1: % ******************************************************************
2: % *********** start of ms.tex ***********
3: % ******************************************************************
4: % TITLE: Optical and Near-Infrared Observations of the Highly
5: % Reddened, \\ Rapidly Expanding Type Ia Supernova 2006X in M100
6: % AUTHOR: Xiaofeng Wang{1,2}, Weidong Li{1}, Alexei V. Filippenko{1}, Kevin Krisciunas{3},
7: % Nicholas B. Suntzeff{3}, Junzheng Li{2}, Tianmeng Zhang{4}, Mohan Ganeshalingam{1},
8: % Ryan J. Foley{1}, Tipei Li{2}, YuQing Lou{2}, Rencheng Shang{2}, Shuangnan Zhang{2},
9: % and Youhong Zhang{2}
10: % (1) Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA;
11: % wangxf@astro.berkeley.edu
12: % (2) Physics Department and Tsinghua Center for Astrophysics (THCA), Tsinghua University,
13: % Beijing, 100084, China; wang\_xf@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn
14: % (3) Physics Department, Texas A\&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843
15: % (4) {National Astronomical Observatories of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, A20,
16: % Datun Road, Beijing 100012, China.}
17:
18: % 60pages, 20 eps figures , 10 tables
19: % ******************************************************************
20: % DATE: 07.31.2007 - manuscript - final version
21: % ******************************************************************
22: %\documentclass[preprint2,10pt]{aastex}
23: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
24: %\usepackage{aastexug}
25: %%%%\usepackage{rotating}
26:
27: %\documentclass{aastex}
28:
29: \documentclass[10pt,preprint]{aastex}
30:
31: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
32: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
33: %%\usepackage{rotating}
34:
35: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
36:
37: \font\bften=cmbx10 scaled 1000 \font\tenrm=cmr10 scaled 1000
38: \font\eightrm=cmr8 scaled 1000 \font\sevenrm=cmr7 scaled 1000
39:
40: %\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{.6}
41:
42: %\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.5}
43: \newcommand{\ubvrino}{\protect\hbox{$U\!BV\!RI$}}
44: \newcommand{\bvrino}{\protect\hbox{$BV\!RI$}}
45: \newcommand{\vrino}{\protect\hbox{$V\!RI$}}
46: \newcommand{\vrizjhkno}{\protect\hbox{$V\!RIzJHK$}}
47: \newcommand{\jhkno}{\protect\hbox{$JHK$}}
48: \newcommand{\ubvri}{\protect\hbox{$U\!BV\!RI$} }
49: \newcommand{\bvri}{\protect\hbox{$BV\!RI$} }
50: \newcommand{\vri}{\protect\hbox{$V\!RI$} }
51: \newcommand{\vrizjhk}{\protect\hbox{$V\!RIzJHK$} }
52: \newcommand{\jhk}{\protect\hbox{$JHK$}}
53:
54: \shorttitle{SN 2006X in M100} \shortauthors{Wang et al.}
55:
56: \def\gsim{\;\lower4pt\hbox{${\buildrel\displaystyle >\over\sim}$}\;}
57: \def\lsim{\;\lower4pt\hbox{${\buildrel\displaystyle <\over\sim}$}\;}
58: \def\grls{\;\lower4pt\hbox{${\buildrel\displaystyle >\over <}$}\;}
59:
60: \begin{document}
61:
62: \title{Optical and Near-Infrared Observations of the Highly
63: Reddened, \\ Rapidly Expanding Type Ia Supernova 2006X in M100}
64:
65: \author{Xiaofeng Wang\altaffilmark{1,2}, Weidong Li\altaffilmark{1},
66: Alexei V. Filippenko\altaffilmark{1}, Kevin
67: Krisciunas\altaffilmark{3}, Nicholas B. Suntzeff\altaffilmark{3}, \\
68: Junzheng Li\altaffilmark{2}, Tianmeng Zhang\altaffilmark{4},
69: Jingsong Deng\altaffilmark{4}, Ryan J. Foley\altaffilmark{1}, Mohan
70: Ganeshalingam\altaffilmark{1}, \\ Tipei Li\altaffilmark{2}, YuQing
71: Lou\altaffilmark{2}, Yulei Qiu\altaffilmark{4}, Rencheng
72: Shang\altaffilmark{2}, Jeffrey M. Silverman\altaffilmark{1}, \\
73: Shuangnan Zhang\altaffilmark{2}, and Youhong Zhang\altaffilmark{2}}
74:
75:
76: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, University of California,
77: Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA; wangxf@astro.berkeley.edu .}
78: \altaffiltext{2}{Physics Department and Tsinghua Center for
79: Astrophysics (THCA), Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China;
80: wang\_xf@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn .} \altaffiltext{3}{Physics
81: Department, Texas A\&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843 }
82: \altaffiltext{4}{National Astronomical Observatories of China,
83: Chinese Academy of Sciences, A20, Datun Road, Beijing 100012,
84: China.}
85:
86:
87: \begin{abstract}
88:
89: We present extensive optical ($UBVRI$), near-infrared ($JK$) light
90: curves and optical spectroscopy of the Type Ia supernova (SN) 2006X
91: in the nearby galaxy NGC 4321 (M100). Our observations suggest that
92: either SN 2006X has an intrinsically peculiar color evolution, or it
93: is highly reddened [$E(B - V)_{host} = 1.42 \pm 0.04$ mag] with $R_V
94: = 1.48 \pm 0.06$, much lower than the canonical value of 3.1 for the
95: average Galactic dust. SN 2006X also has one of the highest
96: expansion velocities ever published for a SN~Ia. Compared with the
97: other SNe~Ia we analyzed, SN 2006X has a broader light curve in the
98: $U$ band, a more prominent bump/shoulder feature in the $V$ and $R$
99: bands, a more pronounced secondary maximum in the $I$ and
100: near-infrared bands, and a remarkably smaller late-time decline rate
101: in the $B$ band. The $B-V$ color evolution shows an obvious
102: deviation from the Lira-Phillips relation at 1 to 3 months after
103: maximum brightness. At early times, optical spectra of SN 2006X
104: displayed strong, high-velocity features of both intermediate-mass
105: elements (Si, Ca, and S) and iron-peak elements, while at late times
106: they showed a relatively blue continuum, consistent with the blue
107: $U-B$ and $B-V$ colors at similar epochs. A light echo and/or the
108: interaction of the SN ejecta and its circumstellar material may
109: provide a plausible explanation for its late-time photometric and
110: spectroscopic behavior. Using the Cepheid distance of M100, we
111: derive a Hubble constant of $72.8 \pm 8.2$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$
112: (statistical) from the normalized dereddened luminosity of SN 2006X.
113: We briefly discuss whether abnormal dust is a universal signature
114: for all SNe~Ia, and whether the most rapidly expanding objects form
115: a subclass with distinct photometric and spectroscopic properties.
116:
117: \end{abstract}
118:
119: \keywords {dust, extinction -- distance scale -- galaxies:
120: individual (NGC 4321) -- supernovae: individual (SN 2006X)}
121:
122: \section{Introduction}
123:
124: Type Ia supernovae (SNe~Ia) are arguably the most accurate tools
125: available for probing the expansion history of the Universe, as
126: their luminosities at maximum light can be calibrated to an
127: uncertainty of $\sim$15\% via several empirical relations between
128: their luminosity and light/color curves (Wang et al. 2006, and
129: references therein). Based on studies of SN~Ia apparent brightness
130: as a function of redshift, Riess et al. (1998) and Perlmutter et al.
131: (1999) were the first to propose that the expansion of the Universe
132: is currently accelerating (for a review see, e.g., Filippenko 2005).
133: This remarkable result, which suggests that the Universe is
134: primarily composed of mysterious dark energy, was subsequently
135: confirmed by more studies using SNe~Ia (Barris et al. 2003; Tonry et
136: al. 2003; Knop et al. 2003; Riess et al. 2004, 2007; Astier et al.
137: 2006; Wood-Vasey et al. 2007), and by independent methods such as
138: the power spectrum of fluctuations in the cosmic microwave
139: background radiation (e.g., Spergel et al. 2003, 2007) and baryon
140: acoustic oscillations (Eisenstein et al. 2005).
141:
142: Despite the success of using SNe~Ia as cosmological probes, a
143: disconcerting fact is that details of the properties of SN~Ia
144: progenitors and their environments remain poorly understood. It is
145: generally believed that a SN~Ia is produced by a carbon-oxygen
146: (C$-$O) white dwarf (WD) accreting matter from a companion star in a
147: binary system. However, the nature of the companion star in the
148: binary system is still unclear: it could be a main-sequence star, a
149: subgiant, or an evolved red giant (Nomoto, Iwamoto, Koshimoto 1997),
150: or even another degenerate C$-$O WD (Iben \& Tutukov 1984; Webbink
151: 1985).
152:
153: Studying the absorption by dust toward SNe~Ia may provide a unique
154: way to peer into their local environments and hence set constraints
155: on the properties of their progenitor system. If the dust enveloping
156: the SNe is totally or partially produced by the progenitor
157: evolution, the ratio of the total to selective absorption [$R_V =
158: A_V/E(B-V)$] may differ from that of normal interstellar dust (e.g.,
159: Wang L 2005). Moreover, accurate determination of the absorption
160: toward a SN~Ia helps establish the accurate luminosity required for
161: precision cosmology.
162:
163: Several studies of global color fits to SNe~Ia have suggested that
164: the dust obscuring SNe~Ia in their host galaxies may differ from the
165: dust observed in the Milky Way Galaxy (Riess et al. 1996; Phillips
166: et al. 1999; Altavilla et al. 2004; Reindl et al. 2005; Wang et al.
167: 2006): the measured value of $R_{V}$ is often found to be smaller
168: than the canonical Galactic value of 3.1. We measure an average
169: $R_{V} = 2.4 \pm 0.2$ from a compilation of published $R_{V}$
170: values\footnote{Methods that do not separate the intrinsic color
171: variation and the host-galaxy reddening from the observed color
172: would give even lower $R$ values (Tripp 1997; Astier et al. 2006;
173: Wang L et al. 2006a).}. The sample of well-observed, highly
174: extinguished SNe~Ia is small but growing, offering the opportunity
175: to study variations of the extinction law on an object-by-object
176: basis. In almost all cases, $R_{V}$ is found to be smaller than 3.1
177: (Krisciunas et al. 2006a; Elias-Rosa et al. 2006, hereafter ER06).
178: It is interesting to investigate whether $R_{V}$ smaller than 3.1 is
179: universal to all SNe~Ia, or just applies to a few or highly reddened
180: events.
181:
182: SN 2006X is a bright, nearby, highly reddened SN~Ia, and is
183: favorable for a detailed study of reddening and dust properties. The
184: recent report of variable, interstellar absorption Na~I~D lines the
185: in high-resolution spectra of SN 2006X indicates of the presence of
186: circumstellar material (CSM) around SN 2006X, which may be related
187: to the stellar wind blown from the companion star (Patat et al.
188: 2007). Here, we present extensive photometric and spectroscopic
189: observations of SN 2006X, enabling us to study its intervening dust
190: and other characteristics. The paper is organized as follows. The
191: observations and data reduction are described in \S 2, while \S 3
192: presents the $UBVRIJK$ light curves, the color curves, and the
193: extinction estimate. The spectral evolution is given in \S 4. We
194: determine the distance and luminosity of the SN in \S 5. Our
195: discussion and conclusions are given in \S 6.
196:
197: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
198:
199: SN 2006X was discovered independently on 7.10 February 2006 (UT
200: dates are used throughout this paper) by S. Suzuki and M. Migliardi
201: (IAUC 8667), with J2000 coordinates $\alpha$ =
202: 12$^{h}$22$^{m}$53$^{s}$.90 and $\delta$ =
203: 15$^{\circ}$48$^{'}$32$^{''}$.90. It is $12''$ W and $48''$ S of the
204: center of the nearby galaxy NGC 4321 (M100), a grand-design Sbc
205: galaxy in the Virgo cluster having a Cepheid distance of $30.91 \pm
206: 0.14$ mag (Freedman et al. 2001). A spectrum of SN 2006X taken
207: shortly after its discovery shows it to be an early SN~Ia (Quimby et
208: al. 2006), similar to that of SN 2002bo 1--2 weeks before maximum
209: light (Benetti et al. 2004) but with a redder continuum.
210:
211: \subsection{Photometry}
212:
213: Our photometric observations of SN 2006X began on 2006 February
214: 8.15, $\sim$11 days before $B$-band maximum. Data were obtained with
215: three telescopes: the 0.80~m THCA-NAOC Telescope (TNT) at Beijing
216: Xinglong Observatory (BAO) in China, the 0.76~m Katzman Automatic
217: Imaging Telescope (KAIT; Filippenko et al. 2001) at Lick Observatory
218: in the U.S., and the 1.3~m telescope at Cerro Tololo Inter-American
219: Observatory (CTIO) in Chile. The TNT observations were obtained
220: using a $1340 \times 1300$ pixel back-illuminated charge-coupled
221: device (CCD) with a field of view (FOV) of $11.5' \times 11.2'$
222: ($0.52''$ pixel$^{-1}$), the KAIT observations were performed using
223: an Apogee AP7 camera with a FOV of $6.6' \times 6.6'$ ($0.79''$
224: pixel$^{-1}$), and the CTIO 1.3~m observations were obtained using
225: the dual-channel optical/near-infrared (IR) camera ANDICAM having an
226: optical FOV of $6.3 \times 6.3'$ ($0.37''$ pixel$^{-1}$) and an IR
227: FOV of $2.3' \times 2.3'$ ($0.27''$ pixel$^{-1}$). Broad-band $BVRI$
228: images were taken with all three telescopes, while the TNT also
229: followed SN 2006X in the $U$ band and the CTIO 1.3~m telescope
230: sampled the $J$ and $K$ bands.
231:
232: As shown in Figure 1, SN 2006X is located between a relatively
233: bright foreground star and the inner edge of one spiral arm of NGC
234: 4321; thus, light contamination needs to be taken into account when
235: measuring the SN flux. One way to do this is to apply galaxy
236: subtraction. Template images of NGC 4321 in various bands were taken
237: with KAIT and TNT on 2007 March 14 and 16 (respectively), roughly
238: one year after the discovery of SN 2006X. For the CTIO 1.3~m
239: observations, we used pre-explosion $B$ and $V$ images of NGC 4321
240: obtained on 24 April 2000 with the Apache Point Observatory 3.5~m
241: telescope in New Mexico.
242:
243: To perform image subtraction, the image containing SN 2006X is first
244: geometrically registered to the corresponding template image. Next,
245: the total fluxes of corresponding foreground stars in the SN and
246: template images are compared, and an appropriate scale factor is
247: applied to the SN image in order to match the template image. Also,
248: the point-spread functions (PSFs) of the two images are convolved to
249: match. The template is then subtracted from the SN image, leaving
250: the SN with a background that is free from host-galaxy
251: contamination. The final step is to perform standard PSF-fitting (or
252: aperture) photometry to measure the instrumental magnitudes for the
253: SN and the local standard stars with the IRAF\footnote{IRAF, the
254: Image Reduction and Analysis Facility, is distributed by the
255: National Optical Astronomy Observatory, which is operated by the
256: Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc. (AURA)
257: under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation
258: (NSF).} DAOPHOT package (Stetson 1987). From the late-time $Hubble
259: Space Telescope$ (HST) Advanced Camera for Survey (ACS) archival
260: images (Proposal 10991 by Arlin Crotts 2006), we speculate that SN
261: 2006X was $\sim$22.0 mag in $B$ and $\sim$21.5 mag in $V$ about one
262: year after maximum. This lingering light barely affects the
263: early-time photometry but it probably results in underestimating the
264: luminosity of SN 2006X by 3-6\% when the SN becomes as faint as 18
265: $-$ 19 mag.
266:
267: The transformation from the instrumental magnitudes to the standard
268: Johnson $UBV$ (1966) and Kron-Cousins $RI$ (1981) systems is
269: established by observing, during a photometric night, a series of
270: Landolt (1992) standards covering a large range of airmasses and
271: colors. The color terms obtained on different photometric nights
272: show some differences, and their average values are listed in Table
273: 1 for the filters used in the TNT, KAIT, and CTIO 1.3~m observations
274: of SN 2006X.
275:
276: A total of 10 photometric nights (2 for TNT, 3 for KAIT, and 5 for
277: the CTIO 1.3~m) were used to calibrate 10 local standard stars in
278: the field of SN 2006X. Table 2 lists the final calibrated $UBVRI$
279: magnitudes and their uncertainties, while Table 3 presents the
280: near-IR $J$-band and $K$-band magnitudes. Only one photometric night
281: was used to do the $U$-band calibration, so the calibrated
282: magnitudes may have larger errors. The near-IR magnitudes of Star 10
283: were measured on 14 nights with respect to the Persson et al. (1998)
284: standards P9144 and LHS2397a. The measured $J$ and $K$ magnitudes
285: are 0.07 mag brighter than the values from the 2MASS survey, which
286: obtained $J$ = 14.793(0.025) mag and $K$ = 13.995(0.040) mag.
287:
288: These local standard stars are then used to transform the
289: instrumental magnitudes of SN 2006X to the standard $UBVRIJK$
290: system, and the final results of the photometry are listed in Table
291: 3 and Table 4. Note that the $BVJK$-band data shown for CTIO 1.3~m
292: telescope include the S-corrections (see details in \S 3.1) which
293: are listed in Table 5. The estimated error shown in parentheses is a
294: quadrature sum of uncertainties in the photometry and the
295: calibrations. The main source of error comes from the photometry,
296: caused by photon noise and uncertainties in the image subtraction.
297:
298: \subsection{Spectroscopy}
299:
300: Spectra of SN 2006X were primarily obtained with the 2.16 m
301: telescope at BAO using the Cassegrain spectrograph and BAO Faint
302: Object Spectrograph and Camera (BFOSC), and with the 3.0 m Shane
303: telescope at Lick Observatory using the Kast double spectrograph
304: (Miller \& Stone 1993). Two very late-time spectra were also
305: obtained at the W. M. Keck Observatory: one with the Low Resolution
306: Imaging Spectrometer (LRIS; Oke et al. 1995) mounted on the 10~m
307: Keck I telescope, and the other with the Deep Extragalactic Imaging
308: Multi-Object Spectrograph (DEIMOS) mounted on the 10~m Keck II
309: telescope. A journal of spectroscopic observations is given in Table
310: 6.
311:
312: All spectra were reduced using standard IRAF routines (e.g.,Foley
313: et~al. 2003). Extraction of the SN spectra was carefully performed
314: to avoid contamination from the nearby star and the spiral arms of
315: the galaxy. For the Kast observations, flatfields for the red-side
316: spectra were taken at the position of the object to reduce near-IR
317: fringing effects. Flux calibration of the spectra was performed by
318: means of spectrophotometric standard stars observed at similar
319: airmass on the same night as the SN. The spectra were corrected for
320: continuum atmospheric extinction using mean extinction curves for
321: BAO and Lick observatory; also telluric lines were removed from the
322: Lick (but not BAO) data. For spectra observed at Lick and Keck, the
323: slit was always aligned along the parallactic angle to avoid
324: chromatic effects in the data (Filippenko 1982). This procedure was
325: not adopted at BAO, however, and it may not significantly affect the
326: continuum shape as the airmass was usually low ($\sim$1.1) when
327: getting these spectra for SN 2006X. In general, the relative
328: spectrophotometry is quite good, consistent with the broadband
329: photometry within about 5\%.
330:
331: \section{Light Curves and Spectra}
332:
333: \subsection{Optical and Near-IR Light Curves}
334:
335: The $UBVRIJK$ light curves of SN 2006X are presented in Figure 2. No
336: K-corrections have been applied to any of the magnitudes due to the
337: small redshift of SN 2006X ($z = 0.0053$). For all the bands we have
338: excellent temporal coverage, especially around maximum light. In
339: general the optical measurements obtained with TNT, KAIT, and the
340: CTIO 1.3~m telescope are consistent with each other within $\pm$0.05
341: mag, except in the $I$ band where differences are more noticeable.
342: We find that the TNT $I$-band magnitudes are systematically brighter
343: than those of KAIT by $0.08 \pm 0.02$ mag and also brighter than
344: those of the CTIO 1.3~m telescope, especially around the dip
345: immediately after maximum where the discrepancy reaches $\sim$0.2
346: mag. This larger difference is likely caused by the different
347: instrument response function in the $I$ band for the different
348: systems.
349:
350: Besides the usual color-term corrections, additional magnitude
351: corrections between instrumental and standard bandpasses
352: (S-corrections; Stritzinger et al. 2002) are sometimes required for
353: the filters that are different from those defined by Bessell (1990).
354: The filters amounted on TNT are standard Johnson-Cousins $UBVRI$
355: system, however, the filter transmission curves are unavailable. We
356: obtained the S-corrections for observations of the CTIO 1.3~m
357: telescope (see Table 5), except in $R$ and $I$ bands where the
358: corrections were found to actually increase the systematic
359: differences of the photometry obtained with different telescopes
360: (e.g., Kriscusnias et al. 2003). We thus have chosen to let the
361: ANDICAM $R$ and $I$ photometry stay as they are. The S-corrections
362: for the filters closer to Bessell's recipe are generally small in
363: $BVR$ (e.g., $\lesssim$ 0.05 mag) but probably significantly larger
364: in $U$ and $I$ (e.g., Pastorello et al. 2007). This is demonstrated
365: by the consistency of the raw magnitudes of TNT and KAIT with the
366: S-corrected magnitudes of the CTIO 1.3~m in $B$ and $V$ bands within
367: their errors (see Fig.2). To account for the $I$-band magnitude
368: difference between the TNT, KAIT, and the CTIO 1~m telescope, we
369: assign a systematic error of 0.10 mag for all the $I$-band
370: magnitudes in the following analysis.
371:
372: A polynomial fit to the $B-$band light curve around maximum yields
373: $B_{max} = 15.40 \pm 0.03$ mag on JD 2,453,786.17 $\pm$ 0.35 (2006
374: February 19.93). This means that our observations started from
375: $-$11.27~d and extended to +116.32~d with respect to the time of $B$
376: maximum. Likewise, the $V$ light curve reached a peak magnitude of
377: $14.04 \pm 0.02$ on JD 2,453,789.11 $\pm$ 0.29, about 2.9~d after
378: $B$ maximum. The fitting parameters for the maxima in the other
379: bands are presented in Table 7, together with the late time decline
380: rates (see below). From the $B$ and $V$ light curves we derived an
381: observed $\Delta m_{15} (B) = 1.17 \pm 0.05$ mag\footnote{The true
382: $\Delta m_{15}(B)$ for SN 2006X is $1.31 \pm 0.05$, taking into
383: account the reddening effect on the light-curve shape (Phillips et
384: al. 1999).} and $B_{max}-V_{max} = 1.36 \pm 0.04$ mag. We also
385: measured the $B - V$ color at 12~d after $B$ maximum to be $1.83 \pm
386: 0.05$ mag. These colors are much redder than the intrinsic values
387: shown by other SNe~Ia with similar $\Delta m_{15} (B)$ (see more
388: discussion in \S 3.3), suggesting that SN 2006X suffered significant
389: line-of-sight reddening.
390:
391: In Figures 3$-$8 we compare the $UBVRIJK$ light curves of SN 2006X
392: with those of other well-observed, nearby SNe~Ia having similar
393: $\Delta m_{15}$ values, including SNe 1994D ($\Delta m_{15} = 1.27$;
394: Richmond et al. 1995; Patat et al. 1996), 1998bu ($\Delta m_{15}$ =
395: 1.04; Jha et al. 1999), 2002bo ($\Delta m_{15}$ = 1.15; Benetti et
396: al. 2004; Krisciunas et al. 2004), 2002er ($\Delta m_{15}$ = 1.32;
397: Pignata et al. 2004), 2003cg ($\Delta m_{15}$ = 1.25; ER06), and
398: 2005cf ($\Delta m_{15}$ = 1.12; Pastorello et al. 2007). The light
399: curves of SN 1984A ($\Delta m_{15}$ = 1.20; Barbon et al. 1989),
400: though not as well observed as those of the other SNe in the
401: comparison, are also included because SN 1984A shares many similar
402: properties with SN 2006X, especially in the spectroscopy and
403: late-time photometry. All the light curves have been normalized to
404: the epoch of their $B$-band maximum and shifted in peak magnitude to
405: match those of SN 2006X.
406:
407: Figure 3 shows that the observed $U$-band light curve of SN 2006X is
408: slightly broader than those of the other SNe~Ia around maximum
409: light, but is comparable to that of SN 2003cg which also suffered
410: significant reddening. Two effects, both associated with large
411: amounts of reddening, might explain why SNe 2003cg and 2006X are
412: broader than other SNe in comparison. As demonstrated by Phillips et
413: al. (1999) and Jha et al. (2007), the total-to-selective absorption
414: ratio, $R_{\lambda}$, may vary with the supernova phase. For
415: instance the true value of $R_{U}$ at 15~d past maximum is found to
416: be smaller than that near maximum by about 0.15 (Jha et al. 2007).
417: This would subsequently broaden the light curves of the reddened SNe
418: by $\sim0.15 E(B-V)$. On the other hand, the change of the overall
419: spectral shape due to the high reddening may shift the effective
420: bandpass at the shorter wavelengths to the longer wavelengths that
421: are characteristic of broader light-curve peaks (see ER06 for a
422: similar argument for SN 2003cg). This may also contribute to the
423: broader peak in $U$. Another possible feature of SN 2006X in the $U$
424: band is the late-time light curve, which despite the large error bar
425: for each measurement, seems to be brighter and possibly declines
426: more slowly than the other SNe.
427:
428: Figure 4 shows the comparison in the $B$ band. While the light
429: curves near maximum are similar to each other, they diverge at late
430: times. Compared to other SNe~Ia, SNe 2006X, 1984A, and 2002bo have
431: relatively higher (by 0.3$-$0.5 mag) luminosity after $t = 40$~d,
432: and their light curves decline more slowly. We measured a late-time
433: decline rate of $\beta = 0.92 \pm 0.05$ mag (100~d)$^{-1}$ for SN
434: 2006X at $t = 40 - 117$~d, which is comparable to the radioactive
435: decay rate of 0.98 mag (100~d)$^{-1}$ for the Co$\rightarrow$Fe
436: decay. The decline rates for SNe 1984A and 2002bo are slightly
437: higher, $\beta = 1.14 \pm 0.06$ mag (100~d)$^{-1}$ and $1.17 \pm
438: 0.10$ mag (100~d)$^{-1}$, respectively. All these decline rates are
439: significantly smaller than the typical value of a normal SN~Ia,
440: $\beta = 1.40 \pm 0.10$ mag (100~d)$^{-1}$, as exhibited by the
441: other SNe~Ia in the comparison.
442:
443: The $V$-band light curve comparison is shown in Figure 5. At around
444: maximum, SN 2006X is slightly broader, and shows a more prominent
445: "shoulder" feature at $t \approx 3$ weeks than other SNe~Ia. Part of
446: the reason for this may be that compared to other SNe~Ia, SN 2006X
447: has higher reddening, and the effective $V$ bandpass is shifted more
448: toward the $R$ band, which is broader than $V$ and has a prominent
449: shoulder feature. It is also possible that there is an intrinsic
450: scatter in the strength of the shoulder feature in the $V$-band
451: light curves of SNe~Ia. In the same manner as the definition of
452: $\Delta m_{15} (B)$, we computed $\Delta m_{15}(V) = 0.63 \pm 0.03$
453: mag for SN 2006X. This is similar to that of SNe 2003cg, 1998aq, and
454: 2005cf [$\Delta m_{15}(V) = 0.63 \pm 0.05$ mag, $0.67 \pm 0.05$, and
455: $0.69 \pm 0.03$ mag, respectively], but smaller than that of SNe
456: 1994D and 2002er [$\Delta m_{15}(V) = 0.85 \pm 0.06$ mag and $0.78
457: \pm 0.04$ mag, respectively]. At late times, SN 2006X has a similar
458: evolution as SN 2002bo, and both are brighter than other comparison
459: SNe~Ia. There are no obvious differences in the late-time decline
460: rates among the SNe.
461:
462: As shown in Figures 6 and 7, SN 2006X exhibits a more prominent
463: "plateau" feature in the $R$ band and a stronger secondary maximum
464: in the $I$ band than other SNe~Ia. The $R$ and $I$ light curves of
465: SNe~Ia are similar to each other before $t = 10$~d, but diverge
466: after that. There are considerable differences in $D_{plateau}$, the
467: duration of the plateau phase in the $R$ band\footnote{D$_{plateau}$
468: measures the interval of the two inflection times, $t_{1}$ and
469: $t_{2}$, of the post-maximum $R$-band light curves. The inflection
470: time is defined as the moment when the first derivative at the
471: transition phase S = $|dm/dt|$ is minimal (e.g., Elmhamdi et al.
472: 2003).} and the time when the $I$ band reaches the second maximum
473: [$t(I_{max})$]: SN 2006X has $D_{plateau} \approx 13$~d, and
474: $t(I_{max}) = 28$~d, while SN 1994D has $D_{plateau} \approx 9$~d
475: and $t(I_{max}) = 20$~d. At late times, SN 2006X has an evolution
476: similar to that of SN 2002bo in the $R$ band, and they are brighter
477: than other SNe~Ia. The two SNe, however, have different decline
478: rates in the $I$ band, and SN 2006X is the brightest object in the
479: comparison.
480:
481: In Figure 8, the $J$-band and $K$-band light curves of SN 2006X are
482: compared with those of SNe 1998bu, 2002bo, 2003cg, and 2005cf. The
483: light curves of the well-observed SN 2001el ($\Delta m_{15} = 1.10
484: \pm 0.03$ mag; Krisciunas et al. 2003) are also overplotted (see the
485: dotted curves). As in the optical bands, the overall light curves of
486: SN 2006X in $J$ and $K$ resemble closely those of SN 2002bo. After
487: the initial peak, both of these SNe show a stronger secondary
488: maximum feature in the $JK$ bands than other SNe~Ia in the
489: comparison. In SN 2001el, the $J$ second-peak feature is somewhat
490: less pronounced; the light curve remains relatively flat from day
491: +11 to +31. Note that there is marginal evidence for a third maximum
492: (or shoulder) in the near-IR light curves of SN 2006X at $\sim$70~d
493: after $B$ maximum. Kasen (2006) has come up with an explanation for
494: the secondary maximum and has predicted that some SNe~Ia might show
495: a third maximum at $\sim$80~d. The variation of the secondary
496: maximum of the near-IR light curves can be related to the abundance
497: stratification in SNe~Ia, the concentration of iron-group elements,
498: and the progenitor metallicity (Kasen 2006).
499:
500: \subsection{Optical and Near-IR Color Curves}
501:
502: The optical color curves of SN 2006X ($U-B$, $B-V$, $V-R$, and
503: $V-I$) are presented in Figure 9. The colors of SN 2006X are much
504: redder than those of the normal Ia SN 2005cf (the triangles) with
505: negligible reddening, suggesting a significant amount of reddening
506: toward SN 2006X. Also overplotted in these panels are the color
507: curves of SNe 1994D, 1998bu, 2002bo, 2002er, 2003cg, all arbitrarily
508: shifted to match the observed colors of SN 2006X at $B$ maximum.
509:
510: The $U - B$ color (Fig. 9a) of SN 2006X does not become
511: progressively redder in a linear fashion after $B$ maximum as the
512: other SNe~Ia do, but has a shoulder or plateau phase for about two
513: weeks. A similar feature is observed in the heavily extinguished SN
514: 2003cg. It is unclear whether this feature is caused by the high
515: reddening of these two objects. After $t \approx 4$ weeks, the $U -
516: B$ colors of SN 2006X seem to be bluer than those of the comparison
517: SNe~Ia, but the error bars of the measurements are relatively large
518: due to the poor $U$-band data quality at late times.
519:
520: The $B - V$ colors of all SNe in the plot (Fig. 9b) have a similar
521: evolution before $t \approx 29$~d, although SN 2006X reached the
522: bluest color a bit earlier, e.g. at $\sim-$8.0 days rather than
523: $\sim-$5 days for the other comparison SNe. All the SNe~Ia reach the
524: reddest color at $t \approx 29$~d, although there are some
525: differences in the time to reach the reddest color. The peak $B - V$
526: colors of the SNe~Ia with smaller decline rates (or $\Delta m_{15}$)
527: might occur later than those of the faster decliners (see also
528: Figure 1 in Wang et al. 2005). We note that the $B - V$ color of SN
529: 2003cg is redder than that of other SNe~Ia by about 0.2 mag at the
530: reddest peak according to the data from ER06. However, the
531: photometric data based on the unpublished KAIT data of SN 2003cg do
532: not have such a discrepancy. Compared with other SNe~Ia, the most
533: notable difference in the $B - V$ color evolution of SN 2006X is
534: after $t \approx 29$~d: SN 2006X became bluer in a much faster pace,
535: and showed an apparent difference from the Lira-Phillips relation
536: (the dash-dotted line in the figure; see Lira 1995 and Phillips et
537: al. 1999). Note also that the $B - V$ color of SN 1994D, although
538: not well observed during this phase, suggests a faster evolution
539: than the Lira-Phillips relation. Thus, as discussed in the more
540: extreme case of the peculiar SN Ia 2000cx (Li et al. 2001), although
541: the Lira-Phillips relation provides a method to estimate the
542: extinction toward SNe~Ia and may work in a statistical dataset, it
543: should be used with caution for any individual SN~Ia.
544:
545: Given the relatively large differences seen in the $U - B$ and $B -
546: V$ color evolution between SN 2006X and other SNe~Ia in the
547: comparison, it is surprising that all SNe~Ia have similar $V - R$
548: color evolution except at very early times (Fig. 9c). The $V - R$
549: color of different SNe~Ia reaches the bluest point at $\sim$12~d
550: after $B$ maximum, then become progressively redder and reaches the
551: maximum around day +31. After the peak the $V - R$ color curve moves
552: gradually toward bluer colors. The similar evolution in the $V - R$
553: color is related to the closer match of the $V$ and $R$ photometry
554: and also a smaller reddening effect.
555:
556: The $V - I$ color curve of SN 2006X (Fig. 9d) exhibits a behavior
557: which is very similar to those of the comparison SNe. All these SNe
558: reached a minimum color at about 9~d after $B$ maximum. The
559: following red peak occurred at around day +31. The only exception is
560: SN 1994D, which showed a rapid increase in $V - I$ after the minima
561: and then reached the peak value 4~d earlier than other SNe~Ia.
562:
563: Figure 10 shows the observed $V - J$ and $V - K$ colors of SN 2006X,
564: along with those of SNe 1998bu, 2001el, 2002bo, 2003cg, and 2005cf
565: (without color shift). All SNe~Ia exhibit a deep minimum at $t
566: \approx 8$--11~d, followed by a maximum at around day +32.
567: Nevertheless the $V$ minus near-$IR$ color of the comparison SNe~Ia
568: shows noticeable scatter, especially in $V - J$ where the magnitude
569: contrast between the valley and peak can differ by more than 0.6
570: mag. The dashed curves in Fig. 10 represent the average loci of the
571: $V-J$ and $V-K$ colors for normal SNe Ia (Krisciunas et al. 2000)
572: that were reddened (shifted upward in Fig.10) by 1.72 mag and 1.95
573: mag, respectively. With respect to the average color curve, the $V -
574: J$ and $V - K$ colors of SN 2002bo seem to better match those of SN
575: 2006X.
576:
577: In general, the overall color evolution of SN 2006X resembles most
578: closely those of SN 2002bo and SN 2002er. Other comparison SNe~Ia
579: may match well with SN 2006X in $V - R$ and $V - I$, but they show
580: larger differences than SN 2006X in $B - V$, $V - NIR$. Both SN
581: 2006X and SN 2003cg exhibited an atypical ``shoulder" feature in $U
582: - B$ for about two weeks immediately after $B$ maximum.
583:
584: \subsection{The Reddening Toward SN 2006X}
585:
586: The Galactic extinction toward NGC 4321/SN 2006X is
587: $A^{\rm{gal}}_{V}=0.087$ mag (Schlegel et al. 1998), corresponding
588: to a color excess of $E(B - V)$ = 0.026 mag [adopting the standard
589: reddening law of Cardelli, Clayton, \& Mathis (1989)]. As suggested
590: by the observed color curves of SN 2006X shown in Figures 9 and 10,
591: SN 2006X may suffer a large amount of extinction within its host
592: galaxy. In this section, we use two methods, global color-curve
593: fitting and the $\Delta m_{15}$ method, to derive the host-galaxy
594: reddening for SN 2006X. Both methods assume SN 2006X has colors
595: similar to those of the other SNe~Ia with either similar evolution
596: in some colors, or comparable $\Delta m_{15}$ values. Given the
597: somewhat unusual evolution in the $U - B$ (a plateau phase) and $B -
598: V$ (an apparent deviation from the Lira-Phillips relation) colors,
599: however, we caution that SN 2006X may have peculiar intrinsic
600: colors, in which case it would be difficult to estimate the
601: host-galaxy reddening toward SN 2006X.
602:
603: From the comparison of color curves discussed in \S 3.2, we find
604: that SN 2006X has a color evolution similar to that of SN 2002bo in
605: $B-V$ and $V - R,I,J,K$, and to that of SN 2002er in $B - V$ and $V
606: - R,I$. The host-galaxy reddenings of SNe 2002bo and 2002er have
607: been determined by different groups (Reindl et al. 2005; Wang et al.
608: 2006; Jha et al. 2007) to be $E(B - V)_{host} = 0.40 \pm 0.04$ mag
609: and $0.16 \pm 0.03$ mag, respectively. We remove both the Galactic
610: and the host-galaxy reddening from SNe 2002bo and 2002er and create
611: their intrinsic color curves, and then apply different amounts of
612: color excesses to the colors of SN 2006X and find the best global
613: fit to these intrinsic color curves. We limit the fit to data with
614: $t \lesssim +40$~d since the $B - V$ color of SN 2006X shows an
615: apparently distinct evolution at late times. This procedure yields
616: the average color excesses $E(B - V) = 1.41 \pm 0.07$ mag, $E(V - R)
617: = 0.61 \pm 0.05$ mag, $E(V - I) = 1.26 \pm 0.05$ mag, $E(V - J) =
618: 1.76 \pm 0.09$ mag, and $E(V - K) = 1.95 \pm 0.09$ mag.
619:
620: Phillips et al. (1999) and Wang et al. (2005, 2006) proposed
621: correlations between the light-curve width parameter $\Delta m_{15}$
622: and the intrinsic $B_{max} - V_{max}$ value (or $C_{max}$) or the
623: $B - V$ color at 12~d after $B$ maximum [$(B - V)_{12}$; or $\Delta
624: C_{12}$], which can extend to other optical colors and even to the
625: $V$ minus near-$IR$ color (e.g., see Fig. 13 in Krisciunas et al.
626: 2004). We use these two correlations to estimate the host-galaxy
627: reddening of SN 2006X. Phillips et al. (1999) found that large
628: reddening changes the observed $\Delta m_{15}$, with $\Delta
629: m_{15}(B)_{true} \approx \Delta m_{15}(B)_{obs} + 0.1 E(B -
630: V)_{true}$, where $\Delta m_{15}(B)_{true}$ and $\Delta
631: m_{15}(B)_{obs}$ are the intrinsic and observed $\Delta m_{15}(B)$
632: values, respectively, and $E(B - V)_{true}$ is the total reddening
633: toward the SN. Elias-Rosa et al. (2006) suggest that this relation
634: works well for the high-reddening case of SN 2003cg. As we use
635: $\Delta m_{15}(B)_{true}$ to infer the intrinsic $C_{max}$ and
636: $\Delta C_{12}$, and derive the reddening toward SN 2006X, this is a
637: loop process; we set $E(B - V)$ as a free parameter, and iterate the
638: fitting process until a convergence is achieved.
639:
640: The color excesses derived from these two methods are consistent
641: with each other within the uncertainties, and they are summarized in
642: Table 8. The weighted average value of $E(B - V)$ is $1.42 \pm 0.04$
643: mag, indicating that SN 2006X suffers heavy host-galaxy reddening.
644:
645: Another independent way to estimate the reddening toward SN 2006X is
646: to measure the equivalent width (EW) of the interstellar Na~I~D
647: doublet, which is proposed to correlate with the amount of
648: line-of-sight dust (Barbon 1990; Munari \& Zwitter 1997). Due to the
649: line blending and the low resolution, we only use the spectra at
650: days +13, +68, and +75 to estimate the EW of Na~I~D. This yields an
651: average EW $\approx$ 1.7 \AA \ for SN 2006X (but see Patat et al.
652: 2007 for measurements of high-resolution spectra and the possible
653: variation of the Na~I~D EW). Using the prescription of Barbon
654: (1990), $E(B - V) = 0.25 \times$ EW (Na~I~D), we derive a reddening
655: of $E(B-V) \approx 0.43$ mag toward SN 2006X. However, the
656: prescription by Munari \& Zwitter (1997), with $E(B - V) = 0.36
657: \times$ EW (Na~I~D), suggests a larger reddening of $E(B - V)
658: \approx 0.61$ mag. Both determinations are significantly smaller
659: than that derived from the photometric method. Due to the large
660: uncertainty in the correlation between the EW of the Na~I~D
661: interstellar absorption and the reddening, we adopt the reddening
662: derived from the photometric method in the following analysis.
663:
664: \subsection{The Extinction Coefficient $R_{V}$}
665:
666: Assuming that the dust surrounding SN 2006X conforms with the
667: extinction law proposed by Cardelli et al. (1989), we can set
668: constraints on the value of $R_{V}$. Cardelli et al. provide an
669: analytic expression for the average extinction law,
670: $A_{\lambda}/A_{V} = a_{\lambda} + b_{\lambda}/R_{V}$ (where
671: $a_{\lambda}$ and $b_{\lambda}$ are wavelength-dependent
672: parameters), which well reproduce the average extinction curve of
673: the Galaxy with $R_{V} = 3.1$. The value of $R_{V}$ for SN 2006X can
674: be obtained by simultaneously matching different color excesses
675: derived in \S 3.3 using our adopted $E(B - V)$ of $1.42 \pm 0.04$
676: mag.
677:
678: Figure 11 shows that the best fit to the mean color excesses
679: ($UBVRIJK$ minus $V$) is achieved with $R_{V} = 1.48 \pm 0.06$,
680: which is much smaller than the standard value of 3.1. This gives a
681: host-galaxy visual extinction $A_{V}$(host) = 2.10 mag for SN 2006X.
682: Excluding the color excesses derived from the near-IR bands in the
683: fit yields the optimal $R_{V}$ = 1.58$\pm$0.15 and $A_{V}$(host) =
684: 2.24 mag. Allowing the best fit $E(B - V)_{host}$ to vary marginally
685: alters these results. Fitting the color excesses of SN 2006X using
686: the standard extinction law ($R_{V} = 3.1$) yields a reduced
687: $\chi^{2}$ of 284.9 and 21.4 for the $UBVRIJK$ and the $UBVRI$
688: colors, respectively. This indicates that the dust surrounding SN
689: 2006X is quite different from that observed in the Galaxy, probably
690: of a much smaller grain size than that of typical interstellar dust.
691: Note that the derived $R_{V}$ value is just the average value; the
692: true value may actually show small variance with supernova phase.
693: For comparison, we also determined the host-galaxy reddening of SN
694: 2006X using the MLCS2k2 method (Jha et al. 2007), which gives
695: $A_{V}$(host) = 2.21 mag and $R_{V} = 1.58$, quite consistent with
696: our determinations with the optical colors.
697:
698: Besides SN 2006X, we note that other heavily extinguished SNe~Ia
699: also tend to suffer reddening by abnormal dust. In Table 9 we list
700: the color excesses and $R_{V}$ derived for several SNe~Ia with $E(B
701: - V)_{host} \gtrsim 0.50$ mag published in the literature. While the
702: $R_{V}$ values of SNe 1995E and 2000ce are within $2\sigma$ of 3.1
703: given their relatively large error bars, the $R_{V}$ values of the
704: other SNe are considerably smaller than 3.1. It is interesting to
705: investigate whether the low $R_{V}$ derived for these highly
706: extinguished SNe~Ia is universal for all SNe~Ia or an exception for
707: a few events. Wang et al. (2006) derived an average $R_{V} = 2.32
708: \pm 0.12$ for Hubble-flow SNe~Ia. In the MLCS2k2 method, an $R_{V}$
709: value lower than 3.1 is often required to fit heavily reddened
710: SNe~Ia. More SNe~Ia with well-observed multicolor light curves will
711: help diagnose the properties of the dust surrounding SNe~Ia. We note
712: that although the infrared light curves themselves suffer little
713: from the dust absorption, their color differences depend more
714: sensitively on the ratio $R_{\lambda}$ than the optical colors (as
715: indicated by the difference between the two curves with different
716: $R_{V}$ in Fig. 11), so they are particularly suitable for studying
717: the $R_{V}$ of SNe~Ia.
718:
719: \section{Optical Spectra}
720:
721: Twelve optical spectra of SN 2006X obtained at BAO and Lick
722: Observatory, spanning $t = -0.9$ to +97.8~d, are displayed in Figure
723: 12. Two late-epoch Keck spectra, taken at days +277.0 and +307.0,
724: are also shown in the plot. The spectral evolution generally follows
725: that of a typical SN~Ia near maximum brightness, but with more
726: pronounced absorption features at 3700~\AA\ due to Ca~II H\&K,
727: 6020~\AA\ due to Si~II $\lambda$6355, and 8100~\AA\ due to the Ca~II
728: near-IR triplet. Other features at early times include the S~II
729: lines near 5400~\AA\ and the blended lines of Fe~II and Si~II near
730: 4500~\AA. Unlike a normal SN~Ia, however, the overall continuum of
731: SN 2006X appears quite flat within the first 2 weeks after $B$
732: maximum because of its high reddening. We discuss the detailed
733: spectral evolution of SN 2006X in the following sections.
734:
735: \subsection{Spectroscopic Evolution at Early Times}
736:
737: In Figures 13--15, we compare the spectra of SN 2006X with those of
738: SNe 1984A (Barbon et al. 1989), 1994D (Filippenko 1997), 2002bo
739: (Benetti et al. 2004), 2002er, and 2003cg (ER06) at several epochs
740: ($t \approx 0$~d, one week, and one month past $B$ maximum). The
741: spectra of SN 2002er are taken from our unpublished spectral
742: library. All of the spectra have been corrected for reddening and
743: redshift. For SN 2006X, $E(B - V)_{host} = 1.42$ mag and $R_{V} =
744: 1.48$ are used, while $E(B - V)_{host} = 1.33$ mag and $R_{V} = 1.8$
745: are used for SN 2003cg (ER06). For the other SNe, the host galaxy
746: reddening is taken from the literature (e.g., Reindl et~al 2005,
747: Wang et~al. 2006, and Jha et~al. 2007) and extinctions are corrected
748: using the standard extinction law with $R_{V} = 3.1$. The line
749: identifications adopted here are taken from Branch et al. (2005,
750: 2006).
751:
752: At $t \approx 0$~d, the spectra of SN 2006X are characterized by
753: lines of the singly ionized intermediate-mass elements (IMEs):
754: Ca~II, Si II, and Mg II (Fig. 13). The width and strength of these
755: lines are comparable to those seen in SNe 1984A and 2002bo, but
756: significantly stronger than those of SNe 1994D, 2002er, and 2003cg.
757: The absorption minima due to Si~II $\lambda$6355 is highly
758: blueshifted to $\sim$ 6020~\AA\ around maximum light, suggesting a
759: high photospheric expansion velocity for SN 2006X. The strong Ca~II
760: H\&K feature, blended with Si~II $\lambda$3858, is more similar to
761: that of SNe 2002bo and 2002er than to the double-dipped feature seen
762: in SNe 1994D and 2003cg. The presence or absence of such a
763: double-dipped feature is probably related to the relative strength
764: of Ca~II and Si~II as suggested by Lentz et al. (2000). In the
765: 4000$-$4500~\AA\ wavelength range, SNe 2006X, 1984A, and 2002bo
766: share a similar feature with a strong absorption at around 4300~\AA,
767: probably owing to a blend of Mg~II $\lambda$4481 and Fe~III
768: $\lambda$4404. The weak feature at $\sim$4400~\AA\ as seen in SNe
769: 1994D, 2002er, and 2003cg is probably due to the Si~III
770: $\lambda\lambda$4553, 4568 blend, which is more sensitive to the
771: temperature in the photosphere. Its absence in the spectra of SNe
772: 2006X, 2002bo, and 1984A suggests a cool temperature. The double
773: S~II lines at 5400~\AA\ and 5600~\AA\ (the ``W''-shaped feature) in
774: SN 2006X are similar to those in the comparison SNe, but are less
775: pronounced. The Si~II $\lambda$5972 absorption feature in SN 2006X
776: is very weak, and its strength is difficult to measure.
777: Nevertheless, we measured the potential luminosity indicator
778: parameter R(Si~II) (defined as the line strength ratio of Si~II
779: $\lambda$5972 to Si II $\lambda$6355; Nugent et al. 1995) as $0.12
780: \pm 0.06$ for SN 2006X, which is much lower than in the other SNe~Ia
781: having similar values of $\Delta m_{15}$ (Fig.3 of Benetti et al
782: 2005).
783:
784: At $t \approx 1$ week (Fig. 14), the spectra of all the SNe~Ia are
785: still dominated by the Si~II, Ca~II, and S~II lines with increasing
786: contribution from the iron-group elements. The W-shaped S~II lines
787: have almost vanished in SNe 2006X and 1984A, and appears as an
788: asymmetric absorption trough in SN 2002bo. The absorption at around
789: 4400~\AA\ is probably due to a blend of Fe~III $\lambda$4404, Fe~II
790: $\lambda$4555, and Mg~II $\lambda$4481, and appears at a higher
791: expansion velocity (shorter wavelength) in SNe 2002bo, 1984A, and
792: 2006X than in the other SNe~Ia. The Fe~II and Si~II features in the
793: range 4700--5000~\AA\ show less substructure in SNe 2006X, 2002bo,
794: and 1984A, while their Si~II $\lambda$5051 line becomes apparently
795: weaker than that of the other comparison SNe~Ia. This probably
796: relates to the high expansion velocity which may smear out the
797: weaker features, or it suggests faster evolution of the S and Si in
798: the high-velocity SNe Ia. By $t \approx 1$ week the O~I
799: $\lambda$7773 line strengthens in other SNe~Ia but is still rather
800: weak in SN 2006X.
801:
802: At $t \approx 1$ month (Fig. 15), numerous Fe~II lines appear in the
803: spectra of SNe~Ia. The Na~I~D and Si~II $\lambda$5972 blend is
804: progressively stronger. The Si~II $\lambda$6355 trough becomes
805: severely affected by the Fe~II $\lambda\lambda$6238, 6248 and Fe~II
806: $\lambda\lambda$6456, 6518 lines, and is barely visible in SN 2006X
807: and SN 1984A, but is still present in the spectra of the other
808: comparison SNe (see the small dip around 6150\AA\ in Fig.15 ). The
809: Ca~II near-IR triplet feature is stronger, and appears at a higher
810: expansion velocity in SNe 2002bo and 2006X than in the other SNe~Ia.
811: The O~I line is comparable to that seen in other SNe~Ia. It is
812: impressive that the overall appearance and evolution of the spectra
813: of SN 2006X are extremely similar to those of SN 1984A and SN 2002bo
814: at all three epochs (although the spectra of SN 1984A have a limited
815: spectral range). Nevertheless, it is worth pointing out that by $t
816: \approx 1$ month the spectral flux at $\lambda$ $<$ 4000~\AA\
817: appears relatively higher than that of the comparison SNe~Ia,
818: although the spectrum at this region had a poorer signal-to-noise
819: ratio. The higher spectral flux below $\lambda$ $\sim$ 4000\AA\
820: seems to be also consistent with the bluer $U - B$ color inferred
821: from the photometry at similar phase. The spectrum near maximum
822: light does not show such a near-UV energy excess. It is unclear when
823: this variation started to occur in SN 2006X, as our spectra taken
824: during the first month past maximum light did not cover the near-UV
825: wavelengths.
826:
827: \subsection{Expansion Velocity of the Ejecta}
828: As the photosphere recedes into deeper and more slowly moving
829: ejecta, the P-Cygni absorption minima of the spectral features in a
830: SN~Ia spectrum gradually shifts redward with time (see also Fig.12).
831: Thus the location of the blueshifted minima can in principle trace
832: the photospheric velocity. Indeed, the photospheric velocity
833: ($v_{exp}$) is best measured by the weakest lines, e.g. S~II
834: $\lambda$ 5640 (Jeffery \& Branch 1990, Mazzali et al. 1993, Patat
835: et al. 1996), although it is usually difficult to measure these weak
836: lines due to blending. The velocities inferred from the strong lines
837: (e.g., Si~II $\lambda$6355) represent approximately the $v_{exp}$ at
838: early phase when the amount of the material above the photosphere is
839: small, but they may not properly indicate of the real $v_{exp}$ as
840: the photosphere falls in the regions where the strong lines could
841: form over a large velocity range due to a flatter density gradient.
842: On account of rather weak S~II lines after maximum in SN 2006X, we
843: only examined the velocity evolution of Si~II $\lambda$6355 and the
844: Fe~II/Fe~III lines.
845:
846: The derived $v_{exp}$ values from Si~II $\lambda$6355 of SN 2006X as
847: a function of time are shown in Figure 16, together with those of
848: the comparison SNe~Ia. The $v_{exp}$ reported for an early-epoch
849: spectrum, taken on 8.35 February (corresponding to $t \approx
850: -11.3$~d) by Quimby, Brown, \& Gerardy (2006), is also included in
851: the plot (shown as the open star). All velocities have been
852: corrected for the redshifts of their respective host galaxies. As
853: can be seen, SN 2006X shows the highest expansion velocities among
854: all SNe in the comparison, with $v_{exp}$ = 20,700 km s$^{-1}$ at
855: $t= -11.3$~d and $v_{exp}$ = 15,700 km s$^{-1}$ at $t= -1.2$~d,
856: while the typical value for most SNe~Ia is around 11,000 km s$^{-1}$
857: at maximum brightness (Filippenko 1997; see also Figure 1 in Benetti
858: et al. 2005). The $v_{exp}$ measured from Ca~II H\&K and S~II
859: $\lambda$5640 near maximum are about 20,500 km s$^{-1}$ and 11,800
860: km s$^{-1}$, respectively, which are also significantly higher than
861: those measured for the other SNe~Ia. SN 1984A and SN 2002bo showed
862: similar, but less pronounced, high-velocity features of the IMEs
863: (Si~II, S~II, and Ca~II). Following Benetti et al. (2005), we
864: calculate the velocity gradient $\dot{v}$ of Si~II $\lambda$6355 for
865: SN 2006X during the period from $t \approx 0$ to $t \approx 30$~d as
866: $123 \pm 10$ km s$^{-1}$ d$^{-1}$, which puts SN 2006X in the group
867: of normal SNe~Ia with high velocity gradients (HVGs). Other SNe~Ia
868: in the HVG group include SNe 1984A and 2002bo discussed in this
869: paper, SNe 1983G, 1989A, 1997bp, and 2002dj (Benetti et al. 2005),
870: and 2004dt (Wang L et al. 2006b).
871:
872: The Fe~II and Fe~III lines are sometimes used to measure the
873: expansion velocities of the inner ejecta of Fe, providing additional
874: clues to the nature of SN~Ia explosions (e.g., Li et al. 2001). The
875: values of $v_{exp}$ determined from Fe~II $\lambda$4555 and/or
876: Fe~III $\lambda$4404 lines of different SNe~Ia are plotted in Figure
877: 17. At early phases the high-excitation Fe~III $\lambda$4404 line is
878: possibly contaminated by Mg~II $\lambda$4481 and hence may not give
879: a reliable measurement of the $v_{exp}$. By $t \approx$ 2--3 weeks,
880: the Fe~II $\lambda$4555 line becomes stronger and gradually
881: dominates the absorption feature near 4300--4400~\AA. This
882: absorption feature yields $v_{exp} \approx$ 10,000 km s$^{-1}$ for
883: SN 2006X at $t \approx 1$ month, which is about 3000 km s$^{-1}$
884: higher than that for SNe 1989B and 1994D and comparable to that for
885: SN 2000cx (Li et al. 2001). Likewise, the Fe~II lines of SNe 1984A
886: and 2002bo display high-velocity behavior. As with Si~II
887: $\lambda$6355, the Fe~II feature in these high-velocity events shows
888: more rapid evolution, with larger velocity gradients than in other
889: comparison SNe~Ia. The values of $v_{exp}$ become much closer to
890: each other when SNe~Ia start entering the nebular phase.
891:
892: The origin of the high-velocity features seen in these SNe~Ia is
893: hotly debated. Lentz et al. (2000) find that the strength, profile,
894: and velocity of Si~II $\lambda$6355 is a function of metallicity.
895: The blueward shift of the Si~II feature is found to increase with
896: higher metallicity. However, Benetti et al. (2004) found that
897: increasing the normal metallicity in the C+O layer by a factor of 10
898: in the canonical deflagration model W7 is not adequate for
899: explaining the large $v_{exp}$ seen in SN 2002bo. It was also
900: proposed that the high $v_{exp}$ in these SNe~Ia may result from
901: delayed-detonation explosions with the transition density from a
902: deflagration to a detonation as the controlling parameter for the
903: internal dispersion of $v_{exp}$ (Lentz et al. 2001; Benetti et al.
904: 2004). With detailed non-LTE calculations, Lentz et al. (2001) find
905: that some delayed-detonation models provide reasonable
906: approximations to the very high-velocity feature of SN 1984A. The
907: increase in density of IMEs at higher velocities is thus responsible
908: for the larger blueshifts of the line minimum in the spectra and
909: hence the higher measured expansion velocities.
910:
911: \subsection{Spectra in the Nebular Phase}
912:
913: Since the $B$-band and probably $V$-band light curves of SN 2006X
914: declined more slowly at late times than those of the other
915: comparison SNe~Ia, it is necessary to examine its late-time spectral
916: behavior in detail. Our collection of nebular-phase spectra of SN
917: 2006X is presented in Figures 18 and 19, together with the spectra
918: of some comparison SNe~Ia at similar epochs. Proper corrections for
919: the reddening and redshift have been applied to all the spectra.
920:
921: In the early nebular phase, at $t \approx 3$ months, the spectra in
922: Figure 18 are quite similar to each other but have subtle
923: differences. The spectra are dominated by various iron lines and
924: have similar relative strengths. The Ca~II near-IR triplet is still
925: the strongest feature in the earlier nebular spectra. Although the
926: late-time spectra of SN 2006X are rather noisy, they do show a
927: relatively higher flux at $\lambda < 5000$~\AA, and an overall bluer
928: continuum than the comparison SNe. The most contrast is with SN
929: 2002bo, in which the relative luminosity in $U$ seems to be fainter
930: than that of SN 2006X by about 1.0 mag. The near-UV excess of SN
931: 2006X might have also occurred in the spectrum at $t \approx 30$~d
932: since $B$ maximum (see Fig. 15). This is consistent with the bluer
933: $U - B$ and $B - V$ colors of SN 2006X compared with the other SNe
934: (Fig. 9).
935:
936: Two very late-phase nebular spectra, obtained with the Keck 10~m
937: telescopes at days +277.0 and +307.0, are shown in Fig. 19. The
938: comparison spectra of SNe 1996X and 1998bu are from the Suspect
939: online supernova spectrum archive (contributed by Salvo et al. 2001
940: and Jha et al. 1999; see http://bruford.nhn.ou.edu/$\sim$suspect),
941: and the spectra of SN 2003du are from Stanishev et al. (2007). The
942: spectra at this time are dominated by forbidden lines of singly and
943: doubly ionized Fe and Co. The overall shape of the spectrum of SN
944: 2006X looks similar to that of SN 1998bu, but the profiles and
945: intensities of some features do show significant differences. The
946: most pronounced one is the absorption feature at about 6100~\AA,
947: which is stronger in SN 2006X than in the other SNe~Ia in our
948: comparison. Other discrepancies include the absorption features near
949: 4200~\AA\ and 4500~\AA, which are prominent in SNe 1996X, 1998bu,
950: and 2003du but are marginally visible in SN 2006X. We note that both
951: SN 2006X and SN 1998bu show relatively higher flux below 4500~\AA\
952: at this phase. The extra flux for SN 1998bu could be caused by a
953: light echo (Cappellaro et al. 2001; Spyromilio et al. 2004), which
954: primarily contributes to the spectrum in the blue.
955:
956: A possible explanation for the abnormal behavior of the
957: nebular-phase spectra and light curves of SN 2006X in the blue is
958: the presence of a light echo. As this supernova is found to suffer
959: significant extinction, it may have occurred in an environment that
960: is abundant with dust, so the occurrence of a light echo is
961: potentially expected. Some of the observable effects of a light echo
962: around a SN Ia include a bluer late-time color, broader spectral
963: lines, and a brighter tail luminosity (Patat 2006), all of which
964: agree with the observations of SN 2006X. The unidentified, prominent
965: feature at $\sim$6100~\AA\ seen in the spectrum at day +307 could be
966: reminiscent of the earlier-epoch Si~II $\lambda$6355, reflected by
967: the surrounding dust. Analysis of the light echo in SN 2006X is
968: given in a separate paper (Wang et al. 2007), in which evidence from
969: the late-time $HST$ image and spectrum is presented. In particular,
970: the PSF-subtracted HST image distinctly reveals prominent echo
971: structure at $\sim 0.05''- 0.13''$ away from the SN. The echo
972: emission might exist at $<$ 0.05'' from the SN site
973: (at $\sim$ 2-$\sigma$ level), as suggested by that the echo
974: inferred from the spectrum is brighter than that resolved in the HST images.
975: However, the exact location of the possible local echo is unknown due to the
976: limitation of the image resolution. With the Cepheid distance to M100 $\sim$15.2 Mpc,
977: the materials illuminated by the resolved LE are found to lie at $\sim$ 27 pc $-$
978: 170 pc from the SN, and it is not clear whether they were
979: produced from a distinct dust component, e.g. the local
980: circumstellar dust, or from a continuous dust distribution as with
981: the outer echo component.
982:
983:
984: \section{The Distance and Luminosity of SN 2006X}
985:
986: The host galaxy of SN 2006X, NGC 4321 (M100), is a well-studied
987: LINER/H~II galaxy (e.g., Ho, Filippenko, \& Sargent 1997). As one of
988: the largest spiral galaxies in the Virgo cluster, it produced SNe
989: 1901B, 1914A, 1959E, 1979C, and 2006X in roughly the last century.
990: Ferarrese et al. (1997) reported a Cepheid distance to NGC 4321 of
991: $m-M = 31.04 \pm 0.17$ mag. A distance of $m-M = 30.91 \pm 0.14$ mag
992: was published by the {\it HST} Key Project (Freedman et al. 2001),
993: which we adopt here in our analysis.
994:
995: \subsection{Absolute Magnitudes and $H_{0}$}
996:
997: With the Cepheid distance and the reddening derived in the previous
998: sections, it is straightforward to calculate the absolute magnitudes
999: of SN 2006X. After correcting for the Galactic reddening of $E(B -
1000: V)_{Gal} = 0.026$ mag with $R_{V} = 3.1$ and the host-galaxy
1001: reddening of $E(B - V)_{host} = 1.42 \pm 0.04$ mag with $R_{V} =
1002: 1.48 \pm 0.06$, we derive the $B$-band and $V$-band absolute
1003: magnitudes to be $-19.10 \pm 0.20$ and $-19.06 \pm 0.17$ mag,
1004: respectively. The magnitudes in other bands are listed in Table 10.
1005:
1006: To compare with other SNe~Ia, we need to normalize the derived
1007: absolute magnitudes of SN 2006X to a nominal light-curve shape, or
1008: $\Delta m_{15}$ value. Phillips et al. (1993) proposed a relation
1009: between $\Delta m_{15}$ and the peak luminosity of SNe~Ia, and there
1010: are now several different versions available in the literature
1011: (e.g., Hamuy et al. 1996; Phillips et al. 1999; Altavilla et al.
1012: 2004). Based on a large sample of SNe~Ia, Prieto et al. (2006)
1013: updated the $M_{max} - \Delta m_{15}$ relation (see their Table 3),
1014: which we adopt to normalize the luminosity of SN 2006X. An
1015: alternative luminosity correction method was proposed by Wang et al.
1016: (2005), who introduced a post-maximum color parameter $\Delta
1017: C_{12}$ which correlates well with the maximum luminosity of SNe~Ia.
1018: The relevant correction coefficients are taken from Table 3 in Wang
1019: et al. (2006).
1020:
1021: The normalized luminosities (to $\Delta m_{15} = 1.1$ mag) of SN
1022: 2006X from the two methods are consistent with each other, and are
1023: listed in Table 10. The normalized luminosity of SN 2006X is
1024: consistent with those of the fiducial SN~Ia in the $U$, $B$, $V$,
1025: and $R$ bands, while it is fainter by $\sim$0.2--0.3 mag in the $I$,
1026: $J$, and $K$ bands. This may be partly due to the more pronounced
1027: spectral features in the red, such as the broader and deeper
1028: absorption trough of the Ca~II near-IR triplet in SN 2006X than in
1029: other SNe~Ia, as discussed in \S 4.1.
1030:
1031: The measured luminosities for SN 2006X from the Cepheid distance to
1032: its host galaxy allow us to determine the Hubble constant via the
1033: formula $H_{0} = 10^{0.2(M+25-\alpha)}$, where $M$ is the absolute
1034: magnitude of SN 2006X and $\alpha$ is the zero point defined by
1035: Hubble-flow SNe~Ia. Using the normalized luminosities calibrated
1036: from the $\Delta C_{12}$ method and the zero point determined by
1037: Wang et al. (2006) from 73 Hubble-flow SNe~Ia, we derive a Hubble
1038: constant (in units of km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$) of 71.1, 73.5, 73.8,
1039: 83.9 from the $U$, $B$, $V$, and $I$ bands, respectively. Excluding
1040: the large value obtained with the peculiar $I$-band data, the
1041: average value of $H_{0}$ derived from SN 2006X is $72.8 \pm 8.2$ km
1042: s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ (statistical), which is consistent with the
1043: estimates from other Cepheid-calibrated SNe~Ia (Jha et al. 1999;
1044: Riess et al. 2005; Wang et al. 2006). The statistical error quoted
1045: here consists of the uncertainty in the extinction correction and
1046: the intrinsic luminosity dispersion of SNe~Ia. An analysis of the
1047: uncertainty associated with the Cepheid distances is important but
1048: is beyond the scope of this paper.
1049:
1050: \subsection{Bolometric Light Curve and Nickel Mass}
1051:
1052: To better understand the overall properties of SN 2006X, we
1053: constructed its quasi-bolometric light curve using our $UBVRIJK$
1054: photometry. For this calculation, we used the normalized passband
1055: transmission curves given by Bessell (1990). The integrated flux in
1056: each band was approximated by the mean flux multiplied by the
1057: effective width of the passband. As we did not get any ultraviolet
1058: (below 3200\AA ) data in SN 2006X, we corrected for the contribution
1059: of $UV$ flux in our calculation using the recipe given by Suntzeff
1060: (1996). Following the procedure in Contardo et al. (2000), we
1061: inferred the corrections for the passbands missing between $U$ and
1062: $I$ from those SNe Ia which have good observations in all the
1063: filters. For the flux beyond $I$ band, we used our own $JK$
1064: data\footnote{The missing $H$-band data may not impact significantly
1065: to the construction of the quasi-bolometric light curve, as the flux
1066: contribution in $H$ inferred from the SNe Ia with good observations
1067: in near $IR$ bands (e.g. SN 2001el, Kricisunas et al. 2003) is
1068: generally found to be smaller than 3\% of the total flux before 80
1069: days after $B$ maximum.} up to $\sim$ 80 days and then applied the
1070: Suntzeff $IR$ correction. The resulting quasi-bolometric light curve
1071: of SN 2006X is shown in Figure 20, together with those of the
1072: comparison SNe~Ia.
1073:
1074: The reddening-corrected quasi-bolometric luminosity of SN 2006X is
1075: ($1.02 \pm 0.10) \times 10^{43}$ erg s$^{-1}$ at maximum brightness,
1076: comparable to that of most comparison SNe~Ia but slightly fainter
1077: than SN 1998bu. Differences in the peak luminosity are often
1078: considered to be caused by variations in the amount of $^{56}$Ni
1079: synthesized during the explosion. The ``bump'' feature at $t =
1080: 20$--32~d is more prominent in SN 2006X than in other comparison
1081: SNe. This is caused by the more pronounced shoulder and ``second
1082: maximum'' seen in the $R$, $I$, and near-IR bands in SN 2006X. We
1083: also note that the contrast between the peak and tail luminosities
1084: of SN 2006X is the smallest among the SNe in the comparison: it has
1085: a peak luminosity in the middle of the group, but the highest tail
1086: luminosity. Efficiency of the trapping of the gamma rays and the
1087: positrons from $^{56}$Co decay (Milne et al. 2001), and small-scale
1088: light echoes or ejecta-CSM interaction, may account for this
1089: difference.
1090:
1091: The radioactive $^{56}$Ni synthesized during a SN~Ia explosion is
1092: the primary physical parameter determining the peak luminosity, the
1093: light curve width, and the spectrosocpic/color evolution of the
1094: event (e.g., Kasen et al. 2006). One method to estimate the
1095: synthesized $^{56}$Ni mass is by assuming that the luminosity at
1096: maximum equals the instantaneous energy deposition rate from the
1097: radioactive decay, the so-called ``Arnett law'' (Arnett 1982; Arnett
1098: et al. 1985; Branch 1992). Following Stritzinger \& Leibundgut
1099: (2005), the maximum luminosity produced by the radioactive $^{56}$Ni
1100: can be written as
1101: \begin{equation}
1102: L_{\rm max} = (6.45e^{\frac{-t_{r}}{8.8}} +
1103: 1.45e^{\frac{-t_{r}}{111.3}})(\frac{M_{\rm Ni}}{M_{\odot}})\times 10^{43}
1104: \,\rm{erg\ s^{-1}}.
1105: \end{equation}
1106: where $t_{r}$ is the rise time of the light curve (e.g., the time
1107: spent by the SN from the explosion to the $B$-band maximum), and
1108: $M_{Ni}$ is the $^{56}$Ni mass (in unit of the solar mass
1109: $M_{\odot}$). Assuming that the luminosity of a SN Ia evolves as an
1110: expanding fireball at very early phase (Goldhaber 1998), the rise
1111: time $t_{r}$ can be derived from the relation (Riess et al. 1999) :
1112: \begin{equation}
1113: L(t) = \varepsilon (t + t_{r})^{2}.
1114: \end{equation}
1115: where $t$ is the elapsed time since maximum and $\varepsilon$ is the
1116: parameter describing the rising rate of the luminosity. Using very
1117: early photometric data in the $R$ band (including the earliest
1118: unfiltered data from IAU Circ. 8667), we derive the rise time to the
1119: $B$ maximum as 18.2$\pm$0.9 d. This is slightly shorter than the
1120: average rise time of 19.5$\pm$0.2 d for a normal SN Ia with $\Delta
1121: m_{15}$ = 1.1 mag (Riess et~al. 1999, but see Strovink 2007 for the
1122: study of a possible dichotomy of the rise time in SNe Ia), but is
1123: consistent with that derived for SN 2002bo ($t_{r}$ = 17.9$\pm$0.5
1124: d; Benetti et~al. 2004) and SN 2005cf ($t_{r}$ = 18.6$\pm$0.4 d;
1125: Pastorello et~al. 2007).
1126:
1127: With the peak quasi-bolometric luminosity and the rise time derived
1128: for SN 2006X, we derive a $^{56}$Ni mass of $0.50 \pm
1129: 0.05$~M$_{\odot}$. This is within the reasonable range of $^{56}$Ni
1130: masses of normal SNe~Ia. The quoted error bar includes uncertainties
1131: in the rise time and bolometric luminosity.
1132:
1133: Table 11 lists all the important parameters derived for SN 2006X in
1134: the previous sections as well as the parameters relevant to its host
1135: galaxy M100.
1136:
1137: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}
1138:
1139: In this paper we present extensive optical and near-IR photometry,
1140: as well as optical spectroscopy, of the nearby SN Ia 2006X in NGC
1141: 4321 (M100). Our observations indicate that SN 2006X is a highly
1142: reddened object with an $R_V$ value much smaller than the canonical
1143: 3.1 for average Galactic dust, and has the highest expansion
1144: velocity ever published for a SN~Ia.
1145:
1146: Compared with other SNe~Ia included in this paper, SN 2006X has a
1147: broader light curve in the $U$ band, a more prominent ``bump''
1148: feature in the $V$ band, a more pronounced shoulder in the $R$ band,
1149: and a brighter second maximum in the $IJK$ bands. Relative to the
1150: peak brightness, SN 2006X has a higher luminosity in the $UBVRIJK$
1151: light curves during the nebular phase than other comparison SNe~Ia.
1152: The $B$-band decline rate at late times, $\beta = 0.92 \pm 0.05$ mag
1153: (100~d)$^{-1}$, is much smaller than that of most normal SNe~Ia. We
1154: note that other SNe~Ia with high expansion velocities, such as SNe
1155: 1984A and 2002bo, also exhibit relatively small late-time decline
1156: rates. Thus, slow late-time decline in the blue bands may be common
1157: for rapidly expanding SNe~Ia.
1158:
1159: The most notable features in the color curves of SN 2006X are a
1160: plateau in the $U - B$ color after $B$ maximum, and an obvious
1161: deviation from the Lira-Phillips relation at $t = 30$ to 90~d. After
1162: SN 2006X reached its reddest color in $B - V$ at $t \approx 30$~d,
1163: it became progressively bluer at a much faster pace than expected
1164: from the Lira-Phillips relation. We thus suggest that the
1165: Lira-Phillips relation should be applied with caution to any
1166: individual SN~Ia.
1167:
1168: We use a global color curve fitting method and the empirical
1169: relations between $\Delta m_{15}$, the peak colors $C_{max}$, and
1170: the post-maximum color $\Delta C_{12}$ to determine the reddening
1171: and extinction of SN 2006X. This yields an average estimate of the
1172: host-galaxy reddening for SN 2006X, $E(B - V)_{host} = 1.42 \pm
1173: 0.04$ mag. Assuming the absorption by dust follows the analytical
1174: model proposed by Cardelli et al. (1989), we obtain $R_{V} = 1.48
1175: \pm 0.06$. The low $R_{V}$ value suggests that the dust around SN
1176: 2006X is quite different from that observed in the Milky Way Galaxy,
1177: perhaps of a different origin than normal ISM dust. This is also
1178: demonstrated by the relatively smaller EW of the interstellar Na~I~D
1179: absorption in the spectra. Further evidence against conventional
1180: interstellar dust for SN 2006X is that the polarized spectrum of SN
1181: 2006X is significantly different from that of extinguished Galactic
1182: stars (Wang L et al. 2006c). It is worth pointing out that most
1183: highly reddened known SNe~Ia, with $E(B - V)_{host} > 0.5$ mag, tend
1184: to have $R_{V}$ values smaller than 3.1. This suggests that the dust
1185: affecting some SNe~Ia may be quite different from that observed in
1186: the Galaxy.
1187:
1188: We caution, however, that SN 2006X may have a peculiar (unknown)
1189: intrinsic color evolution, as suggested by the deviation from the
1190: Lira-Phillips relation in the $B - V$ color. If so, it would be
1191: difficult to estimate the host-galaxy reddening toward SN 2006X and
1192: to study its photometric properties.
1193:
1194: Spectra of SN 2006X reveal high expansion velocities, based on the
1195: IMEs and the iron-group elements. SN 2006X evolves in a manner
1196: similar to that of other rapidly expanding events such as SNe 1984A
1197: and 2002bo. At early times, these high-$v_{exp}$ objects have much
1198: stronger Si~II $\lambda$6355, Ca~II H\&K, and Ca~II near-IR triplet
1199: lines than other SNe~Ia. At late times, spectra of SN 2006X show a
1200: relatively bluer overall continuum, especially at $\lambda <
1201: 4500$~\AA, than the comparison SNe. This is consistent with the
1202: bluer $U - B$ and $B - V$ colors of SN 2006X than the other SNe~Ia
1203: at similar epochs, and suggests an additional input of energy,
1204: probably a light echo.
1205:
1206: To explain the high-velocity features of some SNe~Ia, Benetti et al.
1207: (2004) proposed a scenario in which the burning to IMEs extends
1208: farther out into the outermost layers than in normal SNe~Ia. This
1209: model produces the IMEs at higher velocities, but with no additional
1210: $^{56}$Ni production, which provides a plausible explanation for
1211: most of the spectral features seen in SN 2006X. The above scenario
1212: should account not only for the high-velocity feature of the IMEs,
1213: but also for that of the iron-group elements at earlier phases of SN
1214: evolution.
1215:
1216: On the other hand, we propose that SN 2006X may be produced in a
1217: progenitor environment having abundant CSM. In this scenario, the
1218: high-velocity features shown in the spectra are formed due to the
1219: density increase caused by interaction between the supernova ejecta
1220: and the surrounding material of the progenitor system, which could
1221: be an accretion disk, a filled Roche lobe, or a
1222: common envelope (Gerardy et~al. 2004). %Moreover, we find that some of these
1223: %high-velocity supernovae have somewhat low values of $R_{V}$,
1224: %atypical of ISM dust.
1225: The CSM dust, quite possibly associated with the CSM produced by the
1226: progenitor system (Patat et al. 2007), may be the source of a local
1227: light echo that could account for the late-time extra energy (beyond
1228: radioactive decay) seen at short wavelengths. SN 2006X-like events
1229: may actually represent a subclass of SNe Ia with distinct features
1230: of spectroscopy, photometry, polarization and even extinction, and
1231: the presence of significant CSM dust may be one of the possible
1232: explanations (Wang et al. 2007 in preparations). There is also
1233: possibility that the detection of CSM in SN 2006X is just tied to
1234: the particular viewing angle. Obviously, much further research, both
1235: observational and theoretical, is needed on this problem.
1236:
1237:
1238: \acknowledgments
1239: Some of the data presented here were obtained at
1240: the W. M. Keck Observatory, which is operated as a scientific
1241: partnership among the California Institute of Technology, the
1242: University of California, and the National Aeronautics and Space
1243: Administration (NASA). The Observatory was made possible by the
1244: generous financial support of the W. M. Keck Foundation. We thank
1245: the BAO, Keck, and Lick Observatory staffs for their assistance with
1246: the observations. This research was supported by NSF grant
1247: AST--0607485, the TABASGO Foundation, and the National Natural
1248: Science Foundation of China (NSFC grant 10673007) and the Basic
1249: Research Funding at Tsinghua University (JCqn2005036). KAIT was made
1250: possible by generous donations from Sun Microsystems, Inc., the
1251: Hewlett-Packard Company, AutoScope Corporation, Lick Observatory,
1252: the University of California, and the Sylvia \& Jim Katzman
1253: Foundation. The CTIO 1.3~m telescope is operated by the Smart and
1254: Moderate Aperture Research Telescope System (SMARTS) Consortium. We
1255: are particularly grateful for the scheduling flexibility of SMARTS.
1256: A.V.F. thanks the Aspen Center for Physics, where he participated in
1257: the workshop on ``Supernovae as Cosmological Distance Indicators''
1258: while this paper was nearing completion. We made use of the
1259: NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED), which is operated by the Jet
1260: Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under
1261: contract with NASA.
1262:
1263:
1264: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1265: \bibitem [Altavilla et al.(2004)]{alta04}
1266: % Altavilla, G., Fiorentino, G., Marconi, M., Musella, I.,
1267: % Cappellaro, E., Barbon, R., Benetti, S., Pastorello, A.,
1268: % Riello, M., Turatto, M., Zampieri, L.
1269: Altavilla, G., et~al. 2004, MNRAS, 349, 1344
1270: % Cepheid calibration of Type Ia supernovae and the Hubble constant
1271: \bibitem [Arnett 1982]{arne82} Arnett, W. D., 1982, \apj, 253, 785
1272: \bibitem [Arnett 1985]{arne85} Arnett, W. D., Branch D., \& Wheeler J. C., 1985,
1273: Nature, 314, 337
1274: \bibitem [Astier et al. (2006)]{ast06} Astier, P., et al. 2006, \aap, 447, 31
1275: \bibitem [Barbon (1989)]{bar89} Barbon, B., Rosino L., \& Iijima, T. 1989, \aap,
1276: 220, 83
1277: \bibitem [Barbon et~al. (1990)]{bar90} Barbon, B., Benetti, S.,
1278: Cappellaro, E., Rosino, L., Turrato, M. 1990, \aap, 237, 79
1279: \bibitem [Benetti et~al.(2005)]{ben05} Benetti, S., et~al. 2005, \apj, 623, 1011
1280: \bibitem [Bessell 1990]{besel90} Bessell, M. S. 1990, \pasp, 102, 1181
1281: \bibitem [Branch 2005]{bran05}Branch D., et~al. 2005, \pasp, 117, 545
1282: \bibitem [Branch 2006]{bran06}Branch D., et~al. 2006, \pasp, 118, 560
1283: \bibitem [Cardelli et~al. (1989)]{card89} Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., \&
1284: Mathis, J. S. 1989, \apj, 345, 245
1285: \bibitem [Cappellaro et~al. (2001)]{capp01} Cappellaro, E., et~al. 2001, \apj, 549, L215
1286: \bibitem [Cousins 1981]{cous81} Cousin, A. W. J. 1981, South African Astron. Obs. Circ. 6, 4
1287: \bibitem [Eisenstein et~al. (2005)]{eisen05} Eisenstein, D. J., et~al. 2005, \apj, 633, 560
1288: \bibitem [Elias-Rosa et~al.(2006)]{elias06} Elias-Rosa, N., et~al. 2006, \mnras,
1289: 369, 1880
1290: %2003cg
1291: \bibitem [Elmhamdi et~al. (2003)]{elm03} Elmhamdi, A., Chugai, N. N., \& Danziger,
1292: I. J. 2003, \aap, 404, 1077
1293: \bibitem [Ferarrese et~al. (1997)]{Fera97} Ferarrese, L., et~al. 1997, \apj, 475, 853
1294: \bibitem [Filippenko (1982)]{fili82} Filippenko, A. V. 1982, \pasp, 94, 715
1295: \bibitem [Filippenko (1997)]{fili97}Filippenko, A. V. 1997, \araa, 35, 309
1296: \bibitem [Filippenko (2005)]{fili05}Filippenko, A. V. 2005, in White
1297: Dwarfs: Cosmological and Galactic Probes, ed. E. M. Sion, S. Vennes,
1298: \& H. L. Shipman (Dordrecht: Springer), 97
1299: \bibitem [Filippenko et~al. (2001)]{fili01} Filippenko, A. V., Li, W., Treffers, R.
1300: R., \& Modjaz, M. 2001, in Small Telescope Astronomy on Global
1301: Scales, ed. B. Paczy\'{n}ski, W.-P. Chen, \& C. Lemme (San
1302: Francisco: ASP), p. 121
1303: \bibitem [Foley et~al. (2003)]{foley03} Foley, R. J., et~al. 2003, \pasp, 115, 1220
1304: \bibitem [Freedman et~al. (2001)]{fre01} Freedman, W. L., et~al. 2001, \apj, 553, 47
1305: \bibitem [Gerardy et~al. (2004)]{ger04} Gerardy, C., et~al. 2004, \apj, 607, 391
1306: \bibitem [Goldhaber (1998)]{gold98} Goldhaber, G. 1998, BAAS, 193, 47.13
1307: \bibitem [Hamuy et~al. (1996)]{ham96} Hamuy, M., Phillips, M. M., Suntzeff, N.B.,
1308: Schommer, R.A., Maza, J., \& Aviles, R. 1996, \aj, 112, 2398
1309: % The Hubble Diagram of the Calan/Tololo Type Ia Supernovae and the
1310: % Value of H_0
1311: \bibitem [Ho, Filippenko, \& Sargent (1997)]{hfs97} Ho, L. C., Filippenko, A. V.,
1312: \& Sargent, W. L. W. 1997, ApJS, 112, 315
1313: \bibitem [Iben \& Tutukov (1984)]{Ibtu84} Iben I. Jr., \& Tutukov A. 1984, \apjs,
1314: 55, 335
1315: \bibitem [Jeffery \& Branch (1990)]{JB90} Jeffery, D. J., \& Branch, D. 1990
1316: in Supernovae, Jerusalem Winter School for Theoretical Physics, ed.
1317: Wheeler J. C., Piran T., \& Weinberg, S. (Singapore: World
1318: Scientific), p149
1319: \bibitem [Jha (1999)]{jha99} Jha, S., et~al. 1999, \apjs, 125, 73
1320: \bibitem [Jha (2007)]{jha07} Jha, S., Riess A. G., \& Kirshner, R. P. 2007, \apj,
1321: 659, 122
1322: \bibitem [Johnson (1966)]{john66} Johnson, H. L., Iriarte, B., Mitchell, R. I.,
1323: Wisniewskj, W. Z. 1966, Commun. Lunar Planet. Lab., 4, 99
1324: \bibitem [Kasen (2006)]{kasen06} Kasen, D. 2006, \apj, 649, 939
1325: \bibitem [Kasen \& Woosley (2007)]{kasen07} Kasen, D., \& Woosley, S. E. 2007, \apj, 656, 661
1326: \bibitem [Knop et~al.(2003)]{knop03} Knop, R. A., et~al. 2003, ApJ, 598, 102
1327: % > 40 coauthors
1328: % New Constraints on Omega_M, Omega_L, and w from an Independent
1329: % Set of 11 High-Redshift Supernovae Observed with the Hubble Space
1330: % Telescope
1331: \bibitem [Krisciunas et~al. (2006)]{kris06} Krisciunas, K., Prieto, J. L.,
1332: Garnavich, P. M., Riley, Jessica-Lynn, G., Rest, A., Stubbs, C., \&
1333: McMillan, R. 2006, \aj, 131, 1639
1334: %1999cl
1335: \bibitem [Krisciunas et~al. (2000)]{kris00} Krisciunas, K., et~al. 2000, \apj, 539, 658
1336: \bibitem [Krisciunas et~al. (2003)]{kris03} Krisciunas, K., et~al. 2003, \aj, 125, 166
1337: \bibitem [Krisciunas et~al. (2007)]{kris07} Krisciunas, K., et~al. 2007, \aj, 133, 58
1338: %2001el and 2004S
1339: \bibitem [Lentz et~al. (2000)]{lentz00} Lentz, E. J., Baron, E.,
1340: Branch, D., Hauschildt, P. H., \& Nugent, P. E. 2000, \apj, 530, 966
1341: \bibitem [Lira 1995]{lir95} Lira, P. 1995, Masters thesis, University of Chile
1342: \bibitem [Li, et~al. (2001)]{li01} Li, W., et~al. 2001, \pasp, 113, 1178
1343: \bibitem [Mazalli et~al. (1993)]{maza93} Mazzali, P. A., Lucy, L.
1344: B., Danziger, I. J., Couiffes C., Cappellaro, E., Turatto, M., 1993,
1345: \aap, 269, 423
1346: \bibitem [Milne et~al. (2001)] {milne01} Milne, P. A., The, L. S., \& Leising, M. D.
1347: 2001, \apj, 559, 1019
1348: \bibitem [Miller \& Stone (1993)]{mill93} Miller, J. S., \& Stone, R. P. S. 1993,
1349: Lick Obs. Tech. Rep. No. 66
1350: \bibitem [Nomoto et~al. (1997)]{nom97} Nomoto, K.,Iwamoto, K., \& Kishimoto, N.
1351: 1997, Science, 276, 1378
1352: \bibitem [Nugent et~al. 1995]{nug95} Nugent, P., et~al. 1995, \apj, 455, L147
1353: \bibitem [Oke et~al. (1995)]{Oke95} Oke, J. B., et~al. 1995, \pasp, 107, 375
1354: \bibitem [Parodi et~al. (2000)]{par00} Parodi, B. R., et~al. 2000, \apj, 540, 634
1355: \bibitem [Pastorello et~al.(2007)]{past07} Pastorello, A., et~al. 2007, \mnras, 376,1301
1356: \bibitem [Patat et~al. (1996)]{pat96} Patat, F., Benetti, S., Cappellaro, E.,
1357: Danziger, I. J., Della Valle, M., Mazzali, P. A., \& Turatto, M.
1358: 1996, \mnras, 278, 111
1359: \bibitem [Patat et~al. (2006)]{pat06} Patat, F. 2006, \mnras, 369, 1949
1360: \bibitem [Patat et al. (2007)]{pat07} Patat F. 2007, Science, 317, 924 (P07)
1361: \bibitem [Perlmutter et~al. (1999)]{perl99} Perlmutter, S., et~al. 1999, \apj, 517, 565
1362: \bibitem [Persson et~al. (1998)]{per98} Persson, S. E., Murphy, D. C., Krzeminski,
1363: W., Roth, M., \& Rieke, M. J. 1998, \aj, 116, 2475
1364: \bibitem [Phillips (1993)]{phi93} Phillips, M. M. 1993, \apj, 413, L105
1365: \bibitem [Phillips (1999)]{phi99} Phillips, M. M., et~al. 1999, \aj, 118, 1766 (P99)
1366: \bibitem [Pignata et~al.(2004)]{pig04} Pignata, G., et~al. 2004, \mnras, 355, 178
1367: % > 20 coauthors
1368: % Photometric Observations of the Type Ia SN 2002er in UGC 10743
1369: \bibitem [Prieto et~al. (2006)]{pri06} Prieto, J. L., Rest, A., \& Suntzeff, N. B.
1370: 2006, \apj, 647, 501
1371: \bibitem [Quimby et~al. (2006)]{quim06} Quimby, R., Brown, P., \& Gerardy, C. 2006,
1372: CBET, 393
1373: \bibitem [Reindl et~al.(2005)]{Rei05} Reindl, B., Tammann, G. A., Sandage, A., \&
1374: Saha, A. 2005, \apj, 624, 532
1375: \bibitem [Richmond et~al. (1995)]{Rich95} Richmond, M. W., et~al. 1995, \aj, 109, 2121
1376: %Treffers, R. R., Filippenko, A. V., Van Dyk, S. D., Paik, Y., Peng, C., Marschall, L. A.,
1377: %Laaksonen, B. D., Macintosh, B., McLean, I. S.
1378: %UBVRI Photometry of the Type Ia SN 1994D in NGC 4526
1379: \bibitem [Riess et~al. (1996)]{rie96} Riess, A. G., Press, W. H., \& Kirshner, R. P.
1380: 1996, \apj, 473, 588
1381: \bibitem [Riess et~al. (1998)]{rie98} Riess, A. G., et~al. 1998, \aj, 116, 1009
1382: \bibitem [Riess et~al. (2005)]{Rie05} Riess, A. G., et~al. 2005, \apj, 627, 579
1383: %Li, Weidong; Stetson, Peter B.; Filippenko, Alexei V.; Jha, Saurabh; Kirshner, Robert P.;
1384: %Challis, Peter M.; Garnavich, Peter M.; Chornock, Ryan
1385: %\bibitem [Schaefer (1987)]{sch87} Schaefer, B. E. 1987, \apj, 323, L47
1386: \bibitem [Riess et~al. (2007)]{Rie07} Riess, A. G., et~al. 2007, \apj, 659, 98
1387: \bibitem [Salvo et al. (2001)]{sal01} Salvo M. E., et~al. 2001, \mnras, 321, 254
1388: \bibitem [Schlegel et~al. (1998)]{sfd98} Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., \&
1389: Davis, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525
1390: \bibitem [Spergel et~al. (2003)]{sper03} Spergel, D. N., et~al. 2003, \apjs, 148, 175
1391: \bibitem [Spergel et~al. (2007)]{sper07} Spergel, D. N., et~al. 2007, \apjs, 170, 377
1392: \bibitem [Spyromilio et~al.(2004)]{spy04} Spyromilio, J., Gilmozzi, R., Sollerman,
1393: J., Leibundgut, B., Fransson, C., \& Cuby, J. G. 2004, \aap, 426,547
1394: \bibitem [Stetson 1987]{stet87} Stetson, P. B. 1987, \pasp, 99, 191
1395: \bibitem [Stritzinger et~al. (2002)]{striz02} Stritzinger, M., et~al. 2002, \aj,
1396: 124, 2100
1397: \bibitem [Stritzinger \& Leibundgut (2005)]{stri05} Stritzinger, M., \& Leibundgut,
1398: B., 2005, \aap, 431, 423
1399: \bibitem [Strovink (2007)]{strov07} Srovink, M. 2007, ApJ, in press (astro-ph/07050726)
1400: \bibitem [Suntzeff 1996]{suntz06} Suntzeff, N. B. 1996, in Supernova and Supernova
1401: Remnants, ed. R. McCray \& Z. R. Wang (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ.
1402: Press), p. 41
1403: \bibitem [Suzuki \& Migliardi]{SM06} Suzuki S., \& Migliardi M. 2006, IAU Circ. 8667
1404: \bibitem [Tripp (1997)]{trip97} Tripp, R. 1997, \aap, 325, 871
1405: \bibitem [Tonry et~al. (2003)]{ton03} Tonry, J. L., et~al. 2003, \apj, 594, 1
1406: \bibitem [Wang L (2005)]{wan05} Wang, L. 2005, \apj, 635, L33
1407: \bibitem [Wang L (2006a)]{wan06a} Wang, L., et~al. 2006a, \apj, 641, 50
1408: \bibitem [Wang L (2006b)]{wan06b} Wang, L., et~al. 2006b, \apj, 653, 490
1409: \bibitem [Wang L (2006c)]{wan06c} Wang, L., Baade, D., Patat, F., \& Wheeler, J. C.
1410: 2006c, CBET, 396
1411: \bibitem [Wang et~al. (2005)]{wang05} Wang, X., Wang, L., Zhou, X., Lou, Y., \& Li,
1412: Z. 2005, \apj, 620, L87
1413: \bibitem [Wang et~al. (2006)]{wang06} Wang, X., et~al. 2006, \apj, 645, 488
1414: \bibitem [Wang et~al. (2007)]{wang07} Wang, X., et~al. 2007, \apj, submitted.
1415: \bibitem [Webbink (1984)]{web84} Webbink, R. F. 1984, \apj, 277, 355
1416: \bibitem [Wood-Vasey et~al. (2007)]{wood07} Wood-Vasey, W. M., et~al. 2007, \apj, in
1417: press (astro-ph/0701041)
1418:
1419: \end{thebibliography}
1420:
1421: \clearpage
1422:
1423: %%%%%%%%%%%%
1424: %%% Table 1
1425: %%%%%%%%%%%%
1426: \begin{table}
1427: \begin{center}
1428: \caption{Color Terms for Different Telescopes.}
1429: \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
1430: \tableline\tableline Telescopes& $U$ & $B$ & $V$ & $R$ & $I$ \\
1431: \tableline
1432: TNT & 0.125$\pm$0.016 & $-$0.163$\pm$0.016 & 0.078$\pm$0.007 & 0.098$\pm$0.011 & $-$0.038$\pm$0.003 \\
1433: KAIT & \nodata &$-$0.053$\pm$0.013 & 0.036$\pm$0.007 & 0.069$\pm$0.009 & $-$0.001$\pm$0.007 \\
1434: CTIO 1.3~m& \nodata & 0.050$\pm$0.002 & $-$0.046$\pm$0.002 & $-$0.019$\pm$0.004 &$-$0.088$\pm$0.001\\
1435: \tableline
1436: \end{tabular}
1437: \end{center}
1438: \end{table}
1439:
1440: %%%%%%%%%%%%
1441: %%%Table 2.
1442: %%%%%%%%%%%%
1443: \begin{table}
1444: \begin{center}
1445: \caption{Magnitudes of the photometric standards in the field of SN
1446: 2006X\tablenotemark{a}} {\scriptsize
1447: \begin{tabular}{lccccccccc}
1448: \tableline\tableline
1449: Star & $\alpha$(J2000) & $\delta$(J2000) & $U$ & $B$ & $V$ & $R$ & $I$ & $J$ & $K$ \\
1450: \tableline 1
1451: &12$^h$23$^m$03.77$^s$&15$^\circ$47$'$31.6$''$&14.91(02)&14.758(007)
1452: &
1453: 14.123(003)& 13.759(005) & 13.393(006) & \nodata &\nodata \\
1454: 2 &12:23:10.68&15:44:39.3&17.20(15)&17.069(036) & 16.809(019) &
1455: 16.549(027) &
1456: 16.177(024) & \nodata & \nodata \\
1457: 3 &12:23:05.93&15:43:51.4&16.36(08)&16.613(022) & 16.082(010) &
1458: 15.746(014) &
1459: 15.385(012) & \nodata & \nodata \\
1460: 4 &12:22:48.29&15:43:24.9&\nodata&15.413(013)& 14.763(013) &
1461: 14.411(004) &
1462: 14.083(004) & \nodata & \nodata\\
1463: 5 &12:22:42.60&15:49:03.4&14.94(02)&14.753(011) & 14.100(013) &
1464: 13.746(014) &
1465: 13.404(010)& \nodata & \nodata\\
1466: 6 &12:22:50.09&15:50:47.9&16.51(09) & 16.323(014)&15.675(026)&
1467: 15.305(028) &
1468: 14.941(023)& \nodata & \nodata\\
1469: 7 &12:22:51.46&15:51:04.5&16.75(09)& 16.340(020) &15.458(021) &
1470: 14.945(008)&14.445(008) & \nodata & \nodata \\
1471: 8 &12:22:53.40&15:52:18.7&17.92(23) &16.380(010)&15.224(022)
1472: &14.425(018)
1473: &13.715(033)& \nodata & \nodata \\
1474: 9 &12:22:41.05&15:51:57.8&16.67(09) &16.665(008) &16.131(010)&
1475: 15.775(013)
1476: &15.430(005)& \nodata & \nodata \\
1477: 10 &12:22:53.98&15:48:40.9&\nodata &18.233(017) &17.053(012)
1478: &16.309(006)
1479: &15.613(014)&14.721(006)&13.925(009)\\
1480: \tableline
1481:
1482: \tablenotetext{a}{See Figure 1 for a chart of SN 2006X (in M100) and
1483: the comparison stars.}
1484: \end{tabular}
1485: }
1486: \end{center}
1487: \end{table}
1488:
1489:
1490: %%%%%%%%%%%%
1491: %%% Table 3.
1492: %%%%%%%%%%%%
1493: %\setlength\evensidemargin {-1.45cm}%
1494: % ***********************************************
1495: % Table 3: SN 2006X -- Optical photometry
1496:
1497: \clearpage
1498: \setlength{\hoffset}{-12mm}
1499: % ***********************************************
1500: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccccl}
1501: \tablewidth{560pt} \tabletypesize{\scriptsize} \tablecaption{Optical
1502: photometry of SN 2006X.}
1503: % ***********************************************
1504: \tablehead{
1505: % ***********************************************
1506: \colhead{UT Date} &
1507: \colhead{JD$-$2,450,000} &
1508: \colhead{Phase\tablenotemark{*}}&
1509: \colhead{$U$} &
1510: \colhead{$B$} &
1511: \colhead{$V$} &
1512: \colhead{$R$} &
1513: \colhead{$I$} &
1514: \colhead{Method}&
1515: \colhead{Telescope}
1516: }
1517: % ***********************************************
1518: \startdata
1519: % ***********************************************
1520: \multicolumn{10}{c}{}\\
1521: \noalign{\smallskip}
1522: 02/08/2006 & 3774.90 & $-$11.27 & \nodata & 17.111(0.023) & 15.679(0.019) & 14.832(0.019) & 14.745(0.020) &PSF & KAIT\\
1523: 02/08/2006 & 3775.33 & $-$10.84 & 17.576(0.048) & 17.005(0.018) & 15.566(0.014) & 14.721(0.013) & 14.489(0.017) &PSF &TNT \\
1524: 02/09/2006 & 3775.85 & $-$10.32 & \nodata & 16.701(0.020) & 15.421(0.019) & 14.574(0.015) & 14.416(0.021) &PSF & KAIT \\
1525: 02/09/2006 & 3776.19 & $-$9.98 & 17.449(0.153) & 16.626(0.019) & 15.320(0.014) & 14.476(0.013) & 14.318(0.017) &PSF & TNT \\
1526: 02/10/2006 & 3776.86 & $-$9.31 & \nodata & 16.484(0.021) & 15.146(0.020)& \nodata & \nodata &APER & CTI0 1.3m \\
1527: 02/10/2006 & 3776.96 & $-$9.21 & \nodata & 16.386(0.054) & 15.154(0.018)& 14.327(0.021) & 14.150(0.024) &PSF& KAIT \\
1528: 02/10/2006 & 3777.38 & $-$8.79 & 17.485(0.159) & 16.297(0.015) & 15.012(0.014)& 14.207(0.012) & 13.925(0.016) &PSF& TNT \\
1529: 02/11/2006 & 3778.38 & $-$7.79 & 16.644(0.106) & 16.060(0.018) & 14.797(0.015)& 14.032(0.013) & 13.731(0.017) &PSF& TNT \\
1530: 02/12/2006 & 3778.75 & $-$7.42 & \nodata & 15.994(0.019) & 14.813(0.018)& 14.043(0.014) & 13.781(0.022) &PSF& KAIT \\
1531: 02/13/2006 & 3779.80 & $-$6.37 & \nodata & 15.778(0.020) & 14.545(0.020)& \nodata & \nodata &APER& CTIO 1.3m \\
1532: 02/13/2006 & 3780.39 & $-$5.78 & \nodata & 15.741(0.017) & 14.469(0.015)& 13.786(0.013) & 13.443(0.017) &PSF& TNT \\
1533: 02/15/2006 & 3782.40 & $-$3.77 & \nodata & 15.633(0.041) & 14.343(0.017)& 13.660(0.013) & 13.300(0.019) &PSF& TNT \\
1534: 02/16/2006 & 3783.80 & $-$2.37 & \nodata & 15.389(0.020) & 14.166(0.020)& 13.619(0.015) & 13.298(0.015) &APER& CTIO 1.3m \\
1535: 02/17/2006 & 3784.27 & $-$1.90 & \nodata & 15.441(0.014) & 14.146(0.014)& 13.552(0.013) & \nodata &PSF & TNT \\
1536: 02/18/2006 & 3784.76 & $-$1.51 & \nodata & 15.406(0.020) & 14.178(0.020)& 13.586(0.015) & 13.297(0.015) &APER& CTIO 1.3m \\
1537: 02/18/2006 & 3785.25 & $-$0.92 & 16.256(0.034) & 15.431(0.015) & 14.094(0.014)& 13.521(0.013) & 13.283(0.016) &PSF& TNT \\
1538: 02/19/2006 & 3786.19 & 0.02 & 16.143(0.029) & 15.407(0.014) & 14.059(0.014) &13.499(0.012) & 13.290(0.016) &PSF& TNT \\
1539: 02/21/2006 & 3787.78 & 1.61 & \nodata & 15.418(0.028) & 14.070(0.023) &13.518(0.015) & 13.354(0.015) &APER& CTIO 1.3m \\
1540: 02/21/2006 & 3787.84 & 1.67 & \nodata & 15.466(0.015) & 14.068(0.017) &13.524(0.013) & 13.409(0.018) &PSF& KAIT \\
1541: 02/21/2006 & 3788.27 & 2.10 & 16.273(0.022) & 15.441(0.014) & 14.024(0.014) &13.477(0.012) & 13.323(0.016) &PSF& TNT \\
1542: 02/22/2006 & 3788.82 & 2.65 & \nodata & 15.494(0.015) & 14.054(0.020) &13.513(0.014) & 13.412(0.022) &PSF& KAIT \\
1543: 02/22/2006 & 3789.25 & 3.08 & 16.333(0.024) & 15.499(0.014) & 14.013(0.014) &13.476(0.013) & 13.338(0.016) &PSF& TNT \\
1544: 02/23/2006 & 3789.85 & 3.68 & \nodata & 15.553(0.015) & 14.063(0.017) &13.526(0.015) & 13.444(0.018) &PSF & KAIT \\
1545: 02/23/2006 & 3790.23 & 4.06 & 16.401(0.040) & 15.542(0.014) & 14.025(0.014) &13.507(0.012) & 13.376(0.016) &PSF & TNT \\
1546: 02/24/2006 & 3790.78 & 4.61 & \nodata & 15.585(0.032) & 14.111(0.020) &13.570(0.015) & 13.468(0.015) &APER& CTIO 1.3m \\
1547: 02/24/2006 & 3790.83 & 4.66 & \nodata & 15.618(0.015) & 14.062(0.014) &13.543(0.041) & 13.496(0.030) &PSF& KAIT \\
1548: 02/25/2006 & 3792.23 & 6.06 & 16.545(0.034) & 15.685(0.014) & 14.063(0.014) &13.579(0.012) & 13.461(0.016) &PSF& TNT \\
1549: 02/26/2006 & 3793.23 & 7.06 & 16.594(0.083) & 15.771(0.016) & 14.085(0.014) &13.620(0.013) & 13.508(0.017) &PSF& TNT \\
1550: 02/27/2006 & 3793.83 & 7.66 & \nodata & 15.805(0.020) & 14.126(0.018) &13.712(0.015) & 13.645(0.015) &APER& CTIO 1.3m \\
1551: 02/28/2006 & 3795.34 & 9.17 & 16.794(0.036) & 15.943(0.015) & 14.186(0.014) &13.784(0.012) & 13.643(0.016) &PSF& TNT \\
1552: 03/02/2006 & 3797.39 & 11.22 & 17.003(0.049) & 16.136(0.015) & 14.335(0.014) &13.949(0.013) & 13.749(0.017) &PSF& TNT \\
1553: 03/04/2006 & 3799.39 & 13.22 & 17.246(0.047) & 16.338(0.015) & 14.428(0.014) &14.040(0.013) & 13.757(0.017) &PSF& TNT \\
1554: 03/05/2006 & 3799.74 & 13.57 & \nodata & 16.473(0.031) & 14.488(0.041) &14.048(0.015) & 13.938(0.023) &APER& CTIO 1.3m \\
1555: 03/05/2006 & 3800.32 & 14.15 & 17.379(0.079) & 16.462(0.016) & 14.516(0.014) &14.078(0.012) & 13.742(0.016) &PSF& TNT \\
1556: 03/06/2006 & 3801.22 & 15.05 & 17.583(0.117) & 16.562(0.016) & 14.562(0.014) &14.083(0.012) & 13.729(0.016) &PSF& TNT \\
1557: 03/07/2006 & 3802.23 & 16.06 & \nodata & 16.654(0.019) & 14.610(0.015) &14.082(0.013) & \nodata &PSF& TNT \\
1558: 03/08/2006 & 2802.73 & 16.56 & \nodata & 16.790(0.020) & 14.682(0.017) &14.103(0.015) & 13.864(0.015) &APER& CTIO 1.3m \\
1559: 03/09/2006 & 3803.22 & 17.05 & \nodata & 16.760(0.018) & 14.631(0.014) &14.084(0.013) & 13.661(0.017) &PSF& TNT \\
1560: 03/11/2006 & 3806.16 & 19.99 & \nodata & 17.240(0.045) & 14.777(0.016) &14.096(0.013) & 13.603(0.017) &PSF & TNT \\
1561: 03/12/2006 & 3806.74 & 20.57 & \nodata & 17.303(0.030) & 14.899(0.020) &14.138(0.015) & 13.740(0.015) &APER & CTIO 1.3m \\
1562: 03/13/2006 & 3808.25 & 22.08 & \nodata & 17.243(0.095) & 14.821(0.017) & \nodata & 13.575(0.018) &PSF& TNT \\
1563: 03/15/2006 & 3810.31 & 24.14 & \nodata & 17.506(0.104) & 14.930(0.020) &14.135(0.015) & \nodata &PSF& TNT \\
1564: 03/16/2006 & 3810.70 & 24.53 & \nodata & 17.743(0.108) & 15.045(0.018) &14.200(0.015) & 13.650(0.015) &APER& CTIO 1.3m \\
1565: 03/18/2006 & 3813.23 & 27.06 & 18.959(0.343) & 17.697(0.024) & 15.120(0.014) &14.214(0.012) & 13.518(0.016) &PSF& TNT \\
1566: 03/19/2006 & 3813.82 & 27.65 & \nodata & 17.729(0.042) & 15.221(0.017) &14.313(0.014) & 13.603(0.018) &PSF& KAIT \\
1567: 03/20/2006 & 3814.71 & 28.54 & \nodata & 17.945(0.054) & 15.388(0.015) &14.433(0.015) & 13.709(0.015) &APER& CTIO 1.3m \\
1568: 03/21/2006 & 3815.24 & 29.07 & \nodata & 17.884(0.022) & 15.245(0.014) &14.350(0.013) & 13.566(0.018) &PSF& TNT \\
1569: 03/22/2006 & 3816.80 & 30.63 & \nodata & 17.878(0.039) & 15.454(0.016) &14.538(0.015) & 13.792(0.025) &PSF& KAIT \\
1570: 03/22/2006 & 3817.19 & 31.02 & 19.017(0.212) & 17.948(0.018) & 15.432(0.014) &14.510(0.012) & 13.741(0.016) &PSF& TNT \\
1571: 03/23/2006 & 3818.15 & 31.98 & \nodata & 18.030(0.023) & 15.509(0.014) &14.588(0.013) & 13.818(0.016) &PSF& TNT \\
1572: 03/24/2006 & 3818.72 & 32.55 & \nodata & 18.091(0.033) & 15.607(0.033) &14.722(0.015) & 13.976(0.015) &APER& CTIO 1.3m \\
1573: 03/25/2006 & 3820.17 & 34.00 & 19.087(0.226) & 18.166(0.020) & 15.631(0.014) &14.735(0.012) & 13.976(0.016) &PSF& TNT \\
1574: 03/27/2006 & 3821.77 & 35.60 & \nodata & \nodata & 15.749(0.017) &14.871(0.030) & 14.170(0.043) &PSF& KAIT \\
1575: 03/28/2006 & 3823.20 & 37.00 & 19.055(0.373) & 18.132(0.035) & 15.769(0.015) &14.884(0.013) & 14.156(0.016) &PSF& TNT \\
1576: 03/29/2006 & 3824.16 & 37.99 & 19.334(0.326) & 18.188(0.029) & 15.814(0.015) &14.949(0.013) & 14.215(0.016) &PSF& TNT \\
1577: 03/30/2006 & 3824.77 & 38.60 & \nodata & 18.206(0.030) & 15.923(0.042) &15.116(0.015) & 14.371(0.011) &APER& CTIO 1.3m\\
1578: 03/30/2006 & 3825.10 & 38.93 & \nodata & 18.278(0.052) & 15.839(0.017) &14.987(0.013) & 14.265(0.017) &PSF& TNT \\
1579: 04/01/2006 & 3827.18 & 41.01 & \nodata & 18.306(0.043) & 15.885(0.016) &15.091(0.013) & 14.377(0.017) &PSF& TNT \\
1580: 04/02/2006 & 3828.20 & 42.02 & 19.368(0.344) & 18.261(0.028) & 15.922(0.015) &15.088(0.013) & 14.429(0.017) &PSF& TNT \\
1581: 04/03/2006 & 3829.25 & 43.08 & \nodata & 18.210(0.110) & 15.984(0.034) &15.153(0.014) & 14.475(0.018) &PSF& TNT \\
1582: 04/04/2006 & 3830.15 & 43.98 & \nodata & 18.287(0.027) & 15.997(0.015) &15.171(0.013) & 14.516(0.016) &PSF& TNT \\
1583: 04/07/2006 & 3833.24 & 47.07 & \nodata & 18.315(0.043) & 16.080(0.017) &15.285(0.013) & 14.651(0.017) &PSF& TNT \\
1584: 04/11/2006 & 3836.60 & 50.43 & \nodata & 18.471(0.086) & 16.288(0.025) &15.445(0.022) & 14.913(0.053) &APER& CTIO 1.3m \\
1585: 04/12/2006 & 3838.14 & 51.97 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata &15.382(0.037) & 14.824(0.027) &PSF& TNT \\
1586: 04/16/2006 & 3841.65 & 55.48 & \nodata & 18.523(0.053) & 16.440(0.014) &15.689(0.013) & 15.176(0.010) &APER& CTIO 1.3m\\
1587: 04/18/2006 & 3843.72 & 57.55 & \nodata & 18.443(0.054) & 16.386(0.019) &15.670(0.015) & 15.173(0.028) &PSF& KAIT \\
1588: 04/19/2006 & 3845.13 & 58.86 & \nodata & 18.487(0.023) & 16.440(0.015) &15.695(0.013) & 15.171(0.017) &PSF& TNT \\
1589: 04/21/2006 & 3846.63 & 60.46 & \nodata & 18.444(0.032) & 16.541(0.014) &15.771(0.013) & 15.299(0.015) &APER& CTIO 1.3m \\
1590: 04/24/2006 & 3850.19 & 64.02 & \nodata & 18.492(0.062) & 16.538(0.023) &15.826(0.015) & 15.300(0.022) &PSF& TNT \\
1591: 04/27/2006 & 3852.65 & 66.48 & \nodata & 18.519(0.041) & 16.699(0.019) &15.947(0.015) & 15.576(0.018) &APER& CTIO 1.3m \\
1592: 04/27/2006 & 3852.68 & 66.51 & \nodata & 18.506(0.070) & 16.645(0.018) &15.949(0.013) & 15.514(0.021) &PSF& KAIT \\
1593: 04/28/2006 & 3854.08 & 67.91 & \nodata & 18.555(0.038) & 16.670(0.018) &16.015(0.014) & 15.561(0.018) &PSF& TNT \\
1594: %04/29/2006 & 3854.91 & 68.47 & \nodata & 18.536(0.028) & 16.698(0.016) %& 15.988(0.015) & 15.068(0.018) & Nickel\\
1595: %05/02/2006 & 3857.77 & 71.34 & \nodata & 18.546(0.030) & 16.787(0.017)%& 16.101(0.014) & 15.201(0.018) & Nickel\\
1596: 05/03/2006 & 3858.62 & 72.45 & \nodata & 18.599(0.040) & 16.868(0.033) & \nodata & \nodata &APER& CTIO 1.3m \\
1597: 05/03/2006 & 3859.04 & 72.87 & \nodata & 18.598(0.064) & 16.780(0.025) & 16.139(0.016) & 15.748(0.020) &PSF& TNT \\
1598: 05/05/2006 & 3864.66 & 78.49 & \nodata & 18.818(0.105) & 16.962(0.054) & \nodata & \nodata &APER& CTIO 1.3m \\
1599: 05/10/2006 & 3866.07 & 79.90 & \nodata & 18.589(0.229) & 16.931(0.053) & 16.368(0.023) & 15.978(0.024) &PSF& TNT \\
1600: 05/14/2006 & 3870.07 & 83.90 & \nodata & 18.622(0.061) & 17.091(0.024) & 16.488(0.016) & 16.096(0.020) &PSF& TNT \\
1601: 05/18/2006 & 3873.58 & 87.41 & \nodata & 18.662(0.023) & 17.249(0.011) & \nodata & \nodata &APER& CTIO 1.3m\\
1602: 05/23/2006 & 3879.16 & 92.99 & \nodata & 18.719(0.147) & 17.314(0.043) & 16.721(0.026) & 16.494(0.040) &PSF& TNT \\
1603: 05/26/2006 & 3881.60 & 95.43 & \nodata & 18.773(0.020) & 17.419(0.010) & \nodata & \nodata &APER& CTIO 1.3m \\
1604: 05/28/2006 & 3884.16 & 97.99 & \nodata & 18.795(0.031) & 17.467(0.020) &16.982(0.016) & 16.652(0.020) &PSF& TNT \\
1605: %06/03/2006 & 3889.77 & 103.33 & \nodata & 18.937(0.056) & 17.561(0.024) %& 17.067(0.016) & 16.775(0.021) & Nickel\\
1606: 06/07/2006 & 3894.08 & 107.91 & \nodata & 19.025(0.179) & 17.643(0.032) & 17.279(0.023) & 16.878(0.041) &PSF& TNT \\
1607: 06/14/2006 & 3901.08 & 114.91 & \nodata & 18.886(0.054) & 17.789(0.029) & 17.462(0.023) & 17.064(0.045) &PSF& TNT \\
1608: 06/16/2006 & 3903.03 & 116.86 & \nodata & 19.033(0.199) & 17.969(0.028) & 17.527(0.016) & 17.383(0.021) &PSF& TNT \\
1609: %06/24/2006 & 3910.75 & 124.31 & \nodata & 19.300(0.074) & 17.961(0.031) %& 17.663(0.023) & 17.267(0.024) & Nickel \\
1610: \enddata
1611: \tablenotetext{*}{Relative to the epoch of $B$-band maximum (JD =
1612: 2,453,786.17).}
1613: \end{deluxetable}
1614:
1615: \clearpage
1616: \setlength{\hoffset}{0mm}
1617:
1618: %%%%%%%%%%%%
1619: %%%Table 4
1620: %%%%%%%%%%%%
1621: \begin{table}
1622: \begin{center}
1623: \caption{Infrared photometry of SN 2006X.}
1624: \begin{tabular}{cccccl}
1625: \tableline
1626: UT Date & JD$-$2,450,000 &Phase\tablenotemark{*} & $J$ & $K$ \\
1627: \tableline
1628: 02/10/2006 &3776.86 & $-$9.31 & 13.353(0.013) &13.178(0.038) \\
1629: 02/13/2006 &3779.80 & $-$6.37 & 12.969(0.015) &12.885(0.034) \\
1630: 02/17/2006 &3783.80 & $-$2.37 & 12.921(0.015) &12.881(0.030) \\
1631: 02/18/2006 &3784.76 & $-$1.41 & 12.957(0.015) &12.854(0.030) \\
1632: 02/21/2006 &3787.78 & 1.61 & 13.129(0.013) &12.912(0.045) \\
1633: 02/24/2006 &3790.78 & 4.61 & 13.360(0.013) &13.061(0.043) \\
1634: 02/27/2006 &3793.83 & 7.66 & 13.802(0.018) &13.229(0.058) \\
1635: 03/02/2006 &3796.75 & 10.58 & 14.433(0.019) &13.239(0.040) \\
1636: 03/05/2006 &3799.74 & 13.57 & 14.785(0.029) & \nodata \\
1637: 03/08/2006 &3802.73 & 16.56 & 14.526(0.017) &13.120(0.026) \\
1638: 03/12/2006 &3806.74 & 20.57 & 14.328(0.017) &12.945(0.039) \\
1639: 03/16/2006 &3810.70 & 24.53 & 14.071(0.016) &12.854(0.034) \\
1640: 03/20/2006 &3814.71 & 28.54 & 13.780(0.016) &12.899(0.051) \\
1641: 03/24/2006 &3818.72 & 32.55 & 13.909(0.018) &12.933(0.043) \\
1642: 03/30/2006 &3824.77 & 38.60 & 14.480(0.019) &13.648(0.028) \\
1643: 04/11/2006 &3836.60 & 50.43 & 15.282(0.027) &14.103(0.073) \\
1644: 04/16/2006 &3841.65 & 55.48 & 15.727(0.034) &14.350(0.043) \\
1645: 04/21/2006 &3846.63 & 60.46 & 15.943(0.036) &14.569(0.043) \\
1646: 04/27/2006 &3852.65 & 66.48 & 16.302(0.047) &14.601(0.058) \\
1647: 05/03/2006 &3858.62 & 72.45 & 16.521(0.128) & \nodata \\
1648: 05/09/2006 &3864.66 & 78.49 & 17.121(0.096) &15.124(0.072) \\
1649: \tableline
1650: \end{tabular} \tablenotetext{*}{Relative to the epoch of $B$-band
1651: maximum (JD = 2,453,786.17).}
1652: \end{center}
1653: \end{table}
1654:
1655:
1656: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1657: %%%%Table 5
1658: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1659:
1660: \begin{table}
1661: \begin{center}
1662: \caption{Optical and NIR S-corrections added to the data of CTIO
1663: 1.3~m telescope listed in Tables 3 and 4.}
1664: \begin{tabular}{ccrrrrr}
1665: \tableline
1666: UT Date & JD$-$2,450,000 & Phase\tablenotemark{*} & B & V & J & K \\
1667: \tableline
1668: 02/10/2006 & 3776.86 & $-$9.31 & $-$0.046 & $-$0.004 & 0.038 & $-$0.003 \\
1669: 02/13/2006 & 3779.80 & $-$6.37 & $-$0.043 & 0.001 & 0.046 & 0.005 \\
1670: 02/17/2006 & 3783.80 & $-$2.37 & $-$0.043 & 0.010 & 0.059 & 0.019 \\
1671: 02/18/2006 & 3784.76 & $-$1.41 & $-$0.044 & 0.012 & 0.062 & 0.022 \\
1672: 02/21/2006 & 3787.78 & 1.61 & $-$0.044 & 0.017 & 0.067 & 0.034 \\
1673: 02/24/2006 & 3790.78 & 4.61 & $-$0.043 & 0.021 & 0.036 & 0.057 \\
1674: 02/27/2006 & 3793.83 & 7.66 & $-$0.039 & 0.023 & 0.007 & 0.054 \\
1675: 03/02/2006 & 3796.75 & 10.58 & \nodata& \nodata & $-$0.018 & 0.043 \\
1676: 03/05/2006 & 3799.74 & 13.57 & $-$0.024 & 0.026 & $-$0.043 & \nodata \\
1677: 03/08/2006 & 3802.73 & 16.56 & $-$0.014 & 0.027 & $-$0.066 & 0.018 \\
1678: 03/12/2006 & 3806.74 & 20.57 & $-$0.003 & 0.029 & $-$0.091 & 0.004 \\
1679: 03/16/2006 & 3810.70 & 24.53 & $-$0.019 & 0.032 & $-$0.076 & $-$0.010 \\
1680: 03/20/2006 & 3814.71 & 28.54 & $-$0.066 & 0.036 & $-$0.057 & $-$0.016 \\
1681: 03/24/2006 & 3818.72 & 32.55 & $-$0.069 & 0.039 & $-$0.09 & $-$0.007 \\
1682: 03/30/2006 & 3824.77 & 38.60 & $-$0.066 & 0.041 & $-$0.119 & $-$0.005 \\
1683: 04/11/2006 & 3836.60 & 50.43 & $-$0.056 & 0.030 & $-$0.131 & 0 \\
1684: 04/16/2006 & 3841.65 & 55.48 & $-$0.049 & 0.025 & $-$0.131 & 0 \\
1685: 04/21/2006 & 3846.63 & 60.46 & $-$0.041 & 0.026 & $-$0.131 & 0 \\
1686: 04/27/2006 & 3852.65 & 66.48 & $-$0.032 & 0.026 & $-$0.131 & 0 \\
1687: 05/03/2006 & 3858.62 & 72.45 & $-$0.032 & 0.025 & $-$0.131 & 0 \\
1688: 05/09/2006 & 3864.66 & 78.49 & $-$0.032 & 0.025 & $-$0.131 & 0 \\
1689: 05/18/2006 & 3873.58 & 87.41 & $-$0.032 & 0.025 &\nodata & \nodata \\
1690: 05/26/2006 & 3881.60 & 95.43 & $-$0.032 & 0.025 &\nodata & \nodata \\
1691:
1692: \tableline
1693: \end{tabular} \tablenotetext{*}{Relative to the epoch of $B$-band
1694: maximum (JD = 2,453,786.17).}
1695: \end{center}
1696: \end{table}
1697:
1698:
1699: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1700: %%%%Table 6
1701: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1702:
1703: \begin{table}[htb]
1704: \begin{center}
1705: \caption{Journal of spectroscopic observations of SN 2006X.}
1706: \begin{tabular}{cccccl}
1707: \tableline\tableline
1708: UT Date& JD &Phase\tablenotemark{a}&Range&Resolution\tablenotemark{b}&Instrument\\
1709: &$-$2,450,000&(days)&\AA& \AA & \\
1710: \tableline
1711: 18/02/06&3785.3&$-$0.9&3700-8500&4&BAO 2.16m Cassegrain\\
1712: 21/02/06&3787.7&+1.5&3300-11000 &5-12&Lick Shane 3.0m Kast\\
1713: 21/02/06&3788.3&+2.1&4000-9000 &3&BAO 2.16m BFOSC \\
1714: 25/02/06&3792.3&+6.1&3700-8200 &4&BAO 2.16m Cassegrain\\
1715: 04/03/06&3799.2&+13.1&3700-8200&4&BAO 2.16m Cassegrain\\
1716: 21/03/06&3816.2&+30.1&4000-9000 &3&BAO 2.16m BFOSC\\
1717: 22/03/06&3816.7&+30.6&3300-11000&5-12&Lick Shane 3.0m Kast\\
1718: 01/04/06&3827.2&+41.0&4500-6200 &4&BAO 2.16m Cassegrain\\
1719: 07/04/06&3833.3&+47.1&4500-9000 &3&BAO 2.16m BFOSC\\
1720: 28/04/06&3853.9&+67.7&3900-10500&5-12&Lick Shane 3.0m Kast\\
1721: 05/05/06&3860.9&+74.7&3900-10500&6-12&Lick Shane 3.0m Kast\\
1722: 28/05/06&3884.0&+97.8&3300-11000&5-11&Lick Shane 3.0m Kast\\
1723: 11/23/06&4063.2&+277.0&3100-9200&6&Keck I 10m LRIS \\
1724: 12/23/06&4093.2&+307.0&4500-7200&0.35&Keck II 10m DEIMOS \\
1725: \tableline
1726: \end{tabular} \tablenotetext{a}{Relative to the $B$ maximum(JD=2453786.17)}
1727: \tablenotetext{b}{Approximate Spectral Resolution (full width at
1728: half maximum intensity).}
1729: \end{center}
1730: \end{table}
1731:
1732: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1733: %%%Table 7
1734: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1735: \begin{table}[htb]
1736: \begin{center}
1737: \caption{Light-curve parameters of SN 2006X.} {\scriptsize
1738: \begin{tabular}{lccc}
1739: \tableline\tableline
1740: Band& $t_{max}$ & $m_{peak}$ & $\beta$\tablenotemark{a} \\
1741: \tableline
1742: U &2453785.13$\pm$0.96 &16.20$\pm$0.06& ... \\
1743: B &2453786.17$\pm$0.35 &15.40$\pm$0.03&0.92$\pm$0.05\\
1744: V &2453789.11$\pm$0.29 &14.04$\pm$0.03&2.71$\pm$0.04\\
1745: R &2453789.09$\pm$0.32 &13.50$\pm$0.03&3.30$\pm$0.04\\
1746: I &2453784.73$\pm$0.40 &13.29$\pm$0.10&3.60$\pm$0.02\\
1747: J &2453782.09$\pm$0.38 &12.88$\pm$0.02&6.29$\pm$0.24\\
1748: K &2453782.97$\pm$0.46 &12.82$\pm$0.04&3.78$\pm$0.15\\
1749: \tableline
1750: \end{tabular}}
1751: \tablenotetext{a}{The late-time decline rate (in units of mag
1752: (100~d)$^{-1}$) of the light curve.}
1753: \end{center}
1754: \end{table}
1755:
1756: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1757: %%%Table 8
1758: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1759:
1760: \begin{table}[htb]
1761: \begin{center}
1762: \caption{Host-galaxy reddening of SN 2006X derived from different
1763: methods.}
1764: \begin{tabular}{lcccccc}
1765: \tableline\tableline
1766: Method& $E(U - B)$ & $E(B - V)$ & $E(V - R)$ & $E(V - I)$ & $E(V - J)$ & $E(V - K)$ \\
1767: \tableline Global color
1768: fit&...&1.41$\pm$0.06&0.61$\pm$0.05&1.27$\pm$0.12&1.76$\pm$0.09&1.95$\pm$0.09\\
1769: $C_{max}$ &1.23$\pm$0.13&1.38$\pm$0.07&0.54$\pm$0.07&1.02$\pm$0.13
1770: &1.71$\pm$0.10 &
1771: 2.04$\pm$0.09 \\
1772: $C_{12}$ &... &1.45$\pm$0.06&0.66$\pm$0.06&1.33$\pm$0.12
1773: &1.73$\pm$0.11 &
1774: 1.85$\pm$0.11 \\
1775: Mean &1.23$\pm$0.13&1.42$\pm$0.04&0.61$\pm$0.03&1.22$\pm$0.07
1776: &1.74$\pm$0.06
1777: &1.96$\pm$0.06\\
1778: \tableline
1779: \end{tabular}
1780: \end{center}
1781: \end{table}
1782:
1783:
1784: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1785: %%%Table 9
1786: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1787:
1788: \begin{table}[htb]
1789: \begin{center}
1790: \caption{Parameters of highly extinguished SNe Ia.} {\scriptsize
1791: \begin{tabular}{lccclc}
1792: \tableline\tableline
1793: SN&Host Galaxy & $E(B - V)_{host}$ & $R_{V}$ & Colors & Source\\
1794: \tableline
1795: 1995E &NGC 4419&0.74$\pm$0.05&2.62$\pm$0.28&$BVI$ &1,2\\
1796: 1996ai&NGC 5005&1.69$\pm$0.10&2.03$\pm$0.12&$BVI$ &1,2\\
1797: 1999cl&NGC 4501&1.24$\pm$0.07&1.55$\pm$0.08&$BVRIJHK$&3\\
1798: 2000ce&UGC 4195&0.60$\pm$0.06&2.70$\pm$0.30&$UBVRI$&1,2\\
1799: %2001el&NGC 1448&0.19$\pm$0.03&2.15$\pm$0.23&$UBVRI$&4 \\
1800: %2002cv&NGC 3190&5.50$\pm$0.50&1.56$\pm$0.30&$BVRIJHK$&5\\
1801: 2003cg&NGC 3169&1.33$\pm$0.11&1.80$\pm$0.19&$UBVRIJHK$&4 \\
1802: 2006X &NGC 4321&1.42$\pm$0.06&1.50$\pm$0.15&$UBVRIJK$& This paper\\
1803: \tableline
1804: \end{tabular}}
1805: \tablerefs{(1)Wang et~al. (2006); (2) Jha et~al.
1806: (2007); (3) Krisciunas et~al. (2006); (4) Elias-Rosa et~al. (2006).}
1807: \end{center}
1808: \end{table}
1809:
1810: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1811: %%%Table 10
1812: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1813: \begin{table}[htb]
1814: \begin{center}
1815: \caption{Absolute magnitudes of SN 2006X at maximum light.}
1816: {\scriptsize
1817: \begin{tabular}{lccccccc}
1818: \tableline\tableline
1819: Method& $M_{U}$ & $M_{B}$ & $M_{V}$ & $M_{R}$ & $M_{I}$ & $M_{J}$ & $M_{K}$\\
1820: \tableline Cepheid distance
1821: &$-$19.63$\pm$0.25&$-$19.10$\pm$0.20&$-$19.06$\pm$0.17&$-$19.02$\pm$0.15&$-$18.52$\pm$0.18
1822: &$-$18.37$\pm$0.14 &$-$18.23$\pm$0.14\\
1823: Normalized to $\Delta m_{15}=1.10$& \nodata
1824: &$-$19.23$\pm$0.26&$-$19.18$\pm$0.22&$-$19.13$\pm$0.21&$-$18.62$\pm$0.23&
1825: \nodata &
1826: \nodata \\
1827: Normalized to $\Delta C_{12}=0.31$
1828: &$-$19.92$\pm$0.30&$-$19.31$\pm$0.23&$-$19.22$\pm$0.21&\nodata&$-$18.63$\pm$0.21
1829: &
1830: \nodata &\nodata\\
1831: \tableline
1832: \end{tabular}}
1833: \end{center}
1834: \end{table}
1835: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1836: %%%Table 11
1837: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1838: \begin{table}[htb]
1839: \begin{center}
1840: \caption{Relevant parameters for SN 2006X and its host galaxy.}
1841: {\scriptsize
1842: \begin{tabular}{lcc}
1843: \tableline\tableline
1844: & SN 2006X photometric parameters& \\
1845: \tableline
1846: UT discovery date& 7.15 February 2006 & 1\\
1847: Epoch of $B$ maximum & 2,453,786.17$\pm$0.35 & 2\\
1848: $B_{max}$ & 15.40$\pm$0.03 & 2 \\
1849: $B_{max} - V_{max}$ & 1.36$\pm$0.04 & 2\\
1850: $E(B - V)_{host}$ & 1.42$\pm$0.04 & 2\\
1851: $R_{V}$ & 1.48$\pm$0.06 & 2\\
1852: $M^{B}_{max}$ & $-$19.10$\pm$0.20 & 2 \\
1853: $\Delta m_{15}$(observed)&1.17$\pm$0.05 & 2\\
1854: $\Delta m_{15}$(true) & 1.31$\pm$0.05 & 2\\
1855: $\Delta C_{12}$(observed) & 1.83$\pm$0.05 & 2 \\
1856: $\Delta C_{12}$(true) &0.42$\pm$0.06 & 2\\
1857: Late-time $B$ decline rate & 0.92$\pm$0.05 mag (100~d)$^{-1}$ & 2\\
1858: $H_{0}$ & 72.8$\pm$8.2 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ & 2\\
1859: L$^{max}_{bol}$ & 1.02$\pm$0.10 $\times 10^{43}$ erg s$^{-1}$ & 2\\
1860: $t_{r}$ & 18.2$\pm$0.9 day & 2 \\
1861: M($^{56}$Ni) & 0.50$\pm$0.05~M$_{\odot}$ & 2\\
1862: \tableline\tableline
1863: & SN 2006X spectroscopic parameters & \\
1864: \tableline
1865: $v_{max}$(Si II $\lambda$6355) & $\sim$15500 km s$^{-1}$ & 2\\
1866: $v_{max}$(Ca II H\&K) & $\sim$20500km s$^{-1}$ & 2\\
1867: $v_{max}$ (S II $\lambda$5460) & $\sim$11800 km s$^{-1}$ &2 \\
1868: $v_{30}$ (Fe II $\lambda$4555) &$\sim$10300 km s$^{-1}$ & 2 \\
1869: $\dot{v}$ (Si II $\lambda$6355)& 123$\pm$10 km s$^{-1}$ &2 \\
1870: R(Si II) & 0.12$\pm$0.06 & 2\\
1871: \tableline
1872: \tableline
1873: & Parameters for NGC 4321 & \\
1874: \tableline
1875: Galaxy type & Sbc, LINER/ H II & 3\\
1876: $E(B - V)_{Gal}$ & 0.026& 3\\
1877: $(m-M)_{Cepheid}$ & 30.91$\pm$0.14 & 4 \\
1878: $v_{hel}$ & 1557 km s$^{-1}$ & 3\\
1879: \tableline
1880:
1881: \end{tabular}}
1882: \tablerefs{(1) Suzuki \& Migliardi (2006); (2)
1883: this paper; (3) NASA Extragalactic Database; (4) Freedman et~al.
1884: (2001)}
1885: \end{center}
1886: \end{table}
1887:
1888: \clearpage
1889:
1890:
1891: \begin{figure}
1892: \figurenum{1}
1893: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=160mm]{f1.eps}
1894: \caption{SN 2006X in NGC 4321 (M100). This is a $V$-band image taken
1895: by the 0.8~m TNT on 19.69 Feb. 2006. The supernova and 10 local
1896: reference stars (Table 2) are marked by numbers.}\label{fig-1}
1897: \vspace{-0.0cm}
1898: %\vspace{-0.5cm}
1899: \end{figure}
1900:
1901: \begin{figure}
1902: \figurenum{2} \vspace*{-40mm}\plotone {f2.eps} \vspace{-2.5cm} \hspace{-0.2cm}
1903: \caption{The $UBVRIJK$ light curves of SN 2006X. Solid dots denote the
1904: $UBVRI$ observations from TNT; open circles show the $BVRI$ data
1905: from KAIT; open squares represent the $BVRIJK$ data from the CTIO
1906: 1.3~m telescope. The $U$, $I$, $J$, and $K$ data have been offset
1907: vertically by +0.5, $-$0.5, $-$2.0, and $-$2.5 mag, respectively.}
1908: \label{fig-2} \vspace{-0.2cm}
1909: \end{figure}
1910:
1911: \begin{figure}
1912: \figurenum{3} \plotone {f3.eps}
1913: \caption{Comparison of the observed $U$-band light curves of
1914: SN 2006X with those of SNe 1984A, 1994D, 1998bu, 2002er, 2003cg, and
1915: 2005cf. All light curves are arbitrarily shifted in time and
1916: magnitude to fit the peak value of SN 2006X. The data sources are
1917: cited in the text.}
1918: \label{fig-3}
1919: \end{figure}
1920:
1921: \begin{figure}
1922: \figurenum{4} \plotone {f4.eps}
1923: \caption{Same as Fig. 3 but for the $B$-band light curve.}
1924: \label{fig-4}
1925: \end{figure}
1926:
1927: \begin{figure}
1928: \figurenum{5} \plotone {f5.eps}
1929: \caption{Same as Fig. 3 but for the $V$-band light curve.}
1930: \label{fig-5}
1931: \end{figure}
1932:
1933: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1934: \figurenum{6} \plotone {f6.eps}
1935: \caption{Same as Fig. 3 but for the $R$-band light curve.}
1936: \label{fig-6}
1937: \end{figure}
1938:
1939: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1940: \figurenum{7} \plotone {f7.eps}
1941: \caption{Same as Fig. 3 but for the $I$-band light curve.}
1942: \label{fig-7}
1943: \end{figure}
1944:
1945: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1946: \figurenum{8} \plotone {f8.eps}
1947: \caption{Near-IR $J$-band and $K$-band light curves of SN 2006X
1948: compared with those of SNe 1998bu, 2001el, 2002bo, 2003cg, and
1949: 2005cf. The data sources are cited in the text.}
1950: \label{fig-8}
1951: \end{figure}
1952:
1953:
1954: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1955: \figurenum{9}
1956: %\plotone {f9.eps}
1957: \hspace{-1.5cm}
1958: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=200mm]{f9.eps}
1959: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=90mm]{f22.eps}
1960: \caption{$U - B$, $B - V$, $V - R$, and $V - I$ color curves of
1961: SN 2006X compared with those of SNe 1994D, 1998bu, 2002bo, 2002er,
1962: 2003cg, and 2005cf. To show variations in the color evolution
1963: between different SNe Ia, the peak colors of all comparison SNe
1964: (except for SN 2005cf) have been artificially shifted redwards to
1965: match the observed values of SN 2006X at $B$ maximum. The
1966: dash-dotted line shows the Lira-Phillips relation plus a reddening
1967: of $E(B-V) = 1.42$ mag. The data sources are cited in the text.}
1968: \label{fig-9} \vspace{-0.2cm}
1969: \end{figure}
1970:
1971:
1972:
1973: \begin{figure}
1974: \figurenum{10} \plotone {f10.eps} \vspace{1.2cm}
1975: \caption{The $V - J$ and $V - K$ color curves of SN 2006X, together with
1976: those of SNe 1998bu, 2001el, 2002bo, 2003cg, and 2005cf. The dashed
1977: lines are the loci of the average light curves from Krisciunas et
1978: al. (2000), which are shifted by +1.72 in $V - J$ and +1.95 in $V -
1979: K$ in the ordinate direction to minimize the reduced $\chi^{2}$ of
1980: the fits.}
1981: \label{fig-10} \vspace{-0.2cm}
1982: \end{figure}
1983:
1984:
1985: \begin{figure}
1986: \figurenum{11} \plotone {f11.eps}
1987: \caption{$UVBRIJK$ minus $V$ color differences between SN 2006X and
1988: the unreddened SNe Ia with similar values of $\Delta m_{15}$. The
1989: solid curve shows the best-fit extinction curve following the
1990: analytical model of Cardelli et~al. (1989). The dashed curve
1991: represents the standard extinction curve with $R_{V} = 3.1$.}
1992: \label{fig-11}
1993: \end{figure}
1994:
1995: \begin{figure}
1996: \figurenum{12} \vspace{-4.5cm} {\plotone{f12.eps}}
1997: %\hspace{-0.5cm}
1998: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=100mm]{f3.eps}
1999: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=110mm]{f33.eps}
2000: \caption{Optical spectral evolution of SN 2006X. The spectra have
2001: been corrected for the redshift of NGC 4321 ($v_{hel}$ = 1567 km
2002: s$^{-1}$) but not reddening, and they have been shifted vertically
2003: by arbitrary amounts for clarity. The numbers on the right-hand side
2004: mark the epochs of the spectra in days after $B$ maximum.
2005: Uncorrected telluric absorption is marked with a plus sign inside a
2006: circle.} \label{fig-12}
2007: \end{figure}
2008:
2009:
2010:
2011: \clearpage
2012: \begin{figure}
2013: \figurenum{13} \hspace{-0.5cm} \plotone{f13.eps} \hspace{-0.5cm}
2014: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=100mm]{f3.eps}
2015: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=110mm]{f33.eps}
2016: \caption{The spectrum of SN 2006X near $B$ maximum brightness,
2017: overplotted with comparable-phase spectra of SNe 1984A, 1994D,
2018: 2002bo, 2002er, and 2003cg. All spectra shown here and in the
2019: subsequent figures have been corrected for reddening and redshift.
2020: For clarity of display, the spectra were arbitrarily shifted in the
2021: vertical direction.} \label{fig-13}
2022: \end{figure}
2023:
2024: \begin{figure}
2025: \figurenum{14} \hspace{-0.5cm} {\plotone{f14.eps}} \hspace{-0.5cm}
2026: \caption{Same as Fig. 13 but for spectra about one week after $B$
2027: maximum.} \label{fig-14}
2028: \end{figure}
2029:
2030: \begin{figure}
2031: \figurenum{15} \hspace{-0.5cm} {\plotone{f15.eps}} \vspace{-0.2cm}
2032: \caption{Same as Fig. 13 but for spectra at about 4 weeks past $B$
2033: maximum.} \label{fig-15}
2034: \end{figure}
2035:
2036:
2037: \begin{figure}
2038: \figurenum{16} \hspace{-0.5cm} {\plotone{f16.eps}} \hspace{-0.5cm}
2039: \caption{Evolution of the expansion velocity of SN 2006X as measured
2040: from the minimum of Si~II $\lambda$6355, compared with the values of
2041: SNe 1984A taken from Barbon et~al. (1989), 1989B from Barbon et~al.
2042: (1990), 2002bo from Benetti et~al. (2004), 1994D from Patat et~al.
2043: (1996), 2003cg from Elias-Rosa et~al. (2006), 2002er from Pignata
2044: et~al. (2004), and 2005cf from Garavini et~al. (2007). Some of the
2045: data points in the plot are from our unpublished spectral library.
2046: The numbers in parentheses represent the $\Delta m_{15}$ values for
2047: the SNe~Ia.} \label{fig-16}
2048: \end{figure}
2049:
2050: \begin{figure}
2051: \figurenum{17} \hspace{-0.5cm} {\plotone{f17.eps}} \hspace{-0.5cm}
2052: \caption{The same as Fig. 16, but for the Fe~II $\lambda$4555 line.}
2053: \label{fig-17}
2054: \end{figure}
2055:
2056:
2057: \begin{figure}
2058: \figurenum{18} \vspace{-4.5cm} {\plotone{f18.eps}} \hspace{-0.5cm}
2059: \caption{The early-epoch nebular spectra of SN 2006X compared with
2060: those of other SNe~Ia at three months past $B$ maximum. The dashed
2061: spectra overlapping the spectra of SN 2006X at days +75 and +98 are
2062: those of SNe 1989B and 2002bo at similar epochs. The comparison
2063: spectra are from our unpublished spectral library. All the spectra
2064: have been vertically shifted for clarity. The numbers in parentheses
2065: represent the $\Delta m_{15}$ values for the SNe~Ia.} \label{fig-18}
2066: \end{figure}
2067:
2068:
2069: \begin{figure}
2070: \figurenum{19} \hspace{-0.5cm} {\plotone{f19.eps}} \hspace{-0.5cm}
2071: \caption{Very late-time nebular spectrum of SN 2006X compared with
2072: those of SNe 1996X, 1998bu, and 2003du. The two vertical dotted
2073: lines refer to the Ca~II $\lambda$3945 and Na~I $\lambda$5892
2074: absorptions.} \label{fig-19}
2075: \end{figure}
2076:
2077:
2078: \begin{figure}[htbp]
2079: \figurenum{20} \plotone {f20.eps}
2080: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=90mm]{f.eps}
2081: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=90mm]{f22.eps}
2082: \caption{The quasi-bolometric light curve of SN 2006X computed from the
2083: $UBVRIJK$ light curves. Error bars consist of the uncertainties in
2084: the photometry, the distance and absorption corrections. The
2085: quasi-bolometric light curves constructed from SNe 1994D, 1998bu,
2086: 2002bo, 2002er, 2003cg, and 2005cf are overplotted for comparison
2087: (see \S 3.1 for the data sources). The numbers in parentheses
2088: represent the $\Delta m_{15}$ values for the SNe~Ia.}
2089: \label{fig-20}
2090: \end{figure}
2091:
2092: \end{document}
2093: