1:
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: \documentclass{emulateapj}
4:
5: \shorttitle{Infrared Emission from Abell 2597}
6: \shortauthors{Donahue et al.}
7: \usepackage{graphics,graphicx,epsf,natbib}
8: \bibliographystyle{apj}
9:
10:
11:
12: \received{}
13:
14: \begin{document}
15: \title{Infrared Emission from the Nearby Cool Core Cluster Abell 2597}
16: \author{
17: Megan Donahue\altaffilmark{1},
18: Andr\'es Jord\'an\altaffilmark{2},
19: Stefi A. Baum\altaffilmark{3},
20: Patrick C\^ot\'e\altaffilmark{4},
21: Laura Ferrarese\altaffilmark{4},
22: Paul Goudfrooij\altaffilmark{5},
23: Duccio Macchetto\altaffilmark{5}, Sangeeta Malhotra\altaffilmark{6},
24: Christopher P. O'Dea\altaffilmark{7},
25: James E. Pringle\altaffilmark{8,5}, James E. Rhoads\altaffilmark{6},
26: William B. Sparks\altaffilmark{5}, G. Mark Voit\altaffilmark{1} }
27:
28: \altaffiltext{1}{Michigan State University, Physics \& Astronomy Dept., East Lansing, MI 48824-2320, donahue@pa.msu.edu}
29: \altaffiltext{2}{European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzchild-Stra{\ss}e 2, 85748 Garching ber M\"unchen, Germany, ajordan@eso.org}
30: \altaffiltext{3}{Carlson Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY}
31: \altaffiltext{4}{Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics, National Research Council of Canada,
32: 5071 West Saanich Rd, Victoria, BC V8X 4M6, Canada}
33: \altaffiltext{5}{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21204}
34: \altaffiltext{6}{Physics Department, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1504}
35: \altaffiltext{7}{Physics Department, Rochester Institute of Technology, 84 Lomb Memorial Dr, Rochester NY, 14623-5603}
36: \altaffiltext{8}{Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge, UK}
37:
38:
39: \begin{abstract}
40: We observed the brightest central galaxy (BCG) in the nearby ($z=0.0821$) cool core
41: galaxy cluster Abell 2597 with the
42: IRAC and MIPS instruments on board the Spitzer Space Telescope.
43: The BCG was clearly detected in
44: all Spitzer bandpasses, including the 70 and 160 $\mu$m wavebands. We
45: report aperture photometry of the BCG. The spectral energy
46: distribution exhibits a clear excess in the FIR over a Rayleigh-Jeans
47: stellar tail, indicating a star formation rate of $\sim 4-5$ solar masses
48: per year, consistent with the estimates from the UV %\citep{ODea2004}
49: and its H$\alpha$ luminosity. %\citep{VD1997}.
50: This large FIR luminosity is consistent with that of a starburst or a Luminous Infrared Galaxy (LIRG), but together
51: with a very massive and old population of stars that dominate the energy output of
52: the galaxy. If the dust is at one temperature, the ratio of 70 to 160 micron fluxes indicate that the
53: dust emitting mid-IR in this source is somewhat hotter than the dust emitting mid-IR in two
54: BCGs at higher-redshift ($z\sim0.2-0.3$) and higher FIR luminosities
55: observed earlier by Spitzer, in clusters Abell 1835 and Zwicky 3146.
56:
57: \end{abstract}
58:
59: % 6 keywords allowed
60: \keywords{galaxies:clusters:general --- galaxies:clusters:individual (Abell 2597) --- cooling flows}
61:
62:
63: \section{Introduction}
64:
65: The brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) in the cores of the most X-ray luminous clusters of galaxies
66: are the most massive galaxies in the universe. Their unusually extended stellar
67: envelopes, high optical luminosities, and red colors
68: pose a challenge to models of galaxy formation, which, conversely, predict
69: that the brightest cluster galaxies should be even more luminous than observed
70: and should be blue, not red \citep{2004MNRAS.347.1093B}. According to such models,
71: galaxies at the centers of clusters should be highly luminous and blue because supernova
72: feedback is unable to prevent runaway cooling, condensation, and star formation in the gas
73: at the center of a cluster. However, even though the galaxies at the centers of X-ray luminous
74: clusters are red, Spitzer Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer (MIPS)
75: imaging of moderate redshift ($z\sim 0.2-0.3$)
76: clusters with cool cores and large H$\alpha$ luminosities
77: has revealed that they can still be surprisingly luminous
78: infrared sources, $\sim 10^{44-45}$ erg s$^{-1}$ \citep[][]{2006ApJ...647..922E}.
79: Their mid-infrared luminosity turns out to be $\sim0.1-1\%$ times the total
80: X-ray luminosity from the
81: hot intracluster medium (ICM), and puts these galaxies in the same luminosity class
82: as LIRGs (Luminous Infrared Galaxies.)
83:
84: Historically, clusters in which the central gas radiates enough energy to cool and condense within
85: a Hubble time have been categorized as cooling-flow clusters. Such clusters exhibit highly peaked
86: X-ray fluxes and, usually, ICM temperature gradients that decrease
87: into the cluster core. Cool core clusters are rather common at $z<0.4$, accounting for $\sim50\%$ of
88: the X-ray luminous population, indicating that this phase is not short lived. Yet, the central
89: gas in these clusters does not appear to be cooling and condensing at the rates implied by
90: naive interpretations of X-ray imaging data, which could exceed 100 M$_{\odot} \, {\rm yr}^{-1}$.
91: Central star formation rates are much lower than this, and the central galaxies do not appear to
92: contain the $\sim 10^{12} M_\odot$ of cold gas that should have collected over a
93: Hubble time \citep[eg.][]{1994ARA&A..32..277F}. This was the
94: notorious ``cooling flow'' problem: How can these systems be so common, when
95: there is no obvious source of heat to replenish the energy these systems radiate so quickly?
96:
97: High-resolution X-ray spectroscopy has given the cooling-flow problem an additional twist
98: by showing that most of the X-ray gas with a short cooling time does not even cool
99: below $10^7$K \citep[e.g., ][]{2001A&A...365L.104P}.
100: Hot gas is detected at a range of temperatures down to $\sim 1/3$ of the virial temperature but does
101: not appear to emit at lower temperatures. This result confirms that the gas condensation rates in these systems are not very large but doesn't explain what suppresses cooling.
102: Recent Chandra X-ray observations have suggested that AGN feedback might be what
103: inhibits cooling in cluster cores, because some (but not all)
104: cooling flow clusters host central AGN which excavate kpc-scale cavities in the ICM
105: \citep[eg.][]{2001ApJ...562L.149M}. Still more clusters exhibit elevated
106: central entropy levels which may have been produced by a now-inactive
107: AGN \citep{Donahue2005A, 2006ApJ...643..730D}.
108: There is increasing support for the idea that the central
109: AGN is the culprit providing the ``extra" heating, not only countering radiative cooling
110: in cluster cores, but also providing a self-regulating feedback mechanism in massive galaxies
111: in general \citep[e.g.,][]{2006MNRAS.368L..67B}.
112: These observations and theories have sparked a renewed interest in the role of AGN
113: in the formation of galaxies, and in particular, their role in heating the ICM and stifling star
114: formation.
115:
116: Interestingly, the mechanism that counteracts uninhibited radiative
117: cooling in cluster cores does not appear to shut
118: off star formation altogether. Cooler gas is not completely absent in the central galaxies,
119: a few of which have substantial
120: quantities ($\sim 10^{10-11}$ M$_\odot$) of molecular gas at a range of temperatures.
121: Extended, vibrationally-excited H$_2$ 2-micron emission lines
122: have been detected in these sources
123: \citep[][]{1994iaan.conf..169E, 2001MNRAS.324..443J,2006ApJ...652L..21E}, and
124: about $10^{10-11}$ M$_\odot$ of cold molecular hydrogen has been inferred
125: from CO observations in many of these systems
126: \citep[e.g., ][]{2001MNRAS.328..762E,
127: 2003ApJ...594L..13E, 2006A&A...454..437S}.
128: If some of the ICM cools and forms stars, that could explain why most cool core systems exhibit
129: luminous optical emission-line nebulae, which in turn nearly always accompany the
130: presence of molecular gas. Such nebulae produce bright H$\alpha$ and
131: forbidden line emission \citep[][]{1989ApJ...338...48H}.
132: Emission-line spectroscopy suggests that
133: at least some of the emission can be explained as the result of photoionization and heating
134: by hot stars \citep[][]{1997ApJ...486..242V}.
135: Tantalizing possible detections by FUSE of million degree gas, via OVI emission, suggest that
136: at least some of the gas does cool below X-ray emitting temperatures \citep{2001ApJ...560..187O,
137: 2006ApJ...642..746B}. However, the interpretation of such spectra is complicated, sometimes by the
138: presence of a low-luminosity AGN and possibly by slow shocks or heating by
139: cosmic rays or local X-rays.
140:
141: In this paper, we present Spitzer observations of mid-infrared emission from the BCG in Abell 2597, a nearby cool-core cluster, that address an important question about the cool-core
142: phenomenon: what is the dusty star formation rate in this cluster? These data also
143: stimulate new questions about the star formation in BCGs:
144: (1) Is the infrared emission from a BCG in a cool-core cluster typical of a starburst in a spiral galaxy? (2) Is the dust spectrum characteristic of relatively unprocessed
145: Milky Way-type dust that has been
146: transported to the center of the BCG during a merger, or is it consistent with the dust having been recently exposed
147: to the harsh environment of the intracluster medium? (3) If a modest amount of gas is condensing from the ICM, is the condensation rate consistent with the observed star-formation activity and molecular gas content? Our Spitzer observations show that the IR spectrum of this BCG is fairly typical of a normal starburst, with a far-IR peak at $\sim$70$\mu$m and a mid-IR excess consistent with emission from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The star formation rate implied by the IR and UV emission from this galaxy are also consistent with observational limits on the cooling and condensation rate of gas from the central ICM. In our analysis, we assume $H_0=70$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$,
148: $\Omega_M=0.3$, and $\Omega_\Lambda=0.7$ cosmology. At the redshift of the BCG in
149: A2597 ($z=0.0821\pm0.0002$, \cite{VD1997}) the scale is 1.551 kpc arcsec$^{-1}$.
150:
151:
152: \section{The Brightest Cluster Galaxy in Abell 2597}
153:
154: The brightest cluster galaxy in Abell 2597 (Abell richness class 0)
155: contains a well-studied FRI radio source PKS2322-12 and
156: is conveniently positioned in region of the sky with very low Galactic extinction
157: ($A_B = 0.131$ mag;
158: \citet{1998ApJ...500..525S}), confirmed by
159: \citet{2003MNRAS.343..315B}.
160: The optical spectrum of the central galaxy was studied intensively by \citet{VD1997}, who placed the first
161: model-independent reddening, temperature, and metallicity constraints on a cluster emission-line nebula using faint forbidden lines. They also determined that the excitation mechanism of the
162: emission lines could not be shocks. The preferred excitation source was stars, plus an additional, unidentified, source of
163: heat. This conclusion was supported by analysis of the infrared emission line spectrum of
164: Paschen alpha lines and vibrationally excited H$_2$ \citep{2005MNRAS.360..748J}. One slight difference
165: between these analyses is that the \citet{VD1997} study also placed limits on the UV spectral shape, from the
166: lack of a measurable He II recombination line.
167:
168: \citet{Cardiel1998} found radial gradients in the 4000 \AA~ break and Mg$_2$ indices of Abell 2597's BCG, indicating
169: recent (0.1 Gyr) star formation. \citet{1999ApJ...518..167M} found that its U-band light is unlikely to be
170: from scattered AGN light, based on polarization limits on the continuum. Most
171: recently, it has been studied in the far UV using Hubble Space Telescope
172: STIS observations \citep{ODea2004} and WFPC2 blue and emission-line images \citep{Koekemoer1999}.
173: Vibrationally excited molecular hydrogen was discovered to trace the same features as the
174: optical emission lines by \citet{Donahue2000}.The Chandra X-ray
175: Observatory has reveals two-sided radio bubbles, surrounded by hot ICM \citep{McNamaraA2597_2001}.
176: This BCG also has one of the most convincing FUSE detections of OVI \citep{2001ApJ...560..187O}. Further, $\sim4\times10^9$
177: M$_\odot$ of cold H$_2$ has been inferred from CO detections \citep{Edge2001}.
178:
179: The most recent X-ray observations of A2597 are from a 120-kilosecond XMM observation. Analysis of both EPIC and RGS spectroscopy by \citet{2005MNRAS.358..585M}
180: suggests a classical cooling flow at the level of $90\pm15$ solar masses per year in the
181: central region, dropping to about 20 M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ in the central 40 kpc
182: surrounding the BCG. This result is based on the joint analysis of vanishingly weak ($\sim 1-2\sigma$) FeXVII features in the RGS and the extremely difficult interpretation of soft X-ray excess in the CCD spectrum.
183: While this result at best is only suggestive of cooling, it makes the BCG in Abell 2597
184: the only source with published
185: emission-line detections from gas at $10^{5-7}$K, suggesting a possible connection between condensation from the
186: hot gas and star formation.
187:
188: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
189:
190: \subsection{Infrared Array Camera}
191: The Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) has four wavelength channels, 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and
192: 8 $\mu$m \citep{2004ApJS..154...10F}. The Astronomical Observing Request (AOR) number
193: for the IRAC observation was 13372160. The total observing time with all 4 detectors
194: available for IRAC was 270 minutes. Each frame was 100 seconds. Thirty six positions were
195: dithered for a total of 3600 seconds per bandpass.
196:
197: We have used the flux-calibrated images from the SSC IRAC pipeline (software version S14.0.0) for our analysis. The standard pipeline subtracts dark current based on laboratory measurements and a dark-sky frame based on observations of the darkest, star-free parts of the sky. A flat field, based on observations of zodiacal background and cleaned of cosmic rays, is then divided out of the data. Finally, the data are flux calibrated, producing images with flux units of MJy per steradian.
198: See the IRAC data handbook\footnote{\url{http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/data/hb}} and the IRAC calibration
199: paper of \citet{2005PASP..117..978R} for more detail.
200:
201:
202: \subsection{Multiband Imaging Photometer}
203: The Multiband Imaging Photometer (MIPS) has three bands, with weighted wavelength
204: averages of 23.68 $\mu$m, 71.42 $\mu$m, and 155.9 $\mu$m. For convenience, we will
205: refer to these bands as 24, 70, and 160 $\mu$m. The FWHM of the PSF in those bands
206: is $6\arcsec$, $18\arcsec$, and $40\arcsec$ respectively. Our total observing time with
207: the MIPS was 36 minutes (total exposure time of 10 seconds per pixel at 24 $\mu$m and
208: 15 seconds per pixel for 70 and 160 $\mu$m each). The AOR number
209: for the MIPS observation was 13371904.
210:
211: We used the standard Spitzer Science Center (SSC) pipeline processing (software version S14.4.0)
212: of the 24, 70, and 160 $\mu$m data.
213: We investigated whether the 70 and 160 $\mu$m data would benefit from additional work.
214: We reprocessed the raw 70 and 160 $\mu$m data with the
215: GeRT software package\footnote{GeRT is available from the SSC at \url{http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/mips/gert/}}, following the algorithms derived by the MIPS Instrument
216: Team and the MIPS Instrument Support team \citep{2005PASP..117..503G}. We time-filtered
217: the resulting 70 $\mu$m basic data by subtracting a smoothed version of
218: the signal obtained with a boxcar median filter of 30 frames.
219: This procedure subtracts the residual
220: time-variations of the response. We then used the MOPEX package\footnote{MOPEX:
221: MOsaicking and Point source EXtraction, available from the SSC at
222: \url{http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/postbcd/download-mopex.html}.}
223: to co-add the filtered images. In Figure~\ref{figure:70} we
224: show the GeRT-filtered 70 $\mu$m image side by side with the standard pipeline image. Here we note that
225: there is some evidence for a faint extended region in the filtered data. However, since this region is
226: aligned with the higher-noise streak in the pipeline image, subtracted from the GeRT data,
227: and since a mosaic of the individual pipeline-filtered exposures does not show this
228: feature, we do not make strong claims about its reality.
229:
230: We reduced the 160 $\mu$m data in a very similar way, using GeRT.
231: However, since there are very few pixels and the central source is marginally extended in an
232: odd wedge-shape, additional filtering in the time domain did not result in significantly cleaner 160 $\mu$m images.
233: The exclusion of individual images taken directly after the
234: periodic ``stim" images had no effect on the final product.
235: The MOPEX package was used to combine the 160 $\mu$m basic calibration products.
236:
237:
238: \subsection{Data Analysis}
239:
240: We measured the flux in all seven wavebands
241: within a circular aperture of
242: %25 arcseconds,
243: $r=25\arcsec$ ($\sim39 h_{70}^{-1}$ kpc), centered on
244: the coordinates $\alpha=351.33199$ and $\delta = -12.124612$ (J2000).
245: (RA of $23^h$ $25^m$ $19.6^s$, DEC of -12 07' 29").
246: The background was estimated from pixels in an annulus between
247: %$27.5\arcsec$ and $32.5\arcsec$
248: $38.5\arcsec$ and $42.5\arcsec$
249: from the center. We also measured the flux in a larger aperture ($r=35\arcsec$)
250: for the MIPS 70 and 160 $\mu$m images.
251: A histogram of the
252: background values was fit to a Gaussian initially centered on the median
253: background per pixel.
254: The mean background value was subtracted from the aperture
255: flux. The net fluxes were averaged and multiplied by the aperture sky
256: area in steradians to yield the flux in Janskys.
257: No aperture correction was required for the IRAC photometry.
258:
259: Since the MIPS images are nearly point sources, we used the APEX package to
260: fit point response functions (PRFs) and obtain total fluxes for the MIPS. For comparison, we
261: report both the large aperture flux and the PRF flux for each band. We obtain reasonable agreement
262: except in the case of the 160 $\mu$m aperture flux, for which the aperture correction,
263: even at $r=35\arcsec$ we estimate to be $\sim1.5$, based on the convolution of the
264: standard PRF with the source. The
265: IRAC flux uncertainties are $\sim5\%$. The
266: color terms at 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m are unlikely to be significant; however, if
267: the spectrum is dominated by PAHs at 5.8 and 8 $\mu$m, the color-term corrections
268: could be significant, up to $\sim50\%$. MIPS absolute flux uncertainties are 10\% at
269: 24 $\mu$m and 20\% at 70 and 160 $\mu$m. We report raw and aperture-corrected
270: aperture fluxes in Table~\ref{table:fluxes}.
271:
272:
273:
274: We extracted photometry for this galaxy from the
275: Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) extended source
276: catalog \citep{2000AJ....119.2498J}\footnote{Described in \url{http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/jarrett/2mass/XSC/}
277: and query service available through GATOR \url{http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/applications/Gator/}}
278: in J, H, and K infrared bands.
279: Absolute photometric calibration from \citet{2003AJ....126.1090C} converts
280: the 2MASS magnitudes to Janskys.
281: The 2MASS total apertures (the apertures that measured the total light from the extended source)
282: of $25.35\arcsec$ were similar to that used for the Spitzer data. We show all images (2MASS and Spitzer)
283: in Figure~\ref{figure:all} together with the $r=25\arcsec$ aperture in the 1-24 micron images and
284: the $r=25\arcsec$ and $35\arcsec$ aperture for the 160 micron image, for scale.
285:
286: \section{Discussion}
287:
288: The total amount of far-IR emission from the BGC in Abell 2597 is
289: $\nu L_\nu \sim 1 \times 10^{44}$ erg s$^{-1}$, corresponding to $\sim 4 M_\odot \, {\rm yr}^{-1}$ according to \citet{Kennicutt1998}. This
290: FIR luminosity is as high as that
291: of a LIRG (Luminous Infrared Galaxy), and the broad-band spectrum is consistent with
292: that of a starburst.
293: The IR-inferred star formation rate is also consistent with the conclusion
294: of \citet{ODea2004} that hot stars, detected in the UV, forming at the rate of a few solar masses per year, are the dominant source of ionization of the optical nebula. The emission we detect with IRAC is extended, but it appears to be mainly associated with the central galaxy. The mid-IR sources,
295: except at 24 $\mu$m, are not well-fit by point sources, but those too are
296: completely contained within the boundaries of the stellar light of the BCG.
297: Because of Spitzer's
298: diffraction limit, we cannot say much about its mid-IR morphology. It is also very difficult to place any
299: flux limits on extremely extended emission, beyond the galaxy, such as emission
300: from the cluster ICM itself, due to the nature of mid-IR observations which require
301: multiple, offset exposures to assess the background and the current
302: state of knowledge about absolute Spitzer backgrounds. Because of the positional
303: association of the Spitzer-detected IR
304: emission with the BCG, we suspect that what we detect is entirely interstellar, not intracluster, in nature.
305:
306: Figure~\ref{figure:SED} compares the broad-band spectral energy distribution of this galaxy with the
307: spectrum expected from an old stellar population with zero dust. The near-infrared spectrum
308: is fairly flat, as one would expect from an old stellar population at this redshift, and the
309: stellar mass implied by the near-IR luminosity is $\sim 3.12 \times 10^{11}$ M$_\odot$.
310: Stellar continuum emission is expected to dominate in the 3.5 and 4.5 $\mu$m bands, and
311: the ratio of those two bands to the near-IR emission is consistent with that expectation. Those bands are well-fit by a simple giant elliptical spectral template, obtained from the SED template
312: library of the Hyper-z photometric redshift code \citep{2000A&A...363..476B}. In the far-IR, one can see the prominent 70 - 160 $\mu$m peak observed with MIPS. Such a peak is expected from dust
313: in active star-forming regions. Excess emission over an old, dust-free population is also found
314: in the 5.8 $\mu$m and particularly in the 8 $\mu$m IRAC bands. The excess at 8 $\mu$m is likely
315: due to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) transiently heated by UV photons from hot stars.
316: Such emission features are commonly found in the spectra of star-forming galaxies and usually accompany a far-infrared spectral peak at $\sim 70 \mu$m. Adding a nuclear starburst SED model
317: from \citet{2007A&A...461..445S} of with a total starburst luminosity of $0.95 \times 10^{44}$ erg s$^{-1}$ to the emission from old stars yields an adequate fit (solid line) to the
318: combined 2MASS and Spitzer photometry for this galaxy. Note that PAH features are not expected
319: from dust that has been exposed to a harsh X-ray radiation environment, since tiny grains are easily
320: disrupted by X-rays (Voit 1992). This excess, if confirmed to be PAH features, is an argument against
321: the dusty gas originating from condensations from the hot ICM.
322:
323: The 70 $\mu$m/160 $\mu$m flux ratio is larger than that observed for higher redshift ($z=0.25-0.3$)
324: BCGs by Egami et al. (2006). The observed ratios seen for Abell 1835 and Zwicky 3146 by
325: Egami et al. (2006) are 0.4-0.6, corresponding to a rest-frame black body
326: temperature of $\sim35-40$K. The observed ratio for Abell 2597 is $\sim1.5$, corresponding
327: to a rest-frame black body temperature of $65-75$K.
328: This finding may mean that the temperature of the hot dust
329: in Abell 2597 is greater than in higher redshift BCGs that are forming stars more quickly
330: than the BCG in Abell 2597. It may seem puzzling that a galaxy
331: with a lower star formation rate (SFR) seems to have hotter dust than
332: large-SFR galaxies.
333: One possible explanation is that galaxies with very low SFRs may have only cool dust (if any),
334: those with an intermediate SFR may have warmer dust, and perhaps those with a very high
335: SFR may destroy the dust in the star formation regions. The dust in these systems might then be
336: farther from the heat sources, therefore generating a higher IR luminosity but at a
337: lower dust temperature. Another explanation is suggested by
338: the radiative transfer models presented in \citet{2007A&A...461..445S} that
339: indicate that the very luminous ($L>10^{12.5}L_\odot$)
340: sources are cooler because for a given $A_V$, the dust mass $M_d$ increases
341: like $R^2$, and the dust temperature scales like $L/M_d$ \citep{2007A&A...461..445S}.
342: Also, a large fraction of buried OB stars increases the near-IR flux. Mid-IR spectra, with more than 2-3
343: points per spectrum, of these sources
344: will provide an interesting discriminant between these model SEDs.
345:
346: Assuming for the moment that the far-IR peak is indeed from star-forming regions, we can compare the implied star-formation rate with that inferred from the H$\alpha$ emission. The diameter of the
347: H$\alpha$ nebula is about $16\arcsec$ \citep{HBvM1989}, although the high-surface brightness
348: structure visible in the HST image from \citet{Donahue2000}
349: has a similar diameter to that of the radio source ($\sim5-6\arcsec$).
350: % Heckman 2.7E42, H0=75, ha+[NII]
351: Corrected to $H_0=70$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, \citet{HBvM1989} measure a total H$\alpha$ + [N~II] luminosity
352: of $3.1 \times 10^{42}$ erg s$^{-1}$, which is $\sim 1.3-1.5 \times 10^{42}$ erg s$^{-1}$ in H$\alpha$ alone. (The
353: ratio of H$\alpha/$[N~II]6584\AA~ varies in this source between 0.8-1.0, and the [N~II]6548\AA~ line flux is
354: 1/3 that of the 6584\AA~ line.) A reddening analysis of 5 hydrogen Balmer lines in
355: the spectrum of Abell 2597 by \citet{1997ApJ...486..242V} optical depth at
356: H$\beta$ is about 1.2. The correction to total H$\alpha$ is approximately 25\%,
357: corresponding to $\sim 1.6-1.8 \times 10^{42}$ erg s$^{-1}$
358: Such an analysis is insensitive to absorption by so-called ``grey'' dust, i.e. a population
359: of large grains whose absorption is independent of wavelength.
360: This luminosity corresponds to a total star formation rate of $\sim 12-14$ M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ using
361: the conversion from \citep{Kennicutt1998}.
362: This rate is somewhat larger than the $4 M_\odot \, {\rm yr}^{-1}$ indicated by the far-IR emission but could be an overestimate if any of the H$\alpha$ arises from processes other than star formation (e.g. AGN, shocks).
363:
364: The OVI detection reported by \citet{2001ApJ...560..187O} suggests a gas cooling rate $20\pm5$ solar masses per year in the central 26 kpc (quantities converted to $H_0=70$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$). This quantity is higher than the star formation rate inferred from Spitzer data by a factor of $\sim 5\pm3$ but
365: is consistent with the local cooling rate of $\sim 20~ \rm{M}_\odot ~\rm{yr}^{-1}$ inferred from X-ray spectra by \citet{2005MNRAS.358..585M}.
366:
367: An alternative source of energy for both H$\alpha$ and far-IR emission emission
368: is conduction \citep{1989ApJ...345..153S}. If conduction is not completely suppressed by
369: magnetic fields, it must transfer at least some energy from the X-ray gas to the nebula
370: and the cooler dusty gas associated with it. If we assume saturated heat conduction \citep{1977ApJ...211..135C} from the surrounding $kT=4$ keV ICM
371: through a spherical surface of radius $r=10 r_{10}$ kpc, we obtain a maximum heating rate
372: of a few times $10^{43} r_{10}^2$ erg s$^{-1}$, which represents a significant fraction of the mid-IR
373: luminosity of $10^{44}$ erg s$^{-1}$. However, many factors could reduce the conductive
374: heating rate, such as
375: suppression of conduction via tangled magnetic fields or the deposition of energy into ionized
376: nebular gas instead of into the grains. Additional theoretical work is needed to explore more quantitatively the effect of the surrounding hot ICM on the dusty clouds responsible for the far-IR
377: emission.
378:
379:
380: % THIS PARAGRAPH BASICALLY SAYS WE CAN'T DO MID-IR MORPHOLOGY
381: %\citet{2000ApJ...545..670D} suggested that the similarity of morphologies of emission from different
382: %gas phases may suggest a common excitation source (e.g. stars).
383: %The similarity of the morphology of the FIR 70 micron emission to that of the optical or
384: %near infrared lines is impossible to check. The features imaged with the Hubble Space Telescope and the
385: %Very Large Array spanned $\sim5\arcsec$ across, with sub-arcsecond resolution; the resolution at 70 microns is $18\arcsec$.
386: %There is a suggestion of an extended tail to the south-east in the 70 micron image, but this emission
387: %is at much larger angular size than seen in the Hubble Space telescope optical and near-IR
388: %images for A2597 \citep{2000ApJ...545..670D}. We note that any radio-source excavated
389: %bubbles, such as those seen by
390: %Chandra by \citet{2001ApJ...562L.149M} are invisible at these resolutions.
391:
392: In summary, the UV observations of \cite{ODea2004} place a lower limit on the
393: star-formation rate because extinction corrections revise the UV rate upwards; the H$\alpha$ luminosity
394: provides only an approximate limit since other processes can generate H$\alpha$, and
395: H$\alpha$ can be attenuated by grey absorption.
396: These far-IR infrared observations place the best upper limit on
397: the obscured star formation, because alternative contributions (such
398: as conduction from the ICM) would also revise the inferred star formation rate downward.
399: Because we have estimated above that
400: conduction could in principle provide up to $\sim 50$\% of the IR luminosity,
401: the uncertainty of the IR-inferred star formation rate is at least a factor of two,
402: and we require better theoretical models and more detailed spectra to improve our estimates.
403:
404: \section{Conclusions}
405:
406: We have detected mid-infrared emission from the central galaxy of Abell 2597 with the Spitzer
407: Space Telescope, from 3.6 - 160 $\mu$m. This galaxy has the luminosity and spectral shape of a LIRG embedded
408: in a giant elliptical galaxy. The far infrared luminosity rivals that of the local X-ray luminosity.
409: We have constructed a broad-band spectrum of the
410: galaxy, which is most simply interpreted as a dust-enshrouded stellar population forming stars at
411: a rate $\sim 4 M_\odot \, {\rm yr}^{-1}$ solar masses per year inside the central $35\arcsec$ ($\sim 54$ kpc).
412: This estimate is consistent within a factor of two of
413: estimates from optical, H$\alpha$, and ultraviolet observations. We cannot, however, rule out
414: additional heating of the dust by electron thermal conduction from the hot gas, and we
415: suggest the development of more quantitative physical models of this process. The presence of UV continuum light argues
416: in favor of a substantial fraction of the mid-IR flux being associated with star formation.
417: The star formation rate inferred from the mid-IR emission is somewhat lower than the cooling rate
418: inferred from OVI and recent X-ray observations, but we cannot rule out the hypothesis that
419: cooling gas may feed the star formation implied by the UV, optical, and mid-IR data.
420:
421: Finally, we have have been able to model the broadband infrared SED of the
422: BCG with a basic giant elliptical template and
423: a standard nuclear starburst model from \citet{2007A&A...461..445S}, including PAH features.
424: We therefore have no evidence, based on these data, that the dusty gas condensed from the hot ICM. Further spectroscopic detail is required to test the hypothesis that PAHs are responsible for the mid-IR excess.
425:
426: \acknowledgements
427:
428: Support for Donahue was provided by a NASA Spitzer contract (JPL 1268128)
429: and a NASA LTSA grant (NASA NNG-05GD82G).
430: MD acknowledges useful discussions about Spitzer photometry
431: with the Spitzer helpdesk personnel and with Dr. Grant Tremblay.
432: WBS acknowledges support from NASA Spitzer contract JPL 1269604.
433:
434:
435: %\bibliography{clustercoolingflow}
436:
437: \begin{thebibliography}{41}
438: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
439:
440: \bibitem[{{Barnes} \& {Nulsen}(2003)}]{2003MNRAS.343..315B}
441: {Barnes}, D.~G., \& {Nulsen}, P.~E.~J. 2003, \mnras, 343, 315
442:
443: \bibitem[{{Best} {et~al.}(2006){Best}, {Kaiser}, {Heckman}, \&
444: {Kauffmann}}]{2006MNRAS.368L..67B}
445: {Best}, P.~N., {Kaiser}, C.~R., {Heckman}, T.~M., \& {Kauffmann}, G. 2006,
446: \mnras, 368, L67
447:
448: \bibitem[{{Binney}(2004)}]{2004MNRAS.347.1093B}
449: {Binney}, J. 2004, \mnras, 347, 1093
450:
451: \bibitem[{{Bolzonella} {et~al.}(2000){Bolzonella}, {Miralles}, \&
452: {Pell{\'o}}}]{2000A&A...363..476B}
453: {Bolzonella}, M., {Miralles}, J.-M., \& {Pell{\'o}}, R. 2000, \aap, 363, 476
454:
455: \bibitem[{{Bregman} {et~al.}(2006){Bregman}, {Fabian}, {Miller}, \&
456: {Irwin}}]{2006ApJ...642..746B}
457: {Bregman}, J.~N., {Fabian}, A.~C., {Miller}, E.~D., \& {Irwin}, J.~A. 2006,
458: \apj, 642, 746
459:
460: \bibitem[{{Cardiel} {et~al.}(1998){Cardiel}, {Gorgas}, \&
461: {Aragon-Salamanca}}]{Cardiel1998}
462: {Cardiel}, N., {Gorgas}, J., \& {Aragon-Salamanca}, A. 1998, \mnras, 298, 977
463:
464: \bibitem[{{Cohen} {et~al.}(2003){Cohen}, {Wheaton}, \&
465: {Megeath}}]{2003AJ....126.1090C}
466: {Cohen}, M., {Wheaton}, W.~A., \& {Megeath}, S.~T. 2003, \aj, 126, 1090
467:
468: \bibitem[{{Cowie} \& {McKee}(1977)}]{1977ApJ...211..135C}
469: {Cowie}, L.~L., \& {McKee}, C.~F. 1977, \apj, 211, 135
470:
471: \bibitem[{{Donahue} {et~al.}(2006){Donahue}, {Horner}, {Cavagnolo}, \&
472: {Voit}}]{2006ApJ...643..730D}
473: {Donahue}, M., {Horner}, D.~J., {Cavagnolo}, K.~W., \& {Voit}, G.~M. 2006,
474: \apj, 643, 730
475:
476: \bibitem[{{Donahue} {et~al.}(2000){Donahue}, {Mack}, {Voit}, {Sparks},
477: {Elston}, \& {Maloney}}]{Donahue2000}
478: {Donahue}, M., {Mack}, J., {Voit}, G.~M., {Sparks}, W., {Elston}, R., \&
479: {Maloney}, P.~R. 2000, \apj, 545, 670
480:
481: \bibitem[{{Donahue} {et~al.}(2005){Donahue}, {Voit}, {O'Dea}, {Baum}, \&
482: {Sparks}}]{Donahue2005A}
483: {Donahue}, M., {Voit}, G.~M., {O'Dea}, C.~P., {Baum}, S.~A., \& {Sparks}, W.~B.
484: 2005, \apjl, 630, L13
485:
486: \bibitem[{{Edge}(2001{\natexlab{a}})}]{2001MNRAS.328..762E}
487: {Edge}, A.~C. 2001{\natexlab{a}}, \mnras, 328, 762
488:
489: \bibitem[{{Edge}(2001{\natexlab{b}})}]{Edge2001}
490: ---. 2001{\natexlab{b}}, \mnras, 328, 762
491:
492: \bibitem[{{Edge} \& {Frayer}(2003)}]{2003ApJ...594L..13E}
493: {Edge}, A.~C., \& {Frayer}, D.~T. 2003, \apjl, 594, L13
494:
495: \bibitem[{{Egami} {et~al.}(2006{\natexlab{a}}){Egami}, {Misselt}, {Rieke},
496: {Wise}, {Neugebauer}, {Kneib}, {Le Floc'h}, {Smith}, {Blaylock}, {Dole},
497: {Frayer}, {Huang}, {Krause}, {Papovich}, {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, \&
498: {Rigby}}]{2006ApJ...647..922E}
499: {Egami}, E., {Misselt}, K.~A., {Rieke}, G.~H., {Wise}, M.~W., {Neugebauer}, G.,
500: {Kneib}, J.-P., {Le Floc'h}, E., {Smith}, G.~P., {Blaylock}, M., {Dole}, H.,
501: {Frayer}, D.~T., {Huang}, J.-S., {Krause}, O., {Papovich}, C.,
502: {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, P.~G., \& {Rigby}, J.~R. 2006{\natexlab{a}}, \apj,
503: 647, 922
504:
505: \bibitem[{{Egami} {et~al.}(2006{\natexlab{b}}){Egami}, {Rieke}, {Fadda}, \&
506: {Hines}}]{2006ApJ...652L..21E}
507: {Egami}, E., {Rieke}, G.~H., {Fadda}, D., \& {Hines}, D.~C. 2006{\natexlab{b}},
508: \apjl, 652, L21
509:
510: \bibitem[{{Elston} \& {Maloney}(1994)}]{1994iaan.conf..169E}
511: {Elston}, R., \& {Maloney}, P. 1994, in ASSL Vol. 190: Astronomy with Arrays,
512: The Next Generation, ed. I.~S. {McLean}, 169--+
513:
514: \bibitem[{{Fabian}(1994)}]{1994ARA&A..32..277F}
515: {Fabian}, A.~C. 1994, \araa, 32, 277
516:
517: \bibitem[{{Fazio} {et~al.}(2004){Fazio}, {Hora}, {Allen}, {Ashby}, {Barmby},
518: {Deutsch}, {Huang}, {Kleiner}, {Marengo}, {Megeath}, {Melnick}, {Pahre},
519: {Patten}, {Polizotti}, {Smith}, {Taylor}, {Wang}, {Willner}, {Hoffmann},
520: {Pipher}, {Forrest}, {McMurty}, {McCreight}, {McKelvey}, {McMurray}, {Koch},
521: {Moseley}, {Arendt}, {Mentzell}, {Marx}, {Losch}, {Mayman}, {Eichhorn},
522: {Krebs}, {Jhabvala}, {Gezari}, {Fixsen}, {Flores}, {Shakoorzadeh}, {Jungo},
523: {Hakun}, {Workman}, {Karpati}, {Kichak}, {Whitley}, {Mann}, {Tollestrup},
524: {Eisenhardt}, {Stern}, {Gorjian}, {Bhattacharya}, {Carey}, {Nelson},
525: {Glaccum}, {Lacy}, {Lowrance}, {Laine}, {Reach}, {Stauffer}, {Surace},
526: {Wilson}, {Wright}, {Hoffman}, {Domingo}, \& {Cohen}}]{2004ApJS..154...10F}
527: {Fazio}, G.~G., {et~al.}
528: 2004, \apjs, 154, 10
529:
530: \bibitem[{{Gordon} {et~al.}(2005){Gordon}, {Rieke}, {Engelbracht}, {Muzerolle},
531: {Stansberry}, {Misselt}, {Morrison}, {Cadien}, {Young}, {Dole}, {Kelly},
532: {Alonso-Herrero}, {Egami}, {Su}, {Papovich}, {Smith}, {Hines}, {Rieke},
533: {Blaylock}, {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, {Le Floc'h}, {Hinz}, {Latter},
534: {Hesselroth}, {Frayer}, {Noriega-Crespo}, {Masci}, {Padgett}, {Smylie}, \&
535: {Haegel}}]{2005PASP..117..503G}
536: {Gordon}, K.~D., {et~al.} 2005, \pasp, 117, 503
537:
538: \bibitem[{{Heckman} {et~al.}(1989{\natexlab{a}}){Heckman}, {Baum}, {van
539: Breugel}, \& {McCarthy}}]{1989ApJ...338...48H}
540: {Heckman}, T.~M., {Baum}, S.~A., {van Breugel}, W.~J.~M., \& {McCarthy}, P.
541: 1989{\natexlab{a}}, \apj, 338, 48
542:
543: \bibitem[{{Heckman} {et~al.}(1989{\natexlab{b}}){Heckman}, {Baum}, {van
544: Breugel}, \& {McCarthy}}]{HBvM1989}
545: ---. 1989{\natexlab{b}}, \apj, 338, 48
546:
547: \bibitem[{{Jaffe} {et~al.}(2005){Jaffe}, {Bremer}, \&
548: {Baker}}]{2005MNRAS.360..748J}
549: {Jaffe}, W., {Bremer}, M.~N., \& {Baker}, K. 2005, \mnras, 360, 748
550:
551: \bibitem[{{Jaffe} {et~al.}(2001){Jaffe}, {Bremer}, \& {van der
552: Werf}}]{2001MNRAS.324..443J}
553: {Jaffe}, W., {Bremer}, M.~N., \& {van der Werf}, P.~P. 2001, \mnras, 324, 443
554:
555: \bibitem[{{Jarrett} {et~al.}(2000){Jarrett}, {Chester}, {Cutri}, {Schneider},
556: {Skrutskie}, \& {Huchra}}]{2000AJ....119.2498J}
557: {Jarrett}, T.~H., {Chester}, T., {Cutri}, R., {Schneider}, S., {Skrutskie}, M.,
558: \& {Huchra}, J.~P. 2000, \aj, 119, 2498
559:
560: \bibitem[{{Kennicutt}(1998)}]{Kennicutt1998}
561: {Kennicutt}, Jr., R.~C. 1998, \apj, 498, 541
562:
563: \bibitem[{{Koekemoer} {et~al.}(1999){Koekemoer}, {O'Dea}, {Sarazin},
564: {McNamara}, {Donahue}, {Voit}, {Baum}, \& {Gallimore}}]{Koekemoer1999}
565: {Koekemoer}, A.~M., {O'Dea}, C.~P., {Sarazin}, C.~L., {McNamara}, B.~R.,
566: {Donahue}, M., {Voit}, G.~M., {Baum}, S.~A., \& {Gallimore}, J.~F. 1999,
567: \apj, 525, 621
568:
569: \bibitem[{{McNamara} {et~al.}(1999){McNamara}, {Jannuzi}, {Sarazin}, {Elston},
570: \& {Wise}}]{1999ApJ...518..167M}
571: {McNamara}, B.~R., {Jannuzi}, B.~T., {Sarazin}, C.~L., {Elston}, R., \& {Wise},
572: M. 1999, \apj, 518, 167
573:
574: \bibitem[{{McNamara} {et~al.}(2001{\natexlab{a}}){McNamara}, {Wise}, {Nulsen},
575: {David}, {Carilli}, {Sarazin}, {O'Dea}, {Houck}, {Donahue}, {Baum}, {Voit},
576: {O'Connell}, \& {Koekemoer}}]{2001ApJ...562L.149M}
577: {McNamara}, B.~R., {Wise}, M.~W., {Nulsen}, P.~E.~J., {David}, L.~P.,
578: {Carilli}, C.~L., {Sarazin}, C.~L., {O'Dea}, C.~P., {Houck}, J., {Donahue},
579: M., {Baum}, S., {Voit}, M., {O'Connell}, R.~W., \& {Koekemoer}, A.
580: 2001{\natexlab{a}}, \apjl, 562, L149
581:
582: \bibitem[{{McNamara} {et~al.}(2001{\natexlab{b}}){McNamara}, {Wise}, {Nulsen},
583: {David}, {Carilli}, {Sarazin}, {O'Dea}, {Houck}, {Donahue}, {Baum}, {Voit},
584: {O'Connell}, \& {Koekemoer}}]{McNamaraA2597_2001}
585: ---. 2001{\natexlab{b}}, \apjl, 562, L149
586:
587: \bibitem[{{Morris} \& {Fabian}(2005)}]{2005MNRAS.358..585M}
588: {Morris}, R.~G., \& {Fabian}, A.~C. 2005, \mnras, 358, 585
589:
590: \bibitem[{{O'Dea} {et~al.}(2004){O'Dea}, {Baum}, {Mack}, {Koekemoer}, \&
591: {Laor}}]{ODea2004}
592: {O'Dea}, C.~P., {Baum}, S.~A., {Mack}, J., {Koekemoer}, A.~M., \& {Laor}, A.
593: 2004, \apj, 612, 131
594:
595: \bibitem[{{Oegerle} {et~al.}(2001){Oegerle}, {Cowie}, {Davidsen}, {Hu},
596: {Hutchings}, {Murphy}, {Sembach}, \& {Woodgate}}]{2001ApJ...560..187O}
597: {Oegerle}, W.~R., {Cowie}, L., {Davidsen}, A., {Hu}, E., {Hutchings}, J.,
598: {Murphy}, E., {Sembach}, K., \& {Woodgate}, B. 2001, \apj, 560, 187
599:
600: \bibitem[{{Peterson} {et~al.}(2001){Peterson}, {Paerels}, {Kaastra}, {Arnaud},
601: {Reiprich}, {Fabian}, {Mushotzky}, {Jernigan}, \&
602: {Sakelliou}}]{2001A&A...365L.104P}
603: {Peterson}, J.~R., {Paerels}, F.~B.~S., {Kaastra}, J.~S., {Arnaud}, M.,
604: {Reiprich}, T.~H., {Fabian}, A.~C., {Mushotzky}, R.~F., {Jernigan}, J.~G., \&
605: {Sakelliou}, I. 2001, \aap, 365, L104
606:
607: \bibitem[{{Reach} {et~al.}(2005){Reach}, {Megeath}, {Cohen}, {Hora}, {Carey},
608: {Surace}, {Willner}, {Barmby}, {Wilson}, {Glaccum}, {Lowrance}, {Marengo}, \&
609: {Fazio}}]{2005PASP..117..978R}
610: {Reach}, W.~T., {Megeath}, S.~T., {Cohen}, M., {Hora}, J., {Carey}, S.,
611: {Surace}, J., {Willner}, S.~P., {Barmby}, P., {Wilson}, G., {Glaccum}, W.,
612: {Lowrance}, P., {Marengo}, M., \& {Fazio}, G.~G. 2005, \pasp, 117, 978
613:
614: \bibitem[{{Salom{\'e}} {et~al.}(2006){Salom{\'e}}, {Combes}, {Edge},
615: {Crawford}, {Erlund}, {Fabian}, {Hatch}, {Johnstone}, {Sanders}, \&
616: {Wilman}}]{2006A&A...454..437S}
617: {Salom{\'e}}, P., {Combes}, F., {Edge}, A.~C., {Crawford}, C., {Erlund}, M.,
618: {Fabian}, A.~C., {Hatch}, N.~A., {Johnstone}, R.~M., {Sanders}, J.~S., \&
619: {Wilman}, R.~J. 2006, \aap, 454, 437
620:
621: \bibitem[{{Schlegel} {et~al.}(1998){Schlegel}, {Finkbeiner}, \&
622: {Davis}}]{1998ApJ...500..525S}
623: {Schlegel}, D.~J., {Finkbeiner}, D.~P., \& {Davis}, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525
624:
625: \bibitem[{{Siebenmorgen} \& {Kr{\"u}gel}(2007)}]{2007A&A...461..445S}
626: {Siebenmorgen}, R., \& {Kr{\"u}gel}, E. 2007, \aap, 461, 445
627:
628: \bibitem[{{Sparks} {et~al.}(1989){Sparks}, {Macchetto}, \&
629: {Golombek}}]{1989ApJ...345..153S}
630: {Sparks}, W.~B., {Macchetto}, F., \& {Golombek}, D. 1989, \apj, 345, 153
631:
632: \bibitem[{{Voit} \& {Donahue}(1997{\natexlab{a}})}]{1997ApJ...486..242V}
633: {Voit}, G.~M., \& {Donahue}, M. 1997{\natexlab{a}}, \apj, 486, 242
634:
635: \bibitem[{{Voit} \& {Donahue}(1997{\natexlab{b}})}]{VD1997}
636: ---. 1997{\natexlab{b}}, \apj, 486, 242
637:
638: \end{thebibliography}
639:
640:
641:
642:
643: \clearpage
644:
645: \begin{table}
646: \caption{Infrared Fluxes for the BCG in Abell 2597 \label{table:fluxes}}
647: \begin{center}
648: \begin{tabular}{lcccccccccc} \tableline
649: Band ($\mu$m) & 1.235 & 1.662 & 2.159 & 3.6 & 4.5 & 5.8 & 8.0 & 24 & 70 & 160 \\ \tableline
650: Flux (Unc. mJy) \tablenotemark{1} & 9.7 & 9.3 & 9.64 & 6.0 & 4.0 & 3.1 & 2.7 & 2.1 & 89 & 35 (52) \\
651: Error (mJy) \tablenotemark{2} & 0.6 & 1.1 & 0.96 & 0.8 & 0.2 & 0.2 & 0.01 & 0.2 & 4 & 2 (3) \\ \tableline
652: PRF Flux (mJy) \tablenotemark{3} & & & & & & & & 2.09 & 86 & 57.0 \\
653: Error (mJy) \tablenotemark{2} & & & & & & & & 0.06 & 1 & 1.6 \\ \tableline
654: \end{tabular}
655: \end{center}
656: \tablenotetext{1}{Aperture photometry.
657: Cataloged 2MASS total magnitudes were measured with a large aperture $r=25.35\arcsec$, IRAC and MIPS with $25\arcsec$. MIPS
658: 160 micron aperture fluxes with $r=35\arcsec$ aperture are also reported. Based on test convolutions with
659: the 160 micron PRF, the aperture correction for a $35\arcsec$ radius aperture is 1.5, corrected flux shown in parentheses. }
660: \tablenotetext{2}{The Spitzer measurement
661: uncertainties quoted here are dominated by background subtraction. IRAC absolute photometry is good to about 3\% for
662: point sources \citep{2005PASP..117..978R}.
663: From the MIPS data handbook, MIPS photometric calibration
664: uncertainties of 10\% for 24 $\mu$m and 20\% for 70 and 160 $\mu$m apply.}
665: \tablenotetext{3}{Point response fit (PRF) photometry for MIPS. No aperture correction is needed for the
666: 2MASS or IRAC photometry for this size of aperture and a galaxy of this angular size.
667: To first approximation, the MIPS sources are
668: point-like, so a PRF fit provides a reasonable estimate of the total flux.}
669: \end{table}
670:
671: \clearpage
672:
673: \begin{figure}[ht]
674:
675: %\plotone{MIPS70.eps}
676: \includegraphics[width=180mm]{f1.pdf}
677: \caption{
678: This grey-scale figure shows two matched versions of the MIPS 70 micron image of the brightest
679: cluster galaxy (BCG) in Abell 2597. North is towards the top of the image, and East is
680: towards the left. A one-arcminute scale bar is displayed. The units on the grey scale color bar at
681: the bottom of the figure are MJy per steradian. The left image is of the standard pipeline product,
682: and the right image shows the same object and data, where we subtracted median sky images from the
683: individual exposures using GeRT routines (see text for details), then we co-added
684: using MOPEX. Only the BCG and the point source in the lower left
685: hand corner were masked during this procedure. The result was a cleaner image, and an
686: intriguing hint of an extended 70-micron source, extending approximately 1 arcminute
687: south-east of the brighter compact source near the center of the BCG. This feature is likely a residual of the stripes in the original image, as discussed in the text. A point source $1\arcmin$ north of the BCG in the
688: original image vanishes in the filtered image.
689: \label{figure:70}}
690: \end{figure}
691:
692: \begin{figure}[ht]
693: %\plotone{AllBands.eps}
694: \includegraphics[width=180mm]{f2.pdf}
695: \caption{This grey-scale figure shows matched multiwavelength infrared images of the brightest cluster
696: galaxy in Abell 2597. The angular scale of each image is $130\arcsec$ horizontal and $86\arcsec$
697: vertically. North is up and East is to the left. All subimages have the same angular scale.
698: Left to right, top row: J-band from 2MASS, IRAC 3.6 and 4.5 microns.
699: Second row: IRAC 5.8, 8.0 microns, MIPS 24 microns. Third row: MIPS 70 micron image from the
700: SSC pipeline, the median-sky-subtracted 70 micron image (70F), and the MIPS 160 micron image.
701: An $r=25\arcsec$ aperture is plotted for scale over each subimage. The 160 micron image also
702: shows an $r=35\arcsec$ aperture. \label{figure:all}}
703: \end{figure}
704:
705:
706:
707:
708: \begin{figure}[ht]
709:
710: %\plotone{sed_SK_new2.eps}
711: \includegraphics[width=180mm]{f3.pdf}
712: \caption{ \label{figure:SED}
713: Spectral energy distribution (SED) of the central galaxy of Abell~2597.
714: The solid symbols indicate the
715: 2MASS and \textit{Spitzer} IRAC and MIPS measurements presented in
716: Table~\ref{table:fluxes}.
717: The error bars include systematic uncertainties as
718: described in the text. The solid line is the best-fit
719: two component SED model composed of a giant elliptical SED taken from
720: the SED template library of the Hyper-z photometric redshift code (dashed line)
721: \citep{2000A&A...363..476B}
722: and a nuclear starburst SED model (dotted line)
723: from \citet{2007A&A...461..445S}. The inferred mass of the giant
724: elliptical is $\sim 3.12 \times 10^{11} ~\rm{M}_\odot$
725: The best-fit component from the
726: Siebenmorgen \& Kr\"ugel library is indicated with a dotted line,
727: and corresponds to a mid-IR starburst nucleus of $r=0.35$~kpc where 60\% of the
728: luminosity is from hot spots, dense clouds ($n=10^2$ cm$^{-3}$)
729: around buried OB stars, with a visual extinction $A_V=36$ mag.
730: The total luminosity of this component is $L=10^{10.4}\,\, L_{\odot} \sim 0.95 \times 10^{44}$
731: erg sec$^{-1}$.
732: }
733: \end{figure}
734:
735: \end{document}