1: \documentclass{emulateapj}
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: %\usepackage{amstext,amsmath,natbib}
4: \usepackage{epsfig}
5:
6:
7: \slugcomment{Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal}
8:
9: \shorttitle{Chandra Observation of A13}
10: \shortauthors{JUETT ET AL.}
11:
12:
13: \begin{document}
14:
15: \title{A {\em Chandra} Observation of Abell 13: Investigating the
16: Origin of the Radio Relic}
17:
18: \author{Adrienne~M.~Juett\altaffilmark{1},
19: Craig~L.~Sarazin\altaffilmark{1}, Tracy~E.~Clarke\altaffilmark{2},
20: Heinz~Andernach\altaffilmark{3}, Matthias~Ehle\altaffilmark{4},
21: Yutaka~Fujita\altaffilmark{5}, Joshua~C.~Kempner\altaffilmark{6},
22: Alan~L.~Roy\altaffilmark{7}, Lawrence~Rudnick\altaffilmark{8}, and
23: O.~Bruce~Slee\altaffilmark{9}}
24:
25: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia,
26: P.O. Box 400325, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4325, USA;
27: ajuett@virginia.edu, sarazin@virginia.edu}
28: \altaffiltext{2}{Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Ave. SW,
29: Code 7213, Washington, DC 20375, USA; Interferometrics Inc., 13454
30: Sunrise Valley Drive, Suite 240, Herndon, VA 20171, USA}
31: \altaffiltext{3}{Departamento de Astronom\'{\i}a, Universidad de
32: Guanajuato, AP 144, Guanajuato CP 36000, Mexico}
33: \altaffiltext{4}{XMM-Newton Science Operations Centre, European Space
34: Agency, Villafranca del Castillo, P.O. Box 50727, 28080 Madrid, Spain}
35: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Earth and Space Science, Graduate
36: School of Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan}
37: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Bowdoin College,
38: 8800 College Station, Brunswick, ME 04011, USA}
39: \altaffiltext{7}{Max-Planck-Institut f\"{u}r Radioastronomie, Auf dem
40: H\"{u}gel 69, D-53121 Bonn, Germany}
41: \altaffiltext{8}{University of Minnesota, 116 Church St SE,
42: Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA}
43: \altaffiltext{9}{Australia Telescope National Facility, P.O. Box 76,
44: Epping, NSW 2121, Australia}
45: %craig
46: %%tracy
47: %%jkempner@bowdoin.edu
48: %fujita@vega.ess.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp
49: %%mehle@xmm.vilspa.esa.es
50: %heinz@astro.ugto.mx
51: %aroy@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de
52: %%larry@astro.umn.edu
53: %%slee
54:
55: \begin{abstract}
56: We present results from the {\em Chandra} X-ray observation of Abell
57: 13, a galaxy cluster that contains an unusual noncentral radio source,
58: also known as a radio relic. This is the first pointed X-ray
59: observation of Abell 13, providing a more sensitive study of the
60: properties of the X-ray gas. The X-ray emission from Abell 13 is
61: extended to the northwest of the X-ray peak and shows substructure
62: indicative of a recent merger event. The cluster X-ray emission is
63: centered on the bright galaxy H of \citet{srm+01}. We find no
64: evidence for a cooling flow in the cluster. A knot of excess X-ray
65: emission is coincident with the other bright elliptical galaxy F.
66: This knot of emission has properties similar to the enhanced emission
67: associated with the large galaxies in the Coma cluster.
68:
69: With these {\em Chandra} data we are able to compare the properties of
70: the hot X-ray gas with those of the radio relic from VLA data, to
71: study the interaction of the X-ray gas with the radio emitting
72: electrons. Our results suggest that the radio relic is associated
73: with cooler gas in the cluster. We suggest two explanations for the
74: coincidence of the cooler gas and radio source. First, the gas may
75: have been uplifted by the radio relic from the cluster core.
76: Alternatively, the relic and cool gas may have been displaced from the
77: central galaxy during the cluster merger event.
78: \end{abstract}
79:
80: \keywords{galaxies: clusters: general --- galaxies: clusters:
81: individual (A13) --- X-rays: galaxies: clusters --- radio continuum:
82: galaxies --- intergalactic medium}
83:
84: \section{Introduction}
85: The high spatial resolution of the {\em Chandra X-ray Observatory}
86: allows us to study the intracluster medium (ICM) in clusters of
87: galaxies in unprecedented detail. One interesting result is the
88: interplay between the X-ray emitting gas and non-thermal radio
89: emission. Observations of several galaxy clusters have found X-ray
90: cavities in the ICM coincident with bright radio emission \citep[e.g.,
91: Perseus (A\,426);][]{bvf+93,fse+00}. The central radio sources
92: produce the bubbles of non-thermal plasma responsible for the radio
93: emission. These bubbles then rise, possibly by buoyancy, displacing
94: the X-ray emitting gas and causing cavities in the latter.
95:
96: A number of galaxy clusters contain large-scale diffuse radio sources
97: not associated with active galactic nuclei. These sources are
98: classified into two groups: radio halos which are centrally located,
99: and radio relics. Radio relics are extended diffuse radio sources
100: often located at the periphery of clusters of galaxies. \citet{gf04}
101: present a classification scheme for radio relics based on their
102: observational properties \citep[but see also][]{kbc+04}. Radio relics
103: typically have steep radio spectra ($\alpha > 1$ assuming $S_{\nu}
104: \propto \nu^{-\alpha}$) and are linearly polarized \citep{gf04}. The
105: X-ray surface brightness around most radio relics is low, making it
106: difficult to study the relationship between the X-ray gas and radio
107: emission.
108:
109: \begin{deluxetable*}{lccc}
110: \tablewidth{0pt}
111: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.2in}
112: \tablecaption{Properties of Detected Point Sources in Abell 13 Field}
113: \tablehead{\colhead{Name} & \colhead{R.A.\tablenotemark{a}} &
114: \colhead{Dec.\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{Count Rate ($10^{-3}$~s$^{-1}$)} }
115: \startdata
116: CXOU J001316.6$-$193201 & 00:13:16.67 & $-$19:32:01.2 & 6.3$\pm$0.4 \\
117: CXOU J001319.0$-$193018 & 00:13:19.09 & $-$19:30:18.5 & 0.43$\pm$0.12 \\
118: CXOU J001320.0$-$192748 & 00:13:20.06 & $-$19:27:48.6 & 2.1$\pm$0.2 \\
119: CXOU J001321.9$-$192750 & 00:13:21.98 & $-$19:27:50.7 & 2.4$\pm$0.2 \\
120: CXOU J001326.0$-$193111 & 00:13:26.02 & $-$19:31:11.4 & 3.9$\pm$0.3 \\
121: CXOU J001335.7$-$192805 & 00:13:35.74 & $-$19:28:05.5 & 0.61$\pm$0.14 \\
122: CXOU J001339.9$-$192935 & 00:13:39.94 & $-$19:29:35.8 & 4.2$\pm$0.3 \\
123: CXOU J001341.1$-$192809 & 00:13:41.15 & $-$19:28:09.5 & 1.8$\pm$0.2 \\
124: CXOU J001342.5$-$193209 & 00:13:42.58 & $-$19:32:09.0 & 0.54$\pm$0.13 \\
125: CXOU J001344.6$-$192914 & 00:13:44.60 & $-$19:29:14.1 & 0.38$\pm$0.11 \\
126: CXOU J001344.7$-$193051 & 00:13:44.70 & $-$19:30:51.0 & 4.6$\pm$0.3
127: \enddata
128: \tablenotetext{a}{Units of right ascension are hours, minutes, and
129: seconds, and units of declination are degrees, arcminutes, and
130: arcseconds. The 90\% uncertainty in absolute positional accuracy of
131: {\em Chandra} is 0\farcs6.}
132: \label{tab:srcprop}
133: \end{deluxetable*}
134:
135:
136: Many radio relics, including some of the best known and studied
137: \citep[e.g., the Coma cluster relic 1253$+$275 and Abell
138: 3667;][]{gfs91,rwh+97}, are located far from the cluster center, on
139: the order of Mpcs. However, there exists a subclass of radio relics
140: which are located significantly closer to the cluster center, $\sim$50
141: to 350 kpc. \citet{gf04} classify these as relic sources near the
142: first ranked galaxy. These radio sources share many of the same
143: properties of classical radio relics including steep spectra,
144: filamentary structure, and polarization \citep{srm+01}. Abell 133 is
145: one of the class of radio relics near the first ranked galaxy. A {\em
146: Chandra} observation revealed a tongue-like feature in the X-ray
147: emission comprised of cool gas ($kT \approx 1.3$~keV) which extended
148: from the cD galaxy to the radio relic \citep{fsk+02}. A number of
149: possible origins for the tongue were explored including the suggestion
150: that the cool gas in the tongue was uplifted from the cluster core by
151: the buoyantly rising radio relic. A followup observation with {\em
152: XMM-Newton} is consistent with the uplifted bubble scenario
153: \citep{fsr+04}. However the detection of a cold front southeast of
154: the cluster core and a weak shock in the core suggests that an unequal
155: mass merger is responsible for the tongue feature. In either model,
156: the radio plasma appears to have originated from the active galactic
157: nucleus (AGN) in the central cD, rather than as a direct result of
158: merger shock acceleration.
159:
160: In this paper, we present X-ray data obtained with the {\em Chandra
161: X-ray Observatory} for the cluster Abell 13, another unusual system
162: with a radio relic near the first ranked galaxy. Abell 13 is an X-ray
163: luminous ($8\times10^{43}$~erg~s$^{-1}$ in the 0.5--10~keV range)
164: cluster at $z=0.0943$ \citep{mkd+96}. The relic has an extremely
165: steep ($\alpha \approx 4$) radio spectrum, a linear polarization of
166: $\approx$12\% at 1425~MHz, and spans up to 2\arcmin\/ \citep{srm+01}.
167: No identification of a host galaxy associated with the relic was
168: possible, although the two brightest cluster members are candidates.
169: Interestingly, these two galaxies are separated by 2621~km~s$^{-1}$ in
170: recessional velocity \citep{qr95}. Similarly, from redshift data of
171: the ESO Nearby Abell Clusters Survey (ENACS), \citet{fgg+96} concluded
172: that the radial velocity distribution of Abell 13 may also be
173: interpreted as a bimodal one, with peaks at $z=0.0919$ (16 redshifts,
174: vel.disp. $361^{+53}_{-35}$~km~s$^{-1}$) and $0.0972$ (21 redshifts
175: vel.disp. $515^{+104}_{-81}$~km~s$^{-1}$), or $<cz> = 27570$ and
176: 29160~km~s$^{-1}$. We assume $H_0=70$~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$,
177: $\Omega_M=0.3$, and $\Omega_\Lambda=0.7$ unless otherwise mentioned.
178: At the distance of Abell 13, 1\arcsec\/ corresponds to 1.75 kpc.
179:
180:
181: \section{Spatial Analysis}
182:
183: We observed Abell 13 on 2004 August 25 for 55~ks with {\em Chandra}
184: using the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer \citep[ACIS;][]{gbf+03}.
185: The observation was performed so that both the cluster center and the
186: radio relic were located on the back-illuminated S3 CCD. The ``level
187: 1'' event file was processed using the CIAO v3.2 data analysis
188: package\footnote{http://asc.harvard.edu/ciao/} following the standard
189: reduction procedure. We removed the afterglow correction and created
190: a new observation specific bad pixel file. The level 1 event file was
191: reprocessed to include the new bad pixel file and utilize the improved
192: background event detection in VFAINT mode. We then filtered the data
193: to remove hot pixels, bad columns, and events with grades 1, 3, 5, and
194: 7. Data from the back-illuminated S1 CCD were used to determine time
195: intervals with high background using the tool {\tt lc\_clean}. We
196: filtered the event file on good times, yielding a final exposure time
197: of 50.7~ks. Background data were extracted from the blank sky
198: observations compiled by M. Markevitch\footnote{See
199: http://cxc.harvard.edu/cal/Acis/Cal\_prods/bkgrnd/acisbg/}. Our
200: analysis is restricted to data from the S3 CCD.
201:
202: In Figure~\ref{fig:x}, we show both the raw {\em Chandra} X-ray image
203: of the 0.3--10~keV energy range, and an adaptively smoothed image of
204: the X-ray data produced with the CIAO tool {\tt csmooth}. The
205: smoothed image has a minimum signal-to-noise ratio of 3 per smoothing
206: beam, and has been corrected for exposure and background. The X-ray
207: emission from Abell 13 shows complex structure in the core region. A
208: knot of X-ray emission is also clearly detected 86\arcsec\/ (150~kpc)
209: to the northwest of the cluster's X-ray peak, along with a more
210: diffuse extension of the emission in the same direction.
211:
212: \begin{figure*}
213: \centerline{\epsfig{file=f1a.eps,width=0.5\linewidth}\epsfig{file=f1b_low.eps,width=0.5\linewidth}}
214: \caption{{\em Left Panel:} Raw {\em Chandra} X-ray image (0.3--10~keV)
215: of the 5\arcmin $\times$ 4\arcmin\/ region of Abell 13 encompassing
216: the cluster center and radio relic positions. The image is
217: uncorrected for exposure or background. North is up, and east is
218: left. The image pixels are 0\farcs492. {\em Right Panel:} Adaptively
219: smoothed {\em Chandra} X-ray image of the same region, corrected for
220: background, exposure, and vignetting. Notice the structure in the
221: X-ray core as well as the knot of emission to the northwest of the
222: core. In addition, the X-ray emission is extended to the northwest
223: and west (towards the radio relic). The number of point sources is
224: consistent with that expected from background sources.}
225: \label{fig:x}
226: \end{figure*}
227:
228: We identify 11 point sources in our full band image (0.3--10.0~keV;
229: see Table~\ref{tab:srcprop}). This is consistent with the expected
230: number of background sources from the {\em Chandra} Deep Fields
231: \citep{bah+01,grt+01}. No point source was found at the center of the
232: X-ray emission. Since the cluster emission will reduce our point
233: source detection sensitivity, we also searched for point sources in
234: just the hard band (4.0--10.0~keV) data. In the hard X-ray band, the
235: diffuse emission from the cluster is weaker while the emission from
236: AGN is stronger than at softer bands. Therefore, any AGNs should be
237: more easily detected. We found no point sources within 0\farcm5 of
238: the cluster center, defined to be the position of galaxy H, the
239: brightest cluster galaxy.
240:
241:
242: In Figure~\ref{fig:op}, we show the optical Digital Sky Survey (DSS)
243: image\footnote{Available at http://archive.stsci.edu/dss/} of the
244: cluster with the X-ray contours overlaid. The X-ray contours are
245: based on the image in Figure~\ref{fig:x} {\em right panel}. We have
246: labeled the brightest galaxies following \citet{srm+01}. The X-ray
247: emission is centered near the bright elliptical H (also 2MASX
248: J00133853$-$1930007), the brightest cluster galaxy. The knot of
249: emission to the NW is coincident with the elliptical galaxy F (also
250: 2MASX J00133401$-$1929017), the second brightest cluster galaxy. The
251: steepness of the X-ray gradient to the north and east is an artifact
252: of the CCD edges.
253:
254: We are also interested in comparing the X-ray data with the radio
255: emission from Abell 13. Figure~\ref{fig:xr} shows the X-ray data in
256: red and the radio data in green. We find no enhancement of the X-ray
257: emission near the radio relic, which is different from what was seen
258: for Abell 133 \citep{fsk+02}. Given the low surface brightness of the
259: X-ray emission, it is difficult to determine if there is a deficit of
260: X-ray emission at the position of the radio relic, commonly referred
261: to as an X-ray cavity or radio bubble. The absolute astrometric
262: accuracy of the radio and X-ray maps is roughly 0\farcs5 for each.
263: The radio point source near the cluster center is not associated with
264: galaxy H. Instead, it seems coincident with a barely resolved pair of
265: galaxies in the DSS and Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) images,
266: listed in NED\footnote{Available at http://newwww.ipac.caltech.edu/}
267: as 2MASX~J00133712$-$1930067. No velocity information is available
268: for 2MASX~J00133712$-$1930067, making association with the cluster
269: uncertain.
270:
271: \begin{figure*}
272: \centerline{\epsfig{file=f2.eps,width=0.8\linewidth}}
273: \caption{X-ray brightness contours (0.3--10~keV band, logarithmically
274: spaced by a factor of $\sqrt{2}$) overlaid on the DSS optical image
275: scanned from a SERC-J survey plate taken in 1977 at the UK Schmidt
276: telescope, Australia. The bright galaxies H and F from \citet{srm+01}
277: are labeled. The X-ray emission is centered near galaxy H. A knot of
278: X-ray emission to the northwest of the cluster X-ray peak is
279: consistent with the position of galaxy F. The steepness of the X-ray
280: contours on the northern and eastern edges are artifacts of the CCD
281: edge.}
282: \label{fig:op}
283: \end{figure*}
284:
285:
286: \begin{figure*}
287: \centerline{\epsfig{file=f3_low.eps,width=0.8\linewidth}}
288: \caption{Radio image at 1.4~GHz \citep{srm+01} overlaid in green the
289: adaptively smoothed X-ray image of Abell 13 in red. North is up, and
290: east is left. The region covered is 5\farcm1 $\times$ 3\farcm8. The
291: radio image shows only emission detected at greater than 2.5$\sigma$
292: as determined by \citet{srm+01}. The three compact red spots are
293: X-ray point sources unrelated to the cluster.}
294: \label{fig:xr}
295: \end{figure*}
296:
297: To enhance the structures in the cluster core, we fitted the observed
298: cluster emission with a smooth elliptical isophotal model, using the
299: IRAF/STSDAS task {\tt ellipse}. We allowed the ellipticity, position
300: angle, and intensities of each isophote to vary while keeping the
301: centroids fixed to the position of galaxy H. The model was then
302: subtracted from the data after multiplication of the model counts by
303: 0.5 to avoid oversubtraction. In Figure~\ref{fig:comp}, we show the
304: subtracted image of the cluster in the region around the radio relic
305: with the radio contours overlaid. No excess emission is associated
306: with the radio relic. The cluster emission is faint near the radio
307: relic, and continues to weaken at projected cluster-centric distances
308: greater than that of the relic in the same direction.
309:
310: More interesting structure is seen in the cluster center.
311: Figure~\ref{fig:compcen} shows the same image as Figure~\ref{fig:comp}
312: with a different color scale to enhance the variations in the inner
313: region of the cluster. The knot of emission in the upper right is the
314: second-brightest elliptical galaxy, F. The bright yellow knot of
315: emission is coincident with galaxy H. There is a more diffuse bright
316: extension of emission to the west of galaxy H. In addition, there is
317: other structure in the cluster center perpendicular to the bright
318: extension. Interestingly, the emission extension to the west of
319: galaxy H seems to point in the same direction as one might expect the
320: radio relic to extend if it were projected back to galaxy H.
321:
322: \begin{figure*}
323: \centerline{\epsfig{file=f4_low.eps,width=0.8\linewidth}}
324: \caption{Residual X-ray emission from the cluster (color scale from
325: blue$=$weak to white$=$strong) after partial subtraction of a smooth
326: elliptical isophotal model for the entire cluster. The region shown
327: here encompasses the radio relic and has a size of 4\farcm6 $\times$
328: 2\farcm8. The color scale was chosen to emphasize the outer regions
329: of the cluster near the radio relic. Overlayed are the radio contours
330: as given in \citet{srm+01} with contour levels of 43, 86, 173, 303 and
331: 389 $\mu$Jy~beam$^{-1}$, which correspond to 2.5, 5, 10, 18 and 23
332: $\sigma$. The two brightest galaxies H and F are indicated by the Xs.
333: No excess or clearly associated deficit in X-ray emission is found
334: coincident with the radio relic. Along the eastern tail of the radio
335: emission there appears to be a sharp drop in the residual X-ray
336: emission. However, this drop is not very strong in the total X-ray
337: surface brightness. There is a strong gradient in the southern part
338: of the cluster, but at a larger radius and further south.}
339: \label{fig:comp}
340: \end{figure*}
341:
342: \begin{figure}
343: \centerline{\epsfig{file=f5_low.eps,width=\linewidth}}
344: \caption{Residual emission from center of Abell 13 after partial
345: subtraction of a smooth elliptical isophotal model. The figure spans
346: a region of 2\farcm4 $\times$ 2\farcm2. The color scale was chosen to
347: emphasize the inner region of the cluster near galaxy H. North is up
348: and east is left. The bright region marked with an X near the center
349: coincides with galaxy H. Notice the extension of emission to the west
350: (in the direction of the radio relic) and the excess emission
351: perpendicular to that direction. The X at the top right corner marks
352: the position of galaxy F. }
353: \label{fig:compcen}
354: \end{figure}
355:
356:
357: \subsection{X-ray Emission from Galaxy F}
358: Enhanced X-ray emission has been seen in the large elliptical galaxies
359: in the Coma cluster \citep{vmf+01}. We compared the enhanced emission
360: of galaxy F with the results from Coma. First, we determined the
361: radial profile of the enhancement to determine its size and the
362: appropriate source region for galaxy F. The emission was clearly more
363: extended than the {\em Chandra} point spread function. We found that
364: the enhancement measured $\approx$1\farcs5--2\arcsec\/ in radius, or
365: roughly 3 kpc at the distance of Abell 13. \citet{vmf+01} found that
366: the compact cores associated with the brightest galaxies in the Coma
367: cluster had a physical size of 3~kpc in radius.
368:
369: We attempted to extract a spectrum of the enhanced emission associated
370: with galaxy F from a circular region with radius of 2\arcsec. To
371: account for both the cosmic X-ray background and the cluster emission,
372: we used a local background extracted from an annulus centered on
373: galaxy F with radii of 3\arcsec\/ and 5\arcsec. There are only 31
374: counts in a 2\arcsec\/ region around galaxy F, and we expect 17.5 of
375: these to be background. This is too few counts for spectral fitting
376: or even to determine a useful color for the source. Even a basic
377: color comparison cannot yield any constraint on the temperature of the
378: galaxy gas.
379:
380: We used PIMMS to determine the flux from galaxy F. We measured a
381: 0.5--8.0~keV count rate of $2.1\times10^{-4}$ cts~s$^{-1}$ and assumed
382: a gas temperature of 1~keV for a Raymond-Smith plasma model. The
383: largest elliptical galaxies have X-ray gas temperatures of
384: $\approx$1~keV \citep[e.g.,][]{opc03}. From PIMMS we find a 0.5--2.0
385: keV unabsorbed flux of $8.2 \times 10^{-16}$~erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$,
386: or a luminosity of $2\times 10^{40}$ erg~s$^{-1}$. The galaxies in
387: Coma had similar, although slightly larger (7.6--9.1$\times10^{40}$
388: erg~s$^{-1}$) luminosities. We also calculated the mass of gas
389: necessary to produce the excess emission from galaxy F. To do this,
390: we first calculated the model normalization of a 1~keV {\tt APEC}
391: plasma model that would produce the flux measured from galaxy F. We
392: then calculated the average electron number density in the gas from
393: the model normalization and assuming a spherical gas distribution with
394: 2\arcsec\/ radius. Translating the electron number density into a gas
395: mass, we find that the required gas mass is $4.2 \times
396: 10^{7}$~M$_{\odot}$. This is comparable to the gas masses found in
397: the Coma galaxies and other galaxies in nearby clusters
398: \citep{vmf+01,sjf+07}.
399:
400: Given the similarity in size and luminosity, we may expect that the
401: cause of the X-ray enhancement in galaxy F is the same as that found
402: for the Coma galaxies \citep{vmf+01}. The gas in the Coma galaxies is
403: of low temperature (1--2~keV) and is likely the remains of the
404: galactic X-ray halos. \citet{vmf+01} suggest that the cool gas is in
405: pressure equilibrium with the hotter, intercluster medium.
406:
407:
408: \section{Spectral Analysis}
409: Spectra were extracted from the level 2 event file, excluding point
410: sources within the regions of interest. Background spectra were
411: extracted from the blank-sky background file. For each spectrum,
412: weighted response files (RMFs and ARFs) were generated using the CIAO
413: tools {\tt mkacisrmf} and {\tt mkwarf}, respectively. Finally,
414: spectra were grouped to obtain a minimum of 25 counts per bin.
415: Spectral fitting was primarily performed in XSPEC v11.0, except for
416: the temperature map spectral fits (see \S~\ref{sec:tmap} below).
417:
418:
419: \subsection{Total Spectrum}\label{sec:full}
420: We first determined the integrated spectrum of the cluster using an
421: elliptical region with semi-major and semi-minor axes of 2\farcm5 and
422: 1\farcm9, respectively, and position angle of 121$\arcdeg$ measured
423: from north to east (see Figure~\ref{fig:specshape}). This region was
424: the largest elliptical region whose shape agreed with the outer
425: cluster X-ray isophotes and fit entirely on the S3 CCD. We fit the
426: data with an absorbed plasma model, using the {\tt APEC} model in
427: XSPEC. We fixed the redshift of the cluster to the mean redshift of
428: Abell 13 found in the ENACS study \citep[$z=0.0943$;][]{mkd+96} and
429: the equivalent hydrogen column density to the average Galactic value
430: in the direction of Abell 13, $N_{\rm H} = 2.0 \times
431: 10^{20}$~cm$^{-2}$ \citep{dl90}. The best-fit model had a temperature
432: $kT = 6.0\pm0.3$ keV and a metal abundance of $0.46\pm0.12$ solar (see
433: Table~\ref{tab:spec} and Figure~\ref{fig:clusspec}).
434:
435:
436: We also performed a spectral study to determine if a cooling flow is
437: present in the center of Abell 13, i.e. the peak in the X-ray emission
438: which is also coincident with galaxy H. We extracted spectra in
439: circular annuli out to 100\arcsec\/ from the cluster center. Each
440: spectrum was required to have at least 1000 counts. The width of the
441: annuli ranged from 15\arcsec\/ in the cluster center to 5\arcsec\/ at
442: the periphery of the cluster. We fitted each spectrum with the same
443: {\tt APEC} model used to describe the total cluster emission, allowing
444: only the temperature and normalization to vary (the metallicity was
445: fixed at the best fit value found above). No statistically
446: significant variations in temperature were found. This result is
447: consistent with the temperature map determined in \S~\ref{sec:tmap}.
448:
449:
450: \subsection{Temperature Map}\label{sec:tmap}
451: In order to determine the spectral distribution in the cluster
452: emission, we created an adaptively binned temperature map of Abell 13,
453: shown in Figure~\ref{fig:tmap}. The temperature map was produced
454: using ISIS \citep{hd00}. A spectrum at each map pixel (1 map pixel
455: $=$ 16.3 ACIS pixels $=$ 8\farcs0) was extracted from the event data
456: (excluding point sources) in a square region centered on the pixel.
457: The region size was determined by requiring at least 800 net
458: (i.e. background subtracted) counts in the 0.4--7.0~keV energy range,
459: but with a maximum box size of 183$\times$183 ACIS pixels, or
460: 90\arcsec$\times$90\arcsec. The maximum box size was only reached in
461: the outskirts of the cluster. The total counts in each region were
462: between 1.5 and 2 times the 800 count minimum to account for
463: background subtraction. For each spectrum, a background spectrum was
464: extracted from the blank sky background event file in the same region.
465: RMF and ARF files were constructed for specific locations on the CCD,
466: with a spacing of 32 and 50 pixels, respectively. This was done to
467: account for variations in the response across the CCD, without having
468: to create individual RMF and ARF files for each region which would be
469: computationally demanding. For a given region, the RMF and ARF used
470: to fit the spectrum were chosen by selecting the response files with
471: positions closest to the count-weighted average position of the events
472: in each region. The spectra were grouped to have 25 counts per bin
473: and were fitted in ISIS using the {\tt APEC} thermal model. The
474: Galactic hydrogen column density, redshift, and abundance were fixed
475: to the values found for the full cluster spectrum (\S~\ref{sec:full}
476: above). Only the temperature and normalization of the {\tt APEC}
477: model were allowed to vary. In general, the errors on the temperature
478: map are about 20\% in the temperature. Although, for pixels with
479: higher best-fit temperatures or those near the edge of the map, the
480: errors are larger, in the range of 50--70\%. This is because of the
481: low high-energy sensitivity of {\em Chandra} and the lower statistics
482: of the outer regions.
483:
484: The temperature map shown in Figure~\ref{fig:tmap} is colored such
485: that the coolest regions ($kT \approx 4$~keV) are red, and the hottest
486: regions ($kT \approx 12$~keV) purple. The intensity contours for the
487: X-ray and radio emission from Abell 13 are overlaid. We note that
488: small differences in temperature from pixel to pixel are not
489: statistically meaningful given the errors in the fits (an average
490: error of 1.2~keV at 6.0~keV). Since the fitted region size is larger
491: than a single map pixel, there is overlap of the fitted regions.
492:
493: Of particular interest are the lack of very cool gas in the cluster
494: center and the presence of cool gas associated with the radio relic
495: region. The temperature map shows a large concentration of lower
496: temperature gas associated with the radio relic. Below (\S
497: \ref{sec:rad}) we perform a detailed spectral study of this gas to
498: better constrain its properties. There may also be some hotter gas
499: (purple/blue region) associated with the steep gradient in the X-ray
500: surface brightness contours on the southern edge of the cluster (see
501: e.g., the X-ray contours in Figure~\ref{fig:tmap}) but the temperature
502: errors are large in this region. To try and confirm this result, we
503: extracted spectra on the northern and southern sides of the X-ray
504: gradient. No significant difference in the best-fit temperatures was
505: found, although both regions had large errors. Higher count spectra
506: are required to verify the increased gas temperature along the
507: cluster's southern edge.
508:
509:
510: \subsection{X-ray Spectral Study of the Radio Relic Region}\label{sec:rad}
511: From the temperature map, we see that the X-ray emission associated
512: with the radio relic is colder than the average cluster temperature.
513: This immediately rules out a shock origin as we would expect the
514: emission to be hotter in that case. To determine the nature of this
515: cooler emission, we performed a more rigorous X-ray spectral study of
516: the radio relic region. We fit the spectra from a
517: 2\farcm0$\times$1\farcm4 (major/minor axis) elliptical region
518: surrounding the radio relic (Figure~\ref{fig:specshape}). This region
519: was chosen to encompass the outer portion of the radio relic that is
520: associated with the cooler gas in the temperature map. This region
521: has the advantage that it is a region of lower surface brightness for
522: the hot gas component. If we add in the radio relic region to the
523: east (the tail leading back to galaxy H), the spectrum has a much
524: larger hot gas component and is less sensitive to a cool gas
525: component.
526:
527:
528: \begin{figure}
529: \centerline{\epsfig{file=f6.eps,width=\linewidth}}
530: \caption{Raw {\em Chandra} X-ray image (0.3--10~keV) of Abell 13
531: encompassing the cluster center and radio relic positions. Overlaid
532: are the radio contours of \citet{srm+01}. The straight lines mark the
533: coverage of the VLA data compared to the {\em Chandra} data. The
534: large ellipse marks the region of the data used to determine the
535: spectral model of the full cluster emission (\S~\ref{sec:full}). The
536: smaller ellipse on the right marks the region of the data used to
537: measure the spectrum of the X-ray gas coincident with the radio relic
538: (\S~\ref{sec:rad}). The region covered is 6\farcm6 $\times$
539: 4\farcm7.}
540: \label{fig:specshape}
541: \end{figure}
542:
543:
544: \begin{deluxetable}{lc}
545: %\tablewidth{0pt}
546: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.2in}
547: \tablecaption{Best-Fit {\tt APEC} Model Parameters for
548: Cluster\tablenotemark{a}}
549: \tablehead{\colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{Value}}
550: \startdata
551: $N_{\rm H}$ (cm$^{-2}$) & $2.0\times 10^{20}$\tablenotemark{b} \\
552: $kT$ (keV) & 6.0$\pm$0.3 \\
553: Abundance (solar) & 0.46$\pm$0.12 \\
554: Norm & (2.98$\pm$0.08)$\times 10^{-3}$ \\
555: $\chi^2$/dof & 316.45/297 \\
556: \enddata
557: \tablenotetext{a}{All errors quoted at the 90\%-confidence level.}
558: \tablenotetext{b}{Column density fixed at Galactic value.}
559: \label{tab:spec}
560: \end{deluxetable}
561:
562: \begin{figure}
563: \centerline{\epsfig{file=f7.ps,width=\linewidth}}
564: \caption{{\em Upper panel:} Count spectrum of the X-ray emission from
565: Abell 13 and the best fit model. {\em Lower panel:} Ratio of the data
566: and best-fit model (data/model). The spectrum was extracted from a
567: 2\farcm5 $\times$ 1\farcm9 elliptical region encompassing the largest
568: elliptical isophote contained fully on the S3 CCD. The best-fit model
569: has a temperature $kT = 6.0 \pm 0.3$~keV and a metal abundance of
570: $0.46\pm0.12$ solar.}
571: \label{fig:clusspec}
572: \end{figure}
573:
574: \begin{figure*}
575: \centerline{\epsfig{file=f8_low.eps,width=0.8\linewidth}}
576: \caption{Temperature map of Abell 13. Red signifies regions of lower
577: temperature, purple higher temperature. Overlaid are the X-ray and
578: radio surface brightness contours. No cooling flow is detected. The
579: coolest gas is to the west of the peak in the X-ray emission, and
580: apparently associated with the radio relic.}
581: \label{fig:tmap}
582: \end{figure*}
583:
584:
585: \begin{figure}
586: \centerline{\psfig{file=f9.ps,width=\linewidth}}
587: \caption{Count spectra of the X-ray emission associated with the radio
588: relic, fit with different models. We have fit the spectrum with a
589: single temperature {\tt APEC} model ({\em top panel}), two {\tt APEC}
590: models ({\em middle panel}), and a powerlaw $+$ {\tt APEC} model ({\em
591: bottom panel}). Notice the soft excess at 0.8~keV in the single
592: temperature model ({\em top}) but not the other spectra. The peak at
593: $\sim$1.1~keV is too narrow to be astrophysical and is likely
594: strengthened by binning. At other binnings, it is not as
595: significant.}
596: \label{fig:rrspec}
597: \end{figure}
598:
599: The data were fit with different spectral models, including a single
600: temperature gas model, a two-temperature gas model, and a gas $+$
601: powerlaw emission model. The results are given in
602: Table~\ref{tab:rrspec}. In all fits we have frozen the metallicity of
603: the thermal components to that of the general cluster emission. If
604: allowed to vary, the metallicity is unconstrained. The single
605: temperature gas model, while a decent fit to the data, does not
606: reproduce the excess emission in the data near 0.8~keV (see
607: Figure~\ref{fig:rrspec}). The two-temperature gas model is the best
608: fit to the data. One of the components is consistent with the overall
609: cluster temperature, while the other component has a temperature of
610: $\approx$0.9~keV and accounts for the soft excess seen in the data.
611: The gas $+$ powerlaw model is a worse fit, with the powerlaw component
612: replacing the hotter gas component. The two-temperature gas model is
613: the most appropriate, as it would include both a lower temperature gas
614: associated with the relic as well as hotter cluster emission seen in
615: projection.
616:
617: \section{Discussion}\label{sec:disc}
618: We have presented the {\em Chandra} data of the galaxy cluster Abell
619: 13. The X-ray emission is centered on galaxy H of \citet{srm+01}, the
620: brightest cluster galaxy. The spatial structure near the core is
621: complicated, with a bright tail of excess emission to the west of
622: galaxy H, and a fainter excess to the north. No point source is
623: associated with galaxy H and no cooling flow is found. We also found
624: excess X-ray emission associated with the second-brightest elliptical
625: galaxy, F, in the cluster. The mass of gas associated with galaxy F
626: is consistent with other bright elliptical galaxies in cluster
627: environments \citep{vmf+01,sjf+07}. In general, there is an extension
628: of the X-ray emission to the northwest with respect to the X-ray peak
629: coincident with galaxy H. Finally, no excess or significant deficit
630: in emission is found coincident with the unusual radio relic in Abell
631: 13, although the spectral properties of the gas in this region are
632: different from those in other areas of the cluster. We found a soft
633: excess in the spectrum of gas coincident with the radio relic, which
634: can be well fit by a $\approx$0.9~keV thermal model, suggesting the
635: presence of cooler gas there.
636:
637: The redshift distribution of the galaxies in Abell 13 can be described
638: by a bimodal distribution \citep{fgg+96}. The subclumps are not
639: distinguishable in their location on the sky. Interestingly, the two
640: brightest galaxies, H and F, are associated with different peaks in
641: the redshift distribution and rather than being associated with the
642: peak velocity, either of the cluster as a whole or of either subclump,
643: the velocities of galaxies H and F are on the very edges of the
644: velocity distribution. Galaxy F is on the lower edge for the
645: low-velocity subcluster and galaxy H on the higher edge of the
646: high-velocity subcluster. This, combined with the complicated
647: structure of the X-ray emission, points to an ongoing merger within
648: the cluster and that galaxies H and F have a significant velocity
649: relative to the general cluster distribution. The spatial
650: distribution of the galaxies in Abell 13 shows a northwest-southeast
651: extension, paralleling the X-ray distribution, but extending to larger
652: scales.
653:
654: In the following discussion, we assume that the X-ray gas associated
655: with the radio relic has two components, a hot (6~keV) gas component
656: due to the general cluster emission, and a cooler (0.9~keV) gas
657: component local to the relic. This model is based on our best-fit
658: spectrum found in \S~\ref{sec:rad}. We assume that the two components
659: are in pressure equilibrium.
660:
661: From \citet{srm+01}, the minimum pressure of the radio relic in Abell
662: 13 is $1.4 \times 10^{-12}$ dyne cm$^{-2}$. Their estimate of the
663: thermal pressure of the hot X-ray gas was very rough and based solely
664: on scaling the properties of Abell 85 since no imaging observation of
665: Abell 13 was available. Our {\em Chandra} data allow for a more
666: accurate estimate of the thermal pressure at the location of the
667: relic. However, due to an unfortunate placement of the cluster on the
668: CCD, the only regions which extended out to a distance larger than the
669: relic were in the direction of the relic and to the south. Since the
670: southern edge of the cluster shows a steep gradient in the X-ray
671: emission, we did not consider this region in determining the surface
672: brightness distribution. Instead, we determined the surface
673: brightness of the cluster in a conical region extending from the
674: cluster center out to 4\farcm1 and encompassing position angles of
675: 240--312$\arcdeg$ measured from the north to the east. This region
676: includes the radio relic and associated cool gas which will affect our
677: results; however, while not a perfect measure of the properties of the
678: X-ray gas, it represents a significant improvement on the estimates of
679: \citet{srm+01}. A larger field of view observation would be better
680: suited to address the surface brightness and electron density
681: distributions of the full cluster emission.
682:
683:
684: \begin{deluxetable*}{lccccc}
685: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
686: \tablewidth{0pt}
687: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.1in}
688: \tablecaption{Best-Fit X-ray Spectral Model Parameters for Radio
689: Relic\tablenotemark{a}}
690: \tablehead{\colhead{Model} & \colhead{$kT_1$ (keV)} &
691: \colhead{Norm$_1$} & \colhead{$kT_2$ or $\Gamma$} &
692: \colhead{Norm$_2$} & \colhead{$\chi^2$/dof}}
693: \startdata
694: {\tt APEC} & 5.9$^{+1.9}_{-1.1}$ & (1.77$\pm$0.08)$\times 10^{-4}$ &
695: \nodata & \nodata & 89.4/69 \\
696: {\tt APEC} $+$ {\tt APEC} & 0.86$^{+0.16}_{-0.09}$ &
697: (1.5$\pm$0.8)$\times 10^{-5}$ &
698: 10$^{+12}_{-4}$ & (1.60$\pm$0.12)$\times 10^{-4}$ & 74.3/67 \\
699: {\tt APEC} $+$ PL & 0.89$^{+0.16}_{-0.09}$ & (1.8$\pm$0.8)$\times 10^{-5}$ &
700: 1.40$\pm$0.08 & (3.2$\pm$0.3)$\times 10^{-5}$ & 81.4/67 \\
701: \enddata
702: \tablenotetext{a}{All errors quoted at the 90\%-confidence level. All
703: models were fit including Galactic absorption of $2.0\times
704: 10^{20}$~cm$^{-2}$. Abundances for gas emission models were fixed to
705: the best-fit value from the cluster spectrum, 0.46 of solar. The
706: model parameters Norm$_1$ and Norm$_2$ are the values of the first and
707: second model component normalizations. $kT_2$ or $\Gamma$ is the value
708: of the second model component temperature if {\tt APEC} or photon index
709: if powerlaw.}
710: \label{tab:rrspec}
711: \end{deluxetable*}
712:
713:
714: Using the surface brightness distribution, we estimate the electron
715: density distribution of the hot component following the spherical
716: deprojection method of \citet{kcc83}. We assumed a single temperature
717: of the hot gas of 6.0~keV and used the {\tt APEC} thermal model to
718: convert from counts to electron density. From this, we find an
719: electron density at the relic of $1\times10^{-3}$~cm$^{-3}$. Given
720: this and the average cluster temperature (6.0~keV) determined in
721: \S~\ref{sec:full}, we find that the thermal pressure of the
722: surrounding hot gas at the location of the radio relic is $1.6 \times
723: 10^{-11}$ dyne cm$^{-2}$. This value is larger than the estimate for
724: the pressure of the radio plasma, as has been seen in other X-ray
725: cluster radio bubbles \citep{dft05}. We note that if the relic were
726: at a larger radius than the projected radius, the electron density and
727: thermal pressure would be lower, bringing it closer to the radio
728: plasma pressure estimate. In addition, in the case of Abell 13, if
729: the values assumed by \citet{srm+01} for (1) the ratio of masses in
730: heavy particles and electrons; (2) the plasma filling factor; (3) the
731: low frequency spectral index, and (4) the angle between the line of
732: sight and field direction are given more realistic values then we may
733: increase the radio plasma pressure to that of the confining X-ray gas.
734:
735:
736: \subsection{Origin of the Radio Relic}
737: It is unlikely that the radio relic in Abell 13 is a peripheral
738: cluster relic associated with a cluster merger shock. First, there is
739: no evidence in the {\em Chandra} image or spectra for any shock
740: feature near the relic. Second, the radio image shows a long filament
741: which extends almost all the way back to the brightest elliptical
742: galaxy H (Figure~\ref{fig:xr}). Thus, we assume that the radio
743: emitting plasma originated in an AGN at the center of galaxy H. Based
744: on the classification system of \citet{kbc+04}, which looks at the
745: physical properties and proposed origins of extended cluster radio
746: sources, we would classify Abell 13 as an AGN relic system.
747:
748: We propose two explanations for the multi-wavelength properties of
749: Abell 13. The first is the buoyant bubble scenario suggested by
750: \citet{fsk+02} for Abell 133. The radio source may have uplifted the
751: cool gas from the core of Abell 13. In this scenario, galaxy H would
752: have been an active radio emitter in the past. At some later time,
753: the radio plasma would have risen by buoyancy, and entrained the cool
754: gas in the center, uplifting it to a larger distance from the cluster
755: center. This might also remove the source of fuel for the central
756: AGN. This would explain the lack of cool gas in the cluster center
757: and the fact that currently, galaxy H is neither a radio
758: \citep[$<0.1$~mJy at 1.4~GHz;][]{srm+01} nor a hard X-ray source. To
759: estimate the time scale for the cool gas and radio source to rise by
760: buoyancy from the position of galaxy H, we assume that the cool gas
761: and radio source move at a velocity roughly 1/3 the sound speed,
762: $c_s$, of the hot gas component. For a 6.0~keV gas, $c_s$ is
763: 980~km~s$^{-1}$. The projected separation between the relic and
764: galaxy H is 2\farcm2--3\farcm1. This yields a buoyancy time scale of
765: 7--$10 \times 10^{8}$~yr, roughly consistent with the relic age
766: determined through spectral fitting \citep{srm+01}. To estimate the
767: mass of cool gas uplifted, we take the volume to be that of a prolate
768: spheroid with major and minor axes equal to that of the region used to
769: extract the spectrum of the radio relic. From the two-temperature
770: spectral model, we find that the enclosed mass of cool gas is $\sim 2
771: \times 10^{10}$~M$_{\odot}$. This is a factor of 10 greater than the
772: mass of gas contained in the tongue of X-ray gas found in Abell 133
773: \citep{fsk+02}. However, we note that the electron density for the
774: cool gas is $\sim 5 \times 10^{-4}$~cm$^{-3}$, lower than the hotter
775: cluster gas (particularly the gas towards the center of the cluster)
776: making buoyant uplift a possibility. A cool gas mass of $\sim 2
777: \times 10^{10}$~M$_{\odot}$ implies that previously Abell 13 would
778: have had a mass deposition rate of $\sim 2$~M$_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$
779: assuming a cooling time of $10^{10}$~yr. This is on the low end of
780: the distribution of known cooling flow mass deposition rates
781: \citep[see e.g.,][]{wjf97}. This is only an estimate of the mass of
782: cool gas to determine if the value is realistic. The temperature map
783: shows additional cool regions to the north and east of the radio relic
784: which if taken into account would increase the mass of cool gas.
785: However, the radio relic is filamentary in structure and it is
786: possible that the cool gas also resides in filaments rather than a
787: single big blob, which would decrease the gas mass estimate. Since it
788: is difficult to determine the extent of either of these situations, we
789: merely suggest that the estimated amount of cool gas in Abell 13 seems
790: reasonable for a galaxy cluster.
791:
792: The lower temperature of the gas near the radio source might be due
793: both to the lower entropy of the gas in the cool core of the cluster,
794: plus the effects of adiabatic expansion as this gas was moved out to a
795: lower-pressure region. From our above estimate of the electron
796: density distribution of the cluster gas, we find that the electron
797: density at the cluster center is $\approx$6 times that at the radio
798: relic. The pressure difference between the two locations should also
799: be 6 times assuming a constant hot gas temperature. We assume that
800: the cool gas component is always in pressure equilibrium with the hot
801: gas component that dominates the cluster emission. As a result of
802: adiabatic expansion, the temperature of the cool gas in its current
803: location, $T_{2}$ is related to its initial temperature, $T_{1}$, by
804: \begin{equation}
805: T_2 = T_1 \left( \frac{P_2}{P_1} \right)^{(\gamma - 1)/\gamma}
806: = T_1 \left( \frac{P_2}{P_1} \right)^{2/5}
807: \, ,
808: \end{equation}
809: where $P_1$ is the pressure in the cluster core and $P_2$ is the
810: pressure at the location of the radio relic, and the adiabatic index
811: is $\gamma = 5/3$. Observationally, we found $P_1/P_2 \approx 6$,
812: giving $T_2 \approx 0.5 \, T_1$ for adiabatic expansion. This
813: difference alone cannot account for the cooling of the gas from the
814: average cluster temperature of $\approx$6~keV to its current
815: temperature of $\approx0.9$~keV. Therefore, the cool gas associated
816: with the radio relic must have been cooler than the average cluster
817: temperature to begin with. We can estimate the initial cool gas
818: temperature assuming that adiabatic expansion was the only heating or
819: cooling mechanism as the cool gas was uplifted. This requires that
820: the initial temperature of the cool gas was about $T_1 \approx 2$~keV
821: when this gas was located at the cluster core. This is a reasonable
822: temperature for a cooling core. If the relic were at a larger radius
823: than the projected radius, then we would expect the electron density
824: to be lower and therefore the adiabatic cooling to be stronger. This
825: would make the initial temperature of the cool gas higher, possibly
826: more in line with the average cluster temperature.
827:
828: Our second proposed explanation is that a dynamical event is the
829: origin of the unusual radio relic and disturbed X-ray morphology.
830: Both the X-ray and optical properties (radial velocity distribution)
831: suggest that Abell 13 is undergoing a merger event. The X-ray
832: extension from galaxy H (to the west) points back to the radio relic.
833: This may imply that galaxy H is moving to the east and that the radio
834: relic is at the former position of the galaxy. (We note that the
835: extension may also favor the buoyant uplift scenario.) We propose
836: that before the merger event, galaxy H had a cool core and showed AGN
837: activity. As the merger progressed, the cold core and radio lobes
838: were displaced (or stripped) from the galaxy as a result of ram
839: pressure from the gas in the other subcluster, which did not affect
840: the stars and dark matter in galaxy H. \citet{srm+01} found that the
841: travel time from galaxy H was comparable to the estimated relic age.
842: The long filament of radio emission leading back almost to galaxy H
843: (Figure~\ref{fig:xr}) suggests that the AGN remained active during the
844: initial phases of this stripping process. The concentration of X-ray
845: emission around galaxy H (Figure~\ref{fig:compcen}) suggests that the
846: stripping process is not complete; there is still gas around galaxy H,
847: but it is relatively hot, perhaps due to heating processes associated
848: with the merger. The {\em Chandra} data do not conclusively determine
849: which of these two models is correct, or strongly reject either.
850:
851:
852: \acknowledgements{We would like to thank Gregory Sivakoff and Marios
853: Chatzikos for useful discussions. We would also like to thank the
854: anonymous referee whose comments helped to improve the paper. Support
855: for this work was provided by the National Aeronautics and Space
856: Administration primarily through {\it Chandra} award GO4-5133X, but
857: also through GO4-5137X and GO5-6126X, issued by the Chandra X-ray
858: Observatory, which is operated by the Smithsonian Astrophysical
859: Observatory for and on behalf of NASA under contract NAS8-39073. Some
860: support also came from NASA XMM-Newton award NNG04GO34G. Basic
861: research in radio astronomy at NRL is supported by 6.1 Base funding.
862: HA acknowledges support from CONACyT grant 40094-F. Y.~F.\ is
863: supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education,
864: Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (17740162).
865: L.~R. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation under
866: grants AST-0307600 and AST-0607674 to the University of Minnesota.}
867:
868:
869: \begin{thebibliography}{17}
870: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
871:
872: \bibitem[{{B\"{o}hringer} {et~al.}(1993)}]{bvf+93}
873: {B\"{o}hringer}, H., {Voges}, W., {Fabian}, A.~C., {Edge}, A.~C., \&
874: {Neumann}, D.~M. 1993, \mnras, 264, L25
875:
876: \bibitem[{{Brandt} {et~al.}(2001)}]{bah+01}
877: {Brandt}, W.~N., et al. 2001, \aj, 122, 2810
878:
879: \bibitem[{{Dickey} \& {Lockman}(1990)}]{dl90}
880: {Dickey}, J.~M., \& {Lockman}, F.~J. 1990, \araa, 28, 215
881:
882: \bibitem[Dunn et al.(2005)]{dft05}
883: Dunn, R. J. H., Fabian, A. C. \& Taylor, G. B. 2005, MNRAS, 364, 1343
884:
885: \bibitem[{{Fabian} {et~al.}(2000)}]{fse+00}
886: {Fabian}, A.~C., et al. 2000, \mnras, 318, L65
887:
888: \bibitem[{{Fadda} {et~al.}(1996)}]{fgg+96}
889: {Fadda}, D., {Girardi}, M., {Giuricin}, G., {Mardirossian}, F., \& {Mezzetti},
890: M. 1996, \apj, 473, 670
891:
892: \bibitem[{{Fujita} {et~al.}(2002)}]{fsk+02}
893: {Fujita}, Y., {Sarazin}, C.~L., {Kempner}, J.~C., {Rudnick}, L., {Slee}, O.~B.,
894: {Roy}, A.~L., {Andernach}, H., \& {Ehle}, M. 2002, \apj, 575, 764
895:
896: \bibitem[{{Fujita} {et~al.}(2004)}]{fsr+04}
897: {Fujita}, Y., {Sarazin}, C.~L., {Reiprich}, T.~H., {Andernach}, H., {Ehle}, M.,
898: {Murgia}, M., {Rudnick}, L., \& {Slee}, O.~B. 2004, \apj, 616, 157
899:
900: \bibitem[{{Garmire} {et~al.}(2003)}]{gbf+03}
901: {Garmire}, G.~P., {Bautz}, M.~W., {Ford}, P.~G., {Nousek}, J.~A., \& {Ricker},
902: G.~R. 2003, Proc.\ SPIE, 4851, 28
903: %in X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Telescopes and Instruments for Astronomy.
904: %Edited by Joachim E. Truemper, Harvey D. Tananbaum. Proceedings of the
905: %SPIE, Volume 4851, 28
906:
907: \bibitem[{{Giacconi} {et~al.}(2001)}]{grt+01}
908: {Giacconi}, R., et al. 2001, \apj, 551, 624
909:
910: \bibitem[{{Giovannini} \& {Feretti}(2004)}]{gf04}
911: {Giovannini}, G., \& {Feretti}, L. 2004, J. Korean Astron. Soc., 37, 323
912:
913: \bibitem[{{Giovannini} {et~al.}(1991){Giovannini}, {Feretti}, \&
914: {Stanghellini}}]{gfs91}
915: {Giovannini}, G., {Feretti}, L., \& {Stanghellini}, C. 1991, \aap, 252, 528
916:
917: \bibitem[{{Houck} \& {Denicola}(2000)}]{hd00}
918: {Houck}, J.~C., \& {Denicola}, L.~A. 2000, in ASP Conf. Ser. 216:
919: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IX, ed. N.~Manset,
920: C.~Veillet, \& D.~Crabtree (San Francisco: ASP), 591
921:
922: \bibitem[{{Kempner} {et~al.}(2004)}]{kbc+04}
923: {Kempner}, J.~C., {Blanton}, E.~L., {Clarke}, T.~E., {En{\ss}lin}, T.~A.,
924: {Johnston-Hollitt}, M., \& {Rudnick}, L. 2004, in The Riddle of Cooling Flows
925: in Galaxies and Clusters of galaxies, ed. T.~{Reiprich}, J.~{Kempner}, \&
926: N.~{Soker} (Charlottesville: Univ.\ Virginia), 335
927:
928: \bibitem[{{Kriss} {et~al.}(1983){Kriss}, {Cioffi}, \& {Canizares}}]{kcc83}
929: {Kriss}, G.~A., {Cioffi}, D.~F., \& {Canizares}, C.~R. 1983, \apj, 272, 439
930:
931: \bibitem[{{Mazure} {et~al.}(1996)}]{mkd+96}
932: {Mazure}, A., et al. 1996, \aap, 310, 31
933:
934: \bibitem[{{O'Sullivan} {et~al.}(2003){O'Sullivan}, {Ponman}, \&
935: {Collins}}]{opc03}
936: {O'Sullivan}, E., {Ponman}, T.~J., \& {Collins}, R.~S. 2003, \mnras, 340, 1375
937:
938: \bibitem[{{Quintana} \& {Ram\'{\i}rez}(1995)}]{qr95}
939: {Quintana}, H., \& {Ram\'{\i}rez}, A. 1995, \apjs, 96, 343
940:
941: \bibitem[{{R\"{o}ttgering} {et~al.}(1997)}]{rwh+97}
942: {R\"{o}ttgering}, H.~J.~A., {Wieringa}, M.~H., {Hunstead}, R.~W., \& {Ekers},
943: R.~D. 1997, \mnras, 290, 577
944:
945: \bibitem[{{Slee} {et~al.}(2001)}]{srm+01}
946: {Slee}, O.~B., {Roy}, A.~L., {Murgia}, M., {Andernach}, H., \& {Ehle}, M. 2001,
947: \aj, 122, 1172
948:
949: \bibitem[{Sun {et~al.}(2007)}]{sjf+07}
950: Sun, M., Jones, C., Forman, W., Vikhlinin, A., Donahue, M., \& Voit, M. 2007,
951: \apj, 657, 197
952:
953: \bibitem[{{Vikhlinin} {et~al.}(2001)}]{vmf+01}
954: {Vikhlinin}, A., {Markevitch}, M., {Forman}, W., \& {Jones}, C. 2001, \apjl,
955: 555, L87
956:
957: \bibitem[{{White} {et~al.}(1997){White}, {Jones}, \& {Forman}}]{wjf97}
958: {White}, D.~A., {Jones}, C., \& {Forman}, W. 1997, \mnras, 292, 419
959:
960: \end{thebibliography}
961:
962:
963:
964:
965: \end{document}
966: