1: %
2: % Template for Belle 2006 Summer conference papers
3: %
4: %
5: % TeX'ing this file requires that you have AMS-LaTeX 2.0 installed
6: % as well as the rest of the prerequisites for REVTeX 4.0
7: %
8: % See the REVTeX 4 README file
9: % It also requires running BibTeX. The commands are as follows:
10: %
11: % 1) latex apssamp.tex
12: % 2) bibtex apssamp
13: % 3) latex apssamp.tex
14: % 4) latex apssamp.tex
15: %
16: %%% Use this for e-print submission
17: %%% You also need to do the following:
18: %%% * Comment out widetext, use eqnarray and \nonumber
19: %%% (for the first line) for eq:likelihood
20: %%% * Change the figure size to 0.6
21: %%% * Put preprint numbers and the Belle logo
22: \documentclass[aps,prl,preprint,tightenlines,superscriptaddress,showpacs,byrevtex]{revtex4}
23: %
24: %%% Use this for PRL submission
25: %%% You also need to do the following:
26: %%% * Comment out widetext, use eqnarray and \nonumber
27: %%% (for the first line) for eq:likelihood
28: %%% * Change the figure size to 0.6
29: %%% * Comment out preprint numbers and the Belle logo
30: %\documentclass[aps,prl,preprint,superscriptaddress,showpacs,byrevtex]{revtex4}
31: %
32: %%% Double-column style
33: %%% You also need to do the following:
34: %%% * Use widetext for eq:likelihood, comment out \nonumber
35: %%% * Change the figure size appropriately (should be less than 0.5)
36: %%% * Comment out preprint numbers and the Belle logo
37: %\documentclass[aps,prl,twocolumn,superscriptaddress,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
38: %
39:
40:
41: % Some other (several out of many) possibilities
42: %\documentclass[preprint,aps]{revtex4}
43: %\documentclass[preprint,aps,draft]{revtex4}
44:
45: \usepackage{graphicx} % Include figure files
46: \usepackage{dcolumn} % Align table columns on decimal point
47: \usepackage{color} % Align table columns on decimal point
48:
49: \usepackage{pstricks}
50:
51: \newcommand{\ks}{K_S^0}
52: \newcommand{\ksks}{K_S^0K_S^0}
53: \newcommand{\aksks}{{\cal A}_{\ksks}}
54: \newcommand{\sksks}{{\cal S}_{\ksks}}
55: \newcommand{\sksksvalue}{-0.38}
56: \newcommand{\sksksstat}{0.77}
57: \newcommand{\skskssyst}{0.08}
58: \newcommand{\aksksvalue}{-0.38}
59: \newcommand{\aksksstat}{0.38}
60: \newcommand{\akskssyst}{0.05}
61:
62: \newcommand{\kspizpiz}{K_S^0\pi^0\pi^0}
63: \newcommand{\akspizpiz}{{\cal A}_{\kspizpiz}}
64: \newcommand{\skspizpiz}{{\cal S}_{\kspizpiz}}
65: \newcommand{\skspizpizvalue}{+0.43}
66: \newcommand{\skspizpizstat}{0.49}
67: \newcommand{\skspizpizsyst}{0.09}
68: \newcommand{\akspizpizvalue}{-0.17}
69: \newcommand{\akspizpizstat}{0.24}
70: \newcommand{\akspizpizsyst}{0.06}
71:
72: \newcommand{\qq}{q\overline{q}}
73: \newcommand{\de}{\Delta E}
74: \newcommand{\mbc}{M_{\rm bc}}
75: \newcommand{\dt}{\Delta t}
76: \newcommand{\dmd}{\Delta m_d}
77: \newcommand{\taub}{\tau_{B^0}}
78: \newcommand{\invfb}{~fb$^{-1}$}
79: \newcommand{\bbbar}{B^0\overline{B}{}^0}
80:
81: \graphicspath{{ps}}
82:
83: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.1}
84:
85: \begin{document}
86:
87: %\vspace*{-3\baselineskip}
88: %\resizebox{!}{3cm}{\includegraphics{belle.eps}}
89:
90:
91: %\preprint{\vbox{ \hbox{ }
92: % \hbox{rev.5}
93: %}}
94:
95: \preprint{
96: BELLE-CONF-0723
97: }
98: %\preprint{\vbox{ \hbox{ }
99: % \hbox{
100: %}}
101:
102: \title{ \quad\\[0.5cm]
103: Measurements of $CP$ Violation Parameters
104: in $B^0\to\kspizpiz$ and $B^0\to\ksks$ Decays
105: }
106:
107: \noaffiliation
108:
109: \begin{abstract}
110: We present a measurement of the $CP$ violation parameters
111: in $B^0\to\kspizpiz$ and $B^0\to\ksks$ decays
112: using a data sample containing $657\times 10^6$ $B\overline{B}$
113: pairs collected with the Belle detector at the KEKB
114: asymmetric-energy $e^+e^-$ collider operating at the $\Upsilon(4S)$
115: resonance.
116: We measure
117: \begin{eqnarray}
118: \skspizpiz &=& \skspizpizvalue \pm \skspizpizstat \pm \skspizpizsyst, \nonumber \\
119: \akspizpiz &=& \akspizpizvalue \pm \akspizpizstat \pm \akspizpizsyst, \nonumber \\
120: \sksks &=& \sksksvalue \pm \sksksstat \pm \skskssyst~~ {\rm and}, \nonumber \\
121: \aksks &=& \aksksvalue \pm \aksksstat \pm \akskssyst, \nonumber
122: \end{eqnarray}
123: where the first and second errors are statistical and systematic,
124: respectively.
125: \end{abstract}
126:
127: \pacs{11.30.Er, 12.15.Hh, 13.25.Hw, 14.40.Nd}
128:
129: %\input{author-conf2007.tex}
130: %%% Paper:
131: %%% Journal: Summer 2007 Conference Papers
132: %%% July 17, 2007
133: %%% Contacts:
134: %%% Non-responding authors or those who said NO are commented out.
135: %%% ====================================================================
136: %%% Click the RELOAD button on your web browser to see the updated file.
137: %%% ====================================================================
138: %%% Use \input{author} to insert this material into your latex file.
139: %%%%% Force institutions to appear in alphabetical order when typeset.
140: \affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk}
141: \affiliation{Chiba University, Chiba}
142: \affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221}
143: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taipei}
144: \affiliation{Justus-Liebig-Universit\"at Gie\ss{}en, Gie\ss{}en}
145: \affiliation{The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Hayama}
146: \affiliation{Gyeongsang National University, Chinju}
147: \affiliation{Hanyang University, Seoul}
148: \affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822}
149: \affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba}
150: \affiliation{Hiroshima Institute of Technology, Hiroshima}
151: \affiliation{University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801}
152: \affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing}
153: \affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna}
154: \affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Protvino}
155: \affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow}
156: \affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana}
157: \affiliation{Kanagawa University, Yokohama}
158: \affiliation{Korea University, Seoul}
159: \affiliation{Kyoto University, Kyoto}
160: \affiliation{Kyungpook National University, Taegu}
161: \affiliation{Ecole Polyt\'ecnique F\'ed\'erale Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne}
162: \affiliation{University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana}
163: \affiliation{University of Maribor, Maribor}
164: \affiliation{University of Melbourne, School of Physics, Victoria 3010}
165: \affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya}
166: \affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara}
167: \affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li}
168: \affiliation{National United University, Miao Li}
169: \affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei}
170: \affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow}
171: \affiliation{Nippon Dental University, Niigata}
172: \affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata}
173: \affiliation{University of Nova Gorica, Nova Gorica}
174: \affiliation{Osaka City University, Osaka}
175: \affiliation{Osaka University, Osaka}
176: \affiliation{Panjab University, Chandigarh}
177: \affiliation{Peking University, Beijing}
178: \affiliation{University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260}
179: \affiliation{Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544}
180: \affiliation{RIKEN BNL Research Center, Upton, New York 11973}
181: \affiliation{Saga University, Saga}
182: \affiliation{University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei}
183: \affiliation{Seoul National University, Seoul}
184: \affiliation{Shinshu University, Nagano}
185: \affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon}
186: \affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales}
187: \affiliation{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai}
188: \affiliation{Toho University, Funabashi}
189: \affiliation{Tohoku Gakuin University, Tagajo}
190: \affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai}
191: \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo}
192: \affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo}
193: \affiliation{Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo}
194: \affiliation{Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo}
195: \affiliation{Toyama National College of Maritime Technology, Toyama}
196: \affiliation{Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061}
197: \affiliation{Yonsei University, Seoul}
198: \author{K.~Abe}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
199: \author{I.~Adachi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
200: \author{H.~Aihara}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
201: \author{K.~Arinstein}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
202: \author{T.~Aso}\affiliation{Toyama National College of Maritime Technology, Toyama} % Toyama
203: \author{V.~Aulchenko}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
204: \author{T.~Aushev}\affiliation{Ecole Polyt\'ecnique F\'ed\'erale Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
205: \author{T.~Aziz}\affiliation{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai} % Tata
206: \author{S.~Bahinipati}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
207: \author{A.~M.~Bakich}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales} % Sydney
208: \author{V.~Balagura}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
209: \author{Y.~Ban}\affiliation{Peking University, Beijing} % Peking
210: \author{S.~Banerjee}\affiliation{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai} % Tata
211: \author{E.~Barberio}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, School of Physics, Victoria 3010} % Melbourne
212: \author{A.~Bay}\affiliation{Ecole Polyt\'ecnique F\'ed\'erale Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
213: \author{I.~Bedny}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
214: \author{K.~Belous}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Protvino} % Protvino
215: \author{V.~Bhardwaj}\affiliation{Panjab University, Chandigarh} % Panjab
216: \author{U.~Bitenc}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
217: \author{S.~Blyth}\affiliation{National United University, Miao Li} % NUU
218: \author{A.~Bondar}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
219: \author{A.~Bozek}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
220: \author{M.~Bra\v cko}\affiliation{University of Maribor, Maribor}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
221: \author{J.~Brodzicka}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
222: \author{T.~E.~Browder}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
223: \author{M.-C.~Chang}\affiliation{Department of Physics, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taipei} % FuJen
224: \author{P.~Chang}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
225: \author{Y.~Chao}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
226: \author{A.~Chen}\affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li} % NCU
227: \author{K.-F.~Chen}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
228: \author{W.~T.~Chen}\affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li} % NCU
229: \author{B.~G.~Cheon}\affiliation{Hanyang University, Seoul} % Hanyang
230: \author{C.-C.~Chiang}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
231: \author{R.~Chistov}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
232: \author{I.-S.~Cho}\affiliation{Yonsei University, Seoul} % Yonsei
233: \author{S.-K.~Choi}\affiliation{Gyeongsang National University, Chinju} % Gyeongsang
234: \author{Y.~Choi}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
235: \author{Y.~K.~Choi}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
236: \author{S.~Cole}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales} % Sydney
237: \author{J.~Dalseno}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, School of Physics, Victoria 3010} % Melbourne
238: \author{M.~Danilov}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
239: \author{A.~Das}\affiliation{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai} % Tata
240: \author{M.~Dash}\affiliation{Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061} % VPI
241: \author{J.~Dragic}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
242: \author{A.~Drutskoy}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
243: \author{S.~Eidelman}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
244: \author{D.~Epifanov}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
245: \author{S.~Fratina}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
246: \author{H.~Fujii}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
247: \author{M.~Fujikawa}\affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara} % Nara
248: \author{N.~Gabyshev}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
249: \author{A.~Garmash}\affiliation{Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544} % Princeton
250: \author{A.~Go}\affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li} % NCU
251: \author{G.~Gokhroo}\affiliation{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai} % Tata
252: \author{P.~Goldenzweig}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
253: \author{B.~Golob}\affiliation{University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
254: \author{M.~Grosse~Perdekamp}\affiliation{University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801}\affiliation{RIKEN BNL Research Center, Upton, New York 11973} % UIUC
255: \author{H.~Guler}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
256: \author{H.~Ha}\affiliation{Korea University, Seoul} % Korea
257: \author{J.~Haba}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
258: \author{K.~Hara}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
259: \author{T.~Hara}\affiliation{Osaka University, Osaka} % Osaka
260: \author{Y.~Hasegawa}\affiliation{Shinshu University, Nagano} % Shinshu
261: \author{N.~C.~Hastings}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
262: \author{K.~Hayasaka}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
263: \author{H.~Hayashii}\affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara} % Nara
264: \author{M.~Hazumi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
265: \author{D.~Heffernan}\affiliation{Osaka University, Osaka} % Osaka
266: \author{T.~Higuchi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
267: \author{L.~Hinz}\affiliation{Ecole Polyt\'ecnique F\'ed\'erale Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
268: \author{H.~Hoedlmoser}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
269: \author{T.~Hokuue}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
270: \author{Y.~Horii}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
271: \author{Y.~Hoshi}\affiliation{Tohoku Gakuin University, Tagajo} % TohokuGakuin
272: \author{K.~Hoshina}\affiliation{Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo} % TUAT
273: \author{S.~Hou}\affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li} % NCU
274: \author{W.-S.~Hou}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
275: \author{Y.~B.~Hsiung}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
276: \author{H.~J.~Hyun}\affiliation{Kyungpook National University, Taegu} % Kyungpook
277: \author{Y.~Igarashi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
278: \author{T.~Iijima}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
279: \author{K.~Ikado}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
280: \author{K.~Inami}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
281: \author{A.~Ishikawa}\affiliation{Saga University, Saga} % Saga
282: \author{H.~Ishino}\affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo} % TIT
283: \author{R.~Itoh}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
284: \author{M.~Iwabuchi}\affiliation{The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Hayama} % Sokendai
285: \author{M.~Iwasaki}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
286: \author{Y.~Iwasaki}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
287: \author{C.~Jacoby}\affiliation{Ecole Polyt\'ecnique F\'ed\'erale Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
288: % \author{M.~Jones}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
289: \author{N.~J.~Joshi}\affiliation{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai} % Tata
290: \author{M.~Kaga}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
291: \author{D.~H.~Kah}\affiliation{Kyungpook National University, Taegu} % Kyungpook
292: \author{H.~Kaji}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
293: \author{S.~Kajiwara}\affiliation{Osaka University, Osaka} % Osaka
294: \author{H.~Kakuno}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
295: \author{J.~H.~Kang}\affiliation{Yonsei University, Seoul} % Yonsei
296: \author{P.~Kapusta}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
297: \author{S.~U.~Kataoka}\affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara} % Nara
298: \author{N.~Katayama}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
299: \author{H.~Kawai}\affiliation{Chiba University, Chiba} % Chiba
300: \author{T.~Kawasaki}\affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata} % Niigata
301: \author{A.~Kibayashi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
302: \author{H.~Kichimi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
303: \author{H.~J.~Kim}\affiliation{Kyungpook National University, Taegu} % Kyungpook
304: \author{H.~O.~Kim}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
305: \author{J.~H.~Kim}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
306: \author{S.~K.~Kim}\affiliation{Seoul National University, Seoul} % Seoul
307: \author{Y.~J.~Kim}\affiliation{The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Hayama} % Sokendai
308: \author{K.~Kinoshita}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
309: \author{S.~Korpar}\affiliation{University of Maribor, Maribor}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
310: \author{Y.~Kozakai}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
311: \author{P.~Kri\v zan}\affiliation{University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
312: \author{P.~Krokovny}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
313: \author{R.~Kumar}\affiliation{Panjab University, Chandigarh} % Panjab
314: \author{E.~Kurihara}\affiliation{Chiba University, Chiba} % Chiba
315: \author{A.~Kusaka}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
316: \author{A.~Kuzmin}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
317: \author{Y.-J.~Kwon}\affiliation{Yonsei University, Seoul} % Yonsei
318: \author{J.~S.~Lange}\affiliation{Justus-Liebig-Universit\"at Gie\ss{}en, Gie\ss{}en} % Giessen
319: \author{G.~Leder}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
320: \author{J.~Lee}\affiliation{Seoul National University, Seoul} % Seoul
321: \author{J.~S.~Lee}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
322: \author{M.~J.~Lee}\affiliation{Seoul National University, Seoul} % Seoul
323: \author{S.~E.~Lee}\affiliation{Seoul National University, Seoul} % Seoul
324: \author{T.~Lesiak}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
325: \author{J.~Li}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
326: \author{A.~Limosani}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, School of Physics, Victoria 3010} % Melbourne
327: \author{S.-W.~Lin}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
328: \author{Y.~Liu}\affiliation{The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Hayama} % Sokendai
329: \author{D.~Liventsev}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
330: \author{J.~MacNaughton}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
331: \author{G.~Majumder}\affiliation{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai} % Tata
332: \author{F.~Mandl}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
333: \author{D.~Marlow}\affiliation{Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544} % Princeton
334: \author{T.~Matsumura}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
335: \author{A.~Matyja}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
336: \author{S.~McOnie}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales} % Sydney
337: \author{T.~Medvedeva}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
338: \author{Y.~Mikami}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
339: \author{W.~Mitaroff}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
340: \author{K.~Miyabayashi}\affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara} % Nara
341: \author{H.~Miyake}\affiliation{Osaka University, Osaka} % Osaka
342: \author{H.~Miyata}\affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata} % Niigata
343: \author{Y.~Miyazaki}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
344: \author{R.~Mizuk}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
345: \author{G.~R.~Moloney}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, School of Physics, Victoria 3010} % Melbourne
346: \author{T.~Mori}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
347: \author{J.~Mueller}\affiliation{University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260} % Pittsburgh
348: \author{A.~Murakami}\affiliation{Saga University, Saga} % Saga
349: \author{T.~Nagamine}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
350: \author{Y.~Nagasaka}\affiliation{Hiroshima Institute of Technology, Hiroshima} % Hiroshima
351: \author{Y.~Nakahama}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
352: \author{I.~Nakamura}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
353: \author{E.~Nakano}\affiliation{Osaka City University, Osaka} % OsakaCity
354: \author{M.~Nakao}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
355: \author{H.~Nakayama}\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo} % Tokyo
356: \author{H.~Nakazawa}\affiliation{National Central University, Chung-li} % NCU
357: \author{Z.~Natkaniec}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
358: \author{K.~Neichi}\affiliation{Tohoku Gakuin University, Tagajo} % TohokuGakuin
359: \author{S.~Nishida}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
360: \author{K.~Nishimura}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
361: \author{Y.~Nishio}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
362: \author{I.~Nishizawa}\affiliation{Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo} % TMU
363: \author{O.~Nitoh}\affiliation{Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo} % TUAT
364: \author{S.~Noguchi}\affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara} % Nara
365: \author{T.~Nozaki}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
366: \author{A.~Ogawa}\affiliation{RIKEN BNL Research Center, Upton, New York 11973} % RIKEN
367: \author{S.~Ogawa}\affiliation{Toho University, Funabashi} % Toho
368: \author{T.~Ohshima}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
369: \author{S.~Okuno}\affiliation{Kanagawa University, Yokohama} % Kanagawa
370: \author{S.~L.~Olsen}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
371: \author{S.~Ono}\affiliation{Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo} % TIT
372: \author{W.~Ostrowicz}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
373: \author{H.~Ozaki}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
374: \author{P.~Pakhlov}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
375: \author{G.~Pakhlova}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
376: \author{H.~Palka}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
377: \author{C.~W.~Park}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
378: \author{H.~Park}\affiliation{Kyungpook National University, Taegu} % Kyungpook
379: \author{K.~S.~Park}\affiliation{Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon} % Sungkyunkwan
380: \author{N.~Parslow}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales} % Sydney
381: \author{L.~S.~Peak}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales} % Sydney
382: \author{M.~Pernicka}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
383: \author{R.~Pestotnik}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
384: \author{M.~Peters}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
385: \author{L.~E.~Piilonen}\affiliation{Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061} % VPI
386: \author{A.~Poluektov}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
387: \author{J.~Rorie}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
388: \author{M.~Rozanska}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
389: \author{H.~Sahoo}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
390: \author{Y.~Sakai}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
391: \author{H.~Sakamoto}\affiliation{Kyoto University, Kyoto} % Kyoto
392: \author{H.~Sakaue}\affiliation{Osaka City University, Osaka} % OsakaCity
393: \author{T.~R.~Sarangi}\affiliation{The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Hayama} % Sokendai
394: \author{N.~Satoyama}\affiliation{Shinshu University, Nagano} % Shinshu
395: \author{K.~Sayeed}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
396: \author{T.~Schietinger}\affiliation{Ecole Polyt\'ecnique F\'ed\'erale Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
397: \author{O.~Schneider}\affiliation{Ecole Polyt\'ecnique F\'ed\'erale Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
398: \author{P.~Sch\"onmeier}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
399: \author{J.~Sch\"umann}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
400: \author{C.~Schwanda}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
401: \author{A.~J.~Schwartz}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
402: \author{R.~Seidl}\affiliation{University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801}\affiliation{RIKEN BNL Research Center, Upton, New York 11973} % UIUC
403: \author{A.~Sekiya}\affiliation{Nara Women's University, Nara} % Nara
404: \author{K.~Senyo}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
405: \author{M.~E.~Sevior}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, School of Physics, Victoria 3010} % Melbourne
406: \author{L.~Shang}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing} % IHEP
407: \author{M.~Shapkin}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Protvino} % Protvino
408: \author{C.~P.~Shen}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing} % IHEP
409: \author{H.~Shibuya}\affiliation{Toho University, Funabashi} % Toho
410: \author{S.~Shinomiya}\affiliation{Osaka University, Osaka} % Osaka
411: \author{J.-G.~Shiu}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
412: \author{B.~Shwartz}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
413: \author{J.~B.~Singh}\affiliation{Panjab University, Chandigarh} % Panjab
414: \author{A.~Sokolov}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Protvino} % Protvino
415: \author{E.~Solovieva}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
416: \author{A.~Somov}\affiliation{University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221} % Cincinnati
417: \author{S.~Stani\v c}\affiliation{University of Nova Gorica, Nova Gorica} % NovaGorica
418: \author{M.~Stari\v c}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
419: \author{J.~Stypula}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
420: \author{A.~Sugiyama}\affiliation{Saga University, Saga} % Saga
421: \author{K.~Sumisawa}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
422: \author{T.~Sumiyoshi}\affiliation{Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo} % TMU
423: \author{S.~Suzuki}\affiliation{Saga University, Saga} % Saga
424: \author{S.~Y.~Suzuki}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
425: \author{O.~Tajima}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
426: \author{F.~Takasaki}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
427: \author{K.~Tamai}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
428: \author{N.~Tamura}\affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata} % Niigata
429: \author{M.~Tanaka}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
430: \author{N.~Taniguchi}\affiliation{Kyoto University, Kyoto} % Kyoto
431: \author{G.~N.~Taylor}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, School of Physics, Victoria 3010} % Melbourne
432: \author{Y.~Teramoto}\affiliation{Osaka City University, Osaka} % OsakaCity
433: \author{I.~Tikhomirov}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
434: \author{K.~Trabelsi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
435: \author{Y.~F.~Tse}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, School of Physics, Victoria 3010} % Melbourne
436: \author{T.~Tsuboyama}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
437: \author{K.~Uchida}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
438: \author{Y.~Uchida}\affiliation{The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Hayama} % Sokendai
439: \author{S.~Uehara}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
440: \author{K.~Ueno}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
441: \author{T.~Uglov}\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow} % ITEP
442: \author{Y.~Unno}\affiliation{Hanyang University, Seoul} % Hanyang
443: \author{S.~Uno}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
444: \author{P.~Urquijo}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, School of Physics, Victoria 3010} % Melbourne
445: \author{Y.~Ushiroda}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
446: \author{Y.~Usov}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
447: \author{G.~Varner}\affiliation{University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822} % Hawaii
448: \author{K.~E.~Varvell}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales} % Sydney
449: \author{K.~Vervink}\affiliation{Ecole Polyt\'ecnique F\'ed\'erale Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
450: \author{S.~Villa}\affiliation{Ecole Polyt\'ecnique F\'ed\'erale Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
451: \author{A.~Vinokurova}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
452: \author{C.~C.~Wang}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
453: \author{C.~H.~Wang}\affiliation{National United University, Miao Li} % NUU
454: \author{J.~Wang}\affiliation{Peking University, Beijing} % Peking
455: \author{M.-Z.~Wang}\affiliation{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei} % Taiwan
456: \author{P.~Wang}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing} % IHEP
457: \author{X.~L.~Wang}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing} % IHEP
458: \author{M.~Watanabe}\affiliation{Niigata University, Niigata} % Niigata
459: \author{Y.~Watanabe}\affiliation{Kanagawa University, Yokohama} % Kanagawa
460: \author{R.~Wedd}\affiliation{University of Melbourne, School of Physics, Victoria 3010} % Melbourne
461: \author{J.~Wicht}\affiliation{Ecole Polyt\'ecnique F\'ed\'erale Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
462: \author{L.~Widhalm}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna} % Vienna
463: \author{J.~Wiechczynski}\affiliation{H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow} % Krakow
464: \author{E.~Won}\affiliation{Korea University, Seoul} % Korea
465: \author{B.~D.~Yabsley}\affiliation{University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales} % Sydney
466: \author{A.~Yamaguchi}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
467: \author{H.~Yamamoto}\affiliation{Tohoku University, Sendai} % Tohoku
468: \author{M.~Yamaoka}\affiliation{Nagoya University, Nagoya} % Nagoya
469: \author{Y.~Yamashita}\affiliation{Nippon Dental University, Niigata} % NihonDental
470: \author{M.~Yamauchi}\affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba} % KEK
471: \author{C.~Z.~Yuan}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing} % IHEP
472: \author{Y.~Yusa}\affiliation{Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061} % VPI
473: \author{C.~C.~Zhang}\affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing} % IHEP
474: \author{L.~M.~Zhang}\affiliation{University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei} % USTC
475: \author{Z.~P.~Zhang}\affiliation{University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei} % USTC
476: \author{V.~Zhilich}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
477: \author{V.~Zhulanov}\affiliation{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk} % BINP
478: \author{A.~Zupanc}\affiliation{J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana} % Ljubljana
479: \author{N.~Zwahlen}\affiliation{Ecole Polyt\'ecnique F\'ed\'erale Lausanne, EPFL, Lausanne} % Lausanne
480: \collaboration{The Belle Collaboration}
481:
482: \maketitle
483:
484: %%%% >>>> keep the final version single-spaced
485: \tighten
486:
487: {\renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}}
488: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
489:
490: In the standard model (SM) framework, $CP$ violation arises
491: only from the irreducible phase in the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix~\cite{ckm}.
492: $CP$ violation in flavor changing neutral currents (FCNC) is
493: sensitive to new physics (NP), as new particles beyond the SM may be involved in loop diagrams.
494: Such additional loop diagrams potentially add new $CP$ phases and induce deviations from
495: the SM expectation for time-dependent $CP$ asymmetries~\cite{bib:lucy}.
496:
497: In the decay chain $\Upsilon(4S)\to\bbbar$,
498: one of the two $B$ mesons decays into a $CP$ eigenstate $f_{CP}$
499: at time $t_{CP}$, and the other decays into a flavor specific
500: state $f_{\rm tag}$ at time $t_{\rm tag}$.
501: The $CP$ violation parameters are measured using the
502: time-dependent decay rate~\cite{sanda}
503: \begin{eqnarray}
504: {\cal P}(\Delta t)
505: & = & \frac{e^{-|\Delta t|/\tau_{B^0}}}{4\tau_{B^0}}
506: [1 + q \cdot \{ {\cal S}_{f} \sin(\Delta m_d \Delta t) \nonumber \\
507: & & + {\cal A}_{f} \cos(\Delta m_d \Delta t ) \} ],
508: \label{eq:signal-pdf}
509: \end{eqnarray}
510: where $\dt=t_{CP} - t_{\rm tag}$,
511: $\tau_{B^0}$ is the $B^0$ lifetime, $\dmd$ is
512: the $B^0\overline{B}{}^0$ mixing frequency
513: and $q=+1$ $(-1)$ when $f_{\rm tag} = B^0(\overline{B}{}^0)$.
514: The parameters
515: ${\cal S}_{f}$ and ${\cal A}_{f}$ represent
516: mixing-induced and direct $CP$-violation, respectively,
517:
518: In the SM,
519: the $CP$ violation parameters in $b\to s$ ``penguin"
520: and $b\to c$ ``tree" transitions
521: are predicted to be ${\cal S}_{f}\simeq -\xi_{f}\sin 2\phi_1$
522: and ${\cal A}_{f}\simeq 0$
523: with small theoretical uncertainties~\cite{b2s},
524: where $\phi_1$ is one of the CKM weak angles
525: and $\xi_{f}$ is the $CP$ eigenvalue of the final state.
526: Recent measurements~\cite{belle-b2s06,babar-b2s,kspizpiz-babar}
527: however, indicate that the effective $\sin 2\phi_1$ value,
528: $\sin 2\phi_1^{\rm eff}$, measured with penguin processes
529: is different from $\sin 2\phi_1=0.687\pm0.025$ measured in tree
530: decays by $2.6$ standard deviations ($\sigma$)~\cite{hfag}.
531: %This have shifted that new particles in the loop diagrams the weak phase.
532: %This implies that new particles in the loop diagrams may shift the weak phase.
533: New particles in the loop diagrams may have shifted the weak phase.
534:
535: Belle and BaBar recently observed $b\to d$ FCNC transitions in $B$ meson decays into
536: two kaons $B^+\to K^{+}\ks$ and $B^0\to\ksks$~\cite{b2kk-belle, b2kk-babar, CC}.
537: The $CP$ violation parameters in $b\to d$ transitions
538: are expected to be small because the weak phases in $\bbbar$ mixing and the $b\to d$
539: transition cancel~\cite{ksks-np}.
540: Thus a measurement of large $CP$ violation could indicate
541: the existence of NP.
542: It has been also pointed out that the $CP$ violation parameters
543: as well as the branching fraction for $B^0\to\ksks$ decay can be used to
544: constrain $\phi_2$ ~\cite{phi2-ksks}.
545:
546: In this report, we present measurements of $CP$ violation parameters in $B^0\to\kspizpiz$ decays
547: that proceed through $b\to s \overline{q}q$ ($q=u,d$) transitions,
548: and $B^0\to\ksks$ decays in which pure $b\to d\overline{s}s$
549: penguin processes are the dominant contribution.
550: Because the $\xi_{f}$ for $B^0\to\kspizpiz$ decays is $+1$
551: for any intermediate resonance~\cite{Gershon:2004tk},
552: the SM expectations for the $CP$ violation parameters are ${\cal A}\sim0$
553: and ${\cal S}=-\sin 2\phi_1$ with small theoretical uncertainty~\cite{Cheng-dads}.
554: Both analyses employ a technique~\cite{ks-vertex} that
555: reconstructs the $B^0$ decay vertex position using only
556: $\ks$'s decaying into $\pi^+\pi^-$.
557: The $CP$ violation parameters of these $B$ decay modes have been
558: measured by BaBar~\cite{kspizpiz-babar, b2kk-babar}
559: with 227 (348)$\times 10^6$ $B\overline{B}$ pairs
560: for $B^0\to \kspizpiz$ ($\ksks$).
561: They found a $2.2\sigma$ deviation from the SM expectation
562: for $B^0\to\kspizpiz$ and a large ${\cal S}_{\ksks}$ value;
563: however, no clear conclusion about NP can be obtained because of the large statistical errors.
564:
565: We use a data sample containing $657 \times 10^6 B\overline{B}$ pairs
566: collected by the Belle detector~\cite{belle-detector}
567: at the KEKB $e^+e^-$ asymmetric-energy (3.5 on 8 GeV) collider
568: operating at $\Upsilon(4S)$ resonance~\cite{kekb}.
569: The $\Upsilon(4S)$ is produced with a Lorentz boost factor
570: of $\beta\gamma = 0.425$ approximately along the electron beamline ($z$).
571:
572: Since the two $B$ mesons are produced nearly at rest
573: in the $\Upsilon(4S)$ center-of-mass system (cms),
574: we determine $\dt = \Delta z / \beta\gamma c$,
575: where $\Delta z$ is the distance between the two $B$ decay positions
576: in the $z$ direction.
577: In the Belle detector,
578: a silicon vertex detector (SVD) and a 50-layer central drift chamber (CDC)
579: are used for charged particle tracking.
580: Photons are detected with an electromagnetic calorimeter (ECL)
581: comprised of CsI(Tl) crystals.
582: The devices are placed inside a superconducting solenoid coil
583: providing a 1.5~T magnetic field.
584:
585: We reconstruct $\ks \to \pi^+\pi^-$ candidates
586: from pairs of oppositely charged tracks.
587: The candidates are required to satisfy the following conditions:
588: (a) the two charged tracks do not originate from
589: the beam interaction point (IP),
590: (b) the $z$ positions of the two charged tracks at
591: the $\ks$ decay position have to match,
592: (c) the direction of the pion pair momentum is consistent with
593: the direction from the IP to the $\ks$ decay position, and
594: (d) the invariant mass of the two charged tracks
595: is within $\pm15$~MeV/c$^2$ of the nominal $\ks$ mass.
596: The criteria (a) to (c) are optimized
597: for each $B$ decay mode, and depend on $\ks$ momentum.
598: We form $\pi^0\to\gamma\gamma$ candidates from pairs of two photons.
599: The photon energy in the laboratory frame is required to be greater
600: than 50~MeV. The $\pi^0$ candidates should have invariant masses
601: in the range $0.118$~GeV/c$^2 < M_{\gamma\gamma} < 0.150$~GeV/c$^2$.
602:
603: We reconstruct a $B^0$ candidate by combining a $\ks\to\pi^+\pi^-$ and
604: two $\pi^0$s (a $\ks\to\pi^+\pi^-$)
605: for $B^0\to\kspizpiz$ ($\ksks$) decay.
606: Two kinematic variables are used for the $B^0$ candidate selection:
607: $\de = E_{B} - E_{\rm beam}$
608: and $\mbc=\sqrt{E_{\rm beam}^2 - p_B^2}$,
609: where $E_{\rm beam}$ is the cms beam energy, and
610: $E_{B}$ and $p_{B}$ are the cms energy and momentum,
611: respectively, of a $B$ candidate.
612: We require $|\de|<0.25$ ($0.20$)~GeV and $\mbc>5.20$~GeV/c$^2$
613: for $B^0\to\kspizpiz$ ($\ksks$).
614:
615: We find 34\% ($<1$\%) of events have multiple $B^0\to\kspizpiz$ ($\ksks$) candidates.
616: We choose the candidate having the smallest $\chi^2$ value for the $\pi^0$
617: for $B^0\to\kspizpiz$, and
618: having the smallest difference of $M_{\pi^+\pi^-}$ from the nominal $\ks$ mass
619: for $B^0\to\ksks$.
620: For $B^0\to\kspizpiz$ candidates, we find 23\% of signal events
621: in the Monte-Carlo (MC) simulation are incorrectly reconstructed
622: self-cross-feed (SCF) events;
623: for events at least one particle is replaced
624: with one from either the accompanying $B$ meson decay
625: or from beam background.
626: For 99.5\% of the SCF events, only photons are replaced;
627: the $B$ vertex position is always reconstructed with the correct $\ks$.
628: Therefore, we do not distinguish between the SCF and correctly-reconstructed
629: $B$ candidates for this analysis.
630: No SCF component is found for $B^0\to\ksks$ decays.
631:
632: We remove $B^0\to\kspizpiz$ candidates satisfying one of
633: the following conditions:
634: $M_{\ks\pi^0}>4.8$~GeV/c$^2$ to suppress $B^0\to\ks\pi^0$ decays,
635: $1.77$~GeV/c$^2 < M_{\ks\pi^0} < 1.94$~GeV/c$^2$ ($D^0$ veto),
636: $3.27$~GeV/c$^2 < M_{\pi^0\pi^0} < 3.49$~GeV/c$^2$ ($\chi_{c0}$ veto)
637: and $\cos\theta_{\gamma}>0.9$,
638: where $\theta_{\gamma}$ is the angle between the $\pi^0$ boost direction from
639: the laboratory frame and one of the photons in the $\pi^0$ rest frame.
640: We impose the last condition to suppress $b\to s\gamma$ backgrounds.
641:
642: The dominant background is the continuum, $e^+e^-\to q\overline{q}$
643: ($q=u,d,s,c$).
644: To suppress this background,
645: we form a likelihood ratio
646: ${\cal R} = L_{\rm sig} / (L_{\rm sig} + L_{\rm bg})$,
647: where $L_{\rm sig (bg)}$ is a likelihood function for
648: the signal (continuum) based on the event topology
649: and the $B^0$ flight direction with respect to the beam axis
650: in the cms.
651: The $B^0\to\kspizpiz$ ($\ksks$) candidates having
652: ${\cal R}>0.1 (0.25)$ are selected.
653: We also use ${\cal R}$ to discriminate
654: the signal and background in the fits.
655:
656: We identify the flavor of $f_{\rm tag}$ using an algorithm~\cite{flavor-tag}
657: that provides two variables: $q$ defined in Eq.~(\ref{eq:signal-pdf})
658: and $r$.
659: The parameter $r$ ranges from $r=0$ for no flavor discrimination
660: to $r=1$ for an unambiguous flavor determination.
661: Candidate events having $r>0.1$ are
662: divided into six $r$-bins ($\ell=1,6$).
663: The wrong tag fraction in each $\ell$ bin, $w_{\ell}$,
664: and their differences between $B^0$ and $\overline{B}{}^0$, $\Delta w_{\ell}$,
665: are determined using data~\cite{sss06-belle}.
666:
667: We apply the vertex reconstruction algorithm of Ref.~\cite{ks-vertex}.
668: The vertex position of the $f_{CP}$ decay is determined
669: using the $\ks\to\pi^+\pi^-$ pseudo-track and the IP profile.
670: The two charged tracks are required to have enough associated SVD hits
671: for vertex reconstruction.
672: We reconstruct the $B^0\to f_{\rm tag}$ decay vertex position
673: using charged tracks that are not used for the $f_{CP}$ reconstruction.
674: We measure both ${\cal S}_{f}$ and ${\cal A}_{f}$ parameters
675: with candidate events in which the vertex position is reconstructed
676: successfully.
677: Candidates with no vertex position information
678: are used only for ${\cal A}_{f}$ measurements.
679: Using a signal MC sample,
680: we estimate a vertex reconstruction efficiency of
681: %\textcolor{red}{46.2\% (55.7\%)}
682: 45\% (56\%) for $B^0\to\kspizpiz$ ($\ksks$) decays.
683: % Kspi0pi0 (cp+tagv)
684: % SVD1 32.9%
685: % SVD2 48.3%
686: % average (a*151.961+b*504.764)/(151.961+504.764)=44.7%
687: % KsKs (cp+tagv)
688: % SVD1 42.5%
689: % SVD2 59.7%
690: % average (a*151.961+b*504.764)/(151.961+504.764)=55.7%
691:
692: We determine signal yields with an extended unbinned maximum likelihood
693: fit that makes use of the variables $\de$, $\mbc$ and ${\cal R}$.
694: The selected candidate events include not only the signal
695: but also continuum and $B\overline{B}$ backgrounds.
696:
697: We use a two-dimensional smoothed $\de$-$\mbc$ histogram
698: for the $B^0\to\kspizpiz$ signal probability density function (PDF),
699: while we model the $\de$ ($\mbc$) shape using
700: a sum of two Gaussians (a single Gaussian) for $B^0\to\ksks$ decay.
701: Histogram PDFs are employed for the ${\cal R}$ distributions
702: of signal in both decay modes.
703: %All the PDFs are determined using signal MC simulations.
704: The PDFs are determined using signal MC simulations.
705:
706: The $\de$ ($\mbc$) shape of the continuum background
707: is modeled as a polynomial (an ARGUS~\cite{argus}) function.
708: The parameters of the background functions are floated in the fit.
709: An ${\cal R}$ PDF for continuum background is determined from a data sample
710: collected at a center of mass energy
711: 60~MeV below the $\Upsilon(4S)$ resonance (off-resonance)
712: for the $B^0\to\kspizpiz$
713: and events in the sideband region
714: ($\mbc<5.26$~GeV/c$^2$) for $B^0\to\ksks$ decay.
715: We use the off-resonance data for the former decay mode, since
716: $B\overline{B}$ background contaminates the sideband
717: region, while the latter decay mode has a negligibly small
718: contribution from $B\overline{B}$ background.
719: A large MC sample of $B\overline{B}$ background is used
720: to obtain a smoothed histogram $\de$-$\mbc$ PDF
721: and a histogram PDF of ${\cal R}$ for
722: $B^0\to\kspizpiz$ decay.
723:
724: By fitting the data, we determine the signal yields in the signal box.
725: The signal box is defined as $-0.15$~GeV$ < \de < 0.1$~GeV
726: and $\mbc>5.27$~GeV/c$^2$ ($|\de|<0.1$~GeV and $\mbc>5.27$~GeV/c$^2$)
727: for $B^0\to\kspizpiz$ ($\ksks$) decay.
728: For $B^0\to\kspizpiz$ decay,
729: we divide the candidate events into two categories:
730: events with and without vertex information, and
731: fit the data subsets separately to take into account
732: a possible difference of the signal fraction.
733: For $B^0\to\ksks$ decay, instead of separating the candidate events
734: in the fit,
735: we perform a fit to the whole data sample and
736: employ the vertex reconstruction efficiency
737: estimated from a MC simulation (sideband events)
738: for the signal (continuum) events
739: to determine the signal fractions for the two categories.
740: We obtain $129\pm21$ ($178\pm24$) $B^0\to\kspizpiz$ events
741: with (without) the vertex information,
742: which is consistent with the expected vertex reconstruction efficiency,
743: and $58\pm11$ $B^0\to\ksks$ events.
744: Figure~\ref{fig:de-mbc-r} shows the projections of $\de$, $\mbc$ and ${\cal R}$
745: for candidate events.
746:
747: \begin{figure}
748: \begin{center}
749: \includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{kspi0pi0plot_lr.eps}
750: \includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{kspi0pi0plot_mbc_lr0.9.eps}
751: \includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{kspi0pi0plot_de_lr0.9.eps}
752: \includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{ksksplot_lr.eps}
753: \includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{ksksplot_mbc_lr0.6.eps}
754: \includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{ksksplot_de_lr0.6.eps}
755: \rput(-11.1,8){(a)}
756: \rput(-6.0,8){(b)}
757: \rput(-0.9,8){(c)}
758: \rput(-11.1,3.7){(d)}
759: \rput(-6.0,3.7){(e)}
760: \rput(-0.9,3.7){(f)}
761: \caption{
762: (a) distributions of ${\cal R}$ for the $\de$ and $\mbc$ signal region,
763: (b) $\mbc$ for the $\de$ signal region with ${\cal R} > 0.9$, and
764: (c) $\de$ for the $\mbc$ signal region with ${\cal R} > 0.9$
765: for $B^0\to\ks\pi^0\pi^0$.
766: (d) distributions of ${\cal R}$ for the $\de$ and $\mbc$ signal region,
767: (e) $\mbc$ for the $\de$ signal region with ${\cal R} > 0.6$,
768: (f) $\de$ for the $\mbc$ signal region with ${\cal R} > 0.6$
769: for $B^0\to\ks\ks$.
770: The solid curves and histograms show the fits to signal plus background distributions,
771: and hatched areas show the background contributions.
772: }
773: \label{fig:de-mbc-r}
774: \end{center}
775: \end{figure}
776:
777: We determine the $CP$ violation parameters
778: from an unbinned maximum likelihood fit to the $\dt$ distribution of
779: the candidate events in the signal box.
780: For each event, we calculate a likelihood value:
781: \begin{eqnarray}
782: P_i & =& (1-f_{\rm ol})\sum_k f_k(\de,\mbc,{\cal R})
783: {\cal P}_k(\dt_i) \otimes R_k(\dt_i) \nonumber \\
784: & & + f_{\rm ol}{\cal P}_{\rm ol}(\dt_i),
785: \label{eq:likelihood}
786: \end{eqnarray}
787: where $k$ indicates signal, continuum ($\qq$) and $B\overline{B}$ background
788: components, $f_k(\de,\mbc,{\cal R})$ is the fraction of the component $k$
789: as a function of $\de, \mbc, {\cal R}$.
790: For $B^0\to\ksks$, the $B\overline{B}$ contribution is neglected, i.e.
791: $f_{B\overline{B}}=0$.
792: For the signal function ${\cal P}_{\rm sig}(\dt)$,
793: we use Eq.~(\ref{eq:signal-pdf})
794: modified to incorporate the flavor mis-assignment effect
795: using $w_{\ell}$ and $\Delta w_{\ell}$.
796: This distribution is convolved with a resolution function
797: $R_{\rm sig}(\dt)$~\cite{res-func} to obtain the signal PDF.
798: The continuum $\dt$ distribution ${\cal P}_{\qq}(\dt)$
799: consists of prompt and lifetime components, which is convolved
800: with a resolution function $R_{\qq}(\dt)$ comprised of
801: two Gaussians;
802: all the parameters of the functions are determined
803: using the off-resonance (sideband) data
804: for $B^0\to\kspizpiz$ ($\ksks$) decay.
805: We employ a large MC sample to obtain ${\cal P}_{B\overline{B}}(\dt)$
806: and $R_{B\overline{B}}(\dt)$; the same functional forms as those of the continuum background
807: are used.
808: All the PDFs are combined with a outlier PDF ${\cal P}_{\rm ol}(\dt)$
809: that takes into account a small fraction ($f_{\rm ol}$)
810: of events having large $\dt$ values, giving a likelihood value $P_i$
811: for $i$-th candidate event.
812: For candidate events with no vertex information,
813: we use the likelihood function given in Eq.~(\ref{eq:likelihood}) integrated over $\dt$.
814:
815: In the fit, ${\cal S}_{f}$ and ${\cal A}_{f}$
816: are the only free parameters and are determined
817: by maximizing ${\cal L} = \prod_i P_i$.
818: The fit yields
819: $\skspizpiz=\skspizpizvalue \pm \skspizpizstat$,
820: $\akspizpiz=\akspizpizvalue \pm \akspizpizstat$,
821: $\sksks=\sksksvalue \pm \sksksstat$ and
822: $\aksks=\aksksvalue \pm \aksksstat$,
823: where the errors are statistical.
824: Figure~\ref{fig:dt-acp} show the $\dt$ distributions
825: and the asymmetry ${\cal A}_{CP}$ in each $\dt$ bin,
826: where ${\cal A}_{CP}= (N_+ - N_-)/(N_+ + N_-)$
827: and $N_{+(-)}$ is the number of candidate events with
828: $q=+1$ ($-1$).
829:
830: \begin{figure}
831: \begin{center}
832: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{pi0pi0ks_dt_highr.eps}
833: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{ksks_dt_highr.eps}
834: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{pi0pi0ks_asym_highr.eps}
835: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{ksks_asym_highr.eps}
836: \rput(-13.4,10.2){(a)}
837: \rput(-5.9,10.2){(b)}
838: \rput(-13.4,4.6){(c)}
839: \rput(-5.9,4.6){(d)}
840: \caption{
841: $\dt$ distributions and asymmetries for events with good tags ($r>0.5$)
842: for (a),(c) $B^0\to\ks\pi^0\pi^0$ with ${\cal R} >0.9$ and (b), (d) $B^0\to\ks\ks$
843: with ${\cal R} >0.6$.
844: In the $\dt$ plots, the dashed and solid lines show the fit result for events with $q=\pm1$.
845: The dotted lines show the background contribution.
846: In the asymmetry plots, solid curves show the fit results;
847: the dashed curve in (c) shows the SM expectation ${\cal A}=0$ and ${\cal S}=-\sin 2\phi_1$.
848: }
849: \label{fig:dt-acp}
850: \end{center}
851: \end{figure}
852:
853: \begin{table}
854: \begin{center}
855: \caption{Systematic errors of the measured $CP$ violation parameters.}
856: \begin{tabular}{ccccc}
857: \hline
858: \hline
859:
860: % & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$B^0\to\kspizpiz$}
861: % & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$B^0\to\ksks$} \\
862: sources & $\skspizpiz$ & $\akspizpiz$ & $\sksks$ & $\aksks$ \\
863: \hline
864: wrong tag fraction & $\pm 0.01$ & $\pm 0.01$ & $\pm 0.02$ & $\pm 0.01$ \\
865: physics parameters & $<0.01$ & $<0.01$ & $\pm 0.01$ & $\pm 0.01$ \\
866: resolution function & $\pm 0.04$ & $\pm 0.02$ & $\pm 0.06$ & $<0.01$ \\
867: background $\dt$ shape & $\pm 0.05$ & $\pm 0.02$ & $\pm 0.04$ & $\pm 0.02$ \\
868: background fraction & $\pm 0.05$ & $\pm 0.03$ & $\pm 0.04$ & $\pm 0.02$ \\
869: possible fit bias & $\pm 0.02$ & $\pm 0.01$ & $\pm 0.02$ & $\pm 0.01$ \\
870: vertex reconstruction & $\pm 0.01$ & $\pm 0.02$ & $\pm 0.01$ & $\pm 0.02$ \\
871: tag side interference & $<0.01$ & $\pm 0.04$ & $<0.01$ & $\pm 0.03$ \\
872: \hline
873: total & $\pm 0.09$ & $\pm 0.06$ & $\pm 0.08$ & $\pm 0.05$ \\
874: \hline
875: \hline
876: \label{table:systematic}
877: \end{tabular}
878: \end{center}
879: \end{table}
880:
881: Table~\ref{table:systematic} shows the systematic errors
882: for the measured $CP$ violation parameters.
883: For the uncertainties on the wrong tag fractions,
884: we vary the wrong tag fraction parameters,
885: $w_{\ell}$ and $\Delta w_{\ell}$, by $\pm 1\sigma$ individually,
886: and sum up the $CP$ violation parameter variations in quadrature.
887:
888: The parameters $\taub$ and $\dmd$ are varied by
889: their errors~\cite{pdg} to determine the
890: systematic uncertainties from the physics parameters.
891:
892: We perform fits by varying each parameter in the signal resolution function
893: $R_{\rm sig}(\dt)$.
894: The differences between the fitted parameters and the nominal values
895: are added in quadrature.
896:
897: We vary the background $\dt$ PDF parameter values by $\pm 1\sigma$,
898: and take the quadratic sum of the $CP$ violation parameter variations
899: as the systematic error.
900: For $B^0\to\kspizpiz$, we also take into account the uncertainties originating
901: from possible $CP$ violation in the $B\overline{B}$ background.
902: Using a large MC sample, we find 18\% of the charmless $B$ decay background
903: are $CP$ eigenstates.
904: Each $CP$ asymmetry parameter is varied between $\pm 1$, and the differences
905: are added in quadrature for the systematic error.
906:
907: To estimate the background fraction systematic error,
908: we vary each parameter in the PDFs of $\de$, $\mbc$ and ${\cal R}$,
909: and add the differences in quadrature.
910: For $B^0\to\kspizpiz$,
911: we also take into account uncertainties in the $B\overline{B}$
912: background yields;
913: we vary the charm (charmless) $B$ decay background
914: yields by $\pm 2\sigma$ ($\pm 100$\%).
915: %Systematic uncertainties coming from possible resonant structures,
916: %$B^0\to f_0\ks$ and $B^0\to K^{*0}\pi^0$,
917: For $B^0\to\ks\pi^0\pi^0$, systematic uncertainties coming from the
918: possible signal shape difference due to the uncertainty in the intermediate resonant state
919: are also included.
920: We generate pseudo-experiment MC samples based on PDFs assuming 100\% resonant decays
921: for the cases of $B^0\to f_0\ks$ and $B^0\to K^{*0}\pi^0$ decays,
922: fit the samples with the nominal PDFs, and take the differences
923: as systematic errors.
924:
925: %For fit bais evaluation,
926: %we make use of both psuedo-experiment MC and full-detector MC simulations;
927: %differences between input and output values are regarded as
928: %the systematic biases.
929: A possible fit bias is examined by fitting a large number of MC events.
930: We find no statistically significant bias and assign the MC statistical error as the
931: systematic error.
932:
933: The systematic uncertainties for the vertex reconstruction
934: are estimated by changing the charged track selection criteria,
935: criteria on the vertex fit $\chi^2$ requirements,
936: small bias corrections on $\Delta z$, smearing due to the $B$ flight length,
937: and the SVD mis-alignment parameters.
938:
939: Finally, we take into account the possible $CP$ violation effect
940: in $B^0\to f_{\rm tag}$ decay~\cite{tsi}.
941:
942: To validate our measurements,
943: various checks are carried out.
944: We measure the $B^0$ lifetime;
945: we obtain $\taub = 1.32\pm0.27$ ($1.58\pm0.44$)~ps
946: for $B^0\to\kspizpiz$ ($\ksks$) decay,
947: in agreement with the world average (WA) value~\cite{pdg}.
948: We perform a fit to sideband events; no asymmetries are found for both decay modes.
949: We measure the branching fractions
950: of $B^0\to D^0(\to K_S^0 \pi^0)\pi^0$
951: and $B^0\to\ksks$; we obtain $(3.3\pm0.4)\times 10^{-4}$
952: and $(1.1\pm0.2)\times 10^{-6}$, respectively, consistent with the WA values~\cite{pdg, hfag}.
953: The errors are statistical only.
954: %To check the validity of the vertex reconstruction efficiency
955: %for $B^0\to\ksks$ decay,
956: %we perform a signal yield fit to the candidate events having vertex information;
957: %we find $33\pm 6$ signal events, consistent with the expectation.
958:
959: In summary we measure the $CP$ violation parameters
960: in FCNC $B^0$ decays into $\kspizpiz$ and $\ksks$
961: using a data sample containing $657\times 10^6$ $B\overline{B}$ pairs.
962: We obtain
963: \begin{eqnarray*}
964: \skspizpiz& =& \skspizpizvalue \pm \skspizpizstat \pm \skspizpizsyst, \\
965: \akspizpiz& =& \akspizpizvalue \pm \akspizpizstat \pm \akspizpizsyst, \\
966: \sksks& =& \sksksvalue \pm \sksksstat \pm \skskssyst~~ {\rm and}, \\
967: \aksks& =& \aksksvalue \pm \aksksstat \pm \akskssyst,
968: \end{eqnarray*}
969: where the first and second errors are statistical and systematic,
970: respectively.
971: We estimate that the deviation
972: from the SM expectation for $CP$ violation parameters in $B^0\to\kspizpiz$ decay
973: ${\cal A}=0$ and ${\cal S}=\sin 2\phi_1$ has a significance of $2.0\sigma$.
974: No $CP$ asymmetry is found in $B^0\to\ksks$ decay,
975: which is consistent with the SM prediction.
976: Our results are consistent with other
977: measurements~\cite{kspizpiz-babar, b2kk-belle, b2kk-babar}.
978:
979: We thank the KEKB group for the excellent operation of the
980: accelerator, the KEK cryogenics group for the efficient
981: operation of the solenoid, and the KEK computer group and
982: the National Institute of Informatics for valuable computing
983: and Super-SINET network support. We acknowledge support from
984: the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and
985: Technology of Japan and the Japan Society for the Promotion
986: of Science; the Australian Research Council and the
987: Australian Department of Education, Science and Training;
988: the National Science Foundation of China and the Knowledge
989: Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences under
990: contract No.~10575109 and IHEP-U-503; the Department of
991: Science and Technology of India;
992: the BK21 program of the Ministry of Education of Korea,
993: the CHEP SRC program and Basic Research program
994: (grant No.~R01-2005-000-10089-0) of the Korea Science and
995: Engineering Foundation, and the Pure Basic Research Group
996: program of the Korea Research Foundation;
997: the Polish State Committee for Scientific Research;
998: %-> remove for now: under contract No.~2P03B 01324;
999: the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian
1000: Federation and the Russian Federal Agency for Atomic Energy;
1001: the Slovenian Research Agency; the Swiss
1002: National Science Foundation; the National Science Council
1003: and the Ministry of Education of Taiwan; and the U.S.\
1004: Department of Energy.
1005:
1006:
1007: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1008:
1009: \bibitem{ckm}
1010: N.~Cabibbo, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 10}, 531 (1963);
1011: M.~Kobayashi and T.~Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 49}, 652 (1973).
1012:
1013: \bibitem{bib:lucy}
1014: Y.~Grossman and M.~P.~Worah,
1015: Phys.\ Lett. B \textbf{395}, 241 (1997);
1016: D.~London and A.~Soni,
1017: Phys.\ Lett. B \textbf{407}, 61 (1997);
1018: T.~Moroi,
1019: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 493}, 366 (2000);
1020: D.~Chang, A.~Masiero and H.~Murayama,
1021: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 075013 (2003);
1022: S.~Baek, T.~Goto, Y.~Okada and K.~Okumura,
1023: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 095001 (2001).
1024:
1025: \bibitem{sanda}
1026: A.~B.~Carter and A.~I.~Sanda, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 45}, 952 (1980);
1027: A.~B.~Carter and A.~I.~Sanda, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 23}, 1567 (1981);
1028: I.~I.~Bigi and A.~I.~Sanda, Nucl. Phys. {\bf 193}, 85 (1981);
1029: M.~Gronau, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 63}, 1451 (1989).
1030:
1031: \bibitem{b2s}
1032: M.~Beneke and M.~Neubert, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B675}, 333 (2003);
1033: M.~Beneke, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 620}, 143 (2005);
1034: H.-Y.~Cheng, C.-K.~Chua and A.~Soni, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 72}, 014006 (2005);
1035: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 72}, 094003 (2005);
1036: A.R.~Williamson and J.~Zupan, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 74}, 014003 (2006);
1037: M.~Gronau, J.L.~Rosner and J.~Zupan, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 74}, 093003 (2006).
1038:
1039: \bibitem{belle-b2s06}
1040: K.-F.~Chen {\it et al.} (Belle collaboration),
1041: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 98}, 031802 (2007);
1042: Y.~Chao {\it et al.} (Belle Collaboration),
1043: arXiv:hep-ex/0609006, submitted to Phys. Rev. D.
1044:
1045: \bibitem{babar-b2s}
1046: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} (BaBar collaboration),
1047: arXiv:arXiv:0706.3885, submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett.; % KKK0
1048: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. {\bf 98}, 031801 (2007); % eta'K0
1049: arXiv:hep-ex/0702046, submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett.; % KsKsKs
1050: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 98}, 051803 (2007) % rhoKs
1051:
1052: \bibitem{kspizpiz-babar}
1053: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} (BaBar collaboration),
1054: arXiv:hep-ex/0702010, submitted to Phys. Rev. D.
1055:
1056: \bibitem{hfag}
1057: Heavy Flavor Averaging Group, ``Winter 2007",
1058: \url{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag}.
1059:
1060: \bibitem{b2kk-belle}
1061: S.-W.~Lin {\it et al.} (Belle collaboration),
1062: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 98}, 181804 (2007).
1063:
1064: \bibitem{b2kk-babar}
1065: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} (BaBar collaboration),
1066: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 97}, 171805 (2006).
1067:
1068: \bibitem{CC}
1069: Throughout this paper,
1070: the inclusion of the charge conjugate mode decay is implied
1071: unless otherwise stated.
1072:
1073: \bibitem{ksks-np}
1074: R.~Fleischer and S.~Recksiegel, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf 38}, 251 (2004).
1075:
1076: \bibitem{phi2-ksks}
1077: A.J.~Buras and R.~Fleischer, Phys. Lett. {\bf B360} 138 (1995);
1078: A.~Datta, M.~Imbeault, D.~London and J.~Matias,
1079: arXiv:hep-ph/0611280, to appear in Phys. Rev. D.
1080:
1081: %\cite{Gershon:2004tk}
1082: \bibitem{Gershon:2004tk}
1083: T.~Gershon and M.~Hazumi,
1084: %``Time-dependent CP violation in B0 $\to$ P0 P0 X0 decays,''
1085: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 596}, 163 (2004).
1086: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0402097].
1087: % %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0402097;%%
1088:
1089: \bibitem{Cheng-dads}
1090: H.-Y.~Cheng, arXiv:hep-ph/0702252.
1091:
1092: \bibitem{ks-vertex}
1093: Y.~Ushiroda {\it et al}. (Belle collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94},
1094: 231601 (2005);
1095: K.~Sumisawa {\it et al}. (Belle collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 95},
1096: 061801 (2005).
1097:
1098: \bibitem{belle-detector}
1099: A.~Abashian {\it et al.}, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A {\bf 479}, 1 (2003);
1100: Z.~Natkaniec {\it et al.} (Belle SVD2 group),
1101: Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A {\bf 560}, 1 (2006).
1102:
1103: \bibitem{kekb}
1104: S.~Kurokawa and E.~Kikutani, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A {\bf 499}, 1 (2003),
1105: and other papers included in this volume.
1106:
1107:
1108: \bibitem{flavor-tag}
1109: H.~Kakuno {\it et al.}, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A {\bf 533} 516 (2004).
1110:
1111: \bibitem{sss06-belle}
1112: K.-F.~Chen {\it et al.}. (Belle collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 98}, 031802 (2007).
1113:
1114: \bibitem{argus}
1115: H.~Albrecht {\it et al.} (ARGUS Collab.),
1116: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 241}, 278 (1990).
1117:
1118: \bibitem{res-func}
1119: H.~Tajima {\it et al.}, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A {\bf 533}, 370 (2004).
1120:
1121: \bibitem{pdg}
1122: W.-M.~Yao {\it et al.} (Particle Data Group), J. Phys. {\bf G33}, 1 (2006).
1123:
1124: \bibitem{tsi}
1125: O.~Long, M.~Baak, R.N.~Cahn, and D.~Kirkby,
1126: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 68}, 034010 (2003).
1127:
1128: \end{thebibliography}
1129: %
1130:
1131: \end{document}
1132: