1: \newcommand \Mpc {h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}}
2: \newcommand \kpc {h^{-1}{\rm kpc}}
3: \newcommand \farcs{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\prime\prime}$}}
4: \newcommand \farcm{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\prime}$}}
5: \newcommand \arcm{\hbox{$^{\prime}$}}
6: \newcommand \arcs{\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$}}
7: \newcommand \hfifty {h_{50}}
8: \newcommand \mic {$\mu$m}
9: \newcommand \kms {{\rm km~s}^{-1}}
10: \newcommand \msun {h^{-1} M_\odot}
11: \newcommand \beqn {\begin{equation}}
12: \newcommand \eeqn {\end{equation}}
13: \newcommand \Spitzer {{\em Spitzer}~}
14: \newcommand \Chandra {{\em Chandra}~}
15: \newcommand \ROSAT {{\em ROSAT}~}
16: \documentclass[apjl]{emulateapj}
17: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
18: %\documentclass{aastex}
19: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
20: %\usepackage{epsfig}
21: %\usepackage{natbib}
22:
23: \begin{document}
24:
25: \title{An Extremely Massive Dry Galaxy Merger in a Moderate Redshift Cluster}
26: %\shorttitle{CIRS Virial Mass Function}
27: %\shortauthors{Rines et al.}
28:
29: \author{Kenneth Rines\altaffilmark{1,2}, Rose Finn\altaffilmark{3}, and
30: Alexey Vikhlinin\altaffilmark{1,4}}
31: \email{krines@astro.yale.edu}
32:
33: \altaffiltext{1}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138; krines@cfa.harvard.edu}
34: \altaffiltext{2}{Yale Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8121}
35: %\altaffiltext{3}{Visiting Astronomer, Kitt Peak National Observatory, National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc. (AURA) under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.}
36: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physics, Siena College, Loudonville, NY 12211}
37: \altaffiltext{4}{Space Research Institute, Profsoyuznaya 84/32, Moscow, Russia}
38:
39: \begin{abstract}
40:
41: We have identified perhaps the largest major galaxy merger ever seen.
42: While analysing \Spitzer IRAC images of CL0958+4702, an X-ray-selected
43: cluster at $z$=0.39, we discovered an unusual plume of stars extending
44: $\gtrsim$110$\kpc$ outward from the bright central galaxy (BCG).
45: Three galaxies 1-1.5 mag fainter than the BCG lie within 17 kpc
46: (projected) of the BCG and are probably participating in the merger.
47: The plume is detected in all four IRAC channels and at optical
48: wavelengths in images from the WIYN telescope; the surface brightness
49: is remarkably high ($\mu_r\approx$24.8 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ at 50
50: kpc). The optical and infrared colors are consistent with those of
51: other BCGs, suggesting that the plume is composed of old stars and
52: negligible recent star formation (hence a ``dry merger''). The
53: luminosity in the plume is at least equivalent to a 4$L^*$ galaxy. A
54: diffuse halo extending 110$\kpc$ from the BCG in one
55: IRAC image suggests the total amount of diffuse light is
56: $L_r\sim$1.3$\times$10$^{11}h^{-2} L_\odot$. A \Chandra observation
57: shows an X-ray image and spectrum typical of moderate-mass clusters.
58: We use MMT/Hectospec to measure 905 redshifts in a 1 $deg^2$ region
59: around the cluster. The velocities of two of the BCG companions
60: indicate a merger timescale for the companion galaxies of $\sim$110
61: Myr and $\sim$0.5-1 Gyr for the plume. We conclude that the BCG and
62: intracluster light of CL0958 is formed by major mergers at moderate
63: redshifts. After the major merger is complete, CL0958 will likely
64: become a fossil cluster.
65:
66:
67: \end{abstract}
68:
69: \keywords{galaxies: clusters: individual (CL0958+4702) --- galaxies: interactions --- galaxies: cD --- galaxies:
70: kinematics and dynamics }
71:
72: \section{Introduction}
73:
74: Galaxies in the centers of clusters likely experience many mergers
75: during their formation. Numerical simulations of cluster formation
76: often show frequent mergers of small galaxies with a larger, central
77: galaxy \citep[e.g.,][]{dubinski98}. Supporting this view, many
78: central cluster galaxies contain multiple components, and some cluster
79: galaxies at high redshift are apparently merging pairs
80: \citep{lauer88,vandokkum99,yamada02,tran05}. One bright galaxy (the
81: ``Spiderweb'') in a protocluster at $z$=2.16 is apparently undergoing
82: several minor mergers \citep{miley06}. Some of these mergers likely
83: produce the intracluster light seen in nearby clusters
84: \citep{zwicky1951,2000ApJ...536..561G,mihos05,krick07}.
85: Deep optical observations of early-type field galaxies
86: also reveal features associated with either
87: ongoing mergers or merger remnants \citep{vandokkum05}. These
88: features typically contribute $\sim$5\% of the total starlight:
89: features of this brightness can be produced by either major or minor
90: mergers \citep{vandokkum05,kawata06}.
91:
92: We report here the biggest major galaxy merger ever seen (to our
93: knowledge), involving the near-complete disruption of a galaxy
94: comparable to a brightest cluster galaxy (BCG). This cosmic collision
95: is set in CL0958+4702, an X-ray cluster at moderate redshift
96: ($z$=0.39) discovered with {\em ROSAT}. \citet{molthagen97}
97: identified a galaxy with $z$=0.39 as the optical counterpart (although
98: they did not classify it as a cluster). CL0958 was reidentified in
99: the 400 Square Degree serendipitous survey (400d) of clusters and groups in
100: pointed \ROSAT observations \citep{burenin07}.
101:
102: As part of a multiwavelength observing campaign of 400d clusters, we
103: discovered that CL0958 displays an unusual plume of emission in
104: \Spitzer IRAC images. Further analysis indicates that the emission is
105: coming from an old stellar population at the redshift of the cluster.
106: This evidence suggests that CL0958 is undergoing a major dry merger.
107: The amount of starlight in the plume is at least equal to a 4$L^*$
108: galaxy.
109:
110:
111: CL0958 presents a dramatic example of intracluster light; extended
112: emission is clearly detected in optical images from the WIYN telescope
113: and in mid-infrared images from \Spitzer IRAC data. We determine that
114: CL0958 will probably evolve into a fossil cluster, i.e., a cluster in
115: which the second-brightest member is $\gtrsim$2 mag fainter
116: than the BCG \citep{ponman94,jones00}. Fossil groups and fossil
117: clusters are thought to be produced either from unusual initial
118: conditions or from the mergers of several bright cluster members into
119: one dominant BCG \citep[e.g.,][]{milosavljevic06}. CL0958 provides a
120: dramatic example of the merger scenario in progress.
121:
122: A more complete description of the properties of CL0958 will be made
123: in \citet{c3poi}. Here we describe the basic features
124: of the multiwavelength data. We assume cosmological parameters of
125: $\Omega_m$=0.3, $\Omega_\Lambda$=0.7, and $H_0$=100$h \kms Mpc^{-1}$. At
126: the redshift of the cluster ($z$=0.39), the spatial scale is
127: 1$''$=3.7 $\kpc$.
128:
129: \section{Observations}
130: \subsection{Optical Imaging}
131:
132: We observed CL0958 (and other 400d clusters) with the WIYN telescope
133: in 2005 December. We obtained $griz$ imaging with the OPTIC camera
134: \citep{tonry02,howell03} with the goal of identifying cluster members
135: up to 3 mag fainter than $M^*$. Figure \ref{image} shows the
136: $r$ image from a non-photometric night with $0\farcs5$ seeing.
137: Surrounding the main component of the BCG are three faint components
138: and an asymmetric plume of low surface brightness emission extending
139: primarily NW of the BCG (outlined by contours). The morphology of the
140: plume is very similar to that seen in the late stages of simulations
141: of dry mergers \citep[e.g., Figure 4 of][Figure 1 of van Dokkum
142: 2005]{dubinski98}. The extended emission shows little small-scale
143: structure at the resolution of these images. Note that merger
144: features identified in early-type field galaxies similarly show little
145: small-scale structure in contrast to tidal features seen around
146: late-type galaxies \citep{vandokkum05}. Using the Sloan Digital Sky
147: Survey \citep[SDSS, ][]{sdss} for calibration, we estimate that the
148: outer contour in Figure \ref{image} is $\mu_r$$\approx$24.8 mag arcsec$^{-2}$.
149: Corrected for cosmological surface brightness dimming, the plume in
150: CL0958 has much higher surface brightness ($\mu_r\approx$23.4) than
151: intracluster light and even some cD envelopes in nearby clusters
152: \citep[e.g.,][]{schombert88,2000ApJ...536..561G,mihos05,krick07}.
153:
154: The three companions to the BCG are likely cluster galaxies
155: participating in the major merger. Assigning flux to the various
156: components is challenging. We use SExtractor \citep{sex} to measure
157: relative magnitudes of the BCG and its three companions within 1''
158: diameter apertures: the N,E, and SE companions are respectively
159: +1.32,+1.09, and +1.29 mag fainter than the BCG. The BCG has
160: absolute magnitude $M_r\approx$-21.6 or $L_r\sim$3$\times$10$^{10}
161: h^{-2} L_\odot$ \citep[we use Table A1 of][to correct for
162: bandpass shifting and passive evolution]{wake06}. The plume has a
163: total magnitude r$\sim$18.8 ($L_r\sim$5$\times$10$^{10}
164: h^{-2} L_\odot$) and contains $\sim$46\% of the
165: total light in the region enclosed by the contours in Figure
166: \ref{image}, although this fraction depends sensitively on the
167: parameters used to estimate the contribution of the BCG and BCG
168: companions \citep[e.g., see][]{gonzalez05}. The plume is visible to a
169: similar spatial extent in $i$ band, and is marginally detectable in
170: $g$ and $z$, consistent with the plume having colors typical of an old
171: stellar population.
172:
173: %### contours 448, 462, 476
174:
175:
176: \subsection{Mid-Infrared Imaging}
177:
178: We are observing several 400d clusters with \Spitzer to
179: measure the star formation rates in X-ray clusters and their
180: dependence on redshift and cluster mass (GO2 Program 20225).
181: %Our program includes imaging with both IRAC and MIPS in the 24\mic~ and
182: %70\mic~ bands. Unfortunately, the scheduled collection of MIPS data
183: %for CL0958 were interrupted by the satellite being placed into safe
184: %mode.
185: CL0958 was imaged with IRAC with 100 s exposures using the 12-point
186: Realeaux dither pattern with ``medium'' dither size. We processed the
187: Basic Calibration Data (BCD) files with the Post-BCD software MOPEX
188: after using the IRAC artifact mitigation codes provided by Sean Carey.
189:
190:
191: \begin{figure}
192: %\epsscale{0.8}
193: \figurenum{2}
194: \plotone{f1.ps}
195: \caption{\label{sed}
196: Spectral energy distribution of the BCG (including companions) and the
197: plume of emission. SEDs of another cluster member (labeled ``CGxy'')
198: and of several BCGs from \citet[][dash-dotted lines, scaled to cross
199: at around 4\mic]{egami06} are shown for
200: comparison. Note that the IRAC resolution complicates separating the
201: BCG light from the companions. The spectra of the BCG and two of the
202: companions show early-type populations, so the color differences are
203: probably small. }
204: \end{figure}
205: \epsscale{1}
206:
207: Figure \ref{image} shows IRAC images from the 3.6 and 4.5\mic~
208: channels. The emission seen in the WIYN images is clearly visible.
209: The emission is weakest in the 8.0~\mic~ band, so we measure the colors
210: of the BCG and the plume in two regions where the emission is
211: significant at 8.0~\mic. Specifically, we measure the flux in two
212: boxes of 11$\times$8 IRAC pixels, or 35$\times$50~$\kpc$ (shown in
213: Figure \ref{image}) as well as for another cluster galaxy and
214: background regions. The box containing the BCG also contains the
215: three BCG companions. The IRAC colors (Figure \ref{sed}) agree very well with those
216: of non-star-forming BCGs observed by \citet[][]{egami06}.
217: The luminosity contained in the box
218: around the plume is $\approx$48\% of that contained in the box
219: containing the BCG and companions. Note that the luminosity of the
220: plume may be slightly overestimated due to both light from the wings
221: of the PSF of the BCG and to the IRAC calibration technique, which is
222: optimized for photometry of point
223: sources.\footnote{See http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/irac/calib/extcal/index.html}
224: These two effects could lead to a $\sim$10-20\% overestimate of the
225: flux of the plume within this box. Intracluster light and merger
226: remnants in the nearby universe typically extend to extremely low
227: surface brightnesses
228: \citep[e.g.,][]{mihos05,vandokkum05}, so the above is probably a lower
229: limit on the total light in the plume. Indeed, the 3.6~\mic ~image
230: clearly shows extended low surface brightness emission
231: $\gtrsim$110$\kpc$ from the BCG (Fig.~\ref{image}). Using
232: SExtractor to estimate the light in different apertures, we estimate
233: the total diffuse light in this halo to be $L_r\sim$1.3$\times 10^{11}
234: h^{-2} L_\odot$ [rest-frame $r$-band corrected for passive evolution;
235: we estimate $(r-3.6\mu m)$$\approx$4.2 from 8 spectroscopically confirmed
236: cluster members]. Comparison to the BCGs observed by
237: \citet{egami06} shows that CL0958 is anomalous: most moderate-redshift
238: clusters contain several bright galaxies near the X-ray center, and
239: none show extended emission similar to that in CL0958.
240:
241: %%% 0.07,0.08,0.09,0.10,0.11
242:
243: The IRAC colors of both the BCG and the plume indicate that the
244: ongoing merger is a dry merger: i.e., there is little or no star
245: formation triggered by the merger. This result shows that the
246: progenitor galaxies contained little or no gas, suggesting that the
247: gas around cluster galaxies is efficiently removed by the cluster,
248: e.g., by tidal stripping or ram pressure stripping by the intracluster
249: medium \citep{gunngott,merritt85}. The fact that the plume is
250: composed of an old stellar population demonstrates that the plume is
251: not created by recent star formation, e.g., from a massive cooling
252: flow not centered on the BCG. Further, comparison to the BCGs of
253: \citet{egami06} indicates that the plume has less recent star
254: formation than some BCGs. We conclude that the plume was recently
255: created through a ``dry'' merger, i.e., a merger where the progenitor
256: galaxies contain little or no gas such that little star formation is
257: triggered by the merger \citep[e.g.,][]{bell06}.
258:
259:
260:
261:
262: \subsection{X-ray Observations}
263:
264: CL0958 was observed with \Chandra for 35 ks as part of a \Chandra survey of 400d clusters.
265: Complete details on these observations will be presented in
266: \citet{cccp}. The X-ray emission is regular and shows a slight
267: elongation in the direction of the stellar plume. The spectrum yields
268: a temperature of $3.6\pm0.8$keV. The X-ray luminosity is
269: $L_X$=5.0$\times$10$^{43} h^{-2}$erg s$^{-1}$, making CL0958 a
270: moderately luminous cluster, intermediate in both $L_X$ and $T_X$ to
271: Virgo and Abell 2199 \citep{cirsi}. There is no evidence for a
272: cooling flow in CL0958, supporting our conclusion from the IRAC colors
273: that the plume is not created by cooling of the ICM and subsequent
274: star formation. The X-ray data show little evidence of the dynamical
275: activity suggested by the extended optical light. We find no evidence
276: of any AGNs in the \Chandra field. The upper limit on AGNs at the
277: cluster redshift is $L_X$$<$6$\times 10^{41}$erg s$^{-1}$.
278:
279: \subsection{Optical Spectroscopy}
280:
281: We obtained optical spectroscopy of CL0958 with MMT/Hectospec with the
282: 270-line grating \citep[yielding 6.2\AA~FWHM resolution,
283: ][]{hectospec} in 2007 February. Because the Hectospec field
284: (1$^\circ$ diameter) is much larger than the WIYN images
285: ($10'$$\times$$10'$), we used imaging data from SDSS to select targets
286: for spectroscopy. We observed CL0958 with four configurations (one in
287: marginal conditions) and obtained 905 redshifts. A full discussion of
288: the spectroscopy will be presented in \citet{c3poi}. Here we
289: highlight the results relevant to the major merger.
290:
291: A spectrum of the BCG shows a typical early-type galaxy with no
292: evidence of recent star formation from either [OII] in emission or
293: H$\delta$ in absorption. The 4000\AA~break is strong, typical of an
294: old stellar population. We obtained spectra of the N and SE BCG
295: companions, which have early-type spectra and rest-frame velocities of
296: -63$\pm$41$\kms$ and +86$\pm$41$\kms$ respectively relative to the BCG
297: \citep[redshift uncertainties estimated from repeat observations,
298: see][]{hectospec}. These redshifts provide strong evidence that the N
299: and SE BCG companions are physically close to the BCG; it is highly
300: unlikely that they are chance projections of cluster members from the
301: outskirts of the cluster. This close association supports the
302: possibility that these companions are the remaining nuclei of larger
303: galaxies disrupted in the merger.
304:
305: We identify 21 galaxies within 1 Abell radius of the BCG as likely
306: cluster members based on the redshift-radius distribution
307: \citep{c3poi}. These members yield a projected velocity dispersion of
308: $\sigma_p$=521$^{+107}_{-66}\kms$ using the procedure of
309: \citet{danese}. However, there is a noticeable core of 11 galaxies
310: within 0.8$\Mpc$ with a projected velocity dispersion of
311: $\sigma_p$=244$^{+80}_{-41}\kms$. Assuming the galaxies trace the
312: dark matter, the scaling relation of \citet{evrard07} yields a virial
313: mass estimate of $M_{200}\approx$9.2 (1.0)$\times$10$^{13}\msun$ using
314: the upper (lower) estimates of the velocity dispersion.
315: %The global
316: %properties of CL0958 ($L_X,T_X,\sigma_p,M_{200}$) lie surprisingly
317: %close to the scaling relations of nearby clusters
318: %\citep[e.g.,][]{popesso04,cirsi} if we adopt the larger estimate of
319: %$\sigma_p$=521$\kms$ and $M_{200}$, but CL0958 would be a significant
320: %outlier if we adopt $\sigma_p$=244$\kms$. The X-ray temperature
321: %predicts $\sigma_p\approx$650$\pm$100$\kms$ assuming the
322: %$\sigma_p-T_X$ relation of \citet{2000ApJ...538...65X} and assuming
323: %self-similar evolution.
324: Identification of more cluster members is
325: required to robustly estimate the projected velocity dispersion.
326:
327:
328:
329:
330:
331: \section{Discussion}
332:
333: With the multiwavelength data, we can estimate the timescale of the
334: merger. The spatial scale is set by the limit of the plume, which
335: extends to $\approx$110~$kpc$ in the 3.6~\mic ~image. Assuming that the
336: plume has similar velocity to the BCG companions, the velocity scale
337: is $\lesssim$100$\kms$. These scales suggest a timescale of order
338: 0.5-1 Gyr for the merger remnant to form a relaxed distribution around
339: the BCG. This timescale suggests that major mergers might be fairly
340: common in deep images of galaxy clusters.
341:
342: The BCG companions lie much closer to the BCG than the plume; thus,
343: they will likely merge more quickly. The dynamical friction timescale
344: can be estimated as
345: \beqn
346: T_{\mbox{fric}} = \frac{2\times10^5 r^2 v_c}{M \log{\Lambda}}\mbox{Gyr}
347: \eeqn
348: \citep{patton00}.
349: Correcting for projection assuming random orientation of $r_p$ and
350: $v_p$ [$r^2v_c = (3/2)r_p^2(\sqrt{3})v_p$], we estimate
351: $T_{\mbox{fric}}$$\approx$110 Myr for a companion galaxy mass of
352: $\approx5\times10^{10}M_\odot$ (the BCG companions are $\approx$$L^*$
353: galaxies and we assume $M/L_r\approx 5 M_\odot/L_\odot$). We are
354: therefore observing CL0958 at a fairly special time in its history.
355: The unusual properties of CL0958 have implications for at least two
356: categories of cluster studies: intracluster light and the origin of fossil groups and clusters.
357:
358: \subsection{Intracluster Light}
359:
360: The unusual extended emission around the BCG of CL0958 provides a
361: powerful confirmation of the importance of intracluster light to the
362: total optical luminosity and direct evidence for its origin. The
363: surface brightness and spatial extent of the emission is perhaps the
364: largest detected to date. The dearth of cluster galaxies (other than
365: the BCG companions) with magnitudes comparable to the BCG suggests
366: that the BCG is forming via a major merger. The intracluster light
367: could be the leftover stars from bright galaxies that have recently
368: been disrupted or stars that have been stripped from the BCG
369: companions. CL0958 demonstrates that at least some intracluster light
370: is produced by extreme dynamic events in cluster centers as opposed to
371: slower mechanisms. Indeed, the detailed simulations of
372: \citet{murante07} suggest that most intracluster light is produced by
373: the mergers that form the BCG rather than from tidal stripping.
374:
375: Major ongoing dry mergers appear to be rare in BCGs: images of 35 BCGs
376: at $z$$<$0.1 in Figure 3 of \citet{vonderlinden07} show no mergers
377: similar to that in CL0958, although several BCGs have multiple
378: components: these may be major mergers observed at an earlier stage
379: \citep{lauer88}. CL0958 indicates that ongoing mergers may be more
380: common at higher redshift, as would be expected in hierarchical models
381: of BCG formation \citep{delucia07}.
382:
383: \subsection{The Origin of ``Fossil'' Groups and Clusters}
384:
385: The multiwavelength properties of CL0958 clearly indicate that it is a
386: moderately massive cluster with X-ray properties (and possibly also
387: velocity dispersion) comparable to (1-5)$\times$$10^{14}\msun$
388: clusters. Once the three BCG companions merge with the BCG, the BCG
389: will be $\sim$1.3 mag brighter than the next-brightest galaxy (in
390: observed $r$-band). Depending on the fraction of the plume that
391: accretes onto the BCG, within $\sim$1 Gyr the BCG will be $\sim$2 mag
392: brighter than the next-brightest galaxy. These properties would make
393: CL0958 a ``fossil cluster'', that is, a fossil group with
394: $M\gtrsim10^{14}\msun$
395: \citep{khosroshahi06}.
396:
397: There are two basic mechanisms that could produce fossil groups and
398: fossil clusters. Either initial conditions of the forming group lead
399: to the formation of an extremely dominant BCG/BGG, or several bright
400: group galaxies merge after the initial collapse of the group. One
401: difficulty with the merger hypothesis is that dynamical friction is
402: less efficient for cluster galaxies that have been tidally stripped by
403: the cluster potential \citep{merritt85}. However, more recent
404: theoretical models suggest that cluster merger variance should
405: occasionally produce such systems \citep{milosavljevic06}.
406: %
407: The major dry merger in CL0958 shows that fossil clusters and
408: groups can be produced by major mergers of bright galaxies in the
409: system centers. Deep optical and infrared observations of the other known
410: fossil clusters and groups may reveal less dramatic evidence of merger
411: activity.
412:
413:
414: \section{Conclusions}
415:
416: We have identified a massive stellar plume formed by a major dry
417: merger in an X-ray cluster at $z$=0.39. The amount of light contained
418: in the merger suggests that the equivalent of a 4$L^*$ galaxy in stars
419: is currently visible as a merger remnant; an additional
420: $\sim$10$^{11}L_\odot$ is visible in a diffuse halo of intracluster
421: light. To our knowledge, this is the most massive major galaxy merger
422: ever identified \citep[the ``Spiderweb'' galaxy is an ensemble of
423: minor mergers][]{miley06}. The colors of the plume indicate that it
424: is composed of an old stellar population, consistent with origin in
425: early-type cluster galaxies and inconsistent with recent star
426: formation. This remnant will likely merge with the BCG in $\lesssim$1
427: Gyr, while three galaxies very close to the BCG will probably merge
428: within $\sim$110 Myr. After these galaxies and the plume have merged
429: with the BCG, CL0958 will likely form a ``fossil cluster''.
430: Theoretical models of BCG assembly indicate that BCGs can be assembled
431: quite late, but these models predict that most of this growth occurs
432: through minor mergers
433: \citet{delucia07}. Possible substructure in the galaxy dynamics
434: complicates the measurement of the velocity dispersion.
435: %For some assumptions, the global properties of the
436: %cluster ($L_X, T_X, \sigma_p$) are consistent with observed scaling
437: %relations, although with other assumptions CL0958 is a significant
438: %outlier. If common, systems like CL0958 will present a significant
439: %challenge to efforts at measuring the abundance of clusters via
440: %photometric studies.
441: The existence of this major dry merger demonstrates that
442: intracluster light can be formed in extreme dynamic events and that
443: fossil clusters are at least sometimes formed by major mergers in
444: their centers.
445:
446: \acknowledgements
447:
448: We thank the referee for suggestions that improved the presentation of
449: this letter.
450: We thank Margaret Geller, Michael Kurtz, Scott Kenyon, Sune Toft,
451: Rodion Burenin, Thomas Reiprich, Harald Ebeling, Allan Hornstrup, and
452: Hernan Quintana for helpful discussions and suggestions.
453: Observations reported here were obtained at the MMT Observatory, a
454: joint facility of the Smithsonian Institution and the University of
455: Arizona.
456: The WIYN Observatory is a joint
457: facility of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Indiana University,
458: Yale University, and the National Optical Astronomy Observatories.
459: This work is based on observations made with the Spitzer Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under a contract with NASA. Support for this work was provided by NASA through an award issued by JPL/Caltech.
460:
461: %\bibliographystyle{apj}
462: %\bibliography{rines}
463:
464: \begin{thebibliography}{39}
465: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
466:
467: \bibitem[{{Bell} {et~al.}(2006)}]{bell06}
468: {Bell}, E.~F. {et~al.} 2006, \apj, 640, 241
469:
470: \bibitem[{{Bertin} \& {Arnouts}(1996)}]{sex}
471: {Bertin}, E. \& {Arnouts}, S. 1996, \aaps, 117, 393
472:
473: \bibitem[{{Burenin} {et~al.}(2006){Burenin}, {Vikhlinin}, {Hornstrup},
474: {Ebeling}, {Quintana}, \& {Mescheryakov}}]{burenin07}
475: {Burenin}, R.~A., {Vikhlinin}, A., {Hornstrup}, A., {Ebeling}, H., {Quintana},
476: H., \& {Mescheryakov}, A. 2006, (astro-ph/0610739)
477:
478: \bibitem[{{Danese} {et~al.}(1980){Danese}, {de Zotti}, \& {di Tullio}}]{danese}
479: {Danese}, L., {de Zotti}, G., \& {di Tullio}, G. 1980, \aap, 82, 322
480:
481: %\bibitem[{{Davoodi} {et~al.}(2006)}]{davoodi06}
482: %{Davoodi}, P. {et~al.} 2006, \aj, 132, 1818
483:
484: \bibitem[{{De Lucia} \& {Blaizot}(2007)}]{delucia07}
485: {De Lucia}, G. \& {Blaizot}, J. 2007, \mnras, 375, 2
486:
487: \bibitem[{{Dubinski}(1998)}]{dubinski98}
488: {Dubinski}, J. 1998, \apj, 502, 141
489:
490: \bibitem[{{Egami} {et~al.}(2006)}]{egami06}
491: {Egami}, E. {et~al.} 2006, \apj, 647, 922
492:
493: \bibitem[{{Evrard} {et~al.}(2007)}]{evrard07}
494: {Evrard}, A.~E. {et~al.} 2007, ApJ, submitted (astro-ph/0702241)
495:
496: \bibitem[{{Fabricant} {et~al.}(2005)}]{hectospec}
497: {Fabricant}, D. {et~al.} 2005, \pasp, 117, 1411
498:
499: \bibitem[{{Gonzalez} {et~al.}(2005){Gonzalez}, {Zabludoff}, \&
500: {Zaritsky}}]{gonzalez05}
501: {Gonzalez}, A.~H., {Zabludoff}, A.~I., \& {Zaritsky}, D. 2005, \apj, 618, 195
502:
503: \bibitem[{{Gonzalez} {et~al.}(2000){Gonzalez}, {Zabludoff}, {Zaritsky}, \&
504: {Dalcanton}}]{2000ApJ...536..561G}
505: {Gonzalez}, A.~H., {Zabludoff}, A.~I., {Zaritsky}, D., \& {Dalcanton}, J.~J.
506: 2000, \apj, 536, 561
507:
508: \bibitem[{{Gunn} \& {Gott}(1972)}]{gunngott}
509: {Gunn}, J.~E. \& {Gott}, J.~R.~I. 1972, \apj, 176, 1
510:
511: \bibitem[{{Howell} {et~al.}(2003){Howell}, {Everett}, {Tonry}, {Pickles}, \&
512: {Dain}}]{howell03}
513: {Howell}, S.~B., {Everett}, M.~E., {Tonry}, J.~L., {Pickles}, A., \& {Dain}, C.
514: 2003, \pasp, 115, 1340
515:
516: \bibitem[{{Jones} {et~al.}(2000){Jones}, {Ponman}, \& {Forbes}}]{jones00}
517: {Jones}, L.~R., {Ponman}, T.~J., \& {Forbes}, D.~A. 2000, \mnras, 312, 139
518:
519: \bibitem[{{Kawata} {et~al.}(2006){Kawata}, {Mulchaey}, {Gibson}, \&
520: {S{\'a}nchez-Bl{\'a}zquez}}]{kawata06}
521: {Kawata}, D., {Mulchaey}, J.~S., {Gibson}, B.~K., \&
522: {S{\'a}nchez-Bl{\'a}zquez}, P. 2006, \apj, 648, 969
523:
524: \bibitem[{{Khosroshahi} {et~al.}(2006){Khosroshahi}, {Maughan}, {Ponman}, \&
525: {Jones}}]{khosroshahi06}
526: {Khosroshahi}, H.~G., {Maughan}, B.~J., {Ponman}, T.~J., \& {Jones}, L.~R.
527: 2006, \mnras, 369, 1211
528:
529: \bibitem[{{Krick} \& {Bernstein}(2007)}]{krick07}
530: {Krick}, J.~E. \& {Bernstein}, R.~A. 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 704
531:
532: \bibitem[{{Lauer}(1988)}]{lauer88}
533: {Lauer}, T.~R. 1988, \apj, 325, 49
534:
535: \bibitem[{{Merritt}(1985)}]{merritt85}
536: {Merritt}, D. 1985, \apj, 289, 18
537:
538: \bibitem[{{Mihos} {et~al.}(2005){Mihos}, {Harding}, {Feldmeier}, \&
539: {Morrison}}]{mihos05}
540: {Mihos}, J.~C., {Harding}, P., {Feldmeier}, J., \& {Morrison}, H. 2005, \apjl,
541: 631, L41
542:
543: \bibitem[{{Miley} {et~al.}(2006)}]{miley06}
544: {Miley}, G.~K. {et~al.} 2006, \apjl, 650, L29
545:
546: \bibitem[{{Milosavljevi{\'c}} {et~al.}(2006){Milosavljevi{\'c}}, {Miller},
547: {Furlanetto}, \& {Cooray}}]{milosavljevic06}
548: {Milosavljevi{\'c}}, M., {Miller}, C.~J., {Furlanetto}, S.~R., \& {Cooray}, A.
549: 2006, \apjl, 637, L9
550:
551: \bibitem[{{Molthagen} {et~al.}(1997){Molthagen}, {Wendker}, \&
552: {Briel}}]{molthagen97}
553: {Molthagen}, K., {Wendker}, H.~J., \& {Briel}, U.~G. 1997, \aaps, 126, 509
554:
555: \bibitem[{{Murante} {et~al.}(2006)}]{murante07}
556: {{Murante}, G. and {Giovalli}, M. and {Gerhard}, O. and {Arnaboldi}, M. and
557: {Borgani}, S. and {Dolag}, K.} 2007, \mnras, 377, 2
558:
559: \bibitem[{{Patton} {et~al.}(2000){Patton}, {Carlberg}, {Marzke}, {Pritchet},
560: {da Costa}, \& {Pellegrini}}]{patton00}
561: {Patton}, D.~R., {Carlberg}, R.~G., {Marzke}, R.~O., {Pritchet}, C.~J., {da
562: Costa}, L.~N., \& {Pellegrini}, P.~S. 2000, \apj, 536, 153
563:
564: \bibitem[{{Ponman} {et~al.}(1994){Ponman}, {Allan}, {Jones}, {Merrifield},
565: {McHardy}, {Lehto}, \& {Luppino}}]{ponman94}
566: {Ponman}, T.~J., {Allan}, D.~J., {Jones}, L.~R., {Merrifield}, M., {McHardy},
567: I.~M., {Lehto}, H.~J., \& {Luppino}, G.~A. 1994, \nat, 369, 462
568:
569: %\bibitem[{{Popesso} {et~al.}(2004){Popesso}, {B{\"o}hringer}, {Brinkmann},
570: % {Voges}, \& {York}}]{popesso04}
571: %{Popesso}, P., {B{\"o}hringer}, H., {Brinkmann}, J., {Voges}, W., \& {York},
572: % D.~G. 2004, \aap, 423, 449
573:
574: \bibitem[{{Rines} {et~al.}(2007)}]{c3poi}
575: {Rines}, K. {et~al.} 2007, in preparation
576:
577: \bibitem[{{Rines} \& {Diaferio}(2006)}]{cirsi}
578: {Rines}, K.~J. \& {Diaferio}, A. 2006, \aj, 132, 1275
579:
580: \bibitem[{{Schombert}(1988)}]{schombert88}
581: {Schombert}, J.~M. 1988, \apj, 328, 475
582:
583: \bibitem[{{Stoughton} {et~al.}(2002)}]{sdss}
584: {Stoughton}, C. {et~al.} 2002, \aj, 123, 485
585:
586: \bibitem[{{Tonry} {et~al.}(2002){Tonry}, {Luppino}, {Kaiser}, {Burke}, \&
587: {Jacoby}}]{tonry02}
588: {Tonry}, J.~L., {Luppino}, G.~A., {Kaiser}, N., {Burke}, B.~E., \& {Jacoby},
589: G.~H. 2002, SPIE, 4836, 206
590:
591: \bibitem[{{Tran} {et~al.}(2005){Tran}, {van Dokkum}, {Franx}, {Illingworth},
592: {Kelson}, \& {Schreiber}}]{tran05}
593: {Tran}, K.-V.~H., {van Dokkum}, P., {Franx}, M., {Illingworth}, G.~D.,
594: {Kelson}, D.~D., \& {Schreiber}, N.~M.~F. 2005, \apjl, 627, L25
595:
596: \bibitem[{{van Dokkum}(2005)}]{vandokkum05}
597: {van Dokkum}, P.~G. 2005, \aj, 130, 2647
598:
599: \bibitem[{{van Dokkum} {et~al.}(1999){van Dokkum}, {Franx}, {Fabricant},
600: {Kelson}, \& {Illingworth}}]{vandokkum99}
601: {van Dokkum}, P.~G., {Franx}, M., {Fabricant}, D., {Kelson}, D.~D., \&
602: {Illingworth}, G.~D. 1999, \apjl, 520, L95
603:
604: \bibitem[{{Vikhlinin} {et~al.}(2007)}]{cccp}
605: {Vikhlinin}, A. {et~al.} 2007, in preparation
606:
607: \bibitem[{{von der Linden} {et~al.}(2006){von der Linden}, {Best}, {Kauffmann},
608: \& {White}}]{vonderlinden07}
609: {von der Linden}, A., {Best}, P.~N., {Kauffmann}, G., \& {White}, S.~D.~M.
610: 2006, MNRAS, in press (astro-ph/0611196)
611:
612: \bibitem[{{Wake} {et~al.}(2006)}]{wake06}
613: {Wake}, D.~A. {et~al.} 2006, \mnras, 372, 537
614:
615: %\bibitem[{{Xue} \& {Wu}(2000)}]{2000ApJ...538...65X}
616: %{Xue}, Y. \& {Wu}, X. 2000, \apj, 538, 65
617:
618: \bibitem[{{Yamada} {et~al.}(2002){Yamada}, {Koyama}, {Nakata}, {Kajisawa},
619: {Tanaka}, {Kodama}, {Okamura}, \& {De Propris}}]{yamada02}
620: {Yamada}, T., {Koyama}, Y., {Nakata}, F., {Kajisawa}, M., {Tanaka}, I.,
621: {Kodama}, T., {Okamura}, S., \& {De Propris}, R. 2002, \apjl, 577, L89
622:
623: \bibitem[{{Zwicky}(1951)}]{zwicky1951}
624: {Zwicky}, F. 1951, \pasp, 63, 61
625:
626: \end{thebibliography}
627:
628:
629:
630:
631:
632: \clearpage
633:
634: \begin{figure}
635: %\notetoeditor{Figure 2 (Plate 1) should appear at the end of the paper on the whole page as a plate.}
636: \figurenum{1}
637: \label{image}
638: %\plotone{multipanelfig.ps}
639: \plottwo{f2aa.ps}{f2bb.ps}
640: \plotone{f2cc.ps}
641: \caption{Upper left: 2$\times$120-s $r$-band WIYN image taken with OPTIC in 0\farcs5 seeing.
642: The contours show surface brightness levels of $\mu_r$ = 24.82,24.79,
643: and 24.76 mag arcsec$^{-2}$. The BCG has three companion galaxies
644: within 17$\kpc$ to the N, E, and SE. Upper right: IRAC 3.6\mic ~image.
645: Contours are linearly spaced between 0.07 and 0.11 MJy ster$^{-1}$.
646: The ellipse approximately indicates the spatial extent of the
647: plume. Boxes identify the regions used to measure the SED of the plume, BCG+3, and a nearby cluster galaxy (itself a likely merger in progress).
648: Bottom: False-color image of CL0958. WIYN r-band image in blue, \Spitzer IRAC
649: 3.6\mic ~image in green, IRAC 4.5\mic ~image in red. All images are oriented with North up and East to the left.
650: }
651: \end{figure}
652:
653: %\begin{figure}
654: %\figurenum{2}
655: %\plotone{cl0958color.ps}
656: %\caption{\label{color}
657: %False-color image of CL0958. WIYN r-band image in blue, \Spitzer IRAC
658: %3.6\mic ~image in green, IRAC 4.5\mic ~image in red.}
659: %\end{figure}
660:
661:
662:
663:
664: \end{document}
665:
666: