1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\usepackage{psfig}
3: %\usepackage{graphicx}
4:
5: % Definitions of subexpressions
6: \newcommand{\gsim}{\mbox{\hspace{.2em}\raisebox{.5ex}{$>$}\hspace{-.8em}\raisebox{-.5ex}{$\sim$}\hspace{.2em}}}
7: \newcommand{\lsim}{\mbox{\hspace{.2em}\raisebox{.5ex}{$<$}\hspace{-.8em}\raisebox{-.5ex}{$\sim$}\hspace{.2em}}}
8: \newcommand{\ssst}{\scriptscriptstyle}
9: \newcommand{\E}[1]{\times 10^{#1}}
10: \newcommand{\etal}{et~al.}
11: \newcommand{\lt}{\left} \newcommand{\rt}{\right}
12: \newcommand{\RA}[3]{{#1}^{{\rm h}}{#2}^{{\rm m}}{#3}^{{\rm s}}}
13: \newcommand{\Dec}[3]{{#1}^{\circ}{#2}'{#3}''}
14: \def\xs{{DA~530}}
15:
16: % Definitions of units
17: \newcommand{\s}{\,{\rm s}} \newcommand{\ps}{\,{\rm s}^{-1}}
18: \newcommand{\yr}{\,{\rm yr}} \newcommand{\Msun}{M_{\odot}}
19: \newcommand{\cm}{\,{\rm cm}} \newcommand{\km}{\,{\rm km}}
20: \newcommand{\parsec}{\,{\rm pc}}\newcommand{\kpc}{\,{\rm kpc}}
21: \newcommand{\erg}{\,{\rm ergs}} \newcommand{\K}{\,{\rm K}}
22: \newcommand{\eV}{\,{\rm eV}} \newcommand{\keV}{\,{\rm keV}}
23: \newcommand{\Hz}{\,{\rm Hz}}
24:
25: % Definitions of symbols
26: \newcommand{\nel}{n_{e}} \newcommand{\NH}{N_{\ssst\rm H}}
27: \newcommand{\no}{n_{\ssst 0}} \newcommand{\rPDS}{r_{\ssst\rm PDS}}
28: \newcommand{\vPDS}{v_{\ssst\rm PDS}} \newcommand{\tPDS}{t_{\ssst\rm PDS}}
29: \newcommand{\Ts}{T_{s}}
30: \newcommand{\rs}{r_{s}} \newcommand{\vs}{v_{s}}
31: \newcommand{\nH}{n_{\ssst\rm H}} \newcommand{\mH}{m_{\ssst\rm H}}
32: \newcommand{\nHH}{n({\rm H}_{2})} \newcommand{\NHH}{N({\rm H}_{2})}
33: \newcommand{\xray}{X-ray} \newcommand{\Einstein}{{\em Einstein}}
34: \newcommand{\rosat}{{\sl ROSAT}} \newcommand{\asca}{{\sl ASCA}}
35: \newcommand{\chandra}{{\sl Chandra}}
36: \newcommand{\xmm}{{\sl XMM}-Newton}
37: \newcommand{\du}{d_{2.2}} \newcommand{\Eu}{E_{51}}
38: \newcommand{\lpc}{l_{\rm pc}} \newcommand{\ru}{r_{3}}
39: \newcommand{\mE}{\langle E_{\ssst B-V}\rangle}
40: \newcommand{\rmsn}{\langle\nH^2\rangle^{1/2}}
41: \newcommand{\HI}{H{\small I}}
42:
43: \begin{document}
44:
45: \title{\chandra\ View of DA~530: A Sub-energetic Supernova Remnant with a Pulsar Wind Nebula?}
46:
47: \author{
48: Bing Jiang\altaffilmark{1,2},
49: Yang Chen\altaffilmark{1}, and
50: Q.\ Daniel Wang\altaffilmark{2}
51: }
52: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093,
53: P.R.China}
54: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy, B619E-LGRT,
55: University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA01003}
56: \begin{abstract}
57: DA~530 (G93.3+6.9) is a high Galactic latitude supernova remnant with a
58: well-defined shell-like radio morphology and an exceptionally low
59: X-ray to radio luminosity ratio. Based on a \chandra\ ACIS observation,
60: we report the detection of an extended X-ray feature close to the
61: center of the remnant with $5.3\sigma$ above the background within a circle
62: of $20''$ radius. The spectrum of this feature
63: can be characterized by a power-law with the photon index $\Gamma=1.6\pm0.8$.
64: This feature, spatially coinciding with
65: a nonthermal radio source, most likely represents a pulsar wind nebula.
66: We have further examined the spectrum of the diffuse X-ray emission
67: from the remnant interior with a background-subtracted count rate of
68: $\sim 0.06$ counts $\ps$ in 0.3-3.5 keV.
69: The spectrum of the emission can be described by
70: a thermal plasma with a temperature of $\sim$ 0.3--0.6 keV and a Si
71: over-abundance of $\gtrsim 7$ solar. These spectral characteristics,
72: together with the extremely low X-ray luminosity, suggest that
73: the remnant arises from a supernova with an anomalously low
74: mechanical energy ($< 10^{50}\erg$). The centrally-filled thermal X-ray
75: emission of the remnant may indicate an early thermalization of the SN
76: ejecta by the circum-stellar medium. Our results suggest that the remnant
77: is likely the product of a core-collapsed SN with a progenitor mass of
78: 8-12 M$_\odot$. Similar remnants are probably common in
79: the Galaxy, but have rarely been studied.
80: \end{abstract}
81:
82: \keywords{
83: supernova remnants: individual: DA~530 (G93.3+6.9) ---
84: X-rays: ISM
85: }
86:
87: \section{Introduction}
88: X-ray observations of Galactic supernova remnants (SNRs) help us to explore
89: how stars end their lives and what the end-products are. Existing
90: studies have concentrated on X-ray-bright SNRs, which
91: tend to be energetic and to be located in relatively dense interstellar
92: environments. The conclusions we drew from such studies may thus be biased.
93: Indeed, recent observations of supernovae (SNe) show a broad range of
94: explosion characteristics; some SNe appear to be substantially sub-luminous with
95: very small expansion velocities of the ejecta, indicating low explosion energies
96: (e.g., 1997D-like SNe, Zampieri et~al. 2003, Pastorello et~al. 2004;
97: the 2002cx-like SNe, Jha et~al. 2006). Naturally, one expects that
98: such SNe should lead to sub-energetic SNRs.
99: Therefore, from the study of nearby sub-energetic SNRs, we may learn about
100: the explosion processes and their dependence on progenitor stellar masses
101: and binary properties, for example.
102:
103: DA~530~(G93.3+6.9) is probably the best known example of a sub-energetic
104: SNR. It has a well-defined shell-like morphology in radio
105: (Roger \& Costain 1976; Landecker et~al. 1999, hereafter L99) and is extremely
106: faint in X-ray (L99). It is one of the rare SNRs observed at high Galactic
107: latitudes: only 7 of 265 Galactic SNRs have $|b| > 6^\circ$ in the Green
108: Catalog~\footnote{Green D. A., 2006, `A Catalogue of Galactic Supernova Remnants
109: (2006 April version)', Astrophysics Group, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge,
110: United Kingdom (available at ``http://www.mrao.cam.ac.uk/surveys/snrs/'').};
111: the other 6 are all well-known nearby SNRs,
112: typically with large angular sizes.
113: X-ray emission from DA 530 was first reported by L99, based on
114: an 8-ksec \rosat\ PSPC observation. This observation shows that the
115: remnant has a centrally-filled X-ray morphology and a total
116: luminosity of $1.1\times10^{32}$ ergs/s in the 0.12-2.4 keV band (assuming a
117: distance of $3.5$ kpc). But the very limited counting
118: statistics and energy/spatial resolutions of the observation
119: did not allow for any tight constraints on the thermal properties of the
120: SNR. Nevertheless, L99 suggested that DA~530 is probably created by a
121: sub-energetic Type Ia SN in a very tenuous ambient environment.
122: The total estimated
123: X-ray-emitting gas mass is only about 4$\Msun$.
124: Based on 21-cm \HI\ data, Foster and Routledge
125: (2003) later improved the distance estimate to be $2.2\pm 0.5$ kpc
126: (adopted hereafter), which would reduce the X-ray luminosity and the gas mass.
127: L99 further argued that the low ambient density is probably a result of a
128: preexisting stellar wind bubble indicated by
129: the presence of a ``necklace''-like \HI\ shell located at the outer boundary
130: of the radio continuum shell. A Type Ia SN scenario is proposed because
131: of the remnant's relatively large vertical height (264~pc) above
132: the Galactic plane; but paradoxically, the presence of the wind bubble
133: is indicative of a massive progenitor (L99).
134: DA~530 is so far not detected in infrared and optical, consistent with
135: a relatively low density environment expected at this vertical height.
136: Kaplan et~al.\ (2004) did not find any suitable candidates for
137: a potential stellar remnant of DA530 from a \chandra\ ACIS-I observation
138: and optical/IR follow-ups. No pulsed emission has been detected in DA~530
139: (Lorimer, Lyne \& Camilo 1998).
140:
141: In this paper, we report a re-analysis of the same \chandra\ observation
142: as obtained by Kaplan et~al. (2004). Our initial motivation is to understand
143: why DA530 is so faint in its X-ray emission, as shown in the
144: \rosat\ study.
145: If indeed a remnant of a Type~Ia~SN, it is expected to show
146: enhanced iron lines in the \chandra\ X-ray spectrum.
147: While we find no indication for this enhancement, our analysis
148: (\S~2) leads to
149: several quite unexpected results, which are presented in \S~3. In \S~4,
150: we discuss the implications of these results on the nature of the SN and its
151: environment. We quote statistical error bars at the 90\% confidence
152: level throughout this work.
153:
154: \section{Observation and Data Reduction}\label{sec:img_01}
155:
156: The \chandra\ ACIS-I observation of DA~530 was performed
157: on 17 December 2001 in a faint mode (Obs.\ ID 2808).
158: The target center ($\RA{20}{52}{14}.0$, $\Dec{55}{20}{30}.0$) was placed
159: at the aiming point of the I3 chip.
160: We reprocessed the data using the \chandra\ Interactive Analysis of
161: Observations (CIAO) software package (version 3.2.2),
162: following the ACIS data analysis guide.
163: The lightcurve of the observation indicates no significant background flares
164: and the effective exposure is 16.4 ks.
165: The \chandra\ field of view (FoV) is shown in Fig.~1,
166: in comparison with DA~530's extent in radio continuum.
167:
168: For imaging analysis, counts images and exposure maps are generated in the four bands:
169: $0.5-1$ (S1), $1-2$ (S2), $2-4$ (H1), and $4-8$ (H2) keV.
170: We subtract the non-X-ray contribution, using the ACIS stowed background
171: database~\footnote{available at http://cxc.harvard.edu/contrib/maxim/acisbg/}.
172: All the data are corrected for CTI and gain variations.
173: The \chandra\ 0.5-8 keV intensity image is shown in Fig.~2.
174: Since ACIS-I chips do not cover the entire field of \xs,
175: we also show \rosat\ PSPC intensity contours for comparison.
176:
177: Our main interest here is the diffuse emission from the remnant's interior.
178: Thus we need to subtract the irrelevant point sources from the image.
179: The source detection by Kaplan et~al. (2004) is designed for finding
180: the putative neutral star with a select criteria of $\le 10$ counts and within
181: only $8'$ radius from the center of the remnant.
182: Following the procedures detailed in Wang (2004), we search for discrete
183: sources over the entire FoV of the I-array
184: in the soft (S=S1+S2), hard (H=H1+H2) and broad
185: (S+H) bands.
186: The detection is based on a combined set of algorithms:
187: wavelet, sliding box, and maximum likelihood centroid fitting,
188: which are optimized for detecting point-like sources.
189: The map detection and the maximum likelihood analysis use a detection
190: aperture of the 70\% energy-encircled radius.
191: %Multiple detections with overlapping $2\sigma$
192: %centroid error circles are considered to be identical and the centroid
193: %position with the smallest error is adopted.
194: The threshold of the local false detection probability is $P\le 10^{-6}$,
195: based on the Poisson statistics.
196: We detect all the 18 sources listed in Kaplan et~al. (2004), plus 30
197: additional ones, which are all marked in Fig.~3.
198:
199: To study the diffuse X-ray emission, we remove from the data a circle
200: of 1.5 times the detection radius for each source.
201: We then produce a broad band (H) intensity image
202: of the diffuse X-ray emission (Fig.~3).
203:
204: \section{Data Analysis and Results}\label{sec:img_02}
205:
206: The PSPC image contours show a clear enhancement of the ``diffuse'' X-ray
207: intensity in the field of \xs\ and exhibits no indication for any
208: rim-brightening associated with the outer radio shell (Fig.~2; L99).
209: Using the NED/SIMBAD database, we find that
210: all the bright point sources around the rim are background sources (L99).
211: The ACIS-I image further reveals a faint large-scale diffuse
212: emission in the interior (Fig.~3).
213: The morphology appears to be centrally-filled with clumps of
214: enhancements.
215:
216: \subsection{Diffuse emission}
217: We perform a spectral analysis of the large-scale diffuse X-ray emission
218: associated with DA~530 using the \chandra\ observation.
219: We extract the on-SNR spectrum from the four sectors (radius $\sim 8.5'$)
220: on the ACIS-I chips, which are projected entirely within the boundary of the
221: SNR, and the off-SNR spectrum from the two rectangular regions on the ACIS-S2
222: and S3 chips (see Fig.~1). We subtract from the on- and off-SNR spectra
223: the respective non-X-ray background contributions estimated from
224: the same regions.
225: After being adaptively grouped to achieve a $S/N > 3$ in each bin,
226: the two spectra %, on and off the SNR,
227: are jointly fitted (see Fig.~4), in which the on-SNR sky background is
228: determined by the fit to the off-SNR spectrum, which is well described by a
229: power-law with a photon index $\sim 2$.
230: This double background subtraction method accounts for the position dependence
231: of the background, effective area, and energy response of the instruments.
232: Although the counting statistics of the data are limited,
233: the on-SNR spectrum with a net background-subtracted count rate of $\sim 0.06$
234: counts $\ps$ shows
235: a distinct Si~He$\,\alpha$ ($\sim 1.85$ keV) line.
236: The feature at $\sim 1.34$ keV may represent the He-like Mg~K$\alpha$ line,
237: but this line is too weak to be certain.
238:
239: The net on-SNR spectrum of the diffuse X-ray emission is well
240: characterized with a non-equilibrium ionization thermal plasma model
241: ({\em vpshock} in XSpec). We present in Table~1 the fit results
242: with or without fixing the column density $\NH$ to $5.7\E{21}\cm^{-2}$,
243: an estimate of the total column density based on observations of atomic
244: and molecular gas in the field (L99). This independent estimate represents
245: an upper limit to the true X-ray absorption column density along the
246: sight line to DA 530, depending on its distance. If the remnant is indeed
247: at the distance of $\sim 2.2$ kpc (or $\sim$300 pc above the Galactic plane),
248: beyond the bulk of the neutral gas disk, the estimate should be close to the
249: true absorption column density. The column density from the direct fit
250: to the X-ray spectrum is, however, considerably smaller than the estimate,
251: which may indicate that the remnant is much closer than the adopted
252: distance. But there are uncertainties in the X-ray data calibration
253: (e.g., background subtraction) and modeling. We hence present the results
254: based on these two different absorption column density estimations.
255: There is no significant evidence for an enrichment in Fe
256: (a fit indicates an iron abundance close to the solar value),
257: while the abundance of Si is clearly super-solar.
258: The large ionization parameter ($n_e t_i \sim 10^{12} \cm^{-3}$\,s)
259: indicates that the plasma is close to the collision ionization equilibrium.
260: An equilibrium ionization plasma model ({\em vmekal}) is then applied
261: and the fitted parameters, as well as the confidence ranges, are similar
262: to those from {\em vpshock}.
263:
264: \subsection{The central extended hard X-ray feature}
265: Fig.~3 shows a remarkable small-scale X-ray feature at
266: ${\rm RA}=\RA{20}{52}{14}$, ${\rm Dec.}=\Dec{55}{17}{22}$,
267: near the center of the remnant. This central feature is present chiefly in
268: the range of $1-4$ keV. The radial intensity profile of the feature
269: (Fig.~5) clearly shows that it is an
270: extended source. A fit with an exponential function
271: ($\propto e^{-r/r_0}$) plus a local background gives a scale-length of
272: $6^{\prime\prime}\pm3^{\prime\prime}$.
273: We further extract a spectrum of the feature (Fig.~6) in
274: a circle of $20''$ radius (marked with ``S'' in Fig.~1),
275: which includes about 96\% net counts according to the best-fit exponential
276: function. The total number of counts in 0.3-7 keV band is 50, compared to
277: a local background contribution of 24 counts, estimated from
278: an annulus between $40''$ to $80''$ around the feature.
279: Therefore, the significance of the feature above the local background is
280: 5.3$\sigma$. Accounting for the overall FoV
281: ($17^\prime\times17^\prime$) of the ACIS-I and the size
282: ($20^{\prime\prime}$ radius) of the feature, the statistical probability
283: for it to be due to the random fluctuation of the background is on
284: the order of $10^{-5}$. Of course, there are systematic effects (e.g., the
285: non-uniformity of the diffuse emission; see \S 4.1 for further discussion),
286: which cannot be adequately quantified here. Indeed, there are a few other
287: peaks in Fig.~3. But they are all at large off axis angles and may at
288: least partly due to confusions among adjacent weak sources because of the
289: large PSF. No peak in the central region has a significance close to the above
290: feature or is associated with a radio source (\S~4.1). We conclude that
291: the feature is most likely real and is truly extended.
292:
293: With the very limited counting statistics, the spectrum of the feature
294: (after the local background subtraction)
295: can be well fitted with
296: a variety of models, assuming the hydrogen column density of
297: $N_H = 5.7\E{21}\cm^{-2}$. For example,
298: the power-law model gives a photon index of $1.6\pm 0.8$
299: and an unabsorbed $0.5-10\keV$ flux of $\sim 3.6\E{-14}\,\erg\cm^{-2}\ps$.
300: Alternatively, an optically-thin thermal plasma would indicate a
301: temperature $\gtrsim 2$ keV, substantially higher than that found for
302: the surrounding diffuse X-ray emission ($\sim 0.5$ keV; Table~1).
303: With a lower $N_H$ value assumed (e.g. $1.5\E{21}\cm^{-2}$), the temperature
304: would be even higher, while the photon index in the power-law model
305: would be smaller ($1.1\pm0.7$) with nearly the same unabsorbed $0.5-10\keV$ flux.
306:
307: The central extended hard X-ray feature is not seen in the \rosat\ PSPC
308: observation, which had a low spatial resolution and was sensitive only to
309: X-rays below $\sim2.4\keV$. The feature was also not detected in the ACIS
310: observation, based on the CIAO {\em wavdetect} program with a maximum
311: wavelet scale of $8''$ (Kaplan et~al. 2004). However, with
312: larger scales of 32, 64, 128 pixels, we do detect the feature, using the
313: same program.
314:
315: \section{Discussion}
316:
317: We now discuss the implications of the above results, together with those
318: from previous studies.
319:
320: \subsection{Pulsar Wind Nebula Candidate}\label{sec:pwn}
321:
322: We have shown the evidence for the presence of
323: a central extended X-ray feature in DA 530. This feature is characterized
324: by an angular extent of $\sim 40''$ and a hard spectrum.
325: This hard X-ray feature, with its small extent, could conceivably represent a
326: distant ($z \gtrsim 1$) cluster of galaxies projected in the field.
327: However, such clusters are very rare (only $\sim 10$ X-ray-emitting
328: clusters have been detected at $z>1$; Stanford et~al. 2006).
329: The observed spectrum (Fig.~6) also seems to be a
330: too hard to be consistent with the expected relatively steep (after the redshift)
331: thermal emission from the intracluster medium.
332: Alternatively, the feature might just be an
333: enhancement of the X-ray emission from \xs\, due to a density increase,
334: for example. But assuming a rough pressure balance, one would expect that
335: such density enhancement tends to have a lower temperature than the
336: surrounding, inconsistent with the hard spectrum of the feature (\S 3.2).
337:
338: We propose that the hard X-ray feature most likely represents a pulsar wind nebula (PWN).
339: This interpretation naturally explains the location near the center of \xs,
340: the spatial extension, and the apparently hard spectrum.
341: In this case, the X-ray emission represents the synchrotron radiation from
342: relativistic electrons/positrons in the nebula. The observed spectrum
343: in particular, characterized by a power law with the photon
344: index $\sim1.6\pm 0.8$, is consistent with the typical range
345: $1.3-2.3$ for a PWN (Gotthelf 2003; Gaensler \& Slane 2006).
346:
347: The PWN scenario of the X-ray feature is further supported by its positional
348: coincidence with an extended radio source. It is detected in the
349: 1.4 GHz NRAO VLA Sky Survey (Condon et~al. 1998; Fig.~7) and is listed as
350: ``J205213+551721''
351: in the online database (http://www.cv.nrao.edu/nvss/NVSSlist.shtml).
352: Fig.~7 also includes a radio image of \xs,
353: extracted from the 325 MHz Westerbork Northern Sky Survey
354: (Rengelink et~al. 1997) with a radio intensity enhancement apparent
355: at the source position. The source is also present in the
356: 408 MHz and 1.42 GHz continuum maps of \xs\ (L99).
357: The radio fluxes of the source are $40\pm6$ mJy at 325 MHz and $15.0\pm1.4$ mJy
358: at 1.4 GHz, which give an approximate estimate of the power law spectral slope
359: as $\sim 0.7$, comparable to the typical value $\sim 0.5$ of known PWNe. But
360: sensitive radio observations with a higher spatial resolution is needed to
361: further the test of the PWN scenario. No obvious optical or near-IR
362: counterpart is found within a few arc-seconds around the centroid of
363: the X-ray feature. This is expected for the PWN interpretation.
364: The extension of the radio source
365: ($\sim 36.8^{\prime\prime}\times30.6^{\prime\prime}$, deconvolved FWHM
366: source sizes in NVSS Source catalog)
367: is larger than that of
368: the X-ray feature. This is consistent with the short synchrotron cooling
369: time scale of the X-ray-emitting particles.
370:
371: Of course, the PWN nature of the X-ray feature and the radio peak can be
372: established only when pulsed radiation is detected. While such radiation
373: has not been observed, either due to the limited sensitivity
374: of the existed radio searches (Lorimer et~al. 1998) or to the possibility
375: that the pulsed radiation is beamed away from the Earth, we proceed here
376: with the hypothesis that the X-ray/radio feature represents a PWN in \xs.
377:
378: Using the empirical relationship given for PWNe (Seward \& Wang 1988)
379: and the 0.2-4 keV luminosity of the feature
380: ($L_x\sim 1.6\E{31}\,d^2_{2.2 {\rm~kpc}}$\erg\ s$^{-1}$ obtained from the
381: spectral analysis),
382: we infer the spin-down power of the putative pulsar as
383: $\dot{E}\sim 2.4\E{34}\,d_{2.2 {\rm~kpc}}^{1.4}\,\erg\,s^{-1}$.
384: According to the estimated $F_{PWN}/F_{PSR}$ of 17 pulsars in 2-10 keV
385: (Gotthelf 2004) the ratio seems to be around 1 among the pulsars with
386: low $\dot{E}$. Then the X-ray luminosity for the pulsar will be
387: $\sim10^{31}\erg\ps$.
388: The deduced values, both the X-ray luminosity and $\dot{E}$, are much smaller
389: than that of other PWN/PSR systems (Gotthelf 2003, 2004).
390: However, the pulsar PSR B1929+10 has an even smaller luminosity ($L_x\sim
391: 10^{30}{\rm~ergs~s^{-1}}$) and $\dot{E} (\sim 4\E{33} {\rm~ergs~s^{-1}}$) with
392: its faint nebula ($L_x\sim 1.3\E{30} {\rm~ergs~s^{-1}}$) (Wang, Li \& Begelman
393: 1993; Yancopoulos, Hamilton \& Helfand 1994; Becker et~al. 2006).
394:
395: \subsection{Energetics of the SNR}\label{sec:Ia}
396:
397: From the results on the diffuse X-ray emission associated with \xs\ (Table~1),
398: we estimate various physical parameters of the hot gas enclosed in \xs\
399: (Table~2). The estimation of the total mass ($M$) and mean density ($\rmsn$)
400: of the X-ray-emitting plasma is based on the volume emission
401: measure (Table~1) and the remnant's radio size ($r_s \sim 14'\sim9\,\du$~pc).
402: A volume filling factor ($f$) of the hot gas is included.
403: The mass estimation adopts a
404: correction factor of 2, accounting for the partial spatial field
405: of the on-SNR spectrum within the radio shell. This correction
406: assumes no particular enhancement associated with the
407: rims of the remnant, as indicated by the PSPC observation.
408: We also estimate the total Si mass (M$_{Si}$) and thermal energy ($E_{th}$)
409: of the hot gas, using the abundance and
410: temperature values from the spectral fits.
411:
412: We may further infer the age and explosion energy of \xs\ by applying
413: the canonical Sedov (1959) blastwave model.
414: If the temperature $T_x$ measured from the {\em vpshock} model
415: is adopted as the post-shock temperature $T_s$, we can then
416: estimate the blastwave velocity $\vs=(16k\Ts/3\bar{\mu}\mH)^{1/2}$,
417: the dynamic age $t=2r_s/5v_s$ and the explosion energy
418: $E=(25/4\xi)\rho_1 v_s^2 r_s^3 $ (see Table~2),
419: where the mean atomic weight $\bar{\mu}=0.61$, $\mH$ is the mass
420: of a hydrogen atom, $\xi=2.026$ and $\rho_1$ is the pre-shock medium mass
421: density which is assumed to approximately be the mean swept-up gas density.
422: The low temperature ($0.3-0.6$ keV) of the gas is
423: consistent with the inferred relatively large age ($\sim 5000-7000\yr$)
424: of the remnant.
425: The explosion energy is very low $\sim 1-4\E{49}\,d_{2.2}^{2.5}f^{-1/2}\erg$,
426: about two orders of magnitude lower than the nominal value ($10^{51}\erg$)
427: of a SN.
428: Of course, $T_x \not= T_s$ in the Sedov solution; the ACIS-I field
429: covers a combination of the remnant's physical interior
430: and projected outer shock regions. In the Sedov phase, the inner gas is hotter
431: than the outer gas (i.e., $T_x > T_s$).
432: Therefore, the above estimates represent the upper limits to the thermal and
433: explosion energies and the lower limit to the age.
434: Considering the uncertainty on distance ($2.2\pm 0.5$ kpc),
435: if the remnant is closer than 2.2 kpc,
436: the mass, age, and energy would be even smaller than
437: the values we obtained here; if we take the high end of the distance
438: (2.7 kpc), these parameters would be scaled up a bit,at most with a
439: factor of $\sim1.7$, which would not dramatically affect the final results.
440: Furthermore, the forward shock may have already entered a radiative phase
441: (i.e., $T_s \lesssim T_c=6\times 10^5$ K), consistent with the lack of
442: significant rim-brightened X-ray emission (L99; \S~3). This requires
443: the pre-shock density $n_1 > \left(3/100\right) \left(
444: \bar{\mu}/1.4 kT_c\right) \left(\xi E/r_s^3\right)$,
445: i.e., $n_1 > 1.5 E_{50} \cm^{-3}$, where $E_{50}$ is the explosion energy
446: in units of $10^{50}\erg$.
447: An age of $\ga 1.7\E{4}$ yr is then expected in this case.
448: Since the preshock gas density may be similar to the mean density of the
449: hot gas inside the SNR ($< 0.1 \cm^{-3}$, Table 2),
450: %Since the mean interstellar medium density on the Galactic plane is about
451: %$1 \cm^{-3}$,
452: %the density around DA530 at the relatively high Galactic latitude is
453: %expected to be considerably lower than that.
454: $E$ should then be smaller than $10^{50}$ ergs.
455: In conclusion, the SN
456: responsible for \xs\ appears to be sub-energetic.
457:
458: \subsection{X-ray Morphology}
459:
460: The X-ray results from both \rosat\ and \chandra\ suggest that
461: \xs\ is a so-called thermal composite/mixed-morphology SNR.
462: Whereas the radio continuum emission shows a well-defined shell-like structure,
463: there is little evidence for any associated enhancement in X-ray.
464: This lack of the X-ray emission
465: associated with the forward shock is consistent with
466: the large ionization timescale of the remnant interior and low temperature,
467: as discussed above.
468:
469: The formation mechanisms for thermal composite SNRs in general are still very
470: much uncertain (e.g., Shelton et~al. 2004; Chen et~al.\ 2004;
471: Kawasaki et~al. 2006).
472: These SNRs most likely represent a heterogeneous
473: population, depending on the ambient medium density distribution as well
474: as the remnant ages. Known thermal composites tend to be in dense environments
475: (see Table 7 in Lazendic \& Slane 2006).
476: This may partly be due to observational selection effects, because
477: such remnants tend to be brighter. With more sensitive observations,
478: fainter ones have been detected in less dense environments (Lazendic \& Slane 2006).
479: None of the proposed mechanisms (e.g, evaporation of clouds,
480: thermal conduction effect, and ejecta enrichment) seem to give satisfactory
481: explanations for the observed properties of such thermal composites.
482: This is even more difficult for \xs, which appears to represent an extreme case.
483: \xs\ seems to belong to the group of thermal composites that show enhanced
484: metal abundances in their interior.
485: The number of such remnants is now up to $\sim 50\%$ of the total thermal
486: composites (Lazendic \& Slane 2006).
487: Detailed studies of the abundances and their distribution are needed
488: to investigate their effect on the central brightness.
489:
490: We find that the morphology and other X-ray properties of \xs\ can be
491: explained if the SN ejecta were thermalized early from the interaction with a
492: dense circum-stellar medium (CSM). Without this early thermalization,
493: the current low density would not be consistent with the large $n_e t_i$ of
494: the interior hot gas (Table~1).
495: The required average density needs to be as high as
496: $10\,\cm^{-3}$ for an age of 5000 yr.
497: Such a high density can probably
498: only be realized in a dense CSM surrounding the progenitor.
499: The required total mass of the CSM does not need to be very high (e.g., a few
500: $\Msun$), since the ejecta mass should be small
501: as indicated by the low hot gas mass (Table~2).
502: Similar phenomena are also found in the LMC SNRs DEM~L238 and DEM~L249
503: (Borkowski et~al. 2006).
504:
505: \subsection{Nature of the Explosion}
506:
507: Let us now examine what SN progenitor may have the inferred
508: properties: 1) the production of a pulsar, 2) the low mechanical energy and
509: ejecta mass, and 3) the presence of a dense CSM.
510: A pulsar may be produced in a core-collapsed (CC) SN of a
511: star with a main-sequence mass $\gtrsim 8 \Msun$, an accretion-induced
512: collapse (AIC) of a white dwarf, or a merger-induced
513: collapse (MIC) of two white dwarfs with a combined
514: mass greater than the Chandrasekhar mass. The latter two scenarios, though
515: plausible, may work only for white dwarfs with O/Ne/Mg cores and
516: with fine-tuned accretion rates. The expected explosion rate is low in the
517: Galaxy (e.g., Saio \& Nomoto 1985; King et~al.2001). Also no dense CSM is
518: expected from the progenitor of an AIC or MIC SN. While a wind may
519: be present during the accretion, it is expected to be as fast as 1000 - 1500
520: ${\rm~km~s^{-1}}$ (Hachisu \& Kato 2003), producing no dense CSM.
521: We thus consider the massive star CC SN to be the most probable scenario for
522: \xs. In this case, the CSM can naturally arise from a massive slow wind
523: in a post-main sequence evolutionary stage (e.g., red supergiant). Such a
524: CC SN typically yields a mechanical energy of $\sim 10^{51}\erg$ ,
525: empirically. As mentioned in \S~1, this empirical expectation may be
526: strongly biased.
527: Type II-P SNe such as 1997D have been observed to be
528: sub-energetic events (Zampieri et~al. 2003, Pastorello et~al. 2004).
529: There are two plausible progenitor models for them,
530: a massive star (e.g. $25-40 \Msun$ for SN~1997D), which is likely
531: accompanied by the formation of a black hole (Zampieri et~al. 1998),
532: and an intermediate-mass star ($8-12\Msun$) (Chugai \& Utrobin 2000;
533: Smartt et al.\ 2004).
534: When examining the two models, we found that
535: SNRs Crab and 3C58 may have provided proper evidence
536: for the nature of the DA530 case. Both the plerionic
537: SNRs were observed to have pre-SN mass loss or the CSM and their kinetic
538: energy is $\sim10^{49.5} \erg$ (Rudie \& Fesen 2007), much lower than
539: the canonical $10^{51} \erg$ and similar to the value obtained in \xs.
540: Such subenergetic SNRs are suggested to result from the ``electron
541: capture'' SNe, which are thought to be the end stage of intermediate mass
542: stars (8--12$\Msun$), because the SNe collapse with timescales determined
543: by electron capture rate rather than dynamical timescale and thus the
544: released kinetic energy is lower (Nomoto 1987; Rudie \& Fesen 2007).
545: On the other hand, recent hydrodynamic simulations incoporating
546: electron capture also show that CC~SNe of stars in the mass range of
547: $8-12\Msun$ with O-Ne-Mg cores can be substantially sub-energetic
548: (Kitaura et~al. 2006). Therefore, in view of the small ejecta mass
549: (Table~2), the pre-SN CSM, the low explosion energy, and the presence
550: of the PWN (hence the presence of a neutron star), we favor the low mass
551: CC explosion for DA~530.
552:
553: The interpretation of an 8--12$\Msun$ main-sequence progenitor for the
554: \xs\ SN is also
555: consistent with the observed pre-existing stellar wind bubble (L99). Before
556: evolving to the red supergiant stage, the star is expected to undergo
557: a fast stellar wind period with
558: a mass loss rate of $\sim10^{-10}-10^{-7}\Msun\rm /yr$ (Snow 1982), which
559: can naturally lead to the formation of a surrounding stellar wind bubble.
560: A wind bubble can reach a stall radius:
561: $r_{\rm stall}=43.3 \left(L_{w,36}/n_0\right)^{1/2} C_{0,6}^{-3/2}$ pc,
562: where $L_{w,36}=L_w/10^{36}\erg\cm^{-3}$ is the wind luminosity
563: in units of $10^{36}\erg\ps$, $n_0$ is the undisturbed ambient interstellar
564: medium density,
565: and $C_{0,6}$ is the isothermal sound speed of the medium
566: in units of $10^6\cm\ps$ (eg., Brighenti \& D'Ercole 1994).
567: If $r_{\rm stall}$ is taken to be the H~\small I \normalsize ``necklace''
568: radius $\sim 9$ pc, then the stall time
569: $t_{\rm stall}=2.2\E{6}\left(L_{w,36}/n_0\right)^{1/2}C_{0,6}^{-5/2}\ {\rm yr}\sim 5\E{5}$ yr (assuming $C_{0,6}=1$),
570: reasonably smaller than the lifetime of the progenitor.
571: From $L_w=\frac{1}{2}\dot{\rm M}v_w^2$, we require
572: $\dot{\rm M}\sim 1.2\E{-9} \left(r_{\rm stall}/9\ \rm pc\right)^2\left(n_0/0.1 \cm^{-3}\right) \left(v_w/1000 \km\ps\right)^{-2}C_{0,6}^3$ $\Msun/\rm yr$,
573: where $v_w$ is the velocity of the stellar wind.
574: The wind power of a 8--12 $\Msun$ main-sequence progenitor is high enough to
575: generate such a bubble.
576:
577: In short, we have constructed a plausible scenario for \xs.
578: The progenitor could be a star with its
579: main-sequence progenitor mass in the range of $\sim$ 8--12 $\Msun$.
580: The fast wind in the main-sequence stage produces a wind bubble ($\sim9$ pc),
581: which is responsible for the observed HI ``necklace''-like structure.
582: The massive slow wind in the later red supergiant stage generates a
583: dense CSM, which explains the large ionization time scale of the
584: interior hot gas.
585: The SN apparently has a substantially low mechanical energy
586: and a small ejecta mass and leaves a neutron star as the stellar remnant.
587:
588: If \xs\ indeed represents a typical SNR produced by stars
589: in the main-sequence mass range of $8-12 \Msun$,
590: we should then expect a substantial number of similar remnants in the Galaxy;
591: stars in this mass range account for about one quarter of the total
592: number of stars with
593: masses $\gtrsim 8 \Msun$ (assuming the Salpeter initial mass function) for
594: which CC SNe are expected. Because of the sub-energetics of these remnants,
595: they are generally difficult to detect. Possible known candidates include
596: the Crab Nebula (Nomoto et~al. 1982) and
597: VRO 42.05.01 (G166.0+4.3, Burrows \& Guo 1994) at relatively high
598: Galactic latitudes, 3C~58 (Rudie \& Fesen 2007),
599: and those low-surface brightness SNRs at low latitudes
600: (Bamba et~al. 2003). Those latter SNRs show primarily hard
601: {\sl non-thermal} X-ray emission, which can be understood if the soft
602: {\sl thermal} radiation from low temperature shock-heated gas has largely
603: been absorbed by the intervening cool interstellar medium.
604: Therefore, more detailed studies with improved data on high-latitude
605: Galactic SNRs as well as those in the LMC are essential to the understanding
606: of their true nature and their implications for the evolution of the Galaxy.
607: Meanwhile, deeper observations in both radio and X-ray are needed
608: for a detailed investigation of the PWN candidate of \xs.
609:
610: \section{Summary and Conclusion}
611:
612: We have conducted the spatial and spectral analysis
613: of the X-ray faint SNR DA~530, based chiefly on a \chandra\
614: ACIS-I observation. We have detected a small-scale, extended, hard X-ray
615: feature near the remnant center. Its X-ray characteristics,
616: as well as the spatial coincidence with a radio continuum emission peak,
617: strongly suggests that the feature is a PWN associated with \xs.
618:
619: \xs\ appears to be a SNR with a well-defined radio continuum
620: shell and an apparently centrally-filled thermal X-ray morphology, i.e. the
621: so-called thermal composite SNR.
622: The diffuse X-ray emission from the interior of the remnant is weak
623: and shows spectral characteristics of an optically-thin thermal
624: plasma over-abundant in silicon. The inferred low mass and energy in
625: this plasma suggest that the explosion energy is $< 10^{50}\erg$.
626: The near collisional
627: ionization equilibrium of the plasma further suggests that the SN ejecta
628: have been thermalized early in the evolution of the remnant, probably due to
629: the presence of a dense CSM produced by the SN progenitor.
630:
631: The presence of the PWN and the dense CSM, as well as the low explosion energy,
632: suggest a stellar progenitor with a mass probably in the range of $8-12\Msun$,
633: consistent with the observed HI bubble (L99).
634: As such, \xs\ provides evidence for a nearby
635: sub-energetic SN, which generates a pulsar and a remnant both of X-ray faint.
636:
637: \acknowledgements
638: We thank Zhen-ru Wang, Xiangdong Li, Zhiyuan Li, Yang Su, and Jiangtao Li for
639: helpful discussions and Michael D. Stage for many useful comments.
640: Y.C.\ acknowledges the support from NSFC grants 10673003 and 10221001,
641: while Q.D.W.\ acknowledges the support from NASA/CXC under the grant NAG5-6057X.
642:
643:
644: \begin{references}
645: \reference{}
646: \reference{} Bamba, A. Ueno, M., Koyama, K., \& Yamauchi, S. 2003, ApJ, 589, 253
647: \reference{} Becker, W., Kramer, M., Jessner, A., Taam, R. E., Jia, J. J., Cheng, K. S., Mignani, R., Pellizzoni, A., de Luca, A., Slowikowska, A., \& Caraveo, P. A., 2006, \apj, 645, 1421
648: \reference{} Borkowski, K., Hendrick, S. P., \& Reynolds, S. P. 2006, \apj, 652, 1259
649: \reference{} Brighenti, F.,\& D'Ercole, A. 1994, MNRAS, 270, 65
650: \reference{} Burrows, D. N., \& GPO, Z. 1994, ApJ, 421, L19
651: \reference{} Cash, W. 1979, \apj, 228, 939
652: \reference{} Chen, Y., Su, Y., Slane, P., \& Wang, Q.-D. 2004, \apj, 616, 885
653: \reference{} Chugai, N. N., \& Utrobin, V. P., 2000, A\&A, 354, 557
654: \reference{} Condon, J. J., Cotton, W. D., Greisen, E. W., Yin, Q. F., Perley, R. A., Taylor, G. B., \& Broderick, J. J. 1998, AJ, 115, 1693
655: \reference{fei02} Feigelson, E., et~al. 2002, \apj, 574, 258
656: \reference{} Foster, T., \& Routledge, D. 2003, \apj, 598, 1005
657: \reference{} Gaensler, B. M., \& Slane, P. 2006 ARA\&A, 44, 17
658: %\reference{} Gelfand, J. D., Gaensler, B. M., Slane, P. O., Patnaude, D. J., Hughes, J. P., Camilo, F., 2007, astro-ph/0704.0219
659: \reference{} Gotthelf, E. V. 2003, \apj, 591, 361
660: \reference{} Gotthelf, E. V. 2004, Young Neutron Stars and Their Environments, IAU Symposium no. 218
661: \reference{} Hachisu, I., Kato, M., \& Nomoto, K., 1996, ApJ, 470, 97L
662: \reference{} Hachisu, I., \& Kato, M. 2003, ApJ, 598, 527
663: \reference{} Jha, S., Branch, D., Chormock, R., Foley, R. J., Li, W., Swift, B. J., Casebeer, D., \& Filippenko, A. V. 2006, AJ, 132, 189
664: \reference{} Kaplan, D.\ L., Frail, D.\ A., \& Gaensler, B.\ M. 2004, \apjs, 153, 269
665: \reference{} Kawasaki, M., Ozaki, M., Nagase, F., Inoue, H., \& Petre, R. 2005, \apj, 631, 935
666: \reference{} King, A. R., Pringle, J. E., \& Wickramasinghe, D. T. 2001, MNRAS, 320, L45
667: \reference{} Kitaura, F. S., Janka, H.-Th., \& Hillebrandt, W. 2006, A\&A, 450, 345
668: \reference{} Landecker, T.\ L., Routledge, D., Reynolds, S.\ P., Smegal, R.\ J., Borkowski, K.\ J., \& Seward, F.\ D.\ 1999, \apj, 527, 866 (L99)
669: \reference{} Lazendic, J. S., \& Slane, P. O. 2006, \apj, 647, 350
670: \reference{} Lorimer, D. R., Lyne, A. G., \& Camilo, F. 1998, A\&A, 331, 1002
671: \reference{} Nomoto, K., Spars, W.M., Fesen, R.A., et~al. 1982, Nature, 299, 803
672: \reference{} Nomoto, K., 1987, \apj, 322, 206
673: \reference{} Pastorello, A., Zampieri, L., Turatto, M., Cappellaro, E., Meikle, W.P.S., Benetti, S., Branch, D., Baron, E., Patat, F., Armstrong, M., Altavilla, G., Salvo, M., \& Riello, M. 2004, MNRAS, 347, 74
674: \reference{} Roger, R. S., \& Costain, C. H. 1976, A\&A, 51, 151
675: \reference{} Rengelink, R.B., Tang, Y., A.G. de Bruyn, Miley, G.K., Bremer, M.N., R篓ttgering, H.J.A., \& Bremer, M.A.R., 1997, A\&A Supplement Ser., 124, 259
676: \reference{} Rudie, G. C, \& Fesen, R. A., 2007, astro-ph/0704.2780
677: \reference{} Saio, H., \& Nomoto, K. 1985, \apj, 150, L21
678: \reference{} Sedov, L.\ I.\ 1959, Similarity and Dimensional Methods
679: in Mechanics (New York: Academic)
680: \reference{} Seward, F. D. \& Wang, Z.-R.\ 1988, \apj, 332, 199
681: \reference{} Shelton, R. L., Kuntz, K. D. \& Petre, R. 2004a, \apj, 611, 906
682: \reference{} Smartt, S. J., Maund, J. R., Hendry, Margaret, A., Tout, C. A., Gilmore, G. F., Mattila, S., \& Benn, C. R., 2004, Science, 303, 499
683: \reference{} Snow, T.P.Jr. 1982, \apj, 253, L39
684: \reference{} Stanford, S. A., Romer, A. K., Sabirli, K., Davidson, M., Hilton, M.,
685: Viana, P. T. P., Collins, C. A., Kay, S. T., Liddle, A., R., Mann, R. G., Miller, C. J.,
686: Nichol, R. C., West, M. J., Conselice, C., J., Spinrad, H., Stern, D., Bundy, K., 2006,
687: \apj, 646, L13
688: \reference{} Wang, Q. D. 2004, \apj, 612, 159
689: \reference{} Wang, Q. D., Li, Z. Y., \& Begelman, M. C., 1993, Nature, 364, 127
690: \reference{} Yancopoulos, S., Hamilton, T. T., \& Helfand, D. J., 1994, \apj, 429, 832
691: \reference{} Zampieri, L., Pastorello, A, Turatto, M., Cappellaro, E., Benetti, S., Altavilla, G., Mazzali, P., \& Hamuy, M. 2003, MNRAS, 338, 711
692: \reference{}
693: \end{references}
694:
695: \clearpage
696:
697: \begin{deluxetable}{l|cccccccccc}
698: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
699: \tablecaption{Spectral fit results of \xs}
700: \tablewidth{0pt}
701: \tablehead{
702: \colhead{parameter} \vline &
703: \colhead{free $\NH$} & \colhead{fixed $\NH$}
704: }
705: \startdata
706: $\NH$ ($10^{21}\cm^{-2}$) & $1.5^{+1.1}_{-0.1}$ & $5.7^{\rm a}$ \\
707: \\
708: $kT_x$ (keV) & $0.54_{-0.09}^{+0.07}$ & $0.34^{+0.17}_{-0.03}$ \\
709: {[Si/H]} & $13^{+9}_{-5}$ & $13^{+12}_{-6}$ \\
710: $n_e t_i$ ($\cm^{-3}\,{\rm s}$) & $2\E{12}(>4\E{11})$ & $6(>1)\E{11}$ \\
711: $\int\nel\nH\,dV/\du^{2}$ ($10^{55}\cm^{-3}$)$^{\rm b}$
712: & $1.4^{+0.8}_{-0.7}$ & $9.8^{+7.0}_{-5.2}$ \\
713: \\
714: $F^{(0)}(0.5-10\keV)$ ($\erg\cm^{-2}\ps$) & $7.7\E{-13}$ & $5.1\E{-12}$ \\
715: $\chi^{2}/$d.o.f & 73/72 & 83/73 \\
716: \enddata
717: \tablecomments{Based on the spectral fits to the interior diffuse X-ray emission of
718: \xs\ with an absorbed {\em vpshock} model. Parameter errors are quoted at the
719: 90\% confidence.}
720: \tablenotetext{a}{\phantom{0}The total hydrogen column density along the line of sight
721: adopted from the observations of atomic and molecular gas (L99).}
722: \tablenotetext{b}{\phantom{0}The volume emission measure.}
723: \end{deluxetable}
724:
725: \clearpage
726:
727: \begin{deluxetable}{l|cccccccccc}
728: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
729: \tablecaption{Physical parameters of \xs}
730: \tablewidth{0pt}
731: \tablehead{
732: \colhead{parameter} \vline &
733: \colhead{free $\NH$ (1.5)} & \colhead{fixed $\NH (5.7)$}
734: }
735:
736: \startdata
737: $\rmsn\du^{1/2}f^{1/2}$ ($10^{-2}\cm^{-3}$)$^{\rm a}$ & $1.6^{+0.5}_{-0.4}$ & $4.3^{+1.5}_{-1.1}$ \\
738: M$\ \du^{-5/2}f^{-1/2}\ (\Msun)$ & $1.7^{+0.5}_{-0.4}$ & $4.5^{+1.6}_{-1.2}$ \\
739: M$_{\rm Si}\ \du^{-5/2}f^{-1/2}\ (\Msun)$ & $0.01^{+0.01}_{-0.01}$ & $0.04^{+0.04}_{-0.02}$\\
740: $v_s$ ($\km\ps$) & $670^{+45}_{-60}$ & $530^{+130}_{-26}$ \\
741: $E_{th}\du^{-2}f^{-1/2}$ (ergs) & $4.3^{+1.4}_{-1.3}\E{48}$ & $1.1^{+0.6}_{-0.2}\E{49}$\\
742: $E\du^{-5/2}f^{1/2}$ (ergs)$^{\rm b}$
743: & $1.1^{+0.4}_{-0.3}\E{49}$ & $2.9^{+1.5}_{-0.4}\E{49}$ \\
744: $t\du^{-1}$ ($\yr$)$^{\rm b}$
745: & $5200^{+460}_{-350}$ & $6600^{+300}_{-1600}$ \\
746: \enddata
747: \tablecomments{The parameters are estimated from the spectral fit results
748: in Table~1. Errors are propogated from the confidence ranges of the temperature,
749: the abundance, and the emission measure. }
750: \tablenotetext{a}{\phantom{0}$f$ denotes the volume filling factor of the hot gas.}
751: \tablenotetext{b}{\phantom{0}inferred from the Sedov modeling.}
752: \end{deluxetable}
753:
754: \clearpage
755:
756: \begin{figure}
757: \centerline{ {\hfil\hfil
758: \includegraphics[height=5.5in,angle=0, clip=]{f1.eps}
759: \hfil\hfil}}
760: \caption{
761: The field of view of the \chandra\ ACIS observation of SNR~DA~530, compared with
762: its outer boundary as outlined by a single 1420 MHz continuum intensity
763: contour at 2 mJy beam$^{-1}$ (L99).
764: Detected point-like sources (Fig.~3) have been excluded.
765: The regions are used to extract spectra (see text in \S 3).
766: ``S" marks the region for the extended hard X-ray feature.
767: }
768: \end{figure}
769:
770: \begin{figure}
771: \centerline{ {\hfil\hfil
772: \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth,angle=0, clip=]{f2.eps}
773: \hfil\hfil}}
774: \caption{
775: \chandra\ ACIS-I intensity image of DA~530 in 0.5--8 keV band, compared with
776: the intensity contours of the \rosat\ PSPC, which are
777: spaced at 1.4, 1.65, 1.9, 2.45, 3, 3.6, 4.1, 5.9 and 30
778: $\E{-5} \,{\rm photons}\cm^{-2}\ps\,\mbox{pixel}^{-1}$.
779: Both intensities have been exposure-corrected and smoothed using the
780: CIAO tool {\em csmooth} to achieve a S/N ratio of 2.5--3.5.
781: \chandra\ data are background-subtracted.
782: The same radio outer boundary (grey line) as in Fig.~1 is shown.
783: }
784: \end{figure}
785:
786: \begin{figure}
787: \centerline{ {\hfil\hfil
788: \includegraphics[height=5.5in,angle=0, clip=]{f3.eps}
789: \hfil\hfil}}
790: \caption{
791: Combined diffuse ACIS-I intensity images of DA~530 in 0.5--0.8 keV bands.
792: The contributions of the non-X-ray background and the detected point sources
793: are subtracted.
794: 18 sources listed in Kaplan et~al.\ (2004) are marked with pluses
795: as well as 30 new ones with crosses.
796: The superimposed 0.5--2 keV intensity contours are
797: at 1.9, 2.19, 2.3, 2.5, 3.0 and 3.5 $\E{-3}$ cts $\cm^{-2}$s$^{-1}$ arcmin$^{-2}$.
798: The central bright extended feature is marked with two ticks.
799: }
800: \end{figure}
801:
802: \begin{figure}
803: \centerline{ {\hfil\hfil
804: \includegraphics[height=4.0in,angle=0, clip=]{f4.eps}
805: \hfil\hfil}}
806: \caption{
807: The on-SNR spectra of DA~530 (black) and the local background (grey).
808: Also shown are the best-fit model of on-SNR spectrum (solid lines)
809: consisted of the free $\NH$ {\em vpshock} model (see Table~1; diffuse emission)
810: and a power-law ($\Gamma\sim2$; sky background).
811: The two individual components are also plotted seperately with broken lines.
812: The residuals of the fit are shown in the lower panel.
813: }
814: \end{figure}
815:
816: \begin{figure}
817: \centerline{ {\hfil\hfil
818: \includegraphics[height=5.5in,angle=0, clip=]{f5.eps}
819: \hfil\hfil}}
820: \caption{
821: The radial ACIS-I intensity profile of the central bright feature (crosses
822: with error bars) compared with the ACIS-I 0.5-8 keV PSF (solid line) at the same
823: position, to show the extension of the feature. The data of
824: the feature are exposure-corrected and are adaptively binned to achieve a
825: count-to-noise ratio greater than 3 for the first point and 5 for outer
826: points.
827: The PSF is simulated with
828: {\sl MARX} (v4.2.1), normalized to the total net flux of the source and
829: presented together with the adopted local background estimated from the
830: intensity profile in the $1'-1.5'$ annulus.
831: Dashed line represents a fit to the intensity profile with $I=0.035 e^{-r/0.1}+0.0053$.
832: }
833: \end{figure}
834:
835: \begin{figure}
836: \centerline{ {\hfil\hfil
837: \includegraphics[height=4.0in,angle=270, clip=]{f6.eps}
838: \hfil\hfil}}
839: \caption{
840: The ACIS-I spectrum of the central extended feature, together with the
841: best-fit power-law model with fixed $\NH=5.7\E{21}\cm^{-2}$ and $\Gamma=1.6$.
842: The counts are grouped to have the count-to-noise ratio $>$ 3 per bin.
843: }
844: \end{figure}
845:
846: \begin{figure}
847: \centerline{ {\hfil\hfil
848: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth,angle=0, clip=]{f7a.eps}
849: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth,angle=0, clip=]{f7b.eps}
850: \hfil\hfil}}
851: \caption{
852: {\em Left}: The 1.4 GHz NRAO VLA Sky Survey intensity map, {\em Right}:
853: the 325~MHz Westerbork Northern Sky Survey intensity map. The scales are linear.
854: The same 0.5-2 keV intensity contours as in Fig.~3 except for the highest level,
855: are overlaid to show
856: the position correspondence of the PWN candidate (marked by two sticks)
857: with the radio source.
858: }
859: \end{figure}
860:
861: \end{document}
862:
863: