1: %% July 24, 2007
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3:
4: \newcommand{\etal}{et~al.}
5:
6: \slugcomment{Accepted for publication in AJ}
7:
8: \shorttitle{Star Clusters in M33}
9: \shortauthors{Park and Lee}
10:
11: \begin{document}
12:
13: \title{A Catalog of New M33 Star Clusters Based on the HST/WFPC2 Images}
14:
15: \author{Won-Kee Park and Myung Gyoon Lee}
16:
17: \affil{Astronomy Program, Department of Physics and Astronomy,
18: Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea}
19: \email{wkpark@astro.snu.ac.kr, mglee@astrog.snu.ac.kr}
20:
21: \begin{abstract}
22: We present the result of a survey for star clusters in M33 using the HST/WFPC2
23: archive images.
24: We have found 104 star clusters, including 32 new ones, in the
25: images of 24 fields that were not included in the previous
26: studies. Combining these with previous data in the literature, we increase the
27: number of M33 star clusters found in the HST images to 242.
28: We have derived $BVI$ integrated photometry of these star clusters from the CCD
29: images taken with CFH12k mosaic camera at CFHT.
30: Integrated color-magnitude diagrams of the M33 star clusters
31: are found to be similar in general to those of star clusters in the Large Magellanic Cloud,
32: except that M33 has a much lower fraction of blue star clusters.
33: We find 29 red star clusters with $0.5 \leq (B-V)_0 \leq 1.1$ and $0.7\leq(V-I)_0\leq1.2$,
34: which are old globular cluster candidates.
35: We divide the cluster sample into three groups according to their $(B-V)_0$ color:
36: blue star clusters with $(B-V)_0 \leq 0.3$,
37: intermediate color star clusters with $0.3<(B-V)_0<0.5$, and
38: red star clusters with $(B-V)_0 \geq 0.5$.
39: Most of the new clusters in M33
40: are located along the sequence that is consistent with
41: the theoretical evolutionary path
42: for $Z=0.004$, $Y=0.24$ in the $(B-V)_0$--$(V-I)_0$ diagram, while a few of them are
43: in the redder side in the $(V-I)_0$ color.
44: The red clusters are found relatively more
45: in the outer region of M33 than the blue and intermediate color clusters, and that
46: many of the blue stars are located in the HII regions.
47: The luminosity function for the blue star clusters shows a peak at
48: $M_V \approx -7.3$ mag,
49: while that for the intermediate color star cluster shows a peak at the fainter magnitude $M_V \approx -6.3$ mag.
50: The luminosity function for the red star clusters shows also a peak at $M_V \approx -6.8$ mag,
51: although the number of the clusters is small.
52:
53: \end{abstract}
54:
55: \keywords{galaxies: clusters --- galaxies: individual (M33) ---
56: galaxies: photometry --- galaxies: star clusters}
57:
58:
59: \section{Introduction}
60:
61: Star clusters are an important tool for understanding the formation and evolution of
62: a galaxy. Being an aggregate of many stars, they are bright enough to be observed at
63: great distances.
64: They span a very broad range of age,
65: from a few Myrs to more than 10 Gyrs, encapsulating the whole history of a galaxy.
66: Age distribution of star clusters in
67: a galaxy tells us about the formation and destruction history of the clusters and
68: about the evolution of the galaxy as well.
69: Spatial distribution of the star clusters delineates the structure of a galaxy,
70: and their velocity distribution reveals the kinematics of stellar population and the
71: mass of the host galaxy.
72:
73: Recent studies for star clusters in nearby late type galaxies have
74: revealed details of the star clusters,
75: showing that the populations of star clusters are diverse among the galaxies
76: (see \citet{lee06} and references therein).
77: Local Group galaxies in the nearby universe are ideal targets, due to their
78: proximity, for studying in detail the properties of star clusters.
79: There are three spiral galaxies in the Local Group: our Galaxy, M31 and M33.
80: While star clusters in our Galaxy and M31 have been extensively studied,
81: the star clusters in M33 received relatively less attention.
82:
83: M33 (=NGC 598), the Triangulum galaxy, is a late type spiral galaxy (Scd).
84: It is located at $\sim 910$ kpc from us \citep{kim02}.
85: Its large angular size and inclination of $i = 56\arcdeg $
86: \citep{zar89} make it particularly suitable for studies of its stellar contents.
87: Its mass, $M \sim 5\times10^{10} M_{\odot}$ \citep{cor03}, falls in the intermediate
88: range among the Local Group galaxies.
89:
90: Surveys for star cluster in M33 have been rather sporadic. Early photometric surveys
91: by \citet{hil60} and \citet{km60} identified about 25 star cluster candidates.
92: \citet{md78} reported the discovery of 58 possible star
93: cluster candidates, including most of the objects studied by \citet{hil60}.
94: \citet{cs82} presented the most comprehensive catalog of
95: 250 non-stellar objects in M33, including $BVR$ photometry of 60 star cluster candidates.
96: Later \citet{cs88} presented $BVI$ photometry
97: for 71 additional star cluster candidates.
98: All these surveys were based on the photographic plates so that they were
99: limited rather to the outer part of M33.
100:
101: The first survey for M33 star clusters based on CCD imaging was given by
102: \citet{moc98} using the $BVI$ images from DIRECT project \citep{kal98, sta98}.
103: They presented a list of 51 globular cluster candidates. While they covered the central region
104: of M33 where previous surveys could not examine in detail, their survey was limited to the
105: bright star clusters of $V \lesssim 19$ mag, and did not cover the entire area of M33.
106:
107: The Hubble Space Telescope (HST) offers a great advantage over the ground-based
108: telescopes for star cluster survey in M33.
109: At the distance of M33, star clusters can be easily identified without ambiguity
110: with HST images.
111: Therefore, star cluster samples from HST images are much less likely to be
112: contaminated by other extended sources such as a background galaxy or an H II region.
113: \citet{cha99a, cha01}
114: searched for star clusters in M33 with HST data for the first time.
115: They reported a discovery of 162 star clusters including 131 previously unknown ones
116: in the 55 fields of HST/WFPC2 images. Recently, \citet{bed05}
117: have found 33 star clusters and 51 possible candidates from the $F775W(I)$ image of one
118: HST/ACS field.
119: \citet{sar07a} also reported a discovery of 24 star clusters
120: including 11 new ones from the $VI$ images of two HST/ACS fields in M33.
121:
122: However, the areas of M33 covered by the previous HST-based surveys are much smaller
123: than the entire area of M33. Therefore, it is needed to increase the number of HST fields
124: to make as complete a sample of star clusters as possible.
125: The sample of star clusters established from the HST images also serves as a template
126: for ground-based star cluster surveys.
127:
128: We searched for new M33 star clusters using the additional HST/WFPC2 images that
129: became available after \citet{cha01}'s work.
130: We combined our result with previous M33 star cluster catalogs based on the HST images
131: \citep{cha99a, cha01, bed05, sar07a}, and obtained homogeneous $BVI$ photometry
132: for the star clusters from the deep CCD imaging data taken at the Canada-France-Hawaii-Telescope
133: (CFHT) (Park et al. 2007, in preparation)
134:
135: In this paper, we present the result of M33 star cluster survey with the HST/WFPC2
136: images. Throughout this paper, we will refer the star clusters from the catalog of
137: \citet{bed05} with B designation, and ones from \citet{cha99a, cha01} with CBF.
138: CS designation means the star clusters from \citet{cs82, cs88}, MKKSS designation
139: means the ones from \citet{moc98}, MD the ones from \citet{md78}. Finally, SBGHS
140: designation means the star clusters from \citet{sar07a}.
141:
142: The paper is composed as follows.
143: Section 2 describes the HST/WFPC2 and CFHT data used in this study.
144: In Section 3, star
145: cluster search method and the integrated photometry procedures on CFHT images are
146: described. Section 4 presents various properties of the star clusters:
147: Color-magnitude diagrams (CMD), Color-color diagrams (CCD), and spatial distribution of star clusters.
148: Finally, summary and conclusion are given in the last section.
149:
150: \section{Cluster Selection and Photometry}
151:
152: \subsection{Cluster Selection}
153: We used WFPC2 images of M33 in the HST archive that were not used in the
154: previous studies by \citet{cha99a, cha01}.
155: The images were obtained using various filter combinations of $F300W$, $F336W(U)$,
156: $F436W(B)$, $F555W$, $F606W(V)$, and $F814W(I)$. We selected images only with exposure
157: times longer than 100 sec either in $V$ or $I$. The number of fields thus selected
158: is 24, as listed in Table~\ref{fld_list}. The locations of the fields are displayed on
159: Fig.~\ref{fld_location}, along with the locations of HST/WFPC2 fields for previous star
160: cluster surveys \citep{cha99a, cha01}.
161: Nine of our fields are partially overlapped with previous survey regions.
162: HST/WFPC2 image sets used by \citet{cha99a, cha01} were also downloaded from the archive, and
163: images of previously known star clusters on these image sets were utilized as references for
164: the visual search on the new image sets.
165:
166: Bright star clusters in M33 are easily resolved on the HST/WFPC2 images so that
167: we selected star clusters using visual inspection of each image.
168: We considered extended objects with the hint of resolved stars as star clusters.
169:
170: Since the HST/WFPC2 image sets used in this study have different depths, and they cover
171: different environments in M33 with different filters, we could not put a completeness limit
172: of the survey for each image. The detection of star
173: clusters depends not only on the brightness of the star clusters, but also
174: on their sizes, morphologies, and environments.
175: Experience from the visual investigation tells us that star clusters with
176: $V \leq 20$ can be identified in the shallowest images of the
177: current HST/WFPC2 image sets.
178:
179: From the investigation of HST/WFPC2 fields, we have found 104 star clusters,
180: 32 of which are new ones.
181: The 32 new star clusters are listed in Table~\ref{newcl_list},
182: and their $V$-band grayscale images are shown in Fig.~\ref{newcl}.
183: During the investigation, we identified eight CBF star clusters that were
184: redundantly identified and registered under two different IDs: CBF-15 (CBF-45),
185: CBF-20 (CBF-126), CBF-22 (CBF-91), CBF-53 (CBF-87), CBF-54 (CBF-85), CBF-56
186: (CBF-156), CBF-59 (CBF-95), and CBF-60 (CBF-94). The two star clusters in each
187: pair have not only similar coordinates, but also similar $V$ magnitudes with
188: differences $<0.2$ mag.
189: We inspected carefully the HST/WFPC2 images of the regions where eight pairs
190: are located, and we found neither two star clusters of similar magnitudes in
191: the regions, nor any possible substructures (i.e. multiple OB groups in a
192: cluster) in the clusters that \citet{cha99a, cha01} might have recognized as
193: two separate star clusters. Therefore, we regard these eight cases as
194: redundant identifications of the same star cluster.
195: Throughout this paper, we will present the total number of CBF
196: samples as 154 instead of 162. From these 154 CBF samples, we identified 45 star
197: clusters on our image sets.
198:
199: One of our fields partially overlaps the region where \citet{bed05} searched for
200: star clusters with an HST/ACS image, where they found 33 star clusters and 51 star
201: cluster candidates. 14 star clusters and 18 star cluster candidates fall on
202: our HST/WFPC2 image. We could identify 13 star clusters except cluster ID 15 in \citet{bed05}'s
203: list that seems to be too faint to be seen on our $F606W$ image. We also inspected the 18 star
204: cluster candidates on our image. However, they are so compact in size that it was impossible
205: to tell whether they are star clusters, except for cluster ID 83 in \citet{bed05}'s list.
206: We classified this one as a star cluster after careful inspection of the image.
207:
208: In addition, we found that 12 star cluster candidates from previous ground-based surveys
209: \citep{cs82, moc98, md78}
210: are real star clusters. The coordinates, photometric properties, and cross identification
211: among the various studies for these 71 previously known clusters are listed in Table~\ref{othercl_list}.
212:
213: We make a catalog of 242 star clusters in M33, combining our result with the previous
214: results based on HST-based surveys \citep{cha99a,cha01, bed05, sar07a}.
215: It is the largest catalog of M33 star clusters available to date which includes only
216: the star clusters confirmed in the HST images.
217: It consists of 32 newly found star clusters in this study,
218: 12 previous star cluster candidates that were confirmed to be the genuine ones in this
219: study, 154 star clusters from \citet{cha99a, cha01}, 32 star clusters
220: out of 33 star clusters in \citet{bed05}, one star cluster from the star
221: cluster candidate list of \citet{bed05}, and 11 new star clusters from the list of
222: \citet{sar07a}.
223: The positions and the photometry of all M33 star clusters not
224: included in Tables~\ref{newcl_list} and \ref{othercl_list} are listed in Table~\ref{prevcl_list}.
225:
226: \subsection{Photometry}
227:
228:
229: All star clusters in the combined catalog were observed with HST in different
230: conditions with different purpose. The combination of the filters used for the
231: HST observation varies depending on the field.
232: To secure homogeneous photometry data for all clusters,
233: we used the integrated photometry of these clusters derived
234: from the ground-based images given in Park et al. (2007, in preparation)
235: instead of deriving the photometry from the HST images.
236:
237: Park et al. (2007) presented $BVI$ integrated aperture photometry of clusters and cluster
238: candidates in the $50\arcmin \times 80\arcmin$ field of M33
239: based on the CCD images taken with
240: CFH12k mosaic camera at the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT).
241: The typical seeing of the data is $\sim 0.9$ arcsec for all filters, and the
242: point sources of $V\sim23$ can be measured with errors smaller than $0.1$.
243: Details of the photometry are given in Park et al. (2007), and
244: we give a brief description here.
245:
246: Examination of an aperture growth curve of isolated bright clusters
247: on CFH12k CCD images indicates that most
248: of star cluster light is contained within the aperture of $r \approx 4$ arcsec.
249: However, using such an aperture would cause a large scatter in the measurement of some clusters,
250: because star clusters are often located in the crowded field
251: in M33 so that some neighbor objects happen to be inside the same aperture.
252: For this reason, we used an aperture of $r=2$ arcsec for the measurement of color, although
253: the aperture of $r = 4$ arcsec was used for $V$ magnitude measurement to measure the total light of
254: the star clusters.
255:
256: Some of the star clusters we missed happened to fall on the gaps between the chips in mosaic
257: camera, and some of them happen to be located in so crowded a region that we could not
258: derive their photometry from the CFHT images.
259:
260: To supplement the photometry data for star clusters that could not be measured with CFH12k
261: data, aperture photometry was carried out on the HST/WFPC2 images.
262: We made photometry on the fields that were observed with more than two filters since
263: instrumental magnitude cannot be converted to standard system without color information.
264: For most of fields, two HST/WFPC2 images of identical pointings exist per filter.
265: Fields observed with only one exposure were not included in the measurement.
266: Two images were combined with COMBINE task in IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the
267: National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated by the Association of Universities
268: for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science
269: Foundation} with CRREJECT option to remove the cosmic rays.
270: Cosmetic defects were masked with data quality images that accompany the scientific
271: images.
272: The centers of the clusters were determined visually with IRAF/IMEXAMINE task. Then
273: IRAF/PHOT task was used to measure the instrumental magnitudes of star clusters on the
274: combined images.
275: To be consistent with previous HST-based studies \citep{cha99a, cha01, sar07a},
276: aperture of $r=2.2$ arcsec was adopted for the magnitude measurement, while aperture of
277: $r=1.0$ arcsec for color measurement. Local median values were measured as sky background
278: level in the annulus of inner radius of $r=3.5$ arcsec and outer radius of $r=5.0$ arcsec
279: around each star cluster.
280: The CTE correction was applied to the instrumental magnitudes according to the prescription
281: given at Dolphin (2002)'s web site\footnote{\url{http://purcell.as.arizona.edu/wfpc2\_calib/}}.
282: However, we did not correct for the geometrical distortions in the WFPC2 CCD. The instrumental
283: magnitudes were converted to standard system using the relation also found at the same web site
284: iteratively.
285: In the end, we derived the photometry of 227 out of 242 star clusters with both CFH12k
286: and HST/WFPC2 images.
287:
288: We compared our photometry of the clusters with previous photometry.
289: There are 154 clusters in common with \citet{cha99a, cha01},
290: 16 clusters in common with \citet{cs82},
291: 12 clusters in common with \citet{moc98},
292: and 11 clusters in common with \citet{sar07a}.
293: Note that all photometry was carried
294: out with different aperture sizes:
295: \citet{cha99a, cha01} and \citet{sar07a} used nominal aperture
296: of $r = 2.2$ arcsec for magnitude measurement,
297: while \citet{cs82, cs88} used apertures
298: of $r=2.4$ and $r=3.7$ arcsec, respectively.
299: \citet{moc98} used an aperture of $r=2.88$ arcsec.
300: However, aperture sizes in all cases were determined to contain as much as possible the
301: light from a star cluster, so the
302: resultant aperture magnitudes for a star cluster should be more or less the same.
303:
304: Fig.~\ref{photdiff} shows the comparison of our photometry of the clusters
305: with previous photometry.
306: Large scatter made it difficult to see the difference in magnitude, but for bright
307: star clusters ($V \leq 19$), there is little magnitude differences between this
308: and other studies:
309: $\Delta V$(this study--\citet{cha99a, cha01}) $= -0.04$ with $\sigma = 0.19$,
310: $\Delta V$(this study--\citet{moc98}) $= -0.04$ with $\sigma = 0.17$,
311: $\Delta V$(this study--\citet{cs82, cs88}) $= 0.00$ with $\sigma = 0.10$, and
312: $\Delta V$(this study--\citet{sar07a}) $= -0.04$ with $\sigma = 0.12$, respectively.
313: For fainter sources, however, our measurements get systematically fainter than
314: the other space based measurements.
315: Given that most of the star clusters are located in the region near the M33 center
316: where crowding is severe and sky varies significantly, the sky background level
317: was likely to be overestimated in ground-based images due to the unresolved faint
318: stars, which would lead to a fainter estimation of source brightness.
319:
320: Both the $(B-V)$ and $(V-I)$ colors show good agreement with all the previous studies
321: down to the faintest magnitude in our samples. The differences between this study
322: and other photometry are
323: $\Delta(B-V)$(this study--\citet{cha99a, cha01})$= -0.05$ with $\sigma = 0.20$,
324: $\Delta(V-I)$(this study--\citet{cha99a, cha01})$= -0.01$ with $\sigma = 0.10$,
325: $\Delta(B-V)$(this study--\citet{moc98})$= 0.06$ with $\sigma = 0.10$,
326: $\Delta(V-I)$(this study--\citet{moc98})$= 0.08$ with $\sigma = 0.22$,
327: $\Delta(B-V)$(this study--\citet{cs82, cs88})$= 0.04 $ with $\sigma = 0.08$,
328: and $\Delta(V-I)$(this study--\citet{sar07a})$ = -0.04 $ with $\sigma = 0.08$.
329: The only exception to this tendency is the $(V-I)$ difference between ours and those of
330: \citet{cs82, cs88}, which turned out to be :
331: $\Delta(V-I)$(this study--\citet{cs82, cs88}) $= -0.16 $ with $\sigma = 0.10$.
332:
333: \subsection{Reddening}
334:
335: To get the intrinsic color of the star clusters, the photometric measurements
336: must be corrected for reddening.
337: We estimated the foreground reddening for each star cluster using the $(U-B)$--$(B-V)$ diagram
338: for early type stars in the field covering the cluster.
339: We used the $UBVRI$ photometry of stars in the area of M33 covered in the Local
340: Group Survey given by \citet{mas06}. The $E(B-V)$ derived for each cluster is listed in
341: the fourth column of Table~\ref{newcl_list}, \ref{othercl_list}, and \ref{prevcl_list}.
342:
343: $E(B-V)$ values we derived for M33 star clusters range from $\sim 0.05$ to $\sim 0.20$.
344: For about 130 star clusters, the value of $E(B-V)$ turned
345: out to be $E(B-V) = 0.1$, and for about 100 star clusters the values of $E(B-V)$ were found
346: to be $E(B-V) \geq 0.15$.
347: \citet{cha99b} obtained $E(B-V)$ toward their 60 star clusters either from the
348: photometry of neighboring individual stars by applying reddening free parameters or by using
349: $E(B-V)$ values from \citet{mas95}. The $E(B-V)$ values range $0.06\sim0.33$, and most of them
350: are found to be $0.10$. \citet{sar00} also derived reddening for their
351: 10 globular cluster samples from the shapes of the red giant branches (RGB) in the
352: color-magnitude diagrams of resolved stars. Their $E(V-I)$ estimates are below $0.1$, except
353: for $E(V-I)=0.25\pm0.03$ for Cluster ID 131 (=CS-H10). \citet{sar07a} also obtained $E(V-I)$
354: for 17 star clusters in the same way as \citet{sar00}, which $E(V-I)$ ranges from $0.10
355: \sim 0.45$.
356:
357: Since our error in $E(B-V)$ measurement is as large as $\sim 0.05$, it is quite difficult
358: to see the consistency between our result and other results. But the fact that $E(B-V)$
359: distribution shows peak at $E(B-V) \sim 0.10$, a typical value found in previous studies
360: \citep{cha99b}, indicated that the result obtained in this study is in general consistent
361: with previous studies.
362:
363:
364: \section{Result}
365:
366: \subsection{Color-magnitude diagram}
367:
368:
369: Fig.~\ref{cmd} displays the integrated $M_V - (B-V)_0$ and $M_V - (V-I)_0$
370: color-magnitude diagrams (CMD) of the star clusters in M33.
371: Absolute magnitudes of the star clusters were derived for the adopted
372: distance modulus of $(m - M)_0 = 24.8$ \citep{kim02} and
373: the visual extinction to reddening ratio $R_V= 3.31$ \citep{sch98}.
374: For comparison, we display the CMD for the star clusters in the LMC
375: \citep{bic96} in the panel (c),
376: and the CMDs for the open clusters \citep{lat02} and globular clusters
377: \citep{har96} in our Galaxy in panel (d).
378: We adopted
379: a value for the foreground reddening of $E(B-V) = 0.075$ \citep{sch98}
380: and the distance modulus of $(m - M)_0 = 18.5$ for the LMC clusters.
381:
382: Several features are noted in Fig.~\ref{cmd}.
383: First, the star clusters in all three galaxies are roughly separated into blue and red
384: groups with a color boundary of $(B-V)_0 \simeq 0.5$ in the $M_V - (B-V)_0$ CMD. However,
385: this separation for the M33 clusters in the $M_V - (V-I)_0$ CMD is not
386: as clear as in the $M_V - (B-V)_0$ CMD.
387: Second, the dominant population in M33 is blue clusters, as known before \citep{cs82, cha99b}.
388: Most of the new clusters found or the clusters confirmed in this study are also blue clusters.
389: Third,
390: the brightest blue clusters in M33 are as bright as $M_V \approx -9.0$ mag, which is similar
391: to the value for the Galactic open clusters, but about 1.5 magnitude fainter than
392: that for the LMC.
393: Fourth, the blue envelope for the blue clusters in M33 in the $M_V$--$(B-V)_0$ CMD is slightly
394: redder than that for the LMC blue clusters, as seen from the normalized $(B-V)_0$ color
395: histograms in the panel (a) and (c).
396: Fifth, there are only a small number of red clusters with $(B-V)_0>0.5$ in M33.
397: The $(B-V)_0$ color range of the red clusters in M33, $0.5<(B-V)_0<1.1$,
398: is similar to that for the Galactic globular clusters, but is much larger than
399: that for the LMC red clusters, $0.5<(B-V)_0<0.8$.
400: We found only one new red cluster, and confirmed two known red clusters.
401: Cluster ID 85 (ID 27 in \citet{moc98}), one of the two red clusters confirmed in this study,
402: happens to be the brightest ($M_V=-9.070$ and $(B-V)_0=0.575$) among the known red clusters
403: in M33. The reddest cluster is cluster ID 89, which has integrated colors
404: $(B-V)_0 = 1.579$, and $(V-I)_0 = 1.810$.
405:
406: It is interesting to note that there are only a few red star clusters that are fainter
407: than $M_V \sim -6.0$ in M33,
408: while there are many such faint red star clusters seen in the LMC.
409: The lack of faint red clusters in our catalog of M33 clusters
410: may be due to incompleteness of our cluster search
411: or may be an intrinsic feature of the M33 star cluster system.
412: While we selected HST/WFPC2 images on the basis of $V$ or $I$ exposure
413: times, many of resultant image sets were obtained with combinations of $V$
414: and shorter wavelength passbands such as $U$ and $B$,
415: rather than the combinations of $V$ and $I$.
416: So there is a possibility that our star cluster detection might have been biased
417: toward blue star clusters.
418: However, it may be an intrinsic feature, considering that \citet{cha01} already
419: showed that M33 red star clusters with $(V-I)_0 > 0.78$ has
420: log normal type luminosity function (LF),
421: while intermediate color clusters with $(V-I)_0 \leq 0.78$ show no turnover down to
422: the completeness limit in their LF.
423:
424:
425: \subsection{Color-color diagram}
426:
427: Fig.~\ref{ccd} shows the integrated $(B-V)_0$--$(V-I)_0$ color-color diagram (CCD)
428: of M33 star clusters, along with $(B-V)_0$ and $(V-I)_0$ histograms of M33 star clusters.
429: Galactic globular clusters are also plotted for comparison.
430: We overlaid the theoretical evolutionary path for the Single Stellar Population (SSP)
431: \citep{bru03} for $Z=0.004$, $Y=0.24$ that was reported to give the best overall fit to
432: their M33 star cluster samples which younger than $log(t) \leq 9.0$ \citep{cha99b}.
433: For comparison, evolutionary path of SSP for $Z=0.02$, $Y=0.28$ is also overlaid.
434:
435: Most of the new clusters in M33 including the ones from \citet{bed05}
436: are located along the sequence that is consistent with
437: the theoretical evolutionary path
438: for $Z=0.004$, $Y=0.24$, while a few of them are in the redder side in the
439: $(V-I)_0$ color.
440: This is similar to the case of previously known clusters in M33 and also
441: to the case of the star clusters in M51 \citep{hwa07}.
442: Some bright clusters among these redder clusters are consistent with the
443: theoretical evolutionary path for $Z=0.02$, $Y=0.28$. However, the rest of them
444: cannot be explained with any other models.
445: The continuous distribution of star clusters
446: along the model line indicates that M33 star clusters have been formed continuously from
447: the epoch of the first star cluster formation until recent time.
448:
449: The $(V-I)_0$ distribution
450: shows only one peak at $(V-I)_0 = 0.45$ and monotonically decrease
451: toward red end, while the $(B-V)_0$ distribution shows two distinct peaks
452: at $(B-V)_0 \sim 0.15$ and $(B-V)_0 \sim 0.55$.
453: The $(B-V)_0$ distribution is similar to that given by \citet{sar07b},
454: except that the red peak at $(B-V)_0 \sim 0.55$ in our result, is 0.1 bluer than
455: their result, $(B-V)_0 \sim 0.65$.
456: %while in their
457: %result it appears at $(B-V)_0 \sim 0.65$.
458: The blue peak corresponds to the age of $\sim 2\times10^8$ year and the red one to the age
459: of $\sim 1\times 10^9$ year, if we assume the metallicity of the star clusters, $Z=0.004$.
460:
461:
462: Based on the integrated photometry of the clusters,
463: we can select old globular cluster candidates from our catalog. The $(B-V)_0$ color
464: distribution shows the blue end of red star cluster population is located at $(B-V)_0 \sim 0.5$,
465: which is similar to that of Galactic globular clusters.
466: Although we do not see any similar red peak at $(V-I)_0$ color distribution of M33 star clusters,
467: it is reasonable to set the color criterion for $(V-I)_0$ color as well, in accordance with
468: the $(V-I)_0$ distribution of Galactic globular clusters.
469: The color ranges for most of Galactic globular clusters in Fig.~\ref{ccd} are
470: $0.5 \leq (B-V)_0 \leq 1.1$ and $0.7 \leq (V-I)_0 \leq 1.2$.
471: There are 29 star clusters with this color range
472: in our catalog, which are old globular cluster candidates in M33. Ten of them are
473: newly found in this study. The globular cluster candidates
474: are listed in Table.~\ref{gccand_list}, along with their integrated photometry and
475: cross identifications with previous catalogs.
476:
477: Nine out of ten globular clusters in \citet{sar00} satisfy our color selection
478: criterion.
479: One globular cluster, C38 in \citet{cs82} (=CBF-114), is not included because its color
480: $(V-I)_0 = 0.684$ is a little bluer than the blue limit of the criterion.
481: Our list of 29 globular cluster candidates also includes three oldest star clusters in the
482: list of \citet{sar07a}, clusters ID 58, 131, and 228
483: that are all estimated to be older than $log(t) \sim 9.8$.
484:
485: \subsection{Spatial distribution}
486:
487: We divided the M33 star cluster sample into three groups according to their $(B-V)_0$ color
488: for further analysis: blue star clusters with $(B-V)_0\leq0.3$ ,
489: intermediate color star clusters with $0.3<(B-V)_0<0.5$,
490: and red star clusters with $(B-V)_0\geq0.5$.
491: Fig.~\ref{spatial_dist} displays the spatial distribution of each color group.
492: We also plotted for comparison the locations of H II regions \citep{hod99}
493: that trace well the spiral arm structures of M33.
494: Since HST/WFPC2 observations covered in our catalog do not cover the entire area of M33,
495: the spatial distribution of star clusters cannot be used for the study of spatial
496: structure of the M33 cluster system.
497: Fig.~\ref{spatial_dist} shows that the red clusters are found relatively more
498: in the outer region of M33 than the blue and intermediate color clusters, and that
499: many of the blue stars are located in the HII regions.
500:
501:
502: Note the regions investigated in this study include three fields far east from M33 center
503: (See Fig.~\ref{fld_location} for locations of these fields.). Had any star clusters been
504: found in these regions, it would give a clue on the extent of star cluster system
505: in M33. However, no star clusters were found in these regions with our image sets.
506:
507: \subsection{Cluster luminosity function}
508:
509: With the largest sample of star clusters available, we derived the luminosity
510: function (LF) of star clusters, displaying it in Fig.~\ref{lf}(a).
511: Although we did not estimate the completeness of our survey, it appears that our survey is
512: reasonably complete for clusters brighter than $V \leq 19$. Therefore, only the bright part of
513: LF is considered in further discussion.
514:
515: In Fig.~\ref{lf}(a) the LF for the blue star clusters shows a peak at $M_V \approx -7.3$ mag,
516: and decreases as the magnitude gets fainter,
517: while the intermediate color star cluster LF shows a peak at the fainter magnitude $M_V \approx -6.3$ mag.
518: The LF for the red star clusters shows also a peak at
519: $M_V \approx -6.8$ mag, although the number of the clusters is small.
520:
521: We fitted the LFs for $V<19$ mag using a single Gaussian function,
522: obtaining
523: $M_V(\textrm{peak}) = -6.90\pm0.04$ mag and $\sigma (M_V ) = 1.96$ for the blue star clusters,
524: $M_V(\textrm{peak}) = -6.34\pm0.05$ mag and $\sigma (M_V ) = 1.53$ for the intermediate color star clusters, and
525: $M_V(\textrm{peak}) = -6.79\pm0.06$ mag and $\sigma (M_V ) = 1.39$ for the red star clusters.
526:
527: \citet{cha01} presented the LF of the M33 star clusters for two color groups:
528: $0.70<(V-I)_0<0.78$ (intermediate color star clusters)
529: and $0.78<(V-I)_0$ (red star clusters).
530: So we derived the cluster LFs for the same color
531: groups, as shown in Fig.~\ref{lf}(b). We also plotted the cluster LFs given by \citet{cha01}
532: in Fig.~\ref{lf}(c) for comparison. We adjusted the LFs given by \citet{cha01}
533: applying the same distance modulus for M33 (we adopted
534: $(m-M)_0= 24.80$, while \citet{cha01} adopted $(m-M)_0= 24.64$),
535: shifting the magnitude bins of \citet{cha01}'s LF 0.16 magnitude brighter.
536:
537: In Fig.~\ref{lf}(b) the LFs for the intermediate color and red star clusters derived
538: according to the $(V-I)_0$ color show peaks at
539: $M_V \approx -6.8$ mag, which is roughly similar to those
540: derived according to the $(B-V)_0$ color in Fig.~\ref{lf}(a).
541: However, the LFs for the intermediate color and red star clusters derived in this study are
542: somewhat different from those given by \citet{cha01} in Fig.~\ref{lf}(c).
543: Our LFs contain a larger number of faint star clusters than those given by \citet{cha01}.
544: The peak magnitude in the LF for the red star clusters derived
545: in this study is about 0.3 magnitude fainter
546: than that of \citet{cha01}, $M_V \approx -7.1$ mag, while
547: the peak magnitude in the LF for the intermediate color star clusters
548: in this study is similar to that of \citet{cha01}'s, $M_V \approx -6.7$ mag.
549:
550: \citet{cha01} sampled brighter star clusters more
551: than in our survey. \citet{cha01} combined their catalog based
552: on HST/WFPC2 data with the previous catalogs of M33 star clusters
553: to increase the number of the sample for deriving the LFs.
554: We used only star cluster samples obtained with HST observation.
555: Previous ground based surveys covered a wider area in M33 with shallower depth and poorer
556: resolution compared with
557: the HST survey so that they would include preferentially a larger number of bright and large
558: clusters than the HST surveys.
559: For example,
560: the blue LF for \citet{bed05} samples included in this study with $(B-V)_0 \leq 0.3$ has a peak
561: at the same magnitude to that for blue samples displayed in Fig.~\ref{lf}(a).
562: Thus it is natural that our LFs include a higher portion of faint star
563: clusters than those of \citet{cha01}.
564:
565:
566:
567: \section{Summary and Conclusion}
568:
569:
570: We have carried out a survey of star clusters in M33 using the HST/WFPC2 images in the HST archive that
571: were not covered in the previous studies.
572: We have found 104 stars clusters including 32 new clusters and 12 known clusters
573: confirmed in this study from 24 fields of HST/WFPC2 images.
574: We combined 44 star clusters from this study, 154 star clusters from \citet{cha99a, cha01},
575: 33 star clusters from \citet{bed05}, and 11 star clusters from
576: \citet{sar07a}, to build a catalog of 242 star clusters. This is the most comprehensive
577: catalog available to date which contains only the confirmed genuine star clusters in M33.
578: We present the integrated photometry of these star clusters derived from the $BVI$ images
579: taken with the CFH12K CCD camera at the CFHT. Photometric properties of the star clusters
580: are summarized as follows:
581:
582: \begin{itemize}
583:
584: \item The integrated color-magnitude diagram of star clusters shows that there are two distinct
585: populations in M33: a large number of blue star clusters and a small number of red star clusters.
586: The CMD of the M33 star clusters is in general
587: similar to that of the LMC star clusters.
588:
589: \item We divide the cluster sample into three groups according to their $(B-V)_0$ color:
590: blue star clusters with $(B-V)_0\leq0.3$,
591: intermediate color star clusters with $0.3<(B-V)_0<0.5$, and
592: red star clusters with $(B-V)_0\geq0.5$.
593: Most of the new clusters found or confirmed in this study are blue clusters.
594: There are 29 old globular cluster candidates with $0.5 \leq (B-V)_0 \leq 1.1$
595: and $0.7\leq(V-I)_0\leq1.2$, ten of which are newly found in this study.
596:
597: \item Most of the new clusters in M33 are located along the theoretical evolutionary path
598: for $Z=0.004$, $Y=0.24$ in $(B-V)_0$--$(V-I)_0$ color-color diagram, while a few of them
599: are in the redder side in the $(V-I)_0$ color.
600:
601: \item The red clusters are found relatively more
602: in the outer region of M33 than the blue and intermediate color clusters, and that
603: many of the blue stars are located in the HII regions.
604:
605: \item The luminosity function (LF) for the blue star clusters shows a peak at
606: $M_V \approx -7.3$ mag,
607: while the intermediate color star cluster LF shows a peak at the fainter magnitude
608: $M_V \approx -6.3$ mag. The LF for the red star clusters shows also a peak at $M_V \approx -6.8$,
609: although the number of the clusters is small.
610: \end{itemize}
611:
612:
613: \acknowledgments
614: Authors thank Narae Hwang
615: for many fruitful discussions and comments during the work
616: in this study.
617: This work was supported in part supported by the ABRL(R14-2002-058-01000-0).
618: This is based in part on the W. -K. Park's Ph.D. thesis in Seoul National University.
619:
620: \begin{thebibliography}{}
621: \bibitem[Bedin \etal (2005)]{bed05} Bedin, L. R., Piotto, G., Baume, G., Momany, Y., Carraro, G.,
622: Anderson, J., Messineo, M., \& Ortolani, S. 2005, \aap, 444, 831
623: \bibitem[Bica \etal (1996)]{bic96} Bica, E., Claria, J. J., Dottori, H., Santos, J. F. C., Jr.,
624: \& Piatti, A. E. 1996, \apjs, 102, 57
625: \bibitem[Bruzual \& Charlot (2003)]{bru03} Bruzual, G., \& Charlot, S. 2003, \mnras, 344, 1000
626: \bibitem[Chandar \etal (1999a)]{cha99a} Chandar, R., Bianchi, L., \& Ford, H. C. 1999a,
627: \apjs, 122, 431
628: \bibitem[Chandar \etal (1999b)]{cha99b} Chandar, R., Bianchi, L., \& Ford, H. C. 1999b,
629: \apj, 517, 668
630: \bibitem[Chandar \etal (2001)]{cha01} Chandar, R., Bianchi, L., \& Ford, H. C. 2001,
631: \aap, 366, 498
632: \bibitem[Christian \& Schommer (1982)]{cs82} Christian, C. A., \& Schommer, R. A. 1982,
633: \apjs, 49, 405
634: \bibitem[Christian \& Schommer (1988)]{cs88} Christian, C. A., \& Schommer, R. A. 1988,
635: \aj, 95, 704
636: \bibitem[Corbelli (2003)]{cor03} Corbelli, E. 2003, \mnras, 342, 199
637: \bibitem[Harris (1996)]{har96} Harris, W. E. 1996, \aj, 112, 1487
638: \bibitem[Hiltner (1960)]{hil60} Hiltner, W. A. 1960, \apj, 131, 163
639: \bibitem[Hodge \etal (1999)]{hod99} Hodge, P. W., Balsley, J., Wyder, T. K., \& Skelton, B. P. 1999, \pasp, 111, 685
640: \bibitem[Hwang \& Lee (2007)]{hwa07} Hwang, N., \& Lee, M. G. 2007, \aj, submitted
641: \bibitem[Kaluzny \etal (1998)]{kal98} Kaluzny, J., Stanek, K. Z., Krockenberger, M., Sasselov, D. D.,
642: Tonry, J. L., \& Mateo, M. 1998, \aj, 115, 1016
643: \bibitem[Kim et al.(2002)]{kim02} Kim, M., Kim, E., Lee, M. G., Sarajedini, A.,
644: \& Geisler, D. 2002, \aj, 123, 244
645: \bibitem[Kron \& Mayall (1960)]{km60} Kron, G. E., \& Mayall, N. U. 1960, \aj, 65, 581
646: \bibitem[Lata \etal (2002)]{lat02} Lata, S., Pandey, A. K., Sagar, R., \& Mohan, V. 2002, \aap,
647: 388, 158
648: \bibitem[Lee (2006)]{lee06} Lee, M. G. 2006, Bull. Astr. Soc. India, 34, 99
649: \bibitem[Ma \etal (2002)]{ma02} Ma, J., Zhou, X., Chen, J. -S., Wu, H., Jiang, Z. -J., Xue, S. -J.,
650: \& Zhu, J. 2002, \cjaa, 2, 197
651: %\bibitem[Ma \etal (2002)]{ma02} Ma, J., Zhou, X., \& Chen, J. 2004, \cjaa, 4, 125
652: \bibitem[Massey et al.(1995)]{mas95} Massey, P., Armandroff, T. E., Pyke, R., Patel, K.,
653: \& Wilson, C. 1995, \aj, 110, 2715
654: \bibitem[Massey \etal (2006)]{mas06} Massey, P., Olsen, K. A. G., Hodge, P. W., Strong, S. B.,
655: Jacoby, G. H., Schlingman, W., \& Smith, R. C. 2006, \aj, 131, 2478
656: \bibitem[Melnick \& D'Odorico (1978)]{md78} Melnick, J., \& D'Odorico, S. 1978, \aaps, 34, 249
657: \bibitem[Mochejska \etal (1998)]{moc98} Mochejska, B. J., Kaluzny, J., Krockenberger, M.,
658: Sasselov, D. D., \& Stanek, K. Z. 1998, \actaa, 48, 455
659: \bibitem[Sarajedini \etal (2000)]{sar00} Sarajedini, A., Geisler, D., Schommer, R.,
660: \& Harding, P. 2000, \aj, 120, 2437
661: \bibitem[Sarajedini \etal (2007)]{sar07a} Sarajedini, A., Barker, M. K., Geisler, D., Harding, P.,
662: \& Schommer, R. 2007, \aj, 133, 290
663: \bibitem[Sarajedini \& Mancone (2007)]{sar07b} Sarajedini, A., \& Mancone, C. L. 2007, \aj, 134, 447
664: \bibitem[Schlegel \etal (1998)]{sch98} Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., \& Davis, M. 1998,
665: \apj, 500, 525
666: \bibitem[Stanek \etal (1998)]{sta98} Stanek, K. Z., Kaluzny, J., Krockenberger, M., Sasselov, D. D.,
667: Tonry, J. L., \& Mateo, M. 1998, \aj, 115, 1894
668: \bibitem[Zaritsky \etal (1989)]{zar89} Zaritsky, D., Elston, R., \& Hill, J. M. 1989,
669: \aj, 97, 97
670: \end{thebibliography}
671:
672: \clearpage
673:
674: \begin{figure}
675: \epsscale{1.0}
676: \plotone{f1.eps}
677: \caption{
678: Locations of the HST/WFPC2 fields used in this study, overlaid in black on the
679: grayscale map of $1 \arcdeg \times 1 \arcdeg$ Digitized Sky Survey image of M33.
680: For comparison, locations of HST/WFPC2 fields for previous star cluster surveys
681: \citep{cha99a, cha01} are shown in lighter tone.
682: \label{fld_location}}
683: \end{figure}
684: \clearpage
685:
686: \begin{figure}
687: \epsscale{1.0}
688: \plotone{f2.eps}
689: \caption{
690: A mosaic of the grayscale maps of $V$ band images of new M33 star clusters found in
691: this study. A circle of $r = 3.0$ arcsec
692: is drawn around the cluster to show the scale of each image.
693: Longer and shorter arrows indicate, respectively, north and east.
694: The labels in the right lower corner of each image represent the ID of each star cluster,
695: and the ones in upper right corner the filter name of the each image.
696: \label{newcl}}
697: \end{figure}
698: \clearpage
699:
700: \begin{figure}
701: \epsscale{1.00}
702: \plotone{f3.eps}
703: \caption{
704: Comparison of the photometry between this study and previous studies.
705: Open circles represent the photometry difference of $\Delta$(this study - \citet{cha99a, cha01}),
706: filled squares the difference of $\Delta$(this study - \citet{sar07a}), filled triangles
707: $\Delta$(this study - \citet{moc98}), and crosses denotes the difference of
708: $\Delta$(this study - \citet{cs82, cs88}).
709: \label{photdiff}}
710: \end{figure}
711:
712:
713: \begin{figure}
714: \epsscale{0.8}
715: \plotone{f4.eps}
716: \caption{
717: Integrated color-magnitude diagrams (CMD) of the star clusters in M33, Large
718: Magellanic Cloud (LMC), and our Galaxy. Panels (a) and (b) show the $M_V$--$(B-V)_0$
719: CMD and the $M_V$--$(V-I)_0$ CMD of M33 star clusters, respectively.
720: In both panels, filled circles denote the star clusters newly
721: discovered in this study, and open circles denote the previously known star
722: clusters that were confirmed in this study. Filled squares denote the star
723: clusters from \citet{sar07a}, Crosses the ones in the list of \citet{cha99a, cha01},
724: while triangles the star clusters from \citet{bed05}. Panel (c): integrated
725: $M_V$--$(B-V)_0$ CMD of star clusters in the LMC \citep{bic96}.
726: Panel (d): the integrated $M_V$--$(B-V)_0$ CMD of open clusters \citep{lat02} and
727: globular clusters \citep{har96} in our Galaxy.
728: Globular clusters are marked with filled squares in both panels. Histograms in all
729: panels show the normalized distributions of colors for star cluster samples plotted
730: in each panel.
731: \label{cmd}}
732: \end{figure}
733: \clearpage
734:
735: \begin{figure}
736: \epsscale{0.8}
737: \plotone{f5.eps}
738: \caption{
739: $(B-V)_0$ -- $(V-I)_0$ diagram of the star clusters in M33.
740: Same symbols are used for each group of star clusters as in panels (a) and (b) of
741: Fig.~\ref{cmd}. The sizes of symbols for M33 star clusters represent the relative
742: brightness of the star cluster: the bigger, the brighter.
743: Theoretical evolutionary paths from the Single Stellar Population(SSP) model \citep{bru03}
744: for ${\rm Z}=0.004$, ${\rm Y}=0.24$ (solid line),
745: ${\rm Z}=0.02$, and ${\rm Y}=0.28$ (dashed line) are
746: drawn with star symbols for every dex in age from $10^6$ years to $10^{10}$ years.
747: The arrow represents the reddening direction.
748: Open histograms at upper and right side of the figure represent the distributions of the
749: integrated colors for all M33 star clusters, while hatched histograms for star clusters brighter
750: than $V \leq 19.0$. Color distributions of Galactic globular clusters are represented with
751: dashed lines. Scales of Galactic globular cluster histograms are adjusted to fit in the
752: figures.
753: \label{ccd}}
754: \end{figure}
755: \clearpage
756:
757:
758: \begin{figure}
759: \epsscale{1.00}
760: \plotone{f6.eps}
761: \caption{
762: Spatial distribution of M33 star clusters: (a) blue star clusters with $(B-V)_0 \leq 0.3$,
763: (b) intermediate color star clusters with $0.3<(B-V)_0<0.5$,
764: (c) red star clusters with $(B-V)_0 \geq 0.5$, and (d) all star clusters in our catalog.
765: Small dots represent the locations of H II regions in M33 \citep{hod99}.
766: The center of M33 is marked with big plus sign.
767: Schematic representation of M33
768: is shown on each panel by an ellipse with major axis length corresponding
769: to the effective aperture($A_e$) of M33.
770: \label{spatial_dist}}
771: \end{figure}
772:
773: \begin{figure}
774: \epsscale{1.00}
775: \plotone{f7.eps}
776: \caption{
777: Luminosity function (LF) of M33 star clusters. (a) LFs
778: for blue, intermediate color, and red star clusters
779: that were classified according to their $(B-V)_0$ color.
780: (b) LFs for intermediate color clusters and red clusters
781: that were selected according to their $(V-I)_0$ color as used in \citet{cha01}.
782: (c) LFs for intermediate color clusters and red clusters derived by \citet{cha01},
783: adjusted according to the distance modulus adopted in this study.
784: Vertical dashed lines indicate roughly the cluster survey limit of this study.
785: \label{lf}}
786: \end{figure}
787:
788: \clearpage
789:
790: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccc}
791: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
792: \tablecaption{Summary of HST/WFPC2 fields used in this study \label{fld_list}}
793: \tablewidth{0pt}
794: \tablehead{
795: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{Filters \& Exposure Times} &
796: \colhead{Number of Clusters} \\
797: \cline{3-6} \\
798: \colhead{ID} & \colhead{PropID} & \colhead{$U(F336W)$} & \colhead{$B(F439W)$} &
799: \colhead{$V(F505W)$} & \colhead{$I(F814W)$} & \colhead{new(all)}
800: }
801: \startdata
802: 1 & 6694 & $2\times800$s\tablenotemark{a} & $1\times500$s & $1\times100$s & & 0(8)\\
803: 2 & 8805 & & & $2\times700$s\tablenotemark{b} & & 2(6)\\
804: 3 & 8207 & $2\times400$s & $2\times300$s & $2\times120$s & & 1(10)\\
805: 4 & 8207 & $2\times400$s & $2\times300$s & $2\times120$s & & 3(7)\\
806: 5 & 8207 & $2\times400$s & $2\times300$s & $2\times120$s & & 1(5)\\
807: 6 & 8805 & & & $1\times1000$s\tablenotemark{b}, $1\times900$s\tablenotemark{b}& & 0(5)\\
808: 7 & 8018 & & & $2\times1100$s, $2\times800$s & $2\times1100$s & 4(13)\\
809: 8 & 6431 & & $2\times350$s & $2\times260$s & $1\times260$s, $1\times200$s & 5(13) \\
810: 9 & 9127 & $2\times260$s & $2\times300$s & $2\times160$s & & 3(0) \\
811: 10 & 8805 & & & $2\times700$s\tablenotemark{b} & & 3(6)\\
812: 11 & 8805 & & & $2\times700$s\tablenotemark{b} & & 6(7)\\
813: 12 & 7909 & & & $2\times500$s\tablenotemark{b} & & 0(17)\\
814: 13 & 8207 & $2\times400$s & $2\times300$s & $2\times120$s & & 0(0)\\
815: 14 & 9127 & $2\times260$s & $2\times300$s & $2\times160$s & & 4(7)\\
816: 15 & 8207 & $2\times400$s & $2\times300$s & $2\times120$s & & 2(0)\\
817: 16 & 5237 & $2\times600$s & & $2\times200$s & $2\times200$s & 0(0)\\
818: 17 & 9127 & $2\times160$s, $2\times260$s & $2\times300$s & $2\times160$s & & 2(0)\\
819: 18 & 8207 & $2\times400$s & $2\times300$s & $2\times120$s & & 1(1)\\
820: 19 & 8061 & $1\times1600$s\tablenotemark{a} & & $1\times700$s\tablenotemark{b} & & 1(1)\\
821: 20 & 8207 & $2\times400$s & $2\times300$s & $2\times120$s & & 0(0)\\
822: 21 & 9479 & & & $2\times140$s\tablenotemark{b} & $2\times500$s & 0(0)\\
823: 22 & 9127 & & & $2\times140$s\tablenotemark{b} & $2\times500$s & 0(0)\\
824: 23 & 9127 & & & $2\times140$s\tablenotemark{b} & $2\times500$s & 0(0)\\
825: 24 & 8207 & $2\times400$s & $2\times300$s & $2\times120s$ & & 0(0)\\
826: \enddata
827: \tablenotetext{a}{Observed with F300W.}
828: \tablenotetext{b}{Observed with F606W.}
829: \end{deluxetable}
830:
831: \begin{deluxetable}{rccrrrc}
832: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
833: \tablecaption{Catalog of new M33 star clusters discovered in this study\label{newcl_list}}
834: \tablewidth{0pt}
835: \tablehead{
836: \colhead{ID} & \colhead{RA(2000)} & \colhead{Dec(2000)} & \colhead{$V$\tablenotemark{a}} &
837: \colhead{$B-V$\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{$V-I$\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{$E(B-V)$\tablenotemark{c}}
838: }
839: \startdata
840: 1 & 1 32 36.36 & 30 36 48.61 & $ 19.560\pm0.012 $ & $ 0.130\pm0.007 $ & $ 0.321\pm0.015 $ & $ 0.20 $ \\
841: 2 & 1 33 11.74 & 30 38 56.14 & $ 17.049\pm0.006\tablenotemark{\dagger} $ & $ 0.092\pm0.008 $ & $ 0.089\pm0.011 $ & $ 0.10 $ \\
842: 3 & 1 33 12.67 & 30 38 55.35 & $ 18.287\pm0.027 $ & $ 0.231\pm0.037 $ & $ 0.589\pm0.037 $ & $ 0.10 $ \\
843: 4 & 1 33 14.97 & 30 39 04.70 & $ 18.291\pm0.009 $ & $ 0.479\pm0.009 $ & $ 0.869\pm0.010 $ & $ 0.15 $ \\
844: 5 & 1 33 19.51 & 30 35 30.19 & $ 16.947\pm0.003 $ & $ 0.156\pm0.002 $ & $ 0.463\pm0.004 $ & $ 0.10 $ \\
845: 6 & 1 33 20.25 & 30 34 50.27 & $ 17.677\pm0.006 $ & $ -0.005\pm0.004 $ & $ 0.111\pm0.009 $ & $ 0.10 $ \\
846: 7 & 1 33 21.35 & 30 31 13.02 & $ 18.719\pm0.013 $ & $ 0.194\pm0.008 $ & $ 0.482\pm0.012 $ & $ 0.10 $ \\
847: 8 & 1 33 22.36 & 30 35 30.20 & $ 20.144\pm0.056 $ & $ 0.250\pm0.034 $ & $ 0.696\pm0.052 $ & $ 0.10 $ \\
848: 9 & 1 33 23.15 & 30 52 42.41 & $ 19.220\pm0.011 $ & $ 0.430\pm0.009 $ & $ 0.654\pm0.010 $ & $ 0.15 $ \\
849: 10 & 1 33 26.58 & 30 31 30.82 & $ 18.202\pm0.010 $ & $ 0.258\pm0.007 $ & $ 0.493\pm0.010 $ & $ 0.10 $ \\
850: 11 & 1 33 27.38 & 30 41 48.39 & $ 19.017\pm0.025 $ & $ 0.121\pm0.018 $ & $ 0.426\pm0.032 $ & $ 0.20 $ \\
851: 12 & 1 33 30.06 & 30 31 48.66 & $ 16.466\pm0.002 $ & $ 0.110\pm0.003 $ & $ 0.269\pm0.004 $ & $ 0.10 $ \\
852: 13 & 1 33 30.23 & 30 41 18.89 & $ 18.489\pm0.018 $ & $ 0.365\pm0.013 $ & $ 0.695\pm0.016 $ & $ 0.20 $ \\
853: 14 & 1 33 30.36 & 30 37 43.41 & $ 19.304\pm0.039 $ & $ 0.319\pm0.034 $ & $ 0.930\pm0.040 $ & $ 0.15 $ \\
854: 15 & 1 33 30.38 & 30 36 41.45 & $ 19.034\pm0.031 $ & $ 0.296\pm0.022 $ & $ 0.907\pm0.032 $ & $ 0.10 $ \\
855: 16 & 1 33 30.41 & 30 36 00.04 & $ 18.951\pm0.028 $ & $ 0.361\pm0.021 $ & $ 0.921\pm0.026 $ & $ 0.10 $ \\
856: 17 & 1 33 31.32 & 30 37 34.10 & $ 19.798\pm0.069 $ & $ 0.435\pm0.040 $ & $ 1.180\pm0.043 $ & $ 0.15 $ \\
857: 18 & 1 33 32.16 & 30 30 18.01 & $ 17.878\pm0.006 $ & $ 0.238\pm0.005 $ & $ 0.555\pm0.006 $ & $ 0.10 $ \\
858: 19 & 1 33 32.46 & 30 35 38.30 & $ 16.308\pm0.004 $ & \nodata & $ 0.656\pm0.004 $ & $ 0.15 $ \\
859: 20 & 1 33 36.54 & 30 50 35.79 & $ 17.574\pm0.004 $ & $ 0.038\pm0.004 $ & $ -0.082\pm0.009 $ & $ 0.15 $ \\
860: 21\tablenotemark{*} & 1 33 38.19 & 30 43 24.51 & $ 18.570\pm0.012 $ & $ 0.739\pm0.026 $ & \nodata & $ 0.15 $ \\
861: 22 & 1 33 41.44 & 30 51 10.51 & $ 17.934\pm0.058 $ & $ 0.448\pm0.057 $ & $ 1.085\pm0.076 $ & $ 0.15 $ \\
862: 23 & 1 33 58.09 & 30 37 29.68 & $ 17.771\pm0.013 $ & $ 0.137\pm0.015 $ & $ 0.578\pm0.022 $ & $ 0.20 $ \\
863: 24 & 1 33 58.49 & 30 38 20.96 & $ 16.790\pm0.005 $ & $ 0.097\pm0.006 $ & $ 0.454\pm0.013 $ & $ 0.20 $ \\
864: 25 & 1 33 58.67 & 30 35 26.10 & $ 16.156\pm0.007 $ & $ -0.045\pm0.005 $ & $ 0.012\pm0.009 $ & $ 0.10 $ \\
865: 26 & 1 34 14.44 & 30 34 17.56 & $ 16.879\pm0.013 $ & $ 0.097\pm0.013 $ & $ 0.629\pm0.016 $ & $ 0.10 $ \\
866: 27 & 1 34 14.96 & 30 33 53.66 & $ 17.864\pm0.013 $ & $ 0.035\pm0.011 $ & $ 0.398\pm0.015 $ & $ 0.10 $ \\
867: 28 & 1 34 15.21 & 30 33 15.11 & $ 18.512\pm0.014 $ & $ 0.660\pm0.014 $ & $ 1.047\pm0.012 $ & $ 0.10 $ \\
868: 29 & 1 34 15.74 & 30 33 41.02 & $ 16.834\pm0.011 $ & $ 0.172\pm0.011 $ & $ 0.765\pm0.012 $ & $ 0.10 $ \\
869: 30 & 1 34 18.08 & 30 31 58.93 & $ 18.154\pm0.006 $ & $ -0.016\pm0.005 $ & $ 0.064\pm0.012 $ & $ 0.10 $ \\
870: 31 & 1 34 42.79 & 30 37 20.21 & $ 17.652\pm0.003 $ & $ 0.197\pm0.002 $ & $ 0.810\pm0.003 $ & $ 0.10 $ \\
871: 32 & 1 34 44.60 & 30 37 32.32 & $ 18.071\pm0.005 $ & $ 0.023\pm0.009 $ & $ 0.166\pm0.015 $ & $ 0.05 $ \\
872: \enddata
873: \tablenotetext{a}{Measured on CFH12k CCD image with $r=4.0\arcsec$ aperture.}
874: \tablenotetext{b}{Measured on CFH12k CCD image with $r=2.0\arcsec$ aperture.}
875: \tablenotetext{c}{Measured with $UBVRI$ PSF Photometry data by \citet{mas06}. The uncertainties of the values are
876: $0.05$.}
877: \tablenotetext{\dagger}{Happened to be very close to the edge of the CCD chip. So the measurement was made with
878: smaller apertures.}
879: \tablenotetext{*}{Measured on HST/WFPC2 image instead of CFH12k CCD image, with $r=2.2\arcsec$ and $r=1.0\arcsec$
880: apertures for $V$ and color measurement, respectively.}
881: \end{deluxetable}
882:
883: \begin{deluxetable}{rccrrrcl}
884: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
885: \tablecaption{Catalog of previously known M33 star clusters confirmed in this study\label{othercl_list}}
886: \tablewidth{0pt}
887: \tablehead{
888: \colhead{ID} & \colhead{RA(2000)} & \colhead{Dec(2000)} & \colhead{$V$\tablenotemark{a}} &
889: \colhead{$B-V$\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{$V-I$\tablenotemark{b}} &
890: \colhead{$E(B-V)$\tablenotemark{c}} & \colhead{Cross Identification\tablenotemark{d}}
891: }
892: \startdata
893: 33 & 1 32 34.45 & 30 37 42.09 & $ 20.180\pm0.019 $ & $ 0.559\pm0.016 $ & $ 0.725\pm0.020 $ & $ 0.05 $ & CBF-143 \\
894: 34 & 1 33 22.12 & 30 40 26.15 & $ 18.090\pm0.010 $ & $ 0.080\pm0.007 $ & $ 0.360\pm0.014 $ & $ 0.10 $ & CBF-59 \\
895: 35 & 1 33 22.26 & 30 40 59.64 & $ 18.663\pm0.017 $ & \nodata\tablenotemark{*} & $ 0.475\pm0.018 $ & $ 0.10 $ & CBF-60 \\
896: 36 & 1 33 22.35 & 30 30 14.67 & $ 17.378\pm0.004 $ & $ 0.130\pm0.002 $ & $ 0.460\pm0.004 $ & $ 0.10 $ & CS-H36 \\
897: 37 & 1 33 23.84 & 30 40 26.18 & $ 19.480\pm0.040 $ & $ 0.177\pm0.026 $ & $ 0.685\pm0.041 $ & $ 0.10 $ & CBF-96 \\
898: 38 & 1 33 24.81 & 30 33 55.25 & $ 20.429\pm0.077 $ & $ -0.117\pm0.032 $ & $ 0.358\pm0.068 $ & $ 0.10 $ & CBF-18 \\
899: 39 & 1 33 25.60 & 30 29 57.03 & $ 18.179\pm0.006 $ & $ 0.852\pm0.005 $ & $ 1.115\pm0.004 $ & $ 0.10 $ & CS-U126, MKKSS-5 \\
900: 40 & 1 33 25.96 & 30 36 24.58 & $ 17.525\pm0.007 $ & $ 0.265\pm0.005 $ & $ 0.610\pm0.007 $ & $ 0.10 $ & MKKSS-6 \\
901: 41 & 1 33 26.34 & 30 41 06.96 & $ 18.909\pm0.021 $ & $ 0.477\pm0.014 $ & $ 1.043\pm0.016 $ & $ 0.20 $ & CBF-92 \\
902: 42 & 1 33 26.46 & 30 41 11.84 & $ 19.358\pm0.028 $ & $ 0.361\pm0.022 $ & $ 0.786\pm0.031 $ & $ 0.20 $ & CBF-93 \\
903: \enddata
904: \tablenotetext{a}{Measured on CFH12k CCD image with $r=4.0''$ aperture.}
905: \tablenotetext{b}{Measured on CFH12k CCD image with $r=2.0''$ aperture.}
906: \tablenotetext{c}{Measured with $UBVRI$ PSF Photometry data by \citet{mas06}. The uncertainties of the values are
907: $0.05$.}
908: \tablenotetext{d}{B identifications are from \citet{bed05}; CBF identifications from \citet{cha99a, cha01};
909: CS identification from \citet{cs82}; MKKSS identifications from \citet{moc98}; MD identifications are
910: from \citet{md78} based on the coordinates given by \citet{ma02} ; and S identifications from \citet{sar07a}.}
911: \tablenotetext{*}{Happened to be off from CFHT CFH12k images.}
912: \tablecomments{The complete version of this table is in the electronic edition of
913: the Journal. The printed edition contains only a sample.}
914: \end{deluxetable}
915:
916: \begin{deluxetable}{rccrrrcl}
917: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
918: \tablecaption{Catalog of previously known M33 star clusters\label{prevcl_list}}
919: \tablewidth{0pt}
920: \tablehead{
921: \colhead{ID} & \colhead{RA(2000)} & \colhead{Dec(2000)} & \colhead{$V$\tablenotemark{a}} &
922: \colhead{$B-V$\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{$V-I$\tablenotemark{b}} &
923: \colhead{$E(B-V)$\tablenotemark{c}} & \colhead{Cross Identification\tablenotemark{d}}
924: }
925: \startdata
926: 105\tablenotemark{*} & 1 32 38.83 & 30 39 17.77 & $19.942\pm0.065$ & $ 0.267\pm0.090$ & \nodata & $ 0.10 $ & CBF-162 \\
927: 106 & 1 32 44.28 & 30 40 12.25 & $ 18.434\pm0.005 $ & $ 0.749\pm0.006 $ & $ 1.065\pm0.006 $ & $ 0.10 $ & CBF-161, CS-U88 \\
928: 107 & 1 33 01.16 & 30 35 44.65 & $ 19.485\pm0.026 $ & $ 0.449\pm0.029 $ & $ 1.152\pm0.028 $ & $ 0.05 $ & CBF-39 \\
929: 108 & 1 33 02.39 & 30 34 44.16 & $ 18.022\pm0.006 $ & $ -0.034\pm0.004 $ & $ 0.082\pm0.011 $ & $ 0.15 $ & CBF-40 \\
930: 109 & 1 33 08.10 & 30 28 00.12 & $ 19.062\pm0.015 $ & $ 0.638\pm0.011 $ & $ 0.822\pm0.013 $ & $ 0.15 $ & CBF-86, CS-U140 \\
931: 110 & 1 33 10.08 & 30 29 56.51 & $ 18.523\pm0.022 $ & $ 0.296\pm0.016 $ & $ 0.483\pm0.018 $ & $ 0.15 $ & CBF-89 \\
932: 111 & 1 33 13.84 & 30 29 05.27 & $ 18.884\pm0.013 $ & $ 0.837\pm0.014 $ & $ 0.999\pm0.015 $ & $ 0.20 $ & CBF-53 \\
933: 112 & 1 33 13.88 & 30 29 44.87 & $ 17.929\pm0.012 $ & $ 0.042\pm0.013 $ & $ -0.069\pm0.018 $ & $ 0.15 $ & CBF-88 \\
934: 113 & 1 33 14.28 & 30 28 22.78 & $ 18.298\pm0.006 $ & $ 0.874\pm0.005 $ & $ 1.109\pm0.004 $ & $ 0.10 $ & CBF-54, CS-U137, MD-8 \\
935: 114 & 1 33 15.15 & 30 32 53.26 & $ 19.714\pm0.026 $ & $ 0.629\pm0.018 $ & $ 0.856\pm0.018 $ & $ 0.05 $ & CBF-144 \\
936: \enddata
937: \tablenotetext{a}{Measured on CFH12k CCD image with $r=4.0''$ aperture.}
938: \tablenotetext{b}{Measured on CFH12k CCD image with $r=2.0''$ aperture.}
939: \tablenotetext{c}{Measured with $UBVRI$ PSF Photometry data by \citet{mas06}. The uncertainties of the values are
940: $0.05$.}
941: \tablenotetext{d}{B identifications are from \citet{bed05}; CBF identifications from \citet{cha99a, cha01};
942: CS identification from \citet{cs82}; MKKSS identifications from \citet{moc98}; MD identifications are
943: from \citet{md78} based on the coordinates given by \citet{ma02} ; and S identifications from \citet{sar07a}.}
944: \tablenotetext{*}{Measured on HST/WFPC2 image instead of CFH12k CCD image, with $r=2.2\arcsec$ and $r=1.0\arcsec$
945: apertures for $V$ and color measurement, respectively.}
946: \tablecomments{The complete version of this table is in the electronic edition of
947: the Journal. The printed edition contains only a sample.}
948: \end{deluxetable}
949:
950: \begin{deluxetable}{rrrrcl}
951: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
952: \tablecaption{List of globular cluster candidates\label{gccand_list}}
953: \tablewidth{0pt}
954: \tablehead{
955: \colhead{ID} & \colhead{$V$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{$B-V$\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{$V-I$\tablenotemark{b}}&
956: \colhead{$E(B-V)$\tablenotemark{c}} & \colhead{Cross Identification\tablenotemark{d}}
957: }
958: \startdata
959: 28 & $ 18.512\pm0.014 $ & $ 0.660\pm0.014 $ & $ 1.047\pm0.012 $ & $ 0.10 $ & \\
960: 39 & $ 18.179\pm0.006 $ & $ 0.852\pm0.005 $ & $ 1.115\pm0.004 $ & $ 0.10 $ & CS-U126, MKKSS-5 \\
961: 45 & $ 18.348\pm0.011 $ & $ 0.789\pm0.009 $ & $ 1.140\pm0.009 $ & $ 0.20 $ & CBF-90, CS-U77, MD-17 \\
962: 49 & $ 17.322\pm0.006 $ & $ 0.759\pm0.005 $ & $ 0.976\pm0.004 $ & $ 0.20 $ & CBF-90 \\
963: 58 & $ 19.497\pm0.011 $ & $ 0.885\pm0.015 $ & $ 1.098\pm0.015 $ & $ 0.25 $ & SBGHS-10 \\
964: 76 & $ 17.889\pm0.016 $ & $ 0.711\pm0.018 $ & $ 0.942\pm0.013 $ & $ 0.10 $ & CBF-49, MKKSS-25 \\
965: 84 & $ 18.454\pm0.034 $ & $ 0.742\pm0.050 $ & $ 1.185\pm0.040 $ & $ 0.15 $ & CBF-29 \\
966: 93 & $ 17.791\pm0.009 $ & $ 0.658\pm0.009 $ & $ 0.920\pm0.011 $ & $ 0.10 $ & CBF-118 \\
967: 94 & $ 18.155\pm0.011 $ & $ 0.600\pm0.011 $ & $ 0.888\pm0.014 $ & $ 0.10 $ & CBF-119 \\
968: 106 & $ 18.434\pm0.005 $ & $ 0.749\pm0.006 $ & $ 1.065\pm0.006 $ & $ 0.10 $ & CBF-161, CS-U88 \\
969: 111 & $ 18.884\pm0.013 $ & $ 0.837\pm0.014 $ & $ 0.999\pm0.015 $ & $ 0.20 $ & CBF-53 \\
970: 113 & $ 18.298\pm0.006 $ & $ 0.874\pm0.005 $ & $ 1.109\pm0.004 $ & $ 0.10 $ & CBF-54, CS-U137, MD-8 \\
971: 114 & $ 19.714\pm0.026 $ & $ 0.629\pm0.018 $ & $ 0.856\pm0.018 $ & $ 0.05 $ & CBF-144 \\
972: 130 & $ 19.012\pm0.013 $ & $ 0.685\pm0.013 $ & $ 1.043\pm0.013 $ & $ 0.15 $ & CBF-108, SBGHS-6 \\
973: 131 & $ 18.215\pm0.006 $ & $ 1.244\pm0.007 $ & $ 1.291\pm0.005 $ & $ 0.20 $ & CBF-106, SBGHS-4 \\
974: 146 & $ 16.290\pm0.002 $ & $ 0.645\pm0.001 $ & $ 0.993\pm0.001 $ & $ 0.10 $ & CBF-61, CS-U49, MD-24, MKKSS-21 \\
975: 149 & $ 19.042\pm0.021 $ & $ 0.606\pm0.016 $ & $ 0.967\pm0.013 $ & $ 0.10 $ & CBF-62 \\
976: 157 & $ 19.878\pm0.053 $ & $ 0.605\pm0.063 $ & $ 0.920\pm0.068 $ & $ 0.10 $ & CBF-138 \\
977: 163 & $ 17.261\pm0.003 $ & $ 0.784\pm0.003 $ & $ 1.082\pm0.003 $ & $ 0.10 $ & CBF-104, CS-H38, MD-25, MKKSS-22 \\
978: 189 & $ 16.390\pm0.003 $ & $ 0.707\pm0.002 $ & $ 0.973\pm0.002 $ & $ 0.15 $ & CBF-28 \\
979: 191 & $ 16.512\pm0.008 $ & $ 0.929\pm0.007 $ & $ 1.298\pm0.005 $ & $ 0.10 $ & CBF-98, MKKSS-31 \\
980: 196 & $ 19.149\pm0.018 $ & $ 0.844\pm0.029 $ & $ 1.266\pm0.022 $ & $ 0.15 $ & B-5 \\
981: 206 & $ 16.354\pm0.008 $ & $ 0.947\pm0.007 $ & $ 1.160\pm0.006 $ & $ 0.10 $ & CBF-116, MKKSS-36 \\
982: 214 & $ 18.354\pm0.013 $ & $ 0.621\pm0.013 $ & $ 1.106\pm0.013 $ & $ 0.10 $ & CBF-11 \\
983: 228 & $ 17.123\pm0.003 $ & $ 0.685\pm0.002 $ & $ 0.989\pm0.001 $ & $ 0.10 $ & CBF-70, CS-C03, MD-47, SBGHS-13 \\
984: 234 & $ 19.677\pm0.025 $ & $ 0.636\pm0.024 $ & $ 1.066\pm0.022 $ & $ 0.10 $ & CBF-75 \\
985: 236 & $ 18.793\pm0.008 $ & $ 0.827\pm0.007 $ & $ 1.030\pm0.006 $ & $ 0.10 $ & CBF-74, CS-H24 \\
986: 240 & $ 20.921\pm0.060 $ & $ 0.906\pm0.048 $ & $ 1.366\pm0.038 $ & $ 0.15 $ & CBF-82 \\
987: 241 & $ 17.550\pm0.003 $ & $ 0.821\pm0.004 $ & $ 1.032\pm0.003 $ & $ 0.15 $ & CBF-81, CS-C20, MD-55 \\
988: \enddata
989: \tablenotetext{a}{Measured on CFH12k CCD image with $r=4.0''$ aperture.}
990: \tablenotetext{b}{Measured on CFH12k CCD image with $r=2.0''$ aperture.}
991: \tablenotetext{c}{Measured with $UBVRI$ PSF Photometry data by \citet{mas06}. The uncertainties of the values are
992: $0.05$.}
993: \tablenotetext{d}{B identifications are from \citet{bed05}; CBF identifications from \citet{cha99a, cha01};
994: CS identification from \citet{cs82}; MKKSS identifications from \citet{moc98}; MD identifications are
995: from \citet{md78} based on the coordinates given by \citet{ma02} ; and S identifications from \citet{sar07a}.}
996: \end{deluxetable}
997:
998: \end{document}
999:
1000: