1: %\documentclass[showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
2: %\documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
3: \documentclass[preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
4: \usepackage{epsfig}
5: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
6: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
7: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
8:
9: \let\jnfont=\rm
10: \def\NPB#1,{{\jnfont Nucl.\ Phys.\ B }{\bf #1},}
11: \def\PLB#1,{{\jnfont Phys.\ Lett.\ B }{\bf #1},}
12: \def\EPJC#1,{{\jnfont Eur.\ Phys.\ Jour.\ C }{\bf #1},}
13: \def\PRD#1,{{\jnfont Phys.\ Rev.\ D }{\bf #1},}
14: \def\PRL#1,{{\jnfont Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ }{\bf #1},}
15: \def\MPLA#1,{{\jnfont Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A }{\bf #1},}
16: \def\JPG#1,{{\jnfont J.\ Phys.\ G}{\bf #1},}
17: \def\CTP#1,{{\jnfont Commun.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ }{\bf #1},}
18: \def\ZPC#1,{{\jnfont Z.\ Phys.\ C }{\bf #1},}
19: \def\JHEP#1,{{\jnfont JHEP \ }{\bf #1},}
20: \def\q_slash{\not{\hbox{\kern-2.1pt $q$}}}
21: \def\p_slash{\not{\hbox{\kern-4.0pt $p$}}}
22: \def\k_slash{\not{\hbox{\kern-2.1pt $k$}}}
23: \def\no{\normalsize}
24: \def\un{\underline}
25: \begin{document}
26:
27: %\preprint{\parbox{1.2in}{\noindent }}
28:
29: \title{\ \\[10mm] Single top production associated with a neutral scalar
30: at LHC \\ in topcolor-assisted technicolor}
31:
32: \author{Guoli Liu, Huanjun Zhang \vspace*{0.5cm} }
33: \affiliation{
34: Department of Physics, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China
35: \vspace*{2cm}}
36:
37:
38:
39: \begin{abstract}
40: The topcolor-assisted technicolor (TC2) model predicts a number of neutral scalars
41: like the top-pion ($\pi^0_t$) and the top-Higgs ($h^0_t$). These scalars have
42: flavor-changing neutral-current (FCNC) top quark couplings, among which the top-charm
43: transition couplings may be sizable. Such FCNC couplings induce single top productions
44: associated with a neutral scalar at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
45: through the parton processes $cg \to t \pi_t^0$ and $cg \to t h_t^0$.
46: In this note we examine these productions and find their production rates
47: can exceed the $3\sigma$ sensitivity of the LHC in a large part of parameter space.
48: Since in the Standard Model and the minimal supersymmetric model
49: such rare productions have unobservably small production rates at the LHC,
50: these rare processes will serve as a good probe for the TC2 model.
51:
52: \end{abstract}
53:
54: \pacs{14.65.Ha, 12.60.Fr, 12.60.Jv}
55:
56: \maketitle
57: %\section{Introduction}
58: As the heaviest fermion in the Standard Model (SM), the top quark
59: may be a sensitive probe of new physics \cite{review}.
60: So far there remain plenty of room for new physics in top quark sector due to
61: the small statistics of the top quark events at the Fermilab
62: Tevatron collider \cite{top-mass}.
63: Since the upcoming Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN will produce
64: top quarks copiously and allow to scrutinize the top quark nature, the new physics
65: related to the top quark will be either uncovered or stringently constrained.
66:
67: One of the properties of the top quark in the Standard Model (SM)
68: is its extremely small flavor-changing neutral-current (FCNC) \cite{tcvh-sm}
69: interactions due to the GIM mechanism.
70: Thus, the observation of any FCNC top quark process would be a robust
71: evidence for new physics beyond the SM.
72: Actually, the FCNC top quark interactions can be significantly enhanced
73: in some new physics models, such as the popular minimal supersymmetric
74: model (MSSM) \cite{tcv-mssm,pptc-mssm1,pptc-mssm2}
75: and the topcolor-assisted technicolor (TC2) model \cite{tc-tc2}.
76:
77: The TC2 model predicts a number of neutral scalar bosons like the top-pions
78: and top-Higgs at the weak scale \cite{TC2}. These scalars
79: have FCNC top couplings at tree-level, among which the top-charm
80: FCNC couplings are most significant.
81: Such anomalous FCNC couplings will induce single top productions
82: associated with a neutral scalar at the LHC
83: through the parton processes $cg \to t \pi_t^0$ and $cg \to t h_t^0$.
84: In this note we examine these productions and figure out if their rates
85: can exceed the $3\sigma$ sensitivity of the LHC.
86: Since in the SM and the MSSM such rare productions
87: have unobservably small production rates at the LHC,
88: these rare processes will serve as a probe for the TC2 model
89: if their TC2 predictions can be above the $3\sigma$ sensitivity.
90: \vspace*{0.5cm}
91:
92: %\section{Calculations }
93: Before our calculations we recapitulate the basics of TC2 model.
94: The TC2 model \cite{TC2} combines technicolor
95: interaction with topcolor interaction, with the former being
96: responsible for electroweak symmetry breaking and the latter for
97: generating large top quark mass.
98: The top quark mass is generated from two sources, one is from
99: the extended technicolor (proportional to $\epsilon$) and the other
100: from the topcolor (proportional to $1-\epsilon$).
101: So the mass matrix of up-type quarks is composed of both
102: extended technicolor and topcolor contributions. The diagonalization
103: of this mass matrix will induce FCNC top quark interactions in the Yukawa
104: couplings which involve the composite scalars
105: respectively from topcolor and technicolor condensations.
106:
107: The top-charm FCNC couplings with the top-pion
108: and top-Higgs can be written as \cite{tc-tc2}
109: \begin{eqnarray}
110: {\cal{L}}_{FCNC} = \frac{(1 - \epsilon ) m_{t}}{\sqrt{2}F_{t}}
111: \frac{\sqrt{v^2-F_{t}^{2}}} {v}
112: (i K_{UL}^{tt *} K_{UR}^{tc} \bar{t}_L c_{R} \pi_t^0
113: + K_{UL}^{tt *} K_{UR}^{tc} \bar{t}_L c_{R} h_t^0 + h.c.) ,
114: \label{FCNH}
115: \end{eqnarray}
116: where the factor $\sqrt{v^2-F_t^2}/v$ ( $v \simeq 174$ GeV )
117: reflects the effect of the mixing between the top-pions and the
118: would-be Goldstone bosons \cite{9702265}.
119: $K_{UL}$ and $K_{UR}$ are the rotation matrices that
120: transform respectively the weak eigenstates of left-handed and right-handed
121: up-type quarks to their mass eigenstates, which can be parametrized as
122: \cite{tc-tc2}
123: \begin{equation}
124: K_{UL}^{tt} \simeq 1, \hspace{5mm}
125: K_{UR}^{tt}\simeq \frac{m_t^\prime}{m_t} = 1-\epsilon,\hspace{5mm}
126: K_{UR}^{tc}\leq \sqrt{1-(K_{UR}^{tt})^2}
127: =\sqrt{2\epsilon-\epsilon^{2}}, \label{FCSI}
128: \end{equation}
129: with $m_t^\prime$ denoting the topcolor contribution to the top
130: quark mass. In Eq.(\ref{FCNH}) we neglected the mixing between up
131: quark and top quark.
132:
133: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
134: \begin{figure}[bt]
135: \epsfig{file=fig1.ps,width=12cm}
136: \vspace*{-0.5cm}
137: \caption{Feynman diagrams for
138: parton-level process $c g \to t \pi_t^0$ and $c g \to t h_t^0$.}
139: \label{cgtpi}
140: \end{figure}
141: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
142:
143: As shown in Fig. \ref{cgtpi}, these FCNC interactions in Eq.(\ref{FCNH})
144: induce single top productions
145: associated with a top-pion or a top-Higgs at the LHC
146: through the parton processes $cg \to t \pi_t^0$ or
147: $cg \to t h_t^0$.
148: The amplitude for $cg\to t\pi_t^0$ is given by
149: \begin{equation}
150: {\cal M} = -\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}g_s\frac{m_t}{F_t}\frac{\sqrt{v^2-F_t^2}}{v}
151: K_{UR}^{tt*}K_{UR}^{tc}
152: \bar{u}_t \left[\frac{1}{\hat{s}}
153: (\p_slash_c +\p_slash_g)\gamma^\mu
154: +\frac{1}{\hat{u}-m_t^2} \gamma^\mu(\p_slash_t-\p_slash_g+m_t) \right]P_R u_c ,
155: \label{amp-pi}
156: \end{equation}
157: where $P_R=(1+\gamma_{5})/2$, and
158: $p_{t,c,g}$ are the momentum of top quark, charm quark and gluon, respectively.
159:
160: The hadronic cross section at the LHC is obtained by convoluting the
161: parton cross section with the parton distribution functions. In our
162: calculations we use CTEQ6L \cite{cteq} to generate the parton
163: distributions with the renormalization scale $\mu_R $ and the
164: factorization scale $\mu_F$ chosen to be $\mu_R = \mu_F = m_t + M_S$
165: ($ M_S$ denotes top-pion mass or top-Higgs mass).
166:
167: The parameters involved in our calculations are
168: the masses of the top-pions and top-Higgs,
169: the parameter $K_{UR}^{tc}$, the top-pion decay constant $F_t$
170: and the parameter $\epsilon$ which parametrizes the portion of
171: the extended-technicolor contribution to the top quark mass.
172: In our numerical calculations, we take $F_t=50$ GeV,
173: $\epsilon=0.1$, $K_{UL}^{tt}=1$, $K_{UR}^{tt}=0.9$ and retain
174: $K_{UR}^{tc} $ as a free parameter with a value less than
175: $\sqrt{2\epsilon-\epsilon^{2}}=0.43$.
176: The top quark mass is taken as $m_t=170.9$ GeV \cite{top-mass}.
177:
178: For the masses of the neutral top-pion and top-Higgs, current
179: constraints are rather weak.
180: Theoretically the top-pion masses are model-dependent and
181: are usually of a few hundred GeV \cite{TC2}. The top-Higgs
182: mass, as analysed in \cite{tc-tc2}, has a lower bound of about
183: $2m_t$, which however is an approximate analysis and the mass below
184: $t\bar t$ threshold is also possible \cite{9809470}.
185: Experimentally, the neutral top-pion mass can be constrained
186: if we assume the degeneracy of neutral and charged top-pion masses
187: (the mass splitting between the neutral top-pion and the charged
188: top-pion comes only from the electroweak interactions and thus
189: should be small). The charged top-pion mass is constrained
190: from the absence of $t \to \pi_t^+b$, which gives
191: a lower bound of 165 GeV \cite{t-bpion}, and also from
192: $R_b$ data, which yields a lower bound of about 250 GeV \cite{burdman}.
193: In our numerical results we will
194: show the dependence on the masses of neutral top-pion and top-Higgs.
195:
196: In the following we present some results for the hadronic production
197: cross section via $c g \to t \pi_t^0$. These results are also applicable
198: to the production through $c g \to t h_t^0$, with the top-pion mass replaced by
199: the top-Higgs mass.
200:
201: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
202: \begin{figure}[bt]
203: \epsfig{file=fig2.ps,width=12cm}
204: \vspace*{-0.5cm}
205: \caption{Hadronic cross section for the production via $c g \to t \pi_t^0$
206: at the LHC versus top-pion mass.}
207: \label{cgtpi1}
208: \end{figure}
209: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
210:
211: Fig.\ref{cgtpi1} shows that the hadronic cross section
212: versus top-pion mass for different values of $K_{UR}^{tc}$.
213: We see that the cross section increases with the increasing
214: $K_{UR}^{tc}$ since the cross section
215: is simply proportional to $(K_{UR}^{tc})^2$ as shown in
216: Eq.(\ref{amp-pi}).
217: As the top-pion mass increases, the cross section decreases.
218: The cross section is about several hundreds fb in most of the
219: parameter space.
220:
221: Due to the large QCD backgrounds at the LHC,
222: for the productions of $PP\to t\phi^0+X$ ($\phi^0$ is a neutral scalar
223: and can be top-pion or top-Higgs) we search for the final states
224: from the subsequent decays $t\to Wb \to \ell \nu b$ (
225: $ \ell=e,\mu$) and $\phi^0\to b\bar b$.
226: So the main SM background
227: is the production of $t \bar t$ and $Wb \bar b jj$, where one light jet
228: is mis-identified as a b-jet while the other light jet is not
229: detected if it goes along the pipeline or its transverse momentum is
230: too small.
231:
232: The observability of the signal at the LHC has been investigated
233: in the effective Lagrangian approach \cite{Aguilar-Saavedra:2004wm}.
234: Assuming a luminosity of $100$ fb$^{-1}$, we know from Table 2, Table 4
235: and Eq.(4) in \cite{Aguilar-Saavedra:2004wm} that the $3\sigma$ sensitivity
236: for the production of $PP\to t\phi^0+X$ is about 200 fb.
237: Although this sensitivity is based on the effective Lagrangian
238: approach and may be not perfectly applicable to a specified model,
239: we can take them as a rough criteria to estimate the observability of
240: these channels.
241:
242: To show the observability of the production of $PP\to t\pi^0_t+X$,
243: we plot in Fig.\ref{contour} the contour of the cross section of
244: the $3\sigma$ sensitivity (200 fb) in the plane of $K_{UR}^{tc}$ versus
245: $m_{\pi^0_t}$. We see that in a large part of the parameter space
246: the cross section can exceed the $3\sigma$ sensitivity.
247: As we mentioned earlier, the production $PP\to th+X$ is unobservably small
248: in the SM due to the extremely suppressed $h t\bar c$ coupling. In the
249: MSSM the $PP\to th+X$ has a rate lower than 10 fb \cite{pptc-mssm2} and
250: thus also inaccessible at the LHC.
251: So these rare processes will serve as a good probe for the TC2 model.
252:
253:
254: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
255: \begin{figure}[hbt]
256: \epsfig{file=fig3.ps,width=12cm}
257: \vspace*{-0.5cm}
258: \caption{The contour of
259: $3\sigma$ sensitivity (200 fb) for the cross section
260: of the production via $c g \to t \pi_t^0$
261: at the LHC in the plane
262: of $K_{UR}^{tc}$ versus top-pion mass.}
263: \label{contour}
264: \end{figure}
265: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
266:
267: In conclusion,
268: we examined the single top productions associated with a neutral scalor
269: (top-pion or top-Higgs) at the LHC in topcolor-assisted technicolor
270: model. We found that their production rates
271: can exceed the $3\sigma$ sensitivity of the LHC in a large part of
272: parameter space.
273: Since in the Standard Model and the minimal supersymmetric model
274: such rare productions have unobservably small production rates at the LHC,
275: these rare processes will serve as a good probe for the
276: topcolor-assisted technicolor model.
277:
278:
279: \begingroup\raggedright\begin{thebibliography}{99}
280:
281: \bibitem{review} See, e.g.,
282: D. Chakraborty, J. Konigsberg, D. Rainwater,
283: Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. {\bf 53}, 301 (2003);
284: E.~H.~Simmons, hep-ph/0211335;
285: C.-P. Yuan, hep-ph/0203088;
286: S. Willenbrock, hep-ph/0211067;
287: M. Beneke {\it et al.}, hep-ph/0003033;
288: C. T. Hill and S. J. Parke, \PRD49, 4454 (1994);
289: K. Whisnant, et al., \PRD56, 467 (1997);
290: K. Hikasa, et al., \PRD58, 114003 (1998).
291: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0303092;%%
292: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211335;%%
293: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0203088;%%
294: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211067;%%
295: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0003033;%%
296: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D49,4454;%%
297: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D56,467;%%
298: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D58,114003;%%
299:
300: \bibitem{top-mass} Tevatron Electroweak Working Group, hep-ex/0703034.
301: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0411188;%%
302: \bibitem{tcvh-sm}
303: G.~Eilam, J.~L.~Hewett and A.~Soni, \PRD44, 1473 (1991);
304: B.~Mele, S.~Petrarca and A.~Soddu, \PLB435, 401 (1998);
305: A.~Cordero-Cid, {\it et al.}, \PRD73, 094005 (2006).
306: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0411188;%%
307: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D44,1473;%%
308: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B435,401;%%
309:
310: \bibitem{tcv-mssm}
311: C.~S.~Li, R.~J.~Oakes and J.~M.~Yang, \PRD49, 293 (1994);
312: G.~Couture, C.~Hamzaoui and H.~Konig, \PRD52, 1713 (1995);
313: J.~L.~Lopez, D.~V.~Nanopoulos and R.~Rangarajan, \PRD56, 3100 (1997);
314: G.~M.~de Divitiis, R.~Petronzio and L.~Silvestrini, \NPB504, 45 (1997);
315: J.~M.~Yang, B.-L.~Young and X.~Zhang, \PRD58, 055001 (1998);
316: C.~S.~Li, L.~L.~Yang and L.~G.~Jin, \PLB599, 92 (2004);
317: M.~Frank and I.~Turan, \PRD74, 073014 (2006);
318: %%
319: J.~M.~Yang and C.~S.~Li, \PRD49, 3412 (1994);
320: J.~Guasch and J.~Sola, \NPB562, 3 (1999);
321: G. Eilam, {\it et al.}, \PLB510, 227 (2001).
322: %%
323: J.L. Diaz-Cruz, H.-J. He, C.-P. Yuan \PLB179,530 (2002);
324: D. Delepine and S. Khalil, \PLB599, 62 (2004).
325: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D49,293;%%
326: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D52,1713;%%
327: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D56,3100;%%
328: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B504,45;%%
329: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D58,055001;%%
330: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B599,92;%%
331: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D74,073014;%%
332: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D49,3412;%%
333: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B562,3;%%
334: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B510,227;%%
335: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B179,530;%%
336: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B599,62;%%
337:
338: \bibitem{pptc-mssm1}
339: G.~Eilam, M.~Frank and I.~Turan, \PRD74, 035012 (2006).
340: J.~J.~Liu, C.~S.~Li, L.~L.~Yang and L.~G.~Jin, \NPB705, 3 (2005);
341: J. Guasch, {\it et al.}, hep-ph/0601218;
342: J. M. Yang, Annals Phys. {\bf 316}, 529 (2005);
343: J. Cao, Z. Xiong and J. M. Yang, \NPB651, 87 (2003).
344: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D74,035012;%%
345: %%CITATION = NUPHA, B705,3;%%
346: %%CITATION = HEP-PH, 0601218;%%
347: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0409351;%%
348: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B651,87;%%
349:
350: \bibitem{pptc-mssm2} J.~Cao, {\it et al.}, \PRD74, 031701 (2006); \PRD75, 075021 (2007).
351: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D74,031701;%%
352: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D75,075021;%%
353:
354: \bibitem{tc-tc2}
355: H. J. He and C. P. Yuan, \PRL83, 28(1999);
356: G. Burdman, \PRL83,2888(1999);
357: J. Cao, Z. Xiong, J. M. Yang, \PRD67, 071701 (2003);
358: C.~Yue, {\it et al.}, \PLB 496, 93 (2000);
359: J. Cao, {\it et al.}, \PRD70, 114035 (2004);
360: F. Larios and F. Penunuri, \JPG30, 895(2004);
361: J. Cao, {\it et al.} \EPJC41, 381 (2005); \PRD76, 014004 (2007);
362: %%CITATION = PRLTA,83,28;%%
363: %%CITATION = PRLTA,83,2888%%
364: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D67,071701;%%
365: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B496,301;%%
366: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D70,114035;%%
367: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311056;%%
368: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311166;%%
369: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D76,014004;%%
370:
371: \bibitem{TC2} C. T. Hill, \PLB345, 483 (1995);
372: K. Lane and E. Eichten, \PLB352, 382 (1995);
373: K. Lane and E. Eichten, \PLB433, 96 (1998);
374: W.~A.~Bardeen, C.~T.~Hill, M.~Lindner, \PRD41, 1647 (1990);
375: G. Cvetic, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 71}, 513 (1999).
376: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B345,483;%%
377: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B352,382;%%
378: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B433,96;%%
379:
380: \bibitem{9702265} G. Burdman, D. Kominis, \PLB403, 107 (1997);
381: W. Loniaz, T. Takuch, \PRD62, 055005 (1999).
382:
383:
384: \bibitem{cteq} J.~Pumplin, {\it et al.}, JHEP {\bf 0602}, 032 (2006).
385: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0512167;%%
386:
387: \bibitem{9809470} R. S. Chivukula, B. Dobrescu, H. Georgi, C. T. Hill,
388: \PRD59, 075003 (1999).
389: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D59,075003;%%
390:
391: \bibitem{t-bpion} B.~Balaji, \PLB393, 89 (1997).
392: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B393,89;%%
393:
394: \bibitem{burdman} G.~Burdman and D.~Kominis, \PLB403, 101 (1997);
395: W.~Loinaz and T.~Takeuchi, \PRD60, 015005 (1999).
396: C.~Yue, Y.~P.~Kuang, X.~Wang and W.~Li, \PRD62, 055005 (2000).
397: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B403,101;%%
398: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D60,015005;%%
399: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D62,055005;%%
400:
401: \bibitem{Aguilar-Saavedra:2004wm}
402: J.~A.~Aguilar-Saavedra, Acta Phys.\ Polon.\ B {\bf 35}, 2695 (2004);
403: J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, G. C. Branco, \PLB495, 347 (2000)
404: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0409342;%%
405: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B495,347;%%
406:
407:
408: \end{thebibliography}
409: \endgroup
410:
411: \end{document}
412: