1:  \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}

3: \usepackage{rotating}

4: 

5: \slugcomment{Second Submission to AJ}

6: 

7: \shorttitle{Structure of the Cold ISM}

8: \shortauthors{Holwerda et al.}

9: 

10: \begin{document} 

11: 

12: \title{The Opacity of Spiral Galaxy Disks VIII:\\

13: Structure of the Cold ISM}

14: \author{B. W. Holwerda\altaffilmark{1}, B. Draine \altaffilmark{2}, K.D. Gordon\altaffilmark{3}, R. A. Gonz\'{a}lez \altaffilmark{4}, D. Calzetti\altaffilmark{5}, M. Thornley \altaffilmark{6}, B. Buckalew \altaffilmark{7},  Ronald J. Allen\altaffilmark{1} and P. C. van der Kruit \altaffilmark{8}}

15: 

16: \email{holwerda@stsci.edu}

17: 

18: \altaffiltext{1}{Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA}

19: \altaffiltext{2}{Dept. of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544-1001, USA}

20: \altaffiltext{3}{Steward Observatory/Department of Astronomy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA }

21: \altaffiltext{4}{Centro de Radiastronom\'{\i}a y Astrof\'{\i}sica, Universidad Nacional Aut\'{o}noma de M\'{e}xico, 58190 Morelia, Michoac\'{a}n, Mexico}

22: \altaffiltext{5}{University of Massachusetts, Department of Astronomy, 710 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA 01003}

23: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA  17837}

24: \altaffiltext{7}{Dept. of Physics, Embry-Riddle University, 3700 Willow Creek Rd, Prescott, AZ  86301, USA}

25: \altaffiltext{8}{Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, P.O. Box 800, Groningen, the Netherlands}

26: 

27: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

28: % Edit after comments from SINGS committee

29: % George Bendo second set of comments

30: % Brent Buckalew second set of comments (2 emails)

31: % Ron's comments

32: % Kristen's English edits.

33: % v6

34: % comments by Bruce Draine 

35: % comments by Karl Gordon 

36: % redit needs to include fit of new function to SFM/SED points and new discussion.

37: % reworked after new SED optical depth from Draine 2003

38: % comments by Rosa

39: % comments by Piet vd Kruit, inclination corrections.

40: % erratum by Bruce Draine on SED vales. new Table, figures

41: %%

42: % resubmission after first referee report.

43: % edited after second referee comments.

44: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

45: 

46: \begin{abstract}

47: The quantity of dust in a spiral disk can be estimated using the dust's 

48: typical emission or the extinction of a known source. In this paper, we 

49: compare two techniques, one based on emission and one on absorption, 

50: applied on sections of fourteen disk galaxies. The two measurements reflect, 

51: respectively the average and apparent optical depth of a disk section. 

52: Hence, they depend differently on the average number and optical depth of 

53: ISM structures in the disk.

54: 

55: % why?

56: The small scale geometry of the cold ISM is critical for accurate models of the overall 

57: energy budget of spiral disks. ISM geometry, relative contributions of different 

58: stellar populations and dust emissivity are all free parameters in galaxy Spectral 

59: Energy Distribution (SED) models; they are also sometimes degenerate, depending on 

60: wavelength coverage. Our aim is to constrain typical ISM geometry.

61: 

62: The apparent optical depth measurement comes from the number of distant galaxies 

63: seen in HST images through the foreground disk, calibrated with the  ``Synthetic 

64: Field Method'' (SFM). We discuss what can be learned from the SFM measurement 

65: alone regarding ISM geometry.  

66: 

67: We measure the IR flux in images from the {\it Spitzer} Infrared Nearby 

68: Galaxy Survey in the same section of the disk that was covered by HST. 

69: A physical model of the dust is fit to the SED to estimate the dust surface density, 

70: mean temperature, and brightness in these disk sections. The surface density is 

71: subsequently converted into the average optical depth estimate.

72: 

73: The two measurements generally agree and the SED in order model finds a 

74: mostly cold dust (T $<$ 25 K.). 

75: %

76: The ratios between the measured average and apparent optical depths 

77: of the disk sections imply optically thin ($\tau_c =0.4$) clouds in these disks. 

78: Optically thick disks, are likely to have more than a single cloud 

79: along the line-of-sight.  

80: \end{abstract}

81: 

82: \keywords{(ISM:) dust, extinction, ISM: structure, galaxies: ISM, galaxies: spiral, infrared: galaxies, 

83: infrared: ISM}

84: 	

85: \section{\label{sec:intro}Introduction}

86: 

87: The dust content of a spiral galaxy disk can be mapped either by the 

88: characteristic dust emission in the far-infrared (FIR) and sub-mm regimes, 

89: or by using the attenuation of known background sources. Both techniques 

90: have seen recent significant improvements in accuracy and sensitivity, with 

91: complementary results shedding light on the dusty interstellar medium 

92: in spiral disks.

93: 

94: % emission

95: The emission from the interstellar dust in the disks of spiral galaxies has 

96: been characterized with increasing accuracy by several infrared space 

97: missions (IRAS, ISO and, recently, {\it Spitzer}), as well as the sub-mm 

98: observations of SCUBA on the JCMT. The improvements in spatial

99: resolution and wavelength coverage have led to significant insight into 

100: the temperature components of the dust in spiral disks, and into the relation 

101: between dusty clouds and star-formation. 

102: %

103: The FIR emission from spiral galaxies has revealed that the dust can be 

104: described by two dominant thermal components: warm (25 K $<$ T $<$ 100 K) 

105: and cold (T $<$ 25 K). Both the warm and cold components can be found in 

106: spiral arms, and there is a smooth disk of cold dust between these arms. 

107: Most of the dust mass in the spiral disk is cold \citep[see the review 

108: articles by][]{Genzel00, Tuffs05rev, Popescu05rev}.

109: 

110: % There is some direct evidence that the cold dust disk may extend beyond the stellar 

111: % disk \citep{Alton98, Nelson98, Davies99, Popescu03}. % Trewhella00 find indirect evidence

112: FIR and sub-mm observations of galaxies find indications \citep[e.g.,][]{Trewhella00, Alton98c} 

113: or direct evidence of cold dust disks extending beyond the stellar disk \citep{Nelson98, Davies99, Popescu03}.

114: The studies of edge-on spirals by \cite{Radovich01} and \cite{Xilouris99} 

115: quantified the radial profile as a scalelength of the dust that is 40\% larger 

116: than that of the starlight. The contribution of the cold ISM (T $<$ 25 K) to 

117: the overall emission of spiral disks has been difficult to constrain because 

118: of the degeneracy between dust temperature and mass. Hence, the cold 

119: ISM's relation with HI and their relative distribution remain unknown.

120: 

121: %recent Spizer results. 

122: {\it Spitzer} observations, mostly from the Spitzer Infrared Nearby Galaxy Survey 

123: \citep[SINGS,][]{sings}, have already contributed greatly to the understanding 

124: of spiral disks. The relations between the tracers of cold dust (70 and 160 micron 

125: emission) and star-formation, both obscured (24 micron) and unobscured (UV and 

126: H$\alpha$ emission) have already been studied with this multi-wavelength survey in 

127: several canonical galaxies and their substructure: the starburst M51 \citep{Calzetti05,Thornley06}, 

128: the grand design spiral M81 \citep{Gordon04, PG06}, the rings of NGC 7331 \citep{Regan04} 

129: and M31 \citep{Gordon06}, the superwind in M82 \citep{Engelbracht06}, and the dwarf 

130: NGC 55 \citep{Engelbracht04}. \cite{Dale05,Dale07} discuss the SED of all SINGS galaxies 

131: over all available wavelengths. \cite{Draine07b} find ample evidence for dust in all the 

132: SINGS galaxies, with the gas-to-dust ratio related to the metallicity. They find no evidence 

133: for very cold (T $<$ 10K) dust, however.

134: 

135: These studies find ample evidence of cold dust throughout the optical disks of spirals 

136: but, interestingly, also outside them in various places: on the edge of the optical disk 

137: \citep{Thornley06,Gordon06}, outside M82's superwind \citep{Engelbracht06} and 

138: extending beyond the stellar disk \citep{Hinz06}.

139: 

140: % Absorption

141: Parallel to these investigations of dust emission has gone an observational 

142: effort to quantify the absorption by dust in spiral disks using known background 

143: sources. 

144: % Occuling galaxies

145: \cite{kw92} proposed using occulting galaxy pairs for this purpose. 

146: Nearby occulting galaxy pairs were initially investigated with ground-based 

147: data, both images \citep{Andredakis92,Berlind97,kw99a,kw00a} and 

148: spectra \citep{kw00b}. Subsequently, with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), 

149: a more detailed picture of dust in these nearby disks emerged \citep{kw01a,kw01b,Elmegreen01}.

150: The results of these studies are that extinction is gray\footnote{Gray extinction is 

151: equal attenuation at all wavelengths: there is no relation between color and 

152: measured optical depth. A color measurement is dominated by the lines-of-sight with 

153: the {\it least} extinction, while the independent extinction measure is dominated by those 

154: with the {\it most} extinction. In cases where many lines-of-sight are mixed, gray extinction 

155: is mimicked.} when measured over disk sections greater than 100 pc, but resembles the 

156: Galactic extinction law at smaller scales -- those that can only be resolved with HST. 

157: Arms are found to be more opaque than the general disk, and some evidence suggests 

158: that the dust disk is a fractal, similar to the HI disk. 

159: 

160: % counts of galaxies

161: \cite{Gonzalez98} investigated the use of the calibrated number of distant galaxies seen 

162: though the foreground disk in HST images. The calibrated counts of distant galaxies have 

163: been explored further in the previous papers in this series \citep{Gonzalez98,Gonzalez03, 

164: Holwerda05a, Holwerda05b, Holwerda05c, Holwerda05e,Holwerda05d,Holwerda06sings}. 

165: Both the occulting galaxy technique and counts of distant objects yield very similar 

166: opacities for disks and spiral arms \citep[][]{Holwerda05b}.

167: 

168: % Energy budget problems.

169: In recent years, models have been developed to explain the Spectral Energy Distribution 

170: (SED) of edge-on spirals spanning wavelengths ranging from the UV to the FIR.

171: \citep[e.g.,][]{Popescu00,Misiriotis01,Popescu00, Misiriotis01,Tuffs04, Boissier04, Dasyra05, 

172: Tuffs04,Dasyra05, Calzetti05, Dopita06a,Dopita06b,Draine07a,Draine07b}.\\

173: %

174: Three scenarios have been proposed to explain the discrepancy between the 

175: apparent absorption in UV and optical wavelengths and the emission of dust in the FIR and 

176: sub-mm regimes:

177: \begin{itemize}

178: \item[1.] A young stellar population is embedded in the dense plane of the disk. This is proposed 

179: by \cite{Popescu00} and corroborated by \cite{Driver07}. The embedded young stars pump the 

180: FIR emission radiated by the dust plane. 

181: \item[2.] A strongly clumped dusty medium. The clumping would lead to underestimate the dust 

182: mass from optical extinction in edge-on systems \citep{Bianchi00b, Witt00, Misiriotis02}; 

183: the dust mass would also be underestimated by a UV to FIR SED \citep{Bianchi00c}. 

184: \item[3.] A different emissivity of the cold dust grains --higher than canonical-- in the FIR and 

185: sub-mm. A change of emissivity has been proposed for denser ISM regions \citep{Alton04, 

186: Dasyra05} or, alternatively, for the lower density regions of the disk \citep{Bendo06}.

187: \end{itemize}

188: In all three of these scenarios, the clumpiness of the dusty ISM is an important factor.

189: 

190: While in some models the large scale structure of the dusty ISM has been somewhat constrained 

191: \citep[e.g.,][]{Xilouris99,Seth05,Bianchi07,Kamphuis07}, the small-scale geometry (``clumpiness'') 

192: of the cold ISM remains unknown.

193: % In all three scenarios, the clumpyness of the cold ISM remains an unknown. 

194: Therefore, an estimate of the prevalent dusty cloud size for spiral disks would provide 

195: a constraint for the SED models of spiral disks.

196: 

197: % GOAL OF PAPER!!!

198: Given that SED and extinction techniques are sensitive to different characteristics of the dusty 

199: clouds in the spiral disk, a comparison between the optical depth derived from these two methods 

200: has the potential to figure out the structure of the dusty ISM. Here, we compare the $I$-band optical depths 

201: for a section of the spiral disk, one derived from a SED model of the {\it Spitzer} fluxes (``average''), 

202: and one determined from the number of distant galaxies found in an HST image (``apparent'').

203: %

204: The term ``average'' refers to what the optical depth proportional to the dust mass,  

205: uniformly distributed over the disk section. The term ``apparent'' means the effective optical depth

206: of the disk section for a background uniform light source \citep[original definitions from][]{Natta84}. 

207: %

208: The term ``opacity'' is used throughout our previous papers for the apparent optical depth 

209: measured over a section of the disk for its whole height. 

210: 

211: 

212: % why compare?

213: %A comparison between the optical depths derived from an SED and from the 

214: %counts of distant galaxies could provide further insights into the temperature 

215: %and spatial components of the dusty ISM. 

216: 

217: This paper is structured as follows: \S \ref{sec:data} discusses the {\it Spitzer} 

218: and HST data used. In \S \ref{sec:analysis}, the two different methods to derive 

219: optical depths are presented. We discuss the relation between dust geometry 

220: and galaxy counts in \S \ref{sec:csize}. In \S \ref{sec:results}, we present the 

221: derived optical depths; \S \ref{sec:model} presents a simple geometric model 

222: to interpret the results, and \S \ref{sec:concl} lists our conclusions and future work.

223: 

224: 

225: \section{\label{sec:data}Data}

226: 

227: The data for this paper come from two archives, the HST archive and the fourth 

228: data release \citep{dr4} of the {\it Spitzer Infrared Nearby Galaxy Survey} 

229: \citep[SINGS,][]{sings}\footnote{http://sings.stsci.edu}. There is an overlap of fourteen galaxies between the 

230: SINGS sample and that of \cite{Holwerda05b}. Two of these, NGC 3621 and 

231: NGC 5194, have two WFPC2 exposures analyzed in \cite{Holwerda05b}. The 

232: HST/WFPC2 data reduction is described in \cite{Holwerda05a}. The reasoning 

233: behind the HST sample selection from the archive is explained in \S \ref{ssec:sfm}.

234: 

235: The overlap between HST and {\it Spitzer} data is illustrated in Figure \ref{fig:overlap}, 

236: with the WFPC2 footprint projected on the 24 micron {\it Spitzer} images. Only the solid 

237: angle covered by the WF chips is used for further analysis (the PC chip is excluded).

238: 

239: % Spitzer data

240: % IRAC

241: The Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) mosaic is made with the custom {\it SINGSdither} 

242: script, by M. Regan, that combines the scan images into a single mosaic using the 

243: ``drizzle'' algorithm \citep[Fourth Data Release Notes,][]{dr4}. 

244: % MIPS

245: The Multiband Imaging Photometer for {\it Spitzer} (MIPS) data products are calibrated, 

246: sky--subtracted mosaics in all three bands, reduced as described in \cite{Gordon05, 

247: Bendo06, dr4}. The basic instrument parameters, pixel scale, and adopted PSF FWHM for the 

248: seven main {\it Spitzer} imaging modes are summarized in Table \ref{table:data}. 

249: 

250: \section{\label{sec:analysis}Analysis}

251: 

252: Two parallel estimates of the optical depth of disks are used in this paper: 

253: first, the apparent optical depth of the spiral disks is determined from the number of distant galaxies 

254: identified in the HST/WFPC2 images, calibrated with the ``Synthetic Field Method'' (SFM). 

255: Secondly, the optical depth of the same section of the spiral disks is derived 

256: from the dust surface density, which is a result of the SED model fit to 

257: the {\it Spitzer} fluxes using the model from \cite{Draine07a}.

258: 

259: 

260: \subsection{\label{ssec:sfm}Galaxy counts: ``Synthetic Field Method''}

261: 

262: % A little history...

263: In principle, the number of distant galaxies seen through a spiral disk is a 

264: function of the dust extinction, as well as the crowding and confusion by the 

265: foreground disk. Initial applications of the number of distant galaxies as 

266: an extinction tracer were on the Magellanic Clouds \citep{Shapley51, 

267: Wesselink61b,Hodge74, MacGillivray75}, but they lacked accuracy. 

268: The ``Synthetic Field Method'' (SFM) was developed by 

269: \cite{Gonzalez98} to correct an extinction measurement based on the 

270: number of distant galaxies in an HST image, for the effects of crowding 

271: and confusion by the foreground spiral disk. 

272: 

273: % How the SFM works...

274: The ``Synthetic Field Method'' follows a series of steps. First, the 

275: number of distant galaxies in an HST science field is determined. Second, a series 

276: of simulated (``synthetic'') fields are made. In each of these fields, a typical 

277: background (e.g., the Hubble Deep Field) is first dimmed by a gray screen and 

278: added to the science field. Third, the added distant objects are identified in 

279: these synthetic fields. The fourth step is to measure the relationship between the 

280: number of these identified synthetic distant galaxies and background 

281: dimming. From this relation and the original number of actual distant 

282: galaxies found in the science field, an average opacity can be found.

283: It is important to remake the synthetic fields for each science field because the 

284: crowding and confusion issues are unique in each case.

285: 

286: % new section describing the SFM

287: An additional uncertainty in the resulting average extinction measurement 

288: is the cosmic variance in the intrinsic number of distant galaxies behind the 

289: foreground disk. The uncertainty due to cosmic variance can be estimated from 

290: the two-point correlation function of distant galaxies and folded into the Poissonian 

291: error. The cosmic variance uncertainty is of the same order as the Poisson statistical 

292: error for small numbers \citep[For a complete discussion on the uncertainties of the 

293: SFM, see][]{Holwerda05a}. Therefore, single-field SFM measurements remain 

294: uncertain, but a meaningful conclusion can be drawn from a combined set of 

295: science fields.

296: 

297: % summary of SFM result to date.

298: We have applied this method successfully on archival WFPC2 data. 

299: \cite{Holwerda05b} present the average radial opacity profile of spiral disks and the 

300: effect of spiral arms. The spiral arms are more opaque and show a strong 

301: radial dependence, while the more transparent disk shows a flat profile.

302: % \cite{Holwerda05b} compared the SF measurements to those from the occulting galaxies technique and found them similar for both the disk and spiral arms.

303: \cite{Holwerda05c} compare HI radial profiles to the opacity ones, and conclude 

304: that no good relation between disk opacity and HI surface density radial profiles can 

305: be found. However, \cite{Holwerda05c} find that the sub--mm profile from \cite{Meijerink05} 

306: generally agrees with their opacity measurements of M51. 

307: \cite{Holwerda05d} compare the relation between surface brightness and disk 

308: opacity; this relation is strong in the spiral arms, but weak in the rest of the disk.

309: 

310: \cite{Gonzalez03} predicted, based on simulated data, that the optimum distance for 

311: the application of the SFM with current HST instruments is approximately that of Virgo. 

312: The identification of background galaxies suffers in closer disks, as the stellar disk 

313: becomes more resolved, compounding confusion. This optimum distance, combined 

314: with the availability of deep HST/WFPC2 images from the Cepheid Extragalactic Distance 

315: Scale Key Project, resulted in the sample presented in \cite{Holwerda05b}. \cite{Holwerda05e} 

316: confirmed the results from \cite{Gonzalez03} using this sample, with foreground 

317: disks spanning distances between 3.5 and 35 Mpc. A selection effect of the Key Project 

318: is that the majority of the HST science fields is concentrated on spiral arms and exclude 

319: the centers of the galaxies.

320: 

321: Here, we present average extinction values for the whole WFPC2 field--of--view, 

322: minimizing the uncertainties to the extent possible. 

323: % inclination

324: In our initial papers, we did not apply an inclination correction to the optical depths because

325: the correction depends strongly on the dust geometry \citep[see the discussion in ][]{Holwerda05b}. 

326: However, in this paper we assume a simple dust model in \S \ref{sec:model}.

327: The appropriate inclination correction --$\times ~ cos(i)$-- has been applied to the points 

328: in Figures \ref{fig:fit} and \ref{fig:n_val}, and in Table \ref{table:A}. The uncertainties in the 

329: tables and figures reflect the 1-sigma confidence levels produced by the combination of 

330: the Poisson error and the cosmic variance of background galaxies.

331: 

332: \subsection{SED optical depth estimate}

333: 

334: The average disk optical depth is derived from the {\it Spitzer} observations.

335: First, the surface brightnesses within the WF chips' footprint are measured\footnote{

336: The PC part of the WFPC2 array is not used in either analysis.} (see Figure 

337: \ref{fig:overlap}). Second, these are converted into a dust surface density using an 

338: SED model. Third, this surface density is translated into an $I$-band optical depth.

339: 

340: % 1

341: All the IRAC and MIPS data are convolved to the poorest resolution of the 160 

342: micron observations (see Table \ref{table:data}), and the pixel scale is set to 9". 

343: This is done with the  {\it gauss, wcsmap} and {\it geotran} tasks, under IRAF.

344: Subsequently, the overall flux is measured in the WFPC2 field of view (Figure 

345: \ref{fig:overlap}). Because the 

346: L-shaped aperture is a highly unusual one, the aperture correction remains 

347: uncertain, but not negligible, since the FWHM at 160 micron ($40\farcs0$) 

348: is of the order of the aperture diameter ($3 \times 1\farcm3 \times 1\farcm3$ in an L-shape).

349: Published aperture corrections for the IRAC instruments \citep{Hora04} 

350: overestimate the correction for extended objects \citep{IRACaper}. Here we use 

351: the aperture corrections for extended sources from \cite{IRACaper} for IRAC 

352: fluxes,\footnote{http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/jarrett/irac/calibration/index.html} 

353: and from \cite{MIPSaper} for the MIPS fluxes\footnote{http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/mips/apercorr/} 

354: (see also Table \ref{table:data}).

355: % Fluxes

356: Table \ref{table:flux} gives the average surface brightnesses for the seven 

357: {\it Spitzer} channels in the field-of-view of the three WF chips of the WFPC2

358: array. The uncertainties are derived from the variance in the sky. 

359: Generally, the surface brightnesses agree with the results presented by 

360: \cite{Dale05} for the entire disks.

361: 

362: % SED might tell us somehting as well about geometry.

363: 

364: The second step is to convert these surface brightnesses to a dust surface density. 

365: Initially, we fitted only the MIPS fluxes with two blackbodies and derived surface densities 

366: from these \citep{Holwerda06sings}. However, a more rigorous treatment of the 

367: IR fluxes can be done with a SED model, such as the one presented in \cite{Li01}. 

368: This model uses the physics of grain heating and reradiation, and a model distribution 

369: of grain sizes and types. The updated version from \cite{Draine07a} has been fit to the data, 

370: and the results are shown in Figure \ref{fig:spec}. The derived stellar and dust surface 

371: brightnesses, dust surface density, and mean temperature are presented in Table 

372: \ref{table:model}. Dust surface densities are between 0.1 and $1.4 \times 10^6 M_{\odot} ~ kpc^{-2} $, 

373: with mean temperatures between 14.6 and 17.8 K. 

374: % quality of the fits

375: 

376: 

377: % The model output is summarized in Table \ref{table:model}. 

378: The mean dust temperatures are obtained from the mean radiation scaling, $\bar{U}$,

379: \footnote{The \cite{Draine07a} model uses a distribution of scaling values ($U$) of the local Interstellar Radiation Field 

380: to calculate the irradiation that the grains see. $\bar{U}$ is the average of this scaling distribution.} 

381: in the \cite{Draine07a} model ($T_2$ in their equation 18). The model uses a distribution of 

382: temperatures and grain sizes. Therefore the mean temperature is an indication of the 

383: thermal equilibrium point of the bulk of the dust. Most of the dust is cold ($\rm T < 25 ~ K$). 

384: 

385: % caveats

386: These results are an obvious improvement over a simple single-temperature fit, but the 

387: model parameters in Table \ref{table:model} are still not fully constrained; disagreement 

388: between data and model at the PAH peak at 8 micron could be an effect of metallicity or 

389: the presence of a bright HII region. The 70 and 160 $\mu$ m fluxes hint at colder or more dust 

390: in the disk (Figure \ref{fig:spec}). There are three caveats to the fits: (1) a lack of sub--mm data, 

391: (2) the single color ISRF used and (3) averaging over different types of emission regions, i.e., 

392: HII regions and the general disk.

393: 

394: % (I) no sub-mm data 

395: Additional sub-mm data of comparable quality, needed to better constrain the model and 

396: especially the cold dust emission, will not be available until SCUBA2 starts operations on 

397: the JCMT and the launch of {\it Herschel}.\footnote{{\it Herschel} data will be especially 

398: valuable will be especially valuable as it will not suffer from night sky structure, which is of 

399: similar angular size as these disks.} At present, comparable-quality sub-mm 

400: maps are available only for NGC 5194 \citep{Meijerink05} and NGC 7331 \citep{Regan04}. 

401: \cite{Draine07b} discuss SED models with and without sub-mm data. 

402: %

403: % Referee's comments A1 and A2 more in discussion

404: 

405: % (II) model assumes uniform ISRF, clearly not the case 

406: The second caveat in the derivation of dust mass is the assumption of a constant color for 

407: the interstellar radiation field (ISRF) illuminating the emitting dust. In reality, dust grains 

408: deeper in a dust structure will encounter radiation field that is not only dimmed but also 

409: reddened and, hence, will contribute less flux to the FIR emission. Locally, the ISRF will 

410: also depend on the age of the nearby stellar population. Due to the reddening of the ISRF 

411: deeper in the cloud, dense clouds could contain more dust mass in their centers than 

412: inferred from just the FIR emission. Additional sub-mm observations will help resolve 

413: this uncertainty in the SED optical depth. \cite{Draine07b} discuss fits of the model to 

414: the total fluxes of the SINGS galaxies with and without additional sub-mm data. They find 

415: that the FIR estimate underestimates of 1.5 times the dust mass more (5 out of 17 cases, 

416: notably NGC 3627 and 7331 of our sample) than overestimates it (only M51 of the 17). 

417: 

418: % (III) different regions

419: The third caveat is that the model values are an average over many different types of ISM 

420: regions, each with a different heating mechanism, dust structure and composition (e.g., 

421: photo-dissociation regions, cirrus, and star-forming regions in spiral arms). 

422: The \cite{Draine07a} model's assumptions hold better for some regions than for others, 

423: but we use the results as ``typical'' for these disks. The relative contribution of PAH 

424: emission to the SED is a function of ISM geometry as well as irradiation and composition 

425: \citep[e.g., ][]{Silva98,Piovan06}. Together with a better-constrained FIR/sub-mm SED 

426: one could constrain ISM geometry solely from the relative contributions to the SED. 

427: \cite{Draine07b} discuss the application of the \cite{Draine07a} model to whole disks 

428: of the SINGS galaxies.

429: 

430: The dust surface density is translated into an average optical depth with the 

431: absorption cross section per unit dust mass, $\kappa_{abs}(\lambda)$, and 

432: grain albedo from \cite{Draine03} for the Johnson $I$-band (865.5 \AA.): 

433: $\tau_m = \kappa_{abs} \times (1-Albedo) \times M_{dust}/area$.

434: These optical depth values are presented in Table \ref{table:A}.

435: 

436: 

437: 

438: \section{\label{sec:csize} Cloud size and the SFM}

439: 

440: It continues to be difficult to constrain dusty cloud geometry from models of either  

441: extinction or emission. In this section, we review what can be learned, solely 

442: from the SFM measurements, about the geometry of the extincting medium.

443: % 

444: 

445: In \cite{Holwerda05b}, two indications that the dust disk is clumpy are identified: 

446: (1) the average color of the distant galaxies is independent of the disk opacity implied 

447: by their number, and (2) the measurement of disk opacity is independent of inclination. 

448: % gray == clumpy

449: The lack of a relation between the average opacity of the disk and the average color 

450: of the detected galaxies can be explained by two scenarios: (1) some of the 

451: background galaxies are completely blocked by large clouds, and some are not. 

452: The color measurement is done on background objects that do not suffer from 

453: extinction and, hence, reddening. Alternatively, (2) {\it all} background galaxies are 

454: dimmed by clouds smaller than the projected distant galaxies. Consequently, 

455: some of the distant galaxies are dimmed enough to drop below the detection threshold. 

456: Any detected galaxy's color is, however, measured from mostly unreddened 

457: flux.\footnote{The effect of cloud geometry on the luminosity function of the detected 

458: distant galaxies is, in principle, another possible way to distinguish between cloud 

459: geometries, but this is complicated by the fact that the detection limit of distant galaxies is dominated by 

460: the field properties (brightness and granularity), rather than by the dimming by the dust. 

461: See also the discussions in \cite{Holwerda05e}, and Appendix B in \cite{Holwerda05}.}  

462: However, we note that a relation between the reddening and derived extinction 

463: from the distant galaxies is difficult to detect because (1) the spread in colors of distant 

464: galaxies is substantial and (2) color is measured from the detected galaxies 

465: --automatically the least dimmed-- whereas opacity is measured form the {\it missing} galaxies. 

466: 

467: % inclination==clumpy

468: The inclination effect on the apparent optical depth from the number of 

469: distant galaxies is minimal \citep[see ][, \S 5.1 and Figure 3]{Holwerda05b}. 

470: Assuming a thin layer of optically thick clouds, the apparent optical depth of the disk, 

471: measured from the number of distant galaxies, is dominated by the apparent filling 

472: factor of clouds. The projected filling factor does not change much with inclination: 

473: a flat cloud covering 40\% of a certain disk section still covers 40\% of the inclined section. 

474: Only when the height of the cloud becomes important --when the inclination is closer to 

475: edge-on--, does the apparent filling factor change. This explanation for the lack of an 

476: inclination effect in the opacity profiles does not depend on the size of the clouds. 

477: It could be a single, large, cloud or many small ones in the plane of the disk.

478: %

479: However, the optical depth values in \cite{Holwerda05b} are from different sections of 

480: the disks --although generally centered on a spiral arm-- and the effect of small inclination 

481: differences could well have been masked by comparing different regions in the disks. 

482: In \cite{Holwerda05b} we did not apply an inclination correction because it depends on the 

483: assumed dust geometry. In this paper we do assume a dust geometry and hence make 

484: an inclination correction (\S \ref{sec:model}).

485: 

486: % SFM calibration

487: The simulations in the SFM assume a gray screen, an uniform unclumped dust layer with 

488: opacity equal in the V and I bands. The SFM opacity measurements in this paper are based 

489: on such simulations. In \cite{Holwerda05}, we ran a series of simulations on 

490: NGC 1365\footnote{NGC 1365 is one of the more distant galaxies in the \cite{Holwerda05b} 

491: sample, and we ran these simulations as a validation of the gray screen synthetic fields.} 

492: to characterize the effect of average cloud cross-section on the number of distant galaxies 

493: observable through a disk. 

494: 

495: Figure \ref{fig:sfmsize} shows the effect of cloud size, expressed in pixels, on the simulated 

496: relation between average opacity and number of distant objects. In each simulation, we fix 

497: a cloud size and vary their number to increase disk opacity. An ensemble of unresolved 

498: clouds is effectively the gray screen. For clouds resolved with HST, more than 2 

499: pixels\footnote{Pixel scale is $0\farcs05$ in our data, after the drizzle reduction.}, the relation 

500: between opacity (cloud filling factor) and number of distant objects becomes much shallower. 

501: The same number of distant galaxies observed would then imply a much {\it higher} opacity 

502: of the disk. Because the SFM (calibrated with a gray screen) generally agrees well with 

503: measurements from overlapping galaxies \citep{Holwerda05b}, it seems 

504: unlikely that the disk's opacity is predominantly due to large, resolved clouds. 

505: A pixel of $0\farcs05$ at the distance of NGC 1365 (18 Mpc) is 4 pc in linear size. It is therefore 

506: implied that the structure of the ISM responsible for the disk opacity measured with the 

507: SFM varies in optical depth on scales of $\sim$10 pc or less.

508: 

509: From the SFM measurements alone, the cloud geometry is impossible to determine. Only when 

510: additional information is used --e.g., the general agreement with the occulting galaxy technique-- 

511: it favors small (unresolved) scales for the clouds. Therefore, to constrain cloud geometry, 

512: information from two different techniques needs to be combined.

513: 

514: 

515: \section{\label{sec:results}Optical depths}

516: 

517: Table \ref{table:A} presents the optical depth estimates from the Synthetic Field Method 

518: and the SED model \citep{Draine03, Draine07a}, for the WFPC2 field-of-view. The optical depths range 

519: between 0.1 and 3.5 magnitudes in the $I$-band. The measurements are for different 

520: parts of different spiral disks (Figure \ref{fig:overlap}), explaining in part the range in values.

521: 

522: The optical depth estimates presented here may appear high for the Johnson $I$-band, 

523: compared with other extinction estimates (e.g., those from inclination effects or 

524: reddening), but these are (1) for the entire height of the disk, and (2) generally centered 

525: on a spiral arm. Typical extinction values in the $I$-band are several tenths of a magnitude for a dust screen 

526: in front of the stellar spiral disk \cite[e.g.,][]{Martin06}. Two of the derived SFM opacities 

527: are negative, possibly the effect of an overdensity of distant galaxies behind the target galaxy. 

528: The discrepancy in NGC5194-1 may be due to misidentification of  background galaxies, 

529: as they are difficult to identify in this field.

530: 

531: % comparison between the two

532: Figures \ref{fig:fit} and \ref{fig:n_val} show the values of disk opacity by both methods, over the same 

533: section of the disk. Both methods generally agree within the uncertainties of the measurements. 

534: The agreement is better than our initial estimate from a blackbody fit to the MIPS 

535: fluxes in \cite{Holwerda06sings}. The general agreement and the mean temperature of the 

536: dust (Table \ref{table:model}) imply that most of a disk's opacity is due to the cold dust 

537: in the disk. 

538: 

539: 

540: \section{\label{sec:model}Model of cloud geometry}

541: 

542: The relation between the apparent and average $I$-band optical depth measurements 

543: --the first from the number of distant galaxies in HST images and the second derived from the 

544: {\it Spitzer} SED-- could reveal the nature of the prevalent structure in the ISM.

545: 

546: The {\it a priori} assumptions are that (1)  all dust structure is transparent to the FIR emission 

547: from which the dust surface density is estimated in the SED model, and (2)  the {\it entire} 

548: volume of the cloud emits in the FIR. We adopt {\it Model C} from \cite{Natta84}, 

549: in which a randomly distributed series of clumps covers the area. These authors define 

550: two optical depths: (1) the typical optical depth ($\tau_m$), i.e., the average optical depth that is 

551: proportional to the dust mass; and (2) the apparent optical depth ($\tilde{\tau}$), or the optical 

552: depth if a uniform layer would cover the area.

553: 

554: Our two measurements of optical depth --SED and SFM-- correspond to these two optical 

555: depths, average and apparent. An optical depth based on the SED depends on the dust mass 

556: within the area, and hence corresponds to $\tau_m$. The SFM optical depth is the apparent optical 

557: depth averaged over the area, and hence $\tilde{\tau}$. 

558: These two optical depths need not be the same, and their relation is an indication of 

559: how clumped the medium is. 

560: 

561: %Let us assume a number of small dust structures with a height ($h$) and a cross-section 

562: %($A \sim h^2$), in a solid angle ($\Omega$) of 

563: %the disk. The dust grains have an average grain cross-section ($\sigma$) and 

564: %an emissivity ($Q$). The grain number density in the clouds is denoted by $n_d$, and 

565: %the average surface number density of dusty clouds in $\Omega$ by $\Sigma$. 

566: %The average number of clouds in a line-of-sight is $n$. We assume all 

567: %clumps have the same optical depth $\tau_c$:

568: Let us assume a number of small dust structures with a height ($h$), an average grain cross-section ($\sigma$), and a grain emissivity ($Q$). The grain number density in the clouds is denoted by $n_d$, and 

569: the average number of clouds in a line-of-sight is $n$. We assume all 

570: clumps have the same optical depth $\tau_c$:

571: 

572: \begin{equation}

573: \label{eq:tc}

574: \tau_c = h ~ n_d ~ \sigma ~ Q.

575: \end{equation}

576: 

577: \noindent The average optical depth ($\tau_m$) is then:

578: 

579: \begin{equation}

580: \label{eq:tm}

581: \tau_m = n \times \tau_c,

582: \end{equation}

583: 

584: \noindent and the apparent optical depth can be derived if one assumes a Gaussian distribution 

585: of the number of clouds along the possible lines-of-sight and sum the contributions of all clouds 

586: \citep[see equations 15 and 17-19 in ][]{Natta84}:

587: 

588: \begin{equation}

589: \label{eq:tap}

590: \tilde{\tau} = n \times (1- e^{-\tau_c}),

591: \end{equation}

592: 

593: \noindent with asymptotic values for both optically thin and thick clouds:

594: 

595: \begin{equation}

596: \label{eq:optthin}

597: \tau_c \rightarrow 0, ~ \Rightarrow ~  \tau_m \rightarrow 0, ~  \tilde{\tau} \rightarrow \tau_m, 

598: \end{equation}

599: 

600: \begin{equation}

601: \label{eq:optthick}

602: \tau_c \rightarrow \infty, ~ \Rightarrow ~  \tau_m \rightarrow \infty,  ~ \tilde{\tau} \rightarrow n.

603: \end{equation}

604: 

605: \noindent We note that the inferred dust mass in the disk ($M_{dust}$) is proportional to the number of clouds ($n$) and the cloud optical depth ($\tau_c$).

606: %

607: The ratio of the apparent over the average optical depth is:

608: 

609: \begin{equation}

610: \label{eq:rat}

611: {\tilde{\tau} \over \tau_m} = {1-e^{-\tau_c} \over \tau_c},

612: \end{equation}

613: 

614: \noindent leaving only the optical depth of the clouds ($\tau_c$), and hence the grain density ($n_d$) and the cloud size ($h$) as the variables. Our fit to the relation between SFM and SED optical depth estimates only has $\tau_c$ as the variable (Figure \ref{fig:fit}). 

615: 

616: %First we can now explore some extreme values for the cloud optical depths. 

617: We can now use equation \ref{eq:rat} to derive $\tau_c$ from a fit to the optical depths from SED 

618: ($\tau_m$), and from the number of distant galaxies ($\tilde{\tau}$). 

619: We want to answer three questions. 

620: Are the clouds in the disks typically optically thin or thick? 

621: If all disks are equal, what is the implied cloud optical depth? 

622: How many clouds lie typically along a given line-of-sight?

623: 

624: 

625: \subsection{\label{ssec:tc}Optically thick or thin clouds?}

626: 

627: \noindent Optically thin clouds ($\tau_c << 1$) result in a ratio of optical depths close to unity:

628: 

629: \begin{equation}

630: {\tilde{\tau} \over \tau_m} = {1-e^{-\tau_c} \over \tau_c} \approx {1 - (1-\tau_c) \over \tau_c} = 1;

631: \end{equation}

632: 

633: \noindent optically thick clouds ($\tau_c >> 1$) result in a ratio of:

634: 

635: \begin{equation}

636: {\tilde{\tau} \over \tau_m} = {1-e^{-\tau_c} \over \tau_c} < 1.

637: \end{equation}

638: 

639: Figures \ref{fig:fit} and \ref{fig:n_val} show how a majority of the data exhibit a ratio of order unity. 

640: The cold dust mass in the SED model could be better constrained with additional sub-mm information \citep{Draine07b}. 

641: However, the ratios are, within the errors, consistent with optically thin clouds in most of the disks. 

642: 

643: 

644: \subsection{\label{ssec:h}Cloud size}

645: 

646: Figure \ref{fig:fit} shows the fit to the ratios of apparent to  average optical depths, with $\tau_c$ 

647: as the single fit parameter, as per equation \ref{eq:rat}. For simplicity, we assume here that all 

648: disks are made up of similar clouds, and that there is no difference between arm and disk regions. 

649: The negative SFM measurements are excluded from the fit. The best fit is for a cloud optical depth 

650: of $\tau_c = $0.4 with, on average, 2.6 clouds along the line-of-sight (if the two negative points are 

651: included, the values change, respectively, to $\tau_c$ = 0.56 and n = 1.9). The inferred value 

652: of $\tau_c$ is likely to be a mean between higher values in spiral arms and much lower values 

653: in the disk. Optically thick disks have more clouds along the line of sight, while optically thin disks 

654: harbor a single cloud. 

655: 

656: Reasonable values for the parameters in equation \ref{eq:tc} are:

657: $\rm n_d \approx 5 ~ \times 10^{-3} ~ grains ~ m^{-3}$, 

658: $\rm \sigma = 0.03 ~ \mu m^2$ and $Q= {3 \over 1300} \left({125 \over 160}\right)^\beta = 1.5 ~ 

659: \times 10^{-3}$ with $\beta = 2$ \citep{Hildebrand83}\footnote{There is substantial 

660: discussion in the literature about the value of $\beta$ \citep[e.g.,][]{Bendo03}. 

661: $\beta$ was fixed at 2 in the \cite{Draine07a} models.}. 

662: %

663: The value of 0.4 for $\tau_c$ implies a cloud height, $h$, of $\sim$ 60 pc! 

664: Much larger clouds could be resolved in extinction maps of these disks based on 

665: stellar reddening. In the case of NGC 3627, NGC 5194, NGC 6946 and NGC 7331, 

666: there is a clear spiral arm in the reddening map \citep[][]{Martin06, Holwerda07b}; 

667: the other reddening maps are smooth or do not extend out to cover the whole WFPC2 pointing. 

668: 

669: A more likely scenario is that there is an inverse relation between the cloud 

670: density $n_d$ and scale $h$. Such a relation can be seen in giant molecular clouds (GMC) 

671: of our own Galaxy \citep[e.g, ][]{Solomon87}. In this case, the single optically thin 

672: cloud can be replaced by smaller optically thick ones. We note that the largest GMCs 

673: are of the order of 60 pc.

674: 

675: % the inconsistency with the SFM alone value

676: 

677: The value of ~60 pc clouds appears in contradiction to the implied size in the SFM calibration 

678: ($\sim$10 pc). However, the typical cloud size can be 60 pc and still the disk opacity can change 

679: over smaller scales, if several partially overlapping clouds are seen in projection. The inverse 

680: relation between scale and density would also help make the two scales compatible.

681: 

682: %The value of $\sim$ 60 pc clouds appears in contradiction to the implied size in the SFM calibration ($\sim$ 10 pc). However, the assumption in section \ref{ssec:sfm} is that there is a single cloud along the line-of-sight and the normalization of the fit implies more two clouds on average. Hence, the typical cloud size can be 60 while in projection the disk opacity can change over smaller scales.  The inverse relation between scale and density would also make the two implied scales consistent.

683:   

684: Our data are consistent with optically thin clouds ($\tau_c =0.4$) and 

685: their average opacity value implies a typical cloud size that is unresolved with {\it Spitzer} 

686: in our galaxies. 

687: 

688: \subsection{\label{ssec:n}Cloud Numbers}

689: 

690: The above fit to the relation between $\tilde{\tau}$ and $\tau_m$ indicates that, on average, more 

691: than one cloud is needed along the line-of-sight in most disks ($\bar{n} = 2.6$). However, the 

692: assumption was that  $\tau_c$ had a single value for all the disks. In \S \ref{ssec:tc}, we argued 

693: that the ratio between $\tilde{\tau}$ and $\tau_m$ implied the $\tau_c$ is optically thin. It logically 

694: follows that optically thick disks must have more than a single cloud along the line-of-sight. 

695: 

696: Figure \ref{fig:n_val} illustrates the effect of number of clouds along the line-of-sight ($n$) on the 

697: relation between $\tilde{\tau}$ and $\tau_m$, when $\tau_c$ is freely increased from 0 to $\tau_m/n$ 

698: (the lines have been drawn according to equations \ref{eq:tm} and \ref{eq:tap}). 

699: %Because all the individual clouds are optically thin (section \ref{ssec:tc}), it logically follows that the optically thick disks have more than a single cloud along the line-of-sight. 

700: We note that all disks are consistent with many clouds along the 

701: line-of-sight --including the optically thin ones, also because they lie in the optically thin cloud 

702: (${\tilde{\tau} / \tau_m} \sim 1$, $\tau_c < 1$) regime. 

703: 

704: 

705: \subsection{Potential Improvements}

706: 

707: There are many refinements to be made to the simple model presented here. 

708: Some improvements for future comparisons between these two measurements 

709: of optical depth are: 

710: %

711: (1) a distribution of cloud sizes for both the SFM calibration, as well as in the model 

712: explaining the ratio between SFM and SED optical depths. A model distribution can 

713: be taken from observations of GMCs in our own Galaxy and nearby ones \citep{Heyer01, 

714: Rosolowsky05}. The cross-section distribution could be used in SFM measurements in the future. 

715: %The model by \cite{Draine07a} uses distributions of temperatures and grains sizes to determine dust luminosity and mass. A cross-section distribution could be used in SFM measurements in the future. 

716: %

717: A cross-section distribution can only be applied, if  the foreground disk is at a 

718: single, fixed distance; only one counts though a single foreground galaxy are used. 

719: There are three face-on spirals with enough solid angle in HST imaging as well as 

720: additional {\it Spitzer} data: M51, M81 and M101.

721: %

722: (2) The SED model can be much better constrained with additional sub-mm 

723: observations, the opportunities for which will expand dramatically in the near 

724: future ({\it SCUBA2} on the JCMT and {\it Herschel} satellite).

725: %

726: (3) The effects of grand design spiral arms and galactic radius could be identified 

727: in a single disk; the comparison SFM and SED is not made for different sections of the disks combined.

728: %This was already implied in the simulation in \cite{Holwerda05} as the simulations exploring the relation between numbers of distant galaxies and effective cloud filling factor and average size implied that the clouds were small and numerous (see Figure \ref{fig:sfmsize}). 

729: (4) A future SED model can take into account the reddening of the interstellar radiation field, as it penetrates the ISM.

730: This would require a comprehensive treatment of the ISM structure in addition to its temperature, composition and irradiation. 

731: 

732: 

733: \section{\label{sec:concl}Conclusions}

734: 

735: To constrain models of the spiral disk's energy budget with typical values for the size of dusty clouds 

736: in the ISM, we compare two techniques to extract the average and apparent optical 

737: depths of a section of spiral disk. From the comparison between SFM and SED results, we conclude the following:

738: 

739: \begin{itemize}

740: \item[1.] The SFM's calibration alone implies projected cloud scales predominantly unresolved with HST (of the order of 10 pc in NGC 1365, see \S \ref{sec:csize} and Figure \ref{fig:sfmsize}). 

741: \item[2.] The dust responsible for the disk's opacity is predominantly cold (T $<$ 25 K, Table \ref{table:model}).

742: \item[3.] The average and apparent optical depths of these disk sections, measured from SED and SFM respectively, generally agree (Figure \ref{fig:fit} and \ref{fig:n_val}). This implies generally optically thin clouds ($\tau_c <1$, \S \ref{ssec:tc}).

743: \item[4.] The fit to the ratio between apparent and average optical depth measurements, ${\tilde{\tau} / \tau_m}$, indicates a cloud optical depth, $\tau_c$, of 0.4, more than a single cloud along the line-of-sight, and a cloud size of $\sim$ 60 pc. 

744: If several partially overlapping clouds are seen in projection through the disk, the disk's opacity will change over smaller scales, consistent with conclusion 1.

745: \item[6.] Optically thick disks appear to have more than a single cloud along the line-of-sight (Figure \ref{fig:n_val}) and optically thin disks may have several clouds as well.

746: \end{itemize}

747: 

748: % Future Work.

749: Future work using counts of distant galaxies through a foreground disk could be 

750: used to find cold dust structures at larger galactic radii, provided a sufficiently 

751: large solid angle has been imaged with HST/ACS's superb resolution.\footnote{See 

752: \cite{Holwerda05e} for selection criteria of suitable data.} Notably, the ACS 

753: data on M51, M81  and M101 are very promising for such an analysis.\footnote{The closer disks are slightly less well suited for the SFM because their stellar disk is resolved, but the loss in accuracy is offset by the larger available solid angle.}

754: %

755: {\it Spitzer} observations of these nearby disks are also available, making a similar comparison between SED and apparent optical depth possible for portions of these disks. The typical cloud scale for spiral arms or disk sections or as a function of galactic radius could then be found.

756: The SCUBA-2 instrument has recently been installed on the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope. 

757: A project with SCUBA-2 to map the SINGS galaxies in two sub-mm bands will improve 

758: future SED modelling of these spiral disks significantly over the SED models presented 

759: here. 

760: 

761: \acknowledgements

762: 

763: This work is based in part on archival data obtained with the {\it Spitzer} 

764: Space Telescope, which is operated by JPL, CalTech, under a contract 

765: with NASA. This work is also based on observations with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space 

766: Telescope, obtained at the STScI, which is operated by the Association 

767: of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA), Inc., under NASA 

768: contract NAS5-26555. 

769: 

770: The authors would like to thank T. Jarrett, for making his aperture corrections 

771: of extended sources available to us at an early stage, and Erik Rosolowsky, 

772: for useful discussions on Local Group cloud sizes. We would like to thank Maarten 

773: Baes for discussion of the motivation. We would also like to 

774: thank George Bendo, Erik Hollenback and Kristen Keener for their comments 

775: on earlier drafts of this paper.

776: 

777: %\bibliographystyle{apj} 

778: %\bibliography{/Volumes/FireLite/Bib/Bibliography}

779: 

780: \begin{thebibliography}{81}

781: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi

782: 

783: \bibitem[{{Alton} {et~al.}(1998){Alton}, {Bianchi}, {Rand}, {Xilouris},

784:   {Davies}, \& {Trewhella}}]{Alton98c}

785: {Alton}, P.~B., {Bianchi}, S., {Rand}, R.~J., {Xilouris}, E.~M., {Davies},

786:   J.~I., \& {Trewhella}, M. 1998, \apjl, 507, L125

787: 

788: \bibitem[{{Alton} {et~al.}(2004){Alton}, {Xilouris}, {Misiriotis}, {Dasyra}, \&

789:   {Dumke}}]{Alton04}

790: {Alton}, P.~B., {Xilouris}, E.~M., {Misiriotis}, A., {Dasyra}, K.~M., \&

791:   {Dumke}, M. 2004, \aap, 425, 109

792: 

793: \bibitem[{{Andredakis} \& {van der Kruit}(1992)}]{Andredakis92}

794: {Andredakis}, Y.~C. \& {van der Kruit}, P.~C. 1992, \aap, 265, 396

795: 

796: \bibitem[{{Bendo} {et~al.}(2006){Bendo}, {Dale}, {Draine}, {Engelbracht},

797:   {Kennicutt}, {Calzetti}, {Gordon}, {Helou}, {Hollenbach}, {Li}, {Murphy},

798:   {Prescott}, \& {Smith}}]{Bendo06}

799: {Bendo}, G.~J., {Dale}, D.~A., {Draine}, B.~T., {Engelbracht}, C.~W.,

800:   {Kennicutt}, Jr., R.~C., {Calzetti}, D., {Gordon}, K.~D., {Helou}, G.,

801:   {Hollenbach}, D., {Li}, A., {Murphy}, E.~J., {Prescott}, M.~K.~M., \&

802:   {Smith}, J.-D.~T. 2006, \apj

803: 

804: \bibitem[{{Bendo} {et~al.}(2003){Bendo}, {Joseph}, {Wells}, {Gallais}, {Haas},

805:   {Heras}, {Klaas}, {Laureijs}, {Leech}, {Lemke}, {Metcalfe}, {Rowan-Robinson},

806:   {Schulz}, \& {Telesco}}]{Bendo03}

807: {Bendo}, G.~J., {Joseph}, R.~D., {Wells}, M., {Gallais}, P., {Haas}, M.,

808:   {Heras}, A.~M., {Klaas}, U., {Laureijs}, R.~J., {Leech}, K., {Lemke}, D.,

809:   {Metcalfe}, L., {Rowan-Robinson}, M., {Schulz}, B., \& {Telesco}, C. 2003,

810:   \aj, 125, 2361

811: 

812: \bibitem[{{Berlind} {et~al.}(1997){Berlind}, {Quillen}, {Pogge}, \&

813:   {Sellgren}}]{Berlind97}

814: {Berlind}, A.~A., {Quillen}, A.~C., {Pogge}, R.~W., \& {Sellgren}, K. 1997,

815:   \aj, 114, 107

816: 

817: \bibitem[{{Bianchi}(2007)}]{Bianchi07}

818: {Bianchi}, S. 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 705

819: 

820: \bibitem[{{Bianchi} {et~al.}(2000{\natexlab{a}}){Bianchi}, {Davies}, \&

821:   {Alton}}]{Bianchi00c}

822: {Bianchi}, S., {Davies}, J.~I., \& {Alton}, P.~B. 2000{\natexlab{a}}, \aap,

823:   359, 65

824: 

825: \bibitem[{{Bianchi} {et~al.}(2000{\natexlab{b}}){Bianchi}, {Ferrara}, {Davies},

826:   \& {Alton}}]{Bianchi00b}

827: {Bianchi}, S., {Ferrara}, A., {Davies}, J.~I., \& {Alton}, P.~B.

828:   2000{\natexlab{b}}, \mnras, 311, 601

829: 

830: \bibitem[{{Boissier} {et~al.}(2004){Boissier}, {Boselli}, {Buat}, {Donas}, \&

831:   {Milliard}}]{Boissier04}

832: {Boissier}, S., {Boselli}, A., {Buat}, V., {Donas}, J., \& {Milliard}, B. 2004,

833:   \aap, 424, 465

834: 

835: \bibitem[{{Calzetti} {et~al.}(2005){Calzetti}, {Kennicutt}, {Bianchi},

836:   {Thilker}, {Dale}, {Engelbracht}, {Leitherer}, {Meyer}, {Sosey}, {Mutchler},

837:   {Regan}, {Thornley}, {Armus}, {Bendo}, {Boissier}, {Boselli}, {Draine},

838:   {Gordon}, {Helou}, {Hollenbach}, {Kewley}, {Madore}, {Martin}, {Murphy},

839:   {Rieke}, {Rieke}, {Roussel}, {Sheth}, {Smith}, {Walter}, {White}, {Yi},

840:   {Scoville}, {Polletta}, \& {Lindler}}]{Calzetti05}

841: {Calzetti}, D., {Kennicutt}, R.~C., {Bianchi}, L., {Thilker}, D.~A., {Dale},

842:   D.~A., {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Leitherer}, C., {Meyer}, M.~J., {Sosey}, M.~L.,

843:   {Mutchler}, M., {Regan}, M.~W., {Thornley}, M.~D., {Armus}, L., {Bendo},

844:   G.~J., {Boissier}, S., {Boselli}, A., {Draine}, B.~T., {Gordon}, K.~D.,

845:   {Helou}, G., {Hollenbach}, D.~J., {Kewley}, L., {Madore}, B.~F., {Martin},

846:   D.~C., {Murphy}, E.~J., {Rieke}, G.~H., {Rieke}, M.~J., {Roussel}, H.,

847:   {Sheth}, K., {Smith}, J.~D., {Walter}, F., {White}, B.~A., {Yi}, S.,

848:   {Scoville}, N.~Z., {Polletta}, M., \& {Lindler}, D. 2005, \apj, 633, 871

849: 

850: \bibitem[{{Dale} {et~al.}(2005){Dale}, {Bendo}, {Engelbracht}, {Gordon},

851:   {Regan}, {Armus}, {Cannon}, {Calzetti}, {Draine}, {Helou}, {Joseph},

852:   {Kennicutt}, {Li}, {Murphy}, {Roussel}, {Walter}, {Hanson}, {Hollenbach},

853:   {Jarrett}, {Kewley}, {Lamanna}, {Leitherer}, {Meyer}, {Rieke}, {Rieke},

854:   {Sheth}, {Smith}, \& {Thornley}}]{Dale05}

855: {Dale}, D.~A., {Bendo}, G.~J., {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Gordon}, K.~D., {Regan},

856:   M.~W., {Armus}, L., {Cannon}, J.~M., {Calzetti}, D., {Draine}, B.~T.,

857:   {Helou}, G., {Joseph}, R.~D., {Kennicutt}, R.~C., {Li}, A., {Murphy}, E.~J.,

858:   {Roussel}, H., {Walter}, F., {Hanson}, H.~M., {Hollenbach}, D.~J., {Jarrett},

859:   T.~H., {Kewley}, L.~J., {Lamanna}, C.~A., {Leitherer}, C., {Meyer}, M.~J.,

860:   {Rieke}, G.~H., {Rieke}, M.~J., {Sheth}, K., {Smith}, J.~D.~T., \&

861:   {Thornley}, M.~D. 2005, \apj, 633, 857

862: 

863: \bibitem[{{Dale} {et~al.}(2007){Dale}, {de Paz}, {Gordon}, {Hanson}, {Armus},

864:   {Bendo}, {Bianchi}, {Block}, {Boissier}, {Boselli}, {Buckalew}, {Buat},

865:   {Burgarella}, {Calzetti}, {Cannon}, {Engelbracht}, {Helou}, {Hollenbach},

866:   {Jarrett}, {Kennicutt}, {Leitherer}, {Li}, {Madore}, {Martin}, {Meyer},

867:   {Murphy}, {Regan}, {Roussel}, {Smith}, {Sosey}, {Thilker}, \&

868:   {Walter}}]{Dale07}

869: {Dale}, D.~A., {de Paz}, A.~G., {Gordon}, K.~D., {Hanson}, H.~M., {Armus}, L.,

870:   {Bendo}, G.~J., {Bianchi}, L., {Block}, M., {Boissier}, S., {Boselli}, A.,

871:   {Buckalew}, B.~A., {Buat}, V., {Burgarella}, D., {Calzetti}, D., {Cannon},

872:   J.~M., {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Helou}, G., {Hollenbach}, D.~J., {Jarrett},

873:   T.~H., {Kennicutt}, R.~C., {Leitherer}, C., {Li}, A., {Madore}, B.~F.,

874:   {Martin}, D.~C., {Meyer}, M.~J., {Murphy}, E.~J., {Regan}, M.~W., {Roussel},

875:   H., {Smith}, J.~D.~T., {Sosey}, M.~L., {Thilker}, D.~A., \& {Walter}, F.

876:   2007, \apj, 655, 863

877: 

878: \bibitem[{{Dasyra} {et~al.}(2005){Dasyra}, {Xilouris}, {Misiriotis}, \&

879:   {Kylafis}}]{Dasyra05}

880: {Dasyra}, K.~M., {Xilouris}, E.~M., {Misiriotis}, A., \& {Kylafis}, N.~D. 2005,

881:   \aap, 437, 447

882: 

883: \bibitem[{{Davies} {et~al.}(1999){Davies}, {Alton}, {Trewhella}, {Evans}, \&

884:   {Bianchi}}]{Davies99}

885: {Davies}, J.~I., {Alton}, P., {Trewhella}, M., {Evans}, R., \& {Bianchi}, S.

886:   1999, \mnras, 304, 495

887: 

888: \bibitem[{{Domingue} {et~al.}(1999){Domingue}, {Keel}, {Ryder}, \&

889:   {White}}]{kw99a}

890: {Domingue}, D.~L., {Keel}, W.~C., {Ryder}, S.~D., \& {White}, R.~E. 1999, \aj,

891:   118, 1542

892: 

893: \bibitem[{{Domingue} {et~al.}(2000){Domingue}, {Keel}, \& {White}}]{kw00b}

894: {Domingue}, D.~L., {Keel}, W.~C., \& {White}, R.~E. 2000, \apj, 545, 171

895: 

896: \bibitem[{{Dopita} {et~al.}(2006{\natexlab{a}}){Dopita}, {Fischera},

897:   {Sutherland}, {Kewley}, {Leitherer}, {Tuffs}, {Popescu}, {van Breugel}, \&

898:   {Groves}}]{Dopita06b}

899: {Dopita}, M.~A., {Fischera}, J., {Sutherland}, R.~S., {Kewley}, L.~J.,

900:   {Leitherer}, C., {Tuffs}, R.~J., {Popescu}, C.~C., {van Breugel}, W., \&

901:   {Groves}, B.~A. 2006{\natexlab{a}}, \apjs, 167, 177

902: 

903: \bibitem[{{Dopita} {et~al.}(2006{\natexlab{b}}){Dopita}, {Fischera},

904:   {Sutherland}, {Kewley}, {Tuffs}, {Popescu}, {van Breugel}, {Groves}, \&

905:   {Leitherer}}]{Dopita06a}

906: {Dopita}, M.~A., {Fischera}, J., {Sutherland}, R.~S., {Kewley}, L.~J., {Tuffs},

907:   R.~J., {Popescu}, C.~C., {van Breugel}, W., {Groves}, B.~A., \& {Leitherer},

908:   C. 2006{\natexlab{b}}, \apj, 647, 244

909: 

910: \bibitem[{{Draine}(2003)}]{Draine03}

911: {Draine}, B.~T. 2003, \araa, 41, 241

912: 

913: \bibitem[{{Draine} {et~al.}(2007){Draine}, {Dale}, {Bendo}, {Gordon}, {Smith},

914:   {Armus}, {Engelbracht}, {Helou}, {Kennicutt}, {Li}, {Roussel}, {Walter},

915:   {Calzetti}, {Moustakas}, {Murphy}, {Rieke}, {Bot}, {Hollenbach}, {Sheth}, \&

916:   {Teplitz}}]{Draine07b}

917: {Draine}, B.~T., {Dale}, D.~A., {Bendo}, G., {Gordon}, K.~D., {Smith},

918:   J.~D.~T., {Armus}, L., {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Helou}, G., {Kennicutt}, Jr.,

919:   R.~C., {Li}, A., {Roussel}, H., {Walter}, F., {Calzetti}, D., {Moustakas},

920:   J., {Murphy}, E.~J., {Rieke}, G.~H., {Bot}, C., {Hollenbach}, D.~J., {Sheth},

921:   K., \& {Teplitz}, H.~I. 2007, \apj, 663, 866

922: 

923: \bibitem[{{Draine} \& {Li}(2007)}]{Draine07a}

924: {Draine}, B.~T. \& {Li}, A. 2007, \apj, 657, 810

925: 

926: \bibitem[{{Driver} {et~al.}(2007){Driver}, {Popescu}, {Tuffs}, {Liske},

927:   {Graham}, {Allen}, \& {De Propris}}]{Driver07}

928: {Driver}, S.~P., {Popescu}, C.~C., {Tuffs}, R.~J., {Liske}, J., {Graham},

929:   A.~W., {Allen}, P.~D., \& {De Propris}, R. 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 704

930: 

931: \bibitem[{{Elmegreen} {et~al.}(2001){Elmegreen}, {Kaufman}, {Elmegreen},

932:   {Brinks}, {Struck}, {Klari{\'c}}, \& {Thomasson}}]{Elmegreen01}

933: {Elmegreen}, D.~M., {Kaufman}, M., {Elmegreen}, B.~G., {Brinks}, E., {Struck},

934:   C., {Klari{\'c}}, M., \& {Thomasson}, M. 2001, \aj, 121, 182

935: 

936: \bibitem[{{Engelbracht} {et~al.}(2004){Engelbracht}, {Gordon}, {Bendo},

937:   {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, {Misselt}, {Rieke}, {Young}, {Hines}, {Kelly},

938:   {Stansberry}, {Papovich}, {Morrison}, {Egami}, {Su}, {Muzerolle}, {Dole},

939:   {Alonso-Herrero}, {Hinz}, {Smith}, {Latter}, {Noriega-Crespo}, {Padgett},

940:   {Rho}, {Frayer}, \& {Wachter}}]{Engelbracht04}

941: {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Gordon}, K.~D., {Bendo}, G.~J.,

942:   {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, P.~G., {Misselt}, K.~A., {Rieke}, G.~H., {Young},

943:   E.~T., {Hines}, D.~C., {Kelly}, D.~M., {Stansberry}, J.~A., {Papovich}, C.,

944:   {Morrison}, J.~E., {Egami}, E., {Su}, K.~Y.~L., {Muzerolle}, J., {Dole}, H.,

945:   {Alonso-Herrero}, A., {Hinz}, J.~L., {Smith}, P.~S., {Latter}, W.~B.,

946:   {Noriega-Crespo}, A., {Padgett}, D.~L., {Rho}, J., {Frayer}, D.~T., \&

947:   {Wachter}, S. 2004, \apjs, 154, 248

948: 

949: \bibitem[{{Engelbracht} {et~al.}(2006){Engelbracht}, {Kundurthy}, {Gordon},

950:   {Rieke}, {Kennicutt}, {Smith}, {Regan}, {Makovoz}, {Sosey}, {Draine},

951:   {Helou}, {Armus}, {Calzetti}, {Meyer}, {Bendo}, {Walter}, {Hollenbach},

952:   {Cannon}, {Murphy}, {Dale}, {Buckalew}, \& {Sheth}}]{Engelbracht06}

953: {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Kundurthy}, P., {Gordon}, K.~D., {Rieke}, G.~H.,

954:   {Kennicutt}, R.~C., {Smith}, J.-D.~T., {Regan}, M.~W., {Makovoz}, D.,

955:   {Sosey}, M., {Draine}, B.~T., {Helou}, G., {Armus}, L., {Calzetti}, D.,

956:   {Meyer}, M., {Bendo}, G.~J., {Walter}, F., {Hollenbach}, D., {Cannon}, J.~M.,

957:   {Murphy}, E.~J., {Dale}, D.~A., {Buckalew}, B.~A., \& {Sheth}, K. 2006,

958:   \apjl, 642, L127

959: 

960: \bibitem[{{Genzel} \& {Cesarsky}(2000)}]{Genzel00}

961: {Genzel}, R. \& {Cesarsky}, C.~J. 2000, \araa, 38, 761

962: 

963: \bibitem[{{Gonz{\'a}lez} {et~al.}(1998){Gonz{\'a}lez}, {Allen}, {Dirsch},

964:   {Ferguson}, {Calzetti}, \& {Panagia}}]{Gonzalez98}

965: {Gonz{\'a}lez}, R.~A., {Allen}, R.~J., {Dirsch}, B., {Ferguson}, H.~C.,

966:   {Calzetti}, D., \& {Panagia}, N. 1998, \apj, 506, 152

967: 

968: \bibitem[{{Gonz{\'a}lez} {et~al.}(2003){Gonz{\'a}lez}, {Loinard}, {Allen}, \&

969:   {Muller}}]{Gonzalez03}

970: {Gonz{\'a}lez}, R.~A., {Loinard}, L., {Allen}, R.~J., \& {Muller}, S. 2003,

971:   \aj, 125, 1182

972: 

973: \bibitem[{{Gordon} {et~al.}(2006){Gordon}, {Bailin}, {Engelbracht}, {Rieke},

974:   {Misselt}, {Latter}, {Young}, {Ashby}, {Barmby}, {Gibson}, {Hines}, {Hinz},

975:   {Krause}, {Levine}, {Marleau}, {Noriega-Crespo}, {Stolovy}, {Thilker}, \&

976:   {Werner}}]{Gordon06}

977: {Gordon}, K.~D., {Bailin}, J., {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Rieke}, G.~H., {Misselt},

978:   K.~A., {Latter}, W.~B., {Young}, E.~T., {Ashby}, M.~L.~N., {Barmby}, P.,

979:   {Gibson}, B.~K., {Hines}, D.~C., {Hinz}, J., {Krause}, O., {Levine}, D.~A.,

980:   {Marleau}, F.~R., {Noriega-Crespo}, A., {Stolovy}, S., {Thilker}, D.~A., \&

981:   {Werner}, M.~W. 2006, \apjl, 638, L87

982: 

983: \bibitem[{{Gordon} {et~al.}(2004){Gordon}, {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, {Misselt},

984:   {Murphy}, {Bendo}, {Walter}, {Thornley}, {Kennicutt}, {Rieke}, {Engelbracht},

985:   {Smith}, {Alonso-Herrero}, {Appleton}, {Calzetti}, {Dale}, {Draine},

986:   {Frayer}, {Helou}, {Hinz}, {Hines}, {Kelly}, {Morrison}, {Muzerolle},

987:   {Regan}, {Stansberry}, {Stolovy}, {Storrie-Lombardi}, {Su}, \&

988:   {Young}}]{Gordon04}

989: {Gordon}, K.~D., {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, P.~G., {Misselt}, K.~A., {Murphy},

990:   E.~J., {Bendo}, G.~J., {Walter}, F., {Thornley}, M.~D., {Kennicutt}, Jr.,

991:   R.~C., {Rieke}, G.~H., {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Smith}, J.-D.~T.,

992:   {Alonso-Herrero}, A., {Appleton}, P.~N., {Calzetti}, D., {Dale}, D.~A.,

993:   {Draine}, B.~T., {Frayer}, D.~T., {Helou}, G., {Hinz}, J.~L., {Hines}, D.~C.,

994:   {Kelly}, D.~M., {Morrison}, J.~E., {Muzerolle}, J., {Regan}, M.~W.,

995:   {Stansberry}, J.~A., {Stolovy}, S.~R., {Storrie-Lombardi}, L.~J., {Su},

996:   K.~Y.~L., \& {Young}, E.~T. 2004, \apjs, 154, 215

997: 

998: \bibitem[{{Gordon} {et~al.}(2005){Gordon}, {Rieke}, {Engelbracht}, {Muzerolle},

999:   {Stansberry}, {Misselt}, {Morrison}, {Cadien}, {Young}, {Dole}, {Kelly},

1000:   {Alonso-Herrero}, {Egami}, {Su}, {Papovich}, {Smith}, {Hines}, {Rieke},

1001:   {Blaylock}, {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, {Le Floc'h}, {Hinz}, {Latter},

1002:   {Hesselroth}, {Frayer}, {Noriega-Crespo}, {Masci}, {Padgett}, {Smylie}, \&

1003:   {Haegel}}]{Gordon05}

1004: {Gordon}, K.~D., {Rieke}, G.~H., {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Muzerolle}, J.,

1005:   {Stansberry}, J.~A., {Misselt}, K.~A., {Morrison}, J.~E., {Cadien}, J.,

1006:   {Young}, E.~T., {Dole}, H., {Kelly}, D.~M., {Alonso-Herrero}, A., {Egami},

1007:   E., {Su}, K.~Y.~L., {Papovich}, C., {Smith}, P.~S., {Hines}, D.~C., {Rieke},

1008:   M.~J., {Blaylock}, M., {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, P.~G., {Le Floc'h}, E.,

1009:   {Hinz}, J.~L., {Latter}, W.~B., {Hesselroth}, T., {Frayer}, D.~T.,

1010:   {Noriega-Crespo}, A., {Masci}, F.~J., {Padgett}, D.~L., {Smylie}, M.~P., \&

1011:   {Haegel}, N.~M. 2005, \pasp, 117, 503

1012: 

1013: \bibitem[{{Heyer} {et~al.}(2001){Heyer}, {Carpenter}, \& {Snell}}]{Heyer01}

1014: {Heyer}, M.~H., {Carpenter}, J.~M., \& {Snell}, R.~L. 2001, \apj, 551, 852

1015: 

1016: \bibitem[{{Hildebrand}(1983)}]{Hildebrand83}

1017: {Hildebrand}, R.~H. 1983, \qjras, 24, 267

1018: 

1019: \bibitem[{{Hinz} {et~al.}(2006){Hinz}, {Misselt}, {Rieke}, {Rieke}, {Smith},

1020:   {Blaylock}, \& {Gordon}}]{Hinz06}

1021: {Hinz}, J.~L., {Misselt}, K., {Rieke}, M.~J., {Rieke}, G.~H., {Smith}, P.~S.,

1022:   {Blaylock}, M., \& {Gordon}, K.~D. 2006, \apj, 651, 874

1023: 

1024: \bibitem[{{Hodge}(1974)}]{Hodge74}

1025: {Hodge}, P.~W. 1974, \apj, 192, 21

1026: 

1027: \bibitem[{{Holwerda}(2005)}]{Holwerda05}

1028: {Holwerda}, B.~W. 2005, PhD thesis, Kapteyn Astronomical Institute

1029: 

1030: \bibitem[{{Holwerda} {et~al.}(2005{\natexlab{a}}){Holwerda}, {Gonz\'alez},

1031:   {Allen}, \& {van der Kruit}}]{Holwerda05a}

1032: {Holwerda}, B.~W., {Gonz\'alez}, R.~A., {Allen}, R.~J., \& {van der Kruit},

1033:   P.~C. 2005{\natexlab{a}}, \aj, 129, 1381

1034: 

1035: \bibitem[{{Holwerda} {et~al.}(2005{\natexlab{b}}){Holwerda}, {Gonz\'alez},

1036:   {Allen}, \& {van der Kruit}}]{Holwerda05b}

1037: ---. 2005{\natexlab{b}}, \aj, 129, 1396

1038: 

1039: \bibitem[{{Holwerda} {et~al.}(2005{\natexlab{c}}){Holwerda}, {Gonz\'alez},

1040:   {Allen}, \& {van der Kruit}}]{Holwerda05c}

1041: ---. 2005{\natexlab{c}}, \aap, 444, 101

1042: 

1043: \bibitem[{{Holwerda} {et~al.}(2005{\natexlab{d}}){Holwerda}, {Gonz\'alez},

1044:   {Allen}, \& {van der Kruit}}]{Holwerda05e}

1045: ---. 2005{\natexlab{d}}, \aap, 444, 319

1046: 

1047: \bibitem[{{Holwerda} {et~al.}(2006){Holwerda}, {Gonz\'alez}, {Calzetti},

1048:   {Allen}, {van der Kruit}, \& {the SINGS team}}]{Holwerda06sings}

1049: {Holwerda}, B.~W., {Gonz\'alez}, R.~A., {Calzetti}, D., {Allen}, R.~J., {van

1050:   der Kruit}, P.~C., \& {the SINGS team}. 2006, {arXiv:astro-ph/0603395}

1051: 

1052: \bibitem[{{Holwerda} {et~al.}(2005{\natexlab{e}}){Holwerda}, {Gonz\'alez}, {van

1053:   der Kruit}, \& {Allen}}]{Holwerda05d}

1054: {Holwerda}, B.~W., {Gonz\'alez}, R.~A., {van der Kruit}, P.~C., \& {Allen},

1055:   R.~J. 2005{\natexlab{e}}, \aap, 444, 109

1056: 

1057: \bibitem[{{Holwerda} {et~al.}(2007){Holwerda}, {Meyer}, {Regan}, {Calzetti},

1058:   {Gordon}, {Smith}, {Dale}, {Engelbracht}, {Jarrett}, {Thornley}, {Bot},

1059:   {Buckalew}, {Kennicutt}, \& {Gonz\'alez}}]{Holwerda07b}

1060: {Holwerda}, B.~W., {Meyer}, M., {Regan}, M., {Calzetti}, D., {Gordon}, K.~D.,

1061:   {Smith}, J.~D., {Dale}, K., {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Jarrett}, T., {Thornley},

1062:   M.~D., {Bot}, C., {Buckalew}, B.~A., {Kennicutt}, R.~C., \& {Gonz\'alez},

1063:   R.~A. 2007, \aj, {\it submitted}

1064: 

1065: \bibitem[{{Hora} {et~al.}(2004){Hora}, {Fazio}, {Allen}, {Ashby}, {Barmby},

1066:   {Deutsch}, {Huang}, {Marengo}, {Megeath}, {Melnick}, {Pahre}, {Patten},

1067:   {Smith}, {Wang}, {Willner}, {Hoffmann}, {Pipher}, {Forrest}, {McMurtry},

1068:   {McCreight}, {McKelvey}, {McMurray}, {Moseley}, {Arendt}, {Mentzell}, {Marx},

1069:   {Fixsen}, {Tollestrup}, {Eisenhardt}, {Stern}, {Gorjian}, {Bhattacharya},

1070:   {Carey}, {Glaccum}, {Lacy}, {Lowrance}, {Laine}, {Nelson}, {Reach},

1071:   {Stauffer}, {Surace}, {Wilson}, \& {Wright}}]{Hora04}

1072: {Hora}, J.~L., {Fazio}, G.~G., {Allen}, L.~E., {Ashby}, M.~L.~N., {Barmby}, P.,

1073:   {Deutsch}, L.~K., {Huang}, J.~S., {Marengo}, M., {Megeath}, S.~T., {Melnick},

1074:   G.~J., {Pahre}, M.~A., {Patten}, B.~M., {Smith}, H.~A., {Wang}, Z.,

1075:   {Willner}, S.~P., {Hoffmann}, W.~F., {Pipher}, J.~L., {Forrest}, W.~J.,

1076:   {McMurtry}, C.~W., {McCreight}, C.~R., {McKelvey}, M.~E., {McMurray}, Jr.,

1077:   R.~E., {Moseley}, S.~H., {Arendt}, R.~G., {Mentzell}, J.~E., {Marx}, C.~T.,

1078:   {Fixsen}, D.~J., {Tollestrup}, E.~V., {Eisenhardt}, P.~R., {Stern}, D.,

1079:   {Gorjian}, V., {Bhattacharya}, B., {Carey}, S.~J., {Glaccum}, W.~J., {Lacy},

1080:   M.~D., {Lowrance}, P.~J., {Laine}, S.~J., {Nelson}, B.~O., {Reach}, W.~T.,

1081:   {Stauffer}, J.~R., {Surace}, J.~A., {Wilson}, G., \& {Wright}, E.~L. 2004, in

1082:   Microwave and Terahertz Photonics. Edited by Stohr, Andreas; Jager, Dieter;

1083:   Iezekiel, Stavros. Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 5487, pp. 77-92 (2004).,

1084:   ed. J.~C. {Mather}, 77--92

1085: 

1086: \bibitem[{{Jarrett}(2005)}]{IRACaper}

1087: {Jarrett}, J. 2005, IRAC: Extended Source Calibration

1088: 

1089: \bibitem[{{Kamphuis} {et~al.}(2007){Kamphuis}, {Holwerda}, {Allen}, {Peletier},

1090:   \& {van der Kruit}}]{Kamphuis07}

1091: {Kamphuis}, P., {Holwerda}, B.~W., {Allen}, R.~J., {Peletier}, R.~F., \& {van

1092:   der Kruit}, P.~C. 2007, {ArXiv e-prints/0706.2275}

1093: 

1094: \bibitem[{{Keel} \& {White}(2001{\natexlab{a}})}]{kw01a}

1095: {Keel}, W.~C. \& {White}, R.~E. 2001{\natexlab{a}}, \aj, 121, 1442

1096: 

1097: \bibitem[{{Keel} \& {White}(2001{\natexlab{b}})}]{kw01b}

1098: ---. 2001{\natexlab{b}}, \aj, 122, 1369

1099: 

1100: \bibitem[{{Kennicutt} {et~al.}(2003){Kennicutt}, {Armus}, {Bendo}, {Calzetti},

1101:   {Dale}, {Draine}, {Engelbracht}, {Gordon}, {Grauer}, {Helou}, {Hollenbach},

1102:   {Jarrett}, {Kewley}, {Leitherer}, {Li}, {Malhotra}, {Regan}, {Rieke},

1103:   {Rieke}, {Roussel}, {Smith}, {Thornley}, \& {Walter}}]{sings}

1104: {Kennicutt}, R.~C., {Armus}, L., {Bendo}, G., {Calzetti}, D., {Dale}, D.~A.,

1105:   {Draine}, B.~T., {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Gordon}, K.~D., {Grauer}, A.~D.,

1106:   {Helou}, G., {Hollenbach}, D.~J., {Jarrett}, T.~H., {Kewley}, L.~J.,

1107:   {Leitherer}, C., {Li}, A., {Malhotra}, S., {Regan}, M.~W., {Rieke}, G.~H.,

1108:   {Rieke}, M.~J., {Roussel}, H., {Smith}, J.~T., {Thornley}, M.~D., \&

1109:   {Walter}, F. 2003, \pasp, 115, 928

1110: 

1111: \bibitem[{{Li} \& {Draine}(2001)}]{Li01}

1112: {Li}, A. \& {Draine}, B.~T. 2001, \apj, 554, 778

1113: 

1114: \bibitem[{{MacGillivray}(1975)}]{MacGillivray75}

1115: {MacGillivray}, H.~T. 1975, \mnras, 170, 241

1116: 

1117: \bibitem[{{Meijerink} {et~al.}(2005){Meijerink}, {Tilanus}, {Dullemond},

1118:   {Israel}, \& {van der Werf}}]{Meijerink05}

1119: {Meijerink}, R., {Tilanus}, R.~P.~J., {Dullemond}, C.~P., {Israel}, F.~P., \&

1120:   {van der Werf}, P.~P. 2005, \aap, 430, 427

1121: 

1122: \bibitem[{{Meyer} {et~al.}(2006){Meyer}, {Calzetti}, \& {Regan}}]{Martin06}

1123: {Meyer}, M., {Calzetti}, D., \& {Regan}, M. 2006, \apj, 1, 1

1124: 

1125: \bibitem[{{Misiriotis} \& {Bianchi}(2002)}]{Misiriotis02}

1126: {Misiriotis}, A. \& {Bianchi}, S. 2002, \aap, 384, 866

1127: 

1128: \bibitem[{{Misiriotis} {et~al.}(2001){Misiriotis}, {Popescu}, {Tuffs}, \&

1129:   {Kylafis}}]{Misiriotis01}

1130: {Misiriotis}, A., {Popescu}, C.~C., {Tuffs}, R., \& {Kylafis}, N.~D. 2001,

1131:   \aap, 372, 775

1132: 

1133: \bibitem[{{Muzerolle} {et~al.}(2005){Muzerolle}, {Gordon}, {Engelbracht}, \&

1134:   {Stansberry}}]{MIPSaper}

1135: {Muzerolle}, J., {Gordon}, K., {Engelbracht}, C., \& {Stansberry}, J. 2005,

1136:   MIPS aperture corrections

1137: 

1138: \bibitem[{{Natta} \& {Panagia}(1984)}]{Natta84}

1139: {Natta}, A. \& {Panagia}, N. 1984, \apj, 287, 228

1140: 

1141: \bibitem[{{Nelson} {et~al.}(1998){Nelson}, {Zaritsky}, \& {Cutri}}]{Nelson98}

1142: {Nelson}, A.~E., {Zaritsky}, D., \& {Cutri}, R.~M. 1998, \aj, 115, 2273

1143: 

1144: \bibitem[{{P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez} {et~al.}(2006){P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez},

1145:   {Kennicutt}, {Gordon}, {Misselt}, {Gil de Paz}, {Engelbracht}, {Rieke},

1146:   {Bendo}, {Bianchi}, {Boissier}, {Calzetti}, {Dale}, {Draine}, {Jarrett},

1147:   {Hollenbach}, \& {Prescott}}]{PG06}

1148: {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, P.~G., {Kennicutt}, Jr., R.~C., {Gordon}, K.~D.,

1149:   {Misselt}, K.~A., {Gil de Paz}, A., {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Rieke}, G.~H.,

1150:   {Bendo}, G.~J., {Bianchi}, L., {Boissier}, S., {Calzetti}, D., {Dale}, D.~A.,

1151:   {Draine}, B.~T., {Jarrett}, T.~H., {Hollenbach}, D., \& {Prescott}, M.~K.~M.

1152:   2006, \apj, 648, 987

1153: 

1154: \bibitem[{{Piovan} {et~al.}(2006){Piovan}, {Tantalo}, \& {Chiosi}}]{Piovan06}

1155: {Piovan}, L., {Tantalo}, R., \& {Chiosi}, C. 2006, \mnras, 366, 923

1156: 

1157: \bibitem[{{Popescu} {et~al.}(2000){Popescu}, {Misiriotis}, {Kylafis}, {Tuffs},

1158:   \& {Fischera}}]{Popescu00}

1159: {Popescu}, C.~C., {Misiriotis}, A., {Kylafis}, N.~D., {Tuffs}, R.~J., \&

1160:   {Fischera}, J. 2000, \aap, 362, 138

1161: 

1162: \bibitem[{{Popescu} \& {Tuffs}(2003)}]{Popescu03}

1163: {Popescu}, C.~C. \& {Tuffs}, R.~J. 2003, \aap, 410, L21

1164: 

1165: \bibitem[{{Popescu} \& {Tuffs}(2005)}]{Popescu05rev}

1166: {Popescu}, C.~C. \& {Tuffs}, R.~J. 2005, in AIP Conf. Proc. 761: The Spectral

1167:   Energy Distributions of Gas-Rich Galaxies: Confronting Models with Data,

1168:   155--+

1169: 

1170: \bibitem[{{Radovich} {et~al.}(2001){Radovich}, {Kahanp{\"a}{\"a}}, \&

1171:   {Lemke}}]{Radovich01}

1172: {Radovich}, M., {Kahanp{\"a}{\"a}}, J., \& {Lemke}, D. 2001, \aap, 377, 73

1173: 

1174: \bibitem[{{Regan} {et~al.}(2004){Regan}, {Thornley}, {Bendo}, {Draine}, {Li},

1175:   {Dale}, {Engelbracht}, {Kennicutt}, {Armus}, {Calzetti}, {Gordon}, {Helou},

1176:   {Hollenbach}, {Jarrett}, {Kewley}, {Leitherer}, {Malhotra}, {Meyer},

1177:   {Misselt}, {Morrison}, {Murphy}, {Muzerolle}, {Rieke}, {Rieke}, {Roussel},

1178:   {Smith}, \& {Walter}}]{Regan04}

1179: {Regan}, M.~W., {Thornley}, M.~D., {Bendo}, G.~J., {Draine}, B.~T., {Li}, A.,

1180:   {Dale}, D.~A., {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Kennicutt}, R.~C., {Armus}, L.,

1181:   {Calzetti}, D., {Gordon}, K.~D., {Helou}, G., {Hollenbach}, D.~J., {Jarrett},

1182:   T.~H., {Kewley}, L.~J., {Leitherer}, C., {Malhotra}, S., {Meyer}, M.,

1183:   {Misselt}, K.~A., {Morrison}, J.~E., {Murphy}, E.~J., {Muzerolle}, J.,

1184:   {Rieke}, G.~H., {Rieke}, M.~J., {Roussel}, H., {Smith}, J.-D.~T., \&

1185:   {Walter}, F. 2004, \apjs, 154, 204

1186: 

1187: \bibitem[{{Rosolowsky}(2005)}]{Rosolowsky05}

1188: {Rosolowsky}, E. 2005, \pasp, 117, 1403

1189: 

1190: \bibitem[{{Seth} {et~al.}(2005){Seth}, {Dalcanton}, \& {de Jong}}]{Seth05}

1191: {Seth}, A.~C., {Dalcanton}, J.~J., \& {de Jong}, R.~S. 2005, \aj, 130, 1574

1192: 

1193: \bibitem[{{Shapley}(1951)}]{Shapley51}

1194: {Shapley}, H. 1951, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 37, 133

1195: 

1196: \bibitem[{{Silva} {et~al.}(1998){Silva}, {Granato}, {Bressan}, \&

1197:   {Danese}}]{Silva98}

1198: {Silva}, L., {Granato}, G.~L., {Bressan}, A., \& {Danese}, L. 1998, \apj, 509,

1199:   103

1200: 

1201: \bibitem[{{SINGS team}(2006)}]{dr4}

1202: {SINGS team}. 2006, SINGS fourth data delivery release notes, SINGS team

1203: 

1204: \bibitem[{{Solomon} {et~al.}(1987){Solomon}, {Rivolo}, {Barrett}, \&

1205:   {Yahil}}]{Solomon87}

1206: {Solomon}, P.~M., {Rivolo}, A.~R., {Barrett}, J., \& {Yahil}, A. 1987, \apj,

1207:   319, 730

1208: 

1209: \bibitem[{{Thornley} {et~al.}(2006){Thornley}, {Braine}, \&

1210:   {Gardan}}]{Thornley06}

1211: {Thornley}, M.~D., {Braine}, J., \& {Gardan}, E. 2006, \apjl, 651, L101

1212: 

1213: \bibitem[{{Trewhella} {et~al.}(2000){Trewhella}, {Davies}, {Alton}, {Bianchi},

1214:   \& {Madore}}]{Trewhella00}

1215: {Trewhella}, M., {Davies}, J.~I., {Alton}, P.~B., {Bianchi}, S., \& {Madore},

1216:   B.~F. 2000, \apj, 543, 153

1217: 

1218: \bibitem[{{Tuffs} \& {Popescu}(2005)}]{Tuffs05rev}

1219: {Tuffs}, R.~J. \& {Popescu}, C.~C. 2005, in AIP Conf. Proc. 761: The Spectral

1220:   Energy Distributions of Gas-Rich Galaxies: Confronting Models with Data,

1221:   344--+

1222: 

1223: \bibitem[{{Tuffs} {et~al.}(2004){Tuffs}, {Popescu}, {V{\"o}lk}, {Kylafis}, \&

1224:   {Dopita}}]{Tuffs04}

1225: {Tuffs}, R.~J., {Popescu}, C.~C., {V{\"o}lk}, H.~J., {Kylafis}, N.~D., \&

1226:   {Dopita}, M.~A. 2004, \aap, 419, 821

1227: 

1228: \bibitem[{{Wesselink}(1961)}]{Wesselink61b}

1229: {Wesselink}, A.~J. 1961, \mnras, 122, 509

1230: 

1231: \bibitem[{{White} \& {Keel}(1992)}]{kw92}

1232: {White}, R.~E. \& {Keel}, W.~C. 1992, \nat, 359, 129

1233: 

1234: \bibitem[{{White} {et~al.}(2000){White}, {Keel}, \& {Conselice}}]{kw00a}

1235: {White}, R.~E., {Keel}, W.~C., \& {Conselice}, C.~J. 2000, \apj, 542, 761

1236: 

1237: \bibitem[{{Witt} \& {Gordon}(2000)}]{Witt00}

1238: {Witt}, A.~N. \& {Gordon}, K.~D. 2000, \apj, 528, 799

1239: 

1240: \bibitem[{{Xilouris} {et~al.}(1999){Xilouris}, {Byun}, {Kylafis}, {Paleologou},

1241:   \& {Papamastorakis}}]{Xilouris99}

1242: {Xilouris}, E.~M., {Byun}, Y.~I., {Kylafis}, N.~D., {Paleologou}, E.~V., \&

1243:   {Papamastorakis}, J. 1999, \aap, 344, 868

1244: 

1245: \end{thebibliography}

1246: 

1247: 

1248: % Figure 1 WFPC2 Apertures 

1249: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1250: \begin{center}

1251: % \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{./Figures/MIPS24_wfpc_footprint.eps}

1252: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{./f1.eps}

1253: \caption{The footprints of the WPFC2 camera on board HST, on the 24 micron images 

1254: from the MIPS detector onboard {\it Spitzer}. Most of the HST images do not include the center, and are pointed on a spiral arm. NGC 3621 and NGC 5195 (M51) have two separate WFPC2 fields associated with them. The PC chip, i.e, the small chip in the nook of the ``L'' of the three WF chips, is not used for the SFM analysis, nor as part of our {\it Spitzer} aperture. }

1255: \label{fig:overlap}

1256: \end{center}

1257: \end{figure}

1258: 

1259: 

1260: % Figure 2

1261: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1262: \begin{center}

1263: % \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{./Figures/MIPS24_wfpc_footprint.eps}

1264: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{./f2.eps}

1265: \caption{The Spectral Energy Distribution in the 7 {\it Spitzer} bands (IRAC/MIPS), for each of the WFPC2 apertures in Figure \ref{fig:overlap}. The best fitting model from \cite{Draine07a} is shown. The relevant parameters for each fit are in Table \ref{table:model}.  

1266: }

1267: \label{fig:spec}

1268: \end{center}

1269: \end{figure}

1270: 

1271: % Figure 2 

1272: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1273: \begin{center}

1274: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{./f3.eps}

1275: \caption{Different synthetic fields with different dust disk models from \cite{Holwerda05}. A set of synthetic fields is made using dimmed HDF images. This dimming can be a smooth uniform gray screen (triangles), or some distribution of opaque clouds (curves). The relation between the number of distant galaxies from the HDF that can still be retrieved and the average opacity of the dimming depends on the assumed model. Large, resolved clouds block fewer background objects given the same filling factor. As a result, one a higher optical depth is implied by the intersection of the curve and number of observed background galaxies. The distance to NGC1365 is 18 Mpc, so a pixel of $0\farcs05$ is equivalent to 4 pc in linear size. The scales in the above simulations correspond, therefore, to clouds with cross-sections with a radius of 2, 4, 8, 100 and 400 pc, respectively  }

1276: \label{fig:sfmsize}

1277: \end{center}

1278: \end{figure}

1279: 

1280: % Figure 3

1281: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1282: \begin{center}

1283: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{./f4.eps}

1284: \caption{The mean and apparent optical depth in the $I$-band, from SED ($\tau_m$) and SFM ($\tilde{\tau}$). The best fit with equation \ref{eq:rat} to the ratios of these values is also shown ($\tau_c = 0.4$). The average value for number of clouds along the line-of-sight, $n$, is then 2.6. If the negative SFM values are included in the fit, the cloud optical depth rises to $\tau_c = 0.6$ and the average $n$ becomes 1.9.}

1285: \label{fig:fit}

1286: \end{center}

1287: \end{figure}

1288: 

1289: % Figure 4

1290: \begin{figure}[htbp]

1291: \begin{center}

1292: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{./f5.eps}

1293: \caption{Model values of $\tau_m$ and $\tilde{\tau}$, from equations \ref{eq:tm} and \ref{eq:tap}, for fixed values of the average number of clouds along the line-of-sight (n = 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4). The cloud optical depth $\tau_c$ is left to vary proportionally to $\tau_m$ ($\tau_m = n \times \tau_c$, equation \ref{eq:tm}). Hence maximum cloud optical depths are 6, 3, 1.5, 1 and 0.75 respectively. If optically thin clouds are made up of optically thin clouds, it seems necessary that more than one cloud will lie along the line-of-sight.}

1294: \label{fig:n_val}

1295: \end{center}

1296: \end{figure}

1297: 

1298: 

1299: 

1300: 

1301: % Table 1 Basic Spitzer data

1302: %

1303: \begin{deluxetable}{l l l l}

1304: \tablewidth{0pt.}

1305: \tablecaption{SINGS data description. IRAC and MIPS pixel scales, PSF FWHM, and aperture corrections (the factor by which the fluxes are multiplied). \label{table:data}}

1306: \tablehead{

1307: \colhead{Instrument} 	& \colhead{pixel}	& \colhead{PSF} 	& \colhead{aperture}\\

1308: \colhead{(band)}		& \colhead{scale}	& \colhead{(FWHM)} 	& \colhead{correction}\\

1309: 	& \colhead{\tablenotemark{1}}	& \colhead{\tablenotemark{2}}	& \colhead{\tablenotemark{3}}}

1310: \startdata

1311: IRAC (3.6)  	 	& $0\farcs75$	& $2\farcs5$ 	& 0.9\\

1312: IRAC (4.5)  	 	& $0\farcs75$	& $2\farcs5$ 	& 0.9\\

1313: IRAC (5.8) 	 	& $0\farcs75$	& $2\farcs5$ 	& 0.7\\

1314: IRAC (8.0)  	 	& $0\farcs75$	& $2\farcs5$ 	& 0.75\\

1315: 

1316: MIPS (24)		 	& $1\farcs5$	& $6\farcs0$ 	& 1.16\\

1317: MIPS (70) 	 	& $4\farcs5$	& $18\farcs0$ 	& 1.2\\

1318: MIPS (160) 	 	& $9\farcs0$	& $40\farcs0$ 	& 1.4\\

1319: \enddata

1320: \tablenotetext{1}{Pixel scales were set by the SINGS team.}

1321: \tablenotetext{2}{FWHM values for the IRAC are conservative estimates. Actual FWHM values are better than $2\farcs5$. }

1322: \tablenotetext{3}{The IRAC values are the initial results from T. Jarrett ({\it private communication}), but they do not differ substantially from the final results.}

1323: \end{deluxetable}

1324: 

1325: % Table 2 Fluxes

1326: %

1327: \begin{deluxetable}{l l l l l l l l}

1328: \tablewidth{0pt.}

1329: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1330: \tablecaption{{\it Spitzer} channel surface brightness in the WFPC2 aperture (3 WFs $\times 1.3\arcmin \times 1.3\arcmin$).\label{table:flux}}

1331: \tablehead{

1332: \colhead{Galaxy}		& \colhead{3.6 $\rm \mu m$}		& \colhead{4.5 $\rm \mu m$} & \colhead{5.8 $\rm \mu m$} & \colhead{ 8 $\rm \mu m$} & \colhead{24 $\rm \mu m$} & \colhead{70 $\rm \mu m$} & \colhead{160 $\rm \mu m$} \\

1333: 	& \colhead{MJy/sr} 	& \colhead{MJy/sr} 	& \colhead{MJy/sr} 	& \colhead{MJy/sr} 	& \colhead{MJy/sr} 	& \colhead{MJy/sr} 	& \colhead{MJy/sr} 	\\

1334: }

1335: \startdata

1336: NGC 925		& 0.17 $\pm$ 0.04   & 0.19 $\pm$ 0.08   & 0.12 $\pm$ 0.05   & 3.79 $\pm$ 2.65   & 0.33 $\pm$ 0.06   & 4.76 $\pm$ 0.44   & 21.92 $\pm$ 0.91  \\

1337: NGC 2841	& 0.39 $\pm$ 0.04   & 0.33 $\pm$ 0.09   & 0.88 $\pm$ 0.59   & 3.42 $\pm$ 2.43   & 0.46 $\pm$ 0.04   & 4.54 $\pm$ 0.34   & 34.27 $\pm$ 0.58  \\ 

1338: NGC 3031	& 0.56 $\pm$ 0.03   & 0.39 $\pm$ 0.06   & 0.25 $\pm$ 0.07   & 2.07 $\pm$ 1.41   & 0.23 $\pm$ 0.04   & 3.74 $\pm$ 0.37   & 23.73 $\pm$ 1.38  \\ 

1339: NGC 3198	& 0.13 $\pm$ 0.02   & 0.12 $\pm$ 0.04   & 0.11 $\pm$ 0.04   & 2.28 $\pm$ 1.20   & 0.32 $\pm$ 0.05   & 3.48 $\pm$ 0.36   & 20.09 $\pm$ 0.46  \\ 

1340: NGC 3351	& 0.55 $\pm$ 0.05   & 0.45 $\pm$ 0.16   & 0.33 $\pm$ 0.07   & 5.81 $\pm$ 4.14   & 1.11 $\pm$ 0.06   & 12.54 $\pm$ 0.54  & 43.55 $\pm$ 0.68  \\ 

1341: NGC 3621-1	& 0.24 $\pm$ 0.01   & 0.12 $\pm$ 0.01   & 0.40 $\pm$ 0.05   & 1.27 $\pm$ 0.37   & 0.70 $\pm$ 0.05   & 9.68 $\pm$ 0.46   & 41.38 $\pm$ 0.87  \\ 

1342: NGC 3621-2	& 0.15 $\pm$ 0.01   & 0.17 $\pm$ 0.01   & 0.24 $\pm$ 0.05   & 1.08 $\pm$ 0.37   & 0.66 $\pm$ 0.05   & 11.04 $\pm$ 0.46  & 36.81 $\pm$ 0.87  \\

1343: NGC 3627	& 0.97 $\pm$ 0.04   & 0.68 $\pm$ 0.06   & 1.20 $\pm$ 0.06   & 6.72 $\pm$ 2.89   & 5.80 $\pm$ 0.06   & 49.58 $\pm$ 0.61  & 152.63 $\pm$ 0.95 \\ 

1344: NGC 4321	& 0.55 $\pm$ 0.02   & 0.39 $\pm$ 0.04   & 0.64 $\pm$ 0.06   & 4.45 $\pm$ 2.23   & 2.62 $\pm$ 0.05   & 25.12 $\pm$ 0.46  & 100.53 $\pm$ 0.75 \\ 

1345: NGC 4536	& 0.11 $\pm$ 0.04   & 0.15 $\pm$ 0.07   & 0.72 $\pm$ 3.45   & 3.64 $\pm$ 2.89   & 0.19 $\pm$ 0.05   & 2.35 $\pm$ 0.52   & 10.97 $\pm$ 0.60  \\ 

1346: NGC 4559	& 0.05 $\pm$ 0.03   & 0.04 $\pm$ 0.01   & 0.06 $\pm$ 0.05   & 1.51 $\pm$ 1.05   & 0.10 $\pm$ 0.05   & 2.65 $\pm$ 0.38   & 11.80 $\pm$ 0.53  \\ 

1347: NGC 4725	& 0.11 $\pm$ 0.02   & 0.09 $\pm$ 0.05   & 0.28 $\pm$ 0.20   & 1.76 $\pm$ 1.29   & 0.16 $\pm$ 0.05   & 1.59 $\pm$ 0.35   & 12.50 $\pm$ 0.49  \\

1348: NGC 5194-1	& 0.52 $\pm$ 0.01   & 0.32 $\pm$ 0.01   & 0.80 $\pm$ 0.05   & 2.61 $\pm$ 0.22   & 2.64 $\pm$ 0.04   & 28.61 $\pm$ 0.38  & 124.68 $\pm$ 1.36 \\ 

1349: NGC 5194-2	& 0.56 $\pm$ 0.01   & 0.34 $\pm$ 0.01   & 0.88 $\pm$ 0.05   & 2.76 $\pm$ 0.22   & 3.26 $\pm$ 0.04   & 36.35 $\pm$ 0.38  & 144.30 $\pm$ 1.36 \\ 

1350: NGC 6946	& 0.43 $\pm$ 0.03   & 0.27 $\pm$ 0.01   & 0.71 $\pm$ 0.09   & 2.31 $\pm$ 0.48   & 2.92 $\pm$ 0.07   & 28.88 $\pm$ 0.53  & 80.83 $\pm$ 2.13  \\ 

1351: NGC 7331	& 0.14 $\pm$ 0.01   & 0.10 $\pm$ 0.01   & 0.10 $\pm$ 0.05   & 1.39 $\pm$ 0.88   & 0.23 $\pm$ 0.04   & 3.49 $\pm$ 0.67   & 17.05 $\pm$ 0.79  \\

1352: \enddata

1353: \end{deluxetable}

1354: 

1355: % Table 3 Model output

1356: %

1357: \begin{deluxetable}{l c c c c c c c c c c}

1358: \tablewidth{0pt.}

1359: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1360: 

1361: \tablecaption{Model output: \label{table:model} stellar and dust surface brightness, dust surface density, dust mean temperature \citep[$T_2$ in][]{Draine07a}, fit quality, the parameters of stellar irradiation --minimum and maximum of the distribution, mean irradiative field, fraction of dust exposed to more than $U_{min}$. Models can be found at http://www.astro.princeton.edu/$\sim$draine/dust/irem.html }

1362: \tablehead{

1363: \colhead{Galaxy} 	& \colhead{$L_{star}/area$}	   & \colhead{$L_{dust}/area$} 		& \colhead{$M_{dust}/area$} & \colhead{T} &   \colhead{$\chi^2$}& \colhead{$U_{min}$} & \colhead{$U_{max}$} & \colhead{$\bar{U}$} & \colhead{$\gamma$} & \colhead{model} \\

1364: \colhead{name}         & \colhead{($L_{\odot}/kpc^2$)} & \colhead{($L_{\odot}/kpc^2$)}    & \colhead{($ M_{\odot}/kpc^2$)}   & \colhead{(K)} & \colhead{} & \colhead{}& \colhead{}& \colhead{}& \colhead{} & \colhead{name}\\ 

1365: \colhead{}         & \colhead{$\times 10^8$} & \colhead{$\times 10^8$}    & \colhead{$\times 10^6$}   & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{$\times 10^6$} & \colhead{}  & \colhead{$\times 10^{-3}$} & 

1366: }

1367: \startdata

1368: NGC 0925	& 0.8	& 0.2	& 0.2	& 15.7	& 2.8 	& 0.70 & 10  & 0.8  & 5.8	& U0.70\_1e7\_MW3.1\_20  \\

1369: NGC 2841	& 1.8	& 0.3	& 0.5	& 14.6	& 4.15 	& 0.70 & 10  & 0.8  & 1.0	& U0.70\_1e7\_MW3.1\_20 \\

1370: NGC 3031	& 2.7	& 0.2	& 0.3	& 14.6	& 2.32 	& 0.50 & 1.0 & 0.5  & 1.5	& U0.50\_1e6\_MW3.1\_30\\

1371: NGC 3198	& 0.6	& 0.2	& 0.3	& 15.0	& 3.73 	& 0.50 & 10  & 0.6  & 7.5	& U0.50\_1e7\_MW3.1\_30 \\

1372: NGC 3351	& 2.7	& 0.5	& 0.4	& 16.2	& 1.9 	& 0.80 & 1.0 & 1.0  & 1.6	& U0.80\_1e6\_MW3.1\_10\\

1373: NGC 3621-1	& 0.7	& 0.5	& 0.4	& 16.2	& 2.45 	& 1.00 & 1.0 & 1.0  & 2.6	& U1.00\_1e6\_MW3.1\_60\\

1374: NGC 3621-2	& 0.7	& 0.4	& 0.2	& 16.9	& 10.91	& 1.20 & 10  & 1.3  & 7.3	& U1.20\_1e7\_MW3.1\_30 \\

1375: NGC 3627	& 3.7	& 2.1	& 1.1	& 17.0	& 2.11 	& 1.00 & 10  & 1.4  & 24.5	& U1.00\_1e7\_MW3.1\_30\\

1376: NGC 4321	& 2.2	& 1.1	& 1.0	& 16.0	& 1.91 	& 0.70 & 10  & 0.9  & 15.6	& U0.70\_1e7\_MW3.1\_30 \\

1377: NGC 4536	& 0.5	& 0.1	& 0.1	& 15.7	& 2.32 	& 0.80 & 10  & 0.8  & 2.7	& U0.80\_1e7\_MW3.1\_60 \\

1378: NGC 4559	& 0.2	& 0.1	& 0.1	& 15.7	& 1.76 	& 0.80 & 1.0 & 0.8  & 0.0	& U0.80\_1e6\_MW3.1\_30  \\

1379: NGC 4725	& 0.5	& 0.1	& 0.2	& 14.6	& 3.01 	& 0.50 & 1.0 & 0.5  & 0.0	& U0.50\_1e6\_MW3.1\_60  \\

1380: NGC 5194-1	& 1.6	& 1.4	& 1.2	& 16.0	& 2.33 	& 0.80 & 1.0 & 0.9  & 9.9 	& U0.80\_1e6\_MW3.1\_50    \\

1381: NGC 5194-2	& 1.8	& 1.7	& 1.4	& 16.0	& 1.83 	& 0.80 & 1.0 & 0.9  & 11.7 & U0.80\_1e6\_MW3.1\_40  \\

1382: NGC 6946	& 1.4	& 1.2	& 0.5	& 17.8	& 0.65 	& 1.50 & 1.0 & 1.9  & 20.5	& U1.50\_1e6\_MW3.1\_50\\

1383: NGC 7331	& 0.6	& 0.2	& 0.2	& 15.4	& 2.15 	& 0.70 & 10  & 0.7  & 4.5 	& U0.70\_1e7\_MW3.1\_30\\

1384: 

1385: \enddata

1386: \end{deluxetable}

1387: 

1388: 

1389: 

1390: % Table 4 WFPC2 opacities

1391: %

1392: \begin{deluxetable}{l l l l l l l}

1393: \tablewidth{0pt.}

1394: \tablecaption{The apparent ($\tilde{\tau}$) and average ($\tau_m $) optical depths in $I$-band measured in the WFPC2 field (3 WFs $1\farcm3 \times 1\farcm3$), uncorrected and corrected for inclination.  \label{table:A}}

1395: \tablehead{

1396: \colhead{Galaxy}		& \colhead{$\tilde{\tau}$}	& \colhead{$\tilde{\tau}$}	& \colhead{$\tau_m $} &  \colhead{$\tau_m $}& \colhead{$\tilde{\tau}/\tau_m$}\\

1397: 					& \colhead{(SFM)} 		& \colhead{$\times cos(i)$}& \colhead{(SED)} & \colhead{$\times cos(i)$} & }

1398: \startdata

1399: NGC 0925	& $-0.4^{0.3}_{-0.3}$ & -0.2 & 0.6	& 0.3 & -0.63 \\

1400: NGC 2841	& $0.7^{0.4}_{-0.4}$	& 0.4	& 1.4	& 0.7 & 0.53 \\

1401: NGC 3031	& $0.8^{0.5}_{-0.6}$	& 0.4	& 0.9	& 0.5 & 0.88 \\

1402: NGC 3198	& $0.7^{0.3}_{-0.3}$	& 0.3	& 0.7	& 0.4 & 0.97 \\

1403: NGC 3351	& $1.1^{0.5}_{-0.5}$	& 1.1	& 1.0	& 1.0 & 1.06 \\

1404: NGC 3621-1	& $2.0^{0.5}_{-0.6}$	& 1.1	& 1.0	& 0.5 & 2.05 \\

1405: NGC 3621-2	& $1.0^{0.3}_{-0.3}$	& 0.5	& 0.7	& 0.4 & 1.38 \\

1406: NGC 3627	& $1.9^{0.6}_{-0.7}$	& 1.0	& 3.1 	& 1.7 & 0.61 \\ 

1407: NGC 4321	& $2.2^{0.7}_{-0.8}$	& 1.7	& 2.8 	& 2.2 & 0.76\\ 

1408: NGC 4536	& $0.8^{0.3}_{-0.3}$	& 0.4	& 0.3	& 0.1 & 2.58 \\ 

1409: NGC 4559	& $0.1^{0.3}_{-0.3}$	& 0.1	& 0.3	& 0.1 & 0.39 \\

1410: NGC 4725	& $0.7^{0.3}_{-0.3}$	& 0.5	& 0.5	& 0.4 & 1.38 \\

1411: NGC 5194-1	& $-0.4^{0.4}_{-0.4}$ & -0.4	& 3.3	& 3.0 & -0.12 \\

1412: NGC 5194-1	& $1.3^{0.5}_{-0.6}$	& 1.2	& 3.9	& 3.5 & 0.34 \\

1413: NGC 6946	& $1.0^{0.5}_{-0.5}$	& 0.8	& 1.3	& 1.0 & 0.76 \\

1414: NGC 7331	& $0.3^{0.3}_{-0.3}$	& 0.2	& 0.5	& 0.3 & 0.62 \\

1415: \enddata

1416: \end{deluxetable}

1417: 

1418: \end{document}

1419: 

1420: \begin{thebibliography}{}

1421: 

1422: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Alton} et~al.}{1998}]{Alton98}

1423: {Alton}, P.~B., {Trewhella}, M., {Davies}, J.~I., {Evans}, R., {Bianchi}, S.,

1424:   {Gear}, W., {Thronson}, H., {Valentijn}, E., and {Witt}, A.: 1998,

1425: \newblock {\em \aap} {\bf 335}, 807

1426: 

1427: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Alton} et~al.}{2004}]{Alton04}

1428: {Alton}, P.~B., {Xilouris}, E.~M., {Misiriotis}, A., {Dasyra}, K.~M., and

1429:   {Dumke}, M.: 2004,

1430: \newblock {\em \aap} {\bf 425}, 109

1431: 

1432: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Andredakis} and {van der

1433:   Kruit}}{1992}]{Andredakis92}

1434: {Andredakis}, Y.~C. and {van der Kruit}, P.~C.: 1992,

1435: \newblock {\em \aap} {\bf 265}, 396

1436: 

1437: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Bendo} et~al.}{2006}]{Bendo06}

1438: {Bendo}, G.~J., {Dale}, D.~A., {Draine}, B.~T., {Engelbracht}, C.~W.,

1439:   {Kennicutt}, Jr., R.~C., {Calzetti}, D., {Gordon}, K.~D., {Helou}, G.,

1440:   {Hollenbach}, D., {Li}, A., {Murphy}, E.~J., {Prescott}, M.~K.~M., and

1441:   {Smith}, J.-D.~T.: 2006,

1442: \newblock {\em \apj} {\bf 652}, 283

1443: 

1444: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Bendo} et~al.}{2003}]{Bendo03}

1445: {Bendo}, G.~J., {Joseph}, R.~D., {Wells}, M., {Gallais}, P., {Haas}, M.,

1446:   {Heras}, A.~M., {Klaas}, U., {Laureijs}, R.~J., {Leech}, K., {Lemke}, D.,

1447:   {Metcalfe}, L., {Rowan-Robinson}, M., {Schulz}, B., and {Telesco}, C.: 2003,

1448: \newblock {\em \aj} {\bf 125}, 2361

1449: 

1450: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Berlind} et~al.}{1997}]{Berlind97}

1451: {Berlind}, A.~A., {Quillen}, A.~C., {Pogge}, R.~W., and {Sellgren}, K.: 1997,

1452: \newblock {\em \aj} {\bf 114}, 107

1453: 

1454: \bibitem[Bianchi(2007)]{Bianchi07} Bianchi, S.\ 2007, 

1455: \newblock {\em ArXiv e-prints}, 705, arXiv:0705.1471 

1456: 

1457: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Bianchi} et~al.}{2000}]{Bianchi00}

1458: {Bianchi}, S., {Davies}, J.~I., {Alton}, P.~B., {Gerin}, M., and {Casoli}, F.:

1459:   2000,

1460: \newblock {\em \aap} {\bf 353}, L13

1461: 

1462: \bibitem[Bianchi et al.(2000)]{Bianchi00b} Bianchi, S., Davies, 

1463: J.~I., \& Alton, P.~B.\ 2000, 

1464: \newblock {\em \aap} {\bf 359}, 65 

1465: 

1466: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Calzetti} et~al.}{2005}]{Calzetti05}

1467: {Calzetti}, D., {Kennicutt}, Jr., R.~C., {Bianchi}, L., {Thilker}, D.~A.,

1468:   {Dale}, D.~A., {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Leitherer}, C., {Meyer}, M.~J.,

1469:   {Sosey}, M.~L., {Mutchler}, M., {Regan}, M.~W., {Thornley}, M.~D., {Armus},

1470:   L., {Bendo}, G.~J., {Boissier}, S., {Boselli}, A., {Draine}, B.~T., {Gordon},

1471:   K.~D., {Helou}, G., {Hollenbach}, D.~J., {Kewley}, L., {Madore}, B.~F.,

1472:   {Martin}, D.~C., {Murphy}, E.~J., {Rieke}, G.~H., {Rieke}, M.~J., {Roussel},

1473:   H., {Sheth}, K., {Smith}, J.~D., {Walter}, F., {White}, B.~A., {Yi}, S.,

1474:   {Scoville}, N.~Z., {Polletta}, M., and {Lindler}, D.: 2005,

1475: \newblock {\em \apj} {\bf 633}, 871

1476: 

1477: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Dale} et~al.}{2005}]{Dale05}

1478: {Dale}, D.~A., {Bendo}, G.~J., {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Gordon}, K.~D., {Regan},

1479:   M.~W., {Armus}, L., {Cannon}, J.~M., {Calzetti}, D., {Draine}, B.~T.,

1480:   {Helou}, G., {Joseph}, R.~D., {Kennicutt}, R.~C., {Li}, A., {Murphy}, E.~J.,

1481:   {Roussel}, H., {Walter}, F., {Hanson}, H.~M., {Hollenbach}, D.~J., {Jarrett},

1482:   T.~H., {Kewley}, L.~J., {Lamanna}, C.~A., {Leitherer}, C., {Meyer}, M.~J.,

1483:   {Rieke}, G.~H., {Rieke}, M.~J., {Sheth}, K., {Smith}, J.~D.~T., and

1484:   {Thornley}, M.~D.: 2005,

1485: \newblock {\em \apj} {\bf 633}, 857

1486: 

1487: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Dasyra} et~al.}{2005}]{Dasyra05}

1488: {Dasyra}, K.~M., {Xilouris}, E.~M., {Misiriotis}, A., and {Kylafis}, N.~D.:

1489:   2005,

1490: \newblock {\em \aap} {\bf 437}, 447

1491: 

1492: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Davies} et~al.}{1999}]{Davies99}

1493: {Davies}, J.~I., {Alton}, P., {Trewhella}, M., {Evans}, R., and {Bianchi}, S.:

1494:   1999,

1495: \newblock {\em \mnras} {\bf 304}, 495

1496: 

1497: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Domingue} et~al.}{1999}]{kw99a}

1498: {Domingue}, D.~L., {Keel}, W.~C., {Ryder}, S.~D., and {White}, R.~E.: 1999,

1499: \newblock {\em \aj} {\bf 118}, 1542

1500: 

1501: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Domingue} et~al.}{2000}]{kw00b}

1502: {Domingue}, D.~L., {Keel}, W.~C., and {White}, R.~E.: 2000,

1503: \newblock {\em \apj} {\bf 545}, 171

1504: 

1505: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Draine}}{2003}]{Draine03}

1506: {Draine}, B.~T.: 2003,

1507: \newblock {\em \araa} {\bf 41}, 241

1508: 

1509: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Draine} et~al.}{2007}]{Draine07}

1510: {Draine}, B.~T., {Dale}, D.~A., {Bendo}, G.~J., {Gordon}, K.~D., {Smith},

1511:   J.-D.~T., {Armus}, L., {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Helou}, G., {Kennicutt}, R.~C.,

1512:   {Li}, A., {Roussel}, H., {Walter}, F., {Calzetti}, D., {Murphy}, E.~J.,

1513:   {Rieke}, G.~H., {Bot}, C., {Hollenbach}, D., {Sheth}, K., and {Teplitz},

1514:   H.~I.: 2007,

1515: % \newblock {\em \aj}

1516: \newblock {\em ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints}, No. 0703213

1517: 

1518: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Draine} and {Li}}{2007}]{Draine07a}

1519: {Draine}, B.~T. and {Li}, A.: 2007,

1520: \newblock {\em \apj}, {\bf 657}, 810 

1521: 

1522: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Elmegreen} et~al.}{2001}]{Elmegreen01}

1523: {Elmegreen}, D.~M., {Kaufman}, M., {Elmegreen}, B.~G., {Brinks}, E., {Struck},

1524:   C., {Klari{\'c}}, M., and {Thomasson}, M.: 2001,

1525: \newblock {\em \aj} {\bf 121}, 182

1526: 

1527: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Engelbracht} et~al.}{2004}]{Engelbracht04}

1528: {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Gordon}, K.~D., {Bendo}, G.~J.,

1529:   {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, P.~G., {Misselt}, K.~A., {Rieke}, G.~H., {Young},

1530:   E.~T., {Hines}, D.~C., {Kelly}, D.~M., {Stansberry}, J.~A., {Papovich}, C.,

1531:   {Morrison}, J.~E., {Egami}, E., {Su}, K.~Y.~L., {Muzerolle}, J., {Dole}, H.,

1532:   {Alonso-Herrero}, A., {Hinz}, J.~L., {Smith}, P.~S., {Latter}, W.~B.,

1533:   {Noriega-Crespo}, A., {Padgett}, D.~L., {Rho}, J., {Frayer}, D.~T., and

1534:   {Wachter}, S.: 2004,

1535: \newblock {\em \apjs} {\bf 154}, 248

1536: 

1537: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Engelbracht} et~al.}{2006}]{Engelbracht06}

1538: {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Kundurthy}, P., {Gordon}, K.~D., {Rieke}, G.~H.,

1539:   {Kennicutt}, R.~C., {Smith}, J.-D.~T., {Regan}, M.~W., {Makovoz}, D.,

1540:   {Sosey}, M., {Draine}, B.~T., {Helou}, G., {Armus}, L., {Calzetti}, D.,

1541:   {Meyer}, M., {Bendo}, G.~J., {Walter}, F., {Hollenbach}, D., {Cannon}, J.~M.,

1542:   {Murphy}, E.~J., {Dale}, D.~A., {Buckalew}, B.~A., and {Sheth}, K.: 2006,

1543: \newblock {\em \apjl} {\bf 642}, L127

1544: 

1545: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Genzel} and {Cesarsky}}{2000}]{Genzel00}

1546: {Genzel}, R. and {Cesarsky}, C.~J.: 2000,

1547: \newblock {\em \araa} {\bf 38}, 761

1548: 

1549: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Gonz{\'a}lez} et~al.}{1998}]{Gonzalez98}

1550: {Gonz{\'a}lez}, R.~A., {Allen}, R.~J., {Dirsch}, B., {Ferguson}, H.~C.,

1551:   {Calzetti}, D., and {Panagia}, N.: 1998,

1552: \newblock {\em \apj} {\bf 506}, 152

1553: 

1554: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Gonz{\'a}lez} et~al.}{2003}]{Gonzalez03}

1555: {Gonz{\'a}lez}, R.~A., {Loinard}, L., {Allen}, R.~J., and {Muller}, S.: 2003,

1556: \newblock {\em \aj} {\bf 125}, 1182

1557: 

1558: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Gordon} et~al.}{2006}]{Gordon06}

1559: {Gordon}, K.~D., {Bailin}, J., {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Rieke}, G.~H., {Misselt},

1560:   K.~A., {Latter}, W.~B., {Young}, E.~T., {Ashby}, M.~L.~N., {Barmby}, P.,

1561:   {Gibson}, B.~K., {Hines}, D.~C., {Hinz}, J., {Krause}, O., {Levine}, D.~A.,

1562:   {Marleau}, F.~R., {Noriega-Crespo}, A., {Stolovy}, S., {Thilker}, D.~A., and

1563:   {Werner}, M.~W.: 2006,

1564: \newblock {\em \apjl} {\bf 638}, L87

1565: 

1566: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Gordon} et~al.}{2004}]{Gordon04}

1567: {Gordon}, K.~D., {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, P.~G., {Misselt}, K.~A., {Murphy},

1568:   E.~J., {Bendo}, G.~J., {Walter}, F., {Thornley}, M.~D., {Kennicutt}, Jr.,

1569:   R.~C., {Rieke}, G.~H., {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Smith}, J.-D.~T.,

1570:   {Alonso-Herrero}, A., {Appleton}, P.~N., {Calzetti}, D., {Dale}, D.~A.,

1571:   {Draine}, B.~T., {Frayer}, D.~T., {Helou}, G., {Hinz}, J.~L., {Hines}, D.~C.,

1572:   {Kelly}, D.~M., {Morrison}, J.~E., {Muzerolle}, J., {Regan}, M.~W.,

1573:   {Stansberry}, J.~A., {Stolovy}, S.~R., {Storrie-Lombardi}, L.~J., {Su},

1574:   K.~Y.~L., and {Young}, E.~T.: 2004,

1575: \newblock {\em \apjs} {\bf 154}, 215

1576: 

1577: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Gordon} et~al.}{2005}]{Gordon05}

1578: {Gordon}, K.~D., {Rieke}, G.~H., {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Muzerolle}, J.,

1579:   {Stansberry}, J.~A., {Misselt}, K.~A., {Morrison}, J.~E., {Cadien}, J.,

1580:   {Young}, E.~T., {Dole}, H., {Kelly}, D.~M., {Alonso-Herrero}, A., {Egami},

1581:   E., {Su}, K.~Y.~L., {Papovich}, C., {Smith}, P.~S., {Hines}, D.~C., {Rieke},

1582:   M.~J., {Blaylock}, M., {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, P.~G., {Le Floc'h}, E.,

1583:   {Hinz}, J.~L., {Latter}, W.~B., {Hesselroth}, T., {Frayer}, D.~T.,

1584:   {Noriega-Crespo}, A., {Masci}, F.~J., {Padgett}, D.~L., {Smylie}, M.~P., and

1585:   {Haegel}, N.~M.: 2005,

1586: \newblock {\em \pasp} {\bf 117}, 503

1587: 

1588: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Heyer} et~al.}{2001}]{Heyer01}

1589: {Heyer}, M.~H., {Carpenter}, J.~M., and {Snell}, R.~L.: 2001,

1590: \newblock {\em \apj} {\bf 551}, 852

1591: 

1592: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Hildebrand}}{1983}]{Hildebrand83}

1593: {Hildebrand}, R.~H.: 1983,

1594: \newblock {\em \qjras} {\bf 24}, 267

1595: 

1596: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Hinz} et~al.}{2006}]{Hinz06}

1597: {Hinz}, J.~L., {Misselt}, K., {Rieke}, M.~J., {Rieke}, G.~H., {Smith}, P.~S.,

1598:   {Blaylock}, M., and {Gordon}, K.~D.: 2006,

1599: \newblock {\em \apj} {\bf 651}, 874

1600: 

1601: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Hodge}}{1974}]{Hodge74}

1602: {Hodge}, P.~W.: 1974,

1603: \newblock {\em \apj} {\bf 192}, 21

1604: 

1605: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Holwerda}}{2005}]{Holwerda05}

1606: {Holwerda}, B.~W.: 2005,

1607: \newblock {\em Ph.D.~Thesis}

1608: 

1609: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Holwerda} et~al.}{2005a}]{Holwerda05a}

1610: {Holwerda}, B.~W., {Gonzalez}, R.~A., {Allen}, R.~J., and {van der Kruit},

1611:   P.~C.: 2005a,

1612: \newblock {\em \aj} {\bf 129}, 1381

1613: 

1614: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Holwerda} et~al.}{2005b}]{Holwerda05b}

1615: {Holwerda}, B.~W., {Gonzalez}, R.~A., {Allen}, R.~J., and {van der Kruit},

1616:   P.~C.: 2005b,

1617: \newblock {\em \aj} {\bf 129}, 1396

1618: 

1619: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Holwerda} et~al.}{2005c}]{Holwerda05c}

1620: {Holwerda}, B.~W., {Gonz{\'a}lez}, R.~A., {Allen}, R.~J., and {van der Kruit},

1621:   P.~C.: 2005c,

1622: \newblock {\em \aap} {\bf 444}, 101

1623: 

1624: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Holwerda} et~al.}{2005d}]{Holwerda05e}

1625: {Holwerda}, B.~W., {Gonzalez}, R.~A., {Allen}, R.~J., and {van der Kruit},

1626:   P.~C.: 2005d,

1627: \newblock {\em \aap} {\bf 444}, 319

1628: 

1629: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Holwerda} et~al.}{2006}]{Holwerda06a}

1630: {Holwerda}, B.~W., {Gonzalez}, R.~A., {Calzetti}, D., {Allen}, R.~J., {van der

1631:   Kruit}, P.~C., and {the SINGS team}: 2006,

1632: \newblock {\em ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints} No. 0603395

1633: 

1634: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Holwerda} et~al.}{2005e}]{Holwerda05d}

1635: {Holwerda}, B.~W., {Gonz{\'a}lez}, R.~A., {van der Kruit}, P.~C., and {Allen},

1636:   R.~J.: 2005e,

1637: \newblock {\em \aap} {\bf 444}, 109

1638: 

1639: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Holwerda} et~al.}{2007}]{Holwerda06b}

1640: {Holwerda}, B.~W., {Meyer}, M., {Regan}, M., {Calzetti}, D., {Gordon}, K.~D., {Smith}, J.~D., 

1641: {Dale}, D., {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Jarrett}, T., {Thornley}, M., {Bot}, B., and {Kennicutt}, R.~C.: 2007,

1642: \newblock {\em \aj} {\it submitted}

1643: 

1644: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Hora} et~al.}{2004}]{Hora04}

1645: {Hora}, J.~L., {Fazio}, G.~G., {Allen}, L.~E., {Ashby}, M.~L.~N., {Barmby}, P.,

1646:   {Deutsch}, L.~K., {Huang}, J.~S., {Marengo}, M., {Megeath}, S.~T., {Melnick},

1647:   G.~J., {Pahre}, M.~A., {Patten}, B.~M., {Smith}, H.~A., {Wang}, Z.,

1648:   {Willner}, S.~P., {Hoffmann}, W.~F., {Pipher}, J.~L., {Forrest}, W.~J.,

1649:   {McMurtry}, C.~W., {McCreight}, C.~R., {McKelvey}, M.~E., {McMurray}, Jr.,

1650:   R.~E., {Moseley}, S.~H., {Arendt}, R.~G., {Mentzell}, J.~E., {Marx}, C.~T.,

1651:   {Fixsen}, D.~J., {Tollestrup}, E.~V., {Eisenhardt}, P.~R., {Stern}, D.,

1652:   {Gorjian}, V., {Bhattacharya}, B., {Carey}, S.~J., {Glaccum}, W.~J., {Lacy},

1653:   M.~D., {Lowrance}, P.~J., {Laine}, S.~J., {Nelson}, B.~O., {Reach}, W.~T.,

1654:   {Stauffer}, J.~R., {Surace}, J.~A., {Wilson}, G., and {Wright}, E.~L.: 2004,

1655: \newblock in J.~C. {Mather} (ed.), {\em Microwave and Terahertz Photonics.

1656:   Edited by Stohr, Andreas; Jager, Dieter; Iezekiel, Stavros. Proceedings of

1657:   the SPIE, Volume 5487, pp. 77-92 (2004).}, pp 77--92

1658: 

1659: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Jarrett}}{2005}]{IRACaper}

1660: {Jarrett}, J.: 2005,

1661: \newblock {\em IRAC: Extended Source Calibration}

1662: 

1663: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Kamphuis} et~al.}{2007}]{Kamphuis07}

1664: {Kamphuis}, P., {Holwerda}, B.~W., {Allen},R.~J., {Peletier}, R.~F., and {van der Kruit}, P.~C.

1665: \newblock {\em \aa} {\it in prep }

1666: 

1667: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Keel} and {White}}{2001a}]{kw01a}

1668: {Keel}, W.~C. and {White}, R.~E.: 2001a,

1669: \newblock {\em \aj} {\bf 121}, 1442

1670: 

1671: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Keel} and {White}}{2001b}]{kw01b}

1672: {Keel}, W.~C. and {White}, R.~E.: 2001b,

1673: \newblock {\em \aj} {\bf 122}, 1369

1674: 

1675: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Kennicutt} et~al.}{2003}]{sings}

1676: {Kennicutt}, R.~C., {Armus}, L., {Bendo}, G., {Calzetti}, D., {Dale}, D.~A.,

1677:   {Draine}, B.~T., {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Gordon}, K.~D., {Grauer}, A.~D.,

1678:   {Helou}, G., {Hollenbach}, D.~J., {Jarrett}, T.~H., {Kewley}, L.~J.,

1679:   {Leitherer}, C., {Li}, A., {Malhotra}, S., {Regan}, M.~W., {Rieke}, G.~H.,

1680:   {Rieke}, M.~J., {Roussel}, H., {Smith}, J.~T., {Thornley}, M.~D., and

1681:   {Walter}, F.: 2003,

1682: \newblock {\em \pasp} {\bf 115}, 928

1683: 

1684: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Li} and {Draine}}{2001}]{Li01}

1685: {Li}, A. and {Draine}, B.~T.: 2001,

1686: \newblock {\em \apj} {\bf 554}, 778

1687: 

1688: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{MacGillivray}}{1975}]{MacGillivray75}

1689: {MacGillivray}, H.~T.: 1975,

1690: \newblock {\em \mnras} {\bf 170}, 241

1691: 

1692: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Meijerink} et~al.}{2005}]{Meijerink05}

1693: {Meijerink}, R., {Tilanus}, R.~P.~J., {Dullemond}, C.~P., {Israel}, F.~P., and

1694:   {van der Werf}, P.~P.: 2005,

1695: \newblock {\em \aap} {\bf 430}, 427

1696: 

1697: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Meyer} et~al.}{2006}]{Martin06}

1698: {Meyer}, M., {Calzetti}, D., and {Regan}, M.: 2006,

1699: \newblock {\em in preparation}

1700: 

1701: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Misiriotis} and {Bianchi}}{2002}]{Misiriotis02}

1702: {Misiriotis}, A. and {Bianchi}, S.: 2002,

1703: \newblock {\em \aap} {\bf 384}, 866

1704: 

1705: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Muzerolle} et~al.}{2005}]{MIPSaper}

1706: {Muzerolle}, J., {Gordon}, K., {Engelbracht}, C., and {Stansberry}, J.: 2005,

1707: \newblock {\em MIPS aperture corrections}

1708: 

1709: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Natta} and {Panagia}}{1984}]{Natta84}

1710: {Natta}, A. and {Panagia}, N.: 1984,

1711: \newblock {\em \apj} {\bf 287}, 228

1712: 

1713: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Nelson} et~al.}{1998}]{Nelson98}

1714: {Nelson}, A.~E., {Zaritsky}, D., and {Cutri}, R.~M.: 1998,

1715: \newblock {\em \aj} {\bf 115}, 2273

1716: 

1717: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{P\'{e}rez-Gonz\'{a}lez} et~al.}{2006}]{PG06}

1718: {P\'{e}rez-Gonz\'{a}lez}, P.~G., {Kennicutt}, Jr., R.~C., {Gordon}, K.~D.,

1719:   {Misselt}, K.~A., {Gil de Paz}, A., {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Rieke}, G.~H.,

1720:   {Bendo}, G.~J., {Bianchi}, L., {Boissier}, S., {Calzetti}, D., {Dale}, D.~A.,

1721:   {Draine}, B.~T., {Jarrett}, T.~H., {Hollenbach}, D., and {Prescott},

1722:   M.~K.~M.: 2006,

1723: \newblock {\em \apj} {\bf 648}, 987 

1724: 

1725: \bibitem[Piovan et al.(2006)]{Piovan06} Piovan, L., Tantalo, R., 

1726: \& Chiosi, C.\ 2006, 

1727: \newblock {\em \mnras} {\bf 366}, 923 

1728: 

1729: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Popescu} et~al.}{2000}]{Popescu00}

1730: {Popescu}, C.~C., {Misiriotis}, A., {Kylafis}, N.~D., {Tuffs}, R.~J., and

1731:   {Fischera}, J.: 2000,

1732: \newblock {\em \aap} {\bf 362}, 138

1733: 

1734: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Popescu} and {Tuffs}}{2003}]{Popescu03}

1735: {Popescu}, C.~C. and {Tuffs}, R.~J.: 2003,

1736: \newblock {\em \aap} {\bf 410}, L21

1737: 

1738: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Popescu} and {Tuffs}}{2005}]{Popescu05rev}

1739: {Popescu}, C.~C. and {Tuffs}, R.~J.: 2005,

1740: \newblock in {\em AIP Conf. Proc. 761: The Spectral Energy Distributions of

1741:   Gas-Rich Galaxies: Confronting Models with Data}, pp 155--+

1742: 

1743: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Radovich} et~al.}{2001}]{Radovich01}

1744: {Radovich}, M., {Kahanp{\"a}{\"a}}, J., and {Lemke}, D.: 2001,

1745: \newblock {\em \aap} {\bf 377}, 73

1746: 

1747: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Regan} et~al.}{2004}]{Regan04}

1748: {Regan}, M.~W., {Thornley}, M.~D., {Bendo}, G.~J., {Draine}, B.~T., {Li}, A.,

1749:   {Dale}, D.~A., {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Kennicutt}, R.~C., {Armus}, L.,

1750:   {Calzetti}, D., {Gordon}, K.~D., {Helou}, G., {Hollenbach}, D.~J., {Jarrett},

1751:   T.~H., {Kewley}, L.~J., {Leitherer}, C., {Malhotra}, S., {Meyer}, M.,

1752:   {Misselt}, K.~A., {Morrison}, J.~E., {Murphy}, E.~J., {Muzerolle}, J.,

1753:   {Rieke}, G.~H., {Rieke}, M.~J., {Roussel}, H., {Smith}, J.-D.~T., and

1754:   {Walter}, F.: 2004,

1755: \newblock {\em \apjs} {\bf 154}, 204

1756: 

1757: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Rosolowsky}}{2005}]{Rosolowsky05}

1758: {Rosolowsky}, E.: 2005,

1759: \newblock {\em \pasp} {\bf 117}, 1403

1760: 

1761: \bibitem[Seth et al.(2005)]{Seth05} Seth, A.~C., Dalcanton, 

1762: J.~J., \& de Jong, R.~S.\ 2005, 

1763: \newblock {\em \aj}, {\bf 130}, 1574 

1764: 

1765: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Shapley}}{1951}]{Shapley51}

1766: {Shapley}, H. (ed.): 1951,

1767: \newblock {\em Proceedings of the National Academy of Science} {\bf 37}, 133 

1768: 

1769: \bibitem[Silva et al.(1998)]{Silva} Silva, L., Granato, 

1770: G.~L., Bressan, A., \& Danese, L.\ 1998, 

1771: \newblock {\em \apj} {\bf 509}, 103 

1772: 

1773: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{SINGS team}}{2006}]{dr4}

1774: {SINGS team}: 2006,

1775: \newblock {\em SINGS fourth data delivery release notes},

1776: 

1777: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Solomon} et~al.}{1987}]{Solomon87}

1778: {Solomon}, P.~M., {Rivolo}, A.~R., {Barrett}, J., and {Yahil}, A.: 1987,

1779: \newblock {\em \apj} {\bf 319}, 730

1780: 

1781: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Thornley} et~al.}{2006}]{Thornley06}

1782: {Thornley}, M.~D., {Braine}, J., and {Gardan}, E.: 2006,

1783: \newblock {\em \apjl} {\bf 651}, L101

1784: 

1785: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Trewhella} et~al.}{2000}]{Trewhella00}

1786: {Trewhella}, M., {Davies}, J.~I., {Alton}, P.~B., {Bianchi}, S., and {Madore},

1787:   B.~F.: 2000,

1788: \newblock {\em \apj} {\bf 543}, 153

1789: 

1790: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Tuffs} and {Popescu}}{2005}]{Tuffs05rev}

1791: {Tuffs}, R.~J. and {Popescu}, C.~C.: 2005,

1792: \newblock in {\em AIP Conf. Proc. 761: The Spectral Energy Distributions of

1793:   Gas-Rich Galaxies: Confronting Models with Data}, pp 344--+

1794: 

1795: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Wesselink}}{1961}]{Wesselink61b}

1796: {Wesselink}, A.~J.: 1961,

1797: \newblock {\em \mnras} {\bf 122}, 509

1798: 

1799: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{White} and {Keel}}{1992}]{kw92}

1800: {White}, R.~E. and {Keel}, W.~C.: 1992,

1801: \newblock {\em \nat} {\bf 359}, 129

1802: 

1803: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{White} et~al.}{2000}]{kw00a}

1804: {White}, R.~E., {Keel}, W.~C., and {Conselice}, C.~J.: 2000,

1805: \newblock {\em \apj} {\bf 542}, 761

1806: 

1807: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Witt} and {Gordon}}{2000}]{Witt00}

1808: {Witt}, A.~N. and {Gordon}, K.~D.: 2000,

1809: \newblock {\em \apj} {\bf 528}, 799

1810: 

1811: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Xilouris} et~al.}{1999}]{Xilouris99}

1812: {Xilouris}, E.~M., {Byun}, Y.~I., {Kylafis}, N.~D., {Paleologou}, E.~V., and

1813:   {Papamastorakis}, J.: 1999,

1814: \newblock {\em \aap} {\bf 344}, 868

1815: 

1816: \end{thebibliography}

1817: 

1818: 

1819: