1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
4:
5: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
6:
7: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
8:
9: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
10:
11: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
12: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
13: %% use the longabstract style option.
14:
15: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
16:
17: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
18: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
19: %% the \begin{document} command.
20:
21: \newcommand{\ez}{\mbox{$\hat{{\bf e}}_{\rm z}$}}
22:
23:
24:
25: \shorttitle{Damped oscillations in two inhomogeneous coronal slabs}
26: \shortauthors{Arregui et al.}
27:
28: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
29: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
30:
31: \begin{document}
32:
33:
34: \title{The resonant damping of fast magnetohydrodynamic oscillations in a system of two coronal slabs}
35: %\title{THE RESONANT DAMPING OF FAST MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC OSCILLATIONS IN A SYSTEM OF TWO INHOMOGENEOUS CORONAL SLABS}
36:
37:
38: \author{I\~nigo Arregui\altaffilmark{1}, Jaume
39: Terradas\altaffilmark{1,2}, Ram\'on Oliver\altaffilmark{1}, and
40: Jos\'e Luis Ballester\altaffilmark{1}}
41: %\email{inigo.arregui@uib.es}
42: %\email{jaume.terradas@uib.es}
43: %\email{ramon.oliver@uib.es}
44: %\email{dfsjlb0@uib.es}
45:
46:
47: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
48: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
49: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
50: %% affiliation.
51:
52: \altaffiltext{1}{Departament de F\'{\i}sica, Universitat de les Illes Balears,
53: E-07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain. Email: inigo.arregui@uib.es,
54: jaume.terradas@uib.es, ramon.oliver@uib.es and dfsjlb0@uib.es}
55: \altaffiltext{2}{Centrum voor Plasma Astrofysica, K.U. Leuven,
56: Celestijnenlaan 200B, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium}
57:
58:
59:
60: \begin{abstract}
61: Observations of transversal coronal loop oscillations very often show the excitation and damping
62: of oscillations in groups of coronal loops rather than in individual and isolated structures.
63: We present results on the oscillatory properties (periods, damping rates, and spatial distribution of
64: perturbations) for resonantly damped oscillations in a system of two inhomogeneous coronal slabs and compare
65: them to the properties found in single slab loop models.
66: A system of two identical coronal loops is modeled, in Cartesian geometry, as being composed by
67: two density enhancements. The linear magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) wave equations for oblique propagation of waves are
68: solved and the damping of the different solutions, due to the transversal inhomogeneity of the density profile, is computed.
69: The physics of the obtained results is analyzed by an examination of the perturbed physical variables.
70: We find that, due to the interaction between the loops, the normal modes of oscillation present in a single slab split
71: into symmetric and antisymmetric oscillations when a system of two identical slabs is considered.
72: The frequencies of these solutions may differ from the single slab results when the distance between the loops is of the
73: order of a few slab widths. Oblique propagation of waves weakens this interaction, since
74: solutions become more confined to the edges of the slabs. The damping is strong for
75: surface-like oscillations, while sausage body-like solutions are unaffected. For some solutions, and small
76: slab separations, the damping in a system of two loops differs substantially from the damping of a single loop.
77: \end{abstract}
78:
79:
80:
81: \keywords{MHD --- Sun: corona --- Sun: magnetic fields --- waves}
82:
83:
84: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
85: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 1 INTRODUCTION %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
86: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
87: \section{INTRODUCTION}\label{intro}
88:
89:
90: % 1) Observations of transversal coronal loop oscillations. Damping,
91: % theoretical interpretations, importance for coronal seismology.
92:
93:
94: The solar corona, the outermost part of the solar atmosphere, is able to support a
95: variety of MHD waves in its different magnetic and plasma configurations.
96: In the last years, particular attention has been devoted to the phenomenon of
97: transversal coronal loop oscillations, first observed by instruments
98: on-board TRACE spacecraft \citep{Aschwanden99,Nakariakov99,Aschwanden02, SAT02}. These oscillations,
99: triggered mainly by nearby flares or filament eruptions, consist of lateral displacements
100: of the loops while their foot-points are fixed to the denser photosphere. The characteristic
101: periods are of the order of minutes and oscillations are quickly damped in a few periods.
102:
103: From a theoretical point of view, these oscillations have been interpreted by \citet{Nakariakov99}
104: as the fundamental fast MHD kink mode of a flux tube. This
105: solution involves a global motion of the whole structure that displaces the axis of the tube.
106: The identification of observed oscillations with theoretical MHD wave solutions
107: is the key for coronal seismology, first suggested by \citet{uchida70,REB84}, and has
108: allowed preliminary estimations of the magnetic field strength, transport coefficients, and
109: plasma-$\beta$ in coronal loops \citep{Nakariakov99,Nakariakov01,markusbook}. Some recent examples of the application
110: of coronal seismology can be found in \cite{Nakariakov01,GAA02,AAG05,verwichte06,Arregui07}.
111: As for the nature of the damping mechanism(s) there is little consensus yet and
112: several mechanisms are currently under study, such as non-ideal effects, lateral wave
113: leakage due to the curvature of the loops \citep{TOB06}, mechanisms based on the
114: topology of the magnetic field lines \citep{SB00}, and resonant conversion of wave energy, due
115: to the non-uniformity of the magnetic-plasma configuration
116: \citep{HY88,RR02,GAA02,GAA06}. Foot-point leakage through the chromospheric
117: density gradient \citep{depontieu01,ofman02} has been invoked for the
118: damping of Alfv\'en waves and could be ascribed to the damping of transverse
119: oscillations, as well.
120:
121:
122: % 2) Observed events often correspond to oscillations of groups of loops.
123: % Need for the development of theoretical models
124:
125:
126: Observations of transversal coronal loop oscillations very often show the excitation
127: and damping of motions in groups of coronal loops rather than in single, isolated
128: structures (see for example the event recorded by TRACE on 2001 April 15,
129: analyzed by \citealt{Verwichte04}). However, most of the theoretical models used for their
130: study are based on single loop models. The interaction between the
131: motions of adjacent coronal loops may change the oscillatory properties (periods, damping
132: times, and spatial distribution of perturbations) of the observed event. For this reason,
133: it is important to fully understand the theoretical properties of MHD waves in
134: multiple-loop structures. The interest of these studies is two-fold. On one hand, to see under which
135: conditions these differences in the oscillatory properties are important and, on the other hand, if important,
136: to make reliable predictions and determinations of unknown physical parameters in the corona.
137: For example, when analyzing the 2001 April 15 event, \citet{Verwichte04} report on damping times that are longer
138: than expected from previous observations of transverse oscillations in isolated loops.
139: The fact that the studied coronal loops belong to a group could be behind this
140: result.
141:
142:
143: % 3) Several previous works have considered multi-structures.
144: % List and describe them.
145:
146: Several authors have previously investigated the properties of MHD waves in multi-structures.
147: \citet{BH87} studied the properties of the normal modes of oscillation of a periodic medium.
148: \citet{BF91} and \citet{keppens94} considered the scattering and absorption of acoustic waves
149: by bundles of magnetic flux tubes with sunspot properties. \citet{murawski93} and \citet{MR94}
150: studied, by means of numerical simulations, the propagation of fast waves in a system of two slabs
151: unbounded in the longitudinal direction. The collective nature and properties of oscillations in multi-fibril
152: Cartesian systems was analyzed by \citet{diaz05}, in the context of prominence oscillations.
153: More recently, \citet{ofman05} performed numerical simulations for the damping of a bundle of four loops,
154: \citet{marcu06} have extended the study by \citet{BH87} by including a steady motion in the equilibrium and
155: \citet{OM07} have performed numerical simulations of impulsively excited magneto-sonic waves in two
156: parallel solar coronal slabs.
157: Also recently, \citet{Luna06} have explored the normal modes and the time-dependent
158: evolution of fast kink MHD perturbations in a system of two coronal loops, modeled as plasma slabs.
159: They find a splitting of modes into symmetric and antisymmetric kink-like oscillations.
160: The interaction between two coronal loops produces a variation on the frequency and spatial
161: structure of the eigenfunctions, that depend now on the distance between
162: the loops.
163:
164: % 4) In this paper. Say what we present
165:
166: In this paper, we present the oscillatory properties of fast MHD waves in a system of two Cartesian slabs when both oblique
167: propagation of perturbations and transversal inhomogeneity of
168: the medium are included. These two ingredients produce the resonant damping of fast waves.
169: A particular study of the oscillatory properties of a similar physical system was
170: recently presented by \citet{ATOB07a}, who considered two very close slabs to analyze the effect of the possibly
171: unresolved internal structuring of coronal loops on their transverse damped oscillations.
172: Here a more in-depth analysis is performed. The resonant damping of fast MHD oscillations in a single Cartesian slab has been
173: described by \citet{ATOB07b}. In this paper, a second density enhancement is included and an analogous analysis is
174: presented. This work, thus, constitutes an extension to \citet{Luna06} to the case of oblique propagation and
175: damping by resonant absorption and an extension to \citet{ATOB07b} to a system of two interacting
176: slabs. Although the model adopted in this work is an oversimplification, and is far from being an accurate
177: representation of real coronal loop systems, this simplicity allows a detailed study of the problem.
178:
179: % 5) The layout of the paper.
180:
181: The layout of the paper is as follows. In \S~\ref{equil}, the equilibrium
182: configuration, the linear MHD wave equations for coupled fast and Alfv\'en waves, and a description
183: of the numerical method are presented. Then, \S~\ref{results} describes the results of our study.
184: First, in \S~\ref{undamped}, the normal mode properties of undamped fast waves for oblique propagation
185: are described. Then, in \S~\ref{damping}, the damping properties of the solutions and the
186: physical interpretation of the results are discussed. Finally,
187: in \S~\ref{conclusions}, our
188: conclusions are drawn.
189:
190:
191: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
192: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 2 EQUILIBRIUM, LINEAR WAVES AND NUMERICAL METHOD %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
193: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
194: \section{EQUILIBRIUM MODEL, LINEAR MHD WAVE EQUATIONS, AND NUMERICAL METHOD}\label{equil}
195: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
196:
197:
198: % 1 Model, density and magnetic field
199: We model the equilibrium magnetic and plasma
200: configuration of a system of two coronal loops by means
201: of a one-dimensional model in Cartesian geometry.
202: The magnetic field is straight and pointing in the $z$-direction, ${\mathit {\bf B}}=B\ {\bf \ez}$.
203: For applications to the solar corona, it is a good approximation to consider that
204: the magnetic pressure dominates over the gas
205: pressure. This classic zero plasma-$\beta$ limit
206: implies that the magnetic field is uniform and
207: that the density, $\rho(x)$, or Alfv\'en
208: speed, $v_{\rm A}(x)$, profiles can be chosen arbitrarily.
209: For simplicity, we consider a system of two identical coronal loops.
210: This system is then modeled by defining a particular equilibrium density
211: profile in the $x$-direction (see Figure~\ref{model}), with two density enhancements
212: of half-width $a$ located at $\pm x_0$. The density in each of the slabs is uniform, $\rho_i$, and
213: connected to the uniform coronal environment, with density $\rho_e$, by transitional
214: non-uniform layers of thickness $l$. The explicit expression for the considered
215: equilibrium density is (for $x \ge 0$)
216:
217: \begin{math}
218: \rho(x) =
219: \cases{
220: \rho_e & if \ $0\leq x \leq x_0-a-\frac{l}{2}$,\cr
221: f_1(x) & if \ $x_0-a-\frac{l}{2}\leq x \leq x_0-a+\frac{l}{2}$,\cr
222: \rho_i & if \ $x_0-a-\frac{l}{2}\leq x \leq x_0-a+\frac{l}{2}$,\cr
223: f_2(x) & if \ $x_0+a-\frac{l}{2}\leq x \leq x_0+a+\frac{l}{2}$,\cr
224: \rho_e & if \ $x\geq x_0+a+\frac{l}{2}$,\cr
225: }
226: \end{math}
227:
228:
229:
230: \noindent
231: with $\rho(-x)=\rho(x)$.
232: The particular dependence of the density profiles at the non-uniform transitional layers
233: has no qualitative importance on the obtained results. We have chosen them, following \cite{RR02}
234: and \citet{tom04b}, as
235:
236: \begin{eqnarray}
237: f_1(x)&=&\frac{\rho_i}{2}\left[\left(1+\frac{\rho_e}{\rho_i}\right)-\left(1-\frac{\rho_e}{\rho_i}
238: \right)\sin{\frac{\pi\left[-x-(-x_0+a)\right]}{l}}\right]\\\nonumber
239: \end{eqnarray}
240:
241: \noindent
242: and
243:
244: \begin{eqnarray}
245: f_2(x)&=&\frac{\rho_i}{2}\left[\left(1+\frac{\rho_e}{\rho_i}\right)-\left(1-\frac{\rho_e}{\rho_i}
246: \right)\sin{\frac{\pi\left[x-(x_0+a)\right]}{l}}\right].\label{f2}
247: \end{eqnarray}
248:
249:
250:
251: This equilibrium configuration is the same as the one used by
252: \citet{ATOB07a} for the study of the influence of the internal density structuring of a coronal loop
253: on the properties of their damped oscillations. Their analysis is based on an equilibrium model
254: in which the two slabs are very close to each other and contains a comparison of the results to the ones obtained
255: with similar single slab models. This equilibrium model is also an extension of the one considered
256: by \citet{Luna06}, with the addition of non-uniform density layers at the edges of each slab.
257:
258: % 2 perturbation of the model, linear MHD waves equations
259:
260: In order to study small amplitude oscillations of the previous equilibrium,
261: the linear resistive MHD equations, with constant magnetic diffusivity, $\eta$, are considered.
262: As the equilibrium configuration only
263: depends on the $x$-direction, a spatial and temporal dependence of the form
264: $\exp^{\imath(\omega t-k_y y - k_z z)}$ is assumed for all perturbed quantities,
265: with $\omega=\omega_R+\imath\omega_I$ the complex frequency
266: and $k_y$ and $k_z$ the perpendicular and parallel
267: wavenumbers. For resonantly damped solutions, the real
268: part of the frequency gives the period of the oscillation, $P=2\pi/\omega_R$, while the imaginary part
269: is related to the damping time, $\tau_d=1/\omega_I$.
270: The photospheric line-tying effect is then
271: included by selecting the appropriate parallel
272: wavenumber.
273: This leads to the following set of ordinary differential equations for the two components of the
274: velocity perturbation, $v_x$ and $v_y$, and the three components of the perturbed magnetic field, $b_x$,
275: $b_y$, and $b_z$,
276:
277:
278: \begin{eqnarray}
279: \omega v_x &=& \frac{B}{\rho}\left(- k_z b_{\rm 1x}+\imath \frac{d b_{\rm 1z}}{dx}\right), \label{first}\\
280: \omega v_y &=& \frac{B}{\rho}\left(- k_z b_{\rm 1y}+ k_y b_{\rm 1z}\right),\\
281: \omega \frac{b_{\rm 1x}}{B}&=&- k_z v_x -\imath\frac{\eta}{B}\left[\frac{d^2 b_{\rm 1x}}{dx^2}-\left(k^2_y+k^2_z\right) b_{\rm 1x}\right],\\
282: \omega \frac{b_{\rm 1y}}{B}&=&- k_z v_y -\imath\frac{\eta}{B}\left[\frac{d^2 b_{\rm 1y}}{dx^2}-\left(k^2_y+k^2_z\right) b_{\rm 1y}\right],\\
283: \omega \frac{b_{\rm 1z}}{B}&=&\left(\imath\frac{dv_x}{dx}+ k_y v_y\right)-\imath\frac{\eta}{B}
284: \left[\frac{d^2 b_{\rm 1z}}{dx^2}-\left(k^2_y+k^2_z\right) b_{\rm 1z}\right].\label{last}
285: \end{eqnarray}
286:
287: \noindent
288: These equations, together with the appropriate boundary conditions, define an eigenvalue problem
289: for fast and Alfv\'en normal modes.
290: As the plasma-$\beta$=$0$, the slow mode is absent and there
291: are no motions parallel to the equilibrium magnetic field, $v_z=0$.
292: In this paper, solutions to these equations are obtained by performing a normal mode analysis.
293: When only perpendicular propagation of perturbations is considered ($k_y\neq 0$, $l=0$), the solutions
294: represent undamped fast MHD waves with oblique propagation, in addition to Alfv\'en waves.
295: If non-uniform transitional layers are included ($l\neq 0$), the
296: solutions are damped. In this case, solutions are in general difficult to obtain analytically.
297: Numerical approximations are then obtained
298: using PDE2D \citep{sewell05}, a general-purpose partial differential equation solver. The code uses finite elements
299: and allows the use of a non-uniformly distributed grid, which is needed in order to properly resolve the large gradients
300: that arise in the vicinity of resonant layers. This code has been used successfully in
301: previous studies that involved similar computations of the damping rate by, for example,
302: \citet{TOB06,ATOB07a,ATOB07b}.
303: As for the boundary conditions, we impose the vanishing of the perturbed
304: velocity far away from the two-slab system, hence ${\bf v}\rightarrow 0$ as $x\rightarrow\pm\infty$.
305:
306:
307: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
308: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 3 ANALYSIS AND RESULTS %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
309: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
310: \section{ANALYSIS AND RESULTS}\label{results}
311: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
312:
313: Solutions to Equations~(\ref{first})--(\ref{last}) for the simplest case,
314: when $k_y=0$ and $l=0$, have been obtained by \citet{Luna06}.
315: Fast normal modes are then decoupled from Alfv\'en modes. \citet{Luna06} find that the system is able
316: to support a variety of oscillatory modes. In particular, they concentrate on the splitting of the kink
317: transversal oscillation of a single slab, giving rise to two solutions, symmetric and
318: antisymmetric with respect to $x=0$, in which the two slabs oscillate in the kink mode in
319: phase or anti-phase
320: with the same frequency. The fundamental mode is symmetric and its
321: frequency is constrained between two limiting values. In the limit of no separation between slabs, it is equal to the
322: kink mode frequency of a single slab with double width. As the distance between the slabs is
323: increased, the interaction weakens and, for large separations, the two slabs do not ``feel'' each
324: other and the frequency of the whole system is the same as the kink mode frequency of a single slab.
325: The range of separation between slabs for which
326: the interaction is strong is mainly determined by
327: the parallel wavenumber,
328: $k_z$, which determines the confinement and drop-off rate of the eigenfunctions in the coronal medium.
329: These authors also find that the
330: antisymmetric mode is not present for all the values of the distance
331: between the slabs and becomes leaky when this distance is smaller than a given value, that
332: depends on the adopted value for the parallel
333: wavenumber.
334:
335: When compared to \citet{Luna06}, there are two new ingredients in the physical model under
336: consideration in this paper. On one hand, the non-uniformity of the equilibrium density at the
337: edges of the slabs.
338: On the other hand, the inclusion of perpendicular propagation of perturbations.
339: These two ingredients produce the resonant coupling of fast modes to Alfv\'en modes and, as a
340: result, the global modes of the system are damped. The damping of oscillations in a system of
341: coronal loops has been reported in observations analyzed by \citet{Verwichte04} and is likely to differ
342: from the theoretical values obtained with isolated coronal loop models.
343:
344: In \S~\ref{undamped}, we first describe
345: the normal mode properties of oscillations of our two-slab system when oblique propagation of perturbations
346: is included. Then, in \S~\ref{damping}, the damping of oscillations by resonant absorption and the properties of
347: the eigenfunctions are detailed.
348:
349:
350:
351: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
352: \subsection{Normal Modes in a Two-Slab System with Oblique Propagation}\label{undamped}
353: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
354:
355: We first consider solutions to Equations~(\ref{first})--(\ref{last}) including oblique propagation of
356: waves ($k_y\neq0$) and in the absence of non-uniform transitional layers ($l=0$).
357: Also, $\eta=0$ is set in these equations.
358: As the equilibrium is piece-wise constant there is no resonant coupling to
359: Alfv\'en waves and solutions represent undamped oscillations. These solutions can be obtained by solving an analytical dispersion
360: relation. \citet{ATOB07b} have shown, for a single Cartesian slab, that oblique propagation of waves affects
361: the nature and properties of kink- and sausage-like solutions. The fundamental kink mode, which is body for
362: values of $k_y$ below certain value, becomes surface beyond that particular value.
363: There is a sausage surface wave, with its frequency always below the internal cut-off frequency, which
364: only exists when $k_y\neq0$. The phase speed of these two solutions goes asymptotically to the kink speed for
365: quasi-perpendicular propagation ($k_y\gg k_z$). On the other hand, the sausage body solution, which is leaky in the
366: long wave limit ($k_z a\ll 1$), becomes trapped when a non-zero $k_y$ is included. This solution is always above the
367: internal cut-off frequency and, hence, keeps its body character in the limit of quasi-perpendicular
368: propagation, due to the existence of the sausage surface solution below the internal cut-off frequency.
369: All these features are well displayed in Figure~2 of \citet{ATOB07b}.
370:
371:
372: When a second density enhancement is included, the kink, sausage surface, and
373: sausage body solutions, described by \citet{ATOB07b}, split into symmetric and antisymmetric
374: solutions with respect to $x=0$, giving six solutions that we name symmetric and antisymmetric;
375: kink (with the two slabs oscillating in the kink mode), sausage surface (with the two
376: slabs oscillating in the sausage surface mode), and sausage body (with both slabs oscillating in
377: the sausage body mode).
378:
379:
380: When finding our solutions, we consider fixed
381: values for the density contrast of the two-slab
382: system, $\rho_i/\rho_e$=$10$, and for the longitudinal wavenumber,
383: $k_za$=$\pi/50$. For the observed kink oscillations
384: with a wavelength double the length of the loop,
385: this corresponds to a ratio of length to width
386: $L/2a=25$. These are typical values for observed coronal
387: loops for which transverse oscillations have been reported.
388: We have studied the dependency of the frequency of these solutions as a function
389: of the position of the slabs, related to the distance between the loops, and as a function of the
390: perpendicular wavenumber.
391: Figure~\ref{freq} displays the obtained results.
392: The splitting of the solutions can clearly be seen for the six modes. For the kink symmetric
393: and antisymmetric solutions, the range of distances for which the interaction is strong and the
394: deviation from the kink mode frequency of a single slab significant, is large in the absence of perpendicular propagation
395: ($k_y=0$).
396: Even for distances of the order of $100a$, the two solutions do not converge to
397: that frequency. When perpendicular propagation is included the single slab kink mode frequency
398: is approached for much smaller distances between slabs, in such a way that only for distances of the order of
399: a few times $a$ the symmetric and antisymmetric solutions have frequencies that differ significantly
400: from the kink frequency of a single slab. Also,
401: the increase of the perpendicular wavenumber
402: allows the existence of the kink antisymmetric mode for smaller distances between slabs,
403: in comparison to the $k_y=0$ case, when it becomes leaky below $x_0\simeq 26a$.
404: As for the sausage surface and sausage body, symmetric and antisymmetric solutions, a similar result
405: is obtained. They are plotted only for values of $k_y\neq0$ because the surface solutions only exist
406: when $k_y\neq0$ and the body solutions are leaky
407: below a certain value of $k_y$. We can also appreciate the splitting of the single slab solutions and
408: the dependency of the interaction between the slabs and, hence, the deviation from the single slab frequencies
409: as a function of the slab separation and
410: perpendicular wavenumber. It is interesting to note that the fundamental
411: solution in the case of kink and sausage surface solutions is the symmetric one,
412: while it is the antisymmetric one in the case of the sausage body solutions.
413: The right panels of Figure~\ref{freq} display the frequencies of the six solutions as a function of
414: $k_y$ for a fixed value of the distance between the slabs.
415: As we increase the value of the perpendicular
416: wavenumber both symmetric and antisymmetric solutions converge
417: to the same frequencies and approach those of the kink, sausage surface, and sausage body solutions of a
418: single slab in the limit of quasi-perpendicular propagation.
419:
420: We have computed the difference between the frequency of the symmetric and antisymmetric solutions of the two-slab
421: system and the kink and sausage solutions of a single slab. For the kink solutions, and considering for
422: example $x_0=2a$, the frequency of the symmetric mode is 15\% smaller than the kink mode frequency of
423: a single slab, when $k_y=0$. This difference decreases to 3\% for $k_y a=1$. When the two-slab system
424: is oscillating in the antisymmetric mode, its frequency is 13\% larger that the kink mode frequency for
425: $k_y a=0.5$, while it is only 4\% for $k_ya=1$. As for the sausage surface solutions of the two-slab system,
426: a deviation from the sausage surface frequency of a single slab around 5\% is found, in the case of the
427: symmetric solution with $k_ya=0.3$ and $x_0=2a$. Finally, for the sausage body
428: solutions of the two-slab system with $x_0=2a$, the maximum difference occurs for the antisymmetric solution with
429: $k_ya=0.5$ and is around 10\%.
430:
431: The results displayed in Figure~\ref{freq} can easily be interpreted by analyzing the spatial distribution
432: of the corresponding eigenfunctions. Figures~\ref{kinkkink}, \ref{ssss}, and \ref{sbsb} show the
433: transversal component of the perturbed velocity and the total pressure perturbation for the kink, sausage
434: surface, and sausage body, symmetric and antisymmetric solutions, for different values of the
435: perpendicular wavenumber. In Figure~\ref{kinkkink} the solutions for the kink solutions are plotted for three
436: values of the perpendicular wave number. For $k_y=0$, the transversal velocity is maximum at the internal part
437: of the slabs, while it decreases exponentially outside. The total pressure perturbation has an antisymmetric profile in
438: each slab, with a zero value at the center. When oblique propagation is included, there is an improved confinement of
439: the eigenfunctions with a sharper drop-off rate in the external medium, a behavior also found by \citet{toni03}, in the context of
440: prominence fibril oscillations. Also, the character of the solutions inside
441: the slabs change, and the two solutions become surface-like solutions, with a decreasing amplitude of $v_x$
442: inside the slabs as $k_y$ is increased. This improved confinement of the solutions weakens the interaction between
443: the slabs and results in a frequency of the two-slab kink solution closer to that of the kink mode of a single slab.
444: Regarding the sausage
445: surface and body-like solutions (Figures~\ref{ssss} and \ref{sbsb}), we can appreciate that they have a
446: similar spatial distribution of eigenfunctions. The main difference has to be found in the total pressure perturbation
447: profiles, that are maximum at the center of each slab, for the sausage body solutions, while they peak at
448: the edges of the slabs for the surface-like counterparts.
449: An increase in the perpendicular wavenumber also produces an improved confinement, in the external regions,
450: for these four types of modes. This also helps explaining why the interaction between the slabs weakens for
451: increasing perpendicular wavenumber. However, in contrast to the kink solutions, now the transversal velocity
452: component inside the slabs is not affected by the increase in $k_y$ and the solutions keep their surface or body character.
453: Finally, oblique propagation of waves affects
454: the magnitude of the total pressure perturbation of the sausage surface, symmetric and antisymmetric solutions
455: (Figure~\ref{ssss}), but not very much that of the sausage body, symmetric and antisymmetric, modes inside the
456: density enhancements (Figure~\ref{sbsb}).
457:
458: In summary, the inclusion of perpendicular propagation of perturbations changes significantly the oscillatory properties
459: of fast MHD waves in our two-slab system. First, it allows the existence of two sausage surface solutions that are not
460: present when $k_y=0$. Also, it allows the existence of trapped sausage body solutions for slab separations
461: for which they are leaky when $k_y=0$. Second, it produces an improved confinement of the solutions that, for the
462: six modes, are better confined to the slabs, with a sharper drop-off rate in the coronal medium. This produces
463: changes in the frequencies of the six modes and varies significantly the range of slab separations for which the
464: difference between the symmetric and antisymmetric frequencies and the single slab frequencies are important. In the
465: case of the kink solutions, the increase of the
466: perpendicular wavenumber also changes the character of the solutions
467: inside the slabs, and the modes become
468: surface-like. Therefore, for a fixed value of the
469: parallel wavenumber, both the
470: separation between the loops and the value of the
471: perpendicular wavenumber determine the strength of the
472: interaction between the slabs and the departure of the obtained frequencies from the results obtained with a single
473: loop model.
474:
475:
476:
477: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
478: \subsection{Resonant Damping of Oscillations}\label{damping} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
479: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
480:
481: % 1) Observations of damped oscillations. resonant damping viable explanation
482:
483: Observations of transversal coronal loop oscillations show that motions are rapidly damped in only
484: a few periods \citep{Aschwanden99,Nakariakov99}. Coronal loops forming an arcade
485: also show this property, such as reported by \citet{Verwichte04}.
486: Resonant absorption of wave energy has been proposed as a mechanism for the damping of loop oscillations
487: by \citet{HY88}, prior to observational evidence, provided by TRACE observations,
488: of damped transversal loop oscillations.
489: \citet{GAA02} provided an interpretation to the damping observed in TRACE loop oscillations
490: based on this mechanism. Although there is still no consensus on what causes the rapid damping of loop
491: oscillations, several authors have presented comparisons between theory and observations that point out
492: that resonant damping is a viable mechanism \cite[see][for
493: example]{GAA02,Aschwanden03b,Arregui07}.
494: This damping mechanism relies on the coupling of global fast motions and localized Alfv\'enic motions due to
495: the non-uniformity of the medium in the transversal direction.
496:
497:
498: % 2) What we do to compute the damping of our solutions. Technical intrincancies and parameters
499:
500: To study the damping of the normal modes described in \S~\ref{undamped}, we now include
501: non-uniform transitional layers that connect the internal and external densities at the edges of each
502: slab ($l\neq0$). For the normal mode analysis of Equations~(\ref{first})--(\ref{last}), a small but finite value
503: of the resistivity has to be provided when computing the damping of oscillations.
504: The magnetic Reynolds number in the solar corona is believed to be of the order of $10^{14}$, hence the resistive diffusion time
505: is very large. Such large values of $R_m$ are difficult to handle in any numerical scheme. On the other hand,
506: as shown by \citet{POKE91}, the damping by resonant absorption becomes independent of resistivity, beyond a given value
507: of $R_m$. In our numerical computations, resistivity has been chosen to be
508: small enough for the imaginary part of the frequency to be independent of resistivity, so that we can be confident
509: that solutions that correspond to the solar coronal large Reynolds numbers are obtained.
510: This condition has been checked to a high accuracy and for the solutions presented in this paper
511: a value for the magnetic Reynolds number $R_m=v_{Ai}a/\eta$ (with $v_{Ai}$ the internal Alfv\'en speed)
512: in between $10^6$ and $10^8$ has been sufficient.
513:
514: % 3) Description of the results for the six modes
515:
516: We now consider the six different solutions presented in \S~\ref{undamped} and compute their damping due
517: to the resonant coupling to Alfv\'enic motions. The same parameter values for the equilibrium configurations
518: are considered, but now non-uniform transitional layers of thickness $l/a=0.3$ have been included.
519: The results of our computations are displayed in Figure~\ref{dampingw}. The left panels of this figure show
520: the imaginary part of the frequency, for the six collective solutions under consideration, as a function of the position
521: of the centers of the slabs. As can be seen, the splitting of solutions into symmetric and antisymmetric modes produces
522: these modes to have a damping different from that of the corresponding single slab solutions.
523: These differences go to zero in the limit of large separation between the slabs. As for the kink solutions, the
524: antisymmetric mode has a stronger damping than its symmetric counterpart. This is also true for the sausage-like
525: solutions. The most significant differences on the damping of the kink symmetric solution are produced for
526: small distances between the slabs. However, the difference of the symmetric mode damping with respect to the kink mode
527: damping of a single slab is below 10\%. The kink antisymmetric solution damping, on the other hand, is more than double
528: that of the kink mode of a single slab. Also significant are the differences between the sausage surface
529: symmetric and antisymmetric damping and the corresponding sausage surface mode damping of a single slab.
530: The imaginary parts for these two modes are 70\% smaller and larger, respectively, than the value for the single slab
531: mode.
532: The right panels of Figure~\ref{dampingw} display the damping per period of the six solutions as a
533: function of the perpendicular wavenumber, for a fixed value of the distance between the slabs.
534: As we increase the value of perpendicular
535: wavenumber the damping for both symmetric and antisymmetric solutions
536: approaches the damping of the kink, sausage surface, and sausage body solutions of a
537: single slab, in the limit of quasi-perpendicular propagation.
538: Apart from the difference in the damping of these solutions with respect to those of the single slab and the
539: dependence of the damping with perpendicular
540: wavenumber, the most
541: important result is that surface-like solutions, kink and sausage alike, are clearly strongly damped,
542: within a few periods, for large values of $k_y$, while sausage body
543: solutions are unaffected by resonant couplings (see Figure~\ref{dampingw}, bottom row). The reason for the absence
544: of resonant damping in the case of the two sausage body solutions is that their frequencies lie outside the
545: Alfv\'en continua produced by the presence of the four non-uniform layers. This leads to damping times, for these sausage
546: solutions, that are of the order of the used Reynolds number and several orders of magnitude larger that the periods
547: of oscillation.
548:
549:
550: % 4) Description of the eigenfunctions. They help obtaining a physical interpretation for the obtained
551: % results. The conclusions reached with the use of a single slab can be generalized to a system
552: % of two coronal loops. However, the damping rates are quantitatively different when the two loops
553: % approach each other and this has to be taken into account when comparing theory and observations.
554:
555: In order to better understand the results displayed in Figure~\ref{dampingw} and to get physical insight into the
556: reason(s) for the different damping rates of the different solutions, we have analyzed
557: the spatial distribution of the eigenfunctions for the six kind of solutions.
558: Figures~\ref{eigenkinkkinkdamp}, \ref{eigensusudamp}, and \ref{eigensaussausdamp} display example
559: eigenfunctions for the six types of solutions, for a particular set of parameters.
560: The spatial distribution of eigenfunctions is rather similar to the ones shown in Figures~\ref{kinkkink},
561: \ref{ssss}, and \ref{sbsb}, for undamped solutions, but
562: now peaks at the non-uniform transitional layers are clearly visible in the perturbed transverse
563: velocity of the kink and sausage surface modes, while they are absent in the case
564: of the two sausage body modes. These peaks are an indication of resonant coupling to
565: Alfv\'en waves at the non-uniform layers. Aside from these peaks, the spatial distribution of the magnetic
566: pressure perturbation has extrema at the four resonant layers in the case of the kink and
567: the sausage surface modes, while it is maximum at the centers of the slabs in the case
568: of the sausage body modes. The total pressure perturbation has no extrema at the resonant layers in the case of the
569: sausage body solutions. The behavior of the eigenfunctions at the resonant layers and the fundamental conservation laws
570: that govern the resonant couplings were studied by \citet{sakurai91}
571: in ideal MHD and by \citet{goossens95} in dissipative MHD. These authors find that the derivative of the total pressure
572: perturbation is zero at the resonant positions. This behavior is retrieved in the pressure perturbation
573: for our damped solutions, but not in the two solutions for which resonant couplings are absent.
574:
575:
576:
577:
578: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
579: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
580: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
581: \section{SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS}\label{conclusions}
582: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
583:
584:
585: % 1) What we present in this paper
586:
587: We have presented numerical results from a normal mode analysis for resonantly damped fast MHD
588: oscillations in a system of two coronal loops. For simplicity, the adopted
589: equilibrium model consists of two identical density enhancements in Cartesian
590: geometry. The linearized resistive MHD wave equations are considered and solutions
591: for obliquely propagating waves are obtained. The inclusion of oblique propagation together with non-uniform
592: transitional layers that connect the internal and external densities produce the resonant damping of
593: oscillations.
594:
595:
596: % 2) General results: multiple modes, splitting, effect of ky and distance
597:
598: The considered equilibrium supports a variety of different wave solutions. The normal modes
599: of oscillation in a two-slab system are, in general, different to those of a single and isolated slab, due to the
600: interaction between the slabs. The well-known fast kink
601: and sausage normal modes, present in a single slab configuration, split into symmetric and
602: antisymmetric solutions. We have concentrated our analysis on the six solutions coming from the splitting
603: of the kink and sausage (body and surface) modes in a single slab with oblique propagation, described by
604: \citet{ATOB07b}.
605: The frequencies of these six symmetric and antisymmetric solutions are in general different from the single slab
606: solutions. They depend upon the distance between the slabs (as shown by \citealt{Luna06}, for the kink
607: symmetric and antisymmetric solutions), but also
608: on the magnitude of the perpendicular wavenumber.
609: The inclusion of oblique propagation of perturbations has important effects on the
610: dynamics of the system. First, it introduces two new surface-like solutions, with sausage parity,
611: not present in the case of parallel propagation. Second, it decreases the effect of the interaction
612: between the slabs, since solutions are more confined to the neighborhood of the density enhancements.
613: Both the distance between slabs and perpendicular propagation determine the difference in frequency between the
614: single slab model solutions and the modes described in this paper. These differences are of the order of 15\% at most
615: and should, therefore, be taken into account in the modeling of these events. They are, however, well below the
616: observational uncertainties for the measured periods in
617: transversal coronal loop oscillations, which are of the order of 40\% \citep{Aschwanden02}.
618:
619: % 3) Next, we have studied damping. Conclusions about this
620:
621: Next, we have studied the damping of the different solutions due to resonant coupling to Alfv\'enic
622: motions. The period and damping rate of the six solutions have been computed and the spatial structure of
623: eigenfunctions analyzed in order to find some physical insight into the obtained results. We find that surface-like
624: solutions, both kink and sausage, are strongly damped. On the other hand, the two
625: sausage body solutions are unaffected by resonant absorption.
626: This is due to the absence of resonance due to the fact that the frequencies of these solutions are outside the corresponding Alfv\'en continua.
627: A comparison with the single slab model results reveals that differences in damping are important for small values of
628: the distance between the slabs. The most significant differences arise for the kink antisymmetric solution and
629: the two sausage surface solutions, with differences in the imaginary part of the frequency of the order
630: of 125\% and 70\% with respect to the damping of the corresponding single slab modes.
631: These differences are of the order or larger than the observational uncertainties for the measured damping times in
632: transversal coronal loop oscillations, which are around 60\% \citep{Aschwanden02}.
633:
634: % 4) Application of the present results to observations
635:
636: %\citet{OM07} have recently presented results from numerical simulations in a two-slab system
637: %similar to the one considered in this work. These authors comment that the results of these simulations
638: %reveal that kink and sausage waves possess properties
639: %that depend on the distance between the slabs and identify the
640: %modes excited in the system as additional kink and sausage modes triggered in both strands, in comparison to
641: %the case of a single slab. We believe that a description of normal modes to point out that the two-slab system has its
642: %own normal modes of oscillations, described in this paper, that the single slab kink and sausage alike oscillations
643: %give a good approximation to the frequencies and damping rates in the limit of quasi-perpendicular propagation and large
644: %distances between the slabs, but in general the properties of the symmetric and antisymmetric modes described here should be
645: %used for a proper comparison with observations, as well as for the interpretation of numerical simulations.
646:
647:
648: % 5) Possible generalization to two cylinders. Differences and similarities. Shortcomings of this work.
649: % work in progress with cylinders
650:
651: In this work a magnetic two-slab system has been used to model a two-loop structure.
652: Some of the results found in slab geometry cannot be translated to cylindrical coronal loop systems,
653: while some others give a good approximation to the phase speeds in cylinders. For instance, the
654: sausage surface solutions described in this paper are not present in a system of two
655: cylinders. Also, the sausage body solutions would correspond to perturbations in each
656: cylinder with $m=0$, thus they cannot be resonantly damped solutions. On the other hand, slabs are known
657: to be poor wave-guides in comparison with cylinders. However, our results indicate that the inclusion
658: of oblique propagation produces a sharper drop-off rate of the eigenfunctions in the
659: external medium, resulting in a confinement similar to the case of cylinders and a good approximation of
660: the phase-speed of the kink mode in a slender flux tube. The normal modes of oscillation in a system of two
661: homogeneous cylinders have been computed recently by \citet{Luna07}. These authors find four solutions
662: that correspond to transversal oscillations, symmetric and antisymmetric, in the plane containing the two
663: cylinders. The frequency of these solutions is seen also to differ from the frequency of the kink mode
664: for a single cylinder for small distances between the cylinders. A natural extension to the study
665: presented in this paper and to the results described by \citet{Luna07} is the analysis of the damping
666: in a similar two-cylinder configuration.
667:
668:
669:
670:
671:
672: \acknowledgments
673:
674: The authors acknowledge the Spanish Ministerio de
675: Educaci\'on y Ciencia for the funding
676: provided under project AYA2006-07637 and the Conselleria d'Economia, Hisenda i
677: Innovaci\'o of the Government of the Balearic Islands for the funding provided under
678: grants PRIB-2004-10145 and PCTIB2005GC3-03 (Grups
679: Competitius). J. Terradas acknowledges the Spanish Ministerio de
680: Educaci\'on y Ciencia for the funding provided under a Juan de la Cierva fellowship.
681:
682:
683:
684: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
685: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% References %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
686: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
687: %\bibliographystyle{apj}
688: %\bibliography{arregui}
689: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
690:
691: \begin{thebibliography}{40}
692: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
693:
694: \bibitem[{{Andries} {et~al.}(2005){Andries}, {Arregui}, \& {Goossens}}]{AAG05}
695: {Andries}, J., {Arregui}, I., \& {Goossens}, M. 2005, \apjl, 624, L57
696:
697: \bibitem[{{Arregui} {et~al.}(2007{\natexlab{a}}){Arregui}, {Andries}, {Van
698: Doorsselaere}, {Goossens}, \& {Poedts}}]{Arregui07}
699: {Arregui}, I., {Andries}, J., {Van Doorsselaere}, T., {Goossens}, M., \&
700: {Poedts}, S. 2007{\natexlab{a}}, \aap, 463, 333
701:
702: \bibitem[{{Arregui} {et~al.}(2007{\natexlab{b}}){Arregui}, {Terradas},
703: {Oliver}, \& {Ballester}}]{ATOB07a}
704: {Arregui}, I., {Terradas}, J., {Oliver}, R., \& {Ballester}, J.~L.
705: 2007{\natexlab{b}}, \aap, 466, 1145
706:
707: \bibitem[{{Arregui} {et~al.}(2007{\natexlab{c}}){Arregui}, {Terradas},
708: {Oliver}, \& {Ballester}}]{ATOB07b}
709: ---. 2007{\natexlab{c}}, \solphys, in press
710:
711: \bibitem[{{Aschwanden}(2005)}]{markusbook}
712: {Aschwanden}, M.~J. 2005, {Physics of the Solar Corona. An Introduction with
713: Problems and Solutions (2nd edition)} (Springer-Praxis)
714:
715: \bibitem[{{Aschwanden} {et~al.}(2002){Aschwanden}, {De Pontieu}, {Schrijver},
716: \& {Title}}]{Aschwanden02}
717: {Aschwanden}, M.~J., {De Pontieu}, B., {Schrijver}, C.~J., \& {Title}, A.~M.
718: 2002, \solphys, 206, 99
719:
720: \bibitem[{{Aschwanden} {et~al.}(1999){Aschwanden}, {Fletcher}, {Schrijver}, \&
721: {Alexander}}]{Aschwanden99}
722: {Aschwanden}, M.~J., {Fletcher}, L., {Schrijver}, C.~J., \& {Alexander}, D.
723: 1999, \apj, 520, 880
724:
725: \bibitem[{{Aschwanden} {et~al.}(2003){Aschwanden}, {Nightingale}, {Andries},
726: {Goossens}, \& {Van Doorsselaere}}]{Aschwanden03b}
727: {Aschwanden}, M.~J., {Nightingale}, R.~W., {Andries}, J., {Goossens}, M., \&
728: {Van Doorsselaere}, T. 2003, \apj, 598, 1375
729:
730: \bibitem[{{Berton} \& {Heyvaerts}(1987)}]{BH87}
731: {Berton}, R. \& {Heyvaerts}, J. 1987, \solphys, 109, 201
732:
733: \bibitem[{{Bogdan} \& {Fox}(1991)}]{BF91}
734: {Bogdan}, T.~J. \& {Fox}, D.~C. 1991, \apj, 379, 758
735:
736: \bibitem[{{De Pontieu} {et~al.}(2001){De Pontieu}, {Martens}, \&
737: {Hudson}}]{depontieu01}
738: {De Pontieu}, B., {Martens}, P.~C.~H., \& {Hudson}, H.~S. 2001, \apj, 558, 859
739:
740: \bibitem[{{D{\'{\i}}az} {et~al.}(2003){D{\'{\i}}az}, {Oliver}, \&
741: {Ballester}}]{toni03}
742: {D{\'{\i}}az}, A.~J., {Oliver}, R., \& {Ballester}, J.~L. 2003, \aap, 402, 781
743:
744: \bibitem[{{D{\'{\i}}az} {et~al.}(2005){D{\'{\i}}az}, {Oliver}, \&
745: {Ballester}}]{diaz05}
746: ---. 2005, \aap, 440, 1167
747:
748: \bibitem[{{Goossens} {et~al.}(2006){Goossens}, {Andries}, \& {Arregui}}]{GAA06}
749: {Goossens}, M., {Andries}, J., \& {Arregui}, I. 2006, Royal Society of London
750: Philosophical Transactions Series A, 364, 433
751:
752: \bibitem[{{Goossens} {et~al.}(2002){Goossens}, {Andries}, \&
753: {Aschwanden}}]{GAA02}
754: {Goossens}, M., {Andries}, J., \& {Aschwanden}, M.~J. 2002, \aap, 394, L39
755:
756: \bibitem[{{Goossens} {et~al.}(1995){Goossens}, {Ruderman}, \&
757: {Hollweg}}]{goossens95}
758: {Goossens}, M., {Ruderman}, M.~S., \& {Hollweg}, J.~V. 1995, \solphys, 157, 75
759:
760: \bibitem[{{Hollweg} \& {Yang}(1988)}]{HY88}
761: {Hollweg}, J.~V. \& {Yang}, G. 1988, \jgr, 93, 5423
762:
763: \bibitem[{{Keppens} {et~al.}(1994){Keppens}, {Bogdan}, \&
764: {Goossens}}]{keppens94}
765: {Keppens}, R., {Bogdan}, T.~J., \& {Goossens}, M. 1994, \apj, 436, 372
766:
767: \bibitem[{{Luna} {et~al.}(2006){Luna}, {Terradas}, {Oliver}, \&
768: {Ballester}}]{Luna06}
769: {Luna}, M., {Terradas}, J., {Oliver}, R., \& {Ballester}, J.~L. 2006, \aap,
770: 457, 1071
771:
772: \bibitem[{{Luna} {et~al.}(2007){Luna}, {Terradas}, {Oliver}, \&
773: {Ballester}}]{Luna07}
774: ---. 2007, \apj, submitted
775:
776: \bibitem[{{Marcu} {et~al.}(2006){Marcu}, {Ballai}, \& {Pint{\'e}r}}]{marcu06}
777: {Marcu}, A., {Ballai}, I., \& {Pint{\'e}r}, B. 2006, \aap, 449, 1193
778:
779: \bibitem[{{Murawski}(1993)}]{murawski93}
780: {Murawski}, K. 1993, Acta Astronomica, 43, 161
781:
782: \bibitem[{{Murawski} \& {Roberts}(1994)}]{MR94}
783: {Murawski}, K. \& {Roberts}, B. 1994, \solphys, 151, 305
784:
785: \bibitem[{{Nakariakov} \& {Ofman}(2001)}]{Nakariakov01}
786: {Nakariakov}, V.~M. \& {Ofman}, L. 2001, \aap, 372, L53
787:
788: \bibitem[{{Nakariakov} {et~al.}(1999){Nakariakov}, {Ofman}, {DeLuca},
789: {Roberts}, \& {Davila}}]{Nakariakov99}
790: {Nakariakov}, V.~M., {Ofman}, L., {DeLuca}, E.~E., {Roberts}, B., \& {Davila},
791: J.~M. 1999, Science, 285, 862
792:
793: \bibitem[{{Ofman}(2002)}]{ofman02}
794: {Ofman}, L. 2002, \apjl, 568, L135
795:
796: \bibitem[{{Ofman}(2005)}]{ofman05}
797: ---. 2005, Advances in Space Research, 36, 1572
798:
799: \bibitem[{{Ogrodowczyk} \& {Murawski}(2007)}]{OM07}
800: {Ogrodowczyk}, R. \& {Murawski}, K. 2007, \aap, 461, 1133
801:
802: \bibitem[{{Poedts} \& {Kerner}(1991)}]{POKE91}
803: {Poedts}, S. \& {Kerner}, W. 1991, \prl, 66, 2871
804:
805: \bibitem[{{Roberts} {et~al.}(1984){Roberts}, {Edwin}, \& {Benz}}]{REB84}
806: {Roberts}, B., {Edwin}, P.~M., \& {Benz}, A.~O. 1984, \apj, 279, 857
807:
808: \bibitem[{{Ruderman} \& {Roberts}(2002)}]{RR02}
809: {Ruderman}, M.~S. \& {Roberts}, B. 2002, \apj, 577, 475
810:
811: \bibitem[{{Sakurai} {et~al.}(1991){Sakurai}, {Goossens}, \&
812: {Hollweg}}]{sakurai91}
813: {Sakurai}, T., {Goossens}, M., \& {Hollweg}, J.~V. 1991, \solphys, 133, 227
814:
815: \bibitem[{{Schrijver} {et~al.}(2002){Schrijver}, {Aschwanden}, \&
816: {Title}}]{SAT02}
817: {Schrijver}, C.~J., {Aschwanden}, M.~J., \& {Title}, A.~M. 2002, \solphys, 206,
818: 69
819:
820: \bibitem[{{Schrijver} \& {Brown}(2000)}]{SB00}
821: {Schrijver}, C.~J. \& {Brown}, D.~S. 2000, \apj, 537, L69
822:
823: \bibitem[{{Sewell}(2005)}]{sewell05}
824: {Sewell}, G. 2005, The Numerical Solution of Ordinary and Partial Differential
825: Equations (Wiley-Interscience)
826:
827: \bibitem[{{Terradas} {et~al.}(2006){Terradas}, {Oliver}, \&
828: {Ballester}}]{TOB06}
829: {Terradas}, J., {Oliver}, R., \& {Ballester}, J.~L. 2006, \apj, 650, L91
830:
831: \bibitem[{{Uchida}(1970)}]{uchida70}
832: {Uchida}, Y. 1970, \pasj, 22, 341
833:
834: \bibitem[{{Van Doorsselaere} {et~al.}(2004){Van Doorsselaere}, {Andries},
835: {Poedts}, \& {Goossens}}]{tom04b}
836: {Van Doorsselaere}, T., {Andries}, J., {Poedts}, S., \& {Goossens}, M. 2004,
837: \apj, 606, 1223
838:
839: \bibitem[{{Verwichte} {et~al.}(2006){Verwichte}, {Foullon}, \&
840: {Nakariakov}}]{verwichte06}
841: {Verwichte}, E., {Foullon}, C., \& {Nakariakov}, V.~M. 2006, \aap, 452, 615
842:
843: \bibitem[{{Verwichte} {et~al.}(2004){Verwichte}, {Nakariakov}, {Ofman}, \&
844: {Deluca}}]{Verwichte04}
845: {Verwichte}, E., {Nakariakov}, V.~M., {Ofman}, L., \& {Deluca}, E.~E. 2004,
846: \solphys, 223, 77
847:
848: \end{thebibliography}
849:
850:
851:
852:
853:
854: \clearpage
855:
856:
857:
858: \begin{figure}
859: \centering
860: \includegraphics[width=10.0cm,angle=90]{fig1.ps}
861: \caption{Schematic representation of the two density enhancements
862: (light-shaded regions) of half-width $a$, centered at
863: $\pm x_0$ representing a system of two coronal slabs in the direction transverse to
864: the equilibrium magnetic field. These enhancements with internal density $\rho_i$ connect
865: to the external medium, with density $\rho_e$, by
866: transitional non-uniform layers
867: (shaded regions) of
868: thickness $l$.}
869: \label{model}
870: \end{figure}
871:
872: \clearpage
873:
874:
875: \begin{figure}
876: \includegraphics[width=7.0cm,angle=0]{fig2a.ps}
877: \includegraphics[width=7.0cm,angle=0]{fig2b.ps}\\
878: \includegraphics[width=7.0cm,angle=0]{fig2c.ps}
879: \includegraphics[width=7.0cm,angle=0]{fig2d.ps}\\
880: \includegraphics[width=7.0cm,angle=0]{fig2e.ps}
881: \includegraphics[width=7.0cm,angle=0]{fig2f.ps}
882: \caption{{\em Left}, Frequency as a function of the position of the slabs centers
883: for different values of the perpendicular
884: wavenumber for the kink solutions ({\em top}),
885: the sausage surface solutions ({\em middle}), and the sausage body
886: solutions ({\em bottom}).
887: {\em Right}, Frequency as a function of the perpendicular wavenumber
888: for the same six types of solution, for a fixed distance between the slabs, $x_0=5a$. In all the
889: figures the solid lines correspond to the symmetric solution and the dashed lines to the antisymmetric
890: solution.}
891: \label{freq}
892: \end{figure}
893:
894: \clearpage
895:
896: \begin{figure}
897: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,angle=0]{fig3a.ps}
898: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,angle=0]{fig3b.ps}\\
899: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,angle=0]{fig3c.ps}
900: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,angle=0]{fig3d.ps}\\
901: \caption{Real part of the transversal velocity component, $v_x$, and imaginary part of the
902: perturbed total pressure, $P_T$, for the fundamental symmetric ({\em left}) and antisymmetric
903: ({\em right}) kink solutions, for several values of the perpendicular wave number: $k_ya=0$
904: (dashed lines), $k_ya=0.5$ (dotted lines), and $k_ya=1$ (solid lines). Note that the
905: character of the eigenfunctions for the symmetric mode changes from body-like to
906: surface-like solution as $k_y$ is increased. In all figures the light-shaded regions represent the density enhancements.
907: These solutions have been obtained with a uniform computational grid with $N_x=10\ 000$ points in the
908: range $-80\leq x/a \leq 80$ (except for the kink solutions with $k_y=0$ for which a range $-200\leq x/a
909: \leq 200$ has been used).}
910: \label{kinkkink}
911: \end{figure}
912:
913: \clearpage
914:
915: \begin{figure}
916: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,angle=0]{fig4a.ps}
917: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,angle=0]{fig4b.ps}\\
918: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,angle=0]{fig4c.ps}
919: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,angle=0]{fig4d.ps}
920: \caption{Same as Figure~\ref{kinkkink} for the sausage surface, symmetric ({\em left}) and
921: antisymmetric ({\em right}) solutions and two
922: values of the perpendicular wavenumber: $k_y a=0.3$
923: (dotted lines) and $k_y a=0.5$ (solid lines). These solutions are surface-like for all values of the
924: perpendicular wavenumber.}
925: \label{ssss}
926: \end{figure}
927:
928: \clearpage
929:
930: \begin{figure}
931: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,angle=0]{fig5a.ps}
932: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,angle=0]{fig5b.ps}\\
933: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,angle=0]{fig5c.ps}
934: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,angle=0]{fig5d.ps}\\
935: \caption{Same as Figures~\ref{kinkkink} and \ref{ssss} for the sausage body, symmetric ({\em left}) and
936: antisymmetric ({\em right}) solutions and two
937: values of the perpendicular wavenumber: $k_y a=0.5$ (dotted lines)
938: and $k_y a=1$ (solid lines).
939: Note that for these solutions $v_x$ is very similar to the ones depicted in Figure~\ref{ssss},
940: while the pressure perturbation in and around the slabs differ substantially.
941: These solutions are body-like for all values of the perpendicular wavenumber.}
942: \label{sbsb}
943: \end{figure}
944:
945: \clearpage
946: \begin{figure}
947: \includegraphics[width=6.0cm,angle=0]{fig6a.ps}
948: \includegraphics[width=6.0cm,angle=0]{fig6b.ps}\\
949: \includegraphics[width=6.0cm,angle=0]{fig6c.ps}
950: \includegraphics[width=6.0cm,angle=0]{fig6d.ps}\\
951: \includegraphics[width=6.0cm,angle=0]{fig6e.ps}
952: \includegraphics[width=6.0cm,angle=0]{fig6f.ps}
953: \caption{{\em Left}, Imaginary part of the frequency as a function of the position of the slabs centers
954: for the kink solutions ({\em top}), the sausage surface solutions
955: ({\em middle}), and the sausage body solutions ({\em bottom})
956: for $k_ya=0.3$ and $l/a=0.3$.
957: {\em Right}, Damping time over period as a
958: function of the perpendicular wavenumber
959: for the same six types of solution, for the same parameter values and a fixed distance between
960: the slabs, $x_0=5a$. In all the figures the solid lines correspond to the symmetric solution and the
961: dashed lines to the antisymmetric solution. A value for the magnetic Reynolds number $R_m=v_{Ai}a/\eta=10^{7}$ has
962: been used in a non-uniform grid with $N_x=14\ 000$ points ($2\ 000$ in each of the four non-uniform transitional layers)
963: in the range $-80\leq x/a\leq80$.}
964: \label{dampingw}
965: \end{figure}
966:
967:
968: \clearpage
969:
970:
971: \begin{figure}
972: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,angle=0]{fig7a.ps}
973: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,angle=0]{fig7b.ps}\\
974: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,angle=0]{fig7c.ps}
975: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,angle=0]{fig7d.ps}
976: \caption{Real part of the transversal velocity component, $v_x$, and imaginary part of the
977: perturbed total pressure, $P_T$, for the fundamental symmetric ({\em left}) and antisymmetric
978: ({\em right}) kink solutions, for $k_ya=0.3$ and non-uniform transitional layers with thickness $l/a=0.3$.
979: A value for the magnetic Reynolds number $R_m=v_{Ai}a/\eta=10^{7}$ has been
980: used in a non-uniform grid with $N_x=14\ 000$ points ($2\ 000$ on each of the four non-uniform transitional layers) in the range $-80\leq x/a\leq80$.
981: In all figures the light-shaded regions represent the density enhancements and the shaded regions the non-uniform layers.}
982: \label{eigenkinkkinkdamp}
983: \end{figure}
984:
985: \clearpage
986:
987:
988:
989: \begin{figure}
990: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,angle=0]{fig8a.ps}
991: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,angle=0]{fig8b.ps}\\
992: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,angle=0]{fig8c.ps}
993: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,angle=0]{fig8d.ps}
994: \caption{Same as Figure~\ref{eigenkinkkinkdamp} for the fundamental symmetric ({\em left}) and antisymmetric ({\em right})
995: sausage surface solutions.}
996: \label{eigensusudamp}
997: \end{figure}
998:
999: \clearpage
1000:
1001:
1002: \begin{figure}
1003: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,angle=0]{fig9a.ps}
1004: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,angle=0]{fig9b.ps}\\
1005: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,angle=0]{fig9c.ps}
1006: \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,angle=0]{fig9d.ps}
1007: \caption{Same as Figures~\ref{eigenkinkkinkdamp} and \ref{eigensusudamp} for the fundamental symmetric ({\em left}) and antisymmetric
1008: ({\em right}) sausage body solutions.}
1009: \label{eigensaussausdamp}
1010: \end{figure}
1011:
1012:
1013:
1014:
1015: \end{document}
1016:
1017: