1: %% \documentstyle[emulateapj,psfig,natbib,amsfonts,amsmath]{article}
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: \citestyle{aa}
4:
5: \def\ra#1#2#3{#1$^{\rm h}$#2$^{\rm m}$#3$^{\rm s}$}
6: \def\dec#1#2#3{$#1^\circ#2'#3''$}
7: \def\nod{\nodata}
8: \def\grb{GRB\,Hosts}
9: \def\swift{{\it Swift}}
10: \def\sst{{\it Spitzer}}
11: \def\um{{$\mu$m}}
12:
13: \def\ociw{2}
14: \def\prince{3}
15: \def\hubble{4}
16: \def\ssc{1}
17: \def\uh{5}
18: \def\anu{6}
19: \def\psu{7}
20: \def\srl{8}
21: \def\cit{9}
22: \def\wisc{10}
23:
24: \slugcomment{Submitted to {\it The Astrophysical Journal}}
25: \shorttitle{{\it Spitzer} Observations of GRB Hosts}
26: \shortauthors{Chary et al.}
27:
28: \begin{document}
29:
30: \title{\sst\ Observations of Gamma-Ray Burst Host Galaxies: A Unique Window into High Redshift Chemical Evolution and Star-formation}
31:
32: \author{
33: R.~Chary\altaffilmark{\ssc},
34: E.~Berger\altaffilmark{\ociw,}\altaffilmark{\prince,}\altaffilmark{\hubble},
35: L.~Cowie\altaffilmark{\uh}
36: }
37:
38: \altaffiltext{\ssc}{Spitzer Science Center, California Institute
39: of Technology, Mail Stop 220-6, Pasadena, CA 91125}
40:
41: \altaffiltext{\ociw}{Observatories of the Carnegie Institution
42: of Washington, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101}
43:
44: \altaffiltext{\prince}{Princeton University Observatory,
45: Peyton Hall, Ivy Lane, Princeton, NJ 08544}
46:
47: \altaffiltext{\hubble}{Hubble Fellow}
48:
49: \altaffiltext{\uh}{Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, HI 96822}
50:
51: \begin{abstract}
52:
53: We present deep 3.6\,\um\ observations of three $z\sim 5$ GRB host
54: galaxies with the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}. The host of
55: GRB\,060510B, at $z=4.942$, is detected with a flux density of
56: $0.23\pm 0.04$ $\mu$Jy, corresponding to a rest-frame $V-$band
57: luminosity of $1.3\times 10^{10}$ L$_{\sun}$, or $\approx 0.15$ L$_{*, {\rm V}, z=3}$.
58: We do not detect the hosts of GRBs\,060223A and 060522 and constrain
59: their rest-frame $V-$band luminosity to $<0.1$ L$_{*, {\rm V}, z=3}$. Our
60: observations reveal that $z\sim 5$ GRB host galaxies are a factor of
61: $\sim 3$ less luminous than the median luminosity of
62: spectroscopically-confirmed $z\sim 5$ galaxies in the Great
63: Observatories Origins Deep Survey (GOODS) and the {\it Hubble} Ultra Deep Field (UDF).
64: The strong connection between GRBs and massive star formation implies
65: that not all star-forming galaxies at these redshifts are currently being
66: accounted for in deep surveys and GRBs provide a unique way to measure
67: the contribution to the star-formation rate density from galaxies at
68: the faint end of the galaxy luminosity function. By correlating the
69: co-moving star-formation rate density with co-moving GRB rates at
70: lower redshifts, we estimate a lower limit to the
71: star-formation rate density of $0.12\pm 0.09$ and $0.09\pm 0.05$
72: M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-3}$ at $z\sim 4.5$ and $z\sim 6$,
73: respectively. This is in excellent agreement with extinction corrected estimates from
74: Lyman-break galaxy samples. Finally, our observations provide initial
75: evidence that the metallicity of star-forming galaxies evolve more slowly than the stellar mass density
76: between $z\sim5$ and $z\sim0$, probably indicative of the loss of a significant
77: fraction of metals to the intergalactic medium, especially in low-mass galaxies.
78:
79: \end{abstract}
80:
81: \keywords{gamma rays:bursts --- cosmology:observations ---
82: galaxies:high-redshift --- galaxies:starburst --- galaxies:abundances}
83:
84:
85: \section{Introduction}
86: \label{sec:intro}
87:
88: Our ability to measure the star-formation rate density (SFRD) at $z>4$
89: relies almost entirely on either narrow-band surveys which detect
90: strong Ly$\alpha$ emitting galaxies \citep{Hu:04,Nagao:07} or deep
91: imaging surveys of UV bright Lyman-break galaxies
92: \citep{Gia:04,Bouw:06,Hu:06}. These surveys, by virtue of being flux
93: limited, trace the bright end of the galaxy luminosity function down
94: to $\sim 0.04$ L$_{*,{\rm UV},{\rm z=3}}$. The various observations have
95: revealed a decline in the SFRD by about
96: a factor of 3 between $z\sim 3$ and $z\sim 6$
97: \citep{Bouw:06,Bunker:04}, with much of this decline being due to the
98: evolution of the bright end of the galaxy luminosity function.
99:
100: More than
101: $90\%$ of the estimated SFRD at these redshifts takes place in
102: sub-L$_{*,{\rm UV},{\rm z=3}}$ galaxies.
103: In addition, spectroscopic confirmation of high redshift galaxies
104: relies on Ly$\alpha$ emission, which is easily obscured by dust.
105: There is now increasing evidence for rapid dust production within
106: $\sim 1$ Gyr of the Big Bang \citep{Chary:07, CSE:05, Maiolino:04}. As a
107: result, quantifying possible dust extinction corrections and measuring
108: the faint-end slope of the galaxy luminosity function is essential for
109: minimizing uncertainties in the high redshift SFRD.
110:
111: Measurements of the metallicity in typical star-forming
112: galaxies at $z>4$ is beyond the technological capability of the
113: current generation of instrumentation. The relevant rest-frame optical
114: emission lines are very weak and are redshifted to the mid-IR. The
115: alternative approach of studying chemical enrichment through damped
116: Ly$\alpha$ absorbers (DLAs) detected against background quasars
117: appears to be limited to $z\lesssim 5$ \citep{pgw:03, Songaila:02}, and is biased
118: towards tracing the properties of extended halo gas, which at lower
119: redshift, significantly underestimates the disk metallicity. As a
120: result, the apparent evolution in the mass-metallicity and
121: luminosity-metallicity relations ($M$-$Z$ and $L$-$Z$) from $z=0$ to
122: $z\sim 2$ \citep[e.g.][]{Tremonti:04, KK:04, Savaglio:05} cannot be
123: traced to $z>5$, where such information should shed light on the
124: initial stages of mass build-up and metal enrichment in galaxies.
125:
126: Long duration GRBs, by virtue of being associated with the deaths of
127: massive stars, provide a complementary technique for measuring the
128: SFRD and the chemical enrichment history. \swift\ has revolutionized
129: this study by detecting GRBs out to $z\sim 6$ \citep{Gehrels:04, Kawai:06}. Prompt spectroscopy of
130: the bright afterglows has now provided a sample of $\sim 20$ GRBs over
131: a wide range of redshifts with a wealth of metal absorption features
132: arising in the host galaxy \citep[e.g][]{Jensen:01, Castro:03, Hjorth:03, Vree:04, Fynbo:06}. These observations provide a unique
133: window into the metallicity and gas column density in star forming
134: environments at high redshifts \citep{Chen:05, Berger:06, PCB:06, Price, Prochaska:07}. Once
135: the afterglows fade away, deep observations of the field can also
136: reveal the stellar mass and star-formation rate of the host galaxies,
137: which can then be correlated with the inferred metallicities.
138:
139: In order to
140: study the host galaxies of high redshift GRBs and
141: take advantage of the diagnostics afforded by GRBs, we
142: present {\it Spitzer Space Telescope} 3.6 \um\ observations of the
143: hosts of three GRBs at $4\lesssim z\lesssim 5$. Building on the
144: constraints provided by \citet{Berger:07}
145: on the host galaxy of GRB\,050904 at $z=6.295$, we discuss the nature of the host galaxies,
146: redshift evolution of the luminosity-metallicity relation and provide
147: an independent measure of the high redshift SFRD for comparison with
148: estimates from Lyman-break galaxy samples. Throughout this paper, we
149: adopt a $\Omega_{M}=0.27$, $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.73$, H$_{0}$=71 km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$
150: cosmology.
151:
152:
153: \section{Observations}
154: \label{sec:obs}
155:
156: As part of \sst\ program GO\,20000 (PI: Berger) we observed the fields
157: of GRBs 060223A ($z=4.406$; Berger et al., in prep.), 060510B \citep[$z=4.942$;][]{Price}, and 060522
158: ($z=5.110$; Berger et al., in prep.) with the Infrared Array Camera \citep[IRAC;][]{Fazio:04}
159: in the bandpasses centered at 3.6 and 5.8 $\mu$m (Table 1). The
160: observations were undertaken between September and November 2006,
161: after the afterglows associated with the GRBs had faded below the
162: detectability threshold. As shown in Table 1, the GRB fields lie in
163: regions with ``low" to ``medium''-level zodiacal background and cirrus
164: of 13$-$28 MJy/sr at 24 $\mu$m on the date of the observations. We
165: used 100 s integrations with about 130 medium scale dithers from the
166: random cycling pattern for total on-source integration times of $\sim
167: 13000$ s at each passband. The nominal $3\sigma$ point source
168: sensitivity limits are 0.26 and 2.4 $\mu$Jy, respectively.
169:
170: Starting with the S14.4.0 pipeline-processed basic calibrated data
171: (BCD) sets we corrected the individual frames for muxbleed and column
172: pull down using software developed for the Great Observatories Origins
173: Deep Survey (GOODS). Due to the presence of bright stars in the
174: field, many of the frames at 3.6 $\mu$m also showed evidence for
175: ``muxstriping''. This was removed using an additive correction on a
176: column by column basis. The processed BCD frames were then mosaiced
177: together using the MOPEX routine \citep{mak:05} and drizzled onto a
178: $0.6\arcsec$ grid. Astrometry was performed with respect to the
179: brightest 2MASS stars in the field which showed a peak-to-peak
180: astrometric uncertainty of $0.2\arcsec$ at 3.6 $\mu$m.
181:
182: The location of the GRB hosts was determined by aligning the {\it
183: Spitzer} images against images of the afterglow from the \swift\
184: UV/optical telescope (060223A and 060522) and the Gemini Multi-Object
185: Spectrograph on the Gemini-north 8-m telescope (060510B). For the
186: latter, the astrometric uncertainty is $0.09\arcsec$ in each
187: coordinate, while using the UVOT images we obtain an astrometric
188: uncertainty of about $0.6\arcsec$.
189:
190: All three GRB locations show the presence of nearby ($3\arcsec$)
191: brighter galaxies: GRB\,060223A has two sources with flux densities of
192: 7.2 and 9.1 $\mu$Jy at distances of $1.9\arcsec$ and $2.3\arcsec$ from
193: the GRB position; GRB\,060510B has a source with a flux of 6.1 $\mu$Jy
194: about 3.1$\arcsec$ from the GRB position; and GRB\,060522 has a source
195: with 0.72 $\mu$Jy located 1.6$\arcsec$ away from the burst position.
196: This is not unexpected given the high source density in deep IRAC images.
197: %% Based on the source densities in deep GOODS
198: %% IRAC images (Dickinson et al., in prep.), we estimate that the probability of a 6 $\mu$Jy source falling
199: %% wihin a 3$\arcsec$ beam is 0.08 while there is a 25\% chance of a 0.7
200: %% $\mu$Jy source within the same area.
201: We subtracted the contribution
202: of these sources, in order to obtain the strongest possible constraints
203: on the flux from the GRB host galaxies.
204:
205: Photometry at the position of the host galaxies was performed in fixed
206: circular apertures of $1.2\arcsec$ radius with appropriate beam size
207: corrections applied as stated in the \sst\ Observer's Manual. We
208: clearly detect a galaxy coincident with the position of GRB\,060510B
209: with a flux density of $0.23\pm 0.04$ $\mu$Jy at 3.6 $\mu$m, and a
210: $3\sigma$ upper limit of 2.4 $\mu$Jy at 5.8 $\mu$m (Figure 1). For
211: GRBs 060223A and 060522, due to blending from nearby brighter sources
212: and the residual effects from muxbleed, we are only able to provide
213: $3\sigma$ upper limits to the flux of the host galaxy (Table 1).
214:
215:
216: \section{Luminosity and Metallicity of GRB Hosts}
217: \label{sec:prop}
218:
219: Of the 4 GRB host galaxies at $z\sim 5$ observed in this program at 3.6 and 5.8 \um,
220: (including GRB\,050904), only
221: GRB\,060510B is clearly detected. The observed 3.6 \um\ flux
222: densities/limits for these galaxies correspond to rest-frame $V-$band
223: luminosities of $\sim 0.15$ L$_{*,{\rm V},{\rm z=3}}$, where L$_{*,{\rm V},{\rm z=3}}$ is
224: about $8\times 10^{10}$ L$_{\sun}$ \citep{mar:07, Shapley:01}.
225: It is illustrative to compare the properties of GRB hosts with
226: the field galaxy population at similar redshifts.
227:
228: The GOODS fields have extensive spectroscopy of galaxies at high redshift
229: \citep{Vanzella:05, Eros:06, Eros:07}.
230: There are 275 Lyman-break galaxies in both the GOODS fields
231: which are classified as $V-$band ``dropouts'' i.e. $z\sim5$.
232: The magnitude limit of the GOODS optical observations imply that they are
233: brighter than $\sim 0.2$ L$_{*,{\rm UV},{\rm z=3}}$ \citep{Gia:04},
234: Of these, $\sim$20\% have spectroscopic redshifts while $\sim$30\% are
235: individually detected with IRAC. At higher redshifts, $z\sim6$,
236: it has been shown that galaxies which are individually undetected with IRAC
237: appear to harbor a younger stellar population and have a factor of 10 lower
238: stellar mass than IRAC detected galaxies \citep{Yan}.
239:
240: As shown in Figure 2, GRB host galaxies are factors of $2-3$ times
241: fainter than the median $V-$band luminosity of
242: galaxies which have spectroscopic redshifts of $4.5<z<5.5$ in the GOODS field.
243: Furthermore, the luminosities are comparable to the rest-frame $V-$band luminosity of
244: GRB hosts studied at lower redshifts \citep[e.g.;][]{CBA:02, lef:03}.
245: This suggests that GRB host galaxies are unlike the luminous end of the star-forming, Lyman-break
246: galaxy population which have had about a factor of 10 increase in their stellar mass
247: between $z\sim5$ and $z\sim1$. They are more typical of the blue, faint end of the
248: galaxy $V-$band luminosity function, a population for which it is difficult to measure
249: redshifts or metallicities, in the absence of GRBs, due to their inherent faintness.
250:
251: GRB host galaxies at $z\sim 0.5-3$, which have extensive multi-wavelength data,
252: show clear evidence for very high specific star
253: formation rates indicating an on-going starburst \citep{CBA:02, LC:04,
254: Castro:06}. We do not yet have constraints on the star formation
255: rates in the $z\sim 5$ host galaxies presented here, due to their intrinsic faintness in the
256: rest-frame UV \citep[see e.g.][]{Fruchter, Jakobsson:05}. However, spectroscopy of the afterglows by
257: \citet{Price} and Berger et al. (in prep.) has revealed a
258: wealth of absorption lines which have been used to derive the
259: metallicity and gas column density in the vicinity of the burst.
260:
261: Absorption spectroscopy of the three bursts presented here have yielded
262: neutral hydrogen gas densities in their host galaxies of: ${\rm log}[N({\rm
263: HI})]=21.6\pm 0.1$ (060223A), ${\rm log}[N({\rm HI})]=21.3\pm 0.1$
264: (060510B), and ${\rm log}[N({\rm HI})]=21.0\pm 0.3$ (060522). Thus,
265: all three systems are clearly DLAs, with column densities near the median of
266: the distribution for GRB-DLAs \citep{Berger:06, Jakob:06}. In addition,
267: the metallicities of the GRB 060223A and 060510B systems have been determined from
268: the detection of weak metal lines. For GRB\,060522 the
269: signal-to-noise of the spectrum is too low to clearly identify any
270: metal lines and an estimate of the metallicity is thus not possible.
271: In the case of GRB\,060223A, we find an upper limit on the column
272: density of \ion{S}{2} of ${\rm log}[N({\rm SiII})]<15.3$, leading to a metallicity
273: of ${\rm [S/H]}<-1.45$. The non-detection of \ion{Fe}{2}$\lambda
274: 1608$ leads to a limit of ${\rm [Fe/H]}<-2.65$, but we stress that
275: iron can be heavily depleted onto dust grains. From the
276: detection of the \ion{Si}{2}$\lambda 1304$ line we find
277: ${\rm log}[N({\rm SiII})] \approx 15.3$, and hence ${\rm [Si/H]}\approx -1.8$. As in the
278: case of iron, silicon is also strongly depleted, so we conclude that
279: the metallicity of the GRB\,060223A DLA is in the range of $\sim -1.8$
280: to $\sim -1.4$. For GRB\,060510B, we use the
281: \ion{S}{2}$\lambda\lambda 1250,1253$ lines to measure ${\rm
282: log}[N({\rm SiII})]=15.6\pm 0.1$, and hence a metallicity, ${\rm
283: [S/H]}=-0.85\pm 0.15$ \citep[see also][]{Price}.
284:
285: The metallicity estimates of the GRB hosts along with their rest-frame $B-$band
286: luminosities (assuming a $B-V$ color of 0, typical of star-forming galaxies) are
287: shown in Figure 3.
288: Also shown for comparison are the metallicity-luminosity relationships for different
289: samples of field galaxies.
290: Despite the one detection and two limits for the luminosity
291: of the host galaxies, the figure shows that the redshift evolution of metallicity
292: at a fixed $B-$band luminosity that is seen between $0<z<2$, clearly extends out
293: to $z\sim5$.
294:
295: The chemical enrichment of galaxies is directly related to their past history of star-formation since
296: supernovae and stellar winds are responsible for recycling the products of nucleosynthesis back into
297: the interstellar medium.
298: The stellar mass density is the time integral of the star-formation history.
299: By comparing the redshift evolution of the stellar mass density
300: ($\rho_{*}$) \citep[e.g][]{Dickinson, Yan, Stark, Chary:07}, with the redshift evolution of the
301: metallicity ($Z$), we can search for evolution of the stellar initial mass function and assess the
302: role of feedback in the build-up of galaxies. The {\it Spitzer} observations of the hosts
303: are crucial, since they enable metallicity comparisons to be made at a fixed rest-frame
304: $V-$band luminosity, over a wide range of redshifts.
305:
306: Due to the fact that we have constraints on the $V-$band luminosity and metallicity of
307: only one $z\sim5$ GRB host,
308: we make the assumption that the median metallicity at each redshift, is that of a galaxy which has
309: a similar luminosity as the GRB host. This is not an unreasonable assumption. Within the
310: observational uncertainties, the slope of
311: the mass-metallicity relation appears to be invariant between $z\sim0$ and $z\sim2$ \citep{Erb}.
312: The metallicity values are obtained by effectively making a vertical cut
313: at $-20.8$ mag in Figure 3 and are determined to be $-0.85\pm$0.15, $-0.35\pm$0.1 and $0.33\pm$0.1 dex
314: at redshifts of 5, 2.3 and 0 respectively.
315: The average estimated $\rho_{*}$ at these redshifts are 1.4, 6 and 56 in units of 10$^{7}$~M$_{\sun}$~Mpc$^{-3}$
316: (See references above).
317: We performed a Monte-Carlo analysis to obtain the best fit between $Z(z)$ and $\rho_{*}(z)$.
318:
319: Star-forming galaxies which fall on the local mass-metallicity relationship, show a scatter
320: of $\sim$0.1 dex at bright luminosities and $\sim$0.2 dex at faint luminosities \citep{Tremonti:04}.
321: We use a random number generator to offset the stellar mass density and metallicity by the
322: observed scatter from the mean values quoted above \citep[See][Table 3 for the range in stellar mass density]{Dickinson}.
323: We fit for the relation between $Z(z)-\rho_{*}(z)$ and repeat the process 10000 times.
324: We find that
325: ${\rm d}Z/d\rho_{*}$ appears to be invariant between $0<z<5$ and that $Z(z)\propto\rho_{*}(z)^{0.69\pm0.17}$. This
326: suggests that the chemical enrichment of star-forming
327: galaxies takes place at a slower rate than the build up of stellar mass.
328: This is presumably due to the loss of metals from low-mass galaxies by outflows
329: and stellar winds, an effect which is primarily responsible for the
330: mass-metallicity relation seen in the local Universe \citep{Tremonti:04} and $z\sim2$ Lyman-break
331: galaxies \citep{Erb}. However, alternate mechanisms such as depletion of metals onto dust grains
332: cannot be ruled out at this time.
333:
334: There is the possibility of a selection effect in this analysis. If long duration GRBs arise in collapsars,
335: they might preferentially be in low-metallicity galaxies. As a result, it is possible that
336: GRB hosts have a lower metallicity than the average field galaxy of the same rest-frame optical
337: luminosity. Although
338: GRB hosts appear to be have low luminosities in the rest-frame UV and $V-$band, the observational evidence does not
339: indicate that the hosts have an unusually low-metallicity for their luminosity.
340: Metallicity of
341: GRB host galaxies appear to span the
342: range 0.1$-$1~Z$_{{\rm solar}}$ \citep[e.g][]{Berger:07b, Berger:06, Prochaska:07a} and some of the hosts have even been found
343: to be associated with dusty, infrared luminous galaxies \citep[e.g][]{lef:06}.
344:
345: Nevertheless, we assess the reliability of our derived
346: $Z(z)-\rho_{*}(z)$ relation by considering a bias in the metallicity of GRB environments.
347: If we assume that the metallicity of the GRB environment is higher by $>$0.3 dex compared to the mean metallicity
348: of a galaxy at its luminosity, it implies that the mean metallicity at $z\sim5$ for a field galaxy at the luminosity
349: of the GRB host is -1.15$\pm$0.15.
350: The best fit relation to the three points is then consistent with an exponent
351: of unity i.e. $Z(z)\propto\rho_{*}(z)^{0.85\pm0.19}$ but has a worse $\chi^{2}$.
352: The corollary is that if GRB hosts were biased by 0.3 dex towards lower metallicities, compared to the mean metallicity
353: of a galaxy at its luminosity, the best fit relation is $Z(z)\propto\rho_{*}(z)^{0.52\pm0.16}$ which is a larger
354: deviation from unity.
355: Furthermore, if there were a bias
356: in GRB host metallicities, the slope of the $Z(z)-\rho_{*}(z)$ relation derived above at a fixed
357: $B-$band luminosity, would have
358: a different value between $2<z<5$ and $0<z<2$ due to the fact that the $0<z<2$ relation is determined
359: from star-forming galaxies while the $2<z<5$ relation is derived from GRB hosts and Lyman-break galaxies.
360: This is inconsistent with our fits, although larger samples of GRB hosts are needed to eliminate suggestions
361: of bias.
362:
363: Detection of individual GRB hosts at
364: high redshifts is likely to remain difficult, due to their intrinsic faintness. There is a clear need
365: for homogeneous infrared surveys of GRB host galaxies which will
366: enable stacking to be performed as a function of metallicity, gas
367: density and rest-frame ultraviolet properties. Within our sample,
368: GRB050904 is a marginal IRAC detection \citep{Berger:07},
369: while GRB060223A is dominated by detector systematics. As a result,
370: we are unable to provide additional constraints using stacking.
371: Observations of a larger sample of GRB hosts, such as those currently being
372: targeted in \sst\ program GO4-40599 (PI: Chary),
373: will allow
374: the luminosity-metallicity relation to be measured at high redshift and
375: lead to a better understanding of the faint end of the galaxy luminosity
376: function, a regime which is currently inaccessible even through
377: ultradeep surveys like GOODS and the UDF.
378:
379: \section{Evolution of the Star-formation Rate Density}
380: \label{sec:conc}
381:
382: It is now well known from various mid-infrared, far-infrared and
383: submillimeter surveys, that the star-formation rate density
384: at $z\sim0.5-2.5$ is dominated by infrared luminous galaxies
385: with L$_{{\rm IR}}$=L$(8-1000\,\mu {\rm m})>10^{11}$~L$_{\sun}$ and L$_{{\rm IR}}$/L$_{{\rm UV}}\sim10-100$
386: \citep[e.g][]{tak:05, Denis, Chary:01}. At $z\gtrsim3$, current long-wavelength surveys,
387: due to their limited sensitivity, are unable to detect
388: galaxies which harbor the bulk of the star-formation. Thus, rest-frame ultraviolet
389: observations of galaxies are the only avenue for probing star-formation at high redshifts.
390:
391: The primary uncertainties
392: associated with quantifying the SFRD at $z>3$, are the contribution from galaxies
393: at the faint end of the UV-luminosity function and dust corrections.
394: Since sub-L$_{*, {\rm UV},z=3}$ galaxies contribute $\sim$90\% of the SFRD, measurement
395: of the faint-end slope of the ultraviolet luminosity function, where completeness
396: corrections and surface brightness
397: dimming issues are significant, needs to be undertaken carefully \citep{Steidel, Bouw:06}.
398: Similarly, if extinction were a significant issue, the galaxies that dominate the
399: star-formation rate density would be UV-faint or undetected in magnitude limited
400: rest-frame ultraviolet surveys. GRBs are relatively insensitive to these limitations.
401: If the GRB rate density were correlated with the co-moving star-formation rate density
402: at lower redshifts, where cross-calibration between the UV and IR are in broad agreement,
403: measurement of the GRB rate density at $z>3$ could provide an independent pathway to
404: quantifying the SFRD \citep[see also e.g.;][]{Price:06}.
405:
406: The three parameters which are most likely to dominate the calibration between GRBs and the
407: star-formation rate density are the evolution of metallicity with redshift, evolution
408: of the initial mass function of stars and identification and spectroscopic follow up of the GRB afterglow.
409: If long duration GRBs were to preferentially occur in low metallicity environments,
410: the increase in the average metallicity of the Universe with decreasing redshift would result in a higher
411: SFR/GRB-rate ratio at low redshift. Similarly, evolution of the stellar initial mass function
412: from a ``top-heavy" to a Salpeter mass function with decreasing redshift would increase the
413: SFR/GRB-rate ratio at low redshift.
414: On the other hand, the
415: detection efficiency and spectroscopic completeness of GRBs should be increasing
416: with decreasing redshift, implying a lower SFR/GRB-rate ratio at low redshift.
417:
418: Calibrating each of these parameters individually is challenging at the present time,
419: partly because the relationship between GRB rate and environment is not well known and
420: due to the fact that observational selection effects cannot be quantified.
421: Therefore, we need to rely on empirical comparisons between known star-formation rate
422: estimates and GRB rate densities to assess GRBs as a star-formation rate indicator.
423: This empirical comparison can be optimally done at $z<3$ since in this
424: redshift range the star-formation rate, including the dust obscured component,
425: has been accurately determined from deep mid-infrared and submillimeter
426: surveys.
427:
428: We use the star-formation rate density at $z<3$ from
429: \citet{Chary:01}. We distribute the 52 \swift\ GRBs with spectroscopic
430: redshifts into redshift bins
431: and divide by the co-moving volume in each redshift bin. We also
432: correct for the time dilation to estimate the comoving GRB rate
433: density over the $\sim 2$ year \swift\ lifetime. The redshift bin at
434: $z<0.5$ is omitted since the GRB rate density appears to be anomalously
435: high compared to the rapidly evolving star-formation rate density.
436: We find that within the uncertainties, the
437: rate density of GRBs with spectroscopic redshifts in the range
438: $0.5<z<3$ is constant at a value of $(3.7\pm 1.1)\times 10^{-11}$
439: Mpc$^{-3}$ yr$^{-1}$. This can be compared with the extinction-corrected
440: comoving
441: star-formation rate density in the same redshift range which is
442: in the range 0.12$-$0.25\,M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-3}$
443: and has an average value of $\sim 0.2$ M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-3}$
444: \citep{Chary:01}.
445:
446: Since these two independent rate densities are relatively constant in the
447: $0.5<z<3$ range, we can tentatively make the assumption that the SFR/GRB-rate
448: is constant (Figure 4). The ratio of these two rates implies:
449: \begin{equation}
450: {\rm SFRD} = {\rm GRB~rate} \times (5.2\pm 2.3)\times10^{9},
451: \end{equation}
452: where SFRD is the extinction-corrected star-formation rate density in
453: M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-3}$ and GRB rate is in units of Mpc$^{-3}$
454: yr$^{-1}$.
455:
456: Using our derived calibration, and the measured GRB rate densities at
457: $4<z<5$ and $5<z<7$ of $(2.4\pm 1.2)\times10^{-11}$ and $(1.8\pm
458: 0.9)\times10^{-11}$ Mpc$^{-3}$ yr$^{-1}$, respectively, we infer a net
459: star-formation rate, corrected for extinction, of $0.12\pm 0.06$ and
460: $0.09\pm 0.05$ M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-3}$ at $z\sim 4.5$ and
461: $z\sim 6$ respectively. These estimates are systematically higher
462: than those derived by \citet{Price:06} by factors of $3-5$. The \citet{Price:06} estimates
463: were calibrated at $z\sim3$ where neither the completeness correction
464: factor for the faint end of the UV luminosity function nor the dust
465: extinction correction are reliably known while deep {\it Spitzer} mid-infrared
466: surveys have confirmed the dominant contribution of infrared luminous galaxies
467: to the star-formation rate density at $0.5<z<3$ \citep{tak:05, Daddi:07}.
468: The fact that the GRB rate density
469: is almost flat between $0.5<z<6$, while parameters such as the
470: detection efficiency and spectroscopic completeness should be decreasing
471: with increasing redshift, implies that the measured
472: GRB rate density provides at least a
473: lower limit to the star-formation rate density.
474:
475: It is illustrative to compare this star formation rate estimate with
476: those from deep rest-frame ultraviolet surveys at
477: $z>4$. \citet{Gia:04} derive a star-formation rate density at $z\sim
478: 4$ of 0.02 M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-3}$ when integrating to 0.2
479: $L_{*,{\rm UV},{\rm z=3}}$. After application of an extinction correction of
480: $A_{\rm V}=0.45$ mag, based on the extinction properties in local
481: starburst galaxies, they estimate the total star-formation rate
482: density at $z\sim 4$ to be 0.15 M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-3}$.
483: Similarly, \citet{Bouw:06} derive a star-formation rate density at
484: $z\sim 6$ by integrating the luminosity function of Lyman-break
485: galaxies in the UDF and other deep fields. Integrating the UV luminosity function
486: down to 0.2\,$L_{*, {\rm UV},{\rm z=3}}$ results in a value of $1.3\times 10^{-2}$ M$_{\sun}$
487: yr$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-3}$ while the integral
488: to $10^7$ $L_{\sun}$ yields a SFRD
489: of 0.04 M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-3}$. Application of an extinction correction,
490: inferred to be about $A_{\rm UV}$=0.45 mag at $z\sim6$,
491: to this latter number, implies a SFRD of 0.06\,M$_{\sun}$~yr$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-3}$.
492:
493: The agreement between the SFRD values estimated from ultraviolet
494: surveys and the GRB rate density is reassuring, considering that there
495: have been only 8 GRBs that have been spectroscopically confirmed to be
496: at $z>4$ (Figure 4). However, the SFRD from GRBs primarily
497: traces the faint end of the galaxy luminosity function while the surveys
498: are measuring the contribution from the bright end. As a result,
499: a more reasonable
500: SFRD estimate requires adding the SFRD contribution estimated from the
501: faint end of the galaxy luminosity function, from GRBs, to
502: that from bright LBGs.
503:
504: GRB hosts are fainter than 0.2 $L_{*,{\rm V, z=3}}$. Based
505: on the UV to $V-$band flux ratios of star-forming galaxies
506: at $z\sim3$, it implies that GRB hosts must be fainter than 0.2\,$L_{*,{\rm UV, z=3}}$
507: Adding the SFRD from $L>0.2~L_{\rm *,UV, z=3}$ galaxies to that inferred
508: from the GRB rate density results in an extinction corrected
509: SFRD of $0.27\pm 0.13$ and $0.11\pm 0.05$ M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$
510: Mpc$^{-3}$ at $z\sim 4.5$ and $z\sim 6$, respectively. If confirmed through
511: a larger statistical sample, this is a substantial upward revision suggesting
512: that $L<0.2~L_{\rm *,UV, z=3}$ galaxies contribute at least four times as much
513: to the star-formation rate density at $z\sim6$ as the bright end ($L>0.2~L_{\rm *,UV, z=3}$)
514: of the UV luminosity function. Indirectly, this implies that the faint end slope
515: of the UV luminosity function at $z\sim6$ must be $\sim-1.9$, compared to the value of
516: $-1.73$ that was derived by \citet{Bouw:06}.
517:
518: GRBs are a powerful tool for measuring the high redshift star-formation
519: rate density. In particular, deep {\it Spitzer}
520: observations of GRB hosts can reveal
521: the contribution to the star-formation rate density from the faint
522: end of the galaxy luminosity function,
523: a regime which is inaccessible to deep, rest-frame ultraviolet/near-infrared
524: surveys. Increasing the sample of high redshift GRBs will reduce the
525: uncertainties in the star-formation rate density unaffected by
526: extinction and through stacking analysis on the host
527: galaxies will help estimate the contribution to the stellar mass
528: density from sub-$L_{*}$ galaxies. Comparison between star-formation rate
529: estimates from GRBs with those from deep UV surveys will provide
530: better constraints on the evolution of dust extinction at high
531: redshift and provide tremendous insights into the chemical enrichment
532: of the early Universe.
533:
534: \acknowledgements
535:
536: We wish to thank Mark Dickinson for his comments which strengthened
537: the arguments in this paper. We also acknowledge the extensive resources
538: that are invested by the entire GRB community, not all of whom can be cited here,
539: which enables prompt imaging and spectroscopic
540: follow-up of the bursts. This work is based on
541: observations made with the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
542: California Institute of Technology under a contract with NASA. Support
543: for this work was provided by NASA through an award issued by
544: JPL/Caltech.
545: EB acknowledges support by NASA through Hubble
546: Fellowship grant HST-01171.01 awarded by STSCI, which is operated by
547: AURA, Inc., for NASA under contract NAS5-26555.
548:
549: \begin{thebibliography}{56}
550: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
551:
552: \bibitem[{{Berger} {et~al.}(2006{\natexlab{a}}){Berger}, {Chary}, {Cowie},
553: {Price}, {Schmidt}, {Fox}, {Cenko}, {Djorgovski}, {Soderberg}, {Kulkarni},
554: {McCarthy}, {Gladders}, {Peterson}, \& {Barger}}]{Berger:07}
555: {Berger}, E., {Chary}, R., {Cowie}, L.~L., {Price}, P.~A., {Schmidt}, B.~P.,
556: {Fox}, D.~B., {Cenko}, S.~B., {Djorgovski}, S.~G., {Soderberg}, A.~M.,
557: {Kulkarni}, S.~R., {McCarthy}, P.~J., {Gladders}, M.~D., {Peterson}, B.~A.,
558: \& {Barger}, A.~J. 2006{\natexlab{a}}, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints
559:
560: \bibitem[{{Berger} {et~al.}(2007){Berger}, {Fox}, {Kulkarni}, {Frail}, \&
561: {Djorgovski}}]{Berger:07b}
562: {Berger}, E., {Fox}, D.~B., {Kulkarni}, S.~R., {Frail}, D.~A., \& {Djorgovski},
563: S.~G. 2007, \apj, 660, 504
564:
565: \bibitem[{{Berger} {et~al.}(2006{\natexlab{b}}){Berger}, {Penprase}, {Cenko},
566: {Kulkarni}, {Fox}, {Steidel}, \& {Reddy}}]{Berger:06}
567: {Berger}, E., {Penprase}, B.~E., {Cenko}, S.~B., {Kulkarni}, S.~R., {Fox},
568: D.~B., {Steidel}, C.~C., \& {Reddy}, N.~A. 2006{\natexlab{b}}, \apj, 642, 979
569:
570: \bibitem[{{Bouwens} {et~al.}(2006){Bouwens}, {Illingworth}, {Blakeslee}, \&
571: {Franx}}]{Bouw:06}
572: {Bouwens}, R.~J., {Illingworth}, G.~D., {Blakeslee}, J.~P., \& {Franx}, M.
573: 2006, \apj, 653, 53
574:
575: \bibitem[{{Bunker} {et~al.}(2004){Bunker}, {Stanway}, {Ellis}, \&
576: {McMahon}}]{Bunker:04}
577: {Bunker}, A.~J., {Stanway}, E.~R., {Ellis}, R.~S., \& {McMahon}, R.~G. 2004,
578: \mnras, 355, 374
579:
580: \bibitem[{{Burgarella} {et~al.}(2006){Burgarella}, {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez},
581: {Tyler}, {Rieke}, {Buat}, {Takeuchi}, {Lauger}, {Arnouts}, {Ilbert},
582: {Barlow}, {Bianchi}, {Lee}, {Madore}, {Malina}, {Szalay}, \& {Yi}}]{Denis}
583: {Burgarella}, D., {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, P.~G., {Tyler}, K.~D., {Rieke},
584: G.~H., {Buat}, V., {Takeuchi}, T.~T., {Lauger}, S., {Arnouts}, S., {Ilbert},
585: O., {Barlow}, T.~A., {Bianchi}, L., {Lee}, Y.-W., {Madore}, B.~F., {Malina},
586: R.~F., {Szalay}, A.~S., \& {Yi}, S.~K. 2006, \aap, 450, 69
587:
588: \bibitem[{{Castro} {et~al.}(2003){Castro}, {Galama}, {Harrison}, {Holtzman},
589: {Bloom}, {Djorgovski}, \& {Kulkarni}}]{Castro:03}
590: {Castro}, S., {Galama}, T.~J., {Harrison}, F.~A., {Holtzman}, J.~A., {Bloom},
591: J.~S., {Djorgovski}, S.~G., \& {Kulkarni}, S.~R. 2003, \apj, 586, 128
592:
593: \bibitem[{{Castro Cer{\'o}n} {et~al.}(2006){Castro Cer{\'o}n},
594: {Micha{\l}owski}, {Hjorth}, {Watson}, {Fynbo}, \& {Gorosabel}}]{Castro:06}
595: {Castro Cer{\'o}n}, J.~M., {Micha{\l}owski}, M.~J., {Hjorth}, J., {Watson}, D.,
596: {Fynbo}, J.~P.~U., \& {Gorosabel}, J. 2006, \apjl, 653, L85
597:
598: \bibitem[{{Chary} {et~al.}(2002){Chary}, {Becklin}, \& {Armus}}]{CBA:02}
599: {Chary}, R., {Becklin}, E.~E., \& {Armus}, L. 2002, \apj, 566, 229
600:
601: \bibitem[{Chary \& Elbaz(2001)}]{Chary:01}
602: Chary, R. \& Elbaz, D. 2001, \apj, 556, 562
603:
604: \bibitem[{{Chary} {et~al.}(2007)}]{Chary:07}
605: {Chary}, R. {et~al.} 2007, \apj, submitted
606:
607: \bibitem[{{Chary} {et~al.}(2005){Chary}, {Stern}, \& {Eisenhardt}}]{CSE:05}
608: {Chary}, R.-R., {Stern}, D., \& {Eisenhardt}, P. 2005, \apjl, 635, L5
609:
610: \bibitem[{{Chen} {et~al.}(2005){Chen}, {Prochaska}, {Bloom}, \&
611: {Thompson}}]{Chen:05}
612: {Chen}, H.-W., {Prochaska}, J.~X., {Bloom}, J.~S., \& {Thompson}, I.~B. 2005,
613: \apjl, 634, L25
614:
615: \bibitem[{{Christensen} {et~al.}(2004){Christensen}, {Hjorth}, \&
616: {Gorosabel}}]{LC:04}
617: {Christensen}, L., {Hjorth}, J., \& {Gorosabel}, J. 2004, \aap, 425, 913
618:
619: \bibitem[{{Daddi} {et~al.}(2007){Daddi}, {Dickinson}, {Morrison}, {Chary},
620: {Cimatti}, {Elbaz}, {Frayer}, {Renzini}, {Pope}, {Alexander}, {Bauer},
621: {Giavalisco}, {Huynh}, {Kurk}, \& {Mignoli}}]{Daddi:07}
622: {Daddi}, E., {Dickinson}, M., {Morrison}, G., {Chary}, R., {Cimatti}, A.,
623: {Elbaz}, D., {Frayer}, D., {Renzini}, A., {Pope}, A., {Alexander}, D.~M.,
624: {Bauer}, F.~E., {Giavalisco}, M., {Huynh}, M., {Kurk}, J., \& {Mignoli}, M.
625: 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 705
626:
627: \bibitem[{{Dickinson} {et~al.}(2003){Dickinson}, {Papovich}, {Ferguson}, \&
628: {Budav{\'a}ri}}]{Dickinson}
629: {Dickinson}, M., {Papovich}, C., {Ferguson}, H.~C., \& {Budav{\'a}ri}, T. 2003,
630: \apj, 587, 25
631:
632: \bibitem[{{Erb} {et~al.}(2006){Erb}, {Shapley}, {Pettini}, {Steidel}, {Reddy},
633: \& {Adelberger}}]{Erb}
634: {Erb}, D.~K., {Shapley}, A.~E., {Pettini}, M., {Steidel}, C.~C., {Reddy},
635: N.~A., \& {Adelberger}, K.~L. 2006, \apj, 644, 813
636:
637: \bibitem[{Fazio {et~al.}(2004)}]{Fazio:04}
638: Fazio, G.~G. {et~al.} 2004, \apjs, 154, 10
639:
640: \bibitem[{{Fruchter} {et~al.}(2006){Fruchter}, {Levan}, {Strolger},
641: {Vreeswijk}, {Thorsett}, {Bersier}, {Burud}, {Castro Cer{\'o}n},
642: {Castro-Tirado}, {Conselice}, {Dahlen}, {Ferguson}, {Fynbo}, {Garnavich},
643: {Gibbons}, {Gorosabel}, {Gull}, {Hjorth}, {Holland}, {Kouveliotou}, {Levay},
644: {Livio}, {Metzger}, {Nugent}, {Petro}, {Pian}, {Rhoads}, {Riess}, {Sahu},
645: {Smette}, {Tanvir}, {Wijers}, \& {Woosley}}]{Fruchter}
646: {Fruchter}, A.~S., {Levan}, A.~J., {Strolger}, L., {Vreeswijk}, P.~M.,
647: {Thorsett}, S.~E., {Bersier}, D., {Burud}, I., {Castro Cer{\'o}n}, J.~M.,
648: {Castro-Tirado}, A.~J., {Conselice}, C., {Dahlen}, T., {Ferguson}, H.~C.,
649: {Fynbo}, J.~P.~U., {Garnavich}, P.~M., {Gibbons}, R.~A., {Gorosabel}, J.,
650: {Gull}, T.~R., {Hjorth}, J., {Holland}, S.~T., {Kouveliotou}, C., {Levay},
651: Z., {Livio}, M., {Metzger}, M.~R., {Nugent}, P.~E., {Petro}, L., {Pian}, E.,
652: {Rhoads}, J.~E., {Riess}, A.~G., {Sahu}, K.~C., {Smette}, A., {Tanvir},
653: N.~R., {Wijers}, R.~A.~M.~J., \& {Woosley}, S.~E. 2006, \nat, 441, 463
654:
655: \bibitem[{{Fynbo} {et~al.}(2006){Fynbo}, {Starling}, {Ledoux}, {Wiersema},
656: {Th{\"o}ne}, {Sollerman}, {Jakobsson}, {Hjorth}, {Watson}, {Vreeswijk},
657: {M{\o}ller}, {Rol}, {Gorosabel}, {N{\"a}r{\"a}nen}, {Wijers},
658: {Bj{\"o}rnsson}, {Castro Cer{\'o}n}, {Curran}, {Hartmann}, {Holland},
659: {Jensen}, {Levan}, {Limousin}, {Kouveliotou}, {Nelemans}, {Pedersen},
660: {Priddey}, \& {Tanvir}}]{Fynbo:06}
661: {Fynbo}, J.~P.~U., {Starling}, R.~L.~C., {Ledoux}, C., {Wiersema}, K.,
662: {Th{\"o}ne}, C.~C., {Sollerman}, J., {Jakobsson}, P., {Hjorth}, J., {Watson},
663: D., {Vreeswijk}, P.~M., {M{\o}ller}, P., {Rol}, E., {Gorosabel}, J.,
664: {N{\"a}r{\"a}nen}, J., {Wijers}, R.~A.~M.~J., {Bj{\"o}rnsson}, G., {Castro
665: Cer{\'o}n}, J.~M., {Curran}, P., {Hartmann}, D.~H., {Holland}, S.~T.,
666: {Jensen}, B.~L., {Levan}, A.~J., {Limousin}, M., {Kouveliotou}, C.,
667: {Nelemans}, G., {Pedersen}, K., {Priddey}, R.~S., \& {Tanvir}, N.~R. 2006,
668: \aap, 451, L47
669:
670: \bibitem[{Gehrels {et~al.}(2004)}]{Gehrels:04}
671: Gehrels, N. {et~al.} 2004, \apj, 611, 1005
672:
673: \bibitem[{{Giavalisco} {et~al.}(2004){Giavalisco}, {Dickinson}, {Ferguson},
674: {Ravindranath}, {Kretchmer}, {Moustakas}, {Madau}, {Fall}, {Gardner},
675: {Livio}, {Papovich}, {Renzini}, {Spinrad}, {Stern}, \& {Riess}}]{Gia:04}
676: {Giavalisco}, M., {Dickinson}, M., {Ferguson}, H.~C., {Ravindranath}, S.,
677: {Kretchmer}, C., {Moustakas}, L.~A., {Madau}, P., {Fall}, S.~M., {Gardner},
678: J.~P., {Livio}, M., {Papovich}, C., {Renzini}, A., {Spinrad}, H., {Stern},
679: D., \& {Riess}, A. 2004, \apjl, 600, L103
680:
681: \bibitem[{{Hjorth} {et~al.}(2003){Hjorth}, {M{\o}ller}, {Gorosabel}, {Fynbo},
682: {Toft}, {Jaunsen}, {Kaas}, {Pursimo}, {Torii}, {Kato}, {Yamaoka}, {Yoshida},
683: {Thomsen}, {Andersen}, {Burud}, {Castro Cer{\'o}n}, {Castro-Tirado},
684: {Fruchter}, {Kaper}, {Kouveliotou}, {Masetti}, {Palazzi}, {Pedersen}, {Pian},
685: {Rhoads}, {Rol}, {Tanvir}, {Vreeswijk}, {Wijers}, \& {van den
686: Heuvel}}]{Hjorth:03}
687: {Hjorth}, J., {M{\o}ller}, P., {Gorosabel}, J., {Fynbo}, J.~P.~U., {Toft}, S.,
688: {Jaunsen}, A.~O., {Kaas}, A.~A., {Pursimo}, T., {Torii}, K., {Kato}, T.,
689: {Yamaoka}, H., {Yoshida}, A., {Thomsen}, B., {Andersen}, M.~I., {Burud}, I.,
690: {Castro Cer{\'o}n}, J.~M., {Castro-Tirado}, A.~J., {Fruchter}, A.~S.,
691: {Kaper}, L., {Kouveliotou}, C., {Masetti}, N., {Palazzi}, E., {Pedersen}, H.,
692: {Pian}, E., {Rhoads}, J., {Rol}, E., {Tanvir}, N.~R., {Vreeswijk}, P.~M.,
693: {Wijers}, R.~A.~M.~J., \& {van den Heuvel}, E.~P.~J. 2003, \apj, 597, 699
694:
695: \bibitem[{{Hu} \& {Cowie}(2006)}]{Hu:06}
696: {Hu}, E.~M. \& {Cowie}, L.~L. 2006, \nat, 440, 1145
697:
698: \bibitem[{{Hu} {et~al.}(2004){Hu}, {Cowie}, {Capak}, {McMahon}, {Hayashino}, \&
699: {Komiyama}}]{Hu:04}
700: {Hu}, E.~M., {Cowie}, L.~L., {Capak}, P., {McMahon}, R.~G., {Hayashino}, T., \&
701: {Komiyama}, Y. 2004, \aj, 127, 563
702:
703: \bibitem[{{Jakobsson} {et~al.}(2005){Jakobsson}, {Bj{\"o}rnsson}, {Fynbo},
704: {J{\'o}hannesson}, {Hjorth}, {Thomsen}, {M{\o}ller}, {Watson}, {Jensen},
705: {{\"O}stlin}, {Gorosabel}, \& {Gudmundsson}}]{Jakobsson:05}
706: {Jakobsson}, P., {Bj{\"o}rnsson}, G., {Fynbo}, J.~P.~U., {J{\'o}hannesson}, G.,
707: {Hjorth}, J., {Thomsen}, B., {M{\o}ller}, P., {Watson}, D., {Jensen}, B.~L.,
708: {{\"O}stlin}, G., {Gorosabel}, J., \& {Gudmundsson}, E.~H. 2005, \mnras, 362,
709: 245
710:
711: \bibitem[{{Jakobsson} {et~al.}(2006){Jakobsson}, {Fynbo}, {Ledoux},
712: {Vreeswijk}, {Kann}, {Hjorth}, {Priddey}, {Tanvir}, {Reichart}, {Gorosabel},
713: {Klose}, {Watson}, {Sollerman}, {Fruchter}, {de Ugarte Postigo}, {Wiersema},
714: {Bj{\"o}rnsson}, {Chapman}, {Th{\"o}ne}, {Pedersen}, \& {Jensen}}]{Jakob:06}
715: {Jakobsson}, P., {Fynbo}, J.~P.~U., {Ledoux}, C., {Vreeswijk}, P., {Kann},
716: D.~A., {Hjorth}, J., {Priddey}, R.~S., {Tanvir}, N.~R., {Reichart}, D.,
717: {Gorosabel}, J., {Klose}, S., {Watson}, D., {Sollerman}, J., {Fruchter},
718: A.~S., {de Ugarte Postigo}, A., {Wiersema}, K., {Bj{\"o}rnsson}, G.,
719: {Chapman}, R., {Th{\"o}ne}, C.~C., {Pedersen}, K., \& {Jensen}, B.~L. 2006,
720: \aap, 460, L13
721:
722: \bibitem[{{Jensen} {et~al.}(2001){Jensen}, {Fynbo}, {Gorosabel}, {Hjorth},
723: {Holland}, {M{\"o}ller}, {Thomsen}, {Bj{\"o}rnsson}, {Pedersen}, {Burud},
724: {Henden}, {Tanvir}, {Davis}, {Vreeswijk}, {Rol}, {Hurley}, {Cline},
725: {Trombka}, {McClanahan}, {Starr}, {Goldsten}, {Castro-Tirado}, {Greiner},
726: {Bailer-Jones}, {K{\"u}mmel}, \& {Mundt}}]{Jensen:01}
727: {Jensen}, B.~L., {Fynbo}, J.~U., {Gorosabel}, J., {Hjorth}, J., {Holland}, S.,
728: {M{\"o}ller}, P., {Thomsen}, B., {Bj{\"o}rnsson}, G., {Pedersen}, H.,
729: {Burud}, I., {Henden}, A., {Tanvir}, N.~R., {Davis}, C.~J., {Vreeswijk}, P.,
730: {Rol}, E., {Hurley}, K., {Cline}, T., {Trombka}, J., {McClanahan}, T.,
731: {Starr}, R., {Goldsten}, J., {Castro-Tirado}, A.~J., {Greiner}, J.,
732: {Bailer-Jones}, C.~A.~L., {K{\"u}mmel}, M., \& {Mundt}, R. 2001, \aap, 370,
733: 909
734:
735: \bibitem[{{Kawai} {et~al.}(2006){Kawai}, {Kosugi}, {Aoki}, {Yamada}, {Totani},
736: {Ohta}, {Iye}, {Hattori}, {Aoki}, {Furusawa}, {Hurley}, {Kawabata},
737: {Kobayashi}, {Komiyama}, {Mizumoto}, {Nomoto}, {Noumaru}, {Ogasawara},
738: {Sato}, {Sekiguchi}, {Shirasaki}, {Suzuki}, {Takata}, {Tamagawa}, {Terada},
739: {Watanabe}, {Yatsu}, \& {Yoshida}}]{Kawai:06}
740: {Kawai}, N., {Kosugi}, G., {Aoki}, K., {Yamada}, T., {Totani}, T., {Ohta}, K.,
741: {Iye}, M., {Hattori}, T., {Aoki}, W., {Furusawa}, H., {Hurley}, K.,
742: {Kawabata}, K.~S., {Kobayashi}, N., {Komiyama}, Y., {Mizumoto}, Y., {Nomoto},
743: K., {Noumaru}, J., {Ogasawara}, R., {Sato}, R., {Sekiguchi}, K., {Shirasaki},
744: Y., {Suzuki}, M., {Takata}, T., {Tamagawa}, T., {Terada}, H., {Watanabe}, J.,
745: {Yatsu}, Y., \& {Yoshida}, A. 2006, \nat, 440, 184
746:
747: \bibitem[{{Kobulnicky} \& {Kewley}(2004)}]{KK:04}
748: {Kobulnicky}, H.~A. \& {Kewley}, L.~J. 2004, \apj, 617, 240
749:
750: \bibitem[{{Le Floc'h} {et~al.}(2006){Le Floc'h}, {Charmandaris}, {Forrest},
751: {Mirabel}, {Armus}, \& {Devost}}]{lef:06}
752: {Le Floc'h}, E., {Charmandaris}, V., {Forrest}, W.~J., {Mirabel}, I.~F.,
753: {Armus}, L., \& {Devost}, D. 2006, \apj, 642, 636
754:
755: \bibitem[{{Le Floc'h} {et~al.}(2003){Le Floc'h}, {Duc}, {Mirabel}, {Sanders},
756: {Bosch}, {Diaz}, {Donzelli}, {Rodrigues}, {Courvoisier}, {Greiner},
757: {Mereghetti}, {Melnick}, {Maza}, \& {Minniti}}]{lef:03}
758: {Le Floc'h}, E., {Duc}, P.-A., {Mirabel}, I.~F., {Sanders}, D.~B., {Bosch}, G.,
759: {Diaz}, R.~J., {Donzelli}, C.~J., {Rodrigues}, I., {Courvoisier}, T.~J.-L.,
760: {Greiner}, J., {Mereghetti}, S., {Melnick}, J., {Maza}, J., \& {Minniti}, D.
761: 2003, \aap, 400, 499
762:
763: \bibitem[{{Maiolino} {et~al.}(2004){Maiolino}, {Schneider}, {Oliva}, {Bianchi},
764: {Ferrara}, {Mannucci}, {Pedani}, \& {Roca Sogorb}}]{Maiolino:04}
765: {Maiolino}, R., {Schneider}, R., {Oliva}, E., {Bianchi}, S., {Ferrara}, A.,
766: {Mannucci}, F., {Pedani}, M., \& {Roca Sogorb}, M. 2004, \nat, 431, 533
767:
768: \bibitem[{{Makovoz} \& {Khan}(2005)}]{mak:05}
769: {Makovoz}, D. \& {Khan}, I. 2005, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and
770: Systems XIV, ed. P.~{Shopbell}, M.~{Britton}, \& R.~{Ebert}, Vol. 347, 81--+
771:
772: \bibitem[{{Marchesini} {et~al.}(2007){Marchesini}, {van Dokkum}, {Quadri},
773: {Rudnick}, {Franx}, {Lira}, {Wuyts}, {Gawiser}, {Christlein}, \&
774: {Toft}}]{mar:07}
775: {Marchesini}, D., {van Dokkum}, P., {Quadri}, R., {Rudnick}, G., {Franx}, M.,
776: {Lira}, P., {Wuyts}, S., {Gawiser}, E., {Christlein}, D., \& {Toft}, S. 2007,
777: \apj, 656, 42
778:
779: \bibitem[{{Nagao} {et~al.}(2007){Nagao}, {Murayama}, {Maiolino}, {Marconi},
780: {Kashikawa}, {Ajiki}, {Hattori}, {Ly}, {Malkan}, {Motohara}, {Ohta},
781: {Sasaki}, {Shioya}, \& {Taniguchi}}]{Nagao:07}
782: {Nagao}, T., {Murayama}, T., {Maiolino}, R., {Marconi}, A., {Kashikawa}, N.,
783: {Ajiki}, M., {Hattori}, T., {Ly}, C., {Malkan}, M.~A., {Motohara}, K.,
784: {Ohta}, K., {Sasaki}, S.~S., {Shioya}, Y., \& {Taniguchi}, Y. 2007, ArXiv
785: Astrophysics e-prints
786:
787: \bibitem[{{Price} {et~al.}(2006){Price}, {Cowie}, {Minezaki}, {Schmidt},
788: {Songaila}, \& {Yoshii}}]{Price:06}
789: {Price}, P.~A., {Cowie}, L.~L., {Minezaki}, T., {Schmidt}, B.~P., {Songaila},
790: A., \& {Yoshii}, Y. 2006, \apj, 645, 851
791:
792: \bibitem[{{Price} {et~al.}(2007){Price}, {Songaila}, {Cowie}, {Bell Burnell},
793: {Berger}, {Cucchiara}, {Fox}, {Hook}, {Kulkarni}, {Penprase}, {Roth}, \&
794: {Schmidt}}]{Price}
795: {Price}, P.~A., {Songaila}, A., {Cowie}, L.~L., {Bell Burnell}, J., {Berger},
796: E., {Cucchiara}, A., {Fox}, D.~B., {Hook}, I., {Kulkarni}, S.~R., {Penprase},
797: B., {Roth}, K.~C., \& {Schmidt}, B. 2007, \apjl, 663, L57
798:
799: \bibitem[{{Prochaska} {et~al.}(2006){Prochaska}, {Chen}, \& {Bloom}}]{PCB:06}
800: {Prochaska}, J.~X., {Chen}, H.-W., \& {Bloom}, J.~S. 2006, \apj, 648, 95
801:
802: \bibitem[{{Prochaska} {et~al.}(2007{\natexlab{a}}){Prochaska}, {Chen}, {Bloom},
803: {Dessauges-Zavadsky}, {O'Meara}, {Foley}, {Bernstein}, {Burles}, {Dupree},
804: {Falco}, \& {Thompson}}]{Prochaska:07}
805: {Prochaska}, J.~X., {Chen}, H.-W., {Bloom}, J.~S., {Dessauges-Zavadsky}, M.,
806: {O'Meara}, J.~M., {Foley}, R.~J., {Bernstein}, R., {Burles}, S., {Dupree},
807: A.~K., {Falco}, E., \& {Thompson}, I.~B. 2007{\natexlab{a}}, \apjs, 168, 231
808:
809: \bibitem[{{Prochaska} {et~al.}(2007{\natexlab{b}}){Prochaska}, {Chen},
810: {Dessauges-Zavadsky}, \& {Bloom}}]{Prochaska:07a}
811: {Prochaska}, J.~X., {Chen}, H.-W., {Dessauges-Zavadsky}, M., \& {Bloom}, J.~S.
812: 2007{\natexlab{b}}, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints
813:
814: \bibitem[{{Prochaska} {et~al.}(2003){Prochaska}, {Gawiser}, {Wolfe}, {Castro},
815: \& {Djorgovski}}]{pgw:03}
816: {Prochaska}, J.~X., {Gawiser}, E., {Wolfe}, A.~M., {Castro}, S., \&
817: {Djorgovski}, S.~G. 2003, \apjl, 595, L9
818:
819: \bibitem[{{Savaglio} {et~al.}(2005){Savaglio}, {Glazebrook}, {Le Borgne},
820: {Juneau}, {Abraham}, {Chen}, {Crampton}, {McCarthy}, {Carlberg}, {Marzke},
821: {Roth}, {J{\o}rgensen}, \& {Murowinski}}]{Savaglio:05}
822: {Savaglio}, S., {Glazebrook}, K., {Le Borgne}, D., {Juneau}, S., {Abraham},
823: R.~G., {Chen}, H.-W., {Crampton}, D., {McCarthy}, P.~J., {Carlberg}, R.~G.,
824: {Marzke}, R.~O., {Roth}, K., {J{\o}rgensen}, I., \& {Murowinski}, R. 2005,
825: \apj, 635, 260
826:
827: \bibitem[{{Shapley} {et~al.}(2005){Shapley}, {Coil}, {Ma}, \&
828: {Bundy}}]{Shapley:05}
829: {Shapley}, A.~E., {Coil}, A.~L., {Ma}, C.-P., \& {Bundy}, K. 2005, \apj, 635,
830: 1006
831:
832: \bibitem[{{Shapley} {et~al.}(2001){Shapley}, {Steidel}, {Adelberger},
833: {Dickinson}, {Giavalisco}, \& {Pettini}}]{Shapley:01}
834: {Shapley}, A.~E., {Steidel}, C.~C., {Adelberger}, K.~L., {Dickinson}, M.,
835: {Giavalisco}, M., \& {Pettini}, M. 2001, \apj, 562, 95
836:
837: \bibitem[{{Songaila} \& {Cowie}(2002)}]{Songaila:02}
838: {Songaila}, A. \& {Cowie}, L.~L. 2002, \aj, 123, 2183
839:
840: \bibitem[{{Stark} {et~al.}(2007){Stark}, {Bunker}, {Ellis}, {Eyles}, \&
841: {Lacy}}]{Stark}
842: {Stark}, D.~P., {Bunker}, A.~J., {Ellis}, R.~S., {Eyles}, L.~P., \& {Lacy}, M.
843: 2007, \apj, 659, 84
844:
845: \bibitem[{{Steidel} {et~al.}(1999){Steidel}, {Adelberger}, {Giavalisco},
846: {Dickinson}, \& {Pettini}}]{Steidel}
847: {Steidel}, C.~C., {Adelberger}, K.~L., {Giavalisco}, M., {Dickinson}, M., \&
848: {Pettini}, M. 1999, \apj, 519, 1
849:
850: \bibitem[{{Takeuchi} {et~al.}(2005){Takeuchi}, {Buat}, \&
851: {Burgarella}}]{tak:05}
852: {Takeuchi}, T.~T., {Buat}, V., \& {Burgarella}, D. 2005, \aap, 440, L17
853:
854: \bibitem[{{Tremonti} {et~al.}(2004){Tremonti}, {Heckman}, {Kauffmann},
855: {Brinchmann}, {Charlot}, {White}, {Seibert}, {Peng}, {Schlegel}, {Uomoto},
856: {Fukugita}, \& {Brinkmann}}]{Tremonti:04}
857: {Tremonti}, C.~A., {Heckman}, T.~M., {Kauffmann}, G., {Brinchmann}, J.,
858: {Charlot}, S., {White}, S.~D.~M., {Seibert}, M., {Peng}, E.~W., {Schlegel},
859: D.~J., {Uomoto}, A., {Fukugita}, M., \& {Brinkmann}, J. 2004, \apj, 613, 898
860:
861: \bibitem[{{Vanzella} {et~al.}(2006){Vanzella}, {Cristiani}, {Dickinson},
862: {Kuntschner}, {Nonino}, {Rettura}, {Rosati}, {Vernet}, {Cesarsky},
863: {Ferguson}, {Fosbury}, {Giavalisco}, {Grazian}, {Haase}, {Moustakas},
864: {Popesso}, {Renzini}, {Stern}, \& {The Goods Team}}]{Eros:06}
865: {Vanzella}, E., {Cristiani}, S., {Dickinson}, M., {Kuntschner}, H., {Nonino},
866: M., {Rettura}, A., {Rosati}, P., {Vernet}, J., {Cesarsky}, C., {Ferguson},
867: H.~C., {Fosbury}, R.~A.~E., {Giavalisco}, M., {Grazian}, A., {Haase}, J.,
868: {Moustakas}, L.~A., {Popesso}, P., {Renzini}, A., {Stern}, D., \& {The Goods
869: Team}. 2006, \aap, 454, 423
870:
871: \bibitem[{Vanzella {et~al.}(2005)}]{Vanzella:05}
872: Vanzella, E. {et~al.} 2005, \aap, 434, 53
873:
874: \bibitem[{Vanzella {et~al.}(2007)}]{Eros:07}
875: ---. 2007, \aap
876:
877: \bibitem[{{Vreeswijk} {et~al.}(2004){Vreeswijk}, {Ellison}, {Ledoux}, {Wijers},
878: {Fynbo}, {M{\o}ller}, {Henden}, {Hjorth}, {Masi}, {Rol}, {Jensen}, {Tanvir},
879: {Levan}, {Castro Cer{\'o}n}, {Gorosabel}, {Castro-Tirado}, {Fruchter},
880: {Kouveliotou}, {Burud}, {Rhoads}, {Masetti}, {Palazzi}, {Pian}, {Pedersen},
881: {Kaper}, {Gilmore}, {Kilmartin}, {Buckle}, {Seigar}, {Hartmann}, {Lindsay},
882: \& {van den Heuvel}}]{Vree:04}
883: {Vreeswijk}, P.~M., {Ellison}, S.~L., {Ledoux}, C., {Wijers}, R.~A.~M.~J.,
884: {Fynbo}, J.~P.~U., {M{\o}ller}, P., {Henden}, A., {Hjorth}, J., {Masi}, G.,
885: {Rol}, E., {Jensen}, B.~L., {Tanvir}, N., {Levan}, A., {Castro Cer{\'o}n},
886: J.~M., {Gorosabel}, J., {Castro-Tirado}, A.~J., {Fruchter}, A.~S.,
887: {Kouveliotou}, C., {Burud}, I., {Rhoads}, J., {Masetti}, N., {Palazzi}, E.,
888: {Pian}, E., {Pedersen}, H., {Kaper}, L., {Gilmore}, A., {Kilmartin}, P.,
889: {Buckle}, J.~V., {Seigar}, M.~S., {Hartmann}, D.~H., {Lindsay}, K., \& {van
890: den Heuvel}, E.~P.~J. 2004, \aap, 419, 927
891:
892: \bibitem[{{Yan} {et~al.}(2006){Yan}, {Dickinson}, {Giavalisco}, {Stern},
893: {Eisenhardt}, \& {Ferguson}}]{Yan}
894: {Yan}, H., {Dickinson}, M., {Giavalisco}, M., {Stern}, D., {Eisenhardt},
895: P.~R.~M., \& {Ferguson}, H.~C. 2006, \apj, 651, 24
896:
897: \bibitem[{Yoshida {et~al.}(2006)}]{Yoshida}
898: Yoshida, M. {et~al.} 2006, \apj, 653, 988
899:
900: \end{thebibliography}
901:
902: \begin{figure}
903: \plotone{f1.ps}
904: \caption{\sst\ image of the host galaxy of GRB\,060510B at
905: \ra{15}{56}{29.607},\dec{+78}{34}{12.42} (J2000). Image is
906: 12$\arcsec$ on a side, North is up, East to the left. The left panel
907: shows the processed mosaic while the right panel shows the image
908: with the foreground galaxy 3.1$\arcsec$ to the East
909: subtracted. }
910: \end{figure}
911:
912: \begin{figure}[hbp]
913: \plottwo{f2a.ps}{f2b.ps}
914: \caption{(Left) Histogram showing the distribution of observed 3.6
915: $\mu$m magnitudes for galaxies in the GOODS fields with spectroscopic
916: redshifts $4.5<z<5.5$. The solid symbols show the brightness of the GRB host
917: galaxies observed in this paper relative to the field galaxies.
918: (Right) GRB hosts have rest-frame $V-$band luminosities which are a
919: factor of $\sim2-3$ fainter than field galaxies at similar redshifts
920: and provide a complementary way to study the faint end luminosity
921: function of star-forming galaxies. Also shown as the shaded histogram is the
922: $V-$band luminosities of GRB hosts at a median redshift of $\sim$1 \citep{CBA:02, lef:03} which
923: indicate that GRB hosts span similar $V-$band luminosities, regardless
924: of redshift.}
925: \end{figure}
926:
927: \begin{figure}
928: \epsscale{0.7}
929: \plotone{f3.ps}
930: \caption{
931: Luminosity-metallicity relationship for star-forming galaxies at $z<2$
932: compared with the host galaxies of $z>4$ gamma-ray bursts. The galaxy
933: data are from GDDS and CFRS at $z\sim0.4-1$
934: \citep[circles;][]{Savaglio:05}, TKRS at $z\sim0.3-1$
935: \citep[diamonds;][]{KK:04}, DEEP2 at $z\sim1-1.5$
936: \citep[squares;][]{Shapley:05} and LBGs at $z\sim2.3$ \citep[error
937: bars;][]{Erb}. The gray lines represent the relation derived for
938: $z\sim0.1$ galaxies from the Sloan Digitized Sky Survey
939: \citep{Tremonti:04}. GRBs provide a unique window into the evolution
940: of the mass-metallicity relation at high redshift and indicate that
941: the chemical enrichment of galaxies with redshift occurs at a lower rate than
942: the build up of stellar mass, presumably due to the expulsion of metals
943: in low-mass galaxies by outflows.}
944: \end{figure}
945:
946: \begin{figure}
947: \epsscale{0.7}
948: \plotone{f4.ps}
949: \caption{Star-formation rate density inferred from spectroscopically
950: confirmed long-duration \swift\ GRBs (solid squares). The solid black
951: line is the extinction-corrected star-formation rate density inferred
952: at $z<4$ from a variety of multiwavelength surveys in the mid-infrared
953: and submillimeter, which are used to calibrate the GRBs
954: \citep{Chary:01}. The
955: lower hatched region is the extinction uncorrected SFRD from
956: rest-frame UV surveys ($>0.04$~L$_{\rm *,UV,z=3}$), including estimates by
957: \citet{Steidel}, \citet{Yoshida} and \citet{Bouw:06}. The upper hatched rectangle are
958: these values corrected upward for reddening using the UV-slope
959: technique by \citet{Bouw:06}. The SFRD inferred from GRBs at $z>4$ is
960: consistent, within the significant errors, to the extinction corrected
961: SFRD. Follow-up of a larger number of high-redshift GRBs are required
962: to confirm if the higher rate density derived from the GRBs is
963: statistically significant.}
964: \end{figure}
965:
966: \begin{deluxetable}{lllccccl}
967: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
968: \tablecaption{\sst\ Observations of $z\sim5$ GRB Host Galaxies}
969: \tablewidth{0pt}
970: \rotate
971: \tablehead{
972: \colhead{GRB} &
973: \colhead{RA, DEC (J2000)} &
974: \colhead{Redshift} &
975: \colhead{Date of Observation} &
976: \colhead{Sky Background\tablenotemark{a}} &
977: \colhead{Exposure Time} &
978: \multicolumn{2}{c}{Flux Density in $\mu$Jy} \\
979: \cline{7-8}
980: \colhead{} &
981: \colhead{} &
982: \colhead{} &
983: \colhead{} &
984: \colhead{MJy/sr} &
985: \colhead{} &
986: \colhead{3.6$\mu$m} &
987: \colhead{5.8$\mu$m}
988: }
989:
990: \startdata
991: GRB\,060223A & \ra{03}{40}{49.561},\dec{-17}{07}{48.36} & 4.406 & 2006 Sep 23 & 24.8 & 130$\times$100s & $<$0.3 & $<$2.4\\
992: GRB\,060510B & \ra{15}{56}{29.607},\dec{+78}{34}{12.42} & 4.942 & 2006 Oct 26 & 13.4 & 130$\times$100s & 0.23$\pm$0.04 & $<$2.1 \\
993: GRB\,060522 & \ra{21}{31}{44.800},\dec{+02}{53}{10.35} & 5.110 & 2006 Nov 23 & 28.4 & 138$\times$100s & $<0.2$ & $<$2.4 \\
994:
995: \enddata
996: \tablenotetext{a}{Background at 24$\mu$m, dominated by the zodiacal light.}
997: \end{deluxetable}
998: \end{document}
999: