1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % Four New Lensed Quasars from the SDSS
4: %
5: % Time-stamp: <07/11/18 20:12:54 oguri>
6: %
7: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
8: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
9: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
10: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11: \slugcomment{}
12: %
13: \shorttitle{Four New Lensed Quasars from the SDSS}
14: \shortauthors{Oguri}
15: %\received{}
16: \begin{document}
17: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
19: \title{Discovery of Four Gravitationally Lensed Quasars from the Sloan
20: Digital Sky Survey}
21: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
22: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
23: %
24: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
25: \author{
26: Masamune Oguri,\altaffilmark{1,2}
27: Naohisa Inada,\altaffilmark{3,4}
28: Alejandro Clocchiatti,\altaffilmark{5}
29: Issha Kayo,\altaffilmark{6}
30: Min-Su Shin,\altaffilmark{2}
31: Joseph F. Hennawi,\altaffilmark{7}
32: Michael A. Strauss,\altaffilmark{2}
33: Tomoki Morokuma,\altaffilmark{4,8}
34: Donald P. Schneider,\altaffilmark{9} and
35: Donald G. York\altaffilmark{10}
36: }
37:
38: \altaffiltext{1}{Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and
39: Cosmology, Stanford University, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, CA
40: 94025.}
41: \altaffiltext{2}{Princeton University Observatory, Peyton Hall,
42: Princeton, NJ 08544.}
43: \altaffiltext{3}{Cosmic Radiation Laboratory, RIKEN (The Institute of
44: Physical and Chemical Research), 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.}
45: \altaffiltext{4}{Institute of Astronomy, Faculty of Science, University
46: of Tokyo, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-0015, Japan.}
47: \altaffiltext{5}{Pontificia Universidad Cat\'{o}lica de Chile,
48: Departamento de Astronom\'{\i}a y Astrof\'{\i}sica,
49: Casilla 306, Santiago 22, Chile.}
50: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Physics and Astrophysics, Nagoya
51: University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8062, Japan.}
52: \altaffiltext{7}{Department of Astronomy, University of California at Berkeley, 601
53: Campbell Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411.}
54: \altaffiltext{8}{Optical and Infrared Astronomy Division, National Astronomical
55: Observatory of Japan, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8588, Japan.}
56: \altaffiltext{9}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The
57: Pennsylvania State University, 525 Davey Laboratory,
58: University Park, PA 16802.}
59: \altaffiltext{10}{Dept. of Astronomy and Astrophysics, and The Enrico
60: Fermi Institute, 5640 So. Ellis Avenue, AAC002, The University of
61: Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.}
62:
63: \begin{abstract}
64: We present the discovery of four gravitationally lensed quasars
65: selected from the spectroscopic quasar catalog of the Sloan Digital
66: Sky Survey. We describe imaging and spectroscopic follow-up
67: observations that support the lensing interpretation of the following
68: four quasars: SDSS~J0832+0404 (image separation $\theta=1\farcs98$,
69: source redshift $z_s=1.115$, lens redshift $z_l=0.659$);
70: SDSS~J1216+3529 ($\theta=1\farcs49$, $z_s=2.012$); SDSS~J1322+1052
71: ($\theta=2\farcs00$, $z_s=1.716$); and SDSS~J1524+4409
72: ($\theta=1\farcs67$, $z_s=1.210$, $z_l=0.320$). Each system has two
73: lensed images. We find that the fainter image component of
74: SDSS~J0832+0404 is significantly redder than the brighter component,
75: perhaps because of differential reddening by the lensing galaxy. The
76: lens potential of SDSS~J1216+3529 might be complicated by the presence
77: of a secondary galaxy near the main lensing galaxy.
78: \end{abstract}
79:
80: \keywords{gravitational lensing --- quasars: general}
81:
82: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
83: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
84: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
85: \section{Introduction}\label{sec:intro}
86: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
87: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
88: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
89:
90: Gravitationally lensed multiple quasars provide unique probes of
91: astronomical objects, and are also useful to constrain cosmological
92: parameters. Since gravitational lensing is a pure gravitational
93: effect, it allows us to determine mass distributions of astrophysical
94: objects including dark matter. In addition, the well-known underlying
95: physics makes it a reliable tool to study cosmology. See
96: \citet{kochanek06} for a recent review of applications of lensed
97: quasars.
98:
99: The power of lensed quasars as astrophysical and cosmological probes
100: is enhanced by constructing statistical samples of these objects with
101: well-defined source populations and well-understood selection
102: functions. Statistical lens samples have been constructed in the optical
103: \citep[e.g.,][]{maoz93} and the radio \citep[e.g.,][]{helbig99}
104: bands. The current largest statistical sample is a radio sample: The
105: Cosmic Lens All-Sky Survey \citep[CLASS;][]{myers03,browne03} discovered
106: $~20$ lensed quasars among $~16,000$ radio sources. The sample has been
107: used to constrain cosmological parameters \citep[e.g.,][]{chae02}.
108:
109: The purpose of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Quasar Lens Search
110: \citep[SQLS;][]{oguri06} is to construct a large statistical lens
111: sample in optical band. The SQLS searches for
112: lensed quasars among spectroscopically confirmed quasar catalogs in the
113: Sloan Digital Sky Survey \citep[SDSS;][]{york00}. Thus far we have
114: discovered $>20$ new lensed quasars as well as several previously
115: known lenses in the SDSS footprint \citep[e.g.,][and references
116: therein]{kayo07}, therefore it has already become the largest
117: statistical sample of strongly lensed quasars. \citet{inada07}
118: presented the first statistical lens sample of the SQLS from the Data
119: Release 3 (DR3).
120:
121: In this paper, we report the discoveries of four additional lensed
122: quasars from the SQLS. All the systems are double lenses with
123: small ($1''-2''$) image separations. They are initially selected
124: from the SDSS data, and the lensing hypothesis is tested against
125: photometric and spectroscopic follow-up observations at the University
126: of Hawaii 2.2-meter (UH88) telescope, the United Kingdom Infra-Red
127: Telescope (UKIRT), the Subaru telescope, the European Southern
128: Observatory 3.6-meter (ESO3.6m) telescope, and the Astrophysical
129: Research Consortium 3.5-meter (ARC3.5m) Telescope. We also perform
130: simple mass modeling to further test the validity of their lensing
131: interpretation. Throughout the paper we adopt
132: the standard cosmology with matter density $\Omega_M=0.27$ and
133: cosmological constant $\Omega_\Lambda=0.73$. The dimensionless
134: Hubble constant is denoted by $h$.
135:
136: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
137: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
138: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
139: \section{Selection of Lens Candidates}\label{sec:sdss}
140: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
141: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
142: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
143:
144: The aim of the SDSS is to map one quarter of the entire sky by
145: conducting both a photometric survey \citep{gunn98,lupton99,tucker06} in
146: five broad-band optical filters \citep{fukugita96} and a spectroscopic
147: survey with a multi-fiber spectrograph covering 3800{\,\AA} to
148: 9200{\,\AA} at a resolution of $\hbox{R}\sim1800$
149: \citep{blanton03}. The SDSS uses a dedicated 2.5-m telescope
150: \citep{gunn06} at the Apache Point
151: Observatory in New Mexico, USA. The data are processed by automated
152: pipelines \citep{lupton01,lupton07}. The targets for spectroscopy are
153: selected based on colors and morphology in the imaging survey
154: \citep{eisenstein01,richards02,strauss02}. The astrometry is accurate
155: to better than about $0\farcs1$ rms per coordinate \citep{pier03} and
156: the photometry is calibrated to less than about 0.02 magnitude over
157: the entire survey area \citep{hogg01,smith02,ivezic04}. Most of the
158: data are publicly available
159: \citep{stoughton02,abazajian03,abazajian04,abazajian05,adelman06,adelman07a,adelman07b}.
160:
161: Lens systems presented in this paper are selected from the SDSS data
162: using the algorithm described in \citet{oguri06}. The basic strategy is
163: to select lens candidates from low-redshift ($z<2.2$) quasars in the SDSS
164: spectroscopic quasar catalogs
165: \citep[e.g.,][]{schneider05,schneider07}. We use two
166: types of selection methods: Morphological selection, designed to
167: locate small-separation ($\sim 1''$) lens candidates, and color
168: selection, to identify lenses with larger image separations.
169: The efficiency of our lens selection is $\sim 10\%$ at small
170: ($\theta<2''$) image separations \citep{oguri06,inada07}.
171: We summarize the SDSS properties of our new lenses in Table
172: \ref{tab:sdss}. The SDSS images of these four candidates are shown in
173: Figure \ref{fig:sdss-chart}. Two of them, SDSS J0832+0404 and SDSS
174: J1216+3529, are selected by the color selection algorithm, whereas the
175: other two are identified by the morphological selection algorithm.
176:
177: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
178: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
179: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
180: \section{Follow-Up Observations of Individual Objects}\label{sec:follow}
181: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
182: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
183: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
184:
185: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
186: \subsection{SDSS~J0832+0404}\label{sec:0832}
187: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
188: Optical ($V$ and $I$) images of SDSS~J0832+0404 were taken with the
189: Tektronix 2048$\times$2048 CCD camera (Tek2k; the pixel scale is
190: $0\farcs2195$ pixel$^{-1}$) at the UH88 telescope on 2006 Nov 15. The
191: seeing was $\sim 1\farcs1$. Images with a total exposure time for each
192: filter of 600~sec were taken under photometric conditions. The fluxes
193: were calibrated using the standard star SA 113 339 \citep{landolt92}.
194: We also obtained near-infrared ($K$) images of this object with the
195: UKIRT Fast-Track Imager (UFTI; the pixel scale is $0\farcs091$
196: pixel$^{-1}$) at UKIRT on 2006 October 13. The seeing was $\sim
197: 0\farcs7$, and the total exposure time was 1080~sec.
198: The flux is calibrated using the standard star P545-C \citep{persson98}.
199:
200: Spectral follow-up observations were carried out with the ESO Faint Object
201: Spectrograph and Camera (EFOSC2) at the ESO3.6m on 2005 December 31. The
202: total exposure time was 1800~sec. The wavelength coverage was
203: 3700{\,\AA} to 9300{\,\AA} with a spectral dispersion of
204: $\sim5${\,\AA}~pixel$^{-1}$. The spatial resolution was
205: $0\farcs31$~pixel$^{-1}$. We used a grating of 236 lines/mm and a
206: $1\farcs0$ slit. The slit was aligned to observe the two components
207: simultaneously. The spectral resolution was $R\sim 400$. We extracted
208: the spectra using standard IRAF\footnote{
209: IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories,
210: which are operated by the Association of Universities for Research
211: in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National
212: Science Foundation.} tasks. We calibrate the spectra
213: by matching the summed spectral energy distribution (SED) of the two
214: objects to that of the SDSS spectrum. Since the angular separation
215: between the fainter quasar image and the lensing galaxy is small (see
216: below) we did not separate these two components in studying the
217: spectra.
218:
219: The results of our follow-up imaging is shown in Figure
220: \ref{fig:img-sdss0832}. We fit the system using GALFIT
221: \citep{peng02} with two PSFs plus a galaxy modeled by de Vaucouleurs
222: profile in $R$ and $I$ band images, and two PSFs in $V$-band image
223: because the galaxy is not bright enough. We adopt nearby stars as PSF
224: templates. Subtracting the two PSFs
225: shows the presence of a red lensing galaxy more clearly. The fits give
226: us the relative position and brightness of each component (image A,
227: image B, and lens galaxy G), which we summarize in Table
228: \ref{tab:0832}. The image separation between two stellar components is
229: $1\farcs984\pm0\farcs008$. The spectra shown in Figure
230: \ref{fig:spec0832} confirm that the two stellar components have broad
231: emission lines (\ion{C}{3}] and \ion{Mg}{2}) at the same
232: wavelengths, supporting the lensing hypothesis of this system. We
233: note that lensed quasar images (components A and B)
234: have different colors; component B ($V-K\sim 3.1$) is considerably redder
235: than component A ($V-K\sim2.$). This is probably because of the
236: differential dust reddening from the lensing galaxy, which is sometimes
237: seen in lensed quasar systems \citep[e.g.,][]{falco99}.
238:
239: We also measure the redshift of the lensing galaxy from our follow-up
240: spectrum. The spectrum shown in Figure \ref{fig:spec0832g} shows a
241: break at $\sim6600${\,\AA} (it is weak because of the contamination
242: from image B) and two adjacent absorption lines that we
243: interpret as the 4000{\,\AA} break and Ca H \& K lines of an elliptical
244: galaxy. From the Ca H \& K lines we determine the lens redshift to be
245: $z=0.659\pm0.001$. The optical-infrared color of the lens galaxy,
246: $I-K\sim 3.3$, is broadly consistent with this spectroscopic redshift
247: \citep[e.g.,][]{nelson01}.
248:
249: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
250: \subsection{SDSS J1216+3529}\label{sec:1216}
251: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
252: We obtained optical ($V$, $R$, and $I$) images of SDSS J1216+3529 with
253: the Tek2k at the UH88 telescope on 2007 April 11. The total exposure
254: time was 600~sec in $I$ and 300~sec in $V$ and $R$. The seeing was
255: $\sim 0\farcs7$. Photometric calibration was performed using the
256: standard star PG0918+029 \citep{landolt92}. In addition, near-infrared
257: ($H$) images were taken with the Near-Infrared Camera/Fabry-Perot
258: Spectrometer (NIC-FPS; the pixel scale is $0\farcs2709$~pixel$^{-1}$)
259: at the ARC3.5m telescope on 2007 March 7. We obtained a total
260: exposure of 900 sec with $\sim 0\farcs7$ seeing. Since no standard
261: star was observed, we perform the photometric calibration using the
262: Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) data.
263:
264: The spectra of the two stellar components were obtained with the Wide
265: Field Grism Spectrograph 2 \citep[WFGS2;][]{uehara04} at the UH88
266: telescope on 2007 May 13. The grating of 300 lines/mm and the
267: $0\farcs9$ slit results in a spectral resolution of $R\sim 700$
268: covering wavelength from 4300{\,\AA} to 10000{\,\AA}. The spectral
269: dispersion is $\sim 5${\,\AA}~pixel$^{-1}$, and the spatial resolution
270: is $0\farcs37$~pixel$^{-1}$. The exposure time was 5700~sec. The
271: observation was conducted under good seeing ($\sim 0\farcs8$), which
272: makes it rather easy to separate two stellar components. The flux is
273: calibrated by the standard star Feige 34 \citep{oke90} and the data
274: were reduced using IRAF.
275:
276: We show our results of follow-up imaging in Figure
277: \ref{fig:img-sdss1216} and Table \ref{tab:0832}. In addition to
278: the main lensing galaxy (named G1), a red galaxy (denoted
279: as G2) is visible north of the system. Thus we fit the system with two
280: PSFs plus two galaxies (except for $V$-band image in which the
281: galaxies are too faint) to derive the magnitudes and positions. These
282: two galaxies may be physically associated, although the colors
283: are slightly different such that galaxy G2 is bluer than G1.
284: The color $R-I\sim 1.0-1.2$ suggests that they are early-type galaxies
285: at $z\sim 0.5$ \citep{fukugita95}. The colors of two stellar
286: components A and B are quite similar. They are separated by an angle
287: $\theta=1\farcs489\pm0\farcs004$.
288:
289: The spectra are shown in Figure \ref{fig:spec1216}. Multiple
290: quasar emission lines (\ion{C}{4}, \ion{C}{3}], and \ion{Mg}{2}) are
291: seen in both components A and B, confirming that these are lensed
292: images of a quasar at $z=2.012$. Moreover the overall shapes of the
293: spectra are quite similar, as shown in the ratio of the spectra. In
294: addition, there are associated absorptions in \ion{C}{4} emission
295: lines of both components, which further support that these are
296: gravitationally lensed images.
297:
298: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
299: \subsection{SDSS J1322+1052}\label{sec:1322}
300: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
301:
302: Optical images of SDSS J1322+1052 were taken with the Tek2k
303: at the UH88 telescope on 2007 April 11 ($I$; the seeing was
304: $\sim0\farcs7$) and 2007 May 16 ($V$ and $R$; the seeing was
305: $\sim0\farcs8$). The exposure time was 480 sec in $I$ and 300 sec in
306: $V$ and $R$. The observations were conducted under photometric
307: conditions, and we used PG0918+029 and PG1633+099 \citep{landolt92} to
308: derive magnitudes in each image. We took follow-up near-infrared ($H$)
309: images as well with NIC-FPS at the ARC3.5m telescope on 2007 April
310: 26. The seeing was $\sim 0\farcs9$ and the total exposure time was
311: 1200~sec. Again, magnitudes are estimated using the 2MASS data.
312:
313: We acquired spectra of this system with the WFGS2 at the UH88
314: telescope on 2007 May 13. We adopted the same instrument configuration
315: described in \S \ref{sec:1216}, but with a shorter exposure time of
316: 4500~sec.
317:
318: Figure \ref{fig:spec1322} presents the follow-up images, and Table
319: \ref{tab:1322} summarizes the result of fitting. We identify
320: a lensing galaxy (component G) in the images in all four bands. The
321: color, $V-R\sim 1.5$ and $R-I\sim 0.9$, implies a lens redshift of
322: $z\sim 0.5$. The two stellar components (A and B) have similar colors,
323: but the magnitude difference is quite large, $\Delta I=1.72$,
324: corresponding to a flux ratio of $0.205$. The image separation is
325: $2\farcs001\pm0\farcs007$. The spectra shown in Figure
326: \ref{fig:spec1322} confirm that components A and B have similar SEDs:
327: Both components have weak \ion{C}{3}] and \ion{Mg}{2} lines at the
328: same wavelengths, and the ratio of two spectra is almost constant
329: over a wide wavelength range.
330:
331: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
332: \subsection{SDSS~J1524+4409}\label{sec:1524}
333: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
334:
335: We obtained $B$, $R$, and $I$ band images of SDSS~J1524+4409 with
336: the Orthogonal Parallel Transfer Imaging Camera (OPTIC; the pixel
337: scale is $0\farcs1374$~pixel$^{-1}$) at the UH88 telescope on 2006
338: May 4. The exposure time was 400~sec for each filter and the seeing
339: was $\sim 1\farcs1$. The standard star PG1633+099 was used to
340: calibrate the fluxes \citep{landolt92}.
341:
342: Follow-up images shown in Figure \ref{fig:img-sdss1524} indicate that
343: this system consists of two stellar components (A and B) and a bright
344: extended component (G). The colors of components A and B are similar,
345: thus these are likely to be lensed images. The bright galaxy G
346: has red colors and is fitted well by a de Vaucouleurs profile.
347: The image separation between A and B is $1\farcs669\pm0\farcs020$. See
348: Table \ref{tab:1524} for the fitting results.
349:
350: The spectrum of this system was taken with the Faint Object Camera and
351: Spectrograph \citep[FOCAS;][]{kashikawa02} at the Subaru telescope on
352: 2007 January 22. The 300B grism and SY47 filter were used to take the
353: spectrum in the range from 4700{\,\AA} to 9100{\,\AA} with the
354: resolution of $R\sim 500$. A long slit with $1''$ width was aligned to
355: observe the two quasar images simultaneously. The spatial resolution
356: was $0\farcs2$~pixel$^{-1}$ because of 2$\times$2 on chip binning. The
357: spectral dispersion after the binning is $\sim 2.6${\,\AA}~pixel$^{-1}$.
358: The excellent seeing of $\sim 0\farcs6$ allows us to extract spectra
359: of all three components (A, B, and G) in a straightforward way. The
360: total exposure was 900~sec. The spectra were flux calibrated using the
361: standard star G191B2B \citep{oke90}.
362:
363: The spectra are shown in Figure \ref{fig:spec1524}. As expected,
364: components A and B have quasar emission lines (\ion{Mg}{2} and
365: [\ion{O}{2}]) at the same wavelengths and similar overall spectral
366: shapes, confirming that they are lensed images of a quasar at
367: $z=1.210$. A number of absorption lines in the spectrum of component G
368: indicate that the lens is an early-type galaxy at
369: $z=0.320\pm0.001$. The redshift is in agreement with that expected
370: from the colors \citep{fukugita95}.
371:
372: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
373: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
374: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
375: \section{Mass Modeling}\label{sec:model}
376: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
377: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
378: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
379:
380: We perform mass modeling of each lens system. Since the lack of
381: observational constraints for the new lens systems limits detailed
382: studies of their mass distributions, here we adopt the simplest mass
383: model, which are commonly used in lens studies, to check whether such
384: model can fit the new lenses as well. The lens galaxy is assumed
385: to have a singular isothermal ellipsoid profile parameterized by the
386: Einstein radius $R_{\rm E}$, ellipticity $e$ and the position angle
387: (measured East of North) $\theta_e$. We adopt the positions of the quasar
388: images and lensing galaxies (for SDSS J1216+3529 we consider only
389: galaxy G1 because of the small number of our observational
390: constraints) and the fluxes of the quasar images in either $I$ or $K$
391: band in Tables \ref{tab:0832}-\ref{tab:1524}. The number of degrees of
392: freedom of this modeling is zero, therefore we should be able to find
393: models that perfectly fit the observations, as long as the assumed
394: model is reasonable. Fitting is performed using {\it lensmodel}
395: package \citep{keeton01}.
396:
397: We summarize our results in Table \ref{tab:model}. In all models the
398: observables are reproduced well, $\chi^2\sim 0$, with reasonable
399: best-fit values of ellipticity. The existence of feasible mass models
400: is further support for the hypothesis that these systems are
401: indeed gravitational lenses. In Table \ref{tab:model} we show total
402: magnifications ($\mu_{\rm tot}$) and expected time delays ($\Delta t$)
403: of the best-fit models. The errors on the time delays from mass model
404: uncertainties are $\sim 20\%$ \citep{oguri07}.
405:
406: The mass models also predict velocity dispersions of lens galaxies
407: that can be converted to luminosities using the Faber-Jackson
408: relation. We adopt the relation derived by \citet{rusin03} to compute
409: the expected $I$-band magnitude for each lens system. From the
410: spectroscopic lens redshifts of SDSS~J0832+0404 and SDSS~J1524+4409,
411: we calculate the expected magnitudes to be $I=19.4$ and $I=18.9$,
412: respectively. Given the scatter of the relation, $\sim 0.5$ mag, both
413: the estimated magnitudes agree with the observed magnitudes of
414: the lens galaxies. For SDSS J1216+3529 and SDSS J1322+1052, we invert
415: the problem and assume the observed lens galaxy magnitudes to
416: compute the expected lens redshifts from the Faber-Jackson relation.
417: We find $z_l\sim 0.55$ for both SDSS J1216+3529 and SDSS
418: J1322+1052. The scatter in the Faber-Jackson relation implies an error
419: of $\Delta z\sim 0.1$. The estimated redshifts are consistent with the
420: results inferred from the colors of the lens galaxies.
421:
422: Although we were able to fit the systems with a simple singular
423: isothermal ellipsoid model, it is not clear whether this model really
424: represents the true density distribution. Complicated lens potentials
425: could affect lensing statistics \citep[see, e.g.,][for the effect of the
426: lens galaxy environment]{oguri05}, and thus it is important to explore
427: the mass distributions further. The current lack of available number of
428: observational constrains prevents us from further examinations, hence
429: additional observations \citep[e.g., the detection of extended lensed
430: host galaxies; see][]{kochanek01} will be helpful in obtaining more
431: detailed lens potentials of the individual lens systems.
432:
433: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
434: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
435: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
436: \section{Summary}\label{sec:conc}
437: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
438: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
439: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
440:
441: We have presented the discoveries of four lensed quasar systems. All
442: were identified as lens candidates on the course of the SQLS, a
443: systematic survey of lensed quasars from SDSS spectroscopic quasars.
444: Imaging and spectroscopic observations have shown that the pairs of
445: stellar images have similar SEDs in each case, and that these
446: systems also show lensing galaxies among the stellar components.
447: The image configurations and image flux ratios were easily reproduced
448: with simple mass models. Below we summarize the properties of the four
449: new lensed quasars:
450:
451: \begin{itemize}
452: \item SDSS~J0832+0404: A two-image lens with an image separation of
453: $\theta=1\farcs984\pm0\farcs008$. The source redshift is
454: $z_s=1.115\pm0.003$, and the lens redshift is
455: $z_l=0.659\pm0.001$. The fainter component is significantly
456: redder than the brighter component. The $I$-band flux ratio
457: $f_I\sim 0.22$ is smaller than the limit for our statistical
458: lens sample \citep{oguri06}.
459: \item SDSS J1216+3529: A two-image lens with an image separation of
460: $\theta=1\farcs489\pm0\farcs004$ and a source redshift of
461: $z_s=2.012\pm0.002$. There is a secondary galaxy G2 near the main
462: lensing galaxy G1: The rough similarity of their colors suggests
463: that they may be physically associated. The observed colors and
464: magnitude of the lens galaxy as well as mass modeling suggest
465: that the lens redshift is $\sim 0.55$.
466: \item SDSS J1322+1052: A two-image lens with an image separation of
467: $\theta=2\farcs001\pm0\farcs007$ and a source redshift of
468: $z_s=1.716\pm0.002$. Again the $I$-band flux ratio $f_I=0.21$ is
469: below the limit for our statistical lens sample. The lens
470: redshift is $\sim 0.55$, estimated from colors and magnitude of
471: the lens galaxy and mass modeling.
472: \item SDSS J1524+4409: A two-image lens with an image separation of
473: $\theta=1\farcs669\pm0\farcs020$. The source redshift is
474: $z_s=1.210\pm0.001$, and the lens redshift is $z_l=0.320\pm0.001$.
475: In $I$-band the lensing galaxy is much brighter than the lensed
476: quasar components.
477: \end{itemize}
478:
479: We note that SDSS~J0832+0404 and SDSS J1524+4409 will be included in the
480: lens lists from the DR3 quasar catalog \citep{inada07}. The DR5 quasar
481: catalog \citep{schneider07} contains SDSS J1216+3529 and SDSS J1322+1052
482: as well, but not as lenses. The number of lensed quasars discovered (or
483: recovered) by the SQLS is now more than 30,\footnote{See
484: http://www-utap.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/\~{}sdss/sqls/ for a list of lensed
485: quasars in the SQLS.} comprising a significant
486: fraction of all lensed quasars known.
487:
488: \acknowledgments
489:
490: This work was supported in part by Department of Energy contract
491: DE-AC02-76SF00515.
492: I.~K. acknowledges support from Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research
493: on Priority Areas No. 467.
494: A.~C. acknowledges the support of CONICYT, Chile, under grant FONDECYT
495: 1051061.
496: This work is based in part on observations obtained
497: with the Apache Point Observatory 3.5-meter telescope, which is owned
498: and operated by the Astrophysical Research Consortium, and on data
499: collected at Subaru Telescope, which is operated by the National
500: Astronomical Observatory of Japan.
501: Use of the UH 2.2-m telescope and the UKIRT for the observations is
502: supported by NAOJ.
503:
504: Funding for the SDSS and SDSS-II has been provided by the Alfred
505: P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions, the National
506: Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National
507: Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Japanese Monbukagakusho, the
508: Max Planck Society, and the Higher Education Funding Council for
509: England. The SDSS Web Site is http://www.sdss.org/.
510:
511: The SDSS is managed by the Astrophysical Research Consortium for the
512: Participating Institutions. The Participating Institutions are the
513: American Museum of Natural History, Astrophysical Institute Potsdam,
514: University of Basel, Cambridge University, Case Western Reserve
515: University, University of Chicago, Drexel University, Fermilab, the
516: Institute for Advanced Study, the Japan Participation Group, Johns
517: Hopkins University, the Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, the
518: Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, the Korean
519: Scientist Group, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST), Los Alamos
520: National Laboratory, the Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA),
521: the Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA), New Mexico State
522: University, Ohio State University, University of Pittsburgh,
523: University of Portsmouth, Princeton University, the United States
524: Naval Observatory, and the University of Washington.
525:
526:
527: \begin{thebibliography}{}
528:
529: \bibitem[Abazajian et al.(2003)]{abazajian03}
530: Abazajian, K., et al. 2003, \aj, 126, 2081
531:
532: \bibitem[Abazajian et al.(2004)]{abazajian04}
533: Abazajian, K., et al. 2004, \aj, 128, 502
534:
535: \bibitem[Abazajian et al.(2005)]{abazajian05}
536: Abazajian, K., et al. 2005, \aj, 129, 1755
537:
538: \bibitem[Adelman-McCarthy(2006)]{adelman06}
539: Adelman-McCarthy, J.~K., et al. 2006,
540: \apjs, 162, 38
541:
542: \bibitem[Adelman-McCarthy(2007a)]{adelman07a}
543: Adelman-McCarthy, J.~K., et al. 2007a,
544: \apjs, 172, 634
545:
546: \bibitem[Adelman-McCarthy(2007b)]{adelman07b}
547: Adelman-McCarthy, J.~K., et al. 2007b,
548: \apjs, submitted (arXiv:0707.3413)
549:
550: \bibitem[Blanton et al.(2003)]{blanton03}
551: Blanton, M. R., Lin, H., Lupton, R. H., Maley, F. M., Young, N.,
552: Zehavi, I., \& Loveday, J. 2003, \aj, 125, 2276
553:
554: \bibitem[Browne et al.(2003)]{browne03}
555: Browne, I. W. A., et al. 2003, \mnras, 341, 13
556:
557: \bibitem[Chae et al.(2002)]{chae02}
558: Chae, K.-H., et al.\ 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett., 89, 151301
559:
560: \bibitem[Eisenstein et al.(2001)]{eisenstein01}
561: Eisenstein, D. J., et al. 2001, \aj, 122, 2267
562:
563: \bibitem[Falco et al.(1999)]{falco99}
564: Falco, E.~E., et al.\ 1999, \apj, 523, 617
565:
566: \bibitem[Fukugita et al.(1996)]{fukugita96}
567: Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., Doi, M.,
568: Shimasaku, K., \& Schneider, D. P. 1996, \aj, 111, 1748
569:
570: \bibitem[Fukugita et al.(1995)]{fukugita95}
571: Fukugita, M., Shimasaku, K., \& Ichikawa, T. 1995, PASP, 107, 945
572:
573: \bibitem[Gunn et al.(1998)]{gunn98}
574: Gunn, J. E., et al. 1998, \aj, 116, 3040
575:
576: \bibitem[Gunn et al.(2006)]{gunn06}
577: Gunn, J. E., et al. 2006, \aj, 131, 2332
578:
579: \bibitem[Helbig et al.(1999)]{helbig99}
580: Helbig, P., Marlow, D., Quast, R., Wilkinson, P.~N.,
581: Browne, I.~W.~A., \& Koopmans, L.~V.~E.\ 1999, \aaps, 136, 297
582:
583: \bibitem[Hogg et al.(2001)]{hogg01}
584: Hogg, D. W., Finkbeiner, D. P., Schlegel, D. J.,
585: \& Gunn, J. E.\ 2001, \aj, 122, 2129
586:
587: \bibitem[Inada et al.(2007)]{inada07}
588: Inada, N. et al. 2007, \aj, in press (arXiv:0708.0828)
589:
590: \bibitem[Ivezi\'{c} et al.(2004)]{ivezic04}
591: Ivezi\'{c}, \v{Z}., et al. 2004, AN, 325, 583
592:
593: \bibitem[Kashikawa et al.(2002)]{kashikawa02}
594: Kashikawa, N., et al.\ 2002, \pasj, 54, 819
595:
596: \bibitem[Kayo et al.(2007)]{kayo07}
597: Kayo, I. et al. 2007, \aj, 134, 1515
598:
599: \bibitem[Keeton(2001)]{keeton01}
600: Keeton, C.~R.\ 2001b, preprint (astro-ph/0102340)
601:
602: \bibitem[Kochanek et al.(2001)]{kochanek01}
603: Kochanek, C.~S., Keeton, C.~R., \& McLeod, B.~A.\
604: 2001, \apj, 547, 50
605:
606: \bibitem[Kochanek(2006)]{kochanek06}
607: Kochanek, C. S., Schneider, P., Wambsganss, J., 2006,
608: Part 2 of Gravitational Lensing: Strong, Weak \& Micro,
609: Proceedings of the 33rd Saas-Fee Advanced Course,
610: G. Meylan, P. Jetzer \& P. North, eds. (Springer-Verlag: Berlin), 91
611:
612: \bibitem[Landolt(1992)]{landolt92}
613: Landolt, A. U. 1992, \aj, 104, 340
614:
615: \bibitem[Lupton et al.(1999)]{lupton99}
616: Lupton, R. H., Gunn, J. E., \& Szalay, A. S. 1999, \aj, 118, 1406
617:
618: \bibitem[Lupton et al.(2001)]{lupton01}
619: Lupton, R., Gunn, J. E., Ivezi\'c, Z., Knapp, G. R.,
620: Kent, S., \& Yasuda, N. 2001, in ASP Conf. Ser. 238,
621: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems X,
622: ed. F. R. Harnden, Jr., F. A. Primini, and H. E. Payne
623: (San Francisco: Astr. Soc. Pac.), p. 269 (astro-ph/0101420)
624:
625: \bibitem[Lupton(2007)]{lupton07}
626: Lupton, R. 2007, \aj, submitted
627:
628: \bibitem[Maoz et al.(1993)]{maoz93}
629: Maoz, D., et al.\ 1993, \apj, 409, 28
630:
631: \bibitem[Myers et al.(2003)]{myers03}
632: Myers, S. T., et al. 2003, \mnras, 341, 1
633:
634: \bibitem[Nelson et al.(2001)]{nelson01}
635: Nelson, A.~E., Gonzalez, A.~H., Zaritsky, D., \&
636: Dalcanton, J.~J.\ 2001, \apj, 563, 629
637:
638: \bibitem[Oguri et al.(2005)]{oguri05}
639: Oguri, M., Keeton, C.~R., \& Dalal, N.\ 2005, \mnras, 364, 1451
640:
641: \bibitem[Oguri et al.(2006)]{oguri06}
642: Oguri, M., et al. 2006, \aj, 132, 999
643:
644: \bibitem[Oguri(2007)]{oguri07}
645: Oguri, M.\ 2007, \apj, 660, 1
646:
647: \bibitem[Oke(1990)]{oke90}
648: Oke, J.~B.\ 1990, \aj, 99, 1621
649:
650: \bibitem[Peng et al.(2002)]{peng02}
651: Peng, C. Y., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D., \&
652: Rix, H.-W. 2002, \aj, 124, 266
653:
654: \bibitem[Persson et al.(1998)]{persson98}
655: Persson, S.~E., Murphy, D.~C., Krzeminski, W., Roth, M., \&
656: Rieke, M.~J.\ 1998, \aj, 116, 2475
657:
658: \bibitem[Pier et al.(2003)]{pier03}
659: Pier, J. R., Munn, J. A., Hindsley, R. B., Hennessy, G. S.,
660: Kent, S. M., Lupton, R. H., \& Ivezi\'{c}, \'{Z}. 2003,
661: \aj, 125, 1559
662:
663: \bibitem[Richards et al.(2002)]{richards02}
664: Richards, G. T., et al. 2002, \aj, 123, 2945
665:
666: \bibitem[Rusin et al.(2003)]{rusin03}
667: Rusin, D., et al.\ 2003, \apj, 587, 143
668:
669: \bibitem[Schneider et al.(2005)]{schneider05}
670: Schneider, D.~P., et al.\ 2005, \aj, 130, 367
671:
672: \bibitem[Schneider et al.(2007)]{schneider07}
673: Schneider, D.~P., et al.\ 2007, \aj, 134, 102
674:
675: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2002)]{smith02}
676: Smith, J. A., et al. 2002, \aj, 123, 2121
677:
678: \bibitem[Stoughton et al.(2002)]{stoughton02}
679: Stoughton, C., et al. 2002, \aj, 123, 485
680:
681: \bibitem[Strauss et al.(2002)]{strauss02}
682: Strauss, M. A., et al. 2002, \aj, 124, 1810
683:
684: \bibitem[Tucker et al.(2006)]{tucker06}
685: Tucker, D. L., et al. 2006, AN, 327, 821
686:
687: \bibitem[Uehara et al.(2004)]{uehara04}
688: Uehara, M., et al.\ 2004, \procspie, 5492, 661
689:
690: \bibitem[York et al.(2000)]{york00}
691: York, D. G., et al. 2000, \aj, 120, 1579
692:
693: \end{thebibliography}
694:
695: \clearpage
696:
697:
698: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
699: \begin{deluxetable}{crrcccccc}
700: \rotate
701: \tablewidth{0pt}
702: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
703: \tablecaption{SDSS Properties of Gravitationally Lensed Quasars}
704: \tablewidth{0pt}
705: \tablehead{\colhead{Name} &
706: \colhead{RA} &
707: \colhead{Dec} &
708: \colhead{$u$} & \colhead{$g$} & \colhead{$r$} & \colhead{$i$} &
709: \colhead{$z$} & \colhead{Redshift} }
710: \startdata
711: SDSS J0832+0404 & 08:32:16.99 & +04:04:05.2 & $19.42\pm0.04$ &
712: $19.31\pm0.02$ & $18.98\pm0.02$ & $18.95\pm0.02$ & $18.92\pm0.05$ &
713: $1.115\pm0.003$\\
714: SDSS J1216+3529 & 12:16:46.05 & +35:29:41.5 & $19.56\pm0.05$ &
715: $19.43\pm0.03$ & $19.24\pm0.03$ & $19.11\pm0.04$ & $18.85\pm0.04$ &
716: $2.012\pm0.002$\\
717: SDSS J1322+1052 & 13:22:36.41 & +10:52:39.4 & $19.82\pm0.04$ &
718: $19.08\pm0.02$ & $18.75\pm0.01$ & $18.29\pm0.02$ & $18.15\pm0.03$ &
719: $1.716\pm0.002$\\
720: SDSS J1524+4409 & 15:24:45.63 & +44:09:49.6 & $19.94\pm0.05$ &
721: $19.76\pm0.03$ & $19.16\pm0.02$ & $18.82\pm0.02$ & $18.49\pm0.04$ &
722: $1.210\pm0.001$\\
723: \enddata
724: \tablecomments{Magnitudes are Point Spread Function (PSF) magnitudes
725: without Galactic extinction correction. The PSF magnitudes roughly
726: corresponds to magnitudes of the brighter quasar images for these
727: lens systems.}
728: \label{tab:sdss}
729: \end{deluxetable}
730: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
731:
732: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
733: \begin{deluxetable}{crrccc}
734: \tablewidth{0pt}
735: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
736: \tablecaption{SDSS J0832+0404: Astrometry and Photometry}
737: \tablewidth{0pt}
738: \tablehead{\colhead{Name} &
739: \colhead{{$\Delta$}{\rm X}[arcsec]} &
740: \colhead{{$\Delta$}{\rm Y}[arcsec]} &
741: \colhead{$V$} & \colhead{$I$} &
742: \colhead{$K$} }
743: \startdata
744: A & $0.000\pm0.003$ & $0.000\pm0.003$ & $18.87\pm0.01$ & $18.43\pm0.01$ & $16.82\pm0.01$ \\
745: B & $-1.579\pm0.005$ & $-1.202\pm0.005$ & $20.75\pm0.02$ & $20.08\pm0.08$ & $17.70\pm0.02$ \\
746: G & $-1.292\pm0.008$ & $-0.875\pm0.008$ & \nodata & $19.35\pm0.03$ & $16.06\pm0.01$ \\
747: \enddata
748: \tablecomments{The positive directions of {$\Delta$}{\rm X} and
749: {$\Delta$}{\rm Y} are defined by West and North, respectively. The
750: errors are statistical errors only, and do not include systematic
751: errors such as model uncertainties, template PSF uncertainties, and
752: zero-point errors. The positions are derived in $K$-band image.}
753: \label{tab:0832}
754: \end{deluxetable}
755: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
756:
757: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
758: \begin{deluxetable}{crrcccc}
759: \tablewidth{0pt}
760: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
761: \tablecaption{SDSS J1216+3529: Astrometry and Photometry}
762: \tablewidth{0pt}
763: \tablehead{\colhead{Name} &
764: \colhead{{$\Delta$}{\rm X}[arcsec]} &
765: \colhead{{$\Delta$}{\rm Y}[arcsec]} &
766: \colhead{$V$} & \colhead{$R$} &
767: \colhead{$I$} & \colhead{$H$} }
768: \startdata
769: A & $0.000\pm0.002$ & $0.000\pm0.002$ & $18.97\pm0.01$ & $18.85\pm0.01$ & $18.36\pm0.01$ & $17.30\pm0.01$ \\
770: B & $1.486\pm0.002$ & $0.097\pm0.002$ & $19.95\pm0.01$ & $19.82\pm0.01$ & $19.33\pm0.01$ & $18.20\pm0.03$ \\
771: G1& $0.931\pm0.033$ & $-0.075\pm0.033$& \nodata & $21.58\pm0.06$ & $20.31\pm0.05$ & $18.15\pm0.06$ \\
772: G2& $1.743\pm0.022$ & $2.891\pm0.022$ & \nodata & $21.79\pm0.08$ & $20.79\pm0.05$ & $19.23\pm0.13$\\
773: \enddata
774: \tablecomments{See Table \ref{tab:0832} for a note.
775: The positions are derived in $I$-band image.}
776: \label{tab:1216}
777: \end{deluxetable}
778: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
779:
780: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
781: \begin{deluxetable}{crrcccc}
782: \tablewidth{0pt}
783: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
784: \tablecaption{SDSS J1322+1052: Astrometry and Photometry}
785: \tablewidth{0pt}
786: \tablehead{\colhead{Name} &
787: \colhead{{$\Delta$}{\rm X}[arcsec]} &
788: \colhead{{$\Delta$}{\rm Y}[arcsec]} &
789: \colhead{$V$} & \colhead{$R$} &
790: \colhead{$I$} & \colhead{$H$} }
791: \startdata
792: A & $0.000\pm0.002$ & $0.000\pm0.002$ & $18.71\pm0.01$ & $18.41\pm0.01$ & $17.75\pm0.01$ & $16.48\pm0.01$ \\
793: B & $1.052\pm0.004$ & $1.702\pm0.004$ & $20.50\pm0.02$ & $20.19\pm0.01$ & $19.47\pm0.01$ & $18.04\pm0.02$ \\
794: G & $0.714\pm0.018$ & $1.169\pm0.018$ & $22.09\pm0.10$ & $20.55\pm0.04$ & $19.67\pm0.03$ & $17.17\pm0.02$\\
795: \enddata
796: \tablecomments{See Table \ref{tab:0832} for a note. The positions are
797: derived in $I$-band image.}
798: \label{tab:1322}
799: \end{deluxetable}
800: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
801:
802: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
803: \begin{deluxetable}{crrccc}
804: \tablewidth{0pt}
805: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
806: \tablecaption{SDSS J1524+4409: Astrometry and Photometry}
807: \tablewidth{0pt}
808: \tablehead{\colhead{Name} &
809: \colhead{{$\Delta$}{\rm X}[arcsec]} &
810: \colhead{{$\Delta$}{\rm Y}[arcsec]} &
811: \colhead{$B$} & \colhead{$R$} &
812: \colhead{$I$} }
813: \startdata
814: A & $0.000\pm0.008$ & $0.000\pm0.008$ & $20.61\pm0.03$ & $19.98\pm0.02$ & $19.54\pm0.04$ \\
815: B & $-1.485\pm0.012$ & $0.761\pm0.012$ & $21.36\pm0.05$ & $20.57\pm0.02$ & $20.17\pm0.03$ \\
816: G & $-0.576\pm0.012$ & $0.142\pm0.012$ & $21.80\pm0.07$ & $19.06\pm0.02$ & $18.33\pm0.01$ \\
817: \enddata
818: \tablecomments{See Table \ref{tab:0832} for a note. The positions are
819: derived in $I$-band image.}
820: \label{tab:1524}
821: \end{deluxetable}
822: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
823:
824: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
825: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}
826: \tablewidth{0pt}
827: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
828: \tablecaption{Mass Modeling}
829: \tablewidth{0pt}
830: \tablehead{\colhead{Name} &
831: \colhead{$R_{\rm Ein}$} &
832: \colhead{$e$} & \colhead{$\theta_e$[deg]} &
833: \colhead{$\mu_{\rm tot}$} & \colhead{$\Delta t$[$h^{-1}$day]}}
834: \startdata
835: SDSS J0832+0404 & $0\farcs95$ & $0.28$ & $+17$& $3.1$ & $157.8$ \\
836: SDSS J1216+3529 & $0\farcs77$ & $0.15$ & $-55$& $8.4$ & $15.6$ \\
837: SDSS J1322+1052 & $1\farcs03$ & $0.18$ & $-33$& $7.3$ & $45.5$ \\
838: SDSS J1524+4409 & $0\farcs79$ & $0.29$ & $-40$& $7.4$ & $15.3$ \\
839: \enddata
840: \tablecomments{For SDSS J1216+3529 and SDSS J1322+1052, we assume the
841: lens redshift of $z_l=0.5$ in computing predicted time delays.}
842: \label{tab:model}
843: \end{deluxetable}
844: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
845:
846: \clearpage
847:
848: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
849: \begin{figure}
850: \epsscale{.8}
851: \plotone{f1.eps}
852: \caption{Wide-field SDSS $i$-band images of four new lensed quasars,
853: SDSS J0832+0404 ({\it upper left}), SDSS J1216+3529 ({\it upper
854: right}), SDSS J1322+1052 ({\it lower left}), and SDSS J1524+4409 ({\it
855: lower right}). The size of each image is $2'\times 2'$. North is up and
856: East is left.
857: \label{fig:sdss-chart}}
858: \end{figure}
859: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
860:
861: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
862: \begin{figure}
863: \epsscale{.8}
864: \plotone{f2.eps}
865: \caption{Images of SDSS J0832+0404 taken with Tek2k at the UH88
866: telescope ($V$ and $I$) and UFTI at UKIRT ($K$). The upper panels
867: show original images, and the bottom panels show residuals after
868: subtracting two stellar (quasar) components; here the lens galaxy is
869: seen more clearly. North is up and East is left, and the size of each
870: image is $8\farcs8\times 8\farcs8$. The results are summarized in Table
871: \ref{tab:0832}.
872: \label{fig:img-sdss0832}}
873: \end{figure}
874: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
875:
876: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
877: \begin{figure}
878: \epsscale{.8}
879: \plotone{f3.eps}
880: \caption{Spectra of SDSS J0832+0404 A and B(+G) taken with EFOSC2 at
881: the ESO3.6m telescope. The spectral resolution is $R\sim 400$. Dotted
882: lines indicate quasar emission lines redshifted to $z_s=1.115$. The
883: lower panel plots the ratio of the two spectra.
884: \label{fig:spec0832}}
885: \end{figure}
886: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
887:
888: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
889: \begin{figure}
890: \epsscale{.8}
891: \plotone{f4.eps}
892: \caption{The expanded view of the spectrum of SDSS J0832+0404 B
893: (Figure \ref{fig:spec0832}) that shows an indication of the lens
894: galaxy. The break at $\sim 6600${\,\AA} and two adjacent absorption
895: lines suggests that the lens redshift of this system is $z_l=0.659$.
896: The strong absorption at $\sim 7600${\,\AA} is telluric.
897: \label{fig:spec0832g}}
898: \end{figure}
899: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
900:
901: \clearpage
902:
903: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
904: \begin{figure}
905: \epsscale{.98}
906: \plotone{f5.eps}
907: \caption{Images of SDSS J1216+3529 taken with Tek2k at the
908: UH88 telescope ($V$, $R$, and $I$) and NIC-FPS at the ARC3.5m telescope
909: ($H$). As in Figure
910: \ref{fig:img-sdss0832}, upper and lower panels show original images and
911: residuals after subtracting two stellar (quasar) components,
912: respectively. North is up
913: and East is left, and the size of each image is $8\farcs8\times
914: 8\farcs8$. The results are summarized in Table \ref{tab:1216}.
915: \label{fig:img-sdss1216}}
916: \end{figure}
917: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
918:
919: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
920: \begin{figure}
921: \epsscale{.8}
922: \plotone{f6.eps}
923: \caption{Spectra of SDSS J1216+3529 A and B taken with WFGS2 at the UH88
924: telescope. The spectral resolution is $R\sim 700$. The spectra are
925: smoothed with a 3-pixel boxcar. The location
926: of quasar emission lines redshifted to $z_s=2.012$ is indicated by
927: vertical dotted lines. The lower panel plots the ratio of the two
928: spectra. The feature at $\sim 7600${\,\AA} is telluric.
929: \label{fig:spec1216}}
930: \end{figure}
931: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
932:
933: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
934: \begin{figure}
935: \epsscale{.98}
936: \plotone{f7.eps}
937: \caption{Images of SDSS J1322+1052 taken with Tek2k at the
938: UH88 telescope ($V$, $R$, and $I$) and NIC-FPS at the ARC3.5m telescope
939: ($H$). As in Figure
940: \ref{fig:img-sdss0832}, upper and lower panels show original images and
941: residuals after subtracting two stellar (quasar) components,
942: respectively. North is up
943: and East is left, and the size of each image is $8\farcs8\times
944: 8\farcs8$. The result is summarized in Table \ref{tab:1322}.
945: \label{fig:img-sdss1322}}
946: \end{figure}
947: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
948:
949: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
950: \begin{figure}
951: \epsscale{.8}
952: \plotone{f8.eps}
953: \caption{Spectra of SDSS J1322+1052 A and B taken with WFGS2 at the UH88
954: telescope. The spectral resolution is $R\sim 700$. The spectra are
955: smoothed with a 3-pixel boxcar. Vertical
956: lines indicate quasar emission lines redshifted to $z_s=1.716$. Note
957: that the \ion{Mg}{2} emission lines are contaminated by telluric
958: absorption at $\sim 7600${\,\AA}. The lower panel plots the ratio of
959: the two spectra.
960: \label{fig:spec1322}}
961: \end{figure}
962: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
963:
964: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
965: \begin{figure}
966: \epsscale{.8}
967: \plotone{f9.eps}
968: \caption{Images of SDSS J1524+4409 taken with OPTIC at the UH88
969: telescope ($B$, $V$, and $I$). As in Figure \ref{fig:img-sdss0832},
970: upper and lower panels
971: show original images and residuals after subtracting two stellar
972: (quasar) components, respectively. North is up
973: and East is left, and the size of each image is $8\farcs8\times
974: 8\farcs8$. The result is summarized in
975: Table \ref{tab:1524}.
976: \label{fig:img-sdss1524}}
977: \end{figure}
978: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
979:
980: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
981: \begin{figure}
982: \epsscale{.8}
983: \plotone{f10.eps}
984: \caption{Spectra of SDSS J1524+4409 A, B, and G taken with FOCAS at the
985: Subaru telescope. The spectral resolution is $R\sim 500$. All the
986: spectra are smoothed with a 3-pixel boxcar.
987: The spectrum of galaxy G is shifted downward for illustrative purpose.
988: Both quasar emission lines redshifted to $z_s=1.210$ and galaxy
989: absorption lines redshifted to $z_l=0.320$ are indicated with vertical
990: dotted lines. The feature at $\sim 7600${\,\AA} is telluric. The
991: lower panel plots the ratio of the spectra of components A and B.
992: \label{fig:spec1524}}
993: \end{figure}
994: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
995:
996:
997: \end{document}
998:
999: %%
1000: %% End of the tex file
1001:
1002:
1003: % LocalWords: oguri Masamune Naohisa Inada Clocchiatti Issha Su Hennawi Tomoki
1004: % LocalWords: Morokuma Kavli RIKEN Hirosawa Wako Saitama Osawa Mitaka lica de
1005: % LocalWords: Pontificia Universidad Departamento Astronom Astrof sica Casilla
1006: % LocalWords: Chikusa ku kochanek browne UKIRT ESO gunn lupton fukugita rms
1007: % LocalWords: blanton eisenstein richards strauss astrometry hogg ivezic Tek
1008: % LocalWords: stoughton abazajian adelman landolt Imager UFTI persson EFOSC SY
1009: % LocalWords: IRAF NOAO SED Vaucouleurs peng Fabry NIC Grism WFGS uehara Feige
1010: % LocalWords: oke SEDs FOCAS kashikawa grism longslit lensmodel keeton inada
1011: % LocalWords: schneider NAOJ Monbukagakusho Fermilab LAMOST Los MPIA MPA Maley
1012: % LocalWords: Zehavi Loveday Chae Lett Falco Ichikawa Doi Shimasaku PASP Quast
1013: % LocalWords: Helbig Koopmans Finkbeiner Schlegel Ivezi astro ph Wambsganss al
1014: % LocalWords: Saas Meylan Jetzer Szalay Yasuda Conf Ser Harnden Primini San
1015: % LocalWords: Astr Pac Maoz Zaritsky Dalcanton Impey Rix Krzeminski Rieke Munn
1016: % LocalWords: Hindsley Hennessy crrcccccc crrccc arcsec cccccc Ein sdss img
1017: % LocalWords: tek redshifted maoz helbig chae CCD PSFs GALFIT falco rusin PSF
1018: % LocalWords: eps CONICYT FONDECYT crrcccc telluric sqls AAC Dalal
1019: