1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
29: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
30: %% use the longabstract style option.
31:
32: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
33:
34: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
35: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
36: %% the \begin{document} command.
37: %%
38: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
39: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
40: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
41: %% for information.
42:
43: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
44: \newcommand{\myemail}{ohtsuka@jb3.so-net.ne.jp}
45:
46: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
47:
48: %%\slugcomment{submitted to Astrophysical Journal Letters}
49:
50: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
51: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
52: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
53: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
54: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
55: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
56:
57: \shorttitle{Icarus and 2007 $\mathbf{MK_6}$}
58: \shortauthors{Ohtsuka et al.}
59:
60: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
61: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
62:
63: \begin{document}
64:
65: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
66: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
67: %% you desire.
68:
69: \title{Apollo asteroids (1566) Icarus and 2007 $\mathbf{MK_6}$:
70: Icarus family members?}
71:
72: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
73: %% author and affiliation information.
74: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
75: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
76: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
77: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
78:
79: \author{\sc K. Ohtsuka\altaffilmark{1}, \sc H. Arakida\altaffilmark{2}, \sc T. Ito\altaffilmark{3}, \sc T. Kasuga\altaffilmark{4, 3}, \sc J. Watanabe\altaffilmark{3},}
80: \author{\sc D. Kinoshita\altaffilmark{5}, \sc T. Sekiguchi\altaffilmark{3}, \sc D. J. Asher\altaffilmark{6}, and \sc S. Nakano\altaffilmark{7}}
81:
82: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
83: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
84: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
85: %% affiliation.
86:
87: \altaffiltext{1}{Tokyo Meteor Network, 1--27--5 Daisawa, Setagaya-ku,
88: Tokyo 155--0032, JAPAN; ohtsuka@jb3.so-net.ne.jp.}
89: \altaffiltext{2}{Waseda University, 1--6--1 Nishi-Waseda, Shinjuku-ku,
90: Tokyo 169--8050, JAPAN; arakida@aoni.waseda.jp.}
91: \altaffiltext{3}{National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2--21--1 Osawa,
92: Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, JAPAN; tito@cfca.nao.ac.jp,
93: jun.watanabe@nao.ac.jp, t.sekiguchi@nao.ac.jp.}
94: \altaffiltext{4}{Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 2680 Woodlawn Drive,
95: Honolulu, Hawaii 96822--1897; kasugats@IfA.Hawaii.Edu.}
96: \altaffiltext{5}{Institute for Astronomy, National Central University, 300 Jhongda Rd.,
97: Jhongli, Taoyuan 32001, TAIWAN; kinoshita@astro.ncu.edu.tw.}
98: \altaffiltext{6}{Armagh Observatory, College Hill, Armagh, BT61 9DG, UK;
99: dja@arm.ac.uk.}
100: \altaffiltext{7}{OAA computing section, 1--3--19 Takenokuchi, Sumoto,
101: Hyogo 656--0011, JAPAN; nakano@oaa.gr.jp.}
102:
103: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
104: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
105: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
106: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
107: %% editorial office after submission.
108:
109: \begin{abstract}
110:
111: Although it is more complicated to search for near-Earth object (NEO) families than main belt asteroid (MBA) families, since differential orbital evolution within a NEO family can cause current orbital elements to drastically differ from each other, we have found that Apollo asteroids (1566) Icarus and the newly discovered 2007 $\mathrm{MK_6}$ are almost certainly related. Specifically, their orbital evolutions show a similar profile, time shifted by only $\sim 1000$ yr, based on our time-lag theory. The dynamical relationship between Icarus and 2007 $\mathrm{MK_6}$ along with a possible dust band, the Taurid-Perseid meteor swarm, implies the first detection of an asteroidal NEO family, namely the ``Icarus asteroid family''.
112:
113: \end{abstract}
114:
115: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
116: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
117: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
118: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
119:
120: \keywords{minor planets, asteroids --- comets: general --- meteors, meteoroids}
121:
122: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
123: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
124: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
125: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
126: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
127: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
128: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
129: %% each reference.
130:
131:
132: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
133: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
134: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
135: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
136: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
137: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
138: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
139: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
140: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
141: %%
142: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,
143: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first
144: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).
145: %% Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error.
146:
147: \section{Introduction}
148:
149: Near-Earth Apollo asteroid (1566) Icarus = 1949 MA was discovered by Baade (1949) as a 16th magnitude fast-moving object, on a plate taken using the 48-inch Palomar Schmidt on 1949 June 10, when Icarus approached the Earth to within 0.10 AU, near its descending node. Its orbital parameters were highly unusual: it had smaller semimajor axis ($a$ = 1.08 AU), smaller perihelion distance ($q$ = 0.19 AU), and larger eccentricity ($e$ = 0.83) than any other asteroid known at that time and relatively high inclination ($i$ = $23^\circ$). Icarus remained the record holder in having the smallest $q$ among all asteroids until the discovery of (3200) Phaethon in 1983. Indeed, on account of its small $q$, Icarus was historically of particular interest as to whether the relativistic effects on its orbital motion are detectable (e.g., Shapiro et al. 1971).
150:
151: In Icarus' subsequent approaches to the Earth in 1968, 1987, and 1996, the following physical data were derived: absolute magnitude $(H) = 15.95$ and $G$-parameter $= -0.04$ (Tedesco 1989); rather high albedo $\sim 0.33$ and diameter $\sim 1$ km (e.g., Harris 1998); fast rotation period $\sim2.273$ hr (e.g., Gehrels et al. 1970; De Angelis 1995) and others \footnote{http://earn.dlr.de/nea/001566.htm}. Especially notable is that Icarus is spectrally classified as a Q-type in Tholen's taxonomy. Q-type asteroids, which generally are spectroscopic analogues of ordinary chondrites (cf.\ McFadden et al. 1984; Hicks et al. 1998; Fevig \& Fink 2007), are regarded as being less space-weathered S-complex asteroids, with a surface age $\le 10$ Myr owing to resurfacing effects (Marchi et al. 2006). Hence Icarus may represent the rather fresh internal structure of a precursor object broken up in recent history. Moreover, with $q \sim 0.19$ AU, the subsolar point on Icarus should reach a temperature of 800 K by solar heating, in which case the solar thermal stress may be a trigger to destroy the asteroid's surface and subsurface. Resurfacing may alternatively be due to the tidal effects of the terrestrial planets (Nesvorn\'y et al. 2005).
152:
153: For the above reasons, we have expected some ``Icarus Family Members'' (hereafter ``IFM(s)'') to exist in near-Earth space. We have therefore been searching for IFMs based on time-lag measurements (see below) between the orbital evolution of Icarus and any candidate IFM. This procedure was successful in finding the dynamical relationship between (3200) Phaethon and (155140) 2005 UD (Ohtsuka et al. 2006, hereafter Paper I). No certain IFMs had been found in the Apollo asteroid database \footnote{e.g., http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/lists/Apollosq.html} until very recently. However, we finally identified an extremely likely candidate from the latest MPECs (Minor Planet Electronic Circulars): a recently discovered Apollo asteroid 2007 $\mathrm{MK_6}$.
154:
155: \section{Orbital integration of (1566) Icarus}
156:
157: %% In a manner similar to \objectname authors can provide links to dataset
158: %% hosted at participating data centers via the \dataset{} command. The
159: %% second curly bracket argument is printed in the text while the first
160: %% parentheses argument serves as the valid data set identifier. Large
161: %% lists of data set are best provided in a table (see Table 3 for an example).
162: %% Valid data set identifiers should be obtained from the data center that
163: %% is currently hosting the data.
164: %%
165: %% Note that AASTeX interprets everything between the curly braces in the
166: %% macro as regular text, so any special characters, e.g. "#" or "_," must be
167: %% preceded by a backslash. Otherwise, you will get a LaTeX error when you
168: %% compile your manuscript. Special characters do not
169: %% need to be escaped in the optional, square-bracket argument.
170:
171: As preliminary work for the IFM survey and for measuring the time-lags (detailed in the next section) between Icarus and unknown potential IFMs, we calculated the orbital evolution of Icarus. We performed a backward and forward numerical integration of the KS (Kustaanheimo--Stiefel) regularized equation of motion (cf.\ Arakida \& Fukushima 2000, 2001), applying the 12th-order Adams method in double precision with a step size of 0.5 day. The integration covered 10000 BC to 10000 AD (JDT $-1931503.5$ to 5373520.5), and included terms of first order in the post-Newtonian approximation for the Sun's gravitational field since relativistic effects advance the line of apsides of Icarus at a rate of $10''$/century.
172:
173: We also confirmed that the results of our numerical integration did not significantly change even when we adopted smaller step sizes or when we used other integration methods such as the extrapolation method. The initial orbital data of Icarus at osculation epoch 2007 Apr 10.0 TT = JDT 2454200.5 were taken from NASA JPL's HORIZONS System \footnote{http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons.html} and are listed in Table \ref{tbl:orbits}. All the major planets from Mercury through Neptune and the quasi-planet, Pluto, were included as perturbing bodies (the Earth--Moon barycenter being one body, with the Moon's mass added to the Earth's). The coordinates of the major planets were taken from the JPL Planetary and Lunar Ephemeris DE408.
174:
175: Over 20000 yr we found the orbital motion of Icarus to show a high degree of stability, with long-period secular changes according to the cycle in argument of perihelion $\omega$, also known as the Kozai cycle (Kozai 1962). The corresponding large-amplitude oscillations in $q$ and $i$, in antiphase with $e$, have period $\sim 25000$ yr, half that of the $\omega$ cycle. The $\omega$ period of $\sim 50000$ yr is somewhat larger than the $\sim 40000$ yr for Phaethon and 2005 UD (Paper I).
176:
177: \section{Time lag $\Delta t$ of the orbital evolutions}
178:
179: In the first stage of the formation of an asteroid family, the orbital energies ($\propto 1/a$) of bodies or fragments are slightly different from that of the precursor, since the motions of the released objects are slightly accelerated or decelerated relative to the precursor. This results in differences in their evolutionary rates under gravitational perturbations (there may additionally be differential nongravitational perturbations): then a time-lag (which hereafter we call $\Delta t$) in the orbital evolutions arises. At the starting epoch, $\Delta t \approx 0$ yr, and it tends to increase with time. We note that $\Delta t$ is not the time since separation, but rather quantifies how separated in phase two orbits have become in their respective (similar) secular perturbation cycles. For measuring a difference in the evolutionary phase of two orbits, $\Delta t$ is much more suitable than for example the difference in $\omega$, since (for highly eccentric orbits particularly) $d\omega/dt$ is strongly dependent on the phase within the Kozai cycle (cf.\ Fig. \ref{fig:orbits} later). Any IFM should show a very close orbital similarity with Icarus when shifted by the appropriate $\Delta t$ that brings both orbits to the same evolutionary phase.
180:
181: The following successful studies applying this time-lag theory have been made so far: i) anticipation of the Marsden and Kracht comet groups' periodicity and their return: Ohtsuka et al. (2003) anticipated these comet groups, which initially had parabolic orbit solutions, as being fragments of Periodic Comet 96P/Machholz. Their prediction was shown to be correct when Sekanina \& Chodas (2005) linked orbits and found these comet groups to have orbital periods of 5--6 yr, corresponding to 96P's $\sim 5.2$ yr. The Marsden and Kracht comet groups thus turned out to be decameter-size members of the 96P--Quadrantid stream complex. ii) genetic relationship of Phaethon and 2005 UD: Paper I revealed 2005 UD as being the most likely large fragment of Phaethon. This dynamical relationship was confirmed by the physical studies of Jewitt \& Hsieh (2006) and Kinoshita et al. (2007), who classified both objects as F- or B-type. These taxonomic types are very rare, comprising only $\sim 5$\% of NEOs that have been classified; combined with the dynamical evidence, the genetic relationship of Phaethon and 2005 UD is beyond doubt.
182:
183: This time-lag theory is straightforward and is now well established as a technique to demonstrate the existence of cometary stream complexes or likely NEO families; so it should be a useful tool to survey for IFMs.
184:
185: \section{Survey}
186: \subsection{Procedure}
187:
188: The survey for IFMs in the Apollo asteroid database and latest MPECs uses the same procedure as in Paper I. We again applied the following three criteria as the retrieving engine for our IFM survey. The first is the traditional orbital similarity criterion $D_{\rm SH}$ of Southworth \& Hawkins (1963), who defined $D_{\rm SH}$ as a distance between the orbits of two objects $A$ and $B$ in five-dimensional orbital element space $(e, q, \omega, \mathit{\Omega}, i)$, as follows:
189: \begin{eqnarray}
190: D_{\rm SH}^{2} &=& \sum_{j=1}^{5} f_{j}^{2} \left( P_{A,j} - P_{B,j} \right)^2,
191: %%\label{equation-DSH}
192: \end{eqnarray}
193: where $P_{A \; \mathrm{or} \; B,j}$ are orbital elements and $f_j$ are functions of the elements that ensure suitable weights are given to each term in (1). Thus we searched for potential IFMs on the basis of Icarus' orbital evolution from the integration described in Section 2. For each Near-Earth Apollo, we found the minimum $D_{\rm SH}$ between it and Icarus, as Icarus' orbit evolves. A minimum $D_{\rm SH} \le 0.15$ means that Icarus and the given asteroid are within the probable association range.
194:
195: The second and third criteria are the $C_1$ and $C_2$ integrals derived by Moiseev (1945) and Lidov (1961) respectively, which we calculate for candidates selected by $D_{\rm SH}$:
196: \begin{eqnarray}
197: C_1 &=& \left( 1 - e^2 \right) \cos^2 i,\\
198: C_2 &=& e^2 \left( 0.4 - \sin^2 i \: \sin^2 \omega \right) .
199: \end{eqnarray}
200: These integrals describe the secular orbital variations well. Both $C_1$ and $C_2$ are almost invariant for the orbital motions of Phaethon and 2005 UD (Paper I), and should also be useful criteria to distinguish IFMs.
201:
202: \subsection{Detection of the IFM candidate: Near-Earth Apollo asteroid 2007 $\mathbf{MK_6}$}
203:
204: In this way, we finally detected a very likely IFM candidate from the latest MPECs: Near-Earth Apollo asteroid 2007 $\mathrm{MK_6}$, which was recently discovered in the Catalina sky survey, on 2007 June 21.2 (Hill et al. 2007). Soon after, Ohtsuka (2007) made the identification of 2007 $\mathrm{MK_6}$ with another Apollo, 2006 $\mathrm{KT_{67}}$, so 2007 $\mathrm{MK_6}$ = 2006 $\mathrm{KT_{67}}$; the latter was both discovered (on 2006 May 26) and observed only (12 positions over a 1 day arc) by the Mt. Lemmon survey. This extended the arc to more than one year. Nakano successfully linked their orbits, based on 54 positions at two oppositions (covering 2006 May 26 to 2007 June 27) with an RMS residual of $0''.74$. The absolute magnitude $H \sim 19.9$ corresponds to an object a few hundred meters in size at most, if we assume 2007 $\mathrm{MK_6}$ is a high-albedo object such as an S-type.
205:
206: Using Nakano's data, listed in Table \ref{tbl:orbits}, we integrated 2007 $\mathrm{MK_6}$ using the same method as for Icarus. The dynamical evolutions of both asteroids are illustrated in Fig. \ref{fig:orbits}. Icarus and 2007 $\mathrm{MK_6}$ sometimes encounter the terrestrial planets. Encounters with Venus or Earth can cause changes in $a$ but these are small enough that the other elements display a stable secular evolution, as with Phaethon and 2005 UD (Paper I). Neither asteroid has a nodal intersection epoch with Venus or Earth in the past 10000 yr, hence the interval of constant $a$ in Fig. \ref{fig:orbits}.
207:
208: Comparing the orbital elements of 2007 $\mathrm{MK_6}$ at the current epoch with the changing orbit of Icarus over time, as described in Section 4.1, we found a strikingly good match with Icarus at around 1034 AD (Table \ref{tbl:orbits}); thus $\Delta t \sim 1000$ yr. The corresponding minimum value of $D_{\rm SH}$ is only 0.0098. Both $\Delta t$ and $D_{\rm SH}$ are fairly small compared to the respective values $\sim 4600$ yr and 0.04 between Phaethon--2005 UD (Paper I). The $C_1$ and $C_2$ parameters are almost constant, within the ranges 0.26--0.28 and 0.24--0.25 respectively. Therefore 2007 $\mathrm{MK_6}$ is a very strong candidate IFM.
209:
210: The two orbital evolutions show a similar profile, with quasi-sinusoidal changes, simply shifted by $\Delta t \sim 1000$ yr. Their smaller $\Delta t$ than Phaethon--2005 UD suggests a younger separation age, but $D_{\rm SH}$ between Icarus--2007 $\mathrm{MK_6}$ at the same osculation epoch has never been below 0.03 in our integration timespan. Only in quite rare cases (such as the Karin cluster in the main belt; Nesvorn\'y et al. 2002) can an exact separation age be found unambiguously, although we may certainly expect $D_{\rm SH}$ to have been smaller around the time that Icarus and 2007 $\mathrm{MK_6}$ separated. Some test integrations back $10^5$ yr tentatively show $\Delta t$ decreasing back in time but random small changes in $a$ due to close encounters make it hard to reach a precise quantitative conclusion about the separation age. However, this age is clearly within 10 Myr, the resurfacing age of Q-type NEOs, possibly two orders of magnitude shorter. The Icarus--2007 $\mathrm{MK_6}$ parent may well have been injected into the near-Earth environment of the order of 10 Myr ago (cf.\ Bottke et al. 2002), but with the separation occurring much more recently.
211:
212: We also surveyed meteor data related to the IFMs. Consequently, we noticed a likely meteor swarm found by Sekanina (1973) in the Harvard (Havana) radar meteor orbit survey: the daytime Taurid-Perseid meteor swarm, recorded around June 18 in the radar's 1961--1965 term of operation. The orbital parameters are in good agreement with those of Icarus, as presented in Table \ref{tbl:IandT}. Their $D_{\rm SH} \sim 0.08$ is in the probable association range. Although we cannot accurately measure their $\Delta t$, both the current orbits look to be at almost the same evolutionary phase. No further orbital data were found in the radar meteor orbit database. We may therefore regard the Taurids-Perseids as a transient Earth-crossing IFM dust band rather than a cometary meteor stream.
213:
214: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}
215:
216: There have been numerous studies on the formation of main belt asteroid (MBA) families, and also some on NEO families. Statistical studies using NEO orbit data, based on orbital similarity, often generate positive results on the existence of NEO families. However, Fu et al. (2005) concluded that it is unlikely that these results are anything more than random fluctuations in the NEO orbit population. In a past IFM study, Steel et al. (1992) noted an orbital similarity between (5786) Talos = 1991 RC and Icarus. Their orbital elements, except for $\omega$ and $\mathit{\Omega}$, indeed coincide well with each other. However, Talos' longitude of perihelion remains widely separated (by $\sim 50^\circ$) from that of Icarus over the past 11000 yr integrated by Steel et al., so that it is difficult to verify a genetic relationship. If there exist NEO families having high-eccentricity and rather highly inclined orbits, then unless their origin is extremely recent, their differential orbital evolutions, shifted by $\Delta t$, will lead to their current orbital elements being drastically different. For this reason it is more complicated to search for NEO families than MBA families.
217:
218: Nevertheless, we found Near-Earth Apollo asteroids Icarus and 2007 $\mathrm{MK_6}$ to be very likely candidates for IFMs, based on our time-lag theory. Their $\Delta t \sim 1000$ yr and minimized $D_{\rm SH} \sim 0.0098$ are even smaller than those, $\sim 4600$ yr and 0.04, of the well-established Phaethon--2005 UD relationship. Since Phaethon and 2005 UD may have a cometary origin (Paper I), therefore, the dynamical relationship between Icarus and 2007 $\mathrm{MK_6}$ along with a possible IFM dust band may constitute the first detection of an asteroidal NEO family, namely the ``Icarus asteroid family''. In this case, Icarus should be the parent body, but as it is only a 1-km size object, the Icarus family is on a smaller scale than MBA families.
219:
220: The next Earth approaches of Icarus and 2007 $\mathrm{MK_6}$ will occur respectively on 2015 June 17 to 0.05 AU and 2016 June 15 to 0.10 AU, providing good opportunities to determine additional physical parameters and to further study their common origin. It is possible that further accurate astrometry and advances in the numerical analysis will eventually resolve the separation age.
221:
222: %% In this section, we use the \subsection command to set off
223: %% a subsection. \footnote is used to insert a footnote to the text.
224:
225: %% Observe the use of the LaTeX \label
226: %% command after the \subsection to give a symbolic KEY to the
227: %% subsection for cross-referencing in a \ref command.
228: %% You can use LaTeX's \ref and \label commands to keep track of
229: %% cross-references to sections, equations, tables, and figures.
230: %% That way, if you change the order of any elements, LaTeX will
231: %% automatically renumber them.
232:
233: %% This section also includes several of the displayed math environments
234: %% mentioned in the Author Guide.
235: %% The \notetoeditor{TEXT} command allows the author to communicate
236: %% information to the copy editor. This information will appear as a
237: %% footnote on the printed copy for the manuscript style file. Nothing will
238: %% appear on the printed copy if the preprint or
239: %% preprint2 style files are used.
240:
241: %% The eqnarray environment produces multi-line display math. The end of
242: %% each line is marked with a \\. Lines will be numbered unless the \\
243: %% is preceded by a \nonumber command.
244: %% Alignment points are marked by ampersands (&). There should be two
245: %% ampersands (&) per line.
246: %% Putting eqnarrays or equations inside the mathletters environment groups
247: %% the enclosed equations by letter. For instance, the eqnarray below, instead
248: %% of being numbered, say, (4) and (5), would be numbered (4a) and (4b).
249: %% LaTeX the paper and look at the output to see the results.
250:
251: %% This section contains more display math examples, including unnumbered
252: %% equations (displaymath environment). The last paragraph includes some
253: %% examples of in-line math featuring a couple of the AASTeX symbol macros.
254:
255: %% The displaymath environment will produce the same sort of equation as
256: %% the equation environment, except that the equation will not be numbered
257: %% by LaTeX.
258:
259:
260: %% If you wish to include an acknowledgments section in your paper,
261: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments
262: %% command.
263:
264: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the
265: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]
266: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,
267: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the
268: %% text to be printed in the second.
269:
270: \acknowledgments
271:
272: The authors are grateful to the anonymous referee for his careful reading of the manuscript and for his comments.
273:
274: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
275: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
276: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
277: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
278: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
279: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
280: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
281: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
282:
283: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
284: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
285: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
286: %% copy editing. Individual instruments or configurations can be provided
287: %% in parentheses, after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
288:
289: %%{\it Facilities:} \facility{Nickel}, \facility{HST (STIS)}, \facility{CXO (ASIS)}.
290:
291: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.
292: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix
293: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.
294:
295: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.
296: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix
297: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.
298:
299: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
300: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
301: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
302: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
303: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
304: %%
305: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
306: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
307: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
308: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
309: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
310: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
311: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
312: %% place of the \cite commands.
313:
314: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
315: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
316: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
317:
318: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
319: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
320: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
321: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
322: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
323:
324: \begin{thebibliography}{}
325:
326: \bibitem[Arakida \& Fukushima(2000)]{ara00} Arakida, H.,
327: \& Fukushima, T. 2000, \aj, 120, 3333
328: \bibitem[Arakida \& Fukushima(2001)]{ara01} Arakida, H.,
329: \& Fukushima, T. 2001, \aj, 121, 1764
330: \bibitem[Baade(1949)]{baa49} Baade, W. 1949, \iaucirc, 1226
331: \bibitem[Bottke et al.(2002)]{bot02} Bottke, W. F., Morbidelli, A.,
332: Jedicke, R., et al. 2002, \icarus, 156, 399
333: \bibitem[De Angelis(1995)]{dea95} De Angelis, G. 1995, \planss, 43, 649
334: \bibitem[Fevig \& Fink(2007)]{fev07} Fevig, R. A.,
335: \& Fink, U. 2007, \icarus, 133, 69
336: \bibitem[Fu et al.(2005)]{fuh05} Fu, H., Jedicke, R.,
337: Durda, D. D., et al. 2005, \icarus, 178, 434
338: \bibitem[Gehrels et al.(1970)]{geh70} Gehrels, T., Roemer, E.,
339: Taylor, R. C., \& Zellner, B. H. 1970, \aj, 75, 186
340: \bibitem[Harris(1998)]{har98} Harris, A.W. 1998, \icarus, 131, 291
341: \bibitem[Hicks et al.(1998)]{hic98} Hicks, M. D., Fink, U.,
342: \& Grundy, W. M. 1998, \icarus, 133, 69
343: \bibitem[Hill et al.(2007)]{hil07} Hill, R. E., Gibbs, A. R.,
344: Boattini, A., et al. 2007, MPEC-M32
345: \bibitem[Jewitt \& Hsieh(2006)]{jew06} Jewitt, D.,
346: \& Hsieh, H. 2006, \aj, 132, 1624
347: \bibitem[Kinoshita et al.(2007)]{kin07} Kinoshita, D., Ohtsuka, K.,
348: Sekiguchi, T., et al. 2007, \aap, 466, 1153
349: \bibitem[Kozai(1962)]{koz62} Kozai, Y. 1962, \aj, 67, 591
350: \bibitem[Lidov(1961)]{lid61} Lidov, M. L. 1961, Iskusstvennie Sputniki Zemli, 8, 5
351: \bibitem[Marchi et al.(2006)]{mar06} Marchi, S., Magrin, S.,
352: Nesvorn\'y, D., et al. 2006, \mnras, 368, L39
353: \bibitem[McFadden et al.(1984)]{mcf84} McFadden, L. A., Gaffey, M. J.,
354: \& McCord, T. B. 1984, \icarus, 59, 25
355: \bibitem[Moiseev(1945)]{moi45} Moiseev, N. D. 1945, Trudy
356: Gosudarstvennogo Astron. Inst. P.K. Shternberga, 15, 75
357: \bibitem[Nesvorn\'y et al.(2002)]{nes02} Nesvorn\'y, D., Bottke, W. F.,
358: Dones, L., \& Levison, H. F. 2002, \nat, 417, 720
359: \bibitem[Nesvorn\'y et al.(2005)]{nes05} Nesvorn\'y, D., Jedicke, R.,
360: Whiteley, R. J., \& Zeljko, I. 2005, \icarus, 173, 132
361: \bibitem[Ohtsuka(2007)]{oht07} Ohtsuka, K. 2007, MPEC-M49
362: \bibitem[Ohtsuka et al.(2003)]{oht03} Ohtsuka, K., Nakano, S.,
363: \& Yoshikawa, M. 2003, \pasj, 55, 321
364: \bibitem[Ohtsuka et al.(2006)]{oht06} Ohtsuka, K., Sekiguchi, T.,
365: Kinoshita, D., et al. 2006, \aap, 450, L25 (Paper I)
366: \bibitem[Sekanina(1973)]{sek73} Sekanina, Z. 1973, \icarus, 18, 253
367: \bibitem[Sekanina \& Chodas(2005)]{sek05} Sekanina, Z.,
368: \& Chodas, P. W. 2005, \apjs, 161, 551
369: \bibitem[Shapiro et al.(1971)]{sha71} Shapiro, I. I., Smith, W. B., Ash, M. E.,
370: \& Herrick, S. 1971, \aj, 76, 588
371: \bibitem[Southworth \& Hawkins(1963)]{sou63} Southworth, R. B.,
372: \& Hawkins, G. S. 1963, Smithon. Contr. Astrophys., 7, 261
373: \bibitem[Steel et al.(1992)]{ste92} Steel, D.,
374: McNaught, R. H., \& Asher, D. 1992, Minor Planet Bull., 19, 9
375: \bibitem[Tedesco(1989)]{ted89} Tedesco, E. F. 1989, in Asteroids II,
376: ed. R. B. Binzel et al. (Tucson: Univ. Arizona), 1090
377: \end{thebibliography}
378:
379: \clearpage
380:
381: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
382: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
383: %% To embed the sample graphics in
384: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
385: %% \includegraphics commands
386: %%
387: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
388: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
389: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
390: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
391: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
392: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
393: %%
394: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
395: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
396: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
397: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
398: %% journal to journal.
399:
400: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
401: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
402: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
403: %% available in the electronic journal.
404:
405:
406:
407: %\clearpage
408:
409: \begin{table*}[htb]
410: \caption{Orbital parameters of (1566) Icarus and 2007 $\mathrm{MK_6}$ (equinox J2000)}
411: \label{tbl:orbits}
412: \centering
413: \begin{tabular}{lccc}
414: \hline
415: \hline
416: object & \multicolumn{2}{c}{(1566) Icarus} & 2007 $\mathrm{MK_6}$ \\%
417: \hline
418: osculation epoch (TT) & 2007 Apr. 10.0 & 1034 Jul. 03.0 & 2007 Apr. 10.0 \\
419: mean anomaly $M$ & $285^\circ.14414$ & $161^\circ.45243$ & $336^\circ.75725$ \\
420: perihelion distance $q$ (AU) & 0.1866177 & 0.1930133 & 0.1959358 \\
421: semimajor axis $a$ (AU) & 1.0778849 & 1.0776443 & 1.0807494 \\
422: eccentricity $e$ & 0.8268668 & 0.8208933 & 0.8187038 \\
423: argument of perihelion $\omega$ & $31^\circ.29236$ & $25^\circ.37252$ & $25^\circ.38152$ \\
424: longitude of ascending node $\mathit{\Omega}$ & $88^\circ.08105$ & $93^\circ.55925$ & $92^\circ.94672$ \\
425: inclination $i$ & $22^\circ.85385$ & $25^\circ.07805$ & $25^\circ.15553$ \\
426: \# of observations & 711 & & 54 \\
427: arc (oppositions) & 1949--2006 (14) & & 2006--2007 (2) \\
428: RMS residual & $1''.12$ & & $0''.74$ \\
429: absolute mag. $H$ & 15.95 & & 19.9 \\
430: reference & JPL & this work & Nakano \\
431: \hline
432: \end{tabular}
433: \end{table*}
434:
435: \clearpage
436:
437: \begin{table*}[htb]
438: \caption{(1566) Icarus and the Taurids-Perseids (Sekanina 1973) at almost the same evolutionary phase}
439: \label{tbl:IandT}
440: \centering
441: \begin{tabular}{lccccccc}
442: \hline
443: \hline
444: object & epoch & $q$ & $a$ & $e$ & $\omega$ & $\mathit{\Omega}$ & $i$ \\
445: & (TT) & (AU) & (AU) & & & (2000.0) & \\
446: \hline
447: Icarus & 1963 Jul. 3.0 & 0.18697 & 1.07791 & 0.82655 & $31^\circ.032$ & $88^\circ.337$ & $22^\circ.940$ \\
448: Tau-Per & 1961--1965 & 0.163 & 1.268 & 0.871 & $36^\circ.3$ & $86^\circ.7$ & $23^\circ.3$ \\
449: \hline
450: \end{tabular}
451: \end{table*}
452:
453:
454:
455: %% Any table notes must follow the \end{tabular} command.
456:
457: %% If the table is more than one page long, the width of the table can vary
458: %% from page to page when the default \tablewidth is used, as below. The
459: %% individual table widths for each page will be written to the log file; a
460: %% maximum tablewidth for the table can be computed from these values.
461: %% The \tablewidth argument can then be reset and the file reprocessed, so
462: %% that the table is of uniform width throughout. Try getting the widths
463: %% from the log file and changing the \tablewidth parameter to see how
464: %% adjusting this value affects table formatting.
465:
466: %% The \dataset{} macro has also been applied to a few of the objects to
467: %% show how many observations can be tagged in a table.
468:
469: \clearpage
470:
471: \begin{figure}
472: \epsscale{1.0}
473: \plotone{f1.eps}
474: \caption{Orbital evolution of (1566) Icarus and 2007 $\mathrm{MK_6}$.
475: The eight graphs show: $q$ = perihelion distance in AU; $a$ =
476: semimajor axis in AU; $e$ = eccentricity;
477: $\omega$ = argument of perihelion in degrees; $\mathit{\Omega}$ =
478: longitude of ascending node in degrees; $i$ =
479: inclination in degrees; and the $C_1$ and $C_2$ integrals.
480: The abscissa of all is time (Julian Terrestrial Date, JDT).}
481: \label{fig:orbits}
482: \end{figure}
483:
484: %% Tables may also be prepared as separate files. See the accompanying
485: %% sample file table.tex for an example of an external table file.
486: %% To include an external file in your main document, use the \input
487: %% command. Uncomment the line below to include table.tex in this
488: %% sample file. (Note that you will need to comment out the \documentclass,
489: %% \begin{document}, and \end{document} commands from table.tex if you want
490: %% to include it in this document.)
491:
492: %% \input{table}
493:
494: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text
495: %% that appears after it.
496:
497: \end{document}
498:
499: %%
500: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
501: