1: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
2: %%
3: %% Modified 2005 December 5
4:
5: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
6:
7: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
8:
9: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
10:
11: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
12:
13: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
14:
15: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
16:
17: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
18: \newcommand{\myemail}{}
19:
20: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
21:
22: \slugcomment{submitted to ApJ}
23:
24: \shorttitle{Circumstellar Disks in Cha~I}
25: \shortauthors{I. Damjanov et al.}
26:
27: \begin{document}
28:
29: \title{A Comprehensive View of Circumstellar Disks in Chamaeleon I: \\
30: Infrared Excess, Accretion Signatures and Binarity}
31:
32: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
33: %% author and affiliation information.
34: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
35: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
36: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
37: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
38:
39: \author{Ivana Damjanov\altaffilmark{1}, Ray Jayawardhana\altaffilmark{1},
40: Alexander Scholz\altaffilmark{2},\\
41: Mirza Ahmic\altaffilmark{1}, Duy C. Nguyen\altaffilmark{1}, Alexis Brandeker\altaffilmark{3}, Marten H. van Kerkwijk\altaffilmark{1}}
42: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 50 St.~George Street, Toronto,
43: ON M5S~3H4, Canada; damjanov@astro.utoronto.ca.}
44: \altaffiltext{2}{School of Physics \& Astronomy, University
45: of St. Andrews, North Haugh, St.Andrews, Fife KY16~9SS United Kingdom.}
46: \altaffiltext{3}{Stockholm Observatory,
47: AlbaNova University Center, Stockholms Center for Physics, Astronomy and Biotechnology,
48: Roslagstullsbacken 21, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.}
49:
50: \email{}
51:
52: %\author{C. D. Biemesderfer\altaffilmark{4,5}}
53: %\affil{National Optical Astronomy Observatories, Tucson, AZ 85719}
54: %\email{aastex-help@aas.org}
55:
56: %\and
57:
58: %\author{R. J. Hanisch\altaffilmark{5}}
59: %\affil{Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD 21218}
60:
61: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
62: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
63: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
64: %% affiliation.
65:
66: %\altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory.
67: %CTIO is operated by AURA, Inc.\ under contract to the National Science
68: %Foundation.}
69: %\altaffiltext{2}{Society of Fellows, Harvard University.}
70: %\altaffiltext{3}{present address: Center for Astrophysics,
71: % 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}
72: %\altaffiltext{4}{Visiting Programmer, Space Telescope Science Institute}
73: %\altaffiltext{5}{Patron, Alonso's Bar and Grill}
74:
75: \begin{abstract}
76: We present a comprehensive study of disks around 81 young low-mass stars and brown
77: dwarfs in the nearby $\sim$2~Myr-old Chamaeleon~I star-forming region. We use mid-infrared
78: photometry from the \it{Spitzer Space Telescope}\rm, supplemented by findings from ground-based
79: high-resolution optical spectroscopy and adaptive optics imaging. We derive disk fractions
80: of $52\%\pm6\%$ and $58^{+6}_{-7}\%$ based on 8~$\mu$m and 24~$\mu$m colour excesses, respectively,
81: consistent with those reported for other clusters of similar age. Within the uncertainties,
82: the disk frequency in our sample of K3--M8 objects in Cha~I does not depend on stellar mass.
83: Diskless and disk-bearing objects have similar spatial distributions. There are no obvious
84: transition disks in our sample, implying a rapid timescale for the inner disk clearing
85: process; however, we find two objects with weak excess at 3--8~$\mu$m and substantial excess at
86: 24~$\mu$m, which may indicate grain growth and dust settling in the inner disk. For a
87: sub-sample of 35 objects with high-resolution spectra, we investigate the connection
88: between accretion signatures and dusty disks: in the vast majority of cases (29/35)
89: the two are well correlated, suggesting that, on average, the timescale for gas
90: dissipation is similar to that for clearing the inner dust disk. The exceptions are
91: six objects for which dust disks appear to persist even though accretion has
92: ceased or dropped below measurable levels. Adaptive optics images of 65 of our targets reveal
93: that 17 have companions at (projected) separations of 10--80~AU. Of the five
94: $\lesssim20$~AU binaries, four lack infrared excess, possibly indicating that a close
95: companion leads to faster disk dispersal. The closest binary with excess is separated
96: by $\sim20$~AU, which sets an upper limit of $\sim8$~AU for the outer disk radius. The
97: overall disk frequency among stars with companions ($35^{+15}_{-13}\%$) is lower than
98: (but still statistically consistent with) the value for the total sample.
99:
100: \end{abstract}
101:
102: \keywords{Accretion, Accretion Disks -- Circumstellar Matter -- Planetary Systems
103: --Stars: Low Mass, Brown Dwarfs -- Binaries: General}
104:
105: \section{Introduction}
106: Circumstellar disks are a natural outcome of star formation and the
107: potential birth sites of planets. Thus studies of disk evolution can
108: provide useful constraints on both pre-main-sequence stellar
109: evolution and planet formation timescales. Dusty disks may be
110: identified most easily by their infrared emission. Observations in
111: the mid-infrared are much more sensitive to disks than those in
112: the near-infrared, since the stellar photospheric flux declines rapidly at
113: longer wavelengths while the disk emission rises. The {\it Spitzer Space
114: Telescope}, with its Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) and Multiband
115: Imaging Photometer (MIPS) operating in the 3.6--160~$\mu$m range, has
116: greatly improved our ability to identify and study disks surrounding
117: young stars (e.g., \citealp{Hartmann2005,sa2006,Lada2006}). Processes
118: of grain growth and dust settling to the midplane, along with the
119: possible formation of planetesimals, are thought to occur
120: in the inner disks. The consequent reduction of
121: small dust grain abundance results in weak or absent near-infrared
122: emission but the mid- to far-infrared disk emission remains strong,
123: leading to the characteristic signature of ``transition disks''
124: \citep{D'Alessio2005,calvet2005,Muzerolle2006}. The spectral energy
125: distribution (SED) in 4--25~$\mu$m wavelength range is thus ideal for
126: probing dust in the inner disk.
127:
128: Since gas constitutes most ($\sim99\%$) of the disk mass and is
129: essential for building giant planets, it is important to know whether
130: gas and dust disperse on similar timescales. While it is difficult
131: to detect the bulk of the disk gas directly, its presence can be
132: inferred from signatures of accretion from the inner disk edge onto
133: the central star. The most prominent signature of
134: infalling gas is a broad, asymmetric and strong H$\alpha$ emission
135: line \citep{Mohanty2005,Muzerolle2005,Jayawardhana2006}. A comparison
136: between accretion signatures and infrared emission can reveal whether
137: the timescales for dust and gas dissipation are similar. Another
138: important question related to planet formation is whether the presence
139: of a binary companion has a considerable effect on disk evolution
140: \citep[and references therein]{Bouwman2006}.
141:
142: Here we present a comprehensive study of disks surrounding 81 stars and
143: brown dwarfs in the nearby ($160$~pc; \citealp{Whittet1997}), young ($\sim$2
144: ~Myr; \citealp[and references therein]{Luhman2004}) Chamaeleon~I cloud (abbreviated Cha~I in the following),
145: using \t{Spitzer} \rm IRAC 4--8~$\mu$m and MIPS 24~$\mu$m data. We study the
146: overall disk frequency as well as its possible dependence on stellar
147: spectral type, and look for transition disk candidates. For 35 of the
148: targets, for which high-resolution optical spectra are available (Nguyen
149: et al., in prep.; \citealp{Mohanty2005,Muzerolle2005}), we investigate the
150: connection between infrared excess and accretion signatures. For 65
151: objects --the largest such sample to date-- the availability of
152: adaptive optics images (Ahmic et al., in prep.) allows us to explore how
153: multiplicity affects disk dissipation.
154:
155: \section{Spitzer Data and Photometry}\label{data}
156: %\subsection{}
157:
158: We used publicly available images of the Cha~I star-forming region from
159: the IRAC and MIPS instruments aboard the \it {Spitzer Space Telescope} \rm (GTO programs \# 6 and 37, PI: G. Fazio).
160: The IRAC images of the southern and northern cloud cores in Cha~I at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8 and 8.0~$\mu$m were obtained in
161: June and July 2004 (AOR keys 3960320 and 3651328). The plate scale and the spatial resolution of IRAC are $1\farcs2$
162: and $\sim2\arcsec$, respectively \citep{Fazio2004}. For these programs, the Spitzer Science Center (SSC) pipeline
163: (ver S14.0.0) provides two shallow (exp.~time 20.8~s) maps for all of the four IRAC channels, each performed twice
164: with an offset of a few arcseconds. These dual maps for the southern cloud have centers at
165: $\alpha\approx11^\mathrm{h}07^\mathrm{m}$, $\delta\approx-77^\mathrm{h}34^\mathrm{m}$
166: (J2000) for 3.6 and 5.8~$\mu$m and at $\alpha\approx11^\mathrm{h}07^\mathrm{m}$,
167: $\delta\approx-77^\mathrm{h}28^\mathrm{m}$ (J2000) for 4.5 and 8.0~$\mu$m.
168: The northern cloud core maps have centers
169: at $\alpha\approx11^\mathrm{h}09^\mathrm{m}$, $\delta\approx-76^\mathrm{h}36^\mathrm{m}$
170: (J2000) for 3.6 and 5.8~$\mu$m and at $\alpha\approx11^\mathrm{h}10^\mathrm{m}$,
171: $\delta\approx-76^\mathrm{h}30^\mathrm{m}$ (J2000) for 4.5 and 8.0~$\mu$m.
172: The dimensions of the maps are $33\arcmin\times29\arcmin$. In each of the four bands, BCD images for each of the
173: shallow maps were taken through the post-BCD pipeline at the SSC, where the pointing refinement and mosaicing with
174: standard MOPEX tool were performed. We used these archived final post-BCD shallow mosaics for IRAC photometric
175: measurements in our analysis.
176:
177: The observations of the northern and southern Cha~I cloud cores using MIPS were taken in April 2004 and February 2005
178: (AOR keys 3661312 and 3962112). The relevant MIPS imaging band for the purpose of this analysis is the one centered at
179: 24~$\mu$m, since the sensitivity limits and background emission in MIPS channels at 70~$\mu$m and 160~$\mu$m do not allow
180: detection of any but the brightest mid-infrared sources. The plate scale of the 24~$\mu$m array is $2\farcs45$; it has a
181: spatial resolution of 6$\arcsec$ \citep{Rieke2004}. The Cha~I maps have a total size of about $0\fdg5\times1\fdg5$. The
182: total effective exposure time per pointing at 24~$\mu$m is about 80~s. After calibration and correction for distortion,
183: images were combined into the final mosaics within the standard post-BCD SSC pipeline. We used these archived MIPS mosaics
184: for 24~$\mu$m flux measurements.
185:
186: We considered the 157 Cha~I members listed in \citet{Luhman2004}. These are mostly late-type stars with
187: spectral classes in the range of K0--M8, including eight likely brown dwarfs with spectral types later than M6.
188: More than 100 members of Cha~I are found in the IRAC and MIPS images used in our analysis. Two small areas in
189: the covered regions, one each for the northern and the southern field, are affected by localized extended emission
190: associated with bright stars, overlapping PSF structures, as well as saturation effects (see Fig.~\ref{f1}). For objects
191: in those areas, aperture photometry does not give reliable results. To be conservative, we excluded such objects from
192: our analysis -- 35 out of 116 in IRAC and 39 out of 126 in MIPS. We note that this excludes all stars brighter than K3.
193: Our final list of targets contains 81~Cha~I objects with spectral types that span from K3 to M8. Out of these, 69 have
194: detectable fluxes in all four IRAC channels and in the MIPS 24~$\mu$m band. Additional 18 objects with measured
195: 24~$\mu$m fluxes were not present in the IRAC field of view. IRAC 8~$\mu$m and MIPS 24~$\mu$m mosaics with all
196: detected objects are presented in Fig.~\ref{f1}.
197:
198: We performed photometry using the aperture photometry routine \texttt{aper.pro} in the IDLPHOT package.
199: The IDLPHOT routines were integrated into a custom IDL program that uses the World Coordinate System information in
200: the image headers to find the star within the image. The program then determines the centroid of the star and extracts
201: the photometry. For IRAC data, we used a 5-pixel ($6\farcs1$) aperture for each object, with a sky annulus extending
202: from 5 to 10 pixels for sky flux measurements. We applied an aperture correction following the instructions given in the
203: IRAC handbook, version 3.0. For eight Cha~I brown dwarfs with IRAC fluxes previously published by \citet{Luhman2005},
204: our photometry is consistent with theirs to within the errors.
205: For MIPS 24~$\mu$m images, we chose a $6\farcs6$ aperture, with a sky annulus in the range
206: of 7-13$\arcsec$. In order to account for the aperture correction, we used values tabulated in the MIPS handbook, version
207: 3.2.1. The final list of Cha~I targets with their fluxes in units of mJy measured in the 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8~$\mu$m and 24~$\mu$m
208: bands is given in Table~I. The $J-H$ colour for all Cha~I members listed in Table~I is from the Two Micron All Sky
209: Survey (2MASS) Point Source Catalog.
210:
211: \section{Disk Frequency}\label{frac}
212:
213: It is possible to distinguish between diskless (so-called Class III) and disk-harboring (Class II) stars using
214: the IRAC colours, as suggested by \citet{allen2004}. The two classes of objects are indeed well separated in
215: our IRAC colour-colour diagram (Fig.~\ref{f2}): diskless stars do not show colour excess in the IRAC channels
216: and thus fall near the origin of the coordinate system, while those with disks are concentrated in a region demarcated
217: by model colours and measured IRAC colours for objects in various other star-forming regions \citep{allen2004,Hartmann2005}.
218:
219: Another way to distinguish stars with disks from those without is to plot mid-infrared flux ratios against
220: the $J-H$ colour, which is a reasonable proxy for the stellar photosphere. We do this in Fig.~\ref{f3}
221: for the 8~$\mu$m to 4.5~$\mu$m and 24~$\mu$m to 4.5~$\mu$m flux ratios. The presence of two populations of stars
222: is evident. The population with lower flux ratios shows the infrared emission dominated
223: by the stellar photospheres: these are comparable to the blackbody emission function with the temperature range
224: that includes the effective temperatures of all Cha~I members in our sample (dashed line in both panels of
225: Fig.~\ref{f3}). Objects with the higher flux ratios are the ones likely to harbor circumstellar disks; dust
226: emission from the surrounding disk contributes substantially to the infrared emission coming from these objects.
227: Interestingly, there is a clear gap between diskless and disk-bearing stars in both panels, indicating a rapid
228: transition between these two phases (see~\S~\ref{trans} for further discussion).
229:
230: Based on 8~$\mu$m excess, the disk fraction among Cha~I members included in our analysis is $52\%\pm6\%$ ($42/81$)
231: while for objects detected at 24~$\mu$m, it is $58^{+6}_{-7}\%$ ($40/69$)\footnote{Cautious note: Since we excluded
232: a significant fraction of the Cha~I members located close to bright stars (see \S~\ref{data}), our disk frequencies may be
233: biased.}.
234: Thus, the disk frequency we derive for Cha~I is comparable
235: to that found in the $\sim$2~Myr-old IC~348 cluster ($50\%\pm6\%$) from IRAC observations \citep{Lada2006}, but somewhat lower
236: than the $\sim68\%$ disk fraction reported for the $\sim$1~Myr-old Taurus star-forming region, based on 3.6~$\mu$m excess
237: measurements \citep{Haish2001}. On the older side, only $19\%\pm4\%$ of K+M stars in the $\sim$5 ~Myr-old Upper Scorpius OB
238: association show disk excess at 8~$\mu$m and 16~$\mu$m \citep{Carpenter2006}. A similar steep decline in the frequencies
239: of the low-mass stars with disks is also seen in the $\sim$8 ~Myr-old TW Hydrae association \citep{Jayawardhana1999} and
240: in the $\sim$10--12~Myr old NGC~7160 cluster \citep{sa2006}.
241:
242: There have been suggestions that the disk fraction among young stars depends on spectral type and stellar mass
243: \citep{Lada2006,Carpenter2006,sa2006}. However, in the case of Cha~I, circumstellar disks appear to be distributed evenly
244: among late-type ($\geq$~K3) stars (Fig.~\ref{f4}). The fraction of disk-bearing stars in our sample ranges from
245: $47\%\pm10\%$ for M0--M4 stars to $53^{+9}_{-10}\%$ for M4.25--M8 stars and $55^{+18}_{-19}\%$ for K3--K8 stars. These
246: disk fractions are similar to that ($50\%\pm17\%$) reported by \citet{Luhman2005} for very low mass objects in this region.
247: In order to consider a possible dependance on stellar mass, we can convert the effective temperatures of Cha~I members in
248: our sample \citep{Luhman2004} to masses using the \citet{Baraffe1998} pre-main-sequence (PMS) evolutionary tracks for an
249: age of $\sim2$~Myr. We find that stars with masses $\gtrsim1$~M$_{\sun}$ have a disk fraction of $55^{+18}_{-19}\%$
250: while $47\%\pm10\%$ of those in the 0.3~M$_{\sun}$--$\lesssim1$~M$_{\sun}$ range harbor dusty disks. Again, we do
251: not find a significant mass-dependance in the disk frequency, for Cha~I members with masses of 0.1--1.4~M$_{\sun}$. On the
252: other hand, \citet {Lada2006} have found the highest percentage of circumstellar disks in the IC~348 cluster to be
253: among K6--M2 stars ($\sim56\%$), which have masses comparable to the Sun, while the disk fraction for stars $<$ K6
254: is only $\sim19\%$. For Upper Scorpius, the highest disk fraction is for K and M stars with masses in the 0.1--1~M$_{\sun}$
255: range \citep{Carpenter2006}, although the peak value ($\sim19\%$) is much lower than in the younger Cha~I and IC~348 regions.
256: Meanwhile, $\sim48\%$ of G--M2 stars in Trumpler~37 ($\sim$4~Myr) show infrared excess \citep{sa2006}. In summary, the
257: evidence to date suggests that primordial disks survive for $\sim$5 ~Myr around 20--50\% of the stars with masses
258: $\lesssim1$~M$_{\sun}$, thus providing conditions for planet formation. The disk lifetime seems to be a function
259: of object mass in some regions, but not in Cha~I, thus it may also depend on the environment.
260:
261: We also investigated whether there is a difference between the spatial distribution of diskless stars versus disk-bearing
262: stars, especially in terms of their apparent distance from the two intermediate-mass stars in Cha~I. The Herbig Ae/Be star
263: HD~97048 is located in the lower cloud core, while the likely zero-age main sequence A star HD~97300 is in the upper cloud
264: core. Figure~\ref{f5} shows the positions of our targets along with those of the two early-type stars. There does not appear
265: to be a difference between the spatial distributions of stars with 8~$\mu$m excess and those without (filled and open circles in
266: Fig.~\ref{f5}, respectively), outside of $2.5\arcmin$ from HD~97300 in the upper cloud and $6\arcmin$ from HD~97048
267: in the lower cloud core; at smaller distances contamination from the bright stars and cloud core emission prevent reliable
268: flux measurements (see \S~\ref{data}). Average positions of the two types of objects in the lower and upper cloud regions, denoted
269: as open pentagons for disk-bearing and open squares for diskless stars, might suggest that disk-bearing objects are slightly
270: displaced towards the central region of Cha~I. However, this displacement is too small to be statistically significant. Thus, we
271: conclude that there is no evidence for intermediate mass stars influencing disk dissipation in low-mass stars in Cha~I.
272:
273: \section{Transition Disks}\label{trans}
274: Objects that exhibit fluxes at 3--8~$\mu$m fully consistent with photospheric emission, but higher flux levels at
275: longer wavelengths are thought to be caught in the process of inner disk clearing. These disks may have an optically
276: thin inner region devoid of small dust grains, as in the case of CoKu Tau/4 in Taurus \citep{D'Alessio2005}. Theoretical
277: models proposed to explain the clearing process include photoevaporation by ultraviolet radiation from the central star
278: and grain growth related to planet formation processes \citep{Muzerolle2006}.
279:
280: To identify transition disk candidates among Cha~I members in our sample, we have searched for objects with no
281: infrared colour excess at 3--8~$\mu$m (i.e., lying under the dotted line in the upper panel of Fig.~\ref{f3}),
282: but with excess flux at 24~$\mu$m (i.e., lying above the dotted line in the lower panel of Fig.~\ref{f3}).
283: We found two candidates: K8-type star T35 and M5-class star C7-1. We then plotted the infrared spectral energy
284: distributions (SEDs) of these two objects, including near-infrared fluxes from the 2MASS Point Source Catalog,
285: along with the SED of the disk-bearing star T46 (K8) for comparison (Fig.~\ref{f6}). All fluxes have been
286: dereddened using $A_{J}$ given in \citet{Luhman2004} and the reddening law of \citet{Mathis1990}. All three objects show
287: excess above the expected photospheric emission at $\lesssim10$~$\mu$m (based on the STARdusty 2000 models of stellar atmospheres
288: by \citealt{Allard2000}), but the excess is less pronounced in
289: T35 and C7-1. Since small ($<10$~$\mu$m), warm ($T>200$~K) dust grains dominate emission in this wavelength region,
290: the flatter SEDs of T35 and C7-1 may imply that their inner disks are undergoing grain growth and dust settling to
291: the optically thick midplane \citep{Scholz2007}. However, their inner disks are not completely devoid of small grains,
292: unlike the case in previously studied transition objects (e.g., \citealp{D'Alessio2005, Muzerolle2006}).
293:
294: \section{Connections with Accretion and Binarity}\label{other}
295: Our Cha~I sample is ideally suited for investigating the effects of stellar properties and immediate environment on
296: disk dissipation, because high-resolution optical spectra and high-angular resolution images are available for a
297: substantial fraction of the targets. The optical spectra, obtained with MIKE on the Magellan/Clay 6.5\,m telescope,
298: include tracers of disk accretion for 35 objects (Nguyen et al., in prep.; \citealp{Mohanty2005,Muzerolle2005}). Adaptive optics (AO)
299: imaging with NACO on the ESO Very Large Telescope has been carried out for 65 of our targets (Ahmic et al., in prep.).
300:
301: \subsection{Accretion}\label{acc}
302: The strength of the H$\alpha$ emission line is widely used as a signature of (gas) accretion from a disk onto the
303: central star \citep[e.g.,][]{Jayawardhana2006}. In the spectra of accreting objects, the line is dominated by emission produced
304: in the infalling gas, whereas in non-accretors the line is weaker because it comes only from chromospheric activity.
305: Traditionally, young stars were classified as either classical T~Tauri stars (CTTS) if the H$\alpha$ equivalent width
306: (EW) is $> 10$~\AA~ or as weak-line T~Tauri stars (WTTS) if the EW~$< 10$~\AA. But, since the EW depends on the spectral
307: type, \citet{wb2003} proposed the full width of the line at 10$\%$ of the peak as a more robust accretion diagnostic.
308: Based on empirical and physical arguments, \citet{Jayawardhana2003} adopted an H$\alpha$ $10\%$ width
309: of~$\sim200$~km~s$^{-1}$ as a dividing line between accretors and non-accretors, to be applicable to the very low mass
310: regime as well. In fact, \citet{Natta2004} have found that the H$\alpha$ $10\%$ correlates well with the mass
311: accretion rate derived in other ways, and that the $\sim200$~km~s$^{-1}$ threshold corresponds to the mass acretion rate
312: $\sim10^{-11}$~M$_{\sun}$~yr$^{-1}$.
313:
314: To examine the connection between dusty inner disks and gas accretion, in Fig.~\ref{f7} we show the 8~$\mu$m
315: excess versus H$\alpha$~$10\%$ widths for those Cha~I members for which both measurements are available. (The error
316: bars on the H$\alpha$~$10\%$ width refer to the standard deviations of the estimates over four epochs of observations.)
317: Out of 35 objects in this sub-sample, 14 do not show evidence of accretion or dust emission (cf. lower left region in
318: Fig.~\ref{f7}), implying that their inner disks have probably been cleared of both dust and gas. Of 21 objects
319: with infrared excess, 15 appear to be accreting.\footnote{For two of the objects --CHX~18N and T35-- the 8~$\mu$m excess
320: is relatively weak; the latter does have substantial excess at 24~$\mu$m (see~\S~\ref{trans}) while for the former we could not
321: measure it reliably due to background contamination.} Thus, in the vast majority of cases (29/35) the signature of
322: accretion is well correlated with evidence of a dusty disk. This finding suggests that, on average, the gas dissipation
323: timescale is comparable to the timescale for clearing the inner disk of small dust grains.
324:
325: However, six out of the 21 disk-bearing objects in this sub-sample lie below the accretion threshold (upper left
326: part of Fig.~\ref{f7}). Five out of these six objects are in the low-mass regime, with the masses $\lesssim0.3$~M$_{\sun}$
327: (see Table~\ref{tbl-2}). One possible explanation is that accretion rates have dropped below measurable levels
328: even though dust disks persist in these cases. Another explanation is variable accretion: it may well be the case
329: that quiescent phases dominate in the latest stages of accretion, so some objects with disks are observed during
330: the non-accreting epochs \citep[see][]{Hartmann2005, Lada2006, sa2006, Scholz2007}.
331:
332: \subsection{Binarity}\label{bin}
333: Theoretical models of the evolution of T~Tauri disks in binary systems show that the individual circumstellar disks
334: are truncated due to tidal effects. Once truncated, the two disks evolve independently, unless gap-clearing and
335: circumbinary disk formation occur \citep{LA1996}.
336:
337: Of the Cha~I members in our sample, 65 have also been imaged with AO on the ESO VLT (Ahmic et al., in prep.). Among them,
338: there are 15 binaries and two triple systems. In Fig.~\ref{f8}, we show the 8/4.5~$\mu$m flux ratio against
339: projected binary separation for this sub-sample. Given the relatively poor angular resolution of IRAC and MIPS
340: (\S~\ref{data}), these multiple systems are unresolved in the \it{Spitzer} \rm images; thus,
341: we cannot determine which companion is responsible for the infrared excess. Nine of the binaries do not show infrared
342: excess, while other six appear to harbor disks based on the 8/4.5~$\mu$m flux ratio. Neither of the two
343: triples shows mid-infrared excess.
344:
345: The projected separations of the AO-resolved binaries range from $\sim10$~AU to $\sim300$~AU. Of the five binaries
346: with $\lesssim20$~AU separations, four --including the two closest pairs-- exhibit low 8/4.5~$\mu$m flux ratios
347: typical for diskless objects. This implies that either the disks have dissipated completely or a large inner hole
348: is carved out by the companion; in the latter scenario, the disk would be circumbinary and undetectable with the
349: near- and mid-IR data used in our analysis. The closest pair with detectable disk excess --Hn~13-- is separated by
350: $\sim20$~AU. Theoretical modeling suggests that tidally truncated disks would have outer radii between 0.3--0.4 times
351: the physical separation between the two stars for binaries with mass ratios close to one \citep{PP1977}. Thus, the
352: disk(s) in the Hn~13 binary system would have an outer radius of $\sim8$~AU: emission from dust within this radius
353: may explain the excess at 8 and 24~$\mu$m.
354:
355: The two triple systems detected, CHXR~28 and T39, do not exhibit 8~$\mu$m or 24~$\mu$m excess. Their projected
356: separations are 24, $\sim290$~AU and $\sim200$, $\sim720$~AU, respectively. Again, the lack of mid-infrared excess
357: may indicate faster disk dissipation due to the presence of companions or growth of large inner holes.
358:
359:
360: In a recent study of the $\simeq8$~Myr old $\eta$~Chamaeleontis star cluster, \citet{Bouwman2006} reported that
361: disks clear out more rapidly in binary systems with projected separations $\lesssim20$~AU. Their analysis of 15
362: K- and M-type stars, using their own \it{Spitzer} \rm observations and AO-imaging by \citet{Brandeker2006}, shows that
363: only one out of six binaries ($17^{+28}_{-14}\%$) retains a dusty disk while eight out of nine single stars
364: ($89^{+9}_{-21}\%$) harbor disks. Thus, they concluded that circumstellar disks and binarity are anti-correlated.
365: We also find that the disk excess fraction is lower among multple systems ($35^{+15}_{-13}\%$) than among
366: (apparently) single stars ($48\%\pm8\%$) in Cha~I, but the difference is less pronounced in this (younger) region.
367: (The disk frequency for the total sample of 65 objects is $45\%\pm7\%$, a value slightly higher than that for
368: multiple systems.) If we consider only those binaries with $\lesssim20$~AU separations, 4/5 do lack infrared
369: excess. It may be that companions at (projected) distances $\gtrsim20$~AU do not have a strong effect
370: on inner disk dissipation (at least not within $\simeq2$~Myr).
371:
372: \section{Summary}
373:
374: We have presented a comprehensive view on the disks around stars and brown dwarfs in the
375: nearby, young Cha~I dark cloud. In the following, we summarize our results:
376:
377: \begin{enumerate}
378:
379: \item{We used archival \it{Spitzer} \rm data to measure
380: mid-infrared fluxes in the wavelength range 3-24~$\mu$m for 81 known members of the Cha~I
381: star forming region. Our sample shows a clear bimodality in their \it{Spitzer} \rm colours (flux
382: ratios 8/4.5~$\mu$m and 24/4.5~$\mu$m). For about half of the objects, the mid-infrared
383: colours are consistent with purely photospheric emission, while the other half shows substantial
384: mid-infrared colour excess, interpreted as emission from a dusty disk. In both colours,
385: there is a clear gap between the two groups of objects.}
386:
387: \item{The overall disk frequency in our sample is $52\%\pm6\%$ based on the 8/4.5~$\mu$m
388: colour and $58^{+6}_{-7}\%$ based on the 24/4.5~$\mu$m colour. This value is consistent with the
389: disk fractions found in similarly aged regions like IC~348 and Taurus \citep{Haish2001,Hartmann2005,Lada2006}.
390: In contrast, the stellar disk frequency in the somewhat older star forming region Upper Scorpius (age $\sim5$~Myr) appears to
391: be significantly lower ($\sim20$\%, \citealt{Carpenter2006}).}
392:
393: \item{The disk fraction in our sample is, within the statistical uncertainties, not a function
394: of spectral type: independent of the chosen binning, it ranges between 47\% and 55\% for
395: spectral types between K3 and M8. This is in contrast to recent findings in other star forming
396: regions, where the disk frequency has been found to change significantly in the same spectral range
397: \citep{Lada2006,Carpenter2006,Scholz2007}. Environmental differences and
398: mass-dependent disk evolution might be important aspects to explain these findings.}
399:
400: \item{There is no clear difference in the spatial distribution of stars with and without disks.
401: The presence of bright stars in Cha~I does not seem to have any effect on the spatial distribution of dusty disks
402: at distances grater than few arcmin. Although average positions of stars with disks within the two Cha~I cores are
403: slightly displaced with respect to the average positions of disk-bearing stars, the difference is too small to be statistically important.}
404:
405: \item{In our sample, there are no definitive transition disks, i.e. objects without excess at
406: 3--8~$\mu$m, but significant excess at longer wavelengths. These transition disks are often discussed
407: as objects caught in the process of inner disk clearing. However, we find two objects which
408: have weak excess emission at 3--8~$\mu$m (and no colour excess at these wavelengths), but
409: substantial excess at 24~$\mu$m. These objects may be potential pre-cursors to transition disks. This
410: type of SED is best seen in the late-K type star T35, which shows a rising SED at
411: 24~$\mu$m.}
412:
413: \item{For 35 objects in our sample, we combined the \it{Spitzer} \rm data with results from high-resolution
414: optical spectroscopy. As a proxy for accretion, we use the H$\alpha$ 10\% width and adopt a
415: threshold of 200\,km~s$^{-1}$ between accretors and non-accretors. Among the vast majority
416: (29/35), there is a correlation between accretion signatures and infrared excess, consistent with the
417: idea that the dust clearing of the inner disk coincides with a cessation of the gas accretion. However,
418: six of the non-accretors still show signs of an inner dust disk. Thus, in some cases young objects can retain
419: their disks, after continuous accretion has stopped or at least dropped below measurable levels.
420: }
421:
422: \item{We use the results from a Cha~I imaging survey with high spatial resolution using the AO system NACO
423: at ESO/VLT to investigate the impact of multiplicity on the disk properties. AO images have been obtained for
424: 65 objects in our \it{Spitzer} \rm sample, 17 of them have companions at separations between $0\farcs06$
425: and $5\arcsec$, corresponding to (projected) physical separations of 10--800~AU. The disk frequency among the
426: objects with companions ($35^{+15}_{-13}\%$) is lower than (but still consistent with) the value for the total
427: sample, which might
428: hint that the presence of a companion contributes to faster disk dispersal. However, the existence of six
429: objects with disks and companions (at separations between 20--300~AU) suggests that the dispersion of the
430: inner disk is not strongly affected by companions at $\gtrsim20$~AU. For the closest binary with disk, the companion sets
431: an upper limit for the outer disk radius of $\sim8$~AU. (Note that all multiple systems are unresolved
432: in \it{Spitzer} \rm images, implying that we cannot determine which component is responsible for the mid-infrared excesss.)}
433:
434: \end{enumerate}
435:
436: \acknowledgments
437: This research was supported by NSERC grants to RJ and MHvK, and an Early Researcher Award from the Province of
438: Ontario to RJ.
439:
440: %% Putting eqnarrays or equations inside the mathletters environment groups
441: %% the enclosed equations by letter. For instance, the eqnarray below, instead
442: %% of being numbered, say, (4) and (5), would be numbered (4a) and (4b).
443: %% LaTeX the paper and look at the output to see the results.
444:
445: \begin{thebibliography}{}
446: \bibitem[Allard et al.(2000)]{Allard2000} Allard, F, Hauschildt, P. H., \& Schwenke D. 2000, \apj, 540, 1005
447: \bibitem[Allen et al.(2004)]{allen2004} Allen, L. E., Calvet, N.,
448: D'Alessio, P., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 363
449: \bibitem[Andr\'{e} et al.(2000)]{Andre2000} Andr\'{e}, P.,
450: Ward-Thompson, D., \& Barsony, M. 2000, in Mannings, v., Boss, A. P., \& Russell, S. S., eds, Protostars and Planets IV,
451: Tuscon: Univ. Arizona Press, p.59
452: \bibitem[Baraffe et al.(1998)]{Baraffe1998} Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P. H. 1998, \aap, 337, 403B
453: \bibitem[Bouwman et al.(2006)]{Bouwman2006} Bouwman, J., Lawson, A.,
454: Dominik, C., et al. 2006, ApJ, 653, L57
455: \bibitem[Brandeker et al.(2006)]{Brandeker2006} Brandeker, A., Jayawardhana, R., Khavari, P., et al. 2006, \apj, 652, 1572
456: \bibitem[Calvet et al.(2005)]{calvet2005} Calvet, N., D'Alessio, P.,
457: Watson, P. D., et al. 2005, \apj, 630, L185
458: \bibitem[Carpenter et al.(2006)]{Carpenter2006} Carpenter, J. M.,
459: Mamajek, E. E., Hillenbrand, L. A., \& Meyer, M .R. 2006, \apj, 651,
460: L49
461: \bibitem[D'Alessio et al.(2005)]{D'Alessio2005} D'Alessio, P.,
462: Hartmann, L., Calvet, N., et al. 2005, \apj, 621, 461
463: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004)]{Fazio2004} Fazio, G. G., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 10
464: \bibitem[Haish et al.(2001)]{Haish2001} Haish, H. E., Lada, E. A., \& Lada, C. J. 2001, \apj, 533, L153
465: \bibitem[Hartmann et al.(2005)]{Hartmann2005} Hartmann, L., Megeath, S. T., Allen, L., et al. 2005, \apj, 629, 881
466: \bibitem[Jayawardhana et al.(1999)]{Jayawardhana1999}Jayawardhana, R., Hartmann, L., Fazio, G., et al. 1999, \apj, 521, L129
467: \bibitem[Jayawardhana et al.(2003)]{Jayawardhana2003}Jayawardhana, R., Mohanty, S., \& Basri, G. 2003, \apj, 592, 282
468: \bibitem[Jayawardhana et al.(2006)]{Jayawardhana2006}Jayawardhana, R., Coffey, J. Scholz, A., et al. 2006, \apj, 648, 1206
469: \bibitem[Lada et al.(2006)]{Lada2006} Lada, C. J., Muench, A. A., Luhman, K. L., et al. 2006, \apj, 131, 1574
470: \bibitem[L\'opez Mart\'i et al.(2004)]{LopezMarti2004} L\'{o}pez Mart\'{i}, B., Eisl\"{o}ffel, J., Scholz, A., \& Mundt, R. 2004, \aap, 416, 555
471: \bibitem[Lubow \& Artymowicz(1996)]{LA1996} Lubow, S. H. \& Artymowicz, P. 1996, in Wijers, R. A. M. J., Davies, M. B., \& Tout, C. A., eds, Evolutionary
472: Processes in Binary Stars. Kluwer Academic Publishers, p.53
473: \bibitem[Luhman(2004)]{Luhman2004} Luhman, K. L. 2004, \apj, 602, 816
474: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2005)]{Luhman2005} Luhman, K. L., D'Alessio, P.,
475: Calvet, N., et al. 2005, \apj, 620, L516
476: \bibitem[Mathis(1990)]{Mathis1990} Mathis, J. S. 1990, \araa, 28, 37
477: \bibitem[Mohanty et al.(2005)]{Mohanty2005} Mohanty, S., Jayawardhana, R., \& Basri, G. 2005, \apj, 626, 498
478: \bibitem[Muzerolle et al.(2005)]{Muzerolle2005} Muzerolle, J., Luhman, k. L., Brice\~no, C., et al. 2005, \apj, 625, 906
479: \bibitem[Muzerolle et al.(2006)]{Muzerolle2006} Muzerolle, J., Adame,
480: L., D'alessio, P., et al 2006, \apj, 643, 1003
481: \bibitem[Natta et al.(2004)]{Natta2004} Natta, A., Testi, L., Muzerille, J., et al. 2004, \aap, 424, 603
482: \bibitem[Papaloizou \& Pringle(1977)]{PP1977} Papaloizou, J. \& Pringle, J. E. 1997, \mnras, 181, 441
483: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2004)]{Rieke2004} Rieke, G. H., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 25
484: \bibitem[Scholz et al.(2007)]{Scholz2007}Scholz, A., Jayawardhana, R., Wood, K., et al. 2007, ApJ, 660, 1517
485: \bibitem[Sicilia-Aguilar et al.(2006)]{sa2006} Sicilia-Aguilar, A., Hartmann, L., Calvet, N. et al. 2006, \apj, 638, 897
486: \bibitem[White \& Basri(2003)]{wb2003} White, R. J., \& Basri, G. 2003, \apj, 582, 1109
487: \bibitem[Whittet et al.(1997)]{Whittet1997} Whittet, D. C. B., Prusti, T., Franco, G. A. P., et al. 1997, \aap, 327, 1194
488: \end{thebibliography}
489:
490:
491: %\begin{thebibliography}{}
492: %\bibitem[Allen et al.(2004)]{allen2004} Allen, L. E., Calvet, N., D'Alessio, P. et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 363
493: %\bibitem[Andr\'{e} et al.(2000)]{Andre2000} Andr\'{e}, P., Ward-Thompson, D., \& Barsony, M. 2000, in Protostars and Planets IV, ed. V. Mannings, A. P. Boss, \& S. S. Russell (Tuscon: Univ. Arizona Press), 59
494: %\bibitem[Bouwman et al.(2006)]{bouwman2006} Bouwman, J., Lawson, A.,
495: %\bibitem Dominik, C. et al. 2006, arXiv:astro-ph/0610853
496: %\bibitem[Calvet et al.(2005)]{calvet2005} Calvet, N., D'Alessio, P., Watson, P. D. et al. 2005, \apj, 630, L185
497: %\bibitem[Carpenetr et al.(2006)]{Carpenter2006} Carpenter, J. M., Mamajek, E. E., Hillenbrand, L. A., \& Meyer, M .R. 2006, \apj, 651, L49
498: %\bibitem[D'Alessio et al.(2005)]{D'Alessio2005} D'Alessio, P., Hartmann, L., Calvet, N. et al. 2005, \apj, 621, 461
499: %\bibitem[Hartmann et al.(2005)]{Hartmann2005} Hartmann, L., Megeath, S. T., Allen, L. et al. 2005, \apj, 629, 881
500: %\bibitem[Herbst et al.(2006)]{Herbst2006} Herbs, W., Eisl\"{o}ffel, J., Mundt, R., \& Scholz, A. 2006, arXiv:astro-ph/0603673
501: %\bibitem[Lada et al.(2006)]{Lada2006} Lada, C. J., Muench, A. A., Luhman, K. L. et al. 2006, \apj, 131, 1574
502: %\bibitem[Luhman(2004)]{Luhman2004} Luhman, K. L. 2004, \apj, 602, 816
503: %\bibitem[Luhman et al.(2005)]{Luhman2005} Luhman, K. L., Lada, C. J., Hartmann, L. et al. 2005, \apj, 631, L69
504: %\bibitem[Muzerolle et al.(2006)]{Muzerolle2006} Muzerolle, J., Adame, L., D'alessio, P. et al 2006, \apj, 643, 1003
505: %\bibitem[Shu \& Adams(1987)]{shu1987} Shu, F. H. \& Adams, F. C. 1987, in Circumstellar matter; Proceedings of the IAU Symposium, 122, 7
506: %\bibitem[Sicilia-Aguilar et al.(2006)]{sa2006} Sicilia-Aguilar, A., Hartmann, L., Calvet, N. et al. 2006, \apj, 638, 897
507: %\end{thebibliography}
508:
509: \clearpage
510: \begin{figure}[htp]
511: \begin{center}
512: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{f1.eps}
513: \caption{IRAC 8~$\mu$m and MIPS 24~$\mu$m mosaics with the positions of all detected Cha~I members denoted with \it{diamonds} \rm and positions of the
514: objects used in our analysis presented with \it{squares}\rm; a) upper cloud core mosaic in 8~$\mu$m band, b) lower cloud core mosaic in 8~$\mu$m band,
515: c) upper cloud core mosaic in 24~$\mu$m band, d) lower cloud core mosaic in 24~$\mu$m band.
516: \label{f1}}
517: \end{center}
518: \end{figure}
519:
520: \clearpage
521:
522: \begin{figure}[htp]
523: \begin{center}
524: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{f2.eps}
525: \caption{IRAC colour-colour diagram for 71 objects in Cha~I star-forming region. The \it{dotted square} \rm denotes
526: the domain of objects with circumstellar disks \citep{allen2004,Hartmann2005}. Objects without disk excess
527: are located near the origin of the coordinate system. One transition object candidate --C7-1-- with measured fluxes in all four IRAC
528: channels is presented with \it{pentagon}\rm.
529: \label{f2}}
530: \end{center}
531: \end{figure}
532:
533: \clearpage
534:
535: \begin{figure}[htp]
536: \begin{centering}
537: \includegraphics[scale=.43]{f3a.eps}
538: \hfill
539: \includegraphics[scale=.43]{f3b.eps}
540: \caption{Colour-colour diagrams with circumstellar disks tracers (8~$\mu$m to 4.5~$\mu$m flux ratio in the top panel and
541: 24~$\mu$m to 4.5~$\mu$m ratio in the bottom panel) vs. a stellar photosphere tracer ($J-H$). Arrows in the lower panel
542: represent objects for which only upper limits for 24~$\mu$m fluxes could be estimated. \it{Dashed line} \rm in
543: both panels corresponds to the photospheric 8~$\mu$m to 4.5~$\mu$m flux ratio. The \it {dotted lines} \rm represent
544: conservative thresholds for circumstellar disk presence, in our case a 40\% excess above the photosphere in the
545: 8/4.5~$\mu$m and 24/4.5~$\mu$m flux ratios.
546: There are two objects that appear to lie under the threshold in the top panel, but occupy the region above the threshold
547: in the bottom one. These are candidates for the transition objects, i.e. stars with possible clearings in their disks.
548: A third object from the upper panel --CHX~18N-- does not have 24~$\mu$m flux measured. All three object are presented with
549: \it {pentagons} \rm and labeled.
550: \label{f3}}
551: \end{centering}
552: \end{figure}
553:
554: \clearpage
555: \begin{figure}[htp]
556: \begin{center}
557: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{f4.eps}
558: \caption{Histogram of the disk fraction as a function of spectral type for Cha~I members. The spectral type information is
559: taken from \citet{Luhman2004} while the disk detection is based on the 8~$\mu$m excess. The majority of stars in Cha~I and all
560: objects included in this study are of spectral types later than K3. In order to have roughly the same number of objects in every bin,
561: we divided our sample into three bins. The obtained distribution shows that there is no significant difference between the disk
562: fractions among stars of different (late) spectral types in Cha~I.
563: \label{f4}}
564: \end{center}
565: \end{figure}
566:
567: \clearpage
568: \begin{figure}[htp]
569: \begin{center}
570: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{f5.eps}
571: \caption{Spatial distribution of Cha~I members: \it {filled circles} \rm correspond to the positions of the disk bearing objects,
572: while objects without any infrared excess due to disk presence are denoted with \it {open circles}\rm. The two \it{stars} \rm represent
573: intermediate mass stars - HD~97048 in the lower cloud core and HD~97300 in the upper one. \it{Open squares} \rm and \it{open pentagons} \rm
574: mark the average positions of diskless and disk-bearing stars, respectively, in the two cores. \it{Dashed lines} \rm correspond to the boundaries of
575: IRAC maps, and \it {dotted lines} \rm correspond to the boundaries of the 24~$\mu$m MIPS maps.
576: \label{f5}}
577: \end{center}
578: \end{figure}
579:
580: \clearpage
581: \begin{figure}[htp]
582: \begin{center}
583: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{f6.eps}
584: \caption{SEDs for two transition object candidates (T35 and C7-1) and one typical disk-bearing Cha~I member (T46). In each panel measured fluxes in
585: 2MASS, IRAC and 24~$\mu$m MIPS bands are presented with \it{squares}\rm; the model stellar photosphere corresponding to the object's effective temperature
586: (STARdusty2000, \citealt{Allard2000}) is shown with the \it{dashed line} \rm for comparison.
587: \label{f6}}
588: \end{center}
589: \end{figure}
590:
591: \clearpage
592:
593: \begin{figure}[htp]
594: \begin{center}
595: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{f7.eps}
596: \caption{8~$\mu$m excess vs. the full width of H$\alpha$ line at 10\% of the peak for 35 Cha~I members.
597: The H$\alpha$ widths are taken from Nguyen et al. (in prep.; \it{filled squares}\rm), \citet{Mohanty2005}
598: and \citet{Muzerolle2005} (\it{open triangles}\rm).
599: The \it{dashed line} \rm corresponds to the accretion cutoff adopted by \citet{Jayawardhana2003}. The threshold for
600: disk presence on the basic of IRAC colour excess is represented by \it{dotted line} \rm as in the upper panel of
601: Fig.~\ref{f3}. The two objects with prominent accretion signatures and yet without colour excess at $8/4.5\,\mu$m
602: are labeled.
603: \label{f7}}
604: \end{center}
605: \end{figure}
606:
607: \clearpage
608:
609: \begin{figure}[htp]
610: \begin{center}
611: \includegraphics[scale=.8]{f8.eps}
612: \caption{8~$\mu$m excess, indicating presence of a disk, vs. binary separation for 65 Cha~I members (from
613: Ahmic et al., in prep.). The \it{dotted line} \rm represents the threshold for 8~$\mu$m excess from a circumstellar disk,
614: taken from the upper panel of Fig.~\ref{f3}. Two triple systems are presented with both separation values
615: connected by \it{solid lines}\rm. Single objects are positioned at the binary separation of $0\farcs01$ for
616: presentation purposes only.
617: \label{f8}}
618: \end{center}
619: \end{figure}
620:
621: %% If you use the table environment, please indicate horizontal rules using
622: %% \tableline, not \hline.
623: %% Do not put multiple tabular environments within a single table.
624: %% The optional \label should appear inside the \caption command.
625:
626: \clearpage
627: \input{tab1.tex}
628: \clearpage
629: \input{tab2.tex}
630:
631: %% Tables may also be prepared as separate files. See the accompanying
632: %% sample file table.tex for an example of an external table file.
633: %% To include an external file in your main document, use the \input
634: %% command. Uncomment the line below to include table.tex in this
635: %% sample file. (Note that you will need to comment out the \documentclass,
636: %% \begin{document}, and \end{document} commands from table.tex if you want
637: %% to include it in this document.)
638:
639: %% \input{table}
640:
641: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text
642: %% that appears after it.
643:
644: \end{document}
645:
646: %%
647: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
648: