze the absorption lines imprinted by their gaseous halos on the

93: spectra of background quasars.

94: Such halos are thought to give rise to QSO

95: absorption line system of various \hi\ column densities: 

96: the damped \lya\ systems (DLAs), with 

97: log\,$N_{\rm \hi}>20.3$, the sub-DLAs with 

98: $19.0<{\rm log}\,N_{\rm \hi}<20.3$, and 

99: the Lyman limit systems (LLSs) with 

100: $17.0<{\rm log}\,N_{\rm \hi}<19.0$.

101: Observations have shown that highly ionized gas, as detected in

102: \os\ and \cf\ absorption, is present in each of these categories of absorber

103: at $z\ga2$: in DLAs \citep{Lu96, Le98, WP00a, Fo07}, in sub-DLAs, 

104: \citep{DZ03, Pe03, Ri05}, and in LLSs \citep{Be94, KT97, KT99}. 

105: As one progresses down in \hi\ column density 

106: from DLAs to LLSs, one may be

107: sampling progressively more remote (and more highly ionized)

108: regions of Galactic halos, with most gas in LLSs lying outside the

109: halo virial radius \citep{Ma03,Da99}. 

110: Even some \os\ absorbers associated with \lya\ forest clouds, which

111: are thought to represent the low-density intergalactic medium (IGM), may

112: arise in extended galaxy halos or feedback zones from galactic

113: outflows \citep{Be05, Si06}. 

114: 

115: Studying this protogalactic plasma

116: allows one to address two key themes of extragalactic astronomy: 

117: galactic winds and the metal budget.

118: Galactic winds are common at high redshift \citep{Ve05}, and must be

119: present in order to enrich the IGM up to its 

120: observed metallicity \citep{Ag01, Ag05, Ar04}.

121: Simulations predict that the level of ionization in winds is high

122: \citep{OD06, KR07, Fa07}, and direct observations of absorption in

123: high-ionization lines have been made in and around Lyman Break

124: galaxies \citep[LBGs;][]{Pe00, Pe02, Sh03, Ad05}.

125: Low-redshift studies of galactic outflows have also found a

126: high-ionization component \citep{He01, St04}. 

127: Since DLAs represent the largest reservoirs of neutral gas for

128: high-redshift star formation \citep{Wo05}, they are natural

129: sites to look for supernova-driven winds and plasma halos in general.

130: 

131: On the second front, ionized halos are

132: important because of their potential ability to close the metal budget

133: at $z\approx2$: there is currently a discrepancy 

134: between the global density of metals predicted by integrating the star

135: formation history, and the density of metals actually observed

136: \citep{Pe99, Fe05, Bo05, Bo06, Bo07, SF07}.

137: The contribution of plasma halos to the metal budget will be

138: particularly significant if the plasma is hot and

139: collisionally ionized, because the cooling times in low-metallicity,

140: low-density, hot halos are extremely long, and so gas injected into

141: these environments can become locked up until the current epoch. 

142: For $10^6$\,K gas at $10^{-3}$\,cm$^{-3}$ and solar metallicity, 

143: $t_{\rm cool}$ is $2.4\times10^{8}$\,yr \citep{HB90}, 

144: so assuming that to first order $t_{\rm cool}\propto Z^{-1}$, we find that

145: the cooling time in gas at one-hundredth solar metallicity (as seen in

146: DLAs) would be approximately equal to the Hubble time. Finding the gas

147: in hot halos is therefore important for tracing the history of the

148: cosmic metals. 

149: 

150: In a recent paper \citep[][ hereafter Paper I]{Fo07}, we discussed the

151: first observations of \os\ absorption in DLAs, finding evidence for a

152: hot ionized medium that, modulo certain assumptions on metallicity and

153: ionization, typically contains $\ga$40\% as many baryons

154: and metals as there are in the neutral phase. Though 12 DLAs with \os\

155: detections were found, detailed kinematic measurements of the \os\

156: absorption are difficult due to the high density of blends with the

157: \lya\ forest. However, if one instead traces the ionized gas with \cf, whose

158: lines lie redward of the \lya\ forest, the 

159: blending problems are avoided. Thus, although \cf\ may trace a lower

160: temperature phase of plasma than \os, it is a better ion to study for

161: building a sample of statistical size. Partly for this reason, the 

162: properties of \cf\ absorption in the IGM at $z>2$ have been studied at

163: length \citep{CS98, El00, Sy03, Bo03, Ar04, Ag05, So05, So06, Sc06a, Sy07}.

164: 

165: Previous observations of \cf\ absorption in DLAs \citep{Lu96, Le98, WP00a} 

166: and sub-DLAs \citep{DZ03, Pe03, Ri05, Pe07}

167: have found the \cf\ profiles generally occupy a more extended (though

168: overlapping) velocity range than the neutral gas profiles. 

169: In an attempt to explain these observations, \citet{WP00b} tested a

170: model of gas falling radially onto centrifugally-supported exponential

171: disks, and found it was unable to reproduce the observed \cf\ kinematics.

172: On the other hand, \citet{Ma03} found that a model in which hot gas in

173: halos and sub-halos gives rise to the \cf\ absorption in DLAs was generally

174: successful in explaining the kinematics.

175: 

176: We continue the study of \cf\ in DLAs in this paper.

177: We are partly motivated by the recent work of \citet{Le06}, who

178: reported a correlation between low-ion line width $\Delta v_{\rm Neut}$ and

179: metallicity [Z/H] in a sample of 70 DLAs and sub-DLAs, covering

180: over two orders of magnitude in metallicity 

181: \citep[see also][]{WP98, Mu07, Pr07a}.

182: Since the line widths of the neutral species are thought to be

183: gravitationally-dominated, the broader lines may be tracing the more

184: massive halos, and so the $\Delta v_{\rm Neut}$-[Z/H] correlation has

185: been interpreted as evidence for an underlying mass-metallicity relation.

186: A natural follow-on question is whether a similar correlation

187: exists between the \emph{high-ion} line width and DLA metallicity. 

188: In this paper we investigate whether such a correlation exists, as

189: well as exploring other relations between the properties 

190: of \cf\ and those of the neutral gas.

191: To maximize our sample size, we include observations of \cf\

192: absorption in both DLAs and sub-DLAs (and we compare the properties of

193: the \cf\ absorption in the two samples).

194: There is some evidence that sub-DLAs display larger metallicities than

195: DLAs \citep{DZ03, Pe05, Ku07}, and they have been suggested to be more

196: massive \citep{Kh07}. 

197: 

198: The structure of this paper is as follows. Sect. 2 covers the

199: observations, sample selection, and measurements. In Sect. 3

200: we present observed correlations in the data set. In Sect. 4 we

201: discuss the interpretation of these correlations, and we identify a

202: population of absorbers that may trace galactic winds. A summary is

203: presented in Sect. 5.

204: 

205: \section{Data acquisition and handling}

206: \subsection{Observations}

207: Our dataset was formed by combining the DLA/sub-DLA sample of

208: \citet{Le06} with the 

209: Hamburg-ESO DLA survey of \citet[][ 2007, in preparation]{Sm05}.

210: All the data were taken in the years 2000 to 2006 with the Very Large

211: Telescope/Ultraviolet-Visual Echelle Spectrograph (VLT/UVES), located

212: on the 8.2\,m VLT Unit 2 telescope (Kueyen) at Cerro Paranal, Chile. 

213: UVES is described in \citet{De00}.

214: The data reduction was performed as described in \citet{Le03},

215: using the interactive pipeline written by \citet{Ba00}, running on the

216: ESO data reduction system {\tt MIDAS}. The rebinned pixel size is

217: $\approx$2\,\kms\ and the data have a spectral resolution (FWHM) of

218: 6.6\,\kms\ ($R$=45\,000).

219: 

220: \subsection{\cf\ sample selection}

221: We took the 81 DLAs and sub-DLAs in the raw sample with data %*

222: covering \cf, and looked for \cf\ components in a range of

223: $\pm$1000\,\kms\ around the system redshift. 

224: Absorption line components were identified

225: as \cf\ if they were present in both $\lambda$1548 and $\lambda$1550 in

226: the correct (2:1) doublet ratio. 

227: In four cases the \cf\ lines were so contaminated by blends that

228: we rejected them from the sample. 

229: In three other cases, the \hi\ lines or neutral-phase metal lines were too

230: blended for a metallicity to be derived; these were also excluded.

231: No DLAs or sub-DLAs were found where \cf\ absorption is not present. 

232: The final sample contains \ndla\ DLAs

233: and \nsub\ sub-DLAs, which are listed in Table 1.

234: Five of the DLAs and two sub-DLA are at less than 5000\,\kms\ from the

235: QSO redshift, and so may be affected by radiation from the QSO

236: \citep[e.g.][]{El02}.

237: For completeness we retain these $z_{\rm abs}\approx z_{\rm qso}$

238: systems (also known as proximate systems) in the sample, but 

239: the corresponding data points are highlighted in all figures, and we

240: take note of any differences from the intervening population.

241: 

242: \subsection{Measurement}

243: \subsubsection{Apparent Column Density}

244: For each DLA and sub-DLA,

245: we fit a continuum to a region several thousand \kms\ in width

246: centered on \cf\ $\lambda$1548, using a polynomial fit (often linear)

247: to regions of the spectrum judged to be free from absorption. 

248: We defined the zero-point of the velocity scale using the 

249: redshift of the strongest component of neutral gas absorption.

250: We then determined $v_-$ and $v_+$, the velocities

251: where the \cf\ absorption recovers to the continuum on the blueward

252: and redward side of the line.

253: For each pixel between $v_-$ and $v_+$, the apparent

254: optical depth is defined as $\tau_a(v)={\rm ln}\,[F_c(v)/F(v)]$, where

255: $F(v)$ and $F_c(v)$ are the actual flux and the estimated continuum

256: flux as a function of velocity, respectively. The total apparent

257: optical depth is then found by integrating over the line,

258: i.e. $\tau_a=\int_{v-}^{v+}\tau_a(v){\rm d}v$.

259: The apparent column density in each absorber then follows by

260: $N_{\rm a}=[3.768\times10^{14}/(\lambda_0 f)]\tau_a $ \citep{SS91},

261: where $\lambda_0$ is in Angstroms, and $f$ is the oscillator strength

262: of the line. For the two \cf\ lines, we take $\lambda_0=1548.204,

263: 1550.781$\,\AA\ and $f=0.1899, 0.09475$ from \citet{Mo03}; see also

264: \citet{PA04}.  

265: The apparent column density will equal the true column density 

266: so long as the lines are not heavily saturated, and that there is no

267: unresolved saturation in the line profiles.

268: 

269: \subsubsection{Total Line Width}

270: We require a precise measurement of the total \cf\ line width in each

271: system. Following \citet{PW97}, 

272: we define $\Delta v_{\rm \cf}$ as the velocity width that

273: contains the central 90\% of the integrated optical depth in the

274: line. By finding the two pixels where the cumulative integrated

275: optical depth is 5\% and 95\% of the total, and determining the

276: velocity difference between them, one obtains $\Delta v_{\rm \cf}$.

277: This can be done for each of the two lines in the \cf\ doublet, with

278: the same result expected in each case if the lines are unsaturated and

279: unblended. Note that $\Delta v_{\rm \cf}$ is integrated over all

280: components, and should not be

281: confused with the line widths of each individual component.

282: 

283: We also define an alternative measure of total line width as $v_+-v_-$, the

284: total velocity range over which \cf\ absorption is present, regardless

285: of saturation. %*  

286: $v_+-v_-$ is sensitive to weak but nonetheless interesting

287: satellite components that are not contained within $\Delta v_{\rm \cf}$.

288: These weak components are particularly relevant in the search for winds.

289: The drawback of using $v_+-v_-$ is that it has a larger error than 

290: $\Delta v_{\rm \cf}$, since $v_-$ and $v_+$ are 

291: selected by eye (we estimate

292: $\sigma_{v_+-v_-}=20$\,\kms) , and also that it is

293: sensitive to the signal-to-noise ratio (low optical depth absorption is

294: harder to detect in low S/N data). 

295: Our data is of high enough quality to ensure that the second effect should

296: not be a major concern: the noisiest spectrum in our sample has S/N=25, %* 

297: and the mean S/N is 51 (where the S/N is measured per

298: resolution element at the observed wavelength of \cf).

299: 

300: \subsubsection{Mean and Maximum \cf\ Velocity}

301: For each profile, we measure the average optical depth-weighted

302: velocity, denoted by $\bar{v}_{\rm \cf}$, and calculated by 

303: $\bar{v}_{\rm \cf}=\int^{v_+}_{v_-}v\tau_a(v)\mathrm{d}v/\int^{v_+}_{v_-}

304: \tau_a(v)\mathrm{d}v$. 

305: Since the velocity zero-point is defined by the

306: strongest absorption component in the neutral gas, 

307: $\bar{v}_{\rm \cf}$ is equivalent to the mean velocity offset

308: between the neutral and ionized gas. In the analysis we are only

309: concerned with the magnitude of the velocity offset, $|\bar{v}|$,

310: and not whether the gas is blueshifted or redshifted relative to the

311: neutral gas. We also make use of $v_{\rm max}$, the

312: maximum absolute velocity at which \cf\ absorption is observed (i.e.,

313: the terminal velocity), given by $v_{\rm max}={\rm max}(|v_-|, |v_+|)$. 

314: 

315: \subsubsection{Choice of Doublet Line}

316: The measurements of column density, total line width, and mean velocity were

317: conducted independently on $\lambda$1548 and $\lambda$1550.

318: To select which of the two \cf\ transitions to use for our final

319: measurement, we followed the following rules that assess the influence

320: of saturation. 

321: If the condition $F(v_0)/F_c(v_0)>0.1$ (corresponding to

322: $\tau_a(v_0)<2.3$) is true for $\lambda$1548, where $v_0$ denotes the

323: velocity where the absorption in strongest, we use $\lambda$1548 to

324: measure the \cf, otherwise we use $\lambda$1550.

325: If both lines are saturated (defined here as when 

326: $F(v)<\sigma_{F(v)}$ or $F(v)<0.03\,F_c(v)$ at any point

327: within the line profile), we proceed with a lower limit to the

328: column density and an upper limit to the line width 

329: using the results from $\lambda$1550.

330: However, if one of the two \cf\ lines is blended, we use the other

331: line for measurement, regardless of the level of saturation.

332: There are four cases %*

333: where both \cf\ lines are partly blended, but we

334: still have useful information at other velocities within the line profiles.

335: This can occur when the two \cf\ lines, separated by

336: $\approx$500\,\kms, blend with each other.

337: In these cases, which are flagged in Table 1, we derived our best

338: estimate of log\,$N_{\rm \cf}$ using the sum of the column densities

339: measured over two separate unblended velocity ranges, and assuming

340: $\Delta v_{\rm \cf}=0.9(v_+-v_-)$ and $\bar{v}=(v_-+v_+)/2$,

341: where for these cases $v_-$ refers to the lower bound of absorption

342: of the lower velocity range, and $v_+$ refers to the upper bound of

343: absorption of the higher velocity range.

344: 

345: \subsubsection{Properties of the Neutral Phase}

346: In most of the systems in our sample, 

347: the metallicity of the neutral gas, the \hi\

348: column density, and the low-ion line width have

349: already been published in \citet{Le06}, so we take these measurements

350: directly from that paper. 

351: We also include measurements of [Zn/H] in two DLAs 

352: (at $z_{\rm abs}=2.34736$ toward \object{Q0438-0436}

353: and 2.18210 toward \object{Q2311-373}) from \citet{Ak05},

354: one DLA and one sub-DLA (at $z_{\rm abs}=1.85733$ and 1.87519,

355: respectively, toward \object{Q2314-409}) from \citet{EL01},

356: and two DLAs (at $z_{\rm abs}=2.40186$ toward \object{Q0027-186}

357: and 1.98888 toward \object{Q2318-111}) from \citet{No07}.

358: For the remaining cases where no neutral-phase measurements have been

359: published, we executed the measurements using exactly the same techniques

360: as in \citet{Le06}.

361: The metal line used to measure [Z/H] is \ion{Zn}{ii} if detected, otherwise

362: \ion{Si}{ii} or \ion{S}{ii}, and $N_{\rm \hi}$ is

363: derived from a fit to the damping wings of the \lya\ line.

364: Both zinc and silicon are found to be undepleted in DLAs \citep{PW02},

365: so these metallicities should not be significantly affected by dust.

366: We follow the standard practise of quoting metallicities on a

367: logarithmic scale relative to solar.

368: All measurements were adjusted to the solar reference levels

369: adopted by \citet{Mo03}.

370: 

371: \section{Results}

372: The measurements of \cf\ absorption in each of the \ntot\ systems are given

373: in Table 1, and the \cf\ profiles for each system (together with an

374: optically thin line showing the component structure in the neutral

375: phase) are shown in Fig. 1.

376: Our sample spans a redshift range from 1.75 to 3.61 with a median of 2.34.

377: The values of log\,$N_{\rm \hi}$ range from 19.70 to 21.80 with a median of

378: 20.65, and the metallicity [Z/H] lies between $-$2.59 and $-$0.31 with

379: a median of $-$1.36 (i.e., approximately one twentieth of the solar value). 

380: The values of log\,$N_{\rm \cf}$ range from 13.02 to $>$15.41 (median value

381: 14.15), with total line widths $\Delta v_{\rm \cf}$ between 35 and 1110\,\kms\

382: (median value 187\,\kms), and velocity offsets between 0 and 425\,\kms\

383: (median value 46\,\kms). %* %* 

384: 

385: Histograms of the total \cf\ line width (using both $\Delta v$ and

386: $v_+-v_-$) and \cf\ velocity offset are given in Fig. 2.

387: A significant difference between the distributions of $\Delta v$ and

388: $v_+-v_-$ can be seen, with the peak in the $\Delta v$

389: distribution at $\approx$80\,\kms, and the peak in the $v_+-v_-$

390: distribution occurring at $\approx$200\,\kms. This difference is due

391: to the presence of weak, outlying components which contribute to

392: $v_+-v_-$ but not to $\Delta v$. Both distributions show an extended tail 

393: reaching over 1000\,\kms. Fig. 2 also shows the distribution of mean

394: \cf\ velocities.

395: 

396: % Fig 2

397: \setcounter{figure}{1}

398: \begin{figure}

399: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{f2.eps}}

400: \caption{

401:   Normalized histograms of total \cf\ line width and absolute velocity

402:   offset among our DLA/sub-DLA sample. 

403:   The distribution of both $\Delta v$ (dotted) and $v_+-v_-$

404:   (solid) is shown in the top panel.

405:   The peak of the $v_+-v_-$ distribution is $\approx$100\,\kms\

406:   broader than the peak of the $\Delta v$ distribution, reflecting the

407:   presence of low optical depth satellite components.

408:   There is an extended tail of line widths reaching $>$1\,000\,\kms.

409:   We have treated the upper limits to $\Delta v$ as data

410:   points when forming the distribution.

411:   The distribution of the absolute \cf\ velocity offset (i.e., the

412:   mean \cf\ velocity relative to the neutral gas) is shown in the

413:   lower panel.

414:   }

415: \end{figure}

416: 

417: \subsection{DLA \cf\ vs IGM \cf}

418: \cf\ absorbers in the IGM falling at velocities within 1\,000\,\kms\

419: of the DLA/sub-DLA would not necessarily be physically connected to the

420: system. Such IGM \cf\ would contaminate our sample, in particular by

421: contributing to the high $\Delta v_{\rm \cf}$ tail shown in the top

422: panel of Fig. 2. IGM contamination could be occurring in systems 

423: where outlying, discrete components are seen at velocities

424: separated from the bulk of the absorption by hundreds of \kms\

425: (e.g, $z_{\rm abs}=2.293$ toward \object{Q0216+080}, 

426: $z_{\rm abs}=2.347$ toward \object{Q0438-436}, 

427: $z_{\rm abs}=1.825$ toward \object{Q1242+001}, and

428: $z_{\rm abs}=2.154$ toward \object{Q2359-022}).

429: However, we do not wish to exclude these absorbers from our sample,

430: since then we would be biased against finding high-velocity features,

431: such as winds. Our approach is thus to systematically include all \cf\

432: absorption in a fixed velocity interval around the system.

433: 

434: We can assess the level of IGM

435: contamination statistically by comparing the properties of the \cf\ in

436: our sample with those of \cf\ in the IGM. This is shown in Fig. 3,

437: where we compare our DLA/sub-DLA \cf\ column density distribution with

438: the IGM distribution at $z\approx$2--3 measured by 

439: \citet[][data taken from their Fig. 10]{Bo03}.

440: A similar IGM \cf\ distribution is presented by \citet{So05}.

441: We also include in Fig. 3 the distribution of \cf\ near LBGs, taken from

442: Table 3 in \citet{Ad05}; these measurements were 

443: made by finding LBGs lying at impact parameters of $<$1$h_{70}^{-1}$

444: co-moving Mpc from QSO sight lines, and then measuring the \cf\ column

445: densities in the QSO spectra at velocities within 200\,\kms\ of the

446: LBG redshift. Strong \cf\ absorption is also directly observed in LBG

447: spectra by \citet{Sh03}.

448: 

449: The DLA/sub-DLA \cf\ absorbers are clearly a different

450: population from the IGM \cf\ absorbers: the DLA/sub-DLA population shows a

451: mean column density that is higher by almost 1\,dex. The distribution of

452: \cf\ in DLAs and sub-DLAs resembles the distribution of galactic \cf\

453: as seen in LBGs, both with mean column densities near $10^{14}$\,\sqcm.

454: In consequence, the highest $N_{\rm \cf}$ systems in our sample are

455: \emph{least} likely to be of IGM origin. Since we report below that the

456: highest $N_{\rm \cf}$ systems tend to show the broadest \cf,  

457: we come to the conclusion that even the broadest \cf\ absorbers (that

458: were potentially the most suspect in terms of an association with

459: an individual galaxy), are likely to be galactic. 

460: 

461: % Fig. 3

462: \begin{figure}

463: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{f3.eps}}

464: \caption{

465:  Comparison of the normalized \cf\ column density distributions: 

466:  (i) in DLAs and sub-DLAs (solid line, this work);

467:  (ii) in the IGM at $z\approx2-3$ \citep[dashed line;][]{Bo03};

468:  (iii) around LBGs at $z\approx2-3$ \citep[dotted line;][]{Ad05}.

469:  In each case, $N_{\rm \cf}$ is integrated over all components.

470:  Note how a typical DLA/sub-DLA shows (a) considerably stronger \cf\

471:  than a typical IGM \cf\ absorber, but (b) a \cf\ column similar

472:  to the mean seen in the LBG distribution. These two findings support

473:  our interpretation that the \cf\ in DLAs and sub-DLAs is galactic

474:  rather than intergalactic.

475:  We have included the saturated \cf\ absorbers as data points in the

476:  DLA/sub-DLA distribution, using the measured lower limits; this has

477:  the effect of artificially truncating the high $N_{\rm \cf}$ tail of

478:  the solid line.

479: }

480: \end{figure}

481: 

482: We now discuss correlations (or lack thereof) between the various

483: measured quantities in our dataset. For reference, a summary of all

484: correlations found and their statistical significance is given in Table 2.

485: 

486: \subsection{High-ion line width vs low-ion line width}

487: In Fig. 4 we directly compare the high-ion total line width with the

488: low-ion total line width for each DLA and sub-DLA in the sample. 

489: In almost all cases (69 of \ntot) %*

490: the \cf\ lines cover a wider region of velocity space than the neutral

491: lines; this finding has been reported by \citet{Le98} and \citet{WP00a}.

492: We also find a considerable scatter ($\approx$1\,dex)

493: in $\Delta v_{\rm \cf}$ at low $\Delta v_{\rm Neut}$, but the scatter

494: decreases with increasing $\Delta v_{\rm Neut}$.

495: 

496: % Fig. 4

497: \begin{figure}

498: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{f4.eps}}

499: \caption{

500:   Comparison of high-ion and low-ion total line width for DLAs 

501:   (filled circles) and sub-DLAs (open circles). Absorbers at

502:   $<$5\,000\,\kms\ from the QSO redshift are highlighted in square symbols. 

503:   The dashed line shows where $\Delta v_{\rm \cf}=\Delta v_{\rm Neut}$.

504:   In 69 of \ntot\ cases the \cf\ absorption is broader than the neutral

505:   absorption. %* 

506:   There is a large scatter in $\Delta v_{\rm \cf}$

507:   at low $\Delta v_{\rm Neut}$, but

508:   the scatter decreases with increasing $\Delta v_{\rm Neut}$. 

509:   Saturated \cf\ absorbers are shown with upper limits to 

510:   $\Delta v_{\rm \cf}$.

511:   }

512: \end{figure}

513: 

514: \subsection{Internal correlations of \cf\ properties}

515: We find that the \cf\ column density, total line width, and

516: velocity offset are all correlated with one another. 

517: This is shown in Fig. 5, which

518: illustrates a $>$6.0$\sigma$ correlation between $N_{\rm \cf}$ and

519: $(v_+-v_-)_{\rm \cf}$, and a 4.3$\sigma$ correlation between

520: $\bar{v}_{\rm \cf}$ and $(v_+-v_-)_{\rm \cf}$. %*

521: We investigated whether these two correlations were still found when

522: removing the proximate absorbers and the sub-DLAs from the sample, 

523: and found that they were, at $>6.0\sigma$ and 3.8$\sigma$

524: significance, respectively (see Table 2).

525: Finally, we considered the effect of the lower limits

526: on the $N_{\rm \cf}$ vs $(v_+-v_-)_{\rm \cf}$ correlation, by redoing

527: the analysis with the saturated points excluded. We still found a

528: correlation, but the slope (in log-log space) 

529: is lower by $\sim$0.6\,dex in this case (see Fig. 5). %*

530: In summary, the DLAs and sub-DLAs with strong \cf\ absorption tend to show

531: broader and more offset \cf\ profiles. 

532: 

533: % Fig. 5

534: \begin{figure}

535: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{f5.eps}}

536: \caption{

537:  Correlations between the measured \cf\ properties

538:  for both DLAs (filled circles) and sub-DLAs (open circles). 

539:  Proximate absorbers are highlighted in square symbols.

540:  We use $v_+-v_-$ rather than $\Delta v$ to measure the line width,

541:  since it is defined even in the saturated cases.

542:  We annotate the Kendall rank correlation coefficient $\tau$

543:  and its significance on the panel, for various sub-samples. 

544:  Solid lines show linear least-square bisector fits for the case

545:  where all data points are treated equally (including limits).

546:  {\bf Top panel}: \cf\ column density vs \cf\ line width. 

547:  A correlation is found even when excluding the saturated \cf\

548:  absorbers (the lower limits on $N_{\rm \cf}$), although in this case

549:  the slope of the fit (shown as a dashed line) is shallower.

550:  {\bf Bottom panel}: comparison between total \cf\ line width and \cf\

551:  absolute velocity offset, also showing a significant correlation.

552:  These trends show that the stronger \cf\ absorbers tend to be broader

553:  and more offset from the neutral gas than the weaker absorbers.

554:   }

555: \end{figure}

556: 

557: \subsection{Metallicity vs \cf\ column density}

558: We plot $N_{\rm \cf}$ vs [Z/H] in Fig. 6. panel (a).

559: We emphasize that the metallicity is not derived from the \cf\ lines,

560: but is measured independently in the neutral phase of absorption,

561: using either the \ion{Zn}{ii}/\hi, \ion{Si}{ii}/\hi, or \ion{S}{ii}/\hi\ ratio.

562: A Kendall rank correlation test shows that the two

563: quantities are correlated at $>$6.0$\sigma$ significance (where the

564: limits were included in the analysis). %* 

565: Almost all the high-metallicity DLAs show saturated \cf\ lines, which

566: are shown with arrows to represent lower limits to $N_{\rm \cf}$. 

567: The correlation is still found (at 5.1$\sigma$) when only using the 

568: intervening DLAs, %*

569: and is also detected (at 3.5$\sigma$) when only using the cases with

570: [Z/H] derived from \ion{Zn}{ii} (since these metallicities are more

571: robust against dust depletion effects). %*

572: Finally the correlation is still found (but only at 2.5$\sigma$) when only

573: considering the unsaturated \cf\ data points (i.e., when ignoring the

574: lower limits). %*

575: The detection of this correlation confirms the tentative result found

576: in Paper I based on a much smaller sample of twelve DLAs.

577: 

578: % Fig. 6

579: \begin{figure}

580: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{f6.eps}}

581: \caption{

582:   Dependence of \cf\ properties in DLAs (filled circles) and sub-DLAs

583:   (open circles) with neutral-phase metallicity. Proximate absorbers

584:   are highlighted in square symbols.

585:   In each panel, we annotate the Kendall rank correlation coefficient

586:   $\tau$ and its significance, and we show a linear least-square

587:   bisector fit (solid line), for the case where all data points are

588:   treated equally (including the limits).

589:   In panel (a), we find a significant correlation between 

590:   $N_{\rm \cf}$ and [Z/H]. This remains true (at 2.5$\sigma$) even in

591:   the case where the saturated points are excluded, though in this

592:   case the slope is slightly shallower (dashed line).

593:   In panel (b), we show a 3.4$\sigma$ %*

594:   correlation between $\Delta v_{\rm \cf}$ and [Z/H], but this

595:   correlation is \emph{not} found when the saturated points are excluded

596:   (hence there is no dashed line in this panel). 

597:   However, if we instead use $(v_+-v_-)_{\rm \cf}$

598:   to measure the line width (bottom panel), 

599:   since this statistic is not affected by saturation,

600:   a significant (4.1$\sigma$) %*

601:   metallicity-line width correlation does exist.

602:   The detected correlations show that high-metallicity systems tend to

603:   exhibit strong and broad \cf\ absorption. 

604: } 

605: \end{figure}

606:   

607: A linear least-squares bisector fit to the data gives the result:

608: \begin{eqnarray}

609: {\rm log}N_{\rm \cf}=(1.2\pm0.1){\rm [Z/H]}+(15.8\pm0.2) & [\rm{all\;points}]\\

610: {\rm log}N_{\rm \cf}=(1.0\pm0.1){\rm [Z/H]}+(15.4\pm0.2) & [\rm{no\;limits}]\nonumber,

611: \end{eqnarray} %*

612: where $N_{\rm \cf}$ is expressed in \sqcm, the errors 

613: in the slope and y-intercept represent the 1$\sigma$ uncertainties,

614: and the first and second equations describe the cases where the limits

615: are included and excluded in the fit, respectively.

616: 

617: \subsection{Metallicity vs \cf\ total line width}

618: In Fig. 6 panel (b) we find evidence for a loose

619: correlation between metallicity and $\Delta v_{\rm \cf}$.

620: A Kendall $\tau$ test shows a 3.4$\sigma$ correlation when using

621: all \ntot\ DLAs and sub-DLAs. %*

622: If we restrict the sample to the

623: \ndlaigm\ DLAs at $>$5\,000\,\kms\ from the QSO, to remove the effects

624: of sub-DLAs and proximity to the quasar, the significance of the

625: correlation decreases to 2.9$\sigma$. %*

626: Working just with the DLAs and sub-DLAs with metallicities derived

627: from \ion{Zn}{ii}, the significance is 2.6$\sigma$. %*

628: 

629: If we remove the upper limits on $\Delta v_{\rm \cf}$

630: (i.e., the saturated absorbers) from the sample, and redo the

631: correlation analysis, we find no significant detection of a

632: correlation between [Z/H] and $\Delta v_{\rm \cf}$ remains. 

633: However, in a sense this is not surprising, since the saturated

634: absorbers tend to show broad \cf\ lines (Sect. 3.4), %*

635: so by removing them, we are biased against finding a trend with line

636: width. To further investigate whether saturation was 

637: playing a role in setting up this metallicity-line width relation, 

638: we looked for a correlation between [Z/H] and $(v_+-v_-) _{\rm \cf}$

639: As discussed in Sect. 2.3.2, $(v_+-v_-) _{\rm \cf}$ is defined even in the

640: saturated cases. The result was that we detected a positive

641: correlation at the 4.1$\sigma$ level. %*

642: Since we believe this metallicity-\cf\ line width correlation to be

643: one of the most important results of this paper, we investigated

644: whether it was seen independently in the lower- and higher- redshift

645: halves of the sample, and found that it was

646: at $\approx3\sigma$ significance (Fig. 7), even though the mean

647: metallicity of the low-redshift sample is higher than the mean

648: metallicity of the high-redshift sample.

649: Together, these results imply that the \cf\

650: line width and metallicity are correlated in DLAs and sub-DLAs.

651: 

652: % Fig. 7

653: \begin{figure}

654: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{f7.eps}}

655: \caption{

656:   Illustration that the correlation between \cf\ total line width and

657:   metallicity exists independently in the lower and

658:   upper redshift halves of the sample, even though 

659:   there is a difference between the mean metallicity of the two

660:   sub-samples (the lower-$z$ sample shows systematically higher [Z/H]). 

661:   The symbols have their same meanings as in Fig. 6. %*

662:   All DLAs and sub-DLAs in each redshift range were included in the

663:   correlation analysis and in the linear bisector fits, shown with

664:   solid lines.} 

665: \end{figure}

666: 

667: Using the sample of \ntot\ DLAs and sub-DLAs,

668: the best-fit linear least-squares bisector model is:

669: \begin{equation}

670: {\rm [Z/H]}=(1.4\pm0.1){\rm log}\Delta v_{\cf}-(4.6\pm0.5),

671: \end{equation} %*

672: where again the errors are the 1$\sigma$ uncertainties, and where

673: $\Delta v_{\cf}$ is in \kms. The slope of this relation is similar to 

674: that found for the low-ion total line width/metallicity correlation by

675: \citet{Le06}, who report 

676: [Z/H]=(1.55$\pm$0.12)log\,$\Delta v_{\rm Neut}-(4.33\pm0.23)$. 

677: However, we observe a large dispersion in total \cf\ line width at a given

678: metallicity, far larger than the measurement errors,

679: and also larger than the dispersion seen in the low-ion line

680: width/metallicity correlation. 

681: 

682: There are four DLAs 

683: (at $z_{\rm abs}=2.418$ toward \object{Q0112+306},

684: $z_{\rm abs}= 2.076$ toward \object{Q2206-199}, 

685: $z_{\rm abs}= 2.153$ toward \object{Q2222-396}, and

686: $z_{\rm abs}=2.537$ toward \object{Q2344+125}),

687: and one sub-DLA (at $z_{\rm abs}= 3.170$ toward \object{Q1451+123})

688: that stand out on Fig. 6(b) and 6(c). %*

689: due to their unusual properties. These absorbers show

690: narrow \cf\ lines ($\Delta v_{\rm \cf}<50$\,\kms\ in all cases), 

691: low velocity offsets ($|\bar{v}|_{\rm \cf}<10$\,\kms\ in four of five

692: cases), and low metallicities ([Z/H] between $-$2.42 and $-$1.81).

693: These cases play a significant

694: role in generating the correlations discussed here.

695: 

696: \subsection{Metallicity vs \cf\ velocity offset and terminal velocity}

697: Over our sample of \ntot\ DLAs and sub-DLAs, the mean value of

698: $|\bar{v}|_{\rm \cf}$ is 69\,\kms. %*

699: $|\bar{v}|_{\rm \cf}$ is not correlated with the metallicity.

700: However, the absolute maximum \cf\ velocity

701: $v_{\rm max}$ is correlated with the metallicity at the 2.9$\sigma$

702: level (not shown in figures, but see Table 2). %*

703: The significance of this correlation decreases to 2.6$\sigma$ when

704: just using the intervening DLA sample. %*

705: Saturation has no effect on the maximum \cf\ velocity, so we included

706: the saturated \cf\ absorbers in this correlation analysis.

707: We note that $v_{\rm max}$ reaches over 200\,\kms\ in 42 cases, and

708: $>$500\,\kms\ in 8 cases. %* 

709: 

710: \subsection{\hi\ column density versus high ions}

711: We find that none of the \cf\ properties (column density, total line

712: width, and mean velocity) correlate with

713: $N_{\rm \hi}$, even though our sample covers two

714: orders of magnitude in $N_{\rm \hi}$. 

715: In Table 3 we compare the observed properties of \cf\ absorption in

716: DLAs (log\,$N_{\rm \hi}>20.3$) with

717: those in sub-DLAs (log\,$N_{\rm \hi}<20.3$). 

718: There is no significant

719: difference between the two populations in mean column density,

720: mean total line width, or mean velocity offset from the neutral gas.

721: However, if we assume that the ionization fraction \cf/C is the same

722: in all systems, then the DLAs tend to show larger \hw\ column

723: densities than the sub-DLAs (see Sect. 3.9). %*

724: 

725: \subsection{Intervening vs proximate systems}

726: The differences between proximate DLAs and intervening DLAs have 

727: been studied in recent years \citep{El02, Ru06, HP07, Pr07b}.

728: Here we compare the properties of the \cf\ absorption in proximate

729: and intervening DLAs and sub-DLAs. These results are relevant to claims

730: that photoevaporation by the quasar reduces the \hi\ cross-section in

731: proximate DLAs \citep{HP07, Pr07b}. 

732: We find no evidence for a higher degree of ionization in the proximate

733: systems. Indeed, the mean \cf\ column densities and total line

734: widths in the proximate systems are slightly \emph{lower} than the

735: corresponding values in the intervening systems. However, our current

736: proximate sample with \cf\ only contains seven systems, so further

737: data are needed before strong conclusions can be drawn.

738: 

739: \subsection{Total ionized column density}

740: One of the key conclusions of Paper I was that, 

741: if the ionized and neutral phases of DLA have the same metallicity, then

742: the \hw\ column density in the \os\ phase typically amounts to

743: $>$40\% of the \hi\ column density in the neutral phase, and

744: that $N_{\rm \hw}$ in the \cf\ phase amounts to a further $>$20\% of

745: $N_{\rm \hi}$. These percentages are important since they determine the

746: total quantity of baryons and metals hidden in the ionized gas. With

747: the much larger sample in this paper, we are able to improve upon the

748: second of these estimates. $N_{\rm \hw}$ in the \cf\ phase is calculated by:

749: 

750: \begin{equation}

751: N_{\rm \hw}=\frac{N_{\rm \cf}}{f_{\rm \cf}{\rm C/H}}

752: =\frac{N_{\rm \cf}}{f_{\rm \cf}({\rm C/H})_\odot10^{\rm [Z/H]}}

753: \frac{Z_{\rm N}}{Z_{\rm I}}

754: \end{equation}

755: 

756: where $f_{\rm \cf}=N_{\rm \cf}/N_{\rm C}$ is the \cf\ ionization

757: fraction, and $Z_{\rm N}$ and $Z_{\rm I}$ are shorthands for the

758: absolute metallicities in the neutral and ionized gas.

759: We have assumed a solar elemental abundance pattern, so that

760: [C/H]=[Z/H], and we take the solar carbon abundance C/H=$10^{-3.61}$

761: from \citet{AP02}.

762: We assume that $Z_{\rm N}/Z_{\rm I}=1$, though values $<$1 are possible

763: in a scenario where metal-rich, ionized supernova ejecta has yet to

764: mix with the general interstellar medium (ISM), and values $>$1 are

765: possible in an accretion scenario. 

766: Finally, we assume that $f_{\rm \cf}=0.3$, since in Paper I we found this is

767: the maximum amount allowed in \emph{either} photoionization

768: \citep{Fe98} or collisional ionization \citep{GS07} models , and so it

769: gives the most conservative (lowest) value of $N_{\rm \hw}$.  

770: Lower values of $f_{\rm \cf}$ would increase the $N_{\rm \hw}$ estimates.

771: 

772: The resulting values of $N_{\rm \hw}$ are shown in Fig. 8.

773: Based on the \ntot\ systems in this sample, we find

774: that the mean and standard deviation of the warm ionized-to-neutral

775: ratio is 

776: $\langle {\rm log}(N_{\rm \hw}/N_{\rm \hi})\rangle=-1.0\pm0.6$, %*

777: i.e. the \cf\ phase contains $>$10\% of the baryons of the neutral phase.

778: The sub-DLAs show a mean log\,$N_{\rm \hw}$ of 19.33, whereas the

779: DLAs show a mean log\,$N_{\rm \hw}$ of 19.77, a factor of $\approx$2.2

780: higher. %*

781: This is because sub-DLAs show (on average) similar \cf\ columns as

782: DLAs, but higher metallicities. 

783: We note in the lower panel of Fig. 8 that there is no trend

784: for $N_{\rm \hw}$, which is $\propto N_{\rm \cf}$/(Z/H),

785: to depend on metallicity (although such a trend could be partly hidden by the

786: saturation of \cf\ in high metallicity systems).

787: Thus, the correlation reported in Sect 3.4 %*

788: between $N_{\rm \cf}$ and

789: [Z/H] appears to be a simple consequence of the metallicity alone, but

790: does not imply that there is more ionized gas (i.e. more \hw) in the

791: high-metallicity systems.

792: We also note that the scatter in $N_{\rm \hw}$ is substantial, of order 

793: $\approx$2\,dex in $N_{\rm \hw}$

794: at values of [Z/H] between $-$2.0 and $-$1.0.

795: 

796: % Fig. 8

797: \begin{figure}

798: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{f8.eps}}

799: \caption{

800:  Comparison of \hw\ column density in the \cf-bearing

801:  gas integrated over all velocities

802:  with (top) $N_{\rm \hi}$ and (bottom) [Z/H] 

803:  for each system in our sample, assuming an ionization fraction

804:  $N_{\rm \cf}/N_{\rm C}=0.3$. 

805:  The average value of the ratio $N$(\hw)/$N$(\hi) over all \ntot\ systems is

806:  0.1, implying that the \cf\ phase of DLAs and sub-DLAs typically contains

807:  $>$10\% of the baryons and metals in the neutral phase. 

808:  The mean value of $N_{\rm \hw}$ is $\approx$2.5 times lower in

809:  sub-DLAs than in DLAs. 

810: }

811: \end{figure}

812: 

813: \subsection{\cf\ column density vs gas cooling rate}

814: The cooling rate $l_{\rm c}$ in diffuse interstellar gas is directly

815: proportional to the $N_{\rm \cw^*}/N_{\rm \hi}$ ratio\footnote{\cts\

816:   is an excited electronic state of singly ionized carbon.

817:   The transition at 158\,$\mu$m resulting from

818:   the decay from fine-structure state $^2P_{3/2}$ to $^2P_{1/2}$ 

819:   in the 2s$^2$2p term of C$^+$ is

820:   the principal coolant for diffuse neutral interstellar gas.},

821: according to 

822: $l_{\rm c}=N_{\rm \cw^*}h\nu_{\rm ul}A_{\rm ul}/N_{\rm

823:   \hi}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$ per H atom, where $A_{\rm ul}$ is the Einstein

824: $A$ coefficient and $h\nu_{\rm ul}$ the energy of the 158\,$\mu$m line

825: \citep{Po79}. 

826: The cooling rate is of interest since it is equivalent to the

827: heating rate, because the cooling time is so shorter than the

828: dynamical time \citep{Wo03a, Wo03b}. In turn, the heating rate

829: will be related to the intensity of UV radiation and the dust-to-gas

830: ratio, and ultimately to the star formation rate per unit area.

831: 

832: We searched the literature for \cts\ measurements in our sample of

833: DLAs/sub-DLAs with \cf. We took 20 data points (11 measurements and 9 upper

834: limits) from \citet{Sr05}, 9 measurements from \citet{Wo03a}, and one

835: from \citet{He06}. In Fig. 9, we directly compare the cooling rate

836: with the \cf\ column density. 

837: Below log\,$l_{\rm c}=-26.8$, there is no trend evident in the data. 

838: However, we find that the seven points with the highest $N_{\rm \cf}$ %* 

839: are among the systems with the highest cooling rate.

840: Even though a formal correlation between the cooling rate and 

841: $N_{\rm \cf}$ is detected only at the 1.8$\sigma$ level (the \cts\

842: upper limits were excluded in this analysis), we note that the 

843: the median logarithmic \cf\ column density among the systems with 

844: log\,$l_{\rm c}<-26.8$ is 13.86, whereas

845: the median among the systems with 

846: log\,$l_{\rm c}>-26.8$ is 14.83. %*

847: This finding is consistent with the results of

848: Wolfe (2007, in preparation), who finds 

849: evidence for bimodality in DLAs based on the cooling rate, 

850: in the form of significant differences between the metallicities

851: and velocity widths of those DLAs with cooling rates below and above a

852: critical value $l_c=10^{-27}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$\,H$^{-1}$.

853: 

854: % Fig. 9

855: \begin{figure}

856: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{f9.eps}}

857: \caption{Dependence of the \cf\ column density on the 

858:   cooling rate, derived from the $N_{\rm \cw^*}/N_{\rm \hi}$ ratio,

859:   for each DLA (filled circles) and 

860:   sub-DLA (open circles) where data on \cf\ and \cts\ exist. 

861:   Color-coding is used to denote the metallicity of the gas, as

862:   indicated in the legend.

863:   The seven data points with the highest $N_{\rm \cf}$ all show 

864:   above-average cooling rates. Among these seven,

865:   six show high metallicities. %*

866: }

867: \end{figure}

868: 

869: \section{Discussion}

870: 

871: \subsection{Narrow and broad components}

872: There are two physical processes that can provide the 47.9\,eV

873: required to ionize C$^{+2}$ to C$^{+3}$, and so create the gas seen in

874: \cf: photoionization and collisional ionization.

875: In Paper I it was shown [see Fig 3(b) in that paper] 

876: that the line widths of at least one

877: fifth of the \cf\ components observed

878: in DLAs are narrow ($b\la10$\,\kms), implying that in these

879: components, the gas is cool ($T<7\times10^4$\,K), which likely implies

880: collisional ionization is unimportant, and that photoionization is  

881: the ionization mechanism \footnote{Cool but highly ionized clouds

882:   could however be produced by a non-equilibrium collisional

883:   ionization scenario, in which initially hot gas has cooled faster

884:   than it has recombined, leading to ``frozen-in'' ionization \citep{Ka73}.}.

885: These narrow components are not seen in \os. 

886: The detection of cool \cf\ components rules out the idea

887: that {\emph all} the \cf\ in DLAs arises in a hot halo

888: \citep[see][]{Mo96, Ma03}.

889: The source of the extreme-ultraviolet (EUV) radiation at 259\,\AA\

890: that photoionizes C$^{+2}$ to C$^{+3}$ and gives rise to the narrow

891: \cf\ components could be external (the extragalactic background)

892: or internal (O- and B- type stars in the DLA host galaxies).

893: Discussions of the relative importance of internal and external

894: radiation in DLAs are given by \citet{HS99}, \citet{ME05}, and \citet{Sy06}.

895: Note that in the Milky Way, \citet{BH86} found that planetary

896: nebulae are the dominant source of photons in the range 45--54\,eV,

897: but DLA galaxies at $z>2$ are likely too young for planetary nebulae to

898: have formed.

899: 

900: We propose that the broad \cf\ components arise in the hotter phase of DLA

901: plasma that is detected in \os\ absorption (Paper I), i.e the hot

902: ionized medium. This phase will arise following either heat input from

903: supernova in the DLA host galaxy, or by the shock-heating of

904: infalling gas at the virial radius. In the first case, the hot ionized

905: medium may exist in the form of a wind \citep{OD06, Fa07, KR07},

906: though Galactic fountain scenarios are also possible \citep{SF76, Br80, HB90}.

907: The observation that up to 80\% of the \cf\ components are

908: broad is consistent with the origin of the \cf\ in a wind,

909: since in the models of \citet{OD06}, much of the 

910: \cf\ in galactic winds is collisionally ionized.

911: 

912: We note that Type II supernovae will heat interstellar gas to temperatures

913: $>$10$^6$\,K, too high for the formation of \os\ and \cf\ lines, and

914: left to itself, gas at a density of 10$^{-3}$\,cm$^{-3}$ and

915: one-hundredth of the solar metallicity will not cool in a Hubble time.

916: However, if the hot plasma interacts with cool or warm entrained clouds,

917: conductive interfaces \citep{Bo90}, turbulent mixing layers

918: \citep{Sl93, Es06}, or shock fronts \citep{DS96}

919: can form between the hot and cool phases, in which

920: the temperatures are favorable for the formation of \os\ and \cf\

921: lines. These mechanisms, which have been invoked to explain high-ion

922: observations

923: in the extended halo of the Milky Way \citep{Sa03, Zs03, IS04}, 

924: in high-velocity clouds \citep{Se03, Fo04, Fo05, Co05}, and in the Large

925: Magellanic Cloud \citep{Le07}, can explain the broader \cf\ and \os\

926: components seen in the DLAs and sub-DLAs.

927: Note that the interpretation of broad high-ion components in

928: DLAs and sub-DLAs as hot and collisionally ionized is different from the

929: interpretation of the \os\ components in the IGM at $z\ga2$, 

930: which (generally) appear to be photoionized \citep{Ca02, Be02, Lv03,

931: Be05, Re06, Lo07}, though see \citet{Re01} and \citet{Si02, Si06}. 

932: 

933: \subsection{Ionized gas and star formation}

934: \citet{Le06} have presented a [Z/H]-$\Delta v_{\rm Neut}$

935: correlation in DLAs and sub-DLAs, and have interpreted it as implying

936: an underlying mass-metallicity relation \citep[see also][]{WP98, Le98,

937: Mu07, Pr07a}.

938: In this interpretation, $\Delta v_{\rm Neut}$ traces motions due to gravity.

939: Since we find that $\Delta v_{\rm \cf}$ is larger than 

940: $\Delta v_{\rm Neut}$ in almost all cases, an additional energy source

941: is required to heat and accelerate the \cf\ clouds.

942: We suggest that star formation and subsequent supernovae could provide

943: this source. Star formation in DLA and sub-DLA galaxies will lead to:\\

944: (i) metals generated by stellar nucleosynthesis;\\ 

945: (ii) EUV flux from OB stars that can photoionize C$^{+2}$ to C$^{+3}$ in

946: interstellar gas, giving rise to the narrow \cf\ components;\\

947: (iii) supernovae-heated million-degree plasma, which can interact with

948: entrained clouds of cooler gas to produce gas at $T\sim10^5$\,K, where

949: \os\ and \cf\ components are formed through electron collisions;\\ 

950: (iv) mechanical energy injection from supernovae and stellar winds

951: imparting large total velocity widths to the high ions.\\

952: Because star formation leads to metals and to feedback

953: (i.e. mechanical energy injection into the ISM), this scenario would

954: naturally explain the correlation between [Z/H] and $\Delta v_{\rm \cf}$.

955: However, we cannot rule out an alternative scenario in which the

956: plasma phases in DLAs and sub-DLAs are formed following the accretion

957: of infalling, intergalactic gas, rather than by star formation

958: \citep[e.g.][]{WP00b}. The inflow model can also qualitatively explain the

959: metallicity-\cf\ line width correlation: the more massive halos 

960: (which through the mass-metallicity relationship tend to show higher

961: metallicities) would induce higher accretion rates because of their

962: deeper potential wells, and so could create and disperse the \cf\ over

963: large velocity ranges. 

964: 

965: \subsection{Evidence for galactic outflows and winds}

966: Our dataset shows that \cf\ components in DLAs and sub-DLAs exist over

967: a broad velocity range, with a median $\Delta v_{\rm \cf}$ of

968: 187\,\kms, which is approximately twice as broad as the typical

969: velocity spread seen in the neutral gas.

970: The terminal \cf\ velocities reach $>$200\,\kms\ in 42/\ntot\ systems,

971: and $>$500\,\kms\ in 8/\ntot\ systems, and are correlated with the

972: metallicity. Together, this evidence implies that the high ions in

973: DLAs and sub-DLAs trace highly disturbed kinematic environments.

974: In this section we identify a population of high-velocity \cf\

975: components with intriguing ionization properties, and

976: we address whether these components could be created by galactic outflows.

977: 

978: In order to evaluate whether any of the observed \cf\ components

979: represent winds, we need to determine the escape velocity in each

980: system. We calculate this using

981: $v_{\rm circ}=\Delta v_{\rm Neut}/0.6$, an empirical relation found from

982: analysis of artificial spectra in the simulations of \citet{Ha98} and

983: \citet{Ma01}. There is a factor of two dispersion around this

984: relation, due to variations in the viewing angle.

985: We then take $v_{\rm  esc}=\sqrt2v_{\rm circ}$ (appropriate for a

986: spherical halo), so that $v_{\rm esc}\approx2.4\Delta v_{\rm Neut}$.

987: The escape speed we have assumed can be taken as an upper limit,

988: because $v_{\rm esc}$ is calculated in the disk and will decrease with

989: radius, and we may be observing \cf\ at high radii.

990: We have not accounted for drag forces arising due to entrainment

991: between the winds and the galaxy's ISM \citep{FD07}.

992: 

993: When we search for \cf\ absorption at $v<-v_{\rm esc}$ and $v>v_{\rm esc}$, 

994: we find it in 25 of \ndla\ DLAs and 4 of \nsub\ sub-DLAs, i.e. 

995: \cf\ absorption unbound from the central potential well

996: exists in $\approx$40\% of cases. %*

997: These absorbers, which we refer to as wind candidates, are colored with dark

998: shading in Fig. 1, for easy identification. 

999: A key property of the wind candidate absorbers is the low column

1000: density of the accompanying neutral gas absorption.

1001: In this respect, the wind candidates are analogous to the highly

1002: ionized high-velocity clouds seen in the vicinity of the Milky Way

1003: \citep{Se95, Se99, Se03, Co04, Co05, Fo05, Fo06, Ga05}.

1004: They also resemble the $z\approx6$ \cf\ absorbers reported by

1005: \citet{RW06}. % and \citet{Si06b}.

1006: In a handful of cases, wind candidates are seen at both redshifted and

1007: blueshifted velocities in the same system.

1008: In Fig. 10 (top panel) we

1009: plot the absolute wind \cf\ columns as a function of metallicity.

1010: We find similar \cf\ wind column densities in systems that span the

1011: 2.5\,dex range of metallicity in our sample, even in the

1012: highest metallicity systems.

1013: 

1014: Our results are surprising when viewed in the light of simulations of

1015: galactic outflows, which show that dwarf galaxies are more

1016: important than massive galaxies for the metal pollution of the

1017: intergalactic medium 

1018: \citep{MF99, Fe00, Na04b, Sc06b, Ti06, Ko07}, 

1019: since they are incapable of gravitationally confining the

1020: metals released by supernovae. The increase in wind escape fraction

1021: with decreasing galactic mass may contribute to the

1022: origin of the mass-metallicity relationship observed in DLAs and other

1023: high-redshift galaxies \citep{Na04a, Tr04, Mo04, Sa05,

1024:   Er06}\footnote{Low star formation efficiency at low galactic masses

1025:   may also contribute to the mass-metallicity relationship

1026:   \citep{Br07, FD07}.}.

1027: The surprising result here is that, given the mass-metallicity

1028: relation, the higher metallicity (higher mass) galaxies should

1029: decelerate their supernova-driven outflows, so that \cf\ outflows should

1030: not be seen in the high-metallicity systems, but yet we observe the

1031: high-velocity components even in systems with [Z/H]$>-1.0$. 

1032: Furthermore, we find that the maximum outflow

1033: velocity $v_{\rm \max}$ is correlated to the metallicity.

1034: 

1035: For any individual \cf\ component, it is difficult %if not impossible

1036: to determine conclusively whether one is seeing a galactic outflow

1037: from the DLA galaxy \citep[see][]{Fa07}. 

1038: Two other plausible origins are inflow toward the DLA galaxy

1039: \citep{WP00b}, and the ISM of a separate nearby galaxy. 

1040: A contribution of \cf\ from these processes

1041: could help to explain both the scatter seen in each

1042: panel in Figure 6, and the cases with large values for $\Delta v_{\rm \cf}$.

1043: One weakness of the inflow model is that accretion would accelerate

1044: the gas up to but not beyond the escape velocity, 

1045: but yet we see gas moving \emph{above} the escape velocity.

1046: Thus inflow cannot explain the highest-velocity \cf\ components.

1047: The nearby galaxy model has the problem of not readily explaining why the 

1048: ionized-to-neutral gas ratio is so high in the high-velocity

1049: \cf\ components. In other words, if nearby galaxies are

1050: responsible for the high-velocity \cf\ components, where is their

1051: neutral ISM? 

1052: The outflow explanation, on the other hand, naturally explains the

1053: velocities and the ionization properties of the high-velocity \cf\ absorbers.

1054: The outflow model also explains the presence of

1055: metals in the ionized gas (they came from the DLA host galaxy), so it

1056: does not need to resort to pre-enrichment.

1057: A more serious problem is whether we can associate a single DLA with a

1058: single galaxy. This assumption may be false since the clustering

1059: of galaxies near DLAs has been observed both at low \citep{CL03} and

1060: high \citep{Co06a, Co06b, BL03, BL04, El07} redshift.

1061: Our wind interpretation implicitly assumes that each high-velocity \cf\

1062: component arose from a galaxy located in velocity at the point where

1063: the neutral line absorption is strongest. 

1064: 

1065: % Fig. 10

1066: \begin{figure}

1067: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{f10.eps}}

1068: \caption{

1069:   {\bf Top panel}: \cf\ column density moving above the escape speed 

1070:   (i.e. wind candidate $N_{\rm \cf}$) as a function of metallicity, for the 25

1071:   DLAs and 4 sub-DLAs with \cf\ absorption at %*

1072:   $|v|>|v_{\rm esc}|$, where $v_{\rm esc}=2.4\Delta v_{\rm Neut}$.

1073:   {\bf Bottom panel}: Wind mass outflow rate $\dot{M}_{\rm wind}$ 

1074:   divided by characteristic \cf\ radius $r_{40}$ (in units of 40\,kpc)

1075:   vs metallicity. 

1076:   The median mass outflow rate among these cases is 

1077:   22$\langle r_{40} \rangle$\,\mfu. %* 

1078:   The large diamond shows the mass outflow rate determined in the

1079:   $z=2.7$ Lyman Break Galaxy cB58 by \citet{Pe00}, assuming $r$=1\,kpc.

1080:   The filled triangles are the mass flow rates determined for the

1081:   cool winds in the \citet{Ma06} sample of low-redshift ultraluminous

1082:   starburst galaxies and plotted at zero metallicity for convenience.

1083:   Only the DLA and sub-DLA points have been divided by $r_{40}$. 

1084:   %{\bf Bottom panel}: Wind mass outflow rate vs metallicity, assuming

1085:   %a characteristic \cf\ radius of 40\,kpc. %*

1086:   %The median mass outflow rate among these cases is 22\,\mfu. %*

1087:   %The large diamond shows the mass outflow rate determined in the

1088:   %$z=2.7$ Lyman Break Galaxy cB58 by \citet{Pe00}.

1089:   %The filled triangles are the mass flow rates determined for the

1090:   %cool winds in the \citet{Ma06} sample of low-redshift ultraluminous

1091:   %starburst galaxies, plotted at zero metallicity for convenience.

1092: }

1093: \end{figure}

1094: 

1095: \subsubsection{Wind properties}

1096: We present in this section a calculation of

1097: order-of-magnitude estimates for the mass $M$, kinetic energy

1098: $E_{\rm k}$, mass flow rate $\dot{M}$, and flux of kinetic energy

1099: $\dot{E}_{\rm k}$ in the \cf\ wind candidate absorbers.

1100: These calculations are analogous to those used to measure the

1101: energetics of winds in starburst galaxies \citep{He00, Ma05, Ma06} and

1102: LBGs \citep{Pe00}.

1103: 

1104: We assume that the outflow exists in an expanding hemispherical shell

1105: moving at velocity $v$ relative to the neutral gas in the DLA galaxy

1106: (we do not assume a full spherical outflow, since we do not generally

1107: see two components corresponding to the near and far side of the galaxy). 

1108: We then calculate $M$, $E_{\rm k}$, $\dot{M}$, and $\dot{E}_{\rm k}$

1109: using the following equations:

1110: \begin{eqnarray}

1111: M & = & 2\pi r^2\mu m_{\rm H}N_{\rm \hw}\\ 

1112: \dot{M} & = & 4\pi\mu m_{\rm H}r|\bar{v}|N_{\rm \hw}\\ 

1113: E_{\rm k} & = & M\bar{v}^2/2\\

1114: \dot{E_{\rm k}} & = & \dot{M}\bar{v}^2/2

1115: \end{eqnarray} 

1116: 

1117: Here $\mu=1.3$ is the mean molecular weight, $m_{\rm H}$ is the mass of

1118: a hydrogen atom, and $N_{\rm \hw}$ is calculated using Eqn. 3.

1119: It can be seen that these four quantities are proportional to the zeroth,

1120: first, second, and third moments of the \cf\ optical depth profile.

1121: The wind mass flow rates are shown in the lower panel of Fig. 10.

1122: They were calculated by taking the average

1123: of the escape velocity and the terminal velocity for $\bar{v}$, and

1124: deriving $N_{\rm \hw}$ with Eqn. 3 only for that portion of the \cf\

1125: absorption at $|v|>v_{\rm esc}$. 

1126: We only have information on the line-of-sight

1127: velocity (not the full 3D velocity), but since the

1128: line-of-sight passes through a DLA or sub-DLA, we assume we are looking

1129: through the full depth of the galactic halo, so that the line-of-sight

1130: velocity we measure approximates the radial velocity of the outflowing gas. 

1131: 

1132: The only quantity which is not directly measured is the characteristic

1133: radius $r$. If we take a reference value of 

1134: $r=40$\,kpc, as determined for \cf\ around LBGs by \citet{Ad05}, we find that 

1135: the 29 \cf\ wind candidates typically contain (median values)

1136: a total mass of $\sim2\times10^9$\,M$_\odot$, 

1137: a kinetic energy of $\sim1\times10^{57}$\,erg, 

1138: a mass flow rate of $\sim22$\,\mfu, 

1139: and a kinetic energy injection rate of $\sim4\times10^{41}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$. %*

1140: To put these wind mass flow rates in perspective,

1141: \citet{Pe00, Pe02} report a mass flow rate of $\approx$60\,\mfu\ for the

1142: outflow from the $z=2.7$ LBG MS~1512-cB58, and 

1143: \citet{Ma06} calculate the mass loss rates in the cool

1144: winds of a sample of low-redshift ultraluminous starburst galaxies as

1145: between 1 and $>$14\,\mfu.

1146: 

1147: We calculate that the thermal energy in the \cf\ wind absorbers is

1148: only a few percent of their kinetic energy (assuming a temperature of

1149: $10^5$\,K).

1150: Assuming the clouds fill a region whose depth is similar to its width,

1151: a 40\,kpc depth and $N_{\rm \hw}=10^{20}$\,\sqcm\ correspond to a density of 

1152: $n_{\rm \hw}\sim10^{-3}$\,cm$^{-3}$, assuming a filling factor of

1153: unity. In turn, such a medium would exhibit a thermal pressure

1154: $P/k\sim10^2$\,cm$^{-3}$\,K. If the \cf\

1155: arose in interface layers between entrained cool/warm clouds and a

1156: surrounding hot gas, then the line-of-sight filling factor would be

1157: much lower and the \cf\ could exist in higher-density,

1158: higher-pressure, localized regions.

1159: 

1160: Among the 25 DLAs and 4 sub-DLAs showing wind candidate components, %*

1161: the median rate at which each galaxy delivers metals to the IGM is

1162: $\sim1\times10^{-2}$\,\mfu. %*

1163: %Averaging over all DLAs and sub-DLAs (including the ones with no \cf\

1164: %above the escape velocity), we find the mean metal injection rate per

1165: %system is $\sim2\times10^{-2}$\,\mfu. %*.

1166: This estimate is robust to changes in the metallicity of the ionized

1167: gas with respect to the neutral gas.

1168: Assuming that the outflows are driven by the supernovae that follow

1169: star formation, we can calculate the star formation rate 

1170: necessary to power the observed \cf\ outflows.

1171: We use the relation from \citet{Ef00} between kinetic energy injection

1172: rate and star formation rate, 

1173: $\dot{E}_{\rm SN}=2.5\times10^{41}\dot{M}_\star$\,erg s$^{-1}$, 

1174: with $\dot{M}_\star$ in \mfu~\footnote{This relation assumes each supernova

1175: releases $10^{51}$\,erg of kinetic energy and that one supernova

1176: follows from every 125\,$M_\odot$ of star formation.}.

1177: Equating $\dot{E}_{\rm SN}$ to the observed mean flux of kinetic energy, we

1178: find a median required SFR per DLA of $\sim$2\,\mfu, %*

1179: corresponding (with our assumed $r=40$\,kpc)

1180: to a required SFR per unit area ($\dot{\psi_*}$) of 

1181: $\sim3\times10^{-4}$\,\mfu\,kpc$^{-2}$. %*

1182: This is consistent with (though close to) the limit on the SFR per

1183: unit area derived from low surface brightness features (i.e. DLA

1184: analogs) in the Hubble Ultra-Deep Field by 

1185: \citet{WC06}, who report $\dot{\psi_*}\la10^{-3.6}$\mfu\,kpc$^{-2}$. %*

1186: We thus conclude that, at least to an order-of-magnitude, there is

1187: sufficient energy released following star formation to drive the

1188: observed high-velocity \cf\ components in DLAs, supporting the notion

1189: that they trace galactic winds.

1190: 

1191: \section{Summary}

1192: We analyzed the \cf\ absorption in \ndla\ DLAs and \nsub\ sub-DLAs

1193: in the range $1.75\!<\!z_{\rm abs}\!<\!3.61$ observed with VLT/UVES.

1194: We measured the properties of the \cf\ absorption in each system and

1195: investigated how they depend on the properties of the neutral gas.

1196: In most systems the metallicity, \hi\ column density, and line width

1197: in the neutral gas had already been measured.

1198: We executed the neutral gas measurements for the remaining cases.

1199: This study has led us to find that:

1200: 

1201: \begin{enumerate}

1202: \item The \cf\ absorption line profiles are complex, showing 

1203:   both narrow ($b\!<\!10$\,\kms) and broad ($b\!>\!10$\,\kms)

1204:   components, which trace cool, photoionized and

1205:   hot, collisionally ionized gas, respectively (we used \os\ to study

1206:   the hot gas in Paper I).

1207: 

1208: \item The median \cf\ column densities in DLAs and sub-DLAs 

1209:   [$\langle$log$N_{\rm \cf}$(DLA)$\rangle$=14.2] 

1210:   are substantially higher than typical IGM values

1211:   [$\langle$log$N_{\rm \cf}$(IGM)$\rangle$=13.0], 

1212:   but similar to those seen in LBGs

1213:   [$\langle$log$N_{\rm \cf}$(LBG)$\rangle$=14.0].

1214: 

1215: \item The total \cf\ line width is broader than the total neutral line width

1216:   in 69 of 74 cases. %*

1217: 

1218: \item The total \cf\ column density, line width, and velocity offset

1219:   in the DLAs and sub-DLAs are all correlated, so the strongest \cf\

1220:   absorbers also tend to be the broadest and most offset relative to

1221:   the neutral gas.

1222: 

1223: \item The total \cf\ column density is correlated with the

1224:   neutral-phase metallicity. The significance of this correlation is

1225:   $>$6.0$\sigma$, %* 

1226:   and it is found even when the saturated cases, the proximate DLAs,

1227:   and the sub-DLAs are excluded.

1228: 

1229: \item The total \cf\ line width is weakly correlated with the

1230:   neutral-phase metallicity. This correlation is detected at

1231:   $4.1\sigma$ significance (using $(v_+-v_-)_{\rm \cf}$ 

1232:   to measure the total line width), 

1233:   and is found independently in the lower-

1234:   and upper- redshift halves of the sample. The slope of the

1235:   metallicity/high-ion line width relation is similar to the slope of the

1236:   metallicity/low-ion line width relation reported by \citet{Le06}.

1237: 

1238: \item None of the \cf\ properties (column density, line width, central

1239:   velocity) correlate with the \hi\ column density, even though our

1240:   sample spans a factor of 100 in $N_{\rm \hi}$. 

1241:   Indeed, though we only have \nsub\ sub-DLAs against \ndla\ DLAs, the

1242:   mean values of log\,$N$, $\Delta v$, and $|\bar{v}|$ are the same in DLAs

1243:   as in sub-DLAs.

1244:   However, assuming a constant ionization correction 

1245:   $N_{\rm \cf}/N_{\rm C}=0.3$, then the sub-DLAs show a mean 

1246:   $N_{\rm \hw}$ of 19.36, whereas the

1247:   DLAs show a mean $N_{\rm \hw}$ of 19.77, a factor of $\approx$2.5 higher.

1248:   This is because sub-DLAs show (on average) similar \cf\ columns but

1249:   higher metallicities.

1250:  

1251: \item We find slighty lower mean \cf\ column densities and total line

1252:   widths among the seven proximate DLAs/sub-DLAs than among the 67

1253:   intervening systems. This trend is worth investigating using a

1254:   larger proximate sample.

1255: 

1256: \item The mean velocity offset between the \cf\ and the neutral gas

1257:   $|\bar{v}|_{\rm \cf}$ 

1258:   has a mean value of 69\,\kms\ over our \ntot\ DLAs and 

1259:   sub-DLAs, implying a net amount of outflow or inflow is present. %*

1260:   The maximum observed \cf\ velocity $v_{\rm max}$ reaches

1261:   $>$200\,\kms\ in 42/\ntot\ cases, and $>$500\,\kms\ in eight cases.

1262:   $v_{\rm max}$ is correlated with

1263:   the metallicity at the 2.9$\sigma$ level. %*

1264:  

1265: \item We calculate the escape velocity from the width of the neutral

1266:   line absorption. We observe \cf\ moving above the escape velocity in

1267:   25 DLAs and 4 sub-DLAs, covering 2.5 orders of magnitude of %*

1268:   [Z/H]. In other words, \cf\ clouds that are unbound from the central

1269:   potential well are seen in $\approx$40\% of DLAs and sub-DLAs. 

1270:   Assuming a characteristic \cf\ radius of 40\,kpc,

1271:   these wind candidate absorbers show typical (median) masses of

1272:   $\sim2\times10^9$\,M$_\odot$, 

1273:   kinetic energies of $\sim1\times10^{57}$\,erg, mass flow rates of

1274:   $\sim22$\,\mfu, and kinetic energy injection rates %* 

1275:   $\dot{E}_k\sim4\times10^{41}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$. 

1276:   The typical value for $\dot{E}_k$ requires a

1277:   SFR per DLA of $\sim$2\,\mfu, or a SFR per unit area of

1278:   $\sim3\times10^{-4}$\,\mfu\,kpc$^{-2}$, to power the winds.

1279: 

1280: \end{enumerate}

1281: 

1282: We conclude with several remarks concerning the origin of ionized gas in DLAs

1283: and sub-DLAs. Since $\Delta v_{\rm \cf}$ is almost always broader than 

1284: the gravitationally broadened $\Delta v_{\rm Neut}$, an additional

1285: energy source is required to heat and accelerate the \cf-bearing

1286: clouds, in $\approx$40\% of cases to above to escape speed.

1287: We propose that star formation and supernovae can provide this source.

1288: DLA/sub-DLA galaxies with higher rates of star formation will 

1289: produce higher EUV fluxes from massive stars, photoionizing the gas

1290: that is seen in the narrow \cf\ components, and will also undergo higher rates

1291: of Type II supernovae and stellar winds. The supernovae lead to 

1292: (i) metal enrichment through nucleosynthesis, 

1293: (ii) the generation of million-degree interstellar plasma, which can

1294: interact with embedded clouds to form gas containing \cf\ and \os, and

1295: (iii) the injection of mechanical energy to the surrounding

1296: ISM, explaining the extended velocity fields for the ionized gas. 

1297: Such a scenario would explain (at least qualitatively) the

1298: metallicity-\cf\ line width correlation, and the velocity and

1299: ionization level of the wind candidates.

1300: 

1301: Infalling clouds can also contribute to the \cf\ seen in DLAs

1302: \citep[e.g.][]{WP00b}. However, as we have pointed out, infall cannot

1303: explain the highest velocity \cf\ components, which are detected at

1304: well over the escape speed. Although metallicity measurements could in theory

1305: discriminate between the infall and outflow hypotheses, it is very

1306: difficult to directly measure the metallicity of the ionized gas in DLAs.

1307: However, one practical test of the idea that star formation leads to the

1308: production of ionized gas in DLAs (and the associated idea that the

1309: high-velocity \cf\ components in DLAs trace winds) would be a detailed

1310: comparison between the properties of \cf\ absorption in DLAs and in

1311: LBGs, where outflows are \emph{directly} observed \citep{Pe00, Pe02,

1312:   Sh03}. Though we have not yet conducted a full comparison, we do

1313: note that the similar \cf\ column density distributions observed in

1314: DLAs and LBGs suggest that the ionized gas in these two classes of

1315: object shares a common origin in supernova-driven outflows. 

1316: 

1317: \vskip 1cm

1318: {\bf Acknowledgements}\\

1319: AJF gratefully acknowledges the support of a Marie Curie

1320: Intra-European Fellowship awarded by the European Union Sixth

1321: Framework Programme. 

1322: PP and RS gratefully acknowledge support from the Indo-French Centre

1323: for the Promotion of Advanced Research (Centre Franco-Indien pour la

1324: Promotion de la Recherche Avanc\'ee) under contract No. 3004-3.

1325: We thank Alain Smette for kindly providing the spectra of many quasars

1326: in the Hamburg-ESO survey prior to publication. We acknowledge

1327: valuable discussions with Blair Savage, Jason Prochaska, and Art

1328: Wolfe. Finally, we thank the referee for perceptive comments that

1329: improved the paper.

1330: 

1331: \begin{thebibliography}{}

1332: \bibitem[Adelberger et al.(2005)]{Ad05} 

1333: % IGM C IV outflow: gal/abs correlations

1334: Adelberger, K. L., Shapley, A. E., Steidel, C. C., Pettini, M., Erb,

1335: D. K., \& Reddy, N. A., 2005, \apj, 629, 636

1336: 

1337: \bibitem[Aguirre et al.(2001)]{Ag01} % IGM wind Z enrichment

1338: Aguirre, A., Hernquist, L., Schaye, J., Weinberg, D. H., Katz, N., \&

1339: Gardner, J. 2001, \apj, 560, 599

1340: 

1341: \bibitem[Aguirre et al.(2005)]{Ag05} 

1342: % cf CIV in IGM with sim prediction

1343: Aguirre, A., Schaye, J., Hernquist, L., Kay, S., Springel, V., \&

1344: Theuns, T. 2005, \apj, 620, L13

1345: 

1346: \bibitem[Akerman et al.(2005)]{Ak05}

1347: % Chemical Analysis of QALs with UVES

1348: Akerman, C. J., Ellison, S. L., Pettini, M., \& Steidel, C. C. 2005,

1349: \aap, 440, 499

1350: 

1351: \bibitem[Allende Prieto et al.(2002)]{AP02} % solar C/H 

1352: Allende Prieto, C., Lambert, D. L., \& Asplund, A. 2002, \apj, 573, L137

1353: 

1354: \bibitem[Aracil et al.(2004)]{Ar04}

1355: %C IV in IGM: POD search, enriched at tau>1, OVI at tau>0.2

1356: Aracil, B., Petitjean, P., Pichon, C., \& Bergeron, J. 2004, \aap,

1357: 419, 811

1358: 

1359: \bibitem[Ballester et al.(2000)]{Ba00} % UVES reduction pipeline

1360: Ballester, P., Modigliani, A., Boitquin, O., Cristiani, S., Hanuschik,

1361: R., Kaufer, A., \& Wolf, S. 2000, The Messenger, 101, 31

1362: 

1363: \bibitem[Bergeron et al.(1994)]{Be94} % O VI in LLS

1364: Bergeron, J., et al. 1994, \apj, 436, 33

1365: 

1366: \bibitem[Bergeron et al.(2002)]{Be02} 

1367: Bergeron, J., Aracil, B., Petitjean, P., \& Pichon, C. 2002, \aap, 396, L11

1368: 

1369: \bibitem[Bergeron \& Herbert-Fort(2005)]{Be05} 

1370: % VLT O VI systems at 2.0--2.6 in 10 quasars

1371: Bergeron, J., \& Herbert-Fort, S. 2005, 

1372: Probing Galaxies through Quasar Absorption Lines, Proc. IAU

1373: 199, ed. Williams, Shu \& M\'enard, 

1374: 265 (astro-ph/0506700) %(Cambridge: CUP),

1375: 

1376: \bibitem[Boksenberg et al.(2003)]{Bo03}

1377: Boksenberg, A., Sargent, W. L. W., \& Rauch, M. 2003, preprint

1378: (astro-ph/0307557) 

1379: 

1380: \bibitem[Borkowski et al.(1990)Borkowski, Balbus, \& Fristrom]{Bo90}

1381: % Cond Int

1382: Borkowski, K. J., Balbus, S. A., \& Fristrom, C. C. 1990, \apj, 355, 501

1383: 

1384: \bibitem[Bouch\'e \& Lowenthal(2003)]{BL03}

1385: %DLA clustering

1386: Bouch\'e, N., \& Lowenthal, J. D. 2003, \apj, 596, 810	

1387: 

1388: \bibitem[Bouch\'e \& Lowenthal(2004)]{BL04}

1389: %DLA clustering

1390: Bouch\'e, N., \& Lowenthal, J. D. 2004, \apj, 609, 513	

1391: 	

1392: \bibitem[Bouch\'e et al.(2005)]{Bo05} %MMP in Galaxies

1393: Bouch\'e, N., Lehnert, M. D., \& P\'eroux, C. 2005, \mnras, 364, 319

1394: 

1395: \bibitem[Bouch\'e et al.(2006)]{Bo06} %MMP in Galaxies

1396: Bouch\'e, N., Lehnert, M. D., \& P\'eroux, C. 2006, \mnras, 367, L16

1397: 

1398: \bibitem[Bouch\'e et al.(2007)]{Bo07} %MMP in Galaxies

1399: Bouch\'e, N., Lehnert, M. D., Aguirre, A., P\'eroux, C., \& Bergeron,

1400: J. 2007, \mnras, 378, 525 

1401: 

1402: \bibitem[Bregman \& Harrington(1986)]{BH86}

1403: % Planetary nebula -> Galactic narrow CIV

1404: Bregman, J. N., \& Harrington, J. P. 1986, \apj, 309, 833

1405: 

1406: \bibitem[Bregman(1980)]{Br80} % Fountain

1407: Bregman, J. N. 1980, \apj, 236, 577

1408: 

1409: \bibitem[Brooks et al.(2007)]{Br07}

1410: % Origin of MZ relation

1411: Brooks, A. M., Governato, F., Booth, C. M., Willman, B., Gardner,

1412: J. P., Wadsley, J., Stinson, G., \& Quinn, T. 2007, \apj, 655, L17

1413: 	

1414: \bibitem[Carswell, Schaye, \& Kim(2002)]{Ca02} 

1415: % O VI in Ly a forest at z~2 in two QSO spectra, large omega_b in systems

1416: Carswell, B., Schaye, J., \& Kim, T.-S. 2002, \apj, 578, 43

1417: 

1418: \bibitem[Chen \& Lanzetta(2003)]{CL03} % DLA/gal clustering low-Z

1419: Chen, H.-W., \& Lanzetta, K., 2003, \apj, 597, 706

1420: 

1421: \bibitem[Collins et al.(2004)Collins, Shull, \& Giroux]{Co04} % HIHVCs

1422: Collins, J. A., Shull, J. M., \& Giroux, M. L. 2004, \apj, 605, 216

1423: 

1424: \bibitem[Collins et al.(2005)Collins, Shull, \& Giroux]{Co05} % HIHVCs

1425: Collins, J. A., Shull, J. M., \& Giroux, M. L. 2005, \apj, 623, 196

1426: 

1427: \bibitem[Cooke et al.(2006a)]{Co06a} % DLA clustering I

1428: Cooke, J., Wolfe, A. M., Gawiser, E., \& Prochaska, J. X. 2006a,

1429: \apj, 636, L9	

1430: 

1431: \bibitem[Cooke et al.(2006b)]{Co06b} % DLA clustering II

1432: Cooke, J., Wolfe, A. M., Gawiser, E., \& Prochaska, J. X. 2006b, 

1433: \apj, 652, 992	

1434: 

1435: \bibitem[Cowie \& Songaila(1998)]{CS98}

1436: %C IV/HI high even when tau(HI) is low, implying enrichment in IGM

1437: Cowie, L. L., \& Songaila, A. 1998, Nature, 394, 44

1438: 

1439: \bibitem[Dav\'e et al.(1999)]{Da99}

1440: % LLS gas outside of virialized halos

1441: Dav\'e, R., Hernquist, L., Katz, N., \& Weinberg, D. H. 2000, \apj,

1442: 539, 517

1443: 

1444: \bibitem[Dekker et al.(2000)]{De00}

1445: %UVES design

1446: Dekker, H., D'Odorico, S., Kaufer, A., Delabre, B., \& Kotzlowski,

1447: H. 2000, SPIE, 4008, 534

1448: 

1449: \bibitem[Dessauges-Zavadsky et al.(2003)]{DZ03}

1450: %=Sub-DLA paper 1 what fraction of HI is ionized

1451: Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., Péroux, C., Kim, T.-S., D'Odorico, S. \&

1452: McMahon, R. G. 2003, \mnras, 345, 447

1453: 

1454: \bibitem[Dopita \& Sutherland(1996)]{DS96}% Shock Ionization

1455: Dopita, M, A., \& Sutherland, R. S. 1996, \apjs, 102, 161

1456: 

1457: \bibitem[Efstathiou(2000)]{Ef00} % Sn energy as fn of SFR

1458: Efstathiou, G. 2000, \mnras, 317, 697

1459: 

1460: \bibitem[Ellison et al.(2000)]{El00}

1461: %C IV in IGM in 1 high S/N spectrum, f[N(CIV)]

1462: Ellison, S. L., Songaila, A., Schaye, J., \& Pettini, M., 2000, \aj, 120, 1175

1463: 

1464: \bibitem[Ellison \& Lopez(2001)]{EL01}

1465: % Q2314 NHI and Z/H

1466: Ellison, S. L., \& Lopez, S. 2001, \aap, 380, 117

1467: 

1468: \bibitem[Ellison et al.(2002)]{El02}

1469: % PRoximate DLAs

1470: Ellison, S. L., Yan, L., Hook, I. M., Pettini, M., Wall, J. V., \&

1471: Shaver, P. 2002, \aap, 383, 91

1472: 

1473: \bibitem[Ellison et al.(2007)]{El07}

1474: % DLA clustering on scales < 1000 km/s

1475: Ellison, S. L., Hennawi, J. F., Martin, C. L., \& Sommer-Larsen,

1476: J. 2007, \mnras, submitted (astro-ph/0704.1816)	

1477: 

1478: \bibitem[Erb et al.(2006)]{Er06}

1479: % Mass-metallicity relation

1480: Erb, D. K., Shapley, A. E., Pettini, M., Steidel, C. C., Reddy, N. A.,

1481: \& Adelberger, K. L. 2006, \apj, 644, 813

1482: 

1483: \bibitem[Esquivel et al.(2006)]{Es06}

1484: % MHD TMLs

1485: Esquivel, A., Benjamin, R. A., Lazarian, A., Cho, J., \& Leitner,

1486: S. N. 2006, \apj, 648, 1043

1487: 

1488: \bibitem[Fangano et al.(2007)]{Fa07}

1489: % Wind Signatrues in Absorption

1490: Fangano, A. P. M., Ferrara, A., \& Richter, P. 2007, \mnras,

1491: submitted (astro-ph/0704.2143)

1492: 

1493: \bibitem[Ferland et al.(1998)]{Fe98} % CLOUDY

1494: Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., Verner, D. A., Ferguson, J. W., Kingdon,

1495: J. B., \& Verner, E. M. 1998, \pasp, 110, 761 

1496: 

1497: \bibitem[Ferrara et al.(2000)]{Fe00} % High mass->low escape fraction

1498: Ferrara, A., Pettini, M., \& Shchekinov, Y. 2000, \mnras, 319, 539

1499: 

1500: \bibitem[Ferrara et al. (2005)Ferrara, Scannapieco, \& Bergeron]{Fe05} 

1501: % Theoretical paper on Missing Metals:hiding in hot IGM at high z

1502: Ferrara, A., Scannapieco, E., \& Bergeron, J. 2005, ApJ, 634, L37

1503: 

1504: \bibitem[Finlator \& Dav\'e(2007)]{FD07}

1505: % Origin of MZR

1506: Finlator, K., \& Dav\'e, R. 2007, \mnras, submitted (astro-ph/0704.3100) 

1507: 

1508: \bibitem[Fox et al.(2004)]{Fo04} % interface high ions in HVCs

1509: Fox, A. J., Savage, B. D., Wakker, B. P., Richter, P., Sembach, K. R.,

1510: \& Tripp, T. M. 2004, \apj, 602, 738

1511: 

1512: \bibitem[Fox et al.(2005)]{Fo05} % interface high ions in HVCs

1513: Fox, A. J., Wakker, B. P., Savage, B. D., Sembach, K. R., Tripp,

1514: T. M., \& Bland-Hawthorn, J. 2005, \apj, 630, 332

1515: 

1516: \bibitem[Fox et al.(2006)]{Fo06} % highly ionized HVCs

1517: Fox, A. J., Savage, B. D., \& Wakker, B. P. 2006, \apjs, 165, 229

1518: 

1519: \bibitem[Fox et al.(2007)]{Fo07} % OVI in DLAs

1520: Fox, A. J., Petitjean, P., Ledoux, C., \& Srianand, R. 2007, \aap,

1521: 465, 171 (Paper I)

1522: 

1523: \bibitem[Ganguly et al.(2005)]{Ga05} %HI HVCs

1524: Ganguly, R., Sembach, K. R., Tripp, T. M., \& Savage, B. D. 2005,

1525: \apjs, 157, 251

1526: 

1527: \bibitem[Gnat \& Sternberg(2007)]{GS07} %new CIE

1528: Gnat, O., \& Sternberg, A. 2007, \apjs, 168, 213

1529: 

1530: \bibitem[Haehnelt et al.(1998)Haehnelt, Steinmetz, \& Rauch]{Ha98} 

1531: % DLAs may not have host galaxies but be filaments: used for dv90

1532: Haehnelt, M. G., Steinmetz, M., \& Rauch, M. 1998, \apj, 495, 647

1533: 

1534: \bibitem[Heckman et al.(2000)]{He00}

1535: % Absn line probes of starburst winds

1536: Heckman, T. M., Lehnert, M. D., Strickland, D. K., \& Armus, L. 2000,

1537: \apjs, 129, 493

1538: 

1539: \bibitem[Heckman et al.(2001)]{He01}

1540: % O VI in starburst winds

1541: Heckman, T. M., Sembach, K. R., Meurer, G. R., Strickland, D. K.,

1542: Martin, C. L., Calzetti, D., \& Leitherer, C. 2001, \apj, 554, 1021

1543: 

1544: \bibitem[Heinm\"uller et al.(2006)]{He06}

1545: %  DLA toward PKS 0458-020: star formation rate derived

1546: Heinm\"uller, J., Petitjean, P., Ledoux, C., Caucci, S., \& Srianand,

1547: R. 2006, \aap, 449, 33

1548: 

1549: \bibitem[Hennawi \& Prochaska(2007)]{HP07}

1550: % Proximity Effect

1551: Hennawi, J. F. \& Prochaska, J. X. 2007, \apj, 655, 735

1552: 

1553: \bibitem[Houck \& Bregman(1990)]{HB90} 

1554: % Low T fountain, and cooling time expression

1555: Houck, J. C., \& Bregman, J. N. 1990, \apj, 352, 506

1556: 

1557: \bibitem[Howk \& Sembach(1999)]{HS99} 

1558: % Ionization corr in DLAs: local vs EGB radiation

1559: Howk, J. C., \& Sembach, K. R. 1999, \apj, 523, L141 

1560: 

1561: \bibitem[Indebetouw \& Shull(2004)]{IS04}

1562: %Multiple processes in Galactic hot ISM

1563: Indebetouw, R., \& Shull, J. M. 2004, \apj, 607, 309

1564: 

1565: \bibitem[Kafatos(1973)]{Ka73}

1566: % Overionized gas that has cooled

1567: Kafatos, M. 1973, \apj, 182, 433

1568: 

1569: \bibitem[Kawata \& Rauch(2007)]{KR07}

1570: %Galactic Wind Signatures around High Redshift Galaxies

1571: Kawata, D., \& Rauch, M. 2007, \apj, submitted (astro-ph/0704.0652)

1572: 

1573: \bibitem[Khare et al.(2007)]{Kh07}

1574: % Sub DLAs may be massive spiral/elliptical gal, DLAs low mass gal.

1575: Khare, P., Kulkarni, V. P., P\'eroux, C., York, D. G., Lauroesch,

1576: J. T., \& Meiring, J. D. 2007, \aap, 464, 487

1577: 

1578: \bibitem[Kirkman \& Tytler(1997)]{KT97}

1579: % OVI and CIV in LLS I

1580: Kirkman, D., \& Tytler, D. 1997, \apj, 489, L123

1581: 

1582: \bibitem[Kirkman \& Tytler(1999)]{KT99}

1583: % OVI and CIV in LLS II

1584: Kirkman, D., \& Tytler, D. 1999, \apj, 512, L5

1585: 

1586: \bibitem[Kobayashi et al.(2007)]{Ko07}

1587: %Numerical models of cosmic chemical enrichment

1588: Kobayashi, C., Springel, V., \& White, S. D. M. 2007,

1589: \mnras, 376, 1465

1590: 

1591: \bibitem[Kulkarni et al.(2007)]{Ku07}

1592: % Sub-DLAs contain 25% and maybe higher of metal budget

1593: Kulkarni, V. P., Khare, P., P\'eroux, C., York, D. G., Lauroesch,

1594: J. T., Meiring, J. D. 2007, \apj, 661, L88

1595: 

1596: \bibitem[Ledoux et al.(1998)]{Le98}

1597: % Early analysis of C IV vs neutral line width

1598: Ledoux, C., Petitjean, P., Bergeron, J., Wampler, E. J., \& Srianand,

1599: R. 1998, \aap, 337, 51

1600: 

1601: \bibitem[Ledoux et al.(2003)Ledoux, Petitjean, \& Srianand]{Le03}

1602: % Details of data reduction steps

1603: Ledoux, C., Petitjean, P., \& Srianand, R. 2003, \mnras, 346, 209

1604: 

1605: \bibitem[Ledoux et al.(2006)]{Le06} %Mass-metallicity corr

1606: Ledoux, C., Petitjean, P., Fynbo, J. P. U., M\o ller, P., \& Srianand,

1607: R. 2006, \aap, 457, 71

1608: 

1609: \bibitem[Lehner \& Howk(2007)]{Le07} % interfaces in LMC

1610: Lehner, N., \& Howk, J. C. 2007, \mnras, 377, 687

1611: 

1612: \bibitem[Levshakov et al.(2003)]{Lv03} 

1613: % Photoionized O VI toward HE 0515-4414 at z<1.7

1614: Levshakov, S. A., Agafonova, I. I., Reimers, D., \& Baade, R. 2003, \aap, 

1615: 404, 449

1616: 

1617: \bibitem[Lopez et al.(2007)]{Lo07} % IGM O VI IN LENSED QSOs

1618: Lopez, S., Ellison, S., D'Odorico, S., \& Kim, T.-S. 2007, \aap, 469, 61

1619: 

1620: \bibitem[Lu et al.(1996)]{Lu96} 

1621: % Comprehensive study of elemental composition in DLAs and C IV

1622: Lu, L., Sargent, W. L. W., Barlow, T. A., Churchill, C. W., \& Vogt,

1623: S. S. 1996, \apjs, 107, 475

1624: 

1625: \bibitem[Mac-Low \& Ferrara(1999)]{MF99}

1626: % high escape fraction from dwarf galaxies

1627: Mac Low, M., \& Ferrara, A. 1999, \apj, 513, 142

1628: 	

1629: \bibitem[Maller et al.(2001)]{Ma01}

1630: % Models of DLA low ion kinematics

1631: Maller, A. H., Prochaska, J. X., Somerville, R. S.,

1632: \& Primack, J. R. 2001, \mnras, 326, 1475

1633: 

1634: \bibitem[Maller et al.(2003)]{Ma03}

1635: % Model of high-ionization gas in DLAs

1636: Maller, A. H., Prochaska, J. X., Somerville, R. S., \& Primack,

1637: J. R. 2003, \mnras, 343, 268

1638: 

1639: \bibitem[Martin(2005)]{Ma05} %Starburst neutral winds 1

1640: Martin, C. L. 2005, \apj, 621, 227

1641: 

1642: \bibitem[Martin(2006)]{Ma06} %Starburst neutral winds 2

1643: Martin, C. L. 2006, \apj, 647, 222

1644: 

1645: \bibitem[Miralda-Escud\'e(2005)]{ME05}

1646: % Local sources of radiation

1647: Miralda-Escud\'e, J. 2005, \apj, 620, L91

1648: 

1649: \bibitem[Mo \& Miralda-Escud\'e(1996)]{Mo96}

1650: % 2 phase models of ions in LLS: warm core and hot halo around it

1651: Mo, H. J., \& Miralda-Escud\'e, J. 1996, \apj, 469, 589

1652: 

1653: \bibitem[M\o ller et al.(2004)]{Mo04}

1654: %Ground based Ly a emission from DLAs

1655: M\o ller, P., Fynbo, J. P. U., \& Fall, S. M. 2004, \aap, 422, L33

1656: 

1657: \bibitem[Morton(2003)]{Mo03} % Atomic Data

1658: Morton, D. C. 2003, \apjs, 149, 205

1659: 

1660: \bibitem[Murphy et al.(2007)]{Mu07}

1661: % connection between metallicity and metal-line kinematics in DLAs/sub-DLAs

1662: Murphy, M. T., Curran, S. J., Webb, J. K., M\'enager, H., \& Zych,

1663: B. J., 2007, \mnras, 376, 673

1664: 

1665: \bibitem[Nagamine et al.(2004a)]{Na04a}

1666: % SPH/lambda CDM simulations of DLAs at z=0-4.5: I: incidence

1667: Nagamine, K., Springel, V., \& Hernquist, L. 2004a, \mnras, 348, 421

1668: 

1669: \bibitem[Nagamine et al.(2004b)]{Na04b}

1670: % SPH/lambda CDM simulations of DLAs at z=0-4.5: II: SFR and [Z/H]

1671: Nagamine, K., Springel, V., \& Hernquist, L. 2004b, \mnras, 348, 435

1672: 

1673: \bibitem[Noterdaeme al al.(2007)]{No07}

1674: %New DLA physical conditions paper with UVES data

1675: Noterdaeme, P., Ledoux, C., Petitjean, P.,  Le Petit, F., Srianand,

1676: R., \& Smette, A. 2007, \aap, in press (astro-ph/0707.4479)

1677: 

1678: \bibitem[Oppenheimer \& Dav\'e(2006)]{OD06}

1679: % Wind simulations of IGM metal enrichment

1680: Oppenheimer, B., \& Dav\'e, R. 2006, \mnras, 373, 1265

1681: 

1682: \bibitem[P\'eroux et al.(2003)]{Pe03}

1683: % =subDLA paper 3:  total omega in neutral gas in DLAs/subDLAs

1684: P\'eroux, C., Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., D'Odorico, S., Kim, T.-S., \&

1685: McMahon, R. G. 2003, \mnras, 345, 480

1686: 

1687: \bibitem[P\'eroux et al.(2005)]{Pe05}

1688: % =subDLA paper 3:  total omega in neutral gas in DLAs/subDLAs

1689: P\'eroux, C., Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., D'Odorico, S., Kim, T.-S., \&

1690: McMahon, R. G. 2003, \mnras, 363, 479

1691: 

1692: \bibitem[P\'eroux et al.(2007)]{Pe07}

1693: % =subDLA paper 4:  global metallicity evolution

1694: P\'eroux, C., Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., D'Odorico, S., Kim, T.-S., \&

1695: McMahon, R. G. 2007, \mnras, in press (astro-ph/0707.2697)

1696: 

1697: \bibitem[Petitjean \& Aracil(2004)]{PA04}%1548, 1550 wavelengths

1698: Petitjean, P., \& Aracil, B. 2004, \aap, 422, 523

1699: 

1700: \bibitem[Pettini(1999)]{Pe99}

1701: % Original discussion of missing metals problem

1702: Pettini, M. 1999, in Proc. ESO Workshop, Chemical Evolution from Zero

1703: to High Redshift, ed. J. R. Walsh \& M. R. Rosa (Berlin: Springer), 233

1704: (astro-ph/9902173)

1705: 

1706: \bibitem[Pettini et al.(2000)]{Pe00}

1707: % Wind from MS1512 Lyman Break Galaxy Paper I

1708: Pettini, M., Steidel, C. C., Adelberger, K. L., Dickinson, M., \&

1709: Giavalisco, M. 2000, \apj, 528, 96

1710: 

1711: \bibitem[Pettini et al.(2002)]{Pe02}

1712: % Wind from MS1512 Lyman Break Galaxy Paper II

1713: Pettini, M., Rix, S. A., Steidel, C. C., Adelberger, K. L., Hunt,

1714: M. P., \& Shapley, A. E. 2002, \apj, 569, 742

1715: 

1716: \bibitem[Pottasch(1979)]{Po79} % Cooling rate from C II*

1717: Pottasch, S. R., Wesselius, P. R., \& van Duinen, R. J. 1979, \aap,

1718: 74, L15

1719: 

1720: \bibitem[Prochaska \& Wolfe(1997)]{PW97}

1721: % prof statistics: d v, f_mm,% f_edge and f_tpk. DLA kinematics

1722: Prochaska, J. X., \& Wolfe, A. M. 1997, \apj, 487, 73

1723: 

1724: \bibitem[Prochaska \& Wolfe(2002)]{PW02}

1725: % Abundances: Si and Zn undepleted

1726: Prochaska, J. X., \& Wolfe, A. M. 2002, \apj, 566, 68

1727: 

1728: \bibitem[Prochaska et al.(2007a)]{Pr07a}

1729: %Nature of velocity fields in high-Z galaxies

1730: Prochaska, J. X., Chen, H.-W., Wolfe, A. M., Dessauges-Zavadsky, M.,

1731: Bloom, J. S. 2007a, \apj, submitted (astro-ph/0703701)

1732: 

1733: \bibitem[Prochaska et al.(2007b)]{Pr07b}

1734: % Proximate DLAs

1735: Prochaska, J. X., Hennawi, J. F., \& Herbert-Fort, S. 2007b, \apj,

1736: submitted (astro-ph/0703594)

1737: 

1738: %\bibitem[Razoumov et al.(2006)]{Ra06}

1739: % Hydro simulation of low-ion gas in DLAs

1740: %Razoumov, A. O., Norman, M. L., Prochaska, J. X., \& Wolfe,

1741: %A. M. 2006, \apj, 645, 55

1742: 

1743: \bibitem[Reimers et al.(2001)]{Re01} 

1744: % O VI toward HE 0515 (z=1.2--1.7)

1745: % OVI is not found in the same phase as C IV

1746: Reimers, D., Baade, R., Hagen, H.-J., \& Lopez, S. 2001, \aap, 374, 871

1747: 

1748: \bibitem[Reimers et al.(2006)]{Re06}

1749: % Spectral shape of the UV bck and O VI absorbers at z1.5 to HS 0747+4259

1750: Reimers, D., Agafonova, I. I., Levshakov, S. A., Hagen, H.-J.,

1751: Fechner, C., Tytler, D., Kirkman, D., \& Lopez, S. 2006, \aap, 449, 9

1752: 

1753: \bibitem[Richter et al.(2005)]{Ri05}

1754: % He0001 sub-DLA

1755: Richter, P., Ledoux, C., Petitjean, P., \& Bergeron, J. 2005, \aap,

1756: 440, 819

1757: 

1758: \bibitem[Russell et al.(2006)]{Ru06}

1759: % Excess of proximate DLAs => clustering of gals near QSOs

1760: Russell, D. M., Ellison, S. L., \& Benn, C. R. 2006, \mnras, 367, 412

1761: 

1762: \bibitem[Ryan Weber et al.(2006)]{RW06}

1763: % High z C IV

1764: Ryan-Weber, E. V., Pettini, M., \& Madau, P. 2006, \mnras, 371, L78

1765: 

1766: \bibitem[Savage \& Sembach(1991)]{SS91} % AOD I

1767: Savage, B. D., \& Sembach, K. R. 1991, \apj, 379, 245

1768: 

1769: \bibitem[Savaglio et al.(2005)]{Sa05} %M-Z relation

1770: Savaglio, S., et al. 2005, 635, 260, \apj, 

1771: 

1772: \bibitem[Savage et al.(2003)]{Sa03} 

1773: %Multiple processes in Galactic hot ISM

1774: Savage, B. D., et al. 2003, \apjs, 146, 125

1775: 

1776: \bibitem[Scannapieco et al.(2006a)]{Sc06a}

1777: % IGM CIV Clustering. SPH Simulation vs observations

1778: % ``The sources of intergalactic metals''

1779: Scannapieco, E., Pichon, C., Aracil, B., Petitjean, P., Thacker,

1780: R. J., Pogosyan, D., Bergeron, J., \& Couchman, H. M. P. 2006a, \mnras,

1781: 365, 615

1782: 

1783: \bibitem[Scannapieco et al.(2006b)]{Sc06b}

1784: % SPH code of gal formation with warm and hot ISM - II SN feedback

1785: Scannapieco, C., Tissera, P. B., White, S. D. M., \& Springel, V. 2006b,

1786: \mnras, 371, 1125

1787: 

1788: \bibitem[Schaye et al.(2003)]{Sy03}

1789: % C IV in IGM w pix stat: get C/H in IGM w simulations, no z evolution

1790: Schaye, J., Aguirre, A., Kim, T.-S., Theuns, T., Rauch, M., \&

1791: Sargent, W. L. W. 2003, \apj, 593, 768

1792: 

1793: \bibitem[Schaye(2006)]{Sy06}

1794: % radn field for QALs: EGB vs Gal

1795: Schaye, J. 2006, \apj, 643, 59

1796: 

1797: \bibitem[Schaye et al.(2007)]{Sy07}

1798: % C IV in IGM: photoionized, compact, metal rich clouds

1799: Schaye, J., Carswell, R. F., \& Kim, T.-S. 2007, \mnras, submitted

1800: (astro-ph/0701761) 

1801: 

1802: \bibitem[Sembach et al.(1995)]{Se95} % Mrk 509/PKS2155 #1

1803: Sembach, K. R., Savage, B. D., Lu, L., \& Murphy, E. M. 1995, \apj,

1804: 451, 616

1805: 

1806: \bibitem[Sembach et al.(1999)]{Se99} % Mrk 509/PKS2155 #2

1807: Sembach, K. R., \& Savage, B. D., Lu., L., \& Murphy, E. M. 1999,

1808: \apj, 515, 108

1809: 

1810: \bibitem[Sembach et al.(2003)]{Se03}

1811: % Interface for MW high ions

1812: Sembach, K. R., et al. 2003, \apjs, 146, 165

1813: 

1814: \bibitem[Shapiro \& Field(1976)]{SF76}

1815: % Gal Fountain

1816: Shapiro, P. R., \& Field, G. B. 1976, \apj, 205, 762

1817: 

1818: \bibitem[Shapley et al.(2003)]{Sh03}

1819: % Rest-Frame Ultraviolet Spectra of z~3 Lyman Break Galaxies

1820: Shapley, A. E., Steidel, C. C., Pettini, M., \& Adelberger,

1821: K. L. 2003, \apj, 588, 65

1822: 

1823: \bibitem[Simcoe et al.(2002)Simcoe, Sargent, \& Rauch]{Si02} 

1824: % Keck O VI at z=2.5 N(HI)>15.2 =in 5 SLs

1825: Simcoe, R. A., Sargent, W. L. W., \& Rauch, M. 2002, \apj, 578

1826: , 737

1827: 

1828: \bibitem[Simcoe et al.(2006)]{Si06} 

1829: % Keck O VI/CIV and imaging in 1 SL (IGM high ion ratios) + G wind discussion

1830: Simcoe, R. A., Sargent, W. L. W., Rauch, M., \& Becker, G. 2006, \apj,

1831: 637, 648

1832: 

1833: \bibitem[Slavin et al.(1993)Slavin, Shull \& Begelman]{Sl93} 

1834: % TMLs I

1835: Slavin, J. D., Shull, J. M., \& Begelman, M. C. 1993, \apj, 407, 83

1836: 

1837: \bibitem[Smette et al.(2005)]{Sm05}

1838: % Hamburg-ESO quasars 1

1839: Smette, A., Wisotzki, L., Ledoux, C., Garcet, O., Lopez, S., \&

1840: Reimers, D. et al. 2005, 

1841: Probing Galaxies through Quasar Absorption Lines, Proc. IAU

1842: 199, ed. Williams, Shu, \& M\'enard, 475 (astro-ph/0504657) 

1843: %(Cambridge: CUP)

1844: 

1845: \bibitem[Sommer-Larsen \& Fynbo(2007)]{SF07}

1846: % Missing metals

1847: Sommer-Larsen, J., \& Fynbo, J. P. U. 2007, MNRAS, submitted

1848: (astro-ph/0703698)

1849: 

1850: \bibitem[Songaila(2005)]{So05}

1851: % Keck study of CIV in IGM

1852: Songaila, A. 2005, \aj, 130, 1996

1853: 

1854: \bibitem[Songaila(2006)]{So06}

1855: % Which CIV Are associated and which are not?

1856: Songaila, A. 2006, \aj, 131, 24

1857: 

1858: \bibitem[Srianand et al.(2005)]{Sr05} % Physical Conditions in DLAs

1859: Srianand, R., Petitjean, P., Ledoux, C., Ferland, G. \& Shaw, G. 

1860: 2005, \mnras, 362, 549

1861: 

1862: \bibitem[Strickland et al.(2004)]{St04}

1863: % Hot multiphase wind and feedback from disk galaxies

1864: Strickland, D. K., Heckman, T. M., Colbert, E. J. M.,

1865: Hoopes, C. G., \& Weaver, K. A. 2004, \apj, 606, 829

1866: 

1867: \bibitem[Tissera et al.(2006)]{Ti06}

1868: % Galaxy Formation and Supernova Feedback, simulation paper

1869: Tissera, P. B., Scannapieco, C., White, S. D. M., \& Springel,

1870: V. 2006, Revista Mexicana de Astronom\'ia y Astrof\'isica, 26, 125

1871: 

1872: \bibitem[Tremonti et al.(2004)]{Tr04}

1873: % Mass-metallicity relation from SDSS

1874: Tremonti, C. A., et al. 2004, \apj, 613, 898

1875: 

1876: \bibitem[Veilleux et al.(2005)]{Ve05} % Galactic Winds

1877: Veilleux, S., Cecil, G., Bland-Hawthorn, J. 2005, \araa, 43, 769

1878: 

1879: \bibitem[Wolfe et al.(2005)Wolfe, Gawiser, \& Prochaska]{Wo05} 

1880: % ARAA on DLAs

1881: Wolfe, A. M., Gawiser, E., \& Prochaska, J. X. 2005, \araa, 43, 861

1882: 

1883: \bibitem[Wolfe \& Prochaska(1998)]{WP98} % Early dv vs Z/H DLA correlation

1884: Wolfe. A. M., \& Prochaska, J. X. 1998, \apj, 494, L15

1885: 

1886: \bibitem[Wolfe \& Prochaska(2000a)]{WP00a} % Obsn of CIV in 35 DLAs

1887: Wolfe, A. M., \& Prochaska, J. X. 2000a, \apj, 545, 591

1888: 

1889: \bibitem[Wolfe \& Prochaska(2000b)]{WP00b} % Models of C IV in DLAs

1890: Wolfe, A. M., \& Prochaska, J. X. 2000b, \apj, 545, 603

1891: 

1892: \bibitem[Wolfe et al.(2003a)]{Wo03a}

1893: % SFR from CII* method 1: the technique

1894: Wolfe, A. M., Prochaska, J. X., \& Gawiser, E. 2003a, \apj, 593, 215

1895: 

1896: \bibitem[Wolfe et al.(2003b)]{Wo03b}

1897: % SFR from CII* method 2: measuring SFH of Universe

1898: Wolfe, A. M., Gawiser, E., \& Prochaska, J. X. 2003b, \apj, 593, 235

1899: 

1900: \bibitem[Wolfe \& Chen(2006)]{WC06}

1901: Wolfe, A. M, \& Chen, H.-W. 2006, \apj, 652, 981

1902: 

1903: \bibitem[Zsarg\'o et al.(2003)]{Zs03} % various ionn models in MW

1904: Zsarg\'o, J., Sembach, K. R., Howk, J. C., \& Savage, B. D. 2003, \apj,

1905: 586, 1019

1906: 

1907: \end{thebibliography}

1908: \input{tab1.tex}

1909: \input{tab2.tex}

1910: \input{tab3.tex}

1911: 

1912: % Put large spectra figures at end of file

1913: \setcounter{figure}{0}

1914: \begin{figure*}

1915: \includegraphics[width=17cm]{f1.0.low.eps}

1916: \caption{

1917:   VLT/UVES absorption line spectra of \cf\ $\lambda\lambda1548, 1550$ 

1918:   and an optically thin line (typically \ion{Si}{ii} or \ion{Fe}{ii}) 

1919:   chosen to trace the neutral phase component structure, for all DLAs and

1920:   sub-DLAs in our sample. 

1921:   The flux is in arbitrary units, with the bottom of each panel at zero.

1922:   The light (dark) shaded regions show \cf\ absorption

1923:   below (above) $v_{\rm esc}$, where $v_{\rm esc}=2.4\Delta v_{\rm

1924:   Neut}$ (see text).

1925:   The thick vertical line in each \cf\ panel denotes the optical-depth

1926:   weighted mean velocity of the profile. 

1927:   The two narrow vertical lines show the velocities corresponding to 

1928:   5\% and 95\% of the integrated optical depth; the interval between

1929:   these velocities defines the total line width $\Delta v$.

1930:   A small letter ``B'' within the shaded area indicates a

1931:   blend; in these cases the other \cf\ line was used for measurement.

1932:   The label ``Proximate'' implies the absorber is at $<$5\,000\,\kms\

1933:   from the QSO. Note how the wind candidate absorbers (the dark

1934:   regions) show no absorption in the weak neutral line shown here,

1935:   implying these absorbers have low column densities of neutral gas

1936:   and are highly ionized.

1937:   } 

1938: \end{figure*}

1939: \addtocounter{figure}{-1}

1940: \begin{figure*}

1941: \includegraphics[width=17cm]{f1.1.low.eps}

1942: \caption{(-continued).}

1943: \end{figure*}

1944: \addtocounter{figure}{-1}

1945: \begin{figure*}

1946: \includegraphics[width=17cm]{f1.2.low.eps}

1947: \caption{(-continued).}

1948: \end{figure*}

1949: \addtocounter{figure}{-1}

1950: \begin{figure*}

1951: \includegraphics[width=17cm]{f1.3.low.eps}

1952: \caption{(-continued).}

1953: \end{figure*}

1954: 

1955: 

1956: \end{document}

1957: 

1958: