1: \documentclass[aaspp4]{aastex}
2:
3: %Axon comments: 27/02/2007
4: %revision after referee report: May 3rd, May 28, 2007, June 6-28,2007
5: %\documentclass[twocolumn]{emulateapj}
6: %\newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
7: %\newcommand{\SN}{$S/N$}
8: %\newcommand{\AN}{$A/N$}
9: %\newcommand{\Ha}{H$\alpha$}
10: %\newcommand{\Hb}{H$\beta$}
11: %\newcommand{\Hg}{H$\gamma$}
12: %\newcommand{\lda}{$\lambda$}
13: %\newcommand{\mgb}{Mg$b$}
14: %\newcommand{\mgt}{Mg$_2$}
15: %\newcommand{\OI}{[{\sc O$\,$i}]}
16: %\newcommand{\OII}{[{\sc O$\,$ii}]}
17: %\newcommand{\OIII}{[{\sc O$\,$iii}]}
18: %\newcommand{\NI}{[{\sc N$\,$i}]}
19: %\newcommand{\NII}{[{\sc N$\,$ii}]}
20: %\newcommand{\NeIII}{[{\sc Ne$\,$iii}]}
21: %\newcommand{\SII}{[{\sc S$\,$ii}]}
22: %\newcommand{\HI}{{\sc H$\,$i}}
23: %\newcommand{\H{\sc\,ii}}{{\sc H$\,$ii}}
24: %\newcommand{\plm}{$\, \pm \,$}
25: %\newcommand{\Vsys}{$V_\mathrm{sys}$}
26: %\newcommand{\Vrot}{$V_\mathrm{rot}$}
27: %\newcommand{\Vrad}{$V_\mathrm{rad}$}
28: %\newcommand{\epot}{$\varepsilon$}
29: %\newcommand{\OIwa}{\hbox{[O\,{\sc i}]$\lambda $6300}}
30: %\newcommand{\OIwb}{\hbox{[O\,{\sc i}]$\lambda $6364}}
31: %\newcommand{\OIww}{\hbox{[O\,{\sc i}]$\lambda\lambda $6300,6364}}
32: %\newcommand{\Haw}{\hbox{H$\alpha$\,$\lambda $6563}}
33: %\newcommand{\NIIwa}{\hbox{[N\,{\sc ii}]$\lambda $6548}}
34: %\newcommand{\NIIwb}{\hbox{[N\,{\sc ii}]$\lambda $6583}}
35: %\newcommand{\NIIww}{\hbox{[N\,{\sc ii}]$\lambda\lambda $6548,6583}}
36: %\newcommand{\SIIwc}{\hbox{[S\,{\sc ii}]$\lambda $6717}}
37: %\newcommand{\SIIwd}{\hbox{[S\,{\sc ii}]$\lambda $6731}}
38: %\newcommand{\SIIww}{\hbox{[S\,{\sc ii}]$\lambda\lambda $6717,6731}}
39: %\def\kms{$\mbox{km s}^{-1}$}
40: %\def\Myr{$\mbox{M}_\odot\mbox{ yr}^{-1}$}
41: %\def\etal{et al.~}
42: \def\deg{$^\circ$}
43: %\def\asim{\mathord{\sim}}
44:
45: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
46: \slugcomment{To appear in \apj}
47:
48: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
49: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
50: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
51: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
52: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
53: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
54: %\shorttitle{Nuclear spirals as feeding channels to the Supermassive Black Hole}
55: %\shortauthors{Storchi-Bergmann et al.}
56:
57: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
58: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
59:
60: \begin{document}
61:
62: \title{Nuclear spirals as feeding channels to the Supermassive
63: Black Hole: the case of the galaxy NGC\,6951}
64: % \altaffilmark{1}}
65:
66:
67: \author{Thaisa Storchi-Bergmann, Oli L. Dors Jr. \& Rogemar A. Riffel}
68: \affil{Instituto de F\'\i sica, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento
69: Gon\c calves 9500, 91501-970 Porto Alegre RS, Brazil}
70: %\email{thaisa@ufrgs.br}
71:
72:
73: \author{Kambiz Fathi}
74: \affil{Instituto de Astrof\'\i sica de Canarias, C/ V\'\i a L\'actea s/n, 38200 La Laguna,
75: Tenerife, Spain }
76: %\email{fathi@iac.es}
77:
78:
79: \author{David J. Axon}
80: \affil{Physics Department, Rochester Institute of Technology,
81: 85 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, New York 14623, USA}
82:
83: \author{Andrew Robinson }
84: \affil{Physics Department, Rochester Institute of Technology,
85: 85 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, New York 14623, USA}
86:
87: \author{Alessandro Marconi}
88: \affil{INAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri,
89: Largo Fermi 5, I-50125 Firenze, Italy}
90:
91: \author{G\"oran \"Ostlin}
92: \affil{Stockholm Observatory, AlbaNova University Center, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden}
93:
94: %\altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations with the HST/ACS and GMOS-IFU observations}
95:
96:
97:
98: \begin{abstract}
99:
100: We report the discovery of gas streaming motions along nuclear
101: spiral arms towards the LINER nucleus of the galaxy NGC\,6951.
102: The observations, obtained
103: using the GMOS integral field spectrograph on the Gemini North
104: telescope, yielded maps of the flux distributions and gas kinematics
105: in the H$\alpha$, [N{\sc\,ii}]$\lambda$6584 and
106: [S{\sc\,ii}]$\lambda\lambda$6717,31
107: emission lines of the inner 7\arcsec$\times$15\arcsec\ of the galaxy.
108: This region includes a circumnuclear star-forming ring with radius $\sim$500\,pc,
109: a nuclear spiral inside the ring and the LINER nucleus.
110: The kinematics of the ionized gas is dominated by rotation, but
111: subtraction of a kinematic model of a rotating exponential disk reveals
112: deviations from circular rotation within the nuclear ring
113: which can be attributed to (1) streaming motions along the nuclear
114: spiral arms and (2) a bipolar outflow which seems to be
115: associated to a nuclear jet.
116: On the basis of the observed streaming velocities and geometry
117: of the spiral arms we estimate a mass inflow rate of ionized gas
118: of $\approx\,3\times\,10^{-4}$M$_\odot$\,yr$^{-1}$, which is
119: of the order of the accretion rate necessary to power the
120: LINER nucleus of NGC\,6951. Similar streaming motions towards
121: the nucleus of another galaxy with LINER nucleus -- NGC\,1097 --
122: have been reported by our group in a previous paper. Taken together,
123: these results support a scenario in which nuclear
124: spirals are channels through which matter is transferred
125: from galactic scales to the nuclear region to feed the
126: supermassive black hole.
127:
128: %Observations by other authors of
129: %a large mass of molecular gas in the nuclear spiral
130: %suggests that the total mass flow rate is larger than
131: %the one observed in ionized gas, what could cause the accumulation
132: %of an excess mass which could give origin to circumnuclear bursts
133: %of star-formation, as observed around many AGN.
134: %Mass inflows along nuclear spirals could thus not only feed the nuclear SMBH but
135: %also contribute to the growth of the bulge of the galaxy via
136: %episodes of star formation.
137:
138:
139: \end{abstract}
140:
141:
142: \keywords{Galaxies: active, Galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, Galaxies: nuclei,
143: Galaxies: individual (NGC\,6951)}
144:
145:
146:
147: \section{Introduction}
148:
149: One long-standing problem in the study of nuclear activity in
150: galaxies is to understand how mass is transferred from galactic
151: scales down to nuclear scales to feed the supermassive black hole
152: (hereafter SMBH) inside. Many theoretical studies
153: and simulations (Shlosman et al. 1990; Emsellem et al. 2003; Knapen 2005;
154: Emsellem et al. 2006) have shown that non-axisymmetric
155: potentials efficiently promote gas
156: inflow towards the inner regions (Englmaier \& Shlosman 2004).
157: Recent observations have revealed that
158: structures such as small-scale disks or nuclear bars and associated
159: spiral arms are frequently observed in the inner kiloparsec of active
160: galaxies (Erwin \& Sparke 1999; Pogge \& Martini 2002;
161: Laine et al. 2003).
162:
163: In a recent work, Lopes et al. (2007)
164: have shown a strong correlation between the presence of nuclear
165: dust structures (filaments, spirals and disks) and activity
166: in galaxies. Nuclear spirals, in particular,
167: are estimated to reside in more
168: than half of active galaxies (Martini et al. 2003).
169: Martini \& Pogge (1999) have shown that nuclear spirals are not
170: self-gravitating, and that they are likely to be shocks in nuclear
171: gas disks. Simulations by Maciejewski (2004a,b) demonstrated that, if a central SMBH
172: is present, spiral shocks can extend all the way to the SMBH vicinity and
173: generate gas inflow consistent with the accretion rates inferred in
174: local AGN.
175:
176: The above studies support the
177: hypothesis that nuclear spirals are a mechanism for fueling
178: the nuclear SMBH, transporting gas from kiloparsec
179: scales down to a few tens of parsecs of the active
180: nucleus (Knapen et al. 2000; Emsellem et al. 2001;
181: Maciejewski et al. 2002; Marconi et al. 2003;
182: Crenshaw et al. 2003; Fathi et al. 2005).
183: This hypothesis has recently been confirmed by our
184: group (Fathi et al. 2006) in the specific case of
185: the LINER/Seyfert 1 galaxy NGC\,1097.
186: Using Integral Field Spectroscopy at the Gemini telescope
187: we mapped the velocity field of the ionized gas and
188: detected streaming motions towards the nucleus
189: along nuclear spiral arms.
190:
191: NGC\,1097 is the only case so far in which
192: streaming motions along nuclear spiral arms have been mapped.
193: In order to verify if such spirals are always associated with inward
194: streaming motions it is necessary to map the
195: gas kinematics in more galaxies. With this
196: goal in mind, we have obtained Gemini Integral Field
197: spectroscopic observations of a few more active galaxies
198: with nuclear spirals observed in HST images.
199: The sample was selected from nearby galaxies (z$<$0.005)
200: with intermediate inclinations, to facilitate study of the gas
201: kinematics on linear distance scales of tens of parsecs.
202:
203:
204: In the present paper we report the results for
205: NGC\,6951, a galaxy with Hubble type SAB(rs)bc,
206: at a distance of 24\,Mpc (Tully 1988), such that 1 arcsec
207: corresponds to 96\,pc at the galaxy.
208: Originally it was argued that NGC\,6951 has a LINER type nucleus
209: (Filippenko \& Sargent 1985), but
210: more recently it has been suggested that actually its activity
211: is intermediate between LINER and Seyfert
212: (P\'erez et al. 2000). NGC\,6951 hosts a large
213: scale bar (with total extent of $\sim$4\,kpc), and
214: at about 5\arcsec\ (480\,pc) from the nucleus, there is a
215: conspicuous star-forming ring, previously observed in H$\alpha$
216: (M\'arquez \& Moles 1993; P\'erez et al. 2000) and showing
217: also strong CO and HCN emission (Kohno et al. 1999,
218: Garcia-Burillo et al. 2005, Krips et al. 2007). Continuum radio emission
219: has also been observed from the nucleus and star-forming
220: ring by Saikia et al. (1994), while a higher resolution radio
221: image can be found in Ho \& Ulvestad (2001).
222:
223:
224: Our IFU measurements show that, similarly to NGC\,1097,
225: the gas kinematics inside the nuclear ring of NGC\,6951,
226: although dominated by circular rotation, shows deviations
227: in the measured radial velocities which can be interpreted
228: as at least partially due to streaming inward motions along nuclear spiral arms.
229: Our results strenghten the case that nuclear spirals
230: are indeed channels to feed the supermassive black hole in
231: active galaxies.
232:
233: The present paper is organized as follows. In Section 2
234: we describe the observations and reductions. In Section 3
235: we present the flux and kinematic measurements. In Section 4
236: we discuss the results and in Section 5 we present
237: our conclusions.
238:
239:
240: \section{Observations and Reductions}
241:
242: The observations were obtained with the Integral Field Unit of
243: the Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph (GMOS-IFU, Allington-Smith et
244: al. 2002) at the Gemini North telescope, on
245: the nights of August 31 and September 1, 2006. The observations
246: consisted of three adjacent IFU fields
247: (covering $ 5 \times 7 \: \rm arcsec^{2}$ each) resulting in a total
248: angular coverage of $ 7 \times 15 \: \rm arcsec^{2}$ around
249: the nucleus. Three exposures of 500\,s were obtained for each
250: of the 3 IFU fields, slightly shifted in order to correct
251: for detector defects.
252: Observations of the three IFU fields were
253: obtained consecutively on the same night. The fluxes in adjacent IFU
254: pixels from neighbouring fields were found to be consistent within 10\%.
255: Therefore, no shifts or scaling were applied when combining the
256: three fields to obtain the final mosaic.
257:
258:
259: The longest extent of the three adjacent IFU fields was
260: oriented along position angle (hereafter PA) 140$^\circ$,
261: selected to approximately coincide with the major axis of the galaxy,
262: (PA=138\deg\ according to M\'arquez \& Moles 1993), while
263: the large scale bar is oriented approximately along E--W.
264: Each IFU fiber has a diameter which corresponds to
265: 0.2\,\arcsec\ in the sky, while the seeing
266: during the observations ranged between 0.4 and 0.5\,\arcsec,
267: corresponding to a spatial resolution at the galaxy of $\approx$\,40\,pc.
268:
269:
270: The selected wavelength range was 5600--7000\AA,
271: in order to cover the H$\alpha$+[N{\sc\,ii}]$\lambda\lambda$6548,84
272: and [S{\sc\,ii}]$\lambda\lambda$6716,31
273: emission lines, observed with the grating GMOS R400-G5325 (set to central
274: wavelength $\approx$ 6300 \AA), with an instrumental FWHM of
275: 2.9\AA, corresponding to a spectral resolution
276: of R$\approx 2\,300$ ($\approx 130$\,km\,s$^{-1}$).
277:
278:
279:
280: The data reduction was performed using
281: the specific tasks developed for GMOS data in the
282: {\sc gemini.gmos} package as well as generic tasks in {\sc iraf}.
283: The reduction process comprised
284: bias subtraction, flat-fielding, trimming, wavelength calibration,
285: sky subtraction, relative flux calibration, building of the data cubes
286: at a sampling of 0.1$\arcsec$\,$\times$\,0.1$\arcsec$,
287: and finally the alignment and combination of the 9 data cubes.
288: As we have obtained only relative flux calibration (what is called
289: in Gemini ``baseline calibrations''), we have normalized the flux
290: levels using the H$\alpha$ nuclear flux
291: reported by Perez et al. (2000).
292:
293:
294: \section{Results}
295:
296: In Figure~\ref{image} we show the acquisition image with
297: the location of the three IFU fields, together with
298: an image obtained from the IFU data in the continuum
299: adjacent to the H$\alpha$ emission-line.
300: The IFU observations cover the nuclear region out to the star-forming ring,
301: more clearly seen in the H$\alpha$ and [N{\sc\,ii}] images shown in
302: Fig.~\ref{flux_ratios}. The H$\alpha$ and [N{\sc\,ii}] emission lines
303: could be measured over most of the $ 7 \times 15 \: \rm arcsec^{2}$ field,
304: except for a few locations which appear in black in Fig.~\ref{flux_ratios}. For the
305: [S{\sc\,ii}] emission lines, there are more locations where the lines could not be measured due to the low signal-to-noise ratio in these lines.
306:
307: \clearpage
308: \begin{figure*}
309: \centering
310: %\vspace{-6cm}
311: %\hspace{-3cm}
312: \epsscale{1}
313: \plotone{f1.eps}
314: \caption{Left: The acquisition image in the R-band showing
315: the three IFU fields covered by the observations. Right: Image
316: obtained from the IFU spectra in the continuum adjacent to the H$\alpha$+[N{\sc\,ii}]
317: emission lines. The sampling of the data is 0.1\arcsec$\times$0.1\arcsec, and the seeing was $\approx$0.4\arcsec.}
318: \label{image}
319: \end{figure*}
320: \clearpage
321:
322:
323: In Figure~\ref{spectra} we show a sample of spectra: one from the
324: nucleus, one from the star-forming ring and two from locations between
325: the nucleus and the ring. The emission-lines present in most spectra are H$\alpha$,
326: [N{\sc\,ii}]$\lambda\lambda$6548,84 and
327: [S{\sc\,ii}]$\lambda\lambda$6717,31.
328: The lines [O{\sc\,i}]$\lambda\lambda$6300,63
329: were marginally detected only in a few spectra, and were not considered
330: in our analysis due to the poor signal-to-noise ratio (in these lines).
331: The emission-line spectrum from the nucleus is LINER-like ([N{\sc\,ii}]$\lambda$6584
332: stronger than H$\alpha$), as already known from previous works (e.g. Filippenko \& Sargent 1985). More recently, Ho, Fillipenko \& Sargent (1997) have
333: argued that the nuclear activity is better classified as Seyfert 2,
334: after an analysis of the nuclear spectrum
335: taking into account the effect of the underlying stellar absorption
336: in the fluxes of the Balmer lines. P\'erez et al. (2000),
337: after a similar analysis, conclude that the nuclear activity of NGC\,6951
338: is intermediate between LINER and Seyfert 2. Our data are consistent with
339: all these classifications, as our restricted wavelength coverage does
340: not allow the observation of additional line ratios necessary to
341: distinguish between the different types of activity.
342:
343: The emission-line ratios in the star-forming ring
344: are typical of H{\sc\,ii} regions, while
345: in the regions between the nucleus and the ring, the line-ratios are
346: also mostly LINER-like, turning to ``H{\sc\,ii}-like'' as the star-forming ring
347: is approached.
348: \clearpage
349: \begin{figure*}
350: \plotone{f2.eps}
351: \caption{Sample of spectra, with the corresponding locations identified in
352: the IFU image obtained from the integrated flux in the H$\alpha$
353: emission line (central panel). Upper right: the nuclear spectrum;
354: upper left: a spectrum from the star-forming ring; bottom left and right:
355: spectra from regions between the nucleus and star-forming ring.}
356: \label{spectra}
357: \end{figure*}
358: \clearpage
359:
360: \subsection{Line fluxes and excitation of the emitting gas}
361:
362: The line fluxes, radial velocities and velocity dispersions were obtained
363: by fitting Gaussians to the emission-lines, which accurately
364: represent the observed line profiles. The H$\alpha$ image,
365: obtained from the integrated H$\alpha$ flux is shown in
366: Fig.~\ref{flux_ratios}, together with the image in the
367: adjacent continuum. Most spectra have signal-to-noise ratios
368: in the H$\alpha$ and [N{\sc\,ii}] emission lines larger than 50.
369:
370: The star-forming ring is clearly seen in the H$\alpha$ image,
371: formed by several H{\sc\,ii} regions which appear as emission-line knots
372: along the ring. The ring is more extended along the major axis of the galaxy
373: (PA$\sim$140\deg), where it reaches $\approx$ 4.5\arcsec\ from the nucleus
374: (430\,pc at the galaxy),
375: while in the perpendicular direction it reaches only $\approx$ 2.5\arcsec.
376: %If the ring is circular and is located in the plane of the galaxy, then
377: %it can be concluded that the galaxy plane is inclined by $\approx$
378: %56\deg=cos$^{-1}$(2.5/4.5) relative to the plane of the sky. This is
379: %somewhat larger than the value i=42\deg\ obtained by M\'arquez \& Moles (1993) from
380: %the photometry of the galaxy disk.
381:
382: The line ratio map [N{\sc\,ii}]/H$\alpha$, obtained from the ratio
383: of the images in [N{\sc\,ii}]$\lambda$6584
384: and H$\alpha$, as well as the [S{\sc\,ii}]$\lambda$6717/$\lambda$6731
385: ratio map are also shown in Fig.~\ref{flux_ratios}.
386: Prior to the construction of the map [N{\sc\,ii}]/H$\alpha$
387: we have corrected the H$\alpha$ line fluxes by an average
388: underlying absorption due to the stellar population
389: with an equivalenth width of 0.75\AA.
390: This procedure is necessary in order to avoid unphysical very high ratios
391: of [N{\sc\,ii}]/H$\alpha$ and is supported by the inspection of a few
392: spectra which reveal that where H$\alpha$ emission is very faint
393: the line is indeed obviously filling an absorption. The average value of
394: 0.75\AA\ was adopted from the work of P\'erez et al. (2000)
395: who estimated an absorption equivalent width of H$\alpha$ of 1\AA\ at
396: the nucleus and 0.5\AA\ at the ring on the basis of the analysis of the
397: stellar population. We thus decided to adopt an average value
398: between that of the nucleus and that of the ring, as the resulting
399: corrected fluxes did not change by more than $\sim$20\% at the nucleus and
400: $\sim$10\% at the ring if we change the underlying absorption
401: by 0.25\AA.
402:
403:
404: The highest [N{\sc\,ii}]/H$\alpha$ line ratios reach values of 4-5
405: within a $\approx$1\arcsec\ radius from the nucleus, decreasing to 2-3 between
406: 1\arcsec\ and 2\arcsec\ and down to $\approx$0.3 at the circumnuclear ring.
407:
408: The ratio [S{\sc\,ii}]$\lambda$6717/$\lambda$6731 reaches a minimum value
409: of $\approx$0.8, implying a maximum gas density of $\approx\,10^3$\,cm$^{-3}$ within
410: $\approx$\,1\arcsec\ from the nucleus (Osterbrock 1989). At the
411: star-forming ring, the [S{\sc\,ii}]
412: ratio ranges from 1 to 1.4, with typical values at most locations between
413: 1.1 and 1.2, implying gas densities in the range 250--400\,cm$^{-3}$.
414: At the borders of the ring, the low-density limit value of 1.4 ($<$100\,cm$^{-3}$)
415: is reached. In most locations between the nucleus and the ring,
416: the signal-to-noise ratio was too low to get a reliable value for the [S{\sc\,ii}]
417: ratio. In many location where it could be measured, it was in the low-density
418: limit. In order to investigate this further, we have binned 9 spectra
419: together (which corresponds to 0.3\,$\times$\,0.3\,arcsec$^2$,
420: and thus approximately to the angular resolution of the data)
421: in several locations and got ratios in the range 1.2$<$[S{\sc\,ii}]6717/6731$<$1.4, thus somewhat above the low-density limit,
422: implying ionized gas densities of $\sim$100\,cm$^{-3}$, which we will
423: adopt as the typical value for this region.
424:
425: \clearpage
426: \begin{figure*}
427: \epsscale{1}
428: \plotone{f3.eps}
429: \caption{From left to right: map of the continuum flux adjacent to H$\alpha$
430: (in units of erg\,cm$^{-2}$\,s$^{-1}$\,\AA$^{-1}$ per pixel);
431: map of the H$\alpha$ integrated flux (erg\,cm$^{-2}$\,s$^{-1}$ per pixel);
432: line-ratio maps [N{\sc\,ii}]/H$\alpha$ and [S{\sc\,ii}]6717/6731.}
433: \label{flux_ratios}
434: \end{figure*}
435: \clearpage
436:
437:
438: \subsection{Kinematics}
439:
440: The central wavelengths of the Gaussian curves fitted to the emission-lines
441: were used to obtain the gas radial velocities, while the full widths at half
442: maxima (FWHM) were used to obtain the gas velocity dispersions
443: ($\sigma=$FWHM/2.355). The accuracy of the velocity measurements is $\approx$10\,km\,s$^{-1}$. The radial velocity
444: field obtained from H$\alpha$ is shown in the top left panel of
445: Fig.~\ref{radial_vel}. It is dominated
446: by rotation, as evidenced by its similarity to the classical ``spider diagram''
447: (Binney \& Merrifield 1998). (The pixels for which we could not measure the
448: kinematics due to low signal-to-noise ratio in the
449: emission lines are shown in black in the figure.)
450:
451:
452: There are, nevertheless, clear deviations from simple rotation in the
453: radial velocity field. In order to isolate these deviations,
454: we have fitted an exponential thin disk kinematic model to the
455: H$\alpha$ radial velocity data,
456: assuming that the density profile is exponential and its kinematics is
457: circular rotation (Freeman 1970; Binney \& Tremaine 1987).
458: The procedure is similar to the one we have adopted in modelling the
459: circumnuclear gas kinematics of
460: NGC\,1097 (Fathi et al. 2005; Fathi et al. 2006).
461: %The fit is based on a maximum disk
462: %hypothesis, and we thus assume that the dark matter content in the centre of
463: %this galaxy is not very high.
464: %, and thus the residuals show the effect of gravitational perturbation.
465: %Although our method follows some very
466: %simple assumptions, our past experience has shown that
467: %the fit returns realistic kinematic parameters for the scale length,
468: %orientation of the line of nodes and systemic velocity.
469:
470: The velocity field corresponding to the best fit is
471: shown in the top right panel of Fig.~\ref{radial_vel}. The fit to the model
472: gives a systemic velocity of 1450$\pm$20\,km\,s$^{-1}$, a deprojected
473: maximum velocity amplitude of 220$\pm$10\,km\,s$^{-1}$, a disk scale length of
474: 4.1\arcsec$\pm$0.3\,(390\,pc at the galaxy) and
475: a position angle for the line of nodes of PA=125\deg$\pm$10\deg. We have adopted
476: a disk inclination of $i=42$\deg, a value derived from photometry
477: (M\'arquez \& Moles 1993), because the inclination
478: is not well constrained in our multi-parameter space fitting procedure.
479:
480:
481:
482: \clearpage
483: \begin{figure*}
484: \epsscale{0.60}
485: \plotone{f4.eps}
486: \caption{Top left: the H$\alpha$ velocity field. Top right:
487: model velocity field. Bottom left: structure map.
488: Bottom Right: difference between observed and model velocity fields.
489: Curved lines with arrows identify two velocity structures
490: which deviate from the model: the ``W arm''\,(top) and
491: the ``E arm''\,(bottom). The small bar with arrows at the
492: nucleus in the bottom right panel represents a compact radio source (Saikia et al. 2002),
493: and the two white lines delineate a bi-cone within which we observe
494: an enhancement in the values of $\sigma$ (see Fig. \ref{sigma}).
495: The straight black line shows the location of the line of nodes.}
496: \label{radial_vel}
497: \end{figure*}
498: \clearpage
499:
500: A comparison between the measured radial velocity field and the
501: disk model reveals deviations from simple rotation.
502: These deviations are observed along the star-forming ring
503: as well as inside the ring, where, in particular,
504: we have identified two features resembling partial spiral arms
505: marked by two white curved lines with arrows
506: in Fig.~\ref{radial_vel}. In order to investigate
507: if these deviations correspond to real features in the galaxy, we have
508: constructed a structure map (Pogge \& Martini 2002) using an HST image
509: of the nuclear region of NGC\,6951 obtained through the filter F606W
510: (HST proposal 8597, PI M. Regan).
511: The structure map is useful to enhance the contrast in the images,
512: thus showing more clearly both dark structures -- regions obscured by dust,
513: as well as bright regions such as H{\sc\,ii} regions, a compact bright nucleus or star clusters.
514: The structure map is shown in the bottom left panel of Fig.~\ref{radial_vel},
515: where we have drawn the same white lines of the top left panel, showing that
516: the partial spiral arms follow the dusty spiral structure
517: seen in the structure map. Although there are more spiral arms
518: in the structure map than the two we see in the velocity residual map,
519: this difference can be understood as due to the
520: poorer angular resolution of the IFU data ($\approx$0.4\arcsec)
521: compared to that of the HST (0.05\arcsec),
522: which precludes us from establishing a more detailed correspondence.
523: In the bottom right panel of Fig.~\ref{radial_vel} we show the residuals between
524: the observed and the model velocity field, where the
525: white lines correspond again to the partial arm structures.
526: The top arm (hereafter called W arm)
527: corresponds to a blueshifted region in the residual map, while the bottom
528: arm (hereafter E arm) corresponds to a redshifted region.
529: There are aditional blue- and redshift residuals in the star forming ring
530: as well as close to the nucleus. The aditional velocity residuals
531: close to the nucleus in Fig.~\ref{radial_vel} are approximately delimited by
532: the borders of a ``bi-cone'', sketched in white in the figure, which corresponds
533: to regions in which we see an increase in the values of the velocity dispersion,
534: as discussed below.
535:
536:
537: The gas velocity dispersion ($\sigma$) maps in H$\alpha$ and [N{\sc\,ii}]
538: are shown in Fig.\,\ref{sigma}.
539: The instrumental $\sigma$ is $\approx$50\,km\,s$^{-1}$, thus it can be concluded that
540: many values, particularly for H$\alpha$, are at the resolution limit of the instrument.
541: The low values obtained for H$\alpha$ in some regions are due to the fact that, in the
542: region between the nucleus and the star-forming ring H$\alpha$ emission is
543: strongly affected by the underlying stellar absorption (discussed above),
544: which makes the observed emission line weaker and narrower.
545: On the other hand, the [N{\sc\,ii}] profile provides a reliable measure
546: of $\sigma$ because it is free of the contamination by stellar absorption.
547: Most $\sigma$ values range between 60 and 80\,km\,s$^{-1}$ but there are larger
548: values reaching 140\,km\,s$^{-1}$ in two blobs within $\approx$1\arcsec\ from
549: the nucleus to the S-SE and N-NW.
550:
551: \clearpage
552: \begin{figure*}
553: \epsscale{0.8}
554: \plotone{f5.eps}
555: \caption{Velocity dispersion maps in H$\alpha$ (left) and [N{\sc\,ii}]$\lambda$6584 (right).
556: The black bar with two arrows represents the compact nuclear radio source (Saikia et al. 2002), while the two white lines delineate the borders of a bi-cone, whithin which the highest $\sigma$ values are observed, probably due to stirring of the circumnuclear ISM by a nuclear radio jet.}
557: \label{sigma}
558: \end{figure*}
559: \clearpage
560:
561: What could be the origin of these enhancements in $\sigma$?
562: Our experience with previous IFU observations (of other targets; e.g. Riffel
563: et al. 2006; Barbosa et al. 2007), reveal that increases in
564: $\sigma$ in the gas surrounding AGN are usually related to the presence
565: of a passing radio jet. We searched the literature for a possible
566: nuclear radio jet and found that VLA observations by Saikia et al. (2002)
567: of the inner region of NGC\,6951 indeed suggest the presence
568: of a resolved nuclear radio source presenting an
569: angular size of 0.7$\times$0.2\,arcsec$^2$ along PA=156\deg. We show a
570: representation of this small radio source as a bar with
571: arrows in Fig.\,\ref{sigma} as well as
572: in the bottom right panel of Fig.\,\ref{radial_vel}. Notice that the
573: extent and orientation of this radio structure coincide with those of a bright similarly elongated nuclear structure seen in the structure map (bottom left panel of Fig.\,\ref{radial_vel}).
574: As the F606W filter used to obtain the HST image includes H$\alpha$,
575: this coincidence suggests that we are resolving enhanced H$\alpha$
576: emission associated with the radio structure in this image.
577:
578: It can be seen that the estimated extent of the radio source fits well in between
579: the two regions of enhanced $\sigma$ values in Fig.\,\ref{sigma}.
580: We have sketched (in white in the figure) the borders of a bi-cone
581: which includes the regions of largest $\sigma$ values. We notice that
582: the corresponding locations in Fig.~\ref{radial_vel} approximately
583: delimitate also a redshifted H$\alpha$ emitting region
584: to the N--NW and a blue-shifted region to the S--SE
585: observed in the residual H$\alpha$ velocity map (bottom right panel).
586: The observed increase in $\sigma$ along the bi-cone and
587: the presence of associated blue- and reshifts suggests that these two
588: structures are due to an outflow driven by the radio jet. The delineated
589: bi-cone in Figs. \ref{radial_vel} and \ref{sigma} approximately separates
590: the regions affected by the outflow from the regions affected by the
591: residual motion along the spiral arms.
592:
593:
594:
595: \section{Discussion}
596:
597:
598:
599: \subsection{Excitation}
600:
601: An extensive photometric and spectroscopic study of the galaxy NGC\,6951 has been presented
602: by P\'erez et al. (2000, hereafter P00). They adopt the disk major axis PA=138\deg\ and
603: have obtained longslit spectra (slit width of 1 arcsecond) along this PA as well as along PA=48\deg\ (minor axis) and PA=84\deg.
604:
605: P00 quote line ratio values of [N{\sc\,ii}]/H$\alpha$ larger than unity within the inner 2\arcsec,
606: reaching $\approx$5 at the nucleus, in agreement with our results. They present data within the nuclear region at a sampling of 0.5\arcsec\ (although the seeing was 1.2\arcsec\ during their observations). P00 report electron density values
607: increasing from N$_e\sim\,$300\,cm$^{-3}$ at the ring to $\sim\,$1000\,cm$^{-3}$ at the nucleus, also in agreement with our results.
608:
609: In order to further investigate the excitation, we have plotted in Fig.\,\ref{excitation}
610: the ratio [N{\sc\,ii}]/H$\alpha$ vs. the velocity dispersion obtained from the width of the
611: [N{\sc\,ii}]$\lambda$6584 emission-line $\sigma_{[N{\sc\,ii}]}$.
612: We have separated the data from the ring and from the region inside the ring
613: using the H$\alpha$ image to identify the region dominated by the ring.
614: In order to do this, we have fitted two ellipses: one to the inner border of the
615: ring and another to the outer border. Along the longest extent of the
616: ring (approximately along the vertical axis of the figures), the inner
617: border is located at 2.8\arcsec\ from the nucleus and the outer border
618: at 6.8\arcsec, while along the shortest extent of the ring
619: the inner border is at 2.0\arcsec\ and the outer border at 3.6\arcsec.
620:
621:
622: It can be seen that the behavior of the two regions
623: is clearly different: while for the ring most values of [N{\sc\,ii}]/H$\alpha$ are
624: in the range 0.3--0.4, typical of H{\sc\,ii} regions and show just a weak correlation
625: with $\sigma_{[N{\sc\,ii}]}$,
626: in the region inside the ring the [N{\sc\,ii}]/H$\alpha$ values are much higher
627: and present a strong correlation with $\sigma_{[N{\sc\,ii}]}$. This behavior has
628: been observed previously in other galaxies (e.g. Keppel et al. 1991;
629: Sokolowski et al. 1991; Storchi-Bergmann et al. 1996),
630: meaning that the gas excitation is related
631: to its kinematics, and suggest in particular that at least part of the
632: ionization is produced by shocks as shocks do enhance the [N{\sc\,ii}]/H$\alpha$
633: ratio (Viegas \& Contini 1994; Sutherland et al. 1993), as well as
634: broaden the emission-lines. The presence of shocks in the vicinity
635: of the nucleus is particularly evident in Fig.\,\ref{sigma}, where we
636: have shown that two regions which have the highest observed $\sigma$ values
637: are located at the ends of the nuclear radio structure, and can be interpreted
638: as gas from the interstellar medium of the galaxy shocked by
639: a radio jet.
640: \clearpage
641: \begin{figure*}
642: \plotone{f6.eps}
643: \caption{The ratio [N{\sc\,ii}]$\lambda$6584/H$\alpha$ as a function of the [N{\sc\,ii}]$\lambda$6584 velocity dispersion for the region inside the ring (top)
644: and for the ring (bottom).}
645: \label{excitation}
646: \end{figure*}
647: \clearpage
648: \subsection{The nuclear spiral}
649:
650: Garcia-Burillo et al. (2005, hereafter GB05) have obtained
651: molecular CO radio images of the inner region of NGC\,6951, showing that
652: most of the CO emission is concentrated in ``two winding nuclear spiral arms
653: which end up as a pseudo-ring at $\sim$\,350\,pc from the nucleus'',
654: with an estimated molecular gas mass of $\approx\,3\times10^8$\,M$_\odot$.
655: This nuclear spiral seen in molecular gas corresponds in fact to the
656: H$\alpha$ ring, whose strongest H$\alpha$ emission seems to be a bit external to the
657: strongest molecular gas emission.
658:
659: GB05 also report the observation of ``an unresolved nuclear complex''
660: within 50\,pc from the nucleus, estimating its mass to be a few $\sim10^6$\,M$_\odot$.
661: The presence of a relatively large molecular gas mass at the nucleus is supported also
662: by the recent mm-interferometric observations by Krips et al. (2007)
663: who have found compact HCN emission at the nucleus and estimate an even
664: larger mass for the corresponding molecular complex, of $\sim$\,2--10$\times\,10^7\,$M$_\odot$.
665: These observations support the
666: recent inflow of molecular gas to the nuclear region.
667:
668: Besides the nuclear complex, GB05 have also ``tentatively detected''
669: (their words) low level CO emission bridging the gap between
670: the nuclear source and the N part of the ring, with an estimated molecular mass of
671: $\sim\,10^7$\,M$_\odot$. GB05 argue that this structure could be the molecular
672: counterpart of the filamentary spiral structure identified in a
673: J--H color map of NGC\,6951 obtained from HST images. Their J--H map (Fig. 4a in GB05)
674: is very similar to the structure map we show
675: in the lower left panel of Fig.\,\ref{radial_vel}. A comparison of this
676: structure map with both our H$\alpha$ velocity map (upper left panel of Fig.\, \ref{radial_vel})
677: and Fig.\,4 of GB05 shows that their ``molecular bridge''
678: seems to partially coincide with the W arm structure seen in our
679: kinematic map, in particular with the ``inner end'' of our partial W arm.
680: A close look shows that the molecular bridge
681: seems to be associated with the darker regions of the structure map closer to the
682: nucleus (an thus with the dust structure) while our W partial arm
683: is better coincident with the brighter portions of the structure map, a bit
684: more distant from the nucleus.
685: A possible interpretation is that we are seeing two parts of a spiral arm:
686: a more external one, traced by H$\alpha$ emission, and a more
687: internal one, seen only in molecular gas emission, probably due to the
688: absence -- or faintness -- of ionized gas emission.
689:
690:
691:
692: \subsection{Kinematics}
693:
694: The rotation pattern in the H$\alpha$ radial velocity field
695: (Fig.\,\ref{radial_vel}) shows that the SE side of the galaxy is receding
696: while the NW side is approaching.
697: Under the assumption that the spiral arms are trailing, and that the
698: approaching side of the bar piles up the dust in front of it,
699: it can be concluded
700: that the near side of the galaxy is the SW, and the far side is the NE.
701: The deviations from circular rotation along the two partial spiral
702: arms in the inner 2--3\arcsec\ from the nucleus -- blueshifted
703: residuals along the W arm and redshifted
704: residuals along the E arm -- can thus be interpreted as
705: streaming motions along nuclear spiral arms towards the nucleus.
706:
707: Nevertheless, the residuals in this inner region extend beyond
708: the region covered by the E and W
709: arms drawn in Fig.\,\ref{radial_vel}: in particular, there
710: are additional blueshifts observed
711: to the S--SE of the nucleus and redshifts observed to the N--NW,
712: which seem to be a continuation of the E and W arms.
713: Nevertheless, at $\sim$1\arcsec N--NW and S--SE of the
714: nucleus, they are not consistent
715: with streaming motions towards the
716: nucleus. We conclude that these residuals are in fact
717: outflows due to the interaction
718: of the radio source at the nucleus (Saikia et al. 2002)
719: with the circumnuclear ISM of the galaxy.
720:
721: This hypothesis is supported by the increase in the
722: velocity dispersion of the gas from 70\,km\,s$^{-1}$ to 140\,km\,s$^{-1}$
723: along the position angle of the radio structure (PA=156\deg),
724: approximately within a region delineated by two white
725: lines representing the borders of a bi-cone in Fig.\,\ref{sigma}.
726: From the location of this
727: bi-cone in Fig.\,\ref{radial_vel}, we conclude that
728: the residual blueshifts at $\approx$1\arcsec N-NW
729: and redshifts at $\approx$1\arcsec S-SE of the nucleus are
730: observed in the regions corresponding to those with enhanced $\sigma$
731: and can be interpreted as outflows related to the radio source.
732:
733: The residuals from circular motion in the inner 3\arcsec\ thus
734: include two components: (1) streaming motions towards the nucleus
735: along spiral arms and (2) an outflow due to the interaction of
736: a radio source with the circumnuclear ISM of the galaxy. From the
737: relative intensity of the continuum observed in the structure map
738: in the location of the radio structure,
739: which is brighter to the side to which the residuals are blueshifts,
740: we suggest that the near side of the jet is projected against the
741: near side of the galaxy, which is possible only if its angle relative
742: to the galaxy plane is smaller than 48\deg, for the adopted inclination
743: of the galaxy of 42\deg.
744:
745: In the regions corresponding to the ring, there are also
746: radial velocity residuals relative to the circular rotation
747: which could be due to outflows from the starbursts along the ring
748: and/or deviations due to the accumulation of the gas in the
749: Inner Lindblad Ressonance.
750:
751: The kinematics we have obtained for the nuclear region of NGC\,6951
752: can be compared with that
753: obtained in previous works, in particular by P00,
754: who have studied the large scale kinematics from long-slit spectroscopy
755: along three position angles (over a radius of up to 100\arcsec\ from the
756: nucleus): one along the photometric major axis (138\deg),
757: one along the perpendicular direction (48\deg) and one along PA=84\deg.
758: On the basis of the kinematics along these three PAs, P00
759: obtain a systemic velocity of $V_{sys}=1417\pm$\,4\,km\,s$^{-1}$ and an
760: amplitude of the rotation curve of $\approx$\,200\,km\,s${-1}$, after
761: de-projection (see, for example, Fig. 13 of P00). These parameters
762: are similar to our values of $V_{sys}=1450\pm$\,20\,km\,s$^{-1}$ and
763: amplitude $220\pm10$\,km\,s$^{-1}$ of the rotation curve.
764: These paramenters are also similar to those previously
765: obtained by M\'arques \& Moles (1993) on the basis of
766: longslit spectra along the major and minor axes of the galaxy, in spite
767: of the fact that our kinematic data is two-dimensional but covers a much
768: smaller radial extent (3.5\arcsec\,$\times\,7\arcsec$). This difference in
769: angular coverage may explain the difference between the major axis orientation obtained
770: in previous studies and the one derived from our kinematic modelling
771: of 125$\pm$\,10\,\deg.
772:
773: P00 report a ``peculiar structure'' in the velocity field along the
774: minor axis (PA=48\deg), which they argue could be due to a nuclear
775: outflow or to a structure related to the ``internal
776: Inner Lindblad Ressonance (iILR)''. They adopt the second
777: hyppothesis, suggesting counter rotation
778: of an inner disk, which they argue could be related to the iILR,
779: calculated to occur at 180\,pc (2\arcsec).
780: They argue that this would fit into a scenario of disk nested within disks.
781: Our data, with a complete 2D coverage, favors best
782: the nuclear outflow hypothesis, but in combination
783: with streaming motions along nuclear spirals.
784:
785:
786:
787: \subsection{The origin of the nuclear spiral}
788:
789: GB05 have used near-IR HST images of the nuclear region -- where they found
790: a stellar oval -- in combination with the CO observations, in order to estimate whether
791: torques produced by the non-axisymmetric stellar potential would be efficient enough to drain the gas angular momentum allowing its inflow to the nuclear region. GB05 conclude
792: that the inflow is efficient only down to the star forming ring, approximately.
793: Inside the ring, the torques are positive and cannot drive gas inflow. As molecular gas
794: is observed much closer to the nucleus, GB05 conclude that, inside the ring,
795: other mechanisms should be responsible to drive the AGN fueling, such as viscous torques.
796:
797: %GB05 suggests that the AGN feeding in NGC\,6951 (as well as
798: %in other three similar cases they have studied) proceeds in two steps: in the
799: %first step, the large scale bar and the nuclear oval would create torques
800: %which can drive gas inwards, feeding the starburst ring. In the second step,
801: %which occurs inside the ring, viscous torques could be responsible to send gas
802: %to the nucleus and feed the AGN.
803:
804: Englmaier \& Shlosman (2000) have used 2D numerical simulations to show that
805: nuclear gaseous spirals are generated as as result of the gas response to the
806: gravitational potential of a galactic disk with a large scale stellar bar.
807: Both NGC\,6951 and NGC\,1097 (Fathi et al. 2006) present similar large
808: scale stellar bars, which could thus play a role in the formation of the
809: nuclear spirals.
810:
811: More recently, Maciejewski (2004) has considered the effect of a SMBH in
812: nuclear gaseous spirals.
813: %produced as gas response to a non-axisymmetric galactic potential.
814: The fact that the SMBH does play a role is supported by the ubiquitous presence
815: of nuclear spirals in Seyfert galaxies (Martini \& Pogge 1999; Pogge \& Martini 2002),
816: and, in particular, by the strong correlation of their presence with the
817: nuclear activity (Lopes et al. 2007). Maciejewski concludes that,
818: if the asymmetry is strong, spiral shocks are produced, and the central
819: SMBH can allow the spiral shocks to extend all the way to its immediate vicinity,
820: generating gas inflow of up to 0.03\,M$_\odot$\,yr$^{-1}$.
821: The cases of NGC\,6951 presented here and NGC\,1097 presented by Fathi et al. (2006) seem
822: to support the models of Maciejewski (2004a,b).
823:
824:
825: \subsection{Estimating the mass accretion flow}
826:
827: We can use the residual velocities observed along the nuclear spiral
828: to estimate the rate of mass flowing to the
829: nucleus. In order to do that, we assume that the mass flows
830: along two nuclear spiral arms. The cross section of these arms can be
831: estimated assuming an opening angle of 20\deg\ subtended by
832: the spiral arms at 100\,pc from the nucleus.
833: This opening angle corresponds to a radius for an assumed
834: circular cross section of the spiral arm calculated as:
835:
836: \begin{equation}
837: r \approx {\rm 100\,(pc)\ \frac{10\,\pi}{180}= 17.5\,(pc)}
838: \end{equation}
839: \\
840: The flux of matter crossing the circular cross section can be calculated as:
841: \begin{equation}
842: \Phi= N_e\ v\,\pi\,r^2\,n_{arms}\,m_p\,f
843: \end{equation}
844: \noindent
845: where $N_e$ is the electron density, $v$ is the streaming velocity
846: of the gas towards the nucleus, $n_{arms}$ is the number of spiral
847: arms, $m_p$ is the mass of the proton, and $f$ is the filling factor.
848: The filling factor was estimated from:
849:
850: \begin{equation}
851: L_{H\alpha} \sim f\,N_e^2\,j_{H\alpha}(T)\,V
852: \end{equation}
853: \noindent
854: where $L_{H\alpha}$ is the H$\alpha$ luminosity emitted by a volume $V$ and
855: $j_{H\alpha(T)}=$3.534$\times10^{-25}$\,erg\,cm$^{-3}$\,s$^{-1}$
856: (Osterbrock 1989). In the region covered by the partial spiral arms we obtain an average
857: flux per pixel (of angular size 0.1\arcsec$\times$\,0.1\arcsec) of 4.8$\times10^{-17}$\,erg\,cm$^{-2}$\,s$^{-1}$.
858: In order to calculate the H$\alpha$ luminosity in the region covered by a
859: partial arm, we adopt an area of 2\arcsec\,$\times$1\arcsec\, which corresponds to
860: 200 pixels. We thus obtain $L_{H\alpha}$\,=\,200$\,\times$\,4.8$\,\times10^{-17}$\,erg\,cm$^{-2}$\,s$^{-1}
861: \times\,4\pi\,(24$\,Mpc)$^2$=6.62$\times$\,10$^{38}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$.
862: Adopting an approximate volume for the region (from Fig.\,\ref{radial_vel})
863: of 2\arcsec\,$\times$1\arcsec\,$\times\,$1\arcsec, or $V$\,=\,2000$\,\times$\,(9.6\,pc)$^3$,
864: we obtain $f\approx$\,0.004.
865:
866: The velocity residuals in the region of
867: the partial nuclear arms, which we have interpreted as streaming motions,
868: range from $\approx$\,20\,km\,s$^{-1}$ to $\approx$\,50\,km\,s$^{-1}$ (Fig.\,\ref{radial_vel}). Assuming that these streaming motions occur in
869: the plane of the galaxy, we need to correct these values for the inclination of the galaxy
870: $i=42$\deg. The resulting average velocity for the streaming motions is $\approx v$\,=\,40\,km\,s$^{-1}$. For $N_e=100$\,cm$^{-3}$ (Fig.\,\ref{flux_ratios}), $v=40$\,km\,s$^{-1}$ and $n_{arms}=2$, we obtain the value for the flux of matter along the nuclear spirals of $\Phi\approx1.23\times10^{25}$\,g\,s$^{-1}$\,$\times$\,0.004$\approx$\,8$\times10^{-4}$\,M$_{\odot}$\,yr$^{-1}$.
871:
872: We note that the above calculation is only a rough estimate, as it depends on uncertain parameters, such as the geometry of the flow.
873: %We note that in the above calculation we have assumed that the only gas flowing
874: %to the nucleus is the ionized gas traced by the H$\alpha$ emission.
875: %As the molecular gas observed by Krips et al. (2007) seems also to follow the
876: %spiral structure observed in H$\alpha$, and its mass in the inner
877: %1\arcsec\ is at least 2$\times$10$^7$\,M$_\odot$, it may be that this molecular
878: %gas is also flowing to the nucleus and the total mass flow rate may
879: %be larger than the value estimated above.
880: %Another cautinary note regards the fact that we cannot prove that the
881: %gas streaming along the spirals is reaching the nucleus, as our data does not
882: %allow the observation of these motions closer to the nucleus than the observed
883: %spiral arms, both due to the ``confusion'' introduced on the circumnuclear
884: %kinematics by the nuclear outflow and the limited angular resolution.
885: Under the assumption that the gas moving along the spiral is reaching
886: the nucleus, we can compare the above calculated rate of ionized
887: gas flow to the accretion rate necessary to reproduce the
888: luminosity of the LINER nucleus of NGC\,6951, calculated as follows.
889: The nuclear luminosity can be estimated from the
890: H$\alpha$ luminosity of L(H$\alpha$)$=1.6\times\,10^{39}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$
891: (from the nuclear flux and reddening quoted by P00) using
892: the approximation that the bolometric luminosity is $L_{bol}\approx$
893: 100\,$L$(H$\alpha)=1.6\times\,10^{41}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$ (Ho 1999; Ho et al. 2001).
894: This estimate is consistent also with the upper limit on the
895: X-ray luminosity of this galaxy, $L_X\approx\,4\times\,10^{40}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$
896: (Fabbiano et al. 1992; Ho 1999). The mass accretion rate can then
897: be estimated as:
898:
899: \begin{equation}
900: \dot{m}=\frac{L_{bol}}{c^2\,\eta}
901: \end{equation}
902: \noindent
903: where $\eta$ is the efficiency of conversion of the rest mass energy
904: of the accreted material into radiation. For a ``standard''
905: geometrically thin, optically thick accretion disk,
906: $\eta\approx$\,0.1 (e.g. Frank et al. 2002), but for LINERs
907: it has been concluded that the accretion disk is geometrically thick,
908: and optically thin (Ho 2005; Nemmen et al. 2006, Yuan 2007). This
909: kind of accretion flow is known as RIAF (Radiatively Inefficient
910: Accretion Flow; Narayan 2005), and has a typical value for $\eta\approx$\,0.01.
911: We use this value to derive an accretion rate of $\dot{m}=1.78\times\,10^{22}$\,g\,s$^{-1}$,
912: or 2.8$\times\,10^{-4}$\,M${_\odot}$\,yr$^{-1}$. Comparing this
913: accretion rate $\dot{m}$ with the mass flow of ionized gas along the
914: nuclear spirals derived above $\Phi$, we conclude that $\Phi\approx$\,
915: 3\,$\dot{m}$. Thus the flow of ionized gas along the spiral arms
916: is of the order of the one necessary to feed the AGN
917: in NGC\,6951.
918:
919: We should nevertheless point out that this
920: flow is most probably a lower limit to the actual
921: inward flow of matter, as we are observing only the ionized
922: gas, which may be just the ``tip of the iceberg''.
923: Neutral and molecular gas may also be flowing in,
924: as suggested by the $\ge$10$^7$\,M$_\odot$ of
925: molecular gas mass detected at the nucleus by
926: GB05 and Krips et al. (2007).
927:
928: We now compare the above results obtained for NGC\,6951
929: with those obtained for NGC\,1097. Storchi-Bergmann (2007)
930: has calculated the mass flow rate along the nuclear spirals
931: of NGC\,1097 on the basis of similar IFU observations,
932: but for a filling factor f=1. If we adopt a more realistic value
933: of $\sim$ 10$^{-3}$,
934: it can be concluded that the mass flow rate of ionized
935: gas is again similar to the accretion rate necessary to
936: power the LINER nucleus of NGC\,1097.
937: Similarly to the case of NGC\,6951, the total mass flow
938: is probably larger, and could include neutral and molecular gas.
939: A larger mass flow rate would be consistent with the presence of a
940: young starburst (age$\sim$10$^6$\,yr) with mass 10$^6$\,M$_{\odot}$
941: discovered in the nuclear HST-STIS UV nuclear spectrum of NGC\,1097 and estimated
942: to be closer than 9\,pc from the nucleus (Storchi-Bergmann et al. 2005).
943: The gas flowing to the nuclear region is thus not only feeding
944: the nucleus but has also accumulated enough mass to give
945: origin to a circumnuclear starburst in the last 10$^6$\,yrs.
946: The association of recent star-formation with nuclear activity has
947: been claimed in many recent studies (e.g. Cid Fernandes et al. 2001,
948: Storchi-Bergmann et al. 2001) and its association in particular
949: with dust structures in early-type galaxies has been also
950: supported by the recent work of Ferrarese et al. (2006).
951:
952: \section{Concluding Remarks}
953:
954: We have presented IFU-GMOS observations of the
955: ionized gas in the inner region of the galaxy NGC\,6951
956: which evidence the presence of streaming motions
957: along nuclear spiral arms towards its LINER nucleus.
958: The streaming motions are observed over an extent
959: of $\approx$\,200\,pc along two partial spiral arms
960: down to $\approx$\,100\,pc from the nucleus.
961:
962:
963: This is so far only the second galaxy in which such streaming
964: motions have been mapped, the first being NGC\,1097
965: also by our group (Fathi et al. 2006). The relevance of this
966: result stems from the fact that the presence of dusty nuclear structures
967: correlates strongly with nuclear activity (Lopes et al. 2007),
968: what suggests that these structures are associated with the actual fuel on its way
969: in to feed the nuclear SMBH.
970:
971: Nevertheless, until recently, there were no
972: kinematic measurements which showed that these spirals do carry gas inwards.
973: Such kinematic measurements are difficult to obtain due
974: to the fact that the gas kinematics
975: of the nuclear region of active galaxies
976: is usually dominated by outflows from the narrow-line region.
977: Most kinematic studies do reveal outflows and no inflows
978: (e.g. Crenshaw \& Kraemer 2007 and references therein).
979:
980: In order to observe colder gas that can fall inwards it
981: is necessary to obtain gas kinematics around nuclei
982: with low levels of activity, such that the outflows are small,
983: if present. This seems to be the case of NGC\,6951:
984: a LINER nucleus, with a small jet, such that it was
985: possible to disentangle the outlow related to the jet
986: from streaming motions along nuclear spirals.
987: Additional observational constraints to observe
988: such motions around a galaxy nucleus include
989: a favorable orientation of the galaxy to allow the
990: measurement of the kinematics and strong enough gas emission
991: to allow such measurements up to
992: several hundred parsecs from the nucleus, so that
993: we can constrain the disk rotation and on top of it
994: measure the residuals from circular motion.
995:
996: With the present results for NGC\,6951 we
997: can now say that there are two galaxies with confirmed inward
998: streaming motions along nuclear spirals
999: -- NGC\,1097 and NGC\,6951 -- giving strong
1000: support to the hypothesis that these spirals are indeed
1001: channels through which the matter flows inwards
1002: to feed the SMBH.
1003:
1004: The kinematic measurements and an estimated geometry
1005: derived from the observations has allowed us to estimate
1006: the ionized gas mass flow rate along the nuclear spirals
1007: of NGC\,1097 and NGC\,6951. We obtain values which are
1008: similar to the accretion rate
1009: necessary to power the AGN.
1010: The total mass flow rate is most probably
1011: larger, including neutral and molecular gas.
1012: In the case of NGC\,6951, molecular gas
1013: has been recently observed both at the star forming ring
1014: and inside the ring. In the case of NGC\,1097, the young nuclear
1015: starburst found by Storchi-Bergmann et al. (2005) supports
1016: also a larger flow of matter to the nucleus in the last 10$^6$\,yrs.
1017: Thus it may be that the inflows
1018: observed along nuclear spiral arms not only feed nuclear SMBH but
1019: at the same time contribute to the growth of the bulge via star formation.
1020: As a result, both the stellar component of the galaxy and its SMBH at the
1021: nucleus grow after each activity cycle, in agreement
1022: with the scenario implied by the
1023: M$_{BH}\times\sigma$ relation (e.g. Tremaine et al. 2002).
1024:
1025:
1026: \acknowledgments
1027: We acknowledge the referee for relevant suggestions which have improved the paper.
1028: This work was based on observations obtained at the Gemini Observatory, which is operated
1029: by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under a
1030: cooperative agreement with the NSF on behalf of the Gemini partnership: the
1031: National Science Foundation (USA), the Particle Physics and Astronomy Research
1032: Council (UK), the National Research Council (Canada), CONICYT (Chile), the
1033: Australian Research Council (Australia), CNPq (Brazil) and CONICET (Argentina).
1034: KF acknowledges support from the Werner-Gren Foundations, the Royal Swedish
1035: Academy of Sciences and project P3/86 from the Instituto de Astrof\'isica de
1036: Canarias. This work is also based on observations with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope
1037: obtained at the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by
1038: the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Incorporated, under
1039: NASA contract NAS5-26555. TSB, OLD and RAR acknowledge support from the Brazilian
1040: Institutions CNPq and CAPES.
1041:
1042:
1043:
1044: \begin{thebibliography}{100}
1045:
1046: \bibitem[00]{1043}Allington-Smith, J. et al. 2002, \pasp, 114, 892
1047:
1048: \bibitem[00]{1045}Barbosa, F. K. B. et al. 2007, in preparation
1049:
1050: \bibitem[00]{1047}Binney, J. \& Merrifield, M. 1998, Galactic Astronomy, Princeton Series in Astrophysics, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey
1051:
1052: \bibitem[00]{1049}Cid Fernandes, R., Heckman, T., Schmitt, H., Gonz\'alez Delgado, R. \&
1053: Storchi-Bergmann, T. 2001, \mnras, 558, 81
1054:
1055: \bibitem[00]{1052}Crenshaw, D. M., Kraemer, S. B., Gabel, J. R. 2003, \aj, 126, 1690.
1056:
1057: \bibitem[00]{1054}Crenshaw, D. M., Kraemer, S. B. 2007, \apj, in press [astro-ph/0612446]
1058:
1059: \bibitem[00]{1056}Emsellem, E., Fathi, K., Wozniak, H., Ferruit, P., Mundell, C. \& Shinnerer, E. 2006, \mnras, 365, 367
1060:
1061: \bibitem[00]{1058}Emsellem, E., Goudfrooij, P., Ferruit, P. 2003, \mnras, 345, 1297.
1062:
1063: \bibitem[00]{1060}Emsellem, E., et al. 2001, \aap, 368, 52
1064:
1065: \bibitem[00]{1062}Englmaier, P., Shlosman, I. 2000, \apj, 528, 677
1066:
1067: \bibitem[00]{1062}Englmaier, P., Shlosman, I. 2004, \apj, 617, L115
1068:
1069: \bibitem[00]{1064}Erwin, P., Sparke, L. S. 1999, ASPC, 182, 243
1070:
1071: \bibitem[00]{1066}Fabbiano, G., Kim, D.-W. and Trinchieri, G. 1992, \apjs, 80, 531
1072:
1073: \bibitem[00]{1068}Fathi, K., van de Ven, G., Peletier, R.~F., Emsellem, E.,
1074: Falc{\'o}n-Barroso, J., Cappellari, M. \& de Zeeuw, T. 2005, \mnras, 364, 773
1075:
1076: \bibitem[00]{1071}Fathi K., Storchi-Bergmann, T., Riffel, R. A., Winge, C., Axon, D. J., Robinson, A., Capetti, \& Marconi, A. 2006, \apj, 641, L25
1077:
1078: \bibitem[00]{1073}Ferrarese, L. et al. 2006, \apjs, 164, 334
1079:
1080: \bibitem[00]{1075}Filippenko, A. V. \& Sargent, W.L.W. 1985, \apjs, 57, 503
1081:
1082: \bibitem[00]{1077}Frank, J., King, A. R. \& Raine, D. J. 2002, in
1083: Accretion Power in Astrophysics (3rd ed., Cambridge Univ. Press)
1084:
1085: \bibitem[00]{1080}Freeman, K. 1970, \apj, 160, 811
1086:
1087: \bibitem[00]{1082}Garcia-Burillo, S. et al. 2005, \aap, 441, 1011
1088:
1089: \bibitem[00]{1084}Ho, L. C. 1999, \apj, 516, 672
1090:
1091: \bibitem[00]{1086}Ho, L. C. et al. 2001, \apj, 549, L51
1092:
1093: \bibitem[00]{1088}Keppel, J. W. et al. 1991, \apj, 374, 507
1094:
1095: \bibitem[00]{1090}Knapen, J. H. et al. 2000, \apj, 528, 219.
1096:
1097: \bibitem[00]{1092}Knapen, J. H. 2005, ApSS, 295, 85.
1098:
1099: \bibitem[00]{1094}Kohno, K. et al. 1999, ASP Conference Proceedings, vol 217, eds.
1100: J. G. Mangum \& S. J. E. Radford
1101:
1102: \bibitem[00]{1097}Krips, M. et al. 2007, \aap, in press (astro-ph/0701403)
1103:
1104: \bibitem[00]{1099}Laine, S. et al. 2003, AJ, 126, 2717.
1105:
1106: \bibitem[00]{1101}Lopes, R. S., Storchi-Bergmann, T., Martini, P.
1107: \& Saraiva, M. F., 2007, \apj, 655, 718
1108:
1109: \bibitem[00]{1104}Maciejewski, W. 2004a, \mnras, 354, 883
1110:
1111: \bibitem[00]{1106}Maciejewski, W. 2004b, \mnras, 354, 892.
1112:
1113: \bibitem[00]{1108}Maciejewski, W., Teuben, P. J., Sparke, L. S., Stone, J. M. 2002, \mnras, 329, 502.
1114:
1115: \bibitem[00]{1110}Marconi A., Axon D.J. et al. 2003, \apj, 586, 868
1116:
1117: \bibitem[00]{1112}M\'arquez, I. \& Moles, M. 1993, \aj, 105, 2090
1118:
1119: \bibitem[00]{1114}Martini, P., Regan, M. W., Mulchaey, J. S., Pogge,
1120: R. W. 2003, \apj, 589, 77
1121:
1122: \bibitem[00]{1117}Martini, P., Pogge, R. W. 1999, \apj, 569, 624
1123:
1124: \bibitem[00]{1119}Narayan, R., 2005, in From X-ray Binaries to Quasars: Black Hole Accretion on All Mass Scales, ed. T. J. Maccarone, R. P. Fender \& L. C. Ho (Dordrecht: Kluwer)
1125:
1126: \bibitem[00]{1121}Nemmen, R. S., Storchi-Bergmann, T., Yuan, F., Terashima, Y. \& Wilson, A. S. 2006, \apj, 643, 652
1127:
1128: \bibitem[00]{1123}Osterbrock, D., Astrophyscis of Gaseous Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei,
1129: University Science Books
1130:
1131: \bibitem[00]{1126}P\'erez, E. et al. 2000, \aap, 353, 893
1132:
1133: \bibitem[00]{1128}Pogge, R. W., Martini, P. 2002, \apj, 569, 624
1134:
1135: \bibitem[00]{1130}Riffel, R., Storchi-Bergmann, T., Winge, C. \& Barbosa, F. K. B. 2006,
1136: \mnras, 373, 2
1137:
1138: \bibitem[00]{1133}Saikia, D. J., Ohookun, B., Pedlar, A. \& Kohno, K. 2002, \aap, 383, 98
1139:
1140: \bibitem[00]{1135}Saikia, D. J., Pedlar, A., Unger, S. W., Axon, D. J. 1994, \mnras, 270, 46
1141:
1142: \bibitem[00]{1137}Shlosman, I., Begelman, M. C., Frank, J. 1990, Nature, 345, 679.
1143:
1144: \bibitem[00]{1139}Storchi-Bergmann, T. 2007, Proceedings of the IAU Symposium 238,
1145: Black Holes: from Stars to Galaxies -- across the Range of Masses (Prague 2006),
1146: eds. V. Karas \& G. Matt, in preparation.
1147:
1148: \bibitem[00]{1143}Storchi-Bergmann, T., Wilson, A. S, \& Baldwin, J. A. 1996, \apj, 460, 252
1149:
1150: \bibitem[00]{1145}Storchi-Bergmann, T., Gonz�ez Delgado, R. M.; Schmitt, H. R.; Cid Fernandes,
1151: R., Heckman, T. 2001, \apj, 559, 147
1152:
1153: \bibitem[00]{1148}Storchi-Bergmann, T., Nemmen, R. S., Spinelli, P. F., Eracleous, M, Wilson,
1154: A. S., Filippenko, A. V. \& Livio, M. 2005, \apj, 624, L13
1155:
1156: \bibitem[00]{1151}Sokolowski, J., Bland-Hawthorn, J. \& Cecil, G. 1991, \apj, 375, 583
1157:
1158: \bibitem[00]{1153}Sutherland, R. S., Bicknell, G. V. \& Dopita, M. 1993, \apj, 414, 110
1159:
1160: \bibitem[00]{1155}Tremaine, S. et al. 2002, \apj, 574, 740
1161:
1162: \bibitem[00]{1157}Tully, R. B 1988, Nearby Galaxies Catalogue, Cambridge University Press
1163:
1164: \bibitem[00]{1159}Viegas, S. M. \& Contini, M. 1994, \apj, 428, 113
1165:
1166: \bibitem[00]{1161}Yuan, F. 2007, in The Central Engine of Active Galactic Nuclei, ed. L. C. Ho \& J.-M. Wang (San Francisco: ASP) (astro-ph/0701638)
1167:
1168:
1169:
1170:
1171: \end{thebibliography}
1172:
1173:
1174:
1175: \end{document}
1176:
1177:
1178:
1179:
1180:
1181:
1182:
1183:
1184:
1185:
1186:
1187:
1188:
1189:
1190:
1191:
1192: