1:
2: %Collider physics for quasi-stable exotics
3:
4: Given the discussion from the previous section, it is reasonable to
5: assume that exotic new triplet/anti-triplet $SU(3)$ representations
6: will hadronize into color-singlet states on a rapid time scale.
7: These exotic hadrons have come to be known as {\em R-hadrons} in the
8: literature and we will adopt that name for them here. These
9: R-hadrons will be stable on the time scale of the detector and can
10: be treated as hadrons for the duration of their interaction with the
11: detector elements. There has been some discussion of such
12: quasi-stable exotics in the literature, but this has been primarily
13: with regard to long-lived gluino-based
14: R-hadrons~\cite{Baer:1998pg,Mafi:1999dg,Kraan:2004tz,Kraan:2005ji,Kilian:2004uj,Hewett:2004nw}.
15: While the phenomenology of long-lived triplet/anti-triplet
16: representations will be similar, there are important differences. We
17: will therefore revisit the subject in this section and focus on the
18: signature of such states at the LHC experiments. Our analysis will
19: be sufficient to give a sense of the discovery reach of the LHC for
20: such new states, though a more refined analysis with a full detector
21: simulation will no doubt sharpen the conclusions obtained here.
22:
23: \subsection{Collider Phenomenology}
24: \label{qspheno}
25:
26: Unlike the previous studies which assume a gluino component for the
27: R-hadron, here the exotic component can be a scalar or a fermion.
28: Furthermore, these earlier papers were generally motivated by
29: scenarios with very heavy scalars, thus assuming only direct pair
30: production of gluinos. Here there is the very real possibility of
31: producing pairs of the heavier states in the supermultiplet; the
32: next-to-lightest exotic particles (NLEPs). Depending on the mass
33: differences involved, these states may then decay into the LEP which
34: subsequently hadronizes. This provides an additional handle for
35: triggering and event reconstruction which we will describe in the
36: next subsection.
37:
38: Another important distinction between the case of the gluino and
39: that of the exotic quark is in their $SU(3)$ representation, which
40: impacts the sorts of R-hadrons that can form and their interaction
41: cross-sections with the detector elements. Like their gluino
42: counterparts, exotic triplets and anti-triplets can form R-mesons
43: and R-baryons, with the former kinematically favored at the initial
44: hadronization stage. However, the R-hadrons considered here will
45: necessarily have one fewer ``active'' quark than those of the
46: gluino-based variety. As a result, the total cross-section for
47: R-hadron interactions with protons and neutrons will be
48: proportionally reduced.
49:
50: The R-meson states will include $D\bar{d}$ and $D\bar{u}$
51: combinations (as well as the anti-states) and the R-baryons will
52: include $Ddd$, $Duu$ and two combinations of $Ddu$ (as well as their
53: anti-states).\footnote{Approximately 15\% of the R-hadrons produced
54: in the primary high-$p_T$ process will involve a strange quark, with
55: a resulting $6\;{\rm mb}$ reduction in their interactions with
56: protons and neutrons. As this will have a negligible impact on the
57: collider physics considered below we will neglect all heavy flavor
58: R-hadrons.} The meson states will be approximately degenerate in
59: mass, with the bulk of the mass being accounted for by the exotic
60: component. We thus expect roughly 50\% of the R-mesons formed at the
61: initial vertex to be charged. Once produced, charged R-mesons will
62: leave tracks in the inner detector elements. The R-mesons will pass
63: largely unaffected through the electromagnetic calorimeter and enter
64: the hadronic calorimeter. Here the R-hadrons will undergo a series
65: of interactions which include elastic scattering off nucleons,
66: charge-exchange interactions with nucleons and
67: meson-to-baryon/baryon-to-meson interactions~\cite{Kraan:2004tz}.
68: These processes yield an interaction cross-section of roughly 12~mb
69: for R-mesons and 24~mb for R-baryons. The array of possible
70: interactions depends on the R-hadron itself and reveals an important
71: asymmetry.
72:
73: R-mesons of the form $D\bar{q}$ will preferentially undergo
74: meson-to-baryon transitions by extracting two quarks from a target
75: nucleon and producing a light pion in the final state. The resulting
76: $Dqq$ R-baryon will {\em remain} an R-baryon due to the absence of
77: anti-quarks in the detector material. Among the possible R-baryons
78: which can form, the case $Dud$ with $d$ and $u$ in an s-wave
79: configuration will be the lightest state, with the p-wave
80: configurations of $Dud$, $Ddd$ and $Duu$ more massive. In contrast,
81: R-mesons of the form $D^c q$ will {\em remain} R-mesons due to the
82: lack of quark-antiquark annihilation possibilities. Even if an
83: R-baryon of the form $D^c \bar{q} \bar{q}$ were to form, it would
84: quickly be destroyed by baryon-to-meson interactions which produce
85: light pions.
86:
87: With the cross-sections given above, we expect the exotic R-hadrons
88: to undergo a number of interactions with the hadron calorimeter. For
89: R-baryons (R-mesons) we estimate on average 8~(6)~interactions in
90: the ``barrel'' region ($0\leq \eta \leq 1.5$) and
91: 10~(7)~interactions in the ``endcap'' region ($1.5 \leq \eta \leq
92: 2.4$) for both the ATLAS and CMS detectors prior to entering the
93: muon system. As the bulk of the energy and momentum is carried by
94: the (non-interacting) exotic quark, these interactions tend to
95: result in a very small energy deposit in the calorimeter
96: cells~\cite{Kraan:2004tz}. The exact amount depends on the mass of
97: the R-hadron, its kinetic energy and the material through which it
98: is passing. As an example, consider the pair production via~QCD of
99: exotic fermion LEPs with mass $M_D = 600 \GeV$.
100: Figure~\ref{fig:keLEP} gives the distribution of kinetic energies of
101: the produced LEPs from a simulation 10,000~events (roughly $10 {\rm
102: fb}^{-1}$ of data-taking). While most are produced with relatively
103: little kinetic energy there is a long tail in the distribution, with
104: a mean at $E_{\rm kin} \simeq 400 \GeV$. From the results
105: of~\cite{Kraan:2005ji} we estimate the typical energy loss per
106: interaction for R-hadrons with $E_{\rm kin} \lappeq 1 \TeV$ to be
107: somewhere between $0.2$ and $2.2$ GeV. For our simulations in the
108: next subsection we will assume $1.5$ GeV in energy loss per nuclear
109: interaction.
110:
111: We therefore expect most, but not all, R-mesons produced in the
112: primary interaction with $|\eta|\leq 2.4$ to punch-through to the
113: muon chambers as some form of R-hadron in the ATLAS or CMS detector.
114: Those including $D$ will most often arrive as neutral R-baryons
115: while those involving $D^c$ will arrive as some form of neutral or
116: charged R-meson. If we neglect the small possibility of $D^c s$
117: R-mesons, we would anticipate roughly 50\% of the R-mesons involving
118: $D^c$ to be charged when they enter the muon chamber. These charged
119: R-hadrons will leave tracks in the muon system and will have a
120: characteristic velocity $\beta$ significantly different from the
121: essentially massless muon. Of course it is possible for R-hadrons of
122: all types to further interact hadronically in the muon system --
123: perhaps in a charge-exchanging way. We will neglect that small
124: possibility in what follows.
125:
126: %=============== LEP kinetic energy ===================
127: \begin{figure}[tb]
128: \begin{center}
129: \includegraphics[scale=0.5,angle=0]{qshist8.eps}
130: \caption{\footnotesize \textbf{Initial Kinetic Energy of Produced
131: R-hadrons.} Distribution of kinetic energies for fermionic LEPs with
132: $m_D = 600 \GeV$ prior to entering the calorimeter system.}
133: \label{fig:keLEP}
134: \end{center}
135: \end{figure}
136: %===================================================================
137:
138: Typical distances between the widely separated resistive plate
139: chambers in the muon systems of ATLAS and CMS are less than 1~meter,
140: with a separation between the first and last such plate at
141: approximately 3~meters~\cite{TDR}. It should therefore be possible
142: to make a robust distinction between tracks arising from the exotics
143: and those from background muons by measuring the respective
144: times-of-flight (TOF). The primary source of background muons will
145: be single and double weak boson production. Separating the signal
146: from background can be performed by requiring that the TOF between
147: any pair of reference points for the candidate R-hadron be at least
148: 3~ns greater than the TOF of a muon (with $\beta \simeq 1$). The
149: value of 3~ns is sufficiently greater than the $\delta t$ resolution
150: of both the ATLAS and CMS muon system to provide a highly
151: significant $S/\sqrt{B}$ value~\cite{Kraan:2005ji}. The final
152: requirement is that the R-hadron be moving sufficiently {\em
153: swiftly} to arrive at the muon chamber with the time-window for the
154: data to be recorded with the current bunch crossing. This
155: corresponds to a TOF of approximately 18~ns to reach the muon
156: system, or $\beta \simeq 0.5$ for the R-hadron~\cite{Nisati:1997gb}.
157:
158:
159: \subsection{Discovery Reach}
160:
161: There remains, however, the question of triggering on these events.
162: What fraction of the R-hadron events will eventually be recorded to
163: tape? The low-level trigger must capture an event prior to full
164: reconstruction, thus the presence of tracks in the inner detector
165: will not be sufficient to capture an event without significant
166: activity in either the calorimeters or the muon chambers. R-hadrons
167: which stop in the calorimeter will likely deposit sufficient energy
168: to trigger in the $E_T^{\rm sum}$ channel or $E_T^{\rm miss}$
169: channel (assuming the other R-hadron punches-through or decays at a
170: different time). However, given the potentially very long lifetimes
171: of these states these decays will occur at a much later
172: bunch-crossing than that which produced the exotic quarks. Such
173: issues have been addressed in the context of long-lived
174: gluinos~\cite{Arvanitaki:2005nq}. We will not pursue the
175: phenomenology of these cases further, though we will note the number
176: of such ``stopping'' exotics in our simulations to follow.
177:
178: The punch-through R-hadrons are likely to leave only 10-50 GeV of
179: transverse energy in the detector -- not enough to trigger in the
180: $E_T^{\rm sum}$ channel. Furthermore, as the exotic quarks are pair
181: produced and are back-to-back in the center-of-mass frame, the total
182: amount of {\em transverse} energy carried away by the exotics is
183: small. Of course, production of the next-to-lightest exotic particle
184: (NLEP) allows for the possibility of either increased $E_T^{\rm
185: miss}$ through $D_0 \to D_{1/2} \wtd{\chi}^0_1$ decays or increased
186: jet activity through $D_0 \to D_{1/2} \wtd{g}$ decays. In the former
187: case, the two $D_{1/2} \wtd{\chi}^0_1$ systems are again
188: back-to-back, with only a slight increase in $E_T^{\rm miss}$;
189: typical values are less than $50 \GeV$.
190:
191: If either of these triggers is utilized, the event will almost
192: certainly pass the second level triggers as well (due to the
193: presence of, say, a charged track leading to the calorimeter cells
194: and/or the presence of a track in the muon chamber). Nevertheless,
195: it is still preferable for a track to be identified in the muon
196: chamber for signal extraction and correct particle identification.
197: We thus consider the muon trigger alone. Since we expect the
198: emergence of only one charged R-meson (at most) from the two
199: produced exotics, the appropriate low-level trigger is the
200: single-muon channel. We will require a very conservative $p_T$
201: threshold of 15~GeV for triggering on the R-mesons that enter the
202: muon chamber (after accounting for the energy loss due to hadronic
203: interactions in the calorimeter).
204:
205: %--------- Acceptance for the five benchmark cases ------------
206: \begin{table}
207: {\begin{center}
208: \begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|c|c|}
209: \multicolumn{1}{c}{} & \multicolumn{5}{c}{Benchmark Point} \\
210: \hline
211: %\hline
212: & \parbox{1.0cm}{A} &
213: \parbox{1.0cm}{B} & \parbox{1.0cm}{C} &
214: \parbox{1.0cm}{D} & \parbox{1.0cm}{E} \\
215: %
216: \hline \hline
217: %
218: Geom. Accept. & 75.5\% & 79.9\% & 82.3\% & 86.8\% & 82.5\% \\
219: %
220: Charged Frac. & 25.2\% & 25.0\% & 25.1\% & 25.2\% & 25.4\% \\
221: %
222: Temp. Accept. & 82.7\% & 82.8\% & 81.9\% & 79.1\% & 76.9\% \\
223: %
224: TOF & 97.3\% & 96.5\% & 97.2\% & 97.3\% & 97.0\% \\ \hline
225: %
226: Total Accept. & 15.3\% & 16.0\% & 16.5\% & 16.9\% & 15.6\% \\ \hline
227: \hline
228: %
229: $N_{\rm signal}$ ($\times 10^3$) & 120 & 119 & 119 & 11.2 & 26.6 \\
230: %
231: $N_{\rm stop}$ ($\times 10^3$) & 11.1 & 10.8 & 11.3 & 1.36 & 4.56
232: \\ \hline
233: %
234: %Effective X-Section & 39.2 pb & 37.0 pb & 36.0 pb & 3.3 pb & 8.5 pb
235: %
236: \end{tabular}
237: \end{center}}
238: {\caption{\label{qscases} {\bf Signal Acceptance for Quasi-Stable
239: R-hadron Scenarios}. Geometrical acceptance represents the fraction
240: of R-hadrons that are produced with $|\eta| \leq 2.4$. Temporal
241: acceptance represents the fraction of charged non-stopping R-hadrons
242: that arrive within 18~ns of the primary interaction for the event.
243: The percentage that traverse a 3~meter fiducial distance at least
244: 3~ns slower than a $\beta=1$ muon would is given by TOF. The product
245: of these fractions is the total acceptance. The number of signal
246: events (as well as the number of stopping R-hadrons) is given for
247: $10\ {\rm fb}^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity.}}
248: \end{table}
249: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
250:
251: We illustrate the effectiveness of this search strategy in
252: Table~\ref{qscases} for the five benchmark cases presented in
253: Section~\ref{masses}. The acceptance at each stage is roughly
254: constant across the benchmark scenarios. Approximately~75-85\% of
255: the R-hadrons are produced with $|\eta| \leq 2.4$, and roughly 25\%
256: emerge from the calorimeter into the muon system as charged mesons.
257: Of these, approximately 80\% have $\beta \geq 0.5$ and thus arrive
258: within 18~ns of the primary interaction in the event. Each of these
259: R-hadrons will therefore produce a charged track in the muon system.
260: The distribution in transverse momentum for these objects upon
261: arrival at the muon chambers is given in Figure~\ref{fig:ptLEP} for
262: Scenario~C. In this case all of the R-mesons have sufficient $p_T$
263: to trigger given our 15~GeV minimum $p_T$ requirement. This fact was
264: true of all five benchmark points. Thus adding additional trigger
265: possibilities (such as $E_T^{\rm miss}$) is unlikely to add
266: significant numbers of signal events if the muon system is to be
267: used for particle identification. Finally, the fraction of R-mesons
268: moving sufficiently slowly to traverse a 3~meter fiducial distance
269: at least 3~ns longer than a $\beta =1$ muon is given by the ``TOF''
270: entry in Table~\ref{qscases}. This represents the vast majority of
271: R-mesons that enter the muon system within the 18~ns time window. We
272: therefore estimate the total acceptance to be approximately
273: one-sixth of all produced quasi-stable exotics.
274:
275: %=============== LEP pT at the muon chamber ===================
276: \begin{figure}[tb]
277: \begin{center}
278: \includegraphics[scale=0.5,angle=0]{qshist9.eps}
279: \caption{\footnotesize \textbf{Transverse Momentum of Charged
280: R-mesons.} The distribution of $p_T$ for charged R-Mesons with
281: $\beta \geq 0.5$ upon entering the muon system. We assume a minimum
282: of $p_T \geq 15\GeV$ to trigger on the charged track. All R-hadrons
283: moving with the minimum velocity have sufficient momentum to meet
284: this threshold.} \label{fig:ptLEP}
285: \end{center}
286: \end{figure}
287: %===================================================================
288:
289: The discovery reach will track the production cross-section for the
290: lightest exotic particle. In each of our benchmark cases there is at
291: least one exotic state with a mass below 450 GeV, providing for
292: copious production at LHC energies. For the simulations described in
293: Table~\ref{qscases} we allow for production of both the exotic
294: fermion and the lighter exotic scalar. In case~A both the fermion
295: LEP and its slightly heavier scalar will be quasi-stable, while the
296: other cases will involve SUSY cascade decays for the heavier states.
297: The higher production cross-section for the fermion (as demonstrated
298: in Section~\ref{production}) reflects itself in the factor of ten
299: between the number of signal events that arise for cases~A-C and
300: those of cases~D and~E. Given the exceptionally large
301: signal-to-background ratio for events of this type, discovery will
302: not prove a problem if such light exotics exist. We also note that a
303: fair number of the produced exotics have insufficient kinetic energy
304: to punch-through to the muon system and will stop in the
305: calorimeter. The issue of detecting these events has been addressed
306: elsewhere~\cite{Arvanitaki:2005fa}. As the lifetime of these exotics
307: is an undetermined parameter, we merely list the number of such
308: events in Table~\ref{qscases}.
309:
310: %=============== LEP kinetic energy ===================
311: \begin{figure}[tb]
312: \begin{center}
313: \includegraphics[scale=0.5,angle=0]{reachplot.eps}
314: \caption{\footnotesize \textbf{Reach in Exotic Mass for Muon
315: Signature.} Discovery reach at the ATLAS experiment for
316: ``punch-through'' quasi-stable exotics. The threshold for discovery
317: is taken to be ten muon-like events, assuming a negligible
318: background rate.} \label{fig:reach}
319: \end{center}
320: \end{figure}
321: %===================================================================
322:
323: %=============== LEP kinetic energy ===================
324: \begin{figure}[tb]
325: \begin{center}
326: \includegraphics[scale=0.5,angle=0]{stopplot.eps}
327: \caption{\footnotesize \textbf{Stopping R-hadrons as a Function of
328: Exotic Mass.} Discovery reach at the ATLAS experiment for
329: quasi-stable exotics which stop in the calorimeter and subsequently
330: decay. The threshold for discovery is taken to be ten such events,
331: assuming a negligible background rate.} \label{fig:stop}
332: \end{center}
333: \end{figure}
334: %===================================================================
335:
336:
337: As the masses of the exotics increase, the production rate falls. We
338: estimate the discovery reach in $m_D$ and $m_{D_0}$ via the muon
339: signature channel in Figure~\ref{fig:reach}. We use the standard
340: practice of taking ten events to constitute the discovery threshold
341: in cases with an exceptionally small number of expected background
342: events. This corresponds to a mass reach of $m_D \lappeq 1700 \GeV$
343: for the fermion and $m_{D_0} \lappeq 1450 \GeV$ for the scalar
344: exotic in 10 fb$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity. Since it
345: should also be able to detect the fraction of events that stop
346: somewhere in the detector itself, we also include the mass reach for
347: this signature in Figure~\ref{fig:stop}. Here the mass reach for 10
348: events is $m_D \lappeq 1100 \GeV$ for the fermion and $m_{D_0}
349: \lappeq 925 \GeV$ for the scalar. These rough estimates for the
350: discovery reach of quasi-stable $SU(3)$-charged objects are in good
351: agreement with calculations performed in other model
352: contexts~\cite{Kraan:2005ji,Kilian:2004uj,Hewett:2004nw}.
353:
354:
355:
356:
357:
358:
359:
360: %For the edge of the discovery reach you will want to really push a
361: %few things...such as using ISR and FSR to generate enough jet
362: %activity to use the ETSUM trigger....full event simulation to get at
363: %some subset of MET triggers.... look into partial tracks in the muon
364: %chamber... and of course looking at the stopping R-hardrons!
365: