1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
3: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
4:
5: % Use the following two lines for emulated ApJ style (new way)
6: \documentclass[apj]{emulateapj}
7: \usepackage{apjfonts} % Times fonts
8:
9: \usepackage{graphicx}
10:
11: %\usepackage{draftdate}
12: %\slugcomment{\it{}Draft \today}
13:
14: % Cite punctuation definition
15: %\citestyle{aa}
16: %\bibpunct{(}{)}{;}{a}{}{,}
17:
18: \newcommand{\n}{\nodata}
19:
20: \makeindex
21: \citeindextrue
22:
23: \received{2007, July~2}
24: \revised{2007, August~16}
25: \accepted{2007, August~20}
26: \journalinfo{Astrophysical~journal Letters}
27: \submitted{}
28: %\paperid{21968}
29:
30: \shorttitle{The Inner Jet of M87}
31: \shortauthors{Kovalev et al.}
32:
33: \begin{document}
34: \title{The Inner Jet of the Radio Galaxy \objectname{M87}}
35: \author{Y. Y. Kovalev\altaffilmark{1,2},
36: M. L. Lister\altaffilmark{3},
37: D. C. Homan\altaffilmark{4},
38: K. I. Kellermann\altaffilmark{5}
39: }
40:
41: \altaffiltext{1}{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Radioastronomie,
42: Auf dem H\"ugel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany;
43: \mbox{ykovalev@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de}
44: }
45:
46: \altaffiltext{2}{Astro Space Center of Lebedev Physical Institute,
47: Profsoyuznaya 84/32, 117997 Moscow, Russia
48: }
49:
50: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physics, Purdue University,
51: 525 Northwestern Avenue, West Lafayette,
52: IN 47907, U.S.A.;
53: \mbox{mlister@physics.purdue.edu}
54: }
55:
56: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Denison University,
57: Granville, OH 43023, U.S.A.;
58: \mbox{homand@denison.edu}
59: }
60:
61:
62: \altaffiltext{5}{National Radio Astronomy Observatory,
63: 520 Edgemont Road, Charlottesville,
64: VA~22903--2475, U.S.A.;
65: \mbox{kkellerm@nrao.edu}
66: }
67:
68: \begin{abstract}
69: We report new 2~cm VLBA images of the inner radio jet of
70: \objectname{M87} showing a limb brightened structure and unambiguous
71: evidence for a faint 3~mas long counter-feature which also appears limb
72: brightened.
73: %
74: Multi-epoch observations of seven separate jet features show typical
75: speeds of less than a few percent of the speed of light, despite the
76: highly asymmetric jet structure and the implications of the canonical
77: relativistic beaming scenario.
78: %
79: The observed morphology is consistent with
80: a two stream spine-sheath
81: velocity gradient across the jet, as might be expected from the recently
82: discovered strong and variable TeV emission as well as from numerical
83: modeling of relativistic jets.
84: %
85: Considering the large jet to counter-jet flux density ratio and lack of
86: observed fast motion in the jet, we conclude that either the inner part
87: of the M87 jet is intrinsically asymmetric or that the bulk plasma flow
88: speed is much greater than any propagation of shocks or other pattern
89: motions.
90: \end{abstract}
91: \keywords{
92: galaxies: active ---
93: galaxies: jets ---
94: galaxies: individual (M87) ---
95: radio continuum: galaxies ---
96: acceleration of particles
97: }
98:
99: \section{INTRODUCTION}
100: \label{s:intro}
101:
102: The peculiar galaxy \objectname{M87} in the \objectname{Virgo} cluster
103: was among the first to be recognized as a powerful source of radio
104: emission. More than 40 years ago, \cite{S64} argued that since radio
105: galaxies such as \objectname{Cygnus~A} typically have symmetric lobes,
106: the jets which feed the radio lobes are likely to be intrinsically
107: two-sided, but that they would appear one-sided due to differential
108: relativistic Doppler beaming. This simple picture is now widely
109: accepted as the basis of unified models, which try to explain many of
110: the different properties of AGN as due to relativistic beaming and
111: projection effects, rather than to intrinsic differences
112: \citep[e.g.,][]{UP95}.
113:
114: M87 remains of great interest today, since there is strong observational
115: evidence for a $3\times 10^9$ $M_{\sun}$ black hole located at the
116: galactic nucleus thought to power the relativistic jet \citep{H94,
117: MMAC97}. Moreover, at a distance of only 16~Mpc, (1~mas = 0.08~pc; 1~mas
118: per year $=0.25c$) M87 is one of the closest radio galaxies, and as such
119: it has one of the few jets which can be well-resolved on sub-parsec
120: scales in a direction transverse to the flow.
121:
122: The M87 jet has been studied over a wide range of the electromagnetic
123: spectrum, including imaging with HST \citep{BSM99} and the VLA
124: \citep{OHC89} as well as with Chandra \citep{WY02,HCB06}. The observed
125: morphology at radio, optical, and even X-ray wavelengths appears very
126: similar, suggesting a common synchrotron radiation mechanism at all
127: wavelengths and a common spectral index of $-0.67$ throughout the jet
128: \citep{PBS01}. At least at optical and X-ray wavelengths, the electron
129: lifetime down the jet is much shorter than the travel time from the
130: nucleus, suggesting continual in situ acceleration of relativistic
131: particles within the jet \citep{PBS01}.
132:
133: In this paper we report on observations made with the NRAO Very Long
134: Baseline Array (VLBA) at 2~cm wavelength. High dynamic range
135: images constructed from observations made in the year 2000 describe the
136: two-dimensional structure of the jet out to nearly 0.2~arcsec (16~pc)
137: and show the presence of a faint counter-feature. These observations
138: were complemented by regular observations made with lower sensitivity
139: between 1995 and 2007 to study the outward flow within the inner part of
140: the radio jet.
141:
142:
143: \section{THE OBSERVATIONS AND IMAGING}
144: \label{s:obs}
145:
146: %%% TWO COLUMN COLOR FIGURE
147: %\begin{figure*}[p]
148: \begin{figure*}[t!]
149: \begin{center}
150: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{
151: \includegraphics[trim = 0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm]{f1.eps}
152: }
153: \end{center}
154: \caption{\label{f:M87_VLBA}
155: VLBA 2~cm logarithmic false-color image of the M87 jet. The beam, FWHM
156: of 0.6 by 1.3~mas at P.A.~$=-11^\circ$ is shown in the lower left hand
157: corner. The peak intensity is 1.00~Jy\,beam$^{-1}$ and the off-source
158: rms noise 64~$\mu$Jy\,beam$^{-1}$. The corresponding dynamic range is
159: better than 15,000 to 1. This image was obtained from a full track in
160: hour angle using the VLBA along with one VLA antenna on 2000~May~8. The
161: faint counter-jet is seen extending to the southeast.
162: }
163: \end{figure*}
164:
165: M87 has been regularly observed with the VLBA since 1995 as part of the
166: 2~cm VLBA survey \citep{2cmPaperI} and the more recent \mbox{MOJAVE} program
167: \citep{LH05}. In these programs, at each epoch we observed each source
168: for a total of about one hour, with multiple observations spaced over a wide
169: range of hour angle. For M87, we have obtained a total of 21 images
170: between 1995 and 2007. Typically the rms noise in each image is about
171: 0.3~mJy\,beam$^{-1}$. As described in more detail by
172: \cite{2cmPaperI,2cmPaperIII} and \cite{LH05}, for each epoch, the data
173: were calibrated using AIPS and imaged with Difmap. The location of each
174: bright feature was fitted in the visibility plane.
175:
176: We have supplemented these multiple epoch images using VLBA 2~cm archive
177: data from observations made at three epochs in 2000 (22~January, 8~May,
178: 30~December). These later observations included one VLA antenna and were
179: made with full tracks in hour angle each lasting about 10 hours using
180: 2-bit recording at a 256~Mbps data rate, allowing us to reach the
181: thermal noise level of less than 70~$\mu$Jy\,beam$^{-1}$.
182:
183: As a check on the robustness of the weak features seen in these high
184: dynamic range images, different authors independently made images using
185: Difmap and AIPS respectively and obtained very similar results. In
186: addition, to verify the reality of faint ``counter-feature'' reported in
187: \S\ref{s:structure}, one of us generated three artificial datasets of
188: M87. These model datasets were based on the structure of M87 which was
189: observed on 2000~May~8. They used the identical ($u$,$v$)-coverage of
190: that epoch and contained a comparable level of random noise. One of
191: the models contained an extended counter-feature totaling nearly 40~mJy,
192: and two did not. All three model datasets were independently
193: self-calibrated and imaged by another one of us without any prior
194: communication about which models contained the counter-feature. The
195: image maker was able to correctly identify the data with the
196: counter-feature and correctly determined its flux density and extended
197: structure. No counter-feature was found in the derived image down to the
198: noise level from the other two datasets without the counter-feature.
199: Given the results of these trials, and the presence of the
200: counter-feature in all three observed full-track VLBA images as well as
201: in the 20 lower sensetivity 2~cm Survey / \mbox{MOJAVE} images , we are
202: confident that the observed counter-feature is real and that there are
203: no significant artifacts in our image created by the imaging process.
204:
205: \section{JET STRUCTURE }
206: \label{s:structure}
207:
208: In Figure~\ref{f:M87_VLBA}, we show the 2~cm image constructed from
209: observations made with the VLBA plus 1 VLA antenna. A tapered image
210: made with twice the beam size from the same data shows structure out to
211: nearly 0.2~arcsec. As seen in Figure~\ref{f:M87_VLBA}, the jet appears
212: bifurcated, starting at about 5 mas (0.4~pc) from the core,
213: characteristic of a single limb brightened cylindrical or conical jet.
214: The M87 jet appears to be highly collimated, with re-collimation observed
215: between 2~pc where the opening angle is about $16^\circ$, and 12~pc where
216: the opening angle is only $6^\circ$ to $7^\circ$. As discussed in
217: \S\ref{s:obs}, Figure~\ref{f:M87_VLBA} also shows the existence of weak
218: structure extending away from the bright core toward the southeast.
219: Indications of this counter feature were first suggested by
220: \cite{Ly_etal04} on the basis of their 7\,mm VLBA observations. This
221: counter-feature also appears clearly bifurcated but is weaker than the
222: main jet by a factor of 10 to 15 close to the core and is only traced
223: out to 3.1~mas from the core. Between 3.1 and 6~mas away, this feature
224: is weaker than the jet by at least a factor of 200.
225:
226: For several reasons we believe that the eastern extension may be the
227: counter-jet. Based on their higher resolution 7~mm image, \cite{LWJ07}
228: have also detected the counter feature and have argued that the true
229: base of the jet cannot be offset by more than 2~mas from the bright
230: core; whereas we have detected the counter-feature to be at least
231: 3.1~mas long. Also, we note strong circular polarization at a
232: fractional level of $-0.5\%\pm0.1\%$ was detected at 2~cm by \cite{HL06}
233: coincident with the flux density peak, suggesting that this region of
234: the jet has an optical depth near unity \citep[e.g.,][]{J88} which is
235: characteristic of jet cores. Keeping in mind that there is possible ambiguity
236: in the VLBI image alignment, \cite{ZT03} have measured the spectral
237: index between 8~GHz and 12~GHz for the region with the peak intensity to
238: be $\alpha=0.24$ ($S\sim\nu^\alpha$) consistent with an optically thick
239: nucleus. Since the surface brightness of the eastern feature is more
240: than 200 times fainter than the one of the brightest feature which we
241: have identified with the core, it seems unlikely that it could be the
242: actual core. However, considering that no other radio jet has been
243: observed with comparable linear resolution, sensitivity, and dynamic
244: range, we cannot exclude the possibility that we are seeing the detailed
245: structure of the optically thick core of the jet, and that the
246: counter-jet itself is not detected.
247:
248: \section{JET KINEMATICS}
249: \label{s:kinematics}
250:
251: %%% ONE COLUMN COLOR FIGURE
252: %\begin{figure}[p]
253: \begin{figure}[b]
254: \begin{center}
255: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{
256: \includegraphics[trim = 0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm,angle=-90]{f2.eps}
257: }
258: \end{center}
259: \caption{\label{f:speed}
260: The location of seven separate features which were seen at multiple epochs
261: are plotted as a function of time.
262: Component C7 refers to the counter-jet.
263: Typical errors of the components' separation are presented
264: in Table~\ref{t:kinematics}.
265: The large scatter in the positions of the outer two components, C1
266: and C2, is due primarily to their large angular extent
267: which makes location of their centroids uncertain
268: in our snap-shot images of the limb-brightened jet.
269: }
270: \end{figure}
271:
272: \begin{deluxetable}{lccrrr}
273: \tablecolumns{6}
274: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
275: \tablewidth{0pt}
276: \tablecaption{\label{t:kinematics} M87 jet components speed}
277: \tablehead{
278: \colhead{Component} & \colhead{$<R>$} & \colhead{$\sigma_R$} & \colhead{$<\vartheta>$} & \colhead {$\mu_\mathrm{r}$} & \colhead{$\beta_\mathrm{app}$} \\
279: \colhead{} & \colhead{(mas)} & \colhead{(mas)} & \colhead{(deg)} & \colhead{($\mu$as\,yr$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{} \\
280: \colhead{(1)} & \colhead{(2)} & \colhead{(3)} & \colhead{(4)} & \colhead{(5)} & \colhead{(6)}
281: }
282: \startdata
283: C7 & 0.43 & 0.1 & 111.2 & $40\pm6$~\,& $0.010\pm0.001$ \\
284: C6 & 0.43 & 0.1 & 279.2 & $13\pm6$~\,& $0.003\pm0.001$ \\
285: C5 & 1.4 & 0.2 & 283.8 & $59\pm11$ & $0.015\pm0.003$ \\
286: C4 & 2.8 & 0.3 & 283.5 & $104\pm17$ & $0.026\pm0.004$ \\
287: C3 & 6.4 & 0.5 & 282.8 & $82\pm26$ & $0.021\pm0.007$ \\
288: C2 & 13 & 1.3 & 286.6 & $216\pm81$ & $0.05\pm0.02$~\,\\
289: C1 & 21 & 1.1 & 290.0 & $12\pm76$ & $0.00\pm0.02$~\,\\
290: \enddata
291: \tablecomments{
292: Col.~(1): Component identifier,
293: Col.~(2): Mean radial position relative to the core,
294: Col.~(3): Typical radial position error calculated from the scatter of
295: points from the linear fit (Figure~\ref{f:speed}),
296: Col.~(4): Mean position angle relative to the core,
297: Col.~(5): Angular radial speed and $1\sigma$ uncertainty.
298: Positive speed means that a component is receding from the core,
299: negative---approaching the core,
300: Col.~(6): Radial speed in units of the speed of light and $1\sigma$ uncertainty.
301: }
302: \end{deluxetable}
303:
304: HST observations of the M87 jet made between 1994 and 1998 by
305: \cite{BSM99} have suggested superluminal speeds up to about $6c$ in a
306: region approximately 6~arcsec (0.5~kpc) downstream of the central AGN,
307: consistent with what might be expected from Doppler boosting of this
308: highly asymmetric jet. The feature, known as HST-1, is located 0.86
309: arcsec from the base of the jet, and was more recently observed by
310: Chandra and HST to vary dramatically at both X-ray and optical
311: wavelengths \citep{H03,HCB06,CHS07}. It was found to have apparent
312: superluminal speeds up to $4.3\pm0.7c$ in 20~cm VLBA experiment by
313: \cite{CHS07}. However, within 1~arcsec of the nucleus (80~pc), using
314: HST, \cite{BSM99} measured much slower speeds between $0.6c$ and $0.8c$.
315:
316: At radio wavelengths, \cite{BZO95} reported VLA observations which
317: showed a typical speed of about $0.5c$ but ranging up to $2.5c$ at
318: distances up to about 20~arcsec (1.6~kpc) from the nucleus. However,
319: previous VLBA observations \citep{BJ95,JB95} and VSOP (VLBA to HALCA)
320: observations \citep{DEH06} found no evidence of motions within 5~pc of
321: the core, although \cite{RBJM89} reported an observed velocity of
322: $0.28c\pm0.08c$ for a feature located about 20~mas (1.6~pc) from the
323: nucleus. More recently, based on just two of five total epochs,
324: \cite{LWJ07} reported possible speeds between $0.25c$
325: and $0.4c$ for three transient features located about 3~mas (0.24~pc)
326: from the nucleus.
327:
328: We find no evidence for motions faster than $0.07c$ within the inner 20
329: mas (1.6~pc). In Figure~\ref{f:speed} we plot the location of seven
330: separate jet features as a function of time, and we summarize their
331: speeds in Table~\ref{t:kinematics}. All the jet components were fit with
332: circular Gaussians. The fastest jet speed observed is only
333: $0.026\pm0.004c$, while the counter-jet feature apparently moves outward at
334: $0.010\pm0.001c$. The other five features appear essentially stationary
335: over the twelve years that they have been observed, with nominal upper
336: limits to their speed of about $0.07c$.
337: Each feature was detected at 17 to 24 separate epochs.
338:
339: Given that much faster speeds, up to $6c$, have been observed in the
340: arcsecond scale jet, it is important to consider the possibility of
341: temporal under-sampling in our kinematic analysis of the milli-arcsecond
342: scale jet, where $6c$ would correspond to $\simeq 24$~mas\,yr$^{-1}$.
343: Our VLBA sampling interval ranged from 2 to 8~months, with a median of
344: 5~months. A newly ejected, fast component could therefore conceivably
345: travel anywhere between 2 to 16~mas downstream in the time between
346: successive epochs, possibly leading to an incorrect component
347: cross-identification in Figure~\ref{f:speed}. However, the large number
348: of jet components present at each epoch implies that if they have very
349: fast speeds, new components would have to be emitted very frequently
350: from the core region, at a rate of $\sim 2$ per year. But, the flux
351: density and brightness temperature of the core show no indication of
352: such activity, but instead vary relatively smoothly over time. Second,
353: there are clear gaps in jet brightness between 3 and 5~mas and between 6
354: and 10~mas (see Figure~\ref{f:speed} and the movie in the electronic
355: edition of the Journal) in which jet components are never present at any
356: epoch~--- a highly unlikely situation given a high component ejection
357: rate. Third, the brightness temperatures of the individual components C1
358: to C7 are consistent across the epochs, which would not be expected if
359: our cross-identifications were incorrect. Finally, our 2~cm VLBA movie
360: of the jet\footnote{A movie of the jet covering the period 1999 to 2007
361: can be seen in electronic edition of the Astrophysical Journal. The maps
362: prior to 1999 have a higher noise, they were not included in the
363: movie. An up to date version of the movie, as well as a journal of the
364: observations, image and visibility FITS files can be found in our web
365: database
366: http://www.physics.purdue.edu/MOJAVE/sourcepages/1228+126.shtml}, which
367: relies on simple linear interpolation across the epochs, shows no sudden
368: jumps that would be indicative of temporal under-sampling.
369:
370: We believe that this interpretation is more robust than the results of other
371: radio measurements which typically used only two or three epochs. We
372: cannot rule out the possibility of a smooth relativistic flow with no
373: propagating shocks or other patterns.
374:
375: \section{DISCUSSION}
376: \label{s:discussion}
377:
378: Considering that the Doppler boosted relativistic jet of M87 appears
379: one-sided out to kiloparsec scales, the absence of any clear motions in
380: the inner jet is somewhat surprising. We measure a jet to counter-jet
381: flux density ratio of between 10 and 15 (in the year 2000) at a position
382: between 0.5 and 3.1 mas from the core, and a lower limit of 200 between
383: 3.1 to 6.0~mas away. Assuming that the jet is intrinsically
384: bidirectional and symmetric, and that the bulk velocity flow is the same
385: as the pattern motion, our maximum reliable observed speed of
386: $\beta_\mathrm{app}=0.026\pm0.004$ would imply a jet to counter-jet
387: ratio near unity for the commonly accepted viewing angle of $\sim
388: 40^\circ$ \citep[e.g.][]{OHC89, RBJM89}. If the jet and counter-jet are
389: intrinsically symmetric and oriented at an angle of $30^\circ$ to
390: $40^\circ$ to the line of sight, the observed jet to counter-jet flux
391: density ratios imply that the intrinsic flow speed, $\beta$, is 0.5 to
392: 0.6 between 0 and 3.1~mas from the core and increases to $>$0.9 beyond
393: 3.1~mas. Also, we note that the rather small ratio of observed jet to
394: counter-jet speeds (Table~\ref{t:kinematics}) of less than 2.5 is not
395: consistent with simple relativistic beaming models. We conclude that
396: either the inner jet is intrinsically asymmetric, or there are no detectable
397: moving features within a rapidly flowing plasma.
398:
399: Apparent limb brightening is predicted from analytic and numerical
400: modeling of relativistic jets \citep{Aloy_etal2000,Perucho_etal07} and
401: can be reproduced via Kelvin-Helmholtz instability, which is
402: seen in extragalactic jets both at kiloparsec \citep[M87,][]{LHE03} and
403: parsec scales \citep[3C273,][]{LZ01}. Limb brightening can be
404: particularly pronounced when the jet opening angle is greater than the
405: beaming angle \citep{GWD06} and especially if there is a velocity
406: gradient across the jet \citep{GDSW07}. A two layer ``spine-sheath''
407: model has been suggested to explain the existence of observed strong TeV
408: emission from BL~Lacs with apparently slow moving radio jets
409: \citep{CCCG00,PE04,G04}. \cite{SO02} and \cite{GTC05} have considered a
410: two component jet having a fast spine which produces the gamma ray
411: emission by inverse Compton scattering of the radio photons from a
412: surrounding slow layer or sheath. Spine-sheath models have also been
413: discussed by \cite{B96}, \cite{SBB98}, \cite{ARW99}, \cite{LB02}, and
414: \cite{Cohen_etal07}. The central gap seen in our VLBA images of M87, as
415: well as observed TeV emission \citep[][and as discussed above]{A06}
416: combined with the lack of measurable motion within the inner 1.6~pc
417: (\S\ref{s:kinematics}) appear to support this two component model.
418:
419: The recently reported detection of strong variable TeV emission from M87
420: \citep{A06} also presents a problem, since unless the radiating
421: plasma has a large Doppler factor, energy losses due to $\gamma -
422: \gamma$ pair production will extinguish the gamma ray emission
423: \citep[e.g.,][]{DG95}.
424: Although we do not find any evidence for a fast
425: moving jet in M87 close to the central engine, the observed TeV
426: emission can be explained in terms of a dual layer model with a fast
427: inner jet and a slower moving outer layer \citep{GTC05}. In this
428: picture, the inner jet is beamed away from us and is thus not seen in
429: our VLBA images, and we only observe the slower outer layer. However,
430: even the slow outer layer must move at at~least $\beta>0.5$--0.8 to
431: be consistent with the jet to counter-jet flux density ratio as
432: discussed earlier in this section.
433:
434: \cite{CHS07} argue that the superluminal feature HST-1, located at a
435: de-projected distance of more than 100~pc down the jet, may be the
436: source of TeV emission in M87, rather than the base of the jet. By
437: analogy, they suggest that blazar activity more broadly may not, as is
438: widely assumed, be located close to the central engine. If this is the
439: case, we might expect to observe small-scale structure in HST-1 at 2~cm,
440: but we do not find any milliarcsecond structure stronger than 0.75~mJy
441: in that region in the 2000 full-track VLBA data; however our data were
442: taken five years before the HST-1 flaring event in 2005. \cite{A06}
443: commented that an origin of the TeV emission in HST-1 would imply an
444: unrealistically small opening angle for the energy source, assuming the
445: source was located at the base of the jet.
446:
447: \acknowledgments
448: The VLBA is a facility of the National Science Foundation operated by
449: the National Radio Astronomy Observatory under cooperative agreement
450: with Associated Universities, Inc. Part of this work made use of
451: archived VLBA and VLA data obtained by J.~Biretta, F.~Owen, W.~Junor,
452: and one of us (KIK). YYK is a Research Fellow of the Alexander von
453: Humboldt Foundation. YYK was partly supported by the Russian Foundation
454: for Basic Research (grant 05-02-17377). DCH was partially supported by
455: an award from the Research Corporation. Part of this work was done by
456: YYK, DCH, and MLL during their Jansky fellowship at the
457: NRAO. The \mbox{MOJAVE} project is supported under NSF grant AST-0406923 and a
458: grant from the Purdue Research Foundation. We thank T.~Cheung,
459: D.~Harris, A.~Lobanov, E. Ros, C.~Walker, and the \mbox{MOJAVE} team for
460: helpful discussions and contributions to this paper. We also appreciate
461: helpful comments of the anonymous referee.
462:
463: %This research has made use of NASA's Astrophysics Data System.
464:
465: {\it Facilities:} \facility{VLBA, VLA}.
466:
467: \bibliographystyle{apj}
468: %\bibliography{yyk}
469:
470: \begin{thebibliography}{42}
471: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
472:
473: \bibitem[{{Aharonian} {et~al.}(2006)}]{A06}
474: {Aharonian}, F., {et al.} 2006,
475: Science, 314, 1424
476:
477: \bibitem[{{Aloy} {et~al.}(2000)}]{Aloy_etal2000}
478: {Aloy}, M.-A., {G{\'o}mez}, J.-L., {Ib{\'a}{\~n}ez}, J.-M., {Mart{\'{\i}}},
479: J.-M., \& {M{\"u}ller}, E. 2000, \apjl, 528, L85
480:
481: \bibitem[{{Attridge} {et~al.}(1999){Attridge}, {Roberts}, \& {Wardle}}]{ARW99}
482: {Attridge}, J.~M., {Roberts}, D.~H., \& {Wardle}, J.~F.~C. 1999, \apjl, 518,
483: L87
484:
485: \bibitem[{{Biretta} \& {Junor}(1995)}]{BJ95}
486: {Biretta}, J.~A., \& {Junor}, W. 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of
487: Science, 92, 11364
488:
489: \bibitem[{{Biretta} {et~al.}(1999){Biretta}, {Sparks}, \& {Macchetto}}]{BSM99}
490: {Biretta}, J.~A., {Sparks}, W.~B., \& {Macchetto}, F. 1999, \apj, 520, 621
491:
492: \bibitem[{{Biretta} {et~al.}(1995){Biretta}, {Zhou}, \& {Owen}}]{BZO95}
493: {Biretta}, J.~A., {Zhou}, F., \& {Owen}, F.~N. 1995, \apj, 447, 582
494:
495: \bibitem[{{Bridle}(1996)}]{B96}
496: {Bridle}, A.~H. 1996, in ASP Conf.\ Ser.\ 100: Energy Transport in Radio
497: Galaxies and Quasars, ed. P.~E. {Hardee}, A.~H. {Bridle}, \& J.~A. {Zensus},
498: 383--394
499:
500: \bibitem[{{Cheung} {et~al.}(2007){Cheung}, {Harris}, \& {Stawarz}}]{CHS07}
501: {Cheung}, C.~C., {Harris}, D.~E., \& {Stawarz}, L. 2007, \apjl, 663, L65
502:
503: \bibitem[{{Chiaberge} {et~al.}(2000)}]{CCCG00}
504: {Chiaberge}, M., {Celotti}, A., {Capetti}, A., \& {Ghisellini}, G. 2000, \aap,
505: 358, 104
506:
507: \bibitem[{{Cohen} {et~al.}(2007)}]{Cohen_etal07}
508: {Cohen}, M.~H., {Lister}, M.~L., {Homan}, D.~C., {Kadler}, M., {Kellermann},
509: K.~I., {Kovalev}, Y.~Y., \& {Vermeulen}, R.~C. 2007, \apj, 658, 232
510:
511: \bibitem[{{Dodson} {et~al.}(2006){Dodson}, {Edwards}, \& {Hirabayashi}}]{DEH06}
512: {Dodson}, R., {Edwards}, P.~G., \& {Hirabayashi}, H. 2006, \pasj, 58, 243
513:
514: \bibitem[{{Dondi} \& {Ghisellini}(1995)}]{DG95}
515: {Dondi}, L., \& {Ghisellini}, G. 1995, \mnras, 273, 583
516:
517: \bibitem[{{Ghisellini} {et~al.}(2005){Ghisellini}, {Tavecchio}, \&
518: {Chiaberge}}]{GTC05}
519: {Ghisellini}, G., {Tavecchio}, F., \& {Chiaberge}, M. 2005, \aap, 432, 401
520:
521: \bibitem[{{Giroletti} {et~al.}(2004)}]{G04}
522: {Giroletti}, M., et~al. 2004, \apj, 600, 127
523:
524: \bibitem[{{Gopal-Krishna} {et~al.}(2007){Gopal-Krishna}, {Dhurde},
525: {Sircar}, \& {Wiita}}]{GDSW07}
526: {Gopal-Krishna}, {Dhurde}, S., {Sircar}, P., \& {Wiita}, P.~J. 2007,
527: \mnras, 377, 446
528:
529: \bibitem[{{Gopal-Krishna} {et~al.}(2006){Gopal-Krishna}, {Wiita}, \&
530: {Dhurde}}]{GWD06}
531: {Gopal-Krishna}, {Wiita}, P.~J., \& {Dhurde}, S. 2006, \mnras, 369, 1287
532:
533: \bibitem[{{Harms} {et~al.}(1994)}]{H94}
534: {Harms}, R.~J., et~al. 1994, \apjl, 435, L35
535:
536: \bibitem[{{Harris} {et~al.}(2003)}]{H03}
537: {Harris}, D.~E., {Biretta}, J.~A., {Junor}, W., {Perlman}, E.~S., {Sparks},
538: W.~B., \& {Wilson}, A.~S. 2003, \apjl, 586, L41
539:
540: \bibitem[{{Harris} {et~al.}(2006)}]{HCB06}
541: {Harris}, D.~E., {Cheung}, C.~C., {Biretta}, J.~A., {Sparks}, W.~B., {Junor},
542: W., {Perlman}, E.~S., \& {Wilson}, A.~S. 2006, \apj, 640, 211
543:
544: \bibitem[{{Homan} \& {Lister}(2006)}]{HL06}
545: {Homan}, D.~C., \& {Lister}, M.~L. 2006, \aj, 131, 1262
546:
547: \bibitem[{{Jones}(1988)}]{J88}
548: {Jones}, T.~W. 1988, \apj, 332, 678
549:
550: \bibitem[{{Junor} \& {Biretta}(1995)}]{JB95}
551: {Junor}, W., \& {Biretta}, J.~A. 1995, \aj, 109, 500
552:
553: \bibitem[{{Kellermann} {et~al.}(2004)}]{2cmPaperIII}
554: {Kellermann}, K.~I., {Lister}, M.~L., {Homan}, D.~C., {Vermeulen}, R.~C.,
555: {Cohen}, M.~H., {Ros}, E., {Kadler}, M., {Zensus}, J.~A., \& {Kovalev}, Y.~Y.
556: 2004, \apj, 609, 539
557:
558: \bibitem[{{Kellermann} {et~al.}(1998)}]{2cmPaperI}
559: {Kellermann}, K.~I., {Vermeulen}, R.~C., {Zensus}, J.~A., \& {Cohen}, M.~H.
560: 1998, \aj, 115, 1295
561:
562: \bibitem[{{Laing} \& {Bridle}(2002)}]{LB02}
563: {Laing}, R.~A., \& {Bridle}, A.~H. 2002, \mnras, 336, 328
564:
565: \bibitem[{{Lister} \& {Homan}(2005)}]{LH05}
566: {Lister}, M.~L., \& {Homan}, D.~C. 2005, \aj, 130, 1389
567:
568: \bibitem[{{Lobanov} {et~al.}(2003)}]{LHE03}
569: {Lobanov}, A., {Hardee}, P., \& {Eilek}, J. 2003, New Astronomy Review, 47, 629
570:
571: \bibitem[{{Lobanov} \& {Zensus}(2001)}]{LZ01}
572: {Lobanov}, A.~P., \& {Zensus}, J.~A. 2001, Science, 294, 128
573:
574: \bibitem[{{Ly} {et~al.}(2007){Ly}, {Walker}, \& {Junor}}]{LWJ07}
575: {Ly}, C., {Walker}, R.~C., \& {Junor}, W. 2007, \apj, 660, 200
576:
577: \bibitem[{{Ly} {et~al.}(2004){Ly}, {Walker}, \& {Wrobel}}]{Ly_etal04}
578: {Ly}, C., {Walker}, R.~C., \& {Wrobel}, J.~M. 2004, \aj, 127, 119
579:
580: \bibitem[{{Macchetto} {et~al.}(1997)}]{MMAC97}
581: {Macchetto}, F., {Marconi}, A., {Axon}, D.~J., {Capetti}, A., {Sparks}, W., \&
582: {Crane}, P. 1997, \apj, 489, 579
583:
584: \bibitem[{{Owen} {et~al.}(1989){Owen}, {Hardee}, \& {Cornwell}}]{OHC89}
585: {Owen}, F.~N., {Hardee}, P.~E., \& {Cornwell}, T.~J. 1989, \apj, 340, 698
586:
587: \bibitem[{{Perlman} {et~al.}(2001)}]{PBS01}
588: {Perlman}, E.~S., {Biretta}, J.~A., {Sparks}, W.~B., {Macchetto}, F.~D., \&
589: {Leahy}, J.~P. 2001, \apj, 551, 206
590:
591: \bibitem[{{Perucho} {et~al.}(2007)}]{Perucho_etal07}
592: {Perucho}, M., {Hanasz}, M., {Mart{\'{\i}}}, J.-M., \& {Miralles}, J.-A. 2007,
593: Phy.\ Rev.\ E, 75, 056312
594:
595: \bibitem[{{Piner} \& {Edwards}(2004)}]{PE04}
596: {Piner}, B.~G., \& {Edwards}, P.~G. 2004, \apj, 600, 115
597:
598: \bibitem[{{Reid} {et~al.}(1989)}]{RBJM89}
599: {Reid}, M.~J., {Biretta}, J.~A., {Junor}, W., {Muxlow}, T.~W.~B., \& {Spencer},
600: R.~E. 1989, \apj, 336, 112
601:
602: \bibitem[{{Shklovsky}(1964)}]{S64}
603: {Shklovsky}, I.~S. 1964, Sov.~Astron., 7, 748
604:
605: \bibitem[{{Stawarz} \& {Ostrowski}(2002)}]{SO02}
606: {Stawarz}, {\L}., \& {Ostrowski}, M. 2002, \apj, 578, 763
607:
608: \bibitem[{{Swain} {et~al.}(1998){Swain}, {Bridle}, \& {Baum}}]{SBB98}
609: {Swain}, M.~R., {Bridle}, A.~H., \& {Baum}, S.~A. 1998, \apjl, 507, L29
610:
611: \bibitem[{{Urry} \& {Padovani}(1995)}]{UP95}
612: {Urry}, C.~M., \& {Padovani}, P. 1995, \pasp, 107, 803
613:
614: \bibitem[{{Wilson} \& {Yang}(2002)}]{WY02}
615: {Wilson}, A.~S., \& {Yang}, Y. 2002, \apj, 568, 133
616:
617: \bibitem[{{Zavala} \& {Taylor}(2003)}]{ZT03}
618: {Zavala}, R.~T., \& {Taylor}, G.~B. 2003, \apj, 589, 126
619:
620: \end{thebibliography}
621:
622: \end{document}
623: