1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: %\usepackage{graphicx}
4: %\usepackage{latexsym}
5: %\usepackage{natbib}
6: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
7:
8:
9:
10:
11:
12: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
13: \documentclass[]{emulateapj}
14: \usepackage{graphicx}
15: \usepackage{latexsym}
16: \usepackage{natbib}
17: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
18:
19:
20:
21: \begin{document}
22:
23: \title{Intermittent millisecond X-ray pulsations from the neutron-star X-ray transient SAX~J1748.9--2021 in the globular cluster NGC~6440}
24:
25: \author{D. Altamirano\altaffilmark{1},
26: P. Casella\altaffilmark{1},
27: A. Patruno\altaffilmark{1},
28: R. Wijnands\altaffilmark{1},
29: M. van der Klis\altaffilmark{1}}
30: % \\ University of Amsterdam}
31:
32:
33:
34:
35:
36: \altaffiltext{1}{Email: diego@science.uva.nl ; Astronomical Institute, ``Anton Pannekoek'',
37: University of Amsterdam, and Center for High Energy Astrophysics,
38: Kruislaan 403, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.}
39:
40:
41:
42:
43:
44:
45:
46: \begin{abstract}
47:
48: We report on intermittent X-ray pulsations with a frequency of
49: 442.36~Hz from the neutron-star X-ray binary SAX~J1748.9--2021 in the
50: globular cluster NGC~6440. The pulsations were seen during both
51: 2001 and 2005 outbursts of the source, but only intermittently,
52: appearing and disappearing on timescales of hundreds of seconds.
53: %
54: We find a suggestive relation between the occurrence
55: of type-I X-ray bursts and the appearance of the pulsations but the relation
56: is not strict.
57: %
58: This behavior is very similar to that of the intermittent accreting
59: millisecond X-ray pulsar HETE~J1900.1--2455. The reason for the
60: intermittence of the pulsations remains unclear.
61: %
62: However it is now evident that a strict division between pulsating and
63: non-pulsating does not exist.
64: %
65: By studying the Doppler shift of the pulsation frequency we determine
66: an orbit with a period of 8.7 hrs and an projected semi major axis of
67: 0.39 lightsec. The companion star might be a main--sequence or a
68: slightly evolved star with a mass of $\sim$1 $M_\odot$.
69: %
70: Therefore, SAX~J1748.9--2021 has a longer period and may have a more
71: massive companion star than all the other accreting millisecond X-ray
72: pulsars except for Aql X-1.
73:
74: \end{abstract}
75: \keywords{binaries: general--pulsars: individual
76: (SAX~J1748.9--2021)--stars: neutron }
77: \maketitle
78:
79:
80: \section{Introduction}
81: \label{sec:intro}
82:
83: Accreting millisecond pulsars \citep[AMPs,][]{Alpar82,Backer82} are
84: transient low mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs) that show X-ray pulsations
85: during their outbursts. A total of nine AMPs out of ~100 non-pulsating
86: LMXBs have been found to date. The reason why only this small subgroup
87: of binaries pulsates is still unknown. The first seven AMPs discovered
88: showed persistent X-ray pulsations throughout the outbursts. Recently
89: \citet{Kaaret06} discovered the AMP HETE~J1900.1--2455, which has
90: remained active for more than 2 years\footnote{At the time of
91: submitting this letter, the source is still active.} but showed
92: pulsations only intermittently during the first $\sim2$ months of
93: activity \citep{Galloway07a}.
94: %
95: From the transient source Aql X-1 pulsations were detected
96: \citep{Casella07} only for $\sim150$~sec out of the $\sim1.3$~Msec the
97: source has (so far) been observed with the Rossi X-ray Time Explorer
98: (RXTE).
99:
100: \citet{Gavriil06,Gavriil07} recently reported on the detection of
101: $\sim442.3$~Hz pulsations in an observation of the 2005 outburst of a
102: transient source in the globular cluster (GC) NGC~6440. The pulsations
103: followed a flux decay observed at the beginning of the observation and
104: were reminiscent of those observed during superbursts; however, as
105: \citet{Gavriil07} suggest, they could also be a detection from a new
106: intermittent accreting millisecond pulsar. \citet{Kaaret03} report a
107: 409.7~Hz burst oscillation in an X-ray transient (SAX~J1748.9--2021)
108: located also in NGC~6440 and this GC harbors at least 24 X-ray sources
109: \citep{Pooley02}, so \citet{Gavriil07} concluded that the burst
110: oscillations and the pulsations were probably coming from different
111: X-ray transients in the same GC.
112:
113:
114: %
115: The exact formation mechanisms behind the pulsations of these three
116: sources remains unknown.
117: %
118: The existence of intermittent pulsations with a small duty cycle
119: implies that many other apparently non-pulsating LMXBs might be
120: pulsating, bridging the gap between the small number of AMPs
121: and the large group of non-pulsating LMXBs.
122: %
123:
124: We are performing a detailed analysis of all RXTE archival data of
125: neutron-star LMXBs to search for transient pulsations in their X-ray
126: flux \citep[see also][]{Casella07}.
127: %
128: In this Letter we present the results of our search on the three X-ray
129: outbursts observed from the globular cluster NGC~6440.
130:
131: %
132:
133: \section{The neutron-star transient SAX~J1748.9--2021 in NGC~6440}
134:
135: NGC~6440 is a GC at $8.5\pm0.4$~kpc \citep{Ortolani94}. Bright X-ray
136: outbursts from a LMXB were reported in 1971, 1998, 2001 and 2005
137: \citep[]{Markert75,Zand99,Verbunt00,Zand01,Markwardt05}.
138: %
139: \citet{Zand01} from X-ray and optical observations concluded that the
140: 1998 and 2001 outbursts were from the same object, which they
141: designated SAX~J1748.9--2021.
142:
143:
144:
145: \begin{figure*}[t]
146: \center
147: \resizebox{2\columnwidth}{!}{\rotatebox{0}{\includegraphics{./f1.eps}}}
148: \caption{Intensity (2.0--16.0~keV) normalized by Crab vs. time of the
149: three outbursts. Gray symbols show the 16-sec averaged intensity
150: during the pointed PCA observations.
151: %
152: The continuous line shows the ASM light curve.
153: %
154: Black marks at the \textit{top} mark the times of type-I X-ray
155: bursts. Black marks at the \textit{bottom} mark the times when we
156: detect significant pulsations. Years of the outburst is shown in each
157: panel. }
158: \label{fig:lc}
159: \end{figure*}
160:
161: \section{Observations, data analysis and results}
162: \label{sec:dataanalysis}
163:
164: We used data from the RXTE Proportional Counter Array \citep[PCA, for
165: instrument information see][]{Jahoda06}. Up to July, 2007, there were
166: 27 pointed observations of SAX J1748.9--2021, each covering 1 to 5
167: consecutive 90-min satellite orbits. Usually, an orbit contains
168: between 1 and 5 ksec of useful data separated by 1--4 ksec data gaps
169: due to Earth occultations and South Atlantic Anomaly passages.
170: %
171: Adopting a source position \citep[$\alpha=17^h 48^m 52^s.163$, $\delta
172: = -20^o 21^{'} 32^{''}.40$; J2000][]{Pooley02} we converted the
173: 2--60~keV photon arrival times to the Solar System barycenter with the
174: FTOOL faxbary, which uses the JPL DE-200 ephemeris along with the
175: spacecraft ephemeris and fine clock corrections to provide an absolute
176: timing accuracy of ~5-8 $\rm\,\mu s$ \citep{Rots04}.
177:
178: We performed a Fourier timing analysis using the high-time resolution
179: data collected in the Event (E\_125us\_64M\_0\_1s) and the Good Xenon
180: modes. Power spectra were constructed using data segments of 128, 256
181: and 512 seconds and with a Nyquist frequency of 4096~Hz. No
182: background or dead-time corrections were made prior to the calculation
183: of the power spectra, but all reported rms amplitudes are background
184: corrected; deadtime corrections are negligible.
185:
186: %########### TABLE ###########################
187: \begin{table}
188: \caption{Timing parameters for NGC~6440}
189:
190: %\centering
191: \scriptsize
192: \begin{tabular}{lc}
193: \hline
194: \hline
195: Parameter & Value \\
196: \hline
197: Orbital period, P$_{orb}$(hr) \dotfill & 8.764(6) hr \\
198: %
199: Projected semi major axis, $a_x sin i$ (lightsec.)\dotfill & 0.39(1) \\
200: %
201: Epoch of 0$^o$ mean longitude$^1$, $T_0$ (MJD/TDB) \dotfill & 52190.047(4) \\
202: %
203: Eccentricity, e \dotfill & $<0.001$ \\
204: %
205: Spin frequency $\nu_0$ (Hz) \dotfill & 442.361(1) \\
206: %
207: Pulsar mass function, $f_x$ ($\times 10^{-4} M_{\sun}$)\dotfill & $\simeq4.8$ \\
208: %
209: Minimum companion mass, $M_c$ ($M_{\sun}$)\dotfill & $\gtrsim0.1$ \\
210: %
211: \hline
212: %
213: $^1$The mean longitude at 0$^o$ in a circular orbit corresponds \\
214: to the ascending node of the orbit.\\
215: \end{tabular}
216:
217: \label{table:data}
218: \end{table}
219: %########### END TABLE #######################
220:
221:
222:
223: \subsection{Colors, light curves and states}
224:
225: From the Standard~2 data \citep{Jahoda06}, we calculated colors and
226: intensities with a time resolution of 16 seconds and normalized by
227: Crab \citep[e.g ][]{Altamirano07}. The PCA observations sample three
228: different outbursts (see Fig.~\ref{fig:lc}). The color-color diagrams
229: show a pattern (not plotted) typical for atoll sources. The power
230: spectral fits confirm the identification of these states \citep[see
231: also][]{Kaaret03}. We looked for kHz QPOs, but found none.
232:
233: %
234: \begin{figure}[!hbtp]
235: \resizebox{1\columnwidth}{!}{\rotatebox{0}{\includegraphics{./f2a.eps}}}
236: \resizebox{1\columnwidth}{!}{\rotatebox{0}{\includegraphics[clip]{./f2b.eps}}}
237: \caption{ \textit{Top:} Dynamical power spectrum of observation
238: 60035-02-03-00 showing intermittent pulsations (contours). In the
239: light curve (line) three X-ray bursts are seen. The pulse frequency
240: drifts due to orbital Doppler modulation. The lowest contour plotted
241: corresponds to Leahy power $13$ and the highest to 55. The contours
242: were generated from power spectra for \textit{non}-overlapping 128~sec
243: intervals of data. \textit{Bottom:} Leahy normalized \citep{Leahy83}
244: power spectrum of 512~sec of data centered $\sim7$~ksec after the
245: start of this observation.
246: %
247: Maximum Leahy power is 102, corresponding to a single-trial
248: probability of $\sim7\cdot10^{-23}$ given Poissonian statistics in the
249: photon arrival times \citep{vanderklis95}. Inset: The 2--60 keV light
250: curve folded at the 2.26-ms period. Two cycles are plotted for
251: clarity. The pulse profile is sinusoidal, with a 95\% upper limit of
252: 0.4\% (rms) on the amplitude of the second harmonic.}
253: \label{fig:pds}
254: \end{figure}
255:
256:
257:
258: %%
259: %
260: No thermonuclear bursts were detected in the first outburst, sixteen
261: during the second \citep{Kaaret03,Galloway07b} and four during the
262: third one.
263: %
264: We searched for burst oscillations during all bursts in the
265: 15--4000~Hz frequency range but found none. \citet{Kaaret03} reported
266: a $\sim4.4\sigma$ burst oscillation at $\sim409.7$~Hz. We find these
267: authors underestimated the number of trials by a factor of at least
268: 180, as their estimate did not take into account the number of X-ray
269: bursts analyzed and the fact that a sliding window was used to find
270: the maximum power. Moreover, we also found that the distribution of
271: powers is not exponential as these authors assumed. Taking into
272: account these effects we estimate the significance for their detection
273: to be $\lesssim2.5\sigma$.
274:
275:
276: \begin{figure}[!hbtp]
277: \resizebox{1\columnwidth}{!}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics[clip]{./f3.eps}}}
278: \caption{Pulse frequency as a function of orbital phase. The
279: plot has been obtained by folding all data between the first and last
280: pulse detection in 2001. Pulsations were detected during 6 of the 18
281: orbital cycles covered. Drawn curve is the best-fit orbital model,
282: measured frequencies and post-fit residuals are shown. The residuals'
283: r.m.s. is $1.2\times10^{-3}$~Hz.}
284: \label{fig:phase}
285: \end{figure}
286: \subsection{Pulsations}
287:
288: We inspected each power spectrum for significant features. We
289: found several, at frequencies $\sim442.3$~Hz in 7 observations:
290: 60035-02-02-04/05/06, 60035-02-03-00/02/03 during the second outburst
291: and 91050-03-07-00 during the third outburst \citep[see also][for a
292: detailed analysis of this observation]{Gavriil07}.
293: %
294: \citet{Zand01} concluded that the 1998 and 2001 outbursts from the
295: LMXB in NGC~6440 were from the same source (Section 2). Since
296: pulsations are detected in both the 2001 and 2005 outbursts, we can
297: now conclude that these two outbursts are also from the same
298: source. Hence, all outbursts observed from NGC~6440 over the last
299: decade are from SAX J1748.9--2021.
300: %
301: %(0.3\% rms amplitude upper limit at the 95\% confidence level)
302:
303: The pulsations are detected intermittently, appearing and disappearing
304: on time scales of hundreds of seconds. The appearance of pulsations
305: seems to be related to the occurrence of type-I X-ray bursts, but the
306: relation is not strict. The first two bursts were observed in an
307: observation on October $8^{th}$ 2001; the first pulsations a day
308: later.
309: %
310: During the third outburst we detect four bursts; pulsations were only
311: detected after the third one. We also detected pulsations with no
312: preceding burst. The structure of our data does not allow us to tell
313: if pulsations and/or other bursts occurred during data gaps.
314: %
315: Figure~\ref{fig:pds} (top) illustrates the relation between pulsations
316: and bursts. The amplitude of the pulsations varies strongly between
317: $\sim2$\% and (often) undetectable (0.3\% rms amplitude upper limit at
318: the 95\% confidence level).
319: %
320: Pulsations are seen right after the occurrence of the first and the
321: third burst, but in the middle of the data pulsations are
322: present without the detection of a preceding burst (although a burst
323: could have happened just before the start of this data segment).
324: %
325: In Figure~\ref{fig:pds} (bottom) we show a power spectrum and
326: corresponding 2--60 keV pulse profile (inset). In these data the
327: pulsation is relatively hard; the rms amplitude increases with energy
328: from $\sim1$\% at 3~keV to $\sim3$\% at 13~keV.
329:
330:
331:
332: The 2--10~keV luminosity during the observations in which we detected
333: pulsations was between 3 and $4\times10^{37}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$
334: \citep[assuming a fixed $N_H=8.2 \times 10^{21}$
335: cm$^{-2}$;][]{Zand01}.
336: %
337: Other observations at similar flux and those at higher ( up to
338: $\simeq5\times10^{37}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$ in observation 91050-03-06-00)
339: and lower fluxes do not show pulsations (see Fig.~\ref{fig:lc}). From
340: 16, 32, 64 and 128~sec average colors we found no significant changes
341: in the energy spectra correlated with the pulse-amplitude variations.
342:
343:
344: We studied the pulse frequency drifts using power spectra of 128, 256
345: and 512~sec data and find a clear 8.7 hours sinusoidal modulation
346: which we interpret as due to Doppler shifts by binary orbital motion
347: with that period. In order to obtain an orbital solution, we performed
348: a $\chi^2$ scan on the orbital parameters using the method described
349: by \citet{Kirsch04} and \citet{Papitto05}. Our best estimates are
350: listed in Table~\ref{table:data}. The combination of data gaps and
351: intermittency of the pulsations yielded aliases, which are taken into
352: account by the reported errors.
353: %
354: In Figure~\ref{fig:phase} we plot the pulse frequency as a
355: function of orbital phase.
356:
357:
358:
359:
360:
361: \section{Discussion}\label{sec:discussion}
362:
363: We have discovered intermittent pulsations from the neutron-star LMXB
364: SAX~J1748.9--2021. Pulsations appear and disappear on time scales of
365: hundreds of seconds. Although we find a suggestive relation between
366: the appearance of the pulsations and the occurrence of type-I X-ray
367: bursts (the pulsations appearing after a burst), the relation is
368: not strict.
369: %
370: We find bursts with no subsequent pulsations and pulsations with no
371: preceding burst (although a burst could have occurred in the preceding
372: data gaps). From the Doppler shifts on the pulsations we determine
373: that the system is in a near-circular orbit with period of 8.7 hours
374: and projected radius of 0.39 lightsec.
375:
376:
377: The stability of the pulsations (after correcting for the binary
378: orbit) strongly suggests that the pulsation frequency reflects the
379: neutron star spin frequency and that SAX~J1748.9--2021 is an accreting
380: millisecond X-ray pulsar.
381: %
382: The characteristics of the pulsations are reminiscent of the those
383: found in HETE~J1900.1--2455: in both sources the pulsations were only
384: intermittently detected and a possible relation between burst
385: occurrence and pulse amplitude exists.
386: %
387: However, there are differences: in HETE~J1900.1--2455 the pulsations
388: were only seen during the first two months of the outburst and their
389: amplitude decreased steadily on timescales of days after the bursts
390: which might have caused them to reappear \citep{Galloway07a}. In
391: SAX~J1748.9--2021 we find the pulsations in the middle of the 2001 and
392: 2005 outbursts and not in the beginning. Furthermore, the amplitude of
393: the pulsations behaves erratically, switching between detection and
394: non-detection on time scales of hundreds of seconds. Despite these
395: differences, the behavior of the pulsations in both sources is so
396: similar that we consider it likely that the same mechanism causes the
397: intermittency of the pulsations in both.
398:
399:
400: \begin{figure}[t]
401: \center
402: \resizebox{1\columnwidth}{!}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics[clip]{./f4.eps}}}
403: \caption{Mass--radius relationship for a Roche lobe-filling companion
404: (continuous line), isochrones of 0.01, 8 and 12 Gyrs with solar
405: metallicity \citep[triangles, crosses and squares, respectively
406: ;][]{Girardi00} and theoretical Zero-age main sequence \citep[ZAMS,
407: dashed line;][]{Tout96}. Black circles mark the inclination of the
408: system as estimated by the mass function of this system.}
409: \label{fig:rvsm}
410: \end{figure}
411:
412:
413: A related system might be Aql~X-1 in which a short-lived ($\sim$150~s)
414: and very rare (duty cycle of 0.03\%) episode of strong pulsations at
415: the neutron-star spin frequency has been detected
416: \citep{Casella07}. In this source, no X-rays bursts were seen in the
417: $\sim1400$~s before the pulsations, making it unlikely that they were
418: triggered by a burst. It is unclear if the pulsations in Aql X-1 were
419: accretion--driven or due to unusual nuclear burning episodes; the same
420: applies to SAX~J1748.9--2021.
421: %
422: The extreme rarity of the pulsations in Aql X-1 could indicate that
423: the mechanism behind them is different from that responsible for the
424: pulsations in HETE~J1900.1--2455 and SAX~J1748.9--2021. Nevertheless,
425: irrespective of the mechanisms behind the pulsations in these three
426: sources, it is clear that a strict division between pulsating and
427: non-pulsating sources cannot be made anymore. It is possible that all
428: sources pulsate occasionally although the recurrence times could be
429: very long.
430:
431:
432: Assuming a constant dipolar magnetic field, following
433: \citet{Psaltis99} (i.e., assuming a geometrically thin disk and
434: neglecting inner disk wind mass loss, radiation drag and GR effects)
435: %
436: we estimate the magnetic field to be
437: $B\gtrsim1.3\times10^{8}$~Gauss. This assumes a 10~km radius
438: $1.4M_{\odot}$ neutron star and $\dot{M}_{max}$, the highest accretion
439: rate at which pulses are detected, of 0.28 of the Eddington critical
440: value as derived from the luminosity observed at the time using a
441: bolometric flux correction of 1.4 \citep{Migliari06}. In the standard
442: magnetic channeling scenario, the question remains of what causes the
443: large variations in pulse amplitude.
444:
445:
446: Comparisons between HETE~J1900.1--2455, SAX~J1748.9--2021 and the
447: other 7 AMSPs can provide clues to understand the pulse-strength
448: variations.
449: %
450: In SAX~J1748.9--2021 and Aql X-1 the time scales on which the pulse
451: amplitude can fluctuate are as short as $\sim10^2$~s, too short for
452: the properties of the neutron star core to change \citep{Galloway07a}.
453: %
454: So, these changes must originate in the disk or the outer layers
455: of the neutron star envelope.
456: %
457: \citet{Galloway07a} suggested (for HETE~J1900.1--2455) that the
458: accumulation of matter on the surface burying the magnetic field
459: \citep{Cumming01} plays a role.
460: %
461: Our results show that this mechanism probably cannot work for
462: SAX~J1748.9--2021, as the pulsations are not seen in the beginning of
463: the outbursts, but instead $\sim3$~weeks and $\sim5$~weeks after the
464: start of the 2001 and 2005 outbursts, respectively, so after a
465: considerable amount of matter has already accreted.
466: %
467: Interestingly, we observe pulsations only around a mass accretion rate
468: of $\simeq2\times10^{-16}\ M_{\odot}/$sec as inferred from the X-ray
469: luminosity, not above or below, indicating that instantaneous mass
470: accretion rate rather than total accreted mass is the important
471: quantity.
472:
473: In both HETE~J1900.1--2455 and SAX~J1748.9--2021 the pulsations seem
474: to appear together with bursts although the exact connection is
475: complex.
476: %
477: This suggests that surface processes may affect the magnetic field.
478: %
479: %
480: Hydrodynamic flows in the surface layer of the neutron star may screen
481: the magnetic field \citep[see review by][and references
482: within]{Bhattacharya02}; perhaps violent processes like bursts
483: temporarily affect such flows, diminishing screening and enhancing the
484: channeling.
485: %
486: %
487: %
488: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
489: %
490:
491: Alternatively, variations in a scattering or screening medium may
492: cause the pulse amplitude modulation (see e.g. discussions in
493: \citet{Psaltis99}, \citet{Titarchuk02}, \citealt{Gogus07},
494: \citealt{Titarchuk07}, \citealt{Casella07} and references within).
495: %
496: For our results, the properties of such a medium should change on
497: timescales of hundreds of seconds; note that we did not detect
498: spectral changes associated with pulse strength modulation.
499: %
500:
501:
502: With an orbital period of $\sim8.7$ hours, this binary system is
503: clearly not an ultra-compact binary as usually found in globular
504: clusters and in fact, SAX~J1748.9--2021 is the AMSP with the longest
505: orbital period after Aql~X-1, which has an orbital period of
506: $\sim19$~hrs \citep{Chevalier91,Welsh00}.
507: %
508: The mass-radius relation for a low-mass Roche lobe-filling companion
509: in a binary \citep{Eggleton83} is $R_c =
510: 0.24~M_{NS}^{1/3}~q^{2/3}~(1+q)^{1/3}~P^{2/3}_{hr} / ( 0.6~q^{2/3} +
511: \ell og(1+q^{1/3})) $, with $P_{hr}$ the orbital period in hours,
512: $M_{NS}$ the mass of the neutron star, $R_c$ radius of the companion
513: and $q=M_c/M_{NS}$, the mass ratio.
514: %between the companion and the NS
515: %masses.
516: Given the mass function and the orbital period and
517: assuming a $1.4M_{\odot}$ neutron star, we plot in Figure~\ref{fig:rvsm} the
518: mass-radius relationship for the companion star.
519: %
520: Given that the age of the Globular Cluster NGC 6440 is
521: $10\pm2$ Gyrs \citep{Santos04} and its metallicity is approximately
522: solar \citep{Ortolani94}, in Figure~\ref{fig:rvsm} we also plot the
523: isochrones for stars with ages of 8 and 12 Gyrs and solar
524: metallicity. Stars with a $M_c<0.85\rm\,M_{\odot}$ cannot fill the
525: Roche lobe while
526: %
527: stars with $M_c>0.95\rm\,M_{\odot}$ would have a radius exceeding the
528: Roche lobe.
529: %
530: This would imply a donor star mass of $0.90\pm0.05M_{\odot}$.
531: %$M_c=0.90\pm0.05\rm\,M_{\odot}$.
532: %
533: However, for masses of 0.95--1.1$\rm\,M_{\odot}$, stars have evolved
534: off the main sequence so binary mass transfer can have affected the
535: radius of the donor star, which means we cannot firmly exclude masses
536: of 0.95--1.1$\rm\,M_{\odot}$. Therefore a more conservative mass
537: range for the donor star is 0.85-1.1$\rm\,M_{\odot}$. Intriguingly,
538: this requires the inclination to be about $9^o$, which has a
539: $\lesssim1\%$ a priori probability for an isotropic sample of binary
540: inclinations.
541: %
542: Of course, this estimate is assuming that SAX~J1748.9--2021 is in a
543: primordial binary. If a different evolutionary path took place
544: (e.g. dynamical interactions), the mass of the companion might be much
545: smaller \citep[see e.g.][]{Zyl04}.
546:
547:
548:
549:
550:
551: %\bibliographystyle{aa}
552: %\bibliography{biblio}
553:
554: \begin{thebibliography}{37}
555: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
556: \expandafter\ifx\csname url\endcsname\relax
557: \def\url#1{{\tt #1}}\fi
558: \expandafter\ifx\csname urlprefix\endcsname\relax\def\urlprefix{URL }\fi
559:
560: \bibitem[{{Alpar} et~al.(1982){Alpar}, {Cheng}, {Ruderman}, \&
561: {Shaham}}]{Alpar82}
562: {Alpar} M.A., {Cheng} A.F., et~al., 1982, \nat, 300, 728
563:
564: \bibitem[{{Altamirano} et~al.(2007){Altamirano}, {van der Klis}, {M{\'e}ndez}
565: et~al.}]{Altamirano07}
566: {Altamirano} D., {van der Klis} M., et~al., 2007, Submitted to \apj
567:
568: \bibitem[{{Backer} et~al.(1982){Backer}, {Kulkarni}, {Heiles}, {Davis}, \&
569: {Goss}}]{Backer82}
570: {Backer} D.C., {Kulkarni} S.R., et~al., 1982, \nat, 300, 615
571:
572: \bibitem[{{Bhattacharya}(2002)}]{Bhattacharya02}
573: {Bhattacharya} D., Jun. 2002, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 23, 67
574:
575: \bibitem[{{Casella} et~al.(2007){Casella}, {Altamirano}, {Wijnands}, \& {van
576: der klis}}]{Casella07}
577: {Casella} P., {Altamirano} D., et~al., 2007, ApJL accepted
578:
579: \bibitem[{{Chevalier} \& {Ilovaisky}(1991)}]{Chevalier91}
580: {Chevalier} C., {Ilovaisky} S.A., Nov. 1991, \aap, 251, L11
581:
582: \bibitem[{{Cumming} et~al.(2001){Cumming}, {Zweibel}, \&
583: {Bildsten}}]{Cumming01}
584: {Cumming} A., {Zweibel} E., {Bildsten} L., 2001, \apj, 557, 958
585:
586: \bibitem[{{Eggleton}(1983)}]{Eggleton83}
587: {Eggleton} P.P., 1983, \apj, 268, 368
588:
589: \bibitem[{{Galloway} et~al.(2006){Galloway}, {Muno}, {Hartman}
590: et~al.}]{Galloway07b}
591: {Galloway} D.K., {Muno} M.P., et~al., 2006, ArXiv e-prints
592:
593: \bibitem[{{Galloway} et~al.(2007){Galloway}, {Morgan}, {Krauss}, {Kaaret}, \&
594: {Chakrabarty}}]{Galloway07a}
595: {Galloway} D.K., {Morgan} E.H., et~al., 2007, \apjl, 654, L73
596:
597: \bibitem[{{Gavriil} et~al.(2006){Gavriil}, {Strohmayer}, {Swank}, \&
598: {Markwardt}}]{Gavriil06}
599: {Gavriil} F.P., {Strohmayer} T.E., et~al., Sep. 2006, In: Bulletin of the
600: American Astronomical Society, vol.~38 of Bulletin of the American
601: Astronomical Society, 336--+
602:
603: \bibitem[{{Gavriil} et~al.(2007){Gavriil}, {Strohmayer}, {Swank}, \&
604: {Markwardt}}]{Gavriil07}
605: {Gavriil} F.P., {Strohmayer} T.E., et~al., Nov. 2007, \apjl, 669, L29
606:
607: \bibitem[{{Girardi} et~al.(2000){Girardi}, {Bressan}, {Bertelli}, \&
608: {Chiosi}}]{Girardi00}
609: {Girardi} L., {Bressan} A., et~al., Feb. 2000, \aaps, 141, 371
610:
611: \bibitem[{{G{\"o}{\u g}{\"u}{\c s}} et~al.(2007){G{\"o}{\u g}{\"u}{\c s}},
612: {Alpar}, \& {Gilfanov}}]{Gogus07}
613: {G{\"o}{\u g}{\"u}{\c s}} E., {Alpar} M.A., {Gilfanov} M., 2007, \apj, 659, 580
614:
615: \bibitem[{{in 't Zand} et~al.(1999){in 't Zand}, {Verbunt}, {Strohmayer}
616: et~al.}]{Zand99}
617: {in 't Zand} J.J.M., {Verbunt} F., et~al., 1999, \aap, 345, 100
618:
619: \bibitem[{{in't Zand} et~al.(2001){in't Zand}, {van Kerkwijk}, {Pooley}
620: et~al.}]{Zand01}
621: {in't Zand} J.J.M., {van Kerkwijk} M.H., et~al., 2001, \apjl, 563, L41
622:
623: \bibitem[{{Jahoda} et~al.(2006){Jahoda}, {Markwardt}, {Radeva}
624: et~al.}]{Jahoda06}
625: {Jahoda} K., {Markwardt} C.B., et~al., 2006, \apjs, 163, 401
626:
627: \bibitem[{{Kaaret} et~al.(2003){Kaaret}, {Zand}, {Heise}, \&
628: {Tomsick}}]{Kaaret03}
629: {Kaaret} P., {Zand} J.J.M.i., et~al., 2003, \apj, 598, 481
630:
631: \bibitem[{{Kaaret} et~al.(2006){Kaaret}, {Morgan}, {Vanderspek}, \&
632: {Tomsick}}]{Kaaret06}
633: {Kaaret} P., {Morgan} E.H., et~al., 2006, \apj, 638, 963
634:
635: \bibitem[{{Kirsch} et~al.(2004){Kirsch}, {Mukerjee}, {Breitfellner}
636: et~al.}]{Kirsch04}
637: {Kirsch} M.G.F., {Mukerjee} K., et~al., Aug. 2004, \aap, 423, L9
638:
639: \bibitem[{{Leahy} et~al.(1983){Leahy}, {Darbro}, {Elsner} et~al.}]{Leahy83}
640: {Leahy} D.A., {Darbro} W., et~al., 1983, \apj, 266, 160
641:
642: \bibitem[{{Markert} et~al.(1975){Markert}, {Backman}, {Canizares}, {Clark}, \&
643: {Levine}}]{Markert75}
644: {Markert} T.H., {Backman} D.E., et~al., 1975, \nat, 257, 32
645:
646: \bibitem[{{Markwardt} \& {Swank}(2005)}]{Markwardt05}
647: {Markwardt} C.B., {Swank} J.H., 2005, The Astronomer's Telegram, 495, 1
648:
649: \bibitem[{{Migliari} \& {Fender}(2006)}]{Migliari06}
650: {Migliari} S., {Fender} R.P., 2006, \mnras, 366, 79
651:
652: \bibitem[{{Ortolani} et~al.(1994){Ortolani}, {Barbuy}, \& {Bica}}]{Ortolani94}
653: {Ortolani} S., {Barbuy} B., {Bica} E., 1994, \aaps, 108, 653
654:
655: \bibitem[{{Papitto} et~al.(2005){Papitto}, {Menna}, {Burderi}
656: et~al.}]{Papitto05}
657: {Papitto} A., {Menna} M.T., et~al., Mar. 2005, \apjl, 621, L113
658:
659: \bibitem[{{Pooley} et~al.(2002){Pooley}, {Lewin}, {Verbunt} et~al.}]{Pooley02}
660: {Pooley} D., {Lewin} W.H.G., et~al., 2002, \apj, 573, 184
661:
662: \bibitem[{{Psaltis} \& {Chakrabarty}(1999)}]{Psaltis99}
663: {Psaltis} D., {Chakrabarty} D., 1999, \apj, 521, 332
664:
665: \bibitem[{{Rots} et~al.(2004){Rots}, {Jahoda}, \& {Lyne}}]{Rots04}
666: {Rots} A.H., {Jahoda} K., {Lyne} A.G., 2004, \apjl, 605, L129
667:
668: \bibitem[{{Santos} \& {Piatti}(2004)}]{Santos04}
669: {Santos} J.F.C. Jr., {Piatti} A.E., 2004, \aap, 428, 79
670:
671: \bibitem[{{Titarchuk} et~al.(2002){Titarchuk}, {Cui}, \& {Wood}}]{Titarchuk02}
672: {Titarchuk} L., {Cui} W., {Wood} K., 2002, \apjl, 576, L49
673:
674: \bibitem[{{Titarchuk} et~al.(2007){Titarchuk}, {Kuznetsov}, \&
675: {Shaposhnikov}}]{Titarchuk07}
676: {Titarchuk} L., {Kuznetsov} S., {Shaposhnikov} N., 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 706
677:
678: \bibitem[{{Tout} et~al.(1996){Tout}, {Pols}, {Eggleton}, \& {Han}}]{Tout96}
679: {Tout} C.A., {Pols} O.R., et~al., 1996, \mnras, 281, 257
680:
681: \bibitem[{{van der Klis}(1995)}]{vanderklis95}
682: {van der Klis} M., 1995, Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute on
683: the Lives of the Neutron Stars, held in Kemer, Turkey, August 19-September
684: 12, 1993. Editor(s), M. A. Alpar, U. Kiziloglu, J. van Paradijs; Publisher,
685: Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Boston, Massachusetts, 301
686:
687: \bibitem[{{van Zyl} et~al.(2004){van Zyl}, {Charles}, {Arribas} et~al.}]{Zyl04}
688: {van Zyl} L., {Charles} P.A., et~al., May 2004, \mnras, 350, 649
689:
690: \bibitem[{{Verbunt} et~al.(2000){Verbunt}, {van Kerkwijk}, {in't Zand}, \&
691: {Heise}}]{Verbunt00}
692: {Verbunt} F., {van Kerkwijk} M.H., et~al., 2000, \aap, 359, 960
693:
694: \bibitem[{{Welsh} et~al.(2000){Welsh}, {Robinson}, \& {Young}}]{Welsh00}
695: {Welsh} W.F., {Robinson} E.L., {Young} P., Aug. 2000, \aj, 120, 943
696:
697: \end{thebibliography}
698:
699:
700: \end{document}
701:
702:
703:
704: