1: \documentclass[11pt]{article}
2: \usepackage{amsmath}
3: \usepackage{epsfig}
4:
5: \setlength{\textwidth}{6.7in}
6: \setlength{\hoffset}{-0.95in}
7: \setlength{\voffset}{-0.8in}
8: \setlength{\textheight}{8.7in}
9:
10: \newcommand{\ord}[1]{\mathcal{O}(#1)}
11: \newcommand{\del}{\partial}
12: \newcommand{\at}[1]{\Big|_{#1}}
13: \newcommand{\bra}[1]{\langle #1|}
14: \newcommand{\ket}[1]{|#1\rangle}
15: \newcommand{\dcirc}{\mathop{{}^\circ_\circ}}
16: \newcommand{\ntom}
17: {\quad \xrightarrow[\,\,{\cal W}_n \to {\cal W}_m\,]{} \quad}
18:
19: \newcommand{\sectiono}[1]{\section{#1}\setcounter{equation}{0}}
20: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}
21:
22: \begin{document}
23:
24: \baselineskip=17pt
25:
26: \begin{titlepage}
27: % \rightline{\today}
28: \rightline{\tt arXiv:0707.4472}
29: \rightline{\tt DESY 07-110}
30: \rightline{\tt MIT-CTP-3851}
31: \begin{center}
32:
33: \vskip 2.0cm
34: {\Large \bf {Exact marginality in open string field theory:
35: a general framework}}\\
36: \vskip 1.5cm
37:
38: {\large {Michael Kiermaier${}^1$ and Yuji Okawa${}^2$}}
39:
40: \vskip 1.0cm
41:
42: {\it {${}^1$ Center for Theoretical Physics}}\\
43: {\it {Massachusetts Institute of Technology}}\\
44: {\it {Cambridge, MA 02139, USA}}\\
45: mkiermai@mit.edu
46:
47: \vskip 0.5cm
48:
49: {\it {${}^2$ DESY Theory Group}}\\
50: {\it {Notkestrasse 85}}\\
51: {\it {22607 Hamburg, Germany}}\\
52: yuji.okawa@desy.de
53:
54: \vskip 1.0cm
55:
56: {\bf Abstract}
57: \end{center}
58:
59: \noindent
60: We construct analytic solutions
61: of open bosonic string field theory
62: for any exactly marginal deformation
63: in any boundary conformal field theory
64: when properly renormalized operator products
65: of the marginal operator are given.
66: We explicitly provide such renormalized operator products
67: for a class of marginal deformations
68: which include the deformations
69: of flat D-branes in flat backgrounds
70: by constant massless modes of the gauge field
71: and of the scalar fields on the D-branes,
72: the cosine potential for a space-like coordinate,
73: and the hyperbolic cosine potential
74: for the time-like coordinate.
75: In our construction
76: we use integrated vertex operators,
77: which are closely related
78: to finite deformations
79: in boundary conformal field theory,
80: while previous analytic solutions
81: were based on unintegrated vertex operators.
82: We also introduce a modified star product
83: to formulate string field theory
84: around the deformed background.
85:
86: \end{titlepage}
87:
88: \newpage
89:
90: \baselineskip=16pt
91: \tableofcontents
92: \baselineskip=17pt
93:
94: \section{Introduction}
95: \setcounter{equation}{0}
96:
97: String field theory\footnote{
98: See \cite{Taylor:2003gn, Sen:2004nf, Rastelli:2005mz, Taylor:2006ye}
99: for reviews.} can potentially be
100: a background-independent formulation of string theory.
101: In the current formulation of string field theory, however,
102: we first need to choose
103: one conformal field theory (CFT)
104: describing a consistent background of string theory.
105: The crucial question is then whether other string backgrounds
106: can be described as classical solutions of string field theory.
107: In particular, for each exactly marginal deformation of the CFT,
108: we expect to have a family of solutions
109: in string field theory labeled by the deformation parameter.
110:
111: Recent remarkable developments in analytic methods
112: of open string field
113: theory~\cite{Schnabl:2005gv}--\cite{Bonora:2007tm}
114: enabled us to address this question in a concrete setting.
115: Analytic solutions for marginal deformations
116: when operator products of the marginal operator are regular
117: were constructed to all orders in the deformation parameter
118: in~\cite{Schnabl:2007az, Kiermaier:2007ba}
119: for open bosonic string field theory~\cite{Witten:1985cc}
120: and in \cite{Erler:2007rh, Okawa:2007ri, Okawa:2007it}
121: for open superstring field theory~\cite{Berkovits:1995ab}.
122: When the operator product of the marginal operator is singular,
123: analytic solutions were constructed to third order
124: in the deformation parameter in \cite{Kiermaier:2007ba}.
125: Recently, analytic solutions for the deformation
126: generated by the zero mode of the gauge field
127: were constructed in~\cite{Fuchs:2007yy} by a different approach
128: and extended to open superstring field theory
129: in~\cite{Fuchs:2007gw}.
130: While the equation of motion is satisfied
131: to all orders in the deformation parameter,
132: a closed form expression for a solution satisfying
133: the reality condition on the string field
134: has not been presented in~\cite{Fuchs:2007yy, Fuchs:2007gw}.
135: For earlier study of marginal deformations in string field theory,
136: see~\cite{Sen:2000hx}--\cite{Kishimoto:2005bs}.
137:
138: In this paper, we present a procedure to construct
139: a solution satisfying the reality condition
140: in open bosonic string field theory
141: for any exactly marginal deformation in any boundary CFT
142: when properly renormalized operator products
143: of the marginal operator are given.
144: The analytic solutions
145: in~\cite{Schnabl:2007az, Kiermaier:2007ba}
146: were constructed using unintegrated vertex operators
147: and $b$-ghost insertions.
148: Our strategy is to use integrated vertex operators,
149: which are closely related
150: to finite deformations in boundary CFT.
151: We assume several properties
152: of the properly renormalized operator products
153: of the marginal operator.
154: Since the identification of a set of
155: assumptions which are sufficient for the construction of a solution
156: is one of the main points of the paper,
157: we will explain these assumptions in detail in the following.
158: We will then present our solutions.
159:
160: \subsection{Assumptions}
161: \label{assumptions}
162:
163: When there exists an exactly marginal deformation in a given
164: boundary CFT, we have a family of consistent boundary conditions
165: labeled by the deformation parameter which we denote by $\lambda$.
166: Consider the boundary CFT on the upper-half plane and suppose that
167: we change boundary conditions
168: on a segment of the boundary
169: between $a$ and $b$.
170: Since the new boundary condition is also conformal,
171: an integral of the BRST current
172: along a contour vanishes
173: if both end points of the contour lie inside the region
174: between $a$ and $b$.
175: By $C (t_f, \, t_i)$ we denote a contour in the
176: upper-half plane which starts from the point $t_i$ on the real axis
177: and ends on $t_f$ on the real axis,
178: and we use $C (t_f, \, t_i)$
179: with $t_f < t_i$ in what follows.
180: We have
181: \begin{figure}[tb]\Large
182: \begin{center}
183: \raisebox{-.6cm}{\epsfig{figure=QexpV2.eps, width=8cm}}
184: $\quad=\quad 0$
185: \end{center}\normalsize
186: \caption{Illustration of~(\ref{QexpV2}).
187: The bold line indicates a change of boundary conditions
188: on the segment between $a$ and $b$.
189: The integral of the BRST current in~(\ref{QexpV2})
190: vanishes when $a < t_f < t_i < b$.}
191: \label{fig1}
192: \end{figure}
193: \begin{equation}\label{QexpV2}
194: \int_{C (t_f, \, t_i)} \Bigl[ \, \frac{dz}{2 \pi i} \, j_B (z)
195: - \frac{d \bar{z}}{2 \pi i} \, \tilde{\jmath}_B (\bar{z}) \,
196: \Bigr] = 0
197: \quad \text{when} \quad a < t_f < t_i < b \,,
198: \end{equation}
199: where $j_B (z)$ and $\tilde{\jmath}_B (\bar{z})$ are
200: the holomorphic and antiholomorphic components
201: of the BRST current, respectively. See figure~\ref{fig1}.
202: This identity holds inside any correlation function
203: of the deformed CFT as long as no operators are inserted
204: between the contour $C (t_f, \, t_i)$ and the real axis.
205: When $t_f < a < b < t_i$, there are contributions from
206: the points $a$ and $b$ where the boundary condition changes:
207: \begin{equation}
208: \begin{split}
209: & \int_{C (t_f, \, t_i)} \Bigl[ \, \frac{dz}{2 \pi i} \, j_B (z)
210: - \frac{d \bar{z}}{2 \pi i} \, \tilde{\jmath}_B (\bar{z}) \,
211: \Bigr] \\
212: & = \int_{C (b)} \Bigl[ \, \frac{dz}{2 \pi i} \, j_B (z) - \frac{d
213: \bar{z}}{2 \pi i} \, \tilde{\jmath}_B (\bar{z}) \, \Bigr] + \int_{C
214: (a)} \Bigl[ \, \frac{dz}{2 \pi i} \, j_B (z) - \frac{d \bar{z}}{2
215: \pi i} \, \tilde{\jmath}_B (\bar{z}) \, \Bigr] \,,
216: \end{split}
217: \label{contour-integral-1}
218: \end{equation}
219: where we have defined the
220: infinitesimal contour $C(t)$ around any point $t$ by
221: \begin{equation}
222: C(t)\,=\, \lim_{\epsilon\to0} \, C(t-\epsilon,t+\epsilon)\,.
223: \end{equation}
224: See figure~\ref{figAss1a}.
225: \begin{figure}[tb]
226: \Large
227: \begin{center}
228: \raisebox{-.6cm}{\epsfig{figure=QexpV.eps, width=5cm}}
229: $\,=\,$
230: \raisebox{-.6cm}{\epsfig{figure=QbexpV.eps, width=5cm}}
231: $\,+\,$
232: \raisebox{-.6cm}{\epsfig{figure=QaexpV.eps, width=5cm}}
233: \end{center}
234: \normalsize
235: \caption{Illustration of~(\ref{contour-integral-1}).
236: When $t_f < a < b < t_i$,
237: the integral of the BRST current on the left-hand side
238: decomposes into a sum of two integrals
239: localized at the end points $a$ and $b$ of the segment.}\label{figAss1a}
240: \end{figure}
241: The nonvanishing contributions in~(\ref{contour-integral-1})
242: can be thought of as the BRST transformations
243: of the boundary-condition changing operators.
244: We also have
245: \begin{figure}[tb]
246: \Large
247: \begin{center}
248: \raisebox{-.8cm}{\epsfig{figure=QQaexpV.eps, width=6cm}}
249: $\quad=\quad-\,$
250: \raisebox{-.8cm}{\epsfig{figure=QabexpV.eps, width=6cm}}
251: \end{center}
252: \normalsize
253: \caption{Illustration of~(\ref{contour-integral-2}).
254: With the presence of the BRST integral localized at $a$,
255: the integral along $C(t_f,t_i)$ on the left-hand side
256: localizes only at the other end point $b$
257: because of the nilpotency of the BRST transformation.
258: }\label{figAss2a}
259: \end{figure}
260: \begin{equation}
261: \begin{split}
262: & \int_{C (t_f, \, t_i)} \Bigl[ \, \frac{dz}{2 \pi i} \, j_B (z) -
263: \frac{d \bar{z}}{2 \pi i} \, \tilde{\jmath}_B (\bar{z}) \, \Bigr] \,
264: \int_{C (a)} \Bigl[ \, \frac{dz}{2 \pi i} \, j_B (z) - \frac{d
265: \bar{z}}{2 \pi i} \, \tilde{\jmath}_B (\bar{z}) \,
266: \Bigr] \\
267: & = {}- \int_{C (a)} \Bigl[ \, \frac{dz}{2 \pi i} \, j_B (z) -
268: \frac{d \bar{z}}{2 \pi i} \, \tilde{\jmath}_B (\bar{z}) \, \Bigr] \,
269: \int_{C (b)} \Bigl[ \, \frac{dz}{2 \pi i} \, j_B (z) - \frac{d
270: \bar{z}}{2 \pi i} \, \tilde{\jmath}_B (\bar{z}) \, \Bigr] \,,
271: \end{split}
272: \label{contour-integral-2}
273: \end{equation}
274: where again $t_f < a < b < t_i$, as shown in figure~\ref{figAss2a}.
275:
276: The boundary CFT with a different boundary condition
277: on a segment between $a$ and $b$ discussed above
278: can also be described
279: in the boundary CFT with the original boundary condition
280: on the whole real axis by inserting
281: an exponential of the marginal operator $V(t)$
282: integrated over the segment between $a$ and $b$,
283: \begin{equation}\label{exp-before-renormalization}
284: \exp \biggl[ \, \lambda \int_a^b dt \, V(t) \, \biggr]
285: = 1 + \lambda \int_a^b dt \, V(t)
286: + \frac{\lambda^2}{2!} \int_a^b dt_1 \int_a^b dt_2 \,
287: V(t_1) \, V(t_2) + \, \ldots \, ,
288: \end{equation}
289: into the correlation function.
290: When operator products of the marginal operator are singular,
291: we need to renormalize
292: the operator~(\ref{exp-before-renormalization})
293: properly to make it well defined,
294: and we denote the renormalized operator by
295: \begin{equation}
296: [ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r \,,
297: \end{equation}
298: where
299: \begin{equation}
300: V(a,b) \equiv \int_a^b dt \, V(t) \,.
301: \end{equation}
302: Then the equations (\ref{contour-integral-1})
303: and (\ref{contour-integral-2})
304: can be translated
305: into the following assumptions
306: on the operator~$[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$.\\
307:
308: \noindent
309: {\it 1. The BRST transformation of
310: the operator $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
311: takes the following form:}
312: \begin{equation}
313: Q_B \cdot [ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r
314: = [ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, O_R (b) \, ]_r
315: - [ \, O_L (a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r \,,
316: \tag{I}\label{1}
317: \end{equation}
318: {\it where $O_L (a)$ and $O_R (b)$ are some local operators
319: at $a$ and $b$, respectively.}\\
320:
321: \noindent
322: {\it 2. The BRST transformation of
323: the operator $[ \, O_L (a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
324: is given by}
325: \begin{equation}
326: Q_B \cdot [ \, O_L (a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r
327: = {}- [ \, O_L (a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, O_R (b) \, ]_r \,.
328: \tag{II}\label{2}
329: \end{equation}\\
330: \noindent
331: These are our first two assumptions.
332: They are illustrated in figures~\ref{figAss1b} and~\ref{figAss2b}.
333:
334: \begin{figure}[tb]
335: \Large
336: \begin{center}
337: \raisebox{-.6cm}{\epsfig{figure=QexpV3.eps, width=5cm}}
338: $\,=\,$
339: \raisebox{-.6cm}{\epsfig{figure=ObexpV.eps, width=5cm}}
340: $\,-\,$
341: \raisebox{-.6cm}{\epsfig{figure=OaexpV.eps, width=5cm}}\\
342: \end{center}
343: \normalsize
344: \caption{
345: Illustration of the assumption~(\ref{1}).
346: The BRST transformation on the operator
347: $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$ generates
348: local operators $O_L(a)$ and $O_R(b)$
349: at the end points of the segment.
350: Compare this figure with figure \ref{figAss1a}.
351: }\label{figAss1b}
352: \end{figure}
353: \begin{figure}[tb]
354: \Large
355: \begin{center}
356: \raisebox{-.6cm}{\epsfig{figure=QOaexpV.eps, width=5cm}}
357: $\,=\,-$
358: \raisebox{-.6cm}{\epsfig{figure=OabexpV.eps, width=5cm}}
359: \end{center}
360: \normalsize
361: \caption{
362: Illustration of the assumption (\ref{2}).
363: The BRST transformation on the operator
364: $[ \, O_L(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
365: generates the local operator $O_R (b)$.
366: Compare this figure with figure \ref{figAss2a}.
367: }\label{figAss2b}
368: \end{figure}
369:
370: We can also introduce different boundary conditions
371: on different segments on the boundary by inserting
372: \begin{equation}
373: [ \, \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\lambda_i V (a_i, a_{i+1} )} \, ]_r \,
374: \label{multiple-regions}
375: \end{equation}
376: with $a_i < a_{i+1}$ for $i = 1, 2, \ldots , n$
377: into the correlation function.
378: We make the following two assumptions on this operator.\\
379:
380: \noindent
381: {\it 3. Replacement. When $\lambda_{i+1} = \lambda_i$, the product
382: $e^{\lambda_i V (a_i, a_{i+1} )} \,
383: e^{\lambda_{i+1} V (a_{i+1}, a_{i+2} )}$
384: inside the operator (\ref{multiple-regions})
385: can be replaced by
386: $e^{\lambda_i V (a_i, a_{i+2} )}$}:
387: \begin{equation}
388: [ \, \ldots \, e^{\lambda_i V (a_i, a_{i+1} )} \,
389: e^{\lambda_i V (a_{i+1}, a_{i+2} )} \, \ldots \, ]_r
390: = [ \, \ldots \, e^{\lambda_i V (a_i, a_{i+2} )} \,
391: \ldots \, ]_r \,.
392: \tag{III}\label{3}
393: \end{equation}\\
394: \noindent
395: {\it 4. Factorization. When $\lambda_j$ vanishes,
396: the renormalized product~(\ref{multiple-regions})
397: factorizes as follows:}
398: \begin{equation}
399: [ \, \ldots \, e^{\lambda_{j-1} V (a_{j-1}, a_{j} )} \,
400: e^{\lambda_{j+1} V (a_{j+1}, a_{j+2} )} \, \ldots \, ]_r
401: =
402: [ \, \ldots \, e^{\lambda_{j-1} V (a_{j-1}, a_{j} )} \,]_r\,
403: [ \, e^{\lambda_{j+1} V (a_{j+1}, a_{j+2} )} \, \ldots \, ]_r
404: \,.
405: \tag{IV}\label{4}
406: \end{equation}\\
407: \noindent
408: We also assume that (\ref{3}) and (\ref{4}) hold
409: when $O_L (a_1)$, $O_R (a_{n+1})$, or both of them
410: are inserted in~(\ref{multiple-regions}).
411:
412: A change of boundary conditions
413: on a segment between $a$ and $b$ is local
414: and independent of other regions of the Riemann surface
415: where the boundary CFT is defined.
416: Thus the operator $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
417: should be independent of the global shape
418: of the Riemann surface.
419: However, renormalization schemes
420: such as the standard normal ordering
421: can depend on the global shape of the surface
422: through the propagator,
423: and normal ordered products of nonlocal operators
424: generically do depend on the surface.
425: We consider boundary conformal field theory
426: defined on a family of semi-infinite cylinders ${\cal W}_n$
427: obtained from the upper-half plane of $z$
428: by the identification $z \sim z + n + 1$
429: and make the following assumption.\\
430:
431: \noindent
432: {\it 5. Locality. The operators $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
433: and $[ \, O_L (a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
434: defined on ${\cal W}_n$ coincide
435: with those defined on ${\cal W}_m$ with $m > n$}:
436: \begin{equation}
437: \begin{split}
438: [ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r
439: ~ \text{on} ~ {\cal W}_n ~
440: & = ~ [ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r
441: ~ \text{on} ~ {\cal W}_m \,, \\
442: [ \, O_L(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r
443: ~ \text{on} ~ {\cal W}_n ~
444: & = ~ [ \, O_L(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r
445: ~ \text{on} ~ {\cal W}_m \,.
446: \end{split}
447: \tag{V}\label{5}
448: \end{equation}\\
449: \indent
450: Finally, $e^{\lambda V(a,b)}$
451: is classically invariant under the reflection
452: where $V(t)$ is replaced by $V(a+b-t)$,
453: and we assume that
454: $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$ preserves this symmetry.\\
455:
456: \noindent
457: {\it 6. Reflection. The operator $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
458: is invariant under the reflection
459: where $V(t)$ is replaced by $V(a+b-t)$}:
460: \begin{equation}
461: \biggl[ \, \exp \biggl( \, \lambda \int_a^b dt \, V(a+b-t) \,
462: \biggr) \, \biggr]_r
463: = \biggl[ \, \exp \biggl( \, \lambda \int_a^b dt \, V(t) \,
464: \biggr) \, \biggr]_r \,.
465: \tag{VI}\label{6}
466: \end{equation}
467:
468: \subsection{Solutions}
469: \label{solution}
470:
471: We believe that all of these assumptions are satisfied
472: for any exactly marginal deformation
473: in any boundary CFT
474: if the composite operators are properly renormalized.
475: When the operator
476: $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$ expanded in $\lambda$ as
477: \begin{equation}
478: [ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r
479: = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \lambda^n \,
480: [ \, V^{(n)}(a,b)\, ]_r \,,
481: \end{equation}
482: where
483: \begin{equation}
484: [ \, V^{(n)} (a,b)\, ]_r
485: \equiv \frac{1}{n!} \, [ \, ( V(a,b) )^n \, ]_r
486: \quad\text{ for }\quad n\geq 1
487: \quad\text{ and }\quad [\,V^{(0)}(a,b)\,]_r\equiv1 \,,
488: \end{equation}
489: is given,
490: we claim that solutions
491: to the equation of motion can be constructed in the following way.
492:
493: We first define a state $U$ by
494: \begin{equation}
495: U \equiv 1 + \sum_{n=1}^\infty \, \lambda^n \, U^{(n)} \,,
496: \end{equation}
497: where
498: \begin{equation}
499: \langle \, \phi \,,\, U^{(n)} \, \rangle
500: = \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \, \,
501: [ \, V^{(n)} (1,n) \, ]_r \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_n} \,.
502: \end{equation}
503: Here and in what follows we denote a generic state
504: in the Fock space by $\phi$ and its corresponding operator
505: in the state-operator mapping by $\phi (0)$.
506: The conformal transformation $f(\xi)$ is
507: \begin{equation}
508: f(\xi) = \frac{2}{\pi} \, \arctan \xi \,,
509: \end{equation}
510: and we denote the conformal transformation of $\phi (\xi)$ under the
511: map $f(\xi)$ by $f \circ \phi (\xi)$.
512: The correlation function is evaluated
513: on the surface ${\cal W}_n$,
514: which we defined above when stating the
515: locality assumption~(\ref{5}).
516: We represent it in the region of the upper-half plane of $z$
517: where $-1/2 \le {\rm Re} \, z \le 1/2 + n$.
518:
519: If the assumption~(\ref{1}) is satisfied,
520: the BRST transformation of the operator
521: $[ \, V^{(n)}(a,b) \, ]_r$ takes the form
522: \begin{equation}
523: Q_B \cdot [ \, V^{(n)}(a,b) \, ]_r
524: = \sum_{r=1}^n \, [ \, V^{(n-r)}(a,b) \, O_R^{(r)}(b)\, ]_r
525: {}- \sum_{l=1}^n \, [ \, O_L^{(l)}(a) \, V^{(n-l)}(a,b) \, ]_r\,,
526: \end{equation}
527: where $O_L$ and $O_R$ are expanded as follows:
528: \begin{equation}
529: O_L = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \, \lambda^n \, O_L^{(n)} \,, \qquad
530: O_R = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \, \lambda^n \, O_R^{(n)} \,.
531: \end{equation}
532: Thus the BRST transformation of $U$ can be split into two pieces:
533: \begin{equation}
534: Q_B U = A_R - A_L
535: \end{equation}
536: with
537: \begin{equation}
538: A_L = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \, \lambda^n \, A_L^{(n)} \,, \qquad
539: A_R = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \, \lambda^n \, A_R^{(n)} \,,
540: \end{equation}
541: where
542: \begin{equation}
543: \begin{split}
544: \langle \, \phi \,, A_L^{(n)} \, \rangle &=
545: \sum_{l=1}^n \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \, [ \, O_L^{(l)} (1) \, V^{(n-l)} (1,n) \, ]_r \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_n},\\
546: \langle \, \phi \,, A_R^{(n)} \, \rangle &=
547: \sum_{r=1}^n \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \, [ \, V^{(n-r)} (1,n) \, O_R^{(r)} (n)\, ]_r \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_n} \,.
548: \end{split}
549: \end{equation}
550: We then define $\Psi_L$ and $\Psi_R$ by
551: \begin{equation}
552: \Psi_L \equiv A_L \ast U^{-1} \,, \qquad
553: \Psi_R \equiv U^{-1} \ast A_R \,,
554: \end{equation}
555: where $U^{-1}$ is well defined perturbatively in $\lambda$
556: because $U=1+\ord{\lambda}$.
557: We show that $\Psi_L$ and $\Psi_R$ satisfy the equation of motion,
558: \begin{equation}
559: Q_B \Psi_L + \Psi_L \ast \Psi_L = 0 \,, \qquad
560: Q_B \Psi_R + \Psi_R \ast \Psi_R = 0 \,,
561: \end{equation}
562: though they do not satisfy the reality condition on the string field.
563: They are related by the gauge transformation
564: generated by $U$:
565: \begin{equation}
566: \Psi_R \, = \, U^{-1}\ast \Psi_L\ast U + U^{-1}\ast Q_B U \,.
567: \label{Psi_L-to-Psi_R}
568: \end{equation}
569: A solution $\Psi$ satisfying the reality condition
570: is obtained from $\Psi_L$ or $\Psi_R$
571: by gauge transformations as follows:
572: \begin{equation}
573: \begin{split}
574: \Psi & = \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast \Psi_L \ast \sqrt{U} +
575: \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast Q_B \, \sqrt{U}\\
576: &= \sqrt{U} \ast \Psi_R \ast \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}}
577: + \sqrt{U} \ast Q_B \, \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \\
578: & = \frac{1}{2} \, \biggl[ \, \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast \Psi_L \ast
579: \sqrt{U} + \sqrt{U} \ast \Psi_R \ast \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} +
580: \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast Q_B \, \sqrt{U}
581: - Q_B \, \sqrt{U} \ast \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \, \biggr] \,,
582: \end{split}
583: \end{equation}
584: where $\sqrt{U}$ and $1/\sqrt{U}$ are defined perturbatively
585: in $\lambda$.
586: The three expressions are equivalent
587: because of the relation (\ref{Psi_L-to-Psi_R}).
588: This solution is the main result of the paper.
589: In section \ref{singular_explicit},
590: we explicitly construct $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
591: satisfying all the assumptions
592: and apply the general result
593: to obtain solutions for a class of marginal deformations
594: which include the deformations
595: of flat D-branes in flat backgrounds
596: by constant massless modes of the gauge field
597: and of the scalar fields on the D-branes,
598: the cosine potential for a space-like coordinate,
599: and the hyperbolic cosine potential
600: for the time-like coordinate.
601:
602: The operators $O_R^{(1)}$ and $O_L^{(1)}$ are
603: \begin{equation}
604: O_R^{(1)} = O_L^{(1)} = cV
605: \end{equation}
606: for any marginal deformation. This follows only from the fact
607: that the marginal operator is
608: a primary field of dimension one.
609: When operator products of the marginal operator are regular,
610: there are no higher-order terms and thus
611: $O_R = O_L = \lambda \, cV$.
612: For any exactly marginal deformation
613: where the singular part of the operator product
614: of the marginal operator with itself is
615: \begin{equation}
616: V (t) \, V(0) \sim \frac{1}{t^2} \,,
617: \end{equation}
618: the operators $O_L^{(2)}$ and $O_R^{(2)}$ are
619: \begin{equation}
620: O_R^{(2)} = {}- O_L^{(2)} = \frac{1}{2} \, \partial c\,.
621: \end{equation}
622: For the class of marginal deformations
623: to be considered in section \ref{singular_explicit},
624: there are no higher-order terms
625: and the exact expressions of $O_R$ and $O_L$ are
626: \begin{equation}
627: O_R = \lambda \, cV + \frac{\lambda^2}{2} \, \partial c \,, \qquad
628: O_L = \lambda \, cV - \frac{\lambda^2}{2} \, \partial c \,.
629: \end{equation}
630:
631: \subsection{The organization of the paper}
632: \label{organization}
633:
634: In section~\ref{regular} we first revisit the problem
635: of constructing solutions for marginal deformations
636: with regular operator products.
637: In~\S~\ref{regular_PsiL} we construct a solution $\Psi_L$
638: to the string field theory equation of motion
639: using integrated vertex operators
640: without $b$-ghost insertions.
641: The solution $\Psi_L$, however, does not satisfy
642: the reality condition on the string field.
643: In \S~\ref{regular_real}
644: we construct a gauge transformation which connects
645: $\Psi_L$ and its conjugate solution $\Psi_R$,
646: and then we generate a real solution $\Psi$
647: using the gauge transformation.
648: During the construction of this gauge transformation,
649: we find an important identity.
650: It leads us to discover a class of states $U_\alpha$,
651: which generalize the wedge states $W_\alpha$
652: in a deformed background.
653: We study the properties of $U_\alpha$
654: in~\S~\ref{regular_generalizewedge}.
655:
656: In the process of constructing the gauge transformation
657: that connects $\Psi_L$ and $\Psi_R$,
658: we also find another expression of the solution $\Psi_L$.
659: We study the new form of $\Psi_L$ in~\S~\ref{another}
660: and prove that it satisfies the equation of motion
661: using the properties of $U_\alpha$.
662: The new form of $\Psi_L$ can be generalized
663: to marginal deformations with singular operator products.
664: In~\S~\ref{singular_general_PsiL}
665: we construct $\Psi_L$ for the singular case
666: using the operator $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$, and we prove
667: in~\S~\ref{singular_general_proof}
668: and in appendix~\ref{QBAL-appendix}
669: that it satisfies the equation of motion
670: under the assumptions stated in~\S~\ref{assumptions}.
671: We then generate a real solution $\Psi$
672: for the singular case
673: in~\S~\ref{singular_general_real}
674: by an appropriate gauge transformation
675: as in the regular case in~\S~\ref{regular_real}.
676:
677:
678:
679: In section~\ref{singular_explicit}
680: we explicitly construct the operator
681: $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
682: satisfying the assumptions stated in~\S~\ref{assumptions}
683: for a class of marginal operators
684: with singular operator products defined in~\S~\ref{class}.
685: We give several examples of marginal operators
686: included in this class in~\S~\ref{examples}.
687: In~\S~\ref{explicitRenormalization}
688: we construct $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
689: for the class of marginal operators,
690: and we prove in~\S~\ref{BRST}
691: and in appendix~\ref{proof-appendix}
692: that the assumptions stated
693: in~\S~\ref{assumptions}
694: are satisfied.
695: We discuss conformal properties of the operator
696: $[ \, O_L(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
697: in~\S~\ref{conformal}.
698:
699:
700: In section~\ref{discussion_deformed}
701: we discuss string field theory around the deformed background
702: and demonstrate that it can be elegantly formulated
703: in terms of a new set of algebraic structures
704: by defining a deformed star product,
705: deformed inner product, and deformed BRST operator.
706: Section~\ref{discussion} is for discussion,
707: and in appendix~\ref{discussion_FKP}
708: we explain the relation to the previous work
709: by Fuchs, Kroyter and Potting in~\cite{Fuchs:2007yy}
710: for the special case of marginal deformations
711: corresponding to the constant mode of the gauge field.
712:
713:
714: \section{Marginal deformations
715: with regular operator products}\label{regular}
716: \setcounter{equation}{0}
717:
718: \subsection{Solutions using integrated vertex operators}\label{regular_PsiL}
719:
720: When we calculate $n$-point scattering amplitudes for open bosonic
721: strings on the disk, we use three {\it unintegrated} vertex
722: operators and $n-3$ {\it integrated} vertex operators.
723: The unintegrated vertex operator takes the form $cV$,
724: where $c$ is the $c$ ghost
725: and $V$ is a matter primary field of dimension one.
726: The unintegrated vertex operator is
727: invariant under the BRST transformation:
728: \begin{equation}
729: Q_B \cdot cV (t)
730: \equiv \int_{C (t)} \Bigl[ \, \frac{dz}{2 \pi i} \, j_B (z)
731: - \frac{d \bar{z}}{2 \pi i} \, \tilde{\jmath}_B (\bar{z}) \,
732: \Bigr] \, cV (t) = 0 \,.
733: \label{QcV}
734: \end{equation}
735: The integrated vertex operator is an integral of $V$
736: on the boundary.
737: The BRST transformation of $V$ is a total derivative,
738: \begin{equation}
739: Q_B \cdot V (t) = \partial_t \, [ \, cV (t) \, ] \,,
740: \end{equation}
741: and thus the integrated vertex operator
742: is invariant under the BRST transformation
743: up to nonvanishing terms from the boundaries
744: of the integral region:
745: \begin{equation}\label{QV(a,b)}
746: Q_B \cdot V(a,b)
747: = Q_B \cdot \int_a^b dt \, V(t)
748: = \int_a^b dt \, \partial_t \, [ \, cV(t) \, ]
749: = cV(b) - cV(a) \,.
750: \end{equation}
751: The vertex operator $V$ generates a marginal deformation
752: of the boundary CFT.
753: When the deformation is exactly marginal, we
754: expect a corresponding solution $\Psi$
755: to the equation of motion
756: of open string field theory~\cite{Witten:1985cc}:
757: \begin{equation}
758: Q_B \Psi + \Psi \ast \Psi = 0 \,.
759: \end{equation}
760: In~\cite{Schnabl:2007az, Kiermaier:2007ba},
761: analytic solutions for marginal deformations in open
762: bosonic string field theory were constructed to all orders in the
763: deformation parameter $\lambda$ when operator products $V(t_1) \,
764: V(t_2) \ldots V(t_n)$ of the marginal operator are regular.
765: The solution in~\cite{Schnabl:2007az, Kiermaier:2007ba}
766: takes the form of an expansion in $\lambda$,
767: \begin{equation}
768: \Psi=\sum_{n=1}^\infty \lambda^n \, \Psi^{(n)} \,,
769: \end{equation}
770: and the equation of motion for $\Psi^{(n)}$ is
771: \begin{equation}\label{EOMexpansion}
772: Q_B\Psi^{(n)}=-\sum_{i=1}^{n-1}\Psi^{(n-i)}\ast\Psi^{(i)} \,.
773: \end{equation}
774: In the solution constructed
775: in~\cite{Schnabl:2007az, Kiermaier:2007ba},
776: $\Psi^{(n)}$ is made of $n$
777: unintegrated vertex operators and $n-1$ $b$-ghost insertions. In
778: this section, we construct $\Psi^{(n)}$ using
779: one unintegrated and $n-1$ integrated vertex
780: operators when operator products of the marginal operator
781: are regular.
782:
783: We choose the first term $\Psi^{(1)}$ of the solution to be
784: \begin{equation}\label{psi1cft}
785: \langle \, \phi, \Psi^{(1)} \, \rangle = \langle \, f \circ \phi (0)
786: \, c V (1) \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_1} \,.
787: \end{equation}
788: This satisfies the linearized equation of motion.
789: The starting point of our construction is the observation that
790: $\Psi_L^{(2)}$ made of one unintegrated vertex operator
791: and one integrated vertex operator given by
792: \begin{equation}
793: \langle \, \phi \,, \Psi_L^{(2)} \, \rangle
794: = \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \, cV (1) \, V(1,2) \,
795: \rangle_{{\cal W}_2}
796: = \int_1^2 dt \, \langle
797: \, f \circ \phi (0) \, cV (1) \, V(t) \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_2}
798: \label{regPsiL^(2)}
799: \end{equation}
800: solves the equation of motion
801: $Q_B \Psi_L^{(2)} = {}- \Psi^{(1)} \ast \Psi^{(1)}$.
802: This can be shown as follows:
803: \begin{equation}
804: \begin{split}
805: \langle \, \phi \,, Q_B \, \Psi_L^{(2)} \, \rangle & = {}- \int_1^2
806: dt \, \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \, cV (1) \, \partial_t \, [ \, cV
807: (t) \, ] \,
808: \rangle_{{\cal W}_2} \\
809: & = {}- \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \, cV (1) \, cV (2) \,
810: \rangle_{{\cal W}_2} \\
811: & = {}- \langle \, \phi \,, \Psi^{(1)} \ast \Psi^{(1)} \, \rangle
812: \,,
813: \end{split}
814: \end{equation}
815: where we have used the formulas (\ref{QcV}) and (\ref{QV(a,b)}),
816: and
817: \begin{equation}
818: \lim_{t_2 \to t_1} cV(t_1) \, cV(t_2) = 0 \,,
819: \end{equation}
820: which follows from the condition that the operator product
821: $V(t_1) \, V(t_2)$ is regular in the limit $t_2 \to t_1$.
822:
823: Let us next construct a solution to $\ord{\lambda^3}$.
824: We look for $\Psi_L^{(3)}$ which satisfies
825: \begin{equation}
826: Q_B \, \Psi_L^{(3)}
827: = {}- \Psi^{(1)} \ast \Psi_L^{(2)}
828: - \Psi_L^{(2)} \ast \Psi^{(1)} .
829: \end{equation}
830: The right-hand side is given by
831: \begin{equation}\label{Psi1Psi2}
832: \begin{split}
833: {}- \langle \, \phi \,, \Psi^{(1)} \ast \Psi_L^{(2)}
834: + \Psi_L^{(2)} \ast \Psi^{(1)} \, \rangle
835: & = {}- \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
836: cV (1) \, cV (2) \, V(2,3) \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_3} \\
837: & \quad ~ {}- \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
838: cV (1) \, V(1,2) \, cV (3) \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_3} \,.
839: \end{split}
840: \end{equation}
841: First consider the state $\Psi^{(3)}_{L1}$ defined by
842: \begin{equation}
843: \langle \, \phi \,, \Psi^{(3)}_{L1} \, \rangle
844: = \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
845: cV (1) \, V (1,2) \, V(2,3) \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_3} \,.
846: \end{equation}
847: The BRST transformation of $\Psi^{(3)}_{L1}$ is
848: \begin{equation}
849: \begin{split}
850: \langle \, \phi \,, Q_B \, \Psi^{(3)}_{L1} \, \rangle
851: & = {}- \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
852: cV (1) \, cV (2) \, V(2,3) \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_3} \\
853: & \quad ~ {}- \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
854: cV (1) \, V (1,2) \, cV(3) \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_3} \\
855: & \quad ~{}+ \, \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
856: cV (1) \, V (1,2) \, cV(2) \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_3} \,.
857: \end{split}
858: \label{Q_B-Psi^(3)_1}
859: \end{equation}
860: The first two terms precisely give
861: $- \Psi^{(1)} \ast \Psi_L^{(2)} - \Psi_L^{(2)} \ast \Psi^{(1)}$.
862: To cancel the last term, consider $\Psi^{(3)}_{L2}$
863: defined by
864: \begin{equation}
865: \langle \, \phi \,, \Psi^{(3)}_{L2} \, \rangle
866: = \frac{1}{2} \,
867: \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
868: cV (1) \, \left(V(1,2)\right)^2 \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_3} \,.
869: \end{equation}
870: Using the formula
871: \begin{equation}\label{QVabn}
872: Q_B \cdot \left(V(a,b)\right)^n
873: = n \, [ \, \left(V(a,b)\right)^{n-1} cV(b) - cV(a) \left(V(a,b)\right)^{n-1} \, ] \,,
874: \end{equation}
875: which holds for marginal operators
876: with regular operator products,
877: the BRST transformation of $\Psi^{(3)}_{L2}$
878: can be calculated as follows:
879: \begin{equation}
880: \langle \, \phi \,, Q_B \, \Psi^{(3)}_{L2} \, \rangle
881: = {}- \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
882: cV (1) \, V (1,2) \, cV(2) \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_3} \,.
883: \end{equation}
884: This cancels the last term on the right-hand side
885: of (\ref{Q_B-Psi^(3)_1}).
886: Therefore, $\Psi_L^{(3)}$ can be constructed
887: by adding $\Psi^{(3)}_{L2}$ to $\Psi^{(3)}_{L1}$:
888: \begin{equation}
889: \begin{split}
890: \langle \, \phi \,, \Psi_L^{(3)} \, \rangle
891: & = \langle \, \phi \,, \Psi^{(3)}_{L1}
892: + \Psi^{(3)}_{L2} \, \rangle \\
893: & = \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \, cV (1) \, V (1,2) \, V(2,3) \,
894: \rangle_{{\cal W}_3}
895: + \frac{1}{2} \, \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
896: cV (1) \, \left(V(1,2)\right)^2 \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_3} \,.
897: \end{split}
898: \end{equation}
899:
900: To generalize this solution to higher orders,
901: it turns out to be crucial to rewrite $\Psi_L^{(3)}$
902: in a different form.
903: Using a path-ordered expression
904: for $\Psi^{(3)}_{L2} \,$,
905: $\Psi_L^{(3)}$ can also be written as
906: \begin{figure}[tb]
907: \centerline{\hbox{\epsfig{figure=solutionPsi3.eps, width=17.cm}}}
908: \caption{Illustration of $\Psi_L^{(3)}$.
909: The solid dot represents the $cV$ insertion,
910: and the circles represent the two $V$ insertions.
911: The left $V$ is integrated from $1$ to $2$\,,
912: and the right $V$ is integrated from
913: the position of the left $V$ to $3$\,.
914: }\label{figsolutionPsi3}
915: \end{figure}
916: \begin{equation}
917: \begin{split}
918: \langle \, \phi \,, \Psi_L^{(3)} \, \rangle
919: & = \int_1^2 dt_1 \, \int_2^3 dt_2 \, \langle \,
920: f \circ \phi (0) \, cV (1) \, V (t_1) \, V(t_2) \,
921: \rangle_{{\cal W}_3} \\
922: & \qquad {}+ \int_1^2 dt_1 \, \int_{t_1}^2 dt_2 \,
923: \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
924: cV (1) \, V (t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_3} \\
925: & = \int_1^2 dt_1 \, \int_{t_1}^3 dt_2 \,
926: \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
927: cV (1) \, V (t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_3} \,.
928: \end{split}
929: \end{equation}
930: See figure~\ref{figsolutionPsi3}.
931: It is instructive to see how $\Psi_L^{(3)}$ in this form
932: satisfies the equation of motion.
933: The BRST transformation of
934: $\Psi_L^{(3)}$ is given by
935: \begin{equation}\label{regQPsiL3}
936: \begin{split}
937: \langle \, \phi \,, Q_B\Psi_L^{(3)} \, \rangle = &-\int_1^2 dt_1 \,
938: \int_{t_1}^3 dt_2 \, \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \, cV (1) \,
939: \partial_{t_1} \, [ \, cV(t_1) \, ] \, V(t_2) \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_3}\\
940: & -\int_1^2 dt_1 \, \int_{t_1}^3 dt_2 \, \langle \, f \circ \phi
941: (0) \, cV (1) \, V(t_1) \,
942: \partial_{t_2} \, [ \, cV(t_2) \, ] \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_3} \,.
943: \end{split}
944: \end{equation}
945: The integral region of $t_2$ depends on $t_1$.
946: The first line on the right-hand side of (\ref{regQPsiL3})
947: can be calculated as follows:
948: \begin{equation}\label{Q_B-Psi_L^(3)-1}
949: \begin{split}
950: &-\int_1^2 dt_1 \,
951: \int_{t_1}^3 dt_2 \, \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \, cV (1) \,
952: \partial_{t_1} \, [ \, cV(t_1) \, ] \, V(t_2) \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_3}\\
953: & = -\int_1^2 dt_1 \, \partial_{t_1}
954: \biggl[ \, \int_{t_1}^3 dt_2 \, \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
955: cV (1) \, cV(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \biggr] \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_3}
956: - \int_1^2 dt_1 \, \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \, cV (1) \,
957: cV^2(t_1) \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_3}\\
958: & = -\int_2^3 dt_2 \, \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \, cV (1) \,
959: cV(2) \, V(t_2) \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_3}
960: - \int_1^2 dt_1 \, \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \, cV (1) \,
961: cV^2(t_1) \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_3} \\
962: & = {}- \langle \, \phi \,, \Psi^{(1)} \ast \Psi_L^{(2)} \, \rangle
963: - \int_1^2 dt_1 \, \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \, cV (1) \,
964: cV^2(t_1) \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_3} \,. \\
965: \end{split}
966: \end{equation}
967: The calculation of the second line
968: on the right-hand side of (\ref{regQPsiL3}) is straightforward:
969: \begin{equation}\label{Q_B-Psi_L^(3)-2}
970: \begin{split}
971: & -\int_1^2 dt_1 \, \int_{t_1}^3 dt_2 \, \langle \, f \circ \phi
972: (0) \, cV (1) \, V(t_1) \,
973: \partial_{t_2} \, [ \, cV(t_2) \, ] \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_3} \\
974: & = -\int_1^2 dt_1 \, \langle \, f \circ \phi
975: (0) \, cV (1) \, V(t_1) \, cV(3) \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_3}
976: +\int_1^2 dt_1 \, \langle \, f \circ \phi
977: (0) \, cV (1) \, cV^2(t_1) \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_3} \\
978: & = {}- \langle \, \phi \,, \Psi_L^{(2)} \ast \Psi^{(1)} \, \rangle
979: +\int_1^2 dt_1 \, \langle \, f \circ \phi
980: (0) \, cV (1) \, cV^2(t_1) \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_3} \,.
981: \end{split}
982: \end{equation}
983: Note that the two terms with $cV^2$, which arise from collisions of
984: $cV$ and $V$, cancel each other.
985: We have thus reconfirmed that the equation of motion
986: at $\ord{\lambda^3}$ is satisfied.
987:
988: This form of $\Psi_L^{(3)}$ can be generalized
989: to $\Psi_L^{(n)}$ for any $n$ as follows:
990: \begin{equation}
991: \begin{split}
992: \langle \, \phi \,, \Psi_L^{(n)} \, \rangle &=
993: \Bigl\langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
994: \, c V(1)
995: \int_1^{2} dt_1 \int_{t_1}^{3}
996: dt_2\int_{t_2}^4dt_3 \, \ldots \, \int_{t_{n-2}}^{n}
997: dt_{n-1}
998: \, V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \,V(t_3)\, \ldots \, V(t_{n-1})\Bigr\rangle_{{\cal W}_n} \\
999: &=\Bigl\langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
1000: \, c V(1)
1001: \prod_{j=1}^{n-1} \, \int_{t_{j-1}}^{j+1}dt_j \, V(t_j)\,\Bigr\rangle_{{\cal W}_n}
1002: \qquad \text{ with} \quad t_0\equiv1 \,.
1003: \end{split}
1004: \end{equation}
1005: See figure~\ref{solutionPsin}.
1006: It is straightforward to show that $\Psi_L^{(n)}$
1007: satisfies the equation of motion:
1008: \begin{figure}[tb]
1009: \centerline{\hbox{\epsfig{figure=solutionPsin.eps, width=17.cm}}}
1010: \caption{Illustration of $\Psi_L^{(n)}$.
1011: The solid dot represents the $cV$ insertion,
1012: and the circles represent the $V$ insertions.
1013: The integration region of $t_j$
1014: is from $t_{j-1}$ to $j+1$.
1015: }\label{solutionPsin}
1016: \end{figure}
1017: \begin{equation}
1018: \begin{split}
1019: \langle \, \phi & \,, Q_B\Psi_L^{(n)} \, \rangle\\
1020: =&-\sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \, \Bigl\langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
1021: c V(1)
1022: \prod_{j=1}^{i-1} \int_{t_{j-1}}^{j+1}dt_j V(t_j)
1023: \, \int_{t_{i-1}}^{i+1}dt_i \,
1024: \partial_{t_i} \, [ \, cV(t_i) \, ] \,
1025: \prod_{k=i+1}^{n-1} \int_{t_{k-1}}^{k+1}dt_k V(t_k) \,
1026: \Bigr\rangle_{{\cal W}_n} \\
1027: =&-\sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \, \Bigl\langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
1028: c V(1)
1029: \prod_{j=1}^{i-1} \int_{t_{j-1}}^{j+1}dt_j V(t_j)
1030: \,\, cV(i+1) \,
1031: \int_{i+1}^{i+2}dt_{i+1}\ldots\int_{t_{n-2}}^{n}dt_{n-1}\,
1032: V(t_{i+1})\ldots V(t_k) \,
1033: \Bigr\rangle_{{\cal W}_n} \\
1034: &+\sum_{i=2}^{n-1} \, \Bigl\langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
1035: c V(1)
1036: \prod_{j=1}^{i-1} \int_{t_{j-1}}^{j+1}dt_j V(t_j)
1037: \,\, cV(t_{i-1}) \,
1038: \int_{t_{i-1}}^{i+2}dt_{i+1}\ldots\int_{t_{n-2}}^{n}dt_{n-1}\,
1039: V(t_{i+1})\ldots V(t_k) \,
1040: \Bigr\rangle_{{\cal W}_n} \\
1041: &+\sum_{i=1}^{n-2} \, \Bigl\langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
1042: c V(1)
1043: \prod_{j=1}^{i-1} \int_{t_{j-1}}^{j+1}dt_j V(t_j)
1044: \, \int_{t_{i-1}}^{i+1}dt_i \, cV(t_i) \,
1045: \partial_{t_i}\Biggl[ \, \prod_{k=i+1}^{n-1}
1046: \int_{t_{k-1}}^{k+1}dt_k V(t_k) \, \Biggr] \,
1047: \Bigr\rangle_{{\cal W}_n} \,.
1048: \end{split}
1049: \end{equation}
1050: By carrying out the differentiation in the last line,
1051: we find that the last line precisely
1052: cancels the second line on the right-hand side.
1053: The remaining first line on the right-hand side
1054: is a sum of ${}- \Psi^{(i)} \ast \Psi^{(n-i)}$ over $i$.
1055: We have thus shown
1056: \begin{equation}\label{QregPsiLn}
1057: \langle \, \phi \,,\, Q_B\Psi_L^{(n)} \, \rangle
1058: =- \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \, \langle \, \phi \,, \Psi^{(i)}
1059: \ast \Psi^{(n-i)} \, \rangle\,.
1060: \end{equation}
1061: It is convenient to introduce the following notation:
1062: \begin{equation}\label{regVL}
1063: \begin{split}
1064: V_L^{(n)} (1,n+1) &\equiv \int_1^{2} dt_1
1065: \int_{t_1}^{3}dt_2 \int_{t_2}^{4}dt_3
1066: \, \ldots \, \int_{t_{n-1}}^{n+1}
1067: dt_{n}
1068: \, V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \ldots \, V(t_{n}) \quad\text{ for }\quad
1069: n \geq 1 \,, \\
1070: V_L^{(0)}(1,1) &\equiv 1 \,.
1071: \end{split}
1072: \end{equation}
1073: The superscript $(n)$ indicates the number of operators
1074: and $(1,n+1)$ indicates the region
1075: where operators are inserted, although this notation
1076: is slightly redundant because the number of operators
1077: and the length of the region are correlated
1078: for $V_L^{(n)} (1,n+1)$.
1079: The solution $\Psi_L^{(n)}$ can now be compactly written as
1080: \begin{equation}\label{regPsiLn}
1081: \langle \, \phi \,, \Psi_L^{(n)} \, \rangle =
1082: \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
1083: \, c V(1) \,\, V_L^{(n-1)} (1,n)\,\rangle_{{\cal W}_n} \,.
1084: \end{equation}
1085: The state $\Psi_L$ defined by
1086: \begin{equation}
1087: \Psi_L = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \lambda^n \, \Psi_L^{(n)}
1088: \end{equation}
1089: thus solves the equation of motion to all orders in $\lambda$.
1090:
1091:
1092: \subsection{Solutions satisfying the reality condition}\label{regular_real}
1093:
1094: The solution $\Psi_L$ constructed in the previous subsection
1095: satisfies the equation of motion,
1096: but it does not satisfy the reality condition
1097: on the string field.
1098: In this subsection, we construct a solution satisfying
1099: the reality condition from $\Psi_L$.
1100:
1101: \subsubsection{The reality condition}\label{subsubreality}
1102:
1103: The string field $\Psi$ must have a definite parity
1104: under the combination of the Hermitean conjugation (hc)
1105: and the inverse BPZ conjugation ($\text{bpz}^{-1}$)
1106: to guarantee that the string field theory action
1107: is real~\cite{Gaberdiel:1997ia}.
1108: We define the conjugate $A^\ddagger$ of a string field $A$ by
1109: \begin{equation}
1110: A^\ddagger \equiv \text{bpz}^{-1} \circ \text{hc} \, (A) \,.
1111: \end{equation}
1112: With this definition,
1113: the following relations hold:
1114: \begin{eqnarray}
1115: (Q_B A)^\ddagger &=& {}- (-1)^A \, Q_B A^\ddagger \,,
1116: \label{conjugation-with-Q_B} \\
1117: (A \ast B)^\ddagger &=& B^\ddagger \ast A^\ddagger \,.
1118: \end{eqnarray}
1119: Here and in what follows a string field in the exponent of $(-1)$
1120: denotes its Grassmann property:
1121: it is $0$ mod $2$ for a Grassmann-even state
1122: and $1$ mod $2$ for a Grassmann-odd state.
1123: Since the string field $\Psi$ is Grassmann odd,
1124: it must be {\it even}
1125: under the conjugation $\Psi^\ddagger = \Psi$
1126: in order that $Q_B \Psi$ and $\Psi \ast \Psi$ have the same parity.
1127: We will say that a string field of ghost number one is
1128: \emph{real} when it is even under the conjugation.
1129:
1130: The class of states we use in constructing solutions
1131: for marginal deformations are made of wedge states
1132: with insertions of $cV$ and $V$. Let us consider the conjugate
1133: of a state in this class.
1134: The wedge state $W_\alpha$~\cite{Rastelli:2000iu}
1135: is even under the conjugation
1136: $W_\alpha^\ddagger = W_\alpha$ because it is constructed from
1137: the $SL(2,R)$-invariant vacuum $\ket{0}$
1138: satisfying $\ket{0}^\ddagger=\ket{0}$
1139: by acting with BPZ-even Virasoro generators
1140: $L_{-2}, \, L_{-4}, \, \ldots \,$.
1141: The first term $\Psi^{(1)}$ in the solution
1142: must be even $( \Psi^{(1)} )^\ddagger = \Psi^{(1)}$,
1143: as we discussed above.
1144: Therefore, the conjugate of $W_\alpha \ast \Psi^{(1)} \ast W_\beta$
1145: is $W_\beta \ast \Psi^{(1)} \ast W_\alpha$.
1146: This means that the operator $cV(t)$ on ${\cal W}_n$
1147: is mapped to $cV(n+1-t)$ under the conjugation:
1148: \begin{equation}
1149: cV(t) ~ \longrightarrow ~ cV(n+1-t)
1150: \quad \text{on} \quad {\cal W}_n \,.
1151: \end{equation}
1152: Its derivative $\partial_t \, [ \, cV(t) \, ]$ at $t=a$
1153: is then mapped to ${}- \partial_t \, [ \, cV(t) \, ]$ at $t=n+1-a$.
1154: Since $\partial_t \, [ \, cV(t) \, ]$ is the BRST transformation
1155: of $V(t)$, this means that $Q_B \cdot V(a)$ is mapped
1156: to ${}- Q_B \cdot V(n+1-a)$ on ${\cal W}_n$.
1157: It then follows from (\ref{conjugation-with-Q_B}) that
1158: $V(t)$ is mapped under the conjugation as follows:
1159: \begin{equation}
1160: V(t) ~ \longrightarrow ~ V(n+1-t)
1161: \quad \text{on} \quad {\cal W}_n \,.
1162: \end{equation}
1163: It is straightforward to generalize the argument
1164: to the case with multiple operator insertions.
1165: The conjugate of the state made of the wedge state $W_n$
1166: with $cV(t_1), V(t_2), V(t_3), \ldots, V(t_m)$
1167: is therefore the state made of $W_n$ with
1168: $V(n+1-t_m), V(n+1-t_{m-1}), \ldots , V(n+1-t_2), cV(n+1-t_1)$.
1169:
1170: The state $\Psi_L^{(n)}$ with $n \geq 2$ does not satisfy
1171: the reality condition. Indeed, the operator $V_L^{(n-1)} (1,n)$
1172: defined in~(\ref{regVL}) is mapped as
1173: \begin{equation}
1174: \begin{split}
1175: \int_1^{2} dt_1 \int_{t_1}^{3}
1176: dt_2&\int_{t_2}^{4}dt_3 \, \ldots \, \int_{t_{n-2}}^{n}
1177: dt_{n-1}
1178: \, V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \ldots \, V(t_{n-1})\\
1179: ~ \longrightarrow ~
1180: & \int_1^2 dt_1 \int_{t_1}^3 dt_2 \int_{t_2}^4 dt_3 \,
1181: \ldots \, \int_{t_{n-2}}^n dt_{n-1}
1182: \, V(n+1-t_{n-1}) \, V(n+1-t_{n-2}) \, \ldots \, V(n+1-t_1) \\
1183: & = \int_{n-1}^n dt'_1 \int_{n-2}^{t'_1}
1184: dt'_2 \int_{n-3}^{t'_2} dt'_3 \ldots \int_1^{t'_{n-2}} dt'_{n-1} \,
1185: V(t'_{n-1}) \, V(t'_{n-2}) \ldots V(t'_1)
1186: \end{split}
1187: \end{equation}
1188: under the conjugation, where $t'_i = n+1-t_i$.
1189: We denote the conjugate of $\Psi_L^{(n)}$ by $\Psi_R^{(n)}$.
1190: It is given by
1191: \begin{equation}
1192: \langle \, \phi \,, \Psi_R^{(n)} \, \rangle =
1193: \langle \, \phi \,, ( \Psi_L^{(n)} )^\ddagger \, \rangle =
1194: \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
1195: \,
1196: \, V_R^{(n-1)} (1,n) \,\, c V(n)\,\rangle_{{\cal W}_n} \,,
1197: \end{equation}
1198: where we defined
1199: \begin{equation}
1200: \begin{split}
1201: V_R^{(n)} (1,n+1) &\equiv \int_{n}^{n+1} dt_1
1202: \int_{n-1}^{t_1} dt_2 \int_{n-2}^{t_2} dt_3
1203: \ldots \int_1^{t_{n-1}} dt_{n} \,
1204: V(t_{n}) \, V(t_{n-1}) \ldots V(t_1)
1205: \quad\text{ for }\quad n\geq1\,,\\
1206: V_R^{(0)} (1,1)&\equiv1\,.
1207: \end{split}
1208: \end{equation}
1209: If $\Psi$ satisfies the equation of motion,
1210: its conjugate $\Psi^\ddagger$ also satisfies the equation of motion
1211: because
1212: \begin{equation}
1213: Q_B \Psi^\ddagger + \Psi^\ddagger \ast \Psi^\ddagger
1214: = (Q_B \Psi + \Psi \ast\Psi)^\ddagger = 0 \,.
1215: \end{equation}
1216: Therefore, $\Psi_R$ defined by
1217: \begin{equation}
1218: \Psi_R = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \lambda^n \, \Psi_R^{(n)}
1219: \end{equation}
1220: satisfies the equation of motion.
1221:
1222: \subsubsection{Gauge transformation}
1223:
1224: We have found two solutions $\Psi_L$ and $\Psi_R$,
1225: and we expect that they are related by a gauge transformation
1226: generated by some gauge parameter $U$:
1227: \begin{equation}\label{PsiRL}
1228: \Psi_R \, = \, U^{-1}\ast \Psi_L\ast U + U^{-1}\ast Q_B U
1229: \,.
1230: \end{equation}
1231: For a physical gauge transformation
1232: which relates two string fields satisfying the reality condition,
1233: the gauge parameter $U$ must satisfy the unitarity relation
1234: $U^\ddagger = U^{-1}$.
1235: As we will see later, the gauge parameter $U$
1236: that relates $\Psi_L$ and $\Psi_R$ is even under the conjugation:
1237: $U^\ddagger = U$.
1238: The component fields of $\Psi_L$ and $\Psi_R$
1239: which do not satisfy the reality condition
1240: are thus related through the component fields of $U$
1241: which also violate the reality condition on the gauge parameter.
1242:
1243: Let us now construct $U$ which relates $\Psi_L$ and $\Psi_R$.
1244: It is convenient to rewrite the equation~(\ref{PsiRL}) as follows:
1245: \begin{equation}\label{QU}
1246: Q_B U\, = \, U \ast \Psi_R \, - \,\Psi_L\ast U
1247: \,.
1248: \end{equation}
1249: We can expand $U$ as
1250: \begin{equation}
1251: U = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \lambda^n \, U^{(n)}
1252: \quad \text{with} \quad U^{(0)} = 1 \,,
1253: \end{equation}
1254: and we solve the equation perturbatively in $\lambda$.
1255: We can choose
1256: \begin{equation}
1257: U^{(1)}=0
1258: \end{equation}
1259: because $\Psi_L^{(1)} = \Psi_R^{(1)}$ and therefore $Q_B U^{(1)}=0$.
1260: The equation for $U^{(2)}$ is
1261: \begin{equation}
1262: \langle \, \phi, Q_B \, U^{(2)} \, \rangle
1263: = \langle \, \phi, \Psi_R^{(2)} \, \rangle
1264: - \langle \, \phi, \Psi_L^{(2)} \, \rangle
1265: = \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
1266: [ \, V(1,2) \, cV (2) - cV (1) \, V(1,2) \, ] \,
1267: \rangle_{{\cal W}_2} \,.
1268: \end{equation}
1269: This can be easily solved using the formula (\ref{QVabn}),
1270: and a solution is
1271: \begin{equation}
1272: \langle \, \phi, U^{(2)} \, \rangle
1273: = \frac{1}{2} \, \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
1274: \left(V(1,2)\right)^2 \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_2}\,.
1275: \end{equation}
1276: We can construct $U^{(n)}$ at higher orders recursively in this way.
1277: However, we can infer $U^{(n)}$ from the structure of (\ref{QU}).
1278: If we assume that $U$ can be written
1279: without using $c$ ghosts,
1280: the only $c$ ghost is inserted at $t=n$
1281: in the $\ord{\lambda^n}$ term of
1282: $\langle \, \phi, U \ast \Psi_R \, \rangle$
1283: when represented on ${\cal W}_n$
1284: and at $t=1$ on ${\cal W}_n$
1285: in the $\ord{\lambda^n}$ term of
1286: $\langle \, \phi, \Psi_L \ast U \, \rangle$.
1287: This motivates us to make the following ansatz:
1288: \begin{equation}
1289: \langle \, \phi, U^{(n)} \, \rangle
1290: \propto \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \, V^{(n)} (1,n) \,
1291: \rangle_{{\cal W}_n} \,,
1292: \end{equation}
1293: where
1294: \begin{equation}
1295: V^{(n)} (a,b) \equiv \frac{1}{n!}\left(V(a,b)\right)^n
1296: \quad\text{ for }\quad
1297: n \geq 1 \,, \qquad V^{(0)}(a,b)\equiv1 \,.
1298: \end{equation}
1299: We in fact show that the gauge transformation $U$ in~(\ref{PsiRL})
1300: is given by
1301: \begin{figure}[tb]
1302: \Large
1303: \begin{center}
1304: $1+\frac{\lambda^2}{2!}$
1305: \raisebox{-1.7cm}{\epsfig{figure=U2.eps, height=4.15cm}}
1306: $\,+\,\,\frac{\lambda^3}{3!}$
1307: \raisebox{-1.7cm}{\epsfig{figure=U3.eps, height=4.15cm}}
1308: $+\,\,\ldots$
1309: \end{center}
1310: \normalsize
1311: \caption{Illustration of the expansion
1312: $U=1 + \lambda^2 \, U^{(2)} + \lambda^3 \, U^{(3)}
1313: + \ord{\lambda^4}$.}
1314: \label{figU}
1315: \end{figure}
1316: \begin{equation}\label{regU}
1317: \langle \, \phi \,, U^{(n)} \, \rangle =
1318: \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
1319: \, V^{(n)}(1,n)\,\rangle_{{\cal W}_n}\,.
1320: \end{equation}
1321: See figure~\ref{figU}.
1322: The BRST transformation of $U^{(n)}$ given in~(\ref{regU}) is
1323: \begin{equation}\label{QUlhs}
1324: \langle \, \phi, Q_B U^{(n)} \, \rangle
1325: =\bigl\langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
1326: \, \, \bigl(V^{(n-1)}(1,n)\,cV(n) \, - \, cV(1)\,V^{(n-1)}(1,n)\bigr) \,\bigr\rangle_{{\cal
1327: W}_n}\,,
1328: \end{equation}
1329: where we used~(\ref{QVabn}).
1330: For the special case of $n=1$,
1331: the terms on the right-hand side cancel,
1332: which is consistent because $U^{(1)}=0$.
1333: The $\ord{\lambda^n}$ term of
1334: $U \ast \Psi_R \, - \,\Psi_L\ast U$
1335: in~(\ref{QU}) is given by
1336: \begin{equation}\label{QUrhs}
1337: \begin{split}
1338: &\sum_{m=1}^{n}\langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
1339: \, \, V^{(n-m)}(1,n-m)\,V_R^{(m-1)}(n-m+1,n)\, cV(n) \,\rangle_{{\cal W}_n}\\
1340: &- \sum_{m=1}^{n}
1341: \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,\,\, cV(1) \,
1342: V_L^{(m-1)}(1,m)\,V^{(n-m)}(m+1,n)\,\rangle_{{\cal W}_n}\,.
1343: \end{split}
1344: \end{equation}
1345: The proof of~(\ref{QU}) for $U$ given in~(\ref{regU})
1346: thus reduces to showing that
1347: \begin{equation}\label{V1toVLV0}
1348: \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
1349: \, \, cV(1) \, V^{(n-1)}(1,n)\,\rangle_{{\cal W}_n}\,
1350: =\sum_{m=1}^{n}\langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
1351: \,\, cV(1) \,
1352: V_L^{(m-1)}(1,m)\,V^{(n-m)}(m+1,n)\,\rangle_{{\cal W}_n}\,
1353: \end{equation}
1354: and
1355: \begin{equation}
1356: \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
1357: \, \, V^{(n-1)}(1,n) \, cV(n) \,\rangle_{{\cal W}_n}\,
1358: =\sum_{m=1}^{n}\langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
1359: \, \, V^{(n-m)}(1,n-m)\,V_R^{(m-1)}(n-m+1,n)\, cV(n) \,
1360: \rangle_{{\cal W}_n}\,.
1361: \end{equation}
1362: Since the second equation
1363: follows from the first one by the conjugation,
1364: it is sufficient to show~(\ref{V1toVLV0}).
1365: The operator $V^{(n-1)}(1,n)$ on the left-hand side can be written
1366: in a path-ordered form as follows:
1367: \begin{equation}
1368: V^{(n-1)}(1,n)=\int_1^n dt_1\int_{t_1}^n dt_2\ldots \int_{t_{n-2}}^n
1369: dt_{n-1} \, V(t_1)\ldots V(t_{n-1}) \,.
1370: \end{equation}
1371: We now decompose the integration region $1\leq t_1\leq t_2\leq
1372: \ldots\leq t_{n-1}\leq n$ in the following way:
1373: \begin{equation}\label{integrationdecomposition}
1374: \begin{split}
1375: & t_1 \ge 2 \,, \\
1376: & t_1 \le 2 \,,\, t_2 \ge 3 \,, \\
1377: & t_1 \le 2 \,,\, t_2 \le 3 \,,\, t_3 \ge 4 \,, \\
1378: & \qquad \qquad \vdots \\
1379: & t_1 \le 2 \,,\, t_2 \le 3 \,,\, \ldots \,,\, t_{m-1} \le m \,,\,
1380: t_{m} \ge m+1 \,,\\
1381: & \qquad \qquad \vdots \\
1382: & t_1 \le 2 \,,\, t_2 \le 3 \,,\, t_3 \le 4 \,,\, \ldots\ldots\ldots
1383: \,,\, t_{n-2} \le n-1 \,,\, t_{n-1} \ge n \,,
1384: \\
1385: & t_1 \le 2 \,,\, t_2 \le 3 \,,\, t_3 \le 4 \,,\, \ldots\ldots\ldots
1386: \,,\, t_{n-2} \le n-1 \,,\, t_{n-1} \le n \,.
1387: \end{split}
1388: \end{equation}
1389: This decomposition of the integration region
1390: precisely matches the right-hand side
1391: of~(\ref{V1toVLV0}).
1392: For example, the fourth line of~(\ref{integrationdecomposition})
1393: corresponds to the integration region for the product
1394: of the operators $V_L^{(m-1)}(1,m) \, V^{(n-m)}(m+1,n)$.
1395: Furthermore, the fifth line vanishes because of
1396: the vanishing integration range $n\leq t_{n-1}\leq n$.
1397: This is consistent with the right-hand side of~(\ref{V1toVLV0})
1398: because $V^{(1)}(n,n)=0$.
1399: The last line
1400: is nonvanishing and corresponds to
1401: $V_L^{(n-1)}(1,n) \, V^{(0)}(n+1,n) = V_L^{(n-1)}(1,n)$,
1402: where we used $V^{(0)}(a,b) \equiv 1$.
1403: We conclude that
1404: \begin{equation}\label{decomposeVn}
1405: V^{(n-1)}(1,n)\,
1406: =\,\sum_{m=1}^{n}\, V_L^{(m-1)}(1,m)\,V^{(n-m)}(m+1,n) \,,
1407: \end{equation}
1408: and we have thus shown~(\ref{V1toVLV0}). This completes the proof
1409: that $U$ is the gauge transformation that relates $\Psi_L$ and
1410: $\Psi_R$.
1411:
1412: \subsubsection{Construction of a real solution}
1413:
1414: The state $U$ takes the form
1415: \begin{equation}
1416: U = 1 + \sum_{n=2}^\infty \lambda^n \, U^{(n)} \,,
1417: \end{equation}
1418: and $U^{(n)}$ is even under the conjugation:
1419: $(U^{(n)})^\ddagger = U^{(n)}$.
1420: If a state $X$ is even under the conjugation,
1421: then $\ln (1+X)$ defined by
1422: \begin{equation}
1423: \ln (1+X) \equiv \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n} \,
1424: \underbrace{\, X \ast X \ast \ldots \ast X \,}_{n}
1425: \end{equation}
1426: is also even.
1427: If a state $Y$ is even, then $\exp \, (a \, Y)$ with real $a$ defined by
1428: \begin{equation}
1429: \exp \, (a \, Y) \equiv 1+\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{a^n}{n!} \,
1430: \underbrace{\, Y \ast Y \ast \ldots \ast Y \,}_{n}
1431: \end{equation}
1432: is also even.
1433: Therefore, $(1+X)^{-1}$, $\sqrt{1+X}$ and $1/\sqrt{1+X}$ defined by
1434: \begin{equation}
1435: \begin{split}
1436: (1+X)^{-1} & \equiv
1437: \exp \left[ \, - \ln (1+X) \, \right]
1438: = 1 + \sum_{n=1}^\infty \, (-1)^n \,
1439: \underbrace{\, X \ast X \ast \ldots \ast X \,}_{n} \,, \\
1440: \sqrt{1+X} & \equiv
1441: \exp \left[ \, \frac{1}{2} \, \ln (1+X) \, \right] \,, \qquad
1442: \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+X}} \equiv
1443: \exp \left[ \, - \frac{1}{2} \, \ln (1+X) \, \right]
1444: \end{split}
1445: \end{equation}
1446: are all even if $X^\ddagger = X$.
1447: We define $U^{-1}$, $\sqrt{U}$, and $1/\sqrt{U}$ in this way,
1448: which are well defined to all orders in $\lambda$
1449: and are even under the conjugation.
1450:
1451: We can now construct a real solution $\Psi$ from $\Psi_L$
1452: as follows:
1453: \begin{equation}\label{Psireal}
1454: \begin{split}
1455: \Psi & \equiv \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast \Psi_L \ast \sqrt{U} +
1456: \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast Q_B \, \sqrt{U}\\
1457: &= \sqrt{U} \ast \Psi_R \ast \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}}
1458: + \sqrt{U} \ast Q_B \, \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \\
1459: & = \frac{1}{2} \, \biggl[ \,
1460: \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast \Psi_L \ast \sqrt{U}
1461: + \sqrt{U} \ast \Psi_R \ast \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} +
1462: \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast Q_B \, \sqrt{U} - Q_B \, \sqrt{U}
1463: \ast \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \, \biggr] \,.
1464: \end{split}
1465: \end{equation}
1466: The second expression is obtained from the first one
1467: using $Q_B U = U \ast \Psi_R - \Psi_L \ast U$,
1468: and $\Psi$ manifestly satisfies the reality condition
1469: in the third expression because of the relations
1470: $\Psi_L^\ddagger=\Psi_R$,
1471: $(\sqrt{U} \, )^\ddagger = \sqrt{U}$,
1472: $(1/\sqrt{U} \, )^\ddagger = 1/\sqrt{U}$, and
1473: $(Q_B \, \sqrt{U} \, )^\ddagger
1474: = {}- Q_B \, \sqrt{U}$.
1475: The state $\Psi$ also satisfies the equation of motion
1476: because it is obtained from the solution $\Psi_L$
1477: by the gauge transformation generated by $\sqrt{U}$.
1478:
1479: We have successfully constructed
1480: real analytic solutions for marginal deformations
1481: with regular operator products.
1482: To summarize, our solution takes the form
1483: \begin{equation}
1484: \Psi = \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast \Psi_L \ast \sqrt{U} +
1485: \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast Q_B \, \sqrt{U} \,,
1486: \end{equation}
1487: where $\Psi_L$ and $U$ are defined by
1488: \begin{equation}
1489: \begin{split}
1490: \Psi_L & = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \lambda^n \, \Psi^{(n)}_L \,, \\
1491: \langle \, \phi \,, \Psi^{(n)}_L\, \rangle
1492: & = \,\langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
1493: \, c V(1) \,\, V_L^{(n-1)} (1,n)\,\rangle_{{\cal W}_n}\, \\
1494: &= \int_1^{2} dt_1 \int_{t_1}^{3}dt_2
1495: \, \ldots \, \int_{t_{n-2}}^{n} dt_{n-1}
1496: \,\langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,\, c V(1)\,
1497: \, V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \ldots \, V(t_{n-1})
1498: \,\rangle_{{\cal W}_n}\,,\\
1499: U & = 1 + \sum_{n=2}^\infty \lambda^n \, U^{(n)} \,, \\
1500: \langle \, \phi \,, U^{(n)} \, \rangle & =
1501: \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
1502: V^{(n)} (1,n)\,\rangle_{{\cal W}_n}\, \\
1503: & = \frac{1}{n!}
1504: \int_1^n dt_1 \int_1^n dt_2 \ldots \int_1^n dt_n \,
1505: \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
1506: V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \ldots V(t_n) \,
1507: \rangle_{{\cal W}_n} \,.
1508: \end{split}
1509: \end{equation}
1510:
1511: \subsection{Generalization of wedge states}\label{regular_generalizewedge}
1512:
1513: In the previous subsection, we found the identity (\ref{decomposeVn}).
1514: It is simply a consequence of the decomposition
1515: of the integral region (\ref{integrationdecomposition}).
1516: The identity (\ref{decomposeVn}) can be generalized in the following way.
1517: We define $V_{L,\alpha}^{(n)} (1,n+\alpha)$ for $\alpha \ge 0$ by
1518: \begin{equation}\label{regVLalpha}
1519: \begin{split}
1520: V_{L,\alpha}^{(n)} (1,n+\alpha) &\equiv \int_1^{1+\alpha} dt_1
1521: \int_{t_1}^{2+\alpha} dt_2 \int_{t_2}^{3+\alpha} dt_3 \, \ldots \,
1522: \int_{t_{n-1}}^{n+\alpha} dt_{n} \, V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \ldots \,
1523: V(t_{n}) \quad\text{ for }\quad n\geq1\,,\\
1524: V_{L,\alpha}^{(0)} (1,\alpha)&\equiv1\,.
1525: \end{split}
1526: \end{equation}
1527: This reduces to $V_L^{(n)} (1,n+1)$ defined in (\ref{regVL})
1528: when $\alpha=1$.
1529: We then find that
1530: \begin{equation}\label{decomposeVnalphabeta}
1531: V^{(n)}(1,n+\alpha+\beta)\,=\,\sum_{m=0}^n
1532: V^{(m)}_{L,\alpha}(1,m+\alpha) \,
1533: V^{(n-m)}(m+\alpha+1,n+\alpha+\beta)
1534: \end{equation}
1535: for any non-negative real numbers $\alpha$ and $\beta$.
1536: This identity reduces to (\ref{decomposeVn}) when $\alpha=1$, $\beta=0$.
1537: This generalized identity
1538: can be shown, as before, by decomposing
1539: the path-ordered integration region
1540: $1\leq t_1\leq t_2\leq\ldots\leq t_n\leq n+\alpha+\beta$
1541: of $V^{(n)}(1,n+\alpha+\beta)$
1542: in the following way:
1543: \begin{equation}
1544: \begin{split}
1545: & t_1 \ge 1+\alpha \,, \\
1546: & t_1 \le 1+\alpha \,,\, t_2 \ge 2+\alpha \,, \\
1547: & t_1 \le 1+\alpha \,,\, t_2 \le 2+\alpha \,,\, t_3 \ge 3+\alpha \,, \\
1548: & \qquad \qquad \vdots \\
1549: & t_1 \le 1+\alpha \,,\, t_2 \le 2+\alpha \,,\, \ldots \,,\, t_{m}
1550: \le m+\alpha \,,\,
1551: t_{m+1} \ge m+1+\alpha \,,\\
1552: & \qquad \qquad \vdots \\
1553: & t_1 \le 1+\alpha \,,\, t_2 \le 2+\alpha \,,\, t_3 \le 3+\alpha
1554: \,,\, \ldots\ldots\ldots \,,\, t_{n-1} \le n-1+\alpha \,,\, t_{n}
1555: \ge n+\alpha \,,
1556: \\
1557: & t_1 \le 1+\alpha \,,\, t_2 \le 2+\alpha \,,\, t_3 \le 3+\alpha
1558: \,,\, \ldots\ldots\ldots \,,\, t_{n-1} \le n-1+\alpha \,,\, t_{n}
1559: \le n+\alpha \,.
1560: \end{split}
1561: \end{equation}
1562: This identity can be promoted to a relation of string fields.
1563: We define $U_\alpha$ and $U_{L,\alpha}$ with $\alpha \ge 0$ by
1564: \begin{equation}\label{U_alpha}
1565: \begin{split}
1566: U_\alpha \equiv
1567: \sum_{n=0}^\infty \, \lambda^n \, U_\alpha^{(n)} \,, \qquad
1568: U_{L,\alpha} \equiv
1569: \sum_{n=0}^\infty \, \lambda^n \, U_{L,\alpha}^{(n)} \,,
1570: \end{split}
1571: \end{equation}
1572: where
1573: \begin{equation}
1574: \begin{split}
1575: \langle \, \phi \,, U_\alpha^{(n)} \, \rangle & =
1576: \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \, \, \,
1577: V^{(n)} (1,n+\alpha) \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_{n+\alpha}}
1578: \quad \text{for} \quad n + \alpha > 0 \,, \quad U_0^{(0)} = 1 \,, \\
1579: \langle \, \phi \,, U_{L,\alpha}^{(n)} \, \rangle & =
1580: \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \, \, \,
1581: V_{L,\alpha}^{(n)} (1,n+\alpha) \,
1582: \rangle_{{\cal W}_{n+\alpha}}
1583: \quad \text{for} \quad n+\alpha > 0 \,, \quad U_{L,0}^{(0)} = 1 \,.
1584: \end{split}
1585: \end{equation}
1586: The gauge parameter $U$ in the previous subsection is thus
1587: \begin{equation}
1588: U = U_0\,,
1589: \end{equation}
1590: and the solution $\Psi_L$ in (\ref{regPsiLn}) is $U_{L,1}$
1591: with an extra insertion of $\lambda \, cV(1)$.
1592: It then follows from (\ref{decomposeVnalphabeta}) that
1593: \begin{equation}\label{Ualphabeta}
1594: U_{\alpha+\beta}=U_{L,\alpha}\ast U_\beta\,.
1595: \end{equation}
1596: When $\beta=0$, we have
1597: \begin{equation}
1598: U_\alpha = U_{L,\alpha} \ast U \,,
1599: \end{equation}
1600: where we have used $U_0 = U$.
1601: As we discussed in the previous subsection,
1602: the inverse of $U$ is well defined to all orders in $\lambda$.
1603: We thus find that
1604: \begin{equation}
1605: U_{L,\alpha} = U_\alpha \ast U^{-1} \,.
1606: \end{equation}
1607: It follows from this and (\ref{Ualphabeta}) that
1608: \begin{equation}\label{genWedgeAlgebra}
1609: U_{\alpha+\beta} = U_\alpha \ast U^{-1} \ast U_\beta \,.
1610: \end{equation}
1611: The state $U_\alpha$ is $W_\alpha + \ord{\lambda}$
1612: for $\alpha > 0$,
1613: where $W_\alpha$ is the well-known wedge state
1614: defined by
1615: \begin{equation}
1616: \langle \, \phi \,, W_\alpha \, \rangle
1617: = \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
1618: \rangle_{{\cal W}_\alpha} \,.
1619: \end{equation}
1620: The relation (\ref{genWedgeAlgebra})
1621: for positive $\alpha$ and $\beta$
1622: thus reduces to the famous relation
1623: $W_{\alpha+\beta} = W_\alpha \ast W_\beta$
1624: when $\lambda=0$,
1625: and the state $U_\alpha$ can be thought of as
1626: a generalization of the wedge state $W_\alpha$.
1627: When $\alpha$ is a positive integer,
1628: $U_\alpha$ can be written in terms of $U_1$ and $U^{-1}$:
1629: \begin{equation}
1630: \begin{split}
1631: & U_2 = U_1 \ast U^{-1} \ast U_1 \,, \\
1632: & U_3 = U_1 \ast U^{-1} \ast
1633: U_1 \ast U^{-1} \ast U_1 \,, \\
1634: & U_4 = U_1 \ast U^{-1} \ast U_1 \ast U^{-1} \ast
1635: U_1 \ast U^{-1} \ast U_1 \,, \\
1636: & \qquad \qquad \vdots \\
1637: \end{split}
1638: \end{equation}
1639: This structure indicates a modification of the star product
1640: for finite $\lambda$ defined by
1641: \begin{equation}\label{modified-star}
1642: A \star B \equiv A \ast U^{-1} \ast B \,,
1643: \end{equation}
1644: and the relation (\ref{genWedgeAlgebra}) can be written as
1645: \begin{equation}
1646: U_{\alpha+\beta} = U_\alpha \star U_\beta \,.
1647: \end{equation}
1648: On a technical level,
1649: the relation (\ref{genWedgeAlgebra}) will play an important role
1650: in the next section for the construction of solutions
1651: associated with general marginal deformations.
1652: On a more conceptual level,
1653: we will see in section~\ref{discussion_deformed}
1654: that the modified star product~(\ref{modified-star})
1655: naturally appears in the string field theory action
1656: expanded around a deformed background.
1657:
1658:
1659:
1660: \section{Marginal deformations
1661: with singular operator products}
1662: \setcounter{equation}{0}
1663: \label{singular_general}
1664:
1665:
1666: \subsection{Another form of the solution
1667: with regular operator products}
1668: \label{another}
1669:
1670: In the process of constructing a real solution from $\Psi_L$
1671: in the previous section, we proved that
1672: \begin{equation}\label{QUagain}
1673: Q_B \, U = U \ast \Psi_R - \Psi_L \ast U\,.
1674: \end{equation}
1675: As we have seen in~(\ref{QUlhs}),
1676: the BRST transformation of $U$
1677: can be decomposed into two pieces:
1678: \begin{equation}\label{QUARAL}
1679: Q_B \, U = A_R - A_L \,,
1680: \end{equation}
1681: where $A_L$ and $A_R$ are given by
1682: \begin{figure}[tb]
1683: \Large
1684: \begin{center}
1685: $\lambda$
1686: \hskip-.1cm\raisebox{-1.45cm}{\epsfig{figure=AL1.eps, height=3.4cm}} \hskip-.2cm
1687: $+\,\,\lambda^2$
1688: \hskip-.1cm \raisebox{-1.45cm}{\epsfig{figure=AL2.eps, height=3.4cm}} \hskip-.2cm
1689: $+\,\,\frac{\lambda^3}{2}$
1690: \hskip-.1cm \raisebox{-1.45cm}{\epsfig{figure=AL3.eps, height=3.4cm}} \hskip-.2cm
1691: $+\,\ldots$
1692: \end{center}
1693: \normalsize
1694: \caption{Illustration of the expansion
1695: $A_L= \lambda \, A_L^{(1)} + \lambda^2 \, A_L^{(2)}
1696: + \lambda^3 \, A_L^{(3)} + \ord{\lambda^4}$.}\label{figALreg}
1697: \end{figure}
1698: \begin{equation}\label{ALARregular}
1699: \begin{split}
1700: \langle \, \phi \,, A_L \, \rangle &=
1701: \sum_{n=1}^\infty \lambda^n \,
1702: \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \, cV (1) \, V^{(n-1)} (1,n) \,
1703: \rangle_{{\cal W}_n} \,, \\
1704: \langle \, \phi \,, A_R \, \rangle &=
1705: \sum_{n=1}^\infty \lambda^n \,
1706: \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \, V^{(n-1)} (1,n) \, cV (n) \,
1707: \rangle_{{\cal W}_n} \,.
1708: \end{split}
1709: \end{equation}
1710: See figure~\ref{figALreg}.
1711: At $\ord{\lambda^n}$ with $n \ge 2$,
1712: $A_L$ and $A_R$ account for
1713: the term with $cV(1)$ and the term with $cV(n)$
1714: in $Q_BU^{(n)}$, respectively.
1715: At $\ord{\lambda}$, $Q_B \, U$ vanishes
1716: because $U^{(1)} = 0$, but we have chosen
1717: $A_L$ and $A_R$ at $\ord{\lambda}$
1718: to be $\lambda \, \Psi^{(1)}$ for later convenience.
1719:
1720: In the proof of~(\ref{QUagain}),
1721: we have actually shown that
1722: \begin{equation}\label{ALPsiLU}
1723: A_L = \Psi_L \ast U \,, \qquad
1724: A_R = U \ast \Psi_R \,.
1725: \end{equation}
1726: As we discussed in the previous section,
1727: the inverse of $U$ is well defined to all orders in $\lambda$.
1728: We thus obtain new expressions for $\Psi_L$ and $\Psi_R$:
1729: \begin{equation}\label{defPsiLPsiR}
1730: \Psi_L = A_L \ast U^{-1} \,, \qquad
1731: \Psi_R = U^{-1} \ast A_R \,.
1732: \end{equation}
1733: We have shown that $\Psi_L$
1734: with $\Psi_L^{(n)}$ in the form of~(\ref{regPsiLn})
1735: satisfies the equation of motion. Let us now see how $\Psi_L$
1736: in the new form satisfies the equation of motion.
1737: The BRST transformation of $\Psi_L$ can be calculated as follows:
1738: \begin{equation}\label{rewriteQPsiL}
1739: \begin{split}
1740: Q_B\Psi_L \, &= \, Q_B\,(A_L \ast U^{-1})\\
1741: &=(Q_B A_L)\ast U^{-1}+A_L\ast U^{-1}\ast(Q_B U)\ast U^{-1}\\
1742: &=(Q_B A_L)\ast U^{-1}+A_L\ast U^{-1}\ast(A_R-A_L)\ast U^{-1}\\
1743: &=(Q_B A_L +A_L\ast U^{-1}\ast A_R)\ast U^{-1}-A_L\ast U^{-1}\ast A_L\ast U^{-1}\\
1744: &=(Q_B A_L +A_L\ast U^{-1}\ast A_R)\ast U^{-1}-\Psi_L \ast \Psi_L \,.
1745: \end{split}
1746: \end{equation}
1747: Therefore, the equation of motion is satisfied if
1748: \begin{equation}\label{QAL}
1749: {}- Q_B A_L = A_L\ast U^{-1}\ast A_R \,.
1750: \end{equation}
1751: The left-hand side of the equation can be calculated as follows:
1752: \begin{equation}\label{Q_B-A_L}
1753: {}- \langle \, \phi \,, Q_B A_L \, \rangle =
1754: \sum_{n=2}^\infty \lambda^n \,
1755: \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
1756: cV (1) \, V^{(n-2)} (1,n) \, cV (n) \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_n}\,.
1757: \end{equation}
1758: Let us next consider the structure
1759: of the state $A_L \ast U^{-1} \ast A_R$
1760: on the right-hand side of~(\ref{QAL}).
1761: The $\ord{\lambda^n}$ terms of $A_L$ and $A_R$
1762: are made of the wedge state $W_n$ with operator insertions.
1763: The inverse $U^{-1}$ can be written as a linear combination
1764: of string products made of $\lambda^n \, U^{(n)}$,
1765: and their $\ord{\lambda^n}$ terms
1766: are again made of the wedge state $W_n$ with operator insertions.
1767: It thus follows that all of the $\ord{\lambda^n}$ terms
1768: of $A_L \ast U^{-1} \ast A_R$ are made of $W_n$
1769: with operator insertions.
1770: This is consistent with the structure of~(\ref{Q_B-A_L}).
1771: Furthermore, the insertions of $\lambda \, cV$
1772: on the surface ${\cal W}_n$ are always
1773: $\lambda \, cV (1)$ and $\lambda \, cV (n)$,
1774: which is again
1775: consistent with the structure of~(\ref{Q_B-A_L}).
1776: Finally, let us consider the structure
1777: of integrated vertex operators.
1778: The state ${}-Q_B A_L$ takes the form of the state $U_2$
1779: defined in~(\ref{U_alpha})
1780: with insertions of $\lambda \, cV$.
1781: Similarly, $A_L$ and $A_R$ take the form of $U_1$
1782: with an insertion of $\lambda \, cV$.
1783: The equation (\ref{QAL}) thus
1784: follows from~(\ref{genWedgeAlgebra}) with $\alpha=\beta=1$:
1785: \begin{equation}
1786: U_2 = U_1 \ast U^{-1} \ast U_1 \,.
1787: \end{equation}
1788: We conclude that $\Psi_L$ of the form given in~(\ref{defPsiLPsiR})
1789: satisfies the equation of motion.
1790:
1791:
1792: \subsection{Generalization to the case
1793: with singular operator products}\label{singular_general_PsiL}
1794:
1795: The form $\Psi_L=A_L\ast U^{-1}$ for the solution can be generalized
1796: to the case where operator products of the marginal operator
1797: are singular.
1798: As we discussed in the introduction,
1799: let us denote the properly renormalized operator
1800: implementing the change of the boundary condition
1801: between the points $a$ and $b$
1802: by $[ \, e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)} \, ]_r$,
1803: which is given in the form of an expansion in $\lambda$:
1804: \begin{equation}
1805: [ \, e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)} \, ]_r
1806: = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \, \frac{\lambda^n}{n!} \,
1807: [ \, \left(V(a,b)\right)^n \, ]_r \,,
1808: = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \lambda^n \,
1809: [ \, V^{(n)}(a,b) \, ]_r \,.
1810: \end{equation}
1811: We define $U$ in the general case by
1812: \begin{equation}
1813: U \equiv \sum_{n=0}^\infty \, \lambda^n \, U^{(n)} \,,
1814: \end{equation}
1815: where
1816: \begin{equation}
1817: \langle \, \phi \,, U^{(n)} \, \rangle
1818: = \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \, \,
1819: [ \, V^{(n)} (1,n) \, ]_r \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_n} \,.
1820: \end{equation}
1821:
1822: As we discussed in the introduction, we assume that
1823: the BRST transformation of $[ \, e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
1824: for any exactly marginal deformation
1825: takes the form
1826: \begin{equation}\label{singQexpVab}
1827: Q_B \cdot [ \, e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)} \, ]_r
1828: = [ \, e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)} \, O_R (b) \, ]_r
1829: - [ \, O_L (a) \, e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)} \, ]_r \,,
1830: \end{equation}
1831: where $O_L$ and $O_R$ are $\lambda$-dependent, Grassmann-odd
1832: local operators.
1833: The operators $O_L$ and $O_R$ are closely related
1834: and mapped to each other
1835: under the conjugation discussed in~\S~\ref{subsubreality}
1836: when the reflection assumption~(\ref{6}) is satisfied.
1837: We will discuss the relation between $O_L$ and $O_R$
1838: in more detail in~\S~\ref{singular_general_real},
1839: but it is relevant only when generating
1840: a real solution from $\Psi_L$
1841: and we do not need to assume any relation
1842: between $O_L$ and $O_R$ in the construction
1843: of the solution $\Psi_L$.
1844: In the case of marginal deformations with regular operator products,
1845: we see from~(\ref{QVabn}) that
1846: \begin{equation}
1847: Q_B \cdot e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)}
1848: = \lambda \, \bigl[ \, e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)} \, cV (b)
1849: - cV (a) \, e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)} \, \Bigr]
1850: \end{equation}
1851: and identify
1852: \begin{equation}\label{regOLOR}
1853: O^{regular}_L=O^{regular}_R=\lambda \, cV \,.
1854: \end{equation}
1855: In the case of marginal deformations
1856: with singular operator products,
1857: there can be corrections to $O_L$ and $O_R$,
1858: which are determined from the BRST transformation
1859: of $[ \, V^{(n)} (a,b) \, ]_r$
1860: in the form
1861: \begin{equation}
1862: Q_B \cdot [ \, V^{(n)}(a,b) \, ]_r
1863: = \sum_{r=1}^n \, [ \, V^{(n-r)}(a,b) \, O_R^{(r)}(b)\, ]_r
1864: {}- \sum_{l=1}^n \, [ \, O_L^{(l)}(a) \, V^{(n-l)}(a,b) \, ]_r\,,
1865: \end{equation}
1866: where $O_L$ and $O_R$ are expanded as follows:
1867: \begin{equation}
1868: O_L = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \, \lambda^n \, O_L^{(n)} \,, \qquad
1869: O_R = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \, \lambda^n \, O_R^{(n)} \,.
1870: \end{equation}
1871: The operators $O_L^{(1)}$ and $O_R^{(1)}$ are determined from
1872: the BRST transformation of $[ \, V^{(1)}(a,b) \, ]_r$.
1873: Since $[ \, V^{(1)}(a,b) \, ]_r$ does not require
1874: any renormalization, we find
1875: \begin{equation}
1876: Q_B \cdot [ \, V^{(1)}(a,b) \, ]_r
1877: = Q_B \cdot V(a,b)
1878: = cV(b) - cV(a)
1879: \end{equation}
1880: for any dimension-one primary field $V$.
1881: Thus the operators $O_L^{(1)}$ and $O_R^{(1)}$ are determined to be
1882: \begin{equation}
1883: O_L^{(1)} = O_R^{(1)} = cV
1884: \end{equation}
1885: for any marginal deformation.
1886: Similarly, the operators $O_L^{(n)}$ and $O_R^{(n)}$ with $n \ge 2$
1887: are determined from the BRST transformation of
1888: $[ \, V^{(n)}(a,b) \, ]_r$ with $n \ge 2$\,,
1889: but we do not need any specific information on these operator
1890: in the construction of solutions.
1891: The BRST transformation of $U$ is then given by
1892: \begin{equation}\label{QUsing}
1893: Q_B \, U = A_R - A_L \,,
1894: \end{equation}
1895: where
1896: \begin{equation}
1897: A_L \equiv \sum_{n=1}^\infty \, \lambda^n \, A_L^{(n)} \,, \qquad
1898: A_R \equiv \sum_{n=1}^\infty \, \lambda^n \, A_R^{(n)} \,,
1899: \end{equation}
1900: with
1901: \begin{figure}[tb]
1902: \Large
1903: \begin{center}
1904: $\frac{1}{2}$
1905: \hskip-.2cm
1906: \raisebox{-1.3cm}{\epsfig{figure=AL3O1.eps, height=3.2cm}}
1907: \hskip-.2cm $+$
1908: \raisebox{-1.3cm}{\epsfig{figure=AL3O2.eps,height=3.2cm}}
1909: \hskip-.2cm $+$
1910: \raisebox{-1.3cm}{\epsfig{figure=AL3O3.eps,height=3.2cm}}
1911: \end{center}
1912: \normalsize
1913: \caption{Illustration of $A_L^{(3)}$.}\label{figAL3}
1914: \end{figure}
1915: \begin{equation}
1916: \begin{split}
1917: \langle \, \phi \,, A_L^{(n)} \, \rangle &=
1918: \sum_{l=1}^n \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \, [ \, O_L^{(l)} (1) \, V^{(n-l)} (1,n) \, ]_r \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_n},\\
1919: \langle \, \phi \,, A_R^{(n)} \, \rangle &=
1920: \sum_{r=1}^n \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \, [ \, V^{(n-r)} (1,n) \, O_R^{(r)} (n)\, ]_r \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_n} \,.
1921: \end{split}
1922: \end{equation}
1923: See figure~\ref{figAL3}.
1924: We have defined $A_L^{(1)}$ and $A_R^{(1)}$
1925: to be $\Psi^{(1)}$ as in the regular case.
1926:
1927:
1928: We now \emph{define} $\Psi_L$ by
1929: \begin{equation}
1930: \Psi_L \equiv A_L \ast U^{-1} \,,
1931: \end{equation}
1932: and we conclude from the calculation~(\ref{rewriteQPsiL}),
1933: where we only used the relation $Q_B U = A_R - A_L$,
1934: that $\Psi_L$ satisfies the equation of motion if
1935: \begin{equation}\label{condQAL}
1936: {}- Q_B A_L = A_L\ast U^{-1}\ast A_R \,.
1937: \end{equation}
1938: So far we have only used the assumption~(\ref{1})
1939: on the BRST transformation
1940: of $[\,e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\,]_r$.
1941: We show in the next subsection that the equation~(\ref{condQAL})
1942: holds when the
1943: assumptions~(\ref{2})--(\ref{5})
1944: stated in the introduction are satisfied.
1945:
1946: \subsection{Proof that the equation of motion is satisfied}
1947: \label{singular_general_proof}
1948:
1949: Let us first examine the left-hand side of~(\ref{condQAL}).
1950: {}From the assumption~(\ref{2})
1951: on the BRST transformation of
1952: $[ \, O_L (a) \, e^{\lambda \, V (a,b)} \, ]_r$,
1953: it is given by
1954: \begin{equation}
1955: \begin{split}
1956: {}- \langle \, \phi \,, Q_B A_L^{(n)} \, \rangle &=
1957: \sum_{l+r\leq n} \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
1958: [ \, O_L^{(l)} (1) \, V^{(n-l-r)} (1,n) \, O_R^{(r)} (n) \, ]_r \,
1959: \rangle_{{\cal W}_n}\,.
1960: \end{split}
1961: \end{equation}
1962: If we define $U_\alpha$ for $\alpha\geq0$ in the singular case by
1963: \begin{equation}
1964: U_\alpha \equiv\sum_{n=0}^\infty \, \lambda^n \, U_\alpha^{(n)}
1965: \end{equation}
1966: with
1967: \begin{equation}
1968: \langle \, \phi \,, U_\alpha^{(n)} \, \rangle =
1969: \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \, \, [ \, V^{(n)} (1,n+\alpha) \, ]_r \,
1970: \rangle_{{\cal W}_{n+\alpha}}
1971: \quad \text{for} \quad n + \alpha > 0 \,, \qquad
1972: U_0^{(0)} \equiv 1 \,,
1973: \end{equation}
1974: then ${}- Q_B A_L$ can be constructed from $U_{l+r}$
1975: by inserting $\lambda^l \, O_L^{(l)}$ and $\lambda^r \, O_R^{(r)}$
1976: and by summing over $l$ and $r$. We schematically write the state
1977: in the following way:
1978: \begin{equation}
1979: {}- Q_B A_L \sim \sum_{l, \, r} \, \Bigl( \, U_{l+r}
1980: ~ \text{with} ~ \lambda^l \, O_L^{(l)}
1981: ~ \text{and} ~ \lambda^r \, O_R^{(r)} \, \Bigr) \,.
1982: \end{equation}
1983: The state $A_L$ on the right-hand side of~(\ref{condQAL})
1984: can be constructed from $U_l$ by inserting $\lambda^l \, O_L^{(l)}$
1985: and by summing over $l$.
1986: Similarly, the state $A_R$
1987: can be constructed from $U_r$ by inserting $\lambda^r \, O_R^{(r)}$
1988: and by summing over $r$.
1989: Therefore, the state $A_L \ast U^{-1} \ast A_R$
1990: can be schematically expressed as follows:
1991: \begin{equation}
1992: \begin{split}
1993: A_L \ast U^{-1} \ast A_R
1994: & \sim \sum_l \, \Bigl( \, U_l
1995: ~ \text{with} ~ \lambda^l \, O_L^{(l)} \, \Bigr) \ast U^{-1} \ast
1996: \sum_r \, \Bigl( \, U_r
1997: ~ \text{with} ~ \lambda^r \, O_R^{(r)} \, \Bigr) \\
1998: & \sim \sum_{l, \, r} \, \Bigl( \, U_l \ast U^{-1} \ast U_r
1999: ~ \text{with} ~ \lambda^l \, O_L^{(l)}
2000: ~ \text{and} ~ \lambda^r \, O_R^{(r)} \, \Bigr) \,.
2001: \end{split}
2002: \end{equation}
2003: The equation
2004: ${}- Q_B A_L = A_L\ast U^{-1}\ast A_R$ thus
2005: follows if the relation
2006: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Ulr}
2007: U_{l+r} \, = \, U_l\ast U^{-1} \ast U_r
2008: \end{eqnarray}
2009: with additional operator insertions
2010: of $O_L^{(l)}$ and $O_R^{(r)}$ holds
2011: for the singular case.
2012:
2013: Motivated by this observation,
2014: we first show that
2015: the relation $U_{l+r} \, = \, U_l\ast U^{-1} \ast U_r$
2016: holds for the singular case
2017: if the assumptions of replacement~(\ref{3}), factorization~(\ref{4}),
2018: and locality~(\ref{5}) are satisfied.
2019: It is then straightforward to generalize the proof
2020: by taking into account the insertions
2021: of $O_L^{(l)}$ and $O_R^{(r)}$
2022: and show the equation~(\ref{condQAL}).
2023: Instead of presenting a lengthy formal proof,
2024: we demonstrate how these equations hold
2025: using concrete examples
2026: and then explain how the proof generalizes.
2027:
2028: Let us consider the equation
2029: $U_2=U_1\ast U^{-1}\ast U_1$ at $\ord{\lambda^2}$.
2030: Since $U^{-1} = 1 - \lambda^2 \, U^{(2)}+\ord{\lambda^3}$,
2031: it can be written as follows:
2032: \begin{equation}
2033: U_2^{(2)} = U_1^{(0)} \ast U_1^{(2)} + U_1^{(1)} \ast U_1^{(1)} +
2034: U_1^{(2)} \ast U_1^{(0)} - U_1^{(0)} \ast U^{(2)} \ast U_1^{(0)}
2035: \,.
2036: \end{equation}
2037: All the terms are made of the wedge state $W_4$
2038: with operator insertions.
2039: In the regular case, the equation was a consequence
2040: of the following relation of the operator insertions
2041: on~${\cal W}_4$:
2042: \begin{equation}\label{regV14^2}
2043: \left(V(1,4)\right)^2 = \left(V(2,4)\right)^2 + 2 \, V(1,2) \, V(3,4)
2044: + \left(V(1,3)\right)^2 - \left(V(2,3)\right)^2 \,.
2045: \end{equation}
2046: In the singular case, we need to show
2047: \begin{equation}\label{singV14^2}
2048: [ \, \left(V(1,4)\right)^2 \, ]_r = [ \, \left(V(2,4)\right)^2 \, ]_r
2049: + 2 \, [ \, V(1,2) \, ]_r \, [ \, V(3,4) \, ]_r
2050: + [ \, \left(V(1,3)\right)^2 \, ]_r
2051: - [ \, \left(V(2,3)\right)^2 \, ]_r \,.
2052: \end{equation}
2053: Note that we have implicitly used the locality assumption~(\ref{5}).
2054: The operators $[ \, \left(V(2,4)\right)^2 \, ]_r$
2055: and $[ \, \left(V(1,3)\right)^2 \, ]_r$
2056: on the right-hand side were originally defined on~${\cal W}_3$
2057: and $[ \, \left(V(2,3)\right)^2 \, ]_r$
2058: was defined on~${\cal W}_2$.
2059: They are now inserted on~${\cal W}_4$
2060: in the same forms because of the assumption~(\ref{5}).
2061: We next use the factorization assumption~(\ref{4}) of the following form:
2062: \begin{equation}
2063: [ \, e^{\lambda_1 V(1,2)} \, e^{\lambda_2 V(3,4)} \, ]_r
2064: = [ \, e^{\lambda_1 V(1,2)} \, ]_r \,
2065: [ \, e^{\lambda_2 V(3,4)} \, ]_r \,.
2066: \end{equation}
2067: The relation at $\ord{\lambda_1 \, \lambda_2}$ is
2068: \begin{equation}
2069: [ \, V(1,2) \, V(3,4) \, ]_r
2070: = [ \, V(1,2) \, ]_r \, [ \, V(3,4) \, ]_r \,.
2071: \end{equation}
2072: Thus the right-hand side of~(\ref{singV14^2}) can be written as
2073: \begin{equation}
2074: \begin{split}
2075: & [ \, \left(V(2,4)\right)^2 \, ]_r
2076: + 2 \, [ \, V(1,2) \, ]_r \, [ \, V(3,4) \, ]_r
2077: + [ \, \left(V(1,3)\right)^2 \, ]_r
2078: - [ \, \left(V(2,3)\right)^2 \, ]_r \\
2079: & = [ \, \left(V(2,4)\right)^2 \, ]_r
2080: + 2 \, [ \, V(1,2) \, V(3,4) \, ]_r
2081: + [ \, \left(V(1,3)\right)^2 \, ]_r
2082: - [ \, \left(V(2,3)\right)^2 \, ]_r \,.
2083: \end{split}
2084: \end{equation}
2085: We then use the assumption~(\ref{3}) of replacement in the final step.
2086: It follows from the assumption~(\ref{3}) that
2087: \begin{equation}
2088: [ \, e^{\lambda V(a,c)} \, ]_r
2089: = [ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, e^{\lambda V(b,c)} \, ]_r
2090: \end{equation}
2091: for $a < b < c$. At $\ord{\lambda^2}$, we obtain
2092: the following formula:
2093: \begin{equation}\label{III-lambda^2}
2094: [ \, \left( V(a,c) \right)^2 \, ]_r
2095: = [ \, \left( V(a,b) \right)^2 \, ]_r
2096: + 2 \, [ \, V(a,b) \, V(b,c) \, ]_r
2097: + [ \, \left( V(b,c) \right)^2 \, ]_r \,.
2098: \end{equation}
2099: We thus find
2100: \begin{equation}\label{replacement-examples}
2101: \begin{split}
2102: [ \, \left(V(2,4)\right)^2 \, ]_r
2103: & = [ \, ( \, V(2,3) + V(3,4) \, )^2 \, ]_r \\
2104: & = [ \, \left(V(2,3)\right)^2 \, ]_r + 2 \, [ \, V(2,3) \, V(3,4) \, ]_r
2105: + [ \, \left(V(3,4)\right)^2 \, ]_r \,, \\
2106: [ \, \left(V(1,3)\right)^2 \, ]_r
2107: & = [ \, ( \, V(1,2) + V(2,3) \, )^2 \, ]_r \\
2108: & = [ \, \left(V(1,2)\right)^2 \, ]_r + 2 \, [ \, V(1,2) \, V(2,3) \, ]_r
2109: + [ \, \left(V(2,3)\right)^2 \, ]_r \,. \\
2110: \end{split}
2111: \end{equation}
2112: For the operator $[ \, \left(V(1,4)\right)^2 \, ]_r$
2113: on the left-hand side of~(\ref{singV14^2}),
2114: we use the formula~(\ref{III-lambda^2}) recursively and obtain
2115: \begin{equation}
2116: \begin{split}
2117: [ \, \left(V(1,4)\right)^2 \, ]_r
2118: & = [ \, ( \, V(1,2) + V(2,3) + V(3,4) \, )^2 \, ]_r \\
2119: & = [ \, \left(V(1,2)\right)^2 \, ]_r + [ \, \left(V(2,3)\right)^2 \, ]_r
2120: + [ \, \left(V(3,4)\right)^2 \, ]_r \\
2121: & \quad ~ + 2 \, [ \, V(1,2) \, V(2,3) \, ]_r + 2 \, [ \, V(2,3) \,
2122: V(3,4) \, ]_r
2123: + 2 \, [ \, V(1,2) \, V(3,4) \, ]_r \,. \\
2124: \end{split}
2125: \end{equation}
2126: We can explicitly confirm
2127: that the equation~(\ref{singV14^2}) is satisfied.
2128: However, the coefficients in the basis
2129: \begin{equation}
2130: \begin{split}
2131: & \bigl\{ \, [ \, \left(V(1,2)\right)^2 \, ]_r \,,\,
2132: [ \, \left(V(2,3)\right)^2 \, ]_r \,,\,
2133: [ \, \left(V(3,4)\right)^2 \, ]_r \,, \\
2134: & \quad [ \, V(1,2) \, V(2,3) \, ]_r \,,\,
2135: [ \, V(2,3) \, V(3,4) \, ]_r \,,\,
2136: [ \, V(1,2) \, V(3,4) \, ]_r \, \bigr\}
2137: \end{split}
2138: \end{equation}
2139: are guaranteed to match on both sides of~(\ref{singV14^2})
2140: because they are the same as those
2141: in the regular case
2142: where the corresponding identity~(\ref{regV14^2}) has been shown.
2143:
2144: This proof can be generalized
2145: to $U_{l+r} = U_l \ast U^{-1} \ast U_r$ at $\ord{\lambda^n}$
2146: for any positive integers $l$, $r$, and $n$.
2147: The state $U_{l+r}^{(n)}$ can be expressed
2148: in terms of $[ \, V^{(n)}(1,l+r+n) \, ]_r$ on ${\cal W}_{l+r+n}$.
2149: Because of the assumption~(\ref{5}),
2150: the terms of $U_l \ast U^{-1} \ast U_r$ at $\ord{\lambda^n}$
2151: can also be expressed in terms of products of the form
2152: \begin{equation}
2153: \prod_j \, [ \, V^{(k_j)}(a_j,b_j) \, ]_r
2154: \end{equation}
2155: on ${\cal W}_{l+r+n}$,
2156: where positive integers $k_j$, $a_j$, and $b_j$ satisfy
2157: $1 \le a_j < b_j \le l+r+n$, $b_j < a_{j+1}$ and $\sum_j k_j = n$.
2158: Using the factorization assumption~(\ref{4}),
2159: the products can be written in the form
2160: \begin{equation}
2161: [ \, \prod_j \, V^{(k_j)}(a_j,b_j) \, ]_r
2162: \end{equation}
2163: on ${\cal W}_{l+r+n}$.
2164: Finally, we use the replacement assumption~(\ref{3})
2165: to expand both sides of the equation
2166: $U_{l+r} = U_l \ast U^{-1} \ast U_r$
2167: in the basis
2168: \begin{equation}
2169: \Bigl\{ \, [ \, \prod_{i=1}^{l+r+n-1} \,
2170: V^{(\ell_i)}(i,i+1) \, ]_r \, \Bigr\} \,,
2171: \end{equation}
2172: where $\ell_i$'s are non-negative integers
2173: with $\sum_{i=1}^{l+r+n-1} \ell_i = n$.
2174: The coefficients in the basis are guaranteed to match
2175: on both sides of $U_{l+r} = U_l \ast U^{-1} \ast U_r$
2176: because the equation holds in the regular case.
2177: This completes the proof of $U_{l+r} = U_l \ast U^{-1} \ast U_r$
2178: in the singular case to all orders in $\lambda$.
2179:
2180: The proof of ${}- Q_B A_L = A_L\ast U^{-1}\ast A_R$
2181: is essentially parallel
2182: using the assumptions~(\ref{3}) and~(\ref{4})
2183: of replacement and factorization
2184: with additional insertions of $O_L$ and $O_R$.
2185: We provide the details of the proof in appendix~\ref{QBAL-appendix}.
2186: We thus conclude that $\Psi_L$ given by
2187: \begin{equation}
2188: \Psi_L \,=\, A_L\ast U^{-1}
2189: \end{equation}
2190: solves the equation of motion
2191: for any exactly marginal deformations
2192: satisfying the
2193: assumptions~(\ref{1})--(\ref{5}).
2194:
2195:
2196: \subsection{Construction of a real solution}\label{singular_general_real}
2197:
2198: It is straightforward to construct a real solution
2199: $\Psi$ from $\Psi_L$ as we did in~\S~\ref{regular_real}
2200: for marginal deformations with regular operator products.
2201: The state $U$ satisfies $U^\ddagger = U$
2202: under the assumption~(\ref{6}) of reflection.
2203: It then follows from~(\ref{conjugation-with-Q_B})
2204: that $(Q_B U)^\ddagger = {}- Q_B U$
2205: and thus $(A_R - A_L)^\ddagger = {} A_L - A_R$. From this
2206: we conclude that the local operators $O_L$ and $O_R$ are mapped
2207: under the conjugation discussed in~\S~\ref{subsubreality} as follows:
2208: \begin{equation}\label{conjOLOR}
2209: O_L (t) ~ \longrightarrow ~ O_R (n+1-t) \,, \quad
2210: O_R (t) ~ \longrightarrow ~ O_L (n+1-t)
2211: \quad \text{on} \quad {\cal W}_n \,.
2212: \end{equation}
2213: We thus find
2214: \begin{equation}
2215: A_L^\ddagger = A_R \,, \qquad A_R^\ddagger = A_L \,.
2216: \end{equation}
2217: In the case of marginal deformations with regular operator products,
2218: $O_L$ and $O_R$ are both $\lambda \, cV$
2219: and are indeed mapped as~(\ref{conjOLOR}).
2220:
2221:
2222: We define $\Psi_R$ by
2223: \begin{equation}
2224: \Psi_R \equiv U^{-1} \ast A_R\,.
2225: \end{equation}
2226: As in the regular case,
2227: the state $\Psi_R$ is the conjugate of $\Psi_L$:
2228: \begin{equation}
2229: \Psi_R = \Psi_L^\ddagger\,.
2230: \end{equation}
2231: It satisfies the equation of motion
2232: and obeys the relation $Q_B U = U \ast \Psi_R - \Psi_L \ast U$.
2233: We conclude that $\Psi$ given by
2234: \begin{equation}
2235: \begin{split}
2236: \Psi & = \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast \Psi_L \ast \sqrt{U} +
2237: \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast Q_B \, \sqrt{U}\\
2238: &= \sqrt{U} \ast \Psi_R \ast \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}}
2239: + \sqrt{U} \ast Q_B \, \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \\
2240: & = \frac{1}{2} \, \biggl[ \, \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast \Psi_L \ast
2241: \sqrt{U} + \sqrt{U} \ast \Psi_R \ast \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} +
2242: \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast Q_B \, \sqrt{U} - Q_B \, \sqrt{U}
2243: \ast \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \, \biggr]
2244: \end{split}
2245: \end{equation}
2246: is real and satisfies the equation of motion.
2247: The solution $\Psi$ can also be expressed
2248: in terms of $A_L$ and $A_R$ in the following way,
2249: which might be more convenient
2250: for an explicit expansion in $\lambda$:
2251: \begin{equation}
2252: \begin{split}
2253: \Psi & = \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast A_L \ast \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} +
2254: \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast Q_B \, \sqrt{U}\\
2255: &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast A_R \ast \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}}
2256: + \sqrt{U} \ast Q_B \, \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \\
2257: & = \frac{1}{2} \, \biggl[ \, \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast (A_L+A_R) \ast
2258: \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast Q_B \, \sqrt{U}
2259: - Q_B \, \sqrt{U} \ast \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \, \biggr] \,.
2260: \end{split}
2261: \end{equation}
2262:
2263:
2264:
2265:
2266:
2267:
2268: \section{Explicit construction}\label{singular_explicit}
2269: \setcounter{equation}{0}
2270:
2271:
2272: We have separated the construction of solutions
2273: for marginal deformations in open string field theory
2274: into two steps.
2275: In the previous section,
2276: we have presented the general construction of solutions
2277: in open string field theory from
2278: the operator $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$.
2279: The second step is then to construct
2280: such properly renormalized operators
2281: satisfying the assumptions stated in the introduction
2282: for concrete examples of exactly marginal deformations.
2283: This is a problem in the boundary CFT
2284: and independent of string field theory.
2285: In this section,
2286: we carry out the second step
2287: for a class of marginal deformations
2288: with singular operator products
2289: by constructing $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$ explicitly.
2290:
2291:
2292: \subsection{A class of marginal deformations
2293: with singular operator products}\label{class}
2294:
2295: The dependence of the two-point function
2296: $\langle \, V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \rangle$ on $t_1$ and $t_2$
2297: for a dimension-one primary field $V$
2298: is completely fixed by conformal symmetry.
2299: When the singular part of the operator product expansion (OPE)
2300: of $V$ with itself is given by
2301: \begin{equation}\label{doublepoleOPE}
2302: V (t) \, V(0) \sim \frac{1}{t^2} \,,
2303: \end{equation}
2304: the operator product $V(t_1) \, V(t_2)$ can be made finite
2305: in the limit $t_1 \to t_2$ by subtracting
2306: $\langle \, V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \rangle$ from it.\footnote{
2307: When the double-pole term $1/t^2$ in the OPE $V(t) \, V(0)$
2308: is nonvanishing, we normalize $V(t)$ such that the coefficient
2309: of the double-pole term is unity.
2310: If the state $\Psi^{(1)}$ using $V$ with this normalization
2311: is odd instead of even under the conjugation
2312: discussed in~\S~\ref{subsubreality},
2313: we set $\lambda = i \, \tilde{\lambda}$
2314: and take $\tilde{\lambda}$ to be real
2315: when constructing the real solution $\Psi$
2316: in~\S~\ref{singular_general_real}.}
2317: We define $\dcirc V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \dcirc$ for $t_1 \ne t_2$ by
2318: \begin{equation}
2319: \dcirc V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \dcirc
2320: \equiv V(t_1) \, V(t_2) - G(t_1,t_2) \,,
2321: \end{equation}
2322: where
2323: \begin{equation}
2324: G(t_1,t_2) \equiv \langle \, V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \rangle \,.
2325: \end{equation}
2326: Note that
2327: the correlation function $\langle \, V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \rangle$
2328: depends on the Riemann surface where the boundary CFT is defined,
2329: and thus the definition of $\dcirc V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \dcirc$ also
2330: depends on the Riemann surface.
2331:
2332: The OPE of $V$ with itself, however, can have other singular terms.
2333: For example, the singular part of the OPE can be
2334: \begin{equation}
2335: V(t) \, V(0) \sim \frac{1}{t^2}
2336: + \frac{1}{t} \, \widetilde{V} (0)
2337: \label{single-pole-term}
2338: \end{equation}
2339: with some dimension-one primary field $\widetilde{V}$,
2340: which can be proportional to $V$ itself.
2341: The operator $\dcirc V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \dcirc$
2342: is not finite if the single-pole term with $\widetilde{V}$
2343: is nonvanishing.
2344: We will discuss the case with the OPE~(\ref{single-pole-term})
2345: in more detail in~\S~\ref{BRST}.
2346:
2347: The operator $\dcirc V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \dcirc$ coincides
2348: with the ordinary normal-ordered product
2349: $: V(t_1) \, V(t_2) :$ and is thus manifestly finite
2350: for $V(t) = i \, \partial_t X^\mu (t) / \sqrt{2 \alpha'}$,
2351: where $X^\mu$ is a space-like coordinate
2352: along the D-brane.
2353: However, it is in general different from
2354: $: V(t_1) \, V(t_2) :$ when $V$ is a composite operator.
2355: For example, when $V(t)$ is given by
2356: \begin{equation}
2357: V (t) = \sqrt{2}:\cos\biggl(\frac{X^\mu (t)}{\sqrt{\alpha'}}\biggr): \,,
2358: \end{equation}
2359: we can write $\dcirc V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \dcirc$ as
2360: \begin{equation}
2361: \dcirc V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \dcirc
2362: = \, G (t_1,t_2)^{-1}
2363: : \cos \biggl(\frac{X^\mu (t_1) + X^\mu (t_2)}{\sqrt{\alpha'}}\biggr) :
2364: {}+ G(t_1,t_2) \, \biggl[ \,
2365: : \cos \biggl(\frac{X^\mu (t_1) - X^\mu (t_2)}{\sqrt{\alpha'}}\biggr) : - 1 \,
2366: \biggr] \,,
2367: \end{equation}
2368: which is not the same as the normal-ordered product:
2369: \begin{equation}
2370: \dcirc V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \dcirc
2371: \ne {}: V(t_1) \, V(t_2) :
2372: {}= 2 :\cos\biggl(\frac{X^\mu (t_1)}{\sqrt{\alpha'}}\biggr) \,
2373: \cos\biggl(\frac{X^\mu (t_2)}{\sqrt{\alpha'}}\biggr): \,.
2374: \end{equation}
2375:
2376:
2377:
2378: We similarly define
2379: $\dcirc V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \ldots \, V(t_{n}) \dcirc$
2380: for arbitrary $n$ with $t_i \ne t_j$ recursively as follows:
2381: \begin{equation}\label{genNOrec}
2382: \begin{split}
2383: \dcirc V(t_1) \dcirc &\equiv V(t_1) \,, \\
2384: \dcirc V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \ldots \, V(t_n) \dcirc
2385: &\equiv
2386: \dcirc V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \ldots \, V(t_{n-1}) \dcirc \, V(t_n) \\
2387: & \quad ~ {}- \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \, G(t_i,t_n)\,\dcirc V(t_1) \,
2388: V(t_2) \, \ldots \, V(t_{i-1}) \, V(t_{i+1}) \, \ldots V(t_{n-1})
2389: \dcirc \,
2390: \end{split}
2391: \end{equation}
2392: for $n > 1$ and $t_i\neq t_j$.
2393: This can be formally written in the following form:
2394: \begin{equation}\label{genNO}
2395: \dcirc\prod_i V(t_i)\dcirc =
2396: \exp\,\biggl(-\frac{1}{2}\int dt_1dt_2\, G(t_1,t_2) \,
2397: \frac{\delta}{\delta V(t_1)}\frac{\delta}{\delta V(t_2)}\,\biggr)
2398: \prod_i \, V(t_i)\quad\text{ for }\quad t_i\neq t_j \,.
2399: \end{equation}
2400: For $V(t) = i \, \partial_t X^\mu (t) / \sqrt{2 \alpha'}$,
2401: the operator product
2402: $\dcirc V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \ldots \, V(t_{n}) \dcirc$
2403: again coincides with
2404: \linebreak[4]
2405: $:V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \ldots \, V(t_{n}) :$
2406: and is regular.
2407: In general, however,
2408: $\dcirc V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \ldots \, V(t_{n}) \dcirc$
2409: with $n \ge 3$ can be singular,
2410: even if it is finite in the limit $t_i \to t_j$
2411: for any pair of $i$ and $j$,
2412: when more than two operators
2413: simultaneously collide.
2414: In this section, we consider a class of marginal operators $V$
2415: which satisfy the following {\it finiteness condition}.\\
2416:
2417: \noindent\hskip1cm
2418: {\bf The finiteness condition.} {\it The limit}
2419: \begin{equation}\label{finiteness}
2420: \lim_{t \to t'} \dcirc V(t) \, V(t')^n \dcirc
2421: \end{equation}
2422: \hskip1cm{\it is finite for any positive integer $n$.}\\
2423:
2424: \noindent
2425: We explicitly construct $[ \, e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
2426: satisfying the assumptions stated in the introduction
2427: for this class of marginal operators.
2428:
2429: \subsection{Examples}\label{examples}
2430:
2431: Let us give some examples of such marginal deformations
2432: for D-branes in flat spacetime with Neumann or Dirichlet
2433: boundary conditions.
2434: As we have already mentioned,
2435: the finiteness condition~(\ref{finiteness}) is satisfied for
2436: \begin{equation}
2437: V(t) = \frac{i}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} \, \partial_t X^\mu (t) \,,
2438: \end{equation}
2439: where $X^\mu$ is a space-like direction along the D-brane.
2440: The direction $X^\mu$ can be noncompact
2441: or can be compactified on a circle with any radius.
2442: Similarly, the operator
2443: \begin{equation}
2444: V(t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} \, \partial_t X^0 (t)
2445: \end{equation}
2446: for the time-like direction also satisfies
2447: the finiteness condition.\footnote{
2448: We have to set $\lambda = i \, \tilde{\lambda}$
2449: and take $\tilde{\lambda}$ to be real
2450: for this operator
2451: when constructing the real solution $\Psi$.}
2452: Both of these deformations correspond to turning on
2453: a constant mode of the gauge field on the D-brane.
2454:
2455: The finiteness condition is also satisfied for
2456: \begin{equation}
2457: V(t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} \, \partial_\perp X^\alpha (t) \,,
2458: \end{equation}
2459: where $X^\alpha$ is a direction transverse to the D-brane
2460: and $\partial_\perp$ is the derivative normal to the boundary.
2461: The direction $X^\alpha$ can be noncompact
2462: or can be compactified on a circle with any radius.
2463: This deformation corresponds to displacement
2464: of the position of the D-brane in the direction $X^\alpha$.
2465: The condition~(\ref{finiteness})
2466: is satisfied because the operator
2467: $\dcirc V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \ldots \, V(t_{n}) \dcirc$
2468: again coincides with
2469: $: V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \ldots \, V(t_{n}) :$
2470: and is regular.
2471:
2472: A more nontrivial example of $V$
2473: satisfying~(\ref{finiteness}) is
2474: \begin{equation}\label{Yboson}
2475: V (t) = \sqrt{2}:\cos\biggl(\frac{X^\mu (t)}{\sqrt{\alpha'}}\biggr): \,,
2476: \end{equation}
2477: where $X^\mu$ is again a space-like direction along the D-brane.
2478: The direction $X^\mu$ can be noncompact
2479: or can be compactified on a circle whose radius is
2480: a multiple of the self-dual radius
2481: to be consistent with the periodicity of the cosine potential.
2482: This deformation is known to be exactly
2483: marginal~\cite{Callan:1994ub, Polchinski:1994my,
2484: Recknagel:1998ih, Sen:1999mh}
2485: and interpolates Neumann and Dirichlet boundary conditions.
2486: If we start from a D25-brane and deform the background
2487: by this operator, we obtain a periodic array of D24-branes
2488: at some value of the deformation parameter.
2489: When we compactify the $X^\mu$ direction
2490: on a circle with the self-dual radius,
2491: the free boson for the $X^\mu$ direction can be described
2492: by a different free boson $Y^\mu$
2493: because of the $SU(2) \times SU(2)$ symmetry,
2494: and the marginal operator $V(t)$ can be written
2495: in terms of $Y^\mu$ as follows:
2496: \begin{equation}
2497: V (t) = \sqrt{2}:\cos\biggl(\frac{X^\mu (t)}{\sqrt{\alpha'}}\biggr):
2498: {}= \frac{i}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} \, \partial_t Y^\mu (t) \,.
2499: \end{equation}
2500: See, for example, \S~3.1 of \cite{Sen:2004nf}.
2501: Finiteness of
2502: $\dcirc V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \ldots \, V(t_{n}) \dcirc$
2503: at the self-dual radius is then
2504: a consequence of Wick's theorem in the description
2505: in terms of $Y^\mu$.
2506: On the other hand, the finiteness is highly nontrivial
2507: in the original description in terms of $X^\mu$.
2508: The operator algebra of boundary operators
2509: necessary for the calculation of
2510: $\dcirc V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \ldots \, V(t_{n}) \dcirc$,
2511: however, does not depend on the compactification radius.
2512: Thus $\dcirc V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \ldots \, V(t_{n}) \dcirc$
2513: is finite for any radius which is a multiple of
2514: the self-dual radius and for the noncompact case as well.
2515:
2516:
2517: The operator algebra of boundary operators
2518: necessary for the calculation of the operator product
2519: $\dcirc V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \ldots \, V(t_{n}) \dcirc$
2520: is the same if we replace $X^\mu$ by $i X^0$.
2521: Therefore, the marginal operator
2522: \begin{equation}
2523: V (t) = \sqrt{2}:\cosh\biggl(\frac{X^0(t)}{\sqrt{\alpha'}}\biggr):
2524: \end{equation}
2525: also satisfies the finiteness condition.
2526: This deformation has been discussed in detail
2527: in the context of the rolling tachyon~\cite{Sen:2002nu}.
2528:
2529: All the operators mentioned in this subsection are known
2530: to be exactly marginal.
2531: In the remainder of this section,
2532: we construct solutions in terms of
2533: $\dcirc V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \ldots \, V(t_{n}) \dcirc$,
2534: and the construction depends
2535: on the explicit form of $V$ only
2536: through these operator products.
2537: Thus all the marginal deformations discussed
2538: in this subsection are covered by our construction.
2539:
2540: \subsection{Renormalizing operators}\label{explicitRenormalization}
2541:
2542: For the class of marginal operators
2543: satisfying the finiteness condition~(\ref{finiteness})
2544: in \S~\ref{class},
2545: we can construct finite operators $\dcirc ( V(a,b) )^n \dcirc$
2546: for any $n$ using the point-splitting regularization.
2547: For $n=2$, we construct $\dcirc ( V(a,b) )^2 \dcirc$ as follows:
2548: \begin{equation}
2549: \begin{split}
2550: \dcirc ( V(a,b) )^2 \dcirc
2551: = & \quad\lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \,
2552: \int_a^{b-\epsilon} dt_1\int_{t_1+\epsilon}^{b} dt_2\,
2553: \Bigl(V(t_1)V(t_2)-G(t_1,t_2)\Bigr)\\
2554: &+\lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \,\int_{a+\epsilon}^b
2555: dt_1\int_a^{t_1-\epsilon} dt_2\,
2556: \Bigl(V(t_1)V(t_2)-G(t_1,t_2)\Bigr)\,.
2557: \end{split}
2558: \end{equation}
2559: The first line and the second line on the right-hand side
2560: are actually identical.
2561: We could have written $\dcirc ( V(a,b) )^2 \dcirc$
2562: using only one of them, but we used both of them so that
2563: the integral region reduces to the product of
2564: $a \le t_1 \le b$ and $a \le t_2 \le b$
2565: without any ordering constraint in the limit $\epsilon \to 0$.
2566: The construction can be generalized to any $n$ as follows:
2567: \begin{equation}\label{dcirc-V^n-dcirc}
2568: \dcirc ( V(a,b) )^n \dcirc
2569: = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \,
2570: \int_{\Gamma^{(n)}_\epsilon} dt_1 dt_2 \ldots dt_n \sum_{0 \le k \le
2571: n/2} \frac{(-1)^k \, n!}{2^k \, k! \, (n-2k)!} \, \prod_{i=1}^k \,
2572: G(t_i,t_{i+k}) \, \prod_{j=2k+1}^n V(t_j) \,,
2573: \end{equation}
2574: where the integral region $\Gamma^{(n)}_\epsilon$ is
2575: \begin{equation}
2576: \Gamma^{(n)}_\epsilon: \quad
2577: a \le t_i \le b \quad \text{for} \quad i= 1, 2, \ldots , n
2578: \quad \text{with} \quad | \, t_i - t_j \, | \ge \epsilon
2579: \quad \text{for} \quad i \ne j \,.
2580: \end{equation}
2581: The finiteness condition~(\ref{finiteness})
2582: guarantees that the limit $\epsilon\to 0$ is well defined
2583: and finite for any $n$.
2584: We then define $\dcirc e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)} \dcirc$
2585: by its expansion in $\lambda$:
2586: \begin{equation}
2587: \dcirc e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)} \dcirc \equiv \sum_{n=0}^\infty
2588: \frac{\lambda^n}{n!} \dcirc ( V(a,b) )^n \dcirc \,.
2589: \label{dcirc-exp-dcirc}
2590: \end{equation}
2591:
2592:
2593: The definition of $\dcirc e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)} \dcirc$ depends
2594: on the Riemann surface where the boundary CFT is defined
2595: through the propagator $G(t_1,t_2)$.
2596: When we calculate star products of string fields
2597: involving the operators in the expansion (\ref{dcirc-exp-dcirc}),
2598: the operators defined on ${\cal W}_n$
2599: are embedded in a surface ${\cal W}_m$ with $m \geq n$,
2600: and the operators in the expansion (\ref{dcirc-exp-dcirc})
2601: are not invariant.
2602: Thus we {\it cannot} simply set
2603: $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r
2604: \equiv \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \dcirc$
2605: because the locality assumption (\ref{5})
2606: on $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$ is not satisfied.
2607:
2608: Let us study the issue more explicitly
2609: in a simpler example.
2610: The operator $\dcirc V(a) \, V(a,b) \dcirc$ is given by
2611: \begin{equation}
2612: \dcirc V(a) \, V(a,b) \dcirc
2613: = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \,
2614: \int_{a+\epsilon}^b dt \, \dcirc V(a) \, V(t) \dcirc
2615: = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \,
2616: \int_{a+\epsilon}^b dt \, \Bigl[ \, V(a) \, V(t)
2617: - G(a,t) \, \Bigr] \,.
2618: \end{equation}
2619: We denote the propagator $G(t_1,t_2)$ on ${\cal W}_n$
2620: by $G_n (t_1,t_2)$. Its explicit expression is
2621: \begin{equation}\label{propagator}
2622: G_n (t_1,t_2)
2623: \equiv \langle \, V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_n}
2624: = \frac{\pi^2}{(n+1)^2\sin^2
2625: \Bigl( \, \dfrac{t_2-t_1}{n+1}\,\pi \Bigr)} \,.
2626: \end{equation}
2627: The operator $\dcirc V(a) \, V(a,b) \dcirc$
2628: defined on ${\cal W}_n$ is thus
2629: \begin{equation}
2630: \dcirc V(a) \, V(a,b) \dcirc
2631: = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \,
2632: \int_{a+\epsilon}^b dt \, \Bigl[ \, V(a) \, V(t)
2633: - \frac{\pi^2}{(n+1)^2\sin^2
2634: \bigl( \frac{t-a}{n+1}\,\pi \bigr)} \, \Bigr]
2635: \quad \text{on} \quad {\cal W}_n \,.
2636: \end{equation}
2637: When this operator is embedded in ${\cal W}_m$,
2638: it should be written using the propagator on ${\cal W}_m$
2639: as follows:
2640: \begin{equation}
2641: \begin{split}
2642: & \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \,
2643: \int_{a+\epsilon}^b dt \, \Bigl[ \, V(a) \, V(t)
2644: - \frac{\pi^2}{(n+1)^2\sin^2
2645: \bigl( \frac{t-a}{n+1}\,\pi \bigr)} \, \Bigr] \\
2646: & = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \,
2647: \int_{a+\epsilon}^b dt \, \Bigl[ \, V(a) \, V(t)
2648: - \frac{\pi^2}{(m+1)^2\sin^2
2649: \bigl( \frac{t-a}{m+1}\,\pi \bigr)} \, \Bigr]
2650: - \int_a^b dt \, \delta G(a,t) \,,
2651: \end{split}
2652: \end{equation}
2653: where
2654: \begin{equation}
2655: \begin{split}
2656: \delta G(t_1,t_2) \,& \equiv\, G_n(t_1,t_2)-G_m(t_1,t_2)\\
2657: &=\frac{\pi^2}{(n+1)^2\sin^2\Bigl( \, \dfrac{t_2-t_1}{n+1}\,\pi\Bigr)}
2658: \,-\,
2659: \frac{\pi^2}{(m+1)^2\sin^2\Bigl( \, \dfrac{t_2-t_1}{m+1}\,\pi\Bigr)}
2660: \\
2661: & =\, \frac{(m-n)(2+m+n)\pi^2}{3(m+1)^2(n+1)^2}
2662: +\ord{(t_2-t_1)^2} \,,
2663: \end{split}
2664: \end{equation}
2665: and $\delta G(t_1,t_2)$ is finite in the limit $t_2 \to t_1$.
2666: The operator $\dcirc V(a) \, V(a,b) \dcirc$
2667: defined on ${\cal W}_n$ is thus rewritten
2668: when embedded in ${\cal W}_m$ as
2669: \begin{equation}
2670: \dcirc V(a) \, V(a,b) \dcirc
2671: \ntom
2672: \dcirc V(a) \, V(a,b) \dcirc - \int_a^b dt \, \delta G(a,t) \,.
2673: \label{extra-term}
2674: \end{equation}
2675: The notation
2676: \begin{equation}
2677: A \ntom B
2678: \end{equation}
2679: implies that $A = B$,
2680: but $A$ is written in terms of the propagator on ${\cal W}_n$
2681: and $B$ is written in terms of the propagator on ${\cal W}_m$.
2682: The assumption of locality (\ref{5}) can be stated using this notation as
2683: \begin{equation}
2684: [ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r
2685: \ntom [ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r \,, \qquad
2686: [ \, O_L(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r
2687: \ntom [ \, O_L(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r \,.
2688: \end{equation}
2689: As can be expected from the fact that
2690: $O_L^{(1)} = O_R^{(1)} = cV$ in general,
2691: we will need to define the operator
2692: $[ \, V(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
2693: satisfying
2694: \begin{equation}\label{rewrite5}
2695: [ \, V(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r
2696: \ntom [ \, V(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r \,.
2697: \end{equation}
2698: The operator $\dcirc V(a) \, V(a,b) \dcirc$
2699: does not satisfy
2700: \begin{equation}\label{localityVaVab}
2701: [ \, V(a) \, V(a,b) \, ]_r
2702: \ntom [ \, V(a) \, V(a,b) \, ]_r \,,
2703: \end{equation}
2704: and thus violates~(\ref{rewrite5}) at $\ord{\lambda}$.
2705: In order to cancel the extra term in (\ref{extra-term}),
2706: we add back a finite part
2707: of the propagator contraction which we subtracted.
2708: We define the renormalized contraction
2709: $\langle \, V(a) \, V(a,b) \, \rangle_r$ by
2710: \begin{equation}\label{contrVVab}
2711: \langle V(a)V(a,b)\rangle_r\,\equiv\,
2712: \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \, \biggl[
2713: \, \int_{a+\epsilon}^b dt \, G(a,t) -\frac{1}{\epsilon} \,
2714: \biggr] \,.
2715: \end{equation}
2716: Its explicit expression on ${\cal W}_n$ is
2717: \begin{equation}
2718: \langle \, V(a) \, V(a,b) \, \rangle_r\,
2719: =-\frac{\pi}{1+n}\cot\biggl(\frac{\pi (b-a)}{1+n}\biggr)
2720: \quad \text{on} \quad {\cal W}_n \,,
2721: \end{equation}
2722: and it is rewritten when embedded in ${\cal W}_m$ as
2723: \begin{equation}
2724: \langle \, V(a) \, V(a,b) \, \rangle_r
2725: \ntom
2726: \langle \, V(a) \, V(a,b) \, \rangle_r
2727: + \int_a^b dt \, \delta G(a,t) \,.
2728: \label{-extra-term}
2729: \end{equation}
2730: This allows us to define our first renormalized operator
2731: $[ \,V(a)\,V(a,b)\, ]_r$ by
2732: \begin{equation}\label{renVVab}
2733: \bigl[\,V(a)\,V(a,b)\,\bigr]_r \,\equiv\, \dcirc V(a)\,V(a,b)\dcirc \,+\, \langle \, V(a) \, V(a,b) \, \rangle_r\,.
2734: \end{equation}
2735: Since the extra term in~(\ref{extra-term})
2736: is canceled by the extra terms in~(\ref{-extra-term}),
2737: the operator $[ \,V(a)\,V(a,b)\, ]_r$ is invariant
2738: under the embedding from ${\cal W}_n$ to ${\cal W}_m$
2739: and thus satisfies~(\ref{localityVaVab}).
2740: In fact, we can write $[ \,V(a)\,V(a,b)\, ]_r$
2741: in the following form which does not depend on the propagator:
2742: \begin{equation}\label{alternativeVaVabr}
2743: \bigl[\,V(a)\,V(a,b)\,\bigr]_r
2744: = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \, \biggl[ \,
2745: \int_{a+\epsilon}^b dt\,V(a)\,V(t)-\frac{1}{\epsilon} \, \biggr] \,.
2746: \end{equation}
2747: Similarly, we can define the renormalized contraction
2748: and the renormalized operator for $V(a,b) \, V(b)$ by
2749: \begin{equation}\label{renVabV}
2750: \begin{split}
2751: \langle \, V(a,b) \, V(b) \, \rangle_r
2752: \,&\equiv\, \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \,
2753: \biggl[ \, \int_{a}^{b-\epsilon}\, G(t,b) -\frac{1}{\epsilon} \,
2754: \biggr] \,, \\
2755: \bigl[\,V(a,b)\,V(b)\,\bigr]_r \, &\equiv\,
2756: \dcirc V(a,b)\,V(b)\dcirc \,+\,
2757: \langle \, V(a,b) \, V(b) \, \rangle_r\,
2758: = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \, \biggl[ \,
2759: \int_{a}^{b-\epsilon} dt\,V(t)\,V(b)
2760: -\frac{1}{\epsilon} \, \biggr] \,.
2761: \end{split}
2762: \end{equation}
2763: The renormalized contraction
2764: $\langle \, V(a,b) \, V(b) \, \rangle_r$
2765: on ${\cal W}_n$ is
2766: \begin{equation}
2767: \langle \, V(a,b) \, V(b) \, \rangle_r\,
2768: =-\frac{\pi}{1+n}\cot\biggl(\frac{\pi (b-a)}{1+n}\biggr)
2769: \quad \text{on} \quad {\cal W}_n \,.
2770: \end{equation}
2771:
2772:
2773: We use the same strategy to define $[ \, ( V(a,b) )^2 \, ]_r$.
2774: We define $\langle \, V(a,b)^2 \, \rangle_r$ by
2775: \begin{equation}\label{contrVab2}
2776: \langle \, V(a,b)^2 \, \rangle_r
2777: \,\equiv\, 2 \, \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \,
2778: \biggl[ \, \int_a^{b-\epsilon} dt_1
2779: \int_{t_1+\epsilon}^{b} dt_2\,
2780: G(t_1,t_2)-\frac{b-a-\epsilon}{\epsilon}-\ln\epsilon \,
2781: \biggr] \,.
2782: \end{equation}
2783: Its expression on ${\cal W}_n$ is
2784: \begin{equation}\label{<V(a,b)^2>_r-on-W_n}
2785: \langle \, V(a,b)^2 \, \rangle_r
2786: =\,\ln\biggl(
2787: \frac{\pi^2}{(n+1)^2\sin^2\bigl(\frac{b-a}{n+1}\,\pi\bigr)}\biggr)\\
2788: =\,\ln G_n (a,b)
2789: \quad \text{on} \quad {\cal W}_n \,.
2790: \end{equation}
2791: We then define $[ \, ( V(a,b) )^2 \, ]_r$ by
2792: \begin{equation}\label{renVab2}
2793: \bigl[\, ( V(a,b) )^2\,\bigr]_r
2794: \,\equiv\, \dcirc ( V(a,b) )^2\dcirc
2795: \,+\, \langle \, V(a,b)^2 \, \rangle_r\,.
2796: \end{equation}
2797: Since $\dcirc ( V(a,b) )^2\dcirc$
2798: and $\langle \, V(a,b)^2 \, \rangle_r$ defined on ${\cal W}_n$
2799: are rewritten when embedded in ${\cal W}_m$ as
2800: \begin{equation}
2801: \begin{split}
2802: \dcirc ( V(a,b) )^2\dcirc & \ntom
2803: \dcirc ( V(a,b) )^2\dcirc {}- \Delta \,, \\
2804: \langle \, V(a,b)^2 \, \rangle_r & \ntom
2805: \langle \, V(a,b)^2 \, \rangle_r {}+ \Delta \,,
2806: \end{split}
2807: \end{equation}
2808: where
2809: \begin{equation}
2810: \Delta \equiv
2811: \int_a^bdt_1\int_a^bdt_2\,\delta G(t_1,t_2) \,,
2812: \end{equation}
2813: the operator $[ \, ( V(a,b) )^2 \, ]_r$ is invariant
2814: under the embedding from ${\cal W}_n$ to ${\cal W}_m$.
2815:
2816:
2817: The operator $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \,]_r$ can also be defined
2818: using $\langle \, V(a,b)^2 \, \rangle_r$ as follows:
2819: \begin{equation}\label{renexpV}
2820: [ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \,]_r
2821: \,\equiv\,e^{\frac{1}{2}\lambda^2
2822: \langle \, V(a,b)^2 \, \rangle_r}\,
2823: \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \dcirc \,.
2824: \end{equation}
2825: By replacing $G_n$ in (\ref{dcirc-V^n-dcirc}) on ${\cal W}_n$
2826: with $G_m + \delta G$, we find
2827: \begin{equation}
2828: \dcirc ( V(a,b) )^k \dcirc \ntom
2829: \sum_{0 \le \ell \le k/2}
2830: \frac{(-1)^\ell \, k!}{2^\ell \, (k-2 \ell)! \, \ell !} \,
2831: \Delta^\ell \, \dcirc ( V(a,b) )^{k -2 \ell} \dcirc \,.
2832: \end{equation}
2833: It then follows from
2834: \begin{equation}
2835: \begin{split}
2836: \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \dcirc & \ntom
2837: e^{-\frac{1}{2} \, \lambda^2 \Delta} \,
2838: \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \dcirc \,, \\
2839: e^{\frac{1}{2}\lambda^2 \langle \, V(a,b)^2 \, \rangle_r}
2840: & \ntom
2841: e^{\frac{1}{2} \, \lambda^2 \Delta} \,\,
2842: e^{\frac{1}{2}\lambda^2 \langle \, V(a,b)^2 \, \rangle_r}
2843: \end{split}
2844: \end{equation}
2845: that the operator $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \,]_r$ transforms as
2846: \begin{equation}\label{rewrite5again}
2847: [ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \,]_r
2848: \ntom
2849: [ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \,]_r
2850: \end{equation}
2851: under the embedding
2852: and thus satisfies the locality assumption (\ref{5}).
2853: It is obvious from the definition (\ref{dcirc-V^n-dcirc})
2854: that $[\,e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\,]_r$
2855: is invariant when $V(t)$ is replaced by $V(a+b-t)$
2856: and thus satisfies the reflection assumption (\ref{6}) as well.
2857:
2858: Let us next define the operators
2859: $[\,V(a)\,e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\,]_r$
2860: and $[\,e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\,V(b)\,]_r$.
2861: Using the renormalized contractions
2862: $\langle \, V(a,b)^2 \, \rangle_r$,
2863: $\langle \, V(a) \, V(a,b) \, \rangle_r$,
2864: and $\langle \, V(a,b) \, V(b) \, \rangle_r$,
2865: they are defined as follows:
2866: \begin{equation}\label{renVexpV}
2867: \begin{split}
2868: [\,V(a)\,e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\,]_r\,
2869: &\equiv\,e^{\frac{1}{2}\lambda^2\langle
2870: V(a,b)^2\rangle_r}\, \dcirc
2871: \, \Bigl( \, V(a)+\lambda \, \langle \, V(a) \, V(a,b) \,
2872: \rangle_r\Bigr) \,
2873: e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\dcirc\,,\\
2874: [\,e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\,V(b)\,]_r\,
2875: &\equiv\,e^{\frac{1}{2}\lambda^2\langle
2876: V(a,b)^2\rangle_r}\, \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)}
2877: \Bigl( \, V(b)+\lambda \, \langle \, V(a,b) \, V(b) \,
2878: \rangle_r\Bigr)
2879: \dcirc\,.
2880: \end{split}
2881: \end{equation}
2882: Let us prove that $[\,V(a)\,e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\,]_r$
2883: satisfies the condition~(\ref{rewrite5}).
2884: It follows from the definition of
2885: $\dcirc V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \ldots V(t_n) \dcirc$ that
2886: \begin{equation}
2887: \dcirc V(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \dcirc
2888: = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \, \biggl[ \,
2889: V(a-\epsilon) \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \dcirc
2890: {}- \lambda \, \int_a^b dt \, G(a-\epsilon,t) \,
2891: \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \dcirc \, \biggr] \,.
2892: \end{equation}
2893: We thus find
2894: \begin{equation}\label{localityVaexpVab1}
2895: \begin{split}
2896: e^{\frac{1}{2}\lambda^2\langle V(a,b)^2\rangle_r}\dcirc V(a) \,
2897: e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \dcirc
2898: \hskip-.1cm
2899: \ntom
2900: \hskip-.1cm
2901: e^{\frac{1}{2}\lambda^2\langle V(a,b)^2\rangle_r}
2902: \dcirc V(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \dcirc
2903: {}- \lambda \, \int_a^b dt \, \delta G(a,t) \,
2904: [\, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \,]_r
2905: \end{split}
2906: \end{equation}
2907: for the first term in the definition~(\ref{renVexpV})
2908: of $[ \, V(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$.
2909: Similarly, the second term transforms as
2910: \begin{equation}\label{localityVaexpVab2}
2911: \begin{split}
2912: \lambda \, \langle \, V(a) \, V(a,b) \, \rangle_r\,
2913: [\,e^{\lambda V(a,b)}]_r
2914: \ntom
2915: \lambda \, \langle \, V(a) \, V(a,b) \, \rangle_r \,
2916: [\,e^{\lambda V(a,b)}]_r
2917: {}+ \lambda \, \int_a^b dt \, \delta G(a,t) \,
2918: [\, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \,]_r\,,
2919: \end{split}
2920: \end{equation}
2921: where we used~(\ref{-extra-term}).
2922: Combining~(\ref{localityVaexpVab1})
2923: and~(\ref{localityVaexpVab2}), we have thus shown
2924: that $[ \, V(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
2925: satisfies~(\ref{rewrite5}).
2926:
2927: To summarize, we have defined
2928: $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
2929: satisfying the assumptions of locality~(\ref{5})
2930: and reflection~(\ref{6})
2931: and $[ \, V(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
2932: satisfying~(\ref{rewrite5})
2933: for the class of marginal operators
2934: satisfying the finiteness condition stated in \S~\ref{class}.
2935:
2936:
2937: \subsection{The BRST transformation}\label{BRST}
2938:
2939:
2940: Let us next calculate the BRST transformation
2941: of $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$ defined in (\ref{renexpV})
2942: to verify that the assumption (\ref{1}) on the BRST transformation is satisfied
2943: and determine $O_L$ and $O_R$.
2944: The calculation at $\ord{\lambda}$
2945: is the same as (\ref{QV(a,b)}) in the regular case
2946: and gives $O_L^{(1)} = O_R^{(1)} = cV$.
2947: The calculation at $\ord{\lambda^2}$
2948: involves the OPE
2949: of the marginal operator with itself.
2950: We in fact expect that the assumption (\ref{1})
2951: is {\it not} satisfied when the marginal
2952: deformation is not exactly marginal.
2953: It is known that the deformation associated with $V$
2954: is not exactly marginal
2955: if the single-pole term in~(\ref{single-pole-term})
2956: is nonvanishing. See, for example, \cite{Recknagel:1998ih}.
2957: In the construction of analytic solutions
2958: in~\cite{Kiermaier:2007ba},
2959: there was indeed an obstruction
2960: to solve the equation of motion at $\ord{\lambda^2}$
2961: when the single-pole term in~(\ref{single-pole-term})
2962: is nonvanishing.
2963: It is therefore instructive to briefly consider
2964: the case of the more general OPE~(\ref{single-pole-term}),
2965: \begin{equation}
2966: V(t) \, V(0) \sim \frac{1}{t^2}
2967: + \frac{1}{t} \, \widetilde{V} (0) \,,
2968: \label{single-pole-term-again}
2969: \end{equation}
2970: and to see how the assumption (\ref{1}) is violated
2971: when the single-pole term with $\widetilde{V}$ is nonvanishing.
2972: We regularize $V^{(2)}(a,b)$ as follows:
2973: \begin{equation}
2974: \int_a^{b-\epsilon} d t_1 \int_{t_1+\epsilon}^b d t_2 \,
2975: V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \,.
2976: \end{equation}
2977: The calculation of its BRST transformation
2978: is similar to the calculation of $Q_B \Psi_L^{(3)}$
2979: presented in~(\ref{Q_B-Psi_L^(3)-1}) and~(\ref{Q_B-Psi_L^(3)-2}):
2980: \begin{equation}
2981: \begin{split}
2982: Q_B \cdot \biggl[ \,
2983: & \int_a^{b-\epsilon} d t_1 \int_{t_1+\epsilon}^b d t_2 \,
2984: V(t_1) \, V(t_2) \, \biggr]
2985: =\int_a^{b-\epsilon} d t_1 \int_{t_1+\epsilon}^b d t_2 \,
2986: \Bigl[ \, \del_{t_1} [ \, cV(t_1) \, ] \, V(t_2)
2987: + V(t_1) \,\del_{t_2} [ \, cV(t_2) \, ] \, \Bigr] \\
2988: = &\int_{a}^{b-\epsilon} d t_1 \, V(t_1)\,cV(b)
2989: -\int_{a+\epsilon}^b d t_2 \,cV(a) \, V(t_2)
2990: +\int_a^{b-\epsilon} d t_1 \, V(t_1) \, V(t_1+\epsilon) \,
2991: \bigl[ \, c(t_1)-c(t_1+\epsilon) \, \bigr] \,. \\
2992: \end{split}
2993: \end{equation}
2994: The last term on the right-hand side no longer vanishes
2995: in the limit $\epsilon\to0$
2996: when the OPE of $V$ with itself is singular
2997: and can be calculated as follows:
2998: \begin{equation}\label{collision}
2999: \begin{split}
3000: & \int_a^{b-\epsilon} dt \, V(t) \, V(t+\epsilon) \,
3001: \Bigl[ \, c(t) - c(t+\epsilon) \, \Bigr] \\
3002: & = \int_a^{b-\epsilon} dt \,
3003: \Big( \, \frac{1}{\epsilon^2}
3004: - \frac{1}{\epsilon} \, \widetilde{V} (t)
3005: + \ord{\epsilon^0} \, \Bigr)
3006: \Bigl[ \, - \epsilon \, \partial c(t)
3007: - \frac{\epsilon^2 }{2} \, \partial^2 c(t) + \ord{\epsilon^3} \,
3008: \Bigr] \\
3009: & = \int_a^{b-\epsilon} dt \, \Bigl[ \,
3010: \partial c \widetilde{V} (t)
3011: -\frac{1}{\epsilon} \, \partial c(t)
3012: -\frac{1}{2} \, \partial^2 c(t) \, \Bigr] + \ord{\epsilon} \\
3013: & = \int_a^{b-\epsilon} dt \, \partial c \widetilde{V} (t)
3014: -\frac{1}{\epsilon} \, c(b-\epsilon)
3015: +\frac{1}{\epsilon} \, c(a)
3016: -\frac{1}{2} \, \partial c(b-\epsilon)
3017: +\frac{1}{2} \, \partial c(a) + \ord{\epsilon} \\
3018: & = \int_a^b dt \, \partial c \widetilde{V} (t)
3019: -\frac{1}{\epsilon} \, c(b) +\frac{1}{\epsilon} \, c(a)
3020: +\frac{1}{2} \, \partial c(b) +\frac{1}{2} \, \partial c(a)
3021: + \ord{\epsilon} \,.
3022: \end{split}
3023: \end{equation}
3024: We thus obtain
3025: \begin{equation}
3026: \begin{split}
3027: & Q_B\cdot\biggl[\int_a^{b-\epsilon} d t_1
3028: \int_{t_1+\epsilon}^b d t_2 \, V(t_1) \, V(t_2)\biggr] \\
3029: & = \Biggl[\int_{a}^{b-\epsilon} d t_1 \, V(t_1)\,V(b)
3030: -\frac{1}{\epsilon}\Biggr] c(b)
3031: -c(a)\Biggl[\int_{a+\epsilon}^b d t_2 \,V(a) \, V(t_2)
3032: -\frac{1}{\epsilon}\Biggr] \\
3033: & \quad ~ {}+\frac{\del c(b)}{2}+\frac{\del c(a)}{2}
3034: + \int_a^b d t_1 \partial c \widetilde{V}(t_1)+\ord \epsilon \,.
3035: \end{split}
3036: \label{Q_B-V^(2)}
3037: \end{equation}
3038: This does not take the form of the $\ord{\lambda^2}$ term of
3039: $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, O_R (b) \, ]_r
3040: - [ \, O_L (a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
3041: because of the term with $\del c\widetilde{V}$,
3042: which is finite in the limit $\epsilon \to 0$.
3043: The divergences in (\ref{Q_B-V^(2)}) arise
3044: only when $V(t)$ approaches the end points of the integral region,
3045: and any counterterms to take care of those localized divergences
3046: will not cancel the finite integral of $\del c\widetilde{V}$
3047: over the whole integral region.
3048: Therefore, the assumption (\ref{1}) on the BRST transformation is not satisfied
3049: when the single-pole term in (\ref{single-pole-term-again})
3050: is nonvanishing.
3051: This is consistent because the deformation
3052: is not exactly marginal in this case, as we mentioned before.
3053: When the single-pole term in (\ref{single-pole-term-again}) vanishes,
3054: the result (\ref{Q_B-V^(2)}) in the limit $\epsilon \to 0$
3055: is finite and given by
3056: \begin{equation}
3057: \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \, \biggl[ \,
3058: Q_B\cdot\Bigl[\int_a^{b-\epsilon} d t_1 \int_{t_1+\epsilon}^b d t_2 \,
3059: V(t_1) \, V(t_2)\Bigr] \, \biggr]
3060: = [ \, V(a,b) \, cV(b) \, ]_r
3061: - [ \, cV(a) \, V(a,b) \, ]_r
3062: +\frac{\del c(b)}{2}+\frac{\del c(a)}{2} \,.
3063: \end{equation}
3064: Note that $[ \, V(a,b) \, cV(b) \, ]_r$ and
3065: $[ \, cV(a) \, V(a,b) \, ]_r$
3066: given in~(\ref{alternativeVaVabr})
3067: and~(\ref{renVabV})
3068: emerged naturally.
3069: We conclude that
3070: \begin{equation}
3071: O_R^{(1)}=O_L^{(1)}= cV\,,\qquad
3072: O_R^{(2)}={}-O_L^{(2)}= \frac{1}{2} \, \del c
3073: \end{equation}
3074: for any exactly marginal deformation
3075: with the singular OPE given by~(\ref{doublepoleOPE}).
3076:
3077: Let us now calculate the BRST transformation of
3078: $[\,e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\,]_r$
3079: for the class of marginal operators
3080: satisfying the finiteness condition~(\ref{finiteness})
3081: in~\S~\ref{class}:
3082: \begin{equation}
3083: Q_B\cdot[\,e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\,]_r\,
3084: = e^{\frac{1}{2}\lambda^2\langle
3085: V(a,b)^2\rangle_r}\,\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{\lambda^n}{n!} \,
3086: Q_B\cdot \dcirc \left(V(a,b)\right)^n \dcirc
3087: \end{equation}
3088: We use the expression~(\ref{dcirc-V^n-dcirc})
3089: of $\dcirc \left(V(a,b)\right)^n \dcirc$
3090: and calculate its BRST transformation as follows:
3091: \begin{equation}\label{renQVabn}
3092: \begin{split}
3093: & Q_B\cdot \dcirc \left(V(a,b)\right)^n \dcirc \\
3094: &=\,\sum_{0 \le k\le n/2} \,
3095: \frac{(-1)^k \, n!}{2^k \, k! \, (n-2k)!} \, \lim_{\epsilon \to 0}
3096: \int_{\Gamma^{(n)}_\epsilon} d^nt\prod_{i=1}^k \,
3097: G(t_i,t_{i+k}) \,\, Q_B\cdot \prod_{j=2k+1}^n V(t_j)\\
3098: &=\,n\sum_{0 \le k< n/2} \, \frac{(-1)^k \, (n-1)!}{2^k \, k! \,
3099: (n-2k-1)!} \, \lim_{\epsilon \to 0}
3100: \int_{\Gamma^{(n)}_\epsilon} d^nt\prod_{i=1}^k \,
3101: G(t_i,t_{i+k}) \, \prod_{j=2k+1}^{n-1} V(t_j)\,
3102: \del_{t_n}\bigl[cV(t_n)\bigr]\\
3103: &=\,n \, \lim_{\epsilon \to 0}
3104: \int_{\Gamma^{(n)}_\epsilon} d^nt\,\dcirc V(t_1)\ldots
3105: V(t_{n-1})\dcirc\,\, \del_{t_n}\bigl[cV(t_n)\bigr] \,.
3106: \end{split}
3107: \end{equation}
3108: Using~(\ref{genNOrec}), this can be written in the following way:
3109: \begin{equation}\label{pullin1}
3110: \begin{split}
3111: Q_B\cdot \dcirc \left(V(a,b)\right)^n \dcirc &=\,
3112: \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \int_{\Gamma^{(n)}_\epsilon}
3113: d^nt \, \biggl[ \, n\dcirc V(t_1)\ldots V(t_{n-1})\,
3114: \del_{t_n}\bigl[cV(t_n)\bigr]\dcirc \\
3115: &\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad+n(n-1)\dcirc V(t_1)\ldots
3116: V(t_{n-2})\dcirc \,
3117: \del_{t_n}\bigl[G(t_{n-1},t_n)\,c(t_n)\bigr] \, \biggr] \,.
3118: \end{split}
3119: \end{equation}
3120: The first term of the integrand on the right-hand side is finite
3121: so that we can take the limit $\epsilon \to 0$
3122: and carry out the integral over $t_n$.
3123: The only divergence in the second term of the integrand
3124: arises when $|t_n-t_{n-1}|\to0$.
3125: The integral region therefore factorizes into
3126: that of $t_1,\, t_2,\, \ldots t_{n-2}$
3127: without the restriction $| t_i - t_j | \ge \epsilon$
3128: and $\Gamma^{(2)}_\epsilon$ for $t_{n-1}$ and $t_n$.
3129: We thus obtain
3130: \begin{equation}\label{pullin2}
3131: \begin{split}
3132: Q_B\cdot \dcirc \left(V(a,b)\right)^n \dcirc &=\,n\int_a^b dt_n\,\dcirc \left(V(a,b)\right)^{n-1}\,\,\del_{t_n}\bigl[cV(t_n)\bigr]\dcirc \\
3133: &\qquad\qquad\qquad+n(n-1)\dcirc \left(V(a,b)\right)^{n-2}\dcirc
3134: \, \lim_{\epsilon \to 0}
3135: \int_{\Gamma^{(2)}_\epsilon}dt_{n-1}dt_n\,\del_{t_n}\bigl[G(t_{n-1},t_n)\,c(t_n)\bigr]\\
3136: &=\,n\dcirc \left(V(a,b)\right)^{n-1}\bigl[cV(b)-cV(a)\bigr]\dcirc \\
3137: &\qquad\qquad\qquad+n(n-1)\dcirc \left(V(a,b)\right)^{n-2}\dcirc
3138: \, \lim_{\epsilon \to 0}
3139: \int_{\Gamma^{(2)}_\epsilon}dt_{n-1}dt_n\,\del_{t_n}\bigl[G(t_{n-1},t_n)\,c(t_n)\bigr] \,.
3140: \end{split}
3141: \end{equation}
3142: The integral can be evaluated as follows:
3143: \begin{equation}\label{partialGc}
3144: \begin{split}
3145: & \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \int_{\Gamma^{(2)}_\epsilon} dt_1 dt_2 \,
3146: \partial_{t_2} \bigl[ \, G(t_1,t_2) \, c(t_2) \, \bigr] \\
3147: & = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \, \biggl[ \,
3148: \int_a^{b-\epsilon} dt_1 \int_{t_1+\epsilon}^b dt_2 \,
3149: \partial_{t_2} \bigl[ \, G(t_1,t_2) \, c(t_2) \, \bigr]
3150: + \int_{a+\epsilon}^b dt_1 \int_a^{t_1-\epsilon} dt_2 \,
3151: \partial_{t_2} \bigl[ \, G(t_1,t_2) \, c(t_2) \, \bigr] \,
3152: \biggr] \\
3153: & = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \, \biggl[ \,
3154: \int_a^{b-\epsilon} dt_1 \,
3155: \Bigl[ \, G(t_1,b) \, c(b)
3156: - G(t_1,t_1+\epsilon) \, c(t_1+\epsilon) \, \Bigr] \\
3157: & \qquad \qquad
3158: {}+ \int_{a+\epsilon}^b dt_1 \,
3159: \Bigl[ \, G(t_1-\epsilon,t_1) \, c(t_1-\epsilon)
3160: - G(a,t_1) \, c(a) \, \Bigr] \, \biggr] \\
3161: & = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \, \biggl[ \,
3162: \int_a^{b-\epsilon} dt \, G(t,b) \, c(b)
3163: - \int_{a+\epsilon}^b dt \, G(a,t) \, c(a)
3164: + \int_a^{b-\epsilon} dt \, G(t,t+\epsilon) \,
3165: \Bigl[ \, c(t) - c(t+\epsilon) \, \Bigr] \, \biggr] \,.
3166: \end{split}
3167: \end{equation}
3168: The calculation of the last term is essentially the same
3169: as that of~(\ref{collision})
3170: without the term involving $\widetilde{V}$:
3171: \begin{equation}
3172: \begin{split}
3173: & \int_a^{b-\epsilon} dt \, G(t,t+\epsilon) \,
3174: \Bigl[ \, c(t) - c(t+\epsilon) \, \Bigr]
3175: = \int_a^{b-\epsilon} dt \,
3176: \Big( \, \frac{1}{\epsilon^2} + \ord{\epsilon^0} \, \Bigr)
3177: \Bigl[ \, - \epsilon \, \partial c(t)
3178: - \frac{\epsilon^2 }{2} \, \partial^2 c(t) + \ord{\epsilon^3} \,
3179: \Bigr] \\
3180: & = -\frac{1}{\epsilon} \, c(b) +\frac{1}{\epsilon} \, c(a)
3181: +\frac{1}{2} \, \partial c(b) +\frac{1}{2} \, \partial c(a)
3182: + \ord{\epsilon} \,.
3183: \end{split}
3184: \end{equation}
3185: We thus find
3186: \begin{equation}
3187: \begin{split}
3188: & \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \int_{\Gamma^{(2)}_\epsilon} dt_1 dt_2 \,
3189: \partial_{t_2} \bigl[ \, G(t_1,t_2) \, c(t_2) \, \bigr] \\
3190: & = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \, \biggl[ \,
3191: \int_a^{b-\epsilon} dt \, G(t,b) -\frac{1}{\epsilon} \,
3192: \biggr] \, c(b)
3193: - \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \, \biggl[ \,
3194: \int_{a+\epsilon}^b dt \, G(a,t) -\frac{1}{\epsilon} \,
3195: \biggr] \, c(a)
3196: +\frac{1}{2} \, \partial c(b) +\frac{1}{2} \, \partial c(a) \\
3197: & = \langle \, V(a,b) \, V(b) \, \rangle_r \, c(b)
3198: -\langle \, V(a) \, V(a,b) \, \rangle_r \,c(a)
3199: +\frac{1}{2} \, \partial c(b) +\frac{1}{2} \, \partial c(a) \,,
3200: \end{split}
3201: \end{equation}
3202: where we have used (\ref{contrVVab}) and (\ref{renVabV}).
3203: Combining this and (\ref{pullin2}),
3204: the result can be written as follows:
3205: \begin{equation}\label{Q_B-exp}
3206: \begin{split}
3207: Q_B \cdot \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \dcirc
3208: & = \lambda \, \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, cV(b) \dcirc
3209: {}- \lambda \, \dcirc cV(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \dcirc \\
3210: & \quad ~ + \lambda^2 \, \langle \, V(a,b) \, V(b) \, \rangle_r \,
3211: \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, c(b) \dcirc
3212: {}- \lambda^2 \, \langle \, V(a) \, V(a,b) \, \rangle_r \,
3213: \dcirc c(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \dcirc \\
3214: & \quad ~ + \frac{\lambda^2}{2} \,
3215: \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, \partial c(b) \dcirc
3216: {}+ \frac{\lambda^2}{2} \,
3217: \dcirc \partial c(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \dcirc \,.
3218: \end{split}
3219: \end{equation}
3220: Note that the structures
3221: \begin{equation}
3222: \dcirc \Bigl(V(a)
3223: +\lambda \, \langle \, V(a) \, V(a,b) \, \rangle_r\Bigr) \,
3224: e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \dcirc \,, \qquad
3225: \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, \Bigl(V(b)
3226: +\lambda \, \langle \, V(a,b) \, V(b) \, \rangle_r\Bigr) \dcirc
3227: \end{equation}
3228: of $[\,V(a)\,e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\,]_r$
3229: and $[\,e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\,V(b)\,]_r$
3230: defined in~(\ref{renVexpV}) emerged naturally.
3231: Therefore, the BRST transformation of
3232: $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
3233: can be written using the definitions~(\ref{renVexpV}) as follows:
3234: \begin{equation}\label{QexpV}
3235: Q_B\cdot[\,e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\,]_r\,
3236: =\,\Bigl[\, e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\Bigl(\lambda
3237: cV(b)+\frac{\lambda^2}{2}\,\del c(b)\Bigr)\,\Bigr]_r
3238: -\Bigl[\,\Bigl(\lambda cV(a)-\frac{\lambda^2}{2}\,\del c(a)\Bigr)
3239: e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\,\Bigr]_r\,.
3240: \end{equation}
3241: We have thus verified the assumption~(\ref{1}) on the BRST transformation
3242: and determined the operators $O_L$ and $O_R$ to be
3243: \begin{equation}\label{explicitOLOR}
3244: \begin{split}
3245: O_R=\lambda \, cV+\frac{\lambda^2}{2}\,\del c\,,\qquad
3246: O_L
3247: =\lambda \, cV-\frac{\lambda^2}{2}\,\del c \,,
3248: \end{split}
3249: \end{equation}
3250: or equivalently
3251: \begin{equation}
3252: \begin{split}
3253: O_R^{(1)} = O_L^{(1)} = cV \,, \qquad
3254: O_R^{(2)} = -O_L^{(2)} = \frac{1}{2}\,\del c \,, \qquad
3255: O_R^{(n)} = O_L^{(n)} = 0 \quad \text{for} \quad n \ge 3 \,.
3256: \end{split}
3257: \end{equation}
3258: With these expressions for $O_R$ and $O_L$
3259: and the explicit forms
3260: of $[\,e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \,]_r$
3261: and $[\, V (a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \,]_r$
3262: given in~(\ref{renexpV}) and~(\ref{renVexpV}),
3263: $\Psi_L$ and $\Psi$ can be explicitly constructed
3264: for the class of marginal deformations
3265: satisfying the finiteness condition~(\ref{finiteness})
3266: in~\S~\ref{class}.
3267: If all the assumptions~(\ref{1})--(\ref{6}) stated in the introduction
3268: are satisfied, $\Psi_L$ and $\Psi$ are guaranteed to solve
3269: the equation of motion.
3270: The locality assumption~(\ref{5})
3271: for the operator $[ \, O_L(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \,]_r$
3272: is satisfied because of~(\ref{rewrite5}),~(\ref{rewrite5again}),
3273: and~(\ref{explicitOLOR}).
3274: We have thus verified the assumptions
3275: (\ref{1}), (\ref{5}), and (\ref{6}).
3276: We prove the remaining assumptions of replacement (\ref{3}) and factorization (\ref{4})
3277: in appendix~\ref{explicit_proof}
3278: and the assumption (\ref{2}) on the BRST transformation
3279: in appendix~\ref{appQOLexpV}.
3280:
3281: \subsection{Conformal properties of
3282: $[ \, O_L(a) \, e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)} \, ]_r$}
3283: \label{conformal}
3284:
3285:
3286: The operator $O_L(a)$ always appears
3287: in the combination
3288: $[\,O_L(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\,\ldots\,]_r$
3289: with some $b$.
3290: Similarly, the operator $O_R(b)$ always appears
3291: in the combination
3292: $[\,\ldots \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, O_R(b)\,]_r$
3293: with some $a$.
3294: Correspondingly, the operators $O_L^{(l)}(a)$
3295: and $O_R^{(r)}(b)$ always appear in the form
3296: \begin{equation}
3297: \bigl[ \, \sum_{l=1}^n \, O_L^{(l)}(a) \,
3298: V^{(n-l)}(a,b) \ldots \, \bigr]_r \,, \qquad
3299: \bigl[ \, \ldots \sum_{r=1}^n \, V^{(n-r)}(a,b) \,
3300: O_R^{(r)}(b) \, \bigr]_r \,,
3301: \end{equation}
3302: or
3303: \begin{equation}
3304: \bigl[ \, \sum_{l+r \le n} \, O_L^{(l)}(a) \,
3305: V^{(n-l-r)}(a,b) \, O_R^{(r)}(b) \, \bigr]_r \,.
3306: \end{equation}
3307: We do not need to require the existence of $O_L(a)$
3308: and $O_R(b)$ as independent operators,
3309: and we only need to define
3310: $[ \, O_L(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \ldots \, ]_r$
3311: and $[ \, \ldots e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, O_R(b) \, ]_r$
3312: expanded in $\lambda$.
3313: In fact, operators in these forms are expected
3314: to transform covariantly under conformal transformations.
3315: Let us consider conformal transformations
3316: of the operator $[ \, O_L(a) \, e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
3317: we determined in~\S~\ref{BRST}
3318: to the first nontrivial order in $\lambda$.
3319:
3320:
3321:
3322: When we change boundary conditions
3323: on a segment between $a$ and $b$ of the real axis,
3324: the two end points $a$ and $b$ behave
3325: as primary fields
3326: under conformal transformations,
3327: and they are often described in terms of boundary-condition
3328: changing operators.
3329: We thus expect that the operator $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
3330: is mapped by a conformal transformation $g(z)$
3331: to $g'(a)^{h(\lambda)} \, g'(b)^{h(\lambda)} \,
3332: [ \, e^{\lambda V(g(a), \, g(b))} \, ]_r$,
3333: where $h(\lambda)$ can be interpreted
3334: as the dimension of the boundary-condition changing operator.
3335: For simplicity, we assume that the segment between $a$ and $b$
3336: is mapped by $g(z)$ to a segment on the real axis
3337: so that the operator
3338: $[ \, e^{\lambda V(g(a), \, g(b))} \, ]_r$
3339: is well defined without any generalization.
3340: Since the BRST transformation maps a primary field
3341: to another primary field of the same dimension,
3342: we also expect that the operator
3343: $[ \, O_L(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
3344: transforms covariantly and is mapped by $g(z)$
3345: as
3346: \begin{equation}\label{gmapsOLexpVab}
3347: g\circ [ \, O_L(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r =
3348: g'(a)^{h(\lambda)} \, g'(b)^{h(\lambda)} \,
3349: [ \, O_L (g(a)) \, e^{\lambda V(g(a), \, g(b))} \, ]_r\,.
3350: \end{equation}
3351: To linear order in $\lambda$,
3352: the conformal transformation is
3353: \begin{equation}
3354: g \circ \bigl[ \, \lambda \, cV(a) + \ord{\lambda^2} \, \bigr]
3355: = \lambda \, cV(g(a)) + \ord{\lambda^2}
3356: \end{equation}
3357: and is consistent with
3358: (\ref{gmapsOLexpVab}) for $h(\lambda) = \ord{\lambda}$.
3359: At~$\ord{\lambda^2}$, we have
3360: \begin{equation}\label{O_L-V}
3361: [ \, O^{(1)}_L(a) \, V(a,b) \, ]_r+[ \, O^{(2)}_L(a)\, ]_r
3362: = [ \, cV(a) \, V(a,b) \, ]_r
3363: - \frac{1}{2} \, \partial c(a) \,.
3364: \end{equation}
3365: The operator $\partial c$ is not
3366: a primary field
3367: and thus the second term of (\ref{O_L-V})
3368: does not transform covariantly
3369: under conformal transformations.
3370: In fact, the first term does not transform covariantly either
3371: but the sum $[ \, O^{(1)}_L(a) \, V(a,b) \, ]_r+[ \, O^{(2)}_L(a)\, ]_r$
3372: {\it does} transform covariantly.
3373: The operator $\bigl[\,V(a)\,V(a,b)\,\bigr]_r$
3374: is mapped by $g(z)$ as follows:
3375: \begin{equation}
3376: \begin{split}
3377: & g \circ \bigl[ \, V(a) \, V(a,b) \, \bigr]_r
3378: = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \, \biggl[ \,
3379: \int_{a+\epsilon}^{b} dt \,
3380: g'(a) \, V\bigl(g(a)\bigr) \, g'(t) \, V\bigl(g(t)\bigr)
3381: -\frac{1}{\epsilon} \, \biggr] \\
3382: & = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \, \biggl[ \,
3383: g'(a) \int_{g(a+\epsilon)}^{g(b)} d\tilde{t}\,\,
3384: V\bigl(g(a)\bigr)\,V\bigl(\tilde{t}\bigr)
3385: -\frac{1}{\epsilon} \, \biggr] \\
3386: & = g'(a) \, \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \, \biggl[ \,
3387: \int_{g(a+\epsilon)}^{g(b)} d\tilde{t}\,\,
3388: V\bigl(g(a)\bigr)\,V\bigl(\tilde{t}\bigr)
3389: -\frac{1}{g(a+\epsilon)-g(a)} \, \biggr]
3390: + \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \, \biggl[ \,
3391: \frac{g'(a)}{g(a+\epsilon)-g(a)}
3392: -\frac{1}{\epsilon} \, \biggr] \\
3393: & = g'(a) \, \bigl[ \, V\bigl(g(a)\bigr)\,\,
3394: V\bigl(g(a), \, g(b)\bigr)\,\bigr]_r
3395: -\frac{g''(a)}{2 \, g'(a)} \,,
3396: \end{split}
3397: \end{equation}
3398: where $\tilde{t} = g(t)$.
3399: If we compare this with
3400: \begin{equation}
3401: g \circ \partial c(a)
3402: = \frac{d}{da} \,
3403: \biggl[ \, \frac{c\bigl(g(a)\bigr)}{g'(a)} \, \biggr]
3404: = \partial c\bigl(g(a)\bigr)
3405: - \frac{g''(a)}{g'(a)^2} \, c\bigl(g(a)\bigr) \,,
3406: \end{equation}
3407: we find
3408: \begin{equation}
3409: \begin{split}
3410: & g \circ [ \, cV(a) \, V(a,b) \, ]_r
3411: - g \circ \frac{\partial c(a)}{2} \\
3412: & = \bigl[ \, cV\bigl(g(a)\bigr)\,\, V\bigl(g(a),\,g(b)\bigr)\,\bigr]_r
3413: -\frac{g''(a)}{2 \, g'(a)^2} \, c\bigl(g(a)\bigr)
3414: -\frac{\del c\bigl(g(a)\bigr)}{2}
3415: + \frac{g''(a)}{2 \, g'(a)^2} \, c\bigl(g(a)\bigr)\\
3416: & = \bigl[ \, cV\bigl(g(a)\bigr)\,\, V\bigl(g(a),\,g(b)\bigr)\,\bigr]_r
3417: -\frac{\del c\bigl(g(a)\bigr)}{2} \,.
3418: \end{split}
3419: \end{equation}
3420: This is consistent with~(\ref{gmapsOLexpVab})
3421: at $\ord{\lambda^2}$
3422: with $h(\lambda) = \ord{\lambda^2}$.
3423: Note that the coefficient of the second term in (\ref{O_L-V})
3424: had to be $-1/2$ for the noncovariant term to be canceled.
3425: Each of these two operators $[ \, O^{(1)}_L(a) \, V(a,b) \, ]_r$
3426: and $[ \, O^{(2)}_L(a)\, ]_r$ defined on ${\cal W}_n$ is invariant
3427: when embedded in ${\cal W}_m$.
3428: Thus any linear combination of the two
3429: is invariant under the embedding from ${\cal W}_n$ to ${\cal W}_m$,
3430: but only the combination
3431: $[ \, O^{(1)}_L(a) \, V(a,b) \, ]_r + [ \, O^{(2)}_L(a)\, ]_r$
3432: transforms covariantly under conformal transformations.
3433: Although the covariance
3434: of $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
3435: and $[ \, O_L(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
3436: under conformal transformations
3437: is not required for the solution
3438: to satisfy the equation of motion,
3439: this calculation provides a nontrivial consistency check
3440: of our result for the operator $O_L$.
3441:
3442:
3443: \section{String field theory around the deformed background}
3444: \label{discussion_deformed}
3445: \setcounter{equation}{0}
3446:
3447: \subsection{Action}
3448:
3449: Now that we have constructed solutions
3450: for general marginal deformations,
3451: let us expand the string field theory action
3452: around the solutions.
3453: The string field theory action is given by
3454: \begin{equation}
3455: S[\Psi]
3456: = {}- \frac{1}{g^2} \, \biggl[ \,
3457: \frac{1}{2} \, \langle \, \Psi \,,\, Q_B \Psi \, \rangle
3458: +\frac{1}{3} \, \langle \, \Psi \,,\, \Psi \ast \Psi \, \rangle \,
3459: \biggr] \,,
3460: \end{equation}
3461: where $g$ is the open string coupling constant.
3462: In the case of a D25-brane in flat spacetime,
3463: $g$ is related to the D25-brane tension $T_{25}$
3464: as $T_{25} = 1 / (2 \pi^2 g^2)$\,.
3465: We shift the string field $\Psi$ as
3466: \begin{equation}
3467: \Psi=\Psi_\lambda+\delta\Psi \,,
3468: \end{equation}
3469: where the solution $\Psi_\lambda$ is
3470: \begin{equation}\label{Psi_lambda}
3471: \begin{split}
3472: \Psi_\lambda
3473: &= \frac{1}{2} \, \biggl[ \, \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast \Psi_L
3474: \ast \sqrt{U} + \sqrt{U} \ast \Psi_R \ast \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}}
3475: + \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast Q_B \sqrt{U}
3476: - Q_B \sqrt{U} \ast \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \, \biggr] \\
3477: &= \frac{1}{2} \, \biggl[ \, \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast (A_L+A_R) \ast
3478: \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} +\frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast Q_B \sqrt{U}
3479: - Q_B \sqrt{U} \ast \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \, \biggr]\,.
3480: \end{split}
3481: \end{equation}
3482: We then expand the action and obtain
3483: \begin{equation}\label{deformedaction1}
3484: \begin{split}
3485: S[\Psi] & = S[\Psi_\lambda]+S[\delta\Psi]
3486: -\frac{1}{g^2} \, \langle \, \delta\Psi \,,\,
3487: \Psi_\lambda \ast \delta\Psi \, \rangle\\
3488: & = S[\Psi_\lambda]+S[\delta\Psi]
3489: -\frac{1}{2g^2} \, \Bigl[ \,
3490: \langle \, \delta\Psi \, , \,
3491: \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast (A_L+A_R)\ast\frac{1}{\sqrt{U}}
3492: \ast\delta\Psi\,\rangle\\
3493: & \quad ~ \hskip 4cm+\langle \, \delta\Psi \, , \,
3494: \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast Q_B \sqrt{U} \ast \delta \Psi \, \rangle
3495: {}- \langle \, \delta\Psi \, , \,
3496: Q_B \sqrt{U} \ast \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}}\ast\delta\Psi \, \rangle \,
3497: \Bigr] \,.
3498: \end{split}
3499: \end{equation}
3500: The term linear in $\delta\Psi$ vanishes
3501: because $\Psi_\lambda$ satisfies the equation of motion.
3502: The term $S[\Psi_\lambda]$ only shifts the action
3503: by an overall constant.
3504: In fact, it should vanish for solutions
3505: corresponding to exactly marginal deformations.
3506: The structure of the action suggests
3507: the following field redefinition:
3508: \begin{equation}
3509: \Phi\equiv\sqrt{U}\ast\delta\Psi\ast\sqrt{U}\qquad\Longrightarrow\qquad
3510: \delta\Psi=\frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast \Phi\ast \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \,.
3511: \end{equation}
3512: The term $S[\delta \Psi]$ can be expressed
3513: in terms of the new variable $\Phi$ as follows:
3514: \begin{equation}\label{SdeltaPsi}
3515: \begin{split}
3516: S[\delta\Psi] &=
3517: S\biggl[ \, \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast \Phi\ast \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \,
3518: \biggr] \\
3519: & = {}-\frac{1}{2g^2}\Bigl\langle \,
3520: \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}}\ast \Phi\ast\frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \,,
3521: \,Q_B\cdot\biggl[ \, \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast \Phi\ast
3522: \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \, \biggr] \, \Bigr\rangle
3523: {}-\frac{1}{3g^2}\bigl\langle \, \Phi \, , \,U^{-1}
3524: \ast\Phi\ast U^{-1}\ast\Phi\ast U^{-1} \, \bigr\rangle\\
3525: & = {}- \frac{1}{2g^2}\Bigl\langle \Phi \,,\,
3526: U^{-1}\ast Q_B \Phi\ast U^{-1} \, \Bigr\rangle
3527: -\frac{1}{3g^2}\bigl\langle \, \Phi \, , \,U^{-1}
3528: \ast\Phi\ast U^{-1}\ast\Phi\ast U^{-1} \, \bigr\rangle\\
3529: & \quad ~ {}-\frac{1}{2g^2}\Bigl\langle \, \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}}
3530: \ast \Phi\ast\frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \,,\,
3531: Q_B\frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast \Phi\ast
3532: \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \, \Bigr\rangle
3533: +\frac{1}{2g^2}\Bigl\langle \, \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}}\ast
3534: \Phi\ast\frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \,,\,\frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast
3535: \Phi\ast Q_B\frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \, \Bigr\rangle \,.
3536: \end{split}
3537: \end{equation}
3538: Using the identity
3539: \begin{equation}
3540: Q_B \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}}
3541: = {}- \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast Q_B\sqrt{U}
3542: \ast \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \,,
3543: \end{equation}
3544: it is easy to see that the last line of~(\ref{SdeltaPsi})
3545: precisely cancels the last two terms
3546: on the right-hand side of~(\ref{deformedaction1}).
3547: The action around the deformed background in terms of $\Phi$
3548: is thus given by
3549: \begin{equation}\label{deformedaction2}
3550: \begin{split}
3551: S[\Psi]=S[\Psi_\lambda]&
3552: {}-\frac{1}{2g^2}\Bigl[ \, \bigl\langle \, \Phi \,,\,
3553: U^{-1}\ast Q_B \Phi\ast U^{-1} \, \bigr\rangle
3554: +\bigl\langle \, \Phi \, , \, U^{-1}\ast (A_L+A_R)\ast
3555: U^{-1}\ast \Phi\ast U^{-1} \, \bigr\rangle \, \Bigr]\\
3556: &{}-\frac{1}{3g^2} \, \bigl\langle \, \Phi \, , \,U^{-1}
3557: \ast\Phi\ast U^{-1}\ast\Phi\ast U^{-1} \, \bigr\rangle\,.
3558: \end{split}
3559: \end{equation}
3560: Let us now introduce the following deformed algebraic structures:
3561: \begin{equation}\label{algstruc}
3562: \begin{split}
3563: A \star B & \equiv A \ast U^{-1} \ast B \,, \\
3564: {\cal Q} A & \equiv
3565: Q_B A + A_L \star A -(-1)^A \, A \star A_R
3566: = Q_B A + \Psi_L \ast A -(-1)^A \, A \ast \Psi_R \,, \\
3567: \langle\langle \, A, B \, \rangle\rangle & \equiv
3568: \langle \, A, U^{-1} \ast B \ast U^{-1} \, \rangle \,.
3569: \end{split}
3570: \end{equation}
3571: As $U=1+\ord{\lambda^2}$, $A_L = \ord{\lambda}$,
3572: and $A_R = \ord{\lambda}$,
3573: these structures reduce to the original star product~$*$,
3574: BRST operator~$Q_B$, and inner product~$\langle\,\,,\,\rangle$
3575: when $\lambda\to 0$.
3576: The shifted action ${\cal S}[\Phi] \equiv S[\Psi]-S[\Psi_\lambda]$
3577: in terms of the new variable $\Phi$ can be written as follows:
3578: \begin{equation}
3579: {\cal S}[\Phi] = {}-\frac{1}{g^2} \, \biggl[ \,
3580: \frac{1}{2} \, \langle\langle \, \Phi \,,\,
3581: {\cal Q}\Phi \, \rangle\rangle
3582: +\frac{1}{3} \, \langle\langle \, \Phi \, , \,
3583: \Phi\star\Phi \, \rangle\rangle \, \biggr] \,,
3584: \end{equation}
3585: where we have used
3586: \begin{equation}
3587: \begin{split}
3588: & \langle \, \Phi \, , \, U^{-1}\ast (A_L+A_R) \ast U^{-1}\ast
3589: \Phi\ast U^{-1} \, \rangle\\
3590: &=\langle \, \Phi \, , \, U^{-1}\ast A_L\ast U^{-1}\ast
3591: \Phi\ast U^{-1} \, \rangle
3592: \,+\,\langle \, \Phi \, , \, U^{-1}\ast
3593: \Phi\ast U^{-1}\ast A_R\ast U^{-1} \, \rangle\,.
3594: \end{split}
3595: \end{equation}
3596: Thus string field theory
3597: around the deformed background can be described
3598: by the star product $\star\,$, the operator ${\cal Q}$,
3599: and the inner product
3600: $\langle\langle\,\,,\,\rangle\rangle$.
3601: Note that $\sqrt{U}$ and $1/\sqrt{U}$ completely disappeared
3602: and the action is written in terms of $U^{-1}$, $A_L$, and $A_R$.
3603:
3604:
3605: \subsection{Properties of algebraic structures around the deformed background}\label{appdeformed}
3606:
3607: Let us verify that the new algebraic structures obey
3608: the following relations
3609: necessary for a consistent formulation of string field theory:
3610: \begin{eqnarray}
3611: {\cal Q}^2 A &=& 0 \,,
3612: \label{Q2A}\\
3613: {\cal Q}\, ( A \star B )
3614: &=& ( {\cal Q} A ) \star B + (-1)^A \, A \star ( {\cal Q} B ) \,,
3615: \label{QA*B}\\
3616: \langle\langle \, A, B \, \rangle\rangle
3617: & =& (-1)^{AB} \, \langle\langle \, B, A \, \rangle\rangle \,,
3618: \label{ABBA}\\
3619: \langle\langle \, {\cal Q} A, B \, \rangle\rangle
3620: & =& -(-1)^{A} \langle\langle \, A, {\cal Q} B \,\rangle\rangle \,,
3621: \label{QAB}\\
3622: \langle\langle \, A, B \star C \, \rangle\rangle
3623: & =& \langle\langle \, A \star B , C \, \rangle\rangle \,.
3624: \label{AB*C}
3625: \end{eqnarray}
3626: Furthermore, we show that
3627: the generalized wedge states $U_\alpha$ satisfy
3628: \begin{equation}\label{QUalpha}
3629: {\cal Q} \, U_\alpha =0 \,.
3630: \end{equation}
3631:
3632: Let us begin with~(\ref{Q2A}).
3633: It follows from the definition of ${\cal Q}$ that
3634: \begin{equation}
3635: \begin{split}
3636: {\cal Q}^2 A & =
3637: {\cal Q} \, \bigl[ \, Q_B A
3638: + \Psi_L \ast A -(-1)^A \, A \ast \Psi_R \, \bigr]\\
3639: &= Q_B^2 A+Q_B \Psi_L\ast A-\Psi_L\ast Q_B A-(-1)^A \, Q_B A \ast \Psi_R- A \ast Q_B\Psi_R\\
3640: & \quad ~ +\Psi_L\ast\Bigl(Q_B A + \Psi_L \ast A -(-1)^A \, A \ast \Psi_R\Bigr)
3641: +(-1)^A\,\Bigl(Q_B A + \Psi_L \ast A -(-1)^A \, A \ast \Psi_R\Bigr)\ast \Psi_R\,.
3642: \end{split}
3643: \end{equation}
3644: Using $Q_B^2=0$ and the equation of motion for $\Psi_L$ and $\Psi_R$,
3645: all the terms cancel and we find
3646: ${\cal Q}^2 A=0$.
3647:
3648: Similarly, we can prove~(\ref{QA*B}) as follows:
3649: \begin{equation}
3650: \begin{split}
3651: {\cal Q}_B \, ( A \star B )
3652: & = Q_B A\ast U^{-1}\ast B+(-1)^A A\ast Q_BU^{-1}\ast B
3653: + (-1)^A A\ast U^{-1}\ast Q_BB \\
3654: & \quad ~ + \Psi_L \ast A \ast U^{-1}\ast B
3655: -(-1)^{A}(-1)^{B} \, A\ast U^{-1}\ast B \ast \Psi_R\\
3656: & = {\cal Q} A \star B +(-1)^A A \star{\cal Q} B \\
3657: & \quad ~ +(-1)^A A\ast Q_BU^{-1}\ast B
3658: +(-1)^A A\ast \Psi_R \ast U^{-1}\ast B -(-1)^{A} \, A\ast U^{-1}\ast \Psi_L\ast B \,.
3659: \end{split}
3660: \end{equation}
3661: The terms in the last line cancel because of the identity
3662: \begin{equation}\label{QU-1}
3663: Q_BU^{-1}={}-U^{-1}\ast Q_BU\ast U^{-1}
3664: =U^{-1}\ast(A_L-A_R)\ast U^{-1}=U^{-1}\ast\Psi_L-\Psi_R\ast U^{-1}\,.
3665: \end{equation}
3666: This completes the proof
3667: of~(\ref{QA*B}).
3668:
3669: It is easy to verify~(\ref{ABBA}) using the properties
3670: of the inner product $\langle\,\,,\,\rangle$:
3671: \begin{equation}
3672: \begin{split}
3673: \langle\langle \, A, B \, \rangle\rangle
3674: &=\langle \, A, U^{-1}\ast B\ast U^{-1} \, \rangle\\
3675: &=\langle \, A\ast U^{-1}, B\ast U^{-1} \, \rangle\\
3676: &=(-1)^{AB}\langle \, B\ast U^{-1}, A\ast U^{-1} \, \rangle\\
3677: &=(-1)^{AB}\langle \, B, U^{-1}\ast A\ast U^{-1} \, \rangle\\
3678: &=(-1)^{AB}\langle\langle \, B, A \, \rangle\rangle\,.
3679: \end{split}
3680: \end{equation}
3681: To show~(\ref{QAB}), we use the corresponding identity of $Q_B$ and
3682: the properties of $\langle\,\,,\,\rangle$. We find
3683: \begin{equation}
3684: \begin{split}
3685: \langle\langle \, {\cal Q}A, B \, \rangle\rangle
3686: & =\langle \, Q_B A + \Psi_L \ast A -(-1)^A \, A \ast \Psi_R\,,\,
3687: U^{-1}\ast B\ast U^{-1} \, \rangle\\
3688: &= {}-(-1)^A\langle \, A \,,\, Q_B U^{-1}\ast B\ast U^{-1}
3689: + U^{-1}\ast Q_B B\ast U^{-1}
3690: +(-1)^BU^{-1}\ast B\ast Q_B U^{-1} \, \rangle\\
3691: & \quad ~ + (-1)^{A}(-1)^{B}
3692: \langle \, A\,,\, U^{-1}\ast B\ast U^{-1}\ast \Psi_L \, \rangle
3693: -(-1)^A \langle \, A\,,\,
3694: \Psi_R\ast U^{-1}\ast B\ast U^{-1} \, \rangle\,.
3695: \end{split}
3696: \end{equation}
3697: Using the identity~(\ref{QU-1}), we obtain
3698: \begin{equation}
3699: \begin{split}
3700: \langle\langle \, {\cal Q}A, B \, \rangle\rangle
3701: =&-(-1)^A \, \langle \, A\,,\, U^{-1} \ast
3702: \bigl( \, Q_B B + \Psi_L \ast B -(-1)^B \, B \ast \Psi_R \, \bigr)
3703: \ast U^{-1} \, \rangle\\
3704: =&-(-1)^A \, \langle\langle \, A, {\cal Q}B \, \rangle\rangle\,.
3705: \end{split}
3706: \end{equation}
3707: Finally, the relation~(\ref{AB*C}) follows from the definitions
3708: of the deformed structures
3709: and the property of the inner product $\langle \, , \, \rangle$:
3710: \begin{equation}
3711: \begin{split}
3712: \langle\langle \, A, B\star C \, \rangle\rangle
3713: & =\langle \, A\,,\,
3714: U^{-1}\ast B\ast U^{-1}\ast C \ast U^{-1}\, \rangle \\
3715: & =\langle \, A \ast U^{-1}\ast B\,,\,
3716: U^{-1}\ast C \ast U^{-1}\, \rangle
3717: =\langle\langle \, A\star B,C \, \rangle\rangle\,.
3718: \end{split}
3719: \end{equation}
3720: We have thus shown that the deformed algebraic structures satisfy
3721: all the algebraic relations required for a consistent
3722: formulation of string field theory.
3723:
3724: Let us now show the equation~(\ref{QUalpha}), namely, that
3725: the generalized wedge states $U_\alpha$ are
3726: annihilated by ${\cal Q}$.
3727: We define the generalizations $A_{L,\alpha}$ and $A_{R,\alpha}$
3728: of $A_L$ and $A_R$, respectively, by
3729: \begin{equation}
3730: A_{L,\alpha} \equiv
3731: \sum_{n=1}^\infty \, \lambda^n \, A_{L,\alpha}^{(n)} \,, \qquad
3732: A_{R,\alpha} \equiv
3733: \sum_{n=1}^\infty \, \lambda^n \, A_{R,\alpha}^{(n)} \,
3734: \end{equation}
3735: for $\alpha\geq0$, where
3736: \begin{equation}
3737: \begin{split}
3738: \langle \, \phi \,, A_{L,\alpha}^{(n)} \, \rangle &=
3739: \sum_{l=1}^n \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \, [ \, O_L^{(l)} (1) \, V^{(n-l)} (1,n+\alpha) \, ]_r \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_{n+\alpha}},\\
3740: \langle \, \phi \,, A_{R,\alpha}^{(n)} \, \rangle &=
3741: \sum_{r=1}^n \langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \, [ \, V^{(n-r)} (1,n+\alpha) \, O_R^{(r)} (n+\alpha)\, ]_r \, \rangle_{{\cal W}_{n+\alpha}} \,.
3742: \end{split}
3743: \end{equation}
3744: Note that $A_L=A_{L,0}$ and $A_R=A_{R,0}$.
3745: The states $A_{L,\alpha}$ and $A_{R,\alpha}$ satisfy
3746: the following relations:
3747: \begin{equation}
3748: Q_B U_\alpha = A_{R,\alpha}-A_{L,\alpha}\,,\qquad
3749: A_{L,\alpha+\beta}=A_{L,\alpha}\ast U^{-1}\ast U_\beta\,,\qquad
3750: A_{R,\alpha+\beta}=U_\alpha\ast U^{-1}\ast A_{R,\beta}\,,
3751: \end{equation}
3752: which are generalizations
3753: of $Q_B U=A_R-A_L$ and
3754: $U_{\alpha+\beta} = U_\alpha\ast U^{-1}\ast U_\beta$.
3755: The first relation immediately follows from
3756: the assumption~(\ref{1}).
3757: The second and third relations can be shown
3758: using the assumptions~(\ref{3})--(\ref{5})
3759: as in the proofs of
3760: $U_{\alpha+\beta} = U_\alpha\ast U^{-1}\ast U_\beta$
3761: and ${}- Q_B A_L = A_L \ast U^{-1} \ast A_R$
3762: in~\S~\ref{singular_general_proof}
3763: and~appendix~\ref{QBAL-appendix}.
3764: Using these relations,
3765: it is easy to show that ${\cal Q} \, U_\alpha$ vanishes:
3766: \begin{equation}
3767: \begin{split}
3768: {\cal Q} \, U_\alpha &=A_{R,\alpha}-A_{L,\alpha} + \Psi_L \ast U_\alpha - \, U_\alpha \ast \Psi_R \\
3769: &=U_\alpha\ast U^{-1}\ast A_{R}-A_L\ast U^{-1}\ast U_\alpha + A_L\ast U^{-1} \ast U_\alpha - \, U_\alpha \ast U^{-1}\ast A_R \\
3770: &=0\,.
3771: \end{split}
3772: \end{equation}
3773:
3774: The state $U_1$ is expected to play the role of the $SL(2,R)$-invariant
3775: vacuum in the deformed theory,
3776: and $U=U_0$ is the identity state
3777: of the deformed star algebra.
3778: In fact,
3779: \begin{equation}
3780: U \star A = U \ast U^{-1} \ast A = A \,, \qquad
3781: A \star U = A \ast U^{-1} \ast U = A \,.
3782: \end{equation}
3783:
3784:
3785: \section{Discussion}\label{discussion}
3786: \setcounter{equation}{0}
3787:
3788: The main result of the paper is
3789: the construction of analytic solutions
3790: of open bosonic string field theory
3791: for general marginal deformations.
3792: We presented a procedure to construct a solution from the operator
3793: $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
3794: satisfying the set of assumptions stated in the introduction.
3795: We believe that all of these assumptions are satisfied
3796: for any exactly marginal deformation
3797: and are thus necessary conditions
3798: for exact marginality of the deformation.
3799: We also believe that the set of assumptions
3800: provides a sufficient condition for marginality
3801: to all orders in $\lambda$
3802: because we have succeeded in constructing
3803: solutions of string field theory.
3804: We regard this new characterization
3805: of exact marginality as another important result of the paper,
3806: and we hope that our approach
3807: motivated by string field theory
3808: will provide new perspectives
3809: on the study of marginal deformations.
3810:
3811: In section~\ref{singular_explicit} we explicitly constructed
3812: the operator $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
3813: for any marginal operator
3814: satisfying the finiteness condition~(\ref{finiteness}).
3815: We thus believe that the finiteness condition~(\ref{finiteness}) is
3816: a sufficient condition for marginality
3817: to all orders in $\lambda$.
3818: We can actually relax the condition
3819: because we only needed finiteness
3820: of the operator $\dcirc ( V(a,b) )^n \dcirc$ constructed
3821: in~(\ref{dcirc-V^n-dcirc}).
3822: Therefore, we can construct solutions
3823: even if the finiteness condition~(\ref{finiteness})
3824: is violated as long as the operator $\dcirc ( V(a,b) )^n \dcirc$
3825: is well defined for any~$n$.\footnote{
3826: We thank Ashoke Sen for discussions on this point
3827: and for explaining explicit examples.}
3828: It would be an interesting open problem
3829: whether the condition can be further relaxed.
3830: In particular, it is an interesting question
3831: whether the operators
3832: $O_L^{(n)}$ and $O_R^{(n)}$ with $n \ge 3$
3833: can be nonvanishing
3834: by nontrivial collisions of more than two operators.
3835: In~\cite{Recknagel:1998ih},
3836: Recknagel and Schomerus
3837: gave a sufficient condition for exact marginality
3838: which they called {\it self-locality} of the marginal operator.
3839: See \S~2.4 of \cite{Recknagel:1998ih}.
3840: It would be also interesting to investigate the relation
3841: between their characterization of exact marginality
3842: in boundary conformal field theory and ours.
3843:
3844: In~\cite{Fuchs:2007yy}, Fuchs, Kroyter and Potting constructed
3845: non-real solutions
3846: for the marginal deformation
3847: corresponding to turning on the constant mode of the gauge field.
3848: We discuss the relation between their solutions and ours
3849: in appendix~\ref{discussion_FKP} and show that
3850: our solutions $\Psi_L$ and $\Psi_R$
3851: for this particular marginal deformation
3852: coincide with theirs.
3853:
3854: There are many interesting directions for future work.
3855: It would be interesting to study
3856: the solution corresponding to the deformation
3857: by the cosine potential in detail.
3858: The deformation at the value of $\lambda$
3859: describing lower-dimensional D-branes
3860: is particularly interesting.
3861: In the level-truncation analysis of marginal deformations,
3862: it has been demonstrated that the Siegel gauge condition
3863: is not globally well defined~\cite{Ellwood:2001ne}
3864: and the branch of the marginal deformation
3865: corresponding to turning on the constant mode
3866: of the gauge field truncates
3867: at a finite value of the deformation parameter~\cite{Sen:2000hx}.\footnote{
3868: See \cite{Asano:2006hk, Asano:2006hm} for recent related study.}
3869: It is therefore important to study the convergence property
3870: of the expansion in $\lambda$ for our solutions.
3871:
3872: We expect that our work will play a role
3873: in further investigating
3874: background independence in string field theory
3875: by extending previous work~\cite{Sen:1990hh}--\cite{Sen:1993kb}.
3876: We also expect that the generalization of our construction
3877: to open superstring field theory formulated
3878: by Berkovits~\cite{Berkovits:1995ab}
3879: would be fairly straightforward.
3880: Another important generalization
3881: is the construction of solutions corresponding
3882: to boundary conditions which are not connected
3883: by exactly marginal deformations.
3884: For example, consider the case
3885: where the original CFT flows to a different CFT
3886: by a marginally relevant deformation.
3887: We then expect that the operator $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
3888: satisfying the assumptions~(\ref{1}) and~(\ref{2})
3889: can be constructed at a special value of $\lambda$
3890: and our framework will be useful
3891: in constructing solutions
3892: for such marginally relevant deformations.
3893: Finally,
3894: the approach explored in~\cite{Imamura:2005zm} seems to be
3895: closely related to ours and may be useful in future developments
3896: of our work.
3897:
3898: \newpage
3899:
3900: \noindent
3901: {\bf \large Acknowledgments}
3902:
3903: \medskip
3904:
3905: We would like to thank Ian Ellwood, Leonardo Rastelli,
3906: Volker Schomerus, Ashoke Sen, and Barton Zwiebach
3907: for useful discussions
3908: and for their valuable comments on an earlier version
3909: of the manuscript.
3910: The work of M.K. is supported in part
3911: by the U.S. DOE grant DE-FG02-05ER41360
3912: and by an MIT Presidential Fellowship.
3913:
3914: \bigskip
3915:
3916: \appendix
3917:
3918: \section{Proof of ${}-Q_BA_L=A_L\ast U^{-1}\ast A_R$}
3919: \label{QBAL-appendix}
3920: \setcounter{equation}{0}
3921:
3922: In~\S~\ref{singular_general_proof}
3923: we have shown that $U_{l+r}=U_l \ast U^{-1} \ast U_r$ holds
3924: for the general case.
3925: To prove the equation ${}-Q_BA_L=A_L\ast U^{-1}\ast A_R$
3926: in~(\ref{condQAL}),
3927: we have to extend this identity to the case
3928: where $O_L$ and $O_R$
3929: are also inserted.
3930: We first present an explicit proof at $\ord{\lambda^4}$
3931: and then explain how the proof generalizes to all orders.
3932: The equation~(\ref{condQAL}) at $\ord{\lambda^4}$ is
3933: \begin{equation}\label{condQAL-lambda^4}
3934: {}- Q_B A_L^{(4)} = A_L^{(1)} \ast A_R^{(3)}
3935: + A_L^{(2)} \ast A_R^{(2)} + A_L^{(3)} \ast A_R^{(1)}
3936: - A_L^{(1)} \ast U_0^{(2)} \ast A_R^{(1)} \,.
3937: \end{equation}
3938: We need to prove that
3939: \begin{equation}\label{lambda^4-example}
3940: \begin{split}
3941: & \quad ~ [ \, O_L^{(1)}(1) \, V^{(2)}(1,4) \, O_R^{(1)}(4) \, ]_r
3942: + [ \, O_L^{(1)}(1) \, V^{(1)}(1,4) \, O_R^{(2)}(4) \, ]_r
3943: + [ \, O_L^{(2)}(1) \, V^{(1)}(1,4) \, O_R^{(1)}(4) \, ]_r \\
3944: & \quad ~ + [ \, O_L^{(1)}(1) \, O_R^{(3)}(4) \, ]_r
3945: + [ \, O_L^{(2)}(1) \, O_R^{(2)}(4) \, ]_r
3946: + [ \, O_L^{(3)}(1) \, O_R^{(1)}(4) \, ]_r \\
3947: & = [ \, W_L^{(1)}(1,1) \, ]_r \,
3948: [ \, W_R^{(3)}(2,4) \, ]_r
3949: + [ \, W_L^{(2)}(1,2) \, ]_r \,
3950: [ \, W_R^{(2)}(3,4) \, ]_r
3951: + [ \, W_L^{(3)}(1,3) \, ]_r \,
3952: [ \, W_R^{(1)}(4,4) \, ]_r \\
3953: & \quad ~ {}- [ \, W_L^{(1)}(1,1) \, ]_r \,
3954: [ \, V^{(2)}(2,3) \, ]_r \, [ \, W_R^{(1)}(4,4) \, ]_r \,,
3955: \end{split}
3956: \end{equation}
3957: where we denoted terms of
3958: $[\,O_L(a)\,e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\,]_r$ and
3959: $[\,e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\,O_R(b)\,]_r$ at $\ord{\lambda^n}$ as follows:
3960: \begin{equation}
3961: W_L^{(n)}(a,b) \equiv
3962: \sum_{l=1}^n O_L^{(l)}(a) \, V^{(n-l)}(a,b) \,, \qquad
3963: W_R^{(n)}(a,b) \equiv
3964: \sum_{r=1}^n V^{(n-r)}(a,b) \, O_R^{(r)}(b) \,.
3965: \end{equation}
3966: Recall that $V^{(0)}(a,b) \equiv 1$ even in the limit $b \to a$.
3967: Thus we have $W_L^{(1)}(1,1) = O_L^{(1)}(1)$
3968: and $W_R^{(1)}(4,4) = O_R^{(1)}(4)$.
3969: Here we have used
3970: the locality assumption~(\ref{5})
3971: on $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
3972: and $[ \, O_L (a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$.
3973: The operator $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, O_R (b) \, ]_r$
3974: defined on ${\cal W}_n$ also takes the same form
3975: when embedded in ${\cal W}_m$ with $m > n$
3976: because $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, O_R (b) \, ]_r
3977: = Q_B \cdot [ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r
3978: + [ \, O_L (a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$ from
3979: the assumption~(\ref{1}).
3980:
3981: We next use the factorization assumption~(\ref{4})
3982: of the following form:
3983: \begin{equation}\label{OLexpexpOR}
3984: [ \, O_L(1) \, e^{\lambda_1 V(1,2)} \,
3985: e^{\lambda_2 V(3,4)} \, O_R(4) \, ]_r
3986: = [ \, O_L(1) \, e^{\lambda_1 V(1,2)} \, ]_r \,
3987: [ \, e^{\lambda_2 V(3,4)} \, O_R(4) \, ]_r \,.
3988: \end{equation}
3989: The operator $O_L(a)$ always appears in the combination
3990: $[ \, O_L(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, \ldots \, ]_r$
3991: with some $b$,
3992: and the value of $\lambda$ for $O_L(a)$ is the same
3993: as the one appearing in the exponential operator.
3994: Similarly, the operator $O_R(b)$ always appears in the combination
3995: $[ \, \ldots \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, O_R(b) \, ]_r$
3996: with some $a$,
3997: and the value of $\lambda$ for $O_R(b)$ is the same
3998: as the one appearing in the exponential operator.
3999: In~(\ref{OLexpexpOR}), for example, the value of $\lambda$
4000: for $O_L(1)$ is $\lambda_1$
4001: and the value of $\lambda$ for $O_R(4)$ is $\lambda_2$.
4002: The relation~(\ref{OLexpexpOR})
4003: at $\ord{\lambda_1^2 \, \lambda_2^2}$ reads
4004: \begin{equation}
4005: [ \, W_L^{(2)}(1,2) \, W_R^{(2)}(3,4) \, ]_r
4006: = [ \, W_L^{(2)}(1,2) \, ]_r \,
4007: [ \, W_R^{(2)}(3,4) \, ]_r \,.
4008: \end{equation}
4009: Since $W_L^{(1)}(a,a) = W_L^{(1)}(a,b)$
4010: and $W_R^{(1)}(b,b) = W_R^{(1)}(a,b)$
4011: for $a < b$,
4012: the operators $[ \, W_L^{(1)}(1,1) \, ]_r$
4013: and $[ \, W_R^{(1)}(4,4) \, ]_r$
4014: can be thought of as the $\ord{\lambda_1}$ term
4015: of $[ \, O_L(1) \, e^{\lambda_1 V(1,1+\alpha)} \, ]_r$
4016: and the $\ord{\lambda_2}$ term
4017: of $[ \, e^{\lambda_2 V(4-\alpha,4)} \, O_R(4) \, ]_r$,
4018: respectively,
4019: with arbitrary $\alpha$ in the range $0 < \alpha < 1$.
4020: Therefore, the right-hand side of~(\ref{lambda^4-example})
4021: can be written using the factorization assumption~(\ref{4}) as follows:
4022: \begin{equation}\label{lambda^4-example-2}
4023: \begin{split}
4024: & \quad ~ [ \, W_L^{(1)}(1,1) \, ]_r \,
4025: [ \, W_R^{(3)}(2,4) \, ]_r
4026: + [ \, W_L^{(2)}(1,2) \, ]_r \,
4027: [ \, W_R^{(2)}(3,4) \, ]_r
4028: + [ \, W_L^{(3)}(1,3) \, ]_r \,
4029: [ \, W_R^{(1)}(4,4) \, ]_r \\
4030: & \quad ~ {}- [ \, W_L^{(1)}(1,1) \, ]_r \,
4031: [ \, V^{(2)}(2,3) \, ]_r \, [ \, W_R^{(1)}(4,4) \, ]_r \\
4032: & = [ \, W_L^{(1)}(1,1) \, W_R^{(3)}(2,4) \, ]_r
4033: + [ \, W_L^{(2)}(1,2) \, W_R^{(2)}(3,4) \, ]_r
4034: + [ \, W_L^{(3)}(1,3) \, W_R^{(1)}(4,4) \, ]_r \\
4035: & \quad ~ {}- [ \, W_L^{(1)}(1,1) \,
4036: V^{(2)}(2,3) \, W_R^{(1)}(4,4) \, ]_r \,.
4037: \end{split}
4038: \end{equation}
4039: We then apply the replacement assumption~(\ref{3})
4040: of the following forms:
4041: \begin{equation}
4042: \begin{split}
4043: [ \, O_L(1) \, e^{\lambda_1 V(1,1+\alpha)} \,
4044: e^{\lambda_2 V(2,4)} \, O_R(4) \, ]_r
4045: & = [ \, O_L(1) \, e^{\lambda_1 V(1,1+\alpha)} \,
4046: e^{\lambda_2 V(2,3)} \,
4047: e^{\lambda_2 V(3,4)} \, O_R(4) \, ]_r \,, \\
4048: [ \, O_L(1) \, e^{\lambda_1 V(1,3)} \,
4049: e^{\lambda_2 V(4-\alpha,4)} \, O_R(4) \, ]_r
4050: & = [ \, O_L(1) \, e^{\lambda_1 V(1,2)} \,
4051: e^{\lambda_1 V(2,3)} \,
4052: e^{\lambda_2 V(4-\alpha,4)} \, O_R(4) \, ]_r\,,
4053: \end{split}
4054: \end{equation}
4055: where $\alpha$ is again an arbitrary number
4056: in the range $0 < \alpha < 1$.
4057: The first equation at $\ord{\lambda_1\lambda_2^3}$
4058: and the second equation at $\ord{\lambda_1^3\lambda_2}$ give
4059: \begin{equation}
4060: \begin{split}
4061: [ \, W_L^{(1)}(1,1) \, W_R^{(3)}(2,4) \, ]_r
4062: & = [ \, W_L^{(1)}(1,1) \, W_R^{(3)}(3,4) \, ]_r
4063: + [ \, W_L^{(1)}(1,1) \, V^{(1)}(2,3) \,
4064: W_R^{(2)}(3,4) \, ]_r \\
4065: & \quad ~ + [ \, W_L^{(1)}(1,1) \, V^{(2)}(2,3) \,
4066: W_R^{(1)}(3,4) \, ]_r \,, \\
4067: [ \, W_L^{(3)}(1,3) \, W_R^{(1)}(4,4) \, ]_r
4068: & = [ \, W_L^{(1)}(1,2) \, V^{(2)}(2,3) \,
4069: W_R^{(1)}(4,4) \, ]_r
4070: + [ \, W_L^{(2)}(1,2) \, V^{(1)}(2,3) \,
4071: W_R^{(1)}(4,4) \, ]_r \\
4072: & \quad ~ + [ \, W_L^{(3)}(1,2) \, W_R^{(1)}(4,4) \, ]_r \,.
4073: \end{split}
4074: \end{equation}
4075: Replacing $W_L^{(1)}(1,1)$ with $W_L^{(1)}(1,2)$
4076: and $W_R^{(1)}(4,4)$ with $W_R^{(1)}(3,4)$,
4077: the right-hand side of~(\ref{lambda^4-example-2})
4078: can be written as follows:
4079: \begin{equation}\label{finalrhs}
4080: \begin{split}
4081: & \quad ~ [ \, W_L^{(1)}(1,1) \, W_R^{(3)}(2,4) \, ]_r
4082: + [ \, W_L^{(2)}(1,2) \, W_R^{(2)}(3,4) \, ]_r
4083: + [ \, W_L^{(3)}(1,3) \, W_R^{(1)}(4,4) \, ]_r \\
4084: & \quad ~ {}- [ \, W_L^{(1)}(1,1) \,
4085: V^{(2)}(2,3) \, W_R^{(1)}(4,4) \, ]_r \\
4086: & = [ \, W_L^{(1)}(1,2) \, W_R^{(3)}(3,4) \, ]_r
4087: + [ \, W_L^{(1)}(1,2) \, V^{(1)}(2,3) \,
4088: W_R^{(2)}(3,4) \, ]_r
4089: + [ \, W_L^{(1)}(1,2) \, V^{(2)}(2,3) \,
4090: W_R^{(1)}(3,4) \, ]_r \\
4091: & \quad ~
4092: + [ \, W_L^{(2)}(1,2) \, W_R^{(2)}(3,4) \, ]_r
4093: + [ \, W_L^{(2)}(1,2) \, V^{(1)}(2,3) \,
4094: W_R^{(1)}(3,4) \, ]_r
4095: + [ \, W_L^{(3)}(1,2) \, W_R^{(1)}(3,4) \, ]_r \,.
4096: \end{split}
4097: \end{equation}
4098:
4099: The terms on the left-hand side of~(\ref{lambda^4-example})
4100: are obtained from the expansion of
4101: $[ \, O_L(1) \, e^{\lambda V(1,4)} \, O_R(4) \, ]_r$
4102: in $\lambda$.
4103: Using the replacement assumption~(\ref{3}), we have
4104: \begin{equation}
4105: [ \, O_L(1) \, e^{\lambda V(1,4)} \, O_R(4) \, ]_r
4106: = [ \, O_L(1) \, e^{\lambda V(1,2)} \, e^{\lambda V(2,3)} \,
4107: e^{\lambda V(3,4)} \, O_R(4) \, ]_r \,.
4108: \end{equation}
4109: By evaluating both sides at $\ord{\lambda^4}$,
4110: the left-hand side of~(\ref{lambda^4-example}) can be written as
4111: \begin{equation}\label{lambda^4-example-3}
4112: \begin{split}
4113: & \quad ~ [ \, O_L^{(1)}(1) \, V^{(2)}(1,4) \, O_R^{(1)}(4) \, ]_r
4114: + [ \, O_L^{(1)}(1) \, V^{(1)}(1,4) \, O_R^{(2)}(4) \, ]_r
4115: + [ \, O_L^{(2)}(1) \, V^{(1)}(1,4) \, O_R^{(1)}(4) \, ]_r \\
4116: & \quad ~ + [ \, O_L^{(1)}(1) \, O_R^{(3)}(4) \, ]_r
4117: + [ \, O_L^{(2)}(1) \, O_R^{(2)}(4) \, ]_r
4118: + [ \, O_L^{(3)}(1) \, O_R^{(1)}(4) \, ]_r \\
4119: & =
4120: [ \, W_L^{(1)}(1,2) \, W_R^{(3)}(3,4) \, ]_r
4121: + [ \, W_L^{(1)}(1,2) \, V^{(1)}(2,3) \,
4122: W_R^{(2)}(3,4) \, ]_r
4123: + [ \, W_L^{(1)}(1,2) \, V^{(2)}(2,3) \,
4124: W_R^{(1)}(3,4) \, ]_r \\
4125: & \quad ~
4126: + [ \, W_L^{(2)}(1,2) \, W_R^{(2)}(3,4) \, ]_r
4127: + [ \, W_L^{(2)}(1,2) \, V^{(1)}(2,3) \,
4128: W_R^{(1)}(3,4) \, ]_r
4129: + [ \, W_L^{(3)}(1,2) \, W_R^{(1)}(3,4) \, ]_r \,.
4130: \end{split}
4131: \end{equation}
4132: We have reproduced~(\ref{finalrhs}) and thus shown
4133: ${}- Q_B A_L = A_L \ast U^{-1} \ast A_R$
4134: at $\ord{\lambda^4}$.
4135:
4136: We will now show
4137: that this proof can be generalized to
4138: $\ord{\lambda^n}$ for any $n \ge 3$,
4139: while the equation trivially holds for $n=1$ and $n=2$.
4140: Using the replacement assumption~(\ref{3}),
4141: we can rewrite
4142: \begin{equation}
4143: [\,O_L(1)\,e^{\lambda V(1,n)}\,O_R(n)\,]_r
4144: = \bigl[\,O_L(1)\,e^{\lambda V(1,2)}
4145: \prod_{i=2}^{n-2}\,[\,e^{\lambda V(i,i+1)}\,]\,
4146: e^{\lambda V(n-1,n)}\,O_R(n)\,\bigr]_r \,.
4147: \end{equation}
4148: At $\ord{\lambda^n}$, this implies that
4149: the operator insertions for ${}- Q_B A_L^{(n)}$
4150: on ${\cal W}_n$ can be expanded in the basis
4151: \begin{equation}\label{basis}
4152: \Bigl\{ \, \bigl[ \, W_L^{(\ell_1)}(1,2) \,
4153: \prod_{i=2}^{n-2} \, [ \, V^{(\ell_i)}(i,i+1) \, ] \,
4154: W_R^{(\ell_{n-1})}(n-1,n) \, \bigr]_r \, \Bigr\} \,,
4155: \end{equation}
4156: where $\ell_i$'s are non-negative integers
4157: with $\sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \ell_i = n$
4158: and $\ell_1,\, \ell_{n-1}\geq1$.
4159: On the other hand, because of the locality assumption~(\ref{5}),
4160: the terms of $A_L \ast U^{-1} \ast A_R$ at $\ord{\lambda^n}$
4161: can be expressed in terms of products of the form
4162: \begin{equation}\label{WexpW}
4163: [ \, W_L^{(k_1)}(1,b_1) \, ]_r \,
4164: \prod_{j=2}^{m-1} \, [ \, V^{(k_j)}(a_j,b_j) \, ]_r \,
4165: [ \, W_R^{(k_m)}(a_m,n) \, ]_r
4166: \end{equation}
4167: on ${\cal W}_n$,
4168: where positive integers $a_j$, $b_j$ and $k_j$ satisfy
4169: $1\le a_j<b_j\le n$,
4170: $b_j < a_{j+1}$, and $\sum_{j=1}^m k_j = n$.
4171: {}From the factorization assumption~(\ref{4}), we have
4172: \begin{equation}
4173: \begin{split}
4174: [ \, O_L(1) \, e^{\lambda_{1} V(1,b_1)} \,]_r
4175: \prod_{j=2}^{m-1} [\, e^{\lambda_{j} V(a_j,b_j)}&\,]_r \,
4176: [\,e^{\lambda_{m} V(a_m,n)} \, O_R(n)\,]_r\\
4177: &=
4178: \bigl[ \, O_L(1) \, e^{\lambda_{1} V(1,b_1)} \,
4179: \prod_{j=2}^{m-1} [\, e^{\lambda_{j} V(a_j,b_j)}\,] \,
4180: e^{\lambda_{m} V(a_m,n)} \,O_R(n)\, \bigr]_r \,.
4181: \end{split}
4182: \end{equation}
4183: At $\ord{\prod_j \lambda^{k_j}}$, this allows us to express~(\ref{WexpW}) as
4184: \begin{equation}
4185: \bigl[ \, W_L^{(k_1)}(1,b_1) \,
4186: \prod_{j=2}^{m-1} \, [ \, V^{(k_j)}(a_j,b_j) \, ] \,
4187: W_R^{(k_m)}(a_m,n) \, \bigr]_r
4188: \end{equation}
4189: on ${\cal W}_n$.
4190: Finally, applying the replacement assumption~(\ref{3})
4191: and using $W_L^{(1)}(1,1)=W_L^{(1)}(1,2)$
4192: and $W_R^{(1)}(n,n)=W_R^{(1)}(n-1,n)$,
4193: the operators can be expanded in the basis~(\ref{basis}).
4194: Now consider the following state for a marginal operator
4195: with regular operator products:
4196: \begin{equation}\label{dummy}
4197: \sum_{l, \, r = 1}^\infty \lambda^{l+r} \,
4198: c_L^{(l)} \, c_R^{(r)} \, U_{l+r} \,,
4199: \end{equation}
4200: where $c_L^{(l)}$ and $c_R^{(r)}$ are parameters.
4201: The operators at $\ord{\lambda^n}$ on ${\cal W}_n$
4202: can be expanded in the basis
4203: \begin{equation}\label{basis-2}
4204: \Bigl\{ \, \omega_L^{(\ell_1)}(1,2) \,
4205: \prod_{i=2}^{n-2} \, [ \, V^{(\ell_i)}(i,i+1) \, ] \,
4206: \omega_R^{(\ell_{n-1})}(n-1,n) \, \Bigr\} \,,
4207: \end{equation}
4208: where
4209: \begin{equation}
4210: \omega_L^{(i)}(1,2) \equiv
4211: \sum_{l=1}^i c_L^{(l)} \, V^{(i-l)}(1,2) \,, \qquad
4212: \omega_R^{(i)}(n-1,n) \equiv
4213: \sum_{r=1}^i c_R^{(i)}\,V^{(i-r)}(n-1,n) \,,
4214: \end{equation}
4215: and $\ell_i$'s are non-negative integers
4216: with $\sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \ell_i = n$ and $\ell_1,\,\ell_{n-1}\geq1$
4217: as in~(\ref{basis}).
4218: The coefficients when the state~(\ref{dummy})
4219: is expanded in this basis reproduce those of ${}-Q_B A_L$
4220: expanded in the basis~(\ref{basis})
4221: with replacing $W_L^{(i)}$ by $\omega_L^{(i)}$
4222: and $W_R^{(i)}$ by $\omega_R^{(i)}$.
4223: Let us next consider the following state for a marginal operator
4224: with regular operator products:
4225: \begin{equation}\label{dummy-2}
4226: \sum_{l, \, r = 1}^\infty
4227: \Bigl( \, \lambda^l \, c_L^{(l)} \, U_l \, \Bigr)
4228: \ast U^{-1} \ast
4229: \Bigl( \, \lambda^r \, c_R^{(r)} \, U_r \, \Bigr)
4230: \end{equation}
4231: where again $c_L^{(l)}$ and $c_R^{(r)}$ are parameters.
4232: The terms of~(\ref{dummy-2}) at $\ord{\lambda^n}$
4233: can also be expanded in the basis~(\ref{basis-2})
4234: and the coefficients reproduce those of $A_L \ast U^{-1} \ast A_R$
4235: at $\ord{\lambda^n}$ expanded in the basis~(\ref{basis})
4236: with replacing $W_L^{(i)}$ by $\omega_L^{(i)}$
4237: and $W_R^{(i)}$ by $\omega_R^{(i)}$.
4238: The states~(\ref{dummy}) and~(\ref{dummy-2})
4239: are actually equal because of the relation
4240: $U_{l+r} = U_l \ast U^{-1} \ast U_r$:
4241: \begin{equation}
4242: \sum_{l, \, r = 1}^\infty \lambda^{l+r} \,
4243: c_L^{(l)} \, c_R^{(r)} \, U_{l+r}
4244: = \sum_{l, \, r = 1}^\infty
4245: \Bigl( \, \lambda^l \, c_L^{(l)} \, U_l \, \Bigr)
4246: \ast U^{-1} \ast
4247: \Bigl( \, \lambda^r \, c_R^{(r)} \, U_r \, \Bigr) \,.
4248: \end{equation}
4249: We have thus shown that
4250: ${}- Q_B A_L = A_L \ast U^{-1} \ast A_R$
4251: to all orders in $\lambda$.
4252:
4253:
4254: \section{Proof of the assumptions}
4255: \label{proof-appendix}
4256: \setcounter{equation}{0}
4257:
4258: In section~\ref{singular_explicit}
4259: we have presented explicit forms
4260: of $[\,e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \,]_r$
4261: and $[\, O_L (a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \,]_r$,
4262: which are used in constructing $\Psi_L$ and $\Psi$,
4263: for the class of marginal deformations
4264: satisfying the finiteness condition~(\ref{finiteness})
4265: in~\S~\ref{class}.
4266: We have shown that the assumptions
4267: (\ref{1}), (\ref{5}), and (\ref{6})
4268: are satisfied for these operators.
4269: We prove the remaining assumptions
4270: (\ref{2}), (\ref{3}), and (\ref{4})
4271: in this appendix.
4272:
4273: \subsection{Assumptions (\ref{3}) and (\ref{4}): replacement and factorization}
4274: \label{explicit_proof}
4275:
4276: Let us start by proving the replacement
4277: and factorization assumptions~(\ref{3}) and~(\ref{4}).
4278: To this end, we first need to define
4279: $[ \, \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\lambda_i V (a_i, a_{i+1} )} \, ]_r$,
4280: $[ \, V (a_1) \,
4281: \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\lambda_i V (a_i, a_{i+1} )} \, ]_r$,
4282: $[ \, \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\lambda_i V (a_i, a_{i+1} )} \,
4283: V (a_{n+1}) \, ]_r$,
4284: and $[ \, V (a_1) \,
4285: \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\lambda_i V (a_i, a_{i+1} )} \,
4286: V (a_{n+1}) \, ]_r$.
4287: Let us begin with
4288: $[ \, \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\lambda_i V (a_i, a_{i+1} )} \, ]_r$.
4289: We define it as follows:
4290: \begin{equation}\label{expliVab}
4291: [ \, \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\lambda_i V (a_i, a_{i+1} )} \, ]_r
4292: \equiv \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\frac{1}{2} \, \lambda_i^2 \,
4293: \langle \, V (a_i, a_{i+1})^2 \, \rangle_r}
4294: \prod_{i < j} \, e^{\lambda_i \lambda_j \,
4295: \langle \, V (a_i, a_{i+1}) \, V (a_j, a_{j+1}) \, \rangle_r}
4296: \dcirc \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\lambda_i V (a_i, a_{i+1} )}
4297: \dcirc \,,
4298: \end{equation}
4299: where
4300: \begin{equation}
4301: \begin{split}
4302: \langle V(a,b)^2\rangle_r\,&\equiv\, 2\lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \,
4303: \biggl[\, \int_a^{b-\epsilon} dt_1\int_{t_1+\epsilon}^{b} dt_2\,
4304: G(t_1,t_2)-\frac{b-a-\epsilon}{\epsilon}-\ln\epsilon \, \biggr] \,,
4305: \\
4306: \langle \, V(a,b) \, V(b,c) \, \rangle_r
4307: & \equiv \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \, \biggl[ \,
4308: \int_a^{b-\epsilon/2} d t_1 \, \int_{b + \epsilon/2}^c d t_2 \,
4309: G (t_1,t_2) + \ln \, \epsilon \, \biggr] \,,
4310: \\
4311: \langle V(a,b)V(c,d)\rangle_r\,
4312: & \equiv\, \int_a^bdt_1\int_c^ddt_2\,G(t_1,t_2)
4313: \end{split}
4314: \end{equation}
4315: for $a<b<c<d$.
4316: Their explicit expressions on ${\cal W}_n$ are
4317: \begin{equation}
4318: \begin{split}
4319: \langle V(a,b)^2\rangle_r
4320: & =\, \ln G_n (a,b) \,, \\
4321: \langle \, V(a,b) \, V(b,c) \, \rangle_r
4322: & =\, \frac{1}{2} \, \Bigl[ \,
4323: \ln G_n (a,c) - \ln G_n (a,b) - \ln G_n (b,c) \, \Bigr] \,, \\
4324: \langle V(a,b)V(c,d)\rangle_r\,
4325: & =\, \frac{1}{2} \, \Bigl[ \, \ln G_n (a,d) + \ln G_n (b,c)
4326: - \ln G_n (a,c) - \ln G_n (b,d) \, \Bigr] \,,
4327: \end{split}
4328: \end{equation}
4329: where
4330: \begin{equation}
4331: G_n (t_1,t_2)
4332: = \frac{\pi^2}{(n+1)^2\sin^2
4333: \Bigl( \, \dfrac{t_2-t_1}{n+1}\,\pi \Bigr)} \,.
4334: \end{equation}
4335: The operator~(\ref{expliVab}) reduces to $[ \, e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
4336: defined in (\ref{renexpV}) when $n=1$.
4337: It is easy to show that
4338: \begin{equation}
4339: \begin{split}
4340: \langle \, V (a,c)^2 \, \rangle_r
4341: & = \langle \, V (a,b)^2 \, \rangle_r
4342: +2 \,\langle \, V (a,b) \, V (b,c) \, \rangle_r
4343: + \langle \, V (b,c)^2 \, \rangle_r \,, \\
4344: \langle \, V (a,c) \, V (c,d) \, \rangle_r
4345: & = \langle \, V (a,b) \, V (c,d) \, \rangle_r
4346: + \langle \, V (b,c) \, V (c,d) \, \rangle_r \,, \\
4347: \langle \, V (a,b) \, V (b,d) \, \rangle_r
4348: & = \langle \, V (a,b) \, V (b,c) \, \rangle_r
4349: + \langle \, V (a,b) \, V (c,d) \, \rangle_r \,, \\
4350: \langle \, V (a,c) \, V (d,e) \, \rangle_r
4351: & = \langle \, V (a,b) \, V (d,e) \, \rangle_r
4352: + \langle \, V (b,c) \, V (d,e) \, \rangle_r \,, \\
4353: \langle \, V (a,b) \, V (c,e) \, \rangle_r
4354: & = \langle \, V (a,b) \, V (c,d) \, \rangle_r
4355: + \langle \, V (a,b) \, V (d,e) \, \rangle_r
4356: \end{split}
4357: \end{equation}
4358: for $a < b < c < d < e$.
4359: The replacement assumption (\ref{3}) is therefore satisfied.
4360: The assumption (\ref{4}) of factorization is also satisfied
4361: because of the definition of
4362: $\langle \, V(a,b) \, V(c,d) \, \rangle_r$
4363: for $a < b < c < d$.
4364:
4365: Let us next define the operators
4366: $[ \, V (a_1) \,
4367: \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\lambda_i \, V (a_i, a_{i+1} )} \, ]_r$,
4368: $[ \, \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\lambda_i \, V (a_i, a_{i+1} )} \,
4369: V (a_{n+1}) \, ]_r$,
4370: and $[ \, V (a_1) \,
4371: \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\lambda_i \, V (a_i, a_{i+1} )} \,
4372: V (a_{n+1}) \, ]_r$.
4373: We define them as follows:
4374: \begin{equation}\label{multiple-region-operators}
4375: \begin{split}
4376: & [ \, V (a_1) \,
4377: \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\lambda_i \, V (a_i, a_{i+1} )} \, ]_r \\
4378: & \qquad \equiv
4379: \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\frac{1}{2} \, \lambda_i^2 \,
4380: \langle \, V (a_i, a_{i+1})^2 \, \rangle_r}
4381: \prod_{i < j} \, e^{\lambda_i \lambda_j \,
4382: \langle \, V (a_i, a_{i+1}) \, V (a_j, a_{j+1}) \, \rangle_r}
4383: \dcirc V (a_1) \, \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\lambda_i \, V (a_i, a_{i+1} )}
4384: \dcirc\\
4385: & \qquad \quad ~ {}+ \sum_{i=1}^n \, \lambda_i \,
4386: \langle \, V(a_1) \, V(a_i,a_{i+1}) \, \rangle_r \,
4387: [ \, \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\lambda_i \, V (a_i, a_{i+1} )} \, ]_r \,,
4388: \\
4389: & [ \, \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\lambda_i \, V (a_i, a_{i+1} )} \,
4390: V (a_{n+1}) \, ]_r \\
4391: & \qquad \equiv
4392: \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\frac{1}{2} \, \lambda_i^2 \,
4393: \langle \, V (a_i, a_{i+1})^2 \, \rangle_r}
4394: \prod_{i < j} \, e^{\lambda_i \lambda_j \,
4395: \langle \, V (a_i, a_{i+1}) \, V (a_j, a_{j+1}) \, \rangle_r}
4396: \dcirc \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\lambda_i \, V (a_i, a_{i+1} )} \,
4397: V (a_{n+1}) \, \dcirc \\
4398: & \qquad \quad ~ {}+ \sum_{i=1}^n \, \lambda_i \,
4399: \langle \, V(a_i,a_{i+1}) \, V(a_{n+1}) \, \rangle_r \,
4400: [ \, \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\lambda_i \, V (a_i, a_{i+1} )} \, ]_r \,,
4401: \\
4402: & [ \, V (a_1) \,
4403: \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\lambda_i \, V (a_i, a_{i+1} )} \,
4404: V (a_{n+1}) \, ]_r \\
4405: & \qquad \equiv
4406: \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\frac{1}{2} \, \lambda_i^2 \,
4407: \langle \, V (a_i, a_{i+1})^2 \, \rangle_r}
4408: \prod_{i < j} \, e^{\lambda_i \lambda_j \,
4409: \langle \, V (a_i, a_{i+1}) \, V (a_j, a_{j+1}) \, \rangle_r}
4410: \dcirc V(a_1) \,
4411: \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\lambda_i \, V (a_i, a_{i+1} )} \,
4412: V (a_{n+1}) \, \dcirc \\
4413: & \qquad \quad ~ {}+ \sum_{i=1}^n \, \lambda_i \,
4414: \langle \, V(a_1) \, V(a_i,a_{i+1}) \, \rangle_r \,
4415: [ \, \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\lambda_i \, V (a_i, a_{i+1} )} \,
4416: V(a_{n+1}) \, ]_r \\
4417: & \qquad \quad ~ {}+ \sum_{i=1}^n \, \lambda_i \,
4418: \langle \, V(a_i,a_{i+1}) \, V(a_{n+1}) \, \rangle_r \,
4419: [ \, V(a_1) \,
4420: \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\lambda_i \, V (a_i, a_{i+1} )} \, ]_r \\
4421: & \qquad \quad ~
4422: {}- \sum_{i, \, j=1}^n \, \lambda_i \, \lambda_j \,
4423: \langle \, V(a_1) \, V(a_i,a_{i+1}) \, \rangle_r \,
4424: \langle \, V(a_j,a_{j+1}) \, V(a_{n+1}) \, \rangle_r \,
4425: [ \, \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\lambda_i \, V (a_i, a_{i+1} )} \, ]_r \\
4426: & \qquad \quad ~ {}+ \langle \, V(a_1) \, V(a_{n+1}) \, \rangle_r \,
4427: [ \, \prod_{i=1}^n \, e^{\lambda_i \, V (a_i, a_{i+1} )} \, ]_r \,,
4428: \end{split}
4429: \end{equation}
4430: where
4431: \begin{equation}
4432: \begin{split}
4433: & \langle \, V(a) \ V(a,b) \, \rangle_r
4434: \equiv \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \, \biggl[
4435: \, \int_{a+\epsilon}^b dt \, G(a,t) -\frac{1}{\epsilon} \,
4436: \biggr] \,, \qquad
4437: \langle \, V(a,b) \, V(b) \, \rangle_r
4438: \equiv\, \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \,
4439: \biggl[ \, \int_{a}^{b-\epsilon} dt \,
4440: G(t,b) -\frac{1}{\epsilon} \, \biggr] \,, \\
4441: & \langle \, V(a) \, V(b,c) \, \rangle_r
4442: \equiv \int_b^c dt \, G(a,t) \,, \qquad
4443: \langle \, V(a,b) \, V(c) \, \rangle_r
4444: \equiv \int_a^b dt \, G(t,c) \,,
4445: \qquad
4446: \langle \, V(a) \, V(b) \, \rangle_r
4447: \equiv G(a,b)
4448: \end{split}
4449: \end{equation}
4450: for $a < b < c$.
4451: These definitions are consistent with
4452: $[ \, V(a) \, e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
4453: and $[ \, e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)} \, V(b) \, ]_r$
4454: in~(\ref{renVexpV}).
4455: It is easy to show that
4456: \begin{equation}
4457: \begin{split}
4458: & \langle \, V (a) \, V (a,c) \, \rangle_r
4459: = \langle \, V (a) \, V (a,b) \, \rangle_r
4460: + \langle \, V (a) \, V (b,c) \, \rangle_r \,, \\
4461: & \langle \, V (a) \, V (b,d) \, \rangle_r
4462: = \langle \, V (a) \, V (b,c) \, \rangle_r
4463: + \langle \, V (a) \, V (c,d) \, \rangle_r \,, \\
4464: & \langle \, V (a,c) \, V (c) \, \rangle_r
4465: = \langle \, V (a,b) \, V (c) \, \rangle_r
4466: + \langle \, V (b,c) \, V (c) \, \rangle_r \,, \\
4467: & \langle \, V (a,c) \, V (d) \, \rangle_r
4468: = \langle \, V (a,b) \, V (d) \, \rangle_r
4469: + \langle \, V (b,c) \, V (d) \, \rangle_r
4470: \end{split}
4471: \end{equation}
4472: for $a < b < c < d$.
4473: The replacement assumption (\ref{3}) is therefore satisfied.
4474: The assumption (\ref{4}) of factorization is also satisfied
4475: because of the definitions of
4476: $\langle \, V(a) \, V(b,c) \, \rangle_r$,
4477: $\langle \, V(a,b) \, V(c) \, \rangle_r$,
4478: and $\langle \, V(a) \, V(b) \, \rangle_r$
4479: for $a < b < c$.
4480:
4481: \subsection{Assumption (\ref{2}): calculation of
4482: $Q_B \cdot [ \, O_L(a) \, e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)} \, ]_r$}\label{appQOLexpV}
4483:
4484: Let us next prove the assumption (\ref{2}) on the BRST transformation of
4485: $[ \, O_L(a) \, e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)} \, ]_r$:
4486: \begin{equation}
4487: Q_B \cdot [ \, O_L(a) \, e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)} \, ]_r
4488: = {}- [ \, O_L(a) \, e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)} O_R(b)\, ]_r \,,
4489: \end{equation}
4490: where
4491: \begin{equation}
4492: O_L (a) = \lambda \, cV (a)
4493: - \frac{\lambda^2}{2} \, \partial c (a) \,, \qquad
4494: O_R (b) = \lambda \, cV (b)
4495: + \frac{\lambda^2}{2} \, \partial c (b) \,.
4496: \end{equation}
4497: The operator $[ \, O_L(a) \, e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
4498: can be written as
4499: \begin{equation}\label{O_L-exp}
4500: \begin{split}
4501: [ \, O_L(a) \, e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)} \, ]_r
4502: & = \lambda \, e^{\frac{1}{2}\lambda^2\langle V(a,b)^2\rangle_r}\,
4503: \dcirc cV(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\dcirc \\
4504: & \quad ~
4505: + \lambda^2 \, \langle \, V(a) \, V(a,b) \, \rangle_r \,
4506: [ \, c(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r
4507: - \frac{\lambda^2}{2} \,
4508: [ \, \partial c(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r \,.
4509: \end{split}
4510: \end{equation}
4511: The BRST transformation of
4512: $\dcirc cV(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\dcirc$
4513: can be calculated in the following way:
4514: \begin{equation}\label{Q_B-dcirc-cV-exp-dcirc}
4515: \begin{split}
4516: & Q_B \cdot \dcirc cV(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\dcirc \\
4517: & = Q_B \cdot \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \, \biggl[ \,
4518: cV(a-\epsilon) \, \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\dcirc
4519: - \lambda \, c(a-\epsilon) \int_a^b dt \, G(a-\epsilon,t) \,
4520: \, \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\dcirc \, \biggr] \\
4521: & = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \, \biggl[ \,
4522: {}- cV(a-\epsilon) \, Q_B \cdot \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\dcirc
4523: {}- \lambda \, c \partial c (a-\epsilon)
4524: \int_a^b dt \, G(a-\epsilon,t) \,
4525: \, \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\dcirc \\
4526: & \qquad \qquad
4527: {}+ \lambda \, c(a-\epsilon) \int_a^b dt \, G(a-\epsilon,t) \,
4528: \, Q_B \cdot \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\dcirc \, \biggr] \,.
4529: \end{split}
4530: \end{equation}
4531: The BRST transformation of $\dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \dcirc$
4532: appearing in~(\ref{Q_B-dcirc-cV-exp-dcirc})
4533: has been calculated in~(\ref{Q_B-exp}).
4534: The contribution from the first term
4535: $\lambda \, \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, cV(b) \dcirc$
4536: on the right-hand side of~(\ref{Q_B-exp}) is
4537: \begin{equation}
4538: \begin{split}
4539: & \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \, \biggl[ \, {}- \lambda \,
4540: cV(a-\epsilon) \, \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, cV(b) \dcirc
4541: {}+ \lambda^2 \, c(a-\epsilon) \int_a^b dt \, G(a-\epsilon,t) \,
4542: \, \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, cV(b) \dcirc \, \biggr] \\
4543: & = {}- \lambda \, \dcirc cV(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, cV(b) \dcirc
4544: {}- \lambda \, G(a,b) \,
4545: \dcirc c(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, c(b) \dcirc \,.
4546: \end{split}
4547: \end{equation}
4548: The contribution from the second term
4549: $- \lambda \, \dcirc cV(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \dcirc$
4550: on the right-hand side of~(\ref{Q_B-exp})
4551: diverges in the limit $\epsilon \to 0$:
4552: \begin{equation}
4553: \begin{split}
4554: & \lambda \, cV(a-\epsilon) \,
4555: \dcirc cV(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \dcirc
4556: {}- \lambda^2 \, c(a-\epsilon) \int_a^b dt \, G(a-\epsilon,t) \,
4557: \, \dcirc cV(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \dcirc \\
4558: & = \lambda \,
4559: \dcirc cV(a-\epsilon) \, cV(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \dcirc
4560: {}+ \lambda \, G(a-\epsilon,a) \, c(a-\epsilon) \, c(a) \,
4561: \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \dcirc \,.
4562: \end{split}
4563: \end{equation}
4564: The first term on the right-hand side vanishes
4565: in the limit $\epsilon \to 0$.
4566: The second term is of $\ord{1/\epsilon}$,
4567: but the sum of this term
4568: and the second term on the right-hand side
4569: of~(\ref{Q_B-dcirc-cV-exp-dcirc}) is finite
4570: in the limit $\epsilon \to 0$:
4571: \begin{equation}
4572: \begin{split}
4573: & \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \, \biggl[ \,
4574: {}- \lambda \, c \partial c (a-\epsilon)
4575: \int_a^b dt \, G(a-\epsilon,t) \,
4576: \, \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\dcirc
4577: {}+ \lambda \, G(a-\epsilon,a) \, c(a-\epsilon) \, c(a) \,
4578: \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \dcirc \, \biggr] \\
4579: & = {}- \lambda \, \langle \, V(a) \, V(a,b) \, \rangle_r \,
4580: c \partial c (a) \, \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\dcirc
4581: {}+ \frac{\lambda}{2}\, c \partial^2 c (a) \,
4582: \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\dcirc \,,
4583: \end{split}
4584: \end{equation}
4585: where we have used
4586: \begin{equation}
4587: \begin{split}
4588: \int_{a}^b dt\, G(a-\epsilon,t)
4589: \,=&\, \frac{1}{\epsilon}
4590: +\langle V(a)\,V(a,b)\rangle_r+\ord \epsilon \,, \\
4591: G(a-\epsilon,a) \, c(a-\epsilon)c(a)
4592: -\frac{1}{\epsilon}c\del c(a-\epsilon)
4593: \,=&\,\frac{1}{2}c\del^2 c(a)+\ord \epsilon \,.
4594: \end{split}
4595: \end{equation}
4596: Contributions from the remaining terms
4597: on the right-hand side of~(\ref{Q_B-exp})
4598: can be easily calculated.
4599: The final result for the BRST transformation of
4600: $\dcirc cV(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\dcirc$ is
4601: \begin{equation}
4602: \begin{split}
4603: Q_B \cdot \dcirc cV(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\dcirc
4604: & = {}- \lambda \,
4605: \dcirc cV(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, cV(b) \dcirc
4606: {}- \lambda \, G(a,b) \,
4607: \dcirc c(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, c(b) \dcirc \\
4608: & \quad ~ {}- \lambda \, \langle \, V(a) \, V(a,b) \, \rangle_r \,
4609: \dcirc c \partial c (a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\dcirc
4610: {}+ \frac{\lambda}{2}\,
4611: \dcirc c \partial^2 c (a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\dcirc \\
4612: & \quad ~ - \lambda^2 \,
4613: \langle \, V(a,b) \, V(b) \, \rangle_r \,
4614: \dcirc cV(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, c(b) \dcirc \\
4615: & \quad ~ - \frac{\lambda^2}{2} \,
4616: \dcirc cV(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, \partial c(b) \dcirc
4617: - \frac{\lambda^2}{2} \,
4618: \dcirc c \partial c V(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \dcirc \,.
4619: \end{split}
4620: \end{equation}
4621: Using (\ref{renVexpV}) and (\ref{multiple-region-operators}),
4622: the operator
4623: $Q_B \cdot \dcirc cV(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\dcirc$
4624: multiplied by the factor
4625: $\lambda \, e^{\frac{1}{2}\lambda^2\langle V(a,b)^2\rangle_r}$
4626: can be written as follows:
4627: \begin{equation}\label{Q_B-O_L-exp-1}
4628: \begin{split}
4629: & \lambda \, e^{\frac{1}{2}\lambda^2\langle V(a,b)^2\rangle_r} \,
4630: Q_B \cdot \dcirc cV(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)}\dcirc \\
4631: & = {}- \lambda \,
4632: [ \, cV(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, O_R (b) \, ]_r
4633: {}+ \lambda^2 \,
4634: \langle \, V(a) \, V(a,b) \, \rangle_r \,
4635: [ \, c(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, O_R (b) \, ]_r \\
4636: & \quad ~ {}- \lambda^2 \, \langle \, V(a) \, V(a,b) \, \rangle_r \,
4637: [ \, c \partial c (a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r
4638: {}+ \frac{\lambda^2}{2}\,
4639: [ \, c \partial^2 c (a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r \\
4640: & \quad ~ - \frac{\lambda^3}{2} \,
4641: [ \, c \partial c V(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r
4642: + \frac{\lambda^4}{2} \, \langle \, V(a) \, V(a,b) \, \rangle_r \,
4643: [ \, c \partial c (a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r \,. \\
4644: \end{split}
4645: \end{equation}
4646: The BRST transformation of
4647: $[ \, c(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$ in (\ref{O_L-exp})
4648: can be calculated as follows:
4649: \begin{equation}\label{Q_B-O_L-exp-2}
4650: \begin{split}
4651: & Q_B \cdot [ \, c(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r
4652: = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \,
4653: Q_B \cdot [ \, c(a-\epsilon) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r \\
4654: & = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \,
4655: [ \, c \partial c (a-\epsilon) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r
4656: - \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \,
4657: [ \, c(a-\epsilon) \, Q_B \cdot e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r \\
4658: & = [ \, c \partial c (a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r
4659: - [ \, c(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, O_R (b) \, ]_r
4660: - \frac{\lambda^2}{2} \,
4661: [ \, c \partial c (a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r \,.
4662: \end{split}
4663: \end{equation}
4664: Similarly, the BRST transformation of
4665: $[ \, \partial c(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
4666: in (\ref{O_L-exp}) can be calculated as
4667: \begin{equation}\label{Q_B-O_L-exp-3}
4668: \begin{split}
4669: Q_B \cdot [ \, \partial c(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r
4670: & = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \,
4671: Q_B \cdot [ \, \partial c(a-\epsilon) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r \\
4672: & = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \,
4673: [ \, c \partial^2 c (a-\epsilon) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r
4674: - \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \,
4675: [ \, \partial c(a-\epsilon) \, Q_B \cdot e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r \\
4676: & = [ \, c \partial^2 c (a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r
4677: - [ \, \partial c(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, O_R (b) \, ]_r
4678: - \lambda \, [ \, c \partial c V (a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r \,.
4679: \end{split}
4680: \end{equation}
4681: By combining the results (\ref{Q_B-O_L-exp-1}),
4682: (\ref{Q_B-O_L-exp-2}), and (\ref{Q_B-O_L-exp-3}), we find
4683: \begin{equation}
4684: \begin{split}
4685: Q_B \cdot [ \, O_L(a) \, e^{\lambda \, V(a,b)} \, ]_r
4686: & = {}- \lambda \,
4687: [ \, cV(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, O_R (b) \, ]_r
4688: + \frac{\lambda^2}{2} \,
4689: [ \, \partial c(a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, O_R (b) \, ]_r \\
4690: & = {}- [ \, O_L (a) \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, O_R (b) \, ]_r \,.
4691: \end{split}
4692: \end{equation}
4693: This completes the proof of the assumption~(\ref{2}).
4694:
4695:
4696:
4697: \section{Marginal deformations for the constant mode
4698: of the gauge field}\label{discussion_FKP}
4699: \setcounter{equation}{0}
4700:
4701: In~\cite{Fuchs:2007yy}, Fuchs, Kroyter and Potting constructed
4702: solutions for the marginal deformation
4703: corresponding to turning on the constant mode of the gauge field.
4704: We discuss the relation
4705: between their solutions and ours in this appendix.
4706:
4707: The marginal operator for this deformation is
4708: \begin{equation}\label{constant-gauge-field}
4709: V(t) = \frac{i}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} \, \partial_t X^\mu (t) \,,
4710: \end{equation}
4711: where $X^\mu$ is a space-like direction along the D-brane.\footnote{
4712: It is straightforward to incorporate
4713: the time-like direction into the discussion.}
4714: The solution in~\cite{Fuchs:2007yy} is written formally
4715: as a pure-gauge form using the operator $X^\mu$.
4716: The propagator $\langle \, X^\mu (t_1) \, X^\mu (t_2) \, \rangle$
4717: is logarithmic, and thus the operator $X^\mu$ does not belong
4718: to the complete set of local operators of the boundary CFT.
4719: If we allow to use $X^\mu$, $V(a,b)$ can be written as follows:
4720: \begin{equation}
4721: V(a,b) \,=\, \frac{i}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}}\int_a^b dt\, \partial_t X^\mu (t) \,=\, \frac{i}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}}\Bigl(X^\mu(b)-X^\mu(a)\Bigr)\,.
4722: \end{equation}
4723: Then the operator $\dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \dcirc$
4724: can be written as
4725: \begin{equation}
4726: \dcirc e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \dcirc
4727: \,=\, : e^{\lambda V(a,b)} :
4728: \,=\, : e^{ \, -\frac{i \lambda}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} X^\mu (a) \,}
4729: e^{ \, \frac{i \lambda}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} X^\mu (b) \,} : \,.
4730: \end{equation}
4731: To turn this operator into $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$\,,
4732: we have to multiply it by
4733: $e^{\frac{1}{2}\lambda^2\langle V(a,b)^2\rangle_r}$. We notice from
4734: the explicit expression~(\ref{<V(a,b)^2>_r-on-W_n}) that
4735: \begin{equation}
4736: \langle \, V(a,b)^2 \, \rangle_r
4737: = \frac{1}{\alpha'} \, \langle \, X^\mu (a) \,\, X^\mu (b) \, \rangle
4738: \end{equation}
4739: and therefore
4740: \begin{equation}\label{rewriteexpVab}
4741: \begin{split}
4742: [ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r
4743: \,&=\,e^{\frac{1}{2}\lambda^2\langle V(a,b)^2\rangle_r}
4744: : e^{ \, -\frac{i \lambda}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} X^\mu (a) \,}
4745: e^{ \, \frac{i \lambda}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} X^\mu (b) \,} : \\
4746: &=\,e^{\, \frac{\lambda^2}{2 \alpha'}
4747: \langle \, X^\mu (a) \, X^\mu (b) \, \rangle}
4748: : e^{ \, -\frac{i\lambda}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} X^\mu (a) \,}
4749: e^{ \, \frac{i \lambda}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} X^\mu (b) \,} : \\
4750: &=\, : e^{ \, -\frac{i \lambda}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} X^\mu (a) \,} : \,
4751: : e^{ \, \frac{i \lambda}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} X^\mu (b) \,} : \,.
4752: \end{split}
4753: \end{equation}
4754: Because of the factor
4755: $e^{\frac{1}{2}\lambda^2\langle V(a,b)^2\rangle_r}$,
4756: the operator
4757: $: e^{ \, -\frac{i \lambda}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} X^\mu (a) \,}
4758: e^{ \, \frac{i \lambda}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} X^\mu (b) \,} :$
4759: factorized into a product
4760: of two primary fields at $a$ and $b$.
4761: We can interpret the operators
4762: ${:e^{-\frac{i \lambda}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} X^\mu(a)} :}$
4763: and
4764: ${:e^{\frac{i \lambda}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} X^\mu(b)} :}$
4765: as the boundary-condition changing operators
4766: at $a$ and $b$, respectively.
4767: The conformal properties of the operator
4768: $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$ discussed
4769: in~\S~\ref{conformal} are manifest in this expression.
4770: In particular, the conformal dimension of
4771: ${:e^{\pm \frac{i \lambda}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} X^\mu(b)} :}$
4772: is $\lambda^2/2$ and thus consistent
4773: with $h(\lambda) = \ord{\lambda^2}$ found in~\S~\ref{conformal}.
4774:
4775: Let us see how the operators $O_L$ and $O_R$
4776: arise from this expression.
4777: Using the formula
4778: \begin{equation}
4779: \begin{split}
4780: Q_B \, \cdot
4781: : e^{ \, \pm \frac{i \lambda}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} X^\mu \,} :
4782: \,&=\,:\biggl(
4783: \pm\lambda \, \frac{i}{\sqrt{2\alpha'}} \, c\del X^\mu
4784: +\frac{\lambda^2}{2}\,\del c \biggr) \,
4785: e^{ \, \frac{\pm i \lambda}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} X^\mu \,} :\\
4786: \,&=\,:\Bigl(\pm\lambda \, cV
4787: +\frac{ \lambda^2}{2}\,\del c \Bigr) \,
4788: e^{ \, \frac{\pm i \lambda}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} X^\mu \,} :\,,
4789: \end{split}
4790: \end{equation}
4791: the BRST transformation of $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
4792: can be calculated as follows:
4793: \begin{equation}
4794: \begin{split}
4795: Q_B \,\cdot\, \bigl[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, \bigr]_r
4796: \,=&\,:e^{ \,- \frac{ i \lambda}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} X^\mu(a) \,}:
4797: \,:\Bigl(\lambda \, cV(b)
4798: +\frac{\lambda^2}{2}\,\del c(b) \Bigr)
4799: e^{ \, \frac{ i \lambda}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} X^\mu(b) \,}:\\
4800: \,&\,-:\Bigl(\lambda \, cV(a)
4801: -\frac{\lambda^2}{2}\,\del c(a) \Bigr)
4802: e^{ \,- \frac{ i \lambda}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} X^\mu(a) \,}:\,:
4803: e^{ \, \frac{ i \lambda}{\sqrt{2 \alpha'}} X^\mu(b) \,}: \,.
4804: \end{split}
4805: \end{equation}
4806: We have thus reproduced our previous result for $O_L$ and $O_R$:
4807: \begin{equation}
4808: \begin{split}
4809: O^{(1)}_R= O^{(1)}_L=cV\,,\qquad
4810: O^{(2)}_R=-O^{(2)}_L=\frac{\del c}{2}\,,\qquad
4811: O^{(n)}_R= O^{(n)}_L=0\qquad\text{for}\quad n\geq 3\,.
4812: \end{split}
4813: \end{equation}
4814:
4815: The operator $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$ is written
4816: in~(\ref{rewriteexpVab}) in terms of the exponential operators
4817: in the complete set of local operators
4818: and thus well defined.
4819: When we construct our solution,
4820: we have to expand $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$ in $\lambda$
4821: to obtain $[ \, V^{(n)} (a,b) \, ]_r$.
4822: We can write $[ \, V^{(n)} (a,b) \, ]_r$
4823: in terms of local operators in the complete set
4824: as we did in section 4,
4825: but if we allow to use $X^\mu$,
4826: $[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, ]_r$
4827: can also be expanded in $\lambda$ as
4828: \begin{equation}
4829: \bigl[ \, e^{\lambda V(a,b)} \, \bigr]_r=\sum_{n=0}^\infty\lambda^n\biggl(\frac{i}{\sqrt{2\alpha'}}\biggr)^n
4830: \sum_{k=0}^n\frac{(-1)^k}{k!(n-k)!}:\bigl(X^\mu(a)\bigr)^k:\, :\bigl(X^\mu(b)\bigr)^{n-k}:\,,
4831: \end{equation}
4832: and the state $U^{(n)}$ for $n\geq1$ is
4833: \begin{equation}
4834: \langle \, \phi \,, U^{(n)} \, \rangle
4835: = \sum_{k=0}^n\biggl(\frac{i}{\sqrt{2\alpha'}}\biggr)^n
4836: \frac{(-1)^k}{k!(n-k)!}\,\bigl\langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
4837: :\bigl(X^\mu(1)\bigr)^k:\, :\bigl(X^\mu(n)\bigr)^{n-k}:\,
4838: \bigr\rangle_{{\cal W}_n} \,.
4839: \end{equation}
4840: The state $U$ can be formally factorized~\cite{Fuchs:2007yy}
4841: as follows:
4842: \begin{equation}
4843: U = \Lambda_L \ast \Lambda_R \,,
4844: \end{equation}
4845: where
4846: \begin{equation}
4847: \Lambda_L = 1 + \sum_{n=1}^\infty \lambda^n \, \Lambda_L^{(n)} \,,
4848: \qquad
4849: \Lambda_R = 1 + \sum_{n=1}^\infty \lambda^n \, \Lambda_R^{(n)}
4850: \end{equation}
4851: with
4852: \begin{equation}
4853: \begin{split}
4854: \langle \, \phi \,, \Lambda_L^{(n)} \, \rangle
4855: & = \frac{1}{n!} \,
4856: \biggl({}- \frac{i}{\sqrt{2\alpha'}}\biggr)^n \,
4857: \bigl\langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
4858: :\bigl(X^\mu(1)\bigr)^n:\, \bigr\rangle_{{\cal W}_n} \,, \\
4859: \langle \, \phi \,, \Lambda_R^{(n)} \, \rangle
4860: & = \frac{1}{n!} \,
4861: \biggl(\frac{i}{\sqrt{2\alpha'}}\biggr)^n \,
4862: \bigl\langle \, f \circ \phi (0) \,
4863: :\bigl(X^\mu(n)\bigr)^n:\, \bigr\rangle_{{\cal W}_n} \,.
4864: \end{split}
4865: \end{equation}
4866: The BRST transformation of $U$ is
4867: \begin{equation}
4868: Q_B U = ( Q_B \Lambda_L ) \ast \Lambda_R
4869: + \Lambda_L \ast ( Q_B \Lambda_R ) \,,
4870: \end{equation}
4871: and we find
4872: \begin{equation}
4873: A_L = {}-(Q_B \Lambda_L) \ast \Lambda_R \,, \qquad
4874: A_R = \Lambda_L \ast (Q_B \Lambda_R) \,.
4875: \end{equation}
4876: The solutions $\Psi_L$ and $\Psi_R$ can thus be written as
4877: \begin{equation}
4878: \Psi_L = A_L \ast U^{-1}
4879: = {}-(Q_B \Lambda_L) \ast \Lambda_L^{-1} \,, \qquad
4880: \Psi_R = U^{-1} \ast A_R
4881: = \Lambda_R^{-1} \ast (Q_B \Lambda_R) \,.
4882: \end{equation}
4883: These expressions in the pure-gauge form
4884: coincide with the solutions
4885: in~\cite{Fuchs:2007yy}.\footnote{
4886: When the polarization vector $\epsilon_\nu$ of~\cite{Fuchs:2007yy}
4887: is given by $\epsilon_\nu = \eta_{\mu \nu}$,
4888: our $\lambda$ is related to that of \cite{Fuchs:2007yy} as follows:
4889: \begin{equation*}
4890: \lambda_{\, \rm FKP}
4891: = \frac{i}{\sqrt{2}} \, \lambda_{\, \rm ours} \,.
4892: \end{equation*}
4893: Note in particular that their $\lambda$ must be imaginary
4894: for the solution at $\ord{\lambda}$
4895: to satisfy the reality condition.
4896: }
4897: Since the real solution~$\Psi$
4898: constructed in~\S~\ref{singular_general_real}
4899: is related to $\Psi_L$ and $\Psi_R$ by gauge transformations,
4900: $\Psi$ can also be written in a pure-gauge form:
4901: \begin{equation}
4902: \begin{split}
4903: \Psi & = {}- \Bigl[ \,
4904: Q_B \, \Bigl( \, \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast \Lambda_L \,
4905: \Bigr) \, \Bigr] \,
4906: \ast \Bigl( \, \Lambda_L^{-1} \ast \sqrt{U} \, \Bigr)\\
4907: & = \Bigl( \, \sqrt{U} \ast \Lambda_R^{-1} \, \Bigr)
4908: \ast \Bigl[\,Q_B \,
4909: \Bigl( \, \Lambda_R \ast \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}}\,\Bigr)\,\Bigr] \,\\
4910: & = \frac{1}{2}\,\Bigl( \, \sqrt{U} \ast \Lambda_R^{-1} \, \Bigr)
4911: \ast \Bigl[\,Q_B \,
4912: \Bigl( \, \Lambda_R \ast \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}}\,\Bigr)\,\Bigr] \,
4913: - \frac{1}{2}\,\Bigl[ \, Q_B \,
4914: \Bigl( \, \frac{1}{\sqrt{U}} \ast \Lambda_L \, \Bigr) \, \Bigr] \,
4915: \ast \Bigl( \, \Lambda_L^{-1} \ast \sqrt{U} \, \Bigr) \,.
4916: \end{split}
4917: \end{equation}
4918: In the last expression, $\Psi$ is manifestly real
4919: because $\Lambda_R^\ddagger=\Lambda_L$.
4920: We have thus solved the problem of finding a real solution
4921: in a pure-gauge form raised in~\cite{Fuchs:2007gw}.
4922:
4923: The states $\Lambda_L$ and $\Lambda_R$
4924: cannot be written in terms of local operators
4925: in the complete set,
4926: while the solutions $\Psi_L$ and $\Psi_R$ can be written
4927: without using $X^\mu$,
4928: as we have explicitly demonstrated
4929: in section~\ref{singular_explicit}.
4930: It is, however, highly nontrivial to derive
4931: such an expression of $\Psi_L$ or $\Psi_R$ from
4932: the pure-gauge form in~\cite{Fuchs:2007yy}.
4933: We could attempt, for example, to write $X^\mu (a)$ as
4934: \begin{equation}
4935: X^\mu (a) = {}- \int_a^\infty dt \, \partial_t X^\mu (t)
4936: \end{equation}
4937: with the prescription that the contribution of
4938: its BRST transformation from the boundary $t=\infty$ vanishes
4939: and with the condition that the ``flux'' to infinity
4940: cancels in the solution.
4941: While this picture could give some useful insight,
4942: it is obviously formal and it seems to be difficult
4943: to make such approaches well defined in general.
4944:
4945: We have seen that
4946: the operator $X^\mu$ used in~\cite{Fuchs:2007yy}
4947: as the basic object
4948: in the construction of the solution
4949: is formally the logarithm of the boundary-condition changing operator
4950: corresponding to the marginal deformation.
4951: Thus the solution in~\cite{Fuchs:2007yy} can be generalized
4952: to other marginal deformations
4953: if an expansion of the boundary-condition changing operator
4954: in $\lambda$ is given.
4955: However, the terms in the expansion do not belong
4956: to the complete set of local operators,
4957: and it is not clear how to calculate
4958: correlation functions involving such operators in general.
4959: Let us, for example, consider the deformation by the cosine potential
4960: along a space-like direction $X^\mu$ which is compactified
4961: at the self-dual radius. In this case,
4962: the expansion of the boundary-condition changing
4963: operator can be written in terms of $: (Y^\mu)^n :$\,,
4964: where $Y^\mu$ is the free boson in the different description
4965: we mentioned in~\S~\ref{examples}.
4966: We then need to calculate
4967: correlation functions
4968: involving both $: (Y^\mu)^n :$ and operators
4969: in the $X^\mu$ description, for example,
4970: when we expand the solution in the component fields.
4971:
4972: While the approach in~\cite{Fuchs:2007yy} can be practically
4973: useful for the particular marginal
4974: deformation~(\ref{constant-gauge-field}),
4975: we believe that our approach has an advantage
4976: in the generalization to other marginal deformations.
4977: In particular, we do not need to enlarge
4978: the Hilbert space of the boundary CFT
4979: at any intermediate stage,
4980: which we believe will be a useful feature
4981: when we address the question of background independence
4982: in string field theory.
4983:
4984: \vskip 2cm
4985:
4986: \small
4987:
4988: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
4989:
4990: %\cite{Taylor:2003gn}
4991: \bibitem{Taylor:2003gn}
4992: W.~Taylor and B.~Zwiebach,
4993: ``D-branes, tachyons, and string field theory,''
4994: arXiv:hep-th/0311017.
4995: %%CITATION = HEP-TH/0311017;%%
4996:
4997: %\cite{Sen:2004nf}
4998: \bibitem{Sen:2004nf}
4999: A.~Sen,
5000: ``Tachyon dynamics in open string theory,''
5001: Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 20}, 5513 (2005)
5002: [arXiv:hep-th/0410103].
5003: %%CITATION = IMPAE,A20,5513;%%
5004:
5005: %\cite{Rastelli:2005mz}
5006: \bibitem{Rastelli:2005mz}
5007: L.~Rastelli,
5008: ``String field theory,''
5009: arXiv:hep-th/0509129.
5010: %%CITATION = HEP-TH/0509129;%%
5011:
5012: %\cite{Taylor:2006ye}
5013: \bibitem{Taylor:2006ye}
5014: W.~Taylor,
5015: ``String field theory,''
5016: arXiv:hep-th/0605202.
5017: %%CITATION = HEP-TH/0605202;%%
5018:
5019: %\cite{Schnabl:2005gv}
5020: \bibitem{Schnabl:2005gv}
5021: M.~Schnabl,
5022: ``Analytic solution for tachyon condensation
5023: in open string field theory,''
5024: Adv.\ Theor.\ Math.\ Phys.\ {\bf 10}, 433 (2006)
5025: [arXiv:hep-th/0511286].
5026: %%CITATION = 00203,10,433;%%
5027:
5028: %\cite{Okawa:2006vm}
5029: \bibitem{Okawa:2006vm}
5030: Y.~Okawa,
5031: ``Comments on Schnabl's analytic solution
5032: for tachyon condensation in Witten's open string field theory,''
5033: JHEP {\bf 0604}, 055 (2006)
5034: [arXiv:hep-th/0603159].
5035: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0604,055;%%
5036:
5037: %\cite{Fuchs:2006hw}
5038: \bibitem{Fuchs:2006hw}
5039: E.~Fuchs and M.~Kroyter,
5040: ``On the validity of the solution of string field theory,''
5041: JHEP {\bf 0605}, 006 (2006)
5042: [arXiv:hep-th/0603195].
5043: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0605,006;%%
5044:
5045: %\cite{Fuchs:2006an}
5046: \bibitem{Fuchs:2006an}
5047: E.~Fuchs and M.~Kroyter,
5048: ``Schnabl's ${\cal L}_0$ operator in the continuous basis,''
5049: JHEP {\bf 0610}, 067 (2006)
5050: [arXiv:hep-th/0605254].
5051: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0610,067;%%
5052:
5053: %\cite{Rastelli:2006ap}
5054: \bibitem{Rastelli:2006ap}
5055: L.~Rastelli and B.~Zwiebach,
5056: ``Solving open string field theory with special projectors,''
5057: arXiv:hep-th/0606131.
5058: %%CITATION = HEP-TH/0606131;%%
5059:
5060: %\cite{Ellwood:2006ba}
5061: \bibitem{Ellwood:2006ba}
5062: I.~Ellwood and M.~Schnabl,
5063: ``Proof of vanishing cohomology at the tachyon vacuum,''
5064: JHEP {\bf 0702}, 096 (2007)
5065: [arXiv:hep-th/0606142].
5066: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0702,096;%%
5067:
5068: %\cite{Fuji:2006me}
5069: \bibitem{Fuji:2006me}
5070: H.~Fuji, S.~Nakayama and H.~Suzuki,
5071: ``Open string amplitudes in various gauges,''
5072: JHEP {\bf 0701}, 011 (2007)
5073: [arXiv:hep-th/0609047].
5074: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0701,011;%%
5075:
5076: %\cite{Fuchs:2006gs}
5077: \bibitem{Fuchs:2006gs}
5078: E.~Fuchs and M.~Kroyter,
5079: ``Universal regularization for string field theory,''
5080: JHEP {\bf 0702}, 038 (2007)
5081: [arXiv:hep-th/0610298].
5082: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0702,038;%%
5083:
5084: %\cite{Okawa:2006sn}
5085: \bibitem{Okawa:2006sn}
5086: Y.~Okawa, L.~Rastelli and B.~Zwiebach,
5087: ``Analytic solutions for tachyon condensation
5088: with general projectors,''
5089: arXiv:hep-th/0611110.
5090: %%CITATION = HEP-TH/0611110;%%
5091:
5092: %\cite{Erler:2006hw}
5093: \bibitem{Erler:2006hw}
5094: T.~Erler,
5095: ``Split string formalism and the closed string vacuum,''
5096: JHEP {\bf 0705}, 083 (2007)
5097: [arXiv:hep-th/0611200].
5098: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0705,083;%%
5099:
5100: %\cite{Imbimbo:2006tz}
5101: \bibitem{Imbimbo:2006tz}
5102: C.~Imbimbo,
5103: ``The spectrum of open string field theory
5104: at the stable tachyonic vacuum,''
5105: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 770}, 155 (2007)
5106: [arXiv:hep-th/0611343].
5107: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B770,155;%%
5108:
5109: %\cite{Erler:2006ww}
5110: \bibitem{Erler:2006ww}
5111: T.~Erler,
5112: ``Split string formalism and the closed string vacuum. II,''
5113: JHEP {\bf 0705}, 084 (2007)
5114: [arXiv:hep-th/0612050].
5115: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0705,084;%%
5116:
5117: %\cite{Schnabl:2007az}
5118: \bibitem{Schnabl:2007az}
5119: M.~Schnabl,
5120: ``Comments on marginal deformations in open string field theory,''
5121: arXiv:hep-th/0701248.
5122: %%CITATION = HEP-TH/0701248;%%
5123:
5124: %\cite{Kiermaier:2007ba}
5125: \bibitem{Kiermaier:2007ba}
5126: M.~Kiermaier, Y.~Okawa, L.~Rastelli and B.~Zwiebach,
5127: ``Analytic solutions for marginal deformations
5128: in open string field theory,''
5129: arXiv:hep-th/0701249.
5130: %%CITATION = HEP-TH/0701249;%%
5131:
5132: %\cite{Erler:2007rh}
5133: \bibitem{Erler:2007rh}
5134: T.~Erler,
5135: ``Marginal Solutions for the Superstring,''
5136: arXiv:0704.0930 [hep-th].
5137: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0704.0930;%%
5138:
5139: %\cite{Okawa:2007ri}
5140: \bibitem{Okawa:2007ri}
5141: Y.~Okawa,
5142: ``Analytic solutions for marginal deformations
5143: in open superstring field theory,''
5144: arXiv:0704.0936 [hep-th].
5145: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0704.0936;%%
5146:
5147: %\cite{Fuchs:2007yy}
5148: \bibitem{Fuchs:2007yy}
5149: E.~Fuchs, M.~Kroyter and R.~Potting,
5150: ``Marginal deformations in string field theory,''
5151: arXiv:0704.2222 [hep-th].
5152: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0704.2222;%%
5153:
5154: %\cite{Okawa:2007it}
5155: \bibitem{Okawa:2007it}
5156: Y.~Okawa,
5157: ``Real analytic solutions for marginal deformations
5158: in open superstring field theory,''
5159: arXiv:0704.3612 [hep-th].
5160: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0704.3612;%%
5161:
5162: %\cite{Ellwood:2007xr}
5163: \bibitem{Ellwood:2007xr}
5164: I.~Ellwood,
5165: ``Rolling to the tachyon vacuum in string field theory,''
5166: arXiv:0705.0013 [hep-th].
5167: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0705.0013;%%
5168:
5169: %\cite{Kishimoto:2007bb}
5170: \bibitem{Kishimoto:2007bb}
5171: I.~Kishimoto and Y.~Michishita,
5172: ``Comments on Solutions for Nonsingular Currents
5173: in Open String Field Theories,''
5174: arXiv:0706.0409 [hep-th].
5175: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0706.0409;%%
5176:
5177: %\cite{Fuchs:2007gw}
5178: \bibitem{Fuchs:2007gw}
5179: E.~Fuchs and M.~Kroyter,
5180: ``Marginal deformation for the photon
5181: in superstring field theory,''
5182: arXiv:0706.0717 [hep-th].
5183: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0706.0717;%%
5184:
5185: %\cite{Bonora:2007tm}
5186: \bibitem{Bonora:2007tm}
5187: L.~Bonora, C.~Maccaferri, R.~J.~Scherer Santos and D.~D.~Tolla,
5188: ``Ghost story. I. Wedge states in the oscillator formalism,''
5189: arXiv:0706.1025 [hep-th].
5190: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0706.1025;%%
5191:
5192: %\cite{Witten:1985cc}
5193: \bibitem{Witten:1985cc}
5194: E.~Witten,
5195: ``Noncommutative Geometry And String Field Theory,''
5196: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 268}, 253 (1986).
5197: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B268,253;%%
5198:
5199: %\cite{Berkovits:1995ab}
5200: \bibitem{Berkovits:1995ab}
5201: N.~Berkovits,
5202: ``SuperPoincare invariant superstring field theory,''
5203: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 450}, 90 (1995)
5204: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 459}, 439 (1996)]
5205: [arXiv:hep-th/9503099].
5206: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B450,90;%%
5207:
5208: %\cite{Sen:2000hx}
5209: \bibitem{Sen:2000hx}
5210: A.~Sen and B.~Zwiebach,
5211: ``Large marginal deformations in string field theory,''
5212: JHEP {\bf 0010}, 009 (2000)
5213: [arXiv:hep-th/0007153].
5214: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0010,009;%%
5215:
5216: %\cite{Iqbal:2000qg}
5217: \bibitem{Iqbal:2000qg}
5218: A.~Iqbal and A.~Naqvi,
5219: ``On marginal deformations in superstring field theory,''
5220: JHEP {\bf 0101}, 040 (2001)
5221: [arXiv:hep-th/0008127].
5222: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0101,040;%%
5223:
5224: %\cite{Takahashi:2001pp}
5225: \bibitem{Takahashi:2001pp}
5226: T.~Takahashi and S.~Tanimoto,
5227: ``Wilson lines and classical solutions
5228: in cubic open string field theory,''
5229: Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ {\bf 106}, 863 (2001)
5230: [arXiv:hep-th/0107046].
5231: %%CITATION = PTPKA,106,863;%%
5232:
5233: %\cite{Kluson:2002ex}
5234: \bibitem{Kluson:2002ex}
5235: J.~Kluson,
5236: ``Exact solutions of open bosonic string field theory,''
5237: JHEP {\bf 0204}, 043 (2002)
5238: [arXiv:hep-th/0202045].
5239: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0204,043;%%
5240:
5241: %\cite{Takahashi:2002ez}
5242: \bibitem{Takahashi:2002ez}
5243: T.~Takahashi and S.~Tanimoto,
5244: ``Marginal and scalar solutions
5245: in cubic open string field theory,''
5246: JHEP {\bf 0203}, 033 (2002)
5247: [arXiv:hep-th/0202133].
5248: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0203,033;%%
5249:
5250: %\cite{Kluson:2002hr}
5251: \bibitem{Kluson:2002hr}
5252: J.~Kluson,
5253: ``Marginal deformations in the open bosonic string field theory
5254: for N D0-branes,''
5255: Class.\ Quant.\ Grav.\ {\bf 20}, 827 (2003)
5256: [arXiv:hep-th/0203089].
5257: %%CITATION = CQGRD,20,827;%%
5258:
5259: %\cite{Kluson:2002av}
5260: \bibitem{Kluson:2002av}
5261: J.~Kluson,
5262: ``Exact solutions in open bosonic string field theory
5263: and marginal deformation in CFT,''
5264: Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 19}, 4695 (2004)
5265: [arXiv:hep-th/0209255].
5266: %%CITATION = IMPAE,A19,4695;%%
5267:
5268: %\cite{Kluson:2003xu}
5269: \bibitem{Kluson:2003xu}
5270: J.~Kluson,
5271: ``Exact solutions in SFT and marginal deformation in BCFT,''
5272: JHEP {\bf 0312}, 050 (2003)
5273: [arXiv:hep-th/0303199].
5274: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0312,050;%%
5275:
5276:
5277:
5278:
5279: %\cite{Coletti:2003ai}
5280: \bibitem{Coletti:2003ai}
5281: E.~Coletti, I.~Sigalov and W.~Taylor,
5282: ``Abelian and nonabelian vector field effective actions from
5283: string field theory,''
5284: JHEP {\bf 0309}, 050 (2003)
5285: [arXiv:hep-th/0306041].
5286: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0309,050;%%
5287:
5288: %\cite{Berkovits:2003ny}
5289: \bibitem{Berkovits:2003ny}
5290: N.~Berkovits and M.~Schnabl,
5291: ``Yang-Mills action from open superstring field theory,''
5292: JHEP {\bf 0309}, 022 (2003)
5293: [arXiv:hep-th/0307019].
5294: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0309,022;%%
5295:
5296: %\cite{Sen:2004cq}
5297: \bibitem{Sen:2004cq}
5298: A.~Sen,
5299: ``Energy momentum tensor and marginal deformations
5300: in open string field theory,''
5301: JHEP {\bf 0408}, 034 (2004)
5302: [arXiv:hep-th/0403200].
5303: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0408,034;%%
5304:
5305: %\cite{Katsumata:2004cc}
5306: \bibitem{Katsumata:2004cc}
5307: F.~Katsumata, T.~Takahashi and S.~Zeze,
5308: ``Marginal deformations and closed string couplings
5309: in open string field theory,''
5310: JHEP {\bf 0411}, 050 (2004)
5311: [arXiv:hep-th/0409249].
5312: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0411,050;%%
5313:
5314: %\cite{Yang:2005iu}
5315: \bibitem{Yang:2005iu}
5316: H.~Yang and B.~Zwiebach,
5317: ``Testing closed string field theory with marginal fields,''
5318: JHEP {\bf 0506}, 038 (2005)
5319: [arXiv:hep-th/0501142].
5320: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0506,038;%%
5321:
5322: %\cite{Kishimoto:2005bs}
5323: \bibitem{Kishimoto:2005bs}
5324: I.~Kishimoto and T.~Takahashi,
5325: ``Marginal deformations and classical solutions
5326: in open superstring field theory,''
5327: JHEP {\bf 0511}, 051 (2005)
5328: [arXiv:hep-th/0506240].
5329: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0511,051;%%
5330:
5331:
5332: %\cite{Gaberdiel:1997ia}
5333: \bibitem{Gaberdiel:1997ia}
5334: M.~R.~Gaberdiel and B.~Zwiebach,
5335: ``Tensor constructions of open string theories I: Foundations,''
5336: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 505}, 569 (1997)
5337: [arXiv:hep-th/9705038].
5338: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B505,569;%%
5339:
5340: %\cite{Rastelli:2000iu}
5341: \bibitem{Rastelli:2000iu}
5342: L.~Rastelli and B.~Zwiebach,
5343: ``Tachyon potentials, star products and universality,''
5344: JHEP {\bf 0109}, 038 (2001)
5345: [arXiv:hep-th/0006240].
5346: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0109,038;%%
5347:
5348: %\cite{Callan:1994ub}
5349: \bibitem{Callan:1994ub}
5350: C.~G.~.~Callan, I.~R.~Klebanov, A.~W.~W.~Ludwig
5351: and J.~M.~Maldacena,
5352: ``Exact solution of a boundary conformal field theory,''
5353: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 422}, 417 (1994)
5354: [arXiv:hep-th/9402113].
5355: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B422,417;%%
5356:
5357: %\cite{Polchinski:1994my}
5358: \bibitem{Polchinski:1994my}
5359: J.~Polchinski and L.~Thorlacius,
5360: ``Free fermion representation
5361: of a boundary conformal field theory,''
5362: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 50}, 622 (1994)
5363: [arXiv:hep-th/9404008].
5364: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D50,622;%%
5365:
5366: %\cite{Recknagel:1998ih}
5367: \bibitem{Recknagel:1998ih}
5368: A.~Recknagel and V.~Schomerus,
5369: ``Boundary deformation theory and moduli spaces of D-branes,''
5370: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 545}, 233 (1999)
5371: [arXiv:hep-th/9811237].
5372: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B545,233;%%
5373:
5374: %\cite{Sen:1999mh}
5375: \bibitem{Sen:1999mh}
5376: A.~Sen,
5377: ``Descent relations among bosonic D-branes,''
5378: Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 14}, 4061 (1999)
5379: [arXiv:hep-th/9902105].
5380: %%CITATION = IMPAE,A14,4061;%%
5381:
5382: %\cite{Sen:2002nu}
5383: \bibitem{Sen:2002nu}
5384: A.~Sen,
5385: ``Rolling tachyon,''
5386: JHEP {\bf 0204}, 048 (2002)
5387: [arXiv:hep-th/0203211].
5388: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0204,048;%%
5389:
5390: %\cite{Sen:1990hh}
5391: \bibitem{Sen:1990hh}
5392: A.~Sen,
5393: ``On the background independence of string field theory,''
5394: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 345}, 551 (1990).
5395: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B345,551;%%
5396:
5397: %\cite{Sen:1990na}
5398: \bibitem{Sen:1990na}
5399: A.~Sen,
5400: ``On the background independence of string field theory
5401: (II). Analysis of on-shell S-matrix elements,''
5402: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 347}, 270 (1990).
5403: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B347,270;%%
5404:
5405: %\cite{Sen:1992pw}
5406: \bibitem{Sen:1992pw}
5407: A.~Sen,
5408: ``On the background independence of string field theory
5409: (III). Explicit field redefinitions,''
5410: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 391}, 550 (1993)
5411: [arXiv:hep-th/9201041].
5412: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B391,550;%%
5413:
5414: %\cite{Sen:1993mh}
5415: \bibitem{Sen:1993mh}
5416: A.~Sen and B.~Zwiebach,
5417: ``A Proof of local background independence
5418: of classical closed string field theory,''
5419: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 414}, 649 (1994)
5420: [arXiv:hep-th/9307088].
5421: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B414,649;%%
5422:
5423: %\cite{Sen:1993kb}
5424: \bibitem{Sen:1993kb}
5425: A.~Sen and B.~Zwiebach,
5426: ``Quantum background independence of closed string field theory,''
5427: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 423}, 580 (1994)
5428: [arXiv:hep-th/9311009].
5429: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B423,580;%%
5430:
5431: %\cite{Ellwood:2001ne}
5432: \bibitem{Ellwood:2001ne}
5433: I.~Ellwood and W.~Taylor,
5434: ``Gauge invariance and tachyon condensation
5435: in open string field theory,''
5436: arXiv:hep-th/0105156.
5437: %%CITATION = HEP-TH/0105156;%%
5438:
5439: %\cite{Asano:2006hk}
5440: \bibitem{Asano:2006hk}
5441: M.~Asano and M.~Kato,
5442: ``New covariant gauges in string field theory,''
5443: arXiv:hep-th/0611189.
5444: %%CITATION = HEP-TH/0611189;%%
5445:
5446: %\cite{Asano:2006hm}
5447: \bibitem{Asano:2006hm}
5448: M.~Asano and M.~Kato,
5449: ``Level truncated tachyon potential in various gauges,''
5450: JHEP {\bf 0701}, 028 (2007)
5451: [arXiv:hep-th/0611190].
5452: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0701,028;%%
5453:
5454: %\cite{Imamura:2005zm}
5455: \bibitem{Imamura:2005zm}
5456: Y.~Imamura, H.~Isono and Y.~Matsuo,
5457: ``Boundary states in open string channel and CFT near corner,''
5458: Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ {\bf 115}, 979 (2006)
5459: [arXiv:hep-th/0512098].
5460: %%CITATION = PTPKA,115,979;%%
5461:
5462: \end{thebibliography}
5463: \end{document}
5464: