1: #LyX 1.4.4 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/

2: \lyxformat 245

3: \begin_document

4: \begin_header

5: \textclass article

6: \language english

7: \inputencoding auto

8: \fontscheme default

9: \graphics default

10: \paperfontsize default

11: \spacing onehalf

12: \papersize a4paper

13: \use_geometry true

14: \use_amsmath 1

15: \cite_engine basic

16: \use_bibtopic false

17: \paperorientation portrait

18: \leftmargin 3cm

19: \topmargin 3cm

20: \rightmargin 2.5cm

21: \bottommargin 3cm

22: \secnumdepth 3

23: \tocdepth 3

24: \paragraph_separation indent

25: \defskip medskip

26: \quotes_language english

27: \papercolumns 1

28: \papersides 1

29: \paperpagestyle default

30: \tracking_changes false

31: \output_changes false

32: \end_header

33: 

34: \begin_body

35: 

36: \begin_layout Title

37: INTERPRETATIONS OF OCTONION WAVE EQUATIONS

38: \end_layout

39: 

40: \begin_layout Author

41: P.

42:  S.

43:  Bisht

44: \begin_inset Formula $^{\text{(1)}}$

45: \end_inset

46: 

47:  , Bimal Pandey

48: \begin_inset Formula $^{\text{(1)}}$

49: \end_inset

50: 

51:  and O.

52:  P.

53:  S.

54:  Negi

55: \begin_inset Formula $^{\text{(2)}}$

56: \end_inset

57: 

58:  

59: \begin_inset Foot

60: status open

61: 

62: \begin_layout Standard

63: Permanent Address- Department of Physics, Kumaun University, S.

64:  S.

65:  J.

66:  Campus, Almora -263601 (U.A.) INDIA

67: \end_layout

68: 

69: \end_inset

70: 

71: 

72: \end_layout

73: 

74: \begin_layout Address

75: \align center

76: \begin_inset Formula $^{\text{(1)}}$

77: \end_inset

78: 

79: Department of Physics,

80: \newline

81:  Kumaun University, 

82: \newline

83: S.

84:  S.

85:  J.

86:  Campus,

87: \newline

88:  Almora - 263601 (Uttarakhand) India

89: \end_layout

90: 

91: \begin_layout Address

92: \align center

93: \begin_inset Formula $^{\text{(2)}}$

94: \end_inset

95: 

96: Institute of Theoretical Physics,

97: \newline

98:  Chinese Academy of Sciences

99: \newline

100:  KITP Building

101:  Room No.- 6304

102: \newline

103: Hai Dian Qu Zhong Guan Chun Dong Lu

104: \newline

105:  55 Hao , Beijing - 100080,

106:  P.R.China 

107: \end_layout

108: 

109: \begin_layout Address

110: \align center

111: Email - ps_bisht123@ rediffmail.com,

112: \newline

113: ops_negi @ yahoo.co.in

114: \end_layout

115: 

116: \begin_layout Abstract

117: The interpretations of octonion wave equations in eight dimensional space-time

118:  have been discussed.

119:  We have made an attempt to discuss the octonion field equation as the equation

120:  of motion for particles carrying simultaneously electric and magnetic charges

121:  (i.e.

122:  dyons) in external and internal spaces respectively.

123:  It has been concluded that the component of octonion potential wave equations

124:  behaves neither the generalized electromagnetic fields of monopoles nor

125:  the dyons.

126:  Rather, they have the mixed behaviour of electromagnetic fields associated

127:  with the electric and magnetic charges in external and internal spaces.

128:  We have also made an attempt to investigate the split octonion wave equation

129:  and its interpretation in classical electrodynamics and accordingly the

130:  consistent and compact forms of eight-dimensional potential and current

131:  equation of dyons are obtained in terms of Zorn's vector matrix realization

132:  of split octonions.Visualizing the external four space as the localization

133:  space for tachyons, it is shown that the split octonion wave equation reduces

134:  to the Maxwell's equation (field equation) for bradyons in 

135: \begin_inset Formula $R^{4}$

136: \end_inset

137: 

138: - space as well as that for tachyons in 

139: \begin_inset Formula $T^{4}$

140: \end_inset

141: 

142: - space in the absence of other.

143: \end_layout

144: 

145: \begin_layout Section

146: INTRODUCTION

147: \end_layout

148: 

149: \begin_layout Standard

150: Octonions were first introduced in Physics by Jordon, Von Neuman and Wigner

151: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-1}

152: 

153: \end_inset

154: 

155: , who investigated a new finite Hilbert space, on replacing the complex

156:  numbers by Octonions

157: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-2}

158: 

159: \end_inset

160: 

161: .

162:  According to celebrated Hurwitz theorem 

163: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-3}

164: 

165: \end_inset

166: 

167:  there exits four-division algebra consisting of 

168: \begin_inset Formula $\mathbb{R}$

169: \end_inset

170: 

171:  (real numbers), 

172: \begin_inset Formula $\mathbb{C}$

173: \end_inset

174: 

175:  (complex numbers), 

176: \begin_inset Formula $\mathbb{H}$

177: \end_inset

178: 

179:  (quaternions) and 

180: \begin_inset Formula $\mathcal{O}$

181: \end_inset

182: 

183:  (octonions).

184:  All four algebras are alternative with antisymmetric associators.

185:  In 1961 Pais 

186: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-4}

187: 

188: \end_inset

189: 

190:  pointed out a striking similarity between the algebra of interactions and

191:  the split octonion algebra.

192:  Recently, some attention has been directed to octonions in theoretical

193:  physics with the hope of extending the 3+1 space-time framework of the

194:  theory to eight dimensions to accommodate the ever increasing quantum numbers

195:  and internal symmetries assigned to elementary particles and gauge fields.

196:  A lot of literature is available 

197: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-5,key-6,key-7,key-8,key-9,key-10,key-11}

198: 

199: \end_inset

200: 

201:  on the applications of octonions to interpret wave equation, Dirac equation,

202:  and the extension of octonion non-associativity to physical theories.

203:  It is assumed there that octonion wave equation contains four-dimensional

204:  internal space of mass parameters while the external four dimensional space

205:  has been interpreted as the four generators of fermions within the quark-lepton

206:  symmetry.

207:  The ingenious work, in this direction is done by Günaydin and Gürsey 

208: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-12,key-13}

209: 

210: \end_inset

211: 

212: , to formulate quark models and colour gauge theory in terms of split octonions.

213:  The 

214: \begin_inset Formula $SU\,(3)$

215: \end_inset

216: 

217:  group appears as the automorphism group of octonion representation leaving

218:  the complex subspace and the scalar product invariant.

219:  This approach is extended by many 

220: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-14,key-15,key-16}

221: 

222: \end_inset

223: 

224:  to investigate the role of octonions and division algebra in unified gauge

225:  theories, higher dimensional theories of supersymmetry and super strings.

226:  Octonions are also used by Buoncristiani 

227: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-17}

228: 

229: \end_inset

230: 

231:  in writing Yang-Mill's field equation in a simpler form.

232:  The extension of quaternion matrices to octonions for their interpretation

233:  in non-Riemannian geometry is described by Marques et al in a series of

234:  papers 

235: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-18,key-19,key-20,key-21,key-22}

236: 

237: \end_inset

238: 

239: .

240:  

241: \end_layout

242: 

243: \begin_layout Standard

244: During the past few years, there has been considerable interest in higher-dimens

245: ional kinematical models 

246: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-23,key-24}

247: 

248: \end_inset

249: 

250:  for a proper and unified representation of relativistic object, bradyonic

251:  as well as tachyonic (including those with internal structure).

252:  It has been speculated 

253: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-25,key-26,key-27}

254: 

255: \end_inset

256: 

257:  that the problem of representation and localization of tachyonic objects

258:  may be solved only with the extension of four-dimensional Minkowski space

259:  to higher-dimensional space-time.

260:  It has already been discussed in a series of papers 

261: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-28,key-29,key-30,key-31,key-32,key-33}

262: 

263: \end_inset

264: 

265:  that the true localization space for the representation of tachyons is

266:  

267: \begin_inset Formula $T^{4}-$

268: \end_inset

269: 

270:  space with one space and three time coordinates while that for bradyons

271:  is the usual 

272: \begin_inset Formula $R^{4}-$

273: \end_inset

274: 

275:  space with one time and three space coordinates.

276:  The unified eight dimensional space time has been discussed earlier 

277: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-32,key-33}

278: 

279: \end_inset

280: 

281:  as the unified space of bradyons and tachyons i.e.

282:  

283: \begin_inset Formula $R^{8}=R^{4}\,\bigcup\, T^{4}$

284: \end_inset

285: 

286: .

287:  The two 

288: \begin_inset Formula $R^{4}-$

289: \end_inset

290: 

291:  and 

292: \begin_inset Formula $T^{4}-$

293: \end_inset

294: 

295: localization spaces are considered as external (internal) space for bradyons

296:  ( tachyons) and vice versa.

297:  Moreover, the built-in duality associated with the combination of symmetries

298:  of 

299: \begin_inset Formula $R^{4}-$

300: \end_inset

301: 

302:  and 

303: \begin_inset Formula $T^{4}-$

304: \end_inset

305: 

306:  subspaces is useful to understand the problem of quark confinement in quantum

307:  chromodynamics where the role of tricolors would be played by three time

308:  coordinates for bradyons and those of three space coordinates for tachyons.

309: \end_layout

310: 

311: \begin_layout Standard

312: In order to interpret octonion wave equations in eight dimensional space-

313:  time, in the present paper, we have made an attempt to discuss the octonion

314:  field equation as the equation of motion for particles carrying simultaneously

315:  electric and magnetic (monopole 

316: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-34}

317: 

318: \end_inset

319: 

320:  ) charges (i.e.

321:  dyons 

322: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-35}

323: 

324: \end_inset

325: 

326:  ).

327:  Starting with the regularity condition in the octonion field equation we

328:  have developed consistent and compact formulation of eight-dimensional

329:  potential and current equations of dyons.

330:  It has been demonstrated that the component of octonion potential wave

331:  equations behaves neither the generalized electromagnetic fields of monopoles

332:  nor the dyons.

333:  Rather, they have the mixed behaviour of electromagnetic fields associated

334:  with the electric and magnetic charges in external and internal spaces.

335: \end_layout

336: 

337: \begin_layout Standard

338: After decomposing the octonion wave equation in to two quaternion-valued

339:  wave equations, it is shown that the two different spaces demonstrate the

340:  separate wave equations for electromagnetic fields.

341:  Visualizing the external four spaces as the localization space for bradyons

342:  and the internal space as the localization space for tachyons, it is shown

343:  that the octonion wave equation reduces to the Maxwell's equation (field

344:  equation) for bradyons in 

345: \begin_inset Formula $R^{4}$

346: \end_inset

347: 

348:  - space as well as that for tachyons in 

349: \begin_inset Formula $T^{4}$

350: \end_inset

351: 

352: - space.

353:  It has also been emphasized that the quaternionic decomposition of octonion

354:  wave equation gives rise to the equations of dyons and tachyonic dyons,

355:  when we take them as combination of bi-quaternion instead of real quaternion

356:  in external and internal four-dimensional spaces of eight dimensional space

357:  time.

358: \end_layout

359: 

360: \begin_layout Standard

361: Then we have made an attempt to investigate the split octonion wave equation

362:  and its interpretation in classical electrodynamics.

363:  Split octonion electrodynamics has been deduced in terms of Zorn's vector

364:  matrix realization by describing electrodynamics potential, current and

365:  other dynamical quantities as octonion variables.

366:  Also the consistent and compact forms of eight-dimensional potential and

367:  current equation of dyons are obtained in terms of Zorn's vector matrix

368:  realization of split octonions.

369:  It has been shown that the octonion valued potential wave equation behaves

370:  neither the generalized electromagnetic fields of monopoles nor of the

371:  dyons.

372:  Rather, they have the mixed behaviour of electromagnetic fields associated

373:  with the electric and magnetic charges in external and internal spaces.

374:  At last, it is shown that split octonion Zorn's vector realization reproduces

375:  two different spaces to demonstrate the separate wave equations for electromagn

376: etic fields.

377:  Visualizing the external four space as the localization space for tachyons,

378:  it is shown that the octonion wave equation, when expressed in terms of

379:  split octonions, reduces to the Maxwell's equation (field equation) for

380:  bradyons in 

381: \begin_inset Formula $R^{4}$

382: \end_inset

383: 

384: - space as well as that for tachyons in 

385: \begin_inset Formula $T^{4}$

386: \end_inset

387: 

388: - space in the absence of other.

389: \end_layout

390: 

391: \begin_layout Section

392: OCTONION DEFINITION

393: \end_layout

394: 

395: \begin_layout Standard

396: An octonion 

397: \begin_inset Formula $x$

398: \end_inset

399: 

400:  is expressed as a set of eight real numbers

401: \end_layout

402: 

403: \begin_layout Standard

404: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

405: x & = & e_{0}x_{0}+e_{1}x_{1}+e_{2}x_{2}+e_{3}x_{3}+e_{4}x_{4}+e_{5}x_{5}+e_{6}x_{6}+e_{7}x_{7}=e_{0}x_{0}+\sum_{A=1}^{7}e_{A}x_{A}\label{eq:1}\end{eqnarray}

406: 

407: \end_inset

408: 

409: where 

410: \begin_inset Formula $e_{A}(A=1,2,...,7)$

411: \end_inset

412: 

413:  are imaginary octonion units and 

414: \begin_inset Formula $e_{0}$

415: \end_inset

416: 

417:  is the multiplicative unit element.

418:  Set of octets 

419: \begin_inset Formula $(e_{0},e_{1},e_{2},e_{3},e_{4},e_{5},e_{6},e_{7})$

420: \end_inset

421: 

422:  are known as the octonion basis elements and satisfy the following multiplicati

423: on rules

424: \end_layout

425: 

426: \begin_layout Standard

427: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

428: e_{0}=1;\,\, & e_{0}e_{A}=e_{A}e_{0}=e_{A}; & \,\,\,\, e_{A}e_{B}=-\delta_{AB}e_{0}+f_{ABC}e_{C}.\,\,(A,B,C=1,2,.....,7)\label{eq:2}\end{eqnarray}

429: 

430: \end_inset

431: 

432: The structure constants 

433: \begin_inset Formula $f_{ABC}$

434: \end_inset

435: 

436:  is completely antisymmetric and takes the value 

437: \begin_inset Formula $1$

438: \end_inset

439: 

440:  for following combinations,

441: \end_layout

442: 

443: \begin_layout Standard

444: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

445: f_{ABC}= & +1; & \forall(ABC)=(123),\,(471)\,(257)\,(165)\,(624)\,(543)\,(736).\label{eq:3}\end{eqnarray}

446: 

447: \end_inset

448: 

449: It is to be noted that the summation convention is used for repeated indices.

450:  Here the octonion algebra 

451: \begin_inset Formula $\mathcal{O}$

452: \end_inset

453: 

454:  is described over the algebra of rational numbers having the vector space

455:  of dimension 

456: \begin_inset Formula $8$

457: \end_inset

458: 

459: .

460:  We now get the following relations among octonion basis elements 

461: \end_layout

462: 

463: \begin_layout Standard

464: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

465: \left[e_{A},\,\, e_{B}\right] & = & 2\, f_{ABC}\, e_{C};\nonumber \\

466: \left\{ e_{A},\,\, e_{B}\right\}  & = & -2\,\delta_{AB}e_{0};\nonumber \\

467: e_{A}(\, e_{B}\, e_{C}) & \neq & (e_{A}\, e_{B}\,)\, e_{C}\label{eq:4}\end{eqnarray}

468: 

469: \end_inset

470: 

471: where brackets 

472: \begin_inset Formula $[\,\,]$

473: \end_inset

474: 

475:  and 

476: \begin_inset Formula $\{\,\,\}$

477: \end_inset

478: 

479:  are used respectively for commutation and the anti commutation relations

480:  while 

481: \begin_inset Formula $\delta_{AB}$

482: \end_inset

483: 

484:  is the usual Kronecker delta-Dirac symbol.

485:  Octonion conjugate is defined as

486: \end_layout

487: 

488: \begin_layout Standard

489: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

490: \overline{x} & = & e_{0}x_{0}-e_{1}x_{1}+-e_{2}x_{2}+-e_{3}x_{3}-e_{4}x_{4}-e_{5}x_{5}-e_{6}x_{6}-e_{7}x_{7}=e_{0}x_{0}-\sum_{A=1}^{7}e_{A}x_{A}\label{eq:5}\end{eqnarray}

491: 

492: \end_inset

493: 

494: where we have used the conjugates of basis elements as 

495: \begin_inset Formula $\overline{e_{0}}=e_{0}$

496: \end_inset

497: 

498:  and 

499: \begin_inset Formula $\overline{e_{A}}=-e_{A}$

500: \end_inset

501: 

502: .

503:  Hence an octonion can be decomposed in terms of its scalar 

504: \begin_inset Formula $(Sc(x))$

505: \end_inset

506: 

507:  and vector 

508: \begin_inset Formula $(Vec(x))$

509: \end_inset

510: 

511:  parts as 

512: \end_layout

513: 

514: \begin_layout Standard

515: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

516: Sc(x) & = & \frac{1}{2}(\, x\,+\,\overline{x}\,);\,\,\,\,\,\, Vec(x)=\frac{1}{2}(\, x\,-\,\overline{x}\,)=\sum_{A=1}^{7}\, e_{A}x_{A}.\label{eq:6}\end{eqnarray}

517: 

518: \end_inset

519: 

520: Conjugates of product of two octonions and its own are described as

521: \end_layout

522: 

523: \begin_layout Standard

524: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

525: \overline{(x\, y)}= & \overline{y}\,\,\overline{x};\,\,\,\,\,\, & \overline{(\overline{x})}=x.\label{eq:7}\end{eqnarray}

526: 

527: \end_inset

528: 

529: while the scalar product of two octonions is defined as 

530: \end_layout

531: 

532: \begin_layout Standard

533: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

534: \left\langle x\,,\, y\right\rangle  & =\frac{1}{2}(x\,\overline{y}+y\,\overline{x})=\frac{1}{2}(\overline{x}\, y+\overline{y}\, x)= & \sum_{\alpha=0}^{7}\, x_{\alpha}\, y_{\alpha}.\label{eq:8}\end{eqnarray}

535: 

536: \end_inset

537: 

538: The norm 

539: \begin_inset Formula $N(x)$

540: \end_inset

541: 

542:  and inverse 

543: \begin_inset Formula $x^{-1}$

544: \end_inset

545: 

546: (for a nonzero 

547: \begin_inset Formula $x$

548: \end_inset

549: 

550: ) of an octonion are respectively defined as

551: \end_layout

552: 

553: \begin_layout Standard

554: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

555: N(x)=x\,\overline{x}=\overline{x}\, x & = & \sum_{\alpha=0}^{7}\, x_{\alpha}^{2}.e_{0};\nonumber \\

556: x^{-1} & = & \frac{\overline{x}}{N(x)}\,\Longrightarrow x\, x^{-1}=x^{-1}\, x=1.\label{eq:9}\end{eqnarray}

557: 

558: \end_inset

559: 

560: The norm 

561: \begin_inset Formula $N(x)$

562: \end_inset

563: 

564:  of an octonion 

565: \begin_inset Formula $x$

566: \end_inset

567: 

568:  is zero if 

569: \begin_inset Formula $x=0$

570: \end_inset

571: 

572: , and is always positive otherwise.

573:  It also satisfies the following property of normed algebra

574: \end_layout

575: 

576: \begin_layout Standard

577: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

578: N(x\, y)= & N(x)\, N(y)= & N(y)\, N(x).\label{eq:10}\end{eqnarray}

579: 

580: \end_inset

581: 

582: Equation (

583: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:4}

584: 

585: \end_inset

586: 

587: ) shows that octonions are not associative in nature and thus do not form

588:  the group in their usual form.

589:  Non-associativity of octonion algebra 

590: \begin_inset Formula $\mathcal{O}$

591: \end_inset

592: 

593:  is provided by the associator 

594: \begin_inset Formula $(x,y,z)=(xy)z-x(yz)\,\,\forall x,y,z\in\mathcal{O}$

595: \end_inset

596: 

597:  defined for any 

598: \begin_inset Formula $3$

599: \end_inset

600: 

601:  octonions.

602:  If the associator is totally antisymmetric for exchanges of any 

603: \begin_inset Formula $2$

604: \end_inset

605: 

606:  variables, i.e.

607:  

608: \begin_inset Formula $(x,y,z)=-(z,y,x)=-(y,x,z)=-(x,z,y)$

609: \end_inset

610: 

611: , then the algebra is called alternative.

612:  Hence, the octonion algebra is neither commutative nor associative but,

613:  is alternative.

614: \end_layout

615: 

616: \begin_layout Section

617: OCTONION WAVE EQUATION

618: \end_layout

619: 

620: \begin_layout Standard

621: In order to write the Octonion wave equation, let us define the differential

622:  octonion 

623: \begin_inset Formula $D$

624: \end_inset

625: 

626:  as

627: \end_layout

628: 

629: \begin_layout Standard

630: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

631: D & = & \sum_{\mu=0}^{7}e_{\mu}D_{\mu}\label{eq:11}\end{eqnarray}

632: 

633: \end_inset

634: 

635: where 

636: \begin_inset Formula $D_{\mu}$

637: \end_inset

638: 

639:  are described as the components of differential operator in eight dimensional

640:  representation.

641:  Here we assume the eight - dimensional space as the combination of two

642:  ( external and internal ) four-dimensional spaces.

643:  As such, we describe a function of octonion variable as

644: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

645: \mathcal{F}(X) & =\sum_{\mu=0}^{7} & e_{\mu}f_{\mu}(X)=f_{0}+e_{1}f_{1}+e_{2}f_{2}+.....+e_{7}f_{7}\label{eq:12}\end{eqnarray}

646: 

647: \end_inset

648: 

649: where 

650: \begin_inset Formula $f_{\mu}$

651: \end_inset

652: 

653:  are scalar functions.

654:  Since octonions are neither commutative nor associative, one has to be

655:  very careful to multiply the octonion either from left or from right in

656:  terms of regularity conditions.

657:  As such, a function 

658: \begin_inset Formula $\mathcal{F}(X)$

659: \end_inset

660: 

661:  of an octonion variable 

662: \begin_inset Formula $X={\displaystyle \sum_{\mu=0}^{7}e_{\mu}X_{\mu}}$

663: \end_inset

664: 

665:  is left regular at 

666: \begin_inset Formula $X$

667: \end_inset

668: 

669:  if and only if 

670: \begin_inset Formula $\mathcal{F}(X)$

671: \end_inset

672: 

673:  satisfies the condition

674: \end_layout

675: 

676: \begin_layout Standard

677: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

678: D\mathcal{F}(X) & = & 0.\label{eq:13}\end{eqnarray}

679: 

680: \end_inset

681: 

682: Similarly, a function 

683: \begin_inset Formula $G(X)$

684: \end_inset

685: 

686:  is a right regular if and only if

687: \end_layout

688: 

689: \begin_layout Standard

690: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

691: G(X)D & = & 0\label{eq:14}\end{eqnarray}

692: 

693: \end_inset

694: 

695: where 

696: \begin_inset Formula $G(X)=g_{0}+g_{1}e_{1}+g_{2}e_{2}+.....+g_{7}e_{7}.$

697: \end_inset

698: 

699:  Then we get 

700: \end_layout

701: 

702: \begin_layout Standard

703: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

704: D\mathcal{F} & = & I_{0}+I_{1}e_{1}+I_{2}e_{2}+I_{3}e_{3}+I_{4}e_{4}+I_{5}e_{5}+I_{6}e_{6}+I_{7}e_{7}\label{eq:15}\end{eqnarray}

705: 

706: \end_inset

707: 

708: where

709: \end_layout

710: 

711: \begin_layout Standard

712: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

713: I_{0} & = & \partial_{0}f_{0}-\partial_{1}f_{1}-\partial_{2}f_{2}-\partial_{3}f_{3}-\partial_{4}f_{4}-\partial_{5}f_{5}-\partial_{6}f_{6}-\partial_{7}f_{7};\nonumber \\

714: I_{1} & = & \partial_{0}f_{1}+\partial_{1}f_{0}+\partial_{2}f_{3}-\partial_{3}f_{2}+\partial_{6}f_{5}-\partial_{5}f_{6}-\partial_{7}f_{4}+\partial_{4}f_{7};\nonumber \\

715: I_{2} & = & \partial_{0}f_{2}+\partial_{2}f_{0}+\partial_{3}f_{1}-\partial_{1}f_{3}+\partial_{4}f_{6}-\partial_{6}f_{4}-\partial_{7}f_{5}+\partial_{5}f_{7};\nonumber \\

716: I_{3} & = & \partial_{0}f_{3}+\partial_{3}f_{0}+\partial_{1}f_{2}-\partial_{2}f_{1}+\partial_{6}f_{7}-\partial_{7}f_{6}+\partial_{5}f_{4}-\partial_{4}f_{5};\nonumber \\

717: I_{4} & = & \partial_{0}f_{4}+\partial_{4}f_{0}+\partial_{3}f_{5}-\partial_{5}f_{3}-\partial_{2}f_{6}+\partial_{6}f_{2}-\partial_{1}f_{7}+\partial_{7}f_{1};\nonumber \\

718: I_{5} & = & \partial_{0}f_{5}+\partial_{5}f_{0}+\partial_{1}f_{6}-\partial_{6}f_{1}+\partial_{7}f_{2}-\partial_{2}f_{7}-\partial_{3}f_{4}+\partial_{4}f_{3};\nonumber \\

719: I_{6} & = & \partial_{0}f_{6}+\partial_{6}f_{0}-\partial_{1}f_{5}+\partial_{5}f_{1}+\partial_{2}f_{4}-\partial_{4}f_{2}-\partial_{3}f_{7}+\partial_{7}f_{3};\nonumber \\

720: I_{7} & = & \partial_{0}f_{7}+\partial_{7}f_{0}+\partial_{1}f_{4}-\partial_{4}f_{1}+\partial_{2}f_{5}-\partial_{5}f_{2}-\partial_{6}f_{3}+\partial_{3}f_{6}.\label{eq:16}\end{eqnarray}

721: 

722: \end_inset

723: 

724: The regularity condition (

725: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:13}

726: 

727: \end_inset

728: 

729: ) may now be considered as homogeneous octonion wave equation for octonion

730:  variables without sources.

731:  On the other hand, equation (

732: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:15}

733: 

734: \end_inset

735: 

736: ) is considered as the inhomogeneous wave equation 

737: \end_layout

738: 

739: \begin_layout Standard

740: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

741: D\mathcal{F} & = & I\label{eq:17}\end{eqnarray}

742: 

743: \end_inset

744: 

745: where 

746: \begin_inset Formula $I$

747: \end_inset

748: 

749:  is again an octonion.

750:  Similarly, we may also write the homogeneous as well as inhomogeneous octonion

751:  wave equations on using the right regularity condition (

752: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:14}

753: 

754: \end_inset

755: 

756: ).

757:  We may now interpret these octonion wave equations as the classical wave

758:  (field) equations of physical variables.

759: \end_layout

760: 

761: \begin_layout Subsection

762: POTENTIAL EQUATION FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS WITH SOURCES

763: \end_layout

764: 

765: \begin_layout Standard

766: Let us consider the case of generalized electromagnetic fields of dyons

767:  (particles carrying simultaneous existence of electric and magnetic charges).

768:  We may now define an octonion valued potential, in eight dimensional formalism

769:  as the combinations of two four-dimensional spaces, as follows

770: \end_layout

771: 

772: \begin_layout Standard

773: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

774: \emptyset & =\sum_{\mu=0}^{7} & e_{\mu}\emptyset_{\mu}=\sum_{\mu=0}^{3}e_{\mu}A_{\mu}+\sum_{\nu=4}^{7}e_{\nu}B_{\nu};\label{eq:18}\end{eqnarray}

775: 

776: \end_inset

777: 

778: where 

779: \begin_inset Formula $\emptyset$

780: \end_inset

781: 

782:  is the octonion potential and 

783: \begin_inset Formula $A_{\mu}$

784: \end_inset

785: 

786:  and 

787: \begin_inset Formula $B_{\nu}$

788: \end_inset

789: 

790: are 

791: \family roman

792: \series medium

793: \shape up

794: \size normal

795: \emph off

796: \bar no

797: \noun off

798: \color none

799: assumed 

800: \family default

801: \series default

802: \shape default

803: \size default

804: \emph default

805: \bar default

806: \noun default

807: \color inherit

808: respectively

809: \family roman

810: \series medium

811: \shape up

812: \size normal

813: \emph off

814: \bar no

815: \noun off

816: \color none

817:  as 

818: \family default

819: \series default

820: \shape default

821: \size default

822: \emph default

823: \bar default

824: \noun default

825: \color inherit

826: the electric and magnetic four - potentials associated with the electric

827:  and magnetic charges of dyons 

828: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-36}

829: 

830: \end_inset

831: 

832: .

833:  As such, we may write the wave equation for octonion potential variable

834:  for simultaneous existence of electric and magnetic charges on a particle

835:  (namely dyons) in the following manner ,

836: \end_layout

837: 

838: \begin_layout Standard

839: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

840: \overline{D}\emptyset & = & F\label{eq:19}\end{eqnarray}

841: 

842: \end_inset

843: 

844: where

845: \end_layout

846: 

847: \begin_layout Standard

848: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

849: \overline{D} & = & F\sum_{\mu=0}^{7}\overline{e_{\mu}}\, D_{\mu}=e_{0}D_{0}-\sum_{A=1}^{7}e_{A}D_{A};\,\,\,\,\,\, F=\sum_{\mu=0}^{7}F_{\mu}e_{\mu}.\label{eq:20}\end{eqnarray}

850: 

851: \end_inset

852: 

853: The coefficients of octonion 

854: \begin_inset Formula $F$

855: \end_inset

856: 

857:  are then given by 

858: \end_layout

859: 

860: \begin_layout Standard

861: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

862: F_{0} & = & \partial_{0}\emptyset_{0}+\partial_{1}\emptyset_{1}+\partial_{2}\emptyset_{2}+\partial_{3}\emptyset_{3}+\partial_{4}\emptyset_{4}+\partial_{5}\emptyset_{5}+\partial_{6}\emptyset_{6}+\partial_{7}\emptyset_{7};\nonumber \\

863: F_{1} & = & \partial_{0}\emptyset_{1}-\partial_{1}\emptyset_{0}+\partial_{3}\emptyset_{2}-\partial_{2}\emptyset_{3}+\partial_{7}\emptyset_{4}-\partial_{4}\emptyset_{7}+\partial_{5}\emptyset_{6}-\partial_{6}\emptyset_{5};\nonumber \\

864: F_{2} & = & \partial_{0}\emptyset_{2}-\partial_{2}\emptyset_{0}+\partial_{1}\emptyset_{3}-\partial_{3}\emptyset_{1}+\partial_{6}\emptyset_{4}-\partial_{4}\emptyset_{6}+\partial_{7}\emptyset_{5}-\partial_{5}\emptyset_{7};\nonumber \\

865: F_{3} & = & \partial_{0}\emptyset_{3}-\partial_{3}\emptyset_{0}+\partial_{2}\emptyset_{1}-\partial_{1}\emptyset_{2}+\partial_{4}\emptyset_{5}-\partial_{5}\emptyset_{4}+\partial_{7}\emptyset_{6}-\partial_{6}\emptyset_{7};\nonumber \\

866: F_{4} & = & \partial_{0}\emptyset_{4}-\partial_{4}\emptyset_{0}-\partial_{3}\emptyset_{5}+\partial_{5}\emptyset_{3}+\partial_{2}\emptyset_{6}-\partial_{6}\emptyset_{2}+\partial_{1}\emptyset_{7}-\partial_{7}\emptyset_{1};\nonumber \\

867: F_{5} & = & \partial_{0}\emptyset_{5}-\partial_{5}\emptyset_{0}-\partial_{1}\emptyset_{6}+\partial_{6}\emptyset_{1}-\partial_{7}\emptyset_{2}+\partial_{2}\emptyset_{7}+\partial_{3}\emptyset_{4}-\partial_{4}\emptyset_{3};\nonumber \\

868: F_{6} & = & \partial_{0}\emptyset_{6}-\partial_{6}\emptyset_{0}+\partial_{1}\emptyset_{5}-\partial_{5}\emptyset_{1}-\partial_{2}\emptyset_{4}+\partial_{4}\emptyset_{2}+\partial_{3}\emptyset_{7}-\partial_{7}\emptyset_{3};\nonumber \\

869: F_{7} & = & \partial_{0}\emptyset_{7}-\partial_{7}\emptyset_{0}-\partial_{1}\emptyset_{4}+\partial_{4}\emptyset_{1}-\partial_{2}\emptyset_{5}+\partial_{5}\emptyset_{2}+\partial_{6}\emptyset_{3}-\partial_{3}\emptyset_{6}.\label{eq:21}\end{eqnarray}

870: 

871: \end_inset

872: 

873: We get 

874: \begin_inset Formula $F_{0}=0$

875: \end_inset

876: 

877:  in the Euclidean space 

878: \begin_inset Formula $(++++++)$

879: \end_inset

880: 

881:  due to eight dimensional Lorentz gauge condition (i.e the combination of

882:  two gauges associated with electric and magnetic potentials).

883:  Thus, one dimensional octonion representation is identical to eight dimensional

884:  spaces over the field of real numbers.

885:  It is isomorphic to four-dimensional space representation over the field

886:  of complex variables which is equivalent to two-dimensional space representatio

887: n over quaternion field variables.

888:  Similarly, one dimensional quaternion space is isomorphic to four-dimensional

889:  space over the field of real numbers which is identical to two- dimensional

890:  space over the field of complex numbers.

891:  So, an octonionic potential may also be described as the combination of

892:  two quaternion potentials in the following manner;

893: \end_layout

894: 

895: \begin_layout Standard

896: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

897: \emptyset & = & \emptyset_{a}+e_{7}\emptyset_{b};\,\,\,\, D=D_{a}+e_{7}D_{b};\,\,\,\, F=F_{a}+e_{7}F_{b}\label{eq:22}\end{eqnarray}

898: 

899: \end_inset

900: 

901: where 

902: \begin_inset Formula $\emptyset_{a}$

903: \end_inset

904: 

905: , 

906: \begin_inset Formula $\emptyset_{b}$

907: \end_inset

908: 

909: , 

910: \begin_inset Formula $D_{a}$

911: \end_inset

912: 

913: , 

914: \begin_inset Formula $D_{b}$

915: \end_inset

916: 

917: , 

918: \begin_inset Formula $F_{a}$

919: \end_inset

920: 

921:  and 

922: \begin_inset Formula $F_{b}$

923: \end_inset

924: 

925:  are quaternion variables described as

926: \end_layout

927: 

928: \begin_layout Standard

929: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

930: \emptyset_{a} & = & \emptyset_{0}+e_{1}\emptyset_{1}+e_{2}\emptyset_{2}+e_{3}\emptyset_{3};\nonumber \\

931: \emptyset_{b} & = & \emptyset_{7}+e_{1}\emptyset_{4}+e_{2}\emptyset_{5}+e_{3}\emptyset_{6};\nonumber \\

932: D_{a} & = & \partial_{0}+e_{1}\partial_{1}+e_{2}\partial_{2}+e_{3}\partial_{3};\nonumber \\

933: D_{b} & = & \partial_{7}+e_{1}\partial_{4}+e_{2}\partial_{5}+e_{3}\partial_{6};\nonumber \\

934: F_{a} & = & F_{0}+e_{1}F_{1}+e_{2}F_{2}+e_{3}F_{3};\nonumber \\

935: F_{b} & = & F_{7}+e_{1}F_{4}+e_{2}F_{5}+e_{3}F_{6}.\label{eq:23}\end{eqnarray}

936: 

937: \end_inset

938: 

939: Here 

940: \begin_inset Formula $e_{1}$

941: \end_inset

942: 

943: , 

944: \begin_inset Formula $e_{2}$

945: \end_inset

946: 

947: , and 

948: \begin_inset Formula $e_{3}$

949: \end_inset

950: 

951:  ; three quaternion units; satisfy the multiplication rule 

952: \begin_inset Formula $e_{j}e_{k}=-\delta_{jk}+\varepsilon_{jkl}e_{l}\quad\forall(j,k,l=1,2,3)$

953: \end_inset

954: 

955: .

956:  If we replace the octonion unit 

957: \begin_inset Formula $e_{7}$

958: \end_inset

959: 

960:  by imaginary unit 

961: \begin_inset Formula $i=\sqrt{-1}$

962: \end_inset

963: 

964: , commutating with all the octonion basis elements 

965: \begin_inset Formula $e_{A}$

966: \end_inset

967: 

968: , the resultant theory of octonions become the theory of bi-quaternion variables

969:  where generalized fields of dyons are written in compact, covariant and

970:  consistent way 

971: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-37}

972: 

973: \end_inset

974: 

975: .

976:  We may now consider the following mapping for different four-dimensional

977:  spaces,

978: \end_layout

979: 

980: \begin_layout Standard

981: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

982: \partial_{7}\rightarrow\partial_{0}^{'}, & \emptyset_{7}\rightarrow B_{0}, & \emptyset_{0}\rightarrow A_{0};\nonumber \\

983: \partial_{4}\rightarrow\partial_{1}^{'}, & \emptyset_{4}\rightarrow B_{1}, & \emptyset_{1}\rightarrow A_{1};\nonumber \\

984: \partial_{5}\rightarrow\partial_{2}^{'}, & \emptyset_{5}\rightarrow B_{2}, & \emptyset_{2}\rightarrow A_{2};\nonumber \\

985: \partial_{6}\rightarrow\partial_{3}^{'}, & \emptyset_{6}\rightarrow B_{3}, & \emptyset_{3}\rightarrow A_{3}.\label{eq:24}\end{eqnarray}

986: 

987: \end_inset

988: 

989: Then we get

990: \end_layout

991: 

992: \begin_layout Standard

993: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

994: F_{j} & = & \partial_{0}A_{j}-\partial_{j}A_{0}+(\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{A})_{j}+\partial_{0}^{'}B_{j}-\partial_{j}^{'}B_{0}+(\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{B})_{j};\nonumber \\

995: F_{j+3} & = & \partial_{0}B_{j}-\partial_{j}B_{0}+(\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{B})_{j}+\partial_{0}^{'}A_{j}-\partial_{j}^{'}A_{0}+(\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{A})_{j};\nonumber \\

996: F_{7} & = & \partial_{0}B_{0}-\partial_{1}B_{1}-\partial_{2}B_{2}-\partial_{3}B_{3}-(\partial_{0}^{'}A_{0}+\partial_{1}^{'}A_{1}+\partial_{2}^{'}A_{2}+\partial_{3}^{'}A_{3}).\label{eq:25}\end{eqnarray}

997: 

998: \end_inset

999: 

1000: Hence equation (

1001: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:25}

1002: 

1003: \end_inset

1004: 

1005: ) shows that 

1006: \begin_inset Formula $F_{0},\,\, F_{j},\,\, F_{j+3}$

1007: \end_inset

1008: 

1009:  and 

1010: \begin_inset Formula $F_{7}$

1011: \end_inset

1012: 

1013:  correspond to the components of electric and magnetic fields obtained in

1014:  terms of components of two four-potentials ( 

1015: \begin_inset Formula $A_{\mu}$

1016: \end_inset

1017: 

1018:  and 

1019: \begin_inset Formula $B_{\mu}$

1020: \end_inset

1021: 

1022: ) in internal and external spaces.

1023:  If these two spaces are completely disjoint spaces, we get only 

1024: \begin_inset Formula $F_{j}$

1025: \end_inset

1026: 

1027:  ; and 

1028: \begin_inset Formula $F_{0}$

1029: \end_inset

1030: 

1031:  vanishing due to Lorentz gauge condition ; while 

1032: \begin_inset Formula $F_{j+3}\,$

1033: \end_inset

1034: 

1035: and 

1036: \begin_inset Formula $F_{7}$

1037: \end_inset

1038: 

1039:  do not occur.

1040:  Here prime derivatives are associated with the second four-dimensional

1041:  structure of eight potential.

1042:  In equation (

1043: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:25}

1044: 

1045: \end_inset

1046: 

1047: ), we find that 

1048: \begin_inset Formula $F_{j}$

1049: \end_inset

1050: 

1051:  is made up of the 

1052: \begin_inset Formula $j^{th}$

1053: \end_inset

1054: 

1055:  components of electric and magnetic fields.

1056:  Here the first term 

1057: \begin_inset Formula $\partial_{0}A_{j}-\partial_{j}A_{0}$

1058: \end_inset

1059: 

1060:  describes the electric field and second term 

1061: \begin_inset Formula $\overrightarrow{(\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{A})_{j}$

1062: \end_inset

1063: 

1064: corresponds to the magnetic field in four-dimensional ( we call it as the

1065:  external ) space.

1066:  In the light of the duality mechanism between electric and magnetic fields

1067:  (and for electric 

1068: \begin_inset Formula $\left\{ A_{\mu}\right\} $

1069: \end_inset

1070: 

1071:  and magnetic 

1072: \begin_inset Formula $\left\{ B_{\mu}\right\} $

1073: \end_inset

1074: 

1075:  four-potentials), the third term 

1076: \begin_inset Formula $\partial_{0}B_{j}-\partial_{j}B_{0}$

1077: \end_inset

1078: 

1079:  of 

1080: \begin_inset Formula $F_{j}$

1081: \end_inset

1082: 

1083:  is equivalent to the magnetic field while the last term 

1084: \begin_inset Formula $(\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{B})_{j}$

1085: \end_inset

1086: 

1087:  denotes the electric field in other four-dimensional ( let us call it as

1088:  internal or magnetic) space.

1089:  On mixing of these two spaces, 

1090: \begin_inset Formula $\partial_{0}A_{j}-\partial_{j}A_{0}+(\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{A})_{j}$

1091: \end_inset

1092: 

1093:  resembles with the expression of generalized electric field and 

1094: \begin_inset Formula $\partial_{0}^{'}B_{j}-\partial_{j}^{'}B_{0}+(\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{B})_{j}$

1095: \end_inset

1096: 

1097:  as that of the generalized magnetic fields of dyons 

1098: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-36,key-37}

1099: 

1100: \end_inset

1101: 

1102:  .

1103:  So, it looks awkward to combine external (internal) space of electric charge

1104:  (magnetic monopole) to the internal (external) space of magnetic monopole

1105:  (electric charge) to interpret 

1106: \begin_inset Formula $F_{j}$

1107: \end_inset

1108: 

1109:  .

1110:  As such, we may conclude that the equation (

1111: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:25}

1112: 

1113: \end_inset

1114: 

1115: ) does not represent the true generalization of potential equation for the

1116:  generalized electromagnetic fields of dyons.

1117:  Rather, we have obtained the mixed behaviour of electric and magnetic charges

1118:  in internal and external spaces.

1119:  So, octonion wave equation of electromagnetic potential faces difficulties

1120:  and hence needs modification to interpret it consistently.

1121:  

1122: \end_layout

1123: 

1124: \begin_layout Subsection

1125: CURRENT EQUATION

1126: \end_layout

1127: 

1128: \begin_layout Standard

1129: We now Analise the octonion wave equation (

1130: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:17}

1131: 

1132: \end_inset

1133: 

1134: ) as the current equation in eight dimensional representations i.e.

1135: \end_layout

1136: 

1137: \begin_layout Standard

1138: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1139: D & F= & S\label{eq:26}\end{eqnarray}

1140: 

1141: \end_inset

1142: 

1143: where

1144: \end_layout

1145: 

1146: \begin_layout Standard

1147: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1148: S_{0} & = & \partial_{0}F_{0}-\partial_{1}F_{1}-\partial_{2}F_{2}-\partial_{3}F_{3}-(\partial_{1}^{'}F_{4}+\partial_{2}^{'}F_{5}+\partial_{3}^{'}F_{6}+\partial_{0}^{'}F_{7});\nonumber \\

1149: S_{j} & = & \partial_{0}F_{j}+\partial_{j}F_{0}+(\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{F})_{j}-\partial_{0}^{'}F_{j+3}+\partial_{j}^{'}F_{7}-(\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{F})_{j+3};\nonumber \\

1150: S_{j+3} & = & \partial_{0}^{'}F_{j}+\partial_{j}^{'}F_{0}-(\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{F})_{j}-\partial_{0}F_{j+3}-\partial_{j}F_{7}-(\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{F})_{j+3};\nonumber \\

1151: S_{7} & = & \partial_{1}F_{4}+\partial_{2}F_{5}+\partial_{3}F_{6}+\partial_{0}F_{7}+(\partial_{0}^{'}F_{0}-\partial_{1}^{'}F_{1}-\partial_{2}^{'}F_{2}-\partial_{3}^{'}F_{3}).\label{eq:27}\end{eqnarray}

1152: 

1153: \end_inset

1154: 

1155: Thus, the current equation for octonion variables describes 

1156: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-38}

1157: 

1158: \end_inset

1159: 

1160:  the generalized structure of differential equations (Maxwell's equations)

1161:  in eight - dimensional space-time.

1162:  Four- dimensional reduction of these differential equations may be visualized

1163:  as the Maxwell's equations in internal and external spaces.

1164:  So, it is difficult to explain the various terms associated with the eight

1165:  parameters 

1166: \begin_inset Formula $S_{\Lambda}(\Lambda=0,1,2,3...,7)$

1167: \end_inset

1168: 

1169: correctly.

1170:  Silagade 

1171: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-38}

1172: 

1173: \end_inset

1174: 

1175:  provided the interpretation of the homogeneous octonion wave equation 

1176: \begin_inset Formula $DF=0$

1177: \end_inset

1178: 

1179:  as equivalent to one of the pair of seven-dimensional Maxwell's equations

1180:  and the second pair of seven dimensional Maxwell's equations may be obtained

1181:  on applying the duality transformations between electric and magnetic fields

1182:  therein.

1183:  Similarly, Gamba and Gogberashvili 

1184: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-8}

1185: 

1186: \end_inset

1187: 

1188:  also tried to explain the structure of eight parameters 

1189: \begin_inset Formula $S_{\Lambda}(\Lambda=0,1,2,3...,7)$

1190: \end_inset

1191: 

1192: but the consistent justification needs modifications.

1193:  Hence, octonion wave equation (

1194: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:26}

1195: 

1196: \end_inset

1197: 

1198: ) may be identified rather a current equation or octonion field equation

1199:  in eight dimensional spaces for mixed structural behaviour of sources (the

1200:  electric and magnetic) instead of dyons.

1201:  In other words we may say that the equation (

1202: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:26}

1203: 

1204: \end_inset

1205: 

1206: ) can not be described as the true field equation of dyons.

1207:  Here 

1208: \begin_inset Formula $S_{0}$

1209: \end_inset

1210: 

1211:  and 

1212: \begin_inset Formula $S_{7}$

1213: \end_inset

1214: 

1215:  may be taken vanishing due to equations of continuity in internal and external

1216:  spaces.

1217: \end_layout

1218: 

1219: \begin_layout Subsection

1220: QUATERNION DECOMPOSITION

1221: \end_layout

1222: 

1223: \begin_layout Standard

1224: We may decompose an octonion in terms of two-quaternions.

1225:  So, let us decompose octonion wave equation for potential in terms of two

1226:  quaternions as

1227: \end_layout

1228: 

1229: \begin_layout Standard

1230: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1231: \overline{D}\emptyset=(\overline{D}_{a}-e_{7}D_{b})(\emptyset_{a}+e_{7}\emptyset_{b}) & = & (\phi+e_{7}\varphi)=F.\label{eq:28}\end{eqnarray}

1232: 

1233: \end_inset

1234: 

1235: Here

1236: \end_layout

1237: 

1238: \begin_layout Standard

1239: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1240: \phi & = & \overline{D}_{a}\emptyset_{a}+\emptyset_{b}\widetilde{D}_{b}=(D_{0}-D_{1}e_{1}-D_{2}e_{2}-D_{3}e_{3})\emptyset_{a}+\emptyset_{b}(\overleftarrow{D_{7}}-\overleftarrow{D_{4}}e_{1}-\overleftarrow{D_{5}}e_{2}-\overleftarrow{D_{6}}e_{3})\label{eq:29}\end{eqnarray}

1241: 

1242: \end_inset

1243: 

1244: where 

1245: \begin_inset Formula $[\overleftarrow{D_{r}},(r=4,5,6,7)]$

1246: \end_inset

1247: 

1248:  represents the partial differential of 

1249: \begin_inset Formula $\emptyset_{b}$

1250: \end_inset

1251: 

1252:  from right to left , 

1253: \begin_inset Formula $\widetilde{D}_{b}$

1254: \end_inset

1255: 

1256:  denotes the quaternion conjugation 

1257: \begin_inset Formula $(\tilde{e_{o}}=e_{0};\quad\tilde{e_{j}}=-e_{j}\quad\forall j=1,2,3)$

1258: \end_inset

1259: 

1260:  from right to left i.e.

1261:  

1262: \end_layout

1263: 

1264: \begin_layout Standard

1265: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray*}

1266: \overline{D}_{a} & = & D_{0}-D_{1}e_{1}-D_{2}e_{2}-D_{3}e_{3};\end{eqnarray*}

1267: 

1268: \end_inset

1269: 

1270: 

1271: \end_layout

1272: 

1273: \begin_layout Standard

1274: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray*}

1275: \overline{\widetilde{D}_{a}} & = & D_{0}+D_{1}e_{1}+D_{2}e_{2}+D_{3}e_{3}=D_{1};\end{eqnarray*}

1276: 

1277: \end_inset

1278: 

1279: 

1280: \end_layout

1281: 

1282: \begin_layout Standard

1283: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray*}

1284: \widetilde{D}_{b} & = & D_{7}-D_{4}e_{1}-D_{5}e_{2}-D_{6}e_{3}\end{eqnarray*}

1285: 

1286: \end_inset

1287: 

1288: and

1289: \end_layout

1290: 

1291: \begin_layout Standard

1292: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1293: \varphi & =\overline{\widetilde{D}}_{a} & \emptyset_{b}-\emptyset_{a}D_{b}=D_{a}\emptyset_{b}-\emptyset_{a}D_{b}.\label{eq:30}\end{eqnarray}

1294: 

1295: \end_inset

1296: 

1297: Here an octonion-valued potential is described as the sum of two quaternions

1298:  by Cayley-Dickson doubling process.

1299:  Thus, we observe that the octonion potential wave equation rules out the

1300:  existence of isolated of magnetic monopole and provides a mixed structural

1301:  behaviour of electromagnetic fields containing both charges simultaneously.

1302:  In other words,  we may say that it is a generalized field equation of

1303:  electromagnetic fields associated with a particle carrying simultaneous

1304:  existence of electric and magnetic charges (namely dyons).

1305:  The generalized electromagnetic fields of dyons are symmetric and dual

1306:  invariant in terms of two four potentials.

1307:  So, the possibility of monopoles (or dyons) in non Abelian or supersymmetric

1308:  gauge theories is directly linked with the existence of second four potential

1309:  which is hidden in external space and present in internal space while the

1310:  electric four potential is the consequence of our external space and seems

1311:  to be hidden in internal space.

1312: \end_layout

1313: 

1314: \begin_layout Standard

1315: Similarly we may express the current equation given by equation (

1316: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:26}

1317: 

1318: \end_inset

1319: 

1320: ) in terms of two quaternions as

1321: \end_layout

1322: 

1323: \begin_layout Standard

1324: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1325: DF & =(D_{a}+e_{7}D_{b})(g+e_{7}h) & =S=s_{a}+e_{7}s_{b}\label{eq:31}\end{eqnarray}

1326: 

1327: \end_inset

1328: 

1329: where

1330: \end_layout

1331: 

1332: \begin_layout Standard

1333: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray*}

1334: s_{a} & = & D_{a}g-hD_{b}=D_{a}\overline{D}_{b}\emptyset_{a}+\emptyset_{b}D_{b}\overline{D}_{b}\end{eqnarray*}

1335: 

1336: \end_inset

1337: 

1338: 

1339: \end_layout

1340: 

1341: \begin_layout Standard

1342: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1343: s_{b} & = & \widetilde{D}_{a}h+gD_{b}=\overline{D}_{a}D_{a}\emptyset_{b}+\emptyset_{b}\overline{D_{b}}D_{b}.\label{eq:32}\end{eqnarray}

1344: 

1345: \end_inset

1346: 

1347: Thus 

1348: \begin_inset Formula $S=s_{a}+e_{7}s_{b}$

1349: \end_inset

1350: 

1351:  is the octonion expression for generalized current density.

1352:  Similarly, we may express the generalized force and generalized field tensor

1353:  density in terms of two quaternions.

1354: \end_layout

1355: 

1356: \begin_layout Subsection

1357: LOCALIZATION SPACES OF BRADYONS AND TACHYONS

1358: \end_layout

1359: 

1360: \begin_layout Standard

1361: \InsetSpace ~

1362: \InsetSpace ~

1363: \InsetSpace ~

1364: \InsetSpace ~

1365: \InsetSpace ~

1366:  We have described the octonion (eight dimensional) space is made of two

1367:  quaternion (namely the external and internal four dimensional) spaces.

1368:  Let us suppose the external four space as the usual Minikowski (or Euclidean)

1369:  

1370: \begin_inset Formula $R^{4}\Rightarrow M\,(1,3)$

1371: \end_inset

1372: 

1373:  - space (consisting one time and three space coordinates).

1374:  This space has been named 

1375: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-23,key-24}

1376: 

1377: \end_inset

1378: 

1379:  as.

1380:  the localization space of bradyons (particles traveling slower than light

1381: \begin_inset Formula $\rightarrow$

1382: \end_inset

1383: 

1384: subluminal particles).

1385:  Accordingly, we describe the internal four dimensional space as the 

1386: \begin_inset Formula $T^{4}\Rightarrow M\,(3,1)$

1387: \end_inset

1388: 

1389:  - space (consisting three time and one space coordinates).

1390:  The possibility of such space is explored 

1391: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-23,key-24}

1392: 

1393: \end_inset

1394: 

1395:  as the localization space of tachyons (particles traveling faster than

1396:  light

1397: \begin_inset Formula $\rightarrow$

1398: \end_inset

1399: 

1400: superluminal particles).

1401:  Hence an octonion eight dimensional space is described as the unified space

1402:  containing both external 

1403: \begin_inset Formula $R^{4}\Rightarrow M\,(1,3)$

1404: \end_inset

1405: 

1406:  and internal 

1407: \begin_inset Formula $T^{4}\Rightarrow M\,(3,1)$

1408: \end_inset

1409: 

1410:  four - dimensional spaces.

1411:  In other words we may identify the octonion space as the unified localization

1412:  space for the description of bradyons and tachyons.

1413:  It is because that the bradyons are the objects of our four dimensional

1414:  world for which the Cauchy's data are described on the plane 

1415: \begin_inset Formula $\left\{ t=0\right\} $

1416: \end_inset

1417: 

1418: while tachyons are localized in time and their Cauchy's data lies on the

1419:  plane 

1420: \begin_inset Formula $\left\{ x=0\right\} .$

1421: \end_inset

1422: 

1423:  Hence, the eight dimensional space of octonion variables described above

1424:  is the unified localization space for bradyons and tachyons and hence be

1425:  expressed as 

1426: \begin_inset Formula $R^{8}=R^{4}\,\bigcup\, T^{4}$

1427: \end_inset

1428: 

1429: .

1430:  The 

1431: \begin_inset Formula $T^{4}-$

1432: \end_inset

1433: 

1434: space is characterized as the hidden space for bradyons while 

1435: \begin_inset Formula $R^{4}-$

1436: \end_inset

1437: 

1438: space is identified as the hidden space for tachyons.

1439:  We may also interpret that the 

1440: \begin_inset Formula $R^{4}-$

1441: \end_inset

1442: 

1443:  space is visualized as the internal space for tachyons (and external space

1444:  for bradyons) and correspondingly the 

1445: \begin_inset Formula $T^{4}-$

1446: \end_inset

1447: 

1448:  space is the internal space for bradyons (and external space for tachyons).

1449:  First quaternion variable of equation (

1450: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:31}

1451: 

1452: \end_inset

1453: 

1454: ) maps to four-dimensional space for bradyons i.e.

1455:  

1456: \begin_inset Formula $R^{4}\simeq(t,\overrightarrow{r})$

1457: \end_inset

1458: 

1459:  while the second quaternion variable gives rise to four-dimensional space

1460:  for tachyons i.e.

1461:  

1462: \begin_inset Formula $T^{4}\simeq(r,\overrightarrow{t})$

1463: \end_inset

1464: 

1465: .

1466:  In the absence of second quaternion, equation (

1467: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:32}

1468: 

1469: \end_inset

1470: 

1471: ) reduces to

1472: \end_layout

1473: 

1474: \begin_layout Standard

1475: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1476: s_{a}= & D_{a}\overline{D}_{a}\emptyset_{a} & \Rightarrow(\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial x^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial y^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial z^{2}})\phi=\square(R)\phi\label{eq:33}\end{eqnarray}

1477: 

1478: \end_inset

1479: 

1480: which resembles to Cauchy-Feuter equation of quaternion variables in 

1481: \begin_inset Formula $R^{4}\simeq(t,\overrightarrow{r})$

1482: \end_inset

1483: 

1484:  space and thus describes the usual Maxwell's equations in electromagnetic

1485:  fields in 

1486: \begin_inset Formula $R^{4}-$

1487: \end_inset

1488: 

1489:  space.

1490:  On the other hand in absence of first quaternion, equation (

1491: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:32}

1492: 

1493: \end_inset

1494: 

1495: ) reduces to 

1496: \end_layout

1497: 

1498: \begin_layout Standard

1499: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1500: s_{b}=\emptyset_{b} & \overline{D}_{b}D_{b} & \Rightarrow\varphi(\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial r^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial t_{x}^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial t_{y}^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial t_{z}^{2}})=\varphi\overleftarrow{\square}(T)\label{eq:34}\end{eqnarray}

1501: 

1502: \end_inset

1503: 

1504: which also describes the Cauchy - Feuter equation of quaternion variables

1505:  in 

1506: \begin_inset Formula $T^{4}\simeq(r,\overrightarrow{t})$

1507: \end_inset

1508: 

1509:  space and coincides with the Maxwell's equations of superluminal photons

1510:  in 

1511: \begin_inset Formula $T^{4}$

1512: \end_inset

1513: 

1514:  - space.

1515:  Equation (

1516: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:33}

1517: 

1518: \end_inset

1519: 

1520: ) is the left regular while equation (

1521: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:34}

1522: 

1523: \end_inset

1524: 

1525: ) is the right regular.

1526:  hence, the regularity conditions are changes for internal and external

1527:  spaces.

1528:  In case of bi-quaternion, equations (

1529: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:33}

1530: 

1531: \end_inset

1532: 

1533: ) and (

1534: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:34}

1535: 

1536: \end_inset

1537: 

1538: ) characterize respectively to the equations of dyons for subluminal and

1539:  superluminal electromagnetic fields.

1540:  In general (i.e.

1541:  octonionic space) describes the unified structure of subluminal and superlumina

1542: l objects.

1543:  As such, the octonionic eight dimensional representation is the unified

1544:  picture of bradyons and tachyons and the octonionic current equations thus

1545:  reproduce two different kinds of Maxwell's equations in external and internal

1546:  spaces in order to explain the simultaneous description of bradyons and

1547:  tachyons.

1548:  Here, we have developed the octonion wave equation and theory of octonion

1549:  field variables in compact and simpler manner.

1550:  So, in order to overcome the non-associativity, it is necessary to decompose

1551:  them in terms of two quaternions isomorphic to two different four-dimensional

1552:  spaces.

1553:  The compact and simpler form of octonion field equation provide an unified

1554:  model of the theories of subluminal and superluminal electromagnetic fields

1555:  in view of the localizability of bradyons and tachyons in consistent manner.

1556: \end_layout

1557: 

1558: \begin_layout Section

1559: SPLIT OCTONION WAVE EQUATION 

1560: \end_layout

1561: 

1562: \begin_layout Standard

1563: The split octonions are a non associative extension of quaternions (or the

1564:  split quaternions).They differ from the octonion in the signature of quadratic

1565:  form.

1566:  The split octonions have a signature 

1567: \begin_inset Formula $(4,4)$

1568: \end_inset

1569: 

1570:  whereas the octonions have positive signature 

1571: \begin_inset Formula $(8,0)$

1572: \end_inset

1573: 

1574: .

1575:  The Cayley algebra of octonions over the field of complex numbers 

1576: \begin_inset Formula $\mathbb{C_{C}=\mathbb{C\otimes C}}$

1577: \end_inset

1578: 

1579:  is visualized as the algebra of split octonions with basis elements 

1580: \begin_inset Formula $u_{0}=\frac{1}{2}(e_{0}+ie_{7});\quad u_{0}^{\star}=\frac{1}{2}(e_{0}-ie_{7}),\quad u_{j}=\frac{1}{2}(e_{j}+ie_{j+3}),\quad u_{j}^{\star}=\frac{1}{2}(e_{j}-ie_{j+3})\,(j=1,2,3;i=\sqrt{-1})$

1581: \end_inset

1582: 

1583:  as the bi-valued (or bi - dimensional) representations of quaternion units

1584:  

1585: \begin_inset Formula $e_{0},\quad e_{1}\quad,e_{2}\quad,e_{3}$

1586: \end_inset

1587: 

1588:  .

1589:  The split Cayley (octonion) algebra is thus expressed in terms of 

1590: \begin_inset Formula $2\times2$

1591: \end_inset

1592: 

1593:  Zorn's vector matrices components of which are scalar and vector parts

1594:  of a quaternion.

1595:  As such , we may also write an arbitrary split octonion 

1596: \begin_inset Formula $A$

1597: \end_inset

1598: 

1599:  in terms of following 

1600: \begin_inset Formula $2\times2$

1601: \end_inset

1602: 

1603:  Zorn's vector matrix realizations 

1604: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-39}

1605: 

1606: \end_inset

1607: 

1608:  as

1609: \end_layout

1610: 

1611: \begin_layout Standard

1612: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1613: A & =au_{0}^{\star}+bu_{0}+x_{i}u_{i}^{\star}+y_{i}u_{i} & =\left(\begin{array}{cc}

1614: a & -\overrightarrow{x}\\

1615: \overrightarrow{y} & b\end{array}\right).\label{eq:35}\end{eqnarray}

1616: 

1617: \end_inset

1618: 

1619: Split octonion conjugation of equation (

1620: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:35}

1621: 

1622: \end_inset

1623: 

1624: ) is then described as,

1625: \end_layout

1626: 

1627: \begin_layout Standard

1628: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1629: \overline{A} & =au_{0}+bu_{0}*-x_{i}u_{i}*-y_{i}u_{i} & =\left(\begin{array}{cc}

1630: b & \overrightarrow{x}\\

1631: -\overrightarrow{y} & a\end{array}\right).\label{eq:36}\end{eqnarray}

1632: 

1633: \end_inset

1634: 

1635: The norm of 

1636: \begin_inset Formula $A$

1637: \end_inset

1638: 

1639:  is defined as,

1640: \end_layout

1641: 

1642: \begin_layout Standard

1643: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1644: \overline{A}A & =A\overline{A} & =(ab+\overrightarrow{x}.\overrightarrow{y})\hat{1}\label{eq:37}\end{eqnarray}

1645: 

1646: \end_inset

1647: 

1648: where 

1649: \begin_inset Formula $\hat{1}$

1650: \end_inset

1651: 

1652:  is the identity element given by 

1653: \begin_inset Formula $\hat{1}=1u_{0}+1u_{0}^{\star}$

1654: \end_inset

1655: 

1656: .

1657:  Any four - vector 

1658: \begin_inset Formula $A_{\mu}$

1659: \end_inset

1660: 

1661:  (complex or real) can equivalently be written in the following Zorn's matrix

1662:  realization as 

1663: \end_layout

1664: 

1665: \begin_layout Standard

1666: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1667: Z(A) & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

1668: x_{4} & -\overrightarrow{x}\\

1669: \overrightarrow{y} & y_{4}\end{array}\right)\label{eq:38}\end{eqnarray}

1670: 

1671: \end_inset

1672: 

1673: and

1674: \end_layout

1675: 

1676: \begin_layout Standard

1677: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1678: Z(\overline{A}) & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

1679: x_{4} & \overrightarrow{x}\\

1680: -\overrightarrow{y} & y_{4}\end{array}\right).\label{eq:39}\end{eqnarray}

1681: 

1682: \end_inset

1683: 

1684: In equation (

1685: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:38}

1686: 

1687: \end_inset

1688: 

1689: , 

1690: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:39}

1691: 

1692: \end_inset

1693: 

1694: ), putting 

1695: \begin_inset Formula $\overrightarrow{x}=\overrightarrow{y}$

1696: \end_inset

1697: 

1698: , we get the equivalent matrix realization for a four vector in bi-valued

1699:  four-dimensional Euclidean space - time.

1700:  In order to develop the the eight dimensional split octonion kinematics,

1701:  we start with the following definition of the split octonion differential

1702:  operator 

1703: \begin_inset Formula $D$

1704: \end_inset

1705: 

1706:  and its conjugate 

1707: \begin_inset Formula $\overline{D}$

1708: \end_inset

1709: 

1710:  in terms of 

1711: \begin_inset Formula $2\times2$

1712: \end_inset

1713: 

1714:  Zorn's matrix realizations,

1715: \end_layout

1716: 

1717: \begin_layout Standard

1718: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1719: D & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

1720: \partial_{4} & -\overrightarrow{\nabla}\\

1721: \overrightarrow{\nabla} & \partial'_{4}\end{array}\right)\label{eq:40}\end{eqnarray}

1722: 

1723: \end_inset

1724: 

1725: 

1726: \end_layout

1727: 

1728: \begin_layout Standard

1729: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1730: \overline{D} & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

1731: \partial_{4} & \overrightarrow{\nabla}\\

1732: -\overrightarrow{\nabla} & \partial'_{4}\end{array}\right)\label{eq:41}\end{eqnarray}

1733: 

1734: \end_inset

1735: 

1736: with the assumption that the primed variables are represented in internal

1737:  space whereas the unprimed variables are defined in external four - dimensional

1738:  space.

1739: \end_layout

1740: 

1741: \begin_layout Subsection

1742: POTENTIAL EQUATION

1743: \end_layout

1744: 

1745: \begin_layout Standard

1746: Let us express an octonion potential in the following form 

1747: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1748: \emptyset & = & A_{4}u_{0}*+B_{4}u_{0}+B_{i}u_{i}*+A_{i}u_{i}\label{eq:42}\end{eqnarray}

1749: 

1750: \end_inset

1751: 

1752: where 

1753: \begin_inset Formula $\left\{ A_{\mu}\right\} =(A_{4},A_{j})$

1754: \end_inset

1755: 

1756:  and 

1757: \begin_inset Formula $\left\{ B_{\mu}\right\} =(B_{4},B_{j})$

1758: \end_inset

1759: 

1760:  are two four - potentials respectively associated with electric and magnetic

1761:  charges.

1762:  Equation (

1763: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:42}

1764: 

1765: \end_inset

1766: 

1767: ) may then be expressed in terms of split octonion 

1768: \begin_inset Formula $2\times2$

1769: \end_inset

1770: 

1771:  Zorn's vector matrix realization as

1772: \end_layout

1773: 

1774: \begin_layout Standard

1775: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1776: \emptyset & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

1777: A_{4} & -\overrightarrow{B}\\

1778: \overrightarrow{A} & B_{4}\end{array}\right)\label{eq:43}\end{eqnarray}

1779: 

1780: \end_inset

1781: 

1782: where 

1783: \begin_inset Formula $A_{4}=i\,\emptyset_{e}$

1784: \end_inset

1785: 

1786: (

1787: \begin_inset Formula $e$

1788: \end_inset

1789: 

1790:  denotes the electric charge) and 

1791: \begin_inset Formula $B_{4}=i\,\emptyset_{g}$

1792: \end_inset

1793: 

1794: (

1795: \begin_inset Formula $g$

1796: \end_inset

1797: 

1798:  denotes the magnetic charge).

1799:  Here 

1800: \begin_inset Formula $\overrightarrow{A}$

1801: \end_inset

1802: 

1803:  and 

1804: \begin_inset Formula $A_{4}$

1805: \end_inset

1806: 

1807:  are assumed to be the components of electric four - potential 

1808: \begin_inset Formula $A_{\mu}=(\overrightarrow{A},\, i\,\emptyset_{e}).$

1809: \end_inset

1810: 

1811:  Similarly 

1812: \begin_inset Formula $\overrightarrow{B}$

1813: \end_inset

1814: 

1815:  and 

1816: \begin_inset Formula $B_{4}$

1817: \end_inset

1818: 

1819:  are considered as the components of magnetic four-potential 

1820: \begin_inset Formula $B_{\mu}=(\overrightarrow{B},\, i\,\emptyset_{g})$

1821: \end_inset

1822: 

1823: .

1824:  We have designed the eight dimensional space spanned by split octonion

1825:  basis elements in terms of two four - dimensional space (namely the external

1826:  and internal space).

1827:  Here also the electric four-potential is described in external four-dimensional

1828:  space while the magnetic four - potential has been considered in internal

1829:  four dimensional spaces.

1830:  Since electric charge and magnetic monopoles are dual to each other ,we

1831:  may interpret these two spaces as dual to each other.

1832:  The internal space of electric charge may be identified as the external

1833:  space of monopole while the external space of electric charge will be visualize

1834: d as the internal space of magnetic monopole or vice versa.

1835:  Accordingly, the electric charge is considered in external space and magnetic

1836:  charge in internal space.

1837:  Hence, eight dimensional spaces have the built in duality where a bradyonic

1838:  monopole plays the role of tachyonic electric charge while the tachyonic

1839:  monopole looks like a bradyonic electric charge or vice versa.

1840:  Eight dimensional spaces have been considered as the unification of 

1841: \begin_inset Formula $R^{4}-$

1842: \end_inset

1843: 

1844:  (bradyonic) and 

1845: \begin_inset Formula $T^{4}-$

1846: \end_inset

1847: 

1848:  (tachyonic) spaces.

1849:  

1850: \end_layout

1851: 

1852: \begin_layout Standard

1853: Let us now write the the inhomogeneous octonion wave equation in its split

1854:  form as

1855: \end_layout

1856: 

1857: \begin_layout Standard

1858: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1859: \overline{D}\emptyset & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

1860: \partial_{4}A_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{A} & -(\partial_{4}\overrightarrow{B}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}B_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{A})\\

1861: \partial'_{4}\overrightarrow{A}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'A_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{B} & \partial'_{4}B_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'.\overrightarrow{B}\end{array}\right)=F\label{eq:44}\end{eqnarray}

1862: 

1863: \end_inset

1864: 

1865: where 

1866: \begin_inset Formula $F$

1867: \end_inset

1868: 

1869:  is a field like electromagnetic field in split octonion 

1870: \begin_inset Formula $2\times2$

1871: \end_inset

1872: 

1873:  Zorn's vector matrix realization as

1874: \end_layout

1875: 

1876: \begin_layout Standard

1877: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1878: F & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

1879: f_{4} & -\overrightarrow{f}\\

1880: \overrightarrow{f}\,' & f_{4}'\end{array}\right).\label{eq:45}\end{eqnarray}

1881: 

1882: \end_inset

1883: 

1884: Comparing equations (

1885: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:44}

1886: 

1887: \end_inset

1888: 

1889: ) and (

1890: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:45}

1891: 

1892: \end_inset

1893: 

1894: ), we get

1895: \end_layout

1896: 

1897: \begin_layout Standard

1898: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1899: f_{4} & = & \partial_{4}A_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{A}=0;\label{eq:46}\end{eqnarray}

1900: 

1901: \end_inset

1902: 

1903: 

1904: \end_layout

1905: 

1906: \begin_layout Standard

1907: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1908: f_{4}' & = & \partial'_{4}B_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'.\overrightarrow{B}=0;\label{eq:47}\end{eqnarray}

1909: 

1910: \end_inset

1911: 

1912: 

1913: \end_layout

1914: 

1915: \begin_layout Standard

1916: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1917: \overrightarrow{f} & = & \partial_{4}\overrightarrow{B}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}B_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{A};\label{eq:48}\end{eqnarray}

1918: 

1919: \end_inset

1920: 

1921: 

1922: \end_layout

1923: 

1924: \begin_layout Standard

1925: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1926: \overrightarrow{f}' & = & \partial'_{4}\overrightarrow{A}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'A_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{B}.\label{eq:49}\end{eqnarray}

1927: 

1928: \end_inset

1929: 

1930: In equations (

1931: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:46}

1932: 

1933: \end_inset

1934: 

1935: , 

1936: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:47}

1937: 

1938: \end_inset

1939: 

1940: ), we could get 

1941: \begin_inset Formula $f_{4}=0$

1942: \end_inset

1943: 

1944:  and 

1945: \begin_inset Formula $f_{4}'=0$

1946: \end_inset

1947: 

1948:  on applying Lorentz gauge conditions on electric and magnetic four potentials.

1949: 

1950: \family roman

1951: \series medium

1952: \shape up

1953: \size normal

1954: \emph off

1955: \bar no

1956: \noun off

1957: \color none

1958:  We may now discuss the different cases in the following sub sections:

1959: \end_layout

1960: 

1961: \begin_layout Subsubsection*

1962: 

1963: \size normal

1964: (i) BRADYONIC CASE

1965: \end_layout

1966: 

1967: \begin_layout Standard

1968: We may describe the theory of bradyons by substituting 

1969: \begin_inset Formula $B_{4}=A_{4},\,\overrightarrow{B}\,=\overrightarrow{A}$

1970: \end_inset

1971: 

1972:  in equations (

1973: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:40}

1974: 

1975: \end_inset

1976: 

1977: -

1978: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:49}

1979: 

1980: \end_inset

1981: 

1982: ) and correspondingly 

1983: \begin_inset Formula $\partial_{4}=\partial_{4}',\,\overrightarrow{\nabla}=\overrightarrow{\nabla}'=\partial$

1984: \end_inset

1985: 

1986: .

1987:  Then we get

1988: \end_layout

1989: 

1990: \begin_layout Standard

1991: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

1992: \overline{D}\emptyset & =F & =\left(\begin{array}{cc}

1993: \partial_{4}A_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{A} & -(\partial_{4}\overrightarrow{A}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}A_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{A})\\

1994: \partial_{4}\overrightarrow{A}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}A_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{A} & \partial_{4}A_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{A}\end{array}\right).\label{eq:50}\end{eqnarray}

1995: 

1996: \end_inset

1997: 

1998: Using the definition of electric and magnetic fields given by

1999: \end_layout

2000: 

2001: \begin_layout Standard

2002: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2003: \overrightarrow{E} & =-\frac{\partial\overrightarrow{A}}{\partial t}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}\emptyset_{e} & =-\frac{\partial\overrightarrow{A}}{\partial t}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}\phi_{e};\label{eq:51}\end{eqnarray}

2004: 

2005: \end_inset

2006: 

2007: 

2008: \end_layout

2009: 

2010: \begin_layout Standard

2011: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2012: \overrightarrow{\mathcal{H}} & = & \overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{A}\label{eq:52}\end{eqnarray}

2013: 

2014: \end_inset

2015: 

2016: and imposing Lorentz-gauge condition 

2017: \begin_inset Formula $\partial_{4}A_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{A}=\frac{\partial\emptyset_{e}}{\partial t}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{A}=0,\,$

2018: \end_inset

2019: 

2020:  and using 

2021: \begin_inset Formula $\overrightarrow{\psi}=\overrightarrow{E}-i\overrightarrow{\mathcal{H}}(i=\sqrt{-1})$

2022: \end_inset

2023: 

2024:  , we get

2025: \end_layout

2026: 

2027: \begin_layout Standard

2028: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2029: -\partial_{4}\overrightarrow{A}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}A_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{A} & = & -i\overrightarrow{E}+\overrightarrow{\mathcal{H}}=-i\overrightarrow{\psi}*;\label{eq:53}\end{eqnarray}

2030: 

2031: \end_inset

2032: 

2033: 

2034: \end_layout

2035: 

2036: \begin_layout Standard

2037: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2038: \partial_{4}\overrightarrow{A}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}A_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{A} & = & i\overrightarrow{E}-\overrightarrow{\mathcal{H}}=i\overrightarrow{\psi}*.\label{eq:54}\end{eqnarray}

2039: 

2040: \end_inset

2041: 

2042: Thus equation (

2043: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:50}

2044: 

2045: \end_inset

2046: 

2047: ) reduces to

2048: \end_layout

2049: 

2050: \begin_layout Standard

2051: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2052: \overline{D}\emptyset & = & F\label{eq:55}\end{eqnarray}

2053: 

2054: \end_inset

2055: 

2056: where

2057: \end_layout

2058: 

2059: \begin_layout Standard

2060: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2061: F & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

2062: 0 & -\overrightarrow{F}\\

2063: \overrightarrow{F} & 0\end{array}\right)=i\psi*.\label{eq:56}\end{eqnarray}

2064: 

2065: \end_inset

2066: 

2067: Equation (

2068: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:56}

2069: 

2070: \end_inset

2071: 

2072: ) is the split octonion form of field tensor 

2073: \begin_inset Formula $F_{\mu\nu}=\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}-\partial_{\nu}A_{\mu}$

2074: \end_inset

2075: 

2076:  describing the electric and magnetic fields.

2077:  Off diagonal vector components of split octonions (

2078: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:50}

2079: 

2080: \end_inset

2081: 

2082: ) are the conjugates to each other and the scalar components along principal

2083:  diagonal are associated with the quaternion scalars (i.e.

2084:  real quaternion).

2085:  Similarly, we get

2086: \end_layout

2087: 

2088: \begin_layout Standard

2089: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2090: D\overline{\emptyset} & = & F^{T}\label{eq:57}\end{eqnarray}

2091: 

2092: \end_inset

2093: 

2094: where

2095: \end_layout

2096: 

2097: \begin_layout Standard

2098: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2099: F^{T} & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

2100: 0 & \overrightarrow{F}*\\

2101: -\overrightarrow{F}* & 0\end{array}\right)=i\psi.\label{eq:58}\end{eqnarray}

2102: 

2103: \end_inset

2104: 

2105: and equations (

2106: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:55}

2107: 

2108: \end_inset

2109: 

2110: ) and (

2111: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:57}

2112: 

2113: \end_inset

2114: 

2115: ) lead to 

2116: \end_layout

2117: 

2118: \begin_layout Standard

2119: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2120: \frac{1}{2}(\overline{D}\emptyset+D\overline{\emptyset}) & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

2121: 0 & \overrightarrow{\mathcal{H}}\\

2122: -\overrightarrow{\mathcal{H}} & 0\end{array}\right)=\overrightarrow{\mathcal{H}}\label{eq:59}\end{eqnarray}

2123: 

2124: \end_inset

2125: 

2126: 

2127: \end_layout

2128: 

2129: \begin_layout Standard

2130: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2131: \frac{1}{2}i\,(\overline{D}\emptyset-D\overline{\emptyset}) & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

2132: 0 & \overrightarrow{E}\\

2133: -\overrightarrow{E} & 0\end{array}\right)=\overrightarrow{E}\label{eq:60}\end{eqnarray}

2134: 

2135: \end_inset

2136: 

2137: where 

2138: \begin_inset Formula $\overrightarrow{E}$

2139: \end_inset

2140: 

2141:  and 

2142: \begin_inset Formula $\overrightarrow{\mathcal{H}}$

2143: \end_inset

2144: 

2145:  are the electric and magnetic fields given by equations (

2146: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:51}

2147: 

2148: \end_inset

2149: 

2150: ,

2151: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:52}

2152: 

2153: \end_inset

2154: 

2155: ).

2156:  Here we have the different split octonion representation in comparison

2157:  to the case quaternion electrodynamics, where 

2158: \begin_inset Formula $\frac{1}{2}(\overline{D}\emptyset+D\overline{\emptyset})$

2159: \end_inset

2160: 

2161:  represents Lorentz condition (i.e.

2162:  scalar part of quaternion) and 

2163: \begin_inset Formula $\frac{1}{2}i\,(\overline{D}\emptyset-D\overline{\emptyset})$

2164: \end_inset

2165: 

2166:  represents the vector part (pure quaternion) of a quaternion.

2167:  It is obvious because the off diagonal elements of an octonion is a quaternion

2168:  while those along principal diagonal are the scalars.

2169: \end_layout

2170: 

2171: \begin_layout Subsubsection*

2172: (ii) TACHYONIC CASE

2173: \end_layout

2174: 

2175: \begin_layout Standard

2176: For the description of tachyons we substitute 

2177: \begin_inset Formula $A_{4}=B_{4},\,\overrightarrow{A}\,=\overrightarrow{B}$

2178: \end_inset

2179: 

2180:  in equations (

2181: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:40}

2182: 

2183: \end_inset

2184: 

2185: ) to (

2186: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:49}

2187: 

2188: \end_inset

2189: 

2190: ) and get the representation of 

2191: \begin_inset Formula $T^{4}-$

2192: \end_inset

2193: 

2194:  space.

2195:  In this space (one space and three time dimensions), the scalar component

2196:  is 

2197: \begin_inset Formula $r\,=|\overrightarrow{r}|=(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2})^{\frac{1}{2}}$

2198: \end_inset

2199: 

2200: and the time gradient vector 

2201: \begin_inset Formula $\overrightarrow{\nabla}'=[t_{x},t_{y},t_{z},\partial_{4}'=(-ir)]$

2202: \end_inset

2203: 

2204: .

2205:  Hence the split octonion form of four differential operator, its conjugate

2206:  and the four potential of tachyons may be written as 

2207: \end_layout

2208: 

2209: \begin_layout Standard

2210: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2211: D & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

2212: \partial'_{4} & -\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\\

2213: \overrightarrow{\nabla}' & \partial'_{4}\end{array}\right)\label{eq:61}\end{eqnarray}

2214: 

2215: \end_inset

2216: 

2217: 

2218: \end_layout

2219: 

2220: \begin_layout Standard

2221: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2222: \overline{D} & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

2223: \partial'_{4} & \overrightarrow{\nabla}'\\

2224: -\overrightarrow{\nabla}' & \partial'_{4}\end{array}\right)\label{eq:62}\end{eqnarray}

2225: 

2226: \end_inset

2227: 

2228: 

2229: \end_layout

2230: 

2231: \begin_layout Standard

2232: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2233: \emptyset & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

2234: B_{4} & -\overrightarrow{B}\\

2235: \overrightarrow{B} & B_{4}\end{array}\right).\label{eq:63}\end{eqnarray}

2236: 

2237: \end_inset

2238: 

2239: Thus we get 

2240: \end_layout

2241: 

2242: \begin_layout Standard

2243: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2244: \overline{D}\emptyset & =F\,' & =\left(\begin{array}{cc}

2245: \partial'_{4}B_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{B} & -(\partial'_{4}\overrightarrow{B}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'B_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{B})\\

2246: \partial'_{4}\overrightarrow{B}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}B_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{B} & \partial'_{4}B_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'.\overrightarrow{B}\end{array}\right).\label{eq:64}\end{eqnarray}

2247: 

2248: \end_inset

2249: 

2250: Now using the following expressions for tachyonic 

2251: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-23,key-24}

2252: 

2253: \end_inset

2254: 

2255:  electric and magnetic fields in 

2256: \begin_inset Formula $T^{4}$

2257: \end_inset

2258: 

2259: - space as

2260: \end_layout

2261: 

2262: \begin_layout Standard

2263: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2264: \overrightarrow{E_{t}} & =-\frac{\partial\overrightarrow{B}}{\partial r}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\emptyset_{g} & =-\frac{\partial\overrightarrow{B}}{\partial r}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'B_{4};\label{eq:65}\end{eqnarray}

2265: 

2266: \end_inset

2267: 

2268: 

2269: \end_layout

2270: 

2271: \begin_layout Standard

2272: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2273: \overrightarrow{H_{t}} & = & \overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{B}\label{eq:66}\end{eqnarray}

2274: 

2275: \end_inset

2276: 

2277: and imposing Lorentz gauge condition in 

2278: \begin_inset Formula $T^{4}-$

2279: \end_inset

2280: 

2281: space as 

2282: \end_layout

2283: 

2284: \begin_layout Standard

2285: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray*}

2286: \partial'_{4}B_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'.\overrightarrow{B} & = & 0,\end{eqnarray*}

2287: 

2288: \end_inset

2289: 

2290: we get

2291: \end_layout

2292: 

2293: \begin_layout Standard

2294: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2295: -\partial'_{4}\overrightarrow{B}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'B_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{B} & = & -i\overrightarrow{E_{t}}+\overrightarrow{H_{t}}=-i\overrightarrow{\psi_{t}}*;\label{eq:67}\end{eqnarray}

2296: 

2297: \end_inset

2298: 

2299: 

2300: \end_layout

2301: 

2302: \begin_layout Standard

2303: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2304: \partial'_{4}\overrightarrow{B}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}B_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{B} & = & i\overrightarrow{E_{t}}-\overrightarrow{H_{t}}=i\overrightarrow{\psi_{t}}*\label{eq:68}\end{eqnarray}

2305: 

2306: \end_inset

2307: 

2308: where 

2309: \begin_inset Formula $\overrightarrow{\psi_{t}}=\overrightarrow{E_{t}}-i\overrightarrow{H_{t}}$

2310: \end_inset

2311: 

2312:  (

2313: \begin_inset Formula $t$

2314: \end_inset

2315: 

2316:  denotes for tachyonic representations).

2317:  Then equation (

2318: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:64}

2319: 

2320: \end_inset

2321: 

2322: ) reduces to

2323: \end_layout

2324: 

2325: \begin_layout Standard

2326: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2327: F\,' & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

2328: 0 & -\overrightarrow{F_{t}}\\

2329: \overrightarrow{F_{t}} & 0\end{array}\right)=i\overrightarrow{\psi_{t}}*.\label{eq:69}\end{eqnarray}

2330: 

2331: \end_inset

2332: 

2333: Equation (

2334: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:64}

2335: 

2336: \end_inset

2337: 

2338: ) is the split octonion form of field tensor 

2339: \begin_inset Formula $F_{\mu\nu}'=\partial'_{\mu}B'_{\nu}-\partial'_{\nu}B'_{\mu}$

2340: \end_inset

2341: 

2342:  components of which describe the electric and magnetic field in 

2343: \begin_inset Formula $T^{4}$

2344: \end_inset

2345: 

2346: - space.

2347:  Similarly, we obtain 

2348: \end_layout

2349: 

2350: \begin_layout Standard

2351: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2352: D\overline{\emptyset} & = & F_{t}'\label{eq:70}\end{eqnarray}

2353: 

2354: \end_inset

2355: 

2356: where

2357: \end_layout

2358: 

2359: \begin_layout Standard

2360: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2361: F_{t}' & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

2362: 0 & \overrightarrow{F_{t}}*\\

2363: \overrightarrow{-F_{t}}* & 0\end{array}\right)=i\overrightarrow{\psi_{t}}.\label{eq:71}\end{eqnarray}

2364: 

2365: \end_inset

2366: 

2367: In the same manner, we get 

2368: \end_layout

2369: 

2370: \begin_layout Standard

2371: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2372: \frac{1}{2}(\overline{D}\emptyset+D\overline{\emptyset}) & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

2373: 0 & \overrightarrow{H_{t}}\\

2374: -\overrightarrow{H_{t}} & 0\end{array}\right)=\overrightarrow{H_{t}}\label{eq:72}\end{eqnarray}

2375: 

2376: \end_inset

2377: 

2378: 

2379: \end_layout

2380: 

2381: \begin_layout Standard

2382: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2383: \frac{1}{2}i\,(\overline{D}\emptyset-D\overline{\emptyset}) & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

2384: 0 & \overrightarrow{E_{t}}\\

2385: -\overrightarrow{E_{t}} & 0\end{array}\right)=\overrightarrow{E_{t}}\label{eq:73}\end{eqnarray}

2386: 

2387: \end_inset

2388: 

2389: where 

2390: \begin_inset Formula $\overrightarrow{E_{t}}$

2391: \end_inset

2392: 

2393:  and 

2394: \begin_inset Formula $\overrightarrow{H_{t}}$

2395: \end_inset

2396: 

2397:  are the electric and magnetic fields of tachyons in 

2398: \begin_inset Formula $T^{4}-$

2399: \end_inset

2400: 

2401: space as given by equations (

2402: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:65}

2403: 

2404: \end_inset

2405: 

2406: ,

2407: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:66}

2408: 

2409: \end_inset

2410: 

2411: ).

2412:  

2413: \end_layout

2414: 

2415: \begin_layout Subsubsection*

2416: (iii) DYONIC CASE

2417: \end_layout

2418: 

2419: \begin_layout Standard

2420: In order to reformulate dyonic field equations in terms of split octonions

2421:  and its Zorn's vector matrix realization, we replace 

2422: \begin_inset Formula $\emptyset$

2423: \end_inset

2424: 

2425:  in equation (

2426: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:42}

2427: 

2428: \end_inset

2429: 

2430: ) by the complex (generalized) four - potential 

2431: \begin_inset Formula $\left\{ V_{\mu}\right\} $

2432: \end_inset

2433: 

2434:  of dyons 

2435: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-36}

2436: 

2437: \end_inset

2438: 

2439:  in the following form

2440: \end_layout

2441: 

2442: \begin_layout Standard

2443: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2444: V & = & V_{4}u_{0}*+V_{4}u_{0}+V_{i}u_{i}*+V_{i}u_{i}=\left(\begin{array}{cc}

2445: V_{4} & -\overrightarrow{V}\\

2446: \overrightarrow{V} & V_{4}\end{array}\right)\label{eq:74}\end{eqnarray}

2447: 

2448: \end_inset

2449: 

2450: where 

2451: \begin_inset Formula $V_{4}$

2452: \end_inset

2453: 

2454:  and 

2455: \begin_inset Formula $\overrightarrow{V}$

2456: \end_inset

2457: 

2458:  are the temporal and spatial components of generalized four - potential

2459:  of dyons.

2460:  These are complex quantities and their real and imaginary components are

2461:  electric and magnetic constituents 

2462: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-36}

2463: 

2464: \end_inset

2465: 

2466: .

2467:  Split octonion four - differential operator is now defined as,

2468: \end_layout

2469: 

2470: \begin_layout Standard

2471: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2472: D & =\partial_{4}u_{0}*+\partial_{4}u_{0}+\partial_{i}u_{i}*+\partial_{i}u_{i}= & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

2473: \partial_{4} & -\overrightarrow{\nabla}\\

2474: \overrightarrow{\nabla} & \partial_{4}\end{array}\right)\label{eq:75}\end{eqnarray}

2475: 

2476: \end_inset

2477: 

2478: Operating split octonion conjugate of four - differential operator given

2479:  by equation (

2480: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:75}

2481: 

2482: \end_inset

2483: 

2484: ) on the equation (

2485: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:74}

2486: 

2487: \end_inset

2488: 

2489: ) and using to communication relations of split octonion units, we get

2490: \end_layout

2491: 

2492: \begin_layout Standard

2493: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2494: \overline{D}V & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

2495: \partial_{4}V_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{V} & -(\partial_{4}\overrightarrow{V}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}V_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{V})\\

2496: \partial_{4}\overrightarrow{V}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}V_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{V} & \partial_{4}V_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{V}\end{array}\right)\label{eq:76}\end{eqnarray}

2497: 

2498: \end_inset

2499: 

2500: where

2501: \end_layout

2502: 

2503: \begin_layout Standard

2504: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2505: \partial_{4}V_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{V} & = & (\partial_{\mu}V_{\mu})(u_{0}*+u_{0})=0.1=0\label{eq:77}\end{eqnarray}

2506: 

2507: \end_inset

2508: 

2509: and

2510: \end_layout

2511: 

2512: \begin_layout Standard

2513: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2514: -\partial_{4}\overrightarrow{V}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}V_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{V} & = & -i\psi*.\label{eq:78}\end{eqnarray}

2515: 

2516: \end_inset

2517: 

2518: Thus 

2519: \begin_inset Formula $V$

2520: \end_inset

2521: 

2522:  is the generalized split octonion potential of dyons and 

2523: \begin_inset Formula $\overrightarrow{\psi}$

2524: \end_inset

2525: 

2526:  is the complex vector field with 

2527: \begin_inset Formula $\overrightarrow{E}$

2528: \end_inset

2529: 

2530:  and 

2531: \begin_inset Formula $\overrightarrow{H}$

2532: \end_inset

2533: 

2534:  as the generalized electromagnetic fields of dyons.

2535:  Consequently, equation (

2536: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:76}

2537: 

2538: \end_inset

2539: 

2540: ) leads to the following split octonion wave equation for dyonic field as

2541: \end_layout

2542: 

2543: \begin_layout Standard

2544: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2545: \overline{D}V & = & G\label{eq:79}\end{eqnarray}

2546: 

2547: \end_inset

2548: 

2549: where

2550: \end_layout

2551: 

2552: \begin_layout Standard

2553: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2554: G & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

2555: 0 & -\overrightarrow{G}\\

2556: \overrightarrow{G} & 0\end{array}\right)=i\overrightarrow{\psi}*.\label{eq:80}\end{eqnarray}

2557: 

2558: \end_inset

2559: 

2560: It is to be noted from equations (

2561: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:46}

2562: 

2563: \end_inset

2564: 

2565: ) to (

2566: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:49}

2567: 

2568: \end_inset

2569: 

2570: ) that 

2571: \begin_inset Formula $f_{4},\,\overrightarrow{f\,},\overrightarrow{\, f}\,'$

2572: \end_inset

2573: 

2574:  and 

2575: \begin_inset Formula $f_{4}'$

2576: \end_inset

2577: 

2578:  are the components of electric and magnetic fields described in terms of

2579:  two four-potentials in internal and external spaces.

2580:  If the two spaces are completely disjoint spaces then we get only 

2581: \begin_inset Formula $\overrightarrow{f}$

2582: \end_inset

2583: 

2584: , in external four - space since 

2585: \begin_inset Formula $f_{4}=0$

2586: \end_inset

2587: 

2588:  due to Lorentz gauge condition while 

2589: \begin_inset Formula $\overrightarrow{f}\,'$

2590: \end_inset

2591: 

2592:  and 

2593: \begin_inset Formula $f_{4\,}'$

2594: \end_inset

2595: 

2596:  do not occur.

2597:  Equations (

2598: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:48}

2599: 

2600: \end_inset

2601: 

2602: ) and (

2603: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:49}

2604: 

2605: \end_inset

2606: 

2607: ) shows that 

2608: \begin_inset Formula $\overrightarrow{f}$

2609: \end_inset

2610: 

2611:  and 

2612: \begin_inset Formula $\overrightarrow{f\,}'$

2613: \end_inset

2614: 

2615:  are made up from electric and magnetic fields, which is the mixing of external

2616:  and internal spaces.

2617:  As such equations (

2618: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:48}

2619: 

2620: \end_inset

2621: 

2622: ) and (

2623: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:49}

2624: 

2625: \end_inset

2626: 

2627: ) do not describe either the usual electric and magnetic fields or the generaliz

2628: ed fields of dyons.

2629:  Rather, they have the mixed behaviour, namely tachyonic dyons.

2630: \end_layout

2631: 

2632: \begin_layout Subsection

2633: 

2634: \size normal

2635: FIELD EQUATIONS

2636: \end_layout

2637: 

2638: \begin_layout Standard

2639: Let us write the octonion wave equation in split representation as

2640: \end_layout

2641: 

2642: \begin_layout Standard

2643: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2644: DF & = & J.\label{eq:81}\end{eqnarray}

2645: 

2646: \end_inset

2647: 

2648: Here 

2649: \begin_inset Formula $D$

2650: \end_inset

2651: 

2652:  and 

2653: \begin_inset Formula $F$

2654: \end_inset

2655: 

2656:  are defined by equations (

2657: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:40}

2658: 

2659: \end_inset

2660: 

2661: ) and (

2662: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:45}

2663: 

2664: \end_inset

2665: 

2666: ) in split octonionic form and 

2667: \begin_inset Formula $J$

2668: \end_inset

2669: 

2670:  is associated with eight dimensional current source density in split octonion

2671:  representation as follows,

2672: \end_layout

2673: 

2674: \begin_layout Standard

2675: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2676: J & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

2677: J_{4} & -\overrightarrow{J}\\

2678: \overrightarrow{J} & J_{4}\end{array}\right).\label{eq:82}\end{eqnarray}

2679: 

2680: \end_inset

2681: 

2682: Now using equations (

2683: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:40}

2684: 

2685: \end_inset

2686: 

2687: ) and (

2688: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:45}

2689: 

2690: \end_inset

2691: 

2692: ) , we get

2693: \end_layout

2694: 

2695: \begin_layout Standard

2696: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2697: DF & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

2698: \partial_{4}f_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{f}\,' & -(\partial_{4}\overrightarrow{f}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}f_{4}'+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times f\,')\\

2699: \partial'_{4}\overrightarrow{f}\,'+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'f_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{f} & \partial'_{4}f_{4}'-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'.\overrightarrow{f}\end{array}\right).\label{eq:83}\end{eqnarray}

2700: 

2701: \end_inset

2702: 

2703: Comparing equations (

2704: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:81}

2705: 

2706: \end_inset

2707: 

2708: ), (

2709: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:82}

2710: 

2711: \end_inset

2712: 

2713: ) and (

2714: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:83}

2715: 

2716: \end_inset

2717: 

2718: ), we get

2719: \end_layout

2720: 

2721: \begin_layout Standard

2722: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2723: J_{4} & = & \partial_{4}f_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{f}\,';\label{eq:84}\end{eqnarray}

2724: 

2725: \end_inset

2726: 

2727: 

2728: \end_layout

2729: 

2730: \begin_layout Standard

2731: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2732: J_{4}' & = & \partial'_{4}f_{4}'-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'.\overrightarrow{f};\label{eq:85}\end{eqnarray}

2733: 

2734: \end_inset

2735: 

2736: 

2737: \end_layout

2738: 

2739: \begin_layout Standard

2740: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2741: \overrightarrow{J} & = & \partial_{4}\overrightarrow{f}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}f_{4}'+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times f\,';\label{eq:86}\end{eqnarray}

2742: 

2743: \end_inset

2744: 

2745: 

2746: \end_layout

2747: 

2748: \begin_layout Standard

2749: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2750: \overrightarrow{J}' & = & \partial'_{4}\overrightarrow{f}\,'+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'f_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{f}.\label{eq:87}\end{eqnarray}

2751: 

2752: \end_inset

2753: 

2754: Let us discuss the following different cases of generalized field equation.

2755: \end_layout

2756: 

2757: \begin_layout Subsubsection*

2758: (i) BRADYONIC CASE

2759: \end_layout

2760: 

2761: \begin_layout Standard

2762: For the description of bradyons, let us substitute 

2763: \begin_inset Formula $B_{4}=A_{4},\,\overrightarrow{B}=\overrightarrow{A},\,\partial_{4}'=\partial_{4},\,\overrightarrow{\nabla}'=\overrightarrow{\nabla}\equiv\partial$

2764: \end_inset

2765: 

2766:  and 

2767: \begin_inset Formula $J_{4}'=J_{4},\,\overrightarrow{J}'=\overrightarrow{J}.$

2768: \end_inset

2769: 

2770:  Using equations (

2771: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:51}

2772: 

2773: \end_inset

2774: 

2775: , 

2776: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:52}

2777: 

2778: \end_inset

2779: 

2780: , 

2781: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:56}

2782: 

2783: \end_inset

2784: 

2785: ) we find that equation (

2786: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:83}

2787: 

2788: \end_inset

2789: 

2790: ) reduces to 

2791: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2792: DF & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

2793: \overrightarrow{\nabla}.\mathcal{\overrightarrow{H}}+i\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{E} & i\frac{\partial\mathcal{\overrightarrow{H}}}{\partial t}+i\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{E}-\frac{\partial\overrightarrow{E}}{\partial t}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\mathcal{\overrightarrow{H}}\\

2794: -i\frac{\partial\mathcal{\overrightarrow{H}}}{\partial t}-i\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{E}+\frac{\partial\overrightarrow{E}}{\partial t}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\mathcal{\overrightarrow{H}} & \overrightarrow{\nabla}.\mathcal{\overrightarrow{H}}+i\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{E}\end{array}\right)\label{eq:88}\end{eqnarray}

2795: 

2796: \end_inset

2797: 

2798: Comparing it with equations (

2799: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:81}

2800: 

2801: \end_inset

2802: 

2803:  , 

2804: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:82}

2805: 

2806: \end_inset

2807: 

2808: ), we find that equation (

2809: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:88}

2810: 

2811: \end_inset

2812: 

2813: ) is analogous to the split octonionic form of Maxwell's equation 

2814: \begin_inset Formula $F_{\mu\nu,\nu}=J_{\mu}$

2815: \end_inset

2816: 

2817:  which is the covariant form of a set of following four differential equations

2818:  i.e.

2819: \end_layout

2820: 

2821: \begin_layout Standard

2822: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray*}

2823: \overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{E}=\rho_{e}=-i\, J_{4}, & \overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{H}= & 0,\end{eqnarray*}

2824: 

2825: \end_inset

2826: 

2827: 

2828: \end_layout

2829: 

2830: \begin_layout Standard

2831: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2832: \overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{H}=-\overrightarrow{J}+\frac{\partial\overrightarrow{E}}{\partial t}, & \overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{E}= & -\frac{\partial\overrightarrow{H}}{\partial t}.\label{eq:89}\end{eqnarray}

2833: 

2834: \end_inset

2835: 

2836: Hence the octonion field equation (

2837: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:81}

2838: 

2839: \end_inset

2840: 

2841: ) is identical to the Maxwell's field equation in compact and simple split

2842:  octonion form.

2843:  Equation (

2844: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:81}

2845: 

2846: \end_inset

2847: 

2848: ) may also be written in terms of potential as 

2849: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2850: DF & =D(\overline{D}\emptyset) & =D\overline{D}\emptyset=\square\emptyset=J\label{eq:90}\end{eqnarray}

2851: 

2852: \end_inset

2853: 

2854: which is equivalent to split octonion form of covariant field equation 

2855: \begin_inset Formula $\square V_{\mu}=J_{\mu}$

2856: \end_inset

2857: 

2858:  of classical electrodynamics.

2859:  As such, we have reformulated the classical electrodynamics in terms of

2860:  compact, simple and consistent representation of split octonion formulations

2861:  for the case of particles traveling slower than light namely bradyons.

2862: \end_layout

2863: 

2864: \begin_layout Subsubsection*

2865: (ii) TACHYONIC CASE

2866: \end_layout

2867: 

2868: \begin_layout Standard

2869: In this case if we may substitute 

2870: \begin_inset Formula $A_{4}=B_{4},\,\overrightarrow{A}=\overrightarrow{B},\,\partial_{4}=\partial_{4}',\,\overrightarrow{\nabla}'=\overrightarrow{\nabla}\equiv\partial$

2871: \end_inset

2872: 

2873:  and 

2874: \begin_inset Formula $J_{4}=J_{4}',\,\overrightarrow{J}=\overrightarrow{J}\,'.$

2875: \end_inset

2876: 

2877:  Hence, using equations (

2878: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:61}

2879: 

2880: \end_inset

2881: 

2882: ) and (

2883: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:64}

2884: 

2885: \end_inset

2886: 

2887: ), we get

2888: \end_layout

2889: 

2890: \begin_layout Standard

2891: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2892: DF & '= & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

2893: J_{4}' & -\overrightarrow{J}\,'\\

2894: \overrightarrow{J} & J_{4}\end{array}\right)=J\,'.\label{eq:91}\end{eqnarray}

2895: 

2896: \end_inset

2897: 

2898: This equation is the split octonionic form of Maxwell's equation 

2899: \begin_inset Formula $F''_{\mu\nu,\nu}=J_{\mu}'$

2900: \end_inset

2901: 

2902:  in 

2903: \begin_inset Formula $T^{4}\,$

2904: \end_inset

2905: 

2906: - space where we have used the following pairs of Maxwell's equation for

2907:  tachyons [

2908: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-25,key-26}

2909: 

2910: \end_inset

2911: 

2912: ]

2913: \end_layout

2914: 

2915: \begin_layout Standard

2916: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray*}

2917: \overrightarrow{\nabla}'.\overrightarrow{E}_{t}=-\rho_{0}, & \overrightarrow{\nabla}'.\overrightarrow{H_{t}}= & 0,\end{eqnarray*}

2918: 

2919: \end_inset

2920: 

2921: 

2922: \end_layout

2923: 

2924: \begin_layout Standard

2925: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

2926: \overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{H_{t}}=-\overrightarrow{J}\,'+\frac{\partial\overrightarrow{E_{t}}}{\partial t}, & \overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{E_{t}}= & -\frac{\partial\overrightarrow{H_{t}}}{\partial t}.\label{eq:92}\end{eqnarray}

2927: 

2928: \end_inset

2929: 

2930: Hence equation (

2931: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:90}

2932: 

2933: \end_inset

2934: 

2935: ) is visualized as the field equation of tachyons in 

2936: \begin_inset Formula $T^{4}\,$

2937: \end_inset

2938: 

2939: - space in compact, simple and consistent split octonionic formulation.

2940:  It has already been concluded 

2941: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-23,key-24,key-25}

2942: 

2943: \end_inset

2944: 

2945:  that 

2946: \begin_inset Formula $T^{4}\,$

2947: \end_inset

2948: 

2949: - space for tachyons plays the same role as bradyons do in 

2950: \begin_inset Formula $R^{4}\,$

2951: \end_inset

2952: 

2953: - space.

2954: \end_layout

2955: 

2956: \begin_layout Subsubsection*

2957: (iii) DYONIC CASE

2958: \end_layout

2959: 

2960: \begin_layout Standard

2961: Here, we consider 

2962: \begin_inset Formula $\left\{ A_{\mu}\right\} $

2963: \end_inset

2964: 

2965:  and 

2966: \begin_inset Formula $\left\{ B_{\mu}\right\} $

2967: \end_inset

2968: 

2969:  as electric and magnetic four - potentials described in external space

2970:  (i.e.

2971:  

2972: \begin_inset Formula $R^{4}\,$

2973: \end_inset

2974: 

2975: -space) only, 

2976: \begin_inset Formula $D$

2977: \end_inset

2978: 

2979:  is defined by equation (

2980: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:75}

2981: 

2982: \end_inset

2983: 

2984: ) and 

2985: \begin_inset Formula $\emptyset$

2986: \end_inset

2987: 

2988:  is replaced by 

2989: \begin_inset Formula $V$

2990: \end_inset

2991: 

2992:  the generalized four- potential of dyons given by equation (

2993: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:74}

2994: 

2995: \end_inset

2996: 

2997: ) .

2998:  Subsequently, on using equations (

2999: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:75}

3000: 

3001: \end_inset

3002: 

3003: ), (

3004: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:76}

3005: 

3006: \end_inset

3007: 

3008: ) and (

3009: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:79}

3010: 

3011: \end_inset

3012: 

3013: ), we get

3014: \end_layout

3015: 

3016: \begin_layout Standard

3017: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

3018: D(\overline{D}V) & = & DG=J\label{eq:93}\end{eqnarray}

3019: 

3020: \end_inset

3021: 

3022: where

3023: \end_layout

3024: 

3025: \begin_layout Standard

3026: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

3027: J & =J_{4}u_{0}*+J_{4}u_{0}+J_{i}u_{i}*+J_{i}u_{i}= & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

3028: J_{4} & -\overrightarrow{J}\\

3029: \overrightarrow{J} & J_{4}\end{array}\right)\label{eq:94}\end{eqnarray}

3030: 

3031: \end_inset

3032: 

3033: is the split octonion form of generalized four - current associated with

3034:  dyons.

3035:  Accordingly, we get

3036: \end_layout

3037: 

3038: \begin_layout Standard

3039: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

3040: D(\overline{D}V) & =(D\overline{D})V=DG & =J\label{eq:95}\end{eqnarray}

3041: 

3042: \end_inset

3043: 

3044: or equivalently

3045: \end_layout

3046: 

3047: \begin_layout Standard

3048: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

3049: \square V & = & J\label{eq:96}\end{eqnarray}

3050: 

3051: \end_inset

3052: 

3053: where

3054: \end_layout

3055: 

3056: \begin_layout Standard

3057: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

3058: \square & = & (\overline{D}D)=(D\overline{D})=\partial_{4}^{2}+\nabla^{2}=\partial_{i}\partial_{i}.\label{eq:97}\end{eqnarray}

3059: 

3060: \end_inset

3061: 

3062: Equations (

3063: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:93}

3064: 

3065: \end_inset

3066: 

3067: ) and (

3068: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:95}

3069: 

3070: \end_inset

3071: 

3072: ) are the split octonion equivalents of Generalized Dirac-Maxwell's (GDM)

3073:  equation of dyons.

3074:  Hence we may describe split octonion wave equation as the generalized field

3075:  equation of dyons in compact, simple and consistent manner.

3076:  Moreover, equation (

3077: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:93}

3078: 

3079: \end_inset

3080: 

3081: ) and (

3082: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:95}

3083: 

3084: \end_inset

3085: 

3086: ) reproduce the field equations corresponding to the dynamics of electric

3087:  charge (magnetic monopole) in the absence of magnetic (electric) charge

3088:  on the dyons.

3089:  Equation (

3090: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:95}

3091: 

3092: \end_inset

3093: 

3094: ) is the thus split octonion equivalent of covariant field equations 

3095: \begin_inset Formula $\square V_{\mu}=J_{\mu}$

3096: \end_inset

3097: 

3098:  of generalized fields of dyons described earlier 

3099: \begin_inset LatexCommand \cite{key-26}

3100: 

3101: \end_inset

3102: 

3103: .

3104: \end_layout

3105: 

3106: \begin_layout Subsection

3107: CURRENT EQUATION

3108: \end_layout

3109: 

3110: \begin_layout Standard

3111: Let us discuss the octonion wave equation as the octonion current differential

3112:  equations in eight - dimension as

3113: \end_layout

3114: 

3115: \begin_layout Standard

3116: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

3117: DJ & = & S.\label{eq:98}\end{eqnarray}

3118: 

3119: \end_inset

3120: 

3121: Here 

3122: \begin_inset Formula $D$

3123: \end_inset

3124: 

3125:  and 

3126: \begin_inset Formula $J$

3127: \end_inset

3128: 

3129:  are defined earlier equations (

3130: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:41}

3131: 

3132: \end_inset

3133: 

3134: ) and (

3135: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:82}

3136: 

3137: \end_inset

3138: 

3139: ) in their split form and 

3140: \begin_inset Formula $S=\square F$

3141: \end_inset

3142: 

3143:  is defined as

3144: \end_layout

3145: 

3146: \begin_layout Standard

3147: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

3148: S & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

3149: S_{4} & -\overrightarrow{S}\\

3150: \overrightarrow{S}' & S_{4}'\end{array}\right).\label{eq:99}\end{eqnarray}

3151: 

3152: \end_inset

3153: 

3154: Now using equations (

3155: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:41}

3156: 

3157: \end_inset

3158: 

3159: ) and (

3160: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:46}

3161: 

3162: \end_inset

3163: 

3164: ) and equation (

3165: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:82}

3166: 

3167: \end_inset

3168: 

3169: ) , we get

3170: \end_layout

3171: 

3172: \begin_layout Standard

3173: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

3174: DJ & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

3175: \partial_{4}J_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{J}\,' & -(\partial_{4}\overrightarrow{J}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}J_{4}'+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{J}\,')\\

3176: \partial'_{4}\overrightarrow{J}\,'+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'J_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{J} & \partial'_{4}J_{4}'-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'.\overrightarrow{J}\end{array}\right).\label{eq:100}\end{eqnarray}

3177: 

3178: \end_inset

3179: 

3180: Now using equations (

3181: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:98}

3182: 

3183: \end_inset

3184: 

3185: ), (

3186: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:99}

3187: 

3188: \end_inset

3189: 

3190: ) and (

3191: \begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{eq:100}

3192: 

3193: \end_inset

3194: 

3195: ) , we get the following set of equations

3196: \end_layout

3197: 

3198: \begin_layout Standard

3199: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

3200: S_{4} & = & \partial_{4}J_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{J}\,';\label{eq:101}\end{eqnarray}

3201: 

3202: \end_inset

3203: 

3204: 

3205: \end_layout

3206: 

3207: \begin_layout Standard

3208: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

3209: S_{4}' & = & \partial'_{4}J_{4}'-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'.\overrightarrow{J};\label{eq:102}\end{eqnarray}

3210: 

3211: \end_inset

3212: 

3213: 

3214: \end_layout

3215: 

3216: \begin_layout Standard

3217: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

3218: \overrightarrow{S} & = & \partial_{4}\overrightarrow{J}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}J_{4}'+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{J}\,';\label{eq:103}\end{eqnarray}

3219: 

3220: \end_inset

3221: 

3222: 

3223: \end_layout

3224: 

3225: \begin_layout Standard

3226: \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray}

3227: \overrightarrow{S}' & = & \partial'_{4}\overrightarrow{J}\,'+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'J_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{J};\label{eq:104}\end{eqnarray}

3228: 

3229: \end_inset

3230: 

3231: where 

3232: \begin_inset Formula $S$

3233: \end_inset

3234: 

3235:  is the new octonion variable parameter obtained from the operation of different

3236: ial operator to current.Hence we may obtain a new kind of field equation

3237:  in terms of new parameter 

3238: \begin_inset Formula $S$

3239: \end_inset

3240: 

3241:  and accordingly we may analyze the different cases for bradyons, tachyons

3242:  and dyons.

3243: \end_layout

3244: 

3245: \begin_layout Standard

3246: 

3247: \end_layout

3248: 

3249: \begin_layout Standard

3250: 

3251: \series bold

3252: Acknowledgment

3253: \series default

3254: - The work is supported by Uttarakhand Council of Science and Technology,

3255:  Dehradun.

3256:  One of us OPSN is thankful to Chinese Academy of Sciences and Third world

3257:  Academy of Sciences for awarding him CAS-TWAS visiting scholar fellowship

3258:  to pursue a research program in China.

3259:  He is also grateful to Professor Tianjun Li for his hospitality at Institute

3260:  of Theoretical Physics, Beijing, China.

3261: \end_layout

3262: 

3263: \begin_layout Bibliography

3264: 

3265: \bibitem {key-1}

3266:  P.

3267:  Jordan, J Neuman, Von and E.

3268:  P.

3269:  Wigner, Ann.

3270:  Math., 

3271: \series bold

3272: \bar under

3273: 35

3274: \series default

3275: \bar default

3276:  , (1934), 29.

3277: \end_layout

3278: 

3279: \begin_layout Bibliography

3280: 

3281: \bibitem [2]{key-2}

3282:  A.

3283:  Cayley, Philos.

3284:  Mag.

3285:  

3286: \series bold

3287: \bar under

3288: 26

3289: \series default

3290: \bar default

3291:  , (1845), 208; R.

3292:  P.

3293:  Graves, "Life of Sir William Rowan Hamilton", 3 volumes, Arno Press, New

3294:  York, 1975; J.

3295:  C.

3296:  Baez, "THE OCTONIONS" , Bull.

3297:  Amer.

3298:  Math.

3299:  Soc., 

3300: \series bold

3301: \bar under

3302: 39

3303: \series default

3304: \bar default

3305: , (2001), 145, math.

3306:  RA/0105155; J.

3307:  H.

3308:  Conway, 

3309: \begin_inset Quotes eld

3310: \end_inset

3311: 

3312: On Quaternions and Octonions: Their Geometry, Arithmetic,and Symmetry,

3313: \begin_inset Quotes erd

3314: \end_inset

3315: 

3316:  A K Peters Ltd, Massachusetts, 2003.

3317: \end_layout

3318: 

3319: \begin_layout Bibliography

3320: 

3321: \bibitem [3]{key-3}

3322:  L.

3323:  E.

3324:  Dickson, Ann.

3325:  Math., 

3326: \series bold

3327: \bar under

3328: 20

3329: \series default

3330: \bar default

3331: , (1919), 155; W.

3332:  R.

3333:  Hamilton, "Elements of quaternions", Chelsea Publications Co., NY, (1969);

3334:  P.G.Tait, "An elementary Treatise on Quaternions", Oxford Univ.

3335:  Press (1875).

3336: \end_layout

3337: 

3338: \begin_layout Bibliography

3339: 

3340: \bibitem [4]{key-4}

3341:  A.

3342:   Pais, Phys.

3343:  Rev.

3344:  Lett., 

3345: \series bold

3346: \bar under

3347: 7

3348: \series default

3349: \bar default

3350: , (1961), 291; 

3351: \end_layout

3352: 

3353: \begin_layout Bibliography

3354: 

3355: \bibitem [5]{key-5}

3356:  R.

3357:  Penny, Am.

3358:  J.

3359:  Phys., 

3360: \series bold

3361: \bar under

3362: 36

3363: \series default

3364: \bar default

3365: , (1968), 871; Nuovo Cimento, 

3366: \series bold

3367: \bar under

3368: B3

3369: \series default

3370: \bar default

3371: , (1971), 95.

3372: \end_layout

3373: 

3374: \begin_layout Bibliography

3375: 

3376: \bibitem [6]{key-6}

3377:  K.

3378:  Imaeda, H.

3379:  Tachibana , M.

3380:  Imaeda and S.Ohta, Il Nuovo Cimento, 

3381: \series bold

3382: \bar under

3383: B100

3384: \series default

3385: \bar default

3386: , (1987), 53; 

3387: \series bold

3388: \bar under

3389: B105

3390: \series default

3391: \bar default

3392: , (1990) 1203; Bull.

3393:  Okayama Univ.

3394:  Sci., 

3395: \series bold

3396: \bar under

3397: A24 

3398: \bar default

3399: ,

3400: \series default

3401: \bar under

3402:  

3403: \bar default

3404: (1989) 181; K.

3405:  Imaeda and H.Tachibana, Il Nuovo Cimento, ; 

3406: \series bold

3407: \bar under

3408: B104 

3409: \series default

3410: \bar default

3411: (1989) 91; Bull.

3412:  Okayama Univ.

3413:  Sci., 

3414: \series bold

3415: \bar under

3416: A19

3417: \series default

3418: \bar default

3419: , (1984) , 93; H.Tachibana; Ph.D.Thesis, Okayama Univ.

3420:  Science (1990).

3421: \end_layout

3422: 

3423: \begin_layout Bibliography

3424: 

3425: \bibitem [7]{key-7}

3426: G.

3427:  C.

3428:  Joshi, Lett Nuovo Cimento, 

3429: \series bold

3430: \bar under

3431: 44

3432: \series default

3433: \bar default

3434: ,(1985), 449; A.

3435:  J.

3436:  Davis and G.

3437:  C.

3438:  Joshi, J.

3439:  Math.

3440:  Phys., 

3441: \series bold

3442: \bar under

3443: 27

3444: \series default

3445: \bar default

3446: ,(1986), 3036; R.

3447:  Foot and G.

3448:  C.

3449:  Joshi, Int.

3450:  J.

3451:  Theor.

3452:  Phys., 

3453: \series bold

3454: \bar under

3455: 28

3456: \series default

3457: \bar default

3458:  , (1989), 1449 ; Phys.

3459:  Lett., 

3460: \series bold

3461: \bar under

3462: B199

3463: \series default

3464: \bar default

3465: , (1987), 203.

3466:  

3467: \end_layout

3468: 

3469: \begin_layout Bibliography

3470: 

3471: \bibitem [8]{key-8}

3472:  A.

3473:  Gamba, J.

3474:  Math.

3475:  Phys.,

3476: \series bold

3477: \bar under

3478:  8

3479: \series default

3480: \bar default

3481: , 775 (1967); Il Nuovo Cimento, 

3482: \series bold

3483: \bar under

3484: A111

3485: \series default

3486: \bar default

3487:  , (1998) 293; M.

3488:  Gogberashvili, "Octonionic Version of Dirac Equations", hep-th/0505101;

3489:  J.

3490:  Phys.

3491:  A: Math.Gen., 

3492: \series bold

3493: \bar under

3494: 39

3495: \series default

3496: \bar default

3497:  , ( 2006) 7099.

3498: \end_layout

3499: 

3500: \begin_layout Bibliography

3501: 

3502: \bibitem [9]{key-9}

3503:  G.

3504:  M.

3505:  Dixon, 

3506: \begin_inset Quotes eld

3507: \end_inset

3508: 

3509: Division Algebras: Octonions, Quaternions, Complex Numbers, and the Algebraic

3510:  Design of Physics

3511: \begin_inset Quotes erd

3512: \end_inset

3513: 

3514: , (Kluwer, 1994); Geoffrey Dixon, 

3515: \begin_inset Quotes eld

3516: \end_inset

3517: 

3518: Division Algebras, (1,9)-Space-time, Matter-antimatter Mixing

3519: \begin_inset Quotes erd

3520: \end_inset

3521: 

3522:  arXiv:hep-th/9303039.

3523:  

3524: \end_layout

3525: 

3526: \begin_layout Bibliography

3527: 

3528: \bibitem [10]{key-10}

3529:  S.

3530:  Okubo, 

3531: \begin_inset Quotes eld

3532: \end_inset

3533: 

3534: Introduction to Octonion and Other Non-Associative Algebras in Physics

3535: \begin_inset Quotes erd

3536: \end_inset

3537: 

3538: , Montreal Memorial Lecture Series in Mathematical Physics, 2, Cambridge

3539:  University Press, 1995; C.H.

3540:  Barton and A.

3541:  Sudbery, 

3542: \begin_inset Quotes eld

3543: \end_inset

3544: 

3545: MAGIC SQUARES OF LIE ALGEBRAS

3546: \begin_inset Quotes erd

3547: \end_inset

3548: 

3549:  arXiv:math.RA/0001083.

3550: \end_layout

3551: 

3552: \begin_layout Bibliography

3553: 

3554: \bibitem [11]{key-11}

3555:  R.

3556:  Dündarer, F.

3557:  Gürsey and C.

3558:  Tze, J.

3559:  Math.

3560:  Phys., 

3561: \series bold

3562: \bar under

3563: 25

3564: \series default

3565: \bar default

3566: , (1980), 1496; Nucl.Phys.,

3567: \series bold

3568: \bar under

3569: B266

3570: \series default

3571: \bar default

3572:  , (1986) , 440; F.

3573:  Gürsey and C Tze,

3574: \begin_inset Quotes eld

3575: \end_inset

3576: 

3577: On the Role of Division, Jordan and Related Algebras in Particle Physics

3578: \begin_inset Quotes erd

3579: \end_inset

3580: 

3581: , World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, 1996; M Günaydin and F Gürsey, Lett

3582:  Nuovo Cimento, 

3583: \series bold

3584: \bar under

3585: 6

3586: \series default

3587: \bar default

3588: ,(1973), 407; M.

3589:  Koca and N.

3590:  Ozdes, J.

3591:  Phys.

3592:  A22, (1989), 1469; S.

3593:  Catto, "Exceptional Projective Geometries and Internal Symmetries", hep-th/0302

3594: 079; .

3595: \end_layout

3596: 

3597: \begin_layout Bibliography

3598: 

3599: \bibitem [12]{key-12}

3600:  M.

3601:  Günaydin and F.

3602:  Gürsey, J.

3603:  Math.

3604:  Phys., 

3605: \series bold

3606: \bar under

3607: 14

3608: \series default

3609: \bar default

3610: ,(1973), 1651.

3611: \end_layout

3612: 

3613: \begin_layout Bibliography

3614: 

3615: \bibitem [13]{key-13}

3616:  M.

3617:  Günaydin and F.

3618:  Gürsey, Phys.

3619:  Rev., 

3620: \series bold

3621: \bar under

3622: D9

3623: \series default

3624: \bar default

3625: ,(1974), 3387.

3626: \end_layout

3627: 

3628: \begin_layout Bibliography

3629: 

3630: \bibitem [14]{key-14}

3631: G.

3632:  Domokos and S.

3633:  Domokos-Kovesi, Phys.

3634:  Rev., 

3635: \series bold

3636: \bar under

3637: D19

3638: \series default

3639: \bar default

3640: ,(1979), 2984; J.

3641:  Math.

3642:  Phys., 18,(1978)

3643: \end_layout

3644: 

3645: \begin_layout Bibliography

3646: 

3647: \bibitem [15]{key-15}

3648: .

3649:  K.Morita ; Prog.

3650:  Theor.

3651:  Phys., 

3652: \series bold

3653: \bar under

3654: 65

3655: \series default

3656: \bar default

3657: ,(1981), 787; 

3658: \series bold

3659: \bar under

3660: 73

3661: \series default

3662: \bar default

3663: , (1985), 999; B.

3664:  A.

3665:  Bernevig, J.

3666:  Hu, N.

3667:  Toumbas, and S.Cheng Zhang, 

3668: \begin_inset Quotes eld

3669: \end_inset

3670: 

3671: The Eight Dimensional Quantum Hall Effect and the Octonions

3672: \begin_inset Quotes erd

3673: \end_inset

3674: 

3675: , arXiv:cond-mat/0306045.

3676: \end_layout

3677: 

3678: \begin_layout Bibliography

3679: 

3680: \bibitem [16]{key-16}

3681:  C.A.

3682:  Manogue and A.

3683:  Sudbery, Phys.

3684:  Rev., D40 , 4073(1989); T.

3685:  Kugo and P.

3686:  Townsend: Nucl.

3687:  Phys., 

3688: \series bold

3689: \bar under

3690: B221

3691: \series default

3692: \bar default

3693: , (1983), 357; J.

3694:  M.

3695:  Evans, Nucl.

3696:  Phys.,

3697: \series bold

3698: \bar under

3699:  B298

3700: \series default

3701: \bar default

3702: , (1988), 92; J.

3703:  Lukierski and F.

3704:  Toppan, Phys.

3705:  Lett., 

3706: \series bold

3707: \bar under

3708: B584

3709: \series default

3710: \bar default

3711:  , (2004), 315 ; 

3712: \series bold

3713: \bar under

3714: B539

3715: \series default

3716: \bar default

3717:  , (2002), 266 ; K.

3718:  S.

3719:  Abdel-Khalek Mostafa, "Ring Division Algebras, Self Duality and Supersymmetry",

3720:  arXiv:hep-th/0002155; J.

3721:  Schray, "Octonions and Supersymmetry", Ph.D.

3722:  thesis, Department of Physics, Oregon State University, 1994; M.

3723:  J.

3724:  Duff, Ed., "The World in Eleven Dimensions: Supergravity, Super membranes

3725:  and M-Theory", Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, 1999.

3726:  MR 2001b:81002 and references cited therein.

3727: \end_layout

3728: 

3729: \begin_layout Bibliography

3730: 

3731: \bibitem [17]{key-17}

3732:  A.

3733:  M.

3734:  Buoncristiani, J.

3735:  Math.

3736:  Phys., 

3737: \series bold

3738: \bar under

3739: 14

3740: \series default

3741: \bar default

3742: , (1973), 849.

3743: \end_layout

3744: 

3745: \begin_layout Bibliography

3746: 

3747: \bibitem [18]{key-18}

3748:  S.

3749:  Marques, and C.

3750:  G.

3751:  Oliveita, J.

3752:  Math.

3753:  Phys., 

3754: \series bold

3755: \bar under

3756: 26

3757: \series default

3758: \bar default

3759: , (1985), 3131.

3760: \end_layout

3761: 

3762: \begin_layout Bibliography

3763: 

3764: \bibitem [19]{key-19}

3765:  S.

3766:  Marques and C G Oliveira, J.

3767:  Math.

3768:  Phys., 

3769: \series bold

3770: \bar under

3771: 29

3772: \series default

3773: \bar default

3774: , (1988), 2127.

3775: \end_layout

3776: 

3777: \begin_layout Bibliography

3778: 

3779: \bibitem [20]{key-20}

3780:  S.

3781:  Marques- Bohham, J.

3782:  Math.

3783:  Phys., 

3784: \series bold

3785: \bar under

3786: 32

3787: \series default

3788: \bar default

3789: , (1991), 1383.

3790: \end_layout

3791: 

3792: \begin_layout Bibliography

3793: 

3794: \bibitem [21]{key-21}

3795:  S.

3796:  Marques - Bonham, J.

3797:  Math.

3798:  Phys., 

3799: \series bold

3800: \bar under

3801: 31

3802: \series default

3803: \bar default

3804: ,(1990), 1478.

3805: \end_layout

3806: 

3807: \begin_layout Bibliography

3808: 

3809: \bibitem [22]{key-22}

3810:  S.

3811:  Marques, C.

3812:  G .Oliveira., Phys.

3813:  Rev., 

3814: \series bold

3815: \bar under

3816: D36

3817: \series default

3818: \bar default

3819: ,(1987), 1716.

3820: \end_layout

3821: 

3822: \begin_layout Bibliography

3823: 

3824: \bibitem [23]{key-23}

3825:  H.

3826:  C.

3827:  Chandola and B.

3828:  S.

3829:  Rajput, J.

3830:  Math.

3831:  Phys, 

3832: \series bold

3833: \bar under

3834: 26

3835: \series default

3836: \bar default

3837: ,(1985), 208.

3838: \end_layout

3839: 

3840: \begin_layout Bibliography

3841: 

3842: \bibitem [24]{key-24}

3843: M.

3844:  C.

3845:  Pant, P.

3846:  S.

3847:  Bisht, O.

3848:  P.

3849:  S.

3850:  Negi and B.

3851:  S.

3852:  Rajput, Cand.

3853:  J.

3854:  of Phys.

3855:  

3856: \series bold

3857: \bar under

3858: 78

3859: \series default

3860: \bar default

3861: , (2000), 1.

3862: \end_layout

3863: 

3864: \begin_layout Bibliography

3865: 

3866: \bibitem [25]{key-25}

3867: O.

3868:  P.

3869:  S.

3870:  Negi, et al., Phys.

3871:  Lett., 

3872: \series bold

3873: \bar under

3874: B105

3875: \series default

3876: \bar default

3877: ,(1981), 281.

3878: \end_layout

3879: 

3880: \begin_layout Bibliography

3881: 

3882: \bibitem [26]{key-26}

3883: O.

3884:  P .

3885:  S.

3886:  Negi, and B.

3887:  S.

3888:  Rajput, Phys.

3889:  Lett.

3890:  

3891: \series bold

3892: \bar under

3893: B113

3894: \series default

3895: \bar default

3896: ,(1982), 183; Lett.

3897:  Nuovo Cimento 

3898: \series bold

3899: \bar under

3900: 34

3901: \series default

3902: \bar default

3903: ,(1982), 180; Indian J.

3904:  Pure and Appl.

3905:  Phys., 

3906: \series bold

3907: \bar under

3908: 2

3909: \series default

3910: \bar default

3911: 0,(1982), 472.

3912: \end_layout

3913: 

3914: \begin_layout Bibliography

3915: 

3916: \bibitem [27]{key-27}

3917: H.

3918:  C.

3919:  Chandola and B.

3920:  S.

3921:  Rajput, Nuovo Cimento 

3922: \series bold

3923: \bar under

3924: B72

3925: \series default

3926: \bar default

3927: , (1982), 21; Indian J.

3928:  Pure and Appl.

3929:  Phys.

3930:  

3931: \series bold

3932: \bar under

3933: 21

3934: \series default

3935: \bar default

3936: ,(1983), 651.

3937: \end_layout

3938: 

3939: \begin_layout Bibliography

3940: 

3941: \bibitem [28]{key-28}

3942:  E.

3943:  Recami and R.

3944:  Mignani, Riv.

3945:  Nuovo Cimento, 

3946: \series bold

3947: \bar under

3948: 4

3949: \series default

3950: \bar default

3951:  , (1974), 209; Lett.

3952:  Nuovo Cimento 

3953: \series bold

3954: \bar under

3955: 16

3956: \series default

3957: \bar default

3958: ,(1976), 449.

3959: \end_layout

3960: 

3961: \begin_layout Bibliography

3962: 

3963: \bibitem [29]{key-29}

3964:  G.

3965:  Dattoli and R.

3966:  Mignani, Lett.

3967:  Nuovo Cimento 

3968: \series bold

3969: \bar under

3970: 22

3971: \series default

3972: \bar default

3973: ,(1978), 65; V.

3974:  Vysin, Lett Nuovo Cimento 

3975: \series bold

3976: \bar under

3977: 22

3978: \series default

3979: \bar default

3980: , (1978), 76.

3981: \end_layout

3982: 

3983: \begin_layout Bibliography

3984: 

3985: \bibitem [30]{key-30}

3986:  E.

3987:  Recami, Riv.

3988:  Nuovo Cimento, 

3989: \series bold

3990: \bar under

3991: 9

3992: \series default

3993: \bar default

3994:  , 1-178 (1986); Found.

3995:  Phys., 

3996: \series bold

3997: \bar under

3998: 31 

3999: \series default

4000: \bar default

4001: , (2001) 1119; PHYSICA, 

4002: \series bold

4003: \bar under

4004: A252 

4005: \series default

4006: \bar default

4007: , (1998), 586.

4008: \end_layout

4009: 

4010: \begin_layout Bibliography

4011: 

4012: \bibitem [31]{key-31}

4013: G.

4014:  D.

4015:  Maccarrone and E.

4016:  Recami, Lett Nuovo Cimento 

4017: \series bold

4018: \bar under

4019: 34

4020: \series default

4021: \bar default

4022: , (1982), 251;

4023: \series bold

4024: \bar under

4025:  28

4026: \series default

4027: \bar default

4028: , (1980), 151 ; P.

4029:  Caldirola, G.

4030:  D.

4031:  Maccarrone and E.

4032:  Recami, Lett Nuovo Cimento, 

4033: \series bold

4034: \bar under

4035: 29 

4036: \series default

4037: \bar default

4038: , (1980), 241.

4039: \end_layout

4040: 

4041: \begin_layout Bibliography

4042: 

4043: \bibitem [32]{key-32}

4044: H.

4045:  C.

4046:  Chandola and B.

4047:  S.

4048:  Rajput, Indian J.

4049:  Pure and Appl.

4050:  Phys.

4051:  

4052: \series bold

4053: \bar under

4054: 22

4055: \series default

4056: \bar default

4057: , (1984), 1.

4058: \end_layout

4059: 

4060: \begin_layout Bibliography

4061: 

4062: \bibitem [33]{key-33}

4063: H.

4064:  C.

4065:  Chandola and B.

4066:  S.

4067:  Rajput, Lett.

4068:  Nuovo Cimento 

4069: \series bold

4070: \bar under

4071: 40

4072: \series default

4073: \bar default

4074: , (1984), 277.

4075: \end_layout

4076: 

4077: \begin_layout Bibliography

4078: 

4079: \bibitem [34]{key-34}

4080:  P.

4081:  A.

4082:  M.

4083:  Dirac, Proc.

4084:  Roy.

4085:  Soc.

4086:  London, 

4087: \series bold

4088: \bar under

4089: A133

4090: \series default

4091: \bar default

4092: , (1931), 60; Phys.

4093:  Rev., 

4094: \series bold

4095: \bar under

4096: 74

4097: \series default

4098: \bar default

4099:  , (1948), 817; G.

4100:  't Hooft, Nucl.

4101:  Phys., 

4102: \series bold

4103: \bar under

4104: B79

4105: \series default

4106: \bar default

4107: , (1974) , 276; A.

4108:  M.

4109:  Polyakov, JETP Lett., 

4110: \series bold

4111: \bar under

4112: 20

4113: \series default

4114: \bar default

4115: , (1974) 194.

4116: \end_layout

4117: 

4118: \begin_layout Bibliography

4119: 

4120: \bibitem [35]{key-35}

4121:  J.

4122:  Schwinger, Science, 

4123: \series bold

4124: \bar under

4125: 165

4126: \series default

4127: \bar default

4128:  , (1978), 757; Phys.

4129:  Rev., 

4130: \series bold

4131: \bar under

4132: 144

4133: \series default

4134: \bar default

4135: , (1986), 1087; 

4136: \series bold

4137: \bar under

4138: 151

4139: \series default

4140: \bar default

4141: , (1966), 1048; 

4142: \series bold

4143: \bar under

4144: 151

4145: \series default

4146: \bar default

4147: , (1966), 1055; 

4148: \series bold

4149: \bar under

4150: 173

4151: \series default

4152: \bar default

4153: , (1968); 1536; D.

4154:  Zwanzinger, Phys.

4155:  Rev., 

4156: \series bold

4157: \bar under

4158: 176

4159: \series default

4160: \bar default

4161: , (1968) , 1489; Phys.

4162:  Rev.,

4163: \series bold

4164: \bar under

4165:  D3

4166: \series default

4167: \bar default

4168: , (1971), 880; B.

4169:  Julia and A.

4170:  Zee, Phys.

4171:  Rev., 

4172: \series bold

4173: \bar under

4174: D11

4175: \series default

4176: \bar default

4177: , (1975), 2227; N.

4178:  Craigie, "Theory and Detection of magnetic Monopoles in Gauge Theories",

4179:  World Scientific, Singapur, 1986.

4180: \end_layout

4181: 

4182: \begin_layout Bibliography

4183: 

4184: \bibitem [36]{key-36}

4185:  P.

4186:  S.Bisht, O.P.S.Negi and B.S.Rajput, IL Nuovo Cimento, 

4187: \series bold

4188: \bar under

4189: A104

4190: \series default

4191: \bar default

4192:  , (1991), 337; Prog.

4193:  Theo.

4194:  Phys., 

4195: \series bold

4196: \bar under

4197: 85

4198: \series default

4199: \bar default

4200: , (1991), 157 .

4201: \end_layout

4202: 

4203: \begin_layout Bibliography

4204: 

4205: \bibitem [37]{key-37}

4206:  Shalini Bisht, P.

4207:  S.

4208:  Bisht and O.

4209:  P.

4210:  S.

4211:  Negi, Nuovo Cimento, 

4212: \series bold

4213: \bar under

4214: B113

4215: \series default

4216: \bar default

4217: , (1998), 1449; B.S.

4218:  Rajput, S.

4219:  R.

4220:  Kumar and O.P.S.Negi, Lett.

4221:  Nuovo 

4222: \series bold

4223: \bar under

4224: 34

4225: \series default

4226: \bar default

4227: , (1982), 180 ; 

4228: \series bold

4229: \bar under

4230: 36

4231: \series default

4232: \bar default

4233: , (1983), 75; V.

4234:  Majernik, PHYSICA, 

4235: \series bold

4236: \bar under

4237: 39

4238: \series default

4239: \bar default

4240: , (2000), 9; V.

4241:  V.

4242:  Kravchenkov, "Applied Quaternion Analysis", Helderman Verlag, Germany (2003).

4243:  

4244: \end_layout

4245: 

4246: \begin_layout Bibliography

4247: 

4248: \bibitem [38]{key-38}

4249:  Z.

4250:  K.

4251:  Silagadze,

4252: \begin_inset Quotes erd

4253: \end_inset

4254: 

4255: Feynman's derivation of Maxwell's equations and extra dimensions

4256: \begin_inset Quotes erd

4257: \end_inset

4258: 

4259: , hep-th/0106235; Annalesde la Foundation Louis de Broglie, 

4260: \series bold

4261: \bar under

4262: 27

4263: \series default

4264: \bar default

4265: , (2002) 241.

4266: \end_layout

4267: 

4268: \begin_layout Bibliography

4269: 

4270: \bibitem [39]{key-39}

4271:  P.

4272:  S.

4273:  Bisht and O.

4274:  P.

4275:  S.

4276:  Negi, Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Phys., 

4277: \series bold

4278: \bar under

4279: 32

4280: \series default

4281: \bar default

4282:  , (1994), 193; 

4283: \series bold

4284: \bar under

4285: 31

4286: \series default

4287: \bar default

4288:  , (1993), 292; Shalini Dangwal, P.S.Bisht and O.P.S.Negi, "Octonionic Gauge

4289:  Formulation for Dyonic Fields", hep-th/0608061, Had.

4290:  J., (2007) (In press); 

4291: \begin_inset Quotes eld

4292: \end_inset

4293: 

4294: Unified Split Octonion Formulation of Dyons

4295: \begin_inset Quotes erd

4296: \end_inset

4297: 

4298: , hep-th/0607209.

4299: \end_layout

4300: 

4301: \end_body

4302: \end_document

4303: