1: %% LyX 1.4.4 created this file.  For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/.

2: %% Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing.

3: \documentclass[english]{article}

4: \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}

5: \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}

6: \usepackage{geometry}

7: \geometry{verbose,a4paper,tmargin=3cm,bmargin=3cm,lmargin=3cm,rmargin=2.5cm}

8: \usepackage{amsmath}

9: \usepackage{setspace}

10: \onehalfspacing

11: \usepackage{amssymb}

12: 

13: \makeatletter

14: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Textclass specific LaTeX commands.

15: \newcommand{\lyxaddress}[1]{

16: \par {\raggedright #1

17: \vspace{1.4em}

18: \noindent\par}

19: }

20: 

21: \usepackage{babel}

22: \makeatother

23: \begin{document}

24: 

25: \title{INTERPRETATIONS OF OCTONION WAVE EQUATIONS}

26: 

27: 

28: \author{P. S. Bisht$^{\text{(1)}}$ , Bimal Pandey$^{\text{(1)}}$ and O.

29: P. S. Negi$^{\text{(2)}}$ %

30: \thanks{Permanent Address- Department of Physics, Kumaun University, S. S.

31: J. Campus, Almora -263601 (U.A.) INDIA%

32: }}

33: 

34: \maketitle

35: 

36: \lyxaddress{\begin{center}

37: $^{\text{(1)}}$Department of Physics,\\

38:  Kumaun University, \\

39: S. S. J. Campus,\\

40:  Almora - 263601 (Uttarakhand) India

41: \par\end{center}}

42: 

43: 

44: \lyxaddress{\begin{center}

45: $^{\text{(2)}}$Institute of Theoretical Physics,\\

46:  Chinese Academy of Sciences\\

47:  KITP Building Room No.- 6304\\

48: Hai Dian Qu Zhong Guan Chun Dong Lu\\

49:  55 Hao , Beijing - 100080, P.R.China 

50: \par\end{center}}

51: 

52: 

53: \lyxaddress{\begin{center}

54: Email - ps\_bisht123@ rediffmail.com,\\

55: ops\_negi @ yahoo.co.in

56: \par\end{center}}

57: 

58: \begin{abstract}

59: The interpretations of octonion wave equations in eight dimensional

60: space-time have been discussed. We have made an attempt to discuss

61: the octonion field equation as the equation of motion for particles

62: carrying simultaneously electric and magnetic charges (i.e. dyons)

63: in external and internal spaces respectively. It has been concluded

64: that the component of octonion potential wave equations behaves neither

65: the generalized electromagnetic fields of monopoles nor the dyons.

66: Rather, they have the mixed behaviour of electromagnetic fields associated

67: with the electric and magnetic charges in external and internal spaces.

68: We have also made an attempt to investigate the split octonion wave

69: equation and its interpretation in classical electrodynamics and accordingly

70: the consistent and compact forms of eight-dimensional potential and

71: current equation of dyons are obtained in terms of Zorn's vector matrix

72: realization of split octonions.Visualizing the external four space

73: as the localization space for tachyons, it is shown that the split

74: octonion wave equation reduces to the Maxwell's equation (field equation)

75: for bradyons in $R^{4}$- space as well as that for tachyons in $T^{4}$-

76: space in the absence of other.

77: \end{abstract}

78: 

79: \section{INTRODUCTION}

80: 

81: Octonions were first introduced in Physics by Jordon, Von Neuman and

82: Wigner\cite{key-1}, who investigated a new finite Hilbert space,

83: on replacing the complex numbers by Octonions\cite{key-2}. According

84: to celebrated Hurwitz theorem \cite{key-3} there exits four-division

85: algebra consisting of $\mathbb{R}$ (real numbers), $\mathbb{C}$

86: (complex numbers), $\mathbb{H}$ (quaternions) and $\mathcal{O}$

87: (octonions). All four algebras are alternative with antisymmetric

88: associators. In 1961 Pais \cite{key-4} pointed out a striking similarity

89: between the algebra of interactions and the split octonion algebra.

90: Recently, some attention has been directed to octonions in theoretical

91: physics with the hope of extending the 3+1 space-time framework of

92: the theory to eight dimensions to accommodate the ever increasing

93: quantum numbers and internal symmetries assigned to elementary particles

94: and gauge fields. A lot of literature is available \cite{key-5,key-6,key-7,key-8,key-9,key-10,key-11}

95: on the applications of octonions to interpret wave equation, Dirac

96: equation, and the extension of octonion non-associativity to physical

97: theories. It is assumed there that octonion wave equation contains

98: four-dimensional internal space of mass parameters while the external

99: four dimensional space has been interpreted as the four generators

100: of fermions within the quark-lepton symmetry. The ingenious work,

101: in this direction is done by Günaydin and Gürsey \cite{key-12,key-13},

102: to formulate quark models and colour gauge theory in terms of split

103: octonions. The $SU\,(3)$ group appears as the automorphism group

104: of octonion representation leaving the complex subspace and the scalar

105: product invariant. This approach is extended by many \cite{key-14,key-15,key-16}

106: to investigate the role of octonions and division algebra in unified

107: gauge theories, higher dimensional theories of supersymmetry and super

108: strings. Octonions are also used by Buoncristiani \cite{key-17} in

109: writing Yang-Mill's field equation in a simpler form. The extension

110: of quaternion matrices to octonions for their interpretation in non-Riemannian

111: geometry is described by Marques et al in a series of papers \cite{key-18,key-19,key-20,key-21,key-22}. 

112: 

113: During the past few years, there has been considerable interest in

114: higher-dimensional kinematical models \cite{key-23,key-24} for a

115: proper and unified representation of relativistic object, bradyonic

116: as well as tachyonic (including those with internal structure). It

117: has been speculated \cite{key-25,key-26,key-27} that the problem

118: of representation and localization of tachyonic objects may be solved

119: only with the extension of four-dimensional Minkowski space to higher-dimensional

120: space-time. It has already been discussed in a series of papers \cite{key-28,key-29,key-30,key-31,key-32,key-33}

121: that the true localization space for the representation of tachyons

122: is $T^{4}-$ space with one space and three time coordinates while

123: that for bradyons is the usual $R^{4}-$ space with one time and three

124: space coordinates. The unified eight dimensional space time has been

125: discussed earlier \cite{key-32,key-33} as the unified space of bradyons

126: and tachyons i.e. $R^{8}=R^{4}\,\bigcup\, T^{4}$. The two $R^{4}-$

127: and $T^{4}-$localization spaces are considered as external (internal)

128: space for bradyons ( tachyons) and vice versa. Moreover, the built-in

129: duality associated with the combination of symmetries of $R^{4}-$

130: and $T^{4}-$ subspaces is useful to understand the problem of quark

131: confinement in quantum chromodynamics where the role of tricolors

132: would be played by three time coordinates for bradyons and those of

133: three space coordinates for tachyons.

134: 

135: In order to interpret octonion wave equations in eight dimensional

136: space- time, in the present paper, we have made an attempt to discuss

137: the octonion field equation as the equation of motion for particles

138: carrying simultaneously electric and magnetic (monopole \cite{key-34}

139: ) charges (i.e. dyons \cite{key-35} ). Starting with the regularity

140: condition in the octonion field equation we have developed consistent

141: and compact formulation of eight-dimensional potential and current

142: equations of dyons. It has been demonstrated that the component of

143: octonion potential wave equations behaves neither the generalized

144: electromagnetic fields of monopoles nor the dyons. Rather, they have

145: the mixed behaviour of electromagnetic fields associated with the

146: electric and magnetic charges in external and internal spaces.

147: 

148: After decomposing the octonion wave equation in to two quaternion-valued

149: wave equations, it is shown that the two different spaces demonstrate

150: the separate wave equations for electromagnetic fields. Visualizing

151: the external four spaces as the localization space for bradyons and

152: the internal space as the localization space for tachyons, it is shown

153: that the octonion wave equation reduces to the Maxwell's equation

154: (field equation) for bradyons in $R^{4}$ - space as well as that

155: for tachyons in $T^{4}$- space. It has also been emphasized that

156: the quaternionic decomposition of octonion wave equation gives rise

157: to the equations of dyons and tachyonic dyons, when we take them as

158: combination of bi-quaternion instead of real quaternion in external

159: and internal four-dimensional spaces of eight dimensional space time.

160: 

161: Then we have made an attempt to investigate the split octonion wave

162: equation and its interpretation in classical electrodynamics. Split

163: octonion electrodynamics has been deduced in terms of Zorn's vector

164: matrix realization by describing electrodynamics potential, current

165: and other dynamical quantities as octonion variables. Also the consistent

166: and compact forms of eight-dimensional potential and current equation

167: of dyons are obtained in terms of Zorn's vector matrix realization

168: of split octonions. It has been shown that the octonion valued potential

169: wave equation behaves neither the generalized electromagnetic fields

170: of monopoles nor of the dyons. Rather, they have the mixed behaviour

171: of electromagnetic fields associated with the electric and magnetic

172: charges in external and internal spaces. At last, it is shown that

173: split octonion Zorn's vector realization reproduces two different

174: spaces to demonstrate the separate wave equations for electromagnetic

175: fields. Visualizing the external four space as the localization space

176: for tachyons, it is shown that the octonion wave equation, when expressed

177: in terms of split octonions, reduces to the Maxwell's equation (field

178: equation) for bradyons in $R^{4}$- space as well as that for tachyons

179: in $T^{4}$- space in the absence of other.

180: 

181: 

182: \section{OCTONION DEFINITION}

183: 

184: An octonion $x$ is expressed as a set of eight real numbers

185: 

186: \begin{eqnarray}

187: x & = & e_{0}x_{0}+e_{1}x_{1}+e_{2}x_{2}+e_{3}x_{3}+e_{4}x_{4}+e_{5}x_{5}+e_{6}x_{6}+e_{7}x_{7}=e_{0}x_{0}+\sum_{A=1}^{7}e_{A}x_{A}\label{eq:1}\end{eqnarray}

188: where $e_{A}(A=1,2,...,7)$ are imaginary octonion units and $e_{0}$

189: is the multiplicative unit element. Set of octets $(e_{0},e_{1},e_{2},e_{3},e_{4},e_{5},e_{6},e_{7})$

190: are known as the octonion basis elements and satisfy the following

191: multiplication rules

192: 

193: \begin{eqnarray}

194: e_{0}=1;\,\, & e_{0}e_{A}=e_{A}e_{0}=e_{A}; & \,\,\,\, e_{A}e_{B}=-\delta_{AB}e_{0}+f_{ABC}e_{C}.\,\,(A,B,C=1,2,.....,7)\label{eq:2}\end{eqnarray}

195: The structure constants $f_{ABC}$ is completely antisymmetric and

196: takes the value $1$ for following combinations,

197: 

198: \begin{eqnarray}

199: f_{ABC}= & +1; & \forall(ABC)=(123),\,(471)\,(257)\,(165)\,(624)\,(543)\,(736).\label{eq:3}\end{eqnarray}

200: It is to be noted that the summation convention is used for repeated

201: indices. Here the octonion algebra $\mathcal{O}$ is described over

202: the algebra of rational numbers having the vector space of dimension

203: $8$. We now get the following relations among octonion basis elements 

204: 

205: \begin{eqnarray}

206: \left[e_{A},\,\, e_{B}\right] & = & 2\, f_{ABC}\, e_{C};\nonumber \\

207: \left\{ e_{A},\,\, e_{B}\right\}  & = & -2\,\delta_{AB}e_{0};\nonumber \\

208: e_{A}(\, e_{B}\, e_{C}) & \neq & (e_{A}\, e_{B}\,)\, e_{C}\label{eq:4}\end{eqnarray}

209: where brackets $[\,\,]$ and $\{\,\,\}$ are used respectively for

210: commutation and the anti commutation relations while $\delta_{AB}$

211: is the usual Kronecker delta-Dirac symbol. Octonion conjugate is defined

212: as

213: 

214: \begin{eqnarray}

215: \overline{x} & = & e_{0}x_{0}-e_{1}x_{1}+-e_{2}x_{2}+-e_{3}x_{3}-e_{4}x_{4}-e_{5}x_{5}-e_{6}x_{6}-e_{7}x_{7}=e_{0}x_{0}-\sum_{A=1}^{7}e_{A}x_{A}\label{eq:5}\end{eqnarray}

216: where we have used the conjugates of basis elements as $\overline{e_{0}}=e_{0}$

217: and $\overline{e_{A}}=-e_{A}$. Hence an octonion can be decomposed

218: in terms of its scalar $(Sc(x))$ and vector $(Vec(x))$ parts as 

219: 

220: \begin{eqnarray}

221: Sc(x) & = & \frac{1}{2}(\, x\,+\,\overline{x}\,);\,\,\,\,\,\, Vec(x)=\frac{1}{2}(\, x\,-\,\overline{x}\,)=\sum_{A=1}^{7}\, e_{A}x_{A}.\label{eq:6}\end{eqnarray}

222: Conjugates of product of two octonions and its own are described as

223: 

224: \begin{eqnarray}

225: \overline{(x\, y)}= & \overline{y}\,\,\overline{x};\,\,\,\,\,\, & \overline{(\overline{x})}=x.\label{eq:7}\end{eqnarray}

226: while the scalar product of two octonions is defined as 

227: 

228: \begin{eqnarray}

229: \left\langle x\,,\, y\right\rangle  & =\frac{1}{2}(x\,\overline{y}+y\,\overline{x})=\frac{1}{2}(\overline{x}\, y+\overline{y}\, x)= & \sum_{\alpha=0}^{7}\, x_{\alpha}\, y_{\alpha}.\label{eq:8}\end{eqnarray}

230: The norm $N(x)$ and inverse $x^{-1}$(for a nonzero $x$) of an octonion

231: are respectively defined as

232: 

233: \begin{eqnarray}

234: N(x)=x\,\overline{x}=\overline{x}\, x & = & \sum_{\alpha=0}^{7}\, x_{\alpha}^{2}.e_{0};\nonumber \\

235: x^{-1} & = & \frac{\overline{x}}{N(x)}\,\Longrightarrow x\, x^{-1}=x^{-1}\, x=1.\label{eq:9}\end{eqnarray}

236: The norm $N(x)$ of an octonion $x$ is zero if $x=0$, and is always

237: positive otherwise. It also satisfies the following property of normed

238: algebra

239: 

240: \begin{eqnarray}

241: N(x\, y)= & N(x)\, N(y)= & N(y)\, N(x).\label{eq:10}\end{eqnarray}

242: Equation (\ref{eq:4}) shows that octonions are not associative in

243: nature and thus do not form the group in their usual form. Non-associativity

244: of octonion algebra $\mathcal{O}$ is provided by the associator $(x,y,z)=(xy)z-x(yz)\,\,\forall x,y,z\in\mathcal{O}$

245: defined for any $3$ octonions. If the associator is totally antisymmetric

246: for exchanges of any $2$ variables, i.e. $(x,y,z)=-(z,y,x)=-(y,x,z)=-(x,z,y)$,

247: then the algebra is called alternative. Hence, the octonion algebra

248: is neither commutative nor associative but, is alternative.

249: 

250: 

251: \section{OCTONION WAVE EQUATION}

252: 

253: In order to write the Octonion wave equation, let us define the differential

254: octonion $D$ as

255: 

256: \begin{eqnarray}

257: D & = & \sum_{\mu=0}^{7}e_{\mu}D_{\mu}\label{eq:11}\end{eqnarray}

258: where $D_{\mu}$ are described as the components of differential operator

259: in eight dimensional representation. Here we assume the eight - dimensional

260: space as the combination of two ( external and internal ) four-dimensional

261: spaces. As such, we describe a function of octonion variable as\begin{eqnarray}

262: \mathcal{F}(X) & =\sum_{\mu=0}^{7} & e_{\mu}f_{\mu}(X)=f_{0}+e_{1}f_{1}+e_{2}f_{2}+.....+e_{7}f_{7}\label{eq:12}\end{eqnarray}

263: where $f_{\mu}$ are scalar functions. Since octonions are neither

264: commutative nor associative, one has to be very careful to multiply

265: the octonion either from left or from right in terms of regularity

266: conditions. As such, a function $\mathcal{F}(X)$ of an octonion variable

267: $X={\displaystyle \sum_{\mu=0}^{7}e_{\mu}X_{\mu}}$ is left regular

268: at $X$ if and only if $\mathcal{F}(X)$ satisfies the condition

269: 

270: \begin{eqnarray}

271: D\mathcal{F}(X) & = & 0.\label{eq:13}\end{eqnarray}

272: Similarly, a function $G(X)$ is a right regular if and only if

273: 

274: \begin{eqnarray}

275: G(X)D & = & 0\label{eq:14}\end{eqnarray}

276: where $G(X)=g_{0}+g_{1}e_{1}+g_{2}e_{2}+.....+g_{7}e_{7}.$ Then we

277: get 

278: 

279: \begin{eqnarray}

280: D\mathcal{F} & = & I_{0}+I_{1}e_{1}+I_{2}e_{2}+I_{3}e_{3}+I_{4}e_{4}+I_{5}e_{5}+I_{6}e_{6}+I_{7}e_{7}\label{eq:15}\end{eqnarray}

281: where

282: 

283: \begin{eqnarray}

284: I_{0} & = & \partial_{0}f_{0}-\partial_{1}f_{1}-\partial_{2}f_{2}-\partial_{3}f_{3}-\partial_{4}f_{4}-\partial_{5}f_{5}-\partial_{6}f_{6}-\partial_{7}f_{7};\nonumber \\

285: I_{1} & = & \partial_{0}f_{1}+\partial_{1}f_{0}+\partial_{2}f_{3}-\partial_{3}f_{2}+\partial_{6}f_{5}-\partial_{5}f_{6}-\partial_{7}f_{4}+\partial_{4}f_{7};\nonumber \\

286: I_{2} & = & \partial_{0}f_{2}+\partial_{2}f_{0}+\partial_{3}f_{1}-\partial_{1}f_{3}+\partial_{4}f_{6}-\partial_{6}f_{4}-\partial_{7}f_{5}+\partial_{5}f_{7};\nonumber \\

287: I_{3} & = & \partial_{0}f_{3}+\partial_{3}f_{0}+\partial_{1}f_{2}-\partial_{2}f_{1}+\partial_{6}f_{7}-\partial_{7}f_{6}+\partial_{5}f_{4}-\partial_{4}f_{5};\nonumber \\

288: I_{4} & = & \partial_{0}f_{4}+\partial_{4}f_{0}+\partial_{3}f_{5}-\partial_{5}f_{3}-\partial_{2}f_{6}+\partial_{6}f_{2}-\partial_{1}f_{7}+\partial_{7}f_{1};\nonumber \\

289: I_{5} & = & \partial_{0}f_{5}+\partial_{5}f_{0}+\partial_{1}f_{6}-\partial_{6}f_{1}+\partial_{7}f_{2}-\partial_{2}f_{7}-\partial_{3}f_{4}+\partial_{4}f_{3};\nonumber \\

290: I_{6} & = & \partial_{0}f_{6}+\partial_{6}f_{0}-\partial_{1}f_{5}+\partial_{5}f_{1}+\partial_{2}f_{4}-\partial_{4}f_{2}-\partial_{3}f_{7}+\partial_{7}f_{3};\nonumber \\

291: I_{7} & = & \partial_{0}f_{7}+\partial_{7}f_{0}+\partial_{1}f_{4}-\partial_{4}f_{1}+\partial_{2}f_{5}-\partial_{5}f_{2}-\partial_{6}f_{3}+\partial_{3}f_{6}.\label{eq:16}\end{eqnarray}

292: The regularity condition (\ref{eq:13}) may now be considered as homogeneous

293: octonion wave equation for octonion variables without sources. On

294: the other hand, equation (\ref{eq:15}) is considered as the inhomogeneous

295: wave equation 

296: 

297: \begin{eqnarray}

298: D\mathcal{F} & = & I\label{eq:17}\end{eqnarray}

299: where $I$ is again an octonion. Similarly, we may also write the

300: homogeneous as well as inhomogeneous octonion wave equations on using

301: the right regularity condition (\ref{eq:14}). We may now interpret

302: these octonion wave equations as the classical wave (field) equations

303: of physical variables.

304: 

305: 

306: \subsection{POTENTIAL EQUATION FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS WITH SOURCES}

307: 

308: Let us consider the case of generalized electromagnetic fields of

309: dyons (particles carrying simultaneous existence of electric and magnetic

310: charges). We may now define an octonion valued potential, in eight

311: dimensional formalism as the combinations of two four-dimensional

312: spaces, as follows

313: 

314: \begin{eqnarray}

315: \emptyset & =\sum_{\mu=0}^{7} & e_{\mu}\emptyset_{\mu}=\sum_{\mu=0}^{3}e_{\mu}A_{\mu}+\sum_{\nu=4}^{7}e_{\nu}B_{\nu};\label{eq:18}\end{eqnarray}

316: where $\emptyset$ is the octonion potential and $A_{\mu}$ and $B_{\nu}$are

317: assumed respectively as the electric and magnetic four - potentials

318: associated with the electric and magnetic charges of dyons \cite{key-36}.

319: As such, we may write the wave equation for octonion potential variable

320: for simultaneous existence of electric and magnetic charges on a particle

321: (namely dyons) in the following manner ,

322: 

323: \begin{eqnarray}

324: \overline{D}\emptyset & = & F\label{eq:19}\end{eqnarray}

325: where

326: 

327: \begin{eqnarray}

328: \overline{D} & = & F\sum_{\mu=0}^{7}\overline{e_{\mu}}\, D_{\mu}=e_{0}D_{0}-\sum_{A=1}^{7}e_{A}D_{A};\,\,\,\,\,\, F=\sum_{\mu=0}^{7}F_{\mu}e_{\mu}.\label{eq:20}\end{eqnarray}

329: The coefficients of octonion $F$ are then given by 

330: 

331: \begin{eqnarray}

332: F_{0} & = & \partial_{0}\emptyset_{0}+\partial_{1}\emptyset_{1}+\partial_{2}\emptyset_{2}+\partial_{3}\emptyset_{3}+\partial_{4}\emptyset_{4}+\partial_{5}\emptyset_{5}+\partial_{6}\emptyset_{6}+\partial_{7}\emptyset_{7};\nonumber \\

333: F_{1} & = & \partial_{0}\emptyset_{1}-\partial_{1}\emptyset_{0}+\partial_{3}\emptyset_{2}-\partial_{2}\emptyset_{3}+\partial_{7}\emptyset_{4}-\partial_{4}\emptyset_{7}+\partial_{5}\emptyset_{6}-\partial_{6}\emptyset_{5};\nonumber \\

334: F_{2} & = & \partial_{0}\emptyset_{2}-\partial_{2}\emptyset_{0}+\partial_{1}\emptyset_{3}-\partial_{3}\emptyset_{1}+\partial_{6}\emptyset_{4}-\partial_{4}\emptyset_{6}+\partial_{7}\emptyset_{5}-\partial_{5}\emptyset_{7};\nonumber \\

335: F_{3} & = & \partial_{0}\emptyset_{3}-\partial_{3}\emptyset_{0}+\partial_{2}\emptyset_{1}-\partial_{1}\emptyset_{2}+\partial_{4}\emptyset_{5}-\partial_{5}\emptyset_{4}+\partial_{7}\emptyset_{6}-\partial_{6}\emptyset_{7};\nonumber \\

336: F_{4} & = & \partial_{0}\emptyset_{4}-\partial_{4}\emptyset_{0}-\partial_{3}\emptyset_{5}+\partial_{5}\emptyset_{3}+\partial_{2}\emptyset_{6}-\partial_{6}\emptyset_{2}+\partial_{1}\emptyset_{7}-\partial_{7}\emptyset_{1};\nonumber \\

337: F_{5} & = & \partial_{0}\emptyset_{5}-\partial_{5}\emptyset_{0}-\partial_{1}\emptyset_{6}+\partial_{6}\emptyset_{1}-\partial_{7}\emptyset_{2}+\partial_{2}\emptyset_{7}+\partial_{3}\emptyset_{4}-\partial_{4}\emptyset_{3};\nonumber \\

338: F_{6} & = & \partial_{0}\emptyset_{6}-\partial_{6}\emptyset_{0}+\partial_{1}\emptyset_{5}-\partial_{5}\emptyset_{1}-\partial_{2}\emptyset_{4}+\partial_{4}\emptyset_{2}+\partial_{3}\emptyset_{7}-\partial_{7}\emptyset_{3};\nonumber \\

339: F_{7} & = & \partial_{0}\emptyset_{7}-\partial_{7}\emptyset_{0}-\partial_{1}\emptyset_{4}+\partial_{4}\emptyset_{1}-\partial_{2}\emptyset_{5}+\partial_{5}\emptyset_{2}+\partial_{6}\emptyset_{3}-\partial_{3}\emptyset_{6}.\label{eq:21}\end{eqnarray}

340: We get $F_{0}=0$ in the Euclidean space $(++++++)$ due to eight

341: dimensional Lorentz gauge condition (i.e the combination of two gauges

342: associated with electric and magnetic potentials). Thus, one dimensional

343: octonion representation is identical to eight dimensional spaces over

344: the field of real numbers. It is isomorphic to four-dimensional space

345: representation over the field of complex variables which is equivalent

346: to two-dimensional space representation over quaternion field variables.

347: Similarly, one dimensional quaternion space is isomorphic to four-dimensional

348: space over the field of real numbers which is identical to two- dimensional

349: space over the field of complex numbers. So, an octonionic potential

350: may also be described as the combination of two quaternion potentials

351: in the following manner;

352: 

353: \begin{eqnarray}

354: \emptyset & = & \emptyset_{a}+e_{7}\emptyset_{b};\,\,\,\, D=D_{a}+e_{7}D_{b};\,\,\,\, F=F_{a}+e_{7}F_{b}\label{eq:22}\end{eqnarray}

355: where $\emptyset_{a}$, $\emptyset_{b}$, $D_{a}$, $D_{b}$, $F_{a}$

356: and $F_{b}$ are quaternion variables described as

357: 

358: \begin{eqnarray}

359: \emptyset_{a} & = & \emptyset_{0}+e_{1}\emptyset_{1}+e_{2}\emptyset_{2}+e_{3}\emptyset_{3};\nonumber \\

360: \emptyset_{b} & = & \emptyset_{7}+e_{1}\emptyset_{4}+e_{2}\emptyset_{5}+e_{3}\emptyset_{6};\nonumber \\

361: D_{a} & = & \partial_{0}+e_{1}\partial_{1}+e_{2}\partial_{2}+e_{3}\partial_{3};\nonumber \\

362: D_{b} & = & \partial_{7}+e_{1}\partial_{4}+e_{2}\partial_{5}+e_{3}\partial_{6};\nonumber \\

363: F_{a} & = & F_{0}+e_{1}F_{1}+e_{2}F_{2}+e_{3}F_{3};\nonumber \\

364: F_{b} & = & F_{7}+e_{1}F_{4}+e_{2}F_{5}+e_{3}F_{6}.\label{eq:23}\end{eqnarray}

365: Here $e_{1}$, $e_{2}$, and $e_{3}$ ; three quaternion units; satisfy

366: the multiplication rule $e_{j}e_{k}=-\delta_{jk}+\varepsilon_{jkl}e_{l}\quad\forall(j,k,l=1,2,3)$.

367: If we replace the octonion unit $e_{7}$ by imaginary unit $i=\sqrt{-1}$,

368: commutating with all the octonion basis elements $e_{A}$, the resultant

369: theory of octonions become the theory of bi-quaternion variables where

370: generalized fields of dyons are written in compact, covariant and

371: consistent way \cite{key-37}. We may now consider the following mapping

372: for different four-dimensional spaces,

373: 

374: \begin{eqnarray}

375: \partial_{7}\rightarrow\partial_{0}^{'}, & \emptyset_{7}\rightarrow B_{0}, & \emptyset_{0}\rightarrow A_{0};\nonumber \\

376: \partial_{4}\rightarrow\partial_{1}^{'}, & \emptyset_{4}\rightarrow B_{1}, & \emptyset_{1}\rightarrow A_{1};\nonumber \\

377: \partial_{5}\rightarrow\partial_{2}^{'}, & \emptyset_{5}\rightarrow B_{2}, & \emptyset_{2}\rightarrow A_{2};\nonumber \\

378: \partial_{6}\rightarrow\partial_{3}^{'}, & \emptyset_{6}\rightarrow B_{3}, & \emptyset_{3}\rightarrow A_{3}.\label{eq:24}\end{eqnarray}

379: Then we get

380: 

381: \begin{eqnarray}

382: F_{j} & = & \partial_{0}A_{j}-\partial_{j}A_{0}+(\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{A})_{j}+\partial_{0}^{'}B_{j}-\partial_{j}^{'}B_{0}+(\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{B})_{j};\nonumber \\

383: F_{j+3} & = & \partial_{0}B_{j}-\partial_{j}B_{0}+(\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{B})_{j}+\partial_{0}^{'}A_{j}-\partial_{j}^{'}A_{0}+(\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{A})_{j};\nonumber \\

384: F_{7} & = & \partial_{0}B_{0}-\partial_{1}B_{1}-\partial_{2}B_{2}-\partial_{3}B_{3}-(\partial_{0}^{'}A_{0}+\partial_{1}^{'}A_{1}+\partial_{2}^{'}A_{2}+\partial_{3}^{'}A_{3}).\label{eq:25}\end{eqnarray}

385: Hence equation (\ref{eq:25}) shows that $F_{0},\,\, F_{j},\,\, F_{j+3}$

386: and $F_{7}$ correspond to the components of electric and magnetic

387: fields obtained in terms of components of two four-potentials ( $A_{\mu}$

388: and $B_{\mu}$) in internal and external spaces. If these two spaces

389: are completely disjoint spaces, we get only $F_{j}$ ; and $F_{0}$

390: vanishing due to Lorentz gauge condition ; while $F_{j+3}\,$and $F_{7}$

391: do not occur. Here prime derivatives are associated with the second

392: four-dimensional structure of eight potential. In equation (\ref{eq:25}),

393: we find that $F_{j}$ is made up of the $j^{th}$ components of electric

394: and magnetic fields. Here the first term $\partial_{0}A_{j}-\partial_{j}A_{0}$

395: describes the electric field and second term $\overrightarrow{(\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{A})_{j}$corresponds

396: to the magnetic field in four-dimensional ( we call it as the external

397: ) space. In the light of the duality mechanism between electric and

398: magnetic fields (and for electric $\left\{ A_{\mu}\right\} $ and

399: magnetic $\left\{ B_{\mu}\right\} $ four-potentials), the third term

400: $\partial_{0}B_{j}-\partial_{j}B_{0}$ of $F_{j}$ is equivalent to

401: the magnetic field while the last term $(\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{B})_{j}$

402: denotes the electric field in other four-dimensional ( let us call

403: it as internal or magnetic) space. On mixing of these two spaces,

404: $\partial_{0}A_{j}-\partial_{j}A_{0}+(\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{A})_{j}$

405: resembles with the expression of generalized electric field and $\partial_{0}^{'}B_{j}-\partial_{j}^{'}B_{0}+(\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{B})_{j}$

406: as that of the generalized magnetic fields of dyons \cite{key-36,key-37}

407: . So, it looks awkward to combine external (internal) space of electric

408: charge (magnetic monopole) to the internal (external) space of magnetic

409: monopole (electric charge) to interpret $F_{j}$ . As such, we may

410: conclude that the equation (\ref{eq:25}) does not represent the true

411: generalization of potential equation for the generalized electromagnetic

412: fields of dyons. Rather, we have obtained the mixed behaviour of electric

413: and magnetic charges in internal and external spaces. So, octonion

414: wave equation of electromagnetic potential faces difficulties and

415: hence needs modification to interpret it consistently. 

416: 

417: 

418: \subsection{CURRENT EQUATION}

419: 

420: We now Analise the octonion wave equation (\ref{eq:17}) as the current

421: equation in eight dimensional representations i.e.

422: 

423: \begin{eqnarray}

424: D & F= & S\label{eq:26}\end{eqnarray}

425: where

426: 

427: \begin{eqnarray}

428: S_{0} & = & \partial_{0}F_{0}-\partial_{1}F_{1}-\partial_{2}F_{2}-\partial_{3}F_{3}-(\partial_{1}^{'}F_{4}+\partial_{2}^{'}F_{5}+\partial_{3}^{'}F_{6}+\partial_{0}^{'}F_{7});\nonumber \\

429: S_{j} & = & \partial_{0}F_{j}+\partial_{j}F_{0}+(\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{F})_{j}-\partial_{0}^{'}F_{j+3}+\partial_{j}^{'}F_{7}-(\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{F})_{j+3};\nonumber \\

430: S_{j+3} & = & \partial_{0}^{'}F_{j}+\partial_{j}^{'}F_{0}-(\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{F})_{j}-\partial_{0}F_{j+3}-\partial_{j}F_{7}-(\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{F})_{j+3};\nonumber \\

431: S_{7} & = & \partial_{1}F_{4}+\partial_{2}F_{5}+\partial_{3}F_{6}+\partial_{0}F_{7}+(\partial_{0}^{'}F_{0}-\partial_{1}^{'}F_{1}-\partial_{2}^{'}F_{2}-\partial_{3}^{'}F_{3}).\label{eq:27}\end{eqnarray}

432: Thus, the current equation for octonion variables describes \cite{key-38}

433: the generalized structure of differential equations (Maxwell's equations)

434: in eight - dimensional space-time. Four- dimensional reduction of

435: these differential equations may be visualized as the Maxwell's equations

436: in internal and external spaces. So, it is difficult to explain the

437: various terms associated with the eight parameters $S_{\Lambda}(\Lambda=0,1,2,3...,7)$correctly.

438: Silagade \cite{key-38} provided the interpretation of the homogeneous

439: octonion wave equation $DF=0$ as equivalent to one of the pair of

440: seven-dimensional Maxwell's equations and the second pair of seven

441: dimensional Maxwell's equations may be obtained on applying the duality

442: transformations between electric and magnetic fields therein. Similarly,

443: Gamba and Gogberashvili \cite{key-8} also tried to explain the structure

444: of eight parameters $S_{\Lambda}(\Lambda=0,1,2,3...,7)$but the consistent

445: justification needs modifications. Hence, octonion wave equation (\ref{eq:26})

446: may be identified rather a current equation or octonion field equation

447: in eight dimensional spaces for mixed structural behaviour of sources

448: (the electric and magnetic) instead of dyons. In other words we may

449: say that the equation (\ref{eq:26}) can not be described as the true

450: field equation of dyons. Here $S_{0}$ and $S_{7}$ may be taken vanishing

451: due to equations of continuity in internal and external spaces.

452: 

453: 

454: \subsection{QUATERNION DECOMPOSITION}

455: 

456: We may decompose an octonion in terms of two-quaternions. So, let

457: us decompose octonion wave equation for potential in terms of two

458: quaternions as

459: 

460: \begin{eqnarray}

461: \overline{D}\emptyset=(\overline{D}_{a}-e_{7}D_{b})(\emptyset_{a}+e_{7}\emptyset_{b}) & = & (\phi+e_{7}\varphi)=F.\label{eq:28}\end{eqnarray}

462: Here

463: 

464: \begin{eqnarray}

465: \phi & = & \overline{D}_{a}\emptyset_{a}+\emptyset_{b}\widetilde{D}_{b}=(D_{0}-D_{1}e_{1}-D_{2}e_{2}-D_{3}e_{3})\emptyset_{a}+\emptyset_{b}(\overleftarrow{D_{7}}-\overleftarrow{D_{4}}e_{1}-\overleftarrow{D_{5}}e_{2}-\overleftarrow{D_{6}}e_{3})\label{eq:29}\end{eqnarray}

466: where $[\overleftarrow{D_{r}},(r=4,5,6,7)]$ represents the partial

467: differential of $\emptyset_{b}$ from right to left , $\widetilde{D}_{b}$

468: denotes the quaternion conjugation $(\tilde{e_{o}}=e_{0};\quad\tilde{e_{j}}=-e_{j}\quad\forall j=1,2,3)$

469: from right to left i.e. 

470: 

471: \begin{eqnarray*}

472: \overline{D}_{a} & = & D_{0}-D_{1}e_{1}-D_{2}e_{2}-D_{3}e_{3};\end{eqnarray*}

473: 

474: 

475: \begin{eqnarray*}

476: \overline{\widetilde{D}_{a}} & = & D_{0}+D_{1}e_{1}+D_{2}e_{2}+D_{3}e_{3}=D_{1};\end{eqnarray*}

477: 

478: 

479: \begin{eqnarray*}

480: \widetilde{D}_{b} & = & D_{7}-D_{4}e_{1}-D_{5}e_{2}-D_{6}e_{3}\end{eqnarray*}

481: and

482: 

483: \begin{eqnarray}

484: \varphi & =\overline{\widetilde{D}}_{a} & \emptyset_{b}-\emptyset_{a}D_{b}=D_{a}\emptyset_{b}-\emptyset_{a}D_{b}.\label{eq:30}\end{eqnarray}

485: Here an octonion-valued potential is described as the sum of two quaternions

486: by Cayley-Dickson doubling process. Thus, we observe that the octonion

487: potential wave equation rules out the existence of isolated of magnetic

488: monopole and provides a mixed structural behaviour of electromagnetic

489: fields containing both charges simultaneously. In other words,  we

490: may say that it is a generalized field equation of electromagnetic

491: fields associated with a particle carrying simultaneous existence

492: of electric and magnetic charges (namely dyons). The generalized electromagnetic

493: fields of dyons are symmetric and dual invariant in terms of two four

494: potentials. So, the possibility of monopoles (or dyons) in non Abelian

495: or supersymmetric gauge theories is directly linked with the existence

496: of second four potential which is hidden in external space and present

497: in internal space while the electric four potential is the consequence

498: of our external space and seems to be hidden in internal space.

499: 

500: Similarly we may express the current equation given by equation (\ref{eq:26})

501: in terms of two quaternions as

502: 

503: \begin{eqnarray}

504: DF & =(D_{a}+e_{7}D_{b})(g+e_{7}h) & =S=s_{a}+e_{7}s_{b}\label{eq:31}\end{eqnarray}

505: where

506: 

507: \begin{eqnarray*}

508: s_{a} & = & D_{a}g-hD_{b}=D_{a}\overline{D}_{b}\emptyset_{a}+\emptyset_{b}D_{b}\overline{D}_{b}\end{eqnarray*}

509: 

510: 

511: \begin{eqnarray}

512: s_{b} & = & \widetilde{D}_{a}h+gD_{b}=\overline{D}_{a}D_{a}\emptyset_{b}+\emptyset_{b}\overline{D_{b}}D_{b}.\label{eq:32}\end{eqnarray}

513: Thus $S=s_{a}+e_{7}s_{b}$ is the octonion expression for generalized

514: current density. Similarly, we may express the generalized force and

515: generalized field tensor density in terms of two quaternions.

516: 

517: 

518: \subsection{LOCALIZATION SPACES OF BRADYONS AND TACHYONS}

519: 

520: ~~~~~ We have described the octonion (eight dimensional) space

521: is made of two quaternion (namely the external and internal four dimensional)

522: spaces. Let us suppose the external four space as the usual Minikowski

523: (or Euclidean) $R^{4}\Rightarrow M\,(1,3)$ - space (consisting one

524: time and three space coordinates). This space has been named \cite{key-23,key-24}

525: as. the localization space of bradyons (particles traveling slower

526: than light$\rightarrow$subluminal particles). Accordingly, we describe

527: the internal four dimensional space as the $T^{4}\Rightarrow M\,(3,1)$

528: - space (consisting three time and one space coordinates). The possibility

529: of such space is explored \cite{key-23,key-24} as the localization

530: space of tachyons (particles traveling faster than light$\rightarrow$superluminal

531: particles). Hence an octonion eight dimensional space is described

532: as the unified space containing both external $R^{4}\Rightarrow M\,(1,3)$

533: and internal $T^{4}\Rightarrow M\,(3,1)$ four - dimensional spaces.

534: In other words we may identify the octonion space as the unified localization

535: space for the description of bradyons and tachyons. It is because

536: that the bradyons are the objects of our four dimensional world for

537: which the Cauchy's data are described on the plane $\left\{ t=0\right\} $while

538: tachyons are localized in time and their Cauchy's data lies on the

539: plane $\left\{ x=0\right\} .$ Hence, the eight dimensional space

540: of octonion variables described above is the unified localization

541: space for bradyons and tachyons and hence be expressed as $R^{8}=R^{4}\,\bigcup\, T^{4}$.

542: The $T^{4}-$space is characterized as the hidden space for bradyons

543: while $R^{4}-$space is identified as the hidden space for tachyons.

544: We may also interpret that the $R^{4}-$ space is visualized as the

545: internal space for tachyons (and external space for bradyons) and

546: correspondingly the $T^{4}-$ space is the internal space for bradyons

547: (and external space for tachyons). First quaternion variable of equation

548: (\ref{eq:31}) maps to four-dimensional space for bradyons i.e. $R^{4}\simeq(t,\overrightarrow{r})$

549: while the second quaternion variable gives rise to four-dimensional

550: space for tachyons i.e. $T^{4}\simeq(r,\overrightarrow{t})$. In the

551: absence of second quaternion, equation (\ref{eq:32}) reduces to

552: 

553: \begin{eqnarray}

554: s_{a}= & D_{a}\overline{D}_{a}\emptyset_{a} & \Rightarrow(\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial x^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial y^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial z^{2}})\phi=\square(R)\phi\label{eq:33}\end{eqnarray}

555: which resembles to Cauchy-Feuter equation of quaternion variables

556: in $R^{4}\simeq(t,\overrightarrow{r})$ space and thus describes the

557: usual Maxwell's equations in electromagnetic fields in $R^{4}-$ space.

558: On the other hand in absence of first quaternion, equation (\ref{eq:32})

559: reduces to 

560: 

561: \begin{eqnarray}

562: s_{b}=\emptyset_{b} & \overline{D}_{b}D_{b} & \Rightarrow\varphi(\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial r^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial t_{x}^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial t_{y}^{2}}-\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial t_{z}^{2}})=\varphi\overleftarrow{\square}(T)\label{eq:34}\end{eqnarray}

563: which also describes the Cauchy - Feuter equation of quaternion variables

564: in $T^{4}\simeq(r,\overrightarrow{t})$ space and coincides with the

565: Maxwell's equations of superluminal photons in $T^{4}$ - space. Equation

566: (\ref{eq:33}) is the left regular while equation (\ref{eq:34}) is

567: the right regular. hence, the regularity conditions are changes for

568: internal and external spaces. In case of bi-quaternion, equations

569: (\ref{eq:33}) and (\ref{eq:34}) characterize respectively to the

570: equations of dyons for subluminal and superluminal electromagnetic

571: fields. In general (i.e. octonionic space) describes the unified structure

572: of subluminal and superluminal objects. As such, the octonionic eight

573: dimensional representation is the unified picture of bradyons and

574: tachyons and the octonionic current equations thus reproduce two different

575: kinds of Maxwell's equations in external and internal spaces in order

576: to explain the simultaneous description of bradyons and tachyons.

577: Here, we have developed the octonion wave equation and theory of octonion

578: field variables in compact and simpler manner. So, in order to overcome

579: the non-associativity, it is necessary to decompose them in terms

580: of two quaternions isomorphic to two different four-dimensional spaces.

581: The compact and simpler form of octonion field equation provide an

582: unified model of the theories of subluminal and superluminal electromagnetic

583: fields in view of the localizability of bradyons and tachyons in consistent

584: manner.

585: 

586: 

587: \section{SPLIT OCTONION WAVE EQUATION }

588: 

589: The split octonions are a non associative extension of quaternions

590: (or the split quaternions).They differ from the octonion in the signature

591: of quadratic form. The split octonions have a signature $(4,4)$ whereas

592: the octonions have positive signature $(8,0)$. The Cayley algebra

593: of octonions over the field of complex numbers $\mathbb{C_{C}=\mathbb{C\otimes C}}$

594: is visualized as the algebra of split octonions with basis elements

595: $u_{0}=\frac{1}{2}(e_{0}+ie_{7});\quad u_{0}^{\star}=\frac{1}{2}(e_{0}-ie_{7}),\quad u_{j}=\frac{1}{2}(e_{j}+ie_{j+3}),\quad u_{j}^{\star}=\frac{1}{2}(e_{j}-ie_{j+3})\,(j=1,2,3;i=\sqrt{-1})$

596: as the bi-valued (or bi - dimensional) representations of quaternion

597: units $e_{0},\quad e_{1}\quad,e_{2}\quad,e_{3}$ . The split Cayley

598: (octonion) algebra is thus expressed in terms of $2\times2$ Zorn's

599: vector matrices components of which are scalar and vector parts of

600: a quaternion. As such , we may also write an arbitrary split octonion

601: $A$ in terms of following $2\times2$ Zorn's vector matrix realizations

602: \cite{key-39} as

603: 

604: \begin{eqnarray}

605: A & =au_{0}^{\star}+bu_{0}+x_{i}u_{i}^{\star}+y_{i}u_{i} & =\left(\begin{array}{cc}

606: a & -\overrightarrow{x}\\

607: \overrightarrow{y} & b\end{array}\right).\label{eq:35}\end{eqnarray}

608: Split octonion conjugation of equation (\ref{eq:35}) is then described

609: as,

610: 

611: \begin{eqnarray}

612: \overline{A} & =au_{0}+bu_{0}*-x_{i}u_{i}*-y_{i}u_{i} & =\left(\begin{array}{cc}

613: b & \overrightarrow{x}\\

614: -\overrightarrow{y} & a\end{array}\right).\label{eq:36}\end{eqnarray}

615: The norm of $A$ is defined as,

616: 

617: \begin{eqnarray}

618: \overline{A}A & =A\overline{A} & =(ab+\overrightarrow{x}.\overrightarrow{y})\hat{1}\label{eq:37}\end{eqnarray}

619: where $\hat{1}$ is the identity element given by $\hat{1}=1u_{0}+1u_{0}^{\star}$.

620: Any four - vector $A_{\mu}$ (complex or real) can equivalently be

621: written in the following Zorn's matrix realization as 

622: 

623: \begin{eqnarray}

624: Z(A) & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

625: x_{4} & -\overrightarrow{x}\\

626: \overrightarrow{y} & y_{4}\end{array}\right)\label{eq:38}\end{eqnarray}

627: and

628: 

629: \begin{eqnarray}

630: Z(\overline{A}) & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

631: x_{4} & \overrightarrow{x}\\

632: -\overrightarrow{y} & y_{4}\end{array}\right).\label{eq:39}\end{eqnarray}

633: In equation (\ref{eq:38}, \ref{eq:39}), putting $\overrightarrow{x}=\overrightarrow{y}$,

634: we get the equivalent matrix realization for a four vector in bi-valued

635: four-dimensional Euclidean space - time. In order to develop the the

636: eight dimensional split octonion kinematics, we start with the following

637: definition of the split octonion differential operator $D$ and its

638: conjugate $\overline{D}$ in terms of $2\times2$ Zorn's matrix realizations,

639: 

640: \begin{eqnarray}

641: D & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

642: \partial_{4} & -\overrightarrow{\nabla}\\

643: \overrightarrow{\nabla} & \partial'_{4}\end{array}\right)\label{eq:40}\end{eqnarray}

644: 

645: 

646: \begin{eqnarray}

647: \overline{D} & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

648: \partial_{4} & \overrightarrow{\nabla}\\

649: -\overrightarrow{\nabla} & \partial'_{4}\end{array}\right)\label{eq:41}\end{eqnarray}

650: with the assumption that the primed variables are represented in internal

651: space whereas the unprimed variables are defined in external four

652: - dimensional space.

653: 

654: 

655: \subsection{POTENTIAL EQUATION}

656: 

657: Let us express an octonion potential in the following form \begin{eqnarray}

658: \emptyset & = & A_{4}u_{0}*+B_{4}u_{0}+B_{i}u_{i}*+A_{i}u_{i}\label{eq:42}\end{eqnarray}

659: where $\left\{ A_{\mu}\right\} =(A_{4},A_{j})$ and $\left\{ B_{\mu}\right\} =(B_{4},B_{j})$

660: are two four - potentials respectively associated with electric and

661: magnetic charges. Equation (\ref{eq:42}) may then be expressed in

662: terms of split octonion $2\times2$ Zorn's vector matrix realization

663: as

664: 

665: \begin{eqnarray}

666: \emptyset & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

667: A_{4} & -\overrightarrow{B}\\

668: \overrightarrow{A} & B_{4}\end{array}\right)\label{eq:43}\end{eqnarray}

669: where $A_{4}=i\,\emptyset_{e}$($e$ denotes the electric charge)

670: and $B_{4}=i\,\emptyset_{g}$($g$ denotes the magnetic charge). Here

671: $\overrightarrow{A}$ and $A_{4}$ are assumed to be the components

672: of electric four - potential $A_{\mu}=(\overrightarrow{A},\, i\,\emptyset_{e}).$

673: Similarly $\overrightarrow{B}$ and $B_{4}$ are considered as the

674: components of magnetic four-potential $B_{\mu}=(\overrightarrow{B},\, i\,\emptyset_{g})$.

675: We have designed the eight dimensional space spanned by split octonion

676: basis elements in terms of two four - dimensional space (namely the

677: external and internal space). Here also the electric four-potential

678: is described in external four-dimensional space while the magnetic

679: four - potential has been considered in internal four dimensional

680: spaces. Since electric charge and magnetic monopoles are dual to each

681: other ,we may interpret these two spaces as dual to each other. The

682: internal space of electric charge may be identified as the external

683: space of monopole while the external space of electric charge will

684: be visualized as the internal space of magnetic monopole or vice versa.

685: Accordingly, the electric charge is considered in external space and

686: magnetic charge in internal space. Hence, eight dimensional spaces

687: have the built in duality where a bradyonic monopole plays the role

688: of tachyonic electric charge while the tachyonic monopole looks like

689: a bradyonic electric charge or vice versa. Eight dimensional spaces

690: have been considered as the unification of $R^{4}-$ (bradyonic) and

691: $T^{4}-$ (tachyonic) spaces. 

692: 

693: Let us now write the the inhomogeneous octonion wave equation in its

694: split form as

695: 

696: \begin{eqnarray}

697: \overline{D}\emptyset & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

698: \partial_{4}A_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{A} & -(\partial_{4}\overrightarrow{B}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}B_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{A})\\

699: \partial'_{4}\overrightarrow{A}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'A_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{B} & \partial'_{4}B_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'.\overrightarrow{B}\end{array}\right)=F\label{eq:44}\end{eqnarray}

700: where $F$ is a field like electromagnetic field in split octonion

701: $2\times2$ Zorn's vector matrix realization as

702: 

703: \begin{eqnarray}

704: F & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

705: f_{4} & -\overrightarrow{f}\\

706: \overrightarrow{f}\,' & f_{4}'\end{array}\right).\label{eq:45}\end{eqnarray}

707: Comparing equations (\ref{eq:44}) and (\ref{eq:45}), we get

708: 

709: \begin{eqnarray}

710: f_{4} & = & \partial_{4}A_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{A}=0;\label{eq:46}\end{eqnarray}

711: 

712: 

713: \begin{eqnarray}

714: f_{4}' & = & \partial'_{4}B_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'.\overrightarrow{B}=0;\label{eq:47}\end{eqnarray}

715: 

716: 

717: \begin{eqnarray}

718: \overrightarrow{f} & = & \partial_{4}\overrightarrow{B}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}B_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{A};\label{eq:48}\end{eqnarray}

719: 

720: 

721: \begin{eqnarray}

722: \overrightarrow{f}' & = & \partial'_{4}\overrightarrow{A}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'A_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{B}.\label{eq:49}\end{eqnarray}

723: In equations (\ref{eq:46}, \ref{eq:47}), we could get $f_{4}=0$

724: and $f_{4}'=0$ on applying Lorentz gauge conditions on electric and

725: magnetic four potentials. We may now discuss the different cases in

726: the following sub sections:

727: 

728: 

729: \subsubsection*{(i) BRADYONIC CASE}

730: 

731: We may describe the theory of bradyons by substituting $B_{4}=A_{4},\,\overrightarrow{B}\,=\overrightarrow{A}$

732: in equations (\ref{eq:40}-\ref{eq:49}) and correspondingly $\partial_{4}=\partial_{4}',\,\overrightarrow{\nabla}=\overrightarrow{\nabla}'=\partial$.

733: Then we get

734: 

735: \begin{eqnarray}

736: \overline{D}\emptyset & =F & =\left(\begin{array}{cc}

737: \partial_{4}A_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{A} & -(\partial_{4}\overrightarrow{A}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}A_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{A})\\

738: \partial_{4}\overrightarrow{A}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}A_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{A} & \partial_{4}A_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{A}\end{array}\right).\label{eq:50}\end{eqnarray}

739: Using the definition of electric and magnetic fields given by

740: 

741: \begin{eqnarray}

742: \overrightarrow{E} & =-\frac{\partial\overrightarrow{A}}{\partial t}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}\emptyset_{e} & =-\frac{\partial\overrightarrow{A}}{\partial t}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}\phi_{e};\label{eq:51}\end{eqnarray}

743: 

744: 

745: \begin{eqnarray}

746: \overrightarrow{\mathcal{H}} & = & \overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{A}\label{eq:52}\end{eqnarray}

747: and imposing Lorentz-gauge condition $\partial_{4}A_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{A}=\frac{\partial\emptyset_{e}}{\partial t}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{A}=0,\,$

748: and using $\overrightarrow{\psi}=\overrightarrow{E}-i\overrightarrow{\mathcal{H}}(i=\sqrt{-1})$

749: , we get

750: 

751: \begin{eqnarray}

752: -\partial_{4}\overrightarrow{A}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}A_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{A} & = & -i\overrightarrow{E}+\overrightarrow{\mathcal{H}}=-i\overrightarrow{\psi}*;\label{eq:53}\end{eqnarray}

753: 

754: 

755: \begin{eqnarray}

756: \partial_{4}\overrightarrow{A}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}A_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{A} & = & i\overrightarrow{E}-\overrightarrow{\mathcal{H}}=i\overrightarrow{\psi}*.\label{eq:54}\end{eqnarray}

757: Thus equation (\ref{eq:50}) reduces to

758: 

759: \begin{eqnarray}

760: \overline{D}\emptyset & = & F\label{eq:55}\end{eqnarray}

761: where

762: 

763: \begin{eqnarray}

764: F & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

765: 0 & -\overrightarrow{F}\\

766: \overrightarrow{F} & 0\end{array}\right)=i\psi*.\label{eq:56}\end{eqnarray}

767: Equation (\ref{eq:56}) is the split octonion form of field tensor

768: $F_{\mu\nu}=\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}-\partial_{\nu}A_{\mu}$ describing

769: the electric and magnetic fields. Off diagonal vector components of

770: split octonions (\ref{eq:50}) are the conjugates to each other and

771: the scalar components along principal diagonal are associated with

772: the quaternion scalars (i.e. real quaternion). Similarly, we get

773: 

774: \begin{eqnarray}

775: D\overline{\emptyset} & = & F^{T}\label{eq:57}\end{eqnarray}

776: where

777: 

778: \begin{eqnarray}

779: F^{T} & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

780: 0 & \overrightarrow{F}*\\

781: -\overrightarrow{F}* & 0\end{array}\right)=i\psi.\label{eq:58}\end{eqnarray}

782: and equations (\ref{eq:55}) and (\ref{eq:57}) lead to 

783: 

784: \begin{eqnarray}

785: \frac{1}{2}(\overline{D}\emptyset+D\overline{\emptyset}) & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

786: 0 & \overrightarrow{\mathcal{H}}\\

787: -\overrightarrow{\mathcal{H}} & 0\end{array}\right)=\overrightarrow{\mathcal{H}}\label{eq:59}\end{eqnarray}

788: 

789: 

790: \begin{eqnarray}

791: \frac{1}{2}i\,(\overline{D}\emptyset-D\overline{\emptyset}) & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

792: 0 & \overrightarrow{E}\\

793: -\overrightarrow{E} & 0\end{array}\right)=\overrightarrow{E}\label{eq:60}\end{eqnarray}

794: where $\overrightarrow{E}$ and $\overrightarrow{\mathcal{H}}$ are

795: the electric and magnetic fields given by equations (\ref{eq:51},\ref{eq:52}).

796: Here we have the different split octonion representation in comparison

797: to the case quaternion electrodynamics, where $\frac{1}{2}(\overline{D}\emptyset+D\overline{\emptyset})$

798: represents Lorentz condition (i.e. scalar part of quaternion) and

799: $\frac{1}{2}i\,(\overline{D}\emptyset-D\overline{\emptyset})$ represents

800: the vector part (pure quaternion) of a quaternion. It is obvious because

801: the off diagonal elements of an octonion is a quaternion while those

802: along principal diagonal are the scalars.

803: 

804: 

805: \subsubsection*{(ii) TACHYONIC CASE}

806: 

807: For the description of tachyons we substitute $A_{4}=B_{4},\,\overrightarrow{A}\,=\overrightarrow{B}$

808: in equations (\ref{eq:40}) to (\ref{eq:49}) and get the representation

809: of $T^{4}-$ space. In this space (one space and three time dimensions),

810: the scalar component is $r\,=|\overrightarrow{r}|=(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2})^{\frac{1}{2}}$and

811: the time gradient vector $\overrightarrow{\nabla}'=[t_{x},t_{y},t_{z},\partial_{4}'=(-ir)]$.

812: Hence the split octonion form of four differential operator, its conjugate

813: and the four potential of tachyons may be written as 

814: 

815: \begin{eqnarray}

816: D & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

817: \partial'_{4} & -\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\\

818: \overrightarrow{\nabla}' & \partial'_{4}\end{array}\right)\label{eq:61}\end{eqnarray}

819: 

820: 

821: \begin{eqnarray}

822: \overline{D} & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

823: \partial'_{4} & \overrightarrow{\nabla}'\\

824: -\overrightarrow{\nabla}' & \partial'_{4}\end{array}\right)\label{eq:62}\end{eqnarray}

825: 

826: 

827: \begin{eqnarray}

828: \emptyset & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

829: B_{4} & -\overrightarrow{B}\\

830: \overrightarrow{B} & B_{4}\end{array}\right).\label{eq:63}\end{eqnarray}

831: Thus we get 

832: 

833: \begin{eqnarray}

834: \overline{D}\emptyset & =F\,' & =\left(\begin{array}{cc}

835: \partial'_{4}B_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{B} & -(\partial'_{4}\overrightarrow{B}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'B_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{B})\\

836: \partial'_{4}\overrightarrow{B}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}B_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{B} & \partial'_{4}B_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'.\overrightarrow{B}\end{array}\right).\label{eq:64}\end{eqnarray}

837: Now using the following expressions for tachyonic \cite{key-23,key-24}

838: electric and magnetic fields in $T^{4}$- space as

839: 

840: \begin{eqnarray}

841: \overrightarrow{E_{t}} & =-\frac{\partial\overrightarrow{B}}{\partial r}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\emptyset_{g} & =-\frac{\partial\overrightarrow{B}}{\partial r}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'B_{4};\label{eq:65}\end{eqnarray}

842: 

843: 

844: \begin{eqnarray}

845: \overrightarrow{H_{t}} & = & \overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{B}\label{eq:66}\end{eqnarray}

846: and imposing Lorentz gauge condition in $T^{4}-$space as 

847: 

848: \begin{eqnarray*}

849: \partial'_{4}B_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'.\overrightarrow{B} & = & 0,\end{eqnarray*}

850: we get

851: 

852: \begin{eqnarray}

853: -\partial'_{4}\overrightarrow{B}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'B_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{B} & = & -i\overrightarrow{E_{t}}+\overrightarrow{H_{t}}=-i\overrightarrow{\psi_{t}}*;\label{eq:67}\end{eqnarray}

854: 

855: 

856: \begin{eqnarray}

857: \partial'_{4}\overrightarrow{B}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}B_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{B} & = & i\overrightarrow{E_{t}}-\overrightarrow{H_{t}}=i\overrightarrow{\psi_{t}}*\label{eq:68}\end{eqnarray}

858: where $\overrightarrow{\psi_{t}}=\overrightarrow{E_{t}}-i\overrightarrow{H_{t}}$

859: ($t$ denotes for tachyonic representations). Then equation (\ref{eq:64})

860: reduces to

861: 

862: \begin{eqnarray}

863: F\,' & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

864: 0 & -\overrightarrow{F_{t}}\\

865: \overrightarrow{F_{t}} & 0\end{array}\right)=i\overrightarrow{\psi_{t}}*.\label{eq:69}\end{eqnarray}

866: Equation (\ref{eq:64}) is the split octonion form of field tensor

867: $F_{\mu\nu}'=\partial'_{\mu}B'_{\nu}-\partial'_{\nu}B'_{\mu}$ components

868: of which describe the electric and magnetic field in $T^{4}$- space.

869: Similarly, we obtain 

870: 

871: \begin{eqnarray}

872: D\overline{\emptyset} & = & F_{t}'\label{eq:70}\end{eqnarray}

873: where

874: 

875: \begin{eqnarray}

876: F_{t}' & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

877: 0 & \overrightarrow{F_{t}}*\\

878: \overrightarrow{-F_{t}}* & 0\end{array}\right)=i\overrightarrow{\psi_{t}}.\label{eq:71}\end{eqnarray}

879: In the same manner, we get 

880: 

881: \begin{eqnarray}

882: \frac{1}{2}(\overline{D}\emptyset+D\overline{\emptyset}) & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

883: 0 & \overrightarrow{H_{t}}\\

884: -\overrightarrow{H_{t}} & 0\end{array}\right)=\overrightarrow{H_{t}}\label{eq:72}\end{eqnarray}

885: 

886: 

887: \begin{eqnarray}

888: \frac{1}{2}i\,(\overline{D}\emptyset-D\overline{\emptyset}) & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

889: 0 & \overrightarrow{E_{t}}\\

890: -\overrightarrow{E_{t}} & 0\end{array}\right)=\overrightarrow{E_{t}}\label{eq:73}\end{eqnarray}

891: where $\overrightarrow{E_{t}}$ and $\overrightarrow{H_{t}}$ are

892: the electric and magnetic fields of tachyons in $T^{4}-$space as

893: given by equations (\ref{eq:65},\ref{eq:66}). 

894: 

895: 

896: \subsubsection*{(iii) DYONIC CASE}

897: 

898: In order to reformulate dyonic field equations in terms of split octonions

899: and its Zorn's vector matrix realization, we replace $\emptyset$

900: in equation (\ref{eq:42}) by the complex (generalized) four - potential

901: $\left\{ V_{\mu}\right\} $ of dyons \cite{key-36} in the following

902: form

903: 

904: \begin{eqnarray}

905: V & = & V_{4}u_{0}*+V_{4}u_{0}+V_{i}u_{i}*+V_{i}u_{i}=\left(\begin{array}{cc}

906: V_{4} & -\overrightarrow{V}\\

907: \overrightarrow{V} & V_{4}\end{array}\right)\label{eq:74}\end{eqnarray}

908: where $V_{4}$ and $\overrightarrow{V}$ are the temporal and spatial

909: components of generalized four - potential of dyons. These are complex

910: quantities and their real and imaginary components are electric and

911: magnetic constituents \cite{key-36}. Split octonion four - differential

912: operator is now defined as,

913: 

914: \begin{eqnarray}

915: D & =\partial_{4}u_{0}*+\partial_{4}u_{0}+\partial_{i}u_{i}*+\partial_{i}u_{i}= & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

916: \partial_{4} & -\overrightarrow{\nabla}\\

917: \overrightarrow{\nabla} & \partial_{4}\end{array}\right)\label{eq:75}\end{eqnarray}

918: Operating split octonion conjugate of four - differential operator

919: given by equation (\ref{eq:75}) on the equation (\ref{eq:74}) and

920: using to communication relations of split octonion units, we get

921: 

922: \begin{eqnarray}

923: \overline{D}V & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

924: \partial_{4}V_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{V} & -(\partial_{4}\overrightarrow{V}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}V_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{V})\\

925: \partial_{4}\overrightarrow{V}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}V_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{V} & \partial_{4}V_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{V}\end{array}\right)\label{eq:76}\end{eqnarray}

926: where

927: 

928: \begin{eqnarray}

929: \partial_{4}V_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{V} & = & (\partial_{\mu}V_{\mu})(u_{0}*+u_{0})=0.1=0\label{eq:77}\end{eqnarray}

930: and

931: 

932: \begin{eqnarray}

933: -\partial_{4}\overrightarrow{V}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}V_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{V} & = & -i\psi*.\label{eq:78}\end{eqnarray}

934: Thus $V$ is the generalized split octonion potential of dyons and

935: $\overrightarrow{\psi}$ is the complex vector field with $\overrightarrow{E}$

936: and $\overrightarrow{H}$ as the generalized electromagnetic fields

937: of dyons. Consequently, equation (\ref{eq:76}) leads to the following

938: split octonion wave equation for dyonic field as

939: 

940: \begin{eqnarray}

941: \overline{D}V & = & G\label{eq:79}\end{eqnarray}

942: where

943: 

944: \begin{eqnarray}

945: G & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

946: 0 & -\overrightarrow{G}\\

947: \overrightarrow{G} & 0\end{array}\right)=i\overrightarrow{\psi}*.\label{eq:80}\end{eqnarray}

948: It is to be noted from equations (\ref{eq:46}) to (\ref{eq:49})

949: that $f_{4},\,\overrightarrow{f\,},\overrightarrow{\, f}\,'$ and

950: $f_{4}'$ are the components of electric and magnetic fields described

951: in terms of two four-potentials in internal and external spaces. If

952: the two spaces are completely disjoint spaces then we get only $\overrightarrow{f}$,

953: in external four - space since $f_{4}=0$ due to Lorentz gauge condition

954: while $\overrightarrow{f}\,'$ and $f_{4\,}'$ do not occur. Equations

955: (\ref{eq:48}) and (\ref{eq:49}) shows that $\overrightarrow{f}$

956: and $\overrightarrow{f\,}'$ are made up from electric and magnetic

957: fields, which is the mixing of external and internal spaces. As such

958: equations (\ref{eq:48}) and (\ref{eq:49}) do not describe either

959: the usual electric and magnetic fields or the generalized fields of

960: dyons. Rather, they have the mixed behaviour, namely tachyonic dyons.

961: 

962: 

963: \subsection{{\normalsize FIELD EQUATIONS}}

964: 

965: Let us write the octonion wave equation in split representation as

966: 

967: \begin{eqnarray}

968: DF & = & J.\label{eq:81}\end{eqnarray}

969: Here $D$ and $F$ are defined by equations (\ref{eq:40}) and (\ref{eq:45})

970: in split octonionic form and $J$ is associated with eight dimensional

971: current source density in split octonion representation as follows,

972: 

973: \begin{eqnarray}

974: J & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

975: J_{4} & -\overrightarrow{J}\\

976: \overrightarrow{J} & J_{4}\end{array}\right).\label{eq:82}\end{eqnarray}

977: Now using equations (\ref{eq:40}) and (\ref{eq:45}) , we get

978: 

979: \begin{eqnarray}

980: DF & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

981: \partial_{4}f_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{f}\,' & -(\partial_{4}\overrightarrow{f}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}f_{4}'+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times f\,')\\

982: \partial'_{4}\overrightarrow{f}\,'+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'f_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{f} & \partial'_{4}f_{4}'-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'.\overrightarrow{f}\end{array}\right).\label{eq:83}\end{eqnarray}

983: Comparing equations (\ref{eq:81}), (\ref{eq:82}) and (\ref{eq:83}),

984: we get

985: 

986: \begin{eqnarray}

987: J_{4} & = & \partial_{4}f_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{f}\,';\label{eq:84}\end{eqnarray}

988: 

989: 

990: \begin{eqnarray}

991: J_{4}' & = & \partial'_{4}f_{4}'-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'.\overrightarrow{f};\label{eq:85}\end{eqnarray}

992: 

993: 

994: \begin{eqnarray}

995: \overrightarrow{J} & = & \partial_{4}\overrightarrow{f}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}f_{4}'+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times f\,';\label{eq:86}\end{eqnarray}

996: 

997: 

998: \begin{eqnarray}

999: \overrightarrow{J}' & = & \partial'_{4}\overrightarrow{f}\,'+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'f_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{f}.\label{eq:87}\end{eqnarray}

1000: Let us discuss the following different cases of generalized field

1001: equation.

1002: 

1003: 

1004: \subsubsection*{(i) BRADYONIC CASE}

1005: 

1006: For the description of bradyons, let us substitute $B_{4}=A_{4},\,\overrightarrow{B}=\overrightarrow{A},\,\partial_{4}'=\partial_{4},\,\overrightarrow{\nabla}'=\overrightarrow{\nabla}\equiv\partial$

1007: and $J_{4}'=J_{4},\,\overrightarrow{J}'=\overrightarrow{J}.$ Using

1008: equations (\ref{eq:51}, \ref{eq:52}, \ref{eq:56}) we find that

1009: equation (\ref{eq:83}) reduces to \begin{eqnarray}

1010: DF & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

1011: \overrightarrow{\nabla}.\mathcal{\overrightarrow{H}}+i\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{E} & i\frac{\partial\mathcal{\overrightarrow{H}}}{\partial t}+i\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{E}-\frac{\partial\overrightarrow{E}}{\partial t}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\mathcal{\overrightarrow{H}}\\

1012: -i\frac{\partial\mathcal{\overrightarrow{H}}}{\partial t}-i\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{E}+\frac{\partial\overrightarrow{E}}{\partial t}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\mathcal{\overrightarrow{H}} & \overrightarrow{\nabla}.\mathcal{\overrightarrow{H}}+i\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{E}\end{array}\right)\label{eq:88}\end{eqnarray}

1013: Comparing it with equations (\ref{eq:81} , \ref{eq:82}), we find

1014: that equation (\ref{eq:88}) is analogous to the split octonionic

1015: form of Maxwell's equation $F_{\mu\nu,\nu}=J_{\mu}$ which is the

1016: covariant form of a set of following four differential equations i.e.

1017: 

1018: \begin{eqnarray*}

1019: \overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{E}=\rho_{e}=-i\, J_{4}, & \overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{H}= & 0,\end{eqnarray*}

1020: 

1021: 

1022: \begin{eqnarray}

1023: \overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{H}=-\overrightarrow{J}+\frac{\partial\overrightarrow{E}}{\partial t}, & \overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{E}= & -\frac{\partial\overrightarrow{H}}{\partial t}.\label{eq:89}\end{eqnarray}

1024: Hence the octonion field equation (\ref{eq:81}) is identical to the

1025: Maxwell's field equation in compact and simple split octonion form.

1026: Equation (\ref{eq:81}) may also be written in terms of potential

1027: as \begin{eqnarray}

1028: DF & =D(\overline{D}\emptyset) & =D\overline{D}\emptyset=\square\emptyset=J\label{eq:90}\end{eqnarray}

1029: which is equivalent to split octonion form of covariant field equation

1030: $\square V_{\mu}=J_{\mu}$ of classical electrodynamics. As such,

1031: we have reformulated the classical electrodynamics in terms of compact,

1032: simple and consistent representation of split octonion formulations

1033: for the case of particles traveling slower than light namely bradyons.

1034: 

1035: 

1036: \subsubsection*{(ii) TACHYONIC CASE}

1037: 

1038: In this case if we may substitute $A_{4}=B_{4},\,\overrightarrow{A}=\overrightarrow{B},\,\partial_{4}=\partial_{4}',\,\overrightarrow{\nabla}'=\overrightarrow{\nabla}\equiv\partial$

1039: and $J_{4}=J_{4}',\,\overrightarrow{J}=\overrightarrow{J}\,'.$ Hence,

1040: using equations (\ref{eq:61}) and (\ref{eq:64}), we get

1041: 

1042: \begin{eqnarray}

1043: DF & '= & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

1044: J_{4}' & -\overrightarrow{J}\,'\\

1045: \overrightarrow{J} & J_{4}\end{array}\right)=J\,'.\label{eq:91}\end{eqnarray}

1046: This equation is the split octonionic form of Maxwell's equation $F''_{\mu\nu,\nu}=J_{\mu}'$

1047: in $T^{4}\,$- space where we have used the following pairs of Maxwell's

1048: equation for tachyons {[}\cite{key-25,key-26}]

1049: 

1050: \begin{eqnarray*}

1051: \overrightarrow{\nabla}'.\overrightarrow{E}_{t}=-\rho_{0}, & \overrightarrow{\nabla}'.\overrightarrow{H_{t}}= & 0,\end{eqnarray*}

1052: 

1053: 

1054: \begin{eqnarray}

1055: \overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{H_{t}}=-\overrightarrow{J}\,'+\frac{\partial\overrightarrow{E_{t}}}{\partial t}, & \overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{E_{t}}= & -\frac{\partial\overrightarrow{H_{t}}}{\partial t}.\label{eq:92}\end{eqnarray}

1056: Hence equation (\ref{eq:90}) is visualized as the field equation

1057: of tachyons in $T^{4}\,$- space in compact, simple and consistent

1058: split octonionic formulation. It has already been concluded \cite{key-23,key-24,key-25}

1059: that $T^{4}\,$- space for tachyons plays the same role as bradyons

1060: do in $R^{4}\,$- space.

1061: 

1062: 

1063: \subsubsection*{(iii) DYONIC CASE}

1064: 

1065: Here, we consider $\left\{ A_{\mu}\right\} $ and $\left\{ B_{\mu}\right\} $

1066: as electric and magnetic four - potentials described in external space

1067: (i.e. $R^{4}\,$-space) only, $D$ is defined by equation (\ref{eq:75})

1068: and $\emptyset$ is replaced by $V$ the generalized four- potential

1069: of dyons given by equation (\ref{eq:74}) . Subsequently, on using

1070: equations (\ref{eq:75}), (\ref{eq:76}) and (\ref{eq:79}), we get

1071: 

1072: \begin{eqnarray}

1073: D(\overline{D}V) & = & DG=J\label{eq:93}\end{eqnarray}

1074: where

1075: 

1076: \begin{eqnarray}

1077: J & =J_{4}u_{0}*+J_{4}u_{0}+J_{i}u_{i}*+J_{i}u_{i}= & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

1078: J_{4} & -\overrightarrow{J}\\

1079: \overrightarrow{J} & J_{4}\end{array}\right)\label{eq:94}\end{eqnarray}

1080: is the split octonion form of generalized four - current associated

1081: with dyons. Accordingly, we get

1082: 

1083: \begin{eqnarray}

1084: D(\overline{D}V) & =(D\overline{D})V=DG & =J\label{eq:95}\end{eqnarray}

1085: or equivalently

1086: 

1087: \begin{eqnarray}

1088: \square V & = & J\label{eq:96}\end{eqnarray}

1089: where

1090: 

1091: \begin{eqnarray}

1092: \square & = & (\overline{D}D)=(D\overline{D})=\partial_{4}^{2}+\nabla^{2}=\partial_{i}\partial_{i}.\label{eq:97}\end{eqnarray}

1093: Equations (\ref{eq:93}) and (\ref{eq:95}) are the split octonion

1094: equivalents of Generalized Dirac-Maxwell's (GDM) equation of dyons.

1095: Hence we may describe split octonion wave equation as the generalized

1096: field equation of dyons in compact, simple and consistent manner.

1097: Moreover, equation (\ref{eq:93}) and (\ref{eq:95}) reproduce the

1098: field equations corresponding to the dynamics of electric charge (magnetic

1099: monopole) in the absence of magnetic (electric) charge on the dyons.

1100: Equation (\ref{eq:95}) is the thus split octonion equivalent of covariant

1101: field equations $\square V_{\mu}=J_{\mu}$ of generalized fields of

1102: dyons described earlier \cite{key-26}.

1103: 

1104: 

1105: \subsection{CURRENT EQUATION}

1106: 

1107: Let us discuss the octonion wave equation as the octonion current

1108: differential equations in eight - dimension as

1109: 

1110: \begin{eqnarray}

1111: DJ & = & S.\label{eq:98}\end{eqnarray}

1112: Here $D$ and $J$ are defined earlier equations (\ref{eq:41}) and

1113: (\ref{eq:82}) in their split form and $S=\square F$ is defined as

1114: 

1115: \begin{eqnarray}

1116: S & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

1117: S_{4} & -\overrightarrow{S}\\

1118: \overrightarrow{S}' & S_{4}'\end{array}\right).\label{eq:99}\end{eqnarray}

1119: Now using equations (\ref{eq:41}) and (\ref{eq:46}) and equation

1120: (\ref{eq:82}) , we get

1121: 

1122: \begin{eqnarray}

1123: DJ & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}

1124: \partial_{4}J_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{J}\,' & -(\partial_{4}\overrightarrow{J}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}J_{4}'+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{J}\,')\\

1125: \partial'_{4}\overrightarrow{J}\,'+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'J_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{J} & \partial'_{4}J_{4}'-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'.\overrightarrow{J}\end{array}\right).\label{eq:100}\end{eqnarray}

1126: Now using equations (\ref{eq:98}), (\ref{eq:99}) and (\ref{eq:100})

1127: , we get the following set of equations

1128: 

1129: \begin{eqnarray}

1130: S_{4} & = & \partial_{4}J_{4}-\overrightarrow{\nabla}.\overrightarrow{J}\,';\label{eq:101}\end{eqnarray}

1131: 

1132: 

1133: \begin{eqnarray}

1134: S_{4}' & = & \partial'_{4}J_{4}'-\overrightarrow{\nabla}'.\overrightarrow{J};\label{eq:102}\end{eqnarray}

1135: 

1136: 

1137: \begin{eqnarray}

1138: \overrightarrow{S} & = & \partial_{4}\overrightarrow{J}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}J_{4}'+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'\times\overrightarrow{J}\,';\label{eq:103}\end{eqnarray}

1139: 

1140: 

1141: \begin{eqnarray}

1142: \overrightarrow{S}' & = & \partial'_{4}\overrightarrow{J}\,'+\overrightarrow{\nabla}'J_{4}+\overrightarrow{\nabla}\times\overrightarrow{J};\label{eq:104}\end{eqnarray}

1143: where $S$ is the new octonion variable parameter obtained from the

1144: operation of differential operator to current.Hence we may obtain

1145: a new kind of field equation in terms of new parameter $S$ and accordingly

1146: we may analyze the different cases for bradyons, tachyons and dyons.

1147: 

1148: 

1149: 

1150: \textbf{Acknowledgment}- The work is supported by Uttarakhand Council

1151: of Science and Technology, Dehradun. One of us OPSN is thankful to

1152: Chinese Academy of Sciences and Third world Academy of Sciences for

1153: awarding him CAS-TWAS visiting scholar fellowship to pursue a research

1154: program in China. He is also grateful to Professor Tianjun Li for

1155: his hospitality at Institute of Theoretical Physics, Beijing, China.

1156: 

1157: \begin{thebibliography}{10}

1158: \bibitem{key-1} P. Jordan, J Neuman, Von and E. P. Wigner, Ann. Math.,

1159: \textbf{\underbar{35}} , (1934), 29.

1160: 

1161: \bibitem[2]{key-2} A. Cayley, Philos. Mag. \textbf{\underbar{26}}

1162: , (1845), 208; R. P. Graves, \char`\"{}Life of Sir William Rowan Hamilton\char`\"{},

1163: 3 volumes, Arno Press, New York, 1975; J. C. Baez, \char`\"{}THE OCTONIONS\char`\"{}

1164: , Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., \textbf{\underbar{39}}, (2001), 145, math.

1165: RA/0105155; J. H. Conway, {}``On Quaternions and Octonions: Their

1166: Geometry, Arithmetic,and Symmetry,'' A K Peters Ltd, Massachusetts,

1167: 2003.

1168: 

1169: \bibitem[3]{key-3} L. E. Dickson, Ann. Math., \textbf{\underbar{20}},

1170: (1919), 155; W. R. Hamilton, \char`\"{}Elements of quaternions\char`\"{},

1171: Chelsea Publications Co., NY, (1969); P.G.Tait, \char`\"{}An elementary

1172: Treatise on Quaternions\char`\"{}, Oxford Univ. Press (1875).

1173: 

1174: \bibitem[4]{key-4} A.  Pais, Phys. Rev. Lett., \textbf{\underbar{7}},

1175: (1961), 291; 

1176: 

1177: \bibitem[5]{key-5} R. Penny, Am. J. Phys., \textbf{\underbar{36}},

1178: (1968), 871; Nuovo Cimento, \textbf{\underbar{B3}}, (1971), 95.

1179: 

1180: \bibitem[6]{key-6} K. Imaeda, H. Tachibana , M. Imaeda and S.Ohta,

1181: Il Nuovo Cimento, \textbf{\underbar{B100}}, (1987), 53; \textbf{\underbar{B105}},

1182: (1990) 1203; Bull. Okayama Univ. Sci., \textbf{\underbar{A24}} \textbf{,}

1183: (1989) 181; K. Imaeda and H.Tachibana, Il Nuovo Cimento, ; \textbf{\underbar{B104}}

1184: (1989) 91; Bull. Okayama Univ. Sci., \textbf{\underbar{A19}}, (1984)

1185: , 93; H.Tachibana; Ph.D.Thesis, Okayama Univ. Science (1990).

1186: 

1187: \bibitem[7]{key-7}G. C. Joshi, Lett Nuovo Cimento, \textbf{\underbar{44}},(1985),

1188: 449; A. J. Davis and G. C. Joshi, J. Math. Phys., \textbf{\underbar{27}},(1986),

1189: 3036; R. Foot and G. C. Joshi, Int. J. Theor. Phys., \textbf{\underbar{28}}

1190: , (1989), 1449 ; Phys. Lett., \textbf{\underbar{B199}}, (1987), 203. 

1191: 

1192: \bibitem[8]{key-8} A. Gamba, J. Math. Phys., \textbf{\underbar{8}},

1193: 775 (1967); Il Nuovo Cimento, \textbf{\underbar{A111}} , (1998) 293;

1194: M. Gogberashvili, \char`\"{}Octonionic Version of Dirac Equations\char`\"{},

1195: hep-th/0505101; J. Phys. A: Math.Gen., \textbf{\underbar{39}} , (

1196: 2006) 7099.

1197: 

1198: \bibitem[9]{key-9} G. M. Dixon, {}``Division Algebras: Octonions,

1199: Quaternions, Complex Numbers, and the Algebraic Design of Physics'',

1200: (Kluwer, 1994); Geoffrey Dixon, {}``Division Algebras, (1,9)-Space-time,

1201: Matter-antimatter Mixing'' arXiv:hep-th/9303039. 

1202: 

1203: \bibitem[10]{key-10} S. Okubo, {}``Introduction to Octonion and

1204: Other Non-Associative Algebras in Physics'', Montreal Memorial Lecture

1205: Series in Mathematical Physics, 2, Cambridge University Press, 1995;

1206: C.H. Barton and A. Sudbery, {}``MAGIC SQUARES OF LIE ALGEBRAS''

1207: arXiv:math.RA/0001083.

1208: 

1209: \bibitem[11]{key-11} R. Dündarer, F. Gürsey and C. Tze, J. Math.

1210: Phys., \textbf{\underbar{25}}, (1980), 1496; Nucl.Phys.,\textbf{\underbar{B266}}

1211: , (1986) , 440; F. Gürsey and C Tze,{}``On the Role of Division,

1212: Jordan and Related Algebras in Particle Physics'', World Scientific,

1213: River Edge, NJ, 1996; M Günaydin and F Gürsey, Lett Nuovo Cimento,

1214: \textbf{\underbar{6}},(1973), 407; M. Koca and N. Ozdes, J. Phys.

1215: A22, (1989), 1469; S. Catto, \char`\"{}Exceptional Projective Geometries

1216: and Internal Symmetries\char`\"{}, hep-th/0302079; .

1217: 

1218: \bibitem[12]{key-12} M. Günaydin and F. Gürsey, J. Math. Phys., \textbf{\underbar{14}},(1973),

1219: 1651.

1220: 

1221: \bibitem[13]{key-13} M. Günaydin and F. Gürsey, Phys. Rev., \textbf{\underbar{D9}},(1974),

1222: 3387.

1223: 

1224: \bibitem[14]{key-14}G. Domokos and S. Domokos-Kovesi, Phys. Rev.,

1225: \textbf{\underbar{D19}},(1979), 2984; J. Math. Phys., 18,(1978)

1226: 

1227: \bibitem[15]{key-15}. K.Morita ; Prog. Theor. Phys., \textbf{\underbar{65}},(1981),

1228: 787; \textbf{\underbar{73}}, (1985), 999; B. A. Bernevig, J. Hu, N.

1229: Toumbas, and S.Cheng Zhang, {}``The Eight Dimensional Quantum Hall

1230: Effect and the Octonions'', arXiv:cond-mat/0306045.

1231: 

1232: \bibitem[16]{key-16} C.A. Manogue and A. Sudbery, Phys. Rev., D40

1233: , 4073(1989); T. Kugo and P. Townsend: Nucl. Phys., \textbf{\underbar{B221}},

1234: (1983), 357; J. M. Evans, Nucl. Phys., \textbf{\underbar{B298}}, (1988),

1235: 92; J. Lukierski and F. Toppan, Phys. Lett., \textbf{\underbar{B584}}

1236: , (2004), 315 ; \textbf{\underbar{B539}} , (2002), 266 ; K. S. Abdel-Khalek

1237: Mostafa, \char`\"{}Ring Division Algebras, Self Duality and Supersymmetry\char`\"{},

1238: arXiv:hep-th/0002155; J. Schray, \char`\"{}Octonions and Supersymmetry\char`\"{},

1239: Ph.D. thesis, Department of Physics, Oregon State University, 1994;

1240: M. J. Duff, Ed., \char`\"{}The World in Eleven Dimensions: Supergravity,

1241: Super membranes and M-Theory\char`\"{}, Institute of Physics Publishing,

1242: Bristol, 1999. MR 2001b:81002 and references cited therein.

1243: 

1244: \bibitem[17]{key-17} A. M. Buoncristiani, J. Math. Phys., \textbf{\underbar{14}},

1245: (1973), 849.

1246: 

1247: \bibitem[18]{key-18} S. Marques, and C. G. Oliveita, J. Math. Phys.,

1248: \textbf{\underbar{26}}, (1985), 3131.

1249: 

1250: \bibitem[19]{key-19} S. Marques and C G Oliveira, J. Math. Phys.,

1251: \textbf{\underbar{29}}, (1988), 2127.

1252: 

1253: \bibitem[20]{key-20} S. Marques- Bohham, J. Math. Phys., \textbf{\underbar{32}},

1254: (1991), 1383.

1255: 

1256: \bibitem[21]{key-21} S. Marques - Bonham, J. Math. Phys., \textbf{\underbar{31}},(1990),

1257: 1478.

1258: 

1259: \bibitem[22]{key-22} S. Marques, C. G .Oliveira., Phys. Rev., \textbf{\underbar{D36}},(1987),

1260: 1716.

1261: 

1262: \bibitem[23]{key-23} H. C. Chandola and B. S. Rajput, J. Math. Phys,

1263: \textbf{\underbar{26}},(1985), 208.

1264: 

1265: \bibitem[24]{key-24}M. C. Pant, P. S. Bisht, O. P. S. Negi and B.

1266: S. Rajput, Cand. J. of Phys. \textbf{\underbar{78}}, (2000), 1.

1267: 

1268: \bibitem[25]{key-25}O. P. S. Negi, et al., Phys. Lett., \textbf{\underbar{B105}},(1981),

1269: 281.

1270: 

1271: \bibitem[26]{key-26}O. P . S. Negi, and B. S. Rajput, Phys. Lett.

1272: \textbf{\underbar{B113}},(1982), 183; Lett. Nuovo Cimento \textbf{\underbar{34}},(1982),

1273: 180; Indian J. Pure and Appl. Phys., \textbf{\underbar{2}}0,(1982),

1274: 472.

1275: 

1276: \bibitem[27]{key-27}H. C. Chandola and B. S. Rajput, Nuovo Cimento

1277: \textbf{\underbar{B72}}, (1982), 21; Indian J. Pure and Appl. Phys.

1278: \textbf{\underbar{21}},(1983), 651.

1279: 

1280: \bibitem[28]{key-28} E. Recami and R. Mignani, Riv. Nuovo Cimento,

1281: \textbf{\underbar{4}} , (1974), 209; Lett. Nuovo Cimento \textbf{\underbar{16}},(1976),

1282: 449.

1283: 

1284: \bibitem[29]{key-29} G. Dattoli and R. Mignani, Lett. Nuovo Cimento

1285: \textbf{\underbar{22}},(1978), 65; V. Vysin, Lett Nuovo Cimento \textbf{\underbar{22}},

1286: (1978), 76.

1287: 

1288: \bibitem[30]{key-30} E. Recami, Riv. Nuovo Cimento, \textbf{\underbar{9}}

1289: , 1-178 (1986); Found. Phys., \textbf{\underbar{31}} , (2001) 1119;

1290: PHYSICA, \textbf{\underbar{A252}} , (1998), 586.

1291: 

1292: \bibitem[31]{key-31}G. D. Maccarrone and E. Recami, Lett Nuovo Cimento

1293: \textbf{\underbar{34}}, (1982), 251; \textbf{\underbar{28}}, (1980),

1294: 151 ; P. Caldirola, G. D. Maccarrone and E. Recami, Lett Nuovo Cimento,

1295: \textbf{\underbar{29}} , (1980), 241.

1296: 

1297: \bibitem[32]{key-32}H. C. Chandola and B. S. Rajput, Indian J. Pure

1298: and Appl. Phys. \textbf{\underbar{22}}, (1984), 1.

1299: 

1300: \bibitem[33]{key-33}H. C. Chandola and B. S. Rajput, Lett. Nuovo

1301: Cimento \textbf{\underbar{40}}, (1984), 277.

1302: 

1303: \bibitem[34]{key-34} P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, \textbf{\underbar{A133}},

1304: (1931), 60; Phys. Rev., \textbf{\underbar{74}} , (1948), 817; G. 't

1305: Hooft, Nucl. Phys., \textbf{\underbar{B79}}, (1974) , 276; A. M. Polyakov,

1306: JETP Lett., \textbf{\underbar{20}}, (1974) 194.

1307: 

1308: \bibitem[35]{key-35} J. Schwinger, Science, \textbf{\underbar{165}}

1309: , (1978), 757; Phys. Rev., \textbf{\underbar{144}}, (1986), 1087;

1310: \textbf{\underbar{151}}, (1966), 1048; \textbf{\underbar{151}}, (1966),

1311: 1055; \textbf{\underbar{173}}, (1968); 1536; D. Zwanzinger, Phys.

1312: Rev., \textbf{\underbar{176}}, (1968) , 1489; Phys. Rev., \textbf{\underbar{D3}},

1313: (1971), 880; B. Julia and A. Zee, Phys. Rev., \textbf{\underbar{D11}},

1314: (1975), 2227; N. Craigie, \char`\"{}Theory and Detection of magnetic

1315: Monopoles in Gauge Theories\char`\"{}, World Scientific, Singapur,

1316: 1986.

1317: 

1318: \bibitem[36]{key-36} P. S.Bisht, O.P.S.Negi and B.S.Rajput, IL Nuovo

1319: Cimento, \textbf{\underbar{A104}} , (1991), 337; Prog. Theo. Phys.,

1320: \textbf{\underbar{85}}, (1991), 157 .

1321: 

1322: \bibitem[37]{key-37} Shalini Bisht, P. S. Bisht and O. P. S. Negi,

1323: Nuovo Cimento, \textbf{\underbar{B113}}, (1998), 1449; B.S. Rajput,

1324: S. R. Kumar and O.P.S.Negi, Lett. Nuovo \textbf{\underbar{34}}, (1982),

1325: 180 ; \textbf{\underbar{36}}, (1983), 75; V. Majernik, PHYSICA, \textbf{\underbar{39}},

1326: (2000), 9; V. V. Kravchenkov, \char`\"{}Applied Quaternion Analysis\char`\"{},

1327: Helderman Verlag, Germany (2003). 

1328: 

1329: \bibitem[38]{key-38} Z. K. Silagadze,''Feynman's derivation of Maxwell's

1330: equations and extra dimensions'', hep-th/0106235; Annalesde la Foundation

1331: Louis de Broglie, \textbf{\underbar{27}}, (2002) 241.

1332: 

1333: \bibitem[39]{key-39} P. S. Bisht and O. P. S. Negi, Indian Journal

1334: of Pure and Applied Phys., \textbf{\underbar{32}} , (1994), 193; \textbf{\underbar{31}}

1335: , (1993), 292; Shalini Dangwal, P.S.Bisht and O.P.S.Negi, \char`\"{}Octonionic

1336: Gauge Formulation for Dyonic Fields\char`\"{}, hep-th/0608061, Had.

1337: J., (2007) (In press); {}``Unified Split Octonion Formulation of

1338: Dyons'', hep-th/0607209.

1339: \end{thebibliography}

1340: 

1341: \end{document}

1342: