1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\lefthead{Schild, Leiter, \& Robertson}
3: %\righthead {Q2237 MECO Model}
4: \begin{document}
5: \title {DIRECT MICROLENSING-REVERBERATION OBSERVATIONS OF THE INTRINSIC
6: MAGNETIC STRUCTURE OF AGN IN DIFFERENT SPECTRAL STATES - A
7: TALE OF TWO QUASARS}
8: %
9: \author{ Rudolph E. Schild\footnote{Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden
10: Street,
11: Cambridge, MA 02138} , Darryl J. Leiter\footnote{Marwood Astrophysical
12: Research Center, Charlottesville, VA 22963} , and Stanley L.
13: Robertson\footnote{
14: Dept. of Physics, Southwestern Oklahoma State University,
15: Weatherford, OK 73096}}
16:
17: \begin{abstract}
18: %
19: We show how direct microlensing-reverberation analysis performed on two
20: well-known Quasars (Q2237 - The Einstein Cross and Q0957 - The Twin) can
21: be used to observe the inner structure of two quasars which are in
22: significantly different spectral states. These observations allow us to
23: measure the detailed internal structure of quasar Q2237 in a radio quiet
24: high-soft state, and compare it to quasar Q0957 in a radio loud low-hard
25: state. We find that the observed differences in the spectral states of
26: these
27: two quasars can be understood as being due to the location of the inner
28: radii of their accretion disks relative to the co-rotation radii of
29: rotating
30: intrinsically magnetic supermassive compact objects in the centers of
31: these quasars.
32:
33: \end{abstract}
34: %
35: \keywords{Galaxies: Quasars: structure: individual: Q2237+0305 ---
36: accretion discs: magnetic fields --- black hole physics --- gravitational
37: lensing: microlensing}
38: %
39: \section{Introduction}
40: %
41: An important fundamental issue confronting the study of AGN and Galactic
42: Black Hole Candidates (GBHC) is the fact that these objects are observed
43: to exist in different spectral states. The phenomenon of spectral state
44: switching was first discovered in neutron star X-ray binaries where it was
45: explained in terms of magnetic propeller effects associated with the
46: interaction of the intrinsic magnetic moment of the of the neutron star
47: with its accretion disk (Ilarianov \& Sunyaev, 1975)
48: Spectral state switching was later observed in GBHC where it was found
49: (Robertson and Leiter, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005) that it could be explained
50: in terms of magnetic propeller effects
51: associated with the interaction of the intrinsic magnetic moment of the
52: GBHC, generated by the central highly red shifted "Magnetospheric Eternally
53: Collapsing Object" (MECO) within it, with the GBHC accretion disk. In these
54: papers it was shown that a unified explanation of spectral properties of
55: GBHC in Radio Loud Low Hard States and Radio Quiet High Soft States can be
56: given as being dynamically generated
57: by the relative location of the inner
58: magnetospheric radii of their accretion disks, with respect to the
59: co-rotation radius associated with the intrinsically magnetic MECO
60: at their centers. A qualitative description of this switching has also been
61: given by Bellon1 (2007).
62:
63: Recent observations, associated with the effects of intrinsic magnetic
64: propeller interactions generated by MECO in quasars, have been discussed by
65: Schild, Leiter, and Robertson, 2006, hereafter referred to as SLR06, in
66: which intensive gravitational microlensing observations of quasar Q0957
67: were described which permitted a reconstruction of this quasars inner
68: radiation emitting structures. Surprisingly these observations did not
69: reveal the expected accretion disk extending in close to the central
70: object.
71: Instead the inner accretion disk was observed to be truncated at a very
72: large inner radius. The hot inner edge of the truncated accretion disc
73: appears to be dominated by a very thin plasma annulus, whose thermal
74: radiation is responsible for the ``small blue bump'' of the quasar spectral
75: energy distribution. In addition, large conical outflow
76: structures were observed about ten times further out from the disk's
77: inner radius.
78:
79: The overall morphology of these dynamic structures was found to be similar
80: to features revealed in simulated accretion flows onto a compact Young
81: Stellar
82: Object which contains a central rotating magnetic dipole object inside of
83: the accretion disk. Since black holes do not contain observable intrinsic
84: dipole fields, such dynamic structures cannot be generated by black
85: hole-accretion disk models. Hence the conclusion was that we were observing
86: the physical effects of an intrinsic magnetic propeller interaction of a
87: central compact magnetic object in Q0957, and that instead of a black hole
88: the super-massive compact object in this quasar was a MECO. (For a review
89: of the observational and theoretical arguments involved in reaching this
90: conclusion about quasar Q0957 see Appendix I).
91:
92: Current observations of galactic black hole candidates (GBHC) and
93: active galactic nuclei (AGN) have begun to suggest that the existence of
94: different spectral states, associated with the presence or absence of
95: intrinsic magnetic propeller effects, may play an important role in
96: explaining the broad range in observed AGN properties (radio and hard
97: X-ray
98: emission, UV optical brightness). In this context we will show in this
99: paper
100: how the application of combined direct microlensing-reverberation
101: analysis on two well known multiple image based quasars (Q2237 - The
102: Einstein Cross and Q0957 -The Twin) can be used to determine the detailed
103: inner structure of two quasars which are in significantly different
104: spectral states.
105:
106: Sections 1-3 of this paper will show how this combined observational
107: technique allows us to measure the internal structure of quasar Q2237 in a
108: radio quiet high-soft state, and compare it to the internal structure
109: which has been observed in quasar Q0957 in a radio loud
110: low-hard state (SLR06).
111: In sections 4 and 5 we then proceed to analyze the data associated with
112: these observed internal quasar structures of these two quasars in the
113: context of mass scaled versions of recently developed theoretical models
114: (Robertson and Leiter 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005) of
115: Galactic Black Hole Candidates
116: (GBHC) that have the ability to describe spectral state switching between
117: a "Radio Loud Low-Hard State" (low level of soft X-ray emission and strong
118: hard X-ray emission plus strong radio emission) and a "Radio Quiet
119: High-Soft
120: State" (high level of soft X-ray emission but low level of hard X-ray
121: emission, with only a weak level radio emission). In this manner we show
122: how direct microlensing-reverberation analysis allows us to obtain a deeper
123: insight into the fundamental physics which underlies the
124: observational fact that quasars, AGN, and GBHC are observed to be able to
125: occupy a common set of different spectral states. These spectral states,
126: which have properties that scale with the mass of the central compact
127: object, can be classified by observable characteristics such as: strong or
128: weak radio emission, hard or soft X-ray fluxes, and the presence or
129: absence of broad relativistic $Fe-K_(\alpha)$ lines.
130:
131: For GBHC at low red shift the internal structures responsible for the
132: different spectral states are too small to be resolved at the wavelengths
133: available with current technology. On the other hand for quasars, which are
134: observed at cosmological distances, it has been found that a combination of
135: direct reverberation, microlensing, and nano-lensing techniques are able to
136: resolve the internal quasar structures associated with their spectral states
137: (SLR06).
138:
139: While individual GBHC objects are observed to switch between the spectral
140: states on time scales of minutes, for AGN and quasars the time scale for
141: the
142: spectral switching process is expected to be the order of years; hence the
143: individually observed AGN will appear to be "frozen" in one state or the
144: other.
145:
146: Reverberation analysis has proved to be an important technique for the
147: study
148: of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) because it can define the characteristics of
149: the complex internal structures in the highly relativistic inner regions
150: which are still too compact to be resolved by direct imaging. The original
151: application by Peterson et al (1991, 1993) showed that a lag between
152: brightness changes of the continuum and emission line regions can be
153: interpreted to indicate the length scale between the regions.
154: Reverberation
155: of the UV-optical continuum light with itself was also discovered, and
156: shown
157: in Q0957 to indicate the existence of internal structure on time scales of
158: 50 days (Schild \& Thomson 1997; S05). In addition,
159: reverberation of the $2{\micron}$ emission against
160: the continuum in NGC 5548 showed that the near-IR emission comes from a
161: region just beyond the broad line region (Suganuma et al, 2004; see similar
162: result for NGC4151 in Swain et al, 2003; Minezaki et al 2004).
163:
164: The reverberation analysis in Q0957 seems particularly interesting because
165: it shows the existence of several non-standard forms of internal
166: structures
167: at lags that seem consistent with emission from the Elvis structures that
168: give rise to the broad emission lines (SLR06).
169: The existence of the pattern stream was inferred from auto-correlation
170: analysis
171: applied to the long brightness record accumulated by Schild and colleagues
172: (Schild \& Thomson, 1995) for the gravitationally lensed multiple image
173: Q0957+561 A,B quasar. A
174: combination of auto-correlation analysis and reverberation methods was
175: required in the analysis of Q0957 since its pattern of intrinsic
176: brightness
177: fluctuations was quite complex, with several pattern streams overlapping
178: to an extent that prevented single patterns from being easily recognized.
179:
180: Fortunately the growing brightness record accumulated from photometric
181: monitoring of the Einstein Cross 4-image gravitational lens Q2237+0305 has
182: shown an unambiguous pattern of brightness peaks that confirm the
183: inferences
184: previously made for Q0957, and allows the relative brightness of the peaks
185: to be estimated. This allowed us to clarify the relationship of the peaks
186: to the internal quasar structures, and also provides unique information on
187: the
188: orientation of the quasar in space with respect to the plane of the sky. In
189: the following section, we will show that in the Q2237+0305 quasar lens, an
190: initial outburst in the central region is followed by reverberations
191: interpreted as fluorescent repeats of the central disturbance, since within
192: reasonable limits they
193: have the same amplitude and time scales. From
194: these we will estimate the size, spacing, and orientation of the
195: UV-optically luminous structures in the Q2237 quasar. We will then show
196: that our size estimates are consistent with direct microlensing estimates of
197: quasar size. In particular our reverberation size scale estimates will be
198: shown to be consistent with the Vakulik et al (2007) estimates of the
199: brightness and size scales of the Q2237 inner UV-optical structure.
200:
201: \section{Determination of Quasar Intrinsic Brightness Peak Lags}
202:
203: Our approach to the determination of the Q2237 structure parameters follows
204: closely the procedure outlined for the Q0957 quasar (S05; SLR06).
205: The procedure is a variant of the
206: reverberation analysis first applied by Peterson et al (1991,1993) to NGC
207: 5548; however their observations and analysis were of the reverberation
208: between the optical continuum and the emission lines. In our implementation
209: for Q0957, reverberation of the continuum emission by itself was discovered
210: by Schild and Thomson (1997), wherein
211: it was noticed that multiple peaks are found in the autocorrelation
212: estimates of the long Q0957 brightness record compiled by Schild and
213: Thomson (1995).
214: The actual succession of peaks evidencing the reverberations have
215: not been identified in the Schild et al brightness data records, because of
216: irregular data sampling, and because many overlapping patterns are seen
217: throughout the Q0957 brightness record. However in Q2237, where 4 quasar
218: images and the central galaxy are clearly seen in the well-known Einstein
219: Cross pattern, identical brightness peaks are clearly evident, and these
220: have been exploited by Vakulik et al (2006) to determine the very short
221: (approximately 1 day) time delay lags of the overall strong gravitational
222: lensing configuration. The excellent photometric data and their
223: plot can be seen at (http://www.astrouw.edu.pl/~ogle/ogle3/huchra.html)
224: (Wozniak et al. (2000).
225: In their colored plot of the image brightness, the first brightening pulse
226: must have occurred at approximately HJD-2450000 = 2550, although the
227: actual
228: mid-point and profile of the initial event are obscured because of poor
229: sampling at the time. The event is signaled by a brightness increase of
230: 0.3 magnitudes for a duration of approximately 150 days. This was
231: especially well seen in the data for image A (green data points).
232: The A image is apparently undergoing a sustained period of low amplitude
233: microlensing whose peak was previously seen in the OGLE I data set
234: (http://bulge.princeton.edu/~ogle/ogle2/huchra.html)(Wozniak et al 2000).
235: Although the peak is defined by brightness measured near the beginning and
236: end only in the OGLE III data set, additional data from Koptelova et al
237: (2004) show that the brightness was constant during that observing season
238: for all four quasar images.
239:
240: The new quasar intrinsic brightening event can probably also be
241: recognized in the B, C, and D images, which causes us to conclude that it
242: is an intrinsic quasar brightening event, not a microlensing artifact.
243: The first peak was followed 415 days later by another peak of comparable
244: brightness at 2965 days, again particularly well seen in the A image green
245: brightness record. This nearly simultaneous rise in all four images was
246: the
247: observational basis for the determination of the time delays of the four
248: images by Vakulik et al, 2006. These authors analyzed the V-band OGLE III
249: data but also their own R-band data, which had somewhat lower brightness
250: peak amplitudes. The lags determined were approximately one day, as
251: expected. The brightness amplitude, about 0.3 magnitudes, and event
252: duration, approximately 100 days, were all comparable to, but slightly
253: lower than, the initial peak. A third peak can barely be recognized at
254: approximately HJD - 2450000 = 3300, but at only half the amplitude of the
255: first two peaks. Nevertheless the duration of the event is the same as for
256: the first two peaks, although the third peak cannot be recognized at all in
257: image B because a microlensing event has evidently distorted the brightness
258: curve. A fourth and somewhat brighter peak can probably be recognized at
259: HJD - 2450000 = 3700 days, but microlensing of both the A and B images
260: combine with poor sampling because of seasonal observing effects, to
261: observe this feature. In Q2237, a fifth and final pulse might be
262: recognizable, but it appears to be too weak to distinguish it from the
263: noise associated with microlensing confusion and seasonal data effects.
264: It is evidently weak,
265: as was also inferred for the final autocorrelation peak at 620 days in
266: Q0957 (S05).
267:
268: We do not consider that the case for the existence of the 2 last peaks is
269: compelling, and we agree that the poor sampling of the light curve at the
270: time of the first peak adds significant uncertainty to the calculation of
271: inclination effects, which will be discussed later in this section.
272: Nevertheless, the fact that these data sets
273: produce a reasonable calculation of the Q2237 strong lensing time lags
274: (Vakulik et al, 2005) inspires confidence that important intrinsic quasar
275: brightening effects have been observed, and even if the quasar fully
276: cooperates, it will be at least 5 years before a comparable event can be
277: fully observed. For this reason application of the calculational procedure,
278: previously used for Q0957 (S05) to these data and the interpretation for
279: the Einstein Cross, Q2237, is fully justified.
280: The observed data appears to present evidence for the existence of a
281: complex
282: interior quasar structure associated with complex physical structures seen
283: in reverberation and having time scales of 3 years as measured by the
284: observer's clock. Correcting this time scale by (1+z) = 2.69 and
285: converting
286: to size scale at light propagation speed gives reverberation quasar
287: structure scale of approximately 1 light year or $10^{18}$cm. In the
288: following
289: paragraphs we will show that a full analysis of this data, including
290: allowance for inclination effects, gives a measurement of the distance
291: from the central object to the Elvis structure whose value is determined
292: to be $8.4 \times 10^{17}cm$.
293:
294: We demonstrate next that if we adopt the series of brightness peaks as
295: continuum reverberations from the various internal quasar structures
296: as was done previously for Q0957 (S05 and SLR06),
297: we can calculate a self-consistent quasar picture that
298: determines the locations and sizes of the quasar structures, and also
299: determines the inclination of the quasar to the line of sight. To do this
300: we adopt the series of 4 equations from S05 for three unknown
301: parameters which imply an over-constrained problem. However because of the
302: large uncertainties in the adopted lags, we do not propose an elaborate
303: statistical analysis for the uncertainty of the derived parameters. The
304: adopted physical quasar model includes an Elvis (2000) outflow structure
305: which is luminous in the UV-optical continuum, and which effectively
306: produces a luminous ring above the accretion disc plane, and a second ring
307: below. The geometry of this structure is shown graphically in the two Q0957
308: references cited above and in Fig 1 of this paper. In the context of
309: this analysis the outer structure produces most of the quasar's UV-optical
310: luminosity. Referring back to the quasar brightness history published by the
311: OGLE III research group, we see that the event marking time zero, which is
312: probably an energy deposition in the quasar's corona- like central region
313: or perhaps at the inner edge of the accretion disc, produces a 30\% brightness
314: increase. This is followed by reverberation off the 4 surfaces of 25\%,
315: 10\%, 10\%, and 5\%, so in a sense 80\% of the quasar's UV-optical
316: luminosity is
317: apparently contributed by these quasar structures. These numbers for the
318: brightness peaks in the first and subsequent reverberations are nicely
319: confirmed by the Vakulik et al (2007) simulation of the observed
320: microlensing events seen in the OGLE III brightness curves. Because the
321: nearby location of the microlensing galaxy makes the microlensing sensitive
322: to the smaller interior structure and hardly sensitive to large outer
323: structure on time scales of available data, and because the amplitudes of
324: the cusp-shaped microlensing events must be caused by stars and can only
325: represent a fraction of the quasar luminosity, the Vakulik et al (2007)
326: results give a direct measure of the fraction of the quasar luminosity
327: contributed by the central structure, which, taking the orientation angle
328: between the observer's line of sight and the quasar's polar axis angle into
329: account, has a radial size estimated from the simulation
330: as $1.9 \times 10^{15} cm$.
331:
332: These Vakulik et al (2007) simulations show that this compact inner
333: structure contributes only half as much UV-optical continuum radiation, as
334: measured with the V filter of the OGLE-III monitoring program, as the large
335: outer structure. In other words, the inner structure contributes only 1/3
336: of the total quasar luminosity. In the preceding paragraph, we estimated
337: that the first impulse observed in the brightness stream was only about
338: $30\%$
339: of the total quasar brightness. The estimates are thus consistent. Notice
340: that the two estimates are independent, one directly from the observed
341: brightness record, while the other one is from a statistical microlensing
342: simulation.
343:
344: For brevity we do not here repeat the equations solved for the quasar
345: structure and inclination; they are given, together with an illustration
346: showing their definition, in Schild (2005, Fig. 1). Solutions to this set of
347: equations were expressed in triads of $(r, \theta, \epsilon)$. Here r is the
348: quasar structure variable giving the radial distance between the compact
349: central object and the luminous surface of the Elvis structure. Variable
350: $\theta$ is the quasar orientation variable, expressed as the angular
351: distance
352: between the observer's line of sight and the quasar's polar axis. Angle
353: $\epsilon$ is the internal structure variable expressing the angle between
354: the radius to the luminous Elvis surface and the accretion disc plane.
355:
356: As described in S05, two possible solutions occur because of the
357: unique geometry associated with the centrally illuminated Elvis structure.
358: In both cases, the first arriving reverberation is from the region of the
359: Elvis structure closest to the observer. Then case 2 is when the second
360: reverberation is from the part of the Elvis structure farthest from the
361: observer but on the same side of the accretion disc, whereas case 1 is
362: when
363: the second reverberation is from the nearest portion on the opposite side
364: of the accretion disc. It will always be true that case 1 is statistically
365: more probable than case 2, since there is just a low probability that the
366: quasar
367: pole is nearly aligned with the observeršs line of sight to the quasar.
368: This is of course true only to the extent that the quasars have not been
369: selected
370: by some orientation-dependent criterion, like the beaming of the radio jet.
371:
372: Our case 1 solution with $(r, \theta, \epsilon)$ of $(8.4 \times 10^{17}$ cm,
373: 21 $\deg$, 10.7 $\deg$) has its luminous Elvis structure rings
374: $1.6 \times 10^{17}$ cm above the accretion disc plane.
375: The case 2 solution with $(8.4 \times 10^{17}cm, 10.7 \deg, 21
376: \deg)$ features the Elvis structure
377: ring $3.0 \times 10^{17}$cm above (and below) the accretion disc plane.
378: For both
379: case 1 and case 2, the angle between the observer and the pole of the
380: accretion disc plane is small, although the quasar was optically selected.
381:
382: In time, better observations of the quasar brightness and color
383: fluctuations will allow discrimination between case 1 and case 2. In both
384: cases, the strongest (brightest) reverberation will always be from the
385: first arriving pulse, because this near-side emitting surface has no
386: absorption and has relativistic beaming of the observed reverberation.
387: The second arriving reverberation in case 2 should be approximately as
388: strong as the first, since it will be seen at a small angle $\theta$ giving
389: approximately the same relativistic beaming and no absorption. In case 1,
390: the second reverberation is off of the surface beamed away from the
391: observer, and is seen through substantial obscuration. These assertions
392: presume that the dark clouds of the putative dusty torus are contained just
393: beyond the Elvis outflow structures (see Fig. 1),
394: which presumably shield them from the
395: hard emissions of the inner chromosphere and the inner edge of the
396: accretion disc. Recall that reverberation between the 2.2 {\micron} emission
397: and the UV/optical emission reported by Minezaki et al (2003) locate the
398: near-IR emission just outside the Elvis structured continuum emitting region.
399:
400: From simple inspection of the brightness records for the Q2237 quasar, we
401: see that the second observed reverberation is less than half the amplitude
402: of the first. This tends to favor the case 1 geometry, which we will
403: therefore adopt for the remainder of this report. For case 1 geometry in
404: Q2237, the luminous surfaces of the Elvis structure are determined from
405: our solution to be $8.4 \times 10^{17}$cm from the compact central source;
406: for the
407: purpose of the modeling calculations to be discussed later in the paper it
408: is important to know how far this is in the accretion disc plane.
409: Multiplying by cos 10.7 $\deg$, we find that the luminous surfaces lie
410: $8.2 \times 10^{17}$cm from the center and $1.6 \times 10^{17}$cm above
411: and below the plane.
412: The opening angle (the angle between the observer's line of sight and the
413: jet outflow, with the central compact source at the vertex) is 79.3
414: degrees.
415:
416: Finally we note that for the solution of the structure equations proposed
417: above, we can predict the arrival time of the final brightness peak. In
418: either case 1 or case 2 orientation, the final peak should arrive 1332
419: days (observer's clock) following the initial outburst.
420:
421:
422:
423: \section{Image Brightness Enhancement Corrections to the Observed
424: Fluxes From Q2237 and Q0957}
425:
426: Because the multiple images associated with gravitational lenses are usually
427: separated by only a few arc seconds in the plane of the sky, historically
428: observations of them at some wavelengths require correction for the number
429: of images if the intrinsic quasar luminosity is to be inferred from a
430: brightness measurement of the combined image. Furthermore, the lensed
431: images
432: are magnified by the lensing, so determination of the intrinsic quasar
433: fluxes requires a correction for the magnification. Accurate knowledge of
434: the fluxes is important to our analytical model of the quasar structure as
435: summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Then as discussed in section 4 below, if the
436: distantly observed MECO period of rotation can be estimated from
437: observations of the outer light cylinder radius of the MECO, the
438: analytical model then allows us to
439: estimate the MECO mass, accretion rate, and magnetic field strength (with
440: rotation rate estimated from the light cylinder radius)
441:
442: \subsection{Image Brightness Corrections to the Observed Flux of Q2237}
443:
444: For Q2237 in the radio quiet high soft state, four images are seen and so
445: the published total radio flux estimate for the entire system must be
446: divided by four. While the magnification factor is still uncertain, the
447: most recent models by Schmidt and Wambsganss (2004) suggest a magnification
448: factor of sixteen. Early radio observations of the Einstein Cross concluded
449: that the quasar was radio quiet, but a more heroic 11 hour integration with
450: the VLA in A configuration produced a 3.6 cm total flux measurement of 593
451: +/- 88 micro-Janskys (Falco et al 1998). With correction of factor 4 for the
452: image multiplicity and 16 for strong lensing magnification, the inferred
453: quasar 3.6 cm radio flux is 9.3 micro-Janskys, which puts it in the class
454: of radio quiet quasars.
455:
456: The X-ray luminosity of Q2237 has been measured in two Chandra observations
457: over the 0.4 - 8.0 Kev band reported by Dai et al (2004). Their uncorrected
458: total flux measurement of $9.2 \times 10^{45}$ergs/sec must be corrected
459: by 4 for
460: the image multiplicity and by factor 16 for strong lensing; we adopt a
461: corrected quasar X-ray luminosity of $1.4 \times 10^{44}$erg/sec. An
462: important discovery of the Chandra observation of Q2237 was the observation
463: of a red shifted broad $FeK_{\alpha}$ line at 5.7 KeV.
464: The estimated FWHM is 0.87
465: KeV and equivalent width is 1200 eV. Thus for a rest wavelength of 8.7 KeV
466: the red shift is 0.52 (velocity $1.6 \times 10^{10}$cm/sec) and
467: the velocity width
468: is $0.45 \times 10^{10}$cm/sec (45,000 km/sec). Because the line
469: is prominent in
470: image A and unseen or weak in images B, C, and D, it must be microlensed, as
471: discussed by Popovic et al(2006), who conclude that the region emitting the
472: emission line must be smaller than the continuum emitting region,
473: consistent with the suggestion that the line emission comes from the thin
474: inner edge of the accretion disc. Popovic et al also noticed that because
475: of the short duration and strength of the microlensing event, micro lenses
476: with mass on the order of a planetary mass are required if the central
477: compact quasar mass is on the order of $3 \times 10^{9}M_\odot$,
478: as estimated here.
479:
480: \subsection{Image Brightness Corrections to the Observed Flux of Q0957}
481:
482: For Q0957 in a radio loud low hard state, two images are seen and the
483: total flux estimate for the entire system must be divided by two. While
484: the magnification factor is still uncertain the most recent models by
485: Schild \& Vakulik (2003), which include the microlensing magnification,
486: suggest an overall brightness amplification factor of three.
487:
488: Radio observations of the Q0957 have shown that the quasar is radio loud
489: and
490: has a jet whose radio brightness is dominated by the core of the jet. Using
491: a correction of factor 2 for the image multiplicity and a factor 3 for
492: strong lensing magnification. The inferred quasar 6 cm radio flux has
493: been
494: determined to be 9.3 milli-Janskys (Lehar et al 1991, Schild (2005) and
495: Schild, Leiter, and Robertson (2006)) giving Q0957 a radio luminosity of
496: $3.7 \times 10^{42}$erg/sec.
497:
498: The X-ray luminosity of Q0957 has been measured in Chandra observations
499: over
500: the 0.4 - 8.0 Kev band reported by Chartas et al (2001). Their
501: uncorrected total flux measurement of $1.5 \times 10^{46}$ergs/sec must be
502: corrected
503: by 2 for the image multiplicity and by factor 3 for strong lensing; we
504: adopt
505: a corrected quasar luminosity of $2.5 \times 10^{45}$erg/sec. We also
506: note that an
507: important conclusion of the Chandra observation of Q0957 was the apparent
508: lack of any red shifted broad Fe-Kalpha line at 5.7 KeV.
509:
510:
511:
512: \section{Analysis of the Internal Structure of Q2237 and Q0957 in Different
513: Spectral States}
514:
515:
516: In the following sections we will compare the observed inner structure for
517: Q2237 (the Einstein Cross quasar in the radio quiet high soft spectral
518: state) to the inner structure of Q0957 (the Twin quasar in the radio loud
519: low hard spectral state) which was previously established in the 2006
520: paper
521: by Schild, Leiter, and Robertson. In the process we will find that the
522: explanation of the physical difference between the two quasars Q0957 and
523: Q2237 is related to the more general question as to why some quasars are
524: observed to be radio loud and have a hard X-ray spectrum while others are
525: observed to be radio quiet and have a soft X-ray spectrum. In this section
526: we will compare and analyze the data for these two quasars, as shown in
527: Tables 1 and 2 below, in terms of a new theoretical quasar model which is
528: easily
529: able to explain the physical nature of these quasars in their different
530: spectral states as well as providing new understanding that can bring
531: unification to a wide body of quasar data.
532:
533: \subsection{Analysis of the Internal Structure of Quasar Q0957 in the Radio
534: Loud Low Hard State (RL-LHS)}
535:
536: We begin by recalling that in SLR06, we examined the empirical data for the
537: lensed and micro-lensed Q0957+561A,B quasar obtained from 20 years of
538: brightness monitoring at visible wavelengths (near-ultraviolet emission at
539: the quasar). In that report we examined several conclusions inferred
540: previously from analysis of the auto-correlation and micro-lensing
541: properties of the monitoring data, and collected these results in a
542: consistent presentation and used them to confront physical quasar models
543: and their simulations. On the basis of the analysis in SLR06 the inner
544: structure
545: observed for the quasar Q0957 in the (RL-LHS), which we referred to as the
546: Schild-Vakulik Structure, was made up of four component parts which had
547: the following dimensional properties (see figure 1):
548:
549: \begin{itemize}
550: \item 1. Elliptical Elvis Structure: $Re = 2 \times 10^{17}$cm, He = $5
551: \times 10^{16}$cm
552:
553: \item 2. Inner Radius of Accretion Disk: $R_{disk} = 4 \times 10^{16}$cm
554:
555: \item 3. Hot Inner Accretion Disk Annulus: delta(R) = $5.4 \times 10^{14}$cm
556:
557: \item 4. Base of Radio Jet: $R_{rad} = 2 \times 10^{16}$cm , $H_{rad} = 9
558: \times 10^{16}$cm
559:
560: \end{itemize}
561: The inner components of this quasar structure were found to be an accretion
562: disc truncated at a large radius whose hot inner edge contained a bright
563: thin annulus. This inner structure was found to be surrounded by an
564: elliptical coronal outflow (Elvis Structure) long known to explain the
565: complex spectroscopic behavior observed in quasars. However it was observed
566: that the opening angle of the coronal Elvis structure with respect to the
567: z-axis of rotation appeared to have a very large value of 76 degrees. In
568: addition a radio emission region was found to be located directly above the
569: compact source. The size and location of this radio emitting region was
570: found to be where the reconnection of magnetic field lines at relativistic
571: Alfven speeds, like that generated by a rotating central object containing
572: an intrinsic magnetic field, should occur. Hence the structure observed in
573: the quasar Q0957+561 appeared to closely resemble the complex
574: inflow-outflow
575: patterns seen in intrinsic magnetic propeller models for young stellar
576: objects (Romanova et al, 2002, 2003a, 2003b, 2004).
577:
578: In SLR06 it was shown how standard black hole models where unable to account
579: for the internal structure observed in the quasar Q0957. In particular we
580: discussed how attempts to model the observed internal structure seen in the
581: quasar Q0957+561 in terms of the intrinsic magnetic moment generated by a
582: central spinning charged black hole failed because the necessary charge on
583: the spinning black hole required to make it work would not be stable
584: enough
585: to account for the long lifetime of the observed Schild-Vakulik structure.
586: Similarly it was
587: shown how attempts to model the internal Q0957 structure in terms of Kerr
588: Black Hole-ADAF-Accretion Disc Corona-Jet Models, in which the magnetic
589: field is tied to the accretion disk and not the central rotating compact
590: object, failed in that this model was unable to account for the very large
591: opening angles observed for the coronal Elvis outflows. Finally it was
592: shown
593: that Magnetically Arrested Disc (MAD) black hole models failed in that
594: they
595: predicted the existence of orbiting infalling hot blobs of plasma inside
596: of
597: the inner region of the accretion disk that were not observed.
598:
599: On the other hand it was shown in SLR06 that the four components of the
600: intrinsically magnetic structure observed in Q0957 could be successfully
601: explained by Magnetospheric Eternally Collapsing Object (MECO) models
602: (Robertson and Leiter 2003, 2004, 2005), which feature highly redshifted,
603: Eddington limited, collapsing central compact objects containing a strong
604: intrinsic magnetic moment aligned with the MECO axis of rotation (see
605: Appendix 1 for more details). This is indicated in Table 1 and Table 2
606: where, taking into account the amplification factor of three discussed in
607: section 3.b it is shown that the MECO model for the quasar Q0957+561 can
608: be represented by a $4.2 \times 10^{9}M_\odot$ mass scaled up version of
609: the class of MECO
610: models that have been used to explain "spectral state switching" phenomena
611: associated with Galactic Black Hole Candidates. Such a massive MECO object
612: does not collapse beyond its event horizon. Instead, in-falling matter
613: heats up and because if its intense radiation collects at a highly redshifted
614: physical surface which is balanced in a state of local Eddington limited
615: secular equilibrium at a radial distance which is just outside of its event
616: horizon. This allows the highly redshifted MECO surface
617: to slowly collapse, while remaining in causal connection
618: outside of its event horizon,
619: over time intervals greater than a Hubble time as
620: seen by a distant observer.
621: Because of the small light cone opening angle for radiation escaping
622: from this highly red shifted MECO surface to a distant observer, the resultant
623: low luminosity in the far-infrared wavelengths make this MECO surface
624: difficult to detect for the case of Q0957+561.
625:
626: In SLR06 it was demonstrated that Q0957 could be successfully modeled only
627: as a MECO driven quasar in the Low Hard State in which the MECO intrinsic
628: magnetic propeller interacted strongly with the inner regions of the
629: quasar's accretion disc. For Q0957 in the Low Hard State, the dynamo
630: action of the intrinsic rotating MECO magnetic dipole field of its central
631: supermassive MECO sweeps clean the central region of the quasar out to the
632: magnetospheric radius where the magnetic propeller acting on the inner
633: edge of the accretion disc creates a very thin annular band, and a radio
634: emitting
635: region above the disc where the magnetic field lines twist and bunch up
636: until they eventually break and reconnect at relativistic speeds. The
637: resultant size and location of the radio emitting region associated with
638: this inner magnetic structure of the quasar was found to be in the
639: region above the central supermassive MECO object where the reconnection
640: of magnetic field lines at relativistic Alfven speeds, like that generated
641: by a rotating central MECO containing an intrinsic magnetic field, should
642: occur.
643:
644: For the quasar Q0957 the outer bi-conic Elliptical Elvis Coronal Outflow
645: Structure, that was observed to occur with a very wide opening angle above
646: and below the accretion disk at a distance
647: $R_{Elvis} \sim 2 \times 10^{17}$cm, was found
648: to be located just inside of the outer light cylinder of its central MECO
649: which occurred at a radial distance of $R_{lc} \sim 2.4 \times 10^{17}$cm.
650: See Table 1-2
651: where this observation, and the formula for the MECO outer light cylinder
652: given by Rlc $\sim (1.5 \times 10^{17}cm) \times T_{year}$, was
653: used to estimate the distantly
654: observed rotation period of the central MECO in Q0957 as
655: $T_{Year} \sim 1.6$ years.
656:
657:
658:
659: The existence and the radial location of bi-conic Elliptical Elvis Coronal
660: Outflow Structures, occurring just inside of the outer
661: light cylinders of
662: central compact MECO magnetic objects surrounded by hot accretion disks, is
663: a predicted observational property of the MECO-quasar accretion disk model
664: that uniquely distinguishes it from a black hole-quasar accretion disk
665: model.
666:
667: The MECO-quasar model satisfies the physical conditions required to
668: generate
669: bi-conic shaped Elvis Outflow Structures just inside of their outer light
670: cylinders by virtue of the combined action of two well-known physical
671: processes:
672: a) Magnetic reconnection effects which can generate upward flows just
673: inside of the outer light cylinder of central compact magnetic objects
674: surrounded
675: by accretion disks (Uzdensky, 2003, 2006; Uzdensky; Spitovsky, 2006),
676: and
677: b) Optical line driving forces, associated with the presence of strong
678: ultraviolet luminosity emitted from the inner magnetospheric radius of a
679: hot accretion disk surrounding the central compact magnetic object, which
680: can act on the magnetic reconnection generated upward flows just inside of
681: the outer light cylinder and there create the bi-conic Elvis Outflow
682: Structures (Elvis 2000, 2003, 2006).
683:
684: In this manner the intrinsic magnetic field of the MECO generates a vertical
685: up-flow of plasma above the accretion disk by magnetic reconnection effects
686: which occur just inside of the outer light cylinder of the MECO. The
687: vertical up-flow of plasma occurs where the surrounding dusty torus ends
688: and the bi-conic Elvis Outflow Structure begins (see Fig. 1). If the inner
689: accretion disk is hot enough to make UV radiation then the effect of
690: photo-ionization line-driving bends the upward flowing plasma outward over
691: the accretion disk and generates the bi-conic Elvis Outflow Structure of
692: positive ions associated with the Broad Emission Line Region (BELR). Charge
693: separation between the electrons and outflowing ions is generated by the
694: photo-ionization process near the MECO light cylinder. The return current
695: of ions most likely flows back to the central region along the separatrix
696: associated with field-line opening due to the differential rotation which
697: occurs in the magnetically-linked MECO disk system.
698:
699:
700: \subsection{Analysis of the Internal Structure of Quasar Q2237 in the
701: Radio Quiet High Soft State}
702:
703: As discussed in sections 3.a the detailed internal structure of quasar
704: Q2237 in a radio quiet high-soft state has been observed to be as follows:
705: \begin{itemize}
706: \item 1. Elliptical Elvis Structure: $Re = 8.2 \times 10^{17}$cm ,
707: $He = 5 \times 10^{16}$cm
708:
709: \item 2. Inner Radius of Accretion Disk: $Rdisk = 1.9 \times 10^{15}$cm
710:
711: \item 3. Broad Iron Line Emission seen: Yes
712:
713: \item 4. Base of Radio Jet: None since there is no jet in Radio Quiet State
714:
715: \end{itemize}
716:
717: In the context of the MECO model the internal structure of the quasar Q2237
718: can be easily understood in terms of different spectral states (i.e. Radio
719: Loud Low Hard States versus Radio Quiet High Soft States) which are
720: distinguished by the nature of the interaction between the accretion disks
721: in these quasars and the intrinsic rotating magnetic moments of their
722: central supermassive MECO. We begin by recalling that in section 4a we
723: found that for Radio Loud Low Hard States like that seen in Q0957, the
724: magnetospheric radius Rm is greater than its MECO co-rotation radius Rcr and
725: the resultant magnetic propeller effect on the accretion disk generates an
726: empty inner region inside of the accretion disk, which is surrounded by a
727: thin hot ring, and a jet outflow leading to strong radio emission. However
728: for Radio Quiet High Soft States (RQ-HSS) like that observed in Q2237, the
729: accretion rate is high enough to push the magnetospheric radius Rm inside
730: of its MECO co-rotation radius $R_{cr}$. This shuts down the
731: magnetic propeller, and
732: the jet outflow which creates a spectral change from a RL-LHS to a RQ-HSS
733: state. In this state the intrinsic magnetic propeller mechanism of the
734: MECO-AGN becomes incapable of ejecting the flow in the form of a jet, which
735: causes an increasingly dense boundary layer of plasma to form at the inner
736: disk radius which eventually pushes it in all the way to the marginally
737: stable orbit. When this occurs the MECO-AGN changes its spectral state from
738: a Radio Loud Low Hard State (RL-LHS) to a Radio Quiet High Soft State
739: (RQ-HSS).
740:
741: To get a better physical insight into the nature of this process let us
742: discuss the dynamics of the MECO-quasar spectral state change from RL-LHS
743: state to the RQ-HSS state in a little more detail. For the higher accretion
744: rates associated with the RQ-HSS the intrinsically rotating MECO magnetic
745: field is dynamically unable to eject the disk material from the interior
746: region inside of the co-rotation radius $R_{cr}$,
747: and the accreted matter piles up
748: against the magnetopause and pushes it inward. The fact that a boundary layer
749: at the inner accretion disk radius must exist around a MECO in the (RQ-HSS)
750: was demonstrated (Robertson and Leiter 2005 section 11, pp 24-25) by
751: comparing the magnetic pressure at the magnetosphere with the impact
752: pressure of a trailing, subsonic disk where it was shown that radial inflow
753: disk velocities in excess of the speed of light would be required to allow
754: the impact pressure to match the magnetic pressure. While the gas pressure
755: in the disk at the inner radius of the transition zone is normally
756: required
757: to match the magnetic pressure in the disk, it turns out that for the
758: (RQ-HSS) state the radiation pressure in the disk is less than the gas
759: pressure. Hence for a MECO-AGN in the RQ-HSS the boundary layer, located
760: at the inner disk radius of its gas pressure dominated, thin, subsonic
761: Keplerian disk, will eventually be pushed down to the marginally stable
762: orbit of its accretion disk so that $R_{disk} \sim R_{ms}$.
763: The value of $R_{ms}$ will
764: depend on the a/M ratio of the rotating Vaidya metric which describes the
765: MECO (which, because of the very highly redshift of the MECO, will to a
766: good
767: approximation be similar to the value of $R_{ms}$ for a Kerr metric). In
768: order to apply the above analysis to the case of Q2237 in the RQ-HSS we
769: recall from section 3.a that Vakulik et al (2007) found that the
770: fraction of the
771: quasar luminosity contributed by the central structure was associated with a
772: radial size of $1.9 \times 10^{15}$cm.
773: Assuming that this is the inner radius of the luminous accretion disc edge
774: for the case of Q2237 in the RQ-HSS, we find that $R_{disc}$ $\sim$ $R_m$
775: $\sim$ $1.9 \times 10^{15}cm = 4.2 R_{grav}$.
776: This is consistent with the central MECO in Q2237 having a mass of $3
777: \times 10^9 M_{odot}$ and a specific angular momentum ratio of a/M = 0.5.
778: In this context we find that
779: the observed core X-ray luminosity of $Lx \sim 1.4 \times 10^{44}$erg/sec,
780: which in the
781: RQ-HSS is generated in the corona above the accretion disk, will interact
782: with the inner region of the accretion disk and generate broad Iron
783: emission lines consistent with Q2237 observation.
784:
785: In addition we find that the properties of MECO-quasar model for Q2237
786: satisfy the physical conditions required to generate bi-conic shaped Elvis
787: Outflow Structures just inside of their outer light cylinders by virtue of the
788: combined action of magnetic reconnection effects (which generate upward
789: flows just inside of the light cylinder of central compact magnetic
790: objects
791: surrounded by accretion disks) and optical line driving forces (associated
792: with the presence of strong ultraviolet luminosity emitted from the inner
793: magnetospheric radius of a hot accretion disk surrounding the central
794: compact magnetic object) which act on the magnetic reconnection generated
795: upward flows that occur just inside of the outer light cylinder and
796: there create the bi-conic
797: Elvis Outflow Structure observed.
798: For the case of the quasar Q2237 the outer bi-conic
799: Elvis Outflow Structure, with a very wide opening angle,
800: which was observed above and below the accretion disk at a distance
801: $R_{Elvis} \sim
802: 8.2 \times 10^{17}$cm, is found to be located just inside the outer light
803: cylinder
804: of its central MECO at $R_{lc} \sim 8.4 \times 10^{17}$cm (note that
805: this result is
806: obtained from $R_{lc} \sim (1.5\times 10^{17}cm) \times T_{year}$, where $T_{year}$ is the distantly
807: observed rotation period of the central MECO, which for the case of Q2237
808: was found to be $T_{year} \sim 5.6$ years). It is important to note that the
809: existence of bi-conic Elliptical Elvis Coronal Outflow Structures, predicted
810: to occur just inside of the outer light cylinders of central compact MECO
811: magnetic objects surrounded by hot accretion disks, is a key observational
812: prediction of the MECO-quasar accretion disk models which distinguishes it
813: from black hole-quasar accretion disk models.
814:
815:
816: \section{CONCLUSIONS}
817:
818: We have shown how direct microlensing-reverberation analysis performed on
819: two well-known Quasars (Q2237 - The Einstein Cross and Q0957 - The Twin)
820: can be used to determine the inner structure of two quasars which are in
821: significantly different spectral states. These observations allowed us to
822: measure the detailed internal structure of quasar Q2237 in a radio quiet
823: high-soft state, and compare it to quasar Q0957 in a radio loud low-hard
824: state. We found that a unified explanation of the dynamics of the inner and
825: outer components of the observed internal structure of these two quasars
826: could be dynamically explained as being due to different spectral states
827: (i.e. Q0957 in a Radio Loud Low Hard State (RL-LHS), and Q2237 in a Radio
828: Quiet High Soft State (RQ-HSS)). We then argued that when taken together,
829: the most plausible physical explanation for the observed differences in
830: the
831: spectral states of these two quasars was due to the location of the inner
832: radii of their accretion disks (see Fig. 2) relative to the
833: co-rotation radii associated
834: with supermassive, rotating "Magnetospheric Eternally Collapsing Objects"
835: (MECO) in the centers of these quasars (ref Appendix I).
836:
837: In support of the above argument we first described the unique
838: gravitational
839: microlensing observations of the quasar Q0957 in the (RL-LHS) which
840: permitted a reconstruction of its internal radiation emitting structures
841: (SLR06). In the context of these observations the inner accretion disk
842: was found to be truncated at a very large radius and surrounded by a very
843: thin hot inner ring of plasma with a large empty inner region inside of it.
844: In addition large bi-conic Elvis outflow structures were observed about ten
845: times further out from the inner disk radius. The overall morphology of
846: these dynamic structures were found to be similar to features revealed in
847: simulated accretion flows into compact Young Stellar Objects which
848: contain a
849: central rotating magnetic dipole objects inside of their accretion disks
850: (Romanova 2002, 2003a). Since black holes do not contain observable intrinsic
851: dipole fields, such dynamic structures cannot be generated by black
852: hole-accretion disk models. Hence our conclusion was that we were
853: observing
854: the physical effects of a central supermassive compact intrinsically
855: magnetic object in Q0957, and that instead of a black hole the
856: super-massive
857: compact object in this quasar was a MECO
858:
859: Then applying the MECO model to the case of Q2237 in the (RQ-HSS), we argued
860: that the higher accretion rates involved pushed the inner magnetospheric
861: radius of its accretion disk through the co-rotation radius of its central
862: MECO and shut down the MECO magnetic propeller effect on the accretion disk.
863: Since the lack of magnetic propeller action on the accretion disk turned off
864: the radio-jet emission leading to the creation of a radio quiet state, and
865: caused the inner radius of the accretion disk to be pushed down to the
866: marginally stable orbit, then X-rays generated in the corona above the
867: accretion disk were able to act on the inner edge of the accretion disk and
868: create the broad iron line 9.7 Kev signature observed in Q2237. In support
869: of this idea we note that models of the inner region surrounding the inner
870: accretion disc edge, for young stellar objects by Romanova (2002, 2003a,b;
871: 2004) and
872: others, feature an inner corona of ionized matter above the accretion
873: disk.
874:
875: Detailed calculations from analytical modeling shown in Table 1-2, showed
876: how the MECO model can quantitatively explain the inner dynamic structures
877: of both the quasar Q0957 in a RL-LHS state as well as that of the quasar
878: Q2237 in a RQ-HSS state. In the MECO model the different spectral states
879: of these two quasars were determined by the magnitude of their respective
880: accretion rates and the interaction between their accretion disks and the
881: intrinsic rotating magnetic moments of their central supermassive MECO. In
882: addition the MECO model for Q0957 and Q2237 connected the location of their
883: Elvis outflow structures to the location of the outer light cylinders of
884: their central rotating supermassive MECO.
885:
886: The MECO model of internal quasar structure presented here, for Q0957 in
887: the radio loud low hard state and Q2237 in the radio quiet high soft
888: state,
889: can be readily applied to a wide body of data on other quasars observed in
890: one or the other of these two spectral states and for this reason has the
891: potential to be able to unify a vast amount of quasar spectroscopic
892: and photometric data.
893:
894: In addition the MECO quasar model has the unique property of dynamically
895: connecting the location of the inner part of the quasar Elvis outflow
896: structure with the location of the outer light cylinders of the central
897: MECO
898: in these quasars. Because of the special geometric relationship that
899: elliptical Elvis outflow structures have to the modified dusty torus
900: components of their Elvis structures as shown in figure 1, the MECO quasar
901: model predicts that for any orientation of the quasar to the line of
902: sight,
903: some component of emission should be evident for any optical depth of
904: dusty
905: torus absorption. This result is based on the assumption that the
906: continuum
907: emission originates principally in a corona near the inner edge of the
908: accretion disc, and at the outflow structures illuminated by the inner
909: corona and accretion disc. This is because in MECO quasar model, the Elvis
910: structures form the inner edge of the dusty torus. Then for all viewing
911: angles the UV-optical power-law continuum should be visible, except
912: possibly
913: for extreme equator-on geometry (with the pole of the accretion disc
914: perpendicular to the line of sight.)
915:
916: In summary we have demonstrated how direct microlensing-reverberation
917: analysis of two Quasars (Q2237 - The Einstein Cross and Q0957 - The Twin)
918: have allowed us to observe inner structure of two quasars which are in
919: significantly different spectral states. Standard black hole accretion
920: disk
921: models were found to be unable to offer a unified dynamical explanation of
922: the observed internal structure of both of these two quasars in different
923: spectral states. Instead we found that a unified explanation could be
924: obtained within the framework of a MECO model. This was done by describing
925: the spectral states of the
926: two quasars in terms of the location of the magnetospheric radii of their
927: accretion disks with respect to the co-rotation radii, inside of the light
928: cylinder surrounding highly red shifted, rotating $M \sim 10^{9}M_{\odot}$
929: MECO in the centers of these quasars.
930:
931: Because of the apparent ease with which the size of the Elvis structure and
932: the quasar orientation with respect to the plane of the sky can be
933: inferred, following the method of S05, future photometric
934: observations with the planned Large Scale Synoptic Telescope (LSST) will
935: allow an important MECO parameter to be easily obtained for any of the
936: thousands of quasars to be monitored. Since the radius of the MECO outer
937: light cylinder depends only on the distantly observed MECO period of
938: rotation, the connection between the MECO outer light cylinder and the
939: location of the Elvis outflow structures observationally determines the
940: distantly observed MECO spin parameter. Hence, in addition to the MECO mass
941: and intrinsic magnetic moment, simple recognition of patterns of
942: reverberations and their timing allows distantly observed MECO spin
943: parameters to be obtained.
944:
945: \section{APPENDIX I. THE STRONG PRINCIPLE OF EQUIVALENCE AND MAGNETOSPHERIC
946: ETERNALLY COLLAPSING OBJECTS (MECO)}
947:
948: In General Relativity, preservation of the Strong Principle of Equivalence
949: (SPOE) requires that Special Relativity must hold locally for all
950: time-like
951: observers in all of space-time. The existence of MECO is implied by the idea
952: that Nature requires that the Strong Principle of Equivalence (SPOE) be
953: dynamically preserved everywhere in space-time for the timelike world lines
954: of massive particles or fluids under the influence of both gravitational and
955: non-gravitational forces. Preservation of the SPOE requires that the frame
956: of reference of the co-moving observer in the massive collapsing fluid must
957: always be connected to the frame of reference of a stationary
958: observer by special relativistic transformations with a physical 3-speed
959: that is less than the speed of light (SLR06 and Landau \&
960: Lifshitz, 1975). Since the left hand side of the Einstein equation cannot by
961: itself enforce the dynamic preservation of the SPOE then SPOE-preserving
962: non-gravitational processes must exist in Nature and must always be included
963: in the energy-momentum tensor on the right hand side of the Einstein
964: equation.
965:
966: It was in this context that the general relativistic MECO solutions to the
967: Einstein-Maxwell equations were discovered, as was shown in the three
968: previously published papers of Robertson and Leiter and developed in more
969: detail in Appendix 1-10 of Astro-ph/0505518. There it was shown that for a
970: collapsing body, the structure and radiation transfer properties of the
971: energy-momentum tensor on the right hand side of the Einstein field
972: equations, could describe a collapsing radiating object which contained
973: equipartition magnetic fields that generated a highly redshifted Eddington
974: limited secular collapse process. This collapse process was shown to
975: preserve the SPOE by dynamically preventing trapped surfaces, that lead to
976: event horizons, from forming.
977:
978: In Appendix 1-10 of Astro-ph/0505518 it was shown that, by using the
979: Einstein-Maxwell Equations and Quantum Electrodynamics in the context of
980: General Relativistic plasma astrophysics, it was possible to virtually
981: stop
982: and maintain a slow, (many Hubble times!) steady collapse of a compact
983: physical plasma object outside of its Schwarzschild radius.
984:
985: The non-gravitational force was Compton photon pressure generated by
986: synchrotron radiation from an intrinsic equipartition magnetic dipole
987: field
988: contained within the compact object. The rate of collapse is controlled by
989: radiation at the local Eddington limit, but from a highly redshifted
990: surface.
991:
992: In Appendix 9 and 10 of Astro-ph/0505518, it was shown that general
993: relativistic surface drift currents within a pair plasma at the MECO
994: surface
995: can generate the required magnetic fields. In particular it was shown in
996: Appendix 9 that the equatorial poloidal magnetic field associated with
997: a locally Eddington limited secular
998: rate of collapse of the exterior surface was shown to be strong enough to
999: spontaneously create bound electron-positron pairs in the surface plasma of
1000: the MECO. In the context of the MECO highly redshifted Eddington limited
1001: balance, the action of this QED process was shown to be sufficient to
1002: stabilize the collapse rate of the MECO surface.
1003:
1004: For the case of hot collapsing radiating matter associated with the MECO,
1005: the corresponding exterior solution to the Einstein equation has been
1006: shown
1007: to be described by the time dependent Vaidya metric where no coordinate
1008: transformation between MECO Vaidya metric and the Black Hole Kerr-Schild
1009: metric exists. Since the highly redshifted MECO Vaidya metric solutions
1010: preserve the SPOE they do not have event horizons, and in addition they
1011: exhibit a distantly observed slowly rotating intrinsic magnetic dipole
1012: moment which interacts with a surrounding accretion disk. Hence the MECO
1013: magnetic moments will have observable effects which distinguish them from
1014: Black Holes if such MECO exist at the centers of galactic black hole
1015: candidates and AGN.
1016:
1017:
1018:
1019: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
1020:
1021: The authors wish to thank Alan Bridle, of the National Radio Astronomy
1022: Observatory (NRAO) in Charlottesville Virginia, for many important
1023: conversations and analytical discussions which played a key role in
1024: clarifying the ideas presented in this paper. In particular one of us (DL)
1025: thanks him for graciously allowing access to the research facilities of
1026: NRAO during the important developmental phase of this work.
1027:
1028: \newpage
1029: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1030:
1031: \bibitem[]{B07}Belloni, T. 2007, Mem. S.A.It, 75, 282
1032: \bibitem[]{CH01}Chartas, G. et al, 2002, ApJ, 565, 96
1033: \bibitem[]{D03}Dai, X. et al, 2004, ApJ, 605, 45
1034: \bibitem{ELV00} Elvis, M., 2000, ApJ, 545, 63
1035: \bibitem{ELV06} Elvis, M., 2006, Mem.S.A.It 77, 573; astro-ph/0606100
1036: \bibitem{ELV03} Elvis, M., 2003, A.S.P.C., 311, 109; astro-ph/0311436
1037: \bibitem[]{F96} Falco, E. et al, 1996, AJ 112, 897
1038: \bibitem{INA} Igumenschev, I. Narayan, R. and Abramowicz, M., 2003, ApJ,
1039: 592, 1042
1040: \bibitem[]{2602}Illarianov, A. \& Sunyaev, R. 1975 A\&A 39, 185
1041: \bibitem[]{K04}Koptelova, E. et al, 2004, MNRAS, 356, 323
1042: \bibitem[]{LL64}Landau, L. \& Lifshitz, E, 1975, Classical Theory of
1043: Fields, 4'th edition, p. 248 - 252
1044: \bibitem{LR} Leiter, D. and Robertson, S. 2003, Found. Physics Lett. 16,
1045: 143
1046: \bibitem[]{L91}Lehar, J. et al, 1992, ApJ, 384, 453
1047: \bibitem[]{Mz04}Minezaki, T. et al, 2004, ApJ, 600, L35
1048: \bibitem[]{P91}Peterson, B. et al (64 authors), 1991, ApJ 368, 119
1049: \bibitem[]{P93}Peterson, B. et al, 1993, ApJ, 392, 470
1050: \bibitem[]{p05}Popovic, L. et al, 2006, ApJ, 637, 620
1051: \bibitem{RL02} Robertson, S., and Leiter, D. 2002, ApJ, 565, 447
1052: \bibitem{RL03} Robertson, S., and Leiter, D. 2003, ApJ, 596, L203
1053: \bibitem{RL04} Robertson, S., and Leiter, D. 2004, MNRAS, 350, 1391
1054: \bibitem{RL05} Robertson, S., and Leiter, D. 2005, ``The Magnetospheric
1055: Eternally Collapsing Object (MECO) Model of Galactic Black Hole Candidate
1056: Candidates and Active Galactic Nuclei'', pp1 - 45 (In New Directions in
1057: Black Hole Research, ed. P.V.Kreitler, Nova Science Publishers, Inc, ISBN
1058: 1-59454-460-3, novapublishers.com
1059: \bibitem{R02} Romanova, M. et al, 2002, ApJ, 578, 420
1060: \bibitem{R03a} Romanova, M. et al, 2003a, ApJ, 588, 400
1061: \bibitem{R03b} Romanova, M. et al, 2003b, ApJ, 595, 1009
1062: \bibitem{R04} Romanova, M. et al, 2004, ApJ, 616, L151
1063: \bibitem{S04b} Schild, R. E. 2004, astro-ph/0409549
1064: \bibitem{S05} Schild, R. E. 2005, AJ, 129, 1225 (S05)
1065: \bibitem[]{SLR}Schild, R. Leiter, D. \& Robertson, S. 2006, AJ, 132, 420
1066: (SLR06)
1067: \bibitem{ST97} Schild, R. E., \& Thomson, D. J., 1995, AJ, 109, 1970
1068: \bibitem{ST97} Schild, R. E., \& Thomson, D. J., 1997, AJ, 113, 130
1069: \bibitem{SV03} Schild, R. E., \& Vakulik, V., 2003, AJ, 126, 689 (SV03)
1070: \bibitem[]{SW04}Schmidt, R. and Wambsganss, J., 1998, A\&A, 335, 379
1071: \bibitem[]{S06}Spitovsky, A., 2006, ApJ, 648, L51
1072: \bibitem[]{MS04}Suganuma, M., et al, 2004, ApJ, 612, L113
1073: \bibitem[]{SW03}Swain, M. et al, 2003, ApJ, 596, L166
1074: \bibitem[]{2707}Uzdensky, D., 2002, ApJ 572, 432
1075: \bibitem[]{2707}Uzdensky, D., 2006, astro-ph/0607656
1076: \bibitem[]{VA06}Vakulik, V. et al, 2006, A\&A, 447, 905
1077: \bibitem[]{VA07}Vakulik, V. et al, 2007, astro-ph/07081082
1078: \bibitem[]{W00}Wozniak et al. (2000), Ap.J., 529, 88
1079:
1080: \end{thebibliography}
1081:
1082: \begin{table*}
1083: \begin{center}
1084: \caption{MECO-QUASAR MAGNETOSPHERIC EQUATIONS - (RL-LHS) AND (RQ-HSS)
1085: - [ref. Astr J. v132,420,(2006) and Astro-ph/0505518]}
1086: \end{center}
1087: \begin{tabular}{lll} \hline
1088: MECO Physical Quantity & Equation & Scale\\
1089: \hline
1090: Surface Redshift - & $1+z_s = 1.5\times 10^8 ({M/7})^{1/2}$ & $M^{1/2}~$\\
1091: Surface Luminosity - & $L_s=L_{Edd}/(1+z_s)$ erg/s & $M^{1/2}~$ \\
1092: Surface Temp. - & $T_s=2.3\times 10^7/[M(1+z_s)]^{1/4}$ K & $M^{-3/8}$\\
1093: Rotation Rate (1/Tyear) - & $\nu=2.8[L_{q,32}/M]^{0.763}/L_{c,44}$cyl/year
1094: & $M^{-1}~$\\
1095: Quiescent Lum. - & $L_{q,32}=0.65 M [L_{c,36}/M]^{1.75}$ erg/s & $M$~~\\
1096: Co-rotation Radius - & $R_c=46.7 R_g/[M \nu_2]^{2/3}$ cm & $M$~~\\
1097: Light Cylinder Radius - & $R_{lc}=[1.52(Tyear)\times 10^{17}]$ cm &$M$~~\\
1098: Magnetic Moment - & $\mu_{27} = 8.16[L_{c,36} M/\nu_2^3]^{1/2}$
1099: $$gauss-cm$^3$ & $M^{5/2}~$\\
1100: Magnetic Field - & $B_\theta = 1.12
1101: (R_g/r)^3[L_{c,36}/(M^5\nu_2^3)]^{1/2}$ gauss
1102: & $M^{-1/2}$\\
1103: Magnetosphere Radius (RL-LHS) - & $R_m= 17R_g[M
1104: \nu_{2}]^{4/21}/(L_{disk}/L_{Edd})^{2/7}$ cm & $M$~~\\
1105: Magnetosphere Radius (RQ-HS) - & $R_m = R_{ms} $ &
1106: $M$~~\\
1107: Core X-ray Luminosity - & $L_{x}= (\eta_{x-corona-disk})L_{disk}$ erg/s
1108: &$$~
1109: \\
1110: Core Radio Luminosity - & $L_{rad,36}=C_{rad-x} M^{0.75}
1111: L_{x,36}^{2/3} {{|1-{(L_{x,36}/L_{c,36})}^{1/3}|}}$ erg/s &
1112: $M^{3/2}$~ \\
1113: \hline
1114: \end{tabular}\\
1115:
1116: In Table 1:
1117:
1118: a) the left hand column summarizes the MECO physical quantities
1119: relevant to Q0957 and Q2237.
1120:
1121: b) the middle column gives the specific form of the equations to be
1122: used in the calculation of these specific physical quantities and;
1123:
1124: c) the right hand column gives the functional form of the relevant
1125: mass scaling of these specific physical quantities in order to demonstrate
1126: clearly how the equations for these physical quantities can be applied to
1127: the case of both GBHC, AGN and QSO.
1128:
1129: Then using the observed values of the X-ray luminosity, radio luminosity,
1130: red shift and the physical dimensions of the internal structure seen in
1131: Q0957 and Q2237 as input in the MECO equations in Table 1, the results
1132: shown in Table 2 are obtained.
1133: \end{table*}
1134: \newpage
1135:
1136: \begin{table*}
1137: \begin{center}
1138: \caption {QUASAR Q2237 (RQ-HSS) VERSUS QUASAR Q0957 (RL-LHS)}
1139: \end{center}
1140: \begin{tabular}{lcc} \hline
1141: MECO Parameters & QUASAR 2237 (RQ-HSS) & QUASAR Q0957 (RL-LHS) \\
1142: \hline
1143: MECO Mass & $3.0\times 10^9 M_\odot$ & $4.2\times 10^9 M_\odot$\\
1144: MECO Magnetic Moment & $7.8\times 10^{51}$ gauss-cm$^3$ & $1.8\times
1145: 10^{52}$ gauss-cm$^3$\\
1146: MECO Magnetic Field & $(4.0\times 10^5$ gauss)($3Rg / r)^3$ & $(3.4\times
1147: 10^5$ gauss) $(3Rg / r)^3$\\
1148: MECO a/M Ratio & $\sim 0.5$ & $>0.7$\\
1149: MECO Surface Redshift & $3.1\times 10^{12}$ & $3.7\times 10^{12}$ \\
1150: MECO Rotation Period - Tyears& $5.6$ Years & $1.6$ Years\\
1151: MECO Surface Luminosity & $1.3\times 10^{35}$ erg/sec & $1.5\times10^{35}$
1152: erg/sec\\
1153: MECO Surface Temp & $74$ K & 66 K\\
1154: MECO Co-rotation Radius & $151 R_g$ & $53 R_g$\\
1155: MECO Light Cylinder-cm &$R=1867 R_g = 8.4\times 10^{17}$ & $R=383 R_g =
1156: 2.4\times 10^{17}$ \\
1157: Accretion Disk Luminosity & $6.2 \times 10^{45}$ erg/sec & $4.6\times
1158: 10^{45}$ erg/sec\\
1159: Eddington Ratio & $0.02$ & $9.0\times 10^{-3}$ \\
1160: Core X-ray Luminosity (OBS) & $1.4 \times 10^{44}$ erg/sec & $2.5\times
1161: 10^{45}$ erg/sec\\
1162: Core Radio Luminosity (OBS) & $1.0\times 10^{40}$ erg/sec & $3.7\times
1163: 10^{42}$ erg/sec\\
1164: Core X-ray Efficiency & $\eta_{x-corona-disk}=0.03$ &
1165: $\eta_{x-corona-disk}=0.54$ \\
1166: Core Radio X-ray Luminosity Coeff. & $C_{rad-x}=2.8\times 10^{-9}$ &
1167: $C_{rad-x}=3.5\times 10^{-7}$ \\
1168: Rm Magnetosphere-cm (OBS) &$R_{m} = 4.2R_g = 1.9\times 10^{15}$ & $R_m = 64
1169: R_g = 4\times 10^{16}$ \\
1170: Rm Emission Wavelength (OBS) &$2000 A_o$ & $2697 A_o$ \\
1171: Hot Annular Ring at Rm-cm (OBS) &$\delta(R_m)=0.025 R_g=1\times10^{13}cm$&
1172: $\delta(R_m) = 1.0 R_g
1173: =5.4\times10^{14}$\\
1174: Base of Radio Jet-cm (OBS) &$$ NONE-COMPACT SOURCE & $R=2\times 10^{16}$
1175: $H=9\times 10^{16}$ \\
1176: Elvis Outflow Structure-cm (OBS) &$R=8.2\times 10^{17}$ $H=1.6\times
1177: 10^{17}$ & $R=2\times 10^{17}$ $H=5\times 10^{16}$\\
1178: \hline
1179: \end{tabular}\\
1180: \bigskip
1181:
1182: In Table 2 the data presented is intended to be read as follows:
1183:
1184: The scaling relations from Table 1 and other
1185: input data are used to determine the properties of Q2237 in the Radio
1186: Quiet High Soft State and Q0957 in the Radio Loud Low Hard State.
1187: We emphasize in the lower rows the model derived predicted values of
1188: observable parameters, principally the observable size scales. However many
1189: of these size scales have already entered the MECO model calculations, but
1190: are repeated here for a complete listing of observable and physical
1191: properties.
1192: \end{table*}
1193:
1194:
1195: \newpage
1196: \begin{figure}
1197: \begin{center}
1198: \plotone{f1.eps}
1199: %% \end{center}
1200: \caption{A cross-section view comparing the structures of two quasars with
1201: structure determined by microlensing-reverberation analysis. For both
1202: quasars, the compact central object (MECO) is a small dot on the left, and
1203: to its right is the accretion disc plane for the right-hand side of the
1204: quasar. To aid comparison of the visible structures, both have been scaled
1205: to make the distance from the central object to the light cylinder and
1206: Elvis structure the same, although in reality the Q2237 quasar is $\times
1207: 3.5$ larger. Labels show the locations of the magnetic radius ($R_m$), the
1208: co-rotation radius ($R_{cr}$), and the light cylinder radius ($R_{lc}$). The
1209: UV-optical luminous structures are the bright band at the inner edge of the
1210: accretion disc and the surfaces of the Elvis structures on the irradiated
1211: side of the dusty torus.}
1212: \label{fig. 1}
1213: \end{center}
1214: \end{figure}
1215:
1216:
1217: \newpage
1218: \begin{figure}
1219: \begin{center}
1220: \plotone{f2.eps}
1221: \end{center}
1222: \caption{A cartoon showing comparison of the inner structure of the two
1223: quasars, emphasizing the important relationship of the magnetospheric
1224: radius $R_m$ (at the inner edge of the accretion disc), to the co-rotation
1225: radius $R_{cr}$, which is where the Keplerian orbital speed equals the
1226: sweeping magnetic field speed. For this comparison the two quasars have
1227: been rescaled to have the same co-rotation radius $R_{cr}$ to emphasize how
1228: the accretion disc in Q2237 penetrates almost to the central MECO because
1229: of its higher accretion rate, whereas
1230: in Q0957 its luminous inner edge is outside of co-rotation. This difference
1231: is the physical reason for the difference in spectral states between the
1232: two quasars.}
1233: \label{fig. 2}
1234: \end{figure}
1235:
1236:
1237:
1238: \end{document}
1239:
1240:
1241:
1242: