1: %******************************************************************************
2: %*
3: %* GALAXY DUST EVOLUTION PAPER
4: %*
5: %******************************************************************************
6:
7:
8: % Version 2.0: 20-JUN-2005. Remove junk stuff, and describe the final method.
9: % Version 2.1: 21-SEP-2005. Add the Spitzer sources, with the corresponding
10: % data reduction.
11: % Version 2.2: 19-JAN-2006. Version given to Eli.
12: % Version 3.0: 11-SEP-2006. Finalize everything.
13: % Version 4.0: 10-MAR-07. Merge paper I & II to incorporate HII regions, and
14: % to please this ruthless capitalist referee.
15:
16:
17: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
18:
19:
20: % Running titles and authors
21: %---------------------------
22: \shorttitle{The delayed injection of PAHs into the ISM of galaxies}
23: \shortauthors{Galliano et al.}
24:
25: % Packages and aliases
26: %---------------------
27: \usepackage{ulem}
28: \input{alias_expressions}
29: \input{alias_general}
30: \input{alias_instruments}
31: \input{alias_objects}
32: \input{alias_physics}
33: \newcommand{\modif}[1]{{#1}}
34:
35: \graphicspath{{.}}
36: \DeclareGraphicsExtensions{.eps}
37:
38: \slugcomment{\today\ (submitted to \apj\ November 10, 2006)}
39:
40: \begin{document}
41:
42:
43: % Title
44: %------
45: \title{STELLAR EVOLUTIONARY EFFECTS ON THE ABUNDANCES OF PAH AND SN-CONDENSED
46: DUST IN GALAXIES}
47:
48: % Authors
49: %--------
50: \author{Fr\'ed\'eric~Galliano,
51: Eli~Dwek}
52: \affil{Observational Cosmology Lab., Code 665,
53: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,
54: Greenbelt MD 20771, USA}
55: \email{galliano@astro.umd.edu}
56: \and
57: \author{Pierre~Chanial}
58: \affil{Astrophysics Group, Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College,
59: Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK}
60:
61: \begin{abstract}
62: Spectral and photometric observations of nearby galaxies show a correlation
63: between the strength of their mid-IR aromatic features, attributed to PAH molecules, and their metal abundance, leading to a deficiency of these features
64: in low-metallicity galaxies.
65: In this paper, we suggest that the observed correlation represents a trend of
66: PAH abundance with galactic age, reflecting the delayed injection of
67: carbon dust into the ISM by AGB stars in the final post-AGB phase of their evolution.
68: AGB stars are the primary sources of PAHs and carbon dust in galaxies,
69: and recycle their ejecta back to the interstellar medium only after a few
70: hundred million years of evolution on the main sequence.
71: In contrast, more massive stars that explode as Type~II supernovae inject
72: their metals and dust almost instantaneously after their formation.
73: We first determined the PAH abundance in galaxies by constructing detailed
74: models of UV-to-radio SED of galaxies that estimate the contribution of dust in
75: PAH-free \hii\ regions, and PAHs and dust from photodissociation regions,
76: to the IR emission.
77: All model components: the galaxies' stellar content, properties of their \hii\
78: regions, and their ionizing and non-ionizing radiation fields and dust
79: abundances, are constrained by their observed multiwavelength spectrum.
80: After determining the PAH and dust abundances in 35 nearby galaxies using
81: our SED model, we use a chemical evolution model to show that the delayed
82: injection of carbon dust by AGB stars provides a natural explanation to the
83: dependence of the PAH content in galaxies with metallicity.
84: We also show that larger dust particles giving rise to the far-IR emission
85: follow a distinct evolutionary trend closely related to the injection of
86: dust by massive stars into the ISM.
87: \end{abstract}
88:
89: \keywords{ISM: dust --
90: infrared: galaxies --
91: galaxies: starburst --
92: galaxies: evolution --
93: stars: post-AGB --
94: supernovae remnants}
95:
96:
97: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
98: % Introduction
99: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
100:
101: \section{INTRODUCTION}
102: \label{sec:intro}
103:
104: Spectral and photometric observations of nearby galaxies with the \isoST\
105: (\iso) and the \spitzST\ have provided the opportunity to investigate the
106: inter-relations between global galactic properties, such as morphology, star
107: formation activity, spectral energy distribution (SED), metallicity, and dust abundance and composition.
108: In particular, these observations have enabled detailed studies of the
109: correlation of dust abundances and composition with metal enrichment in
110: galaxies spanning a wide range of metallicities.
111: Since the metallicity of galaxies evolves monotonically with time, galaxies
112: with different metallicities provide snapshots of the evolutionary history
113: of galaxies.
114:
115: An exciting result provided by \iso\ spectral observations of nearby galaxies
116: was the discovery of a striking correlation between the strength of their
117: mid-IR aromatic features and their metallicity \citep{madden06}.
118: Low-metallicity galaxies exhibited very weak or no aromatic features. Observations of the 8-to-24$\mic$ bands flux ratio obtained with \irac\ and
119: \mips\ instruments showed a correlation of this flux ratio with the galaxies'
120: oxygen abundance \citep{engelbracht05}.
121: Since the \iraciv\ band is supposed to trace the strength of the aromatic
122: features, and the \mipsi\ that of the continuum emission from the hot
123: non-aromatic dust component, this correlation seemed to confirm the trends
124: discovered by \iso.
125: This correlation was independently confirmed by \citet{wu06} and
126: \citet{ohalloran06} from spectral observations of low-metallicity
127: blue compact dwarf galaxies with the \irs\ instrument.
128:
129: The aromatic features are most commonly attributed to the vibrational modes of
130: Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons \citep[PAHs;][]{leger84,allamandola85}, which
131: are large planar molecules made of 50 to 1000 carbon atoms.
132: Their ubiquity makes them an important component of dust models
133: \citep{desert90,dwek97,zubko04,draine07a}, locking up $\sim15-20\%$ of
134: the total amount of interstellar carbon
135: \citep[][with solar abundance constraints]{zubko04}.
136: They mostly reside in galactic photodissociation regions (PDRs), where they
137: play an important role in the heating of the gas by providing photo-electrons
138: \citep[{e.g.}][]{tielens85,bakes94}, and in interstellar chemistry by
139: providing surfaces for chemical reactions.
140: Because of their small sizes, PAHs are stochastically heated by the
141: interstellar radiation fields.
142: The relative strength of some of the aromatic features depends on their
143: ionization state, and varies therefore significantly with the physical
144: condition of the environment \citep{hony01,vermeij02,galliano07}.
145: Understanding the evolution of PAHs and their relation to the global properties
146: of galaxies is therefore extremely important because of the complex mutual
147: influences between PAHs, and their ambient radiative and gaseous surroundings.
148:
149: Several explanations have been offered for the correlation of the intensity
150: of the PAH features with metallicity.
151: The first suggests that the trend reflects an increase in the destruction efficiency of PAHs in low metallicity environments
152: \citep{galliano03,galliano05,madden06}.
153: Low-metallicity environments are bathed with harder photons than our
154: Galaxy, due to the higher effective temperature of their stars, and their
155: young age.
156: Moreover, the paucity of dust allows this hard radiation field to penetrate
157: deeper into the ISM, compared to high-metallicity systems, selectively
158: destroying the PAH molecules by photoevaporation or photodissociation.
159: This explanation is consistent with the models of population synthesis
160: and dust evolution of \citet{dwek00}.
161: Assuming that PAHs are efficiently destroyed by UV photons in \hii\ regions,
162: their models showed an evolutionary trend of PAH features with time, as the
163: relative contribution of ionizing OB stars to the galaxy's SED decreases
164: with time.
165: A second explanation has been proposed by \citet{ohalloran06}, who suggested
166: that PAHs are destroyed by the numerous shocks observed in low metallicity
167: systems.
168: To support their proposition, they showed an anti-correlation between the
169: PAH-to-continuum ratio and the \feiiline/\neiiline\ line ratio, the latter
170: being supposedly a shock tracer.
171: The problem with this explanation is that there is no observational evidence
172: that PAHs are selectively destroyed in shocks.
173: On the contrary, \citet{reach02} showed that, in the shocked medium of
174: 3C$\,$391, both the PAH features and the underlying continuum disappear.
175:
176: All previous explanations attribute the paucity of PAHs to destructive
177: processes that are more efficient in the early stages of galaxy evolution.
178: In contrast, \citet{dwek05} suggested that the observed correlation reflects an
179: evolutionary trend of the sources of interstellar PAHs with metallicity.
180: PAHs and carbon dust are mostly produced in asymptotic giant branch (AGB)
181: stars which, unlike massive stars, recycle their ejecta into the ISM after a
182: significantly longer time of main sequence evolution.
183: The observed correlation of PAH line intensities with metallicity is therefore
184: a trend of PAH abundance with galactic age, reflecting the delayed injection
185: of PAHs and carbon dust into the ISM by AGB stars in their final, post-AGB,
186: phase of their evolution.
187:
188: Such distinct evolutionary trends of SN and AGB produced dust with time
189: were predicted by \citet{dwek98} and more recently by \citet{morgan03}.
190: In particular, the latter show the evolutionary trend of AGB dust with time.
191: This trend can be translated as a trend with metallicity if galaxies
192: approximately share a global ``cosmic'' star formation history.
193:
194: The goal of this paper is to present a detailed evolutionary model to examine
195: whether the observed trend of PAH line intensity with metallicity reflects an
196: evolutionary trend of PAH abundance with metallicity.
197: This requires the determination of PAH abundance from the strength of their
198: aromatic features in the galaxies for which this trend has been observed, and
199: the use of a chemical evolution model to follow the change of PAH abundance with
200: galactic metallicity \citep{dwek98}.
201: The paper is organized as follows.
202: We first present in \refS{sec:sample} the sample of nearby galaxies that
203: were considered in our analysis.
204: In \refS{sec:method}, we describe the method we used to separate the contributions of \hii\ regions and photodissociation regions to the global SED, in order to determine the abundances of PAHs and larger grains in these
205: galaxies in \refS{sec:results}.
206: In \refS{sec:dustvol}, we briefly describe the chemical evolution model
207: used in the calculations, and compare its results to the abundances derived
208: from our SED modeling.
209: The results of the paper are briefly summarized in \refS{sec:conclusion}.
210:
211: % Abundances
212: Throughout this paper we will refer to the solar abundances by
213: \citet{grevesse98}, the oxygen number abundance being
214: $12+\log(\rm O/H)_\odot=8.83$, the Helium and heavy elements to gas mass
215: ratios $Y_\odot=0.248$ and $Z_\odot=0.017$, respectively.
216: Besides, we assume that the helium abundance is independent of the metallicity.
217:
218:
219: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
220: % The sample
221: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
222:
223: \section{THE SAMPLE OF NEARBY GALAXIES}
224: \label{sec:sample}
225:
226: % Selection
227: %----------
228: \subsection{Source Selection}
229:
230: % Mid-IR observations
231: In order to properly characterize the PAH emission, we considered galaxies
232: whose mid-IR spectrum has been observed, either with one of the spectrographs
233: onboard the \iso\ satellite, or with the \irs.
234: We combined ISO samples of starbursts and AGNs
235: \citep{laurent00}, spirals \citep{roussel01}, ellipticals \citep{xilouris04},
236: dwarf galaxies \citep{madden06}, and the low-metallicity sources of
237: the \spitz\ sample presented by \citet{engelbracht05} which were observed by
238: \irs.
239: Among the ellipticals, only \ngc{1399} has a mid-IR spectrum.
240: Consequently, our sample includes various types of galaxies and covers a wide
241: range of metallicities and star formation activity (\reftab{tab:source}).
242:
243: % Selection of the galaxies
244: The modeling that will be presented in \refS{sec:method} requires the
245: assembly of data covering the stellar as well as the dust emission components,
246: for each galaxy.
247: First, we need most of the U, B, V, R, I, J, H, K fluxes, to constrain the
248: stellar spectrum shape.
249: Photometric J, H and K bands are available for almost all of our sources,
250: thanks to the 2MASS survey \citep{jarrett03}.
251: We rejected the galaxies \arp{118}, \arp{236}, \arp{299} and \ngc{4038},
252: for which no B and V bands were reported.
253: Second, the far-IR SED is used to constrain the intensity of the interstellar
254: radiation field (ISRF).
255: Hence, we rejected galaxies which have not been detected by IRAS or MIPS,
256: such as \hstruc, \tol{1214-277} and \tol{65}.
257: In addition, our mass estimates are normalised to the Hydrogen mass.
258: We therefore rejected the galaxy \IRAS{23128-5919}, for which no \hi\
259: observation was reported.
260: Finally, we removed \M{31} from our sample, since its angular diameter is
261: too large to build a consistent observed total SED.
262:
263: The global properties of the selected sources are presented in
264: \reftab{tab:source}.
265: If relevant, the distances were homogenised to
266: $H_\sms{0}=71\; \rm km\,s^{-1}\,Mpc^{-1}$.
267: The masses have been scaled to the adopted distance.
268: \begin{deluxetable}{llllrrrrrrrl}
269: % Head
270: %-----
271: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
272: \rotate
273: \tablecolumns{12}
274: \tablewidth{0pc}
275: \tablecaption{Select Properties of the Sample}
276: \tablehead{
277: \colhead{Name} & \colhead{R.A.} & \colhead{Dec.} &
278: \colhead{Mid-IR} & \colhead{Distance} &
279: \multicolumn{2}{c}{$12+\log({\rm O/H})$} &
280: \multicolumn{2}{c}{$M_\sms{\hi}$} &
281: \multicolumn{2}{c}{$M_\sms{\hmol}$} & \colhead{Notes} \\
282: \colhead{} & \colhead{(J2000)} & \colhead{(J2000)} &
283: \colhead{spectrograph} & \colhead{(Mpc)} &
284: & \colhead{[ref.]} &
285: \colhead{$(10^8\;M_\odot)$} & \colhead{[ref.]} &
286: \colhead{$(10^8\;M_\odot)$} & \colhead{[ref.]} & }
287: % Data
288: %-----
289: \startdata
290: % Haro 11
291: \haro{11} & $00^h36^m52\fs5$ & $-33\degr33\arcmin19\arcsec$ &
292: \irs & 92 &
293: 7.9 & \obsref{ZHaro11} &
294: $\lesssim1$\unc & \refobs{ZHaro11} &
295: $\lesssim1$ & \refobs{ZHaro11} & Pec \hii \\
296: % NGC 253
297: \ngc{253} & $00^h47^m32\fs9$ & $-25\degr17\arcmin18\arcsec$ &
298: \isocam & 3.3 &
299: 9.0 & \obsref{ZN253} &
300: $18$ & \obsref{HIN253} &
301: $17$ & \obsref{H2N253} & \hii \\
302: % NGC 520
303: \ngc{520} & $01^h24^m34\fs9$ & $+03\degr47\arcmin31\arcsec$ &
304: \isocam & 27 &
305: \unc & &
306: $35$ & \obsref{HIN520} &
307: $35$ & \obsref{H2N520} & Pec \hii \\
308: % NGC 613
309: \ngc{613} & $01^h34^m17\fs5$ & $-29\degr24\arcmin58\arcsec$ &
310: \isocam & 19 &
311: 9.2 & \obsref{ZN613} &
312: $37$ & \obsref{bettoni} &
313: \nodata & & Sy \\
314: % NGC 891
315: \ngc{891} & $02^h22^m33\fs4$ & $+42\degr20\arcmin57\arcsec$ &
316: \isocam & 9.6 &
317: 8.9 & \obsref{ZN891} &
318: $76$ & \refobs{bettoni} &
319: $49$ & \refobs{bettoni} & Edge-on \\
320: % NGC 1068
321: \ngc{1068} & $02^h42^m40\fs6$ & $-00\degr00\arcmin47\arcsec$ &
322: \isocam & 15 &
323: 9.0 & \obsref{ZN1068} &
324: $22$ & \obsref{HIN1068} &
325: $74$ & \obsref{H2N1068} & Sy \\
326: % NGC 1097
327: \ngc{1097} & $02^h46^m19\fs1$ & $-30\degr16\arcmin28\arcsec$ &
328: \isocam & 12 &
329: 9.0 & \obsref{ZN1097} &
330: $51$ & \obsref{HIN1097} &
331: $\gtrsim7.3$ & \obsref{H2N1097} & Sy \\
332: % NGC 1140
333: \ngc{1140} & $02^h54^m33\fs5$ & $-10\degr01\arcmin44\arcsec$ &
334: \isocam & 25 &
335: 8.0 & \obsref{heckman} &
336: $52$ & \obsref{HIN1140} &
337: \nodata & & Irr \hii \\
338: % NGC 1365
339: \ngc{1365} & $03^h33^m35\fs6$ & $-36\degr08\arcmin23\arcsec$ &
340: \isocam & 19 &
341: 9.1 & \obsref{ZN1365} &
342: $130$ & \obsref{HIN1365} &
343: $170$ & \obsref{H2N1365} & Sy \\
344: % SBS 0335-052
345: \sbs & $03^h37^m44\fs0$ & $-05\degr02\arcmin38\arcsec$ &
346: \irs & 54 &
347: 7.3 & \obsref{Zsbs} &
348: $9.9$ & \obsref{HIsbs} &
349: \nodata & & BCD \\
350: % NGC 1399
351: \ngc{1399} & $03^h38^m29\fs1$ & $-35\degr27\arcmin03\arcsec$ &
352: \isocam & 21 &
353: \unc & &
354: $\lesssim2$ & \refobs{bettoni} &
355: \nodata & & cD \\
356: % IC 342
357: \IC{342} & $03^h46^m49\fs7$ & $+68\degr05\arcmin45\arcsec$ &
358: \isocam & 3.8 &
359: 8.9 & \obsref{Zic} &
360: $130$ & \refobs{bettoni} &
361: $50$ & \refobs{bettoni} & \hii \\
362: % NGC 1569
363: \ngc{1569} & $04^h30^m49\fs1$ & $+64\degr50\arcmin52\arcsec$ &
364: \isocam & 2.2 &
365: 8.2 & \obsref{ZN1569} &
366: $1.3$ & \obsref{HIN1569} &
367: $0.50$ & \obsref{H2N1569} & Irr \hii \\
368: % NGC 1808
369: \ngc{1808} & $05^h07^m42\fs3$ & $-37\degr30\arcmin47\arcsec$ &
370: \isocam & 11 &
371: 9.1 & \obsref{ZN1808} &
372: $18$ & \obsref{HIN1808} &
373: $20$ & \obsref{H2N1808} & Sy \\
374: % II Zw 40
375: \iizw & $05^h55^m42\fs7$ & $+03\degr23\arcmin29\arcsec$ &
376: \isocam & 10 &
377: 8.1 & \obsref{Ziizw} &
378: $4.2$ & \refobs{bettoni} &
379: $0.23$ & \refobs{bettoni} & BCD \\
380: % He2-10
381: \hen & $08^h36^m15\fs2$ & $-26\degr24\arcmin34\arcsec$ &
382: \irs & 8.7 &
383: 8.9 & \refobs{ZN1569} &
384: $3.1$ & \obsref{HIhen} &
385: $1.6$ & \refobs{HIhen} & Irr \hii \\
386: % I Zw 18
387: \izw & $09^h34^m02\fs0$ & $+55\degr14\arcmin28\arcsec$ &
388: \irs & 13 &
389: 7.2 & \refobs{Zsbs} &
390: $1.2$ & \obsref{HIIZw18} &
391: \nodata & & BCD \\
392: % M 82
393: \M{82} & $09^h55^m51\fs8$ & $+69\degr40\arcmin46\arcsec$ &
394: \isocam & 3.6 &
395: 9.0 & \obsref{ZM82} &
396: $9.0$ & \obsref{HIM82} &
397: $13$ & \obsref{H2M82} & Irr \hii \\
398: % NGC 3256
399: \ngc{3256} & $10^h27^m51\fs1$ & $-43\degr54\arcmin17\arcsec$ &
400: \isocam & 37 &
401: 8.9 & \obsref{ZN3256} &
402: $62$ & \obsref{casasola}&
403: $300$ & \obsref{H2N3256} & Pec \hii \\
404: % Mrk 33
405: \mrk{33} & $10^h32^m31\fs9$ & $+54\degr24\arcmin04\arcsec$ &
406: \irs & 20 &
407: 8.4 & \refobs{ZN3256} &
408: $4.3$ & \obsref{HIMrk33} &
409: $0.70$ & \obsref{H2Mrk33} & Irr \hii \\
410: % Mrk 153
411: \mrk{153} & $10^h49^m05\fs0$ & $+52\degr20\arcmin08\arcsec$ &
412: \irs & 37 &
413: 7.8 & \obsref{ZMrk153} &
414: $6.7$ & \obsref{HIMrk153} &
415: \nodata & & BCD \\
416: % VII Zw 403
417: \viizw & $11^h27^m59\fs9$ & $+78\degr59\arcmin39\arcsec$ &
418: \irs & 4.5 &
419: 7.7 & \refobs{Zsbs} &
420: $0.69$ & \refobs{HIMrk33} &
421: \nodata & & BCD \\
422: % UM 448
423: \um{448} & $11^h42^m12\fs4$ & $+00\degr20\arcmin03\arcsec$ &
424: \irs & 70 &
425: 8.0 & \obsref{ZUM448} &
426: $47$ & \obsref{sage92} &
427: $24$ & \refobs{sage92} & Pec \hii \\
428: % NGC 4945
429: \ngc{4945} & $13^h05^m26\fs2$ & $-49\degr28\arcmin15\arcsec$ &
430: \isocam & 3.9 &
431: \unc & &
432: $45$ & \obsref{huchtmeier}&
433: $17$ & \obsref{H2N4945} & Edge-on Sy \\
434: % Centaurus A
435: \cenA & $13^h25^m28\fs0$ & $-43\degr01\arcmin06\arcsec$ &
436: \isocam & 3.8 &
437: $\sim9$ & \obsref{ZcenA} &
438: $11$ & \obsref{HIcenA} &
439: $2.0$ & \obsref{H2cenA} & Elliptical Sy \\
440: % M 51
441: \M{51} & $13^h29^m52\fs7$ & $+47\degr11\arcmin43\arcsec$ &
442: \isocam & 8.4 &
443: 8.7 & \obsref{ZM51} &
444: $50$ & \obsref{HIM51} &
445: $56$ & \obsref{H2M51} & \\
446: % M 83
447: \M{83} & $13^h37^m00\fs7$ & $-29\degr51\arcmin58\arcsec$ &
448: \isocam & 4.5 &
449: 9.2 & \obsref{ZM83} &
450: $51$ & \obsref{HIM83} &
451: $49$ & \obsref{H2M83} & \hii \\
452: % Tol 89
453: \tol{89} & $14^h01^m21\fs5$ & $-33\degr03\arcmin50\arcsec$ &
454: \irs & 15 &
455: 8.0 & \obsref{Ztol89} &
456: $13$ & \obsref{HItol89} &
457: \nodata & & \hii \\
458: % Cicinus
459: Circinus & $14^h13^m09\fs6$ & $-65\degr20\arcmin21\arcsec$ &
460: \isocam & 4.0 &
461: \unc & &
462: $55$ & \refobs{huchtmeier}&
463: $11$ & \obsref{H2circ} & Sy \\
464: % NGC 5253
465: \ngc{5253} & $13^h39^m55\fs7$ & $-31\degr38\arcmin29\arcsec$ &
466: \isosws & 3.3 &
467: 8.2 & \refobs{heckman} &
468: $0.91$ & \obsref{HIN5253} &
469: $\lesssim0.1$ & \obsref{H2N5253} & Irr \hii \\
470: % Arp 220
471: \arp{220} & $15^h34^m57\fs2$ & $+23\degr30\arcmin11\arcsec$ &
472: \isocam & 73 &
473: \unc & &
474: $280$ & \refobs{casasola}&
475: $160$ & \obsref{H2a220} & ULIRG \\
476: % NGC 6240
477: \ngc{6240} & $16^h52^m58\fs8$ & $+02\degr24\arcmin06\arcsec$ &
478: \isocam & 98 &
479: \unc & &
480: $88$ & \refobs{bettoni} &
481: $310$ & \refobs{bettoni} & LIRG \\
482: % NGC 6946
483: \ngc{6946} & $20^h34^m51\fs2$ & $+60\degr09\arcmin17\arcsec$ &
484: \isocam & 5.5 &
485: 9.1 & \obsref{ZN6946} &
486: $56$ & \obsref{HIN6946} &
487: $33$ & \obsref{H2N6946} & \hii \\
488: % Mrk 930
489: \mrk{930} & $23^h31^m58\fs3$ & $+28\degr56\arcmin50\arcsec$ &
490: \irs & 73 &
491: 8.1 & \refobs{ZUM448} &
492: $28$ & \obsref{HImrk930} &
493: \nodata & & \hii \\
494: % NGC 7714
495: \ngc{7714} & $23^h36^m14\fs1$ & $+02\degr09\arcmin19\arcsec$ &
496: \irs & 37 &
497: 8.5 & \obsref{ZN7714} &
498: $17$ & \obsref{HIN7714} &
499: $22$ & \refobs{HIN7714} & Pec \hii
500: \enddata
501: \label{tab:source}
502: \tablerefs{\refobs{ZHaro11}~\citet{bergvall00};
503: \refobs{ZN253}~\citet{zaritsky94};
504: \refobs{HIN253}~\citet{boomsma05};
505: \refobs{H2N253}~\citet{houghton97};
506: \refobs{HIN520}~\citet{bernloehr93};
507: \refobs{H2N520}~\citet{yun01};
508: \refobs{ZN613}~\citet{alloin79b};
509: \refobs{bettoni}~\citet{bettoni03};
510: \refobs{ZN891}~\citet{otte01};
511: \refobs{ZN1068}~\citet{dutil99};
512: \refobs{HIN1068}~\citet{staveley-smith87};
513: \refobs{H2N1068}~\citet{helfer03};
514: \refobs{ZN1097}~\citet{storchi-bergmann95};
515: \refobs{HIN1097}~\citet{ondrechen89};
516: \refobs{H2N1097}~\citet{gerin88};
517: \refobs{heckman}~\citet{heckman98};
518: \refobs{HIN1140}~\citet{hunter94};
519: \refobs{ZN1365}~\citet{roy97};
520: \refobs{HIN1365}~\citet{jorsater95};
521: \refobs{H2N1365}~\citet{sandqvist95};
522: \refobs{Zsbs}~\citet{izotov99};
523: \refobs{HIsbs}~\citet{thuan99b};
524: \refobs{Zic}~\citet{pilyugin04};
525: \refobs{ZN1569}~\citet{kobulnicky97};
526: \refobs{HIN1569}~\citet{stil02};
527: \refobs{H2N1569}~\citet{israel97};
528: \refobs{ZN1808}~\citet{ravindranath01};
529: \refobs{HIN1808}~\citet{dahlem01};
530: \refobs{H2N1808}~\citet{dahlem90};
531: \refobs{Ziizw}~\citet{perez-montero03};
532: \refobs{HIhen}~\citet{sauvage97};
533: \refobs{HIIZw18}~\citet{van-zee98};
534: \refobs{ZM82}~\citet{boselli02};
535: \refobs{HIM82}~\citet{appleton81};
536: \refobs{H2M82}~\citet{walter02};
537: \refobs{ZN3256}~\citet{mas-hesse99};
538: \refobs{casasola}~\citet{casasola04};
539: \refobs{H2N3256}~\citet{sargent89};
540: \refobs{HIMrk33}~\citet{thuan04};
541: \refobs{H2Mrk33}~\citet{israel05};
542: \refobs{ZMrk153}~\citet{kunth85};
543: \refobs{HIMrk153}~\citet{thuan81};
544: \refobs{ZUM448}~\citet{izotov98};
545: \refobs{sage92}~\citet{sage92};
546: \refobs{huchtmeier}~\citet{huchtmeier88};
547: \refobs{H2N4945}~\citet{dahlem93};
548: \refobs{ZcenA}~\citet{schaerer00};
549: \refobs{HIcenA}~\citet{richter94};
550: \refobs{H2cenA}~\citet{wild97};
551: \refobs{ZM51}~\citet{bresolin04};
552: \refobs{HIM51}~\citet{dean75};
553: \refobs{H2M51}~\citet{helfer03};
554: \refobs{ZM83}~\citet{webster83};
555: \refobs{HIM83}~\citet{tilanus93};
556: \refobs{H2M83}~\citet{lundgren04};
557: \refobs{Ztol89}~\citet{durret85};
558: \refobs{HItol89}~\citet{paturel03};
559: \refobs{H2circ}~\citet{elmouttie98};
560: \refobs{HIN5253}~\citet{reif82};
561: \refobs{H2N5253}~\citet{meier02};
562: \refobs{H2a220}~\citet{sanders91};
563: \refobs{ZN6946}~\citet{kobulnicky99};
564: \refobs{HIN6946}~\citet{carignan90};
565: \refobs{H2N6946}~\citet{tacconi86};
566: \refobs{HImrk930}~\citet{hopkins02};
567: \refobs{ZN7714}~\citet{gonzalez-delgado95};
568: \refobs{HIN7714}~\citet{struck03}.}
569: \tablecomments{The sources are ordered according to their right ascension.
570: The symbol \unc\ identifies uncertain values.
571: Entries for the metallicity for which no data exist are marked
572: by \nodata, and assumed to be solar-to-supersolar.
573: The \hmol\ masses are not used to calculate the dust-to-gas
574: mass ratio, because the IR emission was assumed to originate
575: entirely from the \hi\ gas.
576: }
577: \end{deluxetable}
578:
579:
580: % CAM
581: %----
582: \subsection{\isocam\ Data Reduction}
583: \label{sec:cam}
584:
585: Most of the sources in \reftab{tab:source} were observed with \isocam\
586: \citep{cesarsky96cam} on board the \iso\ satellite \citep{kessler96}.
587: These spectra were used by \citet{madden06}, and we refer to this work for a
588: detailed description of the data reduction.
589: The CVF performed spectral imaging using a $32\times 32$ detector
590: array, with a sampling of $3\upfov$ or $6\upfov$ in our cases, from
591: $\lambda=5\mic$ to $16.5\mic$ with one pointing of two CVFs, from $\lambda=5$
592: to $9.5\mic$ and from $\lambda=9.0$ to $16.5\mic$.
593: The spectral resolution goes from $\lambda/\Delta\lambda=35$ to 51 across the
594: full spectra.
595:
596: For the data treatment, we used the CAM Interactive Reduction
597: \citep[CIR, version AUG01;][]{chanial03}.
598: % Darks
599: The subtraction of the dark currents was performed using the \citet{biviano98}
600: model which predicts the time evolution for each row of the detector, taking
601: into account drifts along each orbit and each revolution.
602: % Glitches
603: We masked the glitches using multi-resolution median filtering
604: \citep{starck99} on each block of data after slicing the cube.
605: Additional deglitching was performed manually, examining the temporal cut for
606: each pixel.
607: % Transients
608: We corrected the systematic memory effects using the Fouks-Schubert method
609: \citep{coulais00}.
610: % Flats
611: We computed a hybrid flat-field image placing a mask on the source and
612: computing a flat field outside this mask from the median of the temporal cut
613: for each pixel.
614: For the pixels which were on-source, the flat-field response was set to the
615: corresponding calibration flat-field.
616: % Calibration
617: The conversion from Analog Digital Units to mJy/pixel was performed using the
618: standard in-flight calibration data base.
619: % Dezodiaqualisation
620: To remove the sky contribution, the sources smaller than the array were masked
621: and, for a given wavelength, the median of the pixels which are off-source
622: were subtracted from each pixel.
623: For the more extended sources, we subtracted an independently observed
624: zodiacal spectrum.
625: The intensity of this spectrum was a free parameter varied in order to match
626: the properly sky subtracted fluxes in the LW2 ($6.7\mic$) and LW3 ($14.3\mic$)
627: broadbands.
628: % Final
629: The final product is a 3D spectral-image of each galaxy.
630: We integrated the spectrum into an aperture encompassing the entire galaxy,
631: and to obtain the global SED of the galaxy.
632: When the angular size of the source was larger than the one of the array, we
633: scaled-up the spectrum to match the \irasi\ broadband flux.
634:
635:
636: % IRS
637: %----
638: \subsection{\irs\ Spectrum Extraction}
639: \label{sec:irs}
640:
641: Several of the low-metallicity sources in \reftab{tab:source} were not
642: observed by \isocam, we therefore complemented our database with publically
643: released mid-IR spectra from the \irs\ spectrometer on board the \spitzST\
644: \citep{houck04irs,werner04}.
645: Among these galaxies, the spectra of \sbs, \ngc{7714}, \viizw, \haro{11} and
646: \izw\ are described in details in \citet{houck04}, \citet{brandl04} and
647: \citet{wu06}.
648: We considered only low-resolution data, taken with
649: the SL (Short-Low) module, from $\lambda=5.2\mic$ to $14.5\mic$,
650: and the LL (Long-Low) module, from $\lambda=14.0\mic$ to $38.0\mic$, both
651: with a spectral resolution of $\lambda/\Delta\lambda\simeq64-128$.
652:
653: We retrieved the Basic Calibrated Data (BCD) that have been preprocessed by
654: the Spitzer Science Center (SSC) data reduction pipeline,
655: and converted to flux density, corrected for stray light and
656: flatfielded.
657: The extraction of the spectra from the 2D space/wavelength images was
658: performed with the Spectral Modeling, Analysis and Reduction Tool
659: \citep[SMART, version 5.5.6;][]{higdon04}.
660: % 1) Campaign masks
661: We first inspected the BCD images and identified the hot pixels which have not
662: been masked out by the SSC.
663: We replaced them by the median of their neighbors.
664: % 2) Sky subtraction
665: For each module, an off-source position is observed.
666: We subtracted this spectrum from the on-source one, in order to remove the
667: sky emission.
668: % 3) Extraction
669: The extraction of the 1D spectrum was performed inside a column whose width
670: vary with the wavelength.
671: We have excluded the bonus order.
672: % 4) Coaddition
673: Then, the various frames, for each nod position, were coadded.
674: % 5) Scaling of the two modules
675: Since the long wavelength end of the SL module and the short wavelength end
676: of the LL one were not systematically overlapping, we finally scaled the SL
677: module, in order to obtain a continuous spectrum.
678: This scaling factor can be as large as $50\%$.
679: % 6) Errors
680: At the time when this publication is written, the \irs\ data handbook
681: recommends not to derive the signal-to-noise ratio from the uncertainties
682: generated by the pipeline.
683: Instead of that, we adopted the recommended systematic error of $20\%$.
684: However, the SL module of the noisiest spectra (\viizw, \mrk{153}, \mrk{930},
685: \izw, \tol{89}) exhibits fluctuations larger than this value.
686: To take into account these statistical variations, we smoothed these spectra
687: into a $\Delta\lambda\simeq 0.2\mic$ window (4 points), and took the standard
688: deviation inside this window as the error.
689: % Final
690: Similarly to what we did with \isocam\ spectra (\refS{sec:cam}), in order
691: to compensate the fact that we may be overlooking some extended emission,
692: we scaled-up the \irs\ SL and LL spectra to match the \irasi\ and \irasii.
693: In the case of \iizw, the \irs\ spectrum does not exhibit the PAH
694: features that \citet{madden06} detected in the extended emission,
695: thus we prefer to use the \isocam\ data for this galaxy.
696: For \tol{89}, the \iraciv\ broadband flux is higher than the integrated
697: spectrum into the same band.
698: This is probably due to the fact that the slit of \irs\ measures only the
699: nucleus emission, which likely has a steeper continuum and weaker features
700: than the extended emission contributing to the total broadband.
701: Therefore, we will consider the mass of PAHs derived for this galaxy to be
702: a lower limit.
703:
704:
705: % Multiwavelength
706: %----------------
707: \subsection{The Multiwavelength SEDs}
708:
709: The UV-to-radio SED of each galaxy was built using data from different catalogs.
710: We extensively used the HYPERLEDA and NED databases.
711: Most of the SEDs include \iras\ broadband fluxes at 12, 25, 60 and $100\mic$
712: \citep{moshir90,rice88}, and J, H, K 2MASS fluxes \citep{jarrett03}.
713: For some of the galaxies, we completed the IR SED with the broadband \spitz\
714: data reported by \citet{dale05}.
715: We kept only data encompassing the entire galaxy.
716: The optical data were corrected for Galactic extinction, using the
717: \citet{schlegel98} extinction maps.
718:
719: For \ngc{5253}, we used the \isosws\ observations of \citet{crowther99} to
720: model the spectrum of this galaxy.
721:
722:
723: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
724: % The method
725: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
726:
727: \section{MODELING THE PANCHROMATIC SEDS OF GALAXIES TO DERIVE THE PAH AND
728: DUST ABUNDANCES}
729: \label{sec:method}
730:
731: % Motivations
732: %------------
733: \subsection{Motivations and Approach}
734:
735: Determining the PAH abundance from the 8 and $24\mic$ fluxes or even from the
736: mid-IR spectrum
737: requires:\textlist{\thetextlist~knowledge of the contribution of other dust
738: species to the mid-IR emission, in order to determine the intrinsic
739: emission in the PAH bands; and
740: \thetextlist~knowledge of the ISRF they are subjected to, since PAHs
741: are stochastically heated.}The dust that contributes to the mid-IR emission is hot dust radiating at equilibrium temperature in \hii\ regions, as well as very small grains undergoing temperature fluctuations in PDRs.
742: Therefore, determining the PAH abundance requires a panchromatic approach,
743: to model the SEDs of galaxies.
744: It requires knowledge of star formation history, and processing of the stellar
745: SED by the gas and dust in the ionized and neutral phases of the galaxy.
746:
747: % The mid-IR colors
748: The $8/24\mic$ flux ratio provides information on the strength of the PAH
749: features in the galaxy, although it is relatively limited.
750: In general, the \iraciv\ flux is dominated by the $6-9\mic$ PAH features, but
751: in some cases, such as low metallicity galaxies or deeply embedded sources, the
752: $8\mic$ flux may be dominated by, respectively, the continuum
753: \citep{madden06,wu06} or the $9.7\mic$ silicate feature
754: \citep[e.g.][]{spoon04,hao07}.
755: When there are no PAHs and the \iraciv\ band is dominated by the continuum,
756: the $8/24\mic$ ratio reflects the color of the mid-IR emitting silicates and
757: graphites.
758: The \mipsi\ flux is dominated by the continuum emission from the silicate
759: and carbon grains.
760: However, this part of the SED is very sensitive to the abundance of small
761: grains \citep[e.g.][]{galliano03,galliano05}, and can originate additionally
762: from large grains close to strong sources of radiation
763: \citep[e.g.][]{plante02,vanzi04}.
764:
765: \reffig{fig:band_ratios} shows the ratio of the two bands, for
766: the sources presented in \reftab{tab:source}.
767: The figure shows that when the PAH-to-continuum ratio is small, the $8/24\mic$
768: ratio plateaus around a value of $\simeq0.1$, which roughly represents the
769: color of the mid-IR continuum.
770: The figure illustrates that the separation between the PAH bands and the
771: continuum is important to study the evolution of their strengths with the
772: metallicity.
773: The error bars on the ratio, in \reffig{fig:band_ratios}, come from the
774: propagation of the observational errors.
775: The error bars on the metallicity were not systematically given by the authors
776: who published them.
777: An error of 0.1~dex in the O/H number abundance accounts for the typical
778: dispersion between independent measurements.
779: There were 6 sources, in \reftab{tab:source}, for which no metallicity
780: measurements were reported.
781: However, all of them have the morphology, optical colors, IR emission and
782: \hmol\ content of solar or supersolar systems, with \ngc{1399} probably
783: having the largest metallicity.
784: We assign an arbitrary $Z=(2\pm1)\:Z_\odot$ to these galaxies, and consider
785: them to be uncertain.
786: \begin{figure}[htbp]
787: \plotone{fig1}
788: \caption{Mid-IR color as a function of the oxygen number abundance, for
789: the sample in \reftab{tab:source}.
790: This figure illustrates the importance of knowing the mid-IR
791: continuum emission in order to derive the intensity of the PAH bands.
792: Our observed SEDs have been integrated over the \iraciv\ and
793: \mipsi\ bandpasses, in order to produce this plot.
794: The two open circles are the (U)LIRGs of our sample.
795: The grey stripe is the $\pm1\sigma$ linear correlation between
796: $\log(\rm O/H)$ and $\log\left(F_\nu(8\mic)/F_\nu(24\mic)\right)$.
797: The hatched stripe shows the range of the ratio
798: ($0.06\lesssim F_\nu(8\mic)/F_\nu(24\mic)\lesssim0.13$), which is
799: a measure of the color of the silicate and graphite continuum,
800: when the PAH features are weak.}
801: \label{fig:band_ratios}
802: \end{figure}
803:
804: % The opacity
805: Knowledge of the shape of the ISRF to determine the PAH abundance is important,
806: since the absorption properties of PAHs are significantly different from
807: the ones of solid-state grains (carbonaceous or silicates)
808: believed to be the carriers of the mid-IR continuum.
809: \reffig{fig:kappabs} shows the different wavelength-dependence of the mass absorption coefficient, $\kappa_\sms{abs}$, of various types of grains.
810: It shows that the value of $\kappa_\sms{abs}$ for PAHs drops by 4 orders of
811: magnitude between 0.1
812: and $1\mic$, where the stars emit most of their energy, while the
813: $\kappa_\sms{abs}$ of graphite and silicate dust drop by less than 2 orders
814: of magnitude.
815: However, most of the energy is absorbed at shorter wavelengths.
816: Thus, the PAHs are more sensitive to very young stellar populations than
817: the grains responsible for the $24\mic$ continuum (\reffig{fig:SEDvsage}),
818: and a correct determination
819: of their excitation rate should take into account this property.
820: \begin{figure}[htbp]
821: \plotone{fig2}
822: \caption{The wavelength-dependence of the mass absorption coefficient of the
823: PAHs \citep{draine07a}, graphites \citep{laor93} and
824: silicates \citep{weingartner01}, integrated over the \citet{zubko04}
825: size distribution, for the bare grain model with solar abundance
826: constraints (BARE-GR-S).}
827: \label{fig:kappabs}
828: \end{figure}
829: \begin{figure}[htbp]
830: \plotone{fig3}
831: \caption{Sensitivity of the mid-IR SED to the age of the stellar populations.
832: The two SEDs come from the same grain populations
833: \citep[abundances and size distribution;][]{zubko04};
834: the only difference is the shape and intensity of the interstellar
835: radiation field they are experiencing.
836: The black SED is heated by a young UV-rich instantaneous burst,
837: while the grey one is the subjected to the local ISRF.
838: It shows that for a given far-IR spectrum, the PAH emission
839: can vary by a factor of $\simeq3$ depending on the shape of the ISRF,
840: therefore affecting the estimate of the PAH abundance by the same
841: amount.}
842: \label{fig:SEDvsage}
843: \end{figure}
844:
845:
846: % HII regions
847: %------------
848: \subsection{The Contribution of \hii\ Regions to the SED of a Galaxy}
849: \label{sec:HII}
850:
851: Models of the spatial distribution of the dust in our Galaxy indicate that
852: \hii\ regions dominate the infrared SED up to wavelengths of $\sim 60\mic$
853: \citep{sodroski97,paladini07}.
854: In principle, the contribution of \hii\ regions could be derived from any
855: tracer of the recombination rate, like the radio free-free continuum.
856: However, the free-free-to-IR ratio depends significantly on the density and
857: dust-to-gas mass ratio in the \hii\ region
858: \citep[{e.g.}][]{petrosian72,mezger74}, requiring detailed modeling of \hii\
859: regions as a function of these parameters.
860:
861: % Intro
862: We consider \hii\ regions to be made of a central ionizing star, surrounded
863: by PAH-free dusty ionized gas.
864: The output of an individual \hii\ region therefore consists
865: of:\textlist{\thetextlist~escaping non-ionizing stellar radiation;
866: \thetextlist~IR emission from the reprocessing of the stellar emission by
867: dust; and
868: \thetextlist~radio free-free emission from the reprocessing of ionizing
869: photons by the gas.}We created a library of \hii\ region spectra for stars
870: of different spectral
871: types, embedded into a gas of different densities and dust-to-gas mass ratios.
872: The total contribution of \hii\ regions to a galaxy's SED is derived by
873: integrating the spectra of indvidual \hii\ regions over the stellar initial
874: mass function (IMF).
875:
876: There are several simplifying assumptions in our procedure.
877: Individual \hii\ regions are considered to be spherical, homogeneous, consisting
878: of pure Hydrogen.
879: In calculating the infrared emission, we neglected scattering of stellar radiation by the dust.
880: We assumed that all the dust radiates at equilibrium dust temperature, and that
881: PAH are destroyed and therefore absent into the \hii\ region itself.
882: In calculating the emission from the ensemble of \hii\ regions, we assumed that
883: they are not clustered, so that the total radiation is an IMF weighted sum over
884: all spectral types, assumed to be surrounded by gas with the same density.
885:
886: The theoretical evolution of the SED of \hii\ regions and their
887: surrounding molecular material has been extensively discussed by
888: \citet{bressan02}, \citet{panuzzo03} and \citet{dopita05,dopita06c,dopita06b}.
889: In these studies, the spectrum of an \hii\ region depends on its evolutionary state, controlled by its age, density and the dissipation time scale of the surrounding molecular clouds.
890: In comparison, our approach is more flexible and empirical, in which the parameters can vary more freely instead of being constrained by evolutionary
891: models.
892:
893: In the following, we describe how we derive the SED of \hii\ regions.
894: The definition of each mathematical variable is summarised in \reftab{tab:var}.
895:
896: \begin{deluxetable}{lll}
897: % Head
898: %-----
899: \tabletypesize{\small}
900: \rotate
901: \tablecolumns{3}
902: \tablewidth{\textheight}
903: \tablecaption{Mathematical Variables Used Throughout the Paper.}
904: \tablehead{
905: \colhead{Name} & \colhead{Units} & \colhead{Definition}}
906: % Data
907: %-----
908: \startdata
909: % General
910: % - - - -
911: \cutinhead{General Variables}
912: $\nu$ & Hz & Frequency of the radiation \\
913: $\lambda$
914: & $\mu$m & Wavelength of the radiation \\
915: $M_\sms{gas}$
916: & $M_\odot$
917: & Gas mass (Hydrogen, Helium and metals) of the region
918: or galaxy \\
919: $M_\sms{dust}$
920: & $M_\odot$
921: & Dust mass of the region or galaxy \\
922: $Z_\sms{dust}=M_\sms{dust}/M_\sms{gas}$
923: & & Dust-to-gas mass ratio \\
924: $Z_\sms{gas}$
925: & & Metal mass fraction in the gas phase (or metallicity) \\
926: $m_\sms{H}=1.67\E{-24}$
927: & g & Mass of a single H atom \\
928: $m_\sms{dust}$
929: & g & Average mass of a dust grain \\
930: $a$ & $\rm\mu m$
931: & Grain radius \\
932: $f(a)$ & $\rm grain\,\mu m^{-1}$
933: & Grain size distribution, normalized to unity \\
934: $Q_\sms{abs}(a,\nu)$
935: & & Absorption efficiency of a grain of radius $a$ \\
936: $\sigma_\sms{dust}(\nu)
937: =\displaystyle\int_0^\infty \pi a^2 Q_\sms{abs}(a,\nu)\,f(a)\ddiff a$
938: & $\rm cm^2\,grain^{-1}$
939: & Average dust cross-section per grain \\
940: $m$ & $M_\odot$
941: & Mass of individual stars \\
942: $\phi(m)$
943: & $M_\odot^{-1}$
944: & Initial mass function \\
945: % HII regions
946: % - - - - - -
947: \cutinhead{\hii\ Region Variables (\refS{sec:HII})}
948: $\nu_1=3.29\E{15}$
949: & Hz & Frequency of the Lyman break \\
950: $R_s$ & cm & Radius of the equivalent dust-free Str\"omgren sphere
951: of a single \hii\ region \\
952: $y=r/R_s$
953: & & Radial coordinate normalised to $R_s$ \\
954: $n_\sms{H}$
955: & $\rm H\,cm^{-3}$
956: & Number of H atoms (or protons) per unit volume \\
957: $n_\sms{dust}$
958: & $\rm grain\,cm^{-3}$
959: & Number of dust particles per unit volume \\
960: $n_e(y)$
961: & $e\,\rm cm^{-3}$
962: & Number of electrons per unit volume \\
963: $x(y)=n_e/n_\sms{H}$
964: & & Ionization fraction of Hydrogen \\
965: $\sigma_\sms{H}(\nu)$
966: & $\rm cm^2\,H^{-1}$
967: & Ionization cross-section of Hydrogen
968: \citep[Eq.~2.4 of][]{spitzer78} \\
969: $T_e$ & K & Electron temperature \\
970: $T_\sms{dust}$
971: & K & Equilibrium dust temperature \\
972: $L_\nu(\nu,y)$
973: & $L_\odot\,\rm Hz^{-1}$
974: & Total monochromatic luminosity, passing
975: through the shell of radius $y$ \\
976: $L_\nu^\sms{OB}(\nu)$
977: & $L_\odot\,\rm Hz^{-1}$
978: & Intrinsic monochromatic luminosity emitted by the central
979: star, given by \citet{panagia73} \\
980: $L_\sms{B}(y)$
981: & $L_\odot$
982: & Luminosity of the case B recombination lines at a
983: radius $y$ \\
984: $L_\nu^\sms{dust}(\nu,y)$
985: & $L_\odot\,\rm Hz^{-1}$
986: & Monchromatic luminosity reprocessed by the dust at a
987: radius $y$ \\
988: $L_\nu^{ff}(\nu,y)$
989: & $L_\odot\,\rm Hz^{-1}$
990: & Monchromatic luminosity of the free-free cooling at
991: a radius $y$ \citep[Eq.~3.54 of ][]{spitzer78} \\
992: $\alpha_\sms{A}(T_e)$
993: & $\rm cm^3\,s^{-1}$
994: & Case A recombination coefficient
995: \citep[Table~2.1 of ][]{osterbrock89} \\
996: $\alpha_\sms{B}(T_e)$
997: & $\rm cm^3\,s^{-1}$
998: & Case B recombination coefficient
999: \citep[Table~2.1 of ][]{osterbrock89} \\
1000: $L_\nu^\sms{\hii}(\nu,m,Z_\sms{dust},n_\sms{H})$
1001: & $L_\odot\,\rm Hz^{-1}$
1002: & Monochromatic luminosity of an individual \hii\ region \\
1003: $t_\sms{burt}$
1004: & Myr & Age of the burst of star formation \\
1005: $L_\nu^\sms{burst}(\nu,t_\sms{burst},Z_\sms{dust},n_\sms{H})$
1006: & $L_\odot\,\rm Hz^{-1}$
1007: & Monocromatic luminosity of a distribution
1008: of \hii\ regions \\
1009: % Global SED
1010: % - - - - -
1011: \cutinhead{Global SED Variables (\refS{sec:SED})}
1012: $t_\sms{SF}$
1013: & Myr & Age of the galaxy \\
1014: $M_\star$
1015: & $M_\odot$
1016: & Mass of the non-ionizing stars \\
1017: $f_\sms{sync}$
1018: & & Ratio between the synchrotron and the free-free
1019: at $\lambda=1\;\rm cm$ \\
1020: $M_\sms{dust}$
1021: & $M_\odot$
1022: & Dust mass in the PDRs \\
1023: $f_\sms{PAH}=M_\sms{PAH}/M_\sms{dust}$
1024: & & PAH mass fraction \\
1025: $f_+=M_\sms{PAH$^+$}/M_\sms{PAH}$
1026: & & Fraction of ionized PAHs \\
1027: $L_i$
1028: & $L_\odot$
1029: & Luminosity of a mid-IR ionic line \\
1030: $U_\nu(\nu)$
1031: & $\rm erg\,s^{-1}\,cm^{-3}\,Hz^{-1}$
1032: & Monochromatic radiation density in the PDRs \\
1033: $U=\displaystyle\int_0^\infty U_\nu(\nu)\ddiff\nu$
1034: & $\rm erg\,s^{-1}\,cm^{-3}$
1035: & Integrated radiation density in the PDRs \\
1036: $L_\nu^\star(\nu,t_\sms{SF},M_\star)$
1037: & $L_\odot\,\rm Hz^{-1}$
1038: & Monochromatic luminosity emitted by the non-ionizing
1039: stars \\
1040: $L_\nu^\sms{sync}(\nu,f_\sms{sync})$
1041: & $L_\odot\,\rm Hz^{-1}$
1042: & Monochromatic luminosity of the synchrotron radiation \\
1043: $L_\nu^\sms{Zub}(\nu,U,M_\sms{dust},f_\sms{PAH},f_+)$
1044: & $L_\odot\,\rm Hz^{-1}$
1045: & Monochromatic luminosity emitted by the dust in
1046: a given $U$ \\
1047: $L_\nu^\sms{PDR}(\nu,\alpha,U_-,U_+,M_\sms{dust},f_\sms{PAH},f_+)$
1048: & $L_\odot\,\rm Hz^{-1}$
1049: & Monochromatic luminosity emitted by the dust in PDRs \\
1050: $P_e^\sms{\hii}(\nu,A_\sms{V}^\sms{\hii})$
1051: & & Escaping fraction of the \hii\ region photons \\
1052: $P_e^\sms{PDR}(\nu,A_\sms{V}^\sms{PDR})$
1053: & & Escaping fraction of the PDR photons \\
1054: $L_\sms{burst}=\displaystyle\int_0^\infty L_\nu^\sms{burst}\ddiff\nu$
1055: & $L_\odot$
1056: & Intrinsic luminosity radiated by the \hii\ regions \\
1057: $\langle P_e L_\sms{burst}\rangle
1058: =\displaystyle\int_0^\infty P_e^\sms{\hii} L_\nu^\sms{burst}\ddiff\nu$
1059: & $L_\odot$
1060: & Escaping luminosity from the \hii\ regions \\
1061: $L_\sms{PDR}=\displaystyle\int_0^\infty L_\nu^\sms{PDR}\ddiff\nu$
1062: & $L_\odot$
1063: & Luminosity radiated by the dust in the PDRs \\
1064: $\langle P_e L_\sms{PDR}\rangle
1065: =\displaystyle\int_0^\infty P_e^\sms{PDR} L_\nu^\sms{PDR}\ddiff\nu$
1066: & $L_\odot$
1067: & Escaping luminosity from the PDRs \\
1068: $L_\star=\displaystyle\int_0^\infty L_\nu^\star\ddiff\nu$
1069: & $L_\odot$
1070: & Intrinsic luminosity radiated by the non-ionizing stars \\
1071: $\langle P_e L_\star\rangle
1072: =\displaystyle\int_0^\infty P_e^\sms{PDR}L_\nu^\star\ddiff\nu$
1073: & $L_\odot$
1074: & Escaping luminosity from the non-ionizing stars \\
1075: % Chemvol
1076: % - - - -
1077: \cutinhead{Elemental and Dust Evolution Variables (\refS{sec:dustvol})}
1078: $\Sigma_\sms{gas}(t)$
1079: & $M_\odot\,\rm pc^{-2}$
1080: & Gas mass surface density \\
1081: $\Sigma_\sms{gas}^{0}$
1082: & $M_\odot\,\rm pc^{-2}$
1083: & Initial gas mass surface density \\
1084: $\Sigma_\sms{SFR}(t)$
1085: & $M_\odot\,\rm yr^{-1}\,pc^{-2}$
1086: & Star formation rate surface density \\
1087: $Z_\sms{ISM}$
1088: & & Total metal mass fraction (gas and dust) in the ISM \\
1089: $\tau(m)$
1090: & Myr & Lifetime of a star of mass $m$ \\
1091: $m_\sms{ej}(t)$
1092: & $M_\odot$
1093: & Mass of gas ejected by a star of mass $m$, after a time
1094: $\tau(m)$ \\
1095: $Y_\sms{Z}(m)$
1096: & $M_\odot$
1097: & Mass of metals ejected by a star of mass $m$, after a time
1098: $\tau(m)$ \\
1099: $\mu_\sms{gas}(t)=\Sigma_\sms{gas}(t)/\Sigma_\sms{gas}^0$
1100: & & Reduced gas mass of the system \\
1101: $\tau_\sms{dust}(t)$
1102: & Myr & Dust lifetime \\
1103: $\langle m_\sms{ISM}\rangle$
1104: & $M_\odot$
1105: & Average gas mass swept-up by a single \snii\ \\
1106: \enddata
1107: \label{tab:var}
1108: \end{deluxetable}
1109:
1110: % Individual HII
1111: \subsubsection{The Modeling of Individual \hii\ Regions}
1112:
1113: We assume that PAHs are totally depleted inside the ionized gas phase (the actual \hii\ region), and that their mass fraction is constant outside of these
1114: regions, inside the photodissociation regions.
1115: Furthermore, we assume that the \hii\ regions are homogeneous, spherical,
1116: and that they contain only Hydrogen and dust.
1117: The dust-free Str\"omgren radius $R_s$ \citep[{e.g.}][]{spitzer78,osterbrock89}
1118: of such a region is defined by the balance between the rate of ionizing photons
1119: emitted by the central star and by the electrons recombining to the ground level, and the rate of recombinations to any level higher than the fundamental
1120: state:
1121: \begin{equation}
1122: \frac{4\pi}{3}\,R_s^3\, n_\sms{H}^2\, \alpha_\sms{B}(T_e)
1123: = \int_{\nu_1}^\infty \frac{L_\nu^\sms{OB}(\nu)}{h\nu}\ddiff \nu.
1124: \end{equation}
1125: We use this quantity to normalize the radial coordinate $r$ to the dimensionless
1126: radius $y=r/R_s$.
1127: In each shell of radius $y$ and thickness $\dd y$, the Hydrogen optical depth is given by:
1128: \begin{equation}
1129: \dd\tau_\sms{H}(\nu,y) = \left[1-x(y)\right]\,n_\sms{H}\,R_s\times
1130: \sigma_\sms{H}(\nu)\ddiff y,
1131: \label{eq:tauH}
1132: \end{equation}
1133: the dust optical depth is:
1134: \begin{equation}
1135: \dd\tau_\sms{dust}(\nu,y) = n_\sms{dust}(y)\,R_s \times
1136: \sigma_\sms{dust}(\nu)\ddiff y,
1137: \label{eq:taud}
1138: \end{equation}
1139: and the volume of the shell is $\dd V(y) = 4\pi\,R_s^3\,y^2\ddiff y$.
1140: We solve the radiative transfer equation, from the central
1141: star to the photoionization front:
1142: \begin{equation}
1143: \frac{\dd L_\nu(\nu,y)}{\dd y} =
1144: - L_\nu(\nu,y)\times\left(\frac{\dd\tau_\sms{H}(\nu,y)}{\dd y}
1145: +\frac{\dd\tau_\sms{dust}(\nu,y)}{\dd y}\right)
1146: +\frac{\dd L_\nu^\sms{dust}(\nu,y)}{\dd y}
1147: +\frac{\dd L_\nu^{ff}(\nu,y)}{\dd y},
1148: \label{eq:ionirate}
1149: \end{equation}
1150: together with the photoionization equilibrium in each shell:
1151: \begin{equation}
1152: \alpha_\sms{A}(T_e)\, x(y)^2 n_\sms{H}^2\ddiff V(y) \times h\nu_1
1153: = \int_{\nu_1}^\infty L_\nu(\nu,y)\,\dd\tau_\sms{H}(\nu,y)
1154: \ddiff\nu.
1155: \label{eq:photoioneq}
1156: \end{equation}
1157: \refeq{eq:photoioneq} gives the value of $x(y)$.
1158:
1159: We assume that all the case B recombination lines are resonantly scattered
1160: by the gas and are finally absorbed locally by the dust.
1161: Therefore the dust is heated both by the stellar continuum and these recombination lines:
1162: \begin{equation}
1163: \int_0^\infty \frac{\dd \tau_\sms{dust}(\nu,y)}{\dd y} L_\nu(\nu,y)\ddiff\nu
1164: +L_\sms{B}(y)
1165: = n_\sms{dust}\frac{\dd V}{\dd y}(y)
1166: \int_0^\infty \sigma_\sms{dust}(\nu)\,4\pi B_\nu(\nu,T_\sms{dust})
1167: \ddiff\nu.
1168: \label{eq:Tdust}
1169: \end{equation}
1170: In \refeq{eq:Tdust}, we assume that the dust is at thermal equilibrium with the
1171: radiation field.
1172: Very small grains may still undergo temperature fluctuations, but since their size distribution is poorly known, we neglect this effect in calculating the IR emission.
1173: This will lead to an underestimate of the $\sim 1 - 20\mic$ continuum.
1174: We will discuss in \refS{sec:SED} an empirical way to compensate this
1175: underestimation.
1176:
1177: Finally, we take into account the fact that dust sublimates in the center of
1178: \hii\ regions \citep[{e.g.}][]{inoue02}, by considering that each shell where
1179: the equilibrium temperature of the dust exceeds its sublimation temperature
1180: is free of this dust specie.
1181: We adopt sublimation temperatures of $2500\;\rm K$ and $1800\;\rm K$
1182: for graphite and silicate, respectively \citep{kruegel03}.
1183:
1184: We solved \refeqs{eq:ionirate} and (\ref{eq:photoioneq}) for stars of
1185: masses $8\msun<m<100\msun$, with a grid of densities ranging from
1186: $n_\sms{H}=1\;\rm cm^{-3}$ to $n_\sms{H}=3\E{4}\;\rm cm^{-3}$, and a grid
1187: of dust-to-gas mass ratios ranging from $Z_\sms{dust}=1/120$
1188: \citep[Galactic value;][]{zubko04} to $Z_\sms{dust}=1/12000$.
1189:
1190: % Star forming regions
1191: \subsubsection{The Total Contribution of \hii\ Regions}
1192:
1193: At the scale of a galaxy, the SED of the ionized gas phase
1194: is the combination of several \hii\ regions.
1195: We assume that all the \hii\ regions of a given galaxy have the same density,
1196: and the same dust-to-gas mass ratio.
1197: We adopt a Salpeter initial mass function:
1198: \begin{eqnarray}
1199: \phi(m) \propto m^{-2.35} & \mbox{for} & m_- < m < m_+ \label{eq:imf} \\
1200: & \mbox{normalised to} & \int_{m_-}^{m_+} \phi(m) \ddiff m = 1 \nonumber\\
1201: & \mbox{with} &
1202: \left\{
1203: \begin{array}{rcl}
1204: m_- & = & 0.1\msun \\
1205: m_+ & = & 100\msun \\
1206: \end{array}
1207: \right. \nonumber
1208: \end{eqnarray}
1209: The total SED of an ensemble of \hii\ regions is then given by:
1210: \begin{equation}
1211: L^\sms{burst}_\nu(\nu,t_\sms{burst},Z_\sms{dust},n_\sms{H})
1212: = \int_{m_-}^{m_+(t_\sms{burst})}
1213: L_\nu^\sms{\hii}(\nu,m,Z_\sms{dust},n_\sms{H})\times \phi(m)\ddiff m.
1214: \label{eq:HII}
1215: \end{equation}
1216: The upper mass decreases with the age of the burst of star formation.
1217: \reffig{fig:HII} shows several of these SEDs.
1218: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1219: \centering
1220: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{fig4}
1221: \caption{SED of an ensemble of \hii\ regions \refeqp{eq:HII}:
1222: for a given age and dust-to-gas mass ratio, varying the density
1223: (top panel);
1224: and for a given age and density, varying the dust-to-gas mass ratio
1225: (bottom panel).
1226: The density tends to increase the dust temperature, as well as
1227: the free-free-to-IR ratio (top panel).
1228: Indeed, when the density is high, the dust absorbs directly a
1229: significant fraction of the ionizing photons.
1230: Inversely, when $Z_\sms{dust}$ drops, more ionizing photons
1231: are absorbed by the gas.
1232: The free-free-to-IR ratio is then higher, and the dust luminosity
1233: lower (bottom panel).}
1234: \label{fig:HII}
1235: \end{figure*}
1236:
1237: In our case, the age of the \hii\ region does not have an important effect
1238: on the shape of the \hii\ SED.
1239: Indeed, the age affects essentially the ionizing-to-non-ionizing photon rate.
1240: Since our \hii\ SEDs are integrated only out to the photoionization front, the
1241: ionizing photons dominate the total power input.
1242: Therefore, in what follows, we will consider \hii\ SEDs with an age of 4~Myr.
1243:
1244:
1245: % PDRs
1246: %-----
1247: \subsection{The Inclusion of Emission from PDRs and the Resulting
1248: Galactic SEDs}
1249: \label{sec:SED}
1250:
1251: % Description of each terms
1252: \subsubsection{The Building Blocks}
1253:
1254: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1255: \centering
1256: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{fig5}
1257: \caption{Demonstration of the panchromatic SED model applied on a galaxy.}
1258: \label{fig:methSED}
1259: \end{figure*}
1260: % Molecular clouds around the star forming region
1261: A significant fraction of the radiation escaping from \hii\ regions is
1262: absorbed by the dust in the surrounding molecular clouds, as well as in
1263: the diffuse ISM.
1264: These dense and diffuse PDR components are also heated by the ambient
1265: non-ionizing radiation field.
1266: Technically, all the parameters of our model are adjusted simultaneously.
1267: However, for clarity, we can decompose the procedure in the following steps:
1268: \begin{enumerate}
1269: \item Observations of at least two data points sampling the radio
1270: continuum constrain the synchrotron-to-free-free ratio.
1271: The synchrotron emission is $L_\nu^\sms{sync}\propto\nu^{-0.8}$.
1272: \item The resulting free-free continuum, together with observations of
1273: the mid-IR continuum between $\sim 5$ and $\sim 60\mic$ are used to
1274: constrain the parameters of the \hii\ regions.
1275: We use the \hii\ templates presented in \refS{sec:HII}, attenuated
1276: with a slab extinction
1277: $P_e^\sms{\hii}(\nu)=\exp\left[-\tau_\sms{dust}(\nu)\right]$,
1278: to account for absorption by intervening dust to the \hii\ region.
1279: The power absorbed, $L_\sms{burst}-\langle P_e L_\sms{burst}\rangle$,
1280: contributes to the heating of the dust in PDRs.
1281: As mentioned in \refS{sec:HII}, we have not taken into account
1282: the emission from stochastically heated grains in this phase.
1283: To correct empirically for this effect, we redistribute a part of
1284: the \hii\ dust power into the sum of two modified black bodies
1285: of temperatures 130~K and 300~K (peaking around 15 and $5\mic$).
1286: The luminosity of each individual black body is free to vary.
1287: We enforce that this redistribution does not exceed $40\%$ of the total
1288: \hii\ dust luminosity.
1289: The dust-to-gas mass ratio in the \hii\ phase is assumed to be equal to
1290: the one in the PDRs.
1291: \item Optical/near-IR broadbands are used to constrain the escaping diffuse
1292: stellar radiation, $L_\nu^\star$, using the
1293: stellar population synthesis code \peg\ \citep{fioc97}, with a
1294: Salpeter IMF, and a star formation rate as a function of time
1295: proportional to a power-law of the gas surface density
1296: with an index of 1.4 \citep{kennicutt98}.
1297: We vary the initial gas mass surface density $\Sigma_\sms{gas}^{0}$
1298: from $3\msun\rm\, pc^{-2}$ to $300\msun\rm\, pc^{-2}$.
1299: Here again, we assume a slab extinction, for the sake of simplicity.
1300: The power absorbed, $L_\star-\langle P_e L_\star\rangle$,
1301: contributes to the heating of the dust in PDRs.
1302: \item The far-IR/submm observed SED constrains the dust emission from the
1303: PDRs.
1304: In order to account for variations of the radiation density, $U$,
1305: in these regions, we assume a power-law distribution, following the
1306: empirical prescription introduced by \citet{dale01}:
1307: \begin{equation}
1308: L_\nu^\sms{PDR}(\nu) \propto \int_{U_-}^{U_+} L_\nu^\sms{Zub}(\nu,U)
1309: \times U^{-\alpha}\ddiff U,
1310: \label{eq:dale}
1311: \end{equation}
1312: where $L_\nu^\sms{Zub}(\nu,U)$ is the dust SED corresponding to a single
1313: radiation density $U$.
1314: We adopt the dust properties of the Galactic diffuse ISM modeled by
1315: \citet{zubko04}, for bare grains with solar abundance constraints.
1316: We fix the silicate-to-graphite mass ratio, but let free to vary
1317: the PAH-to-dust mass ratio, $f_\sms{PAH}$, as well as the fraction of
1318: ionized PAHs, $f_+$.
1319: These PAH properties are constrained by the detailed fit of the
1320: features seen on the mid-IR spectrum.
1321: The shape of the radiation field exciting the dust is:
1322: \begin{equation}
1323: U_\nu(\nu) \propto L_\nu^\sms{burst}(\nu)+L_\nu^\star(\nu).
1324: \end{equation}
1325: This dust component is attenuated by the same factor than the diffuse
1326: ISRF, $P_e^\sms{PDR}(\nu)$, in order to reproduce the silicate
1327: extinction feature at $9.7\mic$.
1328: \item Our mid-IR spectra exhibit several fine structure ionic lines:
1329: \ariiline, \ariiiline, \sivline, \neiiline, \neiiiline,
1330: \siiiline, \siiilineb\ and \siIIline.
1331: We fit these lines in order to get a better $\chi^2$, but
1332: we do not use them for our physical interpretation.
1333: We adopt a Gauss profile whose width is determined by the resolution
1334: of the spectrograph.
1335: The luminosity, $L_i$, of each line is free to vary.
1336: \end{enumerate}
1337: The total SED is then:
1338: \begin{equation}
1339: L_\nu(\nu) = P_e^\sms{\hii}(\nu)\times L_\nu^\sms{burst}(\nu)
1340: + P_e^\sms{PDR}(\nu)\times
1341: \left[L_\nu^\sms{PDR}(\nu)+L_\nu^\star(\nu)\right]
1342: + L_\nu^\sms{sync}(\nu)
1343: + \sum_i L_\nu^{(i)}(\nu).
1344: \label{eq:SED}
1345: \end{equation}
1346: The energy conservation implies that:
1347: \begin{equation}
1348: \langle P_e L_\sms{PDR}\rangle
1349: = L_\sms{burst}-\langle P_e L_\sms{burst}\rangle
1350: + L_\star-\langle P_e L_\star\rangle.
1351: \end{equation}
1352: \reffig{fig:methSED} demonstrates this model, and \reffig{fig:bigSED}
1353: illustrates its geometry.
1354: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1355: \centering
1356: \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{fig6}
1357: \caption{Illustration of the geometry of the model \refeqp{eq:SED}.
1358: The left panels, from the top to the bottom shows the combination
1359: of the various SED building blocks from the massive star clusters
1360: to the observer.
1361: The solid lines are the total SED at each step;
1362: the dashed lines are the SED of the previous step;
1363: the part of the SED that has been absorbed is shown in grey.
1364: The right panel illustrate the path of the photons from the star
1365: clusters to the observer.}
1366: \label{fig:bigSED}
1367: \end{figure*}
1368:
1369: % What constrain what?
1370: \subsubsection{The Model Results}
1371:
1372: % Chi2 and stuff
1373: We fit the observed UV-to-radio SED,
1374: $L_\nu^\sms{obs}(\lambda_i)\pm\Delta L_\nu^\sms{obs}(\lambda_i)/2$
1375: ($i$ denoting an individual wavelength),
1376: of each one of the sources in \reftab{tab:source}, with \refeq{eq:SED},
1377: minimizing the $\chi^2$.
1378: We weight each data point depending on the density of adjacent points:
1379: \begin{equation}
1380: \chi^2 = \sum_i \frac{{\rm min}_j(\lambda_j-\lambda_i)}{\lambda_i}
1381: \left(\frac{L_\nu^\sms{obs}(\lambda_i)-L_\nu(\lambda_i)}
1382: {\Delta L_\nu^\sms{obs}(\lambda_i)}\right)^2.
1383: \label{eq:chi2}
1384: \end{equation}
1385: \refeq{eq:chi2} prevents the $\chi^2$ to be dominated by the parts of the
1386: electromagnetic spectrum where its sampling by the observations is dense.
1387: From this fit, we derive the value of the various free parameters.
1388: In particular, we are interested in the total PAH-to-gas
1389: (and PDR-dust-to-gas) mass ratio,
1390: $Z_\sms{PAH(dust)}$:
1391: \begin{equation}
1392: Z_\sms{PAH(dust)}
1393: = \frac{M_\sms{PAH(dust)}}{\mu\,\left(M_\sms{\hi}+M_\sms{\hmol}\right)}
1394: \qquad\mbox{ where }\qquad \mu=\frac{1}{1-Y_\odot-Z_\sms{gas}}.
1395: \end{equation}
1396:
1397:
1398: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
1399: % Results
1400: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
1401:
1402: \clearpage
1403: \section{THE PAH AND DUST ABUNDANCES IN GALAXIES}
1404: \label{sec:results}
1405:
1406: We applied the method described in \refS{sec:method}
1407: to the sample in \reftab{tab:source} (\reffigs{fig:fits1} to \ref{fig:fits18}).
1408: The results are presented in \reffig{fig:pahvsOovH} and
1409: \reftab{tab:results}.
1410:
1411: % Select galaxies
1412: PAH features are not detected in \izw, \sbs, \mrk{153}, \ngc{5253} and
1413: \ngc{1399}.
1414: For these galaxies, we get an upper limit by fitting the short-wavelength part
1415: of the mid-IR spectrum with the maximum PAH amount allowed by the observational
1416: errors.
1417: \begin{description}
1418: \item[\izw:] The \hi\ extends far out of the star forming region.
1419: Instead of normalizing the dust masses by the value of $M_\sms{\hi}$
1420: in \reftab{tab:source}, we consider that the \hi\ mass associated to the
1421: star forming region is the one of the object \hi-A \citep{van-zee98},
1422: where $M_\sms{\hi} = 4.4\E{7}\msun$.
1423: \item[\sbs:] The $65\mic$ flux is the one reported by \citet{hunt05}.
1424: The fit of this flux gives a far-IR dust temperature slightly colder
1425: than what we would obtain by fitting only the slope of the \irs\ spectrum.
1426: However, this gives a conservative solution, since we derive only an upper
1427: limit on the mass of PAHs, in this galaxy.
1428: The \hi\ halo extends also far out of the star forming region.
1429: We assume that the star forming region has the same size than the optical
1430: galaxy, i.e.\ a radius of 1.6~kpc ($6\arcsec$).
1431: We derive the corresponding mass of \hi, using the average column density of
1432: $N_\sms{\hi}=7.4\E{20}\;\rm cm^{-2}$ reported by \citet{pustilnik01}.
1433: We find $M_\sms{\hi}=4.6\E{7}\msun$.
1434: \item[\viizw:] This \irs\ spectrum of this galaxy has been studied by
1435: \citet{wu06}.
1436: However, they did not report any PAH detection.
1437: The degradation of the spectral resolution that we performed on this spectra
1438: (see \refS{sec:irs}) increases the signal-to-noise ratio significantly.
1439: We report a $4\sigma$ detection of the $7.7 \mic$ feature, and marginal
1440: detections of the $6.2$ and $8.6\mic$ features.
1441: This is the lowest metallicty PAH detection to date.
1442: Similarly to \izw\ and \sbs\ the \hi\ halo extends far out of the star
1443: forming region.
1444: To correct for this effect, we consider that the star forming region has
1445: a size $1\arcmin\times0.5\arcmin$, with a column density
1446: $N_\sms{\hi}=1.6\E{21}\;\rm cm^{-2}$ \citep{thuan04}.
1447: This leads to an effective $M_\sms{\hi}=1.1\E{7}\msun$.
1448: This galaxy has only one radio point.
1449: To remain conservative, we assume that it is free-free dominated.
1450: \item[\mrk{153}:]
1451: The mid-infrared spectrum of this galaxy show prominent silicate emission.
1452: We do not have any radio observation of this object, therefore the
1453: contribution of \hii\ regions to the total SED is rather uncertain.
1454: \item[\haro{11}:] As quoted by \citet{bergvall00}, the ratio
1455: $M_\sms{\hi}/L_\sms{B}<0.01$ is abnormally low in this galaxy.
1456: The low value of the \hi\ mass explains the high value of its dust-to-gas
1457: mass ratio (\reffig{fig:pahvsOovH}).
1458: On the contrary, its PAH-to-dust mass ratio is not peculiar.
1459: This source, at 92~Mpc, is one of the most distant object in our sample.
1460: \item[\IC{342}:] This galaxy is located at $10\degr$ of Galactic
1461: latitude.
1462: Hence, it is highly extincted by the foreground, which explains the
1463: peculiar shape of its optical/near-IR observed SED.
1464: \item[\tol{89}:] The mid-IR spectrum of this galaxy samples only its nucleus.
1465: That is the reason why it underestimates the \iraciv\ flux.
1466: To be conservative, we derive the lower limit on the PAH mass by fitting
1467: the spectrum, and the upper limit, by fitting the broad band.
1468: This galaxy has only one radio point.
1469: Therefore, we assume that it is free-free dominated.
1470: \item[\ngc{1068}:]
1471: This galaxy contains a powerful AGN.
1472: In principle our model can not be applied to this object, since it does
1473: not take into account the contribution of the accretion disc.
1474: However, we fit this galaxy as if it was a starburst, in order to test
1475: the robustness of our approach.
1476: \item[\ngc{1399}:] This object is a cD galaxy.
1477: Its interstellar medium is likely very tenuous and
1478: the mid-IR emission is dominated by the contribution of evolved stars.
1479: It has not been represented on the upper panel of \reffig{fig:pahvsOovH},
1480: since we only know the upper limits on the PAH and \hi\ gas masses.
1481: However, it is shown on the lower panel; the higher open circle is the
1482: ratio between the upper limit on the PAH mass and the lower limit on the
1483: dust mass.
1484: \item[Circinus:] This galaxy is located at Galactic latitude below $5\degr$.
1485: Like \IC{342}, its optical fluxes are very uncertain.
1486: \end{description}
1487:
1488: % Discussion of the dust abundances
1489: The top panel of \reffig{fig:pahvsOovH} shows the variation of the PAH and
1490: dust to gas mass ratios with the metallicity of the interstellar medium.
1491: Each individual galaxy can be seen as a snapshot of galaxy evolution, at a
1492: given time.
1493: First, we note that the Galactic values of the dust-to-gas mass ratios
1494: are in agreement with the one of the other galaxies, around the
1495: same metallicity.
1496: These Galactic values were derived by \citet{zubko04}, from the fit of the emission and extinction of the diffuse interstellar medium, with further constraints from the elemental depletion pattern.
1497: Thus, it is a very reliable estimation.
1498: This comparison confirms that our method does not overlook a significant amount
1499: of dust, at least around the solar metallicity.
1500: Second, the trends of $Z_\sms{PAH}$ and $Z_\sms{dust}$, with the
1501: metallicity are not identical.
1502: Our sample spreads two orders of magnitude in metallicity.
1503: We can see that the PAH-to-gas mass ratio rises by five orders of magnitudes,
1504: while the dust-to-gas mass ratio, by only three.
1505: This differential evolution is illustrated in the lower panel of
1506: \reffig{fig:pahvsOovH}, showing the PAH-to-dust mass ratio.
1507: This figure is the analog of \reffig{fig:band_ratios}, but instead of considering integrated fluxes, it deals with abundances.
1508: The PAH-to-dust mass ratio rises by two orders of magnitude, over our sample,
1509: while the \IRACiv/\MIPSi\ band ratio varies only by one order of magnitude.
1510:
1511: % SEDs
1512: %-----
1513: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1514: \plotone{fig7a}
1515: \plotone{fig7b}
1516: \caption{Fit of the galaxies' SEDs.
1517: The black lines are the components of the model
1518: (\reffig{fig:methSED}) and the thick grey line is the total
1519: observed SED.
1520: The circles with error bars are the broad-band and spectral
1521: observations.
1522: The {\it top-right panel} shows the detailed fit of the mid-IR
1523: spectrum.}
1524: \label{fig:fits1}
1525: \end{figure*}
1526: \clearpage
1527: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1528: \plotone{fig8a}
1529: \plotone{fig8b}
1530: \caption{Fit of the galaxies' SEDs.
1531: See \reffig{fig:fits1} for details.}
1532: \label{fig:fits2}
1533: \end{figure*}
1534: \clearpage
1535: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1536: \plotone{fig9a}
1537: \plotone{fig9b}
1538: \caption{Fit of the galaxies' SEDs.
1539: See \reffig{fig:fits1} for details.}
1540: \label{fig:fits3}
1541: \end{figure*}
1542: \clearpage
1543: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1544: \plotone{fig10a}
1545: \plotone{fig10b}
1546: \caption{Fit of the galaxies' SEDs.
1547: See \reffig{fig:fits1} for details.}
1548: \label{fig:fits4}
1549: \end{figure*}
1550: \clearpage
1551: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1552: \plotone{fig11a}
1553: \plotone{fig11b}
1554: \caption{Fit of the galaxies' SEDs.
1555: See \reffig{fig:fits1} for details.}
1556: \label{fig:fits5}
1557: \end{figure*}
1558: \clearpage
1559: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1560: \plotone{fig12a}
1561: \plotone{fig12b}
1562: \caption{Fit of the galaxies' SEDs.
1563: See \reffig{fig:fits1} for details.}
1564: \label{fig:fits6}
1565: \end{figure*}
1566: \clearpage
1567: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1568: \plotone{fig13a}
1569: \plotone{fig13b}
1570: \caption{Fit of the galaxies' SEDs.
1571: See \reffig{fig:fits1} for details.}
1572: \label{fig:fits7}
1573: \end{figure*}
1574: \clearpage
1575: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1576: \plotone{fig14a}
1577: \plotone{fig14b}
1578: \caption{Fit of the galaxies' SEDs.
1579: See \reffig{fig:fits1} for details.}
1580: \label{fig:fits8}
1581: \end{figure*}
1582: \clearpage
1583: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1584: \plotone{fig15a}
1585: \plotone{fig15b}
1586: \caption{Fit of the galaxies' SEDs.
1587: See \reffig{fig:fits1} for details.}
1588: \label{fig:fits9}
1589: \end{figure*}
1590: \clearpage
1591: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1592: \plotone{fig16a}
1593: \plotone{fig16b}
1594: \caption{Fit of the galaxies' SEDs.
1595: See \reffig{fig:fits1} for details.}
1596: \label{fig:fits10}
1597: \end{figure*}
1598: \clearpage
1599: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1600: \plotone{fig17a}
1601: \plotone{fig17b}
1602: \caption{Fit of the galaxies' SEDs.
1603: See \reffig{fig:fits1} for details.}
1604: \label{fig:fits11}
1605: \end{figure*}
1606: \clearpage
1607: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1608: \plotone{fig18a}
1609: \plotone{fig18b}
1610: \caption{Fit of the galaxies' SEDs.
1611: See \reffig{fig:fits1} for details.}
1612: \label{fig:fits12}
1613: \end{figure*}
1614: \clearpage
1615: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1616: \plotone{fig19a}
1617: \plotone{fig19b}
1618: \caption{Fit of the galaxies' SEDs.
1619: See \reffig{fig:fits1} for details.}
1620: \label{fig:fits13}
1621: \end{figure*}
1622: \clearpage
1623: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1624: \plotone{fig20a}
1625: \plotone{fig20b}
1626: \caption{Fit of the galaxies' SEDs.
1627: See \reffig{fig:fits1} for details.}
1628: \label{fig:fits14}
1629: \end{figure*}
1630: \clearpage
1631: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1632: \plotone{fig21a}
1633: \plotone{fig21b}
1634: \caption{Fit of the galaxies' SEDs.
1635: See \reffig{fig:fits1} for details.}
1636: \label{fig:fits15}
1637: \end{figure*}
1638: \clearpage
1639: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1640: \plotone{fig22a}
1641: \plotone{fig22b}
1642: \caption{Fit of the galaxies' SEDs.
1643: See \reffig{fig:fits1} for details.}
1644: \label{fig:fits16}
1645: \end{figure*}
1646: \clearpage
1647: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1648: \plotone{fig23a}
1649: \plotone{fig23b}
1650: \caption{Fit of the galaxies' SEDs.
1651: See \reffig{fig:fits1} for details.}
1652: \label{fig:fits17}
1653: \end{figure*}
1654: \clearpage
1655: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1656: \plotone{fig24}
1657: \caption{Fit of the galaxies' SEDs.
1658: See \reffig{fig:fits1} for details.}
1659: \label{fig:fits18}
1660: \end{figure*}
1661: \clearpage
1662: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1663: \centering
1664: \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{fig25}
1665: \caption{\uline{Top panel}: dust-to-gas mass ratio for PAHs, $Z_\sms{PAH}$,
1666: and the dust that gives rise to the far-IR emission,
1667: $Z_\sms{dust}$, as a function of metallicity.
1668: \uline{Bottom panel}: mass ratio of PAH-to-dust, as a function
1669: of metallicity.
1670: The circles correspond to galaxies and the open stars to the
1671: the diffuse Galactic ISM \citep{zubko04}.
1672: The filled circles are the reliable measurements, and
1673: the open circles are the ones which are considered uncertain.
1674: The grey stripes are the $\pm1\sigma$ linear correlation, in
1675: logarithmic scale.
1676: These figures show the two distinct evolutionary trends of
1677: $Z_\sms{PAH}$ and $Z_\sms{dust}$ with metallicity.}
1678: \label{fig:pahvsOovH}
1679: \end{figure*}
1680:
1681: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrrrr}
1682: % Head
1683: %-----
1684: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1685: \rotate
1686: \tablecolumns{9}
1687: \tablewidth{0pc}
1688: \tablecaption{SED Modeling Results}
1689: \tablehead{
1690: \colhead{Name} & \colhead{$Z_\sms{gas}$}
1691: & \colhead{$Z_\sms{PAH}$}
1692: & \colhead{$Z_\sms{dust}$}
1693: & \colhead{$t_\sms{SF}$}
1694: & \colhead{$n_\sms{H}$}
1695: & \colhead{$f_+$}
1696: & \colhead{$L_\sms{burst}$}
1697: & \colhead{$L_\sms{PDR}$}
1698: \\
1699: \colhead{} & \colhead{$[Z_\odot]$}
1700: & \colhead{}
1701: & \colhead{}
1702: & \colhead{[Myr]}
1703: & \colhead{$[\rm cm^{-3}]$}
1704: & \colhead{}
1705: & \colhead{$[L_\odot]$}
1706: & \colhead{$[L_\odot]$} }
1707: % Data
1708: %-----
1709: \input{tab3}
1710: \tablecomments{Most of these quantities are defined in
1711: \refS{sec:method} and \reftab{tab:var}.
1712: $Z_\sms{PAH}$ and $Z_\sms{dust}$ are the PAH-to-gas and
1713: dust-to-gas mass ratios;
1714: $t_\sms{SF}$ is the age of the
1715: galaxy constrained by the optical and near-IR broad bands;
1716: $n_\sms{H}$ is the average gas density in \hii\ regions;
1717: $f_+$ is the mass fraction of cationic PAHs;
1718: $L_\sms{burst}$ by the recent burst of star formation;
1719: $L^\sms{PDR}$ is the intrinsic bolometric luminosity emitted
1720: by the dust inside the neutral phase.
1721: The sources are ordered according to their metallicity.
1722: The symbol \unc\ identifies uncertain values.}
1723: \label{tab:results}
1724: \end{deluxetable}
1725:
1726:
1727: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
1728: % Chemical Evolution
1729: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
1730:
1731: % Dust evolution
1732: %---------------
1733: \section{A MODEL FOR THE GAS AND DUST EVOLUTION}
1734: \label{sec:dustvol}
1735:
1736: We have developed a one-zone single-phase chemical evolution model,
1737: to follow the abundances and composition of the dust and the metallicty as a
1738: function of time, in order to interpret the results of our SED modeling.
1739: In this section, we will give a brief description of the physical processes which are incorporated.
1740: A more detailed discussion can be found in \citet{dwek98} and \citet{dwek07}.
1741: Assuming a common star formation history, we will use this model to interpret
1742: the observed evolutionary trend of galaxies' SED with metallicity,
1743: on a global scale.
1744:
1745: % Gas evolution
1746: \subsection{Metal Enrichment and Gas Evolution}
1747: \label{sec:evZ}
1748:
1749: In the present paper, we consider a closed box model.
1750: We consider the delayed injection of material by different stellar progenitors,
1751: but we assume that the mixing of the elements in the ISM is instantaneous.
1752: To be consistent with our stellar population synthesis, we adopt a
1753: Salpeter initial mass function, $\phi(m)$ \refeqp{eq:imf},
1754: where $m$ is the mass of individual stars.
1755: We define the average stellar mass:
1756: \begin{equation}
1757: \langle m\rangle \equiv \int_{m_l}^{m_u} m\,\phi(m)\ddiff m.
1758: \end{equation}
1759: The evolution of the gas mass surface density, $\Sigma_\sms{gas}(t)$, with
1760: the time $t$, is:
1761: \begin{equation}
1762: \frac{\dd\Sigma_\sms{gas}(t)}{\dd t} =
1763: - \Sigma_\sms{SFR}(t) +
1764: \int_{m_l}^{m_u} \Sigma_\sms{SFR}(t-\tau(m))\,
1765: \frac{m_\sms{ej}(m)}{\langle m\rangle}\,\phi(m)\ddiff m,
1766: \label{eq:diffg}
1767: \end{equation}
1768: where $\Sigma_\sms{SFR}(t)$ is the mass of star formed per unit time and
1769: per unit surface area,
1770: $\tau(m)$, the lifetime of a star of mass $m$, and $m_\sms{ej}(m)$,
1771: its mass of gas returned to the ISM.
1772: The first term of the right hand side of \refeq{eq:diffg} is the amount of gas
1773: removed by the star formation, and the second term, is the delayed injection
1774: of the gas (H, He and metals), by the various progenitors.
1775: The ISM metallicity, is defined as:
1776: \begin{equation}
1777: Z_\sms{ISM}(t) \equiv Z_\sms{gas}(t)+Z_\sms{dust}(t),
1778: \end{equation}
1779: where $Z_\sms{gas}(t)$ is the metal-to-gas mass ratio, and
1780: $Z_\sms{dust}(t)$, the dust-to-gas mass ratio that will be discussed at
1781: \refS{sec:evd}.
1782: Its evolution is analog to \refeq{eq:diffg}:
1783: \begin{equation}
1784: \frac{\dd \left[\Sigma_\sms{gas}(t)\,Z_\sms{ISM}(t)\right]}{\dd t} =
1785: - Z_\sms{ISM}(t)\,\Sigma_\sms{SFR}(t)
1786: + \int_{m_l}^{m_u} \Sigma_\sms{SFR}(t-\tau(m))\,
1787: \frac{Y_\sms{Z}(m)}{\langle m\rangle}\,\phi(m)\ddiff m,
1788: \label{eq:diffZ}
1789: \end{equation}
1790: where $Y_Z(m)$ is the yield of elements heavier than He, by the stars of mass
1791: $[m,m+\dd m]$.
1792:
1793: % Yield and SF law
1794: The elemental yields, $Y_Z(m)$, for the low mass stars ($m\leq8\msun$)
1795: are taken from \citet{karakas03b,karakas03}, and from \citet{woosley95} for
1796: the high mass stars ($m>8\msun$).
1797: Furthermore, a prescription for the star formation rate is required, in order
1798: to solve these equations.
1799: This prescription is given by the \citet{schmidt59} law, with the coefficients
1800: derived by \citet{kennicutt98}:
1801: \begin{equation}
1802: \frac{\Sigma_\sms{SFR}(t)}{1\msun\,{\rm yr^{-1}\,pc^{-2}}}
1803: = (2.5\pm0.7)\E{-10}\,\left(\frac{\Sigma_\sms{gas}(t)}
1804: {1\msun\,{\rm pc^{-2}}}\right)^{1.40\pm0.15}
1805: \end{equation}
1806: and is used to replace $\Sigma_\sms{SFR}(t)$ in \refeq{eq:diffg}.
1807: \reffig{fig:gasvol} shows the evolution of the total metallicity, and of the
1808: reduced gas mass
1809: $\mu_\sms{gas}(t) \equiv \Sigma_\sms{gas}(t)/\Sigma_\sms{gas}^0$, where
1810: $\Sigma_\sms{gas}^0 = \Sigma_\sms{gas}(0)$ is the initial gas mass surface
1811: density.
1812: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1813: \centering
1814: \plotone{fig26}
1815: \caption{Evolution of the total metallicity (in units of $Z_\odot$),
1816: and of the reduced gas mass ($\mu_\sms{gas}$),
1817: for two different initial surface gas mass densities,
1818: $\Sigma_\sms{gas}^0$.}
1819: \label{fig:gasvol}
1820: \end{figure}
1821:
1822:
1823: % Dust evolution
1824: \subsection{Dust Formation and Destruction}
1825: \label{sec:evd}
1826:
1827: The evolution of the mass surface density, $\Sigma_i(t)$, of a given
1828: dust specie, is the sum of three
1829: contributions:\textlist{\thetextlist~the rate of dust destruction by
1830: star formation,
1831: \thetextlist~the rate of dust condensation in stellar progenitors,
1832: \thetextlist~the rate of dust destruction in the ISM, by SN blast waves:}
1833: \begin{equation}
1834: \frac{\dd\Sigma_\sms{i}(t)}{\dd t}
1835: = - Z_\sms{i}(t)\,\Sigma_\sms{SFR}(t)
1836: + \int_{m_l}^{m_u}
1837: \frac{Y_i(m)}{\langle m\rangle}\,\Sigma_\sms{SFR}(t-\tau(m))
1838: \,\phi(m)\ddiff m
1839: - \frac{\Sigma_\sms{i}(t)}{\tau_\sms{dust}(t)},
1840: \end{equation}
1841: where $Y_\sms{i}(m)$ is the yield of the considered dust specie by stars
1842: of mass $[m,m+\dd m]$, and $\tau_\sms{dust}(t)$, the dust lifetime in the ISM.
1843:
1844: % Yields
1845: The dust yields are derived from the elemental stellar yields described at
1846: \refS{sec:evZ}, following \citet{dwek98}.
1847: For low mass stars ($m\leq 8\msun$), the dust yields depend on the value of
1848: the C/O ratio.
1849: We assume that the ejecta is microscopically mixed, so that all the excess
1850: carbon is locked-up in dust, if C$>$O.
1851: If C$<$O, then we combine all the available Fe, Si, Mg, Ca and Ti, with one
1852: O atom to produce silicate dust, and titanium oxydes.
1853: For high mass stars ($m>8\msun$), we assume that the ejecta is only macroscopically mixed, so that both carbon and oxygen rich dust can condense.
1854: We assume a condensation efficiency of unity for all dust species.
1855:
1856: % Destruction
1857: The lifetime of dust, $\tau_\sms{dust}(t)$ is directly related to the
1858: \snii\ rate
1859: \citep{dwek80,mckee86}:
1860: \begin{equation}
1861: \tau_\sms{dust}(t) = \frac{\Sigma_\sms{gas}(t)}
1862: {R_\sms{\snii}(t)\,\langle m_\sms{ISM}\rangle},
1863: \end{equation}
1864: where $R_\sms{\snii}(t)$ is the \snii\ rate per unit area, and
1865: $\langle m_\sms{ISM}\rangle$ is the average effective mass of gas, swept up
1866: by a single SN remnant, where the dust is returned back to the gas phase,
1867: by either
1868: thermal sputtering, or grain-grain collision \citep{jones96}.
1869: The value of $\langle m_\sms{ISM}\rangle$ is largely unknown.
1870: We explore its effects, by varying it from $\langle m_\sms{ISM}\rangle=0\msun$
1871: (no destruction), to $\langle m_\sms{ISM}\rangle=300\msun$ (typical
1872: destruction).
1873: The latter value is typical of our Galaxy.
1874: Indeed, if $M_\sms{gas}^\sms{Gal}\simeq5\E{9}\msun$ is the total mass of gas in
1875: our Galaxy, $R_\sms{SN}^\sms{Gal}\simeq1/30\;\rm yr^{-1}$, its average SN rate,
1876: and $\tau_\sms{dust}^\sms{Gal}\simeq5\E{8}\;\rm yr$, the mean lifetime of an
1877: ISM dust particle \citep{jones04}, then:
1878: \begin{equation}
1879: \langle m_\sms{ISM}\rangle
1880: \simeq \frac{M_\sms{gas}^\sms{Gal}}
1881: {R_\sms{SN}^\sms{Gal}\,\tau_\sms{dust}^\sms{Gal}}
1882: \simeq 300\msun.
1883: \end{equation}
1884:
1885: An additional destruction mechanism that apllies only to PAHs and
1886: very small grains is their photoevaporation in intense radiation
1887: fields.
1888: This destruction mechanism primarily affects the abundance of PAHs, and is
1889: taken into account in the SED model that calculates the dust abundances, by
1890: assuming that PAHs do not survive in \hii\ regions.
1891:
1892: % Figure
1893: \reffig{fig:dustvol} shows the evolution of the total dust content formed by massive stars, and the carbon dust formed by AGB stars, for various initial conditions, and destruction efficiencies.
1894: The \snii\ dust evolves almost linearly with the metallicity, in absence of destruction, because the metal enrichment is dominated by massive stars.
1895: In contrast, the AGB carbon dust starts rising when the metallicity of the
1896: ISM is around $1/20\zsun$.
1897: This value corresponds to a time of $\sim100$~Myr (\reffig{fig:gasvol}),
1898: which the lifetime of the most massive AGB stars.
1899: Hence, the carbon dust produced by AGB stars is injected into the ISM, with a
1900: delay which corresponds to the lifetime of the stars.
1901: This evolutionary trend was previously noted by \citet{dwek98} and
1902: \citet{morgan03}.
1903: The change in the slope of the AGB carbon dust, around $1\zsun$, is simply
1904: due to the fact that AGB stars of lifetime longer than $\sim1$~Gyr are
1905: oxygen rich.
1906: The dust destruction effects the evolution for $Z\gtrsim0.1\zsun$.
1907: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1908: \centering
1909: \plotone{fig27}
1910: \caption{Evolution of the dust content with the metallicity of the ISM.
1911: We adopt $\langle m_\sms{ISM}\rangle=300\msun$,
1912: for the curves with grain destruction.}
1913: \label{fig:dustvol}
1914: \end{figure}
1915:
1916:
1917: % Comparison
1918: %-----------
1919: \subsection{Examining the Consistency Between the Stellar Populations and
1920: the Elemental Evolution}
1921: \label{sec:consistency}
1922:
1923: For consistency, we used the same prescription for the evolution of the star
1924: formation rate in both the population synthesis (\refS{sec:results})
1925: and the elemental evolution modeling (\refS{sec:evZ}).
1926: However, we added a late burst of star formation to calculate the galactic SED, which will only have a limited effect on the final elemental abundances of the
1927: galaxy.
1928: The two models differ in the stellar yields, with the latter using the more
1929: recent yields for AGB stars.
1930: \reffig{fig:agevsZ} examines the effect of this different yields by plotting
1931: the galactic age versus metallicity relation for our sample of galaxies.
1932: The model calculations, shown as a grey stripe, are in general good agreement
1933: with the data.
1934: However, for sub-solar metallicities ($\lesssim0.3\zsun$), several galaxies appear
1935: to have an older age, from the stellar point of view, than what would be
1936: inferred from their metal enrichment.
1937: This discrepancy is probably the consequence of assuming a smooth star formation
1938: history.
1939: The differences will only manifest themselves as a moderate change in the stellar spectra, and will have no affect on the conclusions of the paper.
1940: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1941: \centering
1942: \plotone{fig28}
1943: \caption{Consistency between the stellar populations and the elemental
1944: evolution.
1945: The error bars are the age of the galaxies derived from population
1946: synthesis modeling of the optical and near-IR broad-band observations
1947: (\reftab{tab:results}), as a function of the observed metallicity
1948: of the gas (\reftab{tab:source}).
1949: The grey stripe shows the range of values from the elemental
1950: evolution model (\reffig{fig:gasvol}).}
1951: \label{fig:agevsZ}
1952: \end{figure}
1953:
1954:
1955: % Comparison
1956: %-----------
1957: \subsection{PAHs and the Delayed Injection of AGB Carbon Dust}
1958: \label{sec:pahvsZ}
1959:
1960: % Observational evidences of PAH production by AGB stars
1961: From an observational point of view, PAHs are believed to form in the
1962: circumstellar envelopes of carbon rich AGB stars, and to be subsequently
1963: ejected into the ISM through stellar winds.
1964: The paucity of UV photons prevents the direct detection of these PAHs, during
1965: their formation process in the post-AGB phase of the evolution of these stars
1966: \citep{hony01,boersma06}.
1967: However, PAHs are abundantly observed during the later planetary nebula phase
1968: \citet{hony01}.
1969: In what follows, we will assume that PAHs are only formed in the
1970: envelopes of AGB stars.
1971:
1972: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1973: \centering
1974: \plotone{fig29}
1975: \caption{Comparison between the metallicity trends of the PAH abundance
1976: derived from the observed SED and those derived from the
1977: chemical evolution model.
1978: The figure highlights the different evolutionary trend of \snii-
1979: and AGB-condensed dust.}
1980: \label{fig:pahvsZ}
1981: \end{figure*}
1982: % PAH comparison
1983: \reffig{fig:pahvsZ} shows the comparison between the dust and PAH abundances
1984: derived from the observations (\reffig{fig:pahvsOovH}), and the ones produced
1985: by the evolution model (\reffig{fig:dustvol}).
1986: The agreement between the PAH-to-gas mass ratio, and the carbon dust
1987: production by AGB stars is very good, with the galaxies \hen\ and \IC{342} as
1988: the only outliers.
1989: \hen\ is a solar metallicity blue compact dwarf galaxy.
1990: Its SED is similar to lower metallicity galaxies \citep{galliano05},
1991: however its metallicity is very uncertain; for example \citet{vacca92} quoted
1992: $1/6\zsun$.
1993: This uncertainty may reside in the fact that this galaxy has two cores,
1994: resulting from a merger.
1995: The properties of these nuclei are different in terms of dust absorption
1996: \citep{phillips84}, molecular gas content \citep{baas94}, compact source
1997: distribution \citep{cabanac05}, and mid-IR spectrum \citep{martin-hernandez06}.
1998: Thus, our global approach may not apply to this object.
1999: On the contrary the PAH-to-dust mass ratio of \IC{342} is consistent with
2000: the one of other galaxies with the same metallicity (\reffig{fig:pahvsOovH}).
2001: Only its values of $Z_\sms{PAH}$ and $Z_\sms{dust}$ are systematically shifted.
2002: As mentioned in \refS{sec:results} this galaxy suffers a lot of extinction
2003: and confusion since it is located at low Galactic latitude.
2004: This could alter the estimate of the absolute dust-to-gas mass ratios of this
2005: object.
2006: We conclude that the striking evolution of the PAH content in galaxies with metallicity can
2007: naturally be explained by the delayed injection of carbon dust into the ISM, by AGB stars.
2008:
2009: %\begin{figure}[htbp]
2010: % \centering
2011: % \plotone{fig29}
2012: % \caption{Contribution of \hii\ regions relative to PDRs as a function
2013: % of metallicity.
2014: % This figure shows that \hii\ regions contribute systematically
2015: % more to the total SED of low-metallicity galaxies than at
2016: % higher metallicities.}
2017: % \label{fig:hii2pdr}
2018: %\end{figure}
2019: %By taking into account the contribution of PAH-free \hii\ regions to the total
2020: %SED, our model accounts for the destruction of PAHs by UV photons
2021: %capable of subliming or dissociating these molecules.
2022: %And indeed, \hii\ regions are more predominant in low-metallicity systems
2023: %than at higher metallicities (\reffig{fig:hii2pdr}).
2024: %Another process, that was not taken into account in our model, may potentially
2025: %have an impact on the observed trend of PAH abundance with
2026: %metallicity is an additional, non-AGB, source of PAHs.
2027: In principle, PAHs can form by other processes, for example, by
2028: the hydrogenation of small carbon grains in the ISM.
2029: Initially, their abundance will then follow the evolutionary trend of
2030: SN-condensed carbon dust.
2031: However, their absence in low metallicity systems suggests that they are
2032: efficiently destroyed, presumably by shocks or UV radiation, as envisioned in by
2033: \citet{madden06} or \citet{ohalloran06}.
2034: At later times, the rate of PAH production by these interstellar processes
2035: will follow the evolutionary trend of AGB stars, since they will be the major source of carbon dust in the ISM.
2036:
2037: The global trend of PAH abundance with metallicity does not preclude the
2038: possibility of local variations of PAH abundance in individual galaxies.
2039: For example, the SMC which has on the average a metallicity that is $1/6\zsun$
2040: \citep{dufour82} has at least one region, the molecular cloud \smcb\
2041: \citep{reach00}, with a PAH-to-dust ratio that is comparable to the Galactic
2042: value \citep{li02}.
2043: Even in our Galaxy, there are regions with ``super Galactic'' PAH abundances
2044: \citep[{e.g.}][]{ridderstad06}.
2045: Such local abundance variations are a natural consequences of processes, such as
2046: mixing of stellar ejecta and cycling between the ISM phases, that when globally
2047: averaged, will follow the general trend of PAH abundances with metallicity
2048: depicted in \reffig{fig:pahvsZ}.
2049:
2050:
2051: % SN dust
2052: %--------
2053: \subsection{The Evolutionary Trend of SN-Condensed Dust}
2054: \label{sec:SNdust}
2055:
2056: % FIR dust comparison
2057: The dust content is in good agreement with the dust production by
2058: \snii, down to $\sim0.1\zsun$ (\reffig{fig:pahvsZ}).
2059: Below this value, the model systematically overestimates the observed
2060: dust content.
2061: \citet{lisenfeld98} found a similar deficiency, from IRAS observations of blue
2062: compact dwarf and dwarf irregular galaxies.
2063: There may be several reasons for this discrepancy.
2064:
2065: First, we may have overestimated the gas mass, in the lowest metallicity
2066: sources.
2067: Indeed, the distribution of \hi\ of these galaxies extends farther out of
2068: the star forming region, as discussed in \refS{sec:results}.
2069: We have attempted to correct this effect, for \izw, \sbs\ and \viizw, by
2070: considering only the gas content associated with the optical galaxy.
2071: However, we could not correct for the gas located out of the star forming
2072: region and along the line of sight.
2073:
2074: Second, we may have underestimated the dust mass by overlooking a cold
2075: dust component.
2076: Indeed, \citet{galliano03,galliano05} showed that the millimetre excess
2077: observed in the SEDs of \ngc{1140}, \ngc{1569}, \iizw, and \hen, could be
2078: consistently explained by the presence of very cold dust, accounting for
2079: 40 to $80\%$ of the total dust mass.
2080: On \reffig{fig:pahvsZ}, the dust-to-gas mass ratio of these four galaxies
2081: is indeed, below the \snii\ production rate by a factor of $\sim2$.
2082: Assuming that the high clumpiness of the ISM is a general property of low-metallicity systems, and that the filling factor and/or contrast density of
2083: these clumps rises when the metallicity drops, we have a natural explanation
2084: for this deviation.
2085: We can not address this issue, because of the lack of submillimetre data for these very low-metallicity galaxies.
2086:
2087: Third, the discrepancy between the predicted and observed \snii\ dust at low
2088: metallicity could be due to several parameters or assumptions used in the
2089: chemical evolution modeling.
2090: (1) The IMF could play an important role in the absolute value of the
2091: dust production by \snii.
2092: It would indicate that the slope of the IMF is metallicity-dependent, and that
2093: the contribution of massive stars is lower, at very low $Z_\sms{ISM}$, which
2094: seems to be unlikely, both from a theoretical point of view (star formation),
2095: and an observational point of view (star counts).
2096: (2) A much more likely explanation could come from the fact that we assumed
2097: that the condensation into dust of the elements ejected by the \snii\ and
2098: their mixing in the ISM is instantaneous.
2099: If the major part of the dust was to condense into the ISM, and not directly
2100: into the \snii-ejecta, then the dust formation would be delayed after the
2101: death of the massive stars.
2102: (3) Finally, the dust production rates, computed from our dust evolution model,
2103: implicitely assume that the star formation rate of the galaxy is smooth and that
2104: the mixing is instantaneous.
2105: This hypothesis is certainly valid for evolved systems, but could be wrong for
2106: very young objects.
2107: For example, \citet{legrand00} suggested that the star formation history of
2108: \izw\ is not continuous.
2109:
2110:
2111: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
2112: % Conclusion
2113: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
2114:
2115: \section{CONCLUSION AND SUMMARY}
2116: \label{sec:conclusion}
2117:
2118: The weakness of the mid-IR aromatic features in low-metallicity environments has
2119: been traditionally interpreted as the consequence of the increased selective
2120: destruction efficiency of the PAHs in these environments.
2121: In this paper, we presented a new interpretation for the observed correlation
2122: of the intensity of the mid-IR emission from PAHs with galaxies' metallicity.
2123: In our model, this trend is a manifestation of the evolution of the abundance
2124: of interstellar carbon that formed in AGB stars with time.
2125: A fraction of the carbon dust formed in AGB stars in the form of PAH
2126: macromolecules offering a natural explanation of the evolutionary trend of
2127: PAH abundance with galactic metallicity (or time).
2128:
2129: To ascertain this trend, we first converted the trend of observed mid-IR fluxes
2130: to PAH and dust abundances, by modeling the UV-to-radio SEDs in a sample of
2131: 35 nearby galaxies, with metallicities ranging
2132: from $1/50$ to $\sim3\zsun$.
2133: Our models represent the most detailed decomposition of the dust emission
2134: into its gas phase components using a wide range of astrophyical constraints, including: the free-free and mid-IR emissions to constrain the gas and dust
2135: radiation from \hii\ regions; the far-IR and optical
2136: emission to constrain the ISRF that heats the dust in PDRs.
2137: From these models, we determined the abundances of the PAHs and other dust
2138: species associated to the neutral phase of the ISM.
2139: We then used a chemical evolution model to calculate the abundances of SN-
2140: and AGB-condensed dust as a function of time or metallicity.
2141: The model takes into account the delayed recycling of the ejecta from
2142: low-mass stars caused by their finite main-sequence lifetime.
2143:
2144: The main conclusions of this paper are the followings.
2145: \begin{enumerate}
2146: \item From the decomposition of the IR emission into its various emission
2147: components and dust species, we discovered two distinct evolutionary trends
2148: for PAHs and other dust species in galaxies.
2149: \item Comparison of these trends with the chemical evolution models showed
2150: that the abundance of PAHs follows that of the carbon dust from AGB stars.
2151: The remaining dust species follows the evolutionary trend of SN-condensed
2152: dust.
2153: \item The delayed injection of PAHs into the ISM provides a natural
2154: explanation for the paucity of these large molecules in low metallicity
2155: systems.
2156: The subsequent rise in the PAH-to-gas mass ratio with metallicity
2157: is then a natural consequence of the increasing contribution of AGB stars
2158: to the chemical enrichment of the ISM as they evolve off the main sequence.
2159: The trend of the other dust species is a natural consequence of the
2160: evolution of SN-condensed dust which is
2161: instantaneously injected into the ISM after the birth of the progenitor
2162: star.
2163: \item While the model is very successful in observing the gross general
2164: trend, there are some systematic deviations showing that
2165: dust-to-gas mass ratios inferred from observations fall below the calculated
2166: value for SN-condensed dust in the lowest metallicity galaxies.
2167: This discrepancy may be due to one or more of the
2168: following:\textlist{\thetextlist~an overestimate of the \hi\ gas mass used
2169: to derive these dust-to-gas mass ratios;
2170: \thetextlist~an underestimate of the dust mass due to the possible presence
2171: of a cold dust component; and
2172: \thetextlist~a more complex star formation history than used in the
2173: model calculations.}
2174: \item As an aside, in our analysis of the mid-IR spectra of nearby galaxies,
2175: we detected
2176: the $7.7\mic$ aromatic feature at the $4\sigma$ level in \viizw, a dwarf
2177: galaxy with $Z\simeq1/20\zsun$.
2178: This is the lowest metallicity galaxy for which PAH emission has been
2179: detected to date.
2180: \end{enumerate}
2181:
2182: The success of our chemical evolution model, in reproducing the trend of PAH
2183: abundances with metallicity, strongly suggests the importance of stellar
2184: evolutionary effects in determining the abundances and composition of dust in
2185: galaxies.
2186: These will have important consequences for determining the opacity of galaxies
2187: and their reradiated thermal IR emission.
2188: Chemical evolution models for dust must therefore be an integral part of
2189: population synthesis models, providing a self-consistent link between the
2190: stellar and dust emission components of the SED of galaxies.
2191:
2192:
2193: %==============================================================================
2194: % Back matters
2195: %==============================================================================
2196:
2197:
2198: % ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
2199: %-----------------
2200: \acknowledgments
2201:
2202: % Els
2203: We thank Els Peeters for her expert advices on the IRS spectra extraction.
2204: We are grateful to Sacha Hony for a useful discussion about AGB stars.
2205: % Support
2206: This work was performed while two of us (F.~G. \& P.~C.) held a National
2207: Research Council/Oak Ridge Associated Universities research associateship
2208: award at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
2209: E.~D. acknowledges the support of NASA's LTSA03-0000-065.
2210: % ISO & Spitzer
2211: This study is based in part on
2212: observations with \iso, an ESA project with instruments funded by ESA
2213: Member States (especially the PI countries: France, Germany, the
2214: Netherlands and the United Kingdom) and with the participation of ISAS
2215: and NASA.
2216: This work is also based in part on observations made with the \spitzST,
2217: which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California
2218: Institute of Technology under a contract with NASA.
2219: % NED and Hyperleda
2220: This research has made use of the HYPERLEDA database
2221: (http://leda.univ-lyon1.fr) and of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED)
2222: which is also operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute
2223: of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space
2224: Administration.
2225: % Markwardt
2226: We acknowledge the extensive use of the Levenberg-Marquardt least-squares
2227: fitting procedure and the Adams-Bashford-Moulton Ordinary Differential Equation
2228: solver written by Craig B.~Markwardt.
2229:
2230:
2231: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
2232: % Bibliography
2233: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
2234:
2235: \bibliographystyle{/Users/Fred/Documents/Astro/TeXstyle/Packages_AAS/aas}
2236: \bibliography{/Users/Fred/Documents/Astro/TeXstyle/references}
2237:
2238:
2239: \end{document}
2240:
2241:
2242:
2243: