1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: 

3: \shorttitle{Photometric beaming binaries}

4: \shortauthors{Zucker, Mazeh \& Alexander}

5: 

6: \begin{document}

7: 

8: \title{Beaming Binaries --- a New Observational Category of

9:   Photometric Binary Stars}

10: \author{Shay Zucker\altaffilmark{1}, Tsevi Mazeh\altaffilmark{2},

11: and

12: Tal Alexander\altaffilmark{3,4}} 

13: \altaffiltext{1}{Dept. of Geophysics \& Planetary Sciences, 

14: 	Raymond and Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel

15: 	Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel}

16: \altaffiltext{2}{School of Physics \& Astronomy,

17: 	Raymond and Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel

18: 	Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel}

19: \altaffiltext{3}{Faculty of Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, 

20: 	PO Box 26, Rehovot 76100, Israel}

21: \altaffiltext{4}{The William Z. \& Eda Bess Novick career development chair}

22: 

23: \email{shayz@post.tau.ac.il,

24: 	mazeh@post.tau.ac.il,

25: 	Tal.Alexander@weizmann.ac.il}

26: 

27: \begin{abstract}

28: The new photometric space-borne survey missions CoRoT and Kepler will

29: be able to detect minute flux variations in binary stars due to

30: relativistic beaming caused by the line-of-sight motion of their

31: components. In all but very short period binaries ($P>10$\,d), these

32: variations will dominate over the ellipsoidal and reflection periodic

33: variability.  Thus, CoRoT and Kepler will discover a new observational

34: class: photometric beaming binary stars. We examine this new category

35: and the information that the photometric variations can provide. The

36: variations that result from the observatory heliocentric velocity can

37: be used to extract some spectral information even for single stars.

38: \end{abstract}

39: 

40: \keywords{

41: techniques: photometric

42: ---

43: techniques: radial velocities 

44: ---

45: surveys

46: ---

47: binaries: close

48: ---

49: binaries: general

50: ---

51: binaries: spectroscopic

52: }

53: 

54: \section{Introduction}

55: \label{intro}

56: 

57: In 2003 \citeauthor{LoeGau2003} suggested a new {\it photometric}

58: method to detect extrasolar planets, based on the minute variability

59: of the stellar flux due to relativistic beaming induced by the star's

60: reflex radial velocity. \citet{RybLig1979} show that several factors

61: contribute to the beaming effect. The bolometric factors are the

62: Lorentz transformations of the radiated energy and the time intervals,

63: and the modification of the angular distribution of the radiated

64: energy (stellar aberration).  Thus, in the limit where the star's

65: radial (line-of-sight) velocity $v_{\mbox{\tiny R}}$ is much smaller

66: than the speed of light $c$, the observed bolometric flux $F$ is

67: modified relative to the emitted bolometric flux $F_0$ as

68: \begin{equation}

69: F=F_0\left(1+4\frac{v_{\mbox{\tiny R}}}{c}\right) \ .

70: \label{boldoppler}

71: \end{equation}

72: For band-pass photometry, the Doppler shift of the emitted frequency

73: and the spectral index of the source spectrum also have to be taken

74: into account, which finally yields:

75: \begin{equation}

76: F_{\nu}=F_{\nu \mbox{\tiny 0}}\left[1+(3-\alpha)\frac{v_{\mbox{\tiny R}}}{c}\right] \ ,

77: \label{banddoppler}

78: \end{equation}

79: where $F_{\nu}$ and $F_{\nu \mbox{\tiny 0}}$ are the observed and

80: emitted flux density at frequency $\nu$, respectively, and

81: $\alpha=d\log F/d\log\nu$ is the average spectral index around the

82: observed frequency. Note that Equations \ref{boldoppler} and

83: \ref{banddoppler} can also be obtained in a semi-classical context. In

84: any case, since the effect depends on the first order of

85: $v_{\mbox{\tiny R}}/c$ the velocities do not need to be highly

86: relativistic to detect the effect. Detecting beaming variability

87: related to orbital motion requires the very high precision provided by

88: photometric satellites. Even in the extremely high orbital velocities

89: of the stars orbiting the massive black hole in the Galactic Center,

90: the beaming effects cannot be measured with the low photometric

91: precision available for those stars \citep{Zucetal2006}.

92: 

93: \citet{LoeGau2003} suggested to detect stellar periodic motion

94: induced by an unseen planet through the beaming effect. They showed

95: that the amplitude of the beaming effect produced by an extrasolar

96: planet is of the order of micro-magnitude. Such an effect is barely

97: detectable by the new photometric space missions CoRoT \citep{Bag2003}

98: and Kepler \citep{Basetal2005}, which are aiming to find extrasolar

99: {\it transiting} planets, with a typical variability amplitude of

100: $100\,\mu$mag. The obvious advantage of \citet{LoeGau2003} approach is

101: its applicability to planets with almost any inclination, whereas

102: detecting transiting planets is limited only to planets with orbital

103: inclinations close to $90\degr$.

104: 

105: Here we examine the beaming effect in binary stars, and suggest a new

106: class of binaries --- beaming binaries.  These are a hybrid between

107: spectroscopic and ellipsoidal binaries, since the beaming binaries

108: will be detected by periodic photometric variations due to their

109: orbital radial velocity. We show that a binary with an orbital period

110: of $P=100\,$d has a beaming variability of at least ${\cal

111: O}(100\,\mu{\mathrm mag})$, which is easily detectable by CoRoT and

112: even more so by Kepler. We further show that for binaries with periods

113: longer than $10$~days, beaming variability dominates over the

114: competing effects of ellipsoidal and reflection variability. We

115: therefore expect the new satellites to harvest hundreds of previously

116: unknown binaries of this new class.

117: 

118: Beaming variability of order $100\,\mu$mag will also be induced by the

119: Earth's heliocentric motion relative to any observed source, single

120: star or binary. In spectroscopic observations, the effect of the Earth

121: motion is corrected in order to obtain heliocentric radial velocities.

122: Here we show how the dependence of this small variability on the

123: spectral slope at the observed bandpass can be used to probe the

124: spectral characteristics of single and binary stars.

125: 

126: 

127: \section{The amplitude of the beaming effect as compared with the

128:   ellipsoidal and reflection effects}

129: \label{compare}

130: 

131: The three kinds of periodic flux variations we expect to detect in

132: binary stars are those due to the ellipsoidal tidal deformations of

133: the stars, the reflection of the light of each star by its companion,

134: and relativistic beaming, which is the subject of this

135: work. \citet{LoeGau2003} have presented a rough comparison of those

136: three effects in the context of planet-hosting stars. We now compare

137: the three effects for binary stars, assuming for simplicity a circular

138: ($e=0$) edge-on ($\sin i=90\degr$) orbit. Note that for systems with

139: two stellar components, the observed ellipsoidal effect is the

140: weighted average of the ellipsoidal effects of the two stars, whereas

141: the observed beaming effect is the weighted {\it difference} between

142: the beaming variabilities of the two stars, as their effects are

143: exactly in opposite phase. In this respect beaming is similar to the

144: reflection effect.

145: 

146: To a good approximation (see below), the magnitude of the beaming

147: effect can be calculated under the assumption that the two stars

148: radiate as blackbodies. For a blackbody source of temperature

149: $T_{\mathrm{eff}}$ the spectral index $\alpha$ is:

150: \begin{equation}

151: \alpha(\nu) = 3 - \frac{e^x}{e^x-1}x \ ,

152: \end{equation}

153: where $x = h\nu/kT_{\mathrm{eff}}$. 

154: 

155: The binary's orbital separation is given by Kepler's third law,

156: \begin{equation}

157: a = \left(\frac{M_1+M_2}{M_{\sun}}\right)^{1/3}

158: \left(\frac{P}{1\,\mathrm{year}}\right)^{2/3} \, \mathrm{AU} \ ,

159: \end{equation} 

160: where $M_i$ are the two masses, with the subscript 1 referring to the

161: primary and 2 to the secondary.  The amplitude of the primary's

162: radial-velocity variation is then

163: \begin{equation} 

164: K_1 = \left(\frac{M_2}{M_1+M_2}\right)

165:       \left(\frac{a}{1\,\mathrm{AU}}\right)^{-1/2}

166:       29.8\,\mathrm{km\,s}^{-1} \ .

167: \end{equation} 

168: A corresponding expression is obtained for the secondary by

169: interchanging the subscripts $1$ and $2$. The peak-to-peak amplitude

170: of the total expected relative flux variation from the binary due to

171: beaming is then

172: \begin{equation} 

173: \left( \frac{\Delta F_{\nu}}{F_{\nu}}\right)_{\mathrm{beaming}} = 

174: 	\frac{1}{c} \frac{K_1[3-\alpha_1(\nu)]F_{\nu,\mbox{\tiny 1}} - K_2[3-\alpha_2(\nu)]F_{\nu,\mbox{\tiny 2}}}

175: 	{F_{\nu,\mbox{\tiny 1}}+F_{\nu,\mbox{\tiny 2}}}

176: 	\ .

177: \label{lumbeam}

178: \end{equation} 

179: Note that because the observed effect is the difference between the

180: effects of the two stars, the beaming effect vanishes for an

181: equal-mass binary, where the spectral characteristics are also

182: identical for the two components.

183: 

184: In order to estimate the ellipsoidal variability, we use the

185: expression presented by \citet{MorNaf1993} for the peak-to-peak

186: ellipsoidal variability of the primary:

187: \begin{equation} 

188: \left( \frac{\Delta F_{\nu,\mbox{\tiny 1}}}{F_{\nu,\mbox{\tiny 1}}}\right)_{\mathrm{ellips}} \simeq

189: 	0.3\frac{(15+u_1)(1+\tau_1)}{3-u_1}\frac{M_2}{M_1}\left(\frac{R_1}{a}\right)^3

190: \label{lumellips}

191: \end{equation} 

192: Here $\tau_1$ is the gravity darkening coefficient of the primary and

193: $u_1$ is its limb-darkening coefficient. We calculate a similar

194: expression for the secondary and then weight them by the expected

195: blackbody fluxes in order to obtain the total relative variation of

196: the binary.

197: 

198: \citet{MorNaf1993} also provide a prescription for calculating the

199: amplitude of the reflection effect. They assume that each star absorbs

200: some of the bolometric flux of its companion, which heats the stellar

201: hemisphere facing the companion, inducing an asymmetric increased

202: emission.  Assuming blackbody radiation law,

203: \citeauthor{MorNaf1993} define a `luminous-efficiency' factor by:

204: \begin{equation}

205: f_{\lambda}=\left(\frac{T_2}{T_1}\right)^4 \frac{e^{x_2}-1}{e^{x_1}-1} \ ,

206: \label{lumeff}

207: \end{equation}

208: where $T_1$ and $T_2$ are the temperatures of the two components. Like

209: the beaming effect, the contributions of the reflection effects of the

210: two stars are in opposite phase, and the total magnitude of the effect

211: is the weighted difference of the two. Keeping only the leading order

212: terms in the radii (expressed in terms of the orbital separation), we

213: obtain:

214: \begin{equation} 

215: \left( \frac{\Delta F_{\nu}}{F_{\nu}} \right)_{\mathrm{reflect}} = 

216: 	\frac{2}{3}\frac{\left(R_2/a\right)^2 f_{\lambda}^{-1} F_{\nu,\mbox{\tiny 1}} -

217: 	                 \left(R_1/a\right)^2 f_{\lambda} F_{\nu,\mbox{\tiny 2}}}

218:                         {F_{\nu,\mbox{\tiny 1}}+F_{\nu,\mbox{\tiny 2}}}

219: \label{reflec}

220: \end{equation} 

221: 

222: Note that the ellipsoidal and reflection variabilities were calculated

223: assuming tidal locking and a circular orbit.  Furthermore, we use only

224: the leading order terms in the fractional radii. Thus, we might be

225: overestimating the amplitude of those effects. However, these

226: expressions suffice as conservative estimates for comparing with the

227: beaming effects.

228: 

229: We use Equations \ref{lumbeam}, \ref{lumellips},and \ref{reflec} to

230: compare the three effects for three typical binaries and for a range

231: of periods.  Table \ref{tabstars} presents the parameters assumed for

232: the stellar components.  For the purpose of this simple comparison, we

233: assume $u_1,u_2=0.6$ for our hypothetical stars. We calculate the

234: gravity darkening coefficients using the prescription in

235: \citet{Mor1985}.

236: 

237: 

238: 

239: Table \ref{tabbinaries} compares the three effects for the three

240: binaries, observed in the $V$ band, for periods of $10$ and $100$

241: days. In all cases the beaming variability dominates over the other

242: two effects. Figure \ref{compF0K0} shows the three effects for an

243: F0-K0 binary for a range of periods. The corresponding plots for the

244: other cases were very similar. The dependence of the effects on the

245: orbital separation is explicit in the expressions above, and we can

246: use it to understand the dependence on the orbital period. While

247: ellipsoidal variability decreases with period as $P^{-2}$, and the

248: reflection variability as $P^{-4/3}$, the beaming variability only

249: decreases as $P^{-1/3}$, and we expect it to become dominant for long

250: enough periods.

251: 

252: 

253: 

254: 

255: 

256: In the three cases we examined the ellipsoidal variability dominates

257: for periods shorter than $8$ days, while for periods longer than $10$

258: days the beaming variability becomes dominant.  Remarkably, the three

259: lines intersect at about the same period, and the reflection effect is

260: almost never dominant. Furthermore, the amplitude of the beaming

261: variability stays at the detectable levels for CoRoT and Kepler, of

262: $0.1-1$\,mmag for periods of a hundred days and more.

263: 

264: In Figure \ref{figq} we compare the three effects for a range of mass

265: ratios. We assumed a G0 primary, and used power laws for the

266: dependence of the secondary radius and temperature on its mass:

267: $R\propto M^{0.8}$ and $T_{\mathrm{eff}}\propto M^{0.55}$. While the

268: ellipsoidal variability is mostly sensitive to the highest mass

269: ratios, the beaming and reflection effects are more sensitive to

270: intermediary mass ratios. This is mainly because at the highest mass

271: ratios the effects from both binary components are canceled out.

272: 

273: 

274: 

275: 

276: %-----------------------------------

277: \section{Discussion}               %

278: \label{discussion}                 %

279: %-----------------------------------

280: 

281: The radial-velocity beaming lightcurve can yield directly most of the

282: spectroscopic orbital elements, including the period, eccentricity and

283: time of periastron passage. Since these will be obtained as the result

284: of a well defined magnitude-limited photometric survey, they will

285: provide large amounts of new data to statistical studies of

286: spectroscopic binaries, including, e.g., the distribution of orbital

287: period \citep{DuqMay1991,Mazetal2006}, and the relation between

288: orbital period and eccentricity \citep{Haletal2003}.

289: 

290: The only spectroscopic element that cannot be obtained directly from

291: the lightcurve is the radial-velocity amplitude $K_1$. However, as

292: outlined in Equation \ref{lumbeam}, the $K_1$ value can be derived

293: from the amplitude of the beaming effect through the spectral index

294: $\alpha$ of the primary and the relative amplitudes of the beaming

295: effect of the two components of the binary. In most binaries, the

296: secondary is faint enough that we will be able to ascribe the observed

297: beaming variability solely to the primary component. If the primary

298: spectral type is known, we can derive its spectral index ($\alpha$)

299: and obtain $K_1$, thus deriving the full set of orbital elements of a

300: single-lined spectroscopic binary.

301: 

302: In order to estimate $\alpha$ and calibrate the relation between the

303: beaming amplitude and $K_1$, some spectroscopic follow-up observations

304: of the detected binaries should be performed. Since most of the

305: radial-velocity elements will already be known from photometry, only a

306: small number of observations is needed per star.  Multi-object

307: spectrographs, such as FLAMES on the Very Large Telescope

308: \citep{Pasetal2002} or Hydra on the Wiyn telescope \citep{BarArm1995},

309: seem like an efficient means to obtain these observations for the

310: detected beaming binaries in the field.

311: 

312: In the few cases where the two components might have very similar

313: magnitudes and masses, the two contributions to the beaming

314: variability may cancel out, because of their opposite phases.  In

315: cases where the secondary light will be significant but will not

316: cancel the primary light completely, we will need a photometric

317: analogue of spectroscopic disentangling procedures like TODCOR

318: \citep{ZucMaz1994}. Measurements in more than one photometric band

319: may add the constraints needed to solve for $K_1$ and $K_2$.

320: 

321: We note in passing, that the derivation of $K_1$, and when possible

322: also $K_2$, is sensitive to any blending of the binary image with

323: other stars, as they depend on the {\it relative} amplitude of the

324: beaming effect. Therefore, it would be needed to obtain high

325: resolution image of the observed field, in order to spot any other

326: possible contributions to the binary light that might dilute the

327: beaming effect. In fact, measurements in different bands may also

328: serve the same purpose.

329: 

330: %Another possible difficulty is the derivation of the spectral

331: %index. We suggest to use the known spectral type and assume a pure

332: %blackbody stellar spectrum. This might not be appropriate for very

333: %late-type stars, with many spectral features.  We performed

334: %several trials using the spectral library of \citet{Pic1998} and the

335: %V-band transmission function he provides. It seems that the presence

336: %of spectral features does not change considerably the results.

337: 

338: In addition, we propose a simple way to calibrate the relationship

339: between the amplitudes of the radial velocity and the beaming flux

340: variation. Since the satellite motion is known, and is linked with the

341: motion of the Earth, we already have a well known radial-velocity

342: signal in the data for all stars.  CoRoT, for example, will observe

343: dense fields around the ecliptic, continuously for almost half a

344: year. Thus, the amplitude of this heliocentric velocity signal will be

345: close to $60\,\mathrm{km\,s}^{-1}$.

346: 

347: The beaming photometric signal associated with the motion of the

348: telescope will affect all stars, binary and single alike.  Measuring

349: this signal can serve to calibrate $\alpha$ with the radial-velocity

350: amplitude, which in turn can be used to interpret the beaming signal

351: of the stellar orbital velocity, if it is a binary. For single stars

352: $\alpha$ is actually a piece of spectral information that reveals the

353: location of the passband along the blackbody radiation curve, and thus

354: provides an estimate of the stellar effective temperature.  Figure

355: \ref{helio} shows the expected photometric variability amplitude in V

356: for different temperatures, due to heliocentric motion alone, assuming

357: blackbody radiation law, and a heliocentric radial-velocity amplitude

358: of $60\,\mathrm{km\,s}^{-1}$.

359: 

360: Figure \ref{demolc} shows a simulated lightcurve that demonstrates the

361: type of signal we expect to detect for a binary. The lightcurve

362: includes the beaming variability of a $10$-day period G0-K0 binary

363: star, together with the beaming variability related to the

364: heliocentric motion. The associated radial velocity amplitudes are

365: $K_1=52\,\mathrm{km\,s}^{-1}$ and $K_2=69\,\mathrm{km\,s}^{-1}$. The

366: noise included is only a $10^{-4}$ white noise. Note that in the case

367: of the heliocentric motion the contributions of the two components are

368: in phase, and therefore do not cancel out.

369: 

370: Since the signal related to the observatory motion is common to all

371: the observed objects, it will appear as a systematic effect, and may

372: be mistakenly removed as such. Algorithms such as SysRem

373: \citep{Tametal2005} should identify such effects and also the

374: individual response of each object to the same effect, and are thus

375: ideally suited to provide the required information for its correct

376: analysis.

377: 

378: In the lightcurve we show in Figure \ref{demolc} we have neglected

379: stellar microvariability. When actual lightcurves are analyzed, this

380: variability should be properly accounted for. For older solar-type

381: stars of low chromospheric activity, we may use the solar

382: microvariability as the only available example. Although the solar

383: rotational period is about $26$ days, \citet{Aigetal2004} show that

384: due to the short lifetimes of the spots and faculae, there is no clear

385: periodic signal in this period. Instead, most of the signal is in

386: higher frequencies, corresponding to periods shorter than $10$ days.

387: For non-solar type stars, variability due to chromospheric activity

388: may be larger than solar, and care should be taken in separating the

389: beaming effects from the variability effects. 

390: 

391: Efforts are currently underway to characterize the microvariability

392: that we expect to observe with the high-precision photometric

393: satellites \citep[e.g.,][]{Aigetal2004,Lanetal2006,Lud2006}, in order

394: to facilitate the detection of planetary transits. However, the

395: stellar microvariability is not expected to be {\it strictly}

396: periodic, and therefore it should be possible to single out the

397: beaming effect, specially because the shape of the beaming modulation

398: is known and depends only on a few parameters. Spectroscopic

399: information obtained as part of the follow-up observations should also

400: help to further study the chromospheric activity of the binary

401: candidates.

402: 

403: In order to give an order-of-magnitude estimate of the expected number

404: of beaming binaries that will be detected by, e.g., CoRoT, we estimate

405: that $10\%$ of the observed late-types stars have been discovered to

406: be spectroscopic binaries with a threshold of $K_1>3\, \mathrm{km\,

407: s}^{-1}$ and periods of less than a year or so.  This estimate is

408: based on results of the seminal works of \citet{DuqMay1991} and

409: \citet{Latetal2002}. During the lifetime of the mission, CoRoT is

410: expected to monitor about $60000$ stars. Thus, we roughly expect

411: $6000$ of them to be detectable as beaming binaries with $10\mu$mag

412: variability or higher.  Since this estimate applies to binaries with

413: late-type primaries, and accounting for the fact that beaming is

414: biased against equal-mass binaries, we can somewhat scale this number

415: downwards, and estimate CoRoT to yield at least $1000$ beaming binary

416: stars. The fact that the CoRoT sample of beaming binaries will be

417: discovered by a systematic, magnitude-limited survey, will augment

418: significantly the statistical knowledge of binaries.

419: 

420: %--------------------------

421: \section{Conclusion}      %

422: %--------------------------

423: As we have shown in Section \ref{compare}, we expect the multitude of

424: very precise light curves of CoRoT and Kepler to yield hundreds of new

425: binaries through their {\it periodic} beaming variability. Thus a new

426: observational category will emerge --- beaming binaries. In all types

427: of binaries, the discovery and the analysis of the binary motion

428: strongly depend on the timing and the number of the measurements.  For

429: the satellite photometric data we expect continuous radial-velocity

430: data that will yield the spectroscopic orbital elements, the period

431: and eccentricity in particular. Once the spectral index $\alpha$ is

432: known, the radial-velocity amplitude can be derived as well.

433: 

434: Without the beaming binaries, CoRoT and Kepler are supposed to find

435: most of the eclipsing binaries.  However, binaries with periods longer

436: than a few days need very fortuitous geometrical situations to present

437: eclipses, and are therefore rare in the data of photometric surveys

438: \citep[e.g.,][]{Mazetal2006}. The beaming binaries can be detected up

439: to a hundred days and more. Therefore, the new class of binaries will

440: extend our detailed knowledge of the statistical characteristics of

441: binaries by an order of magnitude, specially because these binaries

442: will emerge in the context of a well defined, complete,

443: magnitude-limited, photometric search. This can shed light on the

444: distribution of orbital period \citep[e.g.,][]{DuqMay1991,Mazetal2006}

445: and the relation between orbital period and eccentricity

446: \citep[e.g.,][]{Haletal2003}.

447: 

448: \acknowledgments 

449: This research was supported by a Grant from the G.I.F., the

450: German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development to

451: T.M.  T.A. is supported by Minerva grant 8563 and a New Faculty grant

452: by Sir H. Djangoly, CBE, of London, UK.

453:  

454: 

455: \begin{thebibliography}{}

456: 

457: \bibitem[Aigrain, Favata \& Gilmore(2004)]{Aigetal2004}

458: 	Aigrain, S., Favata, F., \& Gilmore, G. 2004, \aap, 414, 1139

459: 

460: \bibitem[Baglin(2003)]{Bag2003}

461: 	Baglin, A. 2003, Adv. Space Res., 31, 345

462: 

463: \bibitem[Barden \& Armandroff(1995)]{BarArm1995}

464: 	Barden, S. C., \& Armandroff, T. 1995, Proc. SPIE, 2476, 56

465: 

466: \bibitem[Basri, Borucki \& Koch(2005)]{Basetal2005}

467: 	Basri, G., Borucki, W. J., \& Koch, D. 2005, \nar, 49, 478

468: 

469: \bibitem[Cox(2000)]{Cox2000}

470: 	Cox, A. N. 2000, Allen's Astrophysical Quantities (New York:

471: 	AIP)

472: 

473: \bibitem[Duqennoy \& Mayor(1991)]{DuqMay1991}

474: 	Duquennoy, A., \& Mayor, M. 1991, \aap, 248, 485

475: 

476: \bibitem[Halbwachs et al.(2003)]{Haletal2003}

477: 	Halbwachs, J. L., Mayor, M., Udry, S., \& Arenou, F. 2003,

478: 	\aap, 397, 159

479: 

480: \bibitem[Lanza et al.(2006)]{Lanetal2006}

481: 	Lanza, A. F., Messina, S., Pagano, I., \& Rodon\`{o}, M. 2006, AN, 327, 21

482: 

483: \bibitem[Latham et al.(2002)]{Latetal2002}

484: 	Latham, D. W., Stefanik, R. P., Torres, G., Davis, R. J.,

485: 	Mazeh, T., Carney, B. W., Laird, J. B., \& Morse, J. A. 2002,

486: 	\aj, 124, 1144

487: 

488: \bibitem[Loeb \& Gaudi(2003)]{LoeGau2003}

489: 	Loeb, A., \& Gaudi, B. S., \apjl, 588, L117

490: 

491: \bibitem[Ludwig(2006)]{Lud2006}

492: 	Ludwig, H.-G. 2006, \aap, 445, 661

493: 

494: \bibitem[Mazeh, Tamuz \& North(2006)]{Mazetal2006}

495: 	Mazeh, T., Tamuz, O., \& North, P. 2006, \mnras, 367, 1531

496: 

497: \bibitem[Morris(1985)]{Mor1985}

498: 	Morris, S. L. 1985, \apj, 295, 143

499: 

500: \bibitem[Morris \& Naftilan(1993)]{MorNaf1993}

501: 	Morris, S. L., \& Naftilan, S. A. 1993, \apj, 419, 344

502: 

503: \bibitem[Pasquini et al.(2002)]{Pasetal2002}

504: 	Pasquini, L., et al. 2002, Messenger, 110, 1

505: 

506: %\bibitem[Pickles(1998)]{Pic1998}

507: %	Pickles, A. J. 1998, \pasp, 110, 863

508: 

509: \bibitem[Rybicki \& Lightman(1979)]{RybLig1979}

510: 	Rybicki, G. B., \& Lightman, A. P. 1979, Radiative Processes

511: 	in Astrophysics (New York: Wiley)

512: 

513: %\bibitem[Sirko \& Paczy\'{n}sky(2003)]{SirPac2003}

514: %	Sirko, E., \& Paczy\'{n}sky, B. 2003, \apj, 592, 1217

515: 

516: \bibitem[Tamuz, Mazeh \& Zucker(2005)]{Tametal2005}

517: 	Tamuz, O., Mazeh, T., \& Zucker, S. 2005, \mnras, 356, 1466

518: 

519: \bibitem[Zucker et al.(2006)]{Zucetal2006}

520: 	Zucker, S., Alexander, T., Gillessen, S., Eisenhauer, F., \&

521: 	Genzel, R. 2006, \apj, 639, L21

522: 

523: \bibitem[Zucker \& Mazeh(1994)]{ZucMaz1994}

524: 	Zucker, S., \& Mazeh, T. 1994, \apj, 420, 806

525: 

526: 

527: \end{thebibliography}

528: 

529: \clearpage

530: 

531: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}

532: \tablecaption{Stellar parameters for simulation\label{tabstars}}

533: \tablehead{\colhead{parameter} & \colhead{F0} & \colhead{G0} & \colhead{K0} & \colhead{Reference}}

534: \startdata

535: Mass $[M_{\sun}]$ & 1.6 & 1.05 & 0.79 & 1 \\

536: Radius $[R_{\sun}]$ & 1.5 & 1.1 & 0.85 & 1 \\

537: Effective temperature $[\mathrm{K}]$ & 7300 & 5940 & 5150 & 1  \\

538: Gravity darkening coefficient in V & 0.9 & 0.4 & 0.4 & 2 \\

539: \enddata

540: \tablerefs{(1) \citet{Cox2000} (2) \citet{Mor1985}}

541: \end{deluxetable}

542: 

543: \clearpage

544: 

545: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccc}

546: \tablecaption{The three periodic photometric effects for sample binary configurations\label{tabbinaries}}

547: \tablehead{\colhead{\null} & \colhead{\null} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{$P=10$~days} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{$P=100$~days} \\

548: \colhead{Primary} & \colhead{Secondary} & \colhead{ellipsoidal} & \colhead{reflection} & \colhead{beaming} & \colhead{ellipsoidal} & \colhead{reflection} & \colhead{beaming}}

549: \startdata

550: F0 & G0 & $3.9\cdot10^{-4}$ & $4.8\cdot10^{-4}$ & $6.4\cdot10^{-4}$ &

551: $3.9\cdot10^{-6}$ & $2.2\cdot10^{-5}$ & $2.9\cdot10^{-4}$ \\ F0 & K0 &

552: $3.4\cdot10^{-4}$ & $4.1\cdot10^{-4}$ & $8.3\cdot10^{-4}$ &

553: $3.4\cdot10^{-6}$ & $1.9\cdot10^{-5}$ & $3.8\cdot10^{-4}$ \\ G0 & K0 &

554: $1.9\cdot10^{-4}$ & $2.1\cdot10^{-4}$ & $6.6\cdot10^{-4}$ &

555: $1.9\cdot10^{-6}$ & $9.6\cdot10^{-6}$ & $3.1\cdot10^{-4}$

556: \enddata

557: \end{deluxetable}

558: 

559: \clearpage

560: 

561: \begin{figure}

562: \plotone{f1.eps}

563: \caption{

564: The three periodic photometric effects for an F0-K0 binary star in a range of periods.}

565: \label{compF0K0}

566: \end{figure}

567: 

568: \clearpage

569: 

570: \begin{figure}

571: \plotone{f2.eps}

572: \caption{

573: The three periodic photometric effects for a G0 primary in a range of

574: mass ratios.}

575: \label{figq}

576: \end{figure}

577: 

578: \clearpage

579: 

580: \begin{figure}

581: \plotone{f3.eps}

582: \caption{The amplitude of the expected beaming variability of a

583:   black-body radiation induced by the heliocentric motion of CoRoT, in

584:   the V band, assuming the star location is close to the ecliptic and the 

585: radial velocity amplitude is $60\,\mathrm{km\,s}^{-1}$.}

586: \label{helio}

587: \end{figure}

588: 

589: \clearpage

590: 

591: \begin{figure}

592: \plotone{f4.eps}

593: \caption{A simulated CoRoT lightcurve of a $10$-day period G0-K0 

594: binary star. The beaming effects related to the binary orbit and the

595: heliocentric motion are easily noticed. The dashed line represents the

596: pure heliocentric motion beaming signal.}

597: \label{demolc}

598: \end{figure}

599: 

600: \end{document}

601: