1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \newcommand{\sdss}{{\small {SDSS}}}
4: \newcommand{\sdssi}{{\small {SDSS-I}}}
5: \newcommand{\sdssii}{{\small {SDSS-II}}}
6: \newcommand{\sss}{{\small {SSS}}}
7: \newcommand{\snls}{{\small {SNLS}}}
8: \newcommand{\essence}{{\small {ESSENCE}}}
9: \newcommand{\sn}{{\small {SN}}}
10: \newcommand{\snia}{{\small {SN~I}}a}
11: \newcommand{\snibc}{{\small {SN~I}}b/c}
12: \newcommand{\snii}{{\small {SN~II}}}
13: \newcommand{\sne}{{\small {SN}}e}
14: \newcommand{\sneia}{{\small {SN}}e{\small{~I}}a}
15: \newcommand{\sneibc}{{\small {SN}}e{\small{~I}}bc}
16: \newcommand{\sneiii}{{\small {SN}}e{\small{~II}}}
17: \newcommand{\photo}{{\tt {Photo}}}
18: \newcommand{\suspect}{{\small {SUSPECT}}}
19: \newcommand{\dmB}{$\Delta m_{15}(B)$}
20: \newcommand{\ubvri}{{\small {\it {UBVRI}}}}
21: \newcommand{\ccd}{{\small {CCD}}}
22: \newcommand{\apo}{{\small {APO}}}
23: \newcommand{\agn}{{\small {AGN}}}
24: \newcommand{\mjd}{{\small {MJD}}}
25: \newcommand{\adu}{{\small {ADU}}}
26: \newcommand{\hst}{{\it {\small {HST}}}}
27: \newcommand{\csp}{{\small {CSP}}}
28: \newcommand{\snf}{{\small {SNF}actory}}
29: \newcommand{\cfa}{{\small {CfA}}}
30: \newcommand{\loss}{{\small {LOSS}}}
31: \newcommand{\arc}{{\small {ARC}}}
32: \newcommand{\kpno}{{\small {KPNO}}}
33: \newcommand{\mdm}{{\small {MDM}}}
34: \newcommand{\wht}{{\small {WHT}}}
35: \newcommand{\het}{{\small {HET}}}
36: \newcommand{\ntt}{{\small {NTT}}}
37: \newcommand{\nnot}{{\small {NOT}}}
38: \newcommand{\salt}{{\small {SALT}}}
39: \newcommand{\vatt}{{\small {VATT}}}
40: \newcommand{\wiyn}{{\small {WIYN}}}
41: \newcommand{\signoi}{{\small {S/N}}}
42: \newcommand{\gri}{{\it {gri}}}
43: \newcommand{\ugriz}{{\it {ugriz}}}
44: \newcommand{\psf}{{\small {PSF}}}
45: \newcommand{\ra}{{\small {RA}}}
46: \newcommand{\gb}{{\small {GB}}}
47: \newcommand{\tb}{{\small {TB}}}
48: \newcommand{\cpu}{{\small {CPU}}}
49: \newcommand{\raid}{{\small {RAID}}}
50: \newcommand{\pdf}{{\small {PDF}}}
51: \newcommand{\id}{{\small {ID}}}
52: \newcommand\fnu{$\rm{erg~cm}^{-2}~\rm{s}^{-1}~\rm{Hz}^{-1}$}
53: \newcommand\dme{\Delta m(B)}
54:
55:
56: \begin{document}
57:
58: \title{The Sloan Digital Sky Survey-II Supernova Survey: Search Algorithm and
59: Follow-up Observations}
60:
61: \author{
62: Masao~Sako,\altaffilmark{1,2}
63: Bruce~Bassett,\altaffilmark{3,4}
64: Andrew~Becker,\altaffilmark{5}
65: David~Cinabro,\altaffilmark{6}
66: Fritz~DeJongh,\altaffilmark{7}
67: D.~L.~Depoy,\altaffilmark{8}
68: Ben~Dilday,\altaffilmark{9,10}
69: Mamoru~Doi,\altaffilmark{11}
70: Joshua~A.~Frieman,\altaffilmark{7,9,12}
71: Peter~M.~Garnavich,\altaffilmark{13}
72: Craig~J.~Hogan,\altaffilmark{14}
73: Jon~Holtzman,\altaffilmark{15}
74: Saurabh~Jha,\altaffilmark{2}
75: Richard~Kessler,\altaffilmark{9,16}
76: Kohki Konishi,\altaffilmark{17}
77: Hubert~Lampeitl,\altaffilmark{18}
78: John~Marriner,\altaffilmark{7}
79: Gajus~Miknaitis,\altaffilmark{7}
80: Robert~C.~Nichol,\altaffilmark{19}
81: Jose~Luis~Prieto,\altaffilmark{8}
82: Adam~G.~Riess,\altaffilmark{18,20}
83: Michael~W.~Richmond,\altaffilmark{21}
84: Roger~Romani,\altaffilmark{2,22}
85: Donald~P.~Schneider,\altaffilmark{23}
86: Mathew~Smith,\altaffilmark{19}
87: Mark~SubbaRao,\altaffilmark{12}
88: Naohiro~Takanashi,\altaffilmark{11}
89: Kouichi~Tokita,\altaffilmark{11}
90: Kurt~van~der~Heyden,\altaffilmark{4}
91: Naoki~Yasuda,\altaffilmark{17}
92: Chen~Zheng,\altaffilmark{2,22}
93: John~Barentine,\altaffilmark{24,25}
94: Howard~Brewington,\altaffilmark{25}
95: Changsu~Choi,\altaffilmark{26}
96: Jack~Dembicky,\altaffilmark{25}
97: Michael~Harnavek,\altaffilmark{25}
98: Yutaka~Ihara,\altaffilmark{27}
99: Myungshin~Im,\altaffilmark{26}
100: William~Ketzeback,\altaffilmark{25}
101: Scott~J.~Kleinman,\altaffilmark{25,28}
102: Jurek~Krzesi\'{n}ski,\altaffilmark{25,29}
103: Daniel~C.~Long,\altaffilmark{25}
104: Elena~Malanushenko,\altaffilmark{25}
105: Viktor~Malanushenko,\altaffilmark{25}
106: Russet~J.~McMillan,\altaffilmark{25}
107: Tomoki~Morokuma,\altaffilmark{27,30}
108: Atsuko~Nitta,\altaffilmark{25,31}
109: Kaike~Pan,\altaffilmark{25}
110: Gabrelle~Saurage,\altaffilmark{25}
111: Stephanie~A.~Snedden\altaffilmark{25}
112: }
113:
114: \altaffiltext{1}{
115: Department of Physics and Astronomy,
116: University of Pennsylvania, 209 South 33rd Street,
117: Philadelphia, PA 19104.
118: }
119: \altaffiltext{2}{
120: Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics \& Cosmology,
121: Stanford University, P.O. Box 20450, MS29,
122: Stanford, CA 94309.
123: }
124: \altaffiltext{3}{
125: Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics,
126: University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa.
127: }
128: \altaffiltext{4}{
129: South African Astronomical Observatory,
130: P.O. Box 9, Observatory 7935, South Africa.
131: }
132: \altaffiltext{5}{
133: Department of Astronomy,
134: University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195.
135: }
136: \altaffiltext{6}{
137: Department of Physics,
138: Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202.
139: }
140: \altaffiltext{7}{
141: Center for Particle Astrophysics,
142: Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510.
143: }
144: \altaffiltext{8}{
145: Department of Astronomy,
146: Ohio State University, 140 West 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210-1173.
147: }
148: \altaffiltext{9}{
149: Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics,
150: The University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue Chicago, IL 60637.
151: }
152: \altaffiltext{10}{
153: Department of Physics,
154: University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.
155: }
156: \altaffiltext{11}{
157: Institute of Astronomy, Graduate School of Science,
158: University of Tokyo 2-21-1, Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-0015, Japan.
159: }
160: \altaffiltext{12}{
161: Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
162: The University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637.
163: }
164: \altaffiltext{13}{
165: University of Notre Dame, 225 Nieuwland Science, Notre Dame, IN 46556-5670.
166: }
167: \altaffiltext{14}{
168: Department of Astronomy,
169: University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195.
170: }
171: \altaffiltext{15}{
172: Department of Astronomy,
173: MSC 4500,
174: New Mexico State University, P.O. Box 30001, Las Cruces, NM 88003.
175: }
176: \altaffiltext{16}{
177: Enrico Fermi Institute,
178: University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637.
179: }
180: \altaffiltext{17}{
181: Institute for Cosmic Ray Research,
182: University of Tokyo, 5-1-5, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8582, Japan.
183: }
184: \altaffiltext{18}{
185: Space Telescope Science Institute,
186: 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218.
187: }
188: \altaffiltext{19}{
189: Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation,
190: Mercantile House,
191: Hampshire Terrace, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2EG, UK.
192: }
193: \altaffiltext{20}{
194: Department of Physics and Astronomy,
195: Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218.
196: }
197: \altaffiltext{21}{
198: Physics Department,
199: Rochester Institute of Technology,
200: 85 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623-5603.
201: }
202: \altaffiltext{22}{
203: Department of Physics,
204: Stanford University,
205: 382 Via Pueblo Mall, Stanford, CA 94305.
206: }
207: \altaffiltext{23}{
208: Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
209: The Pennsylvania State University,
210: 525 Davey Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802.
211: }
212: \altaffiltext{24}{
213: Department of Astronomy,
214: McDonald Observatory, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712.
215: }
216: \altaffiltext{25}{
217: Apache Point Observatory, P.O. Box 59, Sunspot, NM 88349.
218: }
219: \altaffiltext{26}{
220: Department of Astronomy,
221: Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
222: }
223: \altaffiltext{27}{
224: Institute of Astronomy, Graduate School of Science, University of Tokyo,
225: 2-21-1, Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-0015, Japan.
226: }
227: \altaffiltext{28}{
228: Subaru Telescope,
229: 650 North A'ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720.
230: }
231: \altaffiltext{29}{
232: Obserwatorium Astronomiczne na Suhorze, Akademia Pedagogicazna w Krakowie,
233: ulica Podchor\c{a}\.zych 2, PL-30-084 Krak\'ow, Poland.
234: }
235: \altaffiltext{30}{
236: National Observatory of Japan,
237: 2-21-1, Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan.
238: }
239: \altaffiltext{31}{
240: Gemini Observatory,
241: 670 North A'ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720.
242: }
243: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
244:
245:
246: \received{}
247: \revised{}
248: \accepted{}
249:
250: \slugcomment{Submitted to The Astronomical Journal}
251: \shorttitle{SDSS-II Supernova Survey: Search and Follow-up}
252: \shortauthors{Sako et al.}
253:
254:
255: \begin{abstract}
256:
257: The Sloan Digital Sky Survey-II Supernova Survey has identified a large
258: number of new transient sources in a 300~deg$^2$ region along the celestial
259: equator during its first two seasons of a three-season campaign. Multi-band
260: (\ugriz) light curves were measured for most of the sources, which include
261: solar system objects, Galactic variable stars, active galactic nuclei,
262: supernovae (\sne), and other astronomical transients. The imaging survey is
263: augmented by an extensive spectroscopic follow-up program to identify \sne,
264: measure their redshifts, and study the physical conditions of the explosions
265: and their environment through spectroscopic diagnostics. During the survey,
266: light curves are rapidly evaluated to provide an initial photometric type of
267: the \sne, and a selected sample of sources are targeted for spectroscopic
268: observations. In the first two seasons, 476 sources were selected for
269: spectroscopic observations, of which 403 were identified as \sne. For the
270: Type Ia \sne, the main driver for the Survey, our photometric typing and
271: targeting efficiency is 90\%. Only 6\% of the photometric \snia\ candidates
272: were spectroscopically classified as non-\snia\ instead, and the remaining
273: 4\% resulted in low signal-to-noise, unclassified spectra. This paper
274: describes the search algorithm and the software, and the real-time
275: processing of the \sdss\ imaging data. We also present the details of the
276: supernova candidate selection procedures and strategies for follow-up
277: spectroscopic and imaging observations of the discovered sources.
278:
279: \end{abstract}
280:
281: \keywords{cosmology: observations --- methods: data analysis --- techniques:
282: image processing --- supernovae: general --- surveys}
283:
284:
285: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
286: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
287: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
288: \section{Introduction}
289: \label{section_intro}
290:
291: Measurements of luminosity distances to Type Ia supernovae (\sne) have
292: played a central role in cosmology, leading two independent groups to the
293: remarkable discovery of an unknown, presently-dominant component of the
294: universe, dark energy, and strong evidence for an accelerating universe
295: \citep{riess98,perlmutter99}. Current surveys that target high-redshift
296: \sne\ from the ground -- the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Supernova Legacy
297: Survey (\snls\footnote{http://www.cfht.hawaii.edu/SNLS}; \citealt{astier06})
298: and the Equation of State: Supernovae Trace Cosmic Expansion
299: (\essence\footnote{http://www.ctio.noao.edu/essence}; \citealt{wood-vasey07,
300: miknaitis07}) -- and from space using the \hst\
301: \citep{riess04a,riess07,barbary06} have substantially increased the sample of
302: high-$z$ \sne, and have provided much-improved statistical constraints on
303: the expansion history of the universe.
304:
305: The discovery of cosmic acceleration was made possible in part through
306: extensive observations of nearby Type Ia \sne\ by the Cal\'an/Tololo
307: Supernova Search \citep{hamuy93, hamuy96a, hamuy96b, hamuy96c} and by the
308: \cfa\ follow-up program \citep{riess95, riess96a, riess99, jha06, jha07},
309: and by studies pioneered by \citet{pskovskii77} and by \citet{phillips93} of
310: the relationship between peak brightness and light curve decline rate
311: \citep{hamuy96d, riess96b, phillips99}. Current low-redshift \sn\ surveys
312: and follow-up programs (Lick Observatory Supernova Search --
313: \loss\footnote{http://astro.berkeley.edu/\~bait/kait.html};
314: \citealt{filippenko01}, Carnegie Supernova Project --
315: \csp\footnote{http://csp1.lco.cl/~cspuser1/PUB/CSP.html}; \citealt{hamuy06},
316: Nearby Supernova Factory -- \snf\footnote{http://snfactory.lbl.gov/};
317: \citealt{aldering02}, and the \cfa\ \sn\
318: Group\footnote{http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/oir/Research/supernova/SNgroup.html}),
319: are continuing to discover \sne\ and compile a large number of high-quality
320: multicolor light curves as well as multi-epoch optical spectra of \sneia\ to
321: expand the library of local training data used as ``templates''. These
322: high-quality data sets will be indispensable for calibrating the
323: brightness-decline relation to high precision. Obtaining and studying
324: multi-epoch spectra are also important for computing improved
325: $K$-corrections and minimizing systematic uncertainties \citep{kim96,
326: nugent02, hsiao07}. Recent spectroscopic modeling efforts have also led to
327: a better understanding of the physical mechanism responsible for the
328: observed brightness-decline relation (see, e.g., \citealt{kasen07} and
329: references therein).
330:
331: As one of the three primary scientific components of the Sloan Digital Sky
332: Survey-II (\sdssii), the Supernova Survey takes repeated imaging scans of
333: the same 300~square degrees of the sky during the Fall seasons of 2005 --
334: 2007 to search for and measure light curves of \sne. The imaging survey is
335: complemented by an extensive spectroscopic follow-up program to confirm the
336: \sn\ type and measure redshifts, and to study the detailed spectral
337: properties of a sample of selected events.
338:
339: This program exploits the unique capabilities of the \sdss\ 2.5m telescope
340: \citep{gunn06} and its \ccd\ imaging camera \citep{gunn98} to survey a large
341: volume of space at moderately high cadence. The survey complements and
342: improves upon other low-z and high-z surveys in several important ways. The
343: wide field-of-view camera operating in drift scan mode allows for efficient
344: discoveries of type Ia \sne\ at $0.05 \la z \la 0.4$, a redshift interval
345: that is not easily probed by other existing surveys that target either known
346: nearby galaxies (low-$z$) or narrow pencil-beam volumes (high-$z$). Its
347: well-calibrated multi-band photometric system ($ugriz$;
348: \citealt{fukugita96}) enables precise measurements of supernova light curves
349: with controlled systematics. The absolute magnitude scale is accurate to
350: better than $\sim 2$\% in $r$ and $\sim 2 - 3$\% in the colors \citep{dr5},
351: and a factor of $\sim 2$ improvement has been obtained from repeat imaging
352: of the equatorial region \citep{ivezic07}. Finally, the survey is sensitive
353: to the redshift interval that, given a large enough sample, enables
354: cosmological distance measurements with data from a {\it single telescope},
355: eliminating the need for cross-calibration across two or more photometric
356: systems.
357:
358: This paper is part of a series describing the \sdssii\ Supernova Survey.
359: Here we present a technical description of the search algorithm, data
360: processing, photometric typing of \sn\ candidates, and spectroscopic target
361: selection. \citet{frieman07} presents an overview of the program.
362: Photometry and light curves of the full sample of spectroscopically
363: confirmed \sne\ from the 2005 season are presented in \citet{holtzman07}.
364: Spectroscopic data and their analysis results are described in
365: \citet{zheng07}. \citet{kessler07} presents the \snia\ Hubble diagram and
366: cosmological analysis from the 2005 season. The measurement of the
367: low-redshift Type Ia \sn\ rate is presented in \citet{dilday07}. Detailed
368: studies of two peculiar \sne\ discovered by the \sdssii\ \sn\ Survey,
369: \sn2005hk and \sn2005gj, are presented in \citet{phillips07} and
370: \citet{prieto07}, respectively.
371:
372: The main body of the paper is separated into two broad sections. The first
373: part (\S\ref{sec:obs}) presents the details of the real-time on-mountain
374: data processing and the mechanics of the search pipeline, which identifies
375: new transient events. The second part (\S\ref{sec:spectro}) describes the
376: procedures for supernova candidate identification, photometric \sn\ typing,
377: and the algorithm adopted for selecting targets for spectroscopy. A brief
378: discussion of follow-up imaging observations of a sample of
379: spectroscopically confirmed \sne\ is presented in \S\ref{sec:imaging}. The
380: general results from the 2005 and 2006 seasons are presented in
381: \S\ref{sec:results}. We briefly summarize in \S\ref{sec:summary}.
382:
383:
384: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
385: \section{SDSS 2.5m Observations and Data Processing}
386: \label{sec:obs}
387:
388: The \sdssii\ Supernova Survey has been allocated the bulk of the time during
389: the Fall seasons (September 1 - November 30) of 2005 -- 2007 on the
390: \sdss\ telescope at Apache Point Observatory (\apo). Imaging observations
391: are scheduled on most nights excluding a 5-day period around full moon.
392: Some nights are shared with the {\small SEGUE} program especially during
393: stretches of consecutive nights with good observing conditions. An overview
394: of the \sdss\ is given by \citet{york00}; see \citet{frieman07} for an
395: overview of the \sn\ Survey.
396:
397:
398: \subsection{Survey Area: Stripe 82}
399: \label{subsec:stripe82}
400:
401: The survey area is Stripe 82, the 300~deg$^2$ southern equatorial stripe of
402: the \sdss\ footprint, which covers the approximate coordinate ranges
403: $-60^\circ \la \alpha \la +60^\circ$ (20~hrs to 4~hrs in right ascension,
404: \ra\ or $\alpha$) and $-1.25^\circ \la \delta \la +1.25^\circ$ in
405: declination ($\delta$). The detailed Stripe 82 footprint of each camera
406: column is shown in Table~\ref{tbl:stripe82}. This survey area was selected
407: for three primary reasons: (1) extensive repeat observations were acquired
408: as part of the \sdssi\ survey, before the start of the \sn\ Survey, (2) the
409: area is easily accessible to most telescopes, and (3) it is accessible at
410: low airmass during the Fall months, when most of the northern \sdss\ area is
411: not. The advantages of having repeat observations from \sdssi\ are
412: three-fold. First, the data provide a catalog of known variable sources,
413: which is crucial for distinguishing a small number of new \sn\ candidates
414: from a large population of foreground variable stars and background active
415: galactic nuclei. Second, the deep coadded images constructed from the
416: individual scans serve as references for image subtraction, enabling a more
417: sensitive search of new transient events (the template is essentially
418: noiseless in the detection process). Finally, the deep coadds also allow
419: identification of faint host galaxies that are otherwise undetected in the
420: single-scan images, which are frequently useful for prioritizing follow-up
421: observations. The stripe contains over 3 million cataloged galaxies that
422: are brighter than $r \sim 22.5$~mag.
423:
424: \begin{figure}[!tb] %%%%% run area coverage
425: \begin{center}
426: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=.65\textwidth]{f1.eps}
427: \end{center}
428: \caption{Number of imaging scans of the northern (black) and southern (red)
429: strips for the 2005 (top) and 2006 (bottom) seasons as a function of right
430: ascension. Note that, in contrast to the 2005 season, the 2006 scans are
431: more evenly distributed in right ascension with very little difference
432: between the northern and southern strips.} \label{fig:runarea}
433: \end{figure}
434:
435: Due to gaps between the six \ccd\ columns, the \sdss\ imaging camera is
436: capable of scanning approximately half of the stripe (or one strip) in a
437: single night. During the 2005 season, the observations alternated between
438: the northern strip (82N) and the southern strip (82S) from night to night.
439: In 2006, however, a significant effort was made to avoid long temporal gaps
440: in any given part of the strip, so pieces of \ra\ ranges from both strips
441: were sometimes observed in a single night. We also note that approximately
442: 10\% of Stripe 82 is covered by both the northern and southern strips due to
443: overlapping \ccd\ columns, so $\sim 30$~deg$^2$ of the sky is observed on a
444: cadence of 1 day (modulo weather losses). The lists of all
445: \sdssii\ \sn\ runs, i.e., continuous imaging scans, and their corresponding
446: \ra\ ranges taken during the 2005 and 2006 seasons are given in
447: Table~\ref{tbl:runs2005} and Table~\ref{tbl:runs2006}, respectively. We
448: also show in Figure~\ref{fig:runarea} the number of visits made to each of
449: the strips in 2005 and 2006 as a function of the \ra. The complete set of
450: corrected frames and the uncalibrated object catalogs from 2005 and 2006 are
451: available online as part of the first \sn\ data release ({\small
452: DRSN}1\footnote{http://www.sdss.org/drsn1/DRSN1\_data\_release.html}).
453: These data are also accessible from the Data Archive Server of the Sixth
454: Data Release\footnote{http://www.sdss.org/dr6/access/index.html}
455: \citep{dr6}.
456:
457:
458: \subsection{On-Mountain Processing}
459: \label{subsec:processing}
460:
461: The \sdss\ 2.5m telescope nominally performs observations every night during
462: the search seasons, so the data must be processed within 24~hours to avoid a
463: backlog of unprocessed data and to rapidly identify \sn\ candidates for
464: spectroscopic follow-up observations. A single night of observing produces
465: up to $\sim 200$~Gb of imaging data, so it is highly desirable to process
466: the data on the mountain and significantly reduce the number of images that
467: are transferred over the internet for visual inspection.
468:
469: The data are processed on a dedicated 10 dual-processor (20 processors
470: total) computer cluster that runs at \apo. There are nine computers that
471: process data; each of the 18 processors is responsible for processing all
472: images from a single combination of filter (\gri) and camera column (1 --
473: 6). Each computer has 400~Gb of \raid 5 disk and 2~Gb memory. The 10th
474: monitor/backup computer has 3~Tb of disk and 4~Gb memory and is used for
475: process-management, data transfer, and software development. This setup was
476: specifically chosen to meet our requirement of processing a full night's
477: worth of data within 24~hours. An 11th computer is available as a spare but
478: so far has not been needed -- during the first two years of operation, there
479: were no serious failures. Several disks failed, but the \raid\ system
480: worked properly to prevent any loss of processing time while waiting for a
481: disk to be replaced. There was one curious glitch that may be related to
482: operation at high altitude (2800~m). On occasion one of the computers would
483: hang up, and cycling the power was the only way to revive the system. There
484: were about 20 such incidents per season, although the probability seemed
485: higher in the month of November, possibly due to better weather and longer
486: nights resulting in more computing time. Since people are present at
487: \apo\ day and night, minimal processing time was lost from these hang-ups.
488:
489: There are three main tasks for the process manager: (i) start jobs, (ii)
490: monitor processing progress, and (iii) monitor disk space. Due to the
491: structure of the data acquisition system, the image processing can start
492: only after an imaging run has finished, and the master script is usually
493: executed manually by a person in the morning. While this script could have
494: been automatically started, it is better that a human reviews the observer
495: logs and checks that processing starts smoothly. The master script
496: schedules and allocates resources for copying data from the data acquisition
497: computer to a local disk, photometric reduction in $ugriz$
498: (\S~\ref{subsub:photo}), and frame subtraction (\S~\ref{subsub:framesub})
499: and object detection (\S~\ref{subsub:doobjects}) in $gri$. Several monitor
500: scripts are used to check the status throughout the $\sim 20$~hours needed
501: to process the data. Since data processing continues virtually
502: round-the-clock, a few people often shared the monitoring burden.
503: Continuous monitoring was necessary because there were two common problems
504: that could interupt the processing. First, poor observing conditions caused
505: the photometric reduction software to abort. In this case, the photometric
506: reduction must be reprocessed with a more restrictive \ra\ range. The
507: second source of interruption was the computer hang-ups discussed above.
508: The last process-manager issue concerns disk space. Rather than clearing
509: disk space after each night's data have been processed, we kept all of the
510: subtracted images at \apo\ for 1--2 weeks. The reason for keeping
511: subtracted images is that for interesting candidates we could go back to
512: earlier epochs and process $u$ and $z$: $u$ band was particularly useful to
513: distinguish Type Ia and Type II supernovae. In addition, since the
514: candidate position is known, we re-ran $gri$ photometry at the known
515: location in previous epochs to get a better estimate of the early-epoch
516: fluxes and upper limits. The disk space was managed with a priority system
517: so that clearing disk was mostly based on following a pre-defined algorithm
518: and rarely involved a hasty decision. To avoid risks with automated
519: disk-cleaning, a human-entered command was required.
520:
521: Below we describe the search pipeline and the reduction procedures adopted
522: to take the raw images to the point where they are transferred to the central
523: \sn\ database server at Fermilab.
524:
525:
526: \subsubsection{PHOTO}
527: \label{subsub:photo}
528:
529: The raw data are first processed through the \photo\ pipeline
530: \citep{lupton01,lupton02,stoughton02}. The software produces the corrected
531: frames and generates bad-pixel maps, position-dependent \psf, and
532: astrometric solution \citep{pier03} that are used in subsequent processing
533: stages. Our version of \photo\ does not identify sources in the images or
534: perform photometric measurements \citep{hogg01,smith02,ivezic04,tucker06},
535: as they are not appropriate for efficiently identifying \sn\ candidates,
536: which are usually blended with their host galaxies. As with all standard
537: \sdss\ data, images from each camera column are written in frames of $2048
538: \times 1361$ unique pixels or 13.51\arcmin\ $\times~8.98$\arcmin\ on the
539: sky. The pipeline software was slightly tweaked to run on data taken under
540: poor observing conditions (bright moon, low atmospheric transparency, and
541: poor seeing). In 2005 and 2006, approximately 34\% and 30\%, respectively,
542: of the frames were acquired when the moon was above the horizon.
543: Figure~\ref{fig:seeing} shows the distributions of the $r$-band \psf\ of
544: frames successfully processed through \photo\ during the first two seasons.
545:
546: \begin{figure}[tb] %%%%% seeing distribution
547: \begin{center}
548: \includegraphics[angle=270, width=.65\textwidth]{f2.eps}
549: \end{center}
550: \caption{Cumulative distributions of the $r$-band \psf\ during the 2005
551: (black) and 2006 (red) search seasons. More than half of the frames were
552: acquired at $< 1.2$\arcsec. Only frames successfully processed through
553: \photo\ are included.} \label{fig:seeing}
554: \end{figure}
555:
556:
557: \subsubsection{Image Subtraction}
558: \label{subsub:framesub}
559:
560: To identify new transients in the search data, the images are run through a
561: difference imaging pipeline, which matches the \psf\ of the search and
562: template frames, adjusts for the difference in photometric zeropoint,
563: accurately registers their pixels, and performs the subtraction. The image
564: templates were divided into four separate \ra\ ranges so that human scanning
565: and target selection could begin well before the entire night of data was
566: finished processing. The subtracted frames in each filter are searched for
567: positive fluctuations that consist of at least 2 contiguous pixels each
568: above $3.0~\sigma$ of the noise. The software is derived from version 7.1
569: of the {\tt Photpipe} software used by the Super{\small MACHO} and \essence\
570: collaborations \citep{smith02}. Extensive changes have been implemented to
571: operate successfully on processed \sdss\ data. The modified application is
572: called {\tt Framesub}.
573:
574: The pipeline is operated in three modes: 1) {\tt sdssred} mode, where the
575: input of images is prepared for difference imaging. 2) {\tt sdssdiff},
576: which performs a difference imaging analysis of the search data compared to
577: the template data. To conserve computing time, only the \gri\ frames are
578: differenced and used for object detection. This is the default mode that
579: produces the objects for manual inspection, and subsequently the \sn\
580: candidates described below. 3) {\tt sdssforce} mode, in which, after
581: reliable detection of a supernova candidate, we difference {\it all} data on
582: the object, including the $u$ and $z$ bands, and perform forced-positional
583: photometry at the location of the candidate. The measurements of magnitudes
584: by {\tt sdssdiff} and {\tt sdssforce} are referred to as {\it search} and
585: {\it forced} photometry. The overall structure of the software and detailed
586: descriptions of each mode are provided in Appendix~\ref{app:software}.
587:
588:
589: \subsubsection{Object Detection and Filtering Algorithm}
590: \label{subsub:doobjects}
591:
592: The individual peaks found by {\tt Framesub} are filtered through a software
593: called {\tt doObjects} to remove statistical fluctuations and identify true
594: astronomical sources. First, the single-filter peaks are matched by
595: position to identify sources that are detected in at least two of the three
596: \gri\ filters within $0.8$\arcsec. These sources are flagged as {\it
597: objects}. Significant negative fluctuations are not flagged. The list of
598: objects is compared against the list of known variable sources (the veto
599: catalog) constructed from previous scans of Stripe 82. Any object that
600: matches the position of a known variable is filtered out. Most of the
601: sources in this catalog are variable stars, active galactic nuclei (\agn),
602: and other persistently varying sources. Approximately 10\% (20\%) of the
603: objects identified by {\tt doObjects} in 2005 (2006) were associated with
604: sources in the veto catalog.
605:
606: Given the large area covered by the survey and the overlap of the central
607: \ra\ range of Stripe~82 with the ecliptic plane, our detections are
608: overwhelmingly dominated by solar system objects. The challenge is to
609: remove as many of these objects as possible prior to handscanning, without
610: filtering out real \sn\ candidates. Objects with proper motions in excess
611: of $\sim 1$\arcsec\ per minute are easily rejected by requiring that the
612: object is detected in the $r$ and $i$ bands within $0.8$\arcsec\ (the
613: filters are imaged in the order $riuzg$ and the effective time difference
614: between adjacent filters is 71.7 seconds). Objects that move as slowly as
615: $\sim 0.2$\arcsec\ per minute can be identified through motion between the
616: $g$ and $r$ bands. Objects that move at a slower rate are slightly more
617: difficult to identify; when they pass in front of a background galaxy, they
618: can look like perfectly good \sn\ candidates. Approximately 35\% (40\%) of
619: the objects found in 2005 (2006) were tagged as moving objects and removed
620: prior to human evaluation.
621:
622: New transient sources are entered into a dedicated {\tt MySQL} database and
623: the cutout images are transferred to Fermilab for visual inspection.
624:
625:
626: \subsection{Handscanning, Autoscanning, and SN Candidate Selection}
627: \label{subsec:handscan}
628:
629: In addition to epochs of \sn\ light-curves, the difference imaging and
630: object detection algorithms described above result in the detection of many
631: background sources of variation, both physical and non-physical. In order
632: to robustly reject background and allow us to focus further analysis on
633: promising \sn\ candidates, we require that a human visually inspect images
634: of the objects, a process which we refer to as {\it handscanning}.
635:
636: In addition to moving solar system objects, other major sources of
637: contamination include artifacts caused by (1) subtraction of slightly
638: misaligned images, which creates shapes with clusters of positive and
639: negative counts (objects that we call dipoles) in the differenced images,
640: (2) diffraction spikes, and (3) bright saturated stars. Satellite trails
641: that are not properly masked by the software also contribute to the
642: background. A small fraction of the dipoles are high proper-motion stars
643: that have drifted between the epochs of the template and search images.
644: Many of these background objects, however, can be quickly rejected by visual
645: inspection. In Figure~\ref{fig:object_mosaic}, we show a gallery of cutout
646: search, template, and differenced images of various types of objects
647: evaluated by scanners -- none, artifact, dipole, variable, transient,
648: \sn\ gold, \sn\ bronze, and \sn\ other. All images shown are from the $r$
649: band. In Figure~\ref{fig:object_moving}, we show \gri\ images of a moving
650: object correctly flagged by the software. These images show the source
651: moved between the $g$ and $r$ exposures, which are separated by about 5
652: minutes.
653:
654: As a convenient way for humans to handscan the detected objects, a web
655: interface was constructed that queries the database and displays all of the
656: relevant information about the object, including \gri\ cutout images of the
657: search, template, and differenced images, measured magnitudes, the mean sky
658: coordinates and the relative positions measured in each filter, and a list
659: of all previous detections (if any) within 0.8$\arcsec$ of the object under
660: inspection. The scanner evaluates the information and decides to either tag
661: the object as a possible \sn\ or to reject it as background. If an object
662: is tagged as a \sn\ and there are no previous detections of objects within
663: 0.8$\arcsec$, it becomes a new \sn\ {\it candidate} with a unique
664: \sn\ {\small ID} number. A candidate will always remain a candidate unless
665: it is manually vetoed by one of the scanners (which rarely occurs). All of
666: the candidates can be accessed through a public web
667: site\footnote{http://sdssdp47.fnal.gov/sdsssn/candidates/candTable.php}.
668:
669: \begin{figure}[!tb]
670: \begin{center}
671: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=1.00\textwidth]{f3.eps}
672: \end{center}
673: \caption{A gallery of various types of objects that a scanner evaluates.
674: The panels show $r$-band search (left columns in each panel), template
675: (central columns), and differenced (right columns) images of objects
676: classified by scanners as ``none'', ``artifact'', ``dipole'',
677: ``variable'', ``transient'', ``\sn\ gold'', ``\sn\ bronze'', and
678: ``\sn\ other''. Objects classified as ``none'' are typically detections
679: near the threshold, and are often not visible to the human eye. Most
680: ``artifacts'' are caused by different orientations of diffraction spikes
681: in the search and template images. A ``dipole'' results from imperfect
682: image registration as well as high proper-motion stars. A ``variable'' is
683: an object associated with a persistent source and usually exhibits random
684: temporal variability. These sources are newly variable sources that are
685: not part of the veto catalog. A ``transient'' object is usually seen for
686: the first time and {\it not} associated with a galaxy. The source can be
687: a true \sn\ with an undetected host galaxy or a slow-moving asteroid. An
688: ``\sn\ gold'' is a good \sn\ candidate that is well-separated from the
689: host. An ``\sn\ bronze'' is a possible \sn\ that lies close to the core
690: of the galaxy and can, therefore, also be a variable active galactic
691: nucleus. An ``\sn\ other'' is also a possible \sn, but is most likely a
692: different type of variable source -- in the case shown above, the source
693: is a variable star in NGC1068 (M77). There is another category called
694: ``\sn\ silver'' (not shown), which is used for objects that are similar to
695: a ``transient'', but detected in more than a single epoch (e.g., an
696: \sn\ with an undetected host galaxy). The distinction between
697: gold/silver/bronze/other \sn\ candidates is not important; all objects
698: tagged as an ``\sn'' become a \sn\ candidate. Each cutout image is
699: 20\arcsec\ on the side.}
700: \label{fig:object_mosaic}
701: \end{figure}
702:
703: \begin{figure}[tb]
704: \begin{center}
705: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=0.4\textwidth]{f4.eps}
706: \end{center}
707: \caption{An example of a moving object that was correctly flagged by the
708: autoscanner. As in Figure~\ref{fig:object_mosaic}, the search, template,
709: and differenced images are shown in the left, middle, and right columns,
710: respectively. In addition to the $r$-band images (top row), we also
711: display the $g$ (middle row) and $i$-band (bottom row) images to show the
712: relative position of the source in each filter. Note that the faint
713: source in the $g$-band differenced image appears slightly below and to the
714: left of the center of the image. The images are acquired in the order
715: $ri(uz)g$ with a 71.7-second delay between each filter.}
716: \label{fig:object_moving}
717: \end{figure}
718:
719: During the 2005 observing season, we required that every object that is not
720: rejected by {\tt doObjects} be handscanned by a human. An average of about
721: 3000 -- 5000 objects were inspected per full night of imaging during the
722: Fall 2005 season. Six scanners were on duty on a given night, each scanner
723: responsible for inspecting all objects from one of the six camera columns,
724: or 500 -- 800 objects. Based on our experience in 2005, we made a number of
725: changes to the handscanning procedure for the 2006 season described below.
726:
727:
728: \subsubsection{Autoscanner}
729: \label{subsec:autoscan}
730:
731: To reduce the number of objects to be scanned by humans, prior to the 2006
732: season we implemented a new software filter, called the {\it autoscanner}.
733: The software performs two primary tasks: 1) identifies all objects detected
734: in more than one epoch as well as bright ($g$ or $r<21$~mag) objects
735: detected for the first time, and 2) uses statistical classification
736: techniques to identify and filter out first-epoch background non-\sn\
737: objects.
738:
739: The reasons for performing 1) are as follows. First, the selection of
740: objects detected in more than one epoch provides a very robust way of
741: eliminating moving objects, one of the major contaminants of the 2005 \sn\
742: candidates. Second, the selection of bright first-epoch objects enables us
743: to discover nearby \sne; we can thereby obtain spectroscopic observations
744: well before maximum light and provide rapid alerts to the \sn\ community.
745: In addition, bright, single-epoch candidates provide a back-up list of
746: spectroscopic targets for nights when the spectroscopy queue is not filled
747: by promising multi-epoch candidates. Although most of our targets were
748: spectroscopically observed after two or more epochs of photometry, in a few
749: instances, we did obtain spectroscopic observations of \sn\ candidates based
750: on a single epoch of detection. In the selection of these objects, the
751: autoscanner also identifies objects associated with either a known variable
752: in the veto catalog or a known \sn\ candidate. In the former case, the
753: object is filtered out. In the latter case, since there is no need for a
754: human to scan the object, it is instead flagged by the autoscanner as a
755: known \sn\ candidate, stored in the database, and used in the light curve
756: analysis (see Section~\ref{subsec:snphoto}).
757:
758: For 2), the autoscanner attempts to identify and filter out bright
759: first-epoch objects that belong to one of three classes of background;
760: unmasked diffraction spikes, artifacts of imperfect image registration
761: (dipoles), and moving objects. The software treats the set of objects,
762: along with their evaluations by a human, from the 2005 search as a training
763: set, and compares the observed quantities for newly detected objects against
764: this set. The method used to classify an object is the {\it histogram
765: method of probability density function (\pdf) estimation}. In this method
766: the observable quantities, or attributes, of an object form a
767: multi-dimensional space, and a classification decision is made by
768: considering the number count of objects, in the training set, from each
769: class in a bin centered at the point describing the object we wish to
770: classify. This method has the advantages of being non-parametric, allowing
771: the decision boundaries in the observable space to be arbitrarily
772: complicated, and of explicitly retaining the correlations between
773: observables. A caveat of using the histogram method of \pdf\ estimation is
774: that one must have a sufficient number of objects in the training set to
775: sample the \pdf\ well in all regions of interest. With $\approx 90,000$
776: objects in the training set, this is not a significant limitation for the
777: \sdssii\ \sn\ Survey. A technical discussion of the algorithm is presented
778: in Appendix~\ref{app:autoscanner}.
779:
780: During the 2006 observing season, the autoscanner was used to reject moving
781: objects from among the set of bright first-epoch objects that were to be
782: handscanned. For such bright objects, only $\approx 0.7$\% of them are
783: incorrectly tagged as moving objects by the autoscanner. In contrast to the
784: 2005 observing season, we chose not to handscan epochs of known candidates
785: or objects that showed variation in more than one observing season, and the
786: autoscanner was used to reject such objects. Although some objects were
787: classified as artifacts or dipoles, we chose not to reject these from the
788: handscanning as they are a small fraction of the background in comparison to
789: moving objects, and the relatively small reduction in handscanning that
790: would be accomplished was determined to be outweighed by the risk of missing
791: an early epoch of a nearby \sn.
792:
793: This new handscanning strategy and the autoscanner enabled a reduction in
794: the number of objects scanned by more than an order of magnitude between
795: 2005 and 2006, with no reduction in the quality or quantity of confirmed
796: \sne. While scanning a single camera column in 2005 typically took $2 -
797: 3$~hours per person for a full night of data, in 2006 a scanner could cover
798: two columns in only $10 - 20$~minutes. The reduction of the 2006
799: handscanning by the autoscanner is summarized in Table~\ref{tbl:scanning}.
800:
801: A comparison of the objects classified by the autoscanner as artifacts to
802: their human classification shows that the autoscanner is extremely efficient
803: at recognizing artifacts, and that our concern about potentially rejecting
804: nearby \sne\ was overly cautious. During the 2006 observing campaign, 3753
805: objects had been classified by the autoscanner as artifacts. Humans
806: classified 2668 of these objects as artifacts and 3710 of them as some type
807: of non-\sn\ background. Of the remaining 43 objects classified by a humans
808: as \sn\ candidates, 41 were background (non-\sn) erroneously classified by
809: the scanner, one was a bright nova outburst, and one was the first epoch of
810: a \sn\ that was later (after the 2nd epoch detection) classified as a \sn.
811: Therefore, in cases where they disagree on classification of artifacts, the
812: autoscanner appears to be more reliable than the human scanners.
813:
814:
815: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
816: \section{Spectroscopic Target Selection and Follow-up Observations}
817: \label{sec:spectro}
818:
819: Spectroscopic follow-up is an essential component of any current supernova
820: survey, for both confirming the type of the \sn\ candidate and measuring the
821: cosmological redshift (preferably from host galaxy emission/absorption
822: lines). For the \sdssii\ \sn\ survey, the amount of scheduled spectroscopic
823: telescope time is larger than the amount of imaging time on the \sdss\ 2.5m
824: telescope by a large factor (see also \citealt{frieman07}). The telescopes
825: used for spectroscopy in 2005 and 2006 included the 9.2m \het, 3.6m \ntt,
826: 3.5m \arc, 8.2m Subaru, 2.4m \mdm\ Hiltner, 4.2m \wht, 4m \kpno\ Mayall, 10m
827: Keck, 2.5m \nnot, and the 11m \salt.
828:
829: On any given night during the fall season, there could be several telescopes
830: that are simultaneously scheduled and observing a set of our \sn\
831: candidates. This requires a significant amount of coordination between the
832: various observers at each of the telescopes to avoid observing the same
833: candidate. A single person (the first author of this paper) was responsible
834: for coordinating all follow-up imaging and spectroscopic observations in
835: 2005 and 2006. Telescopes separated by several time zones are relatively
836: easy to coordinate, but those that have similar longitudes (e.g., \mdm,
837: \arc, \kpno) require real-time communication. In general, the brighter
838: targets are parsed to telescopes with smaller aperture, but the magnitude
839: limits must be adjusted depending on the observing conditions at each site.
840: We have made every effort to avoid taking duplicate spectra, but on occasion
841: the same object was observed nearly simultaneously on two telescopes.
842:
843: A good night of imaging of half of Stripe 82 typically yields $100 - 300$
844: objects that are tagged as {\it new} \sn\ candidates, which are publicly
845: accessible through the
846: web\footnote{http://sdssdp47.fnal.gov/sdsssn/candidates/candTable.php}
847: immediately after they are entered into the database. This number
848: significantly exceeds the number of targets we can observe
849: spectroscopically, and choices must be made. The following subsections
850: describe the further prioritization of \sn\ targets for spectroscopic
851: observations. The algorithm and strategy depends on the amount of resources
852: available, which is something that evolved quite substantially between the
853: 2005 and 2006 search seasons.
854:
855:
856: \subsection{SN Photometric Typing}
857: \label{subsec:snphoto}
858:
859: After each night of imaging on the \sdss\ 2.5m telescope, the \gri\ light
860: curves of all active candidates are compared against a library of light
861: curve templates of different \sn\ types. The purpose of this procedure is
862: twofold -- 1) to quickly identify the best-matching template and provide
863: estimates of the redshift, extinction, the approximate date of maximum
864: light, and current apparent magnitudes, and 2) to compute other quantities
865: that are useful for prioritizing follow-up spectroscopy, such as the amount
866: of host galaxy contamination. The process is essential since the number of
867: active \sn\ candidates (a good fraction of which are not \sne) at any given
868: time exceeds the number that can be observed spectroscopically by a large
869: factor. A reliable system is necessary to make efficient use of the
870: valuable spectroscopic resources. Several techniques and algorithms for
871: \sn\ photometric identification have been introduced previously by
872: \citet{poznanski02, poznanski06}, \citet{johnson06}, \citet{riess04b},
873: \citet{sullivan06}, \citet{kunz07}, and \citet{kuznetsova07}. The method
874: adopted here is most similar to that used by the \snls\ spectroscopic follow
875: up described in \citet{sullivan06}. Below, we describe the details of the
876: algorithm.
877:
878: The measured light curves are compared against a library of light curve
879: templates, which are grouped into three types -- \snia, \snibc, and \snii --
880: and are generated from multi-epoch spectra constructed and compiled by
881: P. Nugent\footnote{http://supernova.lbl.gov/~nugent/nugent\_templates.html}
882: and also from the \suspect\
883: database\footnote{http://bruford.nhn.ou.edu/~suspect/index1.html}.
884: Specifically, for the Type Ia, we use Nugent's Branch-normal, 1991T-like,
885: and 1991bg-like templates. The Branch-normal spectra are used for computing
886: synthetic light curves of \sneia\ with a range of luminosities parameterized
887: by the decline rate. The model is described in Appendix~\ref{app:snia_lc}.
888: The set of templates used for the Type Ib/c are Nugent's normal and
889: hypernova Ib/c spectra, as well as spectra and light curves of \sn 1999ex
890: and \sn 2002ap from the \suspect\ database. Similarly, we use Nugent's
891: II-P, II-L, and IIn spectra, and \suspect 's 1993J (IIb), 1998S (IIn), and
892: \sn 1999em (II-P) to generate a set of Type II light curves.
893:
894: The light curves in the observed \ugriz\ filters are calculated on a grid of
895: four parameters ($z$, $A_V$, $T_{\rm{max}}$, [\dmB, template \sn]), where
896: $z$ is the redshift, $A_V$ is the host galaxy extinction in the $V$ band and
897: assumes $R_V = 3.1$, and $T_{\rm{max}}$ is the time of rest-frame $B$-band
898: maximum light. The last parameter refers to either the decline rate
899: parameter for the Branch-normal Ia models (\dmB), or the particular
900: \sn\ template for the peculiar \sneia\ (1991T-like and 1991bg-like) and the
901: core-collapse models. We do not attempt to fit or correct for the Milky Way
902: extinction. In this procedure, we {\it assume} a cosmology to convert the
903: redshift to a luminosity distance, similar to the method adopted by the
904: \snls\ described in \citet{sullivan06}. The adopted cosmological parameters
905: are $\Omega_m = 0.3$ and $\Omega_\Lambda = 0.7$. For the \snia\ templates,
906: we also assume a fiducial peak $B$-band absolute magnitude of $M_B = -19.0 +
907: 5 \log (H_0/70)$~mag, where $H_0$ is the Hubble constant in units of
908: km/s/Mpc, for a standard \dmB = 1.1 \snia. As shown by \citet{sullivan06},
909: a particular set of assumed cosmological parameters in the computation of
910: the model light curves does not significantly bias the population of targets
911: for spectroscopic observations. At low redshift ($z \la 0.2$), the
912: luminosity distances are not sensitive to our choice of $\Omega_m$ and
913: $\Omega_\Lambda$. Above $z \sim 0.2$, the statistical uncertainties in the
914: fluxes and the combination of varying $z$ and $A_V$ can compensate for
915: differences in luminosity distance that might result from a different set of
916: cosmological parameters. The assumption, however, could systematically bias
917: the estimated photometric redshifts, but that is not a concern for the
918: purposes of target selection.
919:
920: The templates are grouped into three \sn\ types -- Ia, Ibc, and II -- and
921: the fitter records the best-fit parameters and the minimum value of the
922: $\chi^2$ statistic on the four-dimensional parameter grid within each of the
923: three types. In addition to identifying the \sn\ type with the lowest
924: $\chi^2$ value, which we refer to as ``type-best'', we examine the relative
925: values of the $\chi^2$ and determine whether the \sn\ candidate should be
926: considered as ``typed'' according to one or both of the following two
927: criteria. If we denote the value of the $\chi^2$ of the best-matching type
928: by $\chi^2_{\rm{min}}$, the next best type as $\chi^2_1$, and the worst one
929: as $\chi^2_2$ (i.e., $\chi^2_{\rm{min}} < \chi^2_1 < \chi^2_2$), the ``A''
930: criterion is satisfied if $\chi^2_{\rm{min}} < \chi^2_1 -
931: \chi^2_{\rm{min}}$. If ``type-best'' is a Ia {\it and} satisfies the above
932: criterion, the candidate is said to have a ``type-A of Ia''. The ``B''
933: criterion is satisfied if $\chi^2_{\rm{min}} < N (\chi^2_{\rm{min}} +
934: \chi^2_1 + \chi^2_2)/3$ with $N = 0.5$. Similarly, if the best-fit type is
935: a \snia\ and satisfies the above $\chi^2$ criterion, the candidate is said
936: to have a ``type-B of Ia''. The value of 0.5 adopted for $N$ works well for
937: \sn\ candidates with low \signoi, and was empirically determined from a
938: sample of spectroscopically confirmed \sne\ from our 2004 engineering run
939: \citep{sako04}. Also computed are the estimated current $g$ and $r$
940: magnitudes from the model light curves. We also search for the nearest
941: galaxy within $10\arcsec$ from the \sn\ position in the \sdss\ galaxy
942: catalog and refit and retype the light curves using the best estimate of its
943: redshift as a prior. We adopt galaxy photometric redshifts from
944: \citet{oyaizu07} and spectroscopic redshifts from the \sdss\ {\small DR}5
945: \citep{dr5}.
946:
947: We note that the absolute $\chi^2$ values for the model fits do not appear
948: to be very meaningful. The models have not been calibrated against real
949: data and there are no errors associated with the light curves (see, e.g.,
950: Appendix~\ref{app:snia_lc}). The current implementation also does not
951: attempt to reject outlier points due to poor zeropointing and imperfect
952: image registration, which are common features of the search photometry. The
953: best-fit $\chi^2$ value for the \snia\ model of a true \snia\ may be large
954: compared to the number of degrees of freedom, but the confidence can be high
955: if that value is well below the values of the other \sn\ types. The {\it
956: relative} values of the $\chi^2$ are, therefore, important and useful
957: discriminators. In Figure~\ref{fig:sn13135_chisq}, we show the values of
958: $\chi_{\rm{min}}^2$, $\chi^2_1 < \chi^2_2$, and $0.5~(\chi^2_{\rm{min}} +
959: \chi^2_1 + \chi^2_2)/3$ as functions of the number of epochs for \sn 2006fz,
960: a Type Ia at z=0.105, with a flat galaxy photometric redshift prior. For
961: this candidate, the model with the minimum $\chi^2$ corresponds to the
962: \snia\ model, and both the ``A'' and ``B'' criteria are satisfied at all
963: epochs. Also shown in Figure~\ref{fig:sn13135_lc} are the light curve fits
964: to \sn 2006fz using the first 2, 4, 6, and 8 epochs of search photometry.
965:
966: \begin{figure}[!tb] %%%%% sample light curve fit results (SN13135)
967: \begin{center}
968: \includegraphics[angle=270, width=.7\textwidth]{f5.eps}
969: \end{center}
970: \caption{Fit results for \sn2006fz (\snia\ at z=0.105; internal candidate
971: \id\ 13135) as functions of the number of epochs in the light curve. The
972: bottom curve (labeled with filled circles) shows the minimum $\chi^2$
973: values, which at every epoch correspond to the Ia model. The top two
974: curves labeled with filled stars and triangles show values relevant for
975: the ``A'' and ``B'' typing criteria, respectively. For this particular
976: \sn, $\chi^2_{\rm{min}}$ is always below these two curves, which implies
977: that this \sn\ is a Type Ia at high-confidence.}
978: \label{fig:sn13135_chisq}
979: \end{figure}
980:
981: \begin{figure}[!tb] %%%%% sample light curves (SN13135)
982: \begin{center}
983: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=1\textwidth]{f6.eps}
984: \end{center}
985: \caption{Light curves of \sn2006fz (same \sn\ as shown in
986: Figure~\ref{fig:sn13135_chisq}) and fits to the best-fit \snia\ models
987: after 2, 4, 6, and 8 epochs of detections without a galaxy photometric
988: redshift prior. Search photometry from \gri\ are shown. Model light
989: curves in $u$ and $z$ are shown as well.}
990: \label{fig:sn13135_lc}
991: \end{figure}
992:
993: The overall performance of the photometric typing software is demonstrated
994: in Figure~\ref{fig:type_snia}, where we plot the fraction of the
995: spectroscopically confirmed \sneia, whose best-fit model is that of a \snia\
996: as a function of the number of the light curve epochs. The figure also
997: shows the fraction of \snia\ that satisfy one of the ``A'' or ``B'' criteria
998: with or without a nearest-neighbor host galaxy redshift prior. Note that
999: the fractions increase between 2 to $\sim 4$~epochs, but the improvement
1000: beyond $\sim 5$~epochs is marginal. The fraction with the best type equal
1001: to a Ia does not reach unity because the spectroscopic sample includes 1)
1002: peculiar \sneia, 2) candidates with poorly subtracted images and photometry
1003: epochs, 3) \sneia\ discovered well after maximum light, and 4) \sne\ with
1004: low-\signoi\ light curves whose best-fit type drifts with the number of
1005: epochs. Candidates that fall into the first three categories were targeted
1006: for spectroscopy because they were nearby and bright enough to be observed
1007: on 3-m class telescopes, and those candidates were observed even if their
1008: best-fit photometric type was not a \snia\ (see
1009: \S~\ref{subsec:spectro-strategy}). The candidates in the fourth category
1010: were observed because they were at one time typed as a \snia. We also show
1011: in Figure~\ref{fig:peakmjd} the time of $B$-band maximum light estimated
1012: from 2 -- 4 light curve epochs in comparison with the ``final'' estimate of
1013: the peak using the full light curves. Again, the reliability improves
1014: substantially between 2 and $\sim 4$~epochs.
1015:
1016: \begin{figure}[tb] %%%%% typing of SN Ia
1017: \begin{center}
1018: \includegraphics[angle=270, width=0.7\textwidth]{f7.eps}
1019: \end{center}
1020: \caption{The fraction of spectroscopically confirmed \sneia\ whose best-fit
1021: model is that of a \snia\ as a function of the number epochs (top curve
1022: with stars). Also shown is the fraction of \sneia, which satisfy one of
1023: the ``A'' or ``B'' criteria with or without a galaxy redshift prior
1024: (bottom curve with triangles). A large fraction of the sources ($>
1025: 80$\%) are typed as \snia\ after only 2 epoch of imaging.}
1026: \label{fig:type_snia}
1027: \end{figure}
1028:
1029: \begin{figure}[tb] %%%%% distribution of peakmjd
1030: \begin{center}
1031: \includegraphics[angle=270, width=0.55\textwidth]{f8.eps}
1032: \end{center}
1033: \caption{Distribution of the difference between the time of $B$-band
1034: maximum estimated using the full light curves and that using the first 2
1035: (top), 3 (middle), and 4 (bottom) epochs of the spectroscopically
1036: confirmed \sneia. Values are taken from fits with a flat redshift prior.
1037: The distributions are fit with a single gaussian, and the $\sigma$ values
1038: are listed in each panel. The width of the distribution stays
1039: approximately constant above 4 epochs. The vertical dashed lines
1040: represent the x-axis origin; not the centroid of the distributions.}
1041: \label{fig:peakmjd}
1042: \end{figure}
1043:
1044: Studies of the software and handscanning efficiencies as functions of the
1045: object brightness with the fakes (see Section~\ref{sec:fakes}) show that the
1046: \sn\ candidate identification and spectroscopic follow-up observations are
1047: essentially complete out to $z \sim 0.12$ \citep{dilday07}. The one
1048: exception to this is our bias against highly-extincted \sne, since the grid
1049: of light curve models did not extend beyond $A_V = 1.0$ in 2005 and $A_V =
1050: 3.0$ in 2006. A post-season analysis of the 2005 candidates with an
1051: extended $A_V$ range recovered two additional photometric \snia\ candidates
1052: with large extinction in this redshift range. There is no evidence for an
1053: additional population of low-$z$ \sneia\ that were missed due to the models
1054: adopted.
1055:
1056: The light curve fits generally run on the \gri\ search photometry, which is
1057: usually accurate to within $\sim 0.1$~mag. Whenever the computer cluster at
1058: \apo\ is idle, we run the pipeline in {\tt sdssforce} mode (see,
1059: \S\ref{subsub:framesub}) to produce $u$ and $z$-band differenced images from
1060: all runs available on the mountain for each of the \sn\ candidates. This
1061: typically includes frames from several pre-discovery epochs. The $u$-band
1062: photometry is sometimes useful for distinguishing \sneia\ from core-collapse
1063: \sne\ that are generally bluer ($u - g \la 0.5$) during the early phases
1064: after explosion.
1065:
1066:
1067: \subsection{Observability Index}
1068: \label{subsec:observability}
1069:
1070: After the \sn\ photometric typing process, the software computes three
1071: quantities that help prioritize the target list for spectroscopic
1072: observations. These quantities are referred to as ``weights'' and they are
1073: constructed specifically to identify candidates that are 1) near or before
1074: peak brightness, 2) less contaminated by galaxy light, and 3) not heavily
1075: extincted by intervening dust. The product of the three weights defines the
1076: ``observability index''; candidates with higher observability index are
1077: generally assigned higher priority.
1078:
1079: For 1), we define the ``time weight'' as,
1080: \begin{equation}
1081: \label{equ:W_T}
1082: W_T = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll}
1083: e^{|t|\{\Delta m_{15}(B)/[10(1+z)]\}} & {\rm{if}}~t < 0~\rm{days}; \\
1084: e^{-t\{\Delta m_{15}(B)/[20(1+z)]\}} & {\rm{if}}~t \geq 0~\rm{days},
1085: \end{array} \right .
1086: \end{equation}
1087: where $t$ is the current estimate of the \sn\ epoch in days relative to
1088: $B$-band maximum brightness. Note that $W_T$ is large when the \sn\ is
1089: young, as \sn\ are most easily classified near maximum light
1090: \citep{filippenko97}, and decays exponentially with a characteristic time
1091: scale of 20 days. The decline-rate parameter \dmB\ and redshift $z$ are
1092: also adopted from the best-fit values obtained from the light curve fits.
1093: If the best-fit type is a core-collapse \sn, \dmB\ is set to unity.
1094:
1095: The second weight computed by the software is the ``contamination weight''
1096: defined as,
1097: \begin{equation}
1098: \label{equ:W_C}
1099: W_C = e^{-2/\theta} \times
1100: \left(\frac{F_{{\rm{SN}},r}}{F_{{\rm{Gal}},r}}\right)^{1/2},
1101: \end{equation}
1102: where $\theta$ is the distance in arcseconds between the \sn\ and the
1103: centroid of the nearest-neighbor host galaxy. The quantity
1104: $F_{{\rm{SN}},r}$ is proportional to the {\it current} $r$-band flux of the
1105: \sn, again, as estimated from the best-fit light curve model,
1106: \begin{equation}
1107: \label{equ:F_SN}
1108: F_{{\rm{SN}},r} = 10^{-0.4~r_{\rm{SN}}}
1109: \end{equation}
1110: and $F_{{\rm{Gal}},r}$ is the estimated local galaxy $r$-band flux at the
1111: position of the \sn\ defined to be,
1112: \begin{equation}
1113: \label{equ:F_gal}
1114: F_{{\rm{Gal}},r} = 10^{-0.4(r_{\rm{Gal}} + d/d_{{\rm{eff}}})},
1115: \end{equation}
1116: where $d$ is the angular separation between the \sn\ and the centroid of the
1117: nearest-neighbor source and $d_{\rm{eff}}$ is the effective radius of that
1118: source along position angle of the \sn. This quantity is computed according
1119: to,
1120: \begin{equation}
1121: \label{equ:d_eff}
1122: d_{\rm{eff}} = \frac{{\tt isoA}^2 (1-e^2)}{1-e^2\cos^2\phi}.
1123: \end{equation}
1124: Here, $\phi$ is the position angle of the \sn\ measured from the position
1125: angle of host galaxy's semimajor axis ({\tt isoPhi}) with ellipticity given
1126: by,
1127: \begin{equation}
1128: \label{equ:ellip}
1129: e^2 = 1 - \left(\frac{{\tt isoB}}{{\tt isoA}}\right)^2.
1130: \end{equation}
1131: The isophotal galaxy parameters ({\tt isoA}, {\tt isoB}, and {\tt isoPhi}),
1132: which are used to measure the galaxy's ellipticity of the 25 magnitudes per
1133: arcsecond isophote, are adopted from the \sdss\ {\small DR}4
1134: catalog\footnote{http://www.sdss.org/dr4/algorithms/classify.html}.
1135: Clearly, candidates with larger values of $W_C$ suffer less contamination
1136: from the host galaxy light.
1137:
1138: The third and final weight is the ``dust weight'', which estimates the
1139: amount of dust extinction from both host galaxy morphology and color, and is
1140: defined to be,
1141: \begin{equation}
1142: \label{equ:W_D}
1143: W_D = e^{-d_{\rm{eff}}/d} \times (1 + 3~f_{\rm{deV}} + 5~c_{\rm{ellip}}),
1144: \end{equation}
1145: The quantity $f_{\rm{deV}}$ is the fractional probability of the source
1146: being well represented by a de Vaucouleurs profile and is again computed
1147: from values in the \sdss\ catalog, i.e.,
1148: \begin{equation}
1149: \label{equ:f_deV}
1150: f_{\rm{deV}} = \frac{{\tt deV\_L}}{{\tt deV\_L} + {\tt exp\_L} + {\tt
1151: star\_L}},
1152: \end{equation}
1153: where {\tt deV\_L}, {\tt exp\_L}, {\tt star\_L} are the null hypothesis
1154: probabilities of the object being well-represented by a de Vaucouleurs
1155: profile, an exponential function, and a stellar profile (\psf),
1156: respectively. The last quantity in parentheses of Equation~\ref{equ:W_D}
1157: characterizes the color of the galaxy, and is defined to be,
1158: \begin{equation}
1159: c_{\rm{ellip}} = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll}
1160: (r_{\rm{Gal}} - i_{\rm{Gal}} - 0.4)/0.2 & {\rm{if}}~(r_{\rm{Gal}} -
1161: i_{\rm{Gal}}) > 0.4~{\rm{and}}~(g_{\rm{Gal}} - r_{\rm{Gal}}) > 0.9; \\
1162: 0 & {\rm{otherwise}},
1163: \end{array} \right .
1164: \end{equation}
1165: where $g_{\rm{Gal}},r_{\rm{Gal}},i_{\rm{Gal}}$ are the host galaxy $g$, $r$,
1166: and $i$-band model magnitudes. This quantity is non-zero only for red
1167: elliptical galaxy candidates, which typically populate the color-color space
1168: bounded by $(r - i) > 0.4$ and $(g - r) > 0.9$. Note that the light curves
1169: also provide an independent (and usually more reliable) estimate of the
1170: amount of dust extinction.
1171:
1172: The final observability index is defined as the product of the three weights,
1173: \begin{equation}
1174: {\rm{observability~index}} = W_T \times W_C \times W_D.
1175: \end{equation}
1176: In practice, the observability index is rarely used for the bright ($r \la
1177: 20.5$~mag) low-$z$ \sn\ candidates, since there are enough spectroscopic
1178: resources to observe nearly all of those targets. At high $z$, however, the
1179: number of \snia\ candidates exceeds the number we can observe given our
1180: limited resources on large-aperture telescopes. In order to select the best
1181: targets from a large number of candidates that satisfy the light curve
1182: selection criteria, the sources are ranked based on the value of the
1183: observability index. Manual screening and selection of the sources by the
1184: spectroscopic coordinator is still required. We describe our strategy in
1185: detail below.
1186:
1187:
1188: \subsection{Spectroscopic Follow-up Strategy}
1189: \label{subsec:spectro-strategy}
1190:
1191: Spectra are obtained by the various spectroscopic teams, who independently
1192: apply for observing time during each of the search seasons. The teams
1193: agreed to confirm types and obtain redshifts of \snia\ candidates at the
1194: highest priority, but each team generally has one or more of their own
1195: \sn\ projects that they pursue in parallel. Some of these include 1)
1196: multi-epoch spectroscopy of peculiar \sne, 2) \sne\ in underluminous host
1197: galaxies, 3) \snibc\ and hypernova candidates, 4) detailed spectroscopic
1198: properties of \snia\ hosts, and 5) multi-epoch studies of line features and
1199: their diversity in \sneia. Whenever possible, we also try to obtain spectra
1200: of other variable objects if a scanner has classified them as
1201: ``interesting''. An example of this is a dwarf nova discovered in Aquarius
1202: \citep{prieto06}.
1203:
1204: In 2005, the primary telescopes used for observing the low-redshift
1205: candidates were the \arc\ 3.5m, \wht\ 4.2m and the \mdm\ 2.4m telescopes.
1206: The high-z candidates were observed with either the \het\ or Subaru. The
1207: resources were sufficient to obtain spectra of most $z \la 0.15$ \snia\
1208: candidates as well as core-collapse \sne\ at $z \la 0.06$, but only a
1209: fraction of the $z \ga 0.15$ candidates were observed.
1210:
1211: During the Fall 2006 campaign, the various spectroscopic teams were awarded
1212: sufficient 3m-class telescope time to obtain a spectrum of essentially {\it
1213: all} \sn\ candidates with $r \la 20.5$~mag (an average \snia\ at $z \la
1214: 0.15$ and core-collapse \sn\ at $z \la 0.06$ near maximum light) {\it and}
1215: obtain multi-epoch spectra of a large sample of nearby ($z \la 0.1$) \sneia.
1216:
1217: We generally require at least two epochs of detection before we target the
1218: candidate for spectroscopic observation, to guarantee that the source is not
1219: an asteroid. This also enables a better estimate of the epoch of peak
1220: brightness of the \sn. Since the primary goal of our survey is to obtain
1221: well-sampled light curves of Type Ia \sne, \sn\ Ia candidates that are
1222: discovered early are generally given higher priority for spectroscopy. This
1223: is especially true for the very low-$z$ candidates ($z \la 0.1$) to enable
1224: rapid confirmation and dissemination to the public.
1225:
1226: In practice, we initially select \snia\ candidates that satisfy at least one
1227: of the ``A'' or ``B'' criteria either with or without a galaxy photometric
1228: redshift prior. There are times, however, during stretches of poor weather
1229: at \apo\ and/or when several 3m-class spectroscopic telescopes are online,
1230: when there are not enough new and bright \snia\ candidates to observe. This
1231: was not an issue during most of the 2005 season, but it occurred frequently
1232: in 2006. In such cases, we loosen the selection criteria and inspect all
1233: currently-bright sources irrespective of their best-fit \sn\ type; there is
1234: only small number ($\sim 30 - 50$) of sources with $r \la 20.5$~mag at any
1235: given time. When necessary, we also target candidates that have only a
1236: single epoch of detection. Extremely red single-epoch targets that are not
1237: associated with a host galaxy are generally avoided (to minimize the chance
1238: of observing an asteroid).
1239:
1240: On the other hand, there is never a shortage of higher-$z$ \snia\ targets at
1241: $z \ga 0.2$, so the ``A'' or ``B'' criterion with or without a galaxy
1242: photometric redshift prior is always used in the pre-selection process. At
1243: these redshifts, we generally avoid candidates that are located within $\sim
1244: 0.5$\arcsec\ of the centroid of a host galaxy, since they have a relatively
1245: higher chance of being an active galactic nucleus. Candidates at $z \sim
1246: 0.3$ that are well-separated from the host and suffer a relatively low level
1247: of extinction (as estimated from the multi-band light curve fits) are
1248: high-priority (priority 0 and 1) targets for \het, which is a
1249: queue-scheduled telescope \citep{shetrone07}. Lower-$z$ candidates ($z \sim
1250: 0.2$) are assigned lower \het\ priority (mostly priority 2, but some at
1251: priority 3). Targets are generally kept active in the \het\ queue until
1252: they are $\sim 20$ days past maximum light as estimated from the light curve
1253: fits. The Subaru telescope has focused on \snia\ candidates in a similar
1254: redshift range, but, to take advantage of its superb image quality, the
1255: Subaru telescope has generally been assigned targets that suffer a
1256: relatively large amount of host contamination (i.e., a low value of $W_C$;
1257: see Section~\ref{subsec:observability}).
1258:
1259: The spectra are often analyzed in real time by the observers on site, and
1260: feedback is given to the spectroscopic coordinator. Depending on the
1261: observing conditions, the target list is adjusted in real time. At the end
1262: of the night, the observers provide a preliminary spectroscopic type of each
1263: of the candidates observed. The type and the preliminary redshift is
1264: entered immediately into the database, and the results are disseminated to
1265: the community through the Central Bureau Electronic Telegrams. All nearby
1266: \sne\ ($z \la 0.08$), however, are also announced to a list of subscribers
1267: via email usually within hours from confirmation, allowing rapid
1268: complementary follow up on other telescopes. Information on all
1269: spectroscopically confirmed \sne\ is placed on a public web
1270: page\footnote{http://sdssdp47.fnal.gov/sdsssn/snlist\_confirmed.php} as soon
1271: as the \sn\ type has been entered into the database. A list of all
1272: spectroscopically confirmed \sne\ from 2005 and 2006 is presented in
1273: Tables~\ref{tbl:sn2005} and \ref{tbl:sn2006}, respectively.
1274:
1275:
1276: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1277: \section{Imaging Follow-up}
1278: \label{sec:imaging}
1279:
1280: Throughout the 2005 search, we used some of our \arc\ 3.5m and \mdm\ 2.4m
1281: time, as well as the imager on the {\small NMSU} 1m telescope, University of
1282: Hawaii 88-inch telescope, the 1.8m Vatican Advanced Technology Telescope
1283: (\vatt), and the 3.5m \wiyn\ telescope to (1) augment the light curve points
1284: of spectroscopically confirmed \sneia\ during periods of poor weather
1285: conditions at \apo\ and (2) obtain late-time photometry of \sne\ that had
1286: faded below the \sdss\ detection limit. Some imaging observations were
1287: performed by the \vatt, the \wiyn, and the 1.5m telescope at Maidanak
1288: Observatory during the 2006 season. Additional imaging data were obtained
1289: on the \arc\ 3.5m during November of 2006 when the Dual Imaging Spectrograph
1290: was not functional. This effort of follow-up imaging was not carried over
1291: for the \mdm\ and for \arc\ during September and October, since we concluded
1292: that spectroscopy is the more valuable use of our resources. In December of
1293: both 2005 and 2006, however, imaging observations were performed to get
1294: light curves of \sne\ discovered in November past maximum light. Deep
1295: multi-band imaging of several host galaxies of \sneia\ were also obtained by
1296: the 2.5m Isaac Newton Telescope.
1297:
1298: A few high-profile \sdssii\ \sn\ targets were also observed extensively by
1299: several follow-up programs -- optical imaging and spectroscopy by the CfA
1300: \sn\ Group, optical and infrared imaging and optical spectroscopy by the
1301: \csp, and optical spectroscopy by the \snf.
1302:
1303:
1304: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1305: \section{Results from Fall 2005 and 2006}
1306: \label{sec:results}
1307:
1308: The 2005 season resulted in 73 unique \sdss\ imaging runs acquired on 59
1309: different nights. Approximately half of the frames were taken under
1310: non-photometric conditions, bright moon, and/or poor seeing. A total of
1311: 155,616 objects were visually inspected during this season, of which 24,402
1312: were tagged as potential \sne, resulting in 11,385 unique \sn\ candidates
1313: (see Table~\ref{tbl:summary}). Interestingly, 6,618 of those candidates
1314: were detected in only a single epoch, and are mostly likely moving solar
1315: system objects that were not filtered properly. A few of these single-epoch
1316: candidates may be fast transients that rise and fade on timescales shorter
1317: than $\sim 1$~day \citep{becker04}. Most of the remaining 4767 candidates
1318: are true variables or transient sources\footnote{A very small fraction of
1319: the 4767 multi-epoch candidates are artefacts of image subtraction -- e.g.,
1320: faint dipoles that appear in the same place at two or more different
1321: epochs.}. A short summary of the 2005 and 2006 seasons is shown in
1322: Table~\ref{tbl:summary}.
1323:
1324: For the 2005 search season, we acquired 248 spectra from 187 distinct \sn\
1325: candidates under various observing conditions. A total of 130 unique
1326: candidates were spectroscopically confirmed to be of Type Ia. One of these
1327: \sneia\ (\sn 2005hj) was co-discovered and spectroscopically observed by the
1328: Texas Supernova Search \citep{quimby07}. The number of confirmed
1329: core-collapse \sne\ were 7 and 13 for Type Ib/c and II, respectively. One
1330: of these Type II \sne\ (\sn 2005mj) was spectroscopically confirmed by the
1331: \essence\ Group. An additional 40 candidates were observed in the
1332: post-season during December 2005 -- January 2006. A sample of 41 \sn\
1333: targets including \sn 2005hk \citep{phillips07} and \sn 2005gj
1334: \citep{prieto07} for which we acquired 16 and 9 spectra, respectively, were
1335: observed spectroscopically more than once. The host galaxy of one 2005
1336: candidate (\sn 7017) was observed during the 2006 search season.
1337: Interestingly, that supernova was still active and visible a year after
1338: discovery; the spectrum was identified as a peculiar \sn\ similar to
1339: \sn2002ic and \sn2005gj.
1340:
1341: In 2006, 90 \sdss\ imaging runs were taken on 60 nights. The number of
1342: visually-inspected objects was reduced by more than an order of magnitude to
1343: 14,430. This improvement is due to the modified moving object finder and
1344: the choice of scanning only second-epoch and bright first-epoch objects. We
1345: identified a total of 3694 unique \sn\ candidates. Surprisingly, there is
1346: still a somewhat large sample (599 out of 3694) of slow-moving single-epoch
1347: objects that were tagged by a scanner as a possible \sn\ and made the
1348: candidates list.
1349:
1350: During the second search season, a total of 449 spectra were acquired, $\sim
1351: 80$\% more than the 2005 season, from 285 unique candidates. Though the
1352: majority of these were observations of new 2006 candidates, a handful of
1353: host galaxies of the 2005 candidates were observed as well. A sample of 197
1354: candidates, including five candidates that were observed by the CfA \sn\
1355: Group and the \essence\ Survey, were spectroscopically confirmed to be
1356: \sneia\ and 14 candidates were identified as spectroscopically probable
1357: \sneia. The number of confirmed core-collapse \sne\ were 7 and 19 for Type
1358: Ib/c and II, respectively.
1359:
1360: Table~\ref{tbl:spectro} summarizes the spectroscopic observations grouped
1361: into candidates discovered in 2005 and 2006. We performed 172 (241)
1362: observations of new \snia\ candidates discovered in 2005 (2006), of which
1363: 130 (197) were spectroscopically confirmed to be \sneia, and 16 (14)
1364: candidates were identified as spectroscopically probable \sneia; the latter
1365: are denoted \sn\ Ia? in Tables~\ref{tbl:sn2005} and \ref{tbl:sn2006}. In
1366: addition, observations of 7 (7) additional candidates in 2005 (2006)
1367: resulted in galaxy spectra (either the \sn\ had faded or the galaxy was too
1368: bright relative to the \sn) with spectroscopic redshifts consistent with
1369: photometric redshifts estimated from the multi-band light curves of the
1370: \sne. Therefore, in the first two years, 90\% of \snia\ targets resulted in
1371: spectra of \sneia, probable \sneia, or host galaxies of photometric \snia\
1372: candidates. A total of 12 \snia\ targets (3\%) were classified instead as
1373: core-collapse \sne, 4 targets (1\%) were classified as either an \agn\ or a
1374: flaring M-dwarf, and 9 targets (2\%) resulted in galaxy spectra with
1375: spectroscopic redshifts inconsistent with photometric redshifts estimated
1376: from the \snia\ model fits. Finally, there is a sample of 18 spectra (4\%),
1377: most of which were taken under poor weather conditions, that are
1378: unidentified.
1379:
1380: Evaluation of the full light curves after the end of each search season
1381: enables identification of additional photometric \snia\ candidates that, for
1382: various reasons, were not spectroscopically observed during the search. We
1383: have identified at least $\sim 200$ high-quality \snia\ candidates from the
1384: 2005 candidates list, and have already acquired host galaxy spectra for a
1385: significantly-sized subsample. These targets are also good fillers during
1386: periods of poor observing conditions at \apo\ that result in a lack of good
1387: new \sn\ candidates. As of the writing of this paper, we have measured
1388: redshifts for 81 host galaxies of candidates with Ia-like light curves. An
1389: additional 13 candidates were identified to be good Ia candidates with host
1390: galaxy redshifts from the \sdss\ redshift survey.
1391:
1392:
1393: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1394: \section{Summary}
1395: \label{sec:summary}
1396:
1397: The search pipeline of the \sdssii\ \sn\ Survey has enabled efficient
1398: discoveries of variable and transient astronomical sources, filtering over
1399: 375,000 objects detected each season into several thousands of \sn\
1400: candidates. A reliable photometric \sn\ typing system and spectroscopic
1401: follow-up algorithm have allowed spectroscopic observations of $\sim 150$
1402: \sneia\ per season with 90\% targeting efficiency. After two seasons, the
1403: search and spectroscopic follow-up algorithms have reached a relatively
1404: mature stage, and it is unlikely that major changes will be made for the
1405: third and final season of 2007. If the observing conditions resemble those
1406: of the previous two years, we expect to increase our sample of
1407: spectroscopically confirmed \snia\ by an additional $\sim 150 - 200$ events,
1408: reaching a sample of $\sim 500$ confirmed \sneia\ for the completed survey.
1409: A majority of the low-redshift sources will have well-sampled multi-band
1410: light curves that can serve as templates for future studies.
1411:
1412: Spectroscopic target selection by a human is appropriate (and preferred) for
1413: a relatively small survey like the \sdssii\ \sn\ survey, but this is
1414: unlikely to be feasible for future large-scale surveys that will discover
1415: thousands or tens of thousands of \sne\ over the period of a few years.
1416: Based on our experience, however, we believe that much of the candidate
1417: identification process can be automated, and with just 2 -- 4 epochs of
1418: multi-band imaging, \sn\ candidates can be assigned probabilities that are
1419: reliable enough for performing follow-up spectroscopy. More quantitative
1420: studies of \sn\ identification using photometric data alone will be
1421: presented in a future article.
1422:
1423:
1424: \clearpage
1425:
1426: \acknowledgements Funding for the \sdss\ and \sdssii\ has been provided by
1427: the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions, the National
1428: Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Aeronautics
1429: and Space Administration, the Japanese Monbukagakusho, the Max Planck
1430: Society, and the Higher Education Funding Council for England. The
1431: \sdss\ Web Site is \verb9http://www.sdss.org/9.
1432:
1433: The \sdss\ is managed by the Astrophysical Research Consortium for the
1434: Participating Institutions. The Participating Institutions are the American
1435: Museum of Natural History, Astrophysical Institute Potsdam, University of
1436: Basel, Cambridge University, Case Western Reserve University, University of
1437: Chicago, Drexel University, Fermilab, the Institute for Advanced Study, the
1438: Japan Participation Group, Johns Hopkins University, the Joint Institute for
1439: Nuclear Astrophysics, the Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and
1440: Cosmology, the Korean Scientist Group, the Chinese Academy of Sciences
1441: ({\small LAMOST}), Los Alamos National Laboratory, the Max-Planck-Institute
1442: for Astronomy ({\small MPIA}), the Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics
1443: ({\small MPA}), New Mexico State University, Ohio State University,
1444: University of Pittsburgh, University of Portsmouth, Princeton University,
1445: the United States Naval Observatory, and the University of Washington.
1446:
1447: The Hobby-Eberly Telescope (\het) is a joint project of the University of
1448: Texas at Austin, the Pennsylvania State University, Stanford University,
1449: Ludwig-Maximillians-Universit\"at M\"unchen, and Georg-August-Universit\"at
1450: G\"ottingen. The \het\ is named in honor of its principal benefactors,
1451: William P. Hobby and Robert E. Eberly. The Marcario Low-Resolution
1452: Spectrograph is named for Mike Marcario of High Lonesome Optics, who
1453: fabricated several optics for the instrument but died before its completion;
1454: it is a joint project of the Hobby-Eberly Telescope partnership and the
1455: Instituto de Astronom\'{\i}a de la Universidad Nacional Aut\'onoma de
1456: M\'exico. The Apache Point Observatory 3.5-meter telescope is owned and
1457: operated by the Astrophysical Research Consortium. We thank the observatory
1458: director, Suzanne Hawley, and site manager, Bruce Gillespie, for their
1459: support of this project. The Subaru Telescope is operated by the National
1460: Astronomical Observatory of Japan. The William Herschel Telescope is
1461: operated by the Isaac Newton Group, and the Nordic Optical Telescope is
1462: operated jointly by Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden, both on
1463: the island of La Palma in the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los
1464: Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias. Observations at the
1465: {\small ESO} New Technology Telescope at La Silla Observatory were made
1466: under programme {\small ID}s 77.A-0437, 78.A-0325, and 79.A-0715. Kitt Peak
1467: National Observatory, National Optical Astronomy Observatory, is operated by
1468: the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc. ({\small
1469: AURA}) under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.
1470: The {\small WIYN} Observatory is a joint facility of the University of
1471: Wisconsin-Madison, Indiana University, Yale University, and the National
1472: Optical Astronomy Observatories. The W.M.\ Keck Observatory is operated as
1473: a scientific partnership among the California Institute of Technology, the
1474: University of California, and the National Aeronautics and Space
1475: Administration. The Observatory was made possible by the generous financial
1476: support of the W.M.\ Keck Foundation. The South African Large Telescope of
1477: the South African Astronomical Observatory is operated by a partnership
1478: between the National Research Foundation of South Africa, Nicolaus
1479: Copernicus Astronomical Center of the Polish Academy of Sciences, the
1480: Hobby-Eberly Telescope Board, Rutgers University, Georg-August-Universit\"at
1481: G\"ottingen, University of Wisconsin-Madison, University of Canterbury,
1482: University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Dartmough College, Carnegie Mellon
1483: University, and the United Kingdom \salt\ consortium.
1484:
1485:
1486: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1487: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1488: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1489: % APPENDIX %
1490: \clearpage
1491:
1492: \appendix
1493: \section{Supernova Software}
1494: \label{app:software}
1495:
1496: This appendix describes the details of the supernova software that runs on
1497: the computer cluster at \apo.
1498:
1499: The majority of {\tt Framesub} is written in the {\tt Perl} language. This
1500: provides the internal glue that strings together the various processing
1501: steps. In general, the image-level computations are written in the {\tt C}
1502: language. These applications are called by the {\tt Perl} scripts. The
1503: implementation of {\tt Framesub} on the computing cluster is controlled by
1504: shell scripts.
1505:
1506: As a programmatic summary, the {\tt Framesub} pipeline consists of a series
1507: of {\it stages}, each of which has {\it actions} which it undertakes, as
1508: well as {\it dependencies} on the successful completion of previous stages.
1509: By default, an ensemble of images is passed from stage to stage using input
1510: and output lists. If an image fails the assigned actions in a particular
1511: stage, the frame is {\it not} passed into the input list for the subsequent
1512: stages of processing. A record is kept of the fact that it failed, and all
1513: such failures must be addressed individually. Below we describe the three
1514: modes in which the pipeline is run.
1515:
1516:
1517: \subsection{{\tt sdssred}}
1518: \label{sec:apsdssred}
1519:
1520: This mode performs the basic reduction and preparation of the data for
1521: image subtraction.
1522:
1523: \begin{itemize}
1524:
1525: \item{{\tt FINDNEWIM}:} After processing by \photo, {\tt Framesub} must
1526: initialize its input list of images. This stage searches for the correct
1527: data products\footnote{http://www.sdss.org/dr6/dm/flatFiles/FILES.html} for
1528: the camera column--filter combination assigned to it. This includes the
1529: {\tt fpC} science image, a {\tt fpM} mask image, an {\tt asTrans} file
1530: providing the astrometry, and a {\tt psField} file that contains \photo 's
1531: model of the \psf\ \citep{stoughton02}.
1532:
1533: \item{{\tt MKSATMASK}:} The {\tt fpM} file contains a pixel--by--pixel mask
1534: corresponding to any operations that have happened on the science image.
1535: This includes interpolation over \ccd\ defects and cosmic rays, the masking
1536: of saturated pixels, and interpolation over bleed trails from the saturated
1537: stars. This stage translates the \sdss --format mask file into a mask image
1538: understood by {\tt Framesub}. In practice, this is merely a reassignment to
1539: the numerical values of the mask bits.
1540:
1541: We provide an additional level of editing in these images by masking halos
1542: around clusters of saturated pixels, as well as extending diffraction spike
1543: masks at the orientation correct for the camera rotation. These additional
1544: masks are only added for clusters of more than 20 saturated pixels. An
1545: operational scale length $r$ for the halo and diffraction masking is
1546: determined by using the number of saturated pixels $N_{\rm sat}$ and solving
1547: for $r$ through $N_{\rm sat} = \pi r^2$.
1548:
1549: \item{{\tt SDSSPSF}:} This stage converts the solution for the \psf~obtained
1550: by \photo\, contained in the {\tt psField} files, into a format readable by
1551: {\tt Dophot} \citep{schechter93}. The \photo\ \psf~solution is later used
1552: to make an aperture correction to the difference image photometric
1553: measurements (see section \ref{sec:apdiffim}).
1554:
1555: \item{{\tt SDSSSTARS}:} This stage obtains a list of the positions,
1556: magnitudes, and magnitude errors for the calibration stars contained within
1557: the frame and stores them in a text file suitable as input to {\tt
1558: SDSSZERO}, which computes the zeropoints of each of the frames (see
1559: below). The list of calibration stars is also an optional input to {\tt
1560: DIFFIM}, providing a list of preferred sources to be used in deriving the
1561: optimal convolution kernel (see section \ref{sec:apdiffim}). The magnitudes
1562: and magnitude errors were initially based on the {\small DR}4 database
1563: \citep{dr4}, but were later updated based on the catalog provided by
1564: \citet{ivezic07}.
1565:
1566: The difference images obtained by the \sn\ Survey are always photometrically
1567: scaled to the template image; the following two stages are included when
1568: running {\tt sdssred} on the template images.
1569:
1570: \item{{\tt STARDOPHOT}:} This stage performs doPhot photometry on a list of
1571: calibration stars provided by {\tt SDSSSTARS}, using the modified version
1572: of the {\tt Dophot} software package.
1573:
1574: \item{{\tt SDSSZERO}:} This stage performs zeropointing of the frame. The
1575: magnitudes and magnitude errors of the calibration stars are first converted
1576: to flux units via $10^{-0.4 m}$, and then the model, ADU counts = A*flux, is
1577: solved for A using the weighted least-squares procedure. The zeropointing
1578: algorithm does iterative sigma clipping at $\{24.0,12.0,6.0,6.0,6.0\}$
1579: standard deviations from the best fit zeropoint model. The final zeropoint,
1580: the statistical error on the zeropoint, and the RMS of the zeropoint are
1581: then converted into magnitudes and stored for use during the \sn\ search.
1582:
1583: \end{itemize}
1584:
1585:
1586: \subsection{{\tt sdssred} With Fakes}
1587: \label{sec:fakes}
1588:
1589: To monitor the software and human search efficiencies, we insert artificial
1590: \sne\ (fakes) into the data stream in real-time. Prior to the beginning of
1591: the survey, a library of fakes was generated (1000 fakes in 2005). Each
1592: fake is assigned a redshift, celestial position ($\alpha$, $\delta$), date
1593: of peak-magnitude in $V$ band, and an intrinsic luminosity. The redshift
1594: distribution was generated according to $dN/dz \propto z^2$ and the
1595: celestial positions are then chosen to be near to a galaxy with the same
1596: redshift, based on a catalog of photometric redshifts \citep{oyaizu07}.
1597:
1598: The fakes generated during the 2005 observing campaign did not include
1599: extinction and reddening; however the set of fakes generated during the 2006
1600: campaign included extinction, with $A_V$ chosen from an exponential
1601: distribution, $P(A_V) \propto e^{-A_V/0.4}$.
1602:
1603: The following stages are used to generate realistic Type Ia \sn\ light
1604: curves for the fakes in real time.
1605:
1606: \begin{itemize}
1607:
1608: \item{{\tt SDSSFAKESELECT}:} To minimize computation time for inserting fakes
1609: into the data stream and still retain the ability to simulate the magnitude
1610: at an arbitrary light-curve epoch, a range of dates for which the fake
1611: magnitude is within the expected limit of the \sdss\ telescope was computed.
1612: This stage checks the library of fakes to see whether any fake has a
1613: position within the limits of the field and that the present \mjd\ falls
1614: within the expected range of observability.
1615:
1616: \item{{\tt STARDOPHOT\_FAKE}:} This stage performs {\tt Dophot} photometry on
1617: calibration stars within the frame. This is necessary to dynamically derive
1618: the magnitude to \adu\ conversion for the fakes.
1619:
1620: \item{{\tt SDSSZERO\_FAKE}:} This stage computes a zeropoint for the frame,
1621: based on the dophot photometry from the previous stage. It is identical to
1622: the {\tt SDSSZERO} stage described in section \ref{sec:apsdssred}.
1623:
1624: \item{{\tt SDSSFAKEINSERT}:} This stage inserts the fake \sne\ into the search
1625: image. Given the current \mjd\ and the fake light-curve parameters
1626: described above, the theoretical magnitude is computed in real-time. The
1627: light-curve model is identical to the stretch model used for online
1628: photometric typing, as described in \S~\ref{subsec:snphoto}. Given the
1629: magnitude and the zeropoint computed above, an integrated flux value is
1630: computed. The \psf\ model for the fake comes from the {\tt Photo} derived
1631: \psf; this is remapped to the astrometric grid of the search image and
1632: photometrically scaled. Poisson noise is added to each pixel. Finally, the
1633: unperturbed search image is copied and the \adu\ values for each pixel are
1634: overlaid on the search image, which is passed to the subsequent processing
1635: stages. A record of changes to the image is written to the {\tt fpC} file
1636: header, and the magnitudes and corresponding \mjd\ are written to a {\tt
1637: MySQL} database.
1638:
1639: \end{itemize}
1640:
1641:
1642: \subsection{{\tt sdssdiff}}
1643: \label{sec:apdiffim}
1644:
1645: This operational mode works with two sets of images that have been
1646: successfully run through the {\tt sdssred} stages. One set of data is
1647: considered the ``template'' for difference imaging, and they are subtracted
1648: from the science images to yield only those objects that have varied in
1649: position or brightness.
1650:
1651: In practice, most of our template images consist of the \psf--optimized
1652: coadds of \sdss\ Stripe 82 \citep{annis06}. The images consist of 5 -- 10
1653: coadded exposures, depending on the position in the stripe, from runs prior
1654: to the 2005 \sn\ search season. Only images with seeing $\la 1.1$\arcsec\
1655: are used. Figure~\ref{fig:sn7876comp} shows an $r$-band coadd image of the
1656: field around \sn2005ir in comparison with a single-exposure search image.
1657: Some of our fields near the edge of the stripe fall outside of the coadd,
1658: and for these we use single--epoch templates from a night with good seeing.
1659:
1660: \begin{figure}[t] %%%%% coadd vs single-frame
1661: \begin{center}
1662: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=1\textwidth]{f9.eps}
1663: \end{center}
1664: \caption{Template (left) and search (right) $r$-band images centered on the
1665: host galaxy of \sn2005ir, a Type Ia \sn\ at $z = 0.076$. The \sn\ is
1666: visible above and slightly to the right of the of the host galaxy in the
1667: right-hand image. The search image was part of run 5823, and was taken
1668: under photometric conditions with $\sim 1.1$\arcsec\ seeing. Images are
1669: 3.3\arcmin\ on the side. Note the enhanced density of faint sources ($r
1670: \ga 23$~mag) visible in the template image that are not detected in the
1671: search image.}
1672: \label{fig:sn7876comp}
1673: \end{figure}
1674:
1675: \begin{itemize}
1676:
1677: \item{{\tt MATCHTEMPL}:} Since the \sdss\ camera is used in drift-scan mode,
1678: the data from a given run comprises a long swath of the sky. This tapestry
1679: is split by \photo\ into individual fields of $2048 \times 1489$ pixels,
1680: with 128 pixels of overlap between neighboring fields. Because Stripe 82 is
1681: an equatorial field, this corresponds to a slice in $\alpha$. It is not
1682: guaranteed that the $\alpha$ boundaries of the science image agree exactly
1683: with those of the template, meaning in general we will need to identify and
1684: combine the two template images that overlap the science image. However,
1685: the pointing model of the telescope is sufficiently accurate that the
1686: overlap in $\delta$ is nearly complete.
1687:
1688: \item{{\tt GLUETEMPL}:} This stage implements the pixel--level coaddition of
1689: the overlapping template images into a single template image whose \ra\
1690: coverage is similar to the input science image.
1691:
1692: \item{{\tt REMAP}:} Because the images may still be misaligned in \ra\ by a
1693: fractional pixel offset, and in declination by multiple pixels, we apply a
1694: remapping kernel that {\it exactly} aligns the glued template image with the
1695: science image. For this operation, we use the astrometry included in the
1696: {\tt asTrans} files to determine, for each pixel in the science image, what
1697: position in the template image needs to be resampled. We apply a
1698: windowed--sinc resampling of the template image with a $9 \times 9$-pixel
1699: footprint (i.e., a Lanczos 4 kernel) to yield a final remapped glued
1700: template image. The template is always remapped to the reference frame of
1701: the science image, to avoid convolving the science data. Because the
1702: template image generally has much higher signal--to--noise (except possibly
1703: near the beginning of the stripe where only single-exposure templates are
1704: available), the ``smoothing'' effects due to convolution are not a serious
1705: issue. We propagate the pixel noise and pixel masks through this
1706: convolution process.
1707:
1708: \item{{\tt DIFFIM}:} After the {\it astrometric} registration described above,
1709: we implement a {\it photometric} registration that matches the \psf\ of the
1710: two images, so that they may be subtracted on a pixel--by--pixel basis.
1711: This uses a modified version of the \cite{alard00} algorithm as described in
1712: \cite{becker04}.
1713:
1714: In this procedure, known objects (stars or galaxies) are used to determine a
1715: set of convolution kernels that minimize the difference between each
1716: convolved template object and the respective science object. Objects that
1717: include masked pixels are rejected, as are variable objects. The ensemble
1718: of kernels is then used to construct a single kernel function that varies
1719: spatially with position on the image, to account for differences in the
1720: \psf\ across the frames. This function is allowed to vary quadratically
1721: across the image. We then apply this kernel to each pixel in the image and
1722: subtract the convolved template from the science image, yielding a
1723: difference image in which the static signal has been subtracted, and only
1724: objects that have varied in position or brightness remain. We choose to
1725: always apply this kernel to the template image, even though in good seeing
1726: conditions this requires us to actually {\it de}convolve the template data.
1727: We propagate the image noise and mask similar to the {\tt REMAP} process.
1728:
1729: \item{{\tt DIFFDOPHOT}:} We next perform object detection on the difference
1730: image, again using the modified {\tt Dophot} package. The software is able
1731: to read the propagated noise and mask images to assist in the object
1732: detection and measurement. The background is explicitly set to zero,
1733: assuming that the difference imaging has produced a background--subtracted
1734: image. The \photo\ \psf\ model and aperture corrections are used to perform
1735: the photometry. We only perform photometry on positive--going excursions,
1736: thus objects that fade in brightness are not measured.
1737:
1738: \item{{\tt PIXCHK}:} We next read in the difference, noise, and mask images
1739: surrounding each detected object and examine the neighboring pixels. The
1740: total {\it number} of positive--valued pixels, negative--valued pixels, and
1741: masked pixels are calculated in an aperture, as well as the total {\it
1742: amount} of flux in positive--valued and negative--valued pixels. These will
1743: be used to reject dipoles due to image misalignment or general failures in
1744: the difference imaging.
1745:
1746: \item{{\tt DIFFCUT}:} This stage rejects candidates from the photometry list
1747: based upon photometry flags and {\tt PIXCHK} values. In particular, objects
1748: for which {\tt Dophot} is unable to perform a 4--parameter fit using the
1749: mean \psf\ parameters are rejected ({\tt Dophot} types 4 or 6). Objects
1750: with \signoi\ smaller than 3.0 are also rejected, as well as objects with
1751: excessive fractions of masked pixels (0.6) or fractions of flux in negative
1752: pixels (0.65), amongst other tests. These cuts yield the set of objects
1753: ingested into the database by {\tt DoObjects}.
1754: \end{itemize}
1755:
1756:
1757: \subsection{{\tt sdssforce}}
1758:
1759: This mode is used to perform forced--positional \psf\ photometry. The
1760: coordinates of the candidate are determined from a \signoi--weighted average
1761: of all objects associated with the \sn. The \psf\ model is adopted from
1762: output of \photo. In practice, this mode is used to measure magnitudes in
1763: the $u$ and $z$ bands, which are not automatically processed by {\tt
1764: sdssdiff}, as well as $ugriz$ magnitudes in images obtained before the \sn\
1765: discovery to obtain measurements of low-\signoi\ detections and upper
1766: limits. This mode yields more accurate measurements of the fluxes than
1767: those produced by {\tt sdssdiff}, and they generally agree with the final
1768: photometry to within $\sim 0.05$~mag in all filters \citep{holtzman07}.
1769:
1770:
1771: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1772: %%% Autoscanner %%%
1773: \section{Autoscanner}
1774: \label{app:autoscanner}
1775:
1776: As a further illustration of the histogram method of \pdf\ estimation, we
1777: note that Bayes' theorem, applied to classification, says that,
1778: \begin{equation}
1779: \frac{P(c_i|\theta)}{P(c_j|\theta)} =
1780: \frac{P(\theta|c_i) P(c_i)}{P(\theta|c_j) P(c_j)}
1781: \end{equation}
1782: where $P(a|b)$ is the conditional probability for $a$ given $b$, $c_i$
1783: represents object class $i$, and $\theta$ denote particular values for the
1784: set of observables of an object. If this ratio is larger than one, then the
1785: object is more likely to belong to class $i$ than to class $j$.
1786:
1787: Applied to the problem at hand, this can be written as,
1788: \begin{equation}
1789: \frac{P(c_i|\theta)}{P(c_j|\theta)} =
1790: \frac{(N_i'/N_i)(N_i/N)}{(N_j'/N_j)(N_j/N)} =
1791: \frac{N_i'}{N_j'}
1792: \end{equation}
1793: where $N_i$ is the total number of objects in the training set belonging to
1794: class $i$, $N$ is the number of total objects in the training set, and a $'$
1795: denotes objects possessing observables $\theta$. The $\theta$ represents a
1796: subset of all possible observables, which is equivalent to marginalizing
1797: over all other observables, and the set used differs according to which
1798: class of background is being tested.
1799:
1800: The criterion used by the autoscanner to identify objects of class $i$ is,
1801: \begin{equation}
1802: \frac{N_i'}{N_j'} >
1803: \frac{N_i}{N_j}
1804: \end{equation}
1805: where $i$ represents the classes of background (artifact, mover, dipole),
1806: and class $j$ is always taken as \sn. The motivation for this criterion is
1807: that we are searching for an {\it overdensity} of objects of class $i$ in
1808: the region of observable space in question. In practice the threshold is a
1809: free parameter that can be adjusted to control the relative level of
1810: accepted signal to background events.
1811:
1812: In this experiment, background events dominate over \sne\ epochs by a large
1813: factor, and a Bayesian classifier would reject \sn\ epochs that lie in a
1814: reasonable region of the observable space if the region overlaps with
1815: background events, even far away from the peak of the background
1816: distribution. A cartoon of the situation is shown in
1817: Figure~\ref{fig:cartoon}. Thus, the autoscanner can also be regarded as a
1818: Bayesian classifier where the thresholds are adjusted {\it a priori} to
1819: mitigate false negatives, at the cost of more background in the scanning.
1820:
1821: \begin{figure} [t]
1822: \begin{center}
1823: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=.7\textwidth]{f10.eps}
1824: \end{center}
1825: \caption{Hypothetical distributions of an observable for signal (dashed)
1826: and background (solid). The peak of the signal occurs at 0;
1827: however, the vastly greater number of background events swamps the
1828: signal. While it is true that an object with a value of this
1829: observable of 0 is more likely to be a background event, this is
1830: clearly not the behavior we want from our classifier, as we are
1831: trying to isolate the relatively rare signal events (i.e. \sn\
1832: epochs). The effect of recasting the problem from one of relative
1833: probabilities to one of overdensities. The peak of the signal
1834: (dashed) is now strongly inconsistent with background.}
1835:
1836: \label{fig:cartoon}
1837: \end{figure}
1838:
1839: The training set for the autoscanner consists of all objects from the 2005
1840: observing season that were ranked by a human as an artifact, a dipole, a
1841: moving object, or a \sn. This set is comprised of 91220 total objects, of
1842: which 65576 are a sub-class of background, and 25644 are objects ranked as a
1843: \sn. The quantities used for classification of artifacts are, a measure of
1844: the objects ellipticity, the signal-to-noise ratio and the value of the
1845: reduced $\chi^{2}$ when fitting the object to a model of the \psf. In
1846: computing the $\chi^2$, we do not account for possible error in the \psf\
1847: model and so objects with large signal-to-noise values also have large
1848: $chi^2$ values. Therefore, in classifying artifacts it is important to
1849: retain the correlation between $chi^2$ and signal-to-noise ratio. The
1850: quantities used for classifying dipoles are the measured flux in negative
1851: valued pixels, and the ratio of measured flux in negative valued pixels to
1852: the flux in positive valued pixels. The quantities used for classifying
1853: moving objects are the measured magnitudes, the magnitude of the apparent
1854: motion between different filters, and an angle describing the apparent
1855: motion between filters. If the object has a detection in the 3 filter-bands
1856: $gri$, then the angle is the angle between the ``vector'' that describes the
1857: apparent motion between the $r$ and $i$ filters, and the ``vector'' that
1858: describes the apparent motion between the $i$ and $g$ filters. If the
1859: object is truly moving then these apparent motions should be nearly
1860: co-linear. If the object is only detected in 2 of the $gri$ filters then
1861: the angle is the angle between the apparent motion between the 2 filters and
1862: the ``unit vector'' aligned in the direction of increasing right-ascension.
1863: Main-belt asteroids typically have an apparent motion in a fixed direction,
1864: and using this angle in the classification is a way to encode that
1865: information.
1866:
1867:
1868:
1869: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1870: %%% SN Ia light curve model %%%
1871: \section{SN Ia Light Curve Models}
1872: \label{app:snia_lc}
1873:
1874: This appendix describes the \snia\ light curve models used for photometric
1875: typing, redshift estimate, and selection of targets for spectroscopic
1876: observations. To calculate synthetic light curves of Branch-normal \sneia\
1877: at various values of \dmB, the $B$-band magnitude change in 15 days from
1878: $B$-band maximum \citep{phillips93}, we adopt the results of
1879: \citet{phillips99}, who found relationships between the peak absolute $BVI$
1880: magnitudes of nearby \sneia\ as a function of \dmB. These authors
1881: parameterize the peak magnitude relative to that of a reference \snia\ with
1882: $\dme = 1.1$ using a quadratic function of the form,
1883: \begin{equation}
1884: \Delta M_{\rm{max}} = a \times [\Delta m_{15}(B) - 1.1] + b \times [\Delta
1885: m_{15}(B) - 1.1]^2.
1886: \end{equation}
1887:
1888: There are $a$ and $b$ coefficients for each of the $BVI$ filters, as listed
1889: in Table~3 of \citet{phillips99}. The $a$ coefficients ($a_B = 0.79$, $a_V
1890: = 0.67$, and $a_I = 0.42$) decrease as a function of the filter effective
1891: wavelength. This shows that \sneia\ with larger \dmB\ are dimmer and
1892: redder; those with smaller \dmB\ are intrinsically more luminous and bluer.
1893: We find that the $a$ coefficient as a function of wavelength can be
1894: well-represented by the following linear relation,
1895: \begin{equation} %%%%% a coefficient equation
1896: \label{equ:acoeff}
1897: a(\lambda) = 1.248 - 1.045 \times 10^{-4}~\lambda(\mbox{\AA}).
1898: \end{equation}
1899: We use this relation to perform color corrections directly onto the template
1900: spectra. Operationally, defining $F_\nu(\lambda, x=0)$ to be the
1901: monochromatic flux (\fnu) of the standard template spectrum at rest-frame
1902: wavelength $\lambda$, then the luminosity-corrected value is given by,
1903: \begin{equation} %%%%% flux correction equation
1904: \label{equ:fcorr}
1905: F_\nu(\lambda, x) \longrightarrow F_\nu(\lambda, x=0) \times 10^{-0.4~(ax +
1906: bx^2)},
1907: \end{equation}
1908: where $x \equiv$ \dmB\ $- 1.1$, $b = 0.633$ \citep{phillips99}, and $a$ is
1909: given in Equation~\ref{equ:acoeff}. Although this color correction is valid
1910: at $B$-band maximum, we assume that it is valid at all epochs. This
1911: provides a way to compute synthetic light curves in the \ugriz\ system (or
1912: any other filter set) for a \snia\ with a given \dmB\ at arbitrary
1913: redshifts.
1914:
1915: \begin{figure}[tb]
1916: \begin{center}
1917: \includegraphics[angle=270, width=.7\textwidth]{f11.eps}
1918: \end{center}
1919: \caption{The stretch factor $s$ at $z = 0$ as a function of \dmB\ adopted
1920: in this work (black) in comparison to that of \citet{perlmutter97}
1921: represented by a dashed line.} \label{fig:stretch}
1922: \end{figure}
1923:
1924: Finally, we stretch the light curves according to the method described in
1925: \citet{perlmutter97}. The Nugent templates folded through the $B$-band
1926: filter transmission curve yield \dmB\ $= 1.05$, so we define $s$ to be unity
1927: when \dmB\ $= 1.05$. For other values of \dmB, we express the stretch
1928: factor as $s = (1+z)~(15/\tau)$, where we have factored out the cosmological
1929: time delay factor, and $\tau$ is represented by the following 3rd-order
1930: polynomial,
1931: \begin{equation} %%%%% stretch equation
1932: \tau[\dme] = c_0 + c_1~\Delta m_{15}(B) + c_2~[\Delta m_{15}(B)]^2 +
1933: c_3~[\Delta m_{15}(B)]^3,
1934: \end{equation}
1935: where $c_0 = 3.455$, $c_1 = 13.719$, $c_2 = -3.601$, and $c_3 = 0.946$.
1936: This gives an adequate representation of the $B$-band light curve for \dmB\
1937: between 0.5 and 2.5. This function $s[$\dmB$]$ at zero redshift is plotted
1938: in Figure~\ref{fig:stretch}. The same relation derived by
1939: \citet{perlmutter97} is also shown for comparison.
1940: Figure~\ref{fig:model_lc} shows rest-frame $g$-band light curves for
1941: different values of \dmB. Peak absolute magnitudes in \ugriz\ as function
1942: of \dmB\ are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:peakmag}.
1943:
1944: \begin{figure}[tb] %%%%% sample light curve figure
1945: \begin{center}
1946: \includegraphics[angle=270, width=.7\textwidth]{f12.eps}
1947: \end{center}
1948: \caption{Sample \snia\ rest-frame $g$-band light curves for four values of
1949: \dmB\ $= 0.8, 1.1, 1.4$, and 1.7.}
1950: \label{fig:model_lc}
1951: \end{figure}
1952:
1953: \begin{figure}[tb] %%%%% peak mag figure
1954: \begin{center}
1955: \includegraphics[angle=270, width=.7\textwidth]{f13.eps}
1956: \end{center}
1957: \caption{Resulting peak absolute magnitudes for a \snia\ at zero redshift in
1958: the \sdss\ \ugriz\ system as functions of \dmB. The curves are analogous
1959: to those shown in Figure~8 of \citet{phillips99}.}
1960: \label{fig:peakmag}
1961: \end{figure}
1962:
1963: Although this procedure does not always accurately reproduce the multi-band
1964: light curves, most notably the variation of the secondary peak in the red
1965: with \dmB\ \citep{riess96b}, they appear to be of sufficient quality for the
1966: purposes of photometric typing.
1967:
1968:
1969: \clearpage
1970:
1971: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1972:
1973: \bibitem[Adelman-McCarthy et al.(2006)]{dr4} Adelman-McCarthy, J.~K., et al.\
1974: 2006, \apjs, 162, 38
1975: \bibitem[Adelman-McCarthy et al.(2007)]{dr5} Adelman-McCarthy, J., et al.\
1976: 2007, \apjs, in press
1977: \bibitem[Adelman-McCarthy et al.(2007)]{dr6} Adelman-McCarthy, J., et al.\
1978: 2007, \apjs, submitted
1979: \bibitem[Alard(2000)]{alard00} Alard, C.\ 2000, \aaps, 144, 363
1980: \bibitem[Aldering et al.(2002)]{aldering02} Aldering, G., et al.\ 2002,
1981: \procspie, 4836, 61
1982: \bibitem[Annis et al.(2006)]{annis06} Annis, J.~T., et al.\ 2006, American
1983: Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 209, \#215.09
1984: \bibitem[Astier et al.(2006)]{astier06} Astier, P., et al.\ 2006, \aap, 447,
1985: 31
1986: \bibitem[Barbary et al.(2006)]{barbary06} Barbary, K., et al.\ 2006, Bulletin
1987: of the American Astronomical Society, 38, 1025
1988: \bibitem[Becker et al.(2004)]{becker04} Becker, A.~C., et al.\ 2004, \apj,
1989: 611, 418
1990: \bibitem[Dilday et al.(2007)]{dilday07} Dilday, B., et al.\ 2007, in
1991: preparation
1992: \bibitem[Filippenko(1997)]{filippenko97} Filippenko, A.~V.\ 1997, \araa, 35,
1993: 309
1994: \bibitem[Filippenko et al.(2001)]{filippenko01} Filippenko, A.~V., Li, W.~D.,
1995: Treffers, R.~R., \& Modjaz, M.\ 2001, IAU Colloq.~183: Small Telescope
1996: Astronomy on Global Scales, 246, 121
1997: \bibitem[Frieman et al.(2007)]{frieman07} Frieman, J. et al.\ 2007, \aj,
1998: submitted
1999: \bibitem[Fukugita et al.(1996)]{fukugita96} Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn,
2000: J.~E., Doi, M., Shimasaku, K., \& Schneider, D.~P.\ 1996, \aj, 111, 1748
2001: \bibitem[Gunn et al.(1998)]{gunn98} Gunn, J.~E., et al.\ 1998, \aj, 116, 3040
2002: \bibitem[Gunn et al.(2006)]{gunn06} Gunn, J.~E., et al.\ 2006, \aj, 131, 2332
2003: \bibitem[Hamuy et al.(1993)]{hamuy93} Hamuy, M., et al.\ 1993, \aj, 106, 2392
2004: \bibitem[Hamuy et al.(1996a)]{hamuy96a} Hamuy, M., Phillips, M.~M., Suntzeff,
2005: N.~B., Schommer, R.~A., Maza, J., \& Aviles, R.\ 1996, \aj, 112, 2391
2006: \bibitem[Hamuy et al.(1996b)]{hamuy96b} Hamuy, M., Phillips, M.~M., Suntzeff,
2007: N.~B., Schommer, R.~A., Maza, J., \& Aviles, R.\ 1996, \aj, 112, 2398
2008: \bibitem[Hamuy et al.(1996c)]{hamuy96c} Hamuy, M., et al.\ 1996, \aj, 112,
2009: 2408
2010: \bibitem[Hamuy et al.(1996d)]{hamuy96d} Hamuy, M., Phillips, M.~M., Suntzeff,
2011: N.~B., Schommer, R.~A., Maza, J., Smith, R.~C., Lira, P., \& Aviles, R.\
2012: 1996, \aj, 112, 2438
2013: \bibitem[Hamuy et al.(2006)]{hamuy06} Hamuy, M., et al.\ 2006, \pasp, 118, 2
2014: \bibitem[Hogg et al.(2001)]{hogg01} Hogg, D.~W., Finkbeiner, D.~P., Schlegel,
2015: D.~J., \& Gunn, J.~E.\ 2001, \aj, 122, 2129
2016: \bibitem[Holtzman et al.(2007)]{holtzman07} Holtzman, J. et al., 2007, in
2017: preparation
2018: \bibitem[Hsiao et al.(2007)]{hsiao07} Hsiao, E.~Y., Conley, A., Howell, D.~A.,
2019: Sullivan, M., Pritchet, C.~J., Carlberg, R.~G., Nugent, P.~E., \& Phillips,
2020: M.~M.\ 2007, \apj, 663, 1187
2021: \bibitem[Ivezi{\'c} et al.(2004)]{ivezic04} Ivezi{\'c}, {\v Z}., et al.\ 2004,
2022: Astronomische Nachrichten, 325, 583
2023: \bibitem[Ivezi{\'c} et al.(2007)]{ivezic07} Ivezi{\'c}, {\v Z}., Allyn Smith,
2024: J., Miknaitis, G., Lin, H., \& Tucker, D.\ 2007, ArXiv Astrophysics
2025: e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0703157
2026: \bibitem[Jha et al.(2006)]{jha06} Jha, S., et al.\ 2006, \aj, 131, 527
2027: \bibitem[Jha et al.(2007)]{jha07} Jha, S., Riess, A.~G., \& Kirshner, R.~P.\
2028: 2007, \apj, 659, 122
2029: \bibitem[Johnson \& Crotts(2006)]{johnson06} Johnson, B.~D., \& Crotts,
2030: A.~P.~S.\ 2006, \aj, 132, 756
2031: \bibitem[Kasen \& Woosley(2007)]{kasen07} Kasen, D., \& Woosley, S.~E.\
2032: 2007, \apj, 656, 661
2033: \bibitem[Kessler et al.(2007)]{kessler07} Kessler, R., et al.\ 2007, in
2034: preparation
2035: \bibitem[Kim et al.(1996)]{kim96} Kim, A., Goobar, A., \& Perlmutter, S.\
2036: 1996, \pasp, 108, 190
2037: \bibitem[Kunz et al.(2007)]{kunz07} Kunz, M., Bassett, B.~A., \& Hlozek,
2038: R.~A.\ 2007, \prd, 75, 103508
2039: \bibitem[Kuznetsova \& Connolly(2007)]{kuznetsova07} Kuznetsova, N.~V., \&
2040: Connolly, B.~M.\ 2007, \apj, 659, 530
2041: \bibitem[Lupton et al.(2001)]{lupton01} Lupton, R., Gunn, J.~E., Ivezi{\'c},
2042: Z., Knapp, G.~R., \& Kent, S.\ 2001, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and
2043: Systems X, 238, 269
2044: \bibitem[Lupton et al.(2002)]{lupton02} Lupton, R.~H., Ivezic, Z., Gunn,
2045: J.~E., Knapp, G., Strauss, M.~A., \& Yasuda, N.\ 2002, \procspie, 4836, 350
2046: \bibitem[Miknaitis et al.(2007)]{miknaitis07} Miknaitis, G., et al.\ 2007,
2047: ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0701043
2048: \bibitem[Nugent et al.(2002)]{nugent02} Nugent, P., Kim, A., \& Perlmutter,
2049: S.\ 2002, \pasp, 114, 803
2050: \bibitem[Oyaizu et al.(2007)]{oyaizu07} Oyaizu, H., et al.\ 2007, in
2051: preparation
2052: \bibitem[Perlmutter et al.(1997)]{perlmutter97} Perlmutter, S., et al.\ 1997,
2053: \apj, 483, 565
2054: \bibitem[Perlmutter et al.(1999)]{perlmutter99} Perlmutter, S., et al.\ 1999,
2055: \apj, 517, 565
2056: \bibitem[Pier et al.(2003)]{pier03} Pier, J.~R., Munn, J.~A., Hindsley, R.~B.,
2057: Hennessy, G.~S., Kent, S.~M., Lupton, R.~H., \& Ivezi{\'c}, {\v Z}.\ 2003,
2058: \aj, 125, 1559
2059: \bibitem[Phillips(1993)]{phillips93} Phillips, M.~M.\ 1993, \apjl, 413, L105
2060: \bibitem[Phillips et al.(1999)]{phillips99} Phillips, M.~M., Lira, P.,
2061: Suntzeff, N.~B., Schommer, R.~A., Hamuy, M., \& Maza, J.\ 1999, \aj, 118,
2062: 1766
2063: \bibitem[Phillips et al.(2007)]{phillips07} Phillips, M.~M., et al.\ 2007,
2064: \pasp, 119, 360
2065: \bibitem[Poznanski et al.(2002)]{poznanski02} Poznanski, D., Gal-Yam, A.,
2066: Maoz, D., Filippenko, A.~V., Leonard, D.~C., \& Matheson, T.\ 2002, \pasp,
2067: 114, 833
2068: \bibitem[Poznanski et al.(2006)]{poznanski06} Poznanski, D., Maoz, D., \&
2069: Gal-Yam, A.\ 2006, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0610129
2070: \bibitem[Prieto et al.(2006)]{prieto06} Prieto, J., Anderson, S., Becker, A.,
2071: Marriner, J., Sako, M., \& Jha, S.\ 2006, Central Bureau Electronic
2072: Telegrams, 692, 1
2073: \bibitem[Prieto et al.(2007)]{prieto07} Prieto, J.~L., et al.\ 2007, in
2074: preparation
2075: \bibitem[Pskovskii(1977)]{pskovskii77} Pskovskii, I.~P.\ 1977, Soviet
2076: Astronomy, 21, 675
2077: \bibitem[Quimby et al.(2007)]{quimby07} Quimby, R., H{\"o}flich, P., \&
2078: Wheeler, J.~C.\ 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 705, arXiv:0705.4467
2079: \bibitem[Riess et al.(1995)]{riess95} Riess, A.~G., Press, W.~H., \& Kirshner,
2080: R.~P.\ 1995, \apjl, 438, L17
2081: \bibitem[Riess(1996)]{riess96a} Riess, A.~G.\ 1996, Ph.D.~Thesis
2082: \bibitem[Riess et al.(1996)]{riess96b} Riess, A.~G., Press, W.~H., \& Kirshner,
2083: R.~P.\ 1996, \apj, 473, 88
2084: \bibitem[Riess et al.(1998)]{riess98} Riess, A.~G., et al.\ 1998, \aj, 116,
2085: 1009
2086: \bibitem[Riess et al.(1999)]{riess99} Riess, A.~G., et al.\ 1999, \aj, 117,
2087: 707
2088: \bibitem[Riess et al.(2004a)]{riess04a} Riess, A.~G., et al.\ 2004, \apj, 607,
2089: 665
2090: \bibitem[Riess et al.(2004b)]{riess04b} Riess, A.~G., et al.\ 2004, \apjl,
2091: 600, L163
2092: \bibitem[Riess et al.(2007)]{riess07} Riess, A.~G., et al.\ 2007, \apj, 659,
2093: 98
2094: \bibitem[Sako et al.(2005)]{sako04} {Sako}, M., et al., in Proceedings of the
2095: 22nd Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics at Stanford, 2004, edited
2096: by P. Chen, E. Bloom, G. Madejski, and V. Petrosian, eConf C041213, 1424
2097: (2005)
2098: \bibitem[Schechter et al.(1993)]{schechter93} Schechter, P.~L., Mateo, M., \&
2099: Saha, A.\ 1993, \pasp, 105, 1342
2100: \bibitem[Shetrone et al.(2007)]{shetrone07} Shetrone, M., et al.\ 2007, \pasp,
2101: 119, 556
2102: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2002)]{smith02} Smith, C., Rest, A., Hiriart, R.,
2103: Becker, A., Stubbs, C.~W., Valdes, F.~G., \& Suntzeff, N.\ 2002, \procspie,
2104: 4836, 395
2105: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2002)]{smith02ugriz} Smith, J.~A., et al.\ 2002, \aj,
2106: 123, 2121
2107: \bibitem[Stoughton et al.(2002)]{stoughton02} Stoughton, C., et al.\ 2002,
2108: \aj, 123, 485
2109: \bibitem[Sullivan et al.(2006)]{sullivan06} Sullivan, M., et al.\ 2006, \aj,
2110: 131, 960
2111: \bibitem[Tucker et al.(2006)]{tucker06} Tucker, D.~L., et al.\ 2006,
2112: Astronomische Nachrichten, 327, 821
2113: \bibitem[Wood-Vasey et al.(2007)]{wood-vasey07} Wood-Vasey, W.~M., et al.\
2114: 2007, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0701041
2115: \bibitem[York et al.(2000)]{york00} York, D.~G., et al.\ 2000, \aj, 120, 1579
2116: \bibitem[Zheng et al.(2007)]{zheng07} Zheng, C. et al., 2007, in preparation
2117:
2118: \end{thebibliography}
2119:
2120:
2121: \clearpage
2122:
2123: \begin{deluxetable}{lcrr}
2124: \tablewidth{0pt}
2125: \tablecaption{Stripe 82 footprint\label{tbl:stripe82}}
2126: \tablehead{
2127: \colhead{Strip} &
2128: \colhead{camcol} &
2129: \colhead{$\delta_{\rm{min}}$\tablenotemark{a}} &
2130: \colhead{$\delta_{\rm{max}}$\tablenotemark{a}}
2131: }
2132: \startdata
2133:
2134: 82N & 1 & $-1.058^\circ$ & $-0.833^\circ$ \\
2135: \nodata & 2 & $-0.638^\circ$ & $-0.413^\circ$ \\
2136: \nodata & 3 & $-0.219^\circ$ & $+0.007^\circ$ \\
2137: \nodata & 4 & $+0.201^\circ$ & $+0.426^\circ$ \\
2138: \nodata & 5 & $+0.621^\circ$ & $+0.846^\circ$ \\
2139: \nodata & 6 & $+1.041^\circ$ & $+1.266^\circ$ \\
2140: 82S & 1 & $-1.267^\circ$ & $-1.042^\circ$ \\
2141: \nodata & 2 & $-0.848^\circ$ & $-0.622^\circ$ \\
2142: \nodata & 3 & $-0.428^\circ$ & $-0.203^\circ$ \\
2143: \nodata & 4 & $-0.008^\circ$ & $+0.217^\circ$ \\
2144: \nodata & 5 & $+0.411^\circ$ & $+0.637^\circ$ \\
2145: \nodata & 6 & $+0.831^\circ$ & $+1.057^\circ$ \\
2146:
2147: \enddata
2148:
2149: \tablenotetext{a}{These values correspond to the nominal $\delta$ values.
2150: The exact telescope pointing differs slightly from night to night
2151: resulting in a shift in $\delta$ by as much as $0.003^\circ$ in either
2152: direction.}
2153:
2154: \end{deluxetable}
2155:
2156:
2157: \begin{deluxetable}{lcllrr}
2158: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
2159: \tablewidth{0pt}
2160: \tablecaption{2005 \sdss\ Supernova Imaging Runs\label{tbl:runs2005}}
2161: \tablehead{
2162: \colhead{Run} &
2163: \colhead{Strip} &
2164: \colhead{MJD$_{\rm{start}}$} &
2165: \colhead{MJD$_{\rm{end}}$} &
2166: \colhead{RA$_{\rm{start}}$} &
2167: \colhead{RA$_{\rm{end}}$}
2168: }
2169: \startdata
2170: 5566 & N & 53616.215 & 53616.469 & $-32.72$ & $+58.91$ \\
2171: 5582 & S & 53622.207 & 53622.477 & $-40.36$ & $+57.41$ \\
2172: 5590 & N & 53623.156 & 53623.324 & $-50.67$ & $ +9.96$ \\
2173: 5597 & S & 53625.176 & 53625.266 & $-50.62$ & $-18.43$ \\
2174: 5603 & N & 53626.141 & 53626.449 & $-50.62$ & $+60.17$ \\
2175: \smallskip
2176: 5607 & S & 53627.137 & 53627.441 & $-50.59$ & $+59.90$ \\
2177: 5610 & N & 53628.129 & 53628.434 & $-50.57$ & $+60.21$ \\
2178: 5619 & S & 53634.129 & 53634.438 & $-50.68$ & $+60.71$ \\
2179: 5622 & N & 53635.137 & 53635.445 & $-50.72$ & $+60.66$ \\
2180: 5628 & S & 53636.133 & 53636.281 & $-50.70$ & $ +1.99$ \\
2181: \smallskip
2182: 5633 & N & 53637.129 & 53637.371 & $-50.68$ & $+36.45$ \\
2183: 5637 & S & 53638.254 & 53638.477 & $-20.72$ & $+60.72$ \\
2184: 5642 & N & 53639.289 & 53639.484 & $-9.82$ & $+60.69$ \\
2185: 5646 & S & 53640.234 & 53640.441 & $-13.85$ & $+60.70$ \\
2186: 5654 & N & 53641.113 & 53641.121 & $-55.42$ & $-53.02$ \\
2187: \smallskip
2188: 5658 & N & 53641.359 & 53641.465 & $+16.08$ & $+54.56$ \\
2189: 5666 & S & 53643.430 & 53643.484 & $+41.25$ & $+60.71$ \\
2190: 5670 & N & 53644.109 & 53644.430 & $-55.53$ & $+60.79$ \\
2191: 5675 & S & 53645.180 & 53645.219 & $-55.52$ & $-41.75$ \\
2192: 5681 & S & 53646.418 & 53646.480 & $+29.97$ & $+52.88$ \\
2193: \smallskip
2194: 5698 & S & 53648.164 & 53648.289 & $-55.62$ & $ -9.81$ \\
2195: 5702 & N & 53649.102 & 53649.129 & $-55.55$ & $-46.42$ \\
2196: 5709 & N & 53654.152 & 53654.359 & $-51.60$ & $+23.25$ \\
2197: 5713 & S & 53655.094 & 53655.363 & $-55.54$ & $+41.47$ \\
2198: 5719 & N & 53656.090 & 53656.246 & $-55.45$ & $ +1.14$ \\
2199: \smallskip
2200: 5729 & S & 53657.203 & 53657.215 & $-46.95$ & $-43.05$ \\
2201: 5730 & S & 53657.258 & 53657.324 & $+37.20$ & $+60.71$ \\
2202: 5731 & N & 53657.332 & 53657.441 & $+21.17$ & $+60.69$ \\
2203: 5732 & S & 53657.449 & 53657.488 & $+47.11$ & $+60.73$ \\
2204: 5743 & N & 53663.086 & 53663.164 & $-55.42$ & $-26.98$ \\
2205: \smallskip
2206: 5744 & N & 53663.176 & 53663.418 & $-29.75$ & $+57.83$ \\
2207: 5745 & S & 53663.430 & 53663.488 & $+33.09$ & $+55.10$ \\
2208: 5754 & S & 53664.117 & 53664.367 & $-55.60$ & $+34.37$ \\
2209: 5759 & N & 53665.082 & 53665.395 & $-55.52$ & $+57.81$ \\
2210: 5760 & S & 53665.406 & 53665.492 & $+25.13$ & $+55.68$ \\
2211: \smallskip
2212: 5763 & S & 53666.082 & 53666.246 & $-55.49$ & $ +3.94$ \\
2213: 5765 & N & 53666.332 & 53666.480 & $ +2.30$ & $+54.86$ \\
2214: 5770 & N & 53668.094 & 53668.406 & $-55.54$ & $+57.94$ \\
2215: 5771 & S & 53668.418 & 53668.492 & $+33.09$ & $+60.79$ \\
2216: 5776 & S & 53669.078 & 53669.391 & $-55.50$ & $+57.82$ \\
2217: \smallskip
2218: 5777 & N & 53669.406 & 53669.496 & $+25.61$ & $+57.96$ \\
2219: 5781 & N & 53670.098 & 53670.410 & $-55.31$ & $+57.86$ \\
2220: 5782 & S & 53670.422 & 53670.500 & $+32.65$ & $+60.66$ \\
2221: 5786 & S & 53671.273 & 53671.484 & $-14.82$ & $+60.65$ \\
2222: 5792 & N & 53673.066 & 53673.379 & $-55.42$ & $+57.91$ \\
2223: \smallskip
2224: 5797 & S & 53674.062 & 53674.375 & $-55.57$ & $+58.05$ \\
2225: 5800 & N & 53675.062 & 53675.371 & $-55.61$ & $+56.07$ \\
2226: 5807 & S & 53676.172 & 53676.465 & $-47.67$ & $+57.89$ \\
2227: 5808 & N & 53676.473 & 53676.496 & $+49.27$ & $+57.96$ \\
2228: 5813 & N & 53677.082 & 53677.359 & $-55.56$ & $+44.59$ \\
2229: \smallskip
2230: 5820 & S & 53679.152 & 53679.441 & $-44.54$ & $+59.96$ \\
2231: 5823 & N & 53680.070 & 53680.391 & $-55.46$ & $+60.71$ \\
2232: 5836 & S & 53681.113 & 53681.438 & $-55.48$ & $+60.70$ \\
2233: 5842 & N & 53683.129 & 53683.449 & $-55.43$ & $+60.76$ \\
2234: 5847 & S & 53684.301 & 53684.398 & $+25.71$ & $+60.74$ \\
2235: \smallskip
2236: 5853 & S & 53685.062 & 53685.172 & $-58.95$ & $-19.28$ \\
2237: 5864 & N & 53686.141 & 53686.152 & $-50.06$ & $-45.42$ \\
2238: 5865 & N & 53686.172 & 53686.242 & $-42.96$ & $-18.11$ \\
2239: 5866 & N & 53686.273 & 53686.391 & $+18.21$ & $+60.73$ \\
2240: 5870 & S & 53687.109 & 53687.250 & $-55.57$ & $ -6.16$ \\
2241: \smallskip
2242: 5871 & S & 53687.258 & 53687.340 & $+31.39$ & $+60.74$ \\
2243: 5872 & N & 53687.352 & 53687.449 & $+25.14$ & $+60.78$ \\
2244: 5878 & N & 53693.059 & 53693.395 & $-59.98$ & $+60.68$ \\
2245: 5882 & S & 53694.074 & 53694.410 & $-60.11$ & $+60.71$ \\
2246: 5889 & S & 53696.355 & 53696.402 & $+44.01$ & $+60.78$ \\
2247: \smallskip
2248: 5895 & S & 53697.059 & 53697.395 & $-60.11$ & $+60.71$ \\
2249: 5898 & N & 53698.059 & 53698.129 & $-59.98$ & $-33.63$ \\
2250: 5902 & N & 53699.082 & 53699.301 & $-60.13$ & $+18.78$ \\
2251: 5905 & S & 53700.059 & 53700.391 & $-59.99$ & $+60.69$ \\
2252: 5909 & N & 53702.059 & 53702.211 & $-59.35$ & $ -4.10$ \\
2253: \smallskip
2254: 5915 & N & 53703.066 & 53703.156 & $-60.01$ & $-27.07$ \\
2255: 5918 & N & 53704.059 & 53704.379 & $-54.46$ & $+60.67$ \\
2256: 5924 & S & 53705.043 & 53705.379 & $-60.06$ & $+60.76$ \\
2257: \enddata
2258:
2259: \end{deluxetable}
2260:
2261:
2262: \begin{deluxetable}{lcllrr}
2263: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
2264: \tablewidth{0pt}
2265: \tablecaption{2006 \sdss\ Supernova Imaging Runs\label{tbl:runs2006}}
2266: \tablehead{
2267: \colhead{Run} &
2268: \colhead{Strip} &
2269: \colhead{MJD$_{\rm{start}}$} &
2270: \colhead{MJD$_{\rm{end}}$} &
2271: \colhead{RA$_{\rm{start}}$} &
2272: \colhead{RA$_{\rm{end}}$}
2273: }
2274: \startdata
2275: 6281 & N & 53974.141 & 53974.203 & $-56.82$ & $-34.52$ \\
2276: 6283 & N & 53974.270 & 53974.336 & $-11.69$ & $+12.42$ \\
2277: 6287 & S & 53975.133 & 53975.465 & $-58.78$ & $+60.70$ \\
2278: 6293 & N & 53977.371 & 53977.387 & $ +7.31$ & $+13.45$ \\
2279: 6313 & N & 53989.121 & 53989.160 & $-60.05$ & $-45.99$ \\
2280: % \smallskip
2281: 6314 & N & 53989.176 & 53989.473 & $-47.39$ & $+60.70$ \\
2282: 6330 & S & 53990.312 & 53990.387 & $ +1.17$ & $+27.82$ \\
2283: 6348 & S & 53993.277 & 53993.371 & $-31.19$ & $ +2.94$ \\
2284: 6349 & S & 53993.379 & 53993.414 & $+26.11$ & $+38.98$ \\
2285: 6353 & S & 53994.125 & 53994.156 & $-59.99$ & $-48.77$ \\
2286: % \smallskip
2287: 6355 & S & 53994.301 & 53994.484 & $ -5.78$ & $+59.80$ \\
2288: 6360 & N & 53995.129 & 53995.254 & $-59.98$ & $-14.92$ \\
2289: 6362 & N & 53995.344 & 53995.391 & $ +9.13$ & $+25.90$ \\
2290: 6363 & N & 53995.414 & 53995.453 & $+25.67$ & $+40.04$ \\
2291: 6367 & S & 53996.168 & 53996.469 & $-47.82$ & $+60.72$ \\
2292: % \smallskip
2293: 6370 & N & 53997.105 & 53997.199 & $-59.99$ & $-26.15$ \\
2294: 6373 & N & 53997.352 & 53997.422 & $-17.22$ & $ +8.09$ \\
2295: 6374 & N & 53997.434 & 53997.469 & $+38.16$ & $+50.88$ \\
2296: 6377 & S & 53998.105 & 53998.312 & $-60.00$ & $+14.85$ \\
2297: 6383 & N & 54000.191 & 54000.430 & $-32.88$ & $+53.50$ \\
2298: % \smallskip
2299: 6391 & N & 54003.145 & 54003.160 & $-60.06$ & $-54.52$ \\
2300: 6400 & N & 54005.078 & 54005.160 & $-60.02$ & $-30.98$ \\
2301: 6401 & S & 54005.168 & 54005.191 & $-50.90$ & $-41.62$ \\
2302: 6402 & S & 54005.230 & 54005.332 & $-24.92$ & $+11.76$ \\
2303: 6404 & S & 54005.383 & 54005.484 & $+24.97$ & $+60.75$ \\
2304: % \smallskip
2305: 6408 & S & 54006.094 & 54006.125 & $-59.99$ & $-48.77$ \\
2306: 6409 & N & 54006.137 & 54006.395 & $-32.79$ & $+60.78$ \\
2307: 6412 & N & 54007.094 & 54007.191 & $-58.91$ & $-24.18$ \\
2308: 6414 & N & 54007.258 & 54007.484 & $-25.93$ & $+54.91$ \\
2309: 6417 & S & 54008.094 & 54008.430 & $-60.13$ & $+60.68$ \\
2310: % \smallskip
2311: 6418 & N & 54008.438 & 54008.461 & $+53.21$ & $+60.70$ \\
2312: 6421 & N & 54009.090 & 54009.422 & $-60.12$ & $+60.69$ \\
2313: 6422 & S & 54009.434 & 54009.484 & $+37.09$ & $+56.10$ \\
2314: 6425 & S & 54010.090 & 54010.426 & $-60.04$ & $+60.77$ \\
2315: 6430 & N & 54011.152 & 54011.488 & $-60.10$ & $+60.71$ \\
2316: % \smallskip
2317: 6433 & S & 54012.082 & 54012.418 & $-60.08$ & $+60.73$ \\
2318: 6435 & N & 54012.434 & 54012.484 & $+36.09$ & $+54.35$ \\
2319: 6441 & N & 54019.102 & 54019.289 & $-60.13$ & $ +6.64$ \\
2320: 6444 & N & 54019.371 & 54019.480 & $+21.13$ & $+60.66$ \\
2321: 6447 & S & 54020.090 & 54020.367 & $-60.05$ & $+40.10$ \\
2322: % \smallskip
2323: 6448 & S & 54020.395 & 54020.457 & $+39.08$ & $+60.79$ \\
2324: 6450 & N & 54021.305 & 54021.492 & $ -6.74$ & $+60.79$ \\
2325: 6453 & S & 54022.137 & 54022.293 & $-60.01$ & $ -4.47$ \\
2326: 6458 & S & 54024.316 & 54024.492 & $ -6.73$ & $+55.85$ \\
2327: 6461 & N & 54025.152 & 54025.488 & $-60.11$ & $+60.71$ \\
2328: % \smallskip
2329: 6464 & S & 54026.090 & 54026.133 & $-59.99$ & $-45.02$ \\
2330: 6468 & S & 54028.078 & 54028.254 & $-60.06$ & $ +2.96$ \\
2331: 6471 & S & 54028.352 & 54028.492 & $ +9.53$ & $+60.74$ \\
2332: 6474 & N & 54029.082 & 54029.336 & $-60.05$ & $+31.41$ \\
2333: 6476 & N & 54029.414 & 54029.496 & $+30.56$ & $+60.66$ \\
2334: % \smallskip
2335: 6479 & S & 54030.082 & 54030.293 & $-60.09$ & $+15.96$ \\
2336: 6480 & S & 54030.371 & 54030.445 & $+33.19$ & $+59.24$ \\
2337: 6484 & N & 54031.070 & 54031.402 & $-60.01$ & $+60.66$ \\
2338: 6488 & S & 54032.070 & 54032.164 & $-60.06$ & $-26.83$ \\
2339: 6494 & S & 54034.137 & 54034.223 & $-61.51$ & $-31.27$ \\
2340: % \smallskip
2341: 6501 & S & 54035.234 & 54035.492 & $-32.56$ & $+60.72$ \\
2342: 6504 & N & 54036.074 & 54036.410 & $-60.00$ & $+60.67$ \\
2343: 6508 & S & 54037.062 & 54037.398 & $-60.52$ & $+60.59$ \\
2344: 6513 & N & 54039.070 & 54039.406 & $-60.08$ & $+60.73$ \\
2345: 6518 & S & 54040.078 & 54040.414 & $-60.12$ & $+60.69$ \\
2346: % \smallskip
2347: 6522 & N & 54041.074 & 54041.152 & $-60.00$ & $-31.86$ \\
2348: 6524 & N & 54041.227 & 54041.379 & $ +6.11$ & $+60.75$ \\
2349: 6525 & S & 54041.387 & 54041.449 & $+39.12$ & $+60.68$ \\
2350: 6528 & S & 54047.070 & 54047.164 & $-60.11$ & $-25.23$ \\
2351: 6530 & S & 54047.254 & 54047.441 & $ -7.98$ & $+60.74$ \\
2352: % \smallskip
2353: 6533 & N & 54048.066 & 54048.344 & $-60.10$ & $+39.61$ \\
2354: 6534 & N & 54048.367 & 54048.430 & $+38.70$ & $+60.71$ \\
2355: 6537 & S & 54049.223 & 54049.438 & $-17.38$ & $+60.78$ \\
2356: 6542 & S & 54050.062 & 54050.215 & $-59.99$ & $ -4.60$ \\
2357: 6545 & S & 54050.344 & 54050.398 & $+41.22$ & $+60.68$ \\
2358: % \smallskip
2359: 6548 & N & 54051.059 & 54051.164 & $-60.03$ & $-22.01$ \\
2360: 6552 & N & 54052.070 & 54052.406 & $-60.05$ & $+60.77$ \\
2361: 6555 & S & 54053.070 & 54053.320 & $-60.02$ & $+31.00$ \\
2362: 6556 & S & 54053.328 & 54053.418 & $+28.37$ & $+60.71$ \\
2363: 6559 & N & 54054.090 & 54054.293 & $-60.06$ & $+14.05$ \\
2364: % \smallskip
2365: 6564 & N & 54055.066 & 54055.316 & $-60.10$ & $+30.18$ \\
2366: 6565 & N & 54055.328 & 54055.418 & $+28.17$ & $+60.66$ \\
2367: 6568 & S & 54056.070 & 54056.406 & $-60.05$ & $+60.77$ \\
2368: 6571 & S & 54057.055 & 54057.152 & $-53.76$ & $-19.32$ \\
2369: 6577 & N & 54058.066 & 54058.398 & $-59.99$ & $+60.68$ \\
2370: % \smallskip
2371: 6580 & S & 54059.066 & 54059.398 & $-60.06$ & $+60.76$ \\
2372: 6584 & N & 54060.137 & 54060.422 & $-42.83$ & $+60.78$ \\
2373: 6590 & S & 54061.074 & 54061.203 & $-60.09$ & $-13.52$ \\
2374: 6592 & S & 54061.277 & 54061.410 & $+12.07$ & $+60.73$ \\
2375: 6596 & S & 54062.070 & 54062.402 & $-60.07$ & $+60.75$ \\
2376: % \smallskip
2377: 6600 & N & 54063.055 & 54063.320 & $-60.10$ & $+34.82$ \\
2378: 6604 & S & 54064.309 & 54064.402 & $+27.24$ & $+60.78$ \\
2379: 6609 & N & 54065.320 & 54065.398 & $+33.18$ & $+60.73$ \\
2380: 6615 & S & 54068.059 & 54068.180 & $-60.05$ & $-16.78$ \\
2381: 6618 & S & 54068.211 & 54068.387 & $ -1.81$ & $+60.77$ \\
2382: \enddata
2383:
2384: \end{deluxetable}
2385:
2386:
2387: \begin{deluxetable}{lr}
2388: \tablewidth{0pt}
2389: \tablecaption{Reduction of 2006 Handscanning by Autoscanner\label{tbl:scanning}}
2390: \tablehead{
2391: \colhead{} &
2392: \colhead{number of objects}
2393: }
2394:
2395: \startdata
2396: Total to be scanned\tablenotemark{a} & 145,428 \\
2397: \hline
2398: 1st epoch & 118,584 \\
2399: \hspace{0.5cm}Bright\tablenotemark{b} & 21,882 \\
2400: \hspace{0.5cm}Scanned\tablenotemark{c} & 8,373 \\
2401: 2nd epoch & 26,844 \\
2402: \hspace{0.5cm}Scanned & 6,007 \\
2403: \hline
2404: Total scanned\tablenotemark{d} & 14,430 \\
2405: \enddata
2406:
2407: \tablenotetext{a}{The number of objects that humans would have scanned in
2408: 2006 without the autoscanner.}
2409: \tablenotetext{b}{Objects that were detected for the first time and brighter
2410: than 21 mag in $g$ or $r$.}
2411: \tablenotetext{c}{Actual number of ``Bright'', first-epoch objects that were
2412: scanned.}
2413: \tablenotetext{d}{Total number of objects scanned in 2006. This number
2414: differs slightly from the sum of the scanned first- and second-epoch objects
2415: because some scanners on a few occasions chose to scan first-epochs objects
2416: as faint as $21.5$~mag in $g$ or $r$.}
2417:
2418: \end{deluxetable}
2419:
2420:
2421:
2422: \begin{deluxetable}{ccrrrclc}
2423: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
2424: \tablewidth{0pt}
2425: \tablecaption{List of spectroscopically confirmed supernovae in
2426: 2005\label{tbl:sn2005}}
2427: \tablehead{
2428: \colhead{Candidate} &
2429: \colhead{IAU} &
2430: &
2431: \colhead{RA\tablenotemark{c}} &
2432: \colhead{Dec} &
2433: \colhead{Discovery} &
2434: &
2435: \colhead{\# of} \\
2436:
2437: \colhead{ID\tablenotemark{a}} &
2438: \colhead{Name} &
2439: \colhead{z\tablenotemark{b}} &
2440: \multicolumn{2}{c}{(degrees in J2000)} &
2441: \colhead{Date} &
2442: \colhead{Type\tablenotemark{d}} &
2443: \colhead{Spectra\tablenotemark{e}}
2444: }
2445: \startdata
2446: 722 & 2005ed & 0.0859 & 0.70569 & +0.75127 & 2005-09-04 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2447: 739 & 2005ef & 0.1072 & 14.59529 & +0.67906 & 2005-09-04 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2448: 744 & 2005ei & 0.1286 & $-$30.80149 & +0.31750 & 2005-09-04 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2449: 762 & 2005eg & 0.1912 & 15.53535 & $-$0.87899 & 2005-09-04 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2450: 774 & 2005ex & 0.0936 & 25.46351 & $-$0.87638 & 2005-09-04 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2451: % \smallskip
2452: 1032 & 2005ez & 0.1299 & 46.79571 & +1.11953 & 2005-09-06 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2453: 1112 & 2005fg & 0.2585 & $-$20.98238 & $-$0.37519 & 2005-09-10 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2454: 1114 & 2005lb & 0.0257 & $-$16.29145 & $-$0.25250 & 2005-09-10 & SN II & 1 \\
2455: 1119 & 2005fc & 0.2982 & $-$39.58644 & +0.89466 & 2005-09-10 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2456: 1166 & \nodata & 0.3825 & 9.35564 & +0.97328 & 2005-09-10 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2457: % \smallskip
2458: 1241 & 2005ff & 0.089 & $-$22.32746 & $-$0.77659 & 2005-09-10 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2459: 1253 & 2005fd & 0.2625 & $-$36.20095 & +0.16308 & 2005-09-10 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2460: 1316 & 2005fe & 0.2174 & $-$25.13617 & +0.49444 & 2005-09-10 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2461: 1371 & 2005fh & 0.1189 & $-$10.62619 & +0.42939 & 2005-09-10 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2462: 1472 & 2005lc & 0.0144 & 45.54660 & $-$1.16651 & 2005-09-10 & SN II & 1 \\
2463: % \smallskip
2464: 1580 & 2005fb & 0.186 & 45.32310 & $-$0.64409 & 2005-09-11 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2465: 1686 & \nodata & 0.1367 & 2.24835 & $-$0.21039 & 2005-09-11 & SN Ia? & 1 \\
2466: 1688 & \nodata & 0.3591 & $-$38.64223 & +0.32454 & 2005-09-11 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2467: 1794 & 2005fj & 0.1426 & $-$42.16314 & $-$0.44537 & 2005-09-11 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2468: 2000 & 2005hl & 0.0243 & $-$46.16752 & +0.54298 & 2005-09-13 & SN Ib & 1 \\
2469: % \smallskip
2470: 2017 & 2005fo & 0.2629 & $-$31.05666 & +0.59352 & 2005-09-13 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2471: 2030 & 2005fl & 0.2343 & $-$48.15841 & $-$1.25328 & 2005-09-13 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2472: 2031 & 2005fm & 0.1530 & $-$47.95680 & $-$1.17143 & 2005-09-13 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2473: 2053 & 2005fk & 0.2651 & $-$41.16734 & $-$0.38295 & 2005-09-13 & SN Ic & 1 \\
2474: 2102 & 2005fn & 0.0958 & $-$47.77902 & +0.19114 & 2005-09-13 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2475: % \smallskip
2476: 2165 & 2005fr & 0.291 & 17.09174 & $-$0.09627 & 2005-09-14 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2477: 2246 & 2005fy & 0.1952 & 50.09041 & $-$0.88558 & 2005-09-14 & SN Ia & 4 \\
2478: 2308 & 2005ey & 0.149 & 34.27287 & +0.28030 & 2005-09-14 & SN Ia & 3 \\
2479: 2330 & 2005fp & 0.2135 & 6.80711 & +1.12060 & 2005-09-14 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2480: 2366 & 2005fq & 0.1462 & 13.43351 & $-$0.56021 & 2005-09-15 & SN II & 1 \\
2481: % \smallskip
2482: 2372 & 2005ft & 0.1798 & 40.52072 & $-$0.54085 & 2005-09-15 & SN Ia & 3 \\
2483: 2422 & 2005fi & 0.268 & 1.99454 & +0.63820 & 2005-09-15 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2484: 2440 & 2005fu & 0.194 & 42.63370 & +0.80780 & 2005-09-15 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2485: 2533 & 2005fs & 0.344 & 31.22069 & $-$0.32647 & 2005-09-15 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2486: 2561 & 2005fv & 0.1170 & 46.34345 & +0.85837 & 2005-09-15 & SN Ia & 4 \\
2487: % \smallskip
2488: 2635 & 2005fw & 0.1440 & 52.70433 & $-$1.23808 & 2005-09-16 & SN Ia & 3 \\
2489: 2661 & \nodata & 0.1930 & $-$6.79249 & +0.09721 & 2005-09-16 & SN II & 1 \\
2490: 2689 & 2005fa & 0.166 & 24.90035 & $-$0.75875 & 2005-09-16 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2491: 2744 & 2005hm & 0.0350 & $-$35.24730 & $-$1.02741 & 2005-09-16 & SN Ib & 1 \\
2492: 2789 & 2005fx & 0.2907 & $-$15.79855 & +0.40110 & 2005-09-17 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2493: % \smallskip
2494: 2916 & 2005fz & 0.121 & $-$44.07830 & +0.56956 & 2005-09-23 & SN Ia & 4 \\
2495: 2943 & 2005go & 0.2662 & 17.70495 & +1.00792 & 2005-09-24 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2496: 2992 & 2005gp & 0.1266 & 55.49706 & $-$0.78267 & 2005-09-24 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2497: 3080 & 2005ga & 0.1739 & 16.93234 & $-$1.03950 & 2005-09-25 & SN Ia & 3 \\
2498: 3087 & 2005gc & 0.1654 & 20.40671 & $-$0.97723 & 2005-09-25 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2499: % \smallskip
2500: 3199 & 2005gs & 0.2511 & $-$26.70728 & +1.05054 & 2005-09-25 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2501: 3241 & 2005gh & 0.387 & $-$47.34854 & $-$0.35409 & 2005-09-25 & SN Ia? & 1 \\
2502: 3256 & 2005hn & 0.1076 & $-$30.73229 & $-$0.22348 & 2005-09-25 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2503: 3317 & 2005gd & 0.1618 & 26.96261 & +0.64061 & 2005-09-25 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2504: 3331 & 2005ge & 0.208 & 34.56138 & +0.79656 & 2005-09-25 & SN Ia? & 2 \\
2505: % \smallskip
2506: 3377 & 2005gr & 0.2460 & 54.15620 & +1.07917 & 2005-09-25 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2507: 3451 & 2005gf & 0.2498 & $-$25.93073 & +0.70815 & 2005-09-25 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2508: 3452 & 2005gg & 0.2313 & $-$25.32850 & +0.63919 & 2005-09-25 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2509: 3592 & 2005gb & 0.0870 & 19.05242 & +0.79195 & 2005-09-26 & SN Ia & 3 \\
2510: 3818 & 2005gi & 0.0511 & 13.96950 & +0.50494 & 2005-09-26 & SN II & 1 \\
2511: % \smallskip
2512: 3901 & 2005ho & 0.0638 & 14.85043 & +0.00261 & 2005-09-26 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2513: 4000 & 2005gt & 0.2793 & 31.01601 & $-$0.36583 & 2005-09-26 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2514: 4012 & \nodata & 0.0253 & 48.44893 & $-$0.24360 & 2005-09-26 & SN Ic & 1 \\
2515: 4046 & 2005gw & 0.278 & $-$5.50168 & +0.64211 & 2005-09-26 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2516: 4241 & 2005gu & 0.3320 & 12.23769 & $-$0.90573 & 2005-09-27 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2517: % \smallskip
2518: 4524 & 2005gj & 0.0618 & 45.29978 & $-$0.55387 & 2005-09-28 & SN Ia & 19 \\
2519: 4577 & 2005gv & 0.365 & 38.47554 & +0.28071 & 2005-09-28 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2520: 4679 & 2005gy & 0.3345 & 21.52834 & +0.67686 & 2005-09-29 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2521: 5103 & 2005gx & 0.148 & $-$0.11556 & +0.73717 & 2005-10-02 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2522: 5183 & 2005gq & 0.3905 & 53.45402 & +0.70935 & 2005-10-02 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2523: % \smallskip
2524: 5350 & 2005hp & 0.1764 & $-$52.78083 & $-$0.77924 & 2005-10-03 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2525: 5391 & 2005hs & 0.3009 & 52.34197 & $-$1.09470 & 2005-10-03 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2526: 5395 & 2005hr & 0.1170 & 49.64095 & +0.12335 & 2005-10-03 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2527: 5533 & 2005hu & 0.2206 & $-$31.33006 & +0.41343 & 2005-10-12 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2528: 5549 & 2005hx & 0.120 & 3.25054 & +0.24823 & 2005-10-12 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2529: % \smallskip
2530: 5550 & 2005hy & 0.1562 & 3.59830 & +0.33305 & 2005-10-12 & SN Ia & 3 \\
2531: 5588 & 2005hw & 0.4103 & 2.36862 & +1.15492 & 2005-10-12 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2532: 5635 & 2005hv & 0.1795 & $-$26.81724 & $-$0.03492 & 2005-10-12 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2533: 5717 & 2005ia & 0.2545 & 17.89596 & $-$0.00589 & 2005-10-12 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2534: 5736 & 2005jz & 0.2654 & 22.86274 & $-$0.63162 & 2005-10-12 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2535: % \smallskip
2536: 5737 & 2005ib & 0.3937 & 22.85704 & $-$0.60339 & 2005-10-12 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2537: 5751 & 2005hz & 0.1305 & 11.63416 & +0.83823 & 2005-10-12 & SN Ia & 3 \\
2538: 5821 & 2005hq & 0.465 & $-$47.41758 & $-$0.82528 & 2005-10-13 & SN Ia? & 2 \\
2539: 5844 & 2005ic & 0.3118 & $-$32.21379 & $-$0.84294 & 2005-10-13 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2540: 5916 & 2005is & 0.1746 & 5.43739 & $-$0.32503 & 2005-10-13 & SN Ia? & 3 \\
2541: % \smallskip
2542: 5944 & 2005hc & 0.0459 & 29.19980 & $-$0.21372 & 2005-10-13 & SN Ia & 5 \\
2543: 5957 & 2005ie & 0.2803 & 34.76058 & $-$0.27283 & 2005-10-13 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2544: 5966 & 2005it & 0.3090 & 16.19039 & +0.51392 & 2005-10-13 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2545: 5994 & 2005ht & 0.189 & $-$47.39745 & $-$0.16789 & 2005-10-13 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2546: 6057 & 2005if & 0.0675 & 52.55362 & $-$0.97458 & 2005-10-15 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2547: % \smallskip
2548: 6100 & 2005ka & 0.3186 & $-$26.51685 & +1.08649 & 2005-10-20 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2549: 6108 & 2005ih & 0.2603 & 1.80660 & +0.34898 & 2005-10-21 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2550: 6127 & 2005iw & 0.2894 & $-$22.67602 & $-$0.09236 & 2005-10-21 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2551: 6137 & 2005iv & 0.3001 & $-$52.06387 & +0.24475 & 2005-10-21 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2552: 6192 & 2005jy & 0.2727 & $-$11.53501 & +1.25699 & 2005-10-21 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2553: % \smallskip
2554: 6196 & 2005ig & 0.2809 & $-$22.36885 & $-$0.50266 & 2005-10-21 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2555: 6249 & 2005ii & 0.2950 & 3.26555 & $-$0.62012 & 2005-10-21 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2556: 6295 & 2005js & 0.0793 & 23.67298 & $-$0.60537 & 2005-10-21 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2557: 6304 & 2005jk & 0.185 & 26.49762 & +1.19596 & 2005-10-21 & SN Ia & 3 \\
2558: 6315 & 2005ix & 0.2557 & $-$49.51717 & +1.09200 & 2005-10-21 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2559: % \smallskip
2560: 6406 & 2005ij & 0.1240 & 46.08861 & $-$1.06296 & 2005-10-22 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2561: 6422 & 2005id & 0.187 & $-$10.86119 & $-$0.66322 & 2005-10-22 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2562: 6471 & \nodata & 0.2018 & $-$50.61388 & +0.49495 & 2005-10-22 & SN II & 1 \\
2563: 6558 & 2005hj\tablenotemark{f} & 0.0574 & 21.70167 & $-$1.23812 & 2005-10-22 & SN Ia & 2 \\ % quimby
2564: 6649 & 2005jd & 0.318 & 34.27586 & +0.53484 & 2005-10-23 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2565: % \smallskip
2566: 6696 & \nodata & 0.2382 & $-$20.92067 & +0.47925 & 2005-10-23 & SN Ia? & 1 \\
2567: 6699 & 2005ik & 0.313 & $-$37.18502 & $-$1.05699 & 2005-10-23 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2568: 6773 & 2005iu & 0.0916 & $-$54.93498 & +0.21737 & 2005-10-24 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2569: 6777 & 2005iy & 0.4043 & $-$38.78356 & +0.38561 & 2005-10-24 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2570: 6780 & 2005iz & 0.206 & $-$31.93139 & +0.26708 & 2005-10-24 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2571: % \smallskip
2572: 6852 & 2005jf & 0.3007 & 53.41983 & $-$0.11210 & 2005-10-24 & SN Ia? & 1 \\
2573: 6924 & 2005ja & 0.329 & $-$1.03067 & +0.87698 & 2005-10-24 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2574: 6933 & 2005jc & 0.214 & 11.35172 & +1.07558 & 2005-10-24 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2575: 6936 & 2005jl & 0.1810 & $-$36.76618 & $-$0.69978 & 2005-10-24 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2576: 6962 & 2005je & 0.0930 & 38.86091 & +1.07488 & 2005-10-24 & SN Ia? & 1 \\
2577: % \smallskip
2578: 6968 & \nodata & 0.0983 & 19.55569 & $-$0.90655 & 2005-10-24 & SN Ia? & 3 \\ % SDSS-z
2579: 7017 & \nodata & 0.1430 & 31.36534 & $-$0.49791 & 2005-10-24 & SN Ia & 3 \\
2580: 7143 & 2005jg & 0.306 & $-$14.73764 & $-$0.20737 & 2005-10-26 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2581: 7147 & 2005jh & 0.1099 & $-$9.98155 & $-$0.05548 & 2005-10-26 & SN Ia & 3 \\
2582: 7243 & 2005jm & 0.2045 & $-$31.92092 & +0.47193 & 2005-10-27 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2583: % \smallskip
2584: 7335 & 2005kn & 0.197 & $-$41.11480 & $-$0.35534 & 2005-10-27 & SN Ia? & 1 \\
2585: 7426 & 2005jb & 0.386 & $-$20.98663 & $-$0.36792 & 2005-10-27 & SN Ia? & 1 \\
2586: 7460 & 2005jx & 0.2133 & $-$36.41594 & $-$0.68170 & 2005-10-27 & SN Ia? & 1 \\
2587: 7473 & 2005ji & 0.220 & 4.32641 & $-$0.25726 & 2005-10-27 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2588: 7475 & 2005jn & 0.3191 & 4.75348 & $-$0.28149 & 2005-10-27 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2589: % \smallskip
2590: 7512 & 2005jo & 0.2354 & 52.09032 & $-$0.32609 & 2005-10-27 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2591: 7779 & 2005jw & 0.376 & $-$49.91979 & $-$0.00717 & 2005-10-28 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2592: 7847 & 2005jp & 0.2126 & 32.45995 & $-$0.06179 & 2005-10-28 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2593: 7876 & 2005ir & 0.0767 & 19.18251 & +0.79463 & 2005-10-28 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2594: 7947 & 2005jj & 0.368 & $-$45.81392 & +0.40835 & 2005-10-28 & SN Ia? & 1 \\
2595: % \smallskip
2596: 8030 & 2005jv & 0.423 & 40.20883 & +0.99314 & 2005-10-28 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2597: 8046 & 2005ju & 0.2591 & 39.11682 & +0.51126 & 2005-10-29 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2598: 8151 & 2005hk & 0.0131 & 6.96200 & $-$1.19815 & 2005-10-29 & SN Ia & 11 \\
2599: 8213 & 2005ko & 0.1855 & $-$2.47907 & $-$0.92139 & 2005-10-31 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2600: 8495 & 2005mi & 0.2151 & $-$24.73898 & $-$0.74816 & 2005-10-31 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2601: % \smallskip
2602: 8598 & 2005jt & 0.3613 & 42.66734 & $-$0.06596 & 2005-11-01 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2603: 8679 & 2005jr & 0.2945 & 15.05152 & +0.34081 & 2005-11-01 & SN II & 1 \\
2604: 8707 & 2005mh & 0.3951 & 41.23617 & +0.20359 & 2005-11-01 & SN Ia? & 1 \\
2605: 8719 & 2005kp & 0.1174 & 7.72148 & $-$0.71884 & 2005-11-01 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2606: 8921 & 2005ld & 0.1462 & $-$34.99800 & $-$0.00792 & 2005-11-02 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2607: % \smallskip
2608: 9032 & 2005le & 0.2549 & $-$22.11544 & $-$0.49357 & 2005-11-02 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2609: 9045 & 2005kq & 0.3903 & $-$12.16286 & $-$0.60863 & 2005-11-02 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2610: 9118 & 2005kr & 0.1344 & 47.12358 & +0.88893 & 2005-11-03 & SN Ic & 1 \\
2611: 9207 & 2005lg & 0.3509 & 19.08363 & $-$0.80780 & 2005-11-03 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2612: 9273 & 2005ks & 0.0992 & $-$35.51432 & $-$0.03245 & 2005-11-03 & SN Ic & 1 \\
2613: % \smallskip
2614: 9457 & 2005li & 0.2572 & $-$24.18564 & +0.25304 & 2005-11-04 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2615: 9467 & 2005lh & 0.2191 & $-$31.04860 & +1.18079 & 2005-11-04 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2616: 10028 & 2005kt & 0.0662 & 17.74185 & +0.27615 & 2005-11-07 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2617: 10096 & 2005lj & 0.0789 & 29.42928 & $-$0.17945 & 2005-11-07 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2618: 10106 & \nodata & 0.1479 & 47.69327 & $-$0.20488 & 2005-11-07 & SN Ia? & 2 \\
2619: % \smallskip
2620: 10297 & 2005mk & 0.1486 & $-$19.33066 & +0.83301 & 2005-11-08 & SN II & 1 \\
2621: 10367 & 2005kb & 0.0155 & 12.71115 & +0.85362 & 2005-11-08 & SN II & 2 \\
2622: 10434 & 2005lk & 0.1037 & $-$30.04406 & $-$1.19371 & 2005-11-08 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2623: 10449 & 2005ll & 0.246 & $-$22.97138 & $-$1.12817 & 2005-11-08 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2624: 10550 & 2005lf & 0.3008 & $-$10.32462 & $-$1.20487 & 2005-11-08 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2625: % \smallskip
2626: 10805 & 2005ku & 0.0456 & $-$15.07246 & $-$0.01371 & 2005-11-10 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2627: 10907 & 2005lm & 0.0853 & 3.77046 & +0.35514 & 2005-11-12 & SN II & 1 \\
2628: 11017 & 2005mj\tablenotemark{g} & 0.210 & $-$37.04401 & $-$1.06939 & 2005-11-13 & SN II & 1 \\ % Magellan
2629: 11067 & 2005ml & 0.119 & 33.51840 & $-$0.23918 & 2005-11-14 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2630: 11206 & 2005mm & 0.3805 & 3.28979 & +1.14552 & 2005-11-20 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2631: % \smallskip
2632: 11300 & 2005ln & 0.130 & 6.75050 & $-$0.58662 & 2005-11-20 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2633: 11320 & 2005mo & 0.2743 & 57.55376 & $-$0.24022 & 2005-11-22 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2634: 11332 & 2005mn & 0.0474 & 57.32682 & $-$0.69207 & 2005-11-23 & SN Ib & 4 \\
2635: 11452 & 2005lo & 0.300 & 9.29943 & $-$1.20342 & 2005-11-24 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2636: 11557 & 2005lq & 0.382 & 40.40017 & +0.20502 & 2005-11-24 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2637: % \smallskip
2638: 11650 & 2005mp & 0.275 & 16.19032 & +0.05563 & 2005-11-25 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2639: 11864 & 2005lp & 0.305 & 26.92832 & +0.20722 & 2005-11-26 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2640: 12136 & 2005mq & 0.352 & $-$9.90923 & $-$0.34989 & 2005-11-27 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2641: \enddata
2642: \tablenotetext{a}{Internal SN candidate designation.}
2643: \tablenotetext{b}{Final spectroscopic redshifts. When narrow galaxy lines
2644: are detected in at least one of the spectra, the redshifts are given to four
2645: decimal places. The typical uncertainties are $\sim 0.0005$. When only the
2646: SN is detected, the redshifts are given to three decimal places and the
2647: uncertainties are $\sim 0.005$ (see \citealt{zheng07}).}
2648: \tablenotetext{c}{Right Ascension is provided in decimal degrees defined in
2649: the range [-180$^\circ$,+180$^\circ$].}
2650: \tablenotetext{d}{The final spectroscopic type of the SN candidate.
2651: Spectroscopically probable SNe Ia are designated ``SN Ia?'' (see
2652: \citealt{zheng07}).}
2653: \tablenotetext{e}{This includes all spectral observations performed
2654: including those of the SN candidate and possibly its host galaxy.}
2655: \tablenotetext{f}{Spectroscopically confirmed by \citet{quimby07}.}
2656: \tablenotetext{g}{Spectroscopically confirmed by the ESSENCE Group.}
2657:
2658: \end{deluxetable}
2659:
2660:
2661: \begin{deluxetable}{ccrrrclc}
2662: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
2663: \tablewidth{0pt}
2664: \tablecaption{List of spectroscopically confirmed supernovae in
2665: 2006\label{tbl:sn2006}}
2666: \tablehead{
2667: \colhead{Candidate} &
2668: \colhead{IAU} &
2669: &
2670: \colhead{RA\tablenotemark{c}} &
2671: \colhead{Dec} &
2672: \colhead{Discovery} &
2673: &
2674: \colhead{\# of} \\
2675:
2676: \colhead{ID\tablenotemark{a}} &
2677: \colhead{Name} &
2678: \colhead{z\tablenotemark{b}} &
2679: \multicolumn{2}{c}{(degrees in J2000)} &
2680: \colhead{Date} &
2681: \colhead{Type\tablenotemark{d}} &
2682: \colhead{Spectra\tablenotemark{e}}
2683: }
2684: \startdata
2685: 12778 & 2006fs & 0.10 & $-$42.50417 & +0.40879 & 2006-08-27 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2686: 12779 & 2006fd & 0.08 & $-$50.52813 & +1.22112 & 2006-08-27 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2687: 12780 & 2006eq\tablenotemark{f} & 0.05 & $-$37.84531 & +1.22811 & 2006-08-27 & SN Ia & 2 \\ % CfA
2688: 12781 & 2006er & 0.08 & 5.40656 & $-$1.00997 & 2006-08-27 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2689: 12782 & 2006fq & 0.07 & 5.00338 & $-$0.62497 & 2006-08-27 & SN II & 1 \\
2690: % \smallskip
2691: 12819 & 2006ho & 0.11 & 8.36686 & $-$0.32024 & 2006-08-29 & SN II & 1 \\
2692: 12820 & 2006fg & 0.04 & 9.58353 & $-$0.29499 & 2006-08-29 & SN II & 4 \\
2693: 12841 & 2006gk & 0.29 & $-$38.65275 & $-$1.03367 & 2006-09-11 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2694: 12842 & 2006ez & 0.09 & $-$36.54476 & $-$1.01596 & 2006-09-11 & SN II & 4 \\
2695: 12843 & 2006fa & 0.17 & $-$36.12191 & $-$0.98027 & 2006-09-11 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2696: % \smallskip
2697: 12851 & 2006gm & 0.25 & $-$15.21893 & $-$0.62737 & 2006-09-11 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2698: 12853 & 2006ey & 0.17 & $-$43.23444 & +0.72307 & 2006-09-11 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2699: 12855 & 2006fk & 0.17 & $-$29.74447 & +0.71624 & 2006-09-11 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2700: 12856 & 2006fl & 0.17 & $-$27.13453 & +0.75598 & 2006-09-11 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2701: 12860 & 2006fc & 0.12 & $-$36.30580 & +1.17591 & 2006-09-11 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2702: % \smallskip
2703: 12869 & 2006ge & 0.28 & $-$32.60088 & +0.00108 & 2006-09-12 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2704: 12874 & 2006fb & 0.24 & $-$6.03538 & $-$0.17711 & 2006-09-12 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2705: 12881 & 2006gu & 0.24 & 10.16235 & $-$0.07357 & 2006-09-12 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2706: 12883 & 2006fr & 0.31 & $-$47.37411 & +0.39867 & 2006-09-12 & SN Ia? & 1 \\
2707: 12897 & 2006eb & 0.02 & 18.42139 & $-$0.10158 & 2006-09-12 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2708: % \smallskip
2709: 12898 & 2006fw & 0.08 & 26.79308 & $-$0.14696 & 2006-09-12 & SN Ia & 3 \\
2710: 12907 & 2006fv & 0.13 & 20.40784 & +0.41453 & 2006-09-12 & SN Ia? & 1 \\
2711: 12927 & 2006fj & 0.19 & 41.78614 & +0.77513 & 2006-09-12 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2712: 12928 & 2006ew & 0.14 & $-$54.99097 & $-$0.97569 & 2006-09-12 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2713: 12930 & 2006ex & 0.15 & $-$50.31722 & $-$0.47453 & 2006-09-12 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2714: % \smallskip
2715: 12950 & 2006fy & 0.08 & $-$8.33255 & $-$0.84028 & 2006-09-12 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2716: 12971 & 2006ff & 0.23 & 6.64850 & $-$0.30207 & 2006-09-12 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2717: 12972 & 2006ft & 0.26 & 7.95859 & $-$0.38296 & 2006-09-12 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2718: 12977 & 2006gh & 0.25 & 13.69561 & $-$0.25086 & 2006-09-12 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2719: 12979 & 2006gf & 0.12 & 11.60148 & +0.00348 & 2006-09-12 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2720: % \smallskip
2721: 12983 & 2006gl & 0.27 & 16.45878 & +0.14480 & 2006-09-12 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2722: 12991 & 2006gd & 0.15 & 17.60995 & $-$1.06803 & 2006-09-12 & SN II & 1 \\
2723: 13005 & 2006fh & 0.12 & 27.39546 & $-$0.64988 & 2006-09-12 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2724: 13025 & 2006fx & 0.22 & $-$18.43267 & +0.41590 & 2006-09-15 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2725: 13038 & 2006gn & 0.10 & $-$12.17322 & +0.50461 & 2006-09-15 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2726: % \smallskip
2727: 13044 & 2006fm & 0.12 & $-$27.45725 & +0.50326 & 2006-09-15 & SN Ia & 3 \\
2728: 13045 & 2006fn & 0.18 & $-$14.97506 & +0.53767 & 2006-09-15 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2729: 13070 & 2006fu & 0.20 & $-$2.21494 & $-$0.74634 & 2006-09-15 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2730: 13072 & 2006fi & 0.23 & $-$25.04053 & +0.02437 & 2006-09-15 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2731: 13099 & 2006gb & 0.27 & $-$0.18127 & $-$1.25038 & 2006-09-16 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2732: % \smallskip
2733: 13135 & 2006fz & 0.10 & 4.17229 & $-$0.42454 & 2006-09-16 & SN Ia & 9 \\
2734: 13136 & 2006go & 0.37 & 6.14068 & $-$0.27906 & 2006-09-16 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2735: 13152 & 2006gg & 0.20 & 7.05211 & +0.11801 & 2006-09-16 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2736: 13174 & 2006ga & 0.24 & 13.23469 & +0.44786 & 2006-09-16 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2737: 13195 & 2006fo & 0.02 & 38.16203 & +0.61751 & 2006-09-16 & SN Ic & 11 \\
2738: % \smallskip
2739: 13254 & 2006gx & 0.18 & 42.05867 & $-$0.34703 & 2006-09-16 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2740: 13305 & 2006he & 0.21 & $-$28.89951 & +0.69121 & 2006-09-17 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2741: 13327 & 2006jf & 0.28 & $-$21.27261 & +0.00204 & 2006-09-17 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2742: 13354 & 2006hr & 0.16 & 27.56482 & $-$0.88727 & 2006-09-17 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2743: 13355 & 2006kh & 0.06 & 27.29935 & $-$0.60526 & 2006-09-17 & SN II & 1 \\
2744: % \smallskip
2745: 13357 & 2006gw & 0.33 & 29.47294 & $-$0.53415 & 2006-09-17 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2746: 13370 & 2006gv & 0.20 & 27.15155 & +0.32822 & 2006-09-18 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2747: 13376 & 2006gq & 0.07 & 26.30225 & +0.35644 & 2006-09-18 & SN II & 4 \\
2748: 13425 & 2006gp & 0.21 & $-$21.45832 & +0.05499 & 2006-09-18 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2749: 13449 & 2006ix & 0.08 & $-$0.19154 & $-$0.31104 & 2006-09-18 & SN II & 1 \\
2750: % \smallskip
2751: 13467 & 2006hq & 0.07 & $-$5.05354 & +0.20523 & 2006-09-18 & SN Ia? & 1 \\
2752: 13506 & 2006hg & 0.24 & 25.24334 & $-$0.72785 & 2006-09-19 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2753: 13511 & 2006hh & 0.24 & 40.61235 & $-$0.79412 & 2006-09-19 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2754: 13518 & 2006mn\tablenotemark{g} & \nodata & 16.95163 & $-$0.10984 & 2006-09-19 & SN Ia & \nodata \\
2755: 13577 & 2006kg & 0.23 & 16.07075 & +0.76913 & 2006-09-19 & SN II & 1 \\
2756: % \smallskip
2757: 13578 & 2006hc & 0.20 & 17.39470 & +0.70416 & 2006-09-19 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2758: 13610 & 2006hd & 0.30 & $-$33.98522 & +0.72628 & 2006-09-19 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2759: 13641 & 2006hf & 0.22 & $-$14.78127 & $-$0.98114 & 2006-09-19 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2760: 13655 & 2006hs & 0.26 & 39.02022 & $-$0.99418 & 2006-09-19 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2761: 13727 & 2006hj & 0.23 & $-$42.41192 & +0.93262 & 2006-09-20 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2762: % \smallskip
2763: 13736 & 2006hv & 0.15 & $-$23.16671 & +1.03097 & 2006-09-20 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2764: 13757 & 2006hk & 0.28 & $-$9.87691 & $-$1.15785 & 2006-09-20 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2765: 13796 & 2006hl & 0.15 & $-$9.30843 & +0.53288 & 2006-09-20 & SN Ia & 3 \\
2766: 13830 & 2006hm & 0.33 & $-$8.43828 & $-$0.38228 & 2006-09-20 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2767: 13835 & 2006hp & 0.25 & 6.05964 & $-$0.24826 & 2006-09-20 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2768: % \smallskip
2769: 13894 & 2006jh & 0.13 & 1.69061 & $-$0.03676 & 2006-09-22 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2770: 13934 & 2006jg & 0.33 & $-$17.88899 & $-$0.43527 & 2006-09-22 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2771: 13936 & 2006hz & 0.23 & 3.17083 & $-$0.53548 & 2006-09-22 & SN II & 1 \\
2772: 13956 & 2006hi & 0.26 & 20.94181 & +0.81673 & 2006-09-23 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2773: 14019 & 2006ki & 0.22 & $-$43.35758 & $-$0.64795 & 2006-09-27 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2774: % \smallskip
2775: 14024 & 2006ht & 0.20 & $-$41.80144 & +0.91635 & 2006-09-27 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2776: 14108 & 2006hu & 0.14 & 53.59465 & $-$1.12321 & 2006-09-28 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2777: 14157 & 2006kj & 0.21 & 51.13669 & +1.02236 & 2006-09-28 & SN Ia? & 1 \\
2778: 14212 & 2006iy & 0.20 & $-$29.52989 & +1.04501 & 2006-09-29 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2779: 14261 & 2006jk & 0.29 & $-$31.75960 & +0.25379 & 2006-09-29 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2780: % \smallskip
2781: 14279 & 2006hx & 0.04 & 18.48878 & +0.37167 & 2006-09-29 & SN Ia & 6 \\
2782: 14284 & 2006ib & 0.18 & 49.04929 & $-$0.60094 & 2006-09-29 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2783: 14298 & 2006jj & 0.27 & $-$45.10495 & +1.22326 & 2006-09-29 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2784: 14318 & 2006py & 0.06 & $-$19.57480 & $-$0.13692 & 2006-09-30 & SN Ia & 3 \\
2785: 14331 & 2006kl & 0.22 & 7.88868 & $-$0.13581 & 2006-09-30 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2786: % \smallskip
2787: 14377 & 2006hw & 0.14 & 48.26431 & $-$0.47163 & 2006-09-30 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2788: 14397 & 2006kk & 0.39 & 6.91610 & +0.64951 & 2006-09-30 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2789: 14421 & 2006ia & 0.17 & 31.82988 & +1.25208 & 2006-09-30 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2790: 14437 & 2006hy & 0.14 & $-$27.91904 & $-$1.19639 & 2006-10-01 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2791: 14450 & 2006kn & 0.12 & $-$45.47827 & +0.90048 & 2006-10-01 & SN II & 1 \\
2792: % \smallskip
2793: 14451 & 2006ji & 0.18 & $-$51.80505 & +0.92707 & 2006-10-01 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2794: 14456 & 2006jm & 0.33 & $-$16.44890 & +1.05066 & 2006-10-01 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2795: 14481 & 2006lj & 0.24 & 2.68173 & +0.20131 & 2006-10-01 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2796: 14492 & 2006jo & 0.08 & 20.81130 & $-$0.32964 & 2006-10-01 & SN Ib & 2 \\
2797: 14599 & 2006jl & 0.05 & $-$51.98055 & $-$0.57454 & 2006-10-01 & SN II & 4 \\
2798: % \smallskip
2799: 14735 & 2006km & 0.30 & 35.15803 & +0.34838 & 2006-10-02 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2800: 14782 & 2006jp & 0.16 & $-$45.76575 & $-$0.27904 & 2006-10-02 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2801: 14815 & 2006iz & 0.14 & $-$40.92836 & +0.55949 & 2006-10-03 & SN Ia & 3 \\
2802: 14816 & 2006ja & 0.11 & $-$23.28370 & +0.50606 & 2006-10-03 & SN Ia & 3 \\
2803: 14846 & 2006jn & 0.23 & 7.66324 & +0.14158 & 2006-10-03 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2804: % \smallskip
2805: 14871 & 2006jq & 0.11 & 54.27710 & +0.00936 & 2006-10-03 & SN Ia & 3 \\
2806: 14979 & 2006jr & 0.18 & 54.94643 & +0.99282 & 2006-10-03 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2807: 14984 & 2006js & 0.19 & $-$46.16643 & $-$0.09279 & 2006-10-03 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2808: 15002 & 2006ko & 0.38 & 22.24981 & +0.76995 & 2006-10-04 & SN Ia? & 1 \\
2809: 15009 & 2006kp & 0.29 & 32.79856 & +0.69583 & 2006-10-04 & SN Ia? & 1 \\
2810: % \smallskip
2811: 15031 & 2006iw & 0.03 & $-$9.66882 & +0.25973 & 2006-10-04 & SN II & 5 \\
2812: 15057 & 2006md\tablenotemark{g} & \nodata & 17.88126 & 0.40949 & 2006-10-04 & SN Ia & \nodata \\
2813: 15129 & 2006kq & 0.20 & $-$41.09761 & $-$0.32143 & 2006-10-04 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2814: 15132 & 2006jt & 0.14 & $-$30.29977 & +0.19769 & 2006-10-04 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2815: 15136 & 2006ju & 0.15 & $-$8.83745 & $-$0.71836 & 2006-10-05 & SN Ia? & 1 \\
2816: % \smallskip
2817: 15161 & 2006jw & 0.25 & 35.84291 & +0.81900 & 2006-10-12 & SN Ia? & 1 \\
2818: 15170 & 2006jx & 0.25 & 58.05858 & +0.29207 & 2006-10-12 & SN Ib & 1 \\
2819: 15171 & 2006kb & 0.12 & $-$55.20746 & $-$1.06449 & 2006-10-13 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2820: 15201 & 2006ks & 0.21 & $-$22.48059 & +0.00364 & 2006-10-13 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2821: 15203 & 2006jy & 0.20 & 15.73471 & +0.18309 & 2006-10-13 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2822: % \smallskip
2823: 15213 & 2006lk & 0.31 & 53.01914 & $-$0.10014 & 2006-10-13 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2824: 15217 & 2006jv & 0.37 & 22.63421 & +0.21980 & 2006-10-13 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2825: 15219 & 2006ka & 0.25 & 34.61115 & +0.22669 & 2006-10-13 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2826: 15222 & 2006jz & 0.20 & 2.85338 & +0.70274 & 2006-10-13 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2827: 15229 & 2006kr & 0.22 & 4.83198 & +1.09072 & 2006-10-13 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2828: % \smallskip
2829: 15234 & 2006kd & 0.13 & 16.95834 & +0.82820 & 2006-10-13 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2830: 15254 & 2006oy & 0.20 & $-$46.50709 & $-$0.36005 & 2006-10-14 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2831: 15259 & 2006kc & 0.22 & $-$22.45580 & $-$0.40782 & 2006-10-14 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2832: 15286 & \nodata\tablenotemark{g} & 0.00 & $-$56.60836 & $-$1.11915 & 2006-10-15 & SN Ia & \nodata \\
2833: 15287 & 2006kt & 0.23 & $-$36.04032 & $-$1.05743 & 2006-10-15 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2834: % \smallskip
2835: 15301 & 2006lo & 0.18 & $-$36.42008 & +0.58911 & 2006-10-15 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2836: 15320 & 2006kv & 0.06 & 0.77773 & +0.91377 & 2006-10-16 & SN II & 4 \\
2837: 15339 & 2006ns & 0.12 & $-$36.61574 & +0.78484 & 2006-10-17 & SN II & 4 \\
2838: 15340 & 2006mu & 0.14 & $-$23.99717 & +0.82135 & 2006-10-17 & SN Ia? & 1 \\
2839: 15354 & 2006lp & 0.22 & 6.77368 & $-$0.12598 & 2006-10-17 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2840: % \smallskip
2841: 15356 & 2006lm & 0.28 & $-$24.94668 & +0.40995 & 2006-10-17 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2842: 15365 & 2006ku & 0.19 & $-$5.44334 & +1.24909 & 2006-10-18 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2843: 15369 & 2006ln & 0.24 & $-$11.16705 & $-$0.56261 & 2006-10-18 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2844: 15383 & 2006lq & 0.32 & 34.14953 & $-$0.15516 & 2006-10-18 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2845: 15421 & 2006kw & 0.18 & 33.74160 & +0.60251 & 2006-10-21 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2846: % \smallskip
2847: 15425 & 2006kx & 0.16 & 55.56108 & +0.47829 & 2006-10-21 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2848: 15433 & 2006mt & 0.22 & 14.87963 & $-$0.25651 & 2006-10-21 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2849: 15440 & 2006lr & 0.26 & 39.72067 & +0.09013 & 2006-10-21 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2850: 15443 & 2006lb & 0.18 & 49.86744 & $-$0.31803 & 2006-10-21 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2851: 15453 & 2006ky & 0.18 & $-$40.33170 & $-$1.02429 & 2006-10-21 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2852: % \smallskip
2853: 15456 & 2006ll & 0.38 & $-$28.13274 & $-$0.90341 & 2006-10-21 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2854: 15459 & 2006la & 0.12 & $-$19.29859 & $-$0.90175 & 2006-10-21 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2855: 15461 & 2006kz & 0.18 & $-$33.15252 & $-$0.49468 & 2006-10-21 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2856: 15466 & 2006mz & 0.25 & $-$42.35496 & $-$0.12322 & 2006-10-21 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2857: 15475 & 2006lc & 0.02 & $-$18.89802 & $-$0.16487 & 2006-10-21 & SN Ic & 7 \\
2858: % \smallskip
2859: 15504 & 2006oc & 0.27 & $-$14.29855 & $-$0.87642 & 2006-10-22 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2860: 15508 & 2006ls & 0.14 & 27.16898 & $-$0.57661 & 2006-10-22 & SN Ia & 3 \\
2861: 15557 & 2006oz & 0.00 & $-$27.77686 & +0.89735 & 2006-10-23 & SN Ib & 1 \\
2862: 15583 & 2006mv & 0.17 & 37.73108 & +0.94630 & 2006-10-23 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2863: 15584 & 2006nt & 0.28 & 43.49546 & +0.98696 & 2006-10-23 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2864: % \smallskip
2865: 15648 & 2006ni & 0.17 & $-$46.28162 & $-$0.19482 & 2006-10-23 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2866: 15674 & 2006nu & 0.20 & $-$19.17084 & +0.26291 & 2006-10-23 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2867: 15704 & 2006nh & 0.36 & 40.21073 & +0.65875 & 2006-10-24 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2868: 15734 & 2006ng & 0.40 & 5.53028 & $-$0.09564 & 2006-10-24 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2869: 15749 & 2006mw & 0.12 & 51.28531 & $-$0.04058 & 2006-10-24 & SN Ia? & 1 \\
2870: % \smallskip
2871: 15756 & 2006nf & 0.39 & 0.37483 & +0.27597 & 2006-10-24 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2872: 15760 & 2006mh\tablenotemark{g} & \nodata & 18.80583 & 0.39925 & 2006-10-24 & SN Ia & \nodata \\
2873: 15776 & 2006na & 0.32 & 32.82944 & $-$0.99826 & 2006-10-24 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2874: 15833 & 2006mx & 0.13 & $-$59.13613 & +0.57021 & 2006-10-26 & SN Ia? & 1 \\
2875: 15868 & 2006pa & 0.25 & 38.09980 & $-$0.71358 & 2006-10-28 & SN Ia? & 3 \\
2876: % \smallskip
2877: 15872 & 2006nb & 0.21 & 36.72250 & $-$0.32781 & 2006-10-28 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2878: 15897 & 2006pb & 0.17 & 11.68145 & $-$1.03290 & 2006-10-29 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2879: 15901 & 2006od & 0.17 & 31.97630 & $-$0.53539 & 2006-10-29 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2880: 16000 & 2006nj & 0.40 & 21.11762 & +0.07439 & 2006-10-30 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2881: 16021 & 2006nc & 0.12 & 13.84373 & $-$0.38881 & 2006-10-30 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2882: % \smallskip
2883: 16032 & 2006nk & 0.20 & 44.06922 & $-$0.41077 & 2006-10-30 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2884: 16069 & 2006nd & 0.13 & $-$18.75392 & $-$1.00660 & 2006-10-31 & SN Ia & 4 \\
2885: 16072 & 2006nv & 0.29 & 3.12444 & $-$0.97731 & 2006-10-31 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2886: 16073 & 2006of & 0.16 & 8.10776 & $-$1.05400 & 2006-10-31 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2887: 16087 & 2006pc & 0.06 & 26.04409 & $-$0.15589 & 2006-11-01 & SN II & 1 \\
2888: % \smallskip
2889: 16093 & 2006oe & 0.34 & $-$9.63753 & +1.13248 & 2006-11-01 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2890: 16099 & 2006nn & 0.20 & 26.42094 & $-$1.05439 & 2006-11-01 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2891: 16100 & 2006nl & 0.19 & 30.43629 & $-$1.03241 & 2006-11-01 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2892: 16106 & 2006no & 0.25 & $-$27.91065 & $-$1.14878 & 2006-11-01 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2893: 16108 & 2006og & 0.16 & $-$56.98224 & +0.57061 & 2006-11-01 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2894: % \smallskip
2895: 16116 & 2006oh & 0.16 & $-$4.69799 & $-$1.10581 & 2006-11-01 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2896: 16165 & 2006nw & 0.16 & 30.73314 & $-$0.53387 & 2006-11-02 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2897: 16179 & 2006nx & 0.14 & 53.37764 & $-$0.67729 & 2006-11-03 & SN Ic & 6 \\
2898: 16185 & 2006ok & 0.10 & 16.86807 & $-$0.26937 & 2006-11-09 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2899: 16192 & 2006ny & 0.08 & 9.82211 & +0.08393 & 2006-11-09 & SN II & 2 \\
2900: % \smallskip
2901: 16206 & 2006pe & 0.16 & 5.78819 & $-$0.05363 & 2006-11-09 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2902: 16211 & 2006nm & 0.31 & $-$11.83591 & +0.26693 & 2006-11-09 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2903: 16213 & 2006oi & 0.20 & 8.97105 & +0.25840 & 2006-11-09 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2904: 16215 & 2006ne & 0.05 & 18.40767 & +0.42388 & 2006-11-09 & SN Ia & 8 \\
2905: 16232 & 2006oj & 0.34 & 17.20541 & $-$0.98955 & 2006-11-10 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2906: % \smallskip
2907: 16259 & 2006ol & 0.12 & $-$7.97003 & +0.85635 & 2006-11-10 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2908: 16276 & 2006om & 0.16 & 20.57866 & +1.01062 & 2006-11-10 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2909: 16280 & 2006nz & 0.04 & 14.12170 & $-$1.22673 & 2006-11-11 & SN Ia & 4 \\
2910: 16281 & 2006pd & 0.19 & $-$7.05785 & $-$0.66805 & 2006-11-11 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2911: 16287 & 2006np & 0.11 & 46.66451 & +0.06403 & 2006-11-11 & SN Ia & 6 \\
2912: % \smallskip
2913: 16314 & 2006oa & 0.06 & $-$39.07107 & $-$0.84347 & 2006-11-12 & SN Ia & 3 \\
2914: 16333 & 2006on & 0.07 & $-$31.00630 & $-$1.07020 & 2006-11-12 & SN Ia & 3 \\
2915: 16350 & 2006ph & 0.24 & $-$36.36051 & $-$0.88583 & 2006-11-14 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2916: 16352 & 2006pk & 0.25 & $-$13.75064 & $-$0.87336 & 2006-11-14 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2917: 16357 & 2006pi & 0.37 & $-$29.18082 & $-$0.60684 & 2006-11-14 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2918: % \smallskip
2919: 16392 & 2006ob & 0.06 & 27.95060 & +0.26331 & 2006-11-14 & SN Ia & 6 \\
2920: 16402 & 2006sv & 0.30 & $-$23.63228 & +0.26527 & 2006-11-14 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2921: 16414 & 2006pj & 0.31 & $-$20.67354 & +0.73814 & 2006-11-14 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2922: 16421 & 2006pg & 0.32 & 51.83630 & +1.08966 & 2006-11-14 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2923: 16442 & 2006oo & 0.28 & $-$30.05319 & $-$0.73322 & 2006-11-15 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2924: % \smallskip
2925: 16473 & 2006pl & 0.22 & $-$31.38785 & +0.58852 & 2006-11-15 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2926: 16482 & 2006pm & 0.20 & $-$31.29049 & +0.93367 & 2006-11-15 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2927: 16541 & 2006pn & 0.13 & 57.26188 & $-$0.53277 & 2006-11-16 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2928: 16567 & 2006pf & 0.40 & 25.43805 & $-$0.18915 & 2006-11-17 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2929: 16578 & 2006po & 0.18 & $-$54.18680 & $-$0.84849 & 2006-11-17 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2930: % \smallskip
2931: 16618 & 2006pq & 0.20 & 21.27937 & $-$1.21894 & 2006-11-18 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2932: 16619 & 2006ps & 0.10 & 25.93874 & $-$1.11192 & 2006-11-18 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2933: 16631 & 2006pv & 0.21 & 54.62279 & $-$0.67557 & 2006-11-18 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2934: 16641 & 2006pr & 0.11 & 23.56123 & $-$0.40363 & 2006-11-18 & SN Ia & 3 \\
2935: 16644 & 2006pt & 0.30 & 36.81737 & $-$0.39348 & 2006-11-18 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2936: % \smallskip
2937: 16668 & 2006pu & 0.15 & 40.72425 & +0.89287 & 2006-11-18 & SN II & 1 \\
2938: 16692 & 2006op & 0.03 & $-$39.61722 & +0.99331 & 2006-11-18 & SN Ia? & 2 \\
2939: 16737 & 2006qc & 0.20 & $-$47.16732 & $-$0.95232 & 2006-11-20 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2940: 16748 & 2006sx & 0.23 & 7.95132 & $-$0.51394 & 2006-11-20 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2941: 16758 & 2006pw & 0.33 & $-$18.38765 & +1.15081 & 2006-11-20 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2942: % \smallskip
2943: 16774 & 2006sy & 0.21 & 35.27168 & +0.82840 & 2006-11-20 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2944: 16776 & 2006qd & 0.27 & $-$12.97859 & $-$0.17608 & 2006-11-20 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2945: 16779 & 2006qa & 0.40 & 45.29054 & $-$0.02624 & 2006-11-20 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2946: 16781 & 2006qb & 0.33 & 52.06103 & $-$0.20096 & 2006-11-20 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2947: 16789 & 2006pz & 0.33 & 43.78434 & +0.23477 & 2006-11-20 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2948: % \smallskip
2949: 16793 & 2006qg & 0.23 & $-$31.42464 & +0.44701 & 2006-11-20 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2950: 16836 & 2006sw & 0.33 & 16.25085 & $-$0.37464 & 2006-11-21 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2951: 16840 & 2006qf & 0.17 & 57.98849 & $-$0.39658 & 2006-11-21 & SN II & 1 \\
2952: 16847 & 2006px & 0.28 & $-$6.67875 & +0.96110 & 2006-11-21 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2953: 16872 & 2006qh & 0.12 & $-$33.02908 & +0.70684 & 2006-11-21 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2954: % \smallskip
2955: 16894 & 2006tb & 0.30 & 56.31453 & $-$0.12854 & 2006-11-22 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2956: 16899 & 2006ta & 0.29 & 52.46008 & +0.29509 & 2006-11-22 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2957: 16938 & 2006qe & 0.39 & $-$11.91674 & $-$0.53442 & 2006-11-22 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2958: 16941 & 2006sz & 0.19 & $-$4.28142 & $-$0.55636 & 2006-11-22 & SN Ia? & 1 \\
2959: 16953 & 2006pp & 0.34 & 12.24364 & +0.47695 & 2006-11-23 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2960: % \smallskip
2961: 16956 & 2006qj & 0.11 & $-$57.22662 & $-$0.31996 & 2006-11-23 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2962: 16988 & 2006qk & 0.06 & $-$23.61507 & +0.15419 & 2006-11-24 & SN Ic & 4 \\
2963: 17048 & 2006qi & 0.19 & 27.58151 & +0.88490 & 2006-11-24 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2964: 17081 & 2006ql & 0.27 & 27.53797 & +0.42048 & 2006-11-25 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2965: 17106 & 2006tc & 0.21 & 47.00818 & +0.94343 & 2006-11-25 & SN Ia & 1 \\
2966: % \smallskip
2967: 17117 & 2006qm & 0.14 & 40.60031 & $-$0.79652 & 2006-11-25 & SN Ia & 2 \\
2968: 17135 & 2006rz & 0.03 & 56.52825 & +0.38975 & 2006-11-26 & SN Ia & 4 \\
2969: \enddata
2970: \tablenotetext{a}{Internal SN candidate designation.}
2971: \tablenotetext{b}{Preliminary spectroscopic redshifts. The typical
2972: uncertainties are $\sim 0.01$. }
2973: \tablenotetext{c}{Right Ascension is provided in decimal degrees defined in
2974: the range [-180$^\circ$,+180$^\circ$].}
2975: \tablenotetext{d}{The preliminary spectroscopic type of the SN candidate.
2976: Spectroscopically probable SNe Ia are designated ``SN Ia?'' (see
2977: \citealt{zheng07}).}
2978: \tablenotetext{e}{This includes all spectral observations performed
2979: including those of the SN candidate and possibly its host galaxy.}
2980: \tablenotetext{f}{Spectroscopically confirmed by the CfA SN Group.}
2981: \tablenotetext{g}{Spectroscopically confirmed by the ESSENCE Group.}
2982:
2983:
2984: \end{deluxetable}
2985:
2986:
2987: \begin{deluxetable}{lrr}
2988: \tablewidth{0pt}
2989: \tablecaption{Summary of the 2005 and 2006 search seasons\label{tbl:summary}}
2990: \tablehead{
2991: \colhead{Number of} &
2992: \colhead{2005} &
2993: \colhead{2006}
2994: }
2995: \startdata
2996: Nights on SDSS 2.5m & 59 & 60 \\
2997: Runs & 73 & 90 \\
2998: Total number of objects & 375,187 & 391,435 \\
2999: \hspace{0.5cm}Number of objects scanned & 155,616 & 14,430 \\
3000: \hspace{0.5cm}Number of objects tagged as SN & 24,402 & 4,189 \\
3001: \hline
3002: SN candidates discovered\tablenotemark{a} & 11,385 & 3,694 \\
3003: \hspace{0.5cm}Single-epoch candidates\tablenotemark{b} & 6,618 & 599 \\
3004: \enddata
3005:
3006: \tablenotetext{a}{The number of unique SN candidates tagged by a scanner.
3007: This number differs from the number of objects tagged as a SN because it
3008: includes multiple objects from the same candidate.}
3009: \tablenotetext{b}{Candidates that were detected in only a single run. Most
3010: of these sources are likely to be solar system objects.}
3011:
3012: \end{deluxetable}
3013:
3014:
3015: \begin{deluxetable}{lrr}
3016: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
3017: \tablewidth{0pt}
3018: \tablecaption{Spectroscopic Observations of 2005 and 2006
3019: Candidates\label{tbl:spectro}}
3020: \tablehead{
3021: \colhead{Number of Spectroscopic Observations} &
3022: \colhead{2005} &
3023: \colhead{2006}
3024: }
3025: \startdata
3026: SN Ia candidates\tablenotemark{a} & 173 & 241 \\
3027: \hspace{0.5cm}Identified as SN Ia & 130\tablenotemark{b} & 197\tablenotemark{c} \\
3028: \hspace{0.5cm}Identified as probable SN Ia & 16 & 14 \\
3029: \hspace{0.5cm}Resulting in host galaxy spectra of photometric SN Ia & 7 & 7 \\
3030: % 89% 90%
3031: \hspace{0.5cm}Resulting in other host galaxy spectra & 3 & 6 \\
3032: \hspace{0.5cm}Identified as SN Ib/c & 1 & 0 \\
3033: \hspace{0.5cm}Identified as SN II & 5\tablenotemark{d} & 6 \\
3034: \hspace{0.5cm}Identified as AGN & 2 & 0 \\
3035: \hspace{0.5cm}Identified as flaring M-dwarf & 1 & 1 \\
3036: \hspace{0.5cm}Unidentified & 8 & 10 \\
3037: \hline
3038: Non-SN Ia candidates\tablenotemark{e} & 24 & 42 \\
3039: \hspace{0.5cm}Identified as SN Ib/c & 7 & 6 \\
3040: \hspace{0.5cm}Identified as SN II & 7 & 14 \\
3041: \hline
3042: Photometric SN Ia candidates with host galaxy spectroscopy\tablenotemark{f} & 81 & 6 \\
3043: Other SN candidates with host galaxy spectroscopy\tablenotemark{g} & 26 & 0 \\
3044: Duplicate and multi-epoch spectra\tablenotemark{h} & 86 & 148 \\
3045: \hline \hline
3046: Total & 390 & 437 \\
3047: \enddata
3048:
3049: \tablenotetext{a}{Number of candidates targeted for spectroscopy that had
3050: been photometrically identified as a possible SN Ia.}
3051: \tablenotetext{b}{This includes one SN Ia that was spectroscopically
3052: confirmed by the Texas Supernova Search \citep{quimby07}.}
3053: \tablenotetext{c}{This includes five SNe Ia that were spectroscopically
3054: confirmed by the CfA SN Group and the ESSENCE Group.}
3055: \tablenotetext{d}{This includes one SN II that was spectroscopically
3056: confirmed by the ESSENCE Group.}
3057: \tablenotetext{e}{This includes observations of core-collapse SNe, novae,
3058: and other interesting transients.}
3059: \tablenotetext{f}{Of the 113 host galaxy spectra obtained, the measured
3060: redshifts of a sample of 81 sources were consistent with the photometric
3061: redshift estimated from the SN Ia model light curve fits, and were thus
3062: identified as photometric SN Ia.}
3063: \tablenotetext{g}{These were targeted as host galaxies of photometric SN Ia
3064: candidates. The observations, however, resulted in either noisy,
3065: unclassifiable spectra or measured spectroscopic redshifts that are
3066: inconsistent with the SN Ia light curve redshifts implying that the
3067: candidates are not SNe Ia.}
3068: \tablenotetext{h}{The total number of duplicate and multi-epoch spectra; not
3069: the number of candidates targeted for multi-epoch spectroscopy.}
3070:
3071: \end{deluxetable}
3072:
3073:
3074: \end{document}
3075: