1: \documentclass{emulateapj}
2: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
3: \usepackage{epsfig}
4: \usepackage{apjfonts}
5: \usepackage{epsfig}
6: \usepackage{epsfig}
7:
8: \begin{document}
9:
10: \newcommand{\tpass}{{t$_{\rm pass}$}}
11: \newcommand{\DeltaD}{{$\Delta D$}}
12: \newcommand{\DeltaV}{{$\Delta V$}}
13: %\newcommand{\Nhost}{{\rm N$_{\rm true}$}}
14: %\newcommand{\Nhalo}{{\rm N$_{\rm true}$}}
15: \newcommand{\Nhost}{{\rm N}}
16: \newcommand{\Nhalo}{{\rm N}}
17: \newcommand{\DN}{${\rm D_N}$}
18: \newcommand{\ewha}{${\rm EW(H\alpha)}$}
19: \newcommand{\Vin}{${\rm V_{in}}$}
20: \newcommand{\Vnow}{${\rm V_{now}}$}\
21: \newcommand{\Vmax}{${\rm V_{\rm max}}$}
22: \newcommand{\Nseven}{${\rm N_{700}}$}
23: \newcommand{\kms}{km s$^{-1}$}
24:
25: \shorttitle{Isolating Triggered Star Formation}
26: \shortauthors{Barton et al.}
27:
28: \bibliographystyle{apj}
29:
30: \title{Isolating Triggered Star Formation}
31:
32: \author{\sc Elizabeth J. Barton\altaffilmark{1}, Jacob A. Arnold\altaffilmark{1},
33: Andrew R. Zentner\altaffilmark{2,3,4}, James S. Bullock\altaffilmark{1}, and
34: Risa H. Wechsler\altaffilmark{5}}
35:
36: \altaffiltext{1}{Center for Cosmology, Department of Physics and
37: Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-4575
38: (email: ebarton@uci.edu)}
39:
40: \altaffiltext{2}{Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics,
41: Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, and The Enrico Fermi Institute,
42: The University of Chicago,
43: Chicago, IL 60637}
44:
45: \altaffiltext{3}{Present Address: Department of Physics and Astronomy
46: University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, zentner@pitt.edu}
47:
48: \altaffiltext{4}{National Science Foundation Fellow}
49:
50: \altaffiltext{5}{Kavli Institute for Particle and Astrophysics \&
51: Cosmology, Physics Department, and Stanford Linear Accelerator Center,
52: Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305}
53:
54: \begin{abstract}
55:
56: Galaxy pairs provide a potentially powerful means of studying
57: triggered star formation from galaxy interactions. We use a large
58: cosmological N-body simulation coupled with a well-tested
59: semi-analytic substructure model to demonstrate that the majority of
60: galaxies in close pairs reside within cluster or group-size halos and
61: therefore represent a biased population, poorly suited for direct
62: comparison to ``field'' galaxies. Thus, the frequent observation that
63: some types of galaxies in pairs have redder colors than ``field''
64: galaxies is primarily a selection effect. We use our simulations to
65: devise a means to select galaxy pairs that are isolated in their dark
66: matter halos with respect to other massive subhalos (\Nhalo $=2$
67: halos) and to select a control sample of isolated galaxies (\Nhalo
68: $=1$ halos) for comparison. We then apply these selection criteria to
69: a volume-limited subset of the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey with M$_{\rm
70: B, j} \leq -19$ and obtain the first clean measure of the {\it
71: typical} fraction of galaxies affected by triggered star formation and
72: the average elevation in the star formation rate. We find that 24\%
73: (30.5 \%) of these L$^\star$ and sub-L$^{\star}$ galaxies in isolated
74: 50 (30) h$^{-1}$ kpc pairs exhibit star formation that is boosted by a
75: factor of $\gtrsim 5$ above their average past value, while only 10\%
76: of isolated galaxies in the control sample show this level of
77: enhancement. Thus, 14\% (20 \%) of the galaxies in these close pairs
78: show clear triggered star formation. Our orbit models suggest that
79: 12\% (16\%) of 50 (30) h$^{-1}$ kpc close pairs that are isolated
80: according to our definition have had a close ($\leq$ 30 h$^{-1}$ kpc) pass
81: within the last Gyr. Thus, the data are broadly consistent with a
82: scenario in which most or all close passes of isolated pairs result in
83: triggered star formation. The isolation criteria we develop provide a
84: means to constrain star formation and feedback prescriptions in
85: hydrodynamic simulations and a very general method of understanding
86: the importance of triggered star formation in a cosmological context.
87:
88: \end{abstract}
89:
90: \keywords{cosmology: theory, large-scale structure of universe ---
91: galaxies: formation, evolution, high-redshift, interactions,
92: statistics}
93:
94: \section{Introduction} \label{sec:intro}
95:
96: Galaxy interactions and mergers help drive galaxy evolution. In the
97: concordance $\Lambda$CDM cosmological model, nearly every galaxy has
98: had a major merger at least once over cosmic time
99: \citep[e.g.,][]{Maller06,Stewart07}. Major mergers and
100: interactions consume available gas, producing stellar populations
101: which subsequently redden with age
102: \citep[e.g.,][]{Larson78, Kennicutt87}. Major mergers destroy disks,
103: turning galaxies into spheroids \citep[e.g.,][]{Toomre72},
104: but also potentially creating large disk galaxies in gas-rich
105: scenarios \citep[e.g.,][]{Robertson06}. Close
106: galaxy passes and minor mergers are even more frequent. These
107: perturbations send gas into the centers of galaxies, where they may
108: contribute to bulge components and even feed black holes
109: \citep[e.g.,][]{Kennicutt84,Barnes92, Mihos96, Barton00, Combes01,
110: Barton01, Barton03, Kannappan04, Kormendy04,FreedmanWoods06,Lin07,
111: SolAlonso07, FreedmanWoods07}. In the hierarchical picture of galaxy
112: formation, mergers play an even more important role during earlier epochs
113: than they do today, possibly triggering the high star formation rates
114: \citep{Lowenthal97, Kolatt99, Somerville01, Wechsler01} observed in
115: some ``Lyman break'' galaxies at $z\gtrsim3$ \citep{Steidel92, Steidel96}
116: or luminous submillimeter galaxies \citep[e.g.,][]{Chapman05}.
117:
118: Existing detailed studies of galaxy interactions show that triggered
119: star formation and morphological evolution can be very rapid and
120: intense. However, we can only observe a ``snapshot'' of the evolution
121: of galaxy pairs. With incomplete phase-space information, we do not
122: know their true frequency, evolutionary timescales, orbits, or fates.
123: Thus, we have neither a complete understanding of the frequency of
124: interactions and mergers nor knowledge of their impact on galaxy
125: evolution. Many processes such as ram pressure stripping, interaction
126: with a cluster or group potential, or high-speed ``harassment,'' may
127: also be very important in establishing the morphologies and stellar
128: populations of galaxies, and in driving the relationships between
129: morphology, color, and local environmental density
130: \citep[e.g.,][]{Gunn72, Dressler80, Postman84, Moore96,Blanton05a}.
131:
132: Hydrodynamic simulations of galaxy interactions can make predictions
133: for the expected star formation rate from any type of galactic
134: collision \citep[e.g.,][]{Barnes92,Mihos96,Springel05, Cox06, Perez06a,
135: Perez06b}.
136: However, these predictions are sensitive to prescriptions for baryonic
137: physics that are highly uncertain. In particular, hydrodynamic simulations
138: must rely on effective models for gas dynamics,
139: cooling, and star formation that these simulations
140: cannot hope to resolve. Uncertainties in these effective theories
141: are an enormous problem for galaxy formation theory and detailed tests
142: of these prescriptions are required. Unfortunately
143: such tests are not simple; the full phase-space
144: information is not known for many real systems.
145: However, empirical, {\it statistical} studies of galaxy interactions and
146: mergers --- when combined with predictions of galaxy orbits in a
147: now well-established cosmological model --- hold promise for uncovering the role of
148: interactions and mergers in galaxy evolution.
149:
150: The first step in studying the effects of interactions and mergers is
151: to identify systems that are undergoing these processes. Using
152: morphological distortion as an indicator of galaxy interactions
153: does yield a subset of the pairs that have definitely had a
154: close pass. However, {\it relying on tidal distortion leads to missed
155: interacting pairs} because (1) sensitivity to low-surface-brightness
156: features is a strong function of seeing, depth, and redshift, (2) the
157: morphological features are short-lived ($\sim$100 Myr), and (3) many
158: of the features, like tidal tails, are resonance effects that only
159: appear in prograde disk galaxy encounters \citep{Toomre72}.
160: For a more complete census of the effects of interactions, it is important
161: to select pairs or systems of galaxies based {\it only} on
162: proximity in redshift and projected separation, then to use
163: mock catalogs constructed from cosmological
164: simulations to understand this selection.
165:
166: Historically, studies of distorted galaxies and galaxies in pairs have
167: been very revealing. The early stages of galaxy interactions can
168: drive gas into the center of a progenitor galaxy and trigger an early
169: episode of central star formation long before the final merger
170: \citep[e.g.,][]{Larson78, Joseph84, Kennicutt87, Mihos94, Mihos96}.
171: The strength of the optical emission line associated with this star
172: formation correlates with the separation of the pair on the sky
173: (\DeltaD) and in redshift \citep[\DeltaV;][]{Barton00}. The
174: optically-detected star formation is strongest in the central few kpc,
175: often dominating the optical light; in the case of a late-type spiral,
176: it can also contribute substantially to the formation of a bulge
177: \citep{Tissera02, Barton03}. This process may be the primary
178: mechanism for the formation of late-type bulges \citep{Kannappan04}.
179: \citet{Kewley06} show that the metallicities of these galaxies provide
180: a ``smoking gun'' for gas infall from the outskirts of the disks.
181: Galaxies with (optically) strong central starbursts have metallicities
182: that are lower than average for their luminosities, consistent with a
183: starburst occurring in gas that was driven into the nucleus from the
184: metal poor outskirts of the progenitor's disk.
185:
186: New, large redshift surveys such as the 2dFGRS \citep{Colless01} and
187: Sloan Digital Sky Survey \citep{York00} provide a means of exploring
188: ever-larger samples of galaxies in pairs, although these samples must be
189: approached with caution because mechanical spectrograph constraints
190: make them deficient in close pairs. The correlations between orbital
191: parameters and star-forming properties of galaxies in pairs have been
192: verified in both the 2dFGRS \citep{Lambas03}, and the SDSS
193: \citep{Nikolic04, Luo07}. However, the studies also appear to reveal
194: unexpected phenomena including apparently {\it suppressed} star
195: formation in widely-separated pairs and red tails in the color
196: distributions of paired galaxies \citep{Lambas03, SolAlonso04,
197: SolAlonso06,Luo07}.
198:
199: Using these empirical results to arrive at a true measure of the
200: amount and timescales of triggered star formation is difficult. Pair
201: samples are complex: they include some interlopers and are rich in
202: galaxies in a variety of environments \citep[e.g.,][]{SolAlonso06,
203: Soares07}. The progenitors of galaxy interactions come from a mixture
204: of galaxy types \citep[e.g.,][]{Focardi06}. In dense environments,
205: many will have already experienced multiple close passes and mergers.
206: They may have consumed or lost much of their gas, leaving little to
207: form new stars. However, in sparser environments, the progenitors of
208: the interaction may have had very few previous interactions. They may
209: have large remaining gas reservoirs. Thus, the efficacy of an
210: interaction in triggering star formation should depend in detail on
211: the environment of the interacting galaxies.
212:
213: Dense clusters of galaxies are straightforward to identify with
214: confidence. However, the low-speed encounters that trigger star
215: formation are extremely unlikely in these clusters. An understanding
216: of tidally-triggered star formation requires accurate probes of
217: isolated galaxies and sparse loose groups. Unfortunately, accurate
218: environmental statistics are difficult to interpret precisely in
219: this regime. Group-finding algorithms are effective at investigating
220: environments \citep{Huchra82}. However, even highly tuned group-finding
221: algorithms construct false groups and miss group members
222: \citep[e.g.,][]{Yang05, Gerke05, Weinmann06, Berlind06, Koester07}.
223: Nearest-neighbor and counts-in-cylinder statistics also have a large
224: scatter \citep[e.g.,][]{Berrier07}.
225:
226: The use of mock galaxy catalogs based on numerical simulations of
227: structure formation in the standard cosmology can help sort these
228: issues out. Direct numerical simulation is difficult because
229: obtaining the necessary resolution to be complete in close pairs while
230: simultaneously modeling a large enough volume to reduce sample
231: variance is computationally expensive. An alternative and proven
232: method is to use an analytic model for dark matter halo substructure
233: \citep[so-called ``subhalos'', e.g.,][]{Zentner03,Taylor05,Zentner05}
234: in conjunction with an $N$-body simulation of a
235: cosmologically-relevant volume. The analytic model treats halo
236: substructure using a method that is approximate, but free of inherent
237: resolution limits, and extends the effective numerical resolution in
238: the simulated volume, ensuring completeness in the dense environments
239: where many close pairs reside. The analytic model also allows for a
240: quantification of shot-noise contributions to close-pair samples that
241: may arise, for example, from the particulars of galaxy orbits and may
242: be significant \citep{Berrier06}. Such models have been developed and
243: validated by comparison to direct $N$-body simulations in the regimes
244: where the two techniques are commensurable
245: \citep{Zentner05}. Thus, the time is
246: ripe to develop new methods aimed at understanding the detailed
247: make-up of pairs of galaxies selected from redshift surveys.
248:
249: We study mock catalogs constructed using the hybrid approach
250: described briefly in the previous paragraph and extensively in
251: \citet{Zentner05} and \citet{Berrier06}. This approach has
252: already succeeded in explaining the apparent lack of evolution in the
253: close pair fraction observed in intermediate-redshift surveys
254: \citep{Lin04, Berrier06}. In the present study, we focus on interpreting
255: the star-forming properties of galaxies in pairs. With the
256: complexities of the large-scale environments of pairs in mind, we
257: explore the construction of appropriate samples and control samples for galaxies in
258: pairs. In particular, we examine ways to isolate the {\it immediate} effects
259: of triggered star formation from other environmental processes. Here,
260: we apply the analysis to a volume-limited sample of galaxies in the
261: 2dFGRS; however, the techniques we discuss are generally applicable to
262: other studies of tight sub-groupings of galaxies.
263:
264: In \S~\ref{sec:methods} we describe the numerical methods and the
265: observational data that we use.
266: \S~\ref{sec:environments} contains a description of the
267: model predictions for the environments of galaxies in pairs; in this
268: section we examine the problem of trying to construct a control sample
269: of objects that are not in pairs. In \S~\ref{sec:isolated}, we
270: restrict to the most isolated pairs and individual galaxies and show
271: that isolated pairs are almost purely dark matter halos containing
272: \Nhalo\ $=2$ galaxies inside their virial radii. The isolated
273: galaxies we select are an appropriate control sample for the progenitors
274: of an interaction. We examine galaxies in pairs in the 2dF Galaxy
275: Redshift Survey \citep[2dFGRS][]{Colless01} in \S~\ref{sec:data} and
276: measure the amount of triggered star formation in isolated pairs
277: relative to the control. We \S~\ref{sec:complex} contains a brief
278: description of the situation in more complex environments, and we
279: conclude in \S~\ref{sec:conclusion}. In future papers, we plan to
280: explore more complex environments in greater detail. The ultimate
281: goal of this and similar studies is to isolate the effects of
282: interactions and then re-integrate the results into a complete
283: cosmological interaction history for galaxies, thus measuring the
284: amount of galaxy evolution triggered by interactions and mergers.
285:
286: \section{The Models and the Data} \label{sec:methods}
287:
288: The first step in our study is to construct mock catalogs of galaxies and
289: study the environments of galaxies in projected, close-pair
290: configurations in order to understand the selection of such objects.
291: We use the information gleaned from the
292: mock samples to aid in the interpretation of close pairs in the
293: 2dFGRS. In this section, we describe the models used to produce mock
294: catalogs and the observational data in turn.
295:
296: \subsection{Mock Galaxy Catalogs}
297:
298: Our model begins with a cosmological N-body simulation from which we
299: extract positions and masses of host dark matter halos within a
300: cosmological volume. We populate the host halos with subhalos using
301: the method of \citet{Zentner05}. Our method for producing mock
302: catalogs has been discussed in detail in \citet{Berrier06}. We
303: provide a brief overview here, and refer the reader to
304: \citet{Berrier06} for a more detailed discussion.
305:
306: Our numerical simulation was run with the Adaptive Refinement Tree
307: N-body code \citep{Kravtsov97} in a standard $\Lambda$CDM cosmology
308: with $\Omega_{m}=0.3$, $\Omega_{\Lambda} = 0.7$, H$_0$ = 70 km
309: s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, and $\sigma_8 = 0.9$. The simulation followed
310: the evolution of $512^3$ particles in comoving box of $120$ h$^{-1}$
311: Mpc on a side, implying a particle mass of $m_p \simeq 1.1 \times 10^9$ h
312: $^{-1} M_\odot$. The simulation grid was refined down to a minimum
313: cell size of $h_{\mathrm{peak}} \simeq 1.8$ h$^{-1}$ kpc on a side.
314: The simulation was previously discussed in
315: \citet{Tasitsiomi04}, \citet{Zentner05}, \citet{Allgood05}, and
316: \citet{Wechsler06}. Host halos in the simulation were identified
317: using a variant of the Bound Density Maxima algorithm
318: \citep[BDM,][]{klypin_etal:99,Kravtsov04a}. We define a halo virial
319: radius as the radius of the sphere, centered on the density peak,
320: within which the mean density is $\Delta_v (z)$ times the mean density
321: of the universe, $\rho_m$. The virial overdensity $\Delta_v(z)$, is
322: given by the spherical top-hat collapse approximation and we compute
323: it using the fitting function of \citet{bryan_norman:98}. Host halos
324: are identified as those halos whose centers
325: do not lie within the virial radius of
326: another halo.
327:
328: In order to determine the substructure properties in each host dark
329: matter halo, we model their mass accretion histories and track their
330: substructure content using an analytic technique that exploits
331: numerous simplifying approximations and several scaling relations
332: derived from direct simulation \citep{Zentner05}. For each host halo of mass
333: $M$ at redshift $z$ in our simulation volume, we randomly
334: generate a mass accretion history using the method of
335: \citet{Somerville99}. At each merger event, we assign an initial
336: orbital energy and angular momentum to the infalling object according
337: to the probability distributions for these quantities derived from
338: cosmological $N$-body simulations \citep{Zentner05}.
339: Each accreted system becomes a subhalo at the time it is
340: accreted. It is assigned a mass and a corresponding maximum circular
341: velocity at this time, \Vmax $=$ \Vin\ . We integrate the orbit of
342: the subhalo in the potential of the main halo from the time of
343: accretion until $z=0$. We model both tidal mass loss and internal
344: heating of subhalos as well as dynamical friction using a modified form of the
345: Chandrasekhar formula \citep{chandrasekhar43} suggested by
346: \citet{Hashimoto03}. As subhalos orbit
347: within their hosts, they lose mass and their maximum circular
348: velocities decrease as the profiles are heated by interactions.
349: We remove galaxy subhalos from our catalogs once their maximum circular
350: velocities drop below \Vmax $= 80$~\kms. This rough criterion is used
351: to mimic the dissolution of the observable galaxy as a result of these
352: interactions.
353:
354: This procedure produces a population of subhalos within each host dark
355: matter halo in the volume. In fact, the procedure is statistical and
356: relies on realizations of the small-scale density field and the
357: orbital parameters for infalling structure. As such, each host may be
358: assigned numerous different subhalo populations that differ in their
359: detail due to realizing these statistical distributions with finite
360: samples. We include such variations by producing four mock catalogs
361: from four independently-realized subhalo populations for each host.
362:
363: The next step is to map galaxies onto the host halo and subhalo populations
364: in the model. Each subhalo has an
365: associated \Vin\ circular velocity that acts as a proxy for its
366: luminosity and each host halo has a corresponding ``central galaxy''
367: with a \Vin = \Vmax. We assign luminosities to halos by matching
368: volume number densities of galaxies between the simulation and the
369: data; thus, we assume that luminosity is a monotonic function of \Vin.
370: In \citet{Berrier06}, we compared the close pair fraction predicted by
371: this method to close pair counts in the UZC and found good agreement
372: if we associated galaxy luminosity in a one-to-one way with \Vin. We
373: use this association throughout this paper. In addition to the
374: work of \citet{Berrier06} which shows the two-point correlation
375: function extending down to $\sim$50 h$^{-1}$ kpc, a similar model
376: has also been shown to reproduce the larger scale galaxy two-point
377: correlation function as a function of luminosity, scale, and redshift
378: \citep{Conroy06}.
379:
380: As discussed below, we focus on halos with \Vin\ $> 160.5$ \kms\ in
381: order to define a mock galaxy catalog with the same number density as the
382: M$_{\rm B,j} \leq -19$ population we consider from the 2dF survey.
383: The numerical model predicts the number of galaxies with \Vin\ $>
384: 160.5$ \kms\ that occupy every host halo in the simulation, \Nhost.
385: As discussed below, most galaxies in the simulation reside in halos by
386: themselves, with \Nhost\ $=1$, but galaxies in highly-clustered
387: regions tend to reside in massive host halos with multiple galaxies,
388: \Nhost\ $\gtrsim 9$. In what follows we analyze the full
389: simulation volume; thus, all results are appropriate for comparison to a
390: volume-limited sample. In addition, we use all four mock catalogs
391: constructed from the four, independent realizations of halo substructure
392: for each host unless otherwise stated.
393:
394:
395: \subsection{Pairs in the 2dF Survey}
396:
397: We examine star formation in pairs selected from the public 2dFGRS
398: database \citep{Colless01}. In contrast to previous studies of 2dFGRS
399: pairs \citep[e.g.,][]{SolAlonso06}, we construct a volume-limited
400: sample with galaxies to $M_{Bj}$ = -19, assuming $\Omega_{\Lambda}$ =
401: 0.7, $\Omega_{m}$ = 0.3, and $H_0$ = 70 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$. The
402: redshift range is from 0.010 to 0.0875. We restrict the study to two
403: simple rectangles in the sky, with coordinates $148.97^o$ $\leq$
404: $\alpha$ $\leq$ $209.42^o$, $-4.78^o$ $\leq$ $\delta$ $\leq$ $2.21^o$
405: and $29.68^o$ $\leq$ $\alpha$ $\leq$ $50.94^o$, $-34.18^o$ $\leq$
406: $\delta$ $\leq$ $-25.32^o$. While these strips are relatively
407: complete, there are some omitted regions near bright stars. We only
408: select pairs from the portion of the sample not within 700 h$^{-1}$ kpc
409: of the edges of the rectangles on the sky or within 1000 km s$^{-1}$
410: of our redshift limits in order to probe the full environments of our
411: targeted objects.
412:
413: The full sample covers a solid angle of 0.317 steradians and a volume
414: of 1.79 x $10^6$ h$^{-3}$ Mpc$^3$. Integrating the luminosity
415: function reveals an expected object density of 0.0107 $\pm$ 0.0008
416: galaxies h$^3$ Mpc$^{-3}$ to ${\rm M_{Bj}}$ = -19 \citep{Croton05};
417: this density corresponds to a cutoff halo circular speed $V_{\rm in}$
418: = 160.5 km s$^{-1}$ in the simulation, which we use consistently
419: throughout the paper. The targeted sample excluding the edges
420: includes 22,601 galaxies, with 1,344 galaxies in close ($\lesssim 50$
421: h$^{-1}$ kpc) pairs.
422:
423: The primary problem faced in our data analysis is survey
424: incompleteness. Overall, the 2dFGRS is approximately $86\%$ complete
425: \citep{Cross04}. In a single observation, the 2dFGRS cannot
426: distinguish objects closer than 25 arcseconds on the sky. At the
427: minimum, median, and maximum redshift of galaxies in the
428: volume-limited sample we consider, this fiber collision separation
429: corresponds to 4.8, 23, and 28 h$^{-1}$ kpc, respectively. However, repeated
430: measurements of the same field with different fiber configurations
431: allow redshift measurements for some close pairs \citep{Lambas03,
432: SolAlonso04}. In dense clusters, where galaxy pairs are
433: preferentially found, there are often many more objects than fibers,
434: leading to a differential incompleteness with environment that has
435: been characterized by the 2dFGRS survey team \citep{Colless01}. We
436: use their tools to probe the effects of incompleteness in
437: \S~\ref{sec:data}.
438:
439: Although it is not a primary focus of this work, we also verify the
440: results of our study using the {\it Sloan Digital Sky Survey} DR4
441: \citep{Adelman-McCarthy06} {\it NYU Value-Added Galaxy Catalog}
442: data \citep{Blanton05b}.
443: We construct volume-limited catalogs to M$_{r} =
444: -19+5\log{h}$ and M$_{r} = -20+5\log{h}$ and consider both galaxies
445: with measured and unmeasured redshifts. We use star formation
446: indicators including the star formation rate per unit mass from
447: \citet{Brinchmann04}. In general, the SDSS results are in
448: qualitative agreement with the 2dF results we focus on here, but the
449: use of $r$-band selection and of different star formation indicators
450: introduce quantitative differences.
451:
452: \section{The Environments of Galaxy Pairs} \label{sec:environments}
453:
454: To isolate triggered star formation from star formation that is not
455: triggered by interactions, we must compare a well-defined pair sample
456: to the appropriate control sample --- typical examples of the
457: immediate progenitors of the interaction. What types of galaxies
458: appear in pairs? To answer this question, we investigate the
459: environments of pairs selected in our simulated volume-limited
460: redshift survey.
461:
462: For each simulated ``galaxy'' (halo or subhalo) above our cutoff
463: circular velocity in the model, we compute \DN, the projected distance
464: to the object's nearest neighbor with \DeltaV$\le 1000$~km~s$^{-1}$.
465: We also measure \Nhost, and the total number of simulated galaxies
466: that lie within the same host dark matter halo as the object.
467: Typically, close pairs are defined based on small projected
468: separations, \DeltaD\ $< 30-100$ h$^{-1}$ kpc, with 50 h$^{-1}$ kpc a
469: commonly used value \citep{Barton00, Lin04, Berrier06}, within
470: \DeltaV$=1000$~km~s$^{-1}$ of its neighbor. Because we have full
471: three-dimensional information from the simulation, we can explore the
472: true nature of the ``apparent'' pairs selected with this technique.
473:
474:
475: \begin{figure}[t]
476: \epsscale{1.05} \plotone{f1.eps}
477: \caption{The fraction of galaxies in the simulation with a total of
478: \Nhost\ galaxies in their host halos as a function of \DN, the projected
479: distance to its nearest neighbor. For each galaxy in the mock
480: catalog, we measure \DN\ within \DeltaV $= 1000$~km~s$^{-1}$, and the
481: total number of galaxies in its host halo, \Nhost. The different
482: lines correspond to different bins of \Nhost, \Nhost\ $= 1$ exactly ({\it
483: solid black}), 2 ({\it dotted green}), 3 ({\it dashed magenta}), 4-8
484: ({\it long-dashed cyan}), and $\geq 9$ ({\it dot-dashed blue})
485: galaxies in the host halo. We shade the ``pair zone,'' galaxies with
486: neighbors within 50 h$^{-1}$ kpc. Close pairs are preferentially
487: found in very well-populated halos.}
488: \label{fig:Nsat_frac}
489: \end{figure}
490:
491: We begin our exploration of close pair selection in
492: Figure~\ref{fig:Nsat_frac}. To construct this figure, we first
493: compute \DN\ and \Nhost\ for each simulated galaxy, using the periodic
494: boundary conditions, if necessary, to fully sample its environment.
495: We then split the objects in each bin of \DN\ into subsets based on
496: the multiplicities of the halos in which the objects reside,
497: $N_{gal}(\mathrm{N}|\mathrm{D_N})$. The ranges of the \Nhost\
498: bins are shown in the labels of Fig.~\ref{fig:Nsat_frac}. Finally, at
499: each value of projected nearest-neighbor separation, we computed the
500: fraction of galaxies within that bin that are in the different subsets
501: of \Nhost. Fig.~\ref{fig:Nsat_frac} shows this fraction among five
502: different bins of \Nhost\ as a function of \DN. In each \DN\ bin, the
503: sum of all fractions is 1. For reference, the shaded region
504: indicates the 50 h$^{-1}$ kpc ``pair zone.'' We note that the x-axis,
505: \DN, is the {\it directly} measurable quantity from redshift survey
506: data, while \Nhost\ is not directly measurable.
507:
508: Fig.~\ref{fig:Nsat_frac} immediately reveals a major issue in
509: selecting appropriate control samples for galaxies in pairs. {\it
510: Pairs in the simulation reside in a highly skewed distribution of
511: environments.} In particular, pairs are vastly over-weighted toward
512: galaxies that reside within well-populated host dark matter halos
513: compared to the average. For example, galaxies with \Nhost\ $\geq 9$
514: comprise 39\% of the pair sample but only 19\% of the simulation as a
515: whole. In contrast, while isolated (N=1) galaxies make up 56\% of the
516: simulation as a whole, only 3\% of the apparent close pairs are
517: actually isolated galaxies. These isolated galaxies in apparent pairs
518: are interlopers according to the analysis of \citet{Berrier06}. The
519: abundant pairs in cluster and large-group systems are not necessarily
520: imminent mergers, nor are they necessarily even interacting directly
521: with each other. \citet{Bailin07} note a similar problem in the
522: study of galactic satellite populations.
523:
524: From a qualitative perspective, Figure~\ref{fig:Nsat_frac} explains
525: many past observations regarding the star-forming properties of
526: galaxies in pairs. For example, pair samples previously analyzed in
527: the 2dFGRS show an increased star formation rate relative to control
528: samples at close separations (\DeltaD $\lesssim 30$ h$^{-1}$ kpc)
529: where the interaction has a dominant effect \citep{Lambas03}.
530: However, at larger separations where the interaction is less important
531: ($100 \lesssim {\rm \Delta D} \leq 200$ h$^{-1}$ kpc), the typical
532: pairs exhibit {\it less} star formation than the field
533: \citep[e.g.,][]{Lambas03, SolAlonso04, SolAlonso06}. In our model,
534: these more widely-separated pairs are also in denser environments than
535: the field: 36\% are in \Nhost\ $\geq 9$-galaxy halos while only 19\%
536: are isolated. This depressed star formation in widely-separated pairs
537: relative to the field results from the fact that galaxies living in
538: more massive and populated systems have suppressed star formation on
539: average.
540:
541: \begin{figure}
542: \plotone{f2.eps}
543: \caption{The normalized distribution, ${\rm d} n/{\rm d}\log(M)$, of host halo
544: masses for 50 h$^{-1}$ kpc pairs ({\it dotted red}),
545: closer 30 h$^{-1}$ kpc pairs ({\it dashed blue}) and the full sample ({\it solid
546: black}) in the simulation. Pairs reside in much more massive halos
547: than typical ``field'' galaxies.}
548: \label{fig:Mhost_histogram}
549: \end{figure}
550:
551: Because pairs are preferentially found in denser environments, the
552: naive comparison of star formation rates between pairs and {\it
553: typical} field galaxies will artificially underestimate any elevation
554: in star formation rate that is directly triggered by an interaction.
555: Fig.~\ref{fig:Mhost_histogram} shows the distribution of host halo
556: masses for galaxies in close (\DeltaD $\leq 50$ and 30 h$^{-1}$ kpc)
557: pairs and the sample as a whole. This Figure emphasizes how skewed
558: the environments actually are. The average host halo mass for the
559: full sample is ${\rm <M_{\rm host}> = 3.2 \times 10^{13}}$~h$^{-1}\
560: M_{\sun}$; for the close (50 h$^{-1}$ kpc) and closer (30 h$^{-1}$
561: kpc) samples of pairs it is 6.0 and 5.7$ \times 10^{13}\ {\rm h^{-1}\
562: M}_{\sun}$, respectively. Moreover, the mode of the full sample,
563: $\sim 10^{12} \ {\rm h^{-1}\ M}_{\sun}$, is almost completely depleted
564: in the pair sample. The analysis of the SDSS by \citet{Weinmann06}
565: tracks the dependence of galaxy properties on host halo mass. We can
566: use their results to understand the implications for galaxies in
567: pairs, which are preferentially selected from higher-mass halos.
568: According to their results the ``average'' color of a galaxy in an
569: ``average'' halo hosting a pair would be $\sim$0.05 magnitudes redder
570: in ${\rm g-r}$ color, have a specific star formation rate
571: \citep[e.g.,][]{Brinchmann04} that is $\sim$20\% lower, and have a
572: late-type fraction that is $\sim$5\% lower than the corresponding
573: averages for the field. Thus, the suppressed star formation observed
574: in some widely-separated galaxy pairs is not related to a single
575: interaction, but is a selection effect associated with cluster and
576: group processes that suppress star formation. This selection effect
577: must be accounted for in a fair analysis of triggered star formation.
578:
579: \begin{figure}
580: \plotone{f3.eps}
581: \caption{The distribution of host halo mass as a function of distance
582: to the nearest neighbor, \DN, in the simulation for a single
583: realization of the substructure model. ({\it Left}) For galaxies with
584: at least one luminous neighbor within 700 h$^{-1}$ kpc and \DeltaV $=
585: 1000$~km~s$^{-1}$, we plot the log of the host halo mass as a function
586: of {\it projected} distance to the nearest neighbor in the simulation.
587: The point colors and types segregate galaxies based on halo
588: occupation. We plot single-galaxy halos ({\it solid black
589: triangles}), \Nhost\ $= 2$ ({\it open green circles}), 3 ({\it filled
590: magenta circles}), 4-8 ({\it open cyan triangles}), and $\geq 9$-galaxy
591: halos ({\it blue crosses}). The solid red line is the virial
592: radius of halos; the dotted red line is the virial radius reduced by a
593: factor of $\sqrt{2/3}$ to account for the typical difference between
594: projected and actual separation. ({\it Right}) We also plot the host
595: mass histogram of the host halo of simulated galaxies with no
596: neighbors within 700 h$^{-1}$ kpc.}
597: \label{fig:Delta_D_vs_Mhost}
598: \end{figure}
599:
600: Fig.~\ref{fig:Delta_D_vs_Mhost} illustrates the nature of the
601: differences between halos that host close pairs and ``typical'' dark
602: matter halos. This figure plots galaxy host halo mass as a function
603: of projected separation to its nearest neighbor up to 700 h$^{-1}$ kpc
604: and within 1000 km s$^{-1}$ in our mock catalogs. The colors and point
605: types segregate host halos based on \Nhost, the number of galaxies
606: they host. The structure of this plot provides a very general means
607: of viewing nearest-neighbor statistics. The isolated halos line up
608: along the lower part of the plot; their locus is analogous to the
609: ``two-halo'' term in the correlation function insofar as the pairs are
610: projections of two coincidentally aligned host halos. The more
611: massive and populated dark matter halos line up along the left
612: vertical edge of the plot. Again, pairs are an extremely skewed
613: population. In contrast, galaxies that are isolated within
614: $\sim$400-500 h$^{-1}$ kpc are almost purely the only occupants in
615: their lower-mass halos.
616:
617: In summary, a comparison of the properties of {\it typical} pairs and
618: typical isolated galaxies selected from the universe as a whole is not
619: the appropriate comparison for isolating star formation triggered by
620: galaxy interactions. The ``field'' is dominated by isolated, low-mass
621: host halos with a mix of a few more luminous systems. Pairs are
622: skewed, preferentially residing in higher-mass host halos. Thus,
623: comparisons of the star-forming properties of pairs and the ``field''
624: do not isolate the effects of the recent interaction. The properties
625: of close pairs reflect all of the other processes that occur in dense
626: group and cluster environments that may act to suppress star formation
627: during late-time interactions. As such, naive comparisons will
628: dramatically underestimate the rise in star formation rate triggered
629: by galaxy interactions. In the next section, we describe one means of
630: constructing samples that better isolate the effects of galaxy
631: interactions from other environment-related processes.
632:
633: \section{Isolating triggered star formation} \label{sec:isolated}
634:
635: Many different measures of large-scale environment have been
636: developed to understand the properties of galaxies as a function of
637: their surroundings. With the advent
638: of redshift surveys, these studies have focused on group-finding
639: algorithms \citep{Huchra82}, {\it n}th nearest neighbor statistics
640: \citep{Dressler80}, and local galaxy count measures
641: \citep[e.g.,][]{Blanton05a, Berrier07}. Here, we adopt \Nseven, the
642: number of neighboring galaxies within 700 h$^{-1}$ kpc on the sky and
643: \DeltaV $= 1000$ km~s$^{-1}$ in redshift of the galaxy in question
644: \citep[see][]{Berrier07}. We note that our results are qualitatively
645: insensitive to choices of environment statistic scale in the range of
646: 700-1000 h$^{-1}$ kpc, but 700 h$^{-1}$ kpc yields a large enough
647: sample of galaxies in pairs in the 2dFGRS (\S~\ref{sec:data}). The use
648: of other statistics such as group-finding algorithms would yield
649: somewhat different results, but the basic problem of separating dense
650: systems from nearby but unassociated isolated dark matter halos
651: remains.
652:
653: Choosing galaxies with limited numbers of companions on $\sim$1~Mpc
654: scale environments is an effective way to preferentially select
655: galaxies in different types of dark matter halos
656: \citep[see][]{Focardi06}. Fig.~\ref{fig:Delta_D_vs_Mhost_NMpc_eq_1}
657: shows the distribution of projected \DN\ as a function of host halo
658: mass for the the restricted set of environments corresponding to
659: galaxies with \Nseven\ $=1$. These are galaxies that have {\it
660: exactly} one companion within 700 h$^{-1}$ kpc and 1000
661: km~s$^{-1}$. This restriction is extremely clean and effective.
662: Widely-separated pairs are almost exclusively isolated halos and the
663: close pairs are almost purely \Nhost\ $=2$ systems.
664: Fig.~\ref{fig:frac_and_histogram} shows the fraction of host halos of
665: each type as a function of separation in this restricted sample and
666: the corresponding host halo masses in the pairs and full
667: distributions. The fraction of \Nhalo\ $=2$ hosts goes from over 90\%
668: at the closest separations to a $50/50$ split of \Nhalo\ $=1$ and
669: \Nhalo\ $=2$ halos at $\sim$175 h$^{-1}$~kpc, to nearly 100\% \Nhalo\
670: $=1$ halos beyond 400 h$^{-1}$~kpc.
671:
672: \begin{figure}[b]
673: \plotone{f4.eps}
674: \caption{The distribution of host halo mass as a function of distance
675: to the nearest neighbor, \DN, in the lowest-density environments for the
676: objects in one realization of our mock galaxy catalogs.
677: The points are the same as Fig.~\ref{fig:Delta_D_vs_Mhost}, but restricted
678: to galaxies with exactly one neighbor within 700 h$^{-1}$ kpc and
679: \DeltaV $= 1000$ km~s$^{-1}$. At right, we plot the host
680: mass histogram of galaxies with \Nseven\ $=0$, or a nearest neighbor
681: distance \DN\ $\geq 700$ h$^{-1}$ kpc.}
682: \label{fig:Delta_D_vs_Mhost_NMpc_eq_1}
683: \end{figure}
684:
685:
686: \begin{figure*}[t]
687: \plottwo{f5a.eps}{f5b.eps}
688: \caption{The distribution of host halo masses and separations in
689: low-density environments in our mock catalogs. We repeat
690: Figs.~\ref{fig:Nsat_frac} and \ref{fig:Mhost_histogram} restricting to
691: galaxies with \Nseven\ $= 1$, or exactly one luminous neighbor within
692: 700 h$^{-1}$ kpc. In the left panel, we plot the fraction of galaxies
693: in hosts with a given number of members, \Nhost, as a function of the
694: distance to the nearest neighbor within 1000 km s$^{-1}$. At right,
695: we plot histograms, ${\rm d} n/{\rm d}\log(M)$, of host halo masses
696: for the control sample of \Nseven\ $\leq 1$ galaxies with \DN\ $\geq
697: 300$ h$^{-1}$ kpc ({\it black, solid}) and for $\leq 50$ h$^{-1}$ kpc
698: pairs with no other neighbors within 700 h$^{-1}$ kpc ({\it red,
699: dotted}) and similarly isolated $\leq 30$ h$^{-1}$ kpc pairs ({\it
700: blue dashed}). The isolated pairs are twice as massive, on average,
701: as the isolated control sample, implying that the control galaxies are
702: likely the immediate progenitors of the pairs.}
703: \label{fig:frac_and_histogram}
704: \end{figure*}
705:
706: The key to the use of ultra-low-density environments is that the
707: restriction provides an extremely clean sample of pairs in \Nhost\
708: $=2$ halos at small separations and {\it a corresponding control
709: sample of isolated galaxies}. This allows us to remove any effects
710: that may be due to numerous and repeated interactions in dense cluster
711: environments and study the relative effect of individual interactions.
712: The sample average masses are ${\rm <M_{\rm host}> = 4.2}$ and ${3.9 \times
713: 10^{12}}$~h$^{-1}\ M_{\sun}$, respectively,
714: for the objects that could be identified as isolated 50 h$^{-1}$ kpc
715: and 30 h$^{-1}$ kpc close pairs, and ${\rm <M_{\rm host}> = 2.2
716: \times 10^{12}}$~h$^{-1}\ M_{\sun}$ for the simulated isolated galaxy
717: sample with \DN\ $> 300$~h$^{-1}$~kpc and \Nseven\ $= 0$ or 1. The
718: peaks in the distributions are offset by $\sim$0.5 dex. Thus,
719: isolated close pair host halos are $\sim$2~--~3 times the typical
720: masses of the isolated galaxy (\Nhost\ $=1$) sample,
721: suggesting that the isolated galaxies are the appropriate immediate
722: progenitors of the \Nhalo\ $=2$ isolated close pairs. In the
723: simulation, the subhalos we would identify observationally as isolated
724: close pairs were accreted roughly 0-8 Gyr ago, with an
725: average of 3.0 Gyr and a wide spread of $\sigma = 1.5$~Gyr. For
726: comparison, the dynamical timescales for these halos are of order
727: $3$~Gyr.
728:
729: % note: masses somewhat skewed; dd < 0.05 NMpc <= 1 and nsat = 2
730: % gives average of 4.4 x 10^12 vs. n=2 average overall of
731: % 6.7 x 10^12;
732: % must be related to how long the substructure lasts
733: %
734: % isolated sample is 2.1 x 10^12 vs. all n=1 halos which is
735: % 1.87 x 10^12; 14% difference
736: %
737:
738: As a guide to interpreting this isolated sample, consider a simple
739: example. At present, the Milky Way and the Andromeda galaxy, viewed
740: from most projections, would be black points on the right side of
741: Fig.~\ref{fig:Delta_D_vs_Mhost_NMpc_eq_1}. They are both isolated
742: with respect to {\it luminous} galaxies. However, as they
743: move toward one another over the course of the next $\sim$few Gyr
744: \citep{Cox07}, they will move to the left on the plot.
745: Eventually their dark matter halos merge and they
746: become an \Nhost\ $=2$ halo, at which time they will move diagonally toward
747: the upper left and ``turn green.'' After perhaps 1-3 Gyr, the
748: baryonic galaxies will completely coalesce; the system would then move
749: horizontally to the right and ``turn black'' in the plot. Isolated
750: systems like the Milky Way and Andromeda are the simplest units of
751: interaction and the best laboratories to isolate the effects of
752: interactions from other physical processes. In the next section, we
753: find isolated pairs in the 2dFGRS and use the appropriate control and
754: paired samples to isolate the effects of an interaction. As we show
755: in \S~\ref{sec:complex}, the situation is much more complex in denser
756: environments.
757:
758: \section{Measuring triggered star formation} \label{sec:data}
759:
760: \begin{figure}
761: \plotone{f6.eps}[b]
762: \caption{Star-forming properties of 2dFGRS galaxies in pairs. ({\it
763: Top}) We plot the distribution of $\eta$ for the volume-limited sample
764: as a whole ({\it solid, black}) and for the close pairs sample ({\it
765: dotted, red}) with \DN\ $\leq 50$ h$^{-1}$ kpc. Larger values of
766: $\eta$ correspond to higher star formation rates \citep{Madgwick03}.
767: Relative to the sample as a whole, the pairs exhibit {\it less} star
768: formation on average, as explained in Fig.~\ref{fig:Nsat_frac} by the
769: fact that they preferentially sample dense galactic
770: environments. ({\it Bottom}) We also restrict to isolated close pairs
771: ({\it dotted, red}) and a control sample of galaxies with a \Nseven\
772: $\leq 1$ and \DN\ $\geq 300$ h$^{-1}$ kpc distant on the sky. The
773: model shows that the pairs are almost always in \Nhost\ $=2$ halos
774: (93\%) and that 99.5\% of the control sample are in \Nhost\ $=1$
775: halos. Relative to the isolated ``control'' galaxies, the isolated
776: pairs have more galaxies on both ends of the $\eta$ distribution.}
777: \label{fig:eta}
778: \end{figure}
779:
780: In \S~4, we demonstrate that the amount of triggered star formation
781: occurring in the universe cannot be measured by comparing typical
782: paired galaxies to typical field galaxies. Dense galactic
783: environments are overrepresented in galaxies in pairs. However, the
784: effects of an interaction can be identified independent from other
785: environmental processes by examining {\it isolated} pairs and
786: comparing them to {\it isolated} galaxies. Although isolated pairs
787: are not the only environments in which triggered star formation is
788: important, they are the simplest to identify and study.
789:
790: Here, we use 2dF survey pairs to examine
791: triggered star formation in galaxy pairs. The ``full sample'' is the
792: full volume-limited sample that is far enough away from the edge of
793: the survey to sample the environments of galaxies without bias. The
794: ``close pairs'' sample is the subset of this full sample that has at
795: least one companion within 50 h$^{-1}$ kpc and 1000 km s$^{-1}$. We
796: focus on the clean measure of the effects of interactions described in
797: \S~\ref{sec:isolated} by constructing the ``isolated close pairs''
798: sample of galaxies that have exactly one companion within 50 h$^{-1}$
799: kpc and 1000 km s$^{-1}$ and no others within 700 h$^{-1}$ kpc and
800: 1000 km s$^{-1}$. We also construct the ``control'' sample where
801: \Nseven\ $=0$ or 1 and the nearest neighbor is \DN\ $\geq 300$
802: h$^{-1}$ kpc away.
803:
804: In the volume-limited sample of 41,239 galaxies, the ``full sample''
805: includes 22,601 galaxies that are not on the edges of the survey
806: volume. There are 1344 galaxies in the ``close pairs'' sample, with
807: spectroscopic companions within 50 h$^{-1}$ kpc and 1000 km s$^{-1}$;
808: 191 of these paired galaxies are in isolated close ($\leq 50$ h$^{-1}$
809: kpc) pairs and 72 are in isolated closer ($\leq 30$ h$^{-1}$ kpc) pairs.
810: The isolated control sample with \DN\ $\geq 300$~h$^{-1}$
811: kpc and \Nseven\ $=0$ or 1 includes 8564 galaxies.
812:
813: We examine the star-forming properties of galaxies using the spectral
814: parameter $\eta$, which \citet{Madgwick02} derive from principal
815: component analysis (PCA) of the 2dFGRS as a whole. Their PCA analysis
816: shows that two-thirds of the variance in the 2dFGRS spectra in a
817: volume-limited sample are contained in the first two projections.
818: $\eta$ is directly measured from a combination of these two
819: projections and is readily available in the 2dFGRS database.
820: \citet{Madgwick03} show that $\eta$ is closely related to both the
821: H$\alpha$ equivalent width measured from spectra and to the stellar
822: birthrate parameter, $b$, the present star formation rate of the
823: galaxy divided by its average past star formation rate. Higher values
824: of $\eta$ correspond directly to higher current star formation rates.
825: \citet{Madgwick03} use model spectral energy distributions with a wide
826: variety of star formation histories to explore this correlation
827: between $\eta$ and $b$.
828:
829: In the top of Fig.~\ref{fig:eta} we plot the distribution of $\eta$
830: for the sample as a whole and all the close pairs. The pairs as a
831: whole exhibit, on average, {\it less} overall star formation than the
832: full volume-limited galaxy sample. The average for the full sample
833: and the close pairs sample are $<\eta>=0.07$ and -0.22,
834: respectively. Fig.~\ref{fig:Nsat_frac} demonstrates why. In
835: the model, most (56\%) galaxies are alone in their dark matter
836: halos. In $\leq 50$ h$^{-1}$ kpc pairs, however, nearly all (97\%)
837: of the galaxies are in denser systems, and often much denser
838: systems. Because pairs preferentially reside in extremely dense
839: environments, their star formation is suppressed except when they are
840: strongly interacting.
841:
842: As we demonstrate in \S~\ref{sec:isolated}, the model predicts that
843: 99.5\% of the galaxies in the isolated control sample are alone in their
844: dark matter halos and that 93\% of the isolated pairs are in \Nhalo\
845: $=2$ halos.
846: Thus, the bottom of Fig.~\ref{fig:eta} provides us with a
847: nearly direct measure of the effects of an interaction, by allowing us
848: to compare the true progenitors (the \Nhalo\ $=1$ ``control'') of the
849: paired (\Nhalo\ $=2$) systems. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test indicates
850: that the control and close-pair $\eta$ distributions differ, with
851: P$_{\rm K-S} = 6.1 \times 10^{-4}$.
852:
853:
854: % Overall
855: %Sample: overall < 50_kpc/h 50-100_kpc/h 100-150_kpc/h 300-700kpc/h
856: %N1: 0.5878337622 0.04723127186 0.06484296173 0.156697005 0.9001327157
857: %N2: 0.08873720467 0.2328990251 0.2097264379 0.1853055954 0.01393496804
858: %N3: 0.04838385805 0.1188925058 0.115501523 0.09102730453 0.0049767741
859: %N48: 0.09857458621 0.2271986902 0.2071935087 0.202860862 0.02654279955
860: %N9p: 0.1764705926 0.3737784922 0.4027355611 0.3641092181 0.05441274121
861:
862: % N1, < 150 kpc/h is 0.09008438885
863: % N2, < 150 kpc/h is 0.2078059018
864:
865:
866: %N700 = 1 Sample
867: %Sample: overall < 50_kpc/h 50-100_kpc/h 100-150_kpc/h 300-700kpc/h
868: %N1: 0.758579433 0.09027777612 0.1534883678 0.3028571308 0.9841688871
869: %N2: 0.2366320789 0.909722209 0.8465116024 0.6971428394 0.009894457646
870: %N3: 0.001596168964 0 0 0 0.001978891436
871: %N48: 0 0 0 0 0
872: %N9p: 0.003192337928 0 0 0 0.003957782872
873:
874: % N1, < 150 kpc/h is 0.1853932589
875: % N2, < 150 kpc/h is 0.8146067262<
876:
877:
878: \begin{figure}
879: \plotone{f7.eps}[b]
880: \caption{Normalized star formation rates of 2dFGRS galaxies in pairs.
881: We plot the distribution of $b$, the ratio of the current star
882: formation rate to the average past star formation rate, inferred from
883: $\eta$ \citep[see][]{Madgwick03}. We restrict to isolated close pairs
884: ({\it dotted, red}) and a control sample of galaxies with \Nseven\
885: $\leq 1$ and \DN\ $\geq 300$ h$^{-1}$ kpc. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
886: indicates that the control and close-pair $\eta$ distributions differ,
887: with P$_{\rm K-S} = 6.1 \times 10^{-4}$. Relative to the \Nhalo\ $=1$
888: ``control'' galaxies, the isolated pairs have fewer galaxies forming
889: stars at their historical average rate; pairs exhibit an excess of
890: galaxies that are very deficient in star formation (5\% excess with $b
891: \leq 0.1$) and an excess of galaxies ({\it green shaded region})
892: with rates boosted by factors of
893: $\gtrsim 5$ (14\%) where the high-$b$ excess, or the
894: shaded region, has an average $\left< b \right> \sim 30$. }
895: \label{fig:b}
896: \end{figure}
897:
898: \begin{figure}
899: \plotone{f8.eps}[b]
900: \caption{Star formation as a function of distance to nearest neighbor
901: in sparse environments. ({\it Top}) For the 2dFGRS sample with
902: \Nseven\ $=1$, we plot $\eta$ as a function of separation to the
903: nearest neighbor; the red line is the averaged smoothed by 100 points.
904: The inset displays the average for \DN\ $\lesssim 0.13$
905: h$^{-1}$ Mpc, highlighting the signal of triggered star formation
906: at \DN\ $\lesssim 0.03$ h$^{-1}$ Mpc.
907: ({\it Bottom}) For the \Nseven\ $=1$ sample in the simulation, we plot the
908: fraction of \Nhalo\ $=1$ ({\it solid, black}) and \Nhalo\ $=2$
909: ({\it dotted, green}) galaxies as a function of \DN, as in
910: Fig.~\ref{fig:frac_and_histogram}.}
911: \label{fig:dd_eta_n1}
912: \end{figure}
913:
914: In Fig.~\ref{fig:b}, we use the approximate values in Figure 7 of
915: \citet{Madgwick03} to convert $\eta$ into $b$, the ratio of the
916: current star formation rate to the average past star formation rate,
917: for the isolated control and isolated pairs samples only. Relative to
918: the \Nhalo\ $=1$ ``control'' galaxies, the isolated pairs have fewer
919: galaxies forming stars at their historical average rate ($b \sim 1$).
920: Pairs include an excess of low- and high-star-formation-rate galaxies.
921: While 24\% of the control sample are forming stars with $b < 0.1$,
922: 29\% of the $< 50$ h$^{-1}$ kpc pairs and 26\% of the $< 30$ h$^{-1}$
923: kpc are forming stars at these low rates; thus, 50 h$^{-1}$ kpc (30
924: h$^{-1}$ kpc) pairs have a 5\% (2\%) excess of slow (or non-) star
925: formers.
926:
927: At the high end of the star-formation rate distribution, 10\% of the
928: control (\Nhalo\ $=1$) sample have rates boosted by $\gtrsim$ a factor
929: of 5. In contrast, 50 h$^{-1}$ kpc (30 h$^{-1}$ kpc) pairs are
930: boosted by $b \geq 5$ 24\% (30.5\%) of the time, for a 14\% (20\%)
931: excess of high star formation rate galaxies. Binning the data with
932: fine bins, weighting by $b$, and limiting the largest (extrapolated)
933: boost to $b=100$, the high-$b$ ($b > 5$) excess in the pairs, the
934: shaded region in Fig.~\ref{fig:b}, has an average of $b \sim 31$ (34).
935: In other words, statistically, this technique shows that for the
936: population of pairs with triggered star formation, the average boost in
937: the star formation rate over the average past rate in that galaxy is a
938: factor of $\sim$30.
939:
940: The error in the average boost due to triggered star formation is
941: dominated by the scatter in the relationship between the physical
942: parameter $b = {\rm SFR/\left< SFR \right>}$ and the measured $\eta$.
943: We estimate the error introduced by this scatter using a Monte-Carlo
944: simulation. \citet{Madgwick03} explore the scatter in the theoretical
945: relationship between $b$ and $\eta$ using synthetic spectra with star
946: formation histories predicted by semi-analytic models. For a typical
947: distribution of star formation histories, this scatter is substantial.
948: We adopt the 1-$\sigma$ scatter in the $\eta$-$b$ distribution in
949: \citet{Madgwick03} in our Monte Carlo simulation, drawing deviations
950: at random from the average $b$ for a given (measured) $\eta$. We
951: resample the entire $b$ distribution for the control, pair, and very
952: close (30 h$^{-1}$ kpc) pair $\eta$ distributions and remeasure the
953: weighted average boost of the excess strong star formers with $b > 5$
954: in the pairs. Because the scatter of $b$ as a function of $\eta$ is
955: much larger in the high-$b$ direction, the 1-$\sigma$ range of
956: resulting values of the average boost of triggered star formation is
957: 42 -- 65 for the 50 h$^{-1}$ kpc pairs and 39 -- 61 30 h$^{-1}$ kpc
958: pairs. We conclude from this analysis that the large scatter between
959: $b$ and $\eta$ results in a wide range of possible star formation
960: boosts resulting from triggered star formation. This type of
961: uncertainty would be typical for other popular parameterizations of
962: star formation history derived from optical spectra, as well. Many
963: optical spectral measures of star formation break down in the
964: ``bursty'' star formation regime that is typical of interacting
965: galaxies.
966:
967: The excess fraction of starbursting galaxies is enhanced in even
968: closer (30 h$^{-1}$ kpc) pairs, while the excess of low star formation
969: rate galaxies is not. We explore the dependence of starbursting
970: galaxies on separation further by dividing the data into bins based on
971: \DN. With 50 h$^{-1}$ kpc bins, only the \DN\ $\leq 50$ h$^{-1}$ kpc
972: bin has a statistically significant excess of high-$b$ galaxies
973: compared with the \Nhalo\ $=1$ control; with 25 h$^{-1}$ kpc bins,
974: only the \DN\ $\leq 50$ h$^{-1}$ bins show a significant excess.
975:
976:
977: \section{Understanding the trends} \label{sec:trends}
978:
979: These trends with separation on the sky have been noted previously by
980: several authors using many different pair datasets \citep{Barton00,
981: Lambas03, Nikolic04, SolAlonso04, SolAlonso06, Lin07}. Thus, the fact
982: that we reproduce them here is not surprising. However, as
983: Figs.~\ref{fig:Nsat_frac} and \ref{fig:frac_and_histogram} show, all
984: pair samples suffer from systematic environmental differences as a
985: function of separation on the sky that are not directly related to
986: interactions. Typical galaxy samples with no environmental controls
987: are dominated by cluster galaxies at separations $\lesssim 200$
988: h$^{-1}$ kpc and field galaxies at separations $\gtrsim 200$ h$^{-1}$
989: kpc. Even the most isolated samples of pairs are dominated by pairs
990: in \Nhalo\ $=2$ halos at separations $\lesssim 200$ h$^{-1}$ kpc and
991: by \Nhalo\ $=1$ halos at separations $\gtrsim 200$ h$^{-1}$ kpc.
992: Here, for the first time, we are uniquely poised to explore these
993: effects and construct appropriate control samples using models.
994:
995: Although we note that isolated galaxies in pairs are the simplest
996: interactions to study and compare with isolated galaxies, they still
997: may be affected by other processes. \Nhalo\ $=2$ halos are often the
998: result of the merger of two \Nhalo\ $=1$ systems, but they can also
999: result from an \Nhalo\ $=3$ system after two of the three baryonic
1000: galaxies coalesce. An origin as a \Nhalo\ $=3$ system is, however,
1001: much less likely for a given system. Although our models
1002: are not presently capable of tracking these mergers in detail,
1003: we note that the density of \Nhalo\
1004: $=3$ is only 8\% of the density of \Nhalo\ $=1$ systems. Thus, the
1005: simplest interpretation of the result in Fig.~\ref{fig:b} is that the
1006: 5\% excess of low-star-formation systems in the \Nhalo\ $=2$
1007: galaxies results from the fact that galaxies in \Nhalo\ $=2$ halos are
1008: more likely than isolated galaxies to have experienced previous
1009: gas-consuming interactions, and that the 14\% excess of strongly
1010: star-forming galaxies in \Nhalo\ $=2$ halos results {\it directly}
1011: from recent interactions. Future investigation of these models will
1012: clarify this evolution.
1013:
1014: \begin{figure}[t]
1015: \plotone{f9.eps}
1016: \caption{Denser environments: the distribution of host halo
1017: mass as a function of distance to the nearest neighbor, \DN, but
1018: restricted to galaxies with 3-8 neighbors within 700 h$^{-1}$ kpc and
1019: \DeltaV $= 1000$ km~s$^{-1}$. The points are the same as
1020: Fig.~\ref{fig:Delta_D_vs_Mhost}.}
1021: \label{fig:Delta_D_vs_Mhost_NMpc_38}
1022: \end{figure}
1023:
1024: Supporting this picture, the boosted star formation does not extend to
1025: all systems with \Nhalo\ $=2$. In Fig.~\ref{fig:dd_eta_n1}, we plot
1026: $\eta$ as a function of separation for the isolated (\Nseven\ $=1$)
1027: sample. A high mean $\eta$ persists only out to
1028: $\sim$40-50 h$^{-1}$ kpc. However, the model plotted below the
1029: points for clarity shows that the \Nhalo\ $=2$ halos dominate well
1030: past 100 h$^{-1}$ kpc. Thus, the boosted star formation at small
1031: separations results from the physical interaction and not merely the
1032: different mix of halo types at smaller separations.
1033: A boosted {\it average} star formation rate does not persist
1034: beyond a few tens of h$^{-1}$ kpc, probably because the strength of
1035: the star formation fades as the burst ages \citep[see][]{Barton00,
1036: Barton03}, and because the fraction of galaxies that have had a recent
1037: close pass is a strong function of \DN.
1038:
1039: The halo substructure model tracks close pericentric passages between
1040: satellites and the central galaxy in the dark matter host halo. These
1041: simulations show that for the isolated close pair galaxies in true
1042: \Nhalo\ $=2$ systems, 12\% of the $\leq$50 h$^{-1}$ kpc pairs and 16\%
1043: of the $\leq$30 h$^{-1}$ kpc pairs have had a close pass with R$_{\rm
1044: peri} < 30$~h$^{-1}$ kpc within the last Gyr. In addition, 40\% of the 50
1045: h$^{-1}$ kpc pairs and 45\% of the 30 h$^{-1}$ kpc pairs have had a
1046: pass with R$_{\rm peri} < 50$~h$^{-1}$ kpc within the last 1.2 Gyr.
1047: Thus, the 2dF data are consistent with a range of scenarios, including
1048: at its extremes, (1) the possibility that nearly all galaxies with $<
1049: 30$~h$^{-1}$ kpc passes burst by an average factor of $\sim$30 for 1
1050: Gyr, or (2) the possibility that $\lesssim$ half of the galaxies with
1051: $< 50$~h$^{-1}$ kpc passes burst this much for $\sim$1.2 Gyr. If star
1052: formation continues for these long timescales, more widely-separated
1053: pairs will contain some systems with triggered star formation.
1054: However, the average star formation rate at wider separations is not
1055: affected because pairs that have had close passes are diluted. The
1056: model shows that only 3\% of the true \Nhalo\ $=2$ systems with
1057: separations $100 < $ \DN\ $ < 200$ h~$^{-1}$ kpc have had a close ($<
1058: 30$ h$^{-1}$kpc) pass within the last Gyr.
1059:
1060: We will attempt further exploration of these scenarios in later work.
1061: However, preliminary analysis of {\it Sloan Digital Sky Survey} DR4
1062: {\it NYU Value-Added Galaxy Catalog} data \citet{York00, Blanton05b,
1063: Adelman-McCarthy06} --- albeit with quite different star formation
1064: measures --- suggests that the bursting fraction is a strong function
1065: of the cutoff luminosity of the sample studied. The fraction also
1066: depends in detail on the star formation measure and on the luminosity
1067: cutoff used for constructing the volume-limited sample, probably
1068: because star formation rate is a strong function of galaxy
1069: luminosity. Qualitatively, the results remain quite consistent between
1070: the 2dF and SDSS samples.
1071:
1072: The optical spectra available in the 2dFGRS (and the SDSS) do
1073: not measure the amount of star formation that is embedded in dust
1074: clouds. Thus, the typical boost of the high-$b$ excess provides an
1075: approximate lower limit to the amount of triggered star formation in a
1076: close galaxy-galaxy pass. As \citet{Cox06} demonstrate,
1077: high-resolution hydrodynamical simulations predict a wide range of
1078: star formation boosts from these close passes. Their models predict
1079: SFR boosts of 6~--~20 above a galaxy's isolated star formation rate in
1080: prograde encounters during the $\sim$ Gyr between the first close pass
1081: and the final merger. Surprisingly, our estimate of $<b> \sim 30$
1082: averaged over the galaxies that have triggered star formation exceeds this
1083: range. However, the uncertainties associated with the mapping between
1084: $\eta$ and $b$ are substantial. Thus, this 2dF analysis remains
1085: broadly consistent with the models described in \citet{Cox06} and does
1086: not yet distinguish among them.
1087:
1088: \subsection{The effects of survey incompleteness}
1089:
1090: The 2dFGRS is not spectroscopically complete; the survey is especially
1091: deficient in close pairs. We examine the effects of incompleteness
1092: using the measured completeness of the sectors in which the galaxies
1093: fall, and the 2dF parameters ``wsel,'' a weighted measure of whether
1094: the ten nearest galaxies have high-quality redshifts, and ``bjlim,''
1095: the limiting magnitude of the relevant sector \citep{Colless01,
1096: Norberg02}. Restricting the sample to sectors with known completeness
1097: $> 90\%$ and with wsel $\geq 1.3$ and bjlim $\geq$19.35, we find a
1098: reduced isolated pairs sample with only 67 pair galaxies and 2132
1099: control galaxies. As a result, a K-S test no longer reveals any
1100: statistical significance of the difference in $\eta$ distributions
1101: (P$_{\rm K-S}=0.35$). Nevertheless, the differences in star-forming
1102: properties of the isolated control and isolated remain qualitatively
1103: unchanged: in the restricted control sample, 12\% of the galaxies have
1104: $b > 5$; in the restricted isolated pairs, 21\% have $b > 5$. Thus,
1105: contamination of the isolated control sample appears to have no
1106: significant effects on our results.
1107:
1108: We further test the effects of redshift survey completeness by
1109: applying the same analysis to the SDSS DR4 sample \citep{Blanton05b,
1110: Adelman-McCarthy06}. Although the detailed results are beyond the
1111: scope of this paper, we are able to use SDSS to find a pure isolated
1112: pair sample and a pure control sample with SDSS. We construct these
1113: samples because we are able to exclude all systems with neighbors that
1114: have unmeasured redshifts. The measured excess of star formation in
1115: isolated pairs compared with the control sample, from SDSS depends
1116: sensitively on the cutoff luminosity of the volume-limited sample.
1117: This dependence arises because higher-luminosity galaxies have less
1118: star formation in general. Using H$\alpha$ equivalent width as a
1119: measure of star formation, the measured excess of pairs with
1120: EW(H$\alpha$) $\geq 25$~\AA\ ranges from somewhat lower than the 2dF
1121: results we present here (4\%) for a sample volume limited to M$_{r} =
1122: -20+5\log{h}$ to 19\% for a sample volume limited to M$_{r} =
1123: -19+5\log{h}$. The 2dF luminosity limit corresponds to galaxies that
1124: are midway between these numbers. Thus, the 2dF and SDSS analyses
1125: agree qualitatively, and the fraction of galaxies in close pairs with
1126: triggered star formation increases when lower luminosity galaxies are
1127: included. The differences may result from the use of very different
1128: measures of star formation or from the use of galaxies in an
1129: intrinsically different luminosity range. However, this analysis
1130: suggests that ``impurity'' in the 2dF sample --- the inclusion of
1131: galaxies and pairs that are not truly isolated --- is not biasing our
1132: results significantly.
1133:
1134: \section{More complex environments} \label{sec:complex}
1135:
1136: Isolated pairs of galaxies are the easiest systems to construct an
1137: appropriate control sample for. However, isolated pairs are by no
1138: means the only pairs that show evidence for triggered star
1139: formation. \citet{SolAlonso06} show that $b$ still increases as pair
1140: separation on the sky decreases for close pairs in denser
1141: environments.
1142:
1143: In Sec.~\ref{sec:isolated}, we describe the effectiveness of isolating
1144: the lowest-density environments to create an appropriate control
1145: sample for galaxies in isolated pairs. Unfortunately, the same type
1146: of technique does not work for higher-density environments. One
1147: cannot separate galaxies into a density bin and
1148: expect the non-pairs to be a good control sample for the pairs.
1149:
1150: To illustrate this point, we restrict the sample to intermediate
1151: values of our environment statistic; in
1152: Fig.~\ref{fig:Delta_D_vs_Mhost_NMpc_38} we plot galaxies with $3 \leq
1153: $~\Nseven~$\leq 8$. As expected, isolated \Nhalo\ $=1$ halos are
1154: missing from the 50 h$^{-1}$ kpc pairs sample (3.1\%) but still
1155: constitute a significant fraction of the overall sample (31\%).
1156: This result immediately illustrates the problem with breaking sets of
1157: galaxies into low, intermediate, and high-density samples and
1158: separating the pairs from these samples \citep[e.g.,][]{SolAlonso06}.
1159: The close pairs have a completely different environmental mix from the
1160: rest of this intermediate-density sample. The mix is a strong
1161: function of distance to the nearest neighbor, and even the pairs
1162: reside in a huge range of hosts, from halos with \Nhalo\ $=2$ galaxies
1163: to halos with \Nhalo\ $> 9$. However, as \citet{SolAlonso06} show,
1164: pairs in dense environments do exhibit a rise in star formation
1165: rate with a very close encounter.
1166:
1167: The ineffectiveness of comparing pairs and ``control'' galaxies in
1168: intermediate- or high-density environments is not merely a result of
1169: the exact technique we use. Group-finding algorithms can be tuned to
1170: lower the incompleteness and/or impurity rates on various scales
1171: \citep[e.g.,][]{Yang05,Gerke05,Weinmann06,Berlind06,Koester07}, but
1172: these algorithms will always include isolated galaxies in denser
1173: systems from the control sample at a higher rate than they appear in
1174: the pairs. Because the distribution of star formation rates in
1175: isolated galaxies has a high-star-formation tail, their contamination
1176: will always lower the measured difference in star formation rate
1177: between paired and non-paired galaxies in loose groups. One effective
1178: approach in these environments is to estimate the contamination of
1179: \Nhalo\ $=1$ galaxies to the sample of interest and to statistically
1180: subtract its contribution.
1181:
1182: What is the appropriate control sample for pairs in dense
1183: environments? Even if one could identify the host halo mass and
1184: occupation of galaxies perfectly, this would still be a difficult
1185: question to answer. The immediate progenitors of pairs in dense
1186: environments can range from isolated galaxies that have just fallen into
1187: the system to galaxies that have been in a loose group for along time but
1188: are just encountering one another for the first time. Tracking the
1189: evolution of the orbits of subhalos in the models will reveal the
1190: progenitors of interactions in crowded environments, but that analysis
1191: is beyond the scope of the present paper.
1192:
1193: \section{Conclusion} \label{sec:conclusion}
1194:
1195: Here, we use mock catalogs based on simulations of cosmological structure
1196: formation in the prevailing $\Lambda$CDM model
1197: to understand the properties of galaxies in pairs.
1198: We examine the typical host dark matter halos of galaxies in
1199: apparent pairs in the simulations and find that:
1200:
1201: \begin{enumerate}
1202:
1203: \item Our simulations show that galaxies in close pairs are preferentially located in cluster
1204: and group environments. As a result, typical close pairs are not
1205: ideal for understanding triggered star formation in galaxy-galaxy
1206: interactions. This result explains why galaxies in pairs can appear
1207: redder or can appear to have less star formation than the typical
1208: ``field'' galaxies. If the goal is to isolate the effects of a recent
1209: interaction, the ``field'' is not an appropriate control sample with
1210: which to compare typical galaxies in close pairs.
1211:
1212: \medskip
1213:
1214: \item Using the simulations, we show that
1215: close pairs in the sparsest environments, with only one neighbor
1216: within 700 h$^{-1}$ kpc, provide the simplest situation for isolating
1217: the effects of an interaction. Close ($< 50$ or $< 30$
1218: h$^{-1}$ kpc) isolated
1219: pairs are almost exclusively in \Nhalo\ $= 2$ halos (93\%). Very
1220: isolated galaxies with at most one neighbor within 700 h$^{-1}$ kpc
1221: that is at least \DN\ $\geq 300$ h$^{-1}$ kpc away are almost
1222: exclusively in \Nhalo\ $=1$ halos (99.5\%). Thus, isolated field
1223: galaxies are the ideal control sample of the progenitors of isolated
1224: pairs.
1225:
1226: \item We study isolated pairs and galaxies in a volume-limited sample
1227: of M$_{\rm B,j} \leq -19$ galaxies from the 2dFGRS. Isolated pairs
1228: with \DeltaD\ $\leq 50$ h$^{-1}$ kpc ($\leq 30$ h$^{-1}$ kpc) show an
1229: excess of both strongly star-forming galaxies and of non-star-forming
1230: galaxies when compared to \Nhalo\ $=1$ control sample. While 24\% of
1231: the control sample is forming stars at $b \lesssim 0.1$ of its average
1232: past rate, 29\% (26\%) of the close pairs lack star formation to this
1233: extent. In addition, 24\% (30.5\%) of the pairs are forming stars at
1234: $b \gtrsim 5$ times their average past rate while only 10\% of the
1235: control sample has rates this high. The rapidly-star-forming excess
1236: population in the pairs is almost certainly due to the direct effects
1237: of the interaction. However, we note that the fraction of galaxies
1238: undergoing triggered starbursts is a function of the limiting absolute
1239: magnitude of the sample because a much smaller fraction of more
1240: luminous galaxies are able to form stars at all.
1241:
1242: \item For the isolated close galaxy pairs in the 2dFGRS,
1243: the galaxies with triggered
1244: star formation have an average star formation boost of $b = $
1245: SFR/$\left<{\rm SFR}\right>\sim 30$.
1246:
1247: \item The measurement of the optical boost of $b\sim30$ for
1248: interactions in 2dFGRS is approximate, due in large part to the large
1249: scatter in relationship between star formation history and measured
1250: optical spectral parameters. The measure also excludes embedded star
1251: formation that is not detectable at optical wavelengths. Thus, it is an
1252: estimate of the lower limit to the boost in star formation rate caused
1253: by triggered star formation. This boost is higher than predictions
1254: derived for boosts from triggered star formation using hydrodynamic
1255: simulations \citep[e.g.,][]{Cox06}, although the uncertainties are too
1256: large to rule out specific models at this stage.
1257:
1258: \item By tracking orbits in the substructure model, we show that for
1259: the isolated close pair galaxies in true \Nhalo\ $=2$ systems, only
1260: 12\% (16 \%) of the 50 (30) h$^{-1}$ kpc pairs have had a close pass
1261: with R$_{\rm peri} < 30$~h$^{-1}$ kpc within the last Gyr, and 40\%
1262: (45\%) have had a pass with R$_{\rm peri} < 50$~h$^{-1}$ kpc within
1263: the last 1.2 Gyr. Thus, the detection of triggered star formation in
1264: 14\% (20\%) of these L$^{\star}$ and sub-L$^{\star}$ systems in the 2dF data
1265: suggest that a large fraction of the galaxies that experience close
1266: passes respond with triggered star formation.
1267:
1268: \end{enumerate}
1269:
1270: \acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge the hard work of the
1271: 2dFGRS team and thank them for making their data public. We also
1272: gratefully acknowledge use of the 2dFGRS mask software by Peder
1273: Norberg and Shaun Cole. We thank Joel Berrier and Heather Guenther
1274: for helping to lay the foundations for the use of these cosmological
1275: models to study galaxies in pairs. We thank Margaret Geller, Alison
1276: Coil, Joel Primack, Sara Ellison, and an anonymous referee for giving
1277: us many insightful and useful comments at various stages. We thank
1278: Anatoly Klypin for running the numerical simulation used here, which
1279: was performed on the IBM RS/6000 SP3 system at the National Energy
1280: Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC). EJB, JAA, and JSB
1281: acknowledge support from the Center for Cosmology at UC Irvine; JSB is
1282: supported by National Science Foundation (NSF) grant AST-0507916. ARZ
1283: is supported by the NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral
1284: Fellowship Program under grant AST-0602122, by the Kavli Institute for
1285: Cosmological Physics at The University of Chicago, and by NSF PHY
1286: 0114422. RHW is supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy
1287: under contract number DE-AC02-76SF00515.
1288:
1289: \bibliography{ms.bbl}
1290:
1291: \end{document}