1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \usepackage{emulateapj5}
4:
5:
6: \begin {document}
7:
8: \title{The Role of Evolutionary Age and Metallicity in the Formation
9: of Classical Be Circumstellar Disks II. Assessing the Evolutionary
10: Nature of Candidate Disk Systems}
11:
12: \author{J.P. Wisniewski\altaffilmark{1,2,3}, K.S. Bjorkman\altaffilmark{3,4},
13: A.M. Magalh\~aes\altaffilmark{3,5}, J.E. Bjorkman\altaffilmark{4},
14: M.R. Meade\altaffilmark{6}, \& Antonio Pereyra\altaffilmark{5}}
15:
16: \altaffiltext{1}{NASA GSFC Exoplanets and Stellar Astrophysics Lab Code 667,
17: Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA John.P.Wisniewski@nasa.gov}
18: \altaffiltext{2}{NPP Fellow}
19: \altaffiltext{3}{Visiting Astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory}
20: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Physics and Astronomy
21: MS 113, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606-3390 USA, Karen.Bjorkman@.utoledo.edu, Jon.Bjorkman@utoledo.edu}
22: \altaffiltext{5}{IAG, Universidade de S\~ao Paulo, Caixa Postal 3386, S\~ao Paulo, SP
23: 01060-970, Brazil, mario@astro.iag.usp.br, antonio@astro.iag.usp.br}
24: \altaffiltext{6}{Space Astronomy Lab, University of Wisconsin-Madison,
25: 1150 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706 USA, meade@sal.wisc.edu}
26:
27:
28: \begin{abstract}
29:
30: We present the first detailed imaging polarization observations of six SMC and six LMC clusters, known
31: to have large populations of B-type stars which exhibit excess H$\alpha$ emission, to
32: constrain the evolutionary status of these stars and hence better establish links between the onset of disk
33: formation in classical Be stars and cluster age and/or metallicity. We parameterize the
34: interstellar polarization (ISP) along the lines of sight to these twelve clusters, thereby providing a diagnostic
35: of the fundamental properties of the dust which characterizes their localized interstellar medium. We determine that the ISP associated with the
36: SMC cluster NGC 330 is characterized by a modified Serkowski law with $\lambda_{max}$
37: $\sim$4500\AA, indicating the presence of smaller than average dust grains. Furthermore, the morphology of the
38: ISP associated with the LMC cluster NGC 2100 suggests that its interstellar environment is characterized by
39: a complex magnetic field.
40:
41: Removing this interstellar polarization component from our data isolates the presence of any intrinsic polarization;
42: the wavelength dependence of this intrinsic polarization provides a diagnostic of the dominant and any secondary polarigenic agents present, enabling us to discriminate pure gas disk systems, i.e. classical Be stars, from composite gas plus dust disk systems, i.e. Herbig Ae/Be or B[e] stars. Our \textit{intrinsic} polarization results, along with available near-IR color information, strongly supports
43: the suggestion of Wisniewski et al. that classical Be stars are present in clusters of age 5-8 Myr, and
44: contradict assertions that the Be phenomenon only develops in the second half of a B star's main sequence
45: lifetime, i.e. no earlier than 10 Myr. Our data imply that a significant number of B-type stars must
46: emerge onto the zero-age-main-sequence rotating at near-critical rotation rates, although we can not rule out the
47: possibility that these data instead reveal the presence of a sub-group of the Be phenomenon characterized by
48: sub-critically rotating objects.
49:
50: Comparing the polarimetric properties of our dataset to a similar survey of Galactic classical Be stars, we find that
51: the prevalence of polarimetric Balmer jump signatures decreases with metallicity. We
52: speculate that these results might indicate that either it is more difficult to form large disk systems in low metallicity
53: environments, or that the average disk temperature is higher in these low metallicity environments. We have
54: characterized the polarimetric signatures of all candidate Be stars in our data sample and find $\sim$25\%
55: are unlikely to arise from true classical Be star-disk systems. This detection of such a substantial number
56: ``contaminants'' suggests one should proceed with caution when attempting to determine the role of evolutionary
57: age and/or metallicity in the Be phenomenon purely via 2-CD results.
58:
59: \end{abstract}
60:
61: \keywords{Magellanic Clouds --- stars: emission-line, Be --- circumstellar
62: matter --- techniques: polarimetric --- clusters:individual (Bruck 60, NGC 330, NGC 346, NGC 371,
63: NGC 456, NGC 458, LH 72, NGC 1818, NGC 1858, NGC 1948, NGC 2004, NGC 2100) ---
64: stars:individual (pi-Aquarii, BD+61d154, MWC349A)}
65:
66: \section{Introduction}
67:
68: While the rapid rotation (v$_{eq}$/v$_{crit}$ $\sim$70-80\% of their critical
69: velocity; \citealt{por96, por03}) of classical Be stars has long been speculated to be
70: the fundamental source driving the production of their geometrically thin
71: circumstellar disks \citep{str31, por03}, recent photometric surveys \citep{fea72,gre92,gre97,
72: die98,kel99,gre00,kel00,ols01,mcs05,wi06a} have suggested secondary mechanisms might
73: contribute to the observed phenomenon. Specifically, \citet{mer82, gre97, fab00} and \citet{kel04}
74: found that the frequency of the Be phenomenon seems to peak in clusters
75: with a main sequence turn-off of B1-B2, leading to the suggestion that the Be phenomenon is
76: enhanced with evolutionary age. Several recent observational studies
77: \citep{gre92,maz96,gre97,mae99,kel04} have also suggested that
78: the Be phenomenon may be more prevalent in low metallicity environments, based on comparisons
79: of the fractional Be populations of Galactic, LMC, and SMC clusters.
80:
81: In \citet{wi06a} (hereafter
82: WB06), we used a simple 2-color diagram (2-CD) technique to identify the
83: fractional candidate Be population of numerous Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), Small
84: Magellanic Cloud (SMC), and Galactic clusters in an effort to improve the statistical database which
85: has been used to link classical Be disk formation with evolutionary age and/or metallicity.
86: WB06 found evidence that the Be phenomenon develops much earlier
87: than previously predicted by theory \citep{fab00}, i.e before the mid-point main sequence lifetime; furthermore, they found evidence of an additional enhancement in the fractional Be content of clusters
88: with evolutionary age. The increased statistics offered by this work, while confirming the previously
89: suggested trend of an enhancement in the Be phenomenon in low metallicity environments, lowered
90: the average fractional Be content of SMC clusters from 39\% \citep{mae99} to 32\%.
91:
92: While the 2-CD has been widely used to link evolutionary age and/or metallicity with Be disk
93: formation, it is inherently unclear whether all B-type objects identified as excess H$\alpha$
94: emitters, i.e. ``Be stars'', are truly classical Be stars. It has been noted that other
95: B-type objects, such as Herbig Ae/Be stars, post-main-sequence B[e] stars, and
96: supergiants, may also exhibit H$\alpha$ emission hence ``contaminate'' these claimed
97: detections (WB06).
98:
99: Polarimetry is a tool which has long been used to investigate the circumstellar environments of
100: Be stars \citep{coy69, poe76, coy82, bjo94, mcd94, qui97, woo97, cla98}. Electron scattering
101: in the innermost region of classical Be circumstellar disks will polarize a small fraction of stellar
102: photons; furthermore, pre- and post-scattering attenuation by hydrogen atoms within the
103: inner disk region will imprint a characteristic wavelength dependence onto this polarization
104: signature if the inner disk is sufficiently dense \citep{woo95}. The wavelength
105: dependence of intrinsic polarization originating from classical Be stars,
106: characterized by geometrically thin, gaseous circumstellar disks, \citep{qui97, woo97, cla98} is
107: significantly different than that expected from the dustier circumstellar environments of Herbig
108: Ae/Be stars, post-main-sequence B[e] stars, and supergiants \citep{vra79,mey02}. Thus for
109: non-pole-on disk
110: geometries, polarimetry can be employed to investigate circumstellar environments and
111: discriminate the evolutionary nature of sources.
112:
113: In this paper, we use imaging polarimetry to investigate the true nature of
114: candidate Be stars in six LMC and six SMC clusters which were initially identified via
115: photometric 2-CDs. In Section 2, we
116: outline our observations and data reduction techniques. In Section 3, we detail how
117: we identified and removed the interstellar polarization component associated with each of
118: our lines of sight. We develop a classification system to characterize the intrinsic polarization
119: observed in our candidate Be star sample in Section 4 and also discuss the results of
120: individual clusters. We discuss the implications of these results in Section 5 and summarize
121: our work in Section 6.
122:
123: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
124:
125: The imaging polarimetry data presented in this study were obtained at the Cerro Tololo
126: Inter-American Observatory (CTIO)\footnote{The Cerro
127: Tololo Inter-American Observatory is operated by
128: the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, under contract with the National Science
129: Foundation.} 1.5m.
130: The f/7.5 secondary configuration was used during our 2001 observing run,
131: which yielded a 15 x 15 arc-minute field of view and a
132: 0.44 arc-second pixel$^{-1}$ scale, while the
133: f/13.5 secondary configuration, which provided a 8 x 8 arc-minute field of view with a 0.24
134: arc-second pixel$^{-1}$ scale, was used during our 2002 observing run. Data were
135: recorded with CTIO's standard Cassegrain focus CCD (CFCCD), a 2048 x 2048
136: multi-amplifier CCD. The standard CFCCD configuration was modified by the addition of a
137: rotatable half-wave plate followed by a fixed analyzer, the latter of which was placed
138: in the upper of the 1.5m's two filter wheels. The polymer achromatic
139: wave-plate was manufactured by Meadowlark Optics and provided
140: polarization modulation for each 90$^{\circ}$ rotation of the
141: wave-plate. Unless otherwise noted, each of our fields of view was
142: observed with the wave-plate rotated through 8 positions 22.5$^{\circ}$
143: apart. The fixed analyzer was a double calcite block whose
144: optical axes had been crossed to minimize astigmatism and color effects.
145: Further details about this polarimeter can be found in
146: \citet{mag96}, \citet{per00}, \citet{mel01}, \& \citet{per02}. We placed
147: CTIO's Tek U, B, V, R, and I filters in the second filter wheel.
148: A summary of the science clusters we observed is presented in Table \ref{polexpose}.
149:
150: Nightly observations of polarization standard stars were obtained to calibrate
151: the polarimetric efficiency of each filter and determine the zero-point of the polarization position
152: angle in each filter, while nightly observations of unpolarized standard stars were obtained
153: to characterize any instrumental polarization present. Our unpolarized standard data
154: indicate that the polarimeter had an instrumental polarization consistent with
155: zero for our 2001 data. The B, V, R, and I filters of our 2002 data also had an instrumental
156: polarization consistent with zero \citep{wis03}, while the U filter data had
157: an instrumental polarization of
158: $\sim$0.1\%, which was removed from the data.
159:
160: The reduction of these data began with standard image processing, including bias
161: and flat field corrections, using standard
162: IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy
163: Observatories, which are operated by the Association of Universities for
164: Research in Astronomy, Inc., under contract with the National Science
165: Foundation.} techniques. Following this initial processing, aperture
166: photometry was performed for all point sources in each of the 8 images of
167: an observation set, using 10 apertures of size 3-12 pixels for
168: the f/7.5 data and 5-14 pixels for the f/13.5 data. The linear
169: polarization of each source was extracted from a least squares solution of the difference
170: amplitudes in the 8 wave-plate positions ($\psi_{i}$), using the PCCDPACK
171: software suite \citep{per00,per02}. Both the expected
172: photon noise errors and the actual measured errors, defined as the
173: residuals at each wave-plate position with respect to the expected
174: $\cos 4\psi_{i}$ curve, were also calculated. With few exceptions, these
175: two errors were consistent with one another.
176:
177: \section{Interstellar Polarization}
178:
179: The polarization observed in our raw data is comprised of the
180: superposition of an interstellar component, attributable to the dichroic absorption of starlight
181: by partially aligned dust grains along each line of sight, and possibly an intrinsic component, attributable
182: to the asymmetric illumination of circumstellar material and/or the illumination of an asymmetrical distribution
183: of circumstellar material. Characterizing and isolating each of these components, although often technically challenging, yields two unique diagnostics. Isolating the interstellar polarization
184: component can facilitate detailed studies of the local interstellar medium (ISM)
185: and provide constraints on fundamental properties such as grain size distributions and shapes, as well
186: as diagnosing the magnitude and direction of local
187: magnetic fields. Isolating the intrinsic polarization component enables investigations of the
188: distribution and chemistry of scatterers which comprise unresolved circumstellar environments.
189: We stress that characterizing the polarizing agent (i.e. gas or dust) responsible for producing an
190: intrinsic polarization signal is not possible simply via inspection of the wavelength dependence of
191: the vector sum of interstellar plus intrinsic (i.e. the total) polarization data.
192:
193: Fortunately, our efforts to identify and separate the interstellar and intrinsic polarization components
194: of our data are simplified by the fact that we have observed rich stellar associations. Most of the stars in
195: these clusters should be normal main sequence stars lacking any type of asymmetrical circumstellar envelope, hence they should not exhibit an intrinsic polarization component. Furthermore, we can
196: assume that all of our stars are located at the same general distance, since they are members of a
197: cluster population, and that the properties
198: of the interstellar medium do not significantly vary over the angular extent of our clusters. Hence
199: each cluster in our sample provides us with a multitude of suitable ``field stars'' whose polarization we
200: can simply average to estimate the interstellar polarization (ISP) along each line of sight, via the
201: commonly used field star technique \citep{mcl78}.
202:
203: In Figure \ref{1818vsel} we show the total V-band polarization of all sources in the LMC cluster NGC 1818
204: having polarimetric signal-to-noise ratios (p/$\sigma_{p}$) greater than 5.0.
205: The distinctive grouping of most objects in the Stokes Q-U diagram of this
206: figure (panel a) and the narrow polarization (panel d) and position angle (panel c) histograms demonstrates
207: that most of these objects do lack significant intrinsic polarization components and only have an ISP
208: component. After excluding objects outside of the dominant trends found in these histograms with an
209: iterative method, we calculated the weighted average and standard deviation of these data to determine
210: a preliminary estimate of this cluster's V-band ISP, as shown in Figure \ref{1818serkv}. The
211: wavelength dependence of these estimates clearly follow the
212: empirical Serkowski law \citep{ser75} commonly used to parameterize an ISP. Over-plotted in Figure
213: \ref{1818serkv} is a modified Serkowski law \citep{ser75, wil82} which we deemed best represented the
214: observational data. The polarization at the midpoint wavelength location
215: of the U, B, V, R, and I filters was then extracted from this curve and served as the final
216: estimate of the ISP. The modified Serkowski parameters determined for
217: all of our lines of sight, along with the extracted filter ISP values, are summarized in Table \ref{isptable}.
218:
219: The ISP values compiled in Table \ref{isptable} are relevant to our efforts to isolate the intrinsic
220: polarization components associated with our target stars; however, they do not yet
221: yield any direct information regarding
222: the properties of the interstellar dust grains which reside in their parent LMC and SMC clusters,
223: as these ISP values are comprised of both foreground
224: Galactic ISP and Magellanic Cloud ISP contributions. Following the techniques used by
225: \citet{cla83} and \citet{rod97}, we used the interstellar polarization maps of \citet{sch76}, to identify and remove this
226: foreground Galactic ISP contribution (see Table \ref{foreground}), hence determine estimates of the ISP
227: intrinsic to our LMC and SMC clusters (see Table \ref{ispintrin}). We used a modified Serkowski-law \citep{ser75,wil82}
228: to extrapolate these maps over the wavelength range of our dataset, and assumed a nominal Galactic $\lambda_{max}$
229: value of 5500\AA\ to characterize the parameter K. The errors cited in the Galactic polarization maps \citep{sch76}
230: and those present in our total ISP estimates (Table \ref{isptable}) were propagated to produce the error estimates cited
231: in Table \ref{ispintrin}.
232:
233: Most of the field stars used to derive our total ISP estimates were not highly reddened objects, hence the intrinsic
234: LMC and SMC ISP values listed in Table \ref{ispintrin} all are characterized by modest polarization amplitudes, which are
235: often on the order of the errors of our data. In spite of this fact, trends in these data are clearly present.
236: As expected, the magnitude of UBVRI polarization towards each cluster follows a Serkowski-like wavelength dependence
237: at a wavelength independent position angle. This lack of position angle rotation indicates that our Galactic
238: interstellar polarization correction was reasonable and that we are looking at a single magnetic field
239: orientation towards each of our clusters. All LMC clusters
240: exhibit similar ISP properties, with polarization magnitudes ranging from $\sim$0.2-0.5\% at a position angle
241: of $\sim$25-45 degrees; similarly, all SMC clusters also exhibit clear evidence of sharing common ISP
242: properties, with polarization magnitudes ranging from $\sim$0.3-0.6\% at a position angle of
243: $\sim$120-150 degrees. The shallow curvature of the Serkowski-law dependence of these data, in combination with
244: the moderate level of uncertainty present, make identifying systematic differences in the interstellar dust grain properties
245: of these clusters difficult. The total ISP (Table \ref{isptable}) and SMC ISP (Table \ref{ispintrin}) of the cluster
246: NGC 330 does however show suggestive evidence of being characterized by
247: a short wavelength $\lambda_{max}$ value of $\sim$4500 \AA\ (Figure \ref{330serk}). Such an
248: effect is commonly attributed to the
249: presence of small dust grains, and has been previously observed in other SMC sight-lines \citep{rod97}. In a future paper, we will examine the wavelength dependence of moderately and highly reddened objects in our dataset to perform a more detailed investigation of the interstellar medium properties of these
250: LMC and SMC clusters, and compliment earlier studies which parameterized the ISM properties of other
251: SMC \citep{rod97} and LMC \citep{cla83} sight-lines.
252:
253:
254: \subsection{NGC 2100}
255:
256: The total polarization vectors of our observations of the LMC cluster
257: NGC 2100 clearly exhibit evidence of a collective, complex morphology (see Figure \ref{rawn2100i}).
258: While Figure \ref{rawn2100i} only presents I-band data, all of our other filters exhibit similar
259: alignment patterns. Recall that we expect most cluster objects should not exhibit an
260: intrinsic polarization component; thus
261: we suggest that these systematic morphological changes are related to changes in
262: the magnetic field properties within our field of view. A substantial discussion of the magnetic
263: field properties of NGC 2100 is presented in \citet{wi06b}. For the purposes of the present study, we
264: will only discuss our efforts to parameterize and remove the ISP along the line of sight to this cluster.
265:
266: We identified three spatial regions in our field of view, corresponding to the region around
267: the cluster core, the region to the south of the cluster core, and the region to the north of
268: the core, which displayed unique ISP characteristics. In Figures
269: \ref{n2100region1isp}, \ref{n2100region2isp}, and \ref{n2100region3isp}, we show the B-band
270: polarization vector maps of what we have defined as regions 1, 2, and 3 respectively in the
271: total ISP along the line of sight to NGC 2100, overlaid on DSS-2 blue images. Having identified
272: these distinct regions, we then extracted total ISP estimates
273: following the technique previously described. We calculated a $\sigma^{-2}$ weighted average
274: of all objects in each filter served as an initial ISP estimate, determined the modified Serkowski-law
275: parameters which best represented the data, as seen in Figure \ref{n2100region1serk} for region 1,
276: and extracted final ISP values (Table \ref{isptable2}) for each region from these Serkowski
277: curves. The locations of the candidate Be stars in NGC 2100 were then correlated to these 3 ISP
278: regions to determine the ISP correction each should receive. We found NGC 2100:KWBBe 102,
279: 630, and 712 resided in area 2, NGC 2100:KWBBe 535, 797, and 1033 resided in area 3,
280: and the rest of the candidate Be stars resided in area 1.
281:
282:
283: \section{Intrinsic Polarization} \label{intrinpolsection}
284:
285: We subtracted the ISP from the observed polarization to isolate any intrinsic polarization
286: components present. The location of candidate Be stars in our fields of view were identified by
287: careful correlation with literature coordinates and finder charts. Using several PCCDPACK routines,
288: we meticulously examined the extracted polarization for each of the candidate Be stars in our sample
289: to search for undesired contamination by a) the ordinary or extraordinary images of nearby
290: objects and b) cosmic ray hits or uncorrected bad pixels. The total polarization of all
291: candidate Be stars which did not suffer from these contamination issues are tabulated in Table
292: \ref{totpol}, while the intrinsic polarization of these objects are tabulated in Table \ref{inpol}.
293:
294: As discussed in the Introduction, electron scattering in the pure gas disks
295: of classical Be stars will polarize a small fraction of stellar photons, producing a well known
296: wavelength dependent intrinsic polarization signature. We emphasize that as polarization is a
297: vector quantity, identifying these signatures a) is only possible via inspection of intrinsic
298: polarization data; and b) requires either the \textit{simultaneous} inspection of both the
299: wavelength dependence of the polarization magnitude \textit{and} position angle, or alternatively
300: inspection of the behavior of the intrinsic data on a Stokes Q-U diagram. An observed
301: wavelength independent intrinsic polarization magnitude and position angle across the
302: entire UBVRI wavelength regime is the expected signature of pure electron scattering, such as that
303: expected from a gaseous classical Be disk. Moreover, pre- or post-scattering
304: absorption will superimpose the wavelength dependent signature of
305: hydrogen opacity on this signal, creating a ``saw-tooth'' polarization signature \citep{bj00b}, if
306: enough absorption events occur. Specifically, this ``saw-tooth'' signature includes the presence of
307: abrupt jumps in the magnitude of intrinsic polarization at the Balmer and Paschen limits, as well as a
308: wavelength independent intrinsic polarization position angle across the entire UBVRI wavelength regime.
309: Examples of these two signatures of classical Be
310: circumstellar disks are given in Figure \ref{pbopiaqr}, which presents multi-epoch observations
311: of the known classical Be star pi Aquarii as observed by the University of Wisconsin's HPOL
312: spectropolarimeter.
313:
314: We have contemporaneously analyzed the
315: Stokes Q-U diagrams of all candidate Be stars' total and intrinsic polarization components to
316: search for evidence of these signatures. We have developed a conservative 4-point
317: classification scale to rank the likelihood that candidate Be stars are truly classical Be stars. Results
318: of this classification are summarized in Table \ref{starclass} for individual objects
319: and in Table \ref{polsummary} for the net results of entire clusters. The design of our classification
320: system emphasized the identification of objects exhibiting a ``saw-tooth'' intrinsic polarization
321: signature and a pure electron scattering signature across the \textit{entire} UBVRI wavelength regime. Specifically, we defined our classification system by:
322:
323:
324: \begin{itemize}
325: \item \textbf{Type-1:} Objects which are \textit{most likely} classical Be stars;
326: \item \textbf{Type-2:} Objects whose polarimetric properties are \textit{not inconsistent} with those
327: expected from classical Be stars;
328: \item \textbf{Type-3:} Objects which are \textit{unlikely} to be classical Be stars; and
329: \item \textbf{Type-4:} Objects which are \textit{highly unlikely} to be classical Be stars.
330: \end{itemize}
331:
332:
333: Stars in our sample which displayed, to
334: within 3 $\sigma$, a ``sawtooth-like'' polarization Balmer jump (BJ) along with a wavelength independent
335: polarization position angle across the entire range of available data (see Figure \ref{polbal}) were
336: assigned a designation of type-1. We claim that all type-1 objects are most likely classical Be stars.
337: Note that we offer a detailed discussion of other objects which could exhibit somewhat
338: similar behavior over \textit{part} of the UBVRI wavelength regime in
339: Section \ref{bevshaebe}. However, as we discuss in Section \ref{nircolors}, analysis of ancillary
340: data demonstrates that it is highly dubious that stars classified as Type-1 polarimetric sources are
341: anything other than classical Be stars.
342:
343: We assigned a designation of type-2 to objects whose polarimetric properties were not
344: inconsistent with that expected from a classical Be star-disk system. As previously discussed,
345: classical Be disks of sufficiently low density will not leave an imprint of hydrogen opacity in their
346: intrinsic polarization signals; hence, stars which exhibited, to within 3$\sigma$, a wavelength
347: independent electron scattering (ES) polarization signature (see Figure \ref{poles}) received
348: a designation of type-2. A small number of objects exhibited a nearly wavelength independent
349: polarization magnitude along with a minor wavelength dependence in their polarization
350: position angles; we designated these objects as type-2 as we believe such stars most likely are exhibiting
351: ES signatures modified by a slight under- or over-correction of their ISP components. We can not rule out
352: that this minor wavelength dependence might also be produced by the additional presence of an optically
353: thin dust disk, as present in post-main-sequence B[e] stars \citep{mag92,mel01}. However,
354: as we show in Section \ref{nircolors}, analysis of ancillary data demonstrate that most type-2
355: objects which we claim exhibit electron-scattering (ES) signatures are likely to be classical Be stars,
356: and substantially less likely to be systems characterized by composite gas plus dust disks
357: (i.e. Herbig Ae/Be, B[e]
358: stars). Finally, we
359: assigned all objects which appeared to be intrinsically unpolarized ($<$ 0.3\% polarization),
360: to within 3$\sigma$, a type-2 designation as this is the expected signature of pole-on or nearly
361: pole-on classical Be stars. We caution the reader that we are not 100\% certain that these
362: unpolarized objects are classical Be stars as: a) stars without gaseous disks, spuriously detected as
363: excess H$\alpha$ emitters on 2-CDs, will also exhibit zero net intrinsic polarization and b) the
364: noise present in the observations of fainter targets may preclude us from clearly identifying
365: them as ``contaminants''.
366:
367: We assigned the designation of type-3 to type-4 to objects whose polarization, to within 3$\sigma$,
368: appeared to be inconsistent with the aforementioned signatures expected from a
369: classical Be star-disk system (see e.g. Figure \ref{polunlikely}). We briefly discuss some of the
370: major types of atypical polarimetric signatures we observed.
371:
372: In Table \ref{starclass}, we assigned a designation of type 3-4 to several objects
373: whose intrinsic polarization exhibited signs of a 90$^{\circ}$ position angle
374: reversal (Figure \ref{n2100intrin111}), which is a signature
375: of a dusty bipolar nebula geometry (see Section \ref{bevshaebe}; see also \citealt{sch92,wup92}).
376: From an inspection of the Stokes Q-U diagram of such an
377: object (Figure \ref{n2100intrin111}), it is clear that even if our initial ISP correction was grossly
378: miscalculated, the wavelength dependent polarization would still be inconsistent with that expected
379: from classical Be stars. While it would be interesting
380: to further probe the circumstellar environments of such objects with follow-up investigations,
381: for the purposes of this paper we merely remark that they are unlikely to be classical Be stars.
382:
383: Several of our candidate Be stars exhibited very large (1-3.5\%), complex intrinsic polarization
384: signatures (see Figure \ref{n1948serklong}). Given the steep drop in their polarization magnitude at
385: short optical wavelengths, along with subtle indications of a corresponding position angle rotation, it
386: is possible that these objects are characterized by dusty bipolar nebulae whose polarization signature
387: exhibits a position angle reversal at UV wavelengths, similar to HD 45677 \citep{wup92}. Alternatively,
388: the polarization of these objects could be interpreted as following a Serkowski-like wavelength
389: dependence characterized by a large $\lambda_{max}$ value. As our data have already been corrected
390: for the average ISP associated with each of our clusters, this latter interpretation would require these
391: objects to be situated in region of patchy dust, likely populated by larger grains given the
392: long wavelength values of $\lambda_{max}$, i.e. $>$ 7000 \AA\ in
393: Figure \ref{n1948serklong} \citep{rod97, whi92}. \citet{ser75} described the expected
394: magnitude of interstellar polarization by the formulation $3 E_{B-V} \le P_{max} \le 9 E_{B-V}$; hence,
395: an additional reddening of 0.3 - 1.0 E${(B-V}$ would be required to produce the measured
396: p$_{max}$ of these objects, $\sim$3\%. The observed colors of at least some of these objects (NGC 1948:KWBBe 98, V-I = 0.67; Keller et al. 1999) is likely sufficient to
397: produce the amount of purported additional ISP, although other objects (NGC 1948:KWBBe 246, V-I = 0.05; Keller et al. 1999) clearly do not meet this criteria. While follow-up optical or infrared spectroscopy of
398: these anomalous candidates would help to determine whether they exhibit a dusty bipolar nebula
399: geometry or are located in a region of patchy dust, for the purpose of this paper we merely stress that it is
400: clear that these objects are not likely to be classical Be stars.
401:
402: We now offer discussion of the polarimetric properties of candidate Be stars
403: in individual clusters. Recall that all candidates which exhibited evidence of contamination,
404: predominantly from nearby neighbors, have been excluded from our analysis. We further note
405: that the effective limiting magnitude of our polarimetric dataset was lower (i.e. brighter) than that
406: considered in WB06.
407:
408: \subsection{LMC Clusters}
409:
410: \subsubsection{NGC 1818}
411:
412: \citet{kel99} identified 40 candidate Be stars associated with the LMC cluster
413: NGC 1818 and its surrounding field. The cluster is densely populated, and because of image
414: overlap issues, we were only able to retrieve polarimetric information for 18 of these
415: candidate Be stars. 4 of these 18 (22\%) showed intrinsic polarization
416: Balmer jump (BJ) signatures, NGC 1818:KWBBe 69, 82, 137, 243. We classified 12 of the 18
417: candidates (67\%) as type-2 objects, and found 5 of the type-2 objects
418: (i.e. 5 of the 18 stars, 28\%, in the total population) exhibited clear evidence
419: of an electron scattering (ES) polarization
420: signature. 2 of the 18 candidates (11\%), NGC 1818:KWBBe 47 and 381, were deemed
421: unlikely to be classical Be stars. While the B, V, R, and I filter polarization of NGC 1818:KWBBe 47
422: were consistent with an ES signature, the U filter exhibited a significant position angle rotation which
423: was inconsistent with an ES origin. Although noisy, the observation of
424: NGC 1818:KWBBe 381 also did not follow an ES wavelength dependence, prompting us to assign it an
425: ``unlikely Be star'' designation.
426:
427: \subsubsection{NGC 1948}
428:
429: \citet{kel99} identified 27 candidate Be stars associated with the cluster
430: NGC 1948 and its nearby field. We were able to extract polarimetric
431: information on 22 of these candidates from our data set. 6 of these 22
432: candidates (27\%) exhibited a polarization Balmer jump,
433: NGC 1948:KWBBe 71, 75, 102, 153, 172, and 240.
434: We classified 12 of the 22 candidates (55\%) as type-2 objects, and found 6 of the type-2
435: objects (i.e. 6 of the 22, 27\%, in
436: the total population) exhibited a definite electron
437: scattering polarization signature, NGC 1948:KWBBe 62, 92, 101, 157, 326, and 790.
438: We note that NGC 1948:KWBBe 92 does show a hint of a small polarization Balmer jump; however, we
439: opted to describe its polarization more conservatively, i.e. as having an electron scattering signature.
440: We found 4 of the 22 stars (18\%) had polarimetric properties which suggested that they were unlikely to
441: be classical Be stars. As previously discussed, 3 of these stars, NGC 1948:KWBBe 98, 183, and 246
442: exhibited intrinsic polarization signals which seemed to follow a Serkowski-like wavelength dependence.
443: NGC 1948:KWBBe 91 was also deemed unlikely to be a classical Be star due to the
444: wavelength dependent nature of its polarization position angle.
445:
446:
447: \subsubsection{NGC 2004}
448:
449: \citet{kel99} identified 67 candidate Be stars associated with the LMC cluster
450: NGC 2004 and its surrounding field. We extracted polarimetric information
451: for 43 of these candidates, and found that 9 of the 43 (21\%), namely
452: NGC 2004:KWBBe 50, 87, 96, 103, 106, 152, 211, 347, 377, showed an intrinsic
453: polarization Balmer jump. 28 of the 43 candidates (65\%) were classified as type-2 objects,
454: and note that 10 of these 28 type-2 objects (i.e. 10 of the 43, 23\%,
455: in the total population), NGC 2004:KWBBe 91, 203, 276, 323, 344, 441, 624, 717, 1175, and 1421 exhibited an electron scattering polarization signature. We found 6 of the
456: 43 (14\%) candidates in NGC 2004 were unlikely to be classical Be
457: stars based on their intrinsic polarization. Of these objects, we note that the 3 filters
458: of polarization extracted for NGC 2004:KWBBe 1315 show suggestive evidence of a
459: polarization position angle flip, a feature which is not expected in classical Be star-disk
460: systems.
461:
462: \subsubsection{LH 72}
463:
464: WB06 identified 50 candidate Be stars in the LMC cluster LH 72, and
465: designated 11 of these detections as tentative. We were able to obtain
466: polarimetric information for 34 of these stars: 1 of the 34 (3\%),
467: LH 72:WBBe 5, showed a polarization Balmer jump and is most likely a
468: bona-fide classical Be star. We classified 22 of the 34 (65\%) stars as
469: type-2 objects, and found 5 of these 22 type-2
470: objects (i.e. 5 of the 34, 15\%, of the total population), LH 72:WBBe 13, 15, 26, 27, and 33
471: exhibited an electron scattering
472: polarization signature. We suggest that 11 of the 34 (32\%) of candidates in LH 72
473: are unlikely to be classical Be stars based on their intrinsic polarization properties.
474: Of these unlikely Be stars, we found that the intrinsic polarization of LH 72:WBBe 9
475: followed a Serkowski-like wavelength dependence, with a $\lambda_{max}$ value $>$
476: 6000 \AA. We extracted polarimetric information for 7 of the 11 stars
477: designated as possible candidate Be stars by WB06.
478: 5 of these 7 stars were classified as type-2 objects, while 2 of the 7
479: appear unlikely to be classical Be stars based on their intrinsic polarization signatures.
480:
481:
482: \subsubsection{NGC 1858}
483:
484: WB06 identified 39 candidate Be stars in the LMC cluster NGC 1858, and we
485: were able to extract polarimetric information for 27 of these 39 stars. 3 of the
486: 27 (11\%), NGC 1858:WBBe 6, 9, and 20, exhibited polarization Balmer jumps.
487: We classified 13 of the 27 (48\%) as type-2 objects, and found 2 of these 13 type-2 stars
488: (i.e. 2 of the 27, 7\%, of the total population) exhibited an electron scattering polarization
489: signature. 11 of the 27 (41\%) candidates in
490: NGC 1858 appear unlikely to be classical Be stars based on their polarimetric
491: signatures. As previously discussed, 2 of these unlikely Be stars, NGC 1858:WBBe 3 and 12
492: had an intrinsic polarization which follow a Serkowski-like wavelength dependence, characterized
493: by a long $\lambda_{max}$ value. 4 of the 39 photometrically identified candidate Be stars
494: in NGC 1858 were judged to be
495: possible detections in WB06: we were able to detect 3 of these 4
496: polarimetrically. We classified 2 of the 3 to be type-2 objects, and the remaining object,
497: NGC 1858:WBBe 9, as a type-1 object.
498:
499: \subsubsection{NGC 2100}
500:
501: \citet{kel99} identified 61 candidate Be stars associated with the LMC cluster
502: NGC 2100. We were able to extract polarimetric information for 35 of the
503: 61 candidates (57\%). 8 of the 35 stars (23\%), NGC 2100:KWBBe 79, 97,
504: 436, 619, 635, 705, 770, and 797, exhibited polarization Balmer jumps and hence are most likely to be
505: classical Be stars. 20 of the 35 stars (57\%) were classified as type-2 stars, and we found 16 of
506: these 20 type-2 stars (i.e. 16 of the 35, 46\%, of the total population) exhibited an
507: electron scattering intrinsic polarization signature. We suggest that 7 of the 35 (20\%)
508: candidates in NGC 2100 are unlikely to be classical Be stars based on their observed
509: intrinsic polarization signatures. Note that the intrinsic polarization of
510: NGC 2100:KWBBe 321 seems to follow a Serkowski-like wavelength dependence, while the
511: unique intrinsic polarization signatures of NGC 2100:KWBBe 111 and 219
512: (Figure \ref{n2100intrin111}) suggests these
513: objects might be dust-disk systems.
514:
515: \subsection{SMC Clusters}
516:
517: \subsubsection{NGC 346}
518:
519: \citet{kel99} identified 48 candidate Be stars in the vicinity of the SMC
520: cluster NGC 346: we have obtained polarimetric information for 33 of
521: these objects. 8 of the 33 objects (24\%), NGC 346:WBBe 85, 93, 191,
522: 236, 374, 445, 468, and 529, exhibited polarization Balmer jumps and hence are most likely
523: classical Be stars. We classified 22 of the 33 stars (67\%) as type-2 stars, and
524: found 7 of these 22 type-2 objects (i.e. 7 of the 33, 21\%, of the total population)
525: exhibited a clear electron scattering intrinsic polarization signature.
526: We suggest that 3 of the 33 candidates in NGC 346 (9\%) are unlikely to be classical Be stars
527: based on their polarimetric signatures. Although not detected via our polarimetric
528: survey, we note that NGC 346:KWBBe 13 and NGC 346:KWBBe 200 should not be
529: considered to be classical Be stars; the former (NGC 346:KWBBe 13) is the well-known
530: Wolf-Rayet/LBV HD 5980 and the later (NGC 346:KWBBe 200) has recently been shown to be
531: the fifth known B[e] in the SMC \citep{wis07}.
532:
533: \subsubsection{NGC 371}
534:
535: WB06 identified 129 candidate Be stars in NGC 371. We have obtained polarimetric
536: information for 73 of these targets, and found 10 of these 73 stars (14\%),
537: NGC 371:WBBe 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 13, 18, 24, and 31 exhibited polarization
538: Balmer jumps, indicating they are most likely classical Be stars. We classified 49 of
539: the 73 stars (67\%) as type-2 objects, and remark that 6 of these 49 type-2 stars
540: (i.e. 6 of the 73, 8\%, of the total population) exhibited a clear electron scattering polarization
541: signature. Note that many of the fainter candidate Be stars included in our
542: 74 detections were not observed at high signal-to-noise levels; thus for most
543: of these objects we can only say that to within 3$\sigma$, their polarimetric
544: properties are not inconsistent with those of classical Be stars. We suggest that
545: 14 of the 73 (19\%) candidates in NGC 371 are unlikely to be classical Be stars
546: based on their polarimetric properties. WB06 suggested that 11 of
547: the 130 photometrically identified candidates
548: should be viewed as ``possible detections''; however, we were only able to extract
549: polarimetric information for 2 of these 11 objects, NGC 371:WBBe 64 and 87. We
550: classified both as type-2 stars.
551:
552:
553: \subsubsection{Bruck 60}
554:
555: We were able to extract polarimetric information for 18 of the 60 candidate Be stars
556: identified photometrically by WB06. We found 1 of the 18
557: (6\%), Bruck 60:WBBe 6, showed a polarization Balmer jump, while we classified
558: 11 of the 18 stars (61\%) as type-2 objects. 8 of these 11 type-2
559: stars (i.e. 8 of the 18, 44\%, of the total population) exhibited an electron scattering
560: intrinsic polarization signature. We suggest that
561: 6 of the 18 (33\%) candidates in Bruck 60 are unlikely to be classical Be stars based on their
562: polarimetric signatures. WB06 noted that 5 of the 26 photometrically
563: identified candidate Be stars in Bruck 60
564: should be considered ``possible detections''. We were only able to detect 1 of
565: these 5 stars polarimetrically, Bruck 60:WBBe 21, and classified it as a type-2 object which
566: exhibited clear evidence of an electron scattering polarization signature.
567:
568:
569: \subsubsection{NGC 456}
570:
571: 23 candidate Be stars in NGC 456 were identified in the photometric survey of WB06, and
572: we were able to extract polarimetric information for 14 of these 23 candidates. Although
573: we did not observe any objects with polarimetric Balmer jumps, we did classify 9 of the 14 stars
574: (64\%) as type-2 objects. 1 of these 9 type-2 stars (i.e. 1 of the 14, 7\%, of the total population),
575: NGC 456:WBBe 1, exhibited an electron scattering polarization signature.
576: We suggest that 5 of the 14 (36\%) candidates in NGC 456 are unlikely to be classical Be stars
577: based on their observed intrinsic polarization components. WB06 suggested 1
578: of NGC 456's 23 photometrically identified candidate Be
579: stars should be viewed as a ``possible detection'': we marginally detected this object,
580: NGC 456:WBBe 21, and suggest that it is unlikely to be a classical Be star.
581:
582: \subsubsection{NGC 458}
583:
584: 30 candidate Be stars were photometrically identified in NGC 458 by WB06, and
585: we were able to extract polarimetric information for 10 of these 30 candidates. None of
586: the 10 detected objects exhibited polarimetric Balmer jumps or clear evidence of having an
587: electron scattering signature. We classified 6 of the 10 stars (60\%), and suggest that
588: 4 of the 10 (40\%) are unlikely to be classical Be stars. We were able to extract
589: polarimetric information for 1 of the 2 initially identified as ``possible
590: detections'' by WB06, NGC 458:WBBe19. We classified this star as a type-2 object;
591: furthermore, we found it exhibited suggestive evidence of a small polarimetric Balmer jump,
592: although the data were very noisy.
593:
594: \subsubsection{NGC 330}
595:
596: \citet{kel99} identified 76 candidate Be stars in the vicinity of NGC 330 and we
597: were able to extract polarimetric information for 41 of these objects. While we did not
598: observe any of the detected candidates to have a polarimetric Balmer jump, we did classify
599: 24 of the 41 (59\%) candidates as type-2 stars, and note that 9 of these 24 type-2
600: objects (i.e. 9 of the 41, 22\%, of the total population) exhibited electron scattering
601: polarimetric signatures. We suggest that 17 of the 41 (41\%) candidates are unlikely to
602: be classical Be stars based on their intrinsic polarimetric signatures.
603:
604: \section{Discussion}
605:
606: \subsection{Analysis of Intrinsic Polarization Statistics}
607:
608: It is clear from Table \ref{polsummary} that the percentage of SMC and LMC candidate Be stars which
609: exhibit polarization Balmer jumps, electron scattering signatures, or were deemed unlikely
610: to be classical Be stars varies significantly from one cluster to the next. To better assess
611: the global trends of our dataset, we extracted simple statistical mean and median values from
612: Table \ref{polsummary}, as summarized in Table \ref{polsummary2}. From Table \ref{polsummary2}, we
613: see that at
614: least 25\% of our dataset is populated by objects which appear unlikely to be classical Be stars.
615: The presence of such a large number of likely ``contaminants'' is interesting, as it confirms one of the
616: initial hypotheses of this project: it is dangerous to assume, a-priori, that all objects identified as
617: excess H$\alpha$ emitters via 2-CD surveys are classical Be stars. We thus suggest caution should
618: be exercised when attempting to ascertain the role evolutionary age and/or metallicity play in the development
619: of the Be phenomenon purely via the analysis of 2-CD data.
620:
621: Assuming these objects are truly ``contaminants'', we recalculated the statistics of our intrinsic
622: polarization dataset after removing these objects from consideration. The results of this
623: exercise are listed in Table \ref{polsum3}. The median prevalence of polarization Balmer jumps in
624: our SMC/LMC dataset is typically between 20-25\% (Table \ref{polsum3}). Polarization Balmer jumps
625: appear to be significantly less prevalent in
626: our SMC clusters (4\%) than in our LMC clusters (25\%); however, this statistic is strongly influenced by the
627: null detection of such signatures in three SMC clusters.
628:
629: Since 1989, the HPOL spectropolarimeter \citep{wol96} mounted on the University of Wisconsin's Pine Bluff
630: Observatory (PBO) has been monitoring the optical spectropolarimetric properties of a sample of 73 known
631: Galactic Be stars, and it provides a statistically significant
632: polarimetric dataset which we will use to aid the interpretation of our results. As yet, most of the $\sim$800
633: HPOL observations of classical Be stars have not had their ISP components identified and
634: removed; hence, we can not
635: readily compare their intrinsic polarization characteristics to our data. However, we can determine the
636: prevalence of polarization Balmer jumps in the HPOL database. Data obtained prior to 1995 have
637: been compiled in catalog form by \citet{bjo00}, and observations characterized by a polarization Balmer jump
638: have already been flagged in the catalog. We have similarly analyzed all observations obtained from 1995-2004 to
639: identify the presence of polarimetric Balmer jumps in these data. We then compiled all HPOL observations
640: of individual classical Be stars into two categories: a) classical Be stars which had \textbf{never}
641: exhibited a polarimetric Balmer jump in any PBO observation; and b) classical Be stars which had
642: exhibited a polarimetric Balmer jump in at least one observation. The results of this classification
643: procedure are given in Table \ref{polsum3}.
644:
645: We found 31 of the 73 (42\%) observed Galactic Be stars exhibited a polarimetric Balmer jump for at least
646: part of the time-frame of the HPOL survey. Amongst early-type Be stars (O9-B5) in the HPOL database, 22
647: of 45 (49\%) exhibited polarimetric Balmer jumps. Note that further restricting the sample to include only
648: O9-B3 type Be stars does not appreciably affect the observed prevalence of polarization Balmer jumps, as 17 of
649: 40 (43\%) exhibited such a signature. In contrast, the prevalence
650: of polarization Balmer jumps does seem to be noticeably lower for later-type (B6-A0) Be stars, as we found
651: only 8 of 26 (31\%) exhibited evidence of a polarimetric Balmer jump.
652:
653: The frequency of polarization Balmer jumps appears to decrease with metallicity: $\sim$45\% of Galactic Be stars in
654: the HPOL database, $\sim$25\% of LMC Be stars from the present study, and $\sim$4\% of SMC Be stars from the
655: present study exhibit polarization Balmer jumps. We suggest several possible explanations for these results.
656: \begin{enumerate}
657: \item
658: It is possible that the average disk properties of classical Be stars are fundamentally
659: different in the low metallicity environments of the SMC and LMC as compared to our Galaxy. The presence of
660: intrinsic polarization in classical Be stars, as well as its wavelength dependence, is a function of disk inclination
661: angle, disk density, and the effective temperature of disk material. Thus the observed lower frequency
662: of polarization Balmer jumps in our data suggest either that it might be harder to form massive disk systems
663: in low metallicity environments or that the average disk temperature is higher in these lower metallicity environments,
664: hence decreasing the amount of pre- and post-scattering absorption by neutral H I.
665:
666: \item Our polarimetric observations provided a one time sampling of LMC and SMC candidate Be
667: stars, while the HPOL survey obtained a larger number of observations, albeit at quasi-random intervals, of
668: a population of known Be stars. Owing to the variable nature of the Be phenomenon, we do not a priori know
669: how often any individual Be star will exhibit any of the possible polarization signatures; hence, the different
670: sampling errors associated with these two databases might explain at least some of the
671: observed differences in the polarization Balmer jump frequencies.
672:
673: \item The statistics presented in Table \ref{polsum3} were based on removing a significant
674: number of objects deemed unlikely to be classical Be stars from consideration, i.e. type-3 and type-4 objects.
675: Recall however that our definition of type-2 objects only required their polarimetric properties to be
676: not inconsistent with those expected from classical Be stars. It is possible that a population of
677: ``contaminants'', either a) unpolarized objects which aren't pole-on or near pole-on classical Be stars;
678: or b) non-classical Be stars which were not identified as such due to low data quality, still reside within
679: our collection of type-2 objects, hence underestimate our polarization Balmer jump fraction frequency.
680: If such a
681: scenario is true, it would further suggest that extreme caution should be exercised when assessing the
682: nature of stellar populations purely via the use of photometric 2-CDs.
683:
684: \end{enumerate}
685:
686:
687: \subsection{Identification of ``Contaminants'' in 2-CD Detected Candidate Be Stars}
688:
689: WB06 identified a large number of B-type objects having excess H$\alpha$ emission via
690: photometric 2-CDs and suggested that these stars be classified as candidate Be stars. D. Gies (2006,
691: personal communication) noted that several candidate Be stars in the WB06 dataset
692: had colors redder than that expected from classical Be stars, and suggested that the
693: frequency of observed blue (or red) excess H$\alpha$ emitters in the 2-color diagrams presented in
694: WB06 increased with the total number of stars of a given color range. Furthermore,
695: he postulated that if these red excess emitters were a) a manifestation of
696: extremely young stars with their birth disks still intact, b) red-type giants or supergiants, or
697: c) false detections owing from the effects of bright background H II emission; measuring the
698: prevalence of these excess emitters could serve as
699: an estimate of the number of ``contaminants'' which affect the blue population of
700: excess H$\alpha$ emitters, i.e. the candidate Be star population.
701:
702: We examined the 2-CD photometry of 6 clusters,
703: common to both this survey and that of WB06 and spanning a wide range of
704: ages (very young, young, old; WB06) and metallicities (SMC, LMC), and
705: determined the frequency of excess red-type
706: H$\alpha$ emitters relative to the total number of red-type stars. We restricted our analysis such
707: that the magnitude of (B-V) colors used to identify candidate Be stars in each cluster (i.e.
708: $\sim$ -0.3 $<$ (B-V) $<$ 0.2 in NGC 458, WB06) matched the range of (B-V) colors
709: used to study the frequency of red-type excess emitters (i.e. 0.2 $<$ (B-V) $<$ 0.7 for NGC 458).
710: Furthermore, we adopted the same (R-H$\alpha$) cutoffs delineating excess emitters from normal
711: stars for each cluster as used by WB06. The results of this exercise
712: are tabulated in column 2 of Table \ref{photcontam}. Interestingly,
713: with few exceptions, the frequency of potential ``contaminants'' implied by this technique is
714: generally consistent with the minimum rate of contamination derived from our polarization results
715: (see column 3 of Table \ref{photcontam}, column 6 of Table \ref{polsummary}), i.e. the candidates
716: we assigned a Type 4 classification. Clearly this photometric contamination check can not provide
717: a diagnostic on the Be classification of individual objects, unlike our polarimetry; however,
718: we suggest that this technique might provide a rough estimate of the role of contaminants in
719: cases in which detailed follow-up observations have not been made or are unfeasible.
720:
721:
722: \subsection{The Evolutionary Status of Excess H$\alpha$ Emitters in Very Young (5-8 Myr) Clusters: Early-Type Classical Be stars or Early-Type Herbig Be stars?}
723:
724: One of the interesting results presented in WB06 was the
725: identification of candidate Be star in clusters
726: of age 5-8 Myr, in an abundance similar to the general frequency of the Be
727: phenomenon in our Galaxy, $\sim$17\%. However, it was uncertain based on those results
728: whether the detected excess H$\alpha$ emitters a) were true classical Be star-disk systems;
729: b) were B-type objects which still possessed remnant star-formation disks, i.e. Herbig Be stars; or c) merely
730: had diffuse H$\alpha$ nebulosity coincidentally associated with them. Our intrinsic polarimetric
731: dataset affords us the opportunity to further constrain the evolutionary status of candidate Be stars in
732: four clusters of age 5-8 Myr, LH 72, NGC 1858, NGC 346, and NGC 371.
733:
734: \subsubsection{Intrinsic Polarization Signatures of Dust versus Gas Disks} \label{bevshaebe}
735:
736: As discussed in the Introduction, Section \ref{intrinpolsection}, and
737: references therein, it is well accepted that classical Be stars are characterized by geometrically thin gas disks, and the mechanism responsible for
738: producing their intrinsic polarization is electron scattering. Herbig Be stars are
739: more complex systems
740: in that their circumstellar environments contain both gas and dust. The \textit{dominant}
741: polarigenic mechanism in Herbig Be stars is well established to be scattering by dust, as outlined in the
742: review papers of \citet{bas88}, \citet{gri94} and \citet{wat98} and numerous references therein.
743: While Herbig Be and classical Be stars exhibit some similar observational traits, such as the presence of an intrinsic, often variable, polarization component \citep{vra79,qui97,vin02,bjo05,bjo06}, the different scattering
744: mechanisms which characterize Herbig Be versus classical Be stars manifest themselves in several
745: observational manners. The magnitude of linear polarization of classical Be stars is typically of
746: order 1\% or less \citep{bjo00}, whereas the average ($\sim$3\%) and maximum (14.5\%) polarization
747: observed in Herbig Ae/Be stars is clearly much larger \citep{tam05}. More importantly, the different
748: scattering mechanisms which dominate in each of these star-disk systems will produce a different
749: wavelength dependence in these stars' intrinsic polarization.
750:
751: The characteristic wavelength dependent intrinsic polarization signature of classical Be stars has already been documented in Section \ref{intrinpolsection}. Herbig Be stars are not known
752: to exhibit any singular ``characteristic'' intrinsic polarization behavior (see e.g.
753: \citealt{vra79,bas88,mey02}); the grain chemistry, grain size distribution, and relative size and
754: extent of the gas and dust disks/envelopes of individual Herbig Be systems likely contributes to the
755: heterogeneous mix of observed intrinsic polarization. Some typical intrinsic polarization trends
756: are observed in Herbig Ae/Be stars however, most notably rotations (and dramatic 90$^{\circ}$ reversals)
757: in the intrinsic polarization position angle \citep{sch92,bjo95,bjo98,mey02}. We
758: remark that several literature works
759: which describe and interpret the wavelength dependence of intrinsic polarization from
760: Herbig Be stars, and at times
761: attempt to draws parallels with the intrinsic polarization behavior of classical Be stars, should be
762: viewed with caution. For example, as noted by \citet{bas88}, both \citet{vra75} and \citet{gar78} employ
763: dubious assumptions in their efforts to constrain the interstellar polarization along the line of sight
764: to their Herbig Be stars, and as such the wavelength dependence of the ``intrinsic'' polarization
765: they report is likely inaccurate.
766: Similarly, the discussion of the wavelength dependence of intrinsic polarization of the Herbig Be star
767: BD+61 154 in \citet{vra79} (see their Figure 2) ignores the wavelength dependence of the intrinsic polarization
768: position angle. The $\sim$40$^{\circ}$ intrinsic polarization position angle rotation from the B to I filter in
769: these data is inconsistent with the expected signature of a pure gas disk system; the wavelength
770: dependence of intrinsic polarization from this Herbig Be star is not similar to that observed for
771: classical Be stars.
772:
773: Although dust scattering is the dominant polarigenic agent for Herbig Be stars, it is still possible to
774: detect evidence of the gaseous inner disk component of some of these systems via polarimetry
775: \citep{vin02,mey02,oud05}. For example, \citet{mey02} presents intrinsic spectropolarimetry
776: of the Herbig Be star MWC349A covering the wavelength range $\sim$5000-10500\AA\ (V,R,I filters),
777: which exhibits both line depolarization effects and a Paschen
778: polarization jump (see their Figure 7), similar to that observed in the classical Be star zeta Tau \citep{woo97}. \citet{mey02} suggest electron scattering as the mechanism responsible for producing
779: these specific features. Evidence of the dusty component of MWC349A's composite disk is also evident
780: in these data. Specifically, the 30-40$^{\circ}$ rotation in the intrinsic continuum polarization position
781: angle, beginning at $\sim$6200 \AA\ and extending to the blue edge of the available data, $\sim$5000 \AA\, indicates the presence of an additional scattering mechanism which becomes more
782: pronounced at shorter wavelengths, i.e. dust scattering.
783:
784: Based on the available literature, we are aware of no compelling examples of Herbig Be stars whose
785: intrinsic polarization magnitude \textit{and} position angle fully follow the known UBVRI behavior
786: of classical Be stars. While neither typical nor likely, we can not rule out the possibility that one could
787: in principle observe a Balmer jump signature in the polarization magnitude of \textit{some} Herbig
788: Be stars, as these systems do have composite gas plus dust disks. However, as
789: dust scattering is the dominant polarigenic scattering agent in Herbig Be stars, it is dubious that the entire
790: UBVRI intrinsic polarization magnitude and position angle of such systems would exhibit no evidence of a
791: non-electron scattering component. Moreover, as astutely pointed out by our referee, it would be
792: even more unlikely to observe one of our ``Type 2 electron scattering (ES) signatures'' in any Herbig
793: Be star, unless the dust grain chemistry and size distribution would conspire to produce
794: grey scattering.
795:
796: Hence, the UBVRI spectral range of the intrinsic polarization data presented in this paper enables
797: us to discriminate deviations from a pure electron scattering signature over a broad spectral range. This
798: allows us to differentiate Herbig Be stars analogous to MWC 349A, whose gaseous disk dominates a portion of
799: the optical polarimetric regime, and Herbig Be stars whose dust disks dominate the optical polarimetric
800: regime, from classical Be stars.
801:
802:
803:
804: \subsubsection{Nebular Origin?}
805:
806: As noted in WB06, many of the candidate Be stars identified in clusters of age 5-8 Myr reside nearby
807: or even within regions characterized by diffuse nebular emission. We consider whether the observed
808: characteristic polarimetric signatures of classical Be stars, both electron scattering and Balmer jump
809: polarization features, could merely be artifacts of this background emission. Such polarization
810: signatures are only produced when the electron scattering optical
811: depth is $\sim$1.0, i.e., that present in the innermost disk region of classical Be stars. The density
812: of any coincident diffuse H$\alpha$ nebulosity present around candidate Be stars is vastly insufficient
813: to create such a polarization signature. Thus while some of the ``Be star'' detections made by
814: H$\alpha$ spectroscopic surveys \citep{maz96} have been shown to be spurious detections due
815: to the presence of coincident gas \citep{kel98}, such diffuse nebulosity can not be responsible for creating
816: the polarimetric signals found in our dataset.
817:
818:
819: \subsubsection{Near-IR Colors} \label{nircolors}
820:
821: Further insight into the evolutionary status of candidate Be stars in our very young (5-8 Myr) clusters
822: may be elicited via inspection of their near-IR colors. It has been shown that the fundamentally
823: different composition of classical Be disks (gas) and Herbig Ae/Be disks (gas and dust) will generally
824: result in these objects occupying distinctly different locations in (J-H) versus (H-K) near-IR 2-color diagrams \citep{lad92,li94}, although minor instances of overlap are observed. As such, we cross-correlated all photometrically identified candidate Be stars residing in clusters studied in this paper with the 2MASS \citep{skr06} survey. Targets for which we were able to extract full JHK photometric data are
825: listed in Table \ref{ircolor}.
826:
827: We plot the 2MASS JHK photometry of all available sources as a function of
828: our polarimetric classifications in Figure \ref{ir2cd} (with error bars) and Figure \ref{ir2cdnoe}
829: (without error bars). Our Type-1 sources
830: which exhibit polarimetric Balmer jumps are plotted as red circles, our Type-2 sources which exhibit
831: ES polarimetric signatures are plotted as green triangles, and all other candidate Be stars (other Type-2 sources, Type-3 sources, Type-4 sources, and polarimetric non-detections) are plotted as blue squares. For reference, we have also plotted the near-IR colors of 101 known Galactic Be stars tabulated by \citet{dou91} as filled black triangles,
832: 21 LMC ``ELHC'' stars which \citet{dew05} suggest are likely to be classical Be stars as yellow
833: open triangles, 2MASS and ground-based \citep{gum95} colors of 13 Magellanic Cloud B[e] stars
834: known to have dusty disks as light blue crosses, and the star ``ELHC-7'' which \citet{dew05} suggest
835: is likely to be a LMC Herbig Ae/Be dusty star-disk system as a pink triangle.
836:
837: Figures \ref{ir2cd} and \ref{ir2cdnoe} clearly demonstrate that most of the candidate Be stars which we were able to correlate with the 2MASS catalog do lie in a distinctly different region of the JHK 2-color diagram than that occupied by known dustier
838: (Herbig Ae/Be or B[e]) systems. Furthermore, although the Magellanic Cloud candidate Be
839: stars' colors exhibit a wide dispersion, likely due in part to the considerable photometric errors of these
840: faint sources (Figure \ref{ir2cd}; Table \ref{ircolor}), we find no clear distinction amongst
841: the near-IR colors of
842: our candidate Be stars as a function of their polarimetric classification. A small number of candidate Be
843: stars marginally overlap with the location of dustier B[e] sources, although these sources
844: are within 3-$\sigma$ of the mean locus of classical Be colors. Clearly better quality near-IR photometry
845: of these sources should be pursued to better elucidate their evolutionary status. Two candidate Be stars
846: clearly exhibit near-IR colors consistent with dusty disk systems, NGC 346:KWBBe 200 and NGC 456:WBBe 7. NGC 346:KWBBe 200 was not detected in our polarimetric survey owing to contamination from a nearby
847: source; however, \citet{wis07} has recently published optical spectroscopic, near-IR photometric, and
848: IR photometric observations of the target and concluded it is a B[e] supergiant, not a classical
849: Be star. NGC 456:WBBe 7 was observed in our polarimetric survey and assigned a classification of Type-3.5. Although noisy, our intrinsic polarization data exhibited marginal evidence of a position angle
850: rotation, which could be indicative of a dusty envelope. The star's near-IR colors seems to verify this
851: tentative interpretation.
852:
853: For comparison, we also plotted the same near-IR colors for only candidate Be stars residing in our very young (5-8 Myr) clusters in Figure \ref{ir2cdvy}. Comparison of Figures \ref{ir2cdnoe} and \ref{ir2cdvy}
854: reveal no distinctive differences; rather, it is quite clear that the vast majority of candidate Be stars in these
855: very young clusters have near-IR colors consistent with those expected from classical Be stars and
856: notably inconsistent with those expected from composite gas plus dust disk systems
857: (Herbig Ae/Be and B[e] stars). Similar to
858: Figure \ref{ir2cdnoe}, Figure \ref{ir2cdvy} reveals that there is no clear color difference amongst our various
859: polarimetric classifications. We interpret these results as additional
860: evidence that the many of the candidate
861: Be stars identified in clusters 5-8 Myr old by WB06 are classical Be stars, and not pre-main-sequence
862: Herbig Be stars.
863:
864: \subsubsection{Natal Disk Clearing Time}
865:
866: The clearing time-scale of natal star formation material (gas and dust) will influence whether it is
867: possible or likely, a-priori, to observe early-type Herbig star-disk systems in clusters of age 5-8 Myr. Amongst the less massive Herbig Ae and T
868: Tauri stars, the median lifetime of inner optically thick accretion disks is 2-3 Myr, and although
869: exceptions do exist, there is little to no H- and K-band evidence of primordial disks beyond
870: a median stellar age of 5 Myr \citep{hil05}. The typical natal disk dissipation for more massive stars
871: is less well known. From a detailed study of the young cluster NGC 6611, \citet{dew97}
872: suggested that the clearing of natal disk material around the more massive stars in this cluster
873: was typically 0.1 Myr or less. Similarly, \citet{pog06} recently suggested that B0e star HD 53367 is a
874: classical Be star, based in part on an observed episodic loss of its disk material, a phenomenon
875: known to characterize many classical Be stars \citep{por03}. \citet{pog06} also identified a
876: 4-5 M$_{solar}$ pre-main-sequence binary companion which, given the pre-main-sequence
877: evolutionary tracks of \citet{pal93}, suggests the system's age is $<$ 0.8 Myr and indicates the natal
878: gas plus dust disk of the B0e star HD 53367 must have dissipated at least on this time-scale. Although
879: clearly not conclusive, these results do suggest that it is reasonable to expect that most of the
880: natal disks will have been cleared from the early B-type stars in our clusters of age 5-8 Myr.
881:
882:
883: \subsubsection{Summary: Most Candidate Be stars in Clusters 5-8 Myr Old Are Classical Be Stars} \label{polconcl}
884:
885: WB06 and \citet{kel99} identified a large population of B-type stars in clusters of age 5-8 Myr which
886: exhibited an excess of
887: H$\alpha$ emission. Observational studies suggest that the natal star formation disks of
888: early B-type stars can clear on timescales of at least 0.1-0.8 Myr, although it is admittedly not clear if this
889: timescale is ``typical'' for all early-type B stars. The near-IR colors of many of the excess H$\alpha$ emitters
890: in these very young clusters are consistent with those
891: expected from gaseous classical Be stars and generally
892: inconsistent with those observed from dustier B[e] and/or Herbig Ae/Be disk systems.
893: The observed wavelength dependence of intrinsic polarization of many H$\alpha$ excess stars in
894: clusters of age 5-8 Myr are also consistent with that expected from pure gas disk systems (classical Be
895: stars) and exhibit no evidence of secondary contributions from dust scattering, as would be expected
896: for composite disk systems (Herbig Ae/Be, B[e] stars). Based on these factors, we suggest that
897: there is compelling evidence supporting the existence of classical Be stars in clusters of age 5-8 Myr.
898:
899:
900:
901:
902: \subsubsection{Be Stars in the First Half of a B Star's Main Sequence Lifetime: A Comparison to \citet{fab00} and \citet{mar06}}
903:
904: As outlined and summarized in Section \ref{polconcl}, data presented in this paper support
905: the suggestion of WB06 that classical Be stars do develop before the mid-point
906: main sequence lifetime of a B star. Specifically, these data support the presence of a significant
907: number of classical Be stars, having crude photometric spectral types
908: of B0-B5 (WB06), in clusters spanning a near-continuous range of ages from log(t) of 6.7-8.1,
909: i.e. 5-126 Myr. These results conflict with claims made by \citet{fab00} and \citet{mar06} that the
910: Be phenomenon develops in the second-half of a B star's main sequence lifetime. \citet{mar06}
911: do suggest that massive Be stars may briefly appear near the ZAMS in the SMC and
912: LMC, before losing their ``Be status'' until the very end of the first part of their main sequence lifetimes.
913: We note that this conclusion was essentially
914: based on a single cluster population, which limits its robustness. WB06 identified, and
915: the intrinsic polarization
916: presented in this paper support, the detection of a large body of Magellanic Cloud Be stars having crude, photometrically-assigned spectral types of B0-B5, in clusters spanning a range of ages from 5-126 Myr.
917: No abrupt absence of classical Be stars was observed in any of the younger-type clusters of our photometric
918: and/or polarimetric datasets. Thus, our larger, more complete investigation of Be stars in Magellanic
919: Cloud clusters calls into question the suggestion that the Be phenomenon is primarily restricted to the second-half
920: of the main-sequence lifetime of B-stars \citep{fab00,mar06} and contradicts the appearance-disappearance-reappearance of the Be phenomenon suggested by \citet{mar06}.
921:
922: \subsubsection{Implications of the Presence of Be Stars in Very Young Clusters}
923:
924: WB06 first reported the presence of candidate classical Be stars in clusters as young as 5 Myr,
925: and noted that if such objects were truly classical Be stars, they would not have spent
926: enough time on the main sequence to spin-up to near-critical rotation velocities via the mechanism
927: proposed by \citet{mey00} or via mass transfer in a binary system \citep{mcs05}. The confirmation
928: of the classical Be status of many of these stars via the present study can be interpreted as evidence
929: that a significant number of classical Be stars emerge onto the
930: zero-age-main-sequence at near critical rotation velocities. An alternate interpretation of our
931: results is that these youthful classical Be stars are evidence of the existence of a subset of the Be phenomenon which rotate at significantly sub-critical
932: rates, perhaps as low as 0.4-0.6 v$_{crit}$ for early-type B stars \citep{cra05}. \citet{cra05} suggested that
933: only a subset of early-type
934: (O7-B2) Be stars might be sub-critical rotators, while later-type objects (B3-A0) should be all near-critical rotators.
935: Our photometric survey of these very young clusters assigned crude spectral types to these candidate Be stars of
936: B0-B5 (WB06); however, owing to detection biases in our follow-up polarimetric observations, we have in general only been able to confirm that portions of the brightest of these
937: candidates (i.e. the earliest spectral sub-types, B0 to $\sim$B3)
938: are bona-fide classical Be stars. Thus our present observations do not rule out the possibility that
939: some of our very young bona-fide classical Be stars might belong to the sub-critical rotation population
940: predicted by \citet{cra05}.
941:
942: The observed emergence of the Be phenomenon earlier in the main sequence lifetime than previously thought
943: also has important implications regarding the role of magnetic fields in the formation of Be disks \citep{cas03}.
944: \citet{mac03} investigated the transport of magnetic flux tubes in 9 M$_{sun}$ stars ($\sim$B2.5-B3) and
945: found these structures could rise from the core to the surface within the (at the time) expected beginning
946: of the Be phenomenon, the mid-point main sequence lifetime. The present study has confirmed the presence of bona-fide classical Be stars in clusters as young as 5 Myr having crude, photometrically assigned spectral types of B0 to $\sim$B3. Although WB06 suggested the presence of an additional population of B4-B5 type candidate Be stars in these clusters, the limited dynamical range probed by the present study was unable to confirm the status of these fainter candidates. Although the magnetic flux transport
947: model of \citet{mac03} had sufficient time to transport flux to the stellar surface for $\sim$B3 stars, this is
948: unlikely to be the case for later type stars ($\geq$B4) which have a much thicker radiative envelope. Hence, the existence of such later-type Be stars in extremely young clusters would likely require an additional
949: mechanism to be employed to accelerate the rise times of magnetic flux (Cassinelli, 2006 personal communication). While challenging, follow-up spectroscopy of these young cluster populations would
950: provide one avenue confirm the presence of these purported \citep{wi06a} later-type systems.
951:
952: \subsection{Future Work}
953:
954: While the present study provides significant advances in identifying and understanding the biases present in
955: earlier 2-CD studies of cluster populations, additional work is clearly required. Our polarimetric survey
956: was not sensitive to pole-on or near-pole-on systems, hence determining which of our
957: ``type-2'' objects are near-pole-on classical Be stars and which are astrophysical objects of a
958: fundamentally different nature is a high priority. We suggest that followup moderate resolution optical
959: spectroscopic or infrared photometric observations would provide reasonable diagnostics to resolve this
960: bias, and enable more quantitative determinations of the bona-fide classical Be content of clusters as a function of
961: age and/or metallicity. Our data suggest that at least 25\% of photometrically identified candidate Be
962: stars appear unlikely to be true classical Be stars; however, we are unable to place firm constraints on the
963: true astrophysical nature of such objects. We suggest that followup infrared photometric and/or spectroscopic
964: observations would be useful to further constrain the evolutionary nature of these objects. Furthermore, such
965: observations would also be useful to ascertain the true nature of candidate Be stars which were too faint to be
966: reliably probed by our polarimetric observations.
967:
968: Our analysis of the intrinsic polarization properties of LMC and SMC classical Be stars suggests that the
969: fundamental disk properties of classical Be stars may depend on metallicity. Modeling followup moderate
970: resolution spectropolarimetric observations of LMC/SMC classical Be stars is a clear avenue one could use to
971: further investigate these results, and we note that the advent of accurate linear spectropolarimeters on large
972: aperture telescopes (i.e. the Focal Reducer Spectrograph (FORS) at the Very Large Telescope (VLT) or the Robert Stobie Spectrograph at the South African Large Telescope (SALT)) make obtaining such observations feasible.
973:
974:
975: \section{Summary}
976:
977: We have used imaging polarimetric observations of six LMC and six SMC clusters to investigate the evolutionary
978: status of B-type stars identified as excess H$\alpha$ emitters via optical 2-color diagram photometric
979: techniques. We characterized the interstellar polarization components of these data in a systematic manner,
980: allowing us to isolate the intrinsic polarization properties of our data, hence constrain the dominant polarigenic
981: agent in each system. We found: \begin{enumerate}
982: \item The interstellar polarization associated with NGC 330 was characterized by $\lambda_{max}$ $\sim$4500\AA,
983: suggesting the presence of a small dust grain population;
984:
985: \item The ISP of NGC 2100 exhibited clear evidence of a complex morphology, indicating the presence of a
986: non-uniform magnetic field. We offer a detailed discussion of this B field and its potential origin in \citet{wi06b}.
987:
988: \item The UBVRI wavelength dependence of \textit{intrinsic} polarization of many candidate Be stars in
989: clusters of age 5-8 Myr exhibit either polarization Balmer jumps and/or electron scattering signatures, which
990: is the expected diagnostic of free-free scattering from a gaseous disk. No evidence of a secondary polarigenic
991: agent, i.e. dust scattering, is observed in these system. Moreover, the 2MASS near-IR colors of many of these
992: systems are most consistent with the expected colors of pure gas disks, and inconsistent with the observed colors
993: of dustier Magellanic Cloud disk systems (Herbig Ae/Be, B[e]). We conclude these data confirm the initial
994: suggestion of \citet{wi06a} that classical Be stars are present in clusters of age 5-8 Myr, contradicting claims
995: that the Be phenomenon only develops in the second half of a B star's main sequence lifetime
996: \citep{fab00,mar06}, i.e. after 10 Myr.
997:
998: \item We interpret the observed presence of classical Be stars in clusters of age 5-8 Myr as evidence that
999: a significant population of early-type B stars must emerge onto the ZAMS rotating at near critical velocities.
1000: We note however that these results do not exclude the possibility that we are observing the hypothesized subset of
1001: classical Be stars which rotate at sub-critical velocities \citep{cra05}.
1002:
1003: \item Comparing the polarimetric properties
1004: of our dataset to a similar survey of Galactic classical Be stars, we find the prevalence of polarimetric
1005: Balmer jump signatures decreases with metallicity. We speculate that these results might indicate that
1006: either it is more difficult to form large disk systems in low metallicity environments, or that the average
1007: disk temperature is higher in these low metallicity environments.
1008:
1009: \item We find evidence that at least 25\% of
1010: photometrically identified candidate Be stars do not exhibit polarimetric signatures consistent with those
1011: expected from classical Be stars. These data strongly suggest that caution must be exercised when
1012: attempting to correlate the onset of the Be phenomenon with evolutionary age and/or metallicity based solely
1013: on statistics derived from simple 2-color diagram photometry.
1014:
1015: \end{enumerate}
1016:
1017:
1018: \acknowledgments
1019:
1020: We thank Joe Cassinelli, Doug Gies, and Jennifer Hoffman for discussions which
1021: enhanced this
1022: paper. The efforts of Brian Babler, Ken Nordsieck, and the PBO observing
1023: crew for supplying the HPOL data presented here are greatly appreciated. We thank the NOAO TAC
1024: for allocating observing time for this project and JPW thanks NOAO for supporting his travel to
1025: CTIO. Portions of this work has been supported in part by NASA NPP NNH06CC03B (JPW), NASA
1026: GRSP NGT5-50469 (JPW), NASA LTSA NAG5-8054 (KSB), NSF AST-0307686 (JEB), and FAPESP
1027: 02/12880-0 (AP) grants. AMM acknowledges travel support by FAPESP;
1028: he is also partially supported by CNPq. Polarimetry at the University of S\~ao Paulo (USP) is
1029: supported by FAPESP. This research has made use of the SIMBAD database operated
1030: at CDS, Strasbourg, France, and the NASA ADS system.
1031:
1032:
1033:
1034: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1035:
1036: \bibitem[Bastien(1988)]{bas88} Bastien, P. 1988, in Polarized Radiation of Circumstellar Origin, ed.
1037: G.V. Coyne et al. (Vatican City:Vatican Obs), 541
1038:
1039: \bibitem[Bjorkman(1994)]{bjo94} Bjorkman, K.S. 1994, Ap\&SS, 221, 335
1040:
1041: \bibitem[Bjorkman et al.(1995)]{bjo95} Bjorkman, K.S. et al. 1995, BAAS, 187, 10604
1042:
1043: \bibitem[Bjorkman et al.(1998)]{bjo98} Bjorkman, K.S. et al. 1998, ApJ, 509, 904
1044:
1045: \bibitem[Bjorkman(2000)]{bj00b} Bjorkman, K.S. 2000, in IAU Coll. 175 ``The Be Phenomenon in
1046: Early-Type Stars'', ed. M. Smith \& H. Henrichs (ASP: San Francisco) 214, 384
1047:
1048: \bibitem[Bjorkman et al.(2000)]{bjo00} Bjorkman, K.S., Meade, M.R., \& Babler, B.L. 2000, in IAU Coll. 175
1049: ``The Be Phenomenon in Early-Type Stars'', ed. M. Smith \& H. Henrichs (ASP: San Francisco) 214, 48
1050:
1051: \bibitem[Bjorkman \& Meade(2005)]{bjo05} Bjorkman, K.S. \& Meade, M.R. 2005, in ASP Conf Ser.
1052: ``Astronomical Polarimetry: Current Status and Future Directions'', ed. A. Adamson, C. Aspin, C.J. Davis, \&
1053: T. Fujiyoshi (ASP: San Francisco) 343, 406
1054:
1055: \bibitem[Bjorkman(2006)]{bjo06} Bjorkman, K.S. 2006, in ASP Conf Ser.
1056: ``Stars with the B[e] Phenomenon'', (ASP: San Francisco) 355, 247
1057:
1058: \bibitem[Cassinelli et al.(2003)]{cas03} Cassinelli, J.P., Brown, J.C., Mahesaran, M., Miller, N.A., \&
1059: Telfer, D.C. 2003, ApJ, 578, 951
1060:
1061: \bibitem[Clarke \& Bjorkman(1998)]{cla98} Clarke, D.S. \& Bjorkman, K.S. 1998, A\&A, 331, 1059
1062:
1063: \bibitem[Clayton et al.(1983)]{cla83} Clayton, G.C., Martin, P.G., \& Thompson, I. 1983, ApJ, 265, 194
1064:
1065: \bibitem[Coyne \& Kruszewski(1969)]{coy69} Coyne, G.V. \& Kruszewski, A. 1969, AJ, 74, 528
1066:
1067: \bibitem[Coyne \& McLean(1982)]{coy82} Coyne, G.V. \& McLean, I.S. 1982, in Be Stars, IAU Symp No. 98, eds. M. Jaschek \& H.-G. Groth, Reidel, Dordrecht, 77
1068:
1069: \bibitem[Cranmer(2005)]{cra05} Cranmer, S.R. 2005, ApJ, 634, 585
1070:
1071: \bibitem[de Winter et al.(1997)]{dew97} de Winter, D., Koulis, C., The, P.S., van den Ancker, M.E.,
1072: Perez, M.R., \& Bibo, E.A. 1997, A\&AS, 121, 223
1073:
1074: \bibitem[de Wit et al.(2005)]{dew05} de Wit, W.J., Beaulieu, J.P., Lamers, H.J.G.L.M., Coutures, C., \& Meeus, G.
1075: 2005, A\&A, 432, 619
1076:
1077: \bibitem[Dieball \& Grebel(1998)]{die98} Dieball, A. \& Grebel, E.K. 1998, A\&A, 339, 773
1078:
1079: \bibitem[Dougherty et al.(1991)]{dou91} Dougherty, S.M., Taylor, A.R., \& Clark, T.A. 1991, AJ, 102, 1753
1080:
1081: \bibitem[Fabregat \& Torrejon(2000)]{fab00} Fabregat, J. \& Torrejon, J.M. 2000, A\&A, 357, 451
1082:
1083: \bibitem[Feast(1972)]{fea72} Feast, M.W. 1972, MNRAS, 159, 113
1084:
1085: \bibitem[Garrison \& Anderson(1978)]{gar78} Garrison, L.M. \& Anderson, C.M. 1978, ApJ, 221, 601
1086:
1087: \bibitem[Grebel, Richtler, \& de Boer(1992)]{gre92} Grebel, E.K., Richtler, T., \& de Boer, K.S. 1992, A\&A, 254, L5
1088:
1089: \bibitem[Grebel(1997)]{gre97} Grebel, E.K. 1997, A\&A, 317, 448
1090:
1091: \bibitem[Grebel \& Chu(2000)]{gre00} Grebel, E.K. \& Chu, Y. 2000, AJ, 119, 787
1092:
1093: \bibitem[Grinin(1994)]{gri94} Grinin, V.P. 1994, in ASP Conf Ser., The Nature and Evolutionary Status of
1094: Herbig Ae/Be Star, ed. P.S. The, M.R. Perez, \& E. van den Heuvel (ASP:San Francisco), 62, 63
1095:
1096: \bibitem[Gummersbach et al.(1995)]{gum95} Gummersbach, C.A., Zickgraf, F.-J., \& Wolf, B. 1995,
1097: A\&A, 302, 409
1098:
1099: \bibitem[Hillenbrand et al.(1993)]{hil93} Hillenbrand, L.A., Massey, P., Strom, S.E., \& Merrill, K.M. 1993,
1100: AJ, 106, 1906
1101:
1102: \bibitem[Hillenbrand(2005)]{hil05} Hillenbrand, L.A. 2005, in A Decade of Discovery: Planets Around
1103: Other Stars, ed. M. Livio (Baltimore: STScI), preprint (astro-ph/0511083)
1104:
1105: \bibitem[Keller \& Bessell(1998)]{kel98} Keller, S.C. \& Bessell, M.S. 1998, A\&A, 340, 397
1106:
1107: \bibitem[Keller et al.(1999)]{kel99} Keller, S.C., Wood, P.R., \& Bessell, M.S.
1108: 1999, A\&AS, 134, 489
1109:
1110: \bibitem[Keller et al.(2000)]{kel00} Keller, S.C., Bessell, M.S., \& Da Costa, G.S. 2000, AJ, 119, 1748
1111:
1112: \bibitem[Keller(2004)]{kel04} Keller, S.C. 2004, PASA, 21, 310
1113:
1114: \bibitem[Lada \& Adams(1992)]{lad92} Lada, C.J. \& Adams, F.C. 1992, ApJ, 393, 278
1115:
1116: \bibitem[Li et al.(1994)]{li94} Li, W., Evans, N.J., Harvey, P.M. \& Colome, C. 1994, ApJ, 433, 199
1117:
1118: \bibitem[Maeder, Grebel, \& Mermilliod(1999)]{mae99} Maeder, A., Grebel, E.K., \& Mermilliod, J-C. 1999, A\&A, 346, 459
1119:
1120: \bibitem[MacGregor \& Cassinelli(2003)]{mac03} MacGregor, K.B. \& Cassinelli, J.P. 2003, ApJ, 586, 480
1121:
1122: \bibitem[Magalh\~aes(1992)]{mag92} Magalh\~aes, A.M. 1992, ApJ, 398, 286
1123:
1124: \bibitem[Magalh\~aes et al.(1996)]{mag96} Magalh\~aes, A.M., Rodrigues, C.V., Margoniner, V.E.,
1125: \& Pereyra, A. 1996, in ASP Conf. Ser., Polarimetry of the Interstellar Medium, ed. W.G. Roberge
1126: \& D.C.B. Whittet (San Francisco:ASP), 97, 118
1127:
1128: \bibitem[Martayan et al.(2007)]{mar06} Martayan, C., Fremat, Y., Hubert, A.-M., Floquet, M.,
1129: Zorec, J., \& Neiner, C. 2007, A\&A, 462, 683
1130:
1131: \bibitem[Mazzali et al.(1996)]{maz96} Mazzali, P.A., Lennon, D.J., Pasian, F.,
1132: Marconi, G., Baade, D., \& Castellani, V. 1996, A\&A, 316, 173
1133:
1134: \bibitem[McDavid(1994)]{mcd94} McDavid, D. 1994, PASP, 106, 949
1135:
1136: \bibitem[McLean \& Brown(1978)]{mcl78} McLean, I.S. \& Brown, J.C. 1978, A\&A, 69, 291
1137:
1138: \bibitem[McSwain \& Gies(2005)]{mcs05} McSwain, M.V. \& Gies, D.R. 2005, ApJS, 161, 118
1139:
1140: \bibitem[Melgarejo et al.(2001)]{mel01} Melgarejo, R., Magalh\~aes, A.M., Carciofi, A.C., \&
1141: Rodrigues, C.V., 2001, A\&A, 377, 581
1142:
1143: \bibitem[Mermilliod(1982)]{mer82} Mermilliod, J.-C. 1982, A\&A, 109, 48
1144:
1145: \bibitem[Meyer et al.(2002)]{mey02} Meyer, J.M., Nordsieck, K.H., \& Hoffman, J.L. 2002, AJ, 123, 1639
1146:
1147: \bibitem[Meynet \& Maeder(2000)]{mey00} Meynet, G. \& Maeder, A. 2000, A\&A, 361, 101
1148:
1149: \bibitem[Olsen et al.(2001)]{ols01} Olsen, K.A.G., Kim, S., \& Buss, J.F. 2001
1150: , AJ, 121, 3075
1151:
1152: \bibitem[Oudmaijer et al.(2005)]{oud05} Oudmaijer, R.D., Drew, J.E., \& Vink, J.S. 2005, MNRAS, 364, 725
1153:
1154: \bibitem[Palla \& Stahler(1993)]{pal93} Palla, F. \& Stahler, S.W. 1993, ApJ, 418, 414
1155:
1156: \bibitem[Pereyra(2000)]{per00} Pereyra, A. 2000, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of S\~ao Paulo
1157:
1158: \bibitem[Pereyra \& Magalh\~aes(2002)]{per02} Pereyra, A. \& Magalh\~aes, A.M. 2002,
1159: ApJS, 141, 469
1160:
1161: \bibitem[Poeckert \& Marlborough(1976)]{poe76} Poeckert, R. \& Marlborough, J.M. 1976, ApJ, 206, 182
1162:
1163: \bibitem[Pogodin et al.(2006)]{pog06} Pogodin, M.A., Malanushenko, V.P., Kozlova, O.V., Tarasova, T.N.,
1164: \& Franco, G.A.P. 2006, A\&A, 452, 551
1165:
1166: \bibitem[Porter(1996)]{por96} Porter, J.M. 1996, MNRAS, 280, 31
1167:
1168: \bibitem[Porter \& Rivinius(2003)]{por03} Porter, J.M. \& Rivinius, T. 2003, PASP, 115, 1153
1169:
1170: \bibitem[Quirrenbach et al.(1997)]{qui97} Quirrenbach, A. et al. 1997, ApJ,
1171: 479, 477
1172:
1173: \bibitem[Rodrigues et al.(1997)]{rod97} Rodrigues, C.V., Magalh\~aes, A.M., Coyne, G.V., \& Piirola, S.J.V.
1174: 1997, ApJ, 485, 618
1175:
1176: \bibitem[Schmidt(1976)]{sch76} Schmidt, Th. 1976, A\&AS, 24, 357
1177:
1178: \bibitem[Schmidt et al.(1992)]{sch92} Schmidt, G.D., Elston, R., \& Lupie, O.L. 1992, AJ, 104, 1563
1179:
1180: \bibitem[Schulte-Ladbeck et al.(1992)]{wup92} Schulte-Ladbeck, R.E. et al. 1992, ApJL, 401, 105
1181:
1182: \bibitem[Serkowski et al.(1975)]{ser75} Serkowski, K., Mathewson, D.S., \& Ford, V.L. 1975,
1183: ApJ, 196, 261
1184:
1185: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(2006)]{skr06} Skrutskie, M.F. et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163
1186:
1187: \bibitem[Struve(1931)]{str31} Struve, O. 1931, ApJ, 73, 94
1188:
1189: \bibitem[Tamura \& Fukagawa(2005)]{tam05} Tamura, M. \& Fukagawa, M. 2005, in ASP Conf Ser.
1190: ``Astronomical Polarimetry: Current Status and Future Directions'', ed. A. Adamson, C. Aspin, C.J. Davis, \&
1191: T. Fujiyoshi (ASP: San Francisco) 343, 215
1192:
1193: \bibitem[Vink et al.(2002)]{vin02} Vink, J.S., Drew, J.E., Harries, T.J., \& Oudmaijer, R.D. 2002, MNRAS,
1194: 337, 356
1195:
1196: \bibitem[Vrba(1975)]{vra75} Vrba, F.J. 1975, ApJ, 195, 101
1197:
1198: \bibitem[Vrba et al.(1979)]{vra79} Vrba, F.J., Schmidt, G.D., \& Hintzen, P.M. 1979, ApJ, 227, 185
1199:
1200: \bibitem[Waters \& Waelkens(1998)]{wat98} Waters, L.B.F.M. \& Waelkens, C. 1998, ARAA, 36, 233
1201:
1202: \bibitem[Whittet et al.(1992)]{whi92} Whittet, D.C.B., Martin, P.G., Hough, J.H., Roush, M.F.,
1203: Bailey, J.A., \& Axon, D.J. 1992, ApJ, 386, 562
1204:
1205: \bibitem[Wilking et al.(1982)]{wil82} Wilking, B.A., Lebofsky, M.J., \& Rieke, G.H. 1982, AJ, 87, 695
1206:
1207: \bibitem[Wisniewski et al.(2003)]{wis03} Wisniewski, J.P., Bjorkman, K.S., \& Magalh\~aes, A.M.
1208: 2003, ApJL, 598, 43
1209:
1210: \bibitem[Wisniewski \& Bjorkman(2006)]{wi06a} Wisniewski, J.P. \& Bjorkman, K.S. 2006, ApJ, 652,458 (WB06)
1211:
1212: \bibitem[Wisniewski et al.(2007a)]{wi06b} Wisniewski, J.P., Bjorkman, K.S., Magalh\~aes, A.M., \& Pereyra, A. 2007a, ApJ,
1213: 664, 296
1214:
1215: \bibitem[Wisniewski et al.(2007b)]{wis07} Wisniewski, J.P., Bjorkman, K.S., Bjorkman, J.E., \& Clampin, M. 2007b, ApJ, submitted
1216:
1217: \bibitem[Wolff et al.(1996)]{wol96} Wolff, M.J., Nordsieck, K.H., \& Nook, M.A. 1996, AJ, 111, 856
1218:
1219: \bibitem[Wood \& Bjorkman(1995)]{woo95} Wood, K. \& Bjorkman, J.E. 1995,
1220: ApJ, 443, 348
1221:
1222: \bibitem[Wood, Bjorkman, \& Bjorkman(1997)]{woo97} Wood, K., Bjorkman, K.S.,
1223: \& Bjorkman, J.E. 1997, ApJ, 477, 926
1224:
1225:
1226:
1227:
1228: \end{thebibliography}
1229:
1230:
1231: \newpage
1232: \begin{table}
1233: \begin{center}
1234: \scriptsize
1235: \caption{Summary of our observations \label{polexpose}}
1236: \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
1237: \tableline
1238: Cluster & Location & Filter & Age & Date & Exposure Time \\
1239: \tableline
1240: Bruck 60 & SMC & U & o & 2002 Oct 19 & 1200 \\
1241: \nodata & \nodata & B & \nodata & 2002 Oct 21 & 720 \\
1242: \nodata & \nodata & V & \nodata & 2002 Oct 19 & 300 \\
1243: \nodata & \nodata & R & \nodata & 2002 Oct 19 & 300 \\
1244: \nodata & \nodata & I & \nodata & 2002 Oct 21 & 300 \\
1245: NGC 330 & SMC & U & y & 2001 Nov 22 & 1200 \\
1246: \nodata & \nodata & B & \nodata & 2001 Nov 23 & 420 \\
1247: \nodata & \nodata & V & \nodata & 2001 Nov 25 & 300 \\
1248: \nodata & \nodata & R & \nodata & 2001 Nov 25 & 240 \\
1249: \nodata & \nodata & I & \nodata & 2001 Nov 24 & 240 \\
1250: NGC346 & SMC & U & vy & 2001 Nov 21 & 720 \\
1251: \nodata & \nodata & B & \nodata & 2001 Nov 22 & 240 \\
1252: \nodata & \nodata & V & \nodata & 2001 Nov 21 & 180 \\
1253: \nodata & \nodata & R & \nodata & 2001 Nov 24 & 180 \\
1254: \nodata & \nodata & I & \nodata & 2001 Nov 23 & 180 \\
1255: NGC 371 & SMC & U & vy & 2002 Oct 18 & 1200 \\
1256: \nodata & \nodata & B & \nodata & 2002 Oct 18 & 600 \\
1257: \nodata & \nodata & V & \nodata & 2002 Oct 17 & 420 \\
1258: \nodata & \nodata & R & \nodata & 2002 Oct 17 & 300 \\
1259: \nodata & \nodata & I & \nodata & 2002 Oct 18 & 420 \\
1260: NGC 456 & SMC & U & y & 2002 Oct 24 & 1200 \\
1261: \nodata & \nodata & B & \nodata & 2002 Oct 26 & 720 \\
1262: \nodata & \nodata & V & \nodata & 2002 Oct 24 & 420 \\
1263: \nodata & \nodata & R & \nodata & 2002 Oct 26 & 300 \\
1264: \nodata & \nodata & I & \nodata & 2002 Oct 25 & 300 \\
1265: NGC 458 & SMC & U & o & 2002 Oct 27 & 1200 \\
1266: \nodata & \nodata & B & \nodata & 2002 Oct 27 & 720 \\
1267: \nodata & \nodata & V & \nodata & 2002 Oct 26 & 300 \\
1268: \nodata & \nodata & I & \nodata & 2002 Oct 27 & 300 \\
1269: LH 72 & LMC & U & vy & 2002 Oct 26 & 1200 \\
1270: \nodata & \nodata & B & \nodata & 2002 Oct 25 & 720 \\
1271: \nodata & \nodata & V & \nodata & 2002 Oct 25 & 420 \\
1272: \nodata & \nodata & R & \nodata & 2002 Oct 27 & 360 \\
1273: \nodata & \nodata & I & \nodata & 2002 Oct 26 & 300 \\
1274: NGC 1818 & LMC & U & y & 2001 Nov 21 & 900 \\
1275: \nodata & \nodata & B & \nodata & 2001 Nov 22 & 240 \\
1276: \nodata & \nodata & V & \nodata & 2001 Nov 21 & 240 \\
1277: \nodata & \nodata & R & \nodata & 2001 Nov 22 & 180 \\
1278: \nodata & \nodata & I & \nodata & 2001 Nov 22 & 300 \\
1279: NGC 1858 & LMC & U & vy & 2002 Oct 19 & 1200 \\
1280: \nodata & \nodata & B & \nodata & 2002 Oct 24 & 720 \\
1281: \nodata & \nodata & V & \nodata & 2002 Oct 18 & 420 \\
1282: \nodata & \nodata & R & \nodata & 2002 Oct 21 & 300 \\
1283: \nodata & \nodata & I & \nodata & 2002 Oct 24 & 300 \\
1284: NGC 1948 & LMC & U & y & 2001 Nov 27 & 1200 \\
1285: \nodata & \nodata & B & \nodata & 2001 Nov 26 & 360 \\
1286: \nodata & \nodata & V & \nodata & 2001 Nov 25 & 180 \\
1287: \nodata & \nodata & R & \nodata & 2001 Nov 26 & 240 \\
1288: \nodata & \nodata & I & \nodata & 2001 Nov 26 & 300 \\
1289: NGC 2004 & LMC & U & y & 2001 Nov 25 & 900 \\
1290: \nodata & \nodata & B & \nodata & 2001 Nov 22 & 180 \\
1291: \nodata & \nodata & V & \nodata & 2001 Nov 27 & 180 \\
1292: \nodata & \nodata & I & \nodata & 2001 Nov 22 & 420 \\
1293: NGC 2100 & LMC & U & y & 2001 Nov 24 & 1200 \\
1294: \nodata & \nodata & B & \nodata & 2001 Nov 23 & 240 \\
1295: \nodata & \nodata & V & \nodata & 2001 Nov 23 & 180 \\
1296: \nodata & \nodata & R & \nodata & 2001 Nov 24 & 180 \\
1297: \nodata & \nodata & I & \nodata & 2001 Nov 23 & 180 \\
1298: \tableline
1299: \tablecomments{We summarize some of the properties of the data presented in this paper. The exposure
1300: times listed are the integration time used at each of eight
1301: wave-plate position. The age labels in column 4, originally defined and discussed
1302: in detail in \citet{wi06a}, correspond to very young (vy) 5-8 Myr; young (y) 10-25 Myr;
1303: and old (o) 32-158 Myr.}
1304: \end{tabular}
1305: \end{center}
1306: \end{table}
1307:
1308:
1309:
1310: \newpage
1311: \begin{table}
1312: \begin{center}
1313: \scriptsize
1314: \caption{Average interstellar polarization \label{isptable}}
1315: \begin{tabular}{lcccccccccc}
1316: \tableline\tableline
1317: Cluster & \% P$_{u}$ & \% P$_{b}$ & \% P$_{v}$ & \% P$_{r}$ &
1318: \% P$_{i}$ & PA & P$_{max}$ & $\lambda_{max}$ & dPA & K \\
1319: \tableline
1320: Bruck 60 & 0.46$\pm$0.18\% & 0.51$\pm$0.30\% & 0.55$\pm$0.23\% & 0.54$\pm$0.19\% & 0.48$\pm$0.19\% & 130 & 0.55\% &
1321: 5500 & 0 & 0.923 \\
1322: LH 72 & 0.34$\pm$0.14\% & 0.37$\pm$0.12\% & 0.40$\pm$0.14\% & 0.39$\pm$0.12\% & 0.35$\pm$0.14\% & 28 & 0.40\% &
1323: 5500 & 0 & 0.923 \\
1324: NGC 330 & 0.51$\pm$0.17\% & 0.53$\pm$0.16\% & 0.52$\pm$0.14\% & 0.48$\pm$0.17\% & 0.41$\pm$0.17\% & 126 & 0.53\% &
1325: 4500 & 0 & 0.737 \\
1326: NGC 346 & 0.31$\pm$0.17\% & 0.35$\pm$0.18\% & 0.37$\pm$0.17\% & 0.36$\pm$0.15\% & 0.32$\pm$0.19\% & 125 & 0.37\% &
1327: 5500 & 0 & 0.923 \\
1328: NGC 371 & 0.38$\pm$0.15\% & 0.42$\pm$0.16\% & 0.45$\pm$0.15\% & 0.44$\pm$0.15\% & 0.39$\pm$0.15\% & 118 & 0.45\% &
1329: 5500 & 0 & 0.923 \\
1330: NGC 456 & 0.57$\pm$0.21\% & 0.63$\pm$0.24\% & 0.67$\pm$0.25\% & 0.66$\pm$0.29\% & 0.58\% & 147 & 0.67\% &
1331: 5500 & -8 & 0.923 \\
1332: NGC 458 & 0.33$\pm$0.34\% & 0.36$\pm$0.23\% & 0.39$\pm$0.22\% & \nodata & 0.34$\pm$0.15\% & 120 & 0.39\% &
1333: 5500 & 0 & 0.923 \\
1334: \tableline
1335: NGC 1818 & 0.52$\pm$0.17\% & 0.58$\pm$0.16\% & 0.62$\pm$0.15\% & 0.61$\pm$0.17\% & 0.54$\pm$0.14\% & 39 & 0.62\% &
1336: 5500 & 0 & 0.923 \\
1337: NGC 1858 & 0.32$\pm$0.21\% & 0.36$\pm$0.15\% & 0.38$\pm$0.16\% & 0.37$\pm$0.22\% & 0.33$\pm$0.17\% & 45 & 0.38\% &
1338: 5500 & 0 & 0.923 \\
1339: NGC 1948 & 0.57$\pm$0.19\% & 0.64$\pm$0.15\% & 0.68$\pm$0.18\% & 0.67$\pm$0.17\% & 0.59$\pm$0.17\% & 35 & 0.68\% &
1340: 5500 & 0 & 0.923 \\
1341: NGC 2004 & 0.32$\pm$0.12\% & 0.36$\pm$0.13\% & 0.38$\pm$0.15\% & \nodata & 0.33$\pm$0.16\% & 26 & 0.38\% &
1342: 5500 & 0 & 0.923 \\
1343: \tableline\tableline
1344: \tablecomments{The Serkowski parameters PA, P$_{max}$, $\lambda_{max}$,
1345: dPA, and K which best described each of our clusters are tabulated, along with the final ISP values in the
1346: U, B, V, R, and I filters. The horizontal line separates SMC clusters (above) from LMC clusters (below).}
1347: \end{tabular}
1348: \end{center}
1349: \end{table}
1350:
1351:
1352: \newpage
1353: \begin{table}
1354: \begin{center}
1355: \scriptsize
1356: \caption{Foreground ISP Corrections \label{foreground}}
1357: \begin{tabular}{lccc}
1358: \tableline\tableline
1359: Schmidt Region & Polarization & Position Angle & Clusters \\
1360: \tableline
1361:
1362: Region I & 0.37 $\pm$ 0.15\% & 111 & Bruck 60 \\
1363: Region II & 0.27$\pm$0.15\% & 123 & NGC 330, 346, 371 \\
1364: Region III & 0.19$\pm$0.21\% & 110 & NGC 456, 458 \\
1365: Region VI & 0.64$\pm$0.19\% & 30 & LH 72 \\
1366: Region VII & 0.32$\pm$0.13\% & 29 & NGC 1818,1858,1948 \\
1367: Region IX & 0.40$\pm$0.13\% & 20 & NGC 2004 \\
1368: \tableline\tableline
1369: \tablecomments{We used the Galactic polarization maps of \citet{sch76} as templates to identify and
1370: remove the foreground Galactic interstellar polarization contribution to each of our Magellanic Cloud
1371: lines of sight. Columns two and three represent the corrections applied to each of our lines of sight,
1372: listed in column four.}
1373: \end{tabular}
1374: \end{center}
1375: \end{table}
1376:
1377:
1378:
1379:
1380: \newpage
1381: \begin{table}
1382: \begin{center}
1383: \scriptsize
1384: \caption{ISP Intrinsic to the Magellanic Clouds \label{ispintrin}}
1385: \begin{tabular}{lcccccccccc}
1386: \tableline\tableline
1387: Cluster & P$_{u}$ & PA$_{u}$ & P$_{b}$ & PA$_{b}$ &
1388: P$_{v}$ & PA$_{v}$ & P$_{r}$ & PA$_{r}$ & P$_{i}$ & PA$_{i}$ \\
1389: \tableline
1390:
1391: Bruck 60 & 0.43$\pm$0.23\% & 132$\pm$15 & 0.45$\pm$0.34\% & 133$\pm$22 &
1392: 0.34$\pm$0.27\% & 151$\pm$23 & 0.41$\pm$0.24\% & 138$\pm$17 & 0.33$\pm$0.24\% & 144$\pm$21 \\
1393: LH 72 & 0.27$\pm$0.24\% & 28$\pm$26 & 0.24$\pm$0.22\% & 27$\pm$26 & 0.24$\pm$0.24\% &
1394: 123$\pm$29 & 0.07$\pm$0.22\% & 18$\pm$90 & 0.07$\pm$0.24\% & 130$\pm$98 \\
1395: NGC 330 & 0.48$\pm$0.23\% & 126$\pm$14 & 0.48$\pm$0.22\% & 126$\pm$13 & 0.25$\pm$0.21 &
1396: 129$\pm$24 & 0.34$\pm$0.23\% & 127$\pm$19 & 0.24$\pm$0.23\% & 128$\pm$28 \\
1397: NGC 346 & 0.28$\pm$0.23\% & 125$\pm$24 & 0.30$\pm$0.23\% & 125$\pm$22 &
1398: 0.10$\pm$0.23\% & 130$\pm$66 & 0.22$\pm$0.21\% & 126$\pm$27 & 0.15$\pm$0.24\% & 127$\pm$46 \\
1399: NGC 371 & 0.35$\pm$0.21\% & 118$\pm$17 & 0.37$\pm$0.22\% & 117$\pm$17 & 0.19$\pm$0.21\% &
1400: 111$\pm$32 & 0.31$\pm$0.21\% & 116$\pm$19 & 0.22$\pm$0.21\% & 114$\pm$27 \\
1401: NGC 456 & 0.56$\pm$0.30\% & 148$\pm$15 & 0.62$\pm$0.32\% & 149$\pm$15 & 0.64$\pm$0.33\% &
1402: 155$\pm$15 & 0.64$\pm$0.36\% & 151$\pm$16 & 0.56\% & 153.2 \\
1403: NGC 458 & 0.31$\pm$0.40\% & 121$\pm$37 & 0.32$\pm$0.31\% & 121$\pm$28 & 0.22$\pm$0.30\% &
1404: 129$\pm$39 & 0.23$\pm$0.26\% & 125$\pm$32 & \nodata & \nodata \\
1405: \tableline
1406: NGC 1818 & 0.49$\pm$0.21\% & 40$\pm$12 & 0.52$\pm$0.21\% & 40$\pm$12 & 0.34$\pm$0.20\% &
1407: 49$\pm$17 & 0.46$\pm$0.21\% & 43$\pm$13 & 0.35$\pm$0.19\% & 45$\pm$16 \\
1408: NGC 1858 & 0.29$\pm$0.25\% & 47$\pm$25 & 0.31$\pm$0.20\% & 48$\pm$19 & 0.20$\pm$0.21\% &
1409: 74$\pm$30 & 0.25$\pm$0.26\% & 55$\pm$30 & 0.19$\pm$0.21\% & 63$\pm$32 \\
1410: NGC 1948 & 0.54$\pm$0.23\% & 35$\pm$12 & 0.58$\pm$0.20\% & 36$\pm$10 & 0.37$\pm$0.22\% &
1411: 40$\pm$17 & 0.51$\pm$0.21\% & 37$\pm$12 & 0.39$\pm$0.21\% & 38$\pm$15 \\
1412: NGC 2004 & 0.28$\pm$0.18\% & 27$\pm$18 & 0.28$\pm$0.18\% & 28$\pm$18 & 0.08$\pm$0.20\% &
1413: 75$\pm$72 & 0.09$\pm$0.21\% & 44$\pm$67 & \nodata & \nodata \\
1414: \tableline\tableline
1415: \tablecomments{We corrected the total measured ISP components of each of our clusters for the effects of
1416: foreground Galactic interstellar polarization, revealing the ISP components which arose from the dichroic
1417: absorption of light by dust grains located
1418: within the Magellanic Clouds. The horizontal line separates SMC clusters (above) from LMC clusters (below).}
1419: \end{tabular}
1420: \end{center}
1421: \end{table}
1422:
1423:
1424: \newpage
1425: \begin{table}
1426: \begin{center}
1427: \scriptsize
1428: \caption{Total interstellar polarization toward NGC 2100 \label{isptable2}}
1429: \begin{tabular}{lcccccccccc}
1430: \tableline\tableline
1431: Cluster & \% P$_{u}$ & \% P$_{b}$ & \% P$_{v}$ & \% P$_{r}$ &
1432: \% P$_{i}$ & PA & P$_{max}$ & $\lambda_{max}$ & dPA & K \\
1433: \tableline
1434: NGC 2100 area 1 & 1.32\% & 1.41\% & 1.44\% & 1.37\% & 1.20\% & 139 & 1.45\% &
1435: 5000 & 0 & 0.83 \\
1436: NGC 2100 area 2 & 1.26\% & 1.35\% & 1.37\% & 1.31\% & 1.14\% & 100 & 1.38\% &
1437: 5000 & 0 & 0.83 \\
1438: NGC 2100 area 3 & 1.64\% & 1.69\% & 1.65\% & 1.54\% & 1.32\% & 78 & 1.70\% &
1439: 4500 & 0 & 0.737 \\
1440: \tableline\tableline
1441: \tablecomments{A summary of the total interstellar polarization values toward NGC 2100
1442: for the 3 distinct spatial
1443: regions identified within the field of view of our NGC 2100 dataset.}
1444: \end{tabular}
1445: \end{center}
1446: \end{table}
1447:
1448:
1449: \newpage
1450: \begin{table}
1451: \begin{center}
1452: \scriptsize
1453: \caption{Total polarization of candidate Be stars \label{totpol}}
1454: \begin{tabular}{lcccccc}
1455: \tableline
1456: Candidate Be Star & Filter & \%P & PA & \% Q & \% U & \% Err \\
1457: \tableline
1458: Bruck 60:WBBe 1 & u & 1.75 & 107.3 & -1.44 & -0.99 & 0.61 \\
1459: & b & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1460: & v & 1.33 & 113.7 & -0.90 & -0.98 & 0.30 \\
1461: & r & 1.33 & 117.6 & -0.76 & -1.09 & 0.35 \\
1462: & i & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1463: \tableline
1464: \tablecomments{The total polarization (i.e. interstellar plus intrinsic components) of
1465: one candidate Be star investigated in this study is tabulated. A table presenting results for
1466: our entire dataset is available in the electronic version of this Journal.}
1467: \end{tabular}
1468: \end{center}
1469: \end{table}
1470:
1471:
1472: \newpage
1473: \begin{table}
1474: \begin{center}
1475: \scriptsize
1476: \caption{Intrinsic polarization of candidate Be stars \label{inpol}}
1477: \begin{tabular}{lcccccc}
1478: \tableline
1479: Candidate Be Star & Filter & \%P & PA & \% Q & \% U & \% Err \\
1480: \tableline
1481: Bruck 60:WBBe 1 & u & 1.46 & 100.9 & -1.36 & -0.54 & 0.61 \\
1482: & b & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1483: & v & 0.91 & 104.4 & -0.80 & -0.44 & 0.30 \\
1484: & r & 0.88 & 110.0 & -0.67 & -0.56 & 0.35 \\
1485: & i & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1486: \tableline
1487: \tablecomments{The intrinsic polarization of
1488: one candidate Be star investigated in this study is tabulated. A table presenting results for
1489: our entire dataset is available in the electronic version of this Journal.}
1490: \end{tabular}
1491: \end{center}
1492: \end{table}
1493:
1494:
1495: \newpage
1496: \begin{table}
1497: \begin{center}
1498: \scriptsize
1499: \caption{Classifying the intrinsic polarization of individual candidate Be stars \label{starclass}}
1500: \begin{tabular}{lcccccc}
1501: \tableline
1502: Name & Pol Balmer Jump? & PA & Classification & Comments \\
1503: \tableline
1504: Bruck 60:WBBe 1 & N & F2 & 2 & moderate ES \\
1505: \tableline
1506: \tablecomments{The classification of the intrinsic polarization signature of one of the candidate Be
1507: stars investigated in this study is presented. Column 2 indicates whether a polarization Balmer
1508: jump was present in the data; the letters in column 3 indicate whether the polarization position
1509: angle was flat (F), linearly sloped (S), or randomly variable (V) while the numbers indicate the
1510: $\sigma$ level of such characterizations; column 4 indicates the likelihood each object is a bona-fide
1511: classical Be star based on the 4 point classification scheme described in the text; and any
1512: relevant comments are listed in column 5. Note that a table presenting results for
1513: our entire dataset is available in the electronic version of this Journal.}
1514: \end{tabular}
1515: \end{center}
1516: \end{table}
1517:
1518:
1519:
1520: \newpage
1521: \begin{table}
1522: \begin{center}
1523: \scriptsize
1524: \caption{Intrinsic polarization summary \label{polsummary}}
1525: \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
1526: \tableline\tableline
1527: Cluster & Detection Rate & \# Pol. BJ & \# ES & Not Inconsistent & Unlikely \\
1528: \nodata & \nodata & (type-1) & (type-2) & (type-2) & (type-3,4) \\
1529: \tableline
1530: Bruck 60 & 18/26 (69\%) & 1/18 (6\%) & 8/18 (44\%) & 11/18 (61\%) & 6/18 (33\%) \\
1531: NGC 330 & 41/76 (54\%) & 0/41 (0\%) & 9/41 (22\%) & 24/41 (59\%) & 17/41 (41\%) \\
1532: NGC 346 & 33/48 (69\%) & 8/33 (24\%)& 7/33 (21\%) & 22/33 (67\%) & 3/33 (9\%) \\
1533: NGC 371 & 73/129 (57\%) & 10/73 (14\%) & 6/73 (8\%) & 49/73 (67\%) & 14/73 (19\%) \\
1534: NGC 456 & 14/23 (61\%) & 0/14 (0\%) & 1/14 (7\%) & 9/14 (64\%) & 5/14 (36\%) \\
1535: NGC 458 & 10/30 (33\%) & 0/10 (0\%) & 0/10 (0\%) & 6/10 (60\%) & 4/10 (40\%) \\
1536: \tableline
1537: LH 72 & 34/50 (67\%) & 1/34 (3\%) & 5/34 (15\%) & 22/34 (65\%) & 11/34 (32\%) \\
1538: NGC 1818 & 18/40 (45\%) & 4/18 (22\%) & 5/18 (28\%) & 12/18 (67\%) & 2/18 (11\%) \\
1539: NGC 1858 & 27/39 (69\%) & 3/27 (11\%) & 2/27 (7\%) & 13/27 (48\%) & 11/27 (41\%) \\
1540: NGC 1948 & 22/27 (81\%) & 6/22 (27\%) & 6/22 (27\%) & 12/22 (55\%) & 4/22 (18\%) \\
1541: NGC 2004 & 43/67 (64\%) & 9/43 (21\%) & 10/43 (23\%) & 28/43 (65\%) & 6/43 (14\%) \\
1542: NGC 2100 & 35/61 (57\%) & 8/35 (23\%) & 16/35 (46\%) & 20/35 (57\%) & 7/35 (20\%) \\
1543: \tableline\tableline
1544: \tablecomments{We summarize the statistics of our classification of the intrinsic polarization properties
1545: of our dataset. The detection rate column describes
1546: the number of candidates for which we were able to extract polarimetric
1547: information. The third column denotes the fraction of candidates which
1548: display polarimetric Balmer jumps (BJ): we consider these objects to be bona-fide classical Be stars. The
1549: fourth column describes the fraction of candidates which exhibit electron scattering (ES) signatures,
1550: i.e. moderate amounts of wavelength-independent
1551: polarization at a wavelength independent position angle. The fifth column
1552: describes candidates that, to within 3 $\sigma$, can not be ruled out as
1553: possible Be stars. The sixth column
1554: describes candidate Be stars whose intrinsic polarization does not agree,
1555: to within 3 $\sigma$, with that expected from classical Be stars. The horizontal line separates SMC clusters (above) from LMC clusters (below).}
1556: \end{tabular}
1557: \end{center}
1558: \end{table}
1559:
1560: \newpage
1561: \begin{table}
1562: \begin{center}
1563: \scriptsize
1564: \caption{Average intrinsic polarization properties \label{polsummary2}}
1565: \begin{tabular}{lcccccc}
1566: \tableline\tableline
1567: Cluster & Mean BJ & Median BJ & Mean ES & Median ES & Mean Unlikely & Median Unlikely \\
1568: \tableline
1569: Very Young & 13\% & 13\% & 13\% & 12\% & 25\% & 26\% \\
1570: Young & 13\% & 21\% & 22\% & 23\% & 26\% & 20\% \\
1571: \tableline
1572: SMC & 7\% & 3\% & 17\% & 15\% & 30\% & 35\% \\
1573: LMC & 18\% & 22\% & 24\% & 25\% & 23\% & 19\% \\
1574: \tableline
1575: ALL SMC+LMC & 13\% & 13\% & 21\% & 22\% & 26\% & 26\% \\
1576: \tableline
1577: \tablecomments{Statistical averages of data listed in Table \ref{polsummary} are presented. Clusters
1578: were grouped according to age (very young and young) as well as metallicity (SMC and LMC). The
1579: final entry labeled \textit{ALL} denotes a global average of all SMC and LMC cluster data regardless of age or metallicity.}
1580: \end{tabular}
1581: \end{center}
1582: \end{table}
1583:
1584: \newpage
1585: \begin{table}
1586: \begin{center}
1587: \caption{Average intrinsic polarization properties with ``contaminants'' removed \label{polsum3}}
1588: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
1589: \tableline\tableline
1590: Cluster & Mean BJ & Median BJ & Mean ES & Median ES \\
1591: \tableline
1592: Very Young & 17\% & 18\% & 17\% & 18\% \\
1593: Young & 16\% & 24\% & 28\% & 31\% \\
1594: \tableline
1595: SMC & 7\% & 4\% & 25\% & 17\% \\
1596: LMC & 22\% & 25\% & 31\% & 29\% \\
1597: \tableline
1598: ALL LMC+SMC & 16\% & 18\% & 28\% & 25\% \\
1599: Milky Way Galaxy & 42-49\% & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1600: \tableline
1601: \tablecomments{Objects deemed unlikely to be classical Be stars in Table \ref{polsummary2} were
1602: removed from consideration, and the statistical averages of data listed in Table \ref{polsummary}
1603: were recalculated. The ``ALL SMC+LMC'' entry denotes a global average of all SMC and LMC cluster
1604: data regardless of age or metallicity. The Milky Way data averages were derived from
1605: analysis of the HPOL polarization catalog, as discussed in Section 5.1.}
1606: \end{tabular}
1607: \end{center}
1608: \end{table}
1609:
1610:
1611: \newpage
1612: \begin{table}
1613: \begin{center}
1614: \scriptsize
1615: \caption{Frequency of Contaminants in Be Populations Identified via 2-CDs \label{photcontam}}
1616: \begin{tabular}{lcc}
1617: \tableline\tableline
1618: Cluster & Analysis of 2-CD data & Analysis of Polarimetry \\
1619: \tableline
1620: Bruck 60 & 14\% & 33\% \\
1621: NGC 371 & 11\% & 19\% \\
1622: NGC 456 & 10\% & 36\% \\
1623: NGC 458 & 38\% & 40\% \\
1624: LH 72 & 25\% & 32\% \\
1625: NGC 1858 & 42\% & 41\% \\
1626: \tableline\tableline
1627: \tablecomments{The possible rate of contamination of classical Be star detections extracted from
1628: photometric 2-color diagrams. As discussed in Section 5.2, the second column represents the
1629: frequency of red-type excess H$\alpha$ emitters, which we suggest might be an appropriate proxy
1630: of the frequency of B-type excess H$\alpha$ emitters which are not classical Be stars. The third
1631: column is a reproduction of column 6 in Table \ref{polsummary} and illustrates the frequency of
1632: 2-CD contaminants as derived from polarimetric observations of candidate Be stars.}
1633: \end{tabular}
1634: \end{center}
1635: \end{table}
1636:
1637: \newpage
1638: \begin{table}
1639: \begin{center}
1640: \scriptsize
1641: \caption{IR Colors of Candidate Be Stars \label{ircolor}}
1642: \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
1643: \tableline\tableline
1644: Star & Classification & (J-H) & (H-K) & (J-H)$_{err}$ & (H-K)$_{err}$ \\
1645: \tableline
1646: Bruck60:WBBe 5 & Type2-4,other & 0.09 & 0.04 & 0.14 & 0.24 \\
1647: Bruck60:WBBe 20 & Type2-4,other & 0.29 & 0.00 & 0.13 & 0.20 \\
1648: LH72:WBBe 5 & Type1:Bal-J & 0.07 & 0.21 & 0.10 & 0.15 \\
1649: LH72:WBBe 15 & Type2:ES & 0.54 & 0.24 & 0.14 & 0.17 \\
1650:
1651: \tableline\tableline
1652: \tablecomments{Near-IR colors are tabulated for all candidate Be stars in clusters
1653: investigated in this paper which were detected in all three 2MASS photometric bands. The
1654: quoted color errors were obtained by adding individual filter errors in quadrature. Column 2
1655: designates the polarimetric designation, if any, assigned to each target within this paper; ``Type-1:Bal-J''
1656: designates Type-1 sources which we assert are most likely to be classical Be stars, ``Type-2:ES''
1657: designates Type-2 sources which exhibit electron scattering intrinsic polarimetric signatures and are
1658: thus likely classical Be stars, and ``Type-2-4,other'' designates all other sources, regardless of whether
1659: they were detected via our polarimetric survey or not. Note that a table presenting results for
1660: our entire dataset is available in the electronic version of this Journal.}
1661: \end{tabular}
1662: \end{center}
1663: \end{table}
1664:
1665:
1666: \newpage
1667: \begin{figure}
1668: \begin{center}
1669: \includegraphics[scale=1.0]{f1.eps}
1670: \caption{The output of the
1671: PCCDPACK routine \textit{select} for the V-band observation of
1672: NGC 1818 is shown. Cluster members having a polarimetric
1673: signal-to-noise level, p/$\sigma_{p}$, greater than 5 are plotted on a Stokes Q-U
1674: diagram (panel a), as a polarization map as a function of pixel location (panel b), and
1675: in position angle (panel c) and polarization (panel d) histograms. As many cluster stars in
1676: panels a, c, and d exhibit the same general polarimetric properties, we suggest that most of these
1677: objects lack significant intrinsic polarization components and instead only exhibit evidence of
1678: interstellar polarization. \label{1818vsel}}
1679: \end{center}
1680: \end{figure}
1681:
1682:
1683: \newpage
1684: \begin{figure}
1685: \begin{center}
1686: \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{f2.eps}
1687: \caption{The observationally derived total ISP estimates for
1688: each filter of NGC 1818 are plotted as
1689: a function of wavelength. The data closely follow a classic Serkowski-law
1690: shape \citep{ser75}, suggesting that our method for determining the ISP in
1691: each cluster was reasonable. Over-plotted on these estimates is a
1692: modified Serkowski-law \citep{ser75,wil82}
1693: which we deemed best fit the estimates. We extracted the U, B, V, R, and I filter
1694: polarization associated with this fit, and hereafter use these values to
1695: describe the ISP of NGC 1818. \label{1818serkv}}
1696: \end{center}
1697: \end{figure}
1698:
1699: \newpage
1700: \begin{figure}
1701: \begin{center}
1702: \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{f3.eps}
1703: \caption{The observationally derived total ISP estimates for
1704: each filter of NGC 330 are plotted as
1705: a function of wavelength. Over-plotted on these estimates is a
1706: modified Serkowski-law \citep{ser75,wil82}
1707: which we deemed best fit the data. These data, as well as the
1708: SMC ISP associated with NGC 330 (see Table \ref{ispintrin}) are
1709: characterized by a $\lambda_{max}$ value of
1710: $\sim$4500 \AA, suggesting the presence of smaller than average
1711: dust grains. \label{330serk}}
1712: \end{center}
1713: \end{figure}
1714:
1715:
1716: \newpage
1717: \clearpage
1718: \begin{figure}
1719: \begin{center}
1720: \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{f4.eps}
1721: \caption{The I-band total polarization vectors of our observations of
1722: the LMC cluster NGC 2100 are
1723: over-plotted on a DSS-2 red image. The general morphology of these polarization vectors matches
1724: that seen in the other 4 filters observed, indicating this structure is real. \label{rawn2100i}}
1725: \end{center}
1726: \end{figure}
1727:
1728:
1729: \newpage
1730: \begin{figure}
1731: \begin{center}
1732: \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{f5.eps}
1733: \caption{The B-band polarization vector map of region 1 in NGC 2100 ISP space is over-plotted on a DSS-2
1734: blue image. \label{n2100region1isp}}
1735: \end{center}
1736: \end{figure}
1737:
1738: \newpage
1739: \begin{figure}
1740: \begin{center}
1741: \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{f6.eps}
1742: \caption{The B-band polarization vector map of region 2 in NGC 2100 ISP space is over-plotted
1743: on a DSS-2 blue image. \label{n2100region2isp}}
1744: \end{center}
1745: \end{figure}
1746:
1747: \newpage
1748: \begin{figure}
1749: \begin{center}
1750: \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{f7.eps}
1751: \caption{The B-band polarization vector map of region 3 in NGC 2100 ISP space is over-plotted
1752: on a DSS-2 blue image. \label{n2100region3isp}}
1753: \end{center}
1754: \end{figure}
1755:
1756:
1757: \newpage
1758: \begin{figure}
1759: \begin{center}
1760: \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{f8.eps}
1761: \caption{The observationally derived initial estimates of the total interstellar polarization towards region 1 of
1762: NGC 2100 is shown, along with the modified Serkowski-law we deemed best fit the data. The final ISP
1763: values for region 1 used in the remainder of this paper were extracted from this Serkowski
1764: curve. \label{n2100region1serk}}
1765: \end{center}
1766: \end{figure}
1767:
1768: \newpage
1769: \begin{figure}
1770: \begin{center}
1771: \includegraphics[scale=0.9]{f9.eps}
1772: \caption{The time variability of the intrinsic polarization of the known Galactic classical
1773: Be star pi Aquarii is shown in these multi-epoch data from the HPOL spectropolarimeter.
1774: During the 1989 and 1991 observations, the inner disk density
1775: was sufficiently high such that the effects of pre- and post-scattering absorption by hydrogen
1776: in the disk is seen in the appearance of a polarization Balmer jump and a ``saw-tooth'' like
1777: wavelength dependence. The inner disk density was sufficiently low in the 1990 observation
1778: such that the wavelength independent electron scattering signature was not noticeably
1779: altered by a hydrogen opacity signature. We have examined our intrinsic imaging polarization
1780: observations of candidate Be stars to search for the polarimetric signatures found in this
1781: figure. \label{pbopiaqr}}
1782: \end{center}
1783: \end{figure}
1784:
1785: \newpage
1786: \begin{figure}
1787: \begin{center}
1788: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{f10.eps}
1789: \caption{The intrinsic polarization of NGC 371:WBBe18 exhibits the ``sawtooth-like'' polarization signature
1790: characteristic of classical Be stars. Such objects were assigned a designation of type-1 to indicate
1791: they are definitely classical Be stars. \label{polbal}}
1792: \end{center}
1793: \end{figure}
1794:
1795: \newpage
1796: \begin{figure}
1797: \begin{center}
1798: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{f11.eps}
1799: \caption{The intrinsic polarization of NGC 371:WBBe21 clearly exhibits a wavelength independent
1800: electron scattering polarization
1801: signature. Such objects were assigned a designation of type-2 to indicate they are not
1802: inconsistent with being classical Be stars. \label{poles}}
1803: \end{center}
1804: \end{figure}
1805:
1806: \newpage
1807: \begin{figure}
1808: \begin{center}
1809: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{f12.eps}
1810: \caption{The intrinsic polarization of NGC 371:WBBe47 is not consistent, to
1811: within 3 $\sigma$, with that expected from a classical Be star. Such objects would receive a
1812: designation of type-3 or type-4, depending on the severity of their deviation from any of the expected
1813: polarimetric signatures. These objects (especially those which receive a type-4 designation)
1814: provide strong evidence that
1815: the 2-CD technique can mis-identify classical Be star-disk systems. \label{polunlikely}}
1816: \end{center}
1817: \end{figure}
1818:
1819: \newpage
1820: \clearpage
1821: \begin{figure}
1822: \begin{center}
1823: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{f13.eps}
1824: \caption{The intrinsic polarization
1825: of NGC 1948:KWBBe 246 follows a complex wavelength dependence. The optical polarization appears to decrease and position angle increase at short wavelengths. Objects which have dusty plus gaseous disks,
1826: such as HD 45677 \citep{wup92}, exhibit similar optical polarimetric behavior, suggesting that
1827: NGC 1948:KWBBe 246 and similar objects in our sample might also be characterized by such disks.
1828: Alternatively, the wavelength dependence of these data also resemble a Serkowski-like behavior \citep{ser75}, which as discussed in Section 4 might indicate that some these types of objects
1829: are characterized by abnormal interstellar dust conditions. \label{n1948serklong}}
1830: \end{center}
1831: \end{figure}
1832:
1833:
1834: \newpage
1835: \begin{figure}
1836: \begin{center}
1837: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{f14.eps}
1838: \caption{The wavelength dependent intrinsic
1839: polarization of NGC 2100:KWBBe 111 clearly is not consistent with that expected from a classical Be star.
1840: We suggest that this object might be a dust-disk system. \label{n2100intrin111}}
1841: \end{center}
1842: \end{figure}
1843:
1844: \newpage
1845: \begin{figure}
1846: \begin{center}
1847: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{f15.eps}
1848: \caption{This near-IR 2-color diagram presents all available 2-MASS photometry of candidate
1849: Be stars residing in clusters investigate in this paper. ``Type-1:Bal-J'' sources (red circles)
1850: correspond to our polarimetrically designated Type-1 sources which we assert are most likely
1851: to be classical Be stars, ``Type-2:ES'' sources (green triangles) correspond to our polarimetrically
1852: designated Type-2 sources which exhibit electron scattering intrinsic polarimetric signatures and are
1853: thus likely classical Be stars, ``Type-2-4,other'' sources (dark blue squares) correspond to
1854: all other candidate Be stars in clusters investigated in this paper regardless of whether
1855: they were detected via our polarimetric survey or not, ``ELHC Be'' sources (yellow triangles) correspond
1856: to LMC stars which \citet{dew05} claim are likely to be classical Be stars, ``Galactic Be'' sources (black
1857: triangles) are 101 known Galactic Be stars tabulated by \citet{dou91}, ``MC B[e]'' (light blue cross)
1858: correspond to 2-MASS and ground-based \citep{gum95} photometry of known Magellanic
1859: Cloud B[e] supergiants, and ``MC HAeBe'' (pink triangle) corresponds to the star ELHC-7, which \citet{dew05} assert is a Herbig Ae/Be star which resides in the LMC. As discussed in
1860: Section \ref{nircolors}, most of the candidate Be stars which we were able to correlate with
1861: the 2MASS catalog exhibit colors consistent with those expected from classical Be stars, and
1862: inconsistent with those expected from composite gas plus dust disk systems (i.e. Herbig
1863: Ae/Be or B[e] stars). \label{ir2cd}}
1864: \end{center}
1865: \end{figure}
1866:
1867: \newpage
1868: \begin{figure}
1869: \begin{center}
1870: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{f16.eps}
1871: \caption{The same data as presented in Figure \ref{ir2cd}, without error bars. \label{ir2cdnoe}}
1872: \end{center}
1873: \end{figure}
1874:
1875: \newpage
1876: \begin{figure}
1877: \begin{center}
1878: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{f17.eps}
1879: \caption{The subset of data presented in Figure \ref{ir2cdnoe}, corresponding to candidate Be
1880: stars residing in ``very young'' clusters of age 5-8 Myr, is presented. As discussed in
1881: Section \ref{nircolors}, the data presented in this Figure and Figure \ref{ir2cdnoe} exhibit
1882: similar properties. Regardless of polarimetric classification type, all candidate Be stars in clusters
1883: of age 5-8 Myr appear consistent with the expected colors of classical Be stars and inconsistent with
1884: the observed colors of composite gas plus dust systems (i.e. Herbig Ae/Be, B[e] stars). We
1885: interpret these data as additional evidence that many of the photometrically identified candidate
1886: Be stars in clusters 5-8 Myr old by WB06 are classical Be stars and not pre-main-sequence
1887: Herbig Be stars. \label{ir2cdvy}}
1888: \end{center}
1889: \end{figure}
1890:
1891: \end{document}
1892:
1893: