1: %
2: % Frieman etal, SDSS SN Overview, Aug. 19, 2007
3: % version for astro-ph
4: %
5: \documentclass[preprint]{aastex}
6:
7: \usepackage{natbib}
8: \citestyle{aa}
9: \usepackage{graphicx}
10:
11: \DeclareGraphicsExtensions{.jpg,.pdf,.png,.eps}
12:
13:
14: \lefthead{Frieman et al.}
15: \righthead{SDSS Supernovae Survey.}
16: \shorttitle{SDSS Supernovae Survey.}
17: \shortauthors{Frieman et al.}
18:
19: \begin{document}
20:
21: \title{The Sloan Digital Sky Survey-II Supernova Survey: Technical Summary
22: }
23:
24: %%% Insert author/affiliation text below this line.
25:
26:
27: \author{
28: Joshua~A.~Frieman,\altaffilmark{1,2,3}
29: Bruce~Bassett,\altaffilmark{4,5}
30: Andrew~Becker,\altaffilmark{6}
31: Changsu Choi,\altaffilmark{7}
32: David~Cinabro,\altaffilmark{8}
33: Fritz~DeJongh,\altaffilmark{1}
34: Darren~L.~Depoy,\altaffilmark{9}
35: Ben~Dilday,\altaffilmark{2,10}
36: Mamoru~Doi,\altaffilmark{11}
37: Peter~M.~Garnavich,\altaffilmark{12}
38: Craig~J.~Hogan,\altaffilmark{6}
39: Jon~Holtzman,\altaffilmark{13}
40: Myungshin~Im,\altaffilmark{7}
41: Saurabh~Jha,\altaffilmark{14}
42: Richard~Kessler,\altaffilmark{2,15}
43: Kohki~Konishi,\altaffilmark{16}
44: Hubert~Lampeitl,\altaffilmark{17}
45: John~Marriner,\altaffilmark{1}
46: Jennifer~L.~Marshall,\altaffilmark{9}
47: David~McGinnis,\altaffilmark{1}
48: Gajus~Miknaitis,\altaffilmark{1}
49: Robert~C.~Nichol,\altaffilmark{18}
50: Jose~Luis~Prieto,\altaffilmark{9}
51: Adam~G.~Riess,\altaffilmark{17,19}
52: Michael~W.~Richmond,\altaffilmark{20}
53: Roger~Romani,\altaffilmark{14}
54: Masao~Sako,\altaffilmark{21}
55: Donald~P.~Schneider,\altaffilmark{22}
56: Mathew~Smith,\altaffilmark{18}
57: Naohiro~Takanashi,\altaffilmark{11}
58: Kouichi~Tokita,\altaffilmark{11}
59: Kurt~van~der~Heyden,\altaffilmark{5}
60: Naoki~Yasuda,\altaffilmark{16}
61: Chen~Zheng,\altaffilmark{14}
62: Jennifer Adelman-McCarthy,\altaffilmark{1}
63: James Annis,\altaffilmark{1}
64: Roberto~J.~Assef,\altaffilmark{9}
65: John~Barentine,\altaffilmark{23,24}
66: Ralf~Bender,\altaffilmark{25,26}
67: Roger~D.~Blandford,\altaffilmark{14}
68: William~N.~Boroski,\altaffilmark{1}
69: Malcolm~Bremer,\altaffilmark{27}
70: Howard~Brewington,\altaffilmark{24}
71: Chris~A.~Collins,\altaffilmark{28}
72: Arlin~Crotts,\altaffilmark{29}
73: Jack~Dembicky,\altaffilmark{24}
74: Jason~Eastman,\altaffilmark{9}
75: Alastair~Edge,\altaffilmark{30}
76: Edmond Edmondson,\altaffilmark{18}
77: Edward~Elson,\altaffilmark{5}
78: Michael~E.~Eyler,\altaffilmark{31}
79: Alexei~V.~Filippenko,\altaffilmark{32}
80: Ryan~J.~Foley,\altaffilmark{32}
81: Stephan~Frank,\altaffilmark{9}
82: Ariel Goobar,\altaffilmark{33}
83: Tina~Gueth,\altaffilmark{13}
84: James~E.~Gunn,\altaffilmark{34}
85: Michael~Harvanek,\altaffilmark{24,35}
86: Ulrich~Hopp,\altaffilmark{25,26}
87: Yutaka~Ihara,\altaffilmark{11}
88: \v{Z}elko~Ivezi\'{c},\altaffilmark{6}
89: Steven~Kahn,\altaffilmark{14}
90: Jared~Kaplan,\altaffilmark{36}
91: Stephen~Kent,\altaffilmark{1,3}
92: William~Ketzeback,\altaffilmark{24}
93: Scott~J.~Kleinman,\altaffilmark{24,37}
94: Wolfram~Kollatschny,\altaffilmark{38}
95: Richard~G.~Kron,\altaffilmark{3}
96: Jurek~Krzesi\'{n}ski,\altaffilmark{24,39}
97: Dennis Lamenti,\altaffilmark{40}
98: Giorgos Leloudas,\altaffilmark{41}
99: Huan Lin,\altaffilmark{1}
100: Daniel~C.~Long,\altaffilmark{24}
101: John~Lucey,\altaffilmark{30}
102: Robert~H.~Lupton,\altaffilmark{34}
103: Elena~Malanushenko,\altaffilmark{24}
104: Viktor~Malanushenko,\altaffilmark{24}
105: Russet~J.~McMillan,\altaffilmark{24}
106: Javier~Mendez,\altaffilmark{42}
107: Christopher~W.~Morgan,\altaffilmark{9,31}
108: Tomoki~Morokuma,\altaffilmark{11,43}
109: Atsuko~Nitta,\altaffilmark{24,44}
110: Linda Ostman,\altaffilmark{33}
111: Kaike~Pan,\altaffilmark{24}
112: Constance~M.~Rockosi,\altaffilmark{45}
113: A.~Kathy~Romer,\altaffilmark{46}
114: Pilar~Ruiz-Lapuente,\altaffilmark{42}
115: Gabrelle~Saurage,\altaffilmark{24}
116: Katie~Schlesinger,\altaffilmark{9}
117: Stephanie~A.~Snedden,\altaffilmark{24}
118: Jesper~Sollerman,\altaffilmark{41,47}
119: Chris Stoughton,\altaffilmark{1}
120: Maximilian~Stritzinger,\altaffilmark{41}
121: Mark~SubbaRao,\altaffilmark{3}
122: Douglas~Tucker,\altaffilmark{1}
123: Petri~Vaisanen,\altaffilmark{5}
124: Linda~C.~Watson,\altaffilmark{9}
125: Shannon~Watters,\altaffilmark{24}
126: J.~Craig~Wheeler,\altaffilmark{23}
127: Brian Yanny,\altaffilmark{1}
128: and
129: Donald~York\altaffilmark{3,15}
130: }
131:
132: \altaffiltext{1}{
133: Center for Particle Astrophysics,
134: Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510.
135: }
136: \altaffiltext{2}{
137: Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics,
138: The University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue Chicago, IL 60637.
139: }
140: \altaffiltext{3}{
141: Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
142: The University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637.
143: }
144: \altaffiltext{4}{
145: Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics,
146: University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa.
147: }
148: \altaffiltext{5}{
149: South African Astronomical Observatory,
150: P.O. Box 9, Observatory 7935, South Africa.
151: }
152: \altaffiltext{6}{
153: Department of Astronomy,
154: University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195.
155: }
156: \altaffiltext{7}{
157: Department of Astronomy,
158: Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
159: }
160: \altaffiltext{8}{
161: Department of Physics,
162: Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202.
163: }
164: \altaffiltext{9}{
165: Department of Astronomy,
166: Ohio State University, 140 West 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210-1173.
167: }
168: \altaffiltext{10}{
169: Department of Physics,
170: University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.
171: }
172: \altaffiltext{11}{
173: Institute of Astronomy, Graduate School of Science,
174: University of Tokyo 2-21-1, Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-0015, Japan.
175: }
176: \altaffiltext{12}{
177: University of Notre Dame, 225 Nieuwland Science, Notre Dame, IN 46556-5670.
178: }
179: \altaffiltext{13}{
180: Department of Astronomy,
181: MSC 4500,
182: New Mexico State University, P.O. Box 30001, Las Cruces, NM 88003.
183: }
184: \altaffiltext{14}{
185: Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics \& Cosmology,
186: Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4060.
187: }
188: \altaffiltext{15}{
189: Enrico Fermi Institute,
190: University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637.
191: }
192: \altaffiltext{16}{
193: Institute for Cosmic Ray Research,
194: University of Tokyo, 5-1-5, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8582, Japan.
195: }
196: \altaffiltext{17}{
197: Space Telescope Science Institute,
198: 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218.
199: }
200: \altaffiltext{18}{
201: Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation,
202: Mercantile House,
203: Hampshire Terrace, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2EG, UK.
204: }
205: \altaffiltext{19}{
206: Department of Physics and Astronomy,
207: Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218.
208: }
209: \altaffiltext{20}{
210: Physics Department,
211: Rochester Institute of Technology,
212: 85 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623-5603.
213: }
214: \altaffiltext{21}{
215: Department of Physics and Astronomy,
216: University of Pennsylvania, 203 South 33rd Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
217: }
218: \altaffiltext{22}{
219: Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
220: The Pennsylvania State University,
221: 525 Davey Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802.
222: }
223: \altaffiltext{23}{
224: Department of Astronomy,
225: McDonald Observatory, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712.
226: }
227: \altaffiltext{24}{
228: Apache Point Observatory, P.O. Box 59, Sunspot, NM 88349.
229: }
230: \altaffiltext{25}{
231: Universitaets-Sternwarte Munich, 1 Scheinerstr, Munich, D-81679, Germany.
232: }
233: \altaffiltext{26}{
234: Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, D-85748, Garching, Munich, Germany.
235: }
236: \altaffiltext{27}{
237: H. H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TL, UK.
238: }
239:
240: \altaffiltext{28}{
241: Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University,
242: Birkenhead CH41 1LD, UK.
243: }
244: \altaffiltext{29}{
245: Department of Astronomy,
246: Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.
247: }
248: \altaffiltext{30}{
249: Department of Physics, University of Durham, South Road,
250: Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.
251: }
252: \altaffiltext{31}{
253: Department of Physics, United States Naval Academy,
254: 572C Holloway Road, Annapolis, MD 21402.
255: }
256: \altaffiltext{32}{
257: Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411.
258: }
259: \altaffiltext{33}{
260: Physics Department, Stockholm University, AlbaNova University Center,
261: 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
262: }
263: \altaffiltext{34}{
264: Princeton University Observatory, Peyton Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544.
265: }
266: \altaffiltext{35}{
267: Lowell Observatory, 1400 Mars Hill Rd., Flagstaff, AZ 86001.
268: }
269: \altaffiltext{36}{
270: Jefferson Laboratory of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
271: }
272: \altaffiltext{37}{
273: Subaru Telescope, 650 North A'ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720.
274: }
275: \altaffiltext{38}{
276: Institut f\"{u}r Astrophysik, Universit\"{a}t G\"{o}ttingen,
277: Friedrich-Hund-Platz 1, D-37077 G\"{o}ttingen, Germany.
278: }
279: \altaffiltext{39}{
280: Obserwatorium Astronomiczne na Suhorze,
281: Akademia Pedagogicazna w Krakowie,
282: ulica Podchor\c{a}\.{z}ych 2, PL-30-084 Krak\'{o}w, Poland.
283: }
284: \altaffiltext{40}{
285: Department of Physics \& Astronomy,
286: San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132-4163.
287: }
288: \altaffiltext{41}{
289: Dark Cosmology Centre, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen,
290: DK-2100, Denmark.
291: }
292: \altaffiltext{42}{
293: Department of Astronomy, University of Barcelona, Marti i Franques 1,
294: E-08028 Barcelona, Spain.
295: }
296: \altaffiltext{43}{
297: National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1, Osawa, Mitaka,
298: Tokyo 181-8588, Japan.
299: }
300: \altaffiltext{44}{
301: Gemini Observatory, 670 North A'ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720.
302: }
303: \altaffiltext{45}{Lick Observatory, University of California, Santa
304: Cruz, CA 95064.
305: }
306: \altaffiltext{46}{
307: Astronomy Center, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QJ, UK.
308: }
309: \altaffiltext{47}{
310: Astronomy Department, Stockholm University, AlbaNova University Center,
311: 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
312: }
313:
314:
315:
316:
317:
318: %%% Insert author/affiliation text above this line.
319:
320:
321: % The abstract environment prints out the receipt and acceptance dates
322: % if they are relevant for the journal style. For the aasms style, they
323: % will print out as horizontal rules for the editorial staff to type
324: % on, so long as the author does not include \received and \accepted
325: % commands. This should not be done, since \received and \accepted dates
326: % are not known to the author.
327:
328: \begin{abstract}
329:
330: The Sloan Digital Sky Survey-II (SDSS-II) has embarked on a multi-year project
331: to identify and measure light curves for
332: intermediate-redshift ($0.05 < z < 0.35$) Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) using
333: repeated five-band ({\it ugriz}) imaging over an area
334: of 300~sq.~deg. The survey region
335: is a stripe 2.5$^{\circ}$ wide centered on the celestial equator in the
336: Southern Galactic Cap that has been imaged numerous times in
337: earlier years, enabling construction of a deep reference image for
338: discovery of new objects.
339: Supernova imaging observations are being acquired
340: between 1 September and 30 November of 2005-7. During the first two
341: seasons, each
342: region was imaged on average every five nights. Spectroscopic
343: follow-up observations to determine supernova type and redshift
344: are carried out on a large number of telescopes.
345: In its first two three-month
346: seasons, the survey has discovered and measured light curves for
347: 327 spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia, 30
348: probable SNe Ia, 14 confirmed SNe Ib/c, 32 confirmed SNe II, plus
349: a large number of photometrically identified SNe Ia, 94 of which
350: have host-galaxy spectra taken so far.
351: This paper provides an overview of the
352: project and briefly describes the observations completed during the first two
353: seasons of operation.
354:
355: \end{abstract}
356:
357: \keywords{supernovae: general, surveys}
358:
359: \section{Introduction}
360:
361: Type Ia supernovae (SNe~Ia) are now
362: well established as the method of choice for accurate relative
363: distance determination over cosmological scales (see, e.g., Leibundgut 2001;
364: Filippenko 2005).
365: However, present cosmological constraints are based upon
366: a Hubble diagram constructed from low- and high-redshift
367: SN Ia samples that have been observed with a variety of
368: telescopes, instruments, and photometric
369: passbands. Photometric offsets between these samples are highly
370: degenerate with changes in cosmological parameters and could be hidden
371: in part because there is a gap or ``redshift desert''
372: between the nearby ($z\lesssim 0.1$) and distant ($z \gtrsim 0.3$)
373: samples; e.g., only 6 of the 157 {\it high-quality} SN Ia light
374: curves comprising the ``Gold sample'' used by Riess et al. (2004)
375: fall in this gap. In addition,
376: the low-redshift SN measurements used to anchor the Hubble
377: diagram themselves were compiled from combinations of several nearby
378: surveys using different telescopes, instruments, and selection criteria.
379: While supernovae provided the first indications for the
380: accelerating Universe (Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999),
381: obtaining precise constraints on the nature
382: of the dark energy will require much improved control over such
383: sources of systematic errors. Increasing precision
384: calls for larger supernova samples with
385: continuous redshift coverage of the Hubble diagram; it also necessitates
386: {\it high-quality} data, with densely sampled, multi-band SN light curves
387: and well-understood photometric calibration.
388:
389: The Sloan Digital Sky Survey-II Supernova Survey,
390: one of the three components of the SDSS-II project,
391: is designed to address both the paucity of SN Ia data at intermediate
392: redshifts and the systematic
393: limitations of previous SN~Ia samples, thereby leading to more robust
394: constraints upon the properties of the dark energy (for a description
395: of the SDSS, see York et al.~2000).
396: With its unique combination
397: of large areal coverage, sensitivity, and photometric accuracy, the SDSS
398: has the ability to bridge the redshift desert and aims to
399: discover and measure high-quality light curves for large numbers of
400: SNe~Ia at \hbox{$0.05 \lesssim z \lesssim 0.35$}.
401: The survey is designed to take advantage of the extensive database of
402: reference images, object catalogs, and photometric calibration
403: previously obtained by the SDSS-I.
404: The uniformity of the SDSS
405: 2.5-m photometric instrumentation, in conjunction with in-situ photometric
406: standards {\it from the same
407: telescope}, minimizes systematic errors arising from
408: instrumental color terms and
409: multi-stage transfer of photometric standards.
410: By the time it is completed, the SDSS-II SN
411: survey will increase the
412: number of ``fully characterized'' SN Ia
413: light curves (with multi-color data before peak and
414: densely-sampled, well-calibrated light curves) by a significant factor.
415:
416: This paper serves as an overview of the SDSS-II Supernova Survey.
417: The scientific motivation and survey goals are discussed in \S 2.
418: The observational strategy is briefly
419: described in \S 3, and \S 4 overviews the data processing and target
420: selection for the program. In \S 5 we describe the spectroscopic
421: follow-up program, and we conclude in \S 6.
422: Throughout, we highlight
423: some of the results from the first two seasons of observations.
424: %The first two seasons of observations, acquired
425: %between September and December of 2005 and 2006, are reviewed in \S 5.
426: This paper serves as a companion and introduction
427: to more detailed papers describing
428: the methods and results from the first observing season.
429: A detailed
430: technical discussion of the on-mountain data processing and spectroscopic
431: selection algorithm is presented by Sako et al.~(2007).
432: Holtzman et al. (2007) describe the algorithm used to obtain
433: SN photometry and present the photometry from the 2005 season.
434: Zheng et al. (2007) describe the corresponding
435: SN spectroscopy.
436: Dilday et al. (2007)
437: present the measurement of the SN Ia rate at low redshift from the
438: 2005 season. Phillips et al. (2007) and Prieto et al. (2007) present
439: data on the peculiar SNe 2005hk and 2005gj. Becker et al. (2007)
440: describe the discovery of trans-Neptunian objects with these data.
441:
442:
443: \section{Scientific Goals}
444:
445: The SDSS-II Supernova Survey aims to address the
446: following primary science goals:
447:
448: \medskip
449: \noindent
450: {\bf 1. Cosmological Parameters from the
451: SN Ia Hubble Diagram:} Measurements of SN Ia distances constrain the
452: history of the Hubble expansion parameter. For illustration,
453: assuming a spatially flat
454: Universe and constant dark energy equation of state parameter $w$ (the
455: ratio of its effective pressure to its energy density), the
456: luminosity distance satisfies $d_L = [(1+z)/H_0] \int dz'/[
457: \Omega_m (1+z')^3 + (1-\Omega_m)(1+z')^{3(1+w)}]^{1/2}$, where
458: $\Omega_m$
459: is the fractional density in non-relativistic matter. The SDSS-II SN survey
460: will obtain distance modulus estimates for
461: $\sim 100$ well-measured SNe Ia in each
462: of the three $\Delta z=0.1$ bins spanning the redshift range
463: $0.05 < z < 0.35$.
464: Occupying a hitherto sparsely populated region of the Hubble diagram,
465: these data
466: will provide important information on the evolution of the cosmic scale
467: factor that is not accessible to any current supernova survey. Assuming
468: that the intrinsic SN Ia distance modulus dispersion is 0.15~mag
469: (in the $V$ band, Phillips et al. 1999), the SDSS-II Supernova
470: Survey will determine the
471: mean distance modulus with a
472: {\it statistical} uncertainty of $\sim 0.015$ mag per redshift
473: bin. At redshift $z=0.2$, that uncertainty is less than the difference in
474: distance modulus between two cosmological models differing by
475: $\delta w=0.1$ (with all other cosmological parameters fixed).
476: In combination with higher-redshift SN samples from
477: ESSENCE (Miknaitis et al. 2007; Wood-Vasey et al. 2007) and
478: SNLS (Astier et al. 2006), and
479: with other cosmological probes that primarily constrain the matter density
480: $\Omega_m$ (e.g., baryon acoustic oscillations,
481: Eisenstein et al. 2005), the
482: SDSS-II SN Survey will lead to more robust cosmological
483: constraints. The intermediate redshift range probed by the SDSS-II SN
484: Survey is also of interest
485: because, if $w \simeq -1$, as suggested by current data,
486: dark energy began dominating over non-relativistic matter
487: at $z \approx 0.4$.
488:
489:
490:
491: \medskip
492: \noindent {\bf 2. Minimization and Evaluation of SN Systematics:}
493: Systematic errors are comparable to statistical errors in the SN
494: surveys that have reported recent results; for
495: future SN cosmology studies with larger datasets, improved
496: control of systematic errors will be essential.
497: The systematics arising from photometric calibration
498: errors are small for the SDSS:
499: years of effort on the large-scale calibration of the
500: imaging data (Smith et al. 2002) have achieved 1\% photometric errors over the
501: area of the SDSS-II SN survey (\v{I}vezi\'{c} et al. 2007). The SDSS-II SN
502: observations employ five filters, providing substantial
503: color information, especially for the low-redshift portion of
504: the sample. It uses a single, stable camera system with
505: well-calibrated and repeatedly measured filter transmission
506: curves, and the SDSS native magnitudes (which are used throughout
507: this paper) are
508: close to the physical
509: AB system (Oke \& Gunn 1983), with well-measured offsets.
510: The large number of SDSS SN light curves can be partitioned into
511: subsets at common redshift to investigate potential sources of
512: systematic error that may afflict SN Ia distance measurements, as
513: well as to
514: search for correlations between Hubble diagram residuals
515: and host-galaxy morphology, metallicity, or extinction.
516:
517: \medskip
518: \noindent{\bf 3. Anchoring the Hubble Diagram and Light Curve Training:}
519: When completed, the low-redshift portion of the SDSS-II SN sample ($z\lesssim
520: 0.15$)
521: will be large enough and of sufficiently high data quality to anchor the Hubble
522: diagram and to re-train light-curve fitters, reducing or
523: eliminating reliance on the
524: heterogeneous low-redshift samples currently employed.
525: The low-redshift portion of the SDSS sample is also
526: distant enough that the effects of correlated peculiar velocities due
527: to large-scale flows (Radburn-Smith, Lucey, \& Hudson 2004;
528: Hui \& Greene 2006; Cooray \& Caldwell 2006),
529: which may be a non-negligible source of systematic
530: error in existing lower-redshift samples---e.g., the ``Hubble bubble''
531: (Zehavi, et al. 1998; Jha, Riess, \& Kirshner 2007)---are small
532: compared to the statistical errors.
533: The large sample and high quality of supernova light curves
534: will provide an unprecedented opportunity to
535: study in detail the color/peak brightness/decline-rate relationship,
536: and to search for any additional photometric
537: parameters that may further reduce the
538: scatter in the Hubble diagram.
539:
540: \medskip
541: \noindent
542: {\bf 4. Rest-frame Ultraviolet Light Curve Templates For High-$z$ SN Surveys:}
543: SN surveys that extend to $z \gtrsim 1.5$ will be required
544: to achieve robust constraints from supernovae on the time evolution of
545: the dark energy equation of state (e.g.,
546: Frieman et al. 2003), as envisioned in the concepts proposed for the
547: NASA-DOE Joint Dark Energy Mission. Hubble Space Telescope
548: pilot programs in the $z>1$ regime are in progress
549: (Riess et al. 2007; Barbary et al. 2006).
550: To reduce systematic errors, these high-redshift SN light curves must be
551: matched to a set of low-redshift templates. For example,
552: at $z = 1.2$, observations in the reddest optical passbands,
553: $\sim$ 8000~\AA\,, correspond to 3600~\AA\,, i.e.,
554: the $u$ band, in
555: the SN rest frame. The SDSS SNe observed
556: at $z = 0.3$ will have this spectral region observed at
557: 4700~\AA , covered by
558: the SDSS $g$ band; the survey will thus improve the rest-frame
559: ultraviolet template data (Jha et al. 2006; Wang et al. 2005) needed for the
560: interpretation of high-redshift SNe.
561:
562: \medskip
563: \noindent
564: {\bf 5. SN Cosmology from Multi-Band Photometry:}
565: Future wide-field imaging surveys, such as DES (Abbott et al. 2005),
566: PanSTARRS (Kaiser 2002), and LSST (Tyson 2002), will
567: measure optical, multi-band light curves for hundreds of
568: thousands of supernovae. Spectra, which have been traditionally
569: used to determine SN types and redshifts, will be obtainable for
570: only a small fraction of them.
571: As they evolve, SNe Ia trace out a distinct
572: locus in multi-color and light-curve shape space that,
573: along with host-galaxy colors,
574: provides information on SN type, redshift, and age
575: (Poznanski et al. 2002; Vanden Berk et al. 2001; Johnson \& Crotts 2006;
576: Sullivan et al. 2006a; Sako et al. 2007).
577: Future surveys
578: will rely heavily on the ability to use this information to
579: {\it photometrically} determine SN type and redshift. With its
580: large database of multi-band SN photometry and follow-up
581: spectroscopy, the SDSS SN Survey will provide an excellent
582: testing ground for development of this technique.
583:
584:
585: \medskip
586: \noindent
587: {\bf 6. SN Rates, Host Galaxies, and Rare SN Types:}
588: In addition to the large sample of high-quality, spectroscopically confirmed
589: SNe~Ia, the
590: survey yields light curves for a multitude of additional supernovae:
591: objects that
592: are almost certainly SNe Ia but which we were unable to confirm
593: spectroscopically, as well as other types of supernovae. Combined with
594: careful monitoring of the detection efficiency using artificial SNe
595: inserted into the data stream, this will enable robust measurement of
596: SN rates.
597: The process in which a white dwarf explodes as a SN~Ia
598: remains a mystery, since the progenitors are so faint that
599: no extragalactic event can be directly observed
600: before exploding. The large SDSS supernova sample
601: provides an unbiased census of host galaxies whose
602: stellar ages and metal abundances are clues to the
603: progenitor properties (e.g., Gallagher et al. 2005; Sullivan et al. 2006b).
604: Stellar population and metallicity evolution are important
605: systematic uncertainties in measuring dark energy with
606: supernovae, and their effect on SN~Ia luminosity can be
607: constrained with the study of a large host-galaxy sample.
608: The SDSS-II SN Survey will also produce a homogeneous set of Type II SN
609: light curves, a small fraction of which will be spectroscopically
610: identified; there is evidence
611: that SNe II may also prove to be useful cosmological probes (e.g.,
612: Hamuy \& Pinto 2002; Baron et al. 2004). Finally,
613: since it covers a larger volume than
614: previous or other current SN surveys, the SDSS also probes rare
615: but intrinsically interesting objects such as ``broad-line'' Type Ib/c
616: supernovae (some of which appear to be associated
617: with GRBs; see Woosley \& Bloom 2007 for a review)
618: and peculiar SNe Ia (e.g., Li et al. 2001, 2003; Hamuy et al. 2003;
619: Chornock et al. 2006; Phillips et al. 2007; Aldering et al. 2006;
620: Prieto et al. 2007).
621:
622:
623:
624:
625: \section{Observing Strategy}
626:
627:
628: The SDSS-II Supernova Survey primary instrument is the SDSS CCD camera
629: (Gunn et al. 1998) mounted on a
630: dedicated 2.5-m telescope (Gunn et al. 2006)
631: at Apache Point Observatory, New Mexico. The camera obtains, nearly
632: simultaneously, images in five broad optical bands ($ugriz$;
633: Fukugita et al.~1996). The camera
634: is used in time-delay-and-integrate (TDI, or drift scan) mode, which
635: provides efficient sky coverage.
636: The Supernova Survey scans at the normal (sidereal) SDSS
637: survey rate, which yields 55-s integrated exposures in each
638: passband; the instrument
639: covers the sky at a rate of approximately 20~sq.~deg~hour$^{-1}$ and
640: achieves 50\% detection completeness for stellar sources at
641: $u=22.5, g=23.2, r=22.6, i=21.9$, and $z=20.8$ (Abazajian et al. 2003).
642: For comparison, the typical peak
643: magnitude for a SN Ia with no extinction is $r \simeq 19.3, 20.8$, and
644: $21.6$ mag for $z=0.1, 0.2$, and $0.3$.
645:
646: The SDSS-II Supernova Survey
647: scans a region (designated stripe~82) centered on the celestial equator
648: in the Southern Galactic hemisphere that is
649: 2.5$^{\circ}$ wide and runs between right ascensions of
650: 20$^{\rm hr}$ and 4$^{\rm hr}$,
651: covering a total area of~300~sq.~deg.
652: Since there are gaps between the six CCD columns in the focal plane,
653: this area is typically covered by
654: alternating, on successive nights of observation,
655: between the interleaving northern and southern declination strips of the
656: stripe.
657: In addition to being nearly optimal for finding SNe Ia in the
658: redshift desert, sidereal scanning
659: benefits from many years of SDSS survey
660: operations and data processing experience. Except near its ends, the stripe 82
661: area has low Galactic extinction (Schlegel et al. 1998),
662: can be observed from Apache Point at low airmass
663: from September through November, and is accessible from almost all
664: ground-based telescopes for subsequent spectroscopic and photometric
665: observations. This stripe has two important additional features, arising
666: from the fact that
667: it has been imaged numerous times during the
668: SDSS-I survey (2000-2005) in photometric conditions with good seeing
669: ($<1.5''$). First,
670: the resulting deeper, co-added images, with a median of 10 single-epoch
671: exposures per band, provide a high-quality,
672: photometrically calibrated template for carrying out image subtraction
673: to discover supernovae. Second, the repeated
674: imaging
675: has enabled improved photometric calibration at the $\sim 1$\% level
676: (\v{I}vezi\'{c} et al. 2007).
677:
678: \begin{figure}[!ht]
679: \centering
680: \includegraphics[width=4.in]{f1.ps}
681: \caption{Right Ascension coverage (in degrees) vs. time (measured from
682: Sept. 1, i.e., MJD-53980) for the southern half of stripe 82
683: during the 2006 SDSS SN season.
684: The large asterisks denote gaps
685: around full moon. The first scan was taken in late August to minimize
686: survey edge effects.
687: The first part of September 2006
688: suffered from poor observing conditions.
689: }
690: \label{fig:area}
691: \end{figure}
692:
693:
694: During the period 1 September through 30 November 2005-7, the
695: Supernova Survey is carried out on most of the useable observing nights.
696: The exceptions are the five brightest nights around each full moon,
697: nights used for telescope engineering (which generally bracket
698: the five full moon nights), and occasional photometric
699: nights used by the SDSS-II SEGUE project for imaging.
700: Accounting for weather, the Moon, and the interrupts above, each
701: region in the survey area
702: has been imaged on average every five nights during the first
703: two seasons, while
704: the average on-sky cadence during non-bright time is about
705: every 4.5 nights, as shown in
706: Figure \ref{fig:area}.
707: As a rolling survey with high cadence, SDSS SN is able to find
708: supernovae well before maximum light (for $z\lesssim 0.3$);
709: Figure \ref{fig:epoch} shows that the vast majority of spectroscopically
710: confirmed SNe Ia were discovered before peak light. The discovery
711: epochs shown here are from the on-mountain search photometry; in some
712: cases, final photometric reductions reveal detections at even
713: earlier epochs. We see that the discovery epoch vs. redshift
714: limit is consistent with a
715: photometric limit for SN Ia
716: discovery of $r \simeq 22.5$. This survey cadence and
717: detection limit result in well-sampled,
718: multi-band light curves, as shown, e.g., in Figure \ref{fig:lightcurve} (see
719: also Holtzman et al. 2007).
720: Since SNe Ia typically spend about 25
721: rest-frame days brighter than 1 mag below peak light,
722: the three-month annual survey duration is long enough
723: that the efficiency hit due to survey ``edge effects'' (in time)
724: is acceptable. The loss can be further minimized by carrying out
725: targeted photometric follow-up observations of SNe on other telescopes into
726: December (see \S \ref{sec:follow}).
727:
728:
729:
730: \begin{figure}[!ht]
731: \centering
732: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f2.eps}
733: \caption{Photometric discovery epoch relative to estimated time of
734: $g$-band peak light vs. Redshift,
735: for 312 spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia from the 2005 and 2006 seasons.
736: The epoch of peak light
737: is determined from light curve fits to the on-mountain
738: photometry. Black points denote supernovae that reached
739: peak light at least seven days after the start of the survey on Sept. 1;
740: red points denote supernovae that peaked before Sept. 7 and
741: account for most
742: of the SNe found after peak. Blue curve shows expected epoch vs.
743: redshift for a fiducial model SN Ia with $r=22.5$, $\Delta m_{15}=1.2$, and no
744: extinction.
745: }
746: \label{fig:epoch}
747: \end{figure}
748:
749: \section{Data Processing and Target Selection}
750: \label{sec:select}
751: We use a dedicated computer cluster at the observatory
752: to perform rapid reductions of the SDSS-II SN imaging data (see Sako et al. 2007
753: for more details). The $ugriz$ data are processed through the first stages of
754: the standard SDSS photometric reduction pipeline (Lupton et al. 2001) to
755: produce ``corrected,'' astrometrically calibrated (Pier et al. 2003)
756: images for the SN search data. The deeper
757: co-added reference images, comprising data taken up through
758: 2004, are convolved to match the point-spread functions
759: of the search frames and subtracted from
760: them, using a modified version of the frame subtraction pipeline
761: developed for ESSENCE (Miknaitis et al. 2007).
762: ``Real-time'' image subtraction is limited to
763: the $gri$ bands, which are the bands most useful for SN detection in
764: the redshift range of interest.
765: The subtracted images are processed through an automated object
766: detection algorithm, which yields initial photometric measurements.
767: Objects detected in more than one passband that are not coincident
768: with previously catalogued
769: stars or variable objects and not detected as moving
770: during the $\sim 5$-minute
771: interval between the $g$ and $r$ exposures are selected for further study.
772: For a full night of
773: imaging, this processing is generally completed within 24 hours or less,
774: and the resulting object information is sent
775: electronically to a computer at Fermilab.
776:
777:
778: For the Fall 2005 observing season, image cutouts of all
779: objects passing the above criteria were
780: manually evaluated using a web interface.
781: For 2006, additional and improved software cuts were applied to
782: reduce the number of objects visually scanned
783: without sacrificing discovery potential. In 2006, single-epoch
784: detections were only passed to manual scanning if they were
785: not detected as moving (with an improved ``autoscanner'' algorithm for
786: vetoing moving objects; see Sako et al. 2007) and if they were bright,
787: with either $r<21$ or $g<21$. Otherwise, at least two detection epochs
788: were required for an object to be scanned. Visual screening
789: is mainly intended to reject artifacts and other objects that
790: are obviously not supernovae; artificial supernovae inserted into
791: the images are used to monitor the efficiency of this process.
792: Objects that pass this screening are denoted
793: ``candidates''. Subsequent object detections at the
794: same position are automatically added to the database of
795: information about each candidate.
796: In 2005, approximately 6,753 sq. deg. of imaging data were
797: processed on the mountain;
798: 145,395 objects were manually scanned, yielding 11,385 unique
799: SN candidates and 130 spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia. In 2006,
800: approximately 7,354 sq. deg. of data were processed;
801: only 14,404 objects were scanned, yielding 3,694 candidates and
802: 197 spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia
803: \footnote{
804: The viability of detecting and following SNe from SDSS imaging data
805: was demonstrated in earlier pilot runs.
806: In Fall 2002, 77 SN candidates were detected in
807: several SDSS scans on stripe 82; 39 of them were subjected to subsequent
808: spectroscopic observation, resulting in 18 confirmed SNe Ia
809: out to $z \simeq 0.4$ and 8 SNe of other types (Miknaitis et al. 2002).
810: In Fall 2004, an engineering test run for the SDSS-II SN Survey
811: was carried out
812: using 20 nights scheduled over 1.5 months, yielding 16 spectroscopically
813: confirmed SNe Ia, 5 SNe II, and 1 SN Ib/c (Sako et al. 2005).}.
814: A gallery of images of the confirmed SNe Ia is shown in Figure
815: \ref{fig:gallery}.
816:
817:
818: The $gri$ light curve for each SN candidate is
819: fit with templates for different SN types and redshifts, allowing
820: for variable reddening
821: and, for SNe Ia, variable light-curve stretch.
822: If host-galaxy spectroscopic or photometric redshift information is
823: available from the SDSS database,
824: it can also be included in the fit. As data on a candidate
825: accumulate over time, the fits are updated. Based on relative $\chi^2$
826: values, SN Ia-like light curves are identified, and a large subset of
827: them are targeted for spectroscopy to determine redshift
828: and confirm SN type. All
829: SN Ia candidates found before peak and with
830: estimated current $r$-band magnitude $\lesssim 20$ are placed on the
831: target list; they are generally accessible with 3-4 m class telescopes,
832: so our follow-up observations are
833: nearly complete out to that magnitude. There is a
834: much larger number of fainter, higher-redshift candidates for which
835: the follow-up resources are limited; those are prioritized based on
836: good light-curve coverage, low estimated host-galaxy light contamination, and
837: low host-galaxy dust extinction estimated from the light-curve fits. The
838: basic goal is to target those SNe for which we expect to
839: achieve accurate distance estimates based on the SDSS photometry.
840: For details of the target selection algorithm,
841: see Sako et al. (2007).
842:
843: Final SN photometry is carried out after each season
844: using the ``scene modeling'' code
845: developed for the SDSS-II SN Survey
846: (Holtzman et al. 2007). A sequence of stars around
847: each SN is taken from the list of \v{I}vezi\'{c} et al. (2007), who derived
848: standard magnitudes from multiple observations taken during the
849: main SDSS survey under photometric, good seeing conditions. Using these
850: stars, frame scalings and astrometric solutions are derived for each
851: of the SN frames, as well as for pre-supernova frames on stripe 82
852: taken as part of either the main SDSS survey (pre-2005) or the SN survey.
853: Finally, the entire stack of frames is simultaneously fit for a single
854: supernova position, a fixed galaxy background in each filter (characterized
855: by a grid of galaxy intensities), and the supernova brightness in each
856: frame. Final photometry is carried
857: out in all five SDSS passbands; however, since SNe Ia are intrinsically
858: UV-faint and the SDSS system throughput is low in the $z$ band,
859: we typically detect
860: SNe Ia in the $u$ and $z$ bands only at modest redshift, $z\lesssim 0.15$.
861: Figure \ref{fig:lightcurve} shows light curves for two SNe Ia based
862: on the outputs of the scene modeling photometry code.
863:
864:
865: \begin{figure}[!ht]
866: \centering
867: \plottwo{f3a.eps}{f3b.eps}
868: \caption{{\it Left}: $griz$ light curves for SN 2005ff, a confirmed
869: SN Ia at $z=0.088$; this
870: light curve is particularly well sampled because it lies in the
871: region where the northern and southern halves of stripe 82 overlap.
872: {\it Right}: $gri$ light curves for SN 2005gg, a confirmed SN Ia at $z=0.231$.
873: Time is measured in days from peak of $g$-band light.
874: }
875: \label{fig:lightcurve}
876: \end{figure}
877:
878: Figure \ref{fig:nepoch} shows the approximate distribution of the number of
879: SDSS photometry epochs for the spectroscopically confirmed
880: SNe from the first two seasons for all types (in black) and for
881: SNe Ia (in red). An epoch here constitutes
882: a detection in at least two of the $gri$ bands; in the majority of
883: cases, the SN is detected in all three bands. The median number of
884: photometric epochs per supernova is 9 based on the on-mountain
885: photometric detections. The final scene-modeling photometry
886: often produces detections at additional epochs at faint flux levels, and
887: additional photometric epochs observed
888: with other telescopes are available for a subset of the supernovae
889: (see discussion at end of \S \ref{sec:follow}).
890:
891: \begin{figure}[!ht]
892: \centering
893: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f4.eps}
894: \caption{Distribution of number of SDSS photometry epochs for
895: confirmed SNe of all types (black) and for SNe Ia (red) for
896: the 2005 and 2006 seasons, based on
897: the on-mountain photometric reductions.
898: }
899: \label{fig:nepoch}
900: \end{figure}
901:
902:
903: All spectroscopically confirmed
904: supernovae are announced in a timely manner through the Central
905: Bureau for Electronic Telegrams. In addition, bright (i.e.,
906: low-redshift)
907: SN candidates observed for at least two epochs and found on the rise are
908: announced, often before spectroscopic confirmation. Moreover,
909: as of the 2006 season, all candidates, with all relevant photometric
910: information (based on the on-mountain reductions), are made available
911: on the worldwide web as soon as they are
912: identified\footnote{http://sdssdp47.fnal.gov/sdsssn/sdsssn.html.}.
913: In collaboration with VOEventNet (Drake et al. 2006),
914: as of 2006 we are also
915: sending all candidates verified by a second epoch of observation to a
916: publicly accessible messaging system, regardless of the results of
917: our light-curve fits to supernova templates. By using this rapid
918: messaging system and standard communication packets structured as
919: XML-format VOEvents, in principle
920: we enable nearly instantaneous follow-up observations of our
921: candidates by a global network of telescopes subscribing to the
922: VOEventNet feed. In 2006, we released information on 3075 two-epoch
923: candidate events\footnote{http://voeventnet.caltech.edu/SDSS.shtml.},
924: and we expect to generate a similar number of events during the
925: 2007 season. Finally,
926: the corrected images and photometric catalogs for all the SN data
927: are made available
928: to the community soon after they are reprocessed through the SDSS
929: photometric pipeline at Fermilab\footnote{
930: http://www.sdss.org/drsn1/DRSN1$_{-}$data$_{-}$release.html.}.
931:
932:
933: \section{Follow-up Observations: Spectroscopy \& Photometry}
934: \label{sec:follow}
935:
936: Spectroscopy of SN candidates is carried out
937: on a number of telescopes, primarily to
938: determine SN type and redshift but also to measure
939: other properties. Where
940: possible, a host-galaxy spectrum is extracted as well, enabling more accurate
941: redshift determination from the narrower galaxy spectral features and
942: determination
943: of host-galaxy spectroscopic type. For our sample,
944: the redshifts based on host-galaxy
945: features are accurate to about $\Delta z= 0.0005$, while
946: those based on SN Ia features
947: are accurate to about $\Delta z=0.005$. For approximately two-thirds
948: of the confirmed SNe Ia, we have redshifts determined from host-galaxy
949: features.
950:
951:
952: \begin{table}[!h]
953: \centering
954: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}
955: \hline
956: Telescope & Aperture (m) & Nights Scheduled & SNe Observed \\
957: \hline
958: HET & 9.2 & 64.5 hrs (2005)& 66 \\
959: & & 80 hrs (2006)& 77 \\
960: \hline
961: NTT & 3.6 & 17 (2006)& 70 \\
962: \hline
963: ARC & 3.5 & 31 half-nights (2005)& 47 \\
964: & & 28 half-nights (2006)& 31 \\
965: \hline
966: Subaru & 8.2 & 6 shared (2005) & 33 \\
967: & & 4 (2006)& 33 \\
968: \hline
969: MDM & 2.4 & 49 shared (2005)& 27 \\
970: & & 50 shared (2006)& 26 \\
971: \hline
972: WHT & 4.2 & 6 (2005)& 26 \\
973: \hline
974: KPNO & 4 & 6 (2006)& 15 \\
975: \hline
976: Keck & 10 & 1 ToO (2005)& 14 \\
977: & & 1 ToO (2006)& 4 \\
978: \hline
979: NOT & 2.6 & 4 (2006)& 10 \\
980: \hline
981: SALT & 11 & ToO (2006)& 5 \\
982: \hline
983: \end{tabular}
984: \caption{Telescope resources allocated
985: for spectroscopic observations in 2005 and 2006. Actual
986: time used is less due to weather and instrument problems.
987: Shown are the amounts allocated for Sept.-Dec.
988: Target of
989: opportunity (ToO) denotes time that was not specifically
990: scheduled for SDSS SN
991: observations. The HET and SALT are queue-scheduled. A portion of
992: the MDM and ARC time allocation listed here was used for
993: additional photometric observations. The
994: last column includes multiple observations of
995: the same SN and includes all confirmed SN types. Legend (for
996: more information, see acknowledgements at the end of the paper):
997: HET: Hobby-Eberly Telescope, McDonald Observatory, Texas; NTT:
998: ESO New Technology
999: Telescope, La Silla Observatory, Chile;
1000: ARC: Apache Point Observatory 3.5 m telescope, New
1001: Mexico; Subaru: Subaru Telescope, National
1002: Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Hawaii; MDM: Hiltner Telescope,
1003: MDM Observatory,
1004: Arizona; WHT: William Herschel Telescope,
1005: La Palma; KPNO: Kitt Peak National Observatory, Arizona;
1006: Keck: W.M. Keck Observatory, Hawaii; NOT: Nordic Optical Telescope,
1007: La Palma; SALT: South African Large Telescope, South African Astronomical
1008: Observatory.
1009: }
1010: \label{tab1}
1011: \end{table}
1012:
1013:
1014: Table \ref{tab1} lists the spectroscopic resources, the
1015: amount of time scheduled on them for each of the first two seasons,
1016: and the number of SNe observed.
1017: In addition to those listed in Table \ref{tab1}, in a handful of cases
1018: spectra have been taken by
1019: other observers/telescopes based on information we have released
1020: in electronic circulars or through
1021: informal communication. These include the Center for Astrophysics
1022: group (S. Blondin, M. Modjaz, R. Kirshner, P. Challis, M. Hicken,
1023: M. Calkins, L. Macri),
1024: the Nearby Supernova Factory, and the ESSENCE team.
1025:
1026:
1027: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1028: \centering
1029: \epsscale{1.11}
1030: \plottwo{f5a.eps}{f5b.eps}
1031: \caption{Spectra of the SNe Ia shown in Fig. \ref{fig:lightcurve}.
1032: {\it Left:} WHT spectrum of SN 2005ff; {\it Right:} Subaru
1033: spectrum of SN 2005gg. Galaxy light has not been subtracted. Red curves
1034: denote template SN Ia spectra at the indicated epochs relative to peak
1035: light. Abscissa shows observed wavelength.
1036: }
1037: \label{fig:spectra}
1038: \end{figure}
1039:
1040: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1041: \centering
1042: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f6.eps}
1043: \caption{Histogram of redshifts of spectroscopically confirmed
1044: SNe Ia for the 2005 (short-dashed) and 2006 (dotted) seasons. Long-dashed
1045: histogram
1046: shows the 2005 confirmed sample plus 94 objects with SN Ia light curves
1047: and subsequent host-galaxy redshift measurements. Solid histogram
1048: shows the sum of these three distributions.
1049: }
1050: \label{fig:spec_hist}
1051: \end{figure}
1052:
1053:
1054: Spectra are analyzed (Zheng et al. 2007) to determine SN type, and
1055: the redshift is determined from either the SN or host-galaxy
1056: spectrum (or both) using standard cross-correlation techniques.
1057: Spectra that are
1058: consistent with those of SNe Ia
1059: but for which the identification is not highly confident are denoted
1060: probable SNe Ia. Two spectra from the 2005 season are
1061: shown in Figure \ref{fig:spectra}.
1062:
1063:
1064: The early light-curve fitting and target selection
1065: algorithm described above in \S \ref{sec:select} has proven to be
1066: very efficient at photometrically identifying SNe Ia.
1067: Approximately 90\% of the objects targeted as SN Ia candidates after two or
1068: more epochs of photometry indeed turned out to be SNe Ia; about
1069: 86\% of the targets were spectroscopically confirmed, while the other
1070: 4\% have high signal-to-noise, multi-band light curves that leave no doubt
1071: that they are SNe Ia. The remaining spectra (about 10\%)
1072: are mostly unclassifiable,
1073: often as a result of marginal observing conditions, but also include
1074: a very small percentage of active galactic nuclei (AGN) and
1075: core-collapse SNe ($\sim 2$\%).
1076: In addition to SNe Ia,
1077: we have also targeted a sample of bright ($r < 20$~mag)
1078: core-collapse SN candidates. Although the colors of these events
1079: could be confused with those of an AGN, we generally avoid candidates
1080: that appear within $\sim 0.5\arcsec$ of the host galaxy nucleus.
1081: The confirmation
1082: efficiency for these events is $\sim 90$\%, comparable to that of the
1083: SNe Ia.
1084:
1085:
1086: Figure \ref{fig:spec_hist} shows the redshift distributions for the
1087: spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia from the 2005 (black) and 2006 (red)
1088: seasons.
1089: For 2005, there were 130 spectroscopically confirmed and 16
1090: spectroscopically probable SNe Ia; for 2006, the corresponding
1091: numbers were 197 and 14. The major difference between the
1092: two seasons is the large
1093: increase in the spectroscopic yield in the redshift
1094: range $0.12<z<0.24$; this is attributable to changes
1095: in targeting strategy (we placed less emphasis on the highest-redshift
1096: candidates in 2006) and to the large increase in $3-4$ m
1097: telescope resources for spectroscopy, as shown in Table \ref{tab1}.
1098: The blue histogram shows the 2005 confirmed SN Ia sample augmented by
1099: a set of 94 host-galaxy redshifts for objects with SN Ia-like light
1100: curves (see below), and the magenta histogram shows the redshift distribution
1101: for the combined sample of 421 SNe Ia to date. The mean redshift for
1102: the combined sample is $z=0.22$.
1103:
1104: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1105: \centering
1106: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f7.eps}
1107: \caption{Distribution of epoch relative to $g$-band peak light
1108: of first spectroscopic observations
1109: for the spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia from the 2005 and 2006 seasons.
1110: The epoch of peak light is estimated from light-curve fits to the
1111: on-mountain photometry.
1112: }
1113: \label{fig:spec_epoch}
1114: \end{figure}
1115:
1116:
1117:
1118: Figure \ref{fig:spec_epoch} shows the distribution of the epoch
1119: of first spectroscopic observation relative to peak light in the $g$ band
1120: for the spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia from 2005 and 2006,
1121: where the latter is determined from light-curve fits to the
1122: on-mountain photometry (Sako et al. 2007). Two-thirds
1123: of the first-epoch spectra
1124: were taken within $\pm 10$ days of peak light, when a SN Ia is within
1125: roughly 1 mag of maximum, and 28\% were taken
1126: before peak light.
1127:
1128: Since spectroscopic resources are limited, we cannot target all
1129: SN Ia candidates, even all those with good-quality
1130: light curves: targets listed at
1131: low priority may not make it onto the queue of any of the
1132: telescopes or may not be observed before fading, due to poor weather, etc.
1133: To gauge the resulting
1134: completeness, after each season we reprocess a large subset of
1135: the SN candidates. For the 2005 season, to find additional SNe Ia,
1136: we first selected
1137: all photometric SN candidates detected at two or more epochs
1138: by the on-mountain photometry pipeline. Those for which the
1139: best-fit light-curve template was a SN Ia were processed
1140: through the final scene-modeling photometry pipeline; in many cases,
1141: additional detection epochs were thereby recovered.
1142: For candidates with resulting high-quality SN
1143: Ia-like light curves which had not been spectroscopically confirmed, we
1144: carry out host-galaxy spectroscopy, as resources permit, to determine
1145: the redshift and measure host-galaxy properties. To date, we have
1146: obtained host spectra and redshifts
1147: for 81 such photometric SN Ia candidates from
1148: the 2005 season, primarily with HET. An additional 13 photometric SN Ia
1149: candidates have host spectra from the SDSS redshift survey.
1150: The redshift distribution for
1151: this combined photometric sample, added to the spectroscopically
1152: confirmed 2005 supernovae, is shown as the blue histogram in
1153: Figure \ref{fig:spec_hist}. We see that these objects largely
1154: fill in the gap at $z \simeq 0.2$ in the 2005 spectroscopic sample.
1155:
1156: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1157: \centering
1158: \includegraphics[width=5.5in]{f8.eps}
1159: \caption{Distribution of confirmed SDSS-II SNe Ia from 2005 and
1160: 2006 in RA and redshift (large blue points),
1161: superposed on the distribution of
1162: galaxies with redshifts measured by the SDSS (small points in black
1163: and magenta).
1164: The SN survey extends slightly beyond the RA limits for
1165: the redshift survey, leading to the handful of SNe that appear
1166: ``out of bounds''.
1167: }
1168: \label{fig:pie}
1169: \end{figure}
1170:
1171:
1172: The distribution in RA and redshift for the spectroscopically
1173: confirmed SNe Ia is shown in Figure \ref{fig:pie}. The SNe Ia
1174: are shown (large purple points) superposed on the
1175: distribution of galaxies with measured redshifts from the
1176: SDSS (black and red points, with color indicating whether the
1177: galaxy is at positive or negative declination within stripe 82).
1178:
1179: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1180: \centering
1181: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f9.eps}
1182: \caption{Number of supernovae vs. number of spectroscopic
1183: epochs per supernova for confirmed SNe with at least three spectroscopic
1184: epochs, from the 2005 and 2006 seasons combined. IAU designations
1185: for those with the most epochs of spectroscopy are indicated. Not shown
1186: are the 44 confirmed SNe with two epochs of spectroscopy. SN 2006fo is a SN
1187: Ib/c at $z=0.02$; SN 2006fz is a SN Ia at $z=0.11$.
1188: }
1189: \label{fig:nspec}
1190: \end{figure}
1191:
1192:
1193: A subsample of the confirmed SNe are targeted for several or more
1194: epochs of spectroscopy. These include peculiar or otherwise interesting
1195: SNe Ia,
1196: e.g., SN 2005hk (Phillips et al. 2007) and SN 2005gj (Prieto et al. 2007),
1197: for which spectral evolution can inform physical modeling.
1198: In addition, normal SNe Ia with
1199: several epochs of spectroscopy will be used to explore development of
1200: improved K-correction models and to study correlations between
1201: spectroscopic evolution and photometric properties.
1202: Figure \ref{fig:nspec} shows a histogram of the number of
1203: spectroscopic epochs for SNe with at least three such epochs.
1204:
1205: In addition to SDSS photometry and follow-up spectroscopy, a number
1206: of SDSS SNe have been imaged in SDSS filters and in other pass bands
1207: with other telescopes. These additional photometric data are
1208: taken for a variety of reasons: to provide more rapid confirmation of
1209: SNe at early epochs, to fill in SDSS light curves during periods
1210: of bad weather at APO, and to extend light curves for SNe that
1211: have faded beyond the SDSS detection limit or that are still
1212: near peak light at the end of the SDSS observing season on Nov. 30.
1213: Telescopes used for this purpose include the University of Hawaii
1214: 2.2 m, the Hiltner 2.4 m at MDM, the
1215: New Mexico State University 1 m at APO, the ARC 3.5 m,
1216: the 1.8 m Vatican Advanced Technology Telescope
1217: at Mt. Graham, the 3.5 m WIYN
1218: telescope at Kitt Peak, the 1.5 m optical telescope
1219: at Maidanak Observatory in Uzbekistan, and the 2.5 m Isaac Newton Telescope at
1220: La Palma. For 2005 and 2006,
1221: 177 confirmed SNe were imaged at least once by one of these
1222: telescopes. In addition, the Carnegie
1223: Supernova Project is obtaining densely sampled optical and
1224: near-infrared (NIR) imaging for many of the SDSS SNe at $z<0.08$ and
1225: NIR imaging near peak for a subsample of SDSS SNe at $z \simeq 0.3$.
1226: Given the differences in filter response for this variety of
1227: instruments, careful attention to color terms and calibrations
1228: is necessary to combine
1229: these data with SDSS photometry (see Holtzman et al. 2007).
1230:
1231: \section{Conclusion}
1232:
1233: The SDSS-II Supernova Survey has
1234: completed the first two of its planned three three-month observing seasons.
1235: Light curves have been measured for 327 spectroscopically confirmed
1236: SNe Ia. Including spectroscopically probable SNe Ia, other confirmed
1237: SN types, and objects with SN Ia-like light curves and host-galaxy
1238: spectroscopy, the yield to date is 496. The Fall 2007 season should
1239: increase the sample size by about 50\%.
1240:
1241:
1242: \acknowledgements
1243:
1244: We acknowledge Christopher Stubbs for his early work developing the
1245: case for this project and Phil Pinto for sharing
1246: his supernova Monte Carlo simulation code during the planning stages.
1247: We thank Pinto, Nick Suntzeff, Saul Perlmutter, Chris Smith, and
1248: Chris Pritchet
1249: for valuable advice in reviewing the SDSS-II SN Survey in the concept stage.
1250:
1251: Funding for the creation and distribution of the SDSS and SDSS-II
1252: has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation,
1253: the Participating Institutions,
1254: the National Science Foundation,
1255: the U.S. Department of Energy,
1256: the National Aeronautics and Space Administration,
1257: the Japanese Monbukagakusho,
1258: the Max Planck Society, and the Higher Education Funding Council for England.
1259: The SDSS Web site \hbox{is {\tt http://www.sdss.org/}.}
1260:
1261: The SDSS is managed by the Astrophysical Research Consortium
1262: for the Participating Institutions. The Participating Institutions are
1263: the American Museum of Natural History,
1264: Astrophysical Institute Potsdam,
1265: University of Basel,
1266: Cambridge University,
1267: Case Western Reserve University,
1268: University of Chicago,
1269: Drexel University,
1270: Fermilab,
1271: the Institute for Advanced Study,
1272: the Japan Participation Group,
1273: Johns Hopkins University,
1274: the Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics,
1275: the Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology,
1276: the Korean Scientist Group,
1277: the Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST),
1278: Los Alamos National Laboratory,
1279: the Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPA),
1280: the Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPiA),
1281: New Mexico State University,
1282: Ohio State University,
1283: University of Pittsburgh,
1284: University of Portsmouth,
1285: Princeton University,
1286: the United States Naval Observatory,
1287: and the University of Washington.
1288:
1289: This work is based in part on observations made at the
1290: following telescopes.
1291: The Hobby-Eberly Telescope (HET) is a joint project of the University of Texas
1292: at Austin,
1293: the Pennsylvania State University, Stanford University,
1294: Ludwig-Maximillians-Universit\"at M\"unchen, and Georg-August-Universit\"at
1295: G\"ottingen. The HET is named in honor of its principal benefactors,
1296: William P. Hobby and Robert E. Eberly. The Marcario Low-Resolution
1297: Spectrograph is named for Mike Marcario of High Lonesome Optics, who
1298: fabricated several optical elements
1299: for the instrument but died before its completion;
1300: it is a joint project of the Hobby-Eberly Telescope partnership and the
1301: Instituto de Astronom\'{\i}a de la Universidad Nacional Aut\'onoma de M\'exico.
1302: The Apache
1303: Point Observatory 3.5 m telescope is owned and operated by
1304: the Astrophysical Research Consortium. We thank the observatory
1305: director, Suzanne Hawley, and site manager, Bruce Gillespie, for
1306: their support of this project.
1307: The Subaru Telescope is operated by the National
1308: Astronomical Observatory of Japan. The William Herschel
1309: Telescope is operated by the
1310: Isaac Newton Group, and the Nordic Optical Telescope is
1311: operated jointly by Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway,
1312: and Sweden, both on the island of La Palma
1313: in the Spanish Observatorio del Roque
1314: de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofisica de
1315: Canarias. Observations at the ESO New Technology Telescope at La Silla
1316: Observatory were made under programme IDs 77.A-0437, 78.A-0325, and
1317: 79.A-0715.
1318: Kitt Peak National Observatory, National Optical
1319: Astronomy Observatory, is operated by the Association of
1320: Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc. (AURA) under
1321: cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.
1322: The WIYN Observatory is a joint facility of the University of
1323: Wisconsin-Madison, Indiana University, Yale University, and
1324: the National Optical Astronomy Observatories.
1325: The W.M. Keck Observatory is operated as a scientific partnership
1326: among the California Institute of Technology, the University of
1327: California, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The
1328: Observatory was made possible by the generous financial support of the
1329: W. M. Keck Foundation.
1330: The South African Large Telescope of the South African Astronomical
1331: Observatory is operated by a partnership between the National
1332: Research Foundation of South Africa, Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical
1333: Center of the Polish Academy of Sciences, the Hobby-Eberly Telescope
1334: Board, Rutgers University, Georg-August-Universit\"at G\"ottingen,
1335: University of Wisconsin-Madison, University of Canterbury, University
1336: of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Dartmouth College, Carnegie Mellon
1337: University, and the United Kingdom SALT consortium.
1338:
1339: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1340:
1341: \bibitem[Abbott et al 2005]{abbott05} Abbott, T., et al. (DES
1342: Collaboration), astro-ph/0510346
1343: \bibitem[Aldering et al. 2006]{aldering06}
1344: Aldering, G., et al. 2006, ApJ, 650, 510
1345: \bibitem[Astier et al. 2006]{astier06}
1346: Astier, P., et al. 2006, A\&A, 447, 31
1347: \bibitem[Barbary et al. 2006]{bar06}
1348: Barbary, K., et al. 2006, AAS Abstracts, 209, 90.01
1349: \bibitem[Baron et al. 2004]{bar04}
1350: Baron, E., et al. 2004, ApJ, 616, L91
1351: \bibitem[Chornock et al. 2006]{chornock06}
1352: Chornock, R., Filippenko, A. V., Branch, D., Foley, R. J., Jha, S.,
1353: \& Li, W. 2006, PASP, 118, 722
1354: \bibitem[Cooray \& Caldwell 2006]{cc06}
1355: Cooray, A., \& Caldwell, R. R. 2006, Phys Rev D, 73, 103002
1356: \bibitem[Dilday et al. 2007]{dilday}
1357: Dilday, B., et al. 2007, in preparation
1358: \bibitem[Drake et al. 2006]{2006AAS...209.7804D}
1359: Drake, A.~J., et al. 2006, BAAS, 209, 7804
1360: \bibitem[Eisenstein et al. 2005]{eis05}
1361: Eisenstein, D., et al. 2005, ApJ, 633, 560
1362: \bibitem[Filippenko 2005]{fil06}
1363: Filippenko, A. V. 2005, in ``White Dwarfs: Cosmological and
1364: Galactic Probes,'' ed. E. M. Sion, S. Vennes, \& H. L. Shipman
1365: (Dordrecht: Springer), 97
1366: \bibitem[Fukugita et al. 1996]{fig96} %% SDSS Photometric System
1367: Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., Doi, M., Shimasaku, K.,
1368: \& Schneider, D. P. 1996, AJ, 111, 1748
1369: \bibitem[Gallagher et al. 2005]{gall05}
1370: Gallagher, J. S., Garnavich, P. M., Berlind, P., Challis, P., Jha, S.,
1371: \& Kirshner, R. P. 2005, ApJ, 634, 210
1372: \bibitem[Gunn et al. 1998]{gcam98} %% SDSS Camera
1373: Gunn, J. E., Carr, M. A., Rockosi, C. M., Sekiguchi, M., et al. 1998,
1374: AJ, 116, 3040
1375: \bibitem[Gunn et al. 2006]{gtel06} %% SDSS Telescope
1376: Gunn, J. E., Siegmund, W. A., Mannery, E. J., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 2332
1377: \bibitem[Hamuy \& Pinto 2001]{hp01} %% Type II SN as Standard Candles
1378: Hamuy, M., \& Pinto, P. 2001, ApJ, 566, L63
1379: \bibitem[Hamuy et al.2003]{ham03}
1380: Hamuy, M., ete al. 2003, Nature, 424, 651
1381: \bibitem[Holtzman et al. 2007]{holtz07}
1382: Holtzman, J., et al. 2007, in preparation
1383: \bibitem[Hui \& Greene 2006]{hg06}
1384: Hui, L., \& Greene, P. 2006, Phys Rev D, 73, 123526
1385: \bibitem[Ivezic et al. 2007]{zi07}
1386: \v{I}vezi\'{c}, Z., et al. 2007, astro-ph/0703157, submitted to AJ
1387: \bibitem[Jha et al. 2006]{jha06}
1388: Jha, S., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 527
1389: \bibitem[Jha, Riess, \& Kirshner 2007]{jrk06}
1390: Jha, S., Riess, A. G., \& Kirshner, R. P. 2007, ApJ, 659, 122
1391: \bibitem[Johnson \& Crotts 2006]{crotts}
1392: Johnson, B., \& Crotts, A. 2006, AJ, 132, 756
1393: \bibitem[Kaiser 2002]{kaiser02} Kaiser, N. 2002, in ``Survey and Other
1394: Telescope Technologies and Discoveries,'' eds.
1395: J. A. Tyson \& S. Wolff, Proceedings of the SPIE, 4836, 154
1396: \bibitem[Leibundgut 2001]{lieb01}
1397: Leibundgut, B. 2001, ARAA, 39, 67
1398: \bibitem[Li et al. 2001]{li01}
1399: Li, W., et al. 2001, PASP, 113, 1178
1400: \bibitem[Li et al. 2003]{li03}
1401: Li, W., et al. 2003, PASP, 115, 453
1402: \bibitem[Lupton et al. 2001]{lgi01}
1403: Lupton, R. H., Gunn, J. E., Ivezi\'c, \v{Z}., Knapp, G. R., Kent, S. M., \&
1404: Yasuda, N. 2001, in ASP Conf. Ser. 238, Astronomical Data Analysis
1405: Software and Systems, ed. F.R.~Harnden, F.A.~Primini, \& H.E.~Payne
1406: (San Francisco:ASP), p. 269
1407: \bibitem[Miknaitis et al. 2002]{gm02} %% SN Detection in SDSS Southern Survey
1408: Miknaitis, G., et al. 2002, BAAS, 34, 1205
1409: \bibitem[Miknaitis et al. 2007]{gm07}
1410: Miknaitis, G., et al. 2007, astro-ph/0701043
1411: \bibitem[Oke \& Gunn 1983]{og83} %% AB photometric system
1412: Oke, J. B., \& Gunn, J. E., 1983, ApJ., 266, 713
1413: \bibitem[Perlmutter et al. 1999]{perl99}
1414: Perlmutter, S., et al. 1999, ApJ, 517, 565
1415: \bibitem[Pier, J.R. et al. 2003]{jrp03} %% SDSS astronometry
1416: Pier, J. R., Munn, J. A., Hindsley, R. B., Hennessy, G. S., Kent, S. M.,
1417: Lupton, R. H., \& Ivezi\'c, \v{Z}., 2003, AJ, 125, 1559
1418: \bibitem[Phillips et al. 1999]{mmp99} %% SN Ia Decline Rate vs Luminosity
1419: Phillips, M. M., Lira, P., Suntzeff, N. B., Schommer, R. A., Hamuy, M.,
1420: \& Maza, J. 1999, AJ, 118, 1766
1421: \bibitem[Phillips et al. 2007]{phillips07}
1422: Phillips, M. M., et al. 2007, PASP, 119, 360
1423: \bibitem[Poznanski et al. 2002]{dp02}
1424: Poznanski, D., Gal-Yam, A., Sharon, K., Filippenko, A. V., Leonard, D. C.,
1425: \& Matheson, T. 2002, PASP, 114, 833
1426: \bibitem[Prieto et al. 2007]{prieto}
1427: Prieto, J. L., et al. 2007, astro-ph/0704.0688, submitted to AJ
1428: \bibitem[Radburn-Smith, Lucey, \& Hudson 2004]{rlh}
1429: Radburn-Smith, D. J., Lucey, J. R., \& Hudson, M. J. 2004, MNRAS, 335, 1378
1430: \bibitem[Riess et al. 1998]{riess98}
1431: Riess, A. G. et al. 1998, AJ, 116, 1009
1432: \bibitem[Riess et al. 2004]{riess04}
1433: Riess, A. G., et al. 2004, ApJ, 607, 665
1434: \bibitem[Riess et al. 2007]{riess06}
1435: Riess, A. G., et al. 2007, ApJ, 659, 98
1436: \bibitem[Sako et al. 2005]{sako05}
1437: Sako, M., et al. 2005, astro-ph/0504455, in Proc. 22nd Texas
1438: Symposium on Relatavistic Astrophysics, Stanford, CA, 13-17 Dec. 2004
1439: \bibitem[Sako et al. 2007]{ms06} %% SDSS/SN Selection Paper
1440: Sako, M., et al. 2007, in preparation
1441: \bibitem[Schlegel et al. 1998]{djs98} %% Galactic Extinction Model
1442: Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., \& Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525
1443: \bibitem[Smith et al. 2002]{jas02} %% SDSS Photometric Calibration
1444: Smith, J. A., et al. 2002, AJ, 123, 2121
1445: \bibitem[Sullivan et al. 2006a]{sull}
1446: Sullivan, M., et al. 2006a, AJ, 131, 960
1447: \bibitem[Sullivan et al. 2006b]{sull2}
1448: Sullivan, M., et al. 2006b, ApJ, 648, 868
1449: \bibitem[Tyson 2002]{tyson02} Tyson, J. A. 2002, in ``Survey and Other
1450: Telescope Technologies and Discoveries,'' eds. J. A. Tyson \& S. Wolff,
1451: Proceedings of the SPIE, 4836, 10
1452: \bibitem[vanden Berk et al. 2001]{dvb01}
1453: Vanden Berk, D. E., Wilhite, B., Miceli, A., Stubbs, C.,
1454: \& Lawton, B. 2001, IAUC, 7744, 1
1455: \bibitem[Wang et al. 2005]{wa05}
1456: Wang, L., et al. 2005, BAAS, 37, 499
1457: \bibitem[Wood-Vasey et al. 2007]{wv07}
1458: Wood-Vasey, W. M., et al. 2007, astro-ph/0701041
1459: \bibitem[Woosley \& Bloom 2006]{wb06}
1460: Woosley, S. E., \& Bloom, J. S. 2006, ARAA, 44, 507
1461: \bibitem[York et al.~2000]{york00} %% SDSS Technical Summary
1462: York, D. G., et al. 2000,
1463: AJ, 120, 1579
1464: \bibitem[Zehavi et al.~1998]{zehavi98}
1465: Zehavi, I., Riess, A. G., Kirshner, R. P., \& Dekel, A. 1998,
1466: ApJ, 503, 483
1467: \bibitem[Zheng et al. 2007]{zheng}
1468: Zheng, C., et al. 2007, in preparation
1469: \end{thebibliography}
1470:
1471:
1472:
1473: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1474: \includegraphics[width=7in]{f10.eps}
1475: \caption{Spectroscopically confirmed SDSS SNe Ia from 2005 and 2006.}
1476: \label{fig:gallery}
1477: \end{figure}
1478:
1479:
1480: \end{document}
1481:
1482: