1: %\documentclass{aastex}
2:
3: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
4: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
5:
6: \usepackage{epsfig}
7:
8: %\input psfig.sty
9:
10: \def\vkm{km s$^{-1}$}
11: \def\vkme{\textrm{km s}^{-1}}
12: \def\degree{$^\circ$}
13: \def\arcs#1{$#1''$}
14: \def\arcsa#1#2{$#1^{\prime\prime}_{^\textrm{.}}#2$}
15: \def\arcsaq#1#2{#1^{\prime\prime}_{^\textrm{.}}#2}
16: \def\smassrate{$M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$}
17: \def\solarmass{$M_\odot$}
18: \def\solarmasse{M_\odot}
19: \def\solarlum{$L_\odot$}
20: \def\IRAS{{\it IRAS}}
21: \def\Jyb{Jy beam$^{-1}$}
22: \def\mJyb{mJy beam$^{-1}$}
23: \def\Jybk{Jy beam$^{-1}$ km s$^{-1}$}
24: \def\Tk{K km s$^{-1}$}
25: \def\tlabel#1{(\textit{#1})}
26: \def\vrot{v_\textrm{rot}}
27: \def\vobs{v_\textrm{obs}}
28: \def\Canto{Cant$\acute{\textrm{o}}$}
29: \def\Volker{V$\ddot{\textrm{o}}$lker}
30: \def\cmc{cm$^{-3}$}
31: \def\cms{cm$^{-2}$}
32: %\def\arcsec{\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$}}
33: %\def\degr{\hbox{$^\circ$}}
34: %\def\arcmin{\hbox{$^\prime$}}
35: \def\micron{$\mu$m}
36:
37: \def\ra#1#2#3#4{#1^\mathrm{h} #2^\mathrm{m} #3^\mathrm{s}_{^\textrm{.}} #4}
38: %\def\dec#1#2#3{#1\degr #2\arcmin #3\arcsec}
39: \def\dec#1#2#3#4{#1\degr #2\arcmin #3^{\prime\prime}_{^\textrm{.}}#4}
40:
41: \def\mH{m_\textrm{\scriptsize H}}
42: \def\Ro{R_\textrm{\scriptsize 0}}
43: \def\Rin{R_\textrm{\scriptsize in}}
44: \def\Rout{R_\textrm{\scriptsize out}}
45: \def\To{T_\textrm{\scriptsize 0}}
46: \def\no{n_\textrm{\scriptsize 0}}
47: \def\vRo{v_{R\textrm{\scriptsize 0}}}
48: \def\vphio{v_{\phi\textrm{\scriptsize 0}}}
49: \def\Lbol{L_\textrm{\scriptsize bol}}
50:
51: \def\H2{H$_2$}
52: \def\N2HP{N$_2$H$^+$}
53: \def\HCOP{HCO$^+$}
54: \def\cCO{C$^{18}$O}
55: \def\cCOa{C$^{18}$O J=1-0}
56: \def\aCO{$^{12}$CO}
57: \def\bCO{$^{13}$CO}
58: \def\NH3{NH$_3$}
59: \def\vobs{v_{\textrm{\scriptsize obs}}}
60:
61: \def\SOt{$N_J=8_9-7_8$}
62: \def\SOta{$N_J=5_6-4_5$}
63: \def\HCOP{HCO$^+$}
64: \def\aHCOP{H$^{13}$CO$^+$}
65:
66: \def\putfig#1#2#3{\epsfig{scale=#1,angle=#2,figure=#3}}
67: %\def\putfig#1#2#3{}
68: \def\leftblank#1{}
69:
70: \begin{document}
71:
72: \title{Submillimeter arcsecond-resolution mapping of the highly collimated protostellar jet HH 211}
73: \author{Chin-Fei Lee\altaffilmark{1,2},
74: Paul T.P. Ho\altaffilmark{1,3}, Aina Palau\altaffilmark{4},
75: Naomi Hirano\altaffilmark{1},
76: Tyler L. Bourke\altaffilmark{3},
77: Hsien Shang\altaffilmark{1}, and Qizhou Zhang\altaffilmark{3}
78: }
79: \altaffiltext{1}{Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
80: P.O. Box 23-141, Taipei 106, Taiwan; cflee@asiaa.sinica.edu.tw}
81: \altaffiltext{2}{
82: Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Submillimeter Array,
83: 645 North A'ohoku, Hilo, HI 96720}
84: \altaffiltext{3}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden
85: Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}
86: \altaffiltext{4}{Laboratorio de Astrof\'{\i}sica Espacial y F\'{\i}sica
87: Fundamental, INTA, Apartado 50727, E-28080 Madrid, Spain}
88:
89: \begin{abstract}
90: We have mapped the protostellar jet HH 211 in 342 GHz continuum, SiO
91: ($J=8-7$), and CO ($J=3-2$) emission at $\sim$ \arcs{1} resolution
92: with the Submillimeter Array (SMA).
93: Thermal dust emission is seen in continuum at the center of the jet,
94: tracing an envelope and a possible optically thick compact disk
95: (with a size $<$ 130 AU) around the protostar.
96: A knotty jet is seen in CO and SiO as in \H2{},
97: but extending closer to the protostar.
98: It consists of a chain of knots
99: on each side of the protostar, with an interknot spacing of $\sim$
100: \arcs{2}$-$\arcs{3} or 600$-$900 AU and
101: the innermost pair of knots at only $\sim$ \arcsa{1}{7} or 535 AU from the
102: protostar. These knots
103: likely trace unresolved internal (bow) shocks (i.e., working surfaces)
104: in the jet, with a velocity range up to $\sim$ 25 \vkm{}.
105: The two-sided mass-loss rate of the jet is estimated to be
106: $\sim (0.7-2.8)\times 10^{-6}$ \solarmass{} yr$^{-1}$.
107: The jet is episodic, precessing, and bending.
108: A velocity gradient is seen consistently across
109: two bright SiO knots (BK3 and RK2)
110: perpendicular to the jet axis,
111: with $\sim$ 1.5$\pm$0.8 \vkm{} at $\sim$ 30$\pm$15 AU, suggesting a presence
112: of a jet rotation.
113: The launching radius of the jet, derived
114: from the potential jet rotation,
115: is $\sim$ 0.15$-$0.06 AU in the inner disk.
116: \end{abstract}
117:
118: \keywords{stars: formation --- ISM: individual: HH 211 ---
119: ISM: jets and outflows.}
120:
121: \section{Introduction}
122:
123: Protostellar jets are seen associated with
124: low-mass protostars in the early stages of star formation.
125: In spite of numerous studies,
126: their physical properties (e.g., speed, episodic nature,
127: collimation, and angular momentum) and thus launching mechanisms
128: are still not well understood.
129: They are believed to be launched from accretion disks around the protostars
130: \cite[see recent reviews by e.g.,][]{Pudritz2007,Ray2007,Shang2007},
131: allowing us to probe the accretion process,
132: which remains heretofore unresolved, as it requires us to observe
133: directly in the inner parts at the AU scale.
134: The Submillimeter Array (SMA)\footnote{ The Submillimeter Array is a joint project between the
135: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and the Academia Sinica Institute of
136: Astronomy and Astrophysics, and is funded by the Smithsonian Institution and
137: the Academia Sinica.} \citep{Ho2004},
138: with the capability to probe warm and dense molecular gas at high angular
139: resolution, can be and has been used to
140: study the physical properties of the jets in detail
141: \cite[e.g.,][]{Hirano2006,Lee2007}.
142:
143:
144: The HH 211 outflow is an archetypical outflow with a highly collimated jet,
145: located in the IC 348 complex in Perseus.
146: The distance of the IC 348 complex is assumed to
147: be 320 pc \citep{Lada2006}, but it could be 250 pc
148: \citep{Enoch2006}.
149: The outflow was discovered in \H2{} shock emission at 2.12 \micron{}
150: \citep{McCaughrean1994}, powered by a young, low-mass, and low-luminosity
151: ($\sim 3.6\; L_\odot$) Class 0 protostar with $T_{bol} < 33$ K
152: \citep{Froebrich2005}. A collimated CO jet was seen surrounded by cavity
153: walls in CO (J=2-1) (Gueth \& Guilloteau 1999, hereafter
154: \citet{Gueth1999}).
155: Recent observations with the SMA in SiO (J=5-4) \citep{Hirano2006} and
156: (J=8-7) \citep{Palau2006} also revealed a collimated SiO
157: jet consisting of a chain of spatially unresolved knots aligned with the CO jet, tracing shock
158: emission along the jet. In this paper, we present observations of the jet in
159: SiO (J=8-7) and CO (J=3-2) at higher-angular resolution than in
160: \citet{Palau2006}, in order to better
161: constrain the physical properties and thus the launching mechanisms
162: of the jet.
163:
164: \section{Observations}\label{sec:obs}
165:
166: Observations toward the HH 211 jet were carried out with the SMA
167: on 2004 October 4 and 18 in the compact
168: configuration and on 2004 September 10 in the extended configuration.
169: Note that
170: the observation on 2004 October 18 was only a short %($\sim$ 0.4 hr on source)
171: partial track
172: %with most of the $uv$ space already covered by the observation on 2004 October 4
173: and thus not included in our analysis.
174: The zenith opacities were $\tau_{230}\simeq 0.1$ and 0.13,
175: respectively, on 2004 October 4 and 2004 September 10.
176: SiO ($J=8-7$) and CO ($J=3-2$) lines were observed simultaneously with
177: continuum using the 345 GHz band receivers.
178: The receivers have two sidebands, lower and upper,
179: covering the frequency range from 335.58 to 337.55 and from 345.59 to 347.56 GHz,
180: respectively.
181: Combining the line-free portions of the two sidebands results in
182: a total continuum bandwidth of $\sim$ 3.7 GHz centered
183: at $\sim$ 342 GHz (or $\lambda \sim$ 880 \micron{}) for the continuum.
184: The baselines have projected lengths ranging from $\sim$ 20 to 225 m.
185: The primary beam has a size of $\sim$ \arcs{35} and three pointings
186: were used to map the jet.
187: For the correlator,
188: 128 spectral channels were used for each 104 MHz chunk,
189: resulting in a velocity resolution of $\sim$ 0.7 \vkm{} per channel.
190:
191: The visibility data were calibrated with the MIR package,
192: with Saturn, Venus, quasars 3C84 and J0355+508 as passband calibrators,
193: quasars 3C84 and J0355+508 as gain calibrators, and Uranus ($\sim 70$ Jy)
194: as a flux calibrator.
195: The flux uncertainty is estimated to be $\sim$ 20\%.
196: The calibrated visibility data were imaged with the MIRIAD package.
197: The dirty maps that were produced from the calibrated visibility data
198: were CLEANed using the Steer clean method,
199: producing the CLEAN component maps.
200: The final maps were obtained by restoring the CLEAN component
201: maps with a synthesized
202: (Gaussian) beam fitted to the main lobe of the dirty beam.
203: With natural weighting, the synthesized beam has
204: a size of \arcsa{1}{28}$\times$\arcsa{0}{84}
205: at a position angle (P.A.) of $\sim$ 70\degree{}.
206: The rms noise level is $\sim$ 0.33 \Jyb{} in the
207: channel maps and 6.5 \mJyb{} in the continuum map.
208: The velocities of the channel maps are LSR.
209: The typical rms of the gain phases is $\sim$ 20\degree{},
210: resulting in an absolute positional accuracy of
211: one tenth of the synthesized beam, or $\sim$ \arcsa{0}{1}.
212:
213: \section{Results}
214:
215: Our results are presented in comparison to
216: the IR image (\H2{} at 2.12 \micron{} + continuum)
217: made with the VLT on 2002 January 4 \citep{Hirano2006}, which
218: shows clear shock interactions along the jet axis.
219: Since our observations were carried out $\sim$ 3 years later than
220: the IR image, the \H2{} shock knots and bow shocks might have
221: moved down along the jet axis by $\sim$ \arcsa{0}{2}$-$\arcsa{0}{4}
222: from their positions in that image, assuming a typical jet velocity of
223: 100$-$200 \vkm{}.
224: This movement, however, does not affect significantly our comparison and conclusions,
225: considering that the angular resolution of our observations is $\sim$
226: 1\arcsec{} along the jet axis.
227: The systemic velocity in this region is assumed to be
228: $9.2$ \vkm{} LSR, as in \citet{Hirano2006} and \citet{Palau2006}.
229: Throughout this paper, the velocity is relative to this systemic value.
230:
231:
232: \subsection{342 GHz Continuum Emission} \label{sec:cont}
233:
234: Continuum emission is detected at 342 GHz
235: at the center of the \H2{} flow
236: with a total (integrated) flux of 0.44$\pm0.10$ Jy.
237: It has a peak at
238: $\alpha_{(2000)}=\ra{03}{43}{56}{801}$,
239: $\delta_{(2000)}=\dec{32}{00}{50}{22}$, with a positional
240: uncertainty of \arcsa{0}{1} (Fig. \ref{fig:cont}).
241: This peak position is within \arcsa{0}{1} of that
242: found at 43.3 GHz (or $\lambda= 7$ mm) with the VLA at an
243: angular resolution of $\sim$ \arcsa{0}{15} \citep{Avila2001}, and is thus
244: considered as the position of the protostar throughout this paper.
245: Note that the continuum flux here is about twice as that found in
246: \citet{Palau2006}, which was based on
247: the observation on 2004 October 18.
248: As mentioned, that observation was only a short partial track with
249: poor $uv$ coverage.
250: Thus, even
251: though their visibility amplitude versus $uv$ distance plot
252: is similar to ours,
253: most of the extended emission was not recovered in their image
254: (see their Fig. 1b).
255: % At 7mm, RA2000:3:43:56.80 DEC2000: 32:00:50.298
256:
257: The emission is seen extending $\sim$
258: \arcs{2} to the southwest from the protostar
259: roughly perpendicular to the jet axis,
260: similar to that seen at 230 GHz \citep{Gueth1999},
261: likely tracing the flattened envelope perpendicular to the jet axis.
262: The envelope, however, seems asymmetric with less emission
263: extending to the northeast.
264: Faint emission is also seen extending to the northwest,
265: similar to that seen at 220 GHz \citep{Hirano2006},
266: probably tracing the envelope material around the west outflow lobe.
267: Near the protostar, the structure is compact and not resolved, as
268: seen in the map made using the visibility data with the $uv$ distance greater
269: than 100 k$\lambda$ (see Fig. \ref{fig:cont}b), with a flux of $\sim$
270: 0.08$\pm0.02$ Jy.
271: This unresolved compact source is also seen in the
272: visibility amplitude versus $uv$
273: distance plot, with a similar flux (Fig. \ref{fig:uvsedcont}a).
274: The size (diameter) of this compact source has an upper limit of
275: $\sim$ \arcsa{0}{4} or 130 AU set by the longest baseline.
276: %which is $\sim$ 500 k$\lambda$
277: Two components, an envelope and a compact source, have also been
278: suggested in other Class 0 sources, e.g.,
279: IRAS 16293-2422 and L1448-C \citep{Schoier2004}, and HH 212
280: \citep{Codella2007,Lee2007}.
281:
282: The spectral energy distribution (SED) of the continuum source
283: (see Fig. \ref{fig:uvsedcont}b)
284: indicates that the continuum emission at 342 GHz is
285: mainly thermal dust emission.
286: Assuming a constant temperature $T_d$, a frequency-independent source
287: size $\Omega$, and a mass opacity
288: $\kappa_\nu = 0.1 (\nu/10^{12} \textrm{\scriptsize Hz})^\beta$
289: cm$^2$ g$^{-1}$ \citep{Beckwith1990} for the dust, the SED can be fitted with
290: $T_d \sim$ 30 K, $\Omega \sim$ 3.6 arcsec$^2$,
291: $\beta \sim 0.6$, and an optical depth $\tau_\nu \sim$ 0.086 at 342 GHz.
292: Our value of $\beta$ is similar to that found by
293: \cite{Gueth1999} and \cite{Avila2001}.
294: The dust temperature is also consistent with the bolometric temperature,
295: which was found to be $<33$ K \citep{Froebrich2005}.
296: However, our $\beta$ is smaller than that found
297: including fluxes from the larger-scale envelope (with a mass of
298: $\sim$ 0.8 \solarmass) in photometric broadband observations,
299: which is 1.3 \citep{Froebrich2005}.
300: $\beta > 1$ was also found toward large-scale envelopes around other
301: embedded YSOs \citep{Dent1998}.
302: Thus,
303: excluding the larger-scale envelope tends to decrease the value of $\beta$,
304: suggesting that the dust grains grow bigger toward the source.
305: The compact source at the center may have even lower $\beta$.
306: To examine this, fluxes of the compact source at 342 and
307: 220 GHz are compared with $F_{\nu} \propto \nu^2$ or $\beta=0$.
308: Assuming that fluxes at long baselines are dominated by the compact source,
309: the fluxes are $\sim$ 0.08$\pm0.02$ Jy at 342 GHz
310: and 0.04$\pm0.02$ Jy at 220 GHz
311: \cite[3 $\sigma$ detection with the SMA data in][with 1 $\sigma$
312: $\sim$ 0.013 \Jyb{} and the uncertainty in flux scale $\sim$ 20 \%]{Hirano2006}.
313: The SED of the compact source at those frequencies seems roughly
314: consistent with $\beta=0$, or an optically thick emission, as in HH 212
315: \citep{Codella2007}.
316: In addition, half of the emission at
317: 43.3 GHz could be from the unresolved compact source.
318: If the compact emission at 342 and
319: 43.3 GHz are indeed arisen from the same region, then the
320: compact source has a size (diameter) of $\lesssim$ \arcsa{0}{1} or 30 AU
321: \citep{Avila2001}.
322: Therefore, the compact source probably has
323: different origin and is likely to be a warm
324: (with a brightness temperature $> 80$ K) optically thick (accretion) disk
325: deeply embedded in the cold envelope.
326: Observations at higher angular resolution are really needed to
327: confirm this.
328: %Note that it is also possible that the value of beta is affected by assuming a
329: %single temperature and a frequency-independent source size.
330:
331: %nuo= 2.05e4 GHz
332: The total mass of the continuum emission
333: (including both the extended and compact components)
334: is estimated to be $\sim$ 0.05 \solarmass{}, assuming
335: optically thin emission with a temperature of 30 K.
336: Since part of the emission is likely to be optically thick,
337: the mass here is only a lower limit.
338:
339: \subsection{SiO Jet}
340:
341: A knotty jet is seen in SiO, as in \citet{Palau2006}, but with
342: more knots resolved at higher angular resolution (Fig. \ref{fig:jet}c).
343: It is bipolar with the blueshifted side in the southeast and
344: the redshifted side in the northwest, but with the redshifted side
345: brighter than the blueshifted side.
346: It consists of a chain of knots
347: on each side of the source with an interknot spacing of $\sim$
348: \arcs{2}$-$\arcs{3} or 600$-$900 AU.
349: It extends out to $\sim$ \arcs{18} away, with
350: the innermost pair of knots at only $\sim$ \arcsa{1}{7} or 535 AU from the
351: source.
352: Most of the knots have \H2{} counterparts, except for those in
353: the inner part. The lack of \H2{} counterparts there was already seen by
354: \citet{Hirano2006} and attributed to
355: the heavy dust extinction associated with the dense envelope
356: as seen in \aHCOP{} \citep{Gueth1999} and NH$_3$ \citep{Wiseman2001}.
357:
358: \subsection{Jet Axes}\label{sec:jetaxis}
359:
360: The eastern component and western component of the SiO jet are not exactly
361: antiparallel (Fig. \ref{fig:jet}c). They
362: are misaligned slightly by $\sim$ 1\degree{}, with their axes estimated to
363: have a P.A. of 116.1\degree{}$\pm0.5$\degree{} and
364: 297.1\degree{}$\pm0.5$\degree{}, respectively, by connecting the source to
365: the SiO knots.
366: Since their original paths of motion are likely to be antiparallel, this
367: misalignment suggests a presence of a jet bending.
368: Assuming both bent by the same degree, they
369: are both bent by $\sim$ 0.5\degree{} to the north
370: with a jet (or mean) axis having a P.A. of 116.6\degree{}$\pm0.5$\degree{}.
371: The peaks of the closest pair of the SiO knots (BK1 and RK1) are not exactly
372: aligned with this jet axis, probably suggesting a slight precession of the jet.
373: That the jet is slightly sinuous also supports this possibility.
374: The angle of precession is estimated to be $<$ 1\degree{}.
375:
376: The jet may also have a large-scale precession as discussed in
377: \citet{Gueth1999} and \citet{Eisloffel2003}, with an angle of $\sim
378: 3$\degree{}. The axis of the SiO jet, which
379: is aligned with the \H2{} knots, is considered as the jet axis in the inner
380: part out to \H2{} bow shocks BB1 and RB1 (Fig. \ref{fig:jet}a). The jet axis
381: in the outer part, which can be estimated by connecting the source to the
382: tip of bow shock BB2 further out in the east, is found to be different
383: by $\sim$ 3\degree{} with a P.A. $\sim$ 113.6\degree{} (indicated by the
384: green dashed line). If we connect this axis to the west, the \H2{}
385: emission RB2 could be the counterpart of bow shock BB2 but mainly seen with
386: the southern wing.
387: %The jet axis in the outermost part is also different and
388: %found to have a P.A. $\sim$ 114.8\degree{} in the west as we connect the
389: %source to the tip of the west outflow lobe.
390:
391: \subsection{CO Jet and Shells} \label{sec:COjs}
392:
393: CO emission is detected not only along the jet axis but also toward outflow
394: shells. In the following, two velocity ranges,
395: high (from $-$23.7 to $-$8.7 \vkm{} and from 10.3 to 35.3 \vkm{}) and
396: low (from $-$5.7 to $-$1.7 \vkm{} and from 0.3 to 4.3 \vkm{},
397: respectively for the blueshifted emission and redshifted emission),
398: are selected to show these components.
399:
400:
401: A knotty jet-like structure is also seen in CO here
402: at high velocity
403: (Fig. \ref{fig:jet}d), as in lower excitation line
404: \citep{Gueth1999}. However, this jet-like
405: structure actually contains two components, a jet component
406: with a similar velocity structure to the SiO jet and a
407: high-velocity shell component with a different velocity structure
408: (see next section).
409: With the selected velocity range,
410: the high-velocity CO emission at $\sim$ \arcs{2}
411: away from the source is mainly from the jet component. It is faint,
412: associated with knots BK1 and RK1 seen in SiO, but slightly
413: downstream.
414:
415: At low velocity, rim-brightened shell-like structures
416: are seen in CO (Fig. \ref{fig:COshell}),
417: coincident with those seen in the IR image, which
418: are mainly from the continuum except near the bow shocks
419: where the \H2{} emission dominates \citep{Eisloffel2003}.
420: These shell-like structures were also seen in lower
421: excitation lines of CO
422: and thought to trace the dense cavity walls of the outflow lobes
423: produced by the \H2{} bow shocks located at the ends of the jet
424: \citep{Gueth1999}.
425: In the eastern lobe, however, the southern and northern
426: shells are seen associated with two different bow shocks,
427: BB1 and BB2, respectively. Thus,
428: the shells likely trace the dense cavity walls
429: recently shocked (excited) by the internal \H2{} bow shocks
430: at different jet axes
431: because of a large-scale jet precession (see \S \ref{sec:jetaxis}).
432:
433: \subsection{Kinematics}\label{sec:kinematics}
434:
435: Position-velocity (PV) diagrams of the SiO and CO emission
436: cut along the jet axis are used to study
437: the kinematics of the jet (Fig. \ref{fig:pvjet}).
438: Note that the CO emission seen at low velocity
439: (indicated by dashed lines) likely traces the
440: cavity walls along the jet axis.
441:
442: In the jet, the SiO emission is localized toward the knots, with
443: a range of velocities detached from the systemic velocity:
444: knots BK1, RK1, RK2, and RK5 are bright
445: and seen with a velocity range of $\sim$ 25
446: \vkm{} (see also their spectra in Fig. \ref{fig:specSiO}),
447: while other knots are faint and seen with a narrower velocity range. At
448: high velocity, CO emission (labeled CO jet)
449: also arises from the jet, showing
450: a similar velocity structure with similar mean velocity
451: but with narrower velocity range (see also Fig. \ref{fig:specSiO}).
452: Thus, the SiO emission
453: and the CO jet emission can be used together to study the kinematics of the jet.
454: They are blueshifted in the east and
455: redshifted in the west. They are,
456: however, more redshifted (with a
457: mean velocity of $\sim$ $20$ \vkm{})
458: in the west than blueshifted (with a
459: mean velocity of $\sim$ $-15$ \vkm{})
460: in the east. In addition, for each component of the jet,
461: the velocity centroids of the individual knots are also
462: different.
463:
464: Linear velocity structures (indicated with solid lines) are
465: seen in CO, as in lower excitation line \citep{Gueth1999},
466: with the velocity magnitude increasing with the distance from the source.
467: These velocity structures are different from that of the SiO jet.
468: To study their origin,
469: we plot in Figure \ref{fig:shell2} the
470: emission of the linear velocity structure (marked by an ellipse) in the west,
471: where it can be better separated from the jet emission.
472: The emission is seen around the jet axis but brighter in the north, with
473: the transverse width increasing with the distance from the source,
474: surrounded by the rim-brightened IR shell (cavity wall).
475: In the far end, the emission shows shell-like structures associated with the
476: \H2{} knots. In the near end, however, it is unclear but may
477: show shell-like structures associated with the SiO knots (comparing Fig.
478: \ref{fig:shell2} with Fig. \ref{fig:jet}c).
479: PV cuts across the jet axis in the west
480: at \arcs{11} and \arcs{12} in the far end, where the structure is
481: better resolved, also show a ring-like velocity structure as expected for a
482: shell (Fig. \ref{fig:pv_per}). Note that, in these PV cuts,
483: the CO emission seen at low velocity is likely from the cavity wall.
484: Therefore, the CO emission associated with the linear velocity structures
485: likely traces the (internal) shells or wakes driven by the (internal)
486: bow shocks \cite[see, e.g.,][]{Raga1993,Gueth1999,Lee2001},
487: surrounded by the dense cavity walls.
488:
489:
490: \subsection{Temperature, Column Density, and Density}\label{sec:TCD}
491:
492: The CO emission is assumed to have
493: an excitation temperature of 100 K in the jet and
494: 50 K in the high-velocity shells.
495: Note that, however, the CO emission,
496: which was detected also in higher-$J$ transitions in the far infrared,
497: could have a higher excitation temperature \citep{Giannini2001}.
498: The \H2{} column density can be derived assuming a CO
499: abundance of 8.5$\times10^{-5}$ \citep{Frerking1982} and optically thin
500: emission in local thermal equilibrium.
501: It is found to be $(4-8)\times 10^{20}$ \cms{} in the jet,
502: which has an intensity of 57$-$104 \Tk{} toward the knots
503: (see Fig. \ref{fig:jet}d, integrated from -23.7 to -8.7 \vkm{} and 10.3 to 35.3
504: \vkm{}),
505: and $4.5\times 10^{20}$ \cms{} in the high-velocity shells, which have
506: a mean intensity of 85 \Tk
507: (see Fig. \ref{fig:shell2}, integrated from 0.3 to 20.3 \vkm{}).
508: The jet is unresolved with a size (diameter) of $<$ \arcs{1} and thus
509: has a density of $>$ $10^{5}$ \cmc{}.
510: Assuming a shell thickness of $\sim$ \arcs{1}, the high-velocity shells
511: have a density of $\sim$ $9\times10^4$ \cmc{}.
512: Note that, however, it is not meaningful to derive the density for the low-velocity
513: shells because their fluxes are mostly resolved out in our observations
514: \cite[see also][]{Gueth1999}.
515:
516: Using the SiO($J=5-4$) observations from \citet{Hirano2006},
517: the line ratio of SiO($J=8-7$)/SiO($J=5-4$) is found to be
518: $\sim$ 0.7 for the first pair of knots but decreasing to
519: $\sim$ 0.4 at the far ends of the SiO jet (Fig. \ref{fig:SiOratio}).
520: Note that this line ratio has been found to be $\sim$ 1.0 for the first
521: pair of knots but decreasing to $\sim$ 0.5 at the far ends of the SiO jet by
522: \citet{Palau2006} at lower angular resolution. However,
523: with their maps, we
524: recalculated the line ratio at lower angular resolution using the same
525: velocity interval and intensity cutoff level and found it to be $\sim$ 0.8
526: for the first pair of knots, and thus consistent with ours within the flux uncertainty.
527: The kinetic temperature of the SiO emission can be assumed
528: to be 300 K for the first pair of knots but 100 K for the knots further out
529: \citep{Hirano2006}. The density can be estimated by comparing the line ratio
530: to that in the LVG calculations with an assumption of optically thin
531: emission \citep{Nisini2002}. Note that, however, the emission could be
532: optically thick \citep{Cabrit2007}. The density is estimated to be
533: $\sim 4\times10^6$ \cmc{} for the first pair of knots but decreasing to
534: $\sim 3\times10^6$ \cmc{} at the far ends of the SiO jet.
535: These densities, however, are a factor of $\sim$ 2 lower than those
536: derived from the line ratio of
537: SiO($J=5-4$)/SiO($J=1-0$) in \citet{Hirano2006}.
538: A detailed study with multiple transitions of SiO will address this in a
539: later paper (Hirano et al. in prep).
540:
541:
542: \section{Molecular Jet}
543:
544: \subsection{Shocks}
545:
546: The SiO knots are seen with a range of velocities, likely
547: tracing the unresolved internal (bow) shocks (i.e., working surfaces)
548: in the jet, as in HH 212 \citep{Codella2007,Lee2007}.
549: It is thought that SiO abundance is greatly enhanced in the shocks
550: as a consequence of grain sputtering or grain-grain collisions releasing
551: Si-bearing material into the gas phase, which reacts rapidly with O-bearing
552: species (e.g., O$_2$ and OH) to form SiO
553: \citep{Schilke1997,Caselli1997}.
554: The emission is consistent with its production in C-type shocks, with a
555: velocity range of $\sim$ 25 \vkm{}, similar to that found to produce
556: the observed SiO column densities in molecular outflows \citep{Schilke1997}.
557: At high velocity, CO is also seen tracing the shocks in the jet. It has
558: smaller velocity range than SiO, tracing weaker shocks where the
559: temperature and density are both lower. Observations at higher angular
560: resolution are needed to study the morphological relationship
561: between the CO and SiO emission by resolving their structures.
562:
563:
564: \subsection{Inclination}\label{sec:dis_inc}
565:
566: The jet inclination, $i$, can be estimated from the mean velocity of the SiO
567: emission, $v_m$, with $i = \sin ^{-1} (v_m/v_j)$, where $v_j$ is the jet
568: velocity.
569: The eastern and western components of the jet
570: may have different inclinations because of their different mean velocities.
571: Assuming a typical jet velocity of 100$-$200 \vkm{},
572: the eastern and western components of the jet have an inclination of
573: $-$8.6\degree{} to $-$4.3\degree{} and
574: 11.4\degree{} to 5.7\degree{}, respectively. Note that, however, it is also
575: possible that the eastern and western components of the jet have the same
576: inclinations but different jet velocities as in T Tauri star jets
577: \citep{LopezM2003}.
578:
579: \subsection{Mass-loss rate}
580:
581: The mass-loss rate of the jet can be estimated from the CO emission of the
582: knots. As mentioned, the knots likely trace the internal (bow) shocks or
583: the jet itself but highly compressed by shocks.
584: Since the knots are
585: unresolved, the compression factor is assumed to be $\sim$ 3,
586: as found in HH 212 at similar angular resolution \citep{Lee2007}.
587: Note that, however, the actual compression factor due to the shocks
588: could be higher, if the knots are resolved.
589: Thus, the (two-sided) mass-loss rate
590: is given by
591: \begin{equation}
592: \dot{M}_j \sim \frac{2}{3}v_j m_{\textrm{\scriptsize H}_2} N b
593: \end{equation}
594: where $N$ and $b$ are the CO column density and the linear size of
595: the synthesized beam perpendicular to the jet axis. With $N \sim (4-8) \times 10^{20}$
596: \cms{} (see \S \ref{sec:TCD}), $b \sim 5\times10^{15}$ cm,
597: and $v_j \sim 100-200$ \vkm{}, $\dot{M}_j \sim (0.7-2.8)\times 10^{-6}$
598: \solarmass{} yr$^{-1}$, similar to that found in HH 212.
599: The accretion rate can be estimated assuming that the bolometric
600: luminosity $\Lbol$ is mainly from the
601: accretion. Assuming a stellar mass of $M_\ast \sim 0.06$ \solarmass{}
602: \cite[derived from an evolution model,][]{Froebrich2003}
603: and a stellar radius of $R_\ast \sim 4 R_\odot$ \citep{Stahler1980}, then
604: the accretion rate
605: $\dot{M}_a \sim \Lbol R_\ast/GM_\ast \sim 8 \times 10^{-6}$
606: \smassrate{}, with $\Lbol \sim 3.6 L_\odot$ \citep{Froebrich2005}.
607: Thus, the mass-loss rate is estimated to be
608: $\sim 9-36$\% of the accretion rate, similar to
609: that found in HH 212 \citep{Lee2007}.
610:
611:
612: \subsection{Episodic, Bending, and Precessing} \label{sec:jetebp}
613:
614: The jet is seen with a chain of knots in SiO and CO with a
615: semiperiodic spacing of $\sim$ \arcs{2}$-$\arcs{3} or 600$-$900 AU.
616: The knots may trace the unresolved (bow) shocks resulting from
617: a semiperiodic variation in the jet velocity \cite[see, e.g.,][]{Suttner1997}.
618: A temporal variation in the jet properties was also suggested in
619: \citet{Gueth1999}.
620: The period, which can be estimated by dividing
621: the interknot spacing by the jet velocity,
622: is found to be $\sim 44-15$ yr, assuming a jet velocity of 100$-$200 \vkm{}.
623: The jet is believed to be launched from an accretion disk around the source.
624: The periodic velocity variation may be
625: due to (1)
626: periodic perturbation of the accretion disk by an unresolved companion
627: at a few AU away
628: %$\big(\frac{GMP^2}{4\pi^2}\big)^{1/3} \sim 3$ AU;
629: or (2) magnetic cycle like the
630: solar magnetic cycle, which has a period of $\sim$ 22 yr \citep{Shu1997}.
631:
632:
633: The jet seems to have a small-scale ($<$ 1\degree{}) precession
634: with a sinuous structure, in addition
635: to a large-scale ($\sim$ 3\degree{}) precession suggested in
636: \citet{Gueth1999} and \citet{Eisloffel2003}.
637: Small-scale jet precession is
638: also seen in other jets, e.g., HH 34 and HH 212, and is generally ascribed
639: to the tidal effects of a companion star on the direction of the jet axis
640: \citep{Reipurth2002}. However,
641: it may also be due to kink instability in the jet \citep{Todo1993}.
642:
643: The jet is also seen bent in SiO with its eastern and western
644: components bent by $\sim$ 0.5\degree{} to the north.
645: The jet was also seen bent in CO but by 3 times larger
646: \citep{Gueth1999} due to contamination from high-velocity
647: shells (see \S \ref{sec:COjs} \& \S \ref{sec:kinematics}).
648: The jet may have an additional bending into the plane of the sky because
649: the eastern and western components of the jet may have different
650: inclinations due to their different mean velocities (see \S \ref{sec:dis_inc}).
651: Assuming their original paths of motion are
652: antiparallel, the eastern and western components of the jet
653: are both bent by $\sim$ 0.7\degree{}$-$1.4\degree{} into the plane of
654: the sky. Thus, the jet may have a total bending of $\sim$
655: 0.9\degree{}$-$1.5\degree{}.
656: Possible mechanisms for jet bending have been discussed in
657: \citet{Fendt1998} and \citet{Gueth1999}.
658: One of the possibilities is
659: due to motion of the jet source in a binary system.
660: The envelope, which is seen
661: elongated toward the southwest, may result from an interaction with a
662: companion in the southwest.
663:
664:
665: \subsection{Rotating and Launching Radius?}
666:
667: %Note that knot RK5 may actually consists of more than one knot, as seen in \H2{}.
668:
669: The jet is expected to be rotating,
670: carrying away extra angular momentum from
671: accretion disk. The HH 211 jet, being close to the plane of the sky, is one
672: of the best candidates to study the rotation. Here, only the first four
673: bright SiO knots (BK1, BK3, RK1, and RK2) are used, because the SiO knots
674: further out are likely to be more affected by shock interactions.
675: % Shock is more developed further out.
676:
677: A velocity gradient is seen across the first four knots (see
678: the solid lines in Fig. \ref{fig:pvrotation}), with $\sim$ 1.5$\pm$0.8
679: \vkm{} at $\sim$ 30$\pm$15 AU (i.e., \arcsa{0}{1}) away from the jet axis.
680: The jet may have a radius (i.e., jet
681: edge) of $\sim$ 30 AU, similar to
682: that of HH 212, which is estimated to be $\sim$ 45 AU
683: \citep{Cabrit2007}.
684: However, the beam dilution due to insufficient angular
685: resolution could make the velocity shift smaller than it really
686: is \cite[see, e.g.,][]{Pesenti2004}.
687: This velocity gradient has the same direction as that seen in the rotating
688: ammonia envelope (Wiseman, private communication),
689: suggesting that it is from the jet rotation.
690: The velocity beyond $\pm$1.5 \vkm{}
691: seems increasing toward the jet axis, also as predicted in
692: magneto-centrifugal wind models.
693:
694:
695: However,
696: the interpretation of the velocity gradient perpendicular to
697: the jet axis is complicated by the presence of a velocity
698: gradient along the jet axis (Fig. \ref{fig:maprotation}).
699: On the blueshifted (east) side, the higher-blueshifted emission (blue
700: contours) is upstream of the lower-blueshifted emission (red contours),
701: while on the redshifted (west) side,
702: the higher-redshifted emission (red contours)
703: is upstream of the lower-redshifted emission (blue contours).
704: This velocity gradient along the jet axis is consistent with
705: the SiO knots being formed by a velocity variation in the jet (see \S
706: \ref{sec:jetebp}), with the faster jet material catching up with the
707: slower jet material. Without sufficient angular resolution,
708: this velocity gradient can not be separated from the
709: component perpendicular to the jet axis.
710: The velocity gradient seen across the knots RK1 and BK1
711: may even arise from the velocity
712: gradient along the jet axis due to the beam position angle.
713: The jet also has a small-scale precession that may introduce
714: a velocity asymmetry between the two jet edges
715: \cite[see][]{Cerqueira2006}.
716: The increase in velocity toward the jet axis may
717: also be due to the side-ways ejection of the shocked material.
718: Therefore, further observations at higher angular resolution are really needed
719: to confirm the jet rotation.
720:
721:
722: The launching radius of the jet can be estimated if
723: the measured velocity gradient is indeed from the jet rotation.
724: In magneto-centrifugal wind models, the jet can be considered as the dense
725: part of the wind along the rotational axis. In the wind,
726: the specific angular momentum and energy can be assumed to be conserved along
727: any given field line. Thus, for a given stellar mass, the specific
728: angular momentum and poloidal velocity (i.e., jet velocity)
729: at large distance
730: can be used to derive the angular velocity and thus the
731: wind launching radius at the foot
732: point of the field line in the accretion disk
733: \cite[see, e.g.,][]{Anderson2003}.
734: The angular velocity at the foot point is found to be
735: $\Omega_0 \sim (0.82-3.23)\times10^{-6}$ s$^{-1}$ or 0.07$-$0.28 day$^{-1}$,
736: using Eq. 4 in \citet{Anderson2003}, assuming a stellar mass of $M_\ast \sim
737: 0.06 M_\odot$ \citep{Froebrich2003} and a jet velocity of 100$-$200 \vkm{}.
738: Thus, the wind launching radius is
739: $\bar{\omega}_0 \sim 0.15-0.06$ AU or $\sim (8-3) R_\ast$, with
740: the stellar radius $R_\ast\sim 4 R_\odot$ \citep{Stahler1980}.
741: Therefore, the jet could be launched either
742: from near the corotation radius ($\sim 0.05$ AU)
743: as in the X-wind model \citep{Shu2000}
744: or beyond in the inner edge ($\sim 0.1$ AU) of a disk as in disk-wind
745: model \citep{Konigl2000}, depending on the jet velocity.
746: Note that, if the jet is really launched from near the corotation
747: radius, the rotation period of the protostar would be locked to be $\sim$ 22 days.
748: A classical T Tauri star has been found to have a typical rotation period of
749: $\sim$ 8 days \cite[see, e.g.,][]{Bouvier1993}, with a stellar mass of 0.5$-$0.8
750: \solarmass{}. The protostar here in HH 211, with a mass of $\sim$ 10 times smaller,
751: could have a rotation period of $\sim$ 3 times longer.
752:
753:
754: \section{Conclusions}
755: We have mapped the protostellar jet HH 211 in 342 GHz continuum, SiO
756: ($J=8-7$), and CO ($J=3-2$) emission. Thermal dust emission is seen in
757: continuum at the center of the jet, tracing an envelope and a possible
758: optically thick compact disk (with a size $<$ 130 AU) around the protostar.
759: A knotty jet is seen in CO and SiO as in
760: \H2{}, but extending closer to the protostar. It consists of a chain of knots
761: on each side of the protostar, with an interknot spacing of $\sim$
762: \arcs{2}$-$\arcs{3} or 600$-$900 AU and
763: the innermost pair of knots at only $\sim$ \arcsa{1}{7} or 535 AU from the
764: protostar. These knots likely trace unresolved internal (bow) shocks in the jet, with a
765: velocity range up to $\sim$ 25 \vkm{}. The jet is episodic, precessing,
766: and bending. The two-sided mass-loss rate of the jet is
767: estimated to be $\sim (0.7-2.4)\times 10^{-6}$ \solarmass{} yr$^{-1}$, about
768: 9$-$36\% of the accretion rate.
769: A velocity gradient is seen consistently across
770: two bright SiO knots (BK3 and RK2)
771: perpendicular to the jet axis,
772: with $\sim$ 1.5$\pm$0.8 \vkm{} at $\sim$ 30$\pm$15 AU, suggesting a presence
773: of a jet rotation.
774: The launching radius of the jet, derived
775: from the potential jet rotation, is $\sim$ 0.15$-$0.062 AU in the inner disk.
776:
777: \acknowledgements
778: We thank the SMA staff for their efforts
779: in running and maintaining the array, and the anonymous referee for
780: the insightful comments. C.-F. Lee thanks Frank H. Shu,
781: Zhi-Yun Lee, and Nagayoshi Ohashi for fruitful conversations.
782: A. P. is grateful to Robert Estalella for helpful discussions.
783:
784: %% Remember to include "(" and ")" for the year,e.g., (1998)
785: %%
786: \begin{thebibliography}{}
787: %\bibitem[Allen, Li, \& Shu(2003)]{Allen2003} Allen, A., Li, Z.,
788: % \& Shu, F.~H.\ 2003, \apj, 599, 363
789: %\bibitem[Alten et al.(1997)]{Alten1997}
790: % Alten, V. P., Bally, J., Devine, D. and Miller, G. J. 1997, IAU Symp. 182:
791: % Herbig-Haro Flows and the Birth of Stars, 182, 51P
792: \bibitem[Anderson et al.(2003)]{Anderson2003} Anderson, J.~M., Li,
793: Z.-Y., Krasnopolsky, R., \& Blandford, R.~D.\ 2003, \apjl, 590, L107
794: %\bibitem[Andr\'e \& Montmerle(1994)]{Andre1994} Andr\'e, P. \&
795: % Montmerle, T. 1994, \apj, 420, 837
796: %\bibitem[Andre et al.(2000)]{Andre2000} Andre, P., Ward-Thompson,
797: %D., \& Barsony, M.\ 2000, Protostars and Planets IV, 59
798: %\bibitem[Anglada \& Rodr{\'{\i}}guez(2002)]{Anglada2002} Anglada,
799: %G.~\& Rodr{\'{\i}}guez, L.~F.\ 2002, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y
800: % Astrofisica, 38, 13
801: %\bibitem[Arce \& Sargent(2004)]{Arce2004} Arce, H.~G.~\&
802: % Sargent, A.~I.\ 2004, \apj, 612, 342
803: \bibitem[Avila et al.(2001)]{Avila2001} Avila, R.,
804: Rodr{\'{\i}}guez, L.~F., \& Curiel, S.\ 2001, Revista Mexicana de
805: Astronomia y Astrofisica, 37, 201
806: %\bibitem[Bachiller(1996)]{Bachiller1996}Bachiller, R. 1996, ARAA, 34, 111
807: %\bibitem[Bachiller et al.(1995)]{Bachiller1995} Bachiller, R.,
808: % Guilloteau, S., Dutrey, A., Planesas, P. \& Martin-Pintado, J. 1995, \aap,
809: % 299, 857
810: %\bibitem[Bally \& Lada(1983)]{Bally1983} Bally, J. \& Lada, C. J.
811: % 1983, \apj, 265, 824
812: \bibitem[Beckwith et al.(1990)]{Beckwith1990} Beckwith, S.~V.~W.,
813: Sargent, A.~I., Chini, R.~S., \& Guesten, R.\ 1990, \aj, 99, 924
814: %\bibitem[Belloche \& Andr{\' e}(2004)]{Belloche2004} Belloche, A.~\&
815: % Andr{\' e}, P.\ 2004, \aap, 419, L35
816: %\bibitem[Bence, Richer \& Padman(1996)]{Bence1996} Bence, S. J.,
817: % Richer, J. S. \& Padman, R. 1996, \mnras, 279, 866
818: %\bibitem[Bence et al.(1998)]{Bence1998} Bence, S. J., Padman, R.,
819: % Isaak, K. G., Wiedner, M. C. \& Wright, G. S. 1998, \mnras, 299, 965
820: %\bibitem[Bohigas, Persi \& Tapia(1993)]{Bohigas1993} Bohigas, J.,
821: % Persi, P. \& Tapia, M. 1993, \aap, 267, 168
822: \bibitem[Bouvier et al.(1993)]{Bouvier1993} Bouvier, J., Cabrit,
823: S., Fernandez, M., Martin, E.~L., \& Matthews, J.~M.\ 1993, \aap, 272, 176
824: %\bibitem[Cabrit, Raga \& Gueth(1997)]{Cabrit1997} Cabrit, S., Raga, A., Gueth, F.
825: % 1997, IAUS, 182, 163
826: \bibitem[Cabrit et al.(2007)]{Cabrit2007} Cabrit, S., Codella, C., Gueth, F.
827: Nisini, B., Gusdorf, A., Dougados, C., \& Bacciotti, F. 2007, \aap, in press
828: %\bibitem[Caselli, Myers, \& Thaddeus(1995)]{Caselli1995} Caselli,
829: % P., Myers, P.~C., \& Thaddeus, P.\ 1995, \apjl, 455, L77
830: \bibitem[Caselli et al.(1997)]{Caselli1997} Caselli, P., Hartquist,
831: T.~W., \& Havnes, O.\ 1997, \aap, 322, 296
832: %\bibitem[Caselli et al.(2002)]{Caselli2002} Caselli, P., Benson,
833: %P.~J., Myers, P.~C., \& Tafalla, M.\ 2002, \apj, 572, 238
834: \bibitem[Cerqueira et al.(2006)]{Cerqueira2006} Cerqueira, A.~H.,
835: Vel{\'a}zquez, P.~F., Raga, A.~C., Vasconcelos, M.~J., \& de Colle, F.\
836: 2006, \aap, 448, 231
837: %\bibitem[Chandler \& Richer(2001)]{Chandler2001} Chandler, C.~J., \&
838: %Richer, J.~S.\ 2001, \apj, 555, 139
839: %\bibitem[Chapman et al.(2002)]{Chapman2002} Chapman, N.~L., Mundy,
840: %L.~G., Lee, C.-F., \& White, S.~M.\ 2002, Bulletin of the American
841: %Astronomical Society, 34, 1133
842: %\bibitem[Chernin et al.(1994)]{Chernin1994} Chernin, L.M., Masson, C.R.,
843: % Gouveia dal Pino, E.M., Benz, W., 1994, ApJ, 426, 204
844: %\bibitem[Chini et al.(1997)]{Chini1997} Chini, R., Reipurth, B.,
845: %Sievers, A., Ward-Thompson, D., Haslam, C.~G.~T., Kreysa, E., \& Lemke, R.\
846: %1997, \aap, 325, 542
847: %\bibitem[Cernicharo \& Reipurth(1996)]{Cernicharo1996} Cernicharo, J.
848: % \& Reipurth, B. 1996, \apjl, 460, L57
849: %\bibitem[Claussen et al.(1998)]{Claussen1998}Claussen, M.J., Marvel., K.B.,
850: % Wootten, A., Wilking, B.A. 1998, ApJL, 507, L79
851: %\bibitem[Codella et al.(2005)]{Codella2005} Codella, C., Bachiller,
852: %R., Benedettini, M., Caselli, P., Viti, S., \& Wakelam, V.\ 2005, \mnras,
853: %361, 244
854: \bibitem[Codella et al.(2007)]{Codella2007} Codella, C., Cabrit,
855: S., Gueth, F., Cesaroni, R., Bacciotti, F., Lefloch, B., \& McCaughrean,
856: M.~J.\ 2007, \aap, 462, L53
857: %\bibitem[Cohen(1980)]{Cohen1980} Cohen, M. 1980, \aj, 85, 29
858: %\bibitem[Coppin, Davis \& Micono(1998)]{Coppin1998} Coppin, K. E.
859: % K., Davis, C. J. \& Micono, M. 1998, \mnras, 301, L10
860: %\bibitem[Davis, Mundt \& Eisloeffel(1994)]{Davis1994} Davis, C. J.,
861: % Mundt, R. \& Eisloeffel, J. 1994, \apjl, 437, L55
862: %\bibitem[Davis et al.(1997)]{Davis1997} Davis,
863: % C. J., Ray, T. P., Eisloeffel, J. \& Corcoran, D. 1997, \aap, 324, 263
864: %\bibitem[Davis et al.(2000)]{Davis2000} Davis, C.~J., Berndsen,
865: %A., Smith, M.~D., Chrysostomou, A., \& Hobson, J.\ 2000, \mnras, 314, 241
866: %\bibitem[de Geus, Bronfman, \& Thaddeus(1990)]{deGeus1990} de
867: % Geus, E.~J., Bronfman, L., \& Thaddeus, P.\ 1990, A\&A, 231, 137
868: %\bibitem[Delamarter, Frank, \& Hartmann(2000)]{Delamarter2000}
869: % Delamarter, G., Frank, A., \& Hartmann, L.\ 2000, \apj, 530, 923
870: \bibitem[Dent et al.(1998)]{Dent1998} Dent, W.~R.~F., Matthews,
871: H.~E., \& Ward-Thompson, D.\ 1998, \mnras, 301, 1049
872: %\bibitem[Downes \& Ray(1999)]{Downes1999} Downes, T. P. Ray, T. P.
873: %1999, \aap, 345, 977
874: \bibitem[Eisl{\"o}ffel et al.(2003)]{Eisloffel2003} Eisl{\"o}ffel,
875: J., Froebrich, D., Stanke, T., \& McCaughrean, M.~J.\ 2003, \apj, 595, 259
876: \bibitem[Enoch et al.(2006)]{Enoch2006} Enoch, M.~L., et al.\
877: 2006, \apj, 638, 293
878: %\bibitem[Evans(1999)]{Evans1999} Evans, N.~J.\ 1999, \araa, 37, 311
879: \bibitem[Fendt \& Zinnecker(1998)]{Fendt1998} Fendt, C., \&
880: Zinnecker, H.\ 1998, \aap, 334, 750
881: %\bibitem[Ferreira et al.(2006)]{Ferreira2006} Ferreira, J.,
882: %Dougados, C., \& Cabrit, S.\ 2006, \aap, 453, 785
883: \bibitem[Frerking et al.(1982)]{Frerking1982} Frerking, M.~A.,
884: Langer, W.~D., \& Wilson, R.~W.\ 1982, \apj, 262, 590
885: \bibitem[Froebrich(2005)]{Froebrich2005} Froebrich, D.\ 2005, \apjs,
886: 156, 169
887: \bibitem[Froebrich et al.(2003)]{Froebrich2003} Froebrich, D., Smith,
888: M.~D., Hodapp, K.-W., \& Eisl{\"o}ffel, J.\ 2003, \mnras, 346, 163
889: %\bibitem[Fukui et al.(1993)]{Fukui1993} Fukui, Y. , Iwata, T. ,
890: % Mizuno, A. , Bally, J. \& Lane, A. P. 1993, Protostars and planets III
891: % (A93-42937 17-90), p. 603-639., 603
892: %\bibitem[Galli \& Shu(1993)]{Galli1993} Galli, D., \& Shu, F.~H.\
893: % 1993, \apj, 417, 243
894: %\bibitem[Galv{\' a}n-Madrid et al.(2004)]{Galvan2004} Galv{\'
895: %a}n-Madrid, R., Avila, R., \& Rodr{\'{\i}}guez, L.~F.\ 2004, Revista
896: %Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica, 40, 31
897: %\bibitem[Garnavich et al.(1997)]{Garnavich1997}
898: % Garnavich, P. M., Noriega-Crespo, A. , Raga, A. C. \& Bohm, K. -H. 1997,
899: % \apj, 490, 752
900: \bibitem[Giannini et al.(2001)]{Giannini2001} Giannini, T., Nisini,
901: B., \& Lorenzetti, D.\ 2001, \apj, 555, 40
902: %\bibitem[Gibb et al.(2004)]{Gibb2004} Gibb, A.~G., Richer,
903: %J.~S., Chandler, C.~J., \& Davis, C.~J.\ 2004, \apj, 603, 198
904: %\bibitem[Girart et al.(2000)]{Girart2000} Girart, J.~M.,
905: % Estalella, R., Ho, P.~T.~P., \& Rudolph, A.~L.\ 2000, \apj, 539, 763
906: %\bibitem[de Gouveia dal Pino \& Benz (1993)]{Gouveia1993} de Gouveia
907: % dal Pino, E. M. \& Benz, W. 1993, \apj, 410, 686
908: %\bibitem[Gredel \& Reipurth(1994)]{Gredel1994} Gredel, R. \&
909: % Reipurth, B. 1994, \aap, 289, L19
910: %\bibitem[Gottlieb, Myers, \& Thaddeus(2003)]{Gottlieb2003} Gottlieb,
911: % C.~A., Myers, P.~C., \& Thaddeus, P.\ 2003, \apj, 588, 655
912: %\bibitem[Gueth et al.(1997)]{Gueth1997} Gueth, F., Guilloteau, S., Dutrey,
913: % A., \& Bachiller, R.\ 1997, \aap, 323, 943
914: %\bibitem[Gueth et al.(1998)]{Gueth1998} Gueth, F., Guilloteau,
915: %S., \& Bachiller, R.\ 1998, \aap, 333, 287
916: \bibitem[GG99()]{Gueth1999} Gueth, F. \&
917: Guilloteau, S. 1999, \aap, 343, 571
918: %\bibitem[Gueth, Guilloteau \& Bachiller(1996)]{Gueth1996} Gueth,
919: % F., Guilloteau, S. \& Bachiller, R. 1996, \aap, 307, 891
920: %\bibitem[Hartigan et al.(2000)]{Hartigan2000} Hartigan, P., Bally,
921: %J., Reipurth, B., \& Morse, J.~A.\ 2000, Protostars and Planets IV, 841
922: %\bibitem[Hartmann et al.(1994)]{Hartmann1994} Hartmann, L., Boss,
923: % A., Calvet, N., \& Whitney, B.\ 1994, \apjl, 430, L49
924: %\bibitem[Hartmann et al.(1996)]{Hartmann1996} Hartmann, L., Calvet,
925: %N., \& Boss, A.\ 1996, \apj, 464, 387
926: %\bibitem[Hayashi et al.(1993)]{Hayashi1993} Hayashi, M., Ohashi,
927: %N., \& Miyama, S.~M.\ 1993, \apjl, 418, L71
928: \bibitem[Hirano et al.(2006)]{Hirano2006} Hirano, N., Liu, S.-Y.,
929: Shang, H., Ho, P.~T.~P., Huang, H.-C., Kuan, Y.-J., McCaughrean, M.~J., \&
930: Zhang, Q.\ 2006, \apjl, 636, L141
931: \bibitem[Ho et al.(2004)]{Ho2004} Ho, P. T. P., Moran, J. M., \& Lo, K. Y.
932: 2004, ApJ, 616, L1
933: %\bibitem[Hodapp(1994)]{Hodapp1994} Hodapp, K. -W. 1994, \apjs, 94,
934: % 615
935: %\bibitem[Hodapp \& Ladd(1995)]{Hodapp1995} Hodapp, K. -W. \& Ladd,
936: % E. F. 1995, \apj, 453, 715
937: %\bibitem[Hogerheijde et al.(1998)]{Hogerheijde1998} Hogerheijde, M.~R.,
938: %van Dishoeck, E.~F., Blake, G.~A., \& van Langevelde, H.~J.\ 1998, \apj,
939: %502, 315
940: %\bibitem[Hogerheijde(2001)]{Hogerheijde2001} Hogerheijde, M.~R.\ 2001,
941: %\apj, 553, 618
942: %\bibitem[J{\o}rgensen et al.(2004)]{Jorgensen2004} J{\o}rgensen,
943: % J.~K., Sch{\" o}ier, F.~L., \& van Dishoeck, E.~F.\ 2004, \aap, 416, 603
944: %\bibitem[J{\o}rgensen et al.(2006)]{Jorgensen2006} J{\o}rgensen,
945: %J.~K., Bourke, T.L., Myers, P.C. Di Francesco, J., Lee, C.-F., Ohashi, N.,
946: %Sch{\" o}ier, F.~L., Takakuwa, S., van Dishoeck, E.~F., Wilner, D.J.,
947: %\& Zhang, Q. \ 2006, \apj, {\it submitted}.
948: %\bibitem[Keto et al.(1988)]{Keto1988} Keto, E.~R., Ho, P.~T.~P.,
949: %\& Haschick, A.~D.\ 1988, \apj, 324, 920
950: \bibitem[Konigl \& Pudritz(2000)]{Konigl2000} Konigl, A., \&
951: Pudritz, R.~E.\ 2000, Protostars and Planets IV, 759
952: %\bibitem[Kumar, Anandarao \& Davis(1999)]{Kumar1999} Kumar, M. S.
953: % N. , Anandarao, B. G. \& Davis, C. J. 1999, \aap, 344, L9
954: %\bibitem[Lada(1985)]{Lada1985} Lada, C. J. 1985, \araa, 23, 267
955: \bibitem[Lada et al.(2006)]{Lada2006} Lada, C.~J., et al.\ 2006,
956: \aj, 131, 1574
957: %\bibitem[Lada \& Fich(1996)]{Lada1996} Lada, C. J. \& Fich, M.
958: % 1996, \apj, 459, 638
959: %\bibitem[Lee et al.(2000)]{Lee2000} Lee, C.-F., Mundy, L.G., Reipurth, B.,
960: % Ostriker, E.C., \& Stone, J.M. 2000, \apj, 542, 925
961: \bibitem[Lee et al.(2001)]{Lee2001} Lee,
962: C.-F., Stone, J.~M., Ostriker, E.~C., \& Mundy, L.~G.\ 2001, \apj, 557, 429
963: %\bibitem[Paper I()]{Lee2006} Lee, C.-F., Ho, P.~T.~P.,
964: %Beuther, H., Bourke, T.~L., Zhang, Q., Hirano, N., \& Shang, H.\ 2006,
965: %\apj, 639, 292
966: \bibitem[Lee et al.(2007)]{Lee2007} Lee, C.-F., Ho, P.~T.~P.,
967: Hirano, N., Beuther, H., Bourke, T.~L., Zhang, Q., \& Shang, H.\ 2007,
968: \apj, 659, 499
969: %\bibitem[Lee, Myers, \& Tafalla(2001)]{LMT2001} Lee, C.~W.,
970: % Myers, P.~C., \& Tafalla, M.\ 2001, \apjs, 136, 703
971: %\bibitem[Lee et al.(2002)]{Lee2002} Lee,
972: % C.-F., Mundy, L.~G., Stone, J.~M., \& Ostriker, E.~C.\ 2002, \apj, 576, 294
973: %\bibitem[Lee et al.(2005)]{Lee2005a} Lee, C., Ho, P.~T.~P., \&
974: % White, S.~M.\ 2005, \apj, 619, 948
975: %\bibitem[Lee \& Ho(2005)]{Lee2005b} Lee, C., \& Ho, P.~T.~P.,
976: %\ 2005, \apj, in press
977: %\bibitem[Lee \& Sahai(2003)]{Lee2003} Lee, C.-F.~\& Sahai, R.\
978: %2003, \apj, 586, 319
979: %\bibitem[Levreault(1988)]{Levreault1988} Levreault, R. M. 1988, \apj,
980: % 330, 897
981: %\bibitem[Lin et al.(1994)]{Lin1994} Lin, D.~N.~C., Hayashi, M.,
982: %Bell, K.~R., \& Ohashi, N.\ 1994, \apj, 435, 821
983: %\bibitem[Linke \& Goldsmith(1980)]{Linke1980} Linke, R.~A., \&
984: % Goldsmith, P.~F.\ 1980, \apj, 235, 437
985: %\bibitem[Li \& Shu(1996)]{Li1996} Li, Z. -Y. \& Shu, F. H.
986: % 1996, \apj, 472, 211
987: \bibitem[L{\'o}pez-Mart{\'{\i}}n et al.(2003)]{LopezM2003}
988: L{\'o}pez-Mart{\'{\i}}n, L., Cabrit, S., \& Dougados, C.\ 2003, \aap, 405,
989: L1
990: %\bibitem[Mardones et al.(1997)]{Mardones1997} Mardones, D., Myers,
991: %P.~C., Tafalla, M., Wilner, D.~J., Bachiller, R., \& Garay, G.\ 1997, \apj,
992: %489, 719
993: %\bibitem[Marvel et al.(in press)]{Marvelpress}Marvel, K.B., McCaughrean, M.J.,
994: % \& Sargent, A.I., manuscript in preparation
995: %\bibitem[Masson \& Chernin(1993)]{Masson1993} Masson, C. R. \&
996: % Chernin, L. M. 1993, \apj, 414, 230
997: %\bibitem[Mathieu et al.(1988)]{Mathieu1988} Mathieu, R. D., Myers,
998: % P. C., Schild, R. E., Benson, P. J. \& Fuller, G. A. 1988, \apj, 330, 385
999: %\bibitem[Matzner \& McKee(1999)]{Matzner1999} Matzner, C. D. \&
1000: % McKee, C. F. 1999, \apjl, 526, L109
1001: \bibitem[McCaughrean et al.(1994)]{McCaughrean1994} McCaughrean, M.~J.,
1002: Rayner, J.~T., \& Zinnecker, H.\ 1994, \apjl, 436, L189
1003: %\bibitem[McCaughrean et al.(2002)]{McCaughrean2002} McCaughrean, M.,
1004: %Zinnecker, H., Andersen, M., Meeus, G., \& Lodieu, N.\ 2002, The Messenger,
1005: %109, 28 (MZAML02)
1006: %\bibitem[McKee et al.(1987)]{Mckee1987} McKee,
1007: % C. F., Hollenbach, D. J., Seab, G. C. \& Tielens, A. G. G. M. 1987, \apj,
1008: % 318, 674
1009: %\bibitem[Meyers-Rice \& Lada(1991)]{Meyers1991} Meyers-Rice, B. A.
1010: %\& Lada, C. J. 1991, \apj, 368, 445
1011: %\bibitem[Micono et al.(1998)]{Micono1998} Micono, M., Davis, C. J.,
1012: %Ray, T. P., Eisloeffel, J. \& Shetrone, M. D. 1998, \apjl, 494, L227
1013: %\bibitem[Momose et al.(1998)]{Momose1998} Momose, M., Ohashi, N.,
1014: % Kawabe, R., Nakano, T., \& Hayashi, M.\ 1998, \apj, 504, 314
1015: %\bibitem[Myers et al.(1987)]{Myers1987} Myers, P.~C., Fuller,
1016: %G.~A., Mathieu, R.~D., Beichman, C.~A., Benson, P.~J., Schild, R.~E., \&
1017: %Emerson, J.~P.\ 1987, \apj, 319, 340
1018: %\bibitem[Myers et al.(1988)]{Myers1988} Myers,
1019: %\bibitem[Myers \& Ladd(1993)]{Myers1993} Myers, P.~C.~\& Ladd,
1020: %E.~F.\ 1993, \apjl, 413, L47
1021: %P. C., Heyer, M., Snell, R. L. \& Goldsmith, P. F. 1988, \apj, 324, 907
1022: %\bibitem[Myers et al.(2000)]{Myers2000} Myers, P.~C., Evans,
1023: %N.~J., \& Ohashi, N.\ 2000, Protostars and Planets IV, 217
1024: %\bibitem[Nagar et al.(1997)]{Nagar1997} Nagar, N.
1025: % M., Vogel, S. N., Stone, J. M. \& Ostriker, E. C. 1997, \apjl, 482, L195
1026: %\bibitem[Ostriker(1997)]{Ostriker1997} Ostriker, E. C. 1997, \apj, 486, 291
1027: %\bibitem[Nakamura(2000)]{Nakamura2000} Nakamura, F.\ 2000, \apj,
1028: %543, 291
1029: \bibitem[Nisini et al.(2002)]{Nisini2002} Nisini, B., Codella, C.,
1030: Giannini, T., \& Richer, J.~S.\ 2002, \aap, 395, L25
1031: %\bibitem[Ohashi et al.(1997)]{Ohashi1997} Ohashi, N., Hayashi, M.,
1032: %Ho, P.~T.~P., \& Momose, M.\ 1997, \apj, 475, 211
1033: %\bibitem[Ostriker et. al.(2001)]{Ostriker2001}
1034: % Ostriker, E.~C., Lee, C., Stone, J.~M., \& Mundy, L.~G.\ 2001, \apj, 557,
1035: % 443
1036: \bibitem[Palau et al.(2006)]{Palau2006}
1037: Palau, A., Ho, P. T. P., Zhang, Q., Estalella, R., Hirano, N., Shang,
1038: H., Lee, C.-F., Bourke, T. L., Beuther, H., \& Kuan, Y.-J.\ 2006,
1039: \apjl, 636, L137
1040: \bibitem[Pesenti et al.(2004)]{Pesenti2004} Pesenti, N., Dougados,
1041: C., Cabrit, S., Ferreira, J., Casse, F., Garcia, P., \& O'Brien, D.\ 2004,
1042: \aap, 416, L9
1043: %\bibitem[Pirogov et al.(2003)]{Pirogov2003} Pirogov, L., Zinchenko,
1044: %I., Caselli, P., Johansson, L.~E.~B., \& Myers, P.~C.\ 2003, \aap, 405, 639
1045: \bibitem[Pudritz et al.(2007)]{Pudritz2007} Pudritz, R.~E., Ouyed,
1046: R., Fendt, C., \& Brandenburg, A.\ 2007, Protostars and Planets V, 277
1047: %\bibitem[Raga et al.(1990)]{Raga1990} Raga, A.~C., Binette, L.,
1048: %Canto, J., \& Calvet, N.\ 1990, \apj, 364, 601
1049: %\bibitem[Raga (1993)]{Raga1993A} Raga, A. C. 1993, \apss, 208, 163
1050: \bibitem[Raga \& Cabrit(1993)]{Raga1993} Raga, A. \& Cabrit, S.
1051: 1993, \aap, 278, 267
1052: %\bibitem[Raga et al.(1993b)]{Raga1993b} Raga, A. C., Canto, J., Calvet N.,
1053: %Rodriguez, L.F., \& Torrelles, J.M., 1993b, \aap, 276, 539
1054: %\bibitem[Raga et al.(2004)]{Raga2004} Raga, A.~C., Noriega-Crespo, A.,
1055: %Gonz{\' a}lez, R.~F., \& Vel{\' a}zquez, P.~F.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 346
1056: \bibitem[Ray et al.(2007)]{Ray2007} Ray, T., Dougados, C.,
1057: Bacciotti, F., Eisl{\"o}ffel, J., \& Chrysostomou, A.\ 2007, Protostars and
1058: Planets V, 231
1059: %\bibitem[Raga, Cabrit \& Canto(1995)]{Raga1995} Raga, A. C.,
1060: %Cabrit, S. \& Canto, J. 1995, \mnras, 273, 422
1061: %\bibitem[Rawlings, Taylor, \& Williams(2000)]{Rawlings2000}
1062: %Rawlings, J.~M.~C., Taylor, S.~D., \& Williams, D.~A.\ 2000, \mnras, 313,
1063: %461
1064: \bibitem[Rebull et al.(2007)]{Rebull2007} Rebull, L.~M., et al.\
1065: 2007, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0701711
1066: %\bibitem[Reipurth \& Olberg(1991)]{Reipurth1991} Reipurth, B. \&
1067: %Olberg, M. 1991, \aap, 246, 535
1068: %\bibitem[Reipurth \& Cernicharo(1995)]{Reipurth1995} Reipurth, B. \&
1069: % Cernicharo, J. 1995, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica
1070: % Conference Series, 1, 43
1071: %\bibitem[Reipurth, Raga, \& Heathcote(1992)]{Reipurth1992} Reipurth,
1072: % B., Raga, A. C. \& Heathcote, S. 1992, \apj, 392, 145
1073: %\bibitem[Reipurth Bally \& Devine(1997a)]{Reipurth1997a} Reipurth, B.,
1074: %Bally, J. \& Devine, D. 1997a, \aj, 114, 2708
1075: %\bibitem[Reipurth et al.(1993)]{Reipurth1993}Reipurth, B., Chini, R., Krugel, E.,
1076: % Kreysa, E., Sievers., A. 1993 A\&A, 273, 221
1077: %\bibitem[Reipurth et al.(1997b)]{Reipurth1997b} Reipurth, B., Hartigan,
1078: % P. , Heathcote, S. , Morse, J. A. \& Bally, J. 1997b, \aj, 114, 757
1079: %\bibitem[Reipurth et al.(1999)]{Reipurth1999} Reipurth, B., Yu, K. ,
1080: %Rodriguez, L. F., Heathcote, S. \& Bally, J. 1999, \aap, 352, L83
1081: \bibitem[Reipurth et al.(2002)]{Reipurth2002} Reipurth, B.,
1082: Heathcote, S., Morse, J., Hartigan, P., \& Bally, J.\ 2002, \aj, 123, 362
1083: %\bibitem[Richer et al.(2000)]{Richer2000}Richer, J. Shepherd, D.,
1084: % Cabrit, S., Bachiller, R., \& Churchwell, E. 2000, in Protostars
1085: %and Planets IV, ed. V. Mannings, A. P. Boss \& S. S. Russell
1086: % (Tucson: University of Arizona Press), in press
1087: %\bibitem[Rodriguez \& Reipurth(1994)]{Rodriguez1994} Rodriguez, L. F.
1088: % \& Reipurth, B. 1994, \aap, 281, 882
1089: %\bibitem[Rodriguez et al.(1998)]{Rodriguez1998} Rodriguez, L. F.,
1090: % Reipurth, B., Raga, A. C. \& Canto, J. 1998, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia
1091: % y Astrofisica, 34, 69
1092: %\bibitem[Rodriguez \& Reipurth(1998)]{Rodriguez1998} Rodriguez, L. F.,
1093: % \& Reipurth, B. 1998, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia
1094: % y Astrofisica, 34, 13
1095: \bibitem[Schilke et al.(1997)]{Schilke1997} Schilke, P., Walmsley,
1096: C.~M., Pineau des Forets, G., \& Flower, D.~R.\ 1997, \aap, 321, 293
1097: \bibitem[Sch{\"o}ier et al.(2004)]{Schoier2004} Sch{\"o}ier, F.~L.,
1098: J{\o}rgensen, J.~K., van Dishoeck, E.~F., \& Blake, G.~A.\ 2004, \aap, 418,
1099: 185
1100: %\bibitem[Shang et al.(1998)]{Shang1998} Shang, H. , Shu,
1101: % F. H. \& Glassgold, A. E. 1998, \apjl, 493, L91
1102: %\bibitem[Shang et al.(2004)]{Shang2004} Shang, H., Lizano, S.,
1103: % Glassgold, A., \& Shu, F.\ 2004, \apjl, 612, L69
1104: %\bibitem[Shang et al.(2006)]{Shang2006} Shang, H., Allen, A., Li,
1105: %Z.-Y., Liu, C.-F., Chou, M.-Y., \& Anderson, J.\ 2006, \apj, 649, 845
1106: \bibitem[Shang et al.(2007)]{Shang2007} Shang, H., Li, Z.-Y., \&
1107: Hirano, N.\ 2007, Protostars and Planets V, 261
1108: %\bibitem[Shirley et al.(2000)]{Shirley2000}
1109: % Shirley, Y.~L., Evans, N.~J., Rawlings, J.~M.~C., \& Gregersen, E.~M.\
1110: % 2000, ApJS, 131, 249
1111: %\bibitem[Shu(1977)]{Shu1977} Shu, F.~H.\ 1977, \apj, 214, 488
1112: %\bibitem[Shu, Adams, \& Lizano(1987)]{Shu1987} Shu, F.~H.,
1113: % Adams, F.~C., \& Lizano, S.\ 1987, \araa, 25, 23
1114: %\bibitem[Shu et al.(1991)]{Shu1991} Shu, F. H.,
1115: % Ruden, S. P., Lada, C. J. \& Lizano, S. 1991, \apjl, 370, L31
1116: %\bibitem[Shu et al.(1995) 1995]{Shu1995} Shu, F.
1117: % H., Najita, J. , Ostriker, E. C. \& Shang, H. 1995, \apjl, 455, L155
1118: \bibitem[Shu et al.(1997)]{Shu1997} Shu, F.~H., Shang, H.,
1119: Glassgold, A.~E., \& Lee, T.\ 1997, Science, 277, 1475
1120: \bibitem[Shu et al.(2000)]{Shu2000} Shu, F.H., Najita, J., Shang, H.,
1121: \& Li, Z. -Y. 2000, in Protostars and Planets IV, ed. V.
1122: Mannings, A. P. Boss \& S. S. Russell
1123: (Tucson: University of Arizona Press), 789
1124: %\bibitem[Smith, Suttner, \& Yorke(1997)]{Smith1997} Smith, M. D.,
1125: % Suttner, G. \& Yorke, H. W. 1997, \aap, 323, 223
1126: \bibitem[Stahler et al.(1980)]{Stahler1980} Stahler, S.~W., Shu,
1127: F.~H., \& Taam, R.~E.\ 1980, \apj, 241, 637
1128: %\bibitem[Steer, Dewdney, \& Ito(1984)]{Steer1984} Steer, D.~G.,
1129: % Dewdney, P.~E., \& Ito, M.~R.\ 1984, \aap, 137, 159
1130: %\bibitem[Stone \& Norman(1994)]{Stone1994} Stone, J. M. \& Norman,
1131: %M. L. 1994, \apj, 420, 237
1132: \bibitem[Suttner et al.(1997)]{Suttner1997}
1133: Suttner, G., Smith, M. D., Yorke, H. W. \& Zinnecker, H. 1997, \aap, 318,
1134: 595
1135: %\bibitem[Tafalla et al.(2002)]{Tafalla2002} Tafalla, M., Myers,
1136: %P.~C., Caselli, P., Walmsley, C.~M., \& Comito, C.\ 2002, \apj, 569, 815
1137: %\bibitem[Takakuwa et al.(2003)]{Takakuwa2003} Takakuwa, S.,
1138: %Kamazaki, T., Saito, M., \& Hirano, N.\ 2003, \apj, 584, 818
1139: %\bibitem[Takami et al.(2006)]{Takami2006} Takami, M., Takakuwa,
1140: %S., Momose, M., Hayashi, M., Davis, C., Pyo, T.-S., Nishikawa, T., \&
1141: %Kohno, K.\ 2006, PASJ, ??
1142: %\bibitem[Terebey et al.(1993)]{Terebey1993} Terebey, S.,
1143: % Chandler, C. J. \& Andre, P. 1993, \apj, 414, 759
1144: \bibitem[Todo et al.(1993)]{Todo1993} Todo, Y., Uchida, Y.,
1145: Sato, T., \& Rosner, R.\ 1993, \apj, 403, 164
1146: %\bibitem[Umemoto et al.(1991)]{Umemoto1991} Umemoto, T., Hirano,
1147: % N., Kameya, O., Fukui, Y., Kuno, N. \& Takakubo, K. 1991, \apj, 377, 510
1148: %\bibitem[Velusamy \& Langer(1998)]{Velusamy1998} Velusamy, T. \&
1149: % Langer, W. D. 1998, \nat, 392, 685
1150: %\bibitem[Viti, Natarajan, \& Williams(2002)]{Viti2002} Viti, S.,
1151: % Natarajan, S., \& Williams, D.~A.\ 2002, \mnras, 336, 797
1152: %\bibitem[\Volker{} et al.(1999)]{Volker1999}
1153: % \Volker, R. , Smith, M. D., Suttner, G. \& Yorke, H. W. 1999,
1154: % \aap, 343, 953
1155: %\bibitem[Ward-Thompson, Motte, \& Andre(1999)]{Ward-Thompson1999}
1156: % Ward-Thompson, D., Motte, F., \& Andre, P.\ 1999, \mnras, 305, 143
1157: %\bibitem[Weintraub et al.(1994)]{Weintraub1994}
1158: % Weintraub, D. A., Tegler, S. C., Kastner, J. H. \& Rettig, T. 1994, \apj,
1159: %423, 674
1160: \bibitem[Wiseman(2001)]{Wiseman2001} Wiseman, J.\ 2001, Science
1161: with the Atacama Large Millimeter Array, 235, 179
1162: %\bibitem[Wiseman et al.(2001)]{Wiseman2001} Wiseman, J., Wootten,
1163: %A., Zinnecker, H., \& McCaughrean, M.\ 2001, \apjl, 550, L87
1164: %\bibitem[Wootten et al.(2002)]{Wootten2002}
1165: % Wootten, A., Mangum, J.~G., Wiseman, J., \& Fuller, G.~A.\ 2002, Bulletin
1166: % of the American Astronomical Society, 34, 1134
1167: %\bibitem[Wouterloot \& Walmsley(1986)]{Wouterloot1986} Wouterloot, J.
1168: % G. A. \& Walmsley, C. M. 1986, \aap, 168, 237
1169: %\bibitem[Wu, Huang \& He(1996)]{Wu1996} Wu, Y., Huang, M. \& He,
1170: % J. 1996, \aaps, 115, 283
1171: %\bibitem[Xu et al.(2000)]{Xu2000} Xu, J., Hardee, P.~E., \&
1172: %Stone, J.~M.\ 2000, \apj, 543, 161
1173: %\bibitem[Yang et al.(1997)]{Yang1997} Yang, J., Ohashi, N. , Yan,
1174: % J. , Liu, C. , Kaifu, N. \& Kimura, H. 1997, \apj, 475, 683
1175: %\bibitem[Zinnecker, McCaughrean, \& Rayner(1998)]{Zinnecker1998}
1176: % Zinnecker, H., McCaughrean, M. J. \& Rayner, J. T. 1998, \nat, 394, 862
1177: %\bibitem[Zinnecker et al.(1992)]{Zinnecker1992} Zinnecker, H. ,
1178: % Bastien, P. , Arcoragi, J. -P. \& Yorke, H. W. 1992, \aap, 265, 726
1179: \end{thebibliography}
1180:
1181: \begin{figure} [!hbp]
1182: \centering
1183: \putfig{0.75}{270}{f1.ps}%{cont0.ps}
1184: \figcaption[]
1185: {342 GHz continuum maps with the asterisk marking the source position.
1186: \tlabel{a} Map made using all the available visibility data. The contours
1187: go from 10 to 90\% of the peak value, which is 155 \mJyb{}.
1188: The beam is \arcsa{1}{28}$\times$\arcsa{0}{84}
1189: with a P.A. of $\sim$ 70\degree{}.
1190: \tlabel{b} Map made using the visibility data with the $uv$ distance greater
1191: than 100 k$\lambda$, showing the central compact source. The contours
1192: go from 35 to 95\% with a step of 15\% of the peak value, which is
1193: 77 \mJyb{}. The beam is \arcsa{0}{74}$\times$\arcsa{0}{46}
1194: with a P.A. of $\sim$ 78\degree{}.
1195: \label{fig:cont}}
1196: \end{figure}
1197:
1198: \begin{figure} [!hbp]
1199: \centering
1200: \putfig{0.7}{270}{f2.ps}%{cont3.ps}
1201: \figcaption[]
1202: {\tlabel{a} Visibility amplitude versus $uv$ distance plot
1203: for the continuum source with 1 $\sigma$ error bars.
1204: The dotted histogram is the zero-expectation level ($\sim$ 1.25 $\sigma$).
1205: \tlabel{b} Spectral energy distribution (SED)
1206: of the continuum source. The filled squares are from our SMA observations.
1207: The open squares, open circles, and diamonds are from the Spitzer [70
1208: \micron{} from \citet{Rebull2007} and 24 \micron{} from Karl
1209: Stapelfeldt, private communication], PdBI \citep{Gueth1999}, and VLA
1210: \citep{Avila2001} observations, respectively. The crosses indicate the
1211: fluxes from the central unresolved point source estimated from our
1212: SMA observations at 342 and 220 GHz.
1213: The solid line shows the single-temperature fit
1214: to the SED of the continuum source (see text for detail). The dashed line
1215: shows the relation $F_{\nu} \propto \nu^2$ for the central
1216: compact source.
1217: \label{fig:uvsedcont}}
1218: \end{figure}
1219:
1220: \begin{figure} [!hbp]
1221: \centering
1222: \putfig{0.85}{270}{f3.ps}%{jet.ps}
1223: \figcaption[]
1224: {
1225: \tlabel{a} The IR image adopted from \citet{Hirano2006}.
1226: The dotted line outlines our observed region.
1227: The dashed lines indicate the jet axes.
1228: The cross marks the source position. Here BBx and RBx indicate blueshifted and
1229: redshifted bow shocks, respectively.
1230: \tlabel{b} 342 GHz continuum contours (as in Fig. \ref{fig:cont}a)
1231: on top of the IR image.
1232: \tlabel{c} Redshifted (6 to 34 \vkm{}) and
1233: blueshifted (-22 to -2 \vkm{}) SiO
1234: contours on top of the IR image.
1235: Contour spacing is 4 \Jybk{} (37.8 \Tk) with the first contour at 4 \Jybk{}.
1236: Here, knots RK1, RK3, RK5, RK7, BK1, BK3, BK5, BK6, and BK8
1237: correspond to knots R1, R2, R3, R4, B1, B2, B3, B4, and B5, respectively,
1238: in \citet{Hirano2006}.
1239: Here BKx and RKx indicate blueshifted and redshifted knots, respectively.
1240: \tlabel{d} High-velocity redshifted (10.3 to 35.3 \vkm{}) and blueshifted
1241: (-23.7 to -8.7 \vkm{}) CO
1242: contours on top of the IR image.
1243: Contour spacing is 1.5 \Jybk{} (14.2 \Tk)
1244: with the first contour at 3 \Jybk{} (28.4 \Tk).
1245: In \tlabel{b}, \tlabel{c}, and \tlabel{d},
1246: the beams are \arcsa{1}{28}$\times$\arcsa{0}{84} and
1247: the images are rotated by 26.6\degree{} clockwise. The western and eastern
1248: components of the jet axis are seen bent by $\sim$ 0.5\degree{} to the north.
1249: \label{fig:jet}}
1250: \end{figure}
1251:
1252: \begin{figure} [!hbp]
1253: \centering
1254: \putfig{0.85}{270}{f4.ps}%{shell.ps}
1255: \figcaption[]
1256: {Low-velocity CO contours on top of the IR image.
1257: The beams are \arcsa{1}{28}$\times$\arcsa{0}{84}.
1258: The cross marks the source position.
1259: \tlabel{a} shows the low-redshifted CO emission integrated from 0.3 to 4.3
1260: \vkm{}.
1261: \tlabel{b} shows the low-blueshifted CO emission integrated
1262: from $-$5.7 to $-$1.7 \vkm{}.
1263: Contour spacing is 1.4 \Jybk{} with the first contour at 1.4 \Jybk{}.
1264: \label{fig:COshell}
1265: }
1266: \end{figure}
1267:
1268: \begin{figure} [!hbp]
1269: \centering
1270: \putfig{0.7}{270}{f5.ps}%{pv-jet.ps2}
1271: \figcaption[]
1272: {PV diagrams of the SiO and CO emission cut along the jet axis
1273: with a width of \arcs{1}.
1274: \tlabel{a} SiO contours, \tlabel{b} IR image, and \tlabel{c} high-velocity
1275: CO contours, as in Fig. \ref{fig:jet}.
1276: \tlabel{d} PV diagrams of the SiO (black contours with image) and CO
1277: (green contours) emission. The SiO contours have a spacing of 0.25 \Jyb{}
1278: (2.36 K) with the first contour at 0.5 \Jyb{} (4.73 K).
1279: The CO contours have a
1280: spacing of 0.225 \Jyb{} (2.12 K) with the first contour at 0.45 \Jyb{}
1281: (4.25 K).
1282: The red and blue dashed lines mark the emission from the low-velocity shells.
1283: The red and blue solid lines mark the emission from the high-velocity shells.
1284: The ellipse outlines the emission from the high-velocity shell in the west.
1285: The red and blue dotted lines indicate the mean velocities of the jet
1286: on the redshifted and blueshifted sides, respectively.
1287: Here, HV and LV denote the high-velocity and
1288: low-velocity ranges, respectively, for the CO emission.
1289: \label{fig:pvjet}
1290: }
1291: \end{figure}
1292:
1293: \begin{figure} [!hbp]
1294: \centering
1295: \putfig{0.6}{270}{f6.ps}%{spec.ps}
1296: \figcaption[]
1297: {SiO (dark) and CO (gray) spectra toward four bright knots with their positions
1298: given in the upper left corners.
1299: \label{fig:specSiO}
1300: }
1301: \end{figure}
1302:
1303: \begin{figure} [!hbp]
1304: \centering
1305: \putfig{0.7}{270}{f7.ps}%{shell2.ps}
1306: \figcaption[]
1307: {CO emission (0.3 to 20.3 \vkm{})
1308: associated with the linear velocity structure in the west,
1309: which is marked with an ellipse in Figure \ref{fig:pvjet},
1310: plotted on top of the IR image. The image is rotated by 26.6\degree{}
1311: clockwise.
1312: Contour spacing is 1.4 \Jybk{} (13.24 \Tk) with the first contour at 1.4 \Jybk{}.
1313: The cross marks the source position. The Xs mark the positions of three SiO
1314: knots.
1315: The dashed line indicates the jet axis.
1316: The dotted lines indicate the locations of the PV cuts shown in Figure
1317: \ref{fig:pv_per}.
1318: \label{fig:shell2}
1319: }
1320: \end{figure}
1321:
1322: \begin{figure} [!hbp]
1323: \centering
1324: \putfig{0.7}{270}{f8.ps}%{pv-jet_per.ps}
1325: \figcaption[]
1326: {CO PV cuts perpendicular to the jet axis in the redshifted lobe at
1327: \tlabel{a} \arcs{11}
1328: and \tlabel{b} \arcs{12} away from the source. The cuts have a width of
1329: \arcs{1}.
1330: Contour spacing is 0.15 \Jyb{} (1.42 K)
1331: with the first contour at 0.2 \Jyb{} (1.89 K).
1332: Here LV and HV shells mean the low-velocity and high-velocity shells, respectively.
1333: \label{fig:pv_per}
1334: }
1335: \end{figure}
1336:
1337: \begin{figure} [!hbp]
1338: \centering
1339: \putfig{0.8}{270}{f9.ps}
1340: \figcaption[]
1341: {Maps of SiO($J=8-7$)/SiO($J=5-4$) ratio, obtained from the
1342: (integrated) SiO ($J=8-7$) and SiO($J=5-4$) maps that have been smoothed to
1343: the same angular resolution of
1344: \arcsa{1}{6}. \tlabel{a} Blueshifted side, with the emission
1345: integrated from -22 to -2 \vkm{}.
1346: \tlabel{b} Redshifted side, with the emission integrated from 6 to 34 \vkm{}.
1347: Contour spacing is 0.1 with the first contour at 0.3.
1348: \label{fig:SiOratio}
1349: }
1350: \end{figure}
1351:
1352: \begin{figure}[!hbp]
1353: \centering
1354: \putfig{0.7}{0}{f10.ps}%{pv-rotation.ps}
1355: \figcaption[]{
1356: PV diagrams of the SiO emission cut perpendicular to the jet axis
1357: across the emission peaks of knots
1358: \tlabel{a} BK1, \tlabel{b} BK3, \tlabel{c} RK1, and \tlabel{d} RK2.
1359: The cuts have a width of \arcsa{0}{3}. The solid lines define the velocity
1360: gradients across the jet axis by connecting the two peaks on the opposite
1361: sides. Contour spacing is 0.15 \Jyb{} (1.42 K)
1362: with the first contour at 0.45 \Jyb{} (4.25 K).
1363: \label{fig:pvrotation}
1364: }
1365: \end{figure}
1366:
1367: \begin{figure}[!hbp]
1368: \centering
1369: \putfig{0.8}{270}{f11.ps}%{pv-rotation.ps}
1370: \figcaption[]{
1371: 1 \vkm{} wide maps of the two line peaks
1372: that define their velocity gradient shown in Figure \ref{fig:pvrotation}
1373: for knots \tlabel{a} BK1, \tlabel{b} BK3, \tlabel{c} RK1, and \tlabel{d} RK2.
1374: Contour spacing is 0.45 \Jyb{} (4.25 K)
1375: with the first contour at 0.30 \Jyb{} (2.83 K).
1376: The crosses mark the cut centers where the emission peaks are in the
1377: integrated maps (see Fig. \ref{fig:jet}c).
1378: The asterisks mark the source position.
1379: \label{fig:maprotation}
1380: }
1381: \end{figure}
1382:
1383: \end{document}
1384: