1: \documentclass[preprint,12pt]{aastex}

2: %\documentclass{emulateapj}

3: % General purpose macros

4: \newcommand{\ee}[1]{\mbox{${} \times 10^{#1}$}}% scientific number format

5: \newcommand{\eten}[1]{\mbox{$10^{#1}$}}% power of ten

6: 

7: %macros for RA and Dec

8: %\newcommand{\h}{\mbox{{$^h$}}

9: %\newcommand{\m}{\mbox{{$^m$}}

10: %\newcommand{\s}{\mbox{{$^s$}}

11: \newcommand{\degree}{\mbox{$^{\circ}$}}

12: \newcommand{\am}{\mbox{\arcmin}}

13: \newcommand{\as}{\mbox{\arcsec}}

14: 

15: %macros for distance, volume, speed

16: \newcommand{\kms}{\mbox{km s$^{-1}$}}% km/s

17: \newcommand\cmv{\mbox{cm$^{-3}$}}

18: \newcommand\cmc{\mbox{cm$^{-2}$}}

19: \newcommand\cmdv{\mbox{cm$^{-2}$ (\kms)$^{-1}$}}

20: \newcommand{\um}{$\mu$m}

21: %\newcommand{\micron}{$\mu$m}

22: 

23: %macros for commonly used symbols

24: \newcommand{\x}{\mbox{${}\times{}$}}

25: \def\lsim {$\rlap{\raise.4ex\hbox{$<$}}\lower.55ex\hbox{$\sim$}\,$}

26: \def\to {$\rightarrow$}

27: \def\about {$\sim$}

28: 

29: %macros to avoid typing headache and needless acronyms simultaneously

30: \newcommand{\iras}{\mbox{\it IRAS}}

31: \newcommand{\iso}{\mbox{\it ISO}}

32: \newcommand{\mm}{millimeter}

33: \newcommand\submm{submillimeter}

34: \newcommand\smm{submillimeter}

35: \newcommand\fir{far-infrared}

36: \newcommand\mir{mid-infrared}

37: \newcommand\nir{near-infrared}

38: \newcommand{\sfr }{\mbox{$\dot M_{\star}$}}

39: \newcommand\sed{spectral energy distribution}

40: \newcommand{\lsun}{\mbox{L$_\odot$}}% Lsun

41: \newcommand{\msun}{\mbox{M$_\odot$}}% Msun

42: \newcommand{\ta}{{$T_A^*$}}

43: \newcommand{\tex}{\mbox{$T_{\rm ex}$}}

44: \newcommand{\tmb}{\mbox{$T_{\rm mb}$}}

45: \newcommand{\tr}{\mbox{$T_R$}}

46: \newcommand{\tk}{\mbox{$T_K$}}

47: \newcommand{\td}{\mbox{$T_d$}}

48: \newcommand{\lbol}{\mbox{$L_{bol}$}} % bolometric luminosity

49: \newcommand{\tbol}{\mbox{$T_{bol}$}} % bolometric temperature

50: \newcommand{\dv}{\mbox{$\Delta v$}}

51: \newcommand{\n}{\mbox{$n$}}

52: \newcommand{\nbar}{\mbox{$\overline{n}$}}

53: \newcommand{\nc}{\mbox{$n_c(jk)$}}

54: \newcommand{\mv}{\mbox{$M_V$}} % virial mass

55: \newcommand{\mc}{\mbox{$M_N$}} % column density mass

56: \newcommand{\mn}{\mbox{$M_n$}} % density mass

57: \newcommand{\meanl}{\mbox{$\langle l \rangle$}} % mean size

58: \newcommand{\meanar}{\mbox{$\langle a/b \rangle$}} % mean aspect ratio

59: \newcommand{\mean}[1]{\mbox{$\langle#1\rangle$}} %generic mean for defined qu.

60: \newcommand{\opacity}{\mbox{$\kappa(\nu)$}} % opacity as func. of freq.

61: \newcommand{\av}{\mbox{$A_V$}} % Visual Extinction

62: \newcommand{\bperp}{\mbox{$B_{\perp}$}} % Projection of B on plane of sky

63: \newcommand{\rinf}{\mbox{$r_{inf}$}} % infall radius

64: \newcommand{\fsmm}{\mbox{$L_{smm}/L_{bol}$}} % submm lum over bol. luminosity

65: \newcommand{\lsmm}{\mbox{$L_{smm}$}} % luminosity longward of 350 mic.

66: \newcommand{\alphanir}{\mbox{$\alpha_{NIR}$}} % spectral index 2-20 mic.

67:  

68: %macros for molecule names

69: \newcommand{\hh}{\mbox{{\rm H}$_2$}}

70: \newcommand{\form}{H$_2$CO}

71: \newcommand{\water}{H$_2$O}

72: \newcommand{\ammonia}{\mbox{{\rm NH}$_3$}}

73: \newcommand{\coo}{$^{13}$CO}

74: \newcommand{\cooo}{C$^{18}$O}

75: \newcommand{\coooo}{C$^{17}$O}

76: \newcommand{\hcop}{HCO$^+$}

77: \newcommand{\hcopi}{H$^{13}$CO$^+$}

78: \newcommand{\dcop}{DCO$^+$}

79: \newcommand{\nthp}{N$_2$H$^+$}

80:  

81: %%% macros for figures in postscript format

82: %   syntax: \psfig{vertical size}{ps file name}{caption}

83: \input{epsf}

84: \newcommand{\psfig}[3]

85:            {{\begin{figure}[tbp]

86:              \vbox to#1{\epsfxsize=\textwidth\epsfbox{#2.ps}}

87:              \caption{#3}

88:              \end{figure}}}

89: \newcommand{\psscaledfig}[4]

90:            {{\begin{figure}[tbp]

91:              \centerline{\vbox to#1{\epsfxsize=#2\epsfbox{#3.ps}}}

92:              \caption{#4}

93:              \end{figure}}}

94:  

95: 

96: 

97: %Macros for this paper

98: \newcommand{\Inu}{\mbox{$I_{\nu}(b)$}}

99: \newcommand{\Snu}{\mbox{$S_{\nu}$}}

100: \newcommand{\Bnu}{\mbox{$B_{\nu}(\Td)$}}

101: \newcommand{\nInu}{\mbox{$I_{\nu}(b)/I_{\nu}(0)$}}

102: \newcommand{\kappanu}{\mbox{$\kappa_{\nu}$}}

103: \newcommand{\Td}{\mbox{$T_{d}$}}

104: \newcommand{\Tdr}{\mbox{$T_{d}(r)$}}

105: \newcommand{\rhor}{\mbox{$\rho (r)$}}

106: \newcommand{\ppc}{pre-protostellar core}

107: \newcommand{\m}{\mbox{$m$}}

108: \newcommand{\p}{\mbox{$p$}}

109: \newcommand{\beam}{\mbox{$\theta_{mb}$}}

110: 

111: \def\sun{$_{\odot}$}

112: \def\um {$\mu$m}

113: %\def\as {{$^{\prime\prime}$}}

114: %\def\am {{$^\prime$}}

115: \def\deg{{$^\circ$}}

116: %\slugcomment{\footnotesize {\LaTeX}ed at \number\time\ min., \today}

117: 

118: \begin{document}

119: 

120: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% title %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

121: 

122: \title{\bf Molecular Line Observations of the Small Protostellar Group L1251B}

123: \author {Jeong-Eun Lee\altaffilmark{1,2},

124: James Di Francesco\altaffilmark{3},

125: Tyler L. Bourke\altaffilmark{4},

126: Neal J. Evans II\altaffilmark{5},

127: Jingwen Wu\altaffilmark{4},

128: }

129: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy and Space Science, Sejong University, 

130: Seoul 143-747, Korea; jelee@sejong.ac.kr} 

131: \altaffiltext{2}{Hubble Fellow, Physics and Astronomy Department, The University

132: of California at Los Angeles, PAB, 430 Portola Plaza, Box 951547, Los Angeles, 

133: CA 90095-1547}

134: \altaffiltext{3}{National Research Council of Canada, Herzberg Institute of 

135: Astrophysics, 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, BC V9E 2E7, Canada; 

136: james.difrancesco@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca}

137: \altaffiltext{4}{Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, 60 Garden Street, 

138: Cambridge, MA 02138; tbourke@cfa.harvard.edu}

139: \altaffiltext{5}{Astronomy Department, The University of Texas at Austin,

140: 1 University Station C1400, Austin, TX 78712-0259; 

141: nje@astro.as.utexas.edu, jingwen@astro.as.utexas.edu}

142: 

143: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% abstract %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

144:  

145: \begin{abstract}

146: We present molecular line observations of L1251B, a small group of pre- and

147: protostellar objects, and its immediate environment in the dense C$^{18}$O

148: core L1251E.  These data are complementary to near-infrared, submillimeter

149: and millimeter continuum observations reported by Lee et al. (2006, ApJ, 648,

150: 491; Paper I).  The single-dish data of L1251B described here show very

151: complex kinematics including infall, rotation and outflow motions, and

152: the interferometer data reveal these in greater detail.

153: Interferometer data of N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ 1$-$0 suggest a very rapidly rotating

154: flattened envelope between two young stellar objects, IRS1 and IRS2.

155: Also, interferometer data of CO 2$-$1 

156: resolve the outflow associated with L1251B seen in single-dish maps

157: into a few narrow and compact components.  Furthermore, the

158: high resolution data support recent theoretical studies of molecular

159: depletions and enhancements that accompany the formation of protostars

160: within dense cores.  Beyond L1251B, single-dish data are also presented of

161: a dense core located $\sim$150\as\ to the east that, in Paper I, was detected

162: at 850 \micron\ but has no associated point sources at near- and mid-infrared

163: wavelengths.  

164: The relative brightness between molecules, which have different chemical 

165: timescales, suggests it is less chemically evolved than L1251B.  This core may

166: be a site for future star formation, however, since line profiles of HCO$^{+}$,

167: CS, and HCN show asymmetry with a stronger blue peak, which is 

168: interpreted as an infall signature.

169: \end{abstract}

170: 

171: \keywords{line: profile --- ISM: individual (L1251B) --- stars: formation}

172: 

173: \section{INTRODUCTION}

174: 

175: Most young stars in our Galaxy formed within groups or clusters (Lada and Lada

176: 2003).  Small, nearby groups of protostellar objects provide compelling cases 

177: for investigating the physical processes involved with such formation since the 

178: numbers involved are relatively small (e.g., $N$ $<$ 10) and the interactions 

179: of these objects with themselves and their environments are less complicated.

180: For example, observational study of kinematics associated with young stars 

181: within groups and their immediate dense gas surroundings could provide evidence 

182: for a specific formation scenario, e.g., fragmentation or triggering, that is 

183: easier to see because of the simpler nature of groups relative to clusters.

184: 

185: Kinematic study of the gas surroundings of protostellar objects is achieved

186: through observation and interpretation of molecular rotational transitions,

187: since line profiles can be shaped by the motions within the source gas (see

188: Di Francesco et al. 2006 for a review.)  For example, outflow motions from

189: young stellar objects were first seen in the low-intensity 

190: wings of CO 1$-$0 emission (e.g., Snell, Loren \& Plambeck 1980).  In addition,

191: rotational motions in dense cores have been suggested from the detection of

192: the shift of centroid velocities along different lines of sight in optically 

193: thin molecular transitions (e.g,. Goodman et al. 1993).  

194: Finally, infall motions in dense cores have 

195: been the interpretation of profiles of moderately optically thick lines that 

196: are asymmetric with a stronger blue peak relative to optically thin lines 

197: (e.g., Zhou et al. 1993; Myers, Evans \& Ohashi 2000).  

198: Such kinematic evidence has come primarily 

199: from single-dish telescopes, i.e., of relatively low spatial resolution, in 

200: studies of isolated protostellar objects.  For protostellar groups, however, 

201: the surface density of objects can be high, and single-dish telescopes may not 

202: have the resolution needed to associate kinematics with particular protostars 

203: within the group.  Instead, data from interferometers are very highly suited 

204: for such studies, especially when used in tandem with data from single-dish 

205: telescopes.

206: 

207: The use of molecular lines to study kinematics is complicated by potentially

208: significant molecular abundance variations along the lines of sight toward 

209: dense gas both before and after star formation.  Such abundance changes can

210: be due to chemical evolution, intertwined with the YSO luminosity evolution

211: since luminosity affects the temperatures of nearby dust grains that interact 

212: with gaseous molecules (see Rawlings \& Yates 2001; Doty et al. 2002; Lee, 

213: Bergin \& Evans 2004).  Of course, YSO luminosity evolution is itself 

214: intertwined with dynamical evolution of the surrounding gas, as much of the 

215: luminosity originates from accretion.  Hence, a holistic approach in general 

216: is required that includes luminosity, dynamics and chemistry, to understand 

217: best the environments from which stars form (see Bergin et al. 1997 and Aikawa 

218: et al. 2001 for early examples of such models).

219: 

220: Located at 300 pc $\pm$ 50 pc (Kun \& Prusti 1993), L1251B is an excellent 

221: example of a small, nearby group of protostellar objects where molecular line 

222: observations can probe the kinematics and chemistry of its environment and 

223: yield clues about its origins.  L1251B is located within L1251E, the densest

224: C$^{18}$O core in L1251 (Sato et al. 1994).  L1251B is associated with a 

225: single IRAS point source, IRAS 22376+7455, and was found associated with CO 

226: outflow by Sato \& Fukui (1989).  In Lee et al. (2006; Paper I), we showed 

227: via single-dish data that IRAS 22376+7455 was associated with a local maximum 

228: of submillimeter emission, although significant peaks of 850 $\mu$m emission 

229: were also seen $\sim$150\as\ to the east.  In addition, we showed Spitzer 

230: Space Telescope (SST) observations of the region that revealed $\sim$20 YSOs 

231: within $\sim$1 pc$^2$ covering L1251B and its surroundings, indicative of the 

232: formation of a group of low-mass stars.  Within L1251B itself, these data 

233: revealed three Class 0/I objects (IRS1, IRS2, and IRS4) and three Class II 

234: objects (IRS3, IRS5, and IRS6), within a projected diameter of 55\as.  (No 

235: near- or mid-infrared sources were found to be associated with other locations 

236: of submillimeter emission adjacent to L1251B.)  Finally, we showed 

237: Submillimeter Array (SMA) continuum observations of L1251B in Paper I that 

238: revealed two compact locations of high column density between IRS1 and IRS2 

239: that may be starless condensations.  Paper I revealed clearly L1251B as a 

240: region of recent (and possibly continuing) star formation within a small 

241: group.

242: 

243: In this paper, we examine line emission associated with L1251B and the core 

244: $\sim$150\as\ to its east (henceforth, the ``east core"), to probe kinematic

245: and chemical processes in the region.  The three embedded Class 0/I sources 

246: and two starless objects within L1251B are especially emphasized; IRS1 is the 

247: most luminous object, IRS2 is located southeast of IRS1 and is associated with 

248: a near-infrared bipolar nebula, and IRS4 is located at the west of IRS1.  

249: The two starless objects are named as SMA-N (the northern one) and SMA-S 

250: (the southern one) in this paper.  

251: Besides the outflow noted by Sato 

252: \& Fukui, earlier molecular line observations have also provided evidence for

253: rotational and infall motions in L1251B.  For example, a velocity gradient of 

254: $\sim$2.3 km s$^{-1}$ pc$^{-1}$ in the northeast--southwest direction across 

255: L1251B suggestive of rotational motion was detected by Goodman et al. (1993) 

256: in NH$_{3}$ (1,1) (also Sato et al. 1994; T$\acute{\rm o}$th \& Walmsley 1996; 

257: Anglada et al.  1997; Morata et al. 1997).  In addition, infall motions toward 

258: L1251B were suggested from the detections of  asymmetric profiles with 

259: stronger blue peaks in

260: HCO$^+$ 1$-$0 and 3$-$2, CS 2$-$1 and H$_2$CO $2_{12}$--$1_{11}$ 

261: by Gregersen et al. (2000) and Mardones et al. (1997), though observations were 

262: published only 

263: toward the IRAS point source position.  Since the relative intensity of a given 

264: molecular line depends upon distributions of density, temperature and molecular 

265: abundance along the line of sight, many other transitions and positions needed 

266: to be observed within L1251B and its surroundings to understand correctly their 

267: physical conditions and dynamical processes.  Here, we have gathered with 

268: single-dish telescopes or interferometers new observations of L1251B in CS 

269: 2$-$1, 3$-$2, and 5$-$4, HCN 1$-$0, CO 2$-$1, $^{13}$CO 2$-$1, C$^{18}$O 2$-$1, 

270: HCO$^+$ 1$-$0 and 3$-$2, H$^{13}$CO$^+$ 1$-$0, DCO$^+$ 3$-$2, N$_2$H$^+$ 1$-$0 

271: and H$_2$CO $3_{12}$--$2_{11}$.

272: 

273: Details of the acquisition of observations of L1251B for this paper are 

274: summarized in \S 2.  Results and analysis of the data are described in \S 

275: 3 and \S 4.  In \S 5, we discuss the chemical and dynamical conditions in 

276: L1251B and the east core.  

277: Finally, a summary of the conclusions of this paper appears in \S 6.

278: 

279: \section{OBSERVATIONS}

280: 

281: \subsection{The Five College Radio Astronomy Observatory (FCRAO) Observations}

282: 

283: Observations of N$_2$H$^+$ 1$-$0 toward L1251B were made in December 1996 with 

284: the FCRAO 14-m telescope near New Salem, MA using QUARRY, the 15-element focal 

285: plane heterodyne receiver array.  Observations of HCO$^+$ 1$-$0 and 

286: H$^{13}$CO$^+$ 1$-$0 were made toward L1251B also at FCRAO in April 1997 and 

287: May 2000, using the QUARRY (1997) and the 32-element SEQUOIA (2000) 

288: focal plane arrays respectively.  The autocorrelator spectrometer was 

289: configured with a band width of 20 MHz over 1024 channels, providing a channel 

290: separation of $\sim$20 kHz ($\sim$0.07 \kms).  Typical system temperatures 

291: were 500-700 K (QUARRY) and 200-250 K (SEQUOIA).  Observations of HCN J=1$-$0 

292: and CS 2$-$1 toward L1251B were also made at FCRAO in February 2005 in OTF 

293: mode using SEQUOIA with a system temperature of $\sim$120 K.  A velocity 

294: resolution of 0.1 km s$^{-1}$ was achieved with the 25 MHz band width on the 

295: dual channel correlator and the data were acquired in frequency-switching mode 

296: with an 8 MHz throw.  The average pointing accuracy was about 4.5\arcsec.

297: Table 1 summarizes observational details of the FCRAO data, including the 

298: frequency ($\nu$), velocity resolution ($\delta v$), the FWHM beam size 

299: ($\theta_{mb}$), the main beam efficiency ($\eta_{\rm mb}$), and the 

300: observing date for each line.

301: 

302: \subsection{The Caltech Submillimeter Observatory (CSO) Observations}

303: 

304: We observed the HCO$^+$ 3$-$2, CO 2$-$1, and DCO$^+$ 3$-$2 lines with the 

305: 10.4 m telescope of the CSO at Mauna Kea, HI in June 1997 and July 2003.

306: HCO$^+$ 3$-$2 had been observed as part of the survey for infall signatures 

307: by Gregersen et al. (2000).  We used an SIS receiver with an acousto-optic

308: spectrometer (AOS) with a 50 MHz band width and 1024 channels.  The frequency 

309: resolution was about 2 to 2.5 channels, i.e., $\sim$0.13 $\rm km~s ^{-1}$ at 

310: 220 GHz. The pointing uncertainty was approximately 4$\arcsec$ on average.  

311: Table 1 also summarizes observational details of these data.

312: 

313: \subsection{The Caltech Owens Valley Radio Observatory (OVRO) Millimeter 

314: Array Observations}

315: 

316: L1251B was observed in several transitions and continuum emission in the 1 

317: mm or 3 mm bands of the OVRO Millimeter Array near Big Pine, CA over several 

318: observing seasons.  The continuum data have been presented in Paper I.  Table 

319: 2 summarizes the line data, i.e., the frequencies observed and the band widths 

320: used, as well as the velocity channel spacings, the synthesized beam FWHMs, 

321: and the $1\sigma$ rms values achieved.  

322: 

323: In Fall 1997 and Spring 1998, H$_{2}$CO J$_{K_{-1}K_{+1}}$ = 3$_{12}$--2$_{11}$

324: at 225.6977750 GHz (Pickett et al. 1998) was observed over 2 L-configuration 

325: and 1 H-configuration tracks for spatial frequency coverages of $\sim$11-156 

326: k$\lambda$.  These data were retrieved from the OVRO archive.  In Fall 1998 

327: and Spring 1999, HCO$^{+}$ 1--0 at 89.1885230 GHz (Pickett et al. 1998) was 

328: observed over 3 L-configuration tracks, for spatial frequency coverages of 

329: 4-35 k$\lambda$.  These data were also retrieved from the OVRO archive.  In 

330: Spring 2001 and Fall 2001, N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ 1--0 at 93.1762650 

331: GHz\footnote{93.1762650 GHz is the frequency of the N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ 101-012 

332: transition found by Caselli, Myers \& Thaddeus (1995).  The other 6 hyperfine 

333: components to the 1--0 transition, at frequencies $<$6 MHz from that of 

334: 101-012 were also observed.} (Caselli, Myers \& Thaddeus 1995) was observed 

335: over 5 L-configuration and 1 H-configuration tracks, for spatial frequency 

336: coverage of 4-64 k$\lambda$.  These data were obtained specifically for this 

337: project.  Refer to Paper I for details about observations and data processing. 

338: 

339: \subsection{The Submillimeter Array (SMA) Observations}

340: 

341: L1251B was observed on 25 September 2005 from the summit of Mauna Kea, HI,

342: with the Submillimeter Array (SMA) in its most compact configuration.  The 

343: 230 GHz SMA receiver was tuned to observe CO 2$-$1, $^{13}$CO 2$-$1, C$^{18}$O 

344: 2$-$1, N$_{2}$D$^{+}$ 3$-$2, SO 5$_{6}$--$4_{5}$, and H$_2$$^{13}$CO 

345: 3$_{12}$--$2_{11}$ in separate correlator windows of various band widths and 

346: channel spacings.  Table 3 lists the respective frequencies, sidebands of 

347: observation, correlator windows, band widths, and channel spacings for these 

348: lines.  Out of the 24 windows in each sideband, the remaining correlator 

349: windows were used to observe continuum emission over effectively $\sim$2 GHz 

350: in each sideband.  The continuum data have been presented in Paper I.  Refer 

351: to Paper I for general information on observations and data processing. 

352:  

353: We used the MIRIAD software package for imaging and deconvolution.  For 

354: the CO and $^{13}$CO data, natural weighting was used without any tapering 

355: to make the respective data cubes.  The C$^{18}$O and N$_{2}$D$^{+}$ data,

356: however, were tapered with a circular Gaussian of 4\as\ FWHM during inversion 

357: to increase the beam size up to $\sim$5\as\ FWHM for improved brightness 

358: sensitivity.  Furthermore, only 20 velocity channels around the central

359: velocity were used for the integrated intensity calculation to bring out 

360: low-brightness features.  Finally, the SO and

361: H$_{2}^{13}$CO data were tapered with Gaussians of 6\as\ FWHM, also to 

362: improve brightness sensitivity, but no detections of either line were 

363: obtained.  To calculate the integrated intensities, all channels were 

364: used with a 2 $\sigma$ rms clip.

365: 

366: \subsection{Data from Other Observations} 

367: 

368: J. Williams (private communication) provided us with unpublished CS 3$-$2 and 

369: 5$-$4 data that were obtained with the NRAO 12-m telescope\footnote{The Kitt 

370: Peak 12 Meter telescope was operated by NRAO, a facility of the National 

371: Science Foundation, operated under cooperative agreement by Associated

372: Universities, Inc.  It presently operated by the Arizona Radio Observatory 

373: (ARO), Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, with partial funding from 

374: the Research Corporation.} on Kitt Peak, AZ in May 1996 (CS 5$-$4) and October 

375: 1997 (CS 3$-$2).  The backend used was the Millimeter AutoCorrelator (MAC) 

376: with a channel spacing of $\sim$48.8 kHz ($\sim$0.1 \kms\ for CS 2$-$1 and 

377: $\sim$0.06 \kms\ for CS 5$-$4).  Typical system temperatures were 250-300 K 

378: (CS 3$-$2) and 450-600 K (CS 5$-$4).  Details of these line observations are 

379: also summarized in Table 1.

380:  

381: \section{RESULTS} 

382: 

383: In this study, we use coordinates in the J2000 epoch, so the ($\alpha$, 

384: $\delta$) coordinates of IRAS 22376+7455, the IRAS point source associated

385: with L1251B, are (22$^{h}$38$^{m}$47.16$^{s}$, +75\deg 11\am 28.71\as). 

386: This position defines the reference center for all figures that use offsets 

387: in their axes.  For example, IRS1 is located at (0\arcsec, $+$5\arcsec).

388: 

389: \subsection{Observations with Single-Dish Telescopes}

390: 

391: Figure 1 presents the integrated intensity maps of CS 2$-$1, HCN 1$-$0, 

392: HCO$^{+}$ 1$-$0 and N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ 1$-$0, 

393: obtained at FCRAO.  In general, these lines trace moderately dense ($\rm n

394: \leq 3 \times 10^5$ $\rm cm^{-3}$) gas, i.e., they have low excitation 

395: requirements compared to other lines in this study.  In each panel, line 

396: emission is shown overlaid onto a map of 850 $\mu$m continuum emission (see 

397: Paper I) and the locations of the YSOs IRS1, IRS2 and IRS4 are denoted by 

398: a circle, square and triangle respectively.  Notably, the line maps of Figure 1 

399: differ from the (low resolution) map of integrated CS 1$-$0 intensity by 

400: Morata et al. (1997), which instead shows a maximum of emission $\sim$200\as\ 

401: north of L1251B and no obvious structure around L1251B itself.  These line 

402: maps are similar to that of NH$_3$ integrated intensity by T$\acute{\rm o}$th 

403: \& Walmsley (1996), however.  Figure 1 shows that L1251B is coincident with 

404: line emission maxima in all four tracers, suggesting it is associated with 

405: moderately dense gas.  Significant line emission is also seen throughout 

406: the region beyond L1251B, however.  For example, CS 2$-$1 shows a third 

407: maximum $\sim$130\as\ north of L1251B, but no other tracer in Figure 1 shows 

408: a maximum towards that general location.  In addition, other maxima are seen 

409: $\sim$100--160\as\ to the east of L1251B, associated with the ``east core" 

410: identified from 850 $\mu$m emission in Paper I.  These eastern maxima are 

411: not coincident with each other, however.  Also, a thin ridge of emission 

412: extends northward from the east core in all maps.  The brightnesses of the 

413: maxima are similar for CS 2$-$1, HCN 1$-$0, and H$^{13}$CO$^+$ 1$-$0 (not 

414: shown) in the east core and L1251B.  The east core, however, is slightly 

415: brighter in HCO$^{+}$ 1$-$0 but much weaker in N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ 1$-$0 than 

416: L1251B, although it was not mapped as extensively in the latter line.

417: 

418: Figure 2 presents the integrated intensity maps of CS 3$-$2 and 5$-$4, 

419: HCO$^{+}$ 3$-$2 and DCO$^{+}$ 3$-$2 obtained with the NRAO 12-m telescope 

420: or the CSO.  In general, these lines 

421: trace gas of higher density ($\rm n \geq 1 \times 10^6$ $\rm cm^{-3}$) 

422: than those shown in Figure 1, i.e., they have relatively high excitation 

423: requirements.  The maps of integrated intensity in Figure 2 are overlaid 

424: onto maps of 1.3 mm continuum emission, which traces the column density 

425: very well.  (As described in Paper I, a shift in the location of the 

426: continuum emission maximum associated with L1251B to the south is seen 

427: with increasing wavelength.)  The positions of IRS1, IRS2 and IRS4 are 

428: shown as in Figure 1, but here ``square-X" symbols denote the locations 

429: the starless objects from Paper I, SMA-N and SMA-S.  Figure 2 shows that 

430: L1251B also contains maxima of higher excitation lines, suggesting even 

431: higher densities than those traced by the lines shown in Figure 1.  

432: (These maps, however, do not extend as widely as those in Figure 1, so 

433: the larger-scale distribution of these lines, e.g., toward the east core, 

434: is not known.)  As in the single-dish continuum data, however, Figure 2 

435: also shows that the integrated intensity maxima of dense gas tracers are 

436: located consistently off-center from IRS1.  

437: For example, the maximum of CS 5$-$4 is located $\sim$15\as\ (greater than a

438: half beam size) south of IRS1.  

439: These shifts seen in continuum and molecular emission maps suggest that 

440: within L1251B the maximum column density, 

441: and probably the density, resides between IRS1 and IRS2.

442: 

443: Figure 3 shows line profiles at the center position of L1251B of all eight 

444: lines from Figures 1 and 2, plus H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ 1$-$0.  The line widths 

445: of DCO$^+$ 3$-$2, H$^{13}$CO$^+$ 1$-$0 and the isolated component of N$_2$H$^+$

446: 1$-$0, which are obtained by Gaussian 

447: fits, are $\sim$1 km s$^{-1}$.  The line widths of HCN 1$-$0 and N$_2$H$^+$ 

448: 1$-$0, which are obtained by their hyperfine structure fits, are $\sim$1.4 

449: and $\sim$1.2 km s$^{-1}$, respectively, 

450: probably affected by their optical depths. 

451: The width of CS 5$-$4, however, is 

452: $\sim$2.6 km s$^{-1}$.  Line wings are seen in the spectra of HCO$^{+}$ 3$-$2, 

453: CS 5$-$4 and HCN 1$-$0.  All profiles in Figure 3, except for H$^{13}$CO$^+$ 

454: 1$-$0, DCO$^+$ 3$-$2, and the isolated component of N$_2$H$^+$ 1$-$0 are 

455: asymmetric with blueshifted peak temperatures.  

456: The peak temperatures of the isolated component of N$_2$H$^+$ 1$-$0 and DCO$^+$ 

457: 3$-$2 lines are located close to the central velocity of 

458: L1251B, i.e., where the deepest dips are seen in the other lines.  

459: We determined the central velocities of L1251B ($-3.65$ km s$^{-1}$) and the 

460: east core ($-4.13$ km s$^{-1}$) by the Gaussian fitting of the isolated 

461: component of N$_2$H$^+$ 1$-$0 and H$^{13}$CO$^+$ 1$-$0, respectively. 

462: Figure 4 shows profiles 

463: of five lines toward the east core, where again asymmetric profiles with 

464: stronger blue peaks

465: are seen in HCO$^{+}$ 1$-$0, CS 2$-$1, and HCN 1$-$0 but not H$^{13}$CO 1$-$0. 

466: Such profiles are not seen everywhere across the region, however, indicating

467: a complex velocity distribution.  For example, the CS 2$-$1 line profile (not 

468: shown) has reversed asymmetry toward the northern maximum of CS 2$-$1.  HCN 

469: 1$-$0 (not shown) also has a reversed profile between the east core and 

470: L1251B.

471: 

472: Figure 5a shows a map of red and blue components of CO 2$-$1 emission toward

473: L1251B only, from data obtained with the CSO 10.4-m Telescope. 

474: The velocity ranges for the red and blue components of the outflow have

475: been determined very conservatively from blue- and red-free spectra 

476: (Figure 5b).  

477: 

478: The extended 

479: outflow from L1251B, as seen by others, is plainly noticeable.  The projected 

480: orientation of the CO outflow is northwest--southeast with blue or red 

481: components respectively in the northwest or southeast.  The two components 

482: overlap significantly at L1251B, however, and the origin of the outflow is not

483: easily identifiable due to the low resolution of the map.

484: 

485: Figure 6 shows HCO$^+$ 3$-$2 spectra from locations across L1251B.  As seen

486: in Figure 3, the central spectrum shows a very strong self-absorption dip and 

487: an asymmetric profile with a stronger blue peak.  Figure 6 also reveals that 

488: the majority of lines off-center to L1251B have asymmetric profiles with 

489: stronger blue peaks, especially with increasing of 

490: the asymmetry with a stronger blue peak to the south.  Not all 

491: the spectra are asymmetric with stronger blue peaks, however.  

492: To the north, the spectra are 

493: double-peaked more symmetrically, and in the north, reversed (red) asymmetry 

494: is seen.  Note that the distribution of HCO$^+$ integrated intensities at 

495: L1251B (Figure 2c) is elongated through the northwest--southeast direction.

496: The outflow map (not shown) from the HCO$^+$ 3$-$2 wing components seen in

497: Figure 3 shows the same trend as seen in the CO 2$-$1 outflow map, i.e., a

498: northwest--southeast extension and a significant positional overlap between 

499: the blue and red components.

500: 

501: \subsection{Interferometric Observations}

502: 

503: Figure 7 shows HCO$^+$ 1$-$0, N$_2$H$^+$ 1$-$0, and H$_2$CO 3$_{12}$--2$_{11}$ 

504: integrated intensities made with data from the OVRO MMA.  Each map in Figure 7 

505: is overlaid onto the $Spitzer$ IRAC 4.5 $\mu$m band image, and the positions of 

506: IRS1, etc., are denoted as in Figures 1 and 2.  In these cases, the maps only

507: show smaller-scale emission features since significant flux on larger scales 

508: was resolved out by the interferometer.  Figure 7 shows that the distributions 

509: of compact line emission differ significantly on small scales.  For example, 

510: Figure 7a shows the HCO$^{+}$ 1$-$0 emission is elongated linearly in the 

511: northwest--southeast direction from IRS1, similar to the direction of the 

512: outflow seen on larger scales (see Figure 5).  Figure 7a also shows that the 

513: N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ 1$-$0 emission is located between IRS1 and IRS2 and is elongated 

514: in a projected direction perpendicular to that of the HCO$^{+}$ emission.  

515: In contrast, Figure 7b shows compact H$_{2}$CO 3$_{12}$--2$_{11}$ 

516: emission in L1251B only at two locations, one centered at IRS1 and another 

517: 2\arcsec\ to the northeast of IRS4.  

518: 

519: Figure 8 shows maps of C$^{18}$O 2$-$1, N$_{2}$D$^{+}$ 3$-$2, CO 2$-$1, and 

520: $^{13}$CO 2$-$1 integrated intensities from L1251B with data from the SMA.  

521: Again, the observations were sensitive to only small-scale, compact features.  

522: The distributions of compact line emission again differ remarkably from each 

523: other and from those shown in Figure 7.  Figure 8a shows the C$^{18}$O 2$-$1 

524: emission, along with N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ 1$-$0 emission shown previously in Figure 

525: 7a.  Compact C$^{18}$O emission is found along a filament containing IRS1 and 

526: IRS2, as well as SMA-N and SMA-S.  Some C$^{18}$O emission is also associated 

527: with IRS4.  Note, however, that brighter C$^{18}$O emission is slightly offset 

528: from all objects in L1251B.  N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ emission, however, is distributed 

529: in a direction perpendicular to the C$^{18}$O filament, but its maxima are 

530: more coincident with SMA-N and SMA-S (but not completely; see \S 4.4).  In 

531: contrast, Figure 8b shows compact N$_{2}$D$^{+}$ 3$-$2 emission, which is 

532: detected in a single location, south of IRS1 and slightly offset to the west 

533: of SMA-S.  Figures 8c and 8d show the compact CO 2$-$1 and $^{13}$CO 2$-$1 

534: emission, which both show a lobe-like structure extending southeast of IRS1.  

535: Bright CO emission is also seen to the northwest of IRS4, with a fainter 

536: extension coincident with IRS4.  In contrast, bright $^{13}$CO emission is 

537: coincident with IRS4 but is not seen to the northwest.  Surprisingly, in these 

538: integrated intensity maps, neither CO nor $^{13}$CO strong emission is seen 

539: associated with or coincident with IRS2, though its infrared nebulosity 

540: morphology is suggestive of an outflow cavity.  

541: 

542: \section{ANALYSIS}

543: 

544: According to our observational results, complex dynamical and chemical

545: processes are coupled in L1251B and the east core.  To study each dynamical 

546: component, i.e., infall, rotation, and outflow, in detail, we describe in 

547: this section the analysis of line profiles using line radiative transfer 

548: calculations and the simulation of observed line profiles (\S 4.1), 

549: centroid velocity maps and a position-velocity diagram (\S 4.2), and 

550: channel maps (\S 4.3), respectively.  In addition, we calculate the 

551: chemical evolution coupled with the evolution of density and luminosity 

552: to compare the relative distribution of observed various molecular line 

553: emission with a chemical model (\S 4.4).

554: 

555: \subsection{Infall}

556: 

557: Toward L1251B, optically thick molecular transitions such as HCO$^+$ 1$-$0 

558: and 3$-$2 show an asymmetrical profile with the brighter blue peak (see 

559: Figure 3).  In addition, optically thin molecular transitions, such as 

560: H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ 1-0 and DCO$^{+}$ 3-2 line are symmetrical, and peak at 

561: the velocities of the deepest dips of the other lines.  Taken together, 

562: such profiles can be indicative of infall motions (see Zhou et al. 1993).  

563: In general, infalling gas will have motions both positive and negative 

564: along the line of sight, and if an excitation gradient exists also along

565: line of the sight, redward self-absorption of gas emission can occur.

566: 

567: L1251B was modeled as an inside-out collapsing sphere (cf. Shu 1977) by Young 

568: et al. (2003), using continuum emission at 450 $\mu$m and 850 $\mu$m to find 

569: density and temperature profiles of the core.  The model parameters provided

570: by Young et al., however, do not correspond to the best-fit model (C. Young, 

571: personal communication).  Instead, the infall radius of the actual best-fit 

572: collapse model of L1251B is 5000 AU, equivalent to an infall timescale of 

573: $5\times 10^4$ years, rather than the 3000 AU provided by Young et al.  Other 

574: parameters of the best-fit model are the same, i.e., an effective sound speed 

575: of 0.46 km s$^{-1}$ and a total luminosity of 10 \lsun.  The model with a 5000 

576: AU infall radius provides much better SED fit.  In the current best-fit model, 

577: the reduced $\chi ^2$ for intensity profiles at 450 $\mu$m and 850 $\mu$m and 

578: the SED are 17, 27, and 3, respectively (compare with $\chi ^2$ in Table 9 

579: and 11 of Young et al.) 

580: 

581: Figure 9 shows the density and velocity profiles of the best-fit inside-out 

582: collapse model. We have used the physical profiles to model HCO$^+$ 3$-$2/1$-$0,

583: H$^{13}$CO$^+$ 1$-$0 and CS 5$-$4 lines with a Monte-Carlo radiative transfer 

584: code (Choi et al. 1995). 

585: These lines trace the densest region, i.e., where the infall velocity is 

586: significant, among the lines observed with single dish telescopes.  To minimize 

587: a contribution from rotational motions, line profiles observed only 

588: at the core center have been modeled.  The kinetic temperature profile (the 

589: dotted line in Figure 9a) has been calculated with a gas energetics code 

590: (Young et al. 2004; Doty \& Neufeld 1997) from the dust temperature profile 

591: obtained from the dust continuum modeling.  Abundance profiles of HCO$^+$ and 

592: CS were calculated with the chemo-dynamical model developed by Lee et al. 

593: (2004).  (This chemical calculation and its results will be described in \S 

594: 4.4.)  Although an interferometric observation is necessary to study whether

595: the high velocity wings of CS 5$-$4 are affected by outflow, Figure 10 shows 

596: that the density and infall velocity structures from 

597: the best-fit model of dust continuum observations can reproduce reasonably 

598: well the observed line profiles detected at the center of the core, especially 

599: CS 5$-$4.

600: Note, however, that it was necessary to reduce the abundance profile of 

601: HCO$^{+}$ by a factor of 2 from that calculated by the chemical model, to

602: fit the HCO$^{+}$ 3$-$2/1$-$0 line. 

603: The line profile of H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ 1$-$0 was also

604: fitted reasonably well with the HCO$^{+}$ abundance profile and the isotopic

605: ratio of $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C$=77$ (Wilson and Rood 1994).  

606: The dotted line in the Figure presents the comparison case without infall.  

607: In this model, constant turbulent widths of 0.6 \kms\ and 0.25 \kms\ 

608: (FWHM = 1 and 0.4 \kms, respectively) were assumed at radii respectively less 

609: than and greater than the infall radius.  Having less turbulent motion in the 

610: outer stationary envelope than in the inner infalling envelope is necessary 

611: to fit the width of the self-absorption feature, especially that in HCO$^+$ 

612: 3$-$2.  

613: The broad line wings of HCO$^+$ 3$-$2/1$-$0 and H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ 1$-$0, 

614: particularly pronounced in the blueshifted emission, are probably caused by 

615: outflowing material, which is not considered in this model.  The higher 

616: ratio between blue and red peaks of the observed line profiles than the 

617: modeled ones, which is commonly seen and never understood, 

618: might be affected by the rotational motion or the non-spherical 

619: geometry. 

620: 

621: \subsection{Rotation}

622: 

623: Beyond the central position of L1251B, variations of the line profiles and

624: position-velocity diagrams suggest rotational motions.  For

625: example, the HCO$^{+}$ 3$-$2 line profiles shown in Figure 6 at positions 

626: offset from (0,0) show asymmetry reversals and increases that may be caused

627: by rotational motions (e.g., see Walker et al. 1994; Zhou 1995; Ward-Thompson 

628: \& Buckley 2001).  A simulation of the HCO$^+$ 3$-$2 spectra with a 2-D Monte 

629: Carlo molecular line radiative transfer code (Hogerheijde \& van der Tak 2000) 

630: for the collapse from a rotating dense cloud (Terebey, Shu \& Cassen 1984) 

631: indeed produces the distribution of blue- and red-asymmetric profiles observed 

632: in L1251B (Lee et al., in preparation).  Note, however, that the wings of

633: line profiles along the projected outflow direction may be still affected by 

634: outflow motions (see \S 4.3 below).

635: 

636: Previous studies (Goodman et al. 1993; Sato et al. 1994; T$\acute{\rm o}$th

637: \& Walmsley 1996; Anglada et al. 1997; Morata et al. 1997) determined that

638: the overall velocity gradient in the L1251B neighborhood, i.e., that covered

639: by the extended 850 \micron\ map in Figure 1, was $\sim$1-2 km s$^{-1}$ 

640: pc$^{-1}$ in the northeast--southwest direction.  

641: Observations by Caselli et al. (2002),

642: however, revealed a more complex velocity distribution in the neighborhood,

643: with gradients of opposite direction.  Namely, L1251B itself is associated

644: with a southwest--northeast gradient, while the east core is associated with a

645: northeast--southwest gradient.  The average direction reported in their paper,

646: however, is also northeast--southwest, suggesting that the previous studies,

647: with poorer resolutions, averaged out the velocity gradient associated with

648: L1251B, whose velocity gradient is only about half of that in the east core.

649: To determine the velocity gradient associated with L1251B and the east core

650: at higher resolution,

651: we fitted the hyperfine structures of HCN 1$-$0 and N$_2$H$^+$ 1$-$0 and the

652: Gaussian profile of H$^{13}$CO$^+$ 1$-$0, and found the same result as shown

653: in Figure 6 of Caselli et al.  For illustration, Figure 11 shows the centroid

654: velocity distribution obtained from HCN 1$-$0, which shows different velocity

655: gradients in L1251B and the east core.  The derived velocity gradient from

656: HCN 1$-$0 in L1251B within 80\arcsec\ is $\sim 3/{\rm cos}(i)$ km s$^{-1}$ 

657: pc$^{-1}$ in the southwest--northeast direction but the velocity gradient in 

658: the east core is $\sim 6/\rm{cos}(i)$ km s$^{-1}$ pc$^{-1}$ in the opposite 

659: direction, i.e., consistent with the direction predicted from previous studies. 

660: Here, $i$ is the inclination of the rotational axis from the plane of sky. 

661:  

662: We have analyzed the centroid velocity shift in L1251B with the

663: N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ 1$-$0 interferometer data (see Figures 7a and 8a).

664: Figure 12a shows a 2-D distribution of the mean centroid velocity with  

665: the integrated intensity contours of the isolated component of N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ 

666: 1$-$0 , which were calculated with the AIPS task, MOMNT. 

667: A clear shift of the centroid velocity is seen from the southwest to the 

668: northeast, along a direction perpendicular to the outflow direction. 

669: This southwest--northeast direction is {\it opposite} to directions of

670: velocity gradient seen in previous studies with lower resolution

671: but consistent with the result of Caselli et al. (2002) and that seen in 

672: HCN 1$-$0 (Figure 11) toward L1251B.

673: A position-velocity diagram taken along a cut centered at (9\as, $-2$\as) and 

674: along P.A. = 33\degree\ (similar to the direction of maximum elongation of 

675: the N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ emission) is seen in Figure 12b.

676: The rotational motion suggested by this gradient

677: is very fast, i.e., $30/cos(i)$ km s$^{-1}$ pc$^{-1}$, $\Omega \sim

678: 10^{-12}/cos(i)$ s$^{-1}$ within 30\arcsec.  

679: This gradient is $\sim$1 order of magnitude larger than what is seen 

680: on larger scales, such as in the HCN map (Fig. 11), suggesting an 

681: increased importance of rotation on small scales. 

682: 

683: \subsection{Outflow}

684: 

685: In this section, we examine at high angular resolution the outflowing gas 

686: from the young stellar objects in L1251B, and provide an initial interpretation 

687: of the data.  Although the evidence for outflows in this region is strong, the 

688: spatial distribution of this gas is very irregular, making it difficult to 

689: associate the observed outflow features with specific objects.

690: 

691: Figure 13 shows the CO 2$-$1 integrated intensity across L1251B as observed

692: from the SMA, divided into red and blue components (emission at line center

693: is excluded).  For reference, the CO components are overlaid onto the 1.3 mm 

694: continuum emission across L1251B, also observed from the SMA.  Figures 14 

695: and 15 show channel maps of CO 2$-$1 respectively for red- and blueshifted 

696: emission.  For reference, the CO emission in each channel is overlaid here

697: onto the N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ 1-0 integrated intensity as observed from the OVRO 

698: millimeter array.  (Note that the velocity range definitions of red- and 

699: blueshifted emission are slightly different in these Figures than those used 

700: for Figures 5 and 13 because of the difference in their velocity resolutions.)

701: In Figures 14 and 15, we also include more channel maps at -1.2 \kms, and 

702: -5.4 and -6.5 \kms, in the red- and blueshifted emission, respectively, to 

703: resolve different outflow components. 

704: For an alternative view of the outflows associated with 

705: L1251B, Figure 16 shows channel maps of HCO$^{+}$ 1-0 observed from OVRO.

706: In the channel maps, especially for blueshifted emission (Figure 15 and 16),  

707: velocities closer to the central velocity than defined conservatively in 

708: Figure 5 and 13 are covered. 

709: While the HCO$^{+}$ 1-0 emission around the central velocity peaks at SMA-S, 

710: which is the densest part in L1251B, at -5.2 and -5.6 \kms, it has peaks at 

711: IRS1 and southeast of IRS4 with a weaker tail toward the northwest of IRS4.

712: Therefore, HCO$^{+}$ 1-0 mainly traces the outflowing material even at the 

713: velocity up to $\sim -5$ \kms.

714: In addition, the comparison between the model and observation of HCO$^{+}$ 1-0

715: in Figure 5b suggests that the emission at -5 \kms\ is affected only by 

716: the outflow.   

717: 

718: As can be seen from Figure 13, significant outflow appears to be associated 

719: with IRS1.  This emission, however, may also include a component from SMA-S.  

720: Bright emission is seen extending southeast of IRS1, with blueshifted emission 

721: to the east-southeast and redshifted emission to the south-southeast and some 

722: positional overlap of these components to the southeast.  The overlap of the 

723: components could indicate a single outflow where the inclination of the axis

724: from the plane of sky is not large and the blue and red components respectively

725: trace the front and back components of an outflow cone.  Note, however, that 

726: in the redshifted -1.2 \kms\ channel of Figure 14, the feature divides into

727: two components, one associated to the west and southwest of IRS1 and another

728: to the southwest of SMA-S.  Note also the pair of distinct components seen in 

729: Figure 15, associated with IRS1 in one blueshifted pair of channels at -5.4 

730: \kms\ and -6.5 \kms\ and associated with SMA-S in another blueshifted pair of 

731: channels at -9.6 \kms\ and -11 \kms.  In the latter case, the emission may 

732: have been made compact and elongated in the northwest-southeast direction 

733: due to higher densities to its immediate northeast, as evident from the

734: N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ emission and the higher-excitation line emission (see Figure 

735: 2). 

736: 

737: For IRS2, a single redshifted feature is seen extending to its southeast in 

738: Figure 13, and this feature is also seen in the CO channel maps from 2 \kms\ 

739: to -1.2 \kms\ of Figure 14.  No corresponding blueshifted feature is obviously 

740: associated with IRS2, however.  It is possible that the blueshifted feature 

741: near IRS1 seen at -5.4 \kms\ and -6.5 \kms\ is associated with IRS2 instead.

742: For example, CO may be severely depleted in the dense regions between IRS1 

743: and IRS2, and the blueshifted outflow from IRS2 may be only visible in CO 

744: near IRS1 because of localized high CO abundance due to the evaporation of 

745: CO from nearby dust grains.  Note, however, that this blueshifted emission 

746: lies in a similar northwest-southeast direction as redshifted emission from 

747: IRS1.  Alternatively, the extended redshifted feature southeast of IRS2 may 

748: be related to IRS1 itself.

749: 

750: Northwest of IRS4, Figure 13 shows red- and blueshifted features with very

751: significant positional coincidence.

752: Again, these features could be due to a single outflow of 

753: low inclination.  The channel maps of Figure 14 and 15 suggest a more complex 

754: interpretation, however, with weak red- and blueshifted emission seen both 

755: northwest and east of IRS4 at -1.2 \kms, -5.4 \kms\ and -6.5 \kms.  Figure

756: 16 shows blueshifted emission from HCO$^{+}$ 1-0 also located to the east 

757: and the northwest of IRS4.  Instead, there may be two outflows present, one 

758: centered at IRS4 and another to the northwest.  This latter may originate 

759: from IRS1 and could be the counterpart to the redshifted emission seen 

760: southeast of IRS2.  Note that not much material is seen between IRS4 and 

761: IRS1, in the continuum emission maps of Figures 2 and 9 or the CO 2$-$1 

762: channel maps of Figure 13.  Compact HCO$^{+}$ 1$-$0 emission {\it is}\/ 

763: seen between IRS4 and IRS1, however, in Figure 16 from -6 \kms\ to -5 \kms.  

764: The strongest HCO$^{+}$ emission is seen southeast of IRS4, and this may

765: constitute a blueshifted outflow component from IRS4. 

766: 

767: A summary of the possible outflows in the L1251B region is shown in Figure 

768: 17, with outflow components schematically plotted over the 1.3 mm continuum

769: emission observed with the SMA.  In this picture, IRS1, IRS2, IRS4 and even

770: SMA-S all have outflows, some of which interact with each other.  If SMA-S

771: indeed has an outflow, it is not a starless condensation after all.  Instead,

772: it may harbor a very low luminosity protostellar object that was undetected

773: by Spitzer.  The existence of such objects has been surmised by others; e.g., 

774: Rebull et al. (2007) suggested that several objects unseen at $\lambda$ 

775: $<$ 70 $\mu$m could be driving numerous outflows observed in HH 211.  Future 

776: observations of L1251B, at even higher resolutions or using various lines that 

777: clearly trace gas shocked by outflow motions (e.g., mid-infrared lines of 

778: H$_{2}$ or millimeter lines of SiO), will be very helpful in disentangling 

779: the association of the outflows with specific sources and their effects on 

780: the evolution of the L1251B core.

781: 

782: \subsection{Chemistry}

783: 

784: Within L1251B, our high-resolution maps provide continued evidence for the 

785: expected chemical behavior of dense gas not associated with protostars.  For

786: example, the HCO$^{+}$ features shown in Figure 7a likely traces outflowing 

787: dense gas, since HCO$^{+}$ can be made abundant through shocks (see Rawlings

788: et al. 2004).  As with HCO$^{+}$, the CO, $^{13}$CO, and diffuse C$^{18}$O 

789: emission seen in Figures 8a, c and d may also be due to extensive depletion 

790: in the extended envelope and enhancements along the outflow axis due to 

791: liberation from grains.  Emission from these lines indeed share some common 

792: features, but note that no compact CO, $^{13}$CO, or C$^{18}$O emission is 

793: seen between IRS1 and IRS4.  A faint ridge of HCO$^{+}$ 1$-$0 emission is 

794: seen at that location in the level of 2 $\sigma$, however.   

795: 

796: In addition, the N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ feature shown in Figure 7a likely traces 

797: non-outflowing gas, since N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ can remain abundant in cold dense 

798: material and can be depleted significantly in outflows.  N$_2$H$^+$ is a 

799: chemical daughter of N$_2$, which forms slowly.  The interactions between 

800: N$_2$H$^+$ and grains replenish N$_2$ in the gas phase because N$_2$H$^+$ 

801: recombines with electrons on the grain surfaces.  The principal destroyers 

802: of N$_2$H$^+$ in the gas phase are CO and electrons.  CO can be significantly 

803: depleted in starless cores (Bergin \& Langer 1997) because the only source 

804: of heating is the interstellar radiation field and the inner temperatures of

805: such cores can be correspondingly very low (e.g., $\sim$7 K; see Evans et al. 

806: 2001).  Also, the electron abundance can be very low ($\sim 10^{-9}$, Williams 

807: et al. 1998) in dense gas that is highly extincted, like that in starless 

808: cores.  The N$_2$H$^+$ emission seen in Figure 7a and 8a is consistent with 

809: the 1.3 mm dust continuum emission mapped by the IRAM 30-m Telescope (see 

810: Paper I), suggesting it is also tracing cold, dense gas.  

811: 

812: N$_2$H$^+$ (and N$_2$D$^+$) will also deplete at densities greater than 

813: $10^6$ cm$^{-3}$ (Di Francesco, Andr\'e \& Myers 2004; Pagani et al. 2005).  

814: Note that the two N$_2$H$^+$ intensity maxima in Figure 7a and 8a are offset

815: slightly to the east from SMA-N and SMA-S, which trace the densest parts of 

816: L1251B.  (The C$^{18}$O emission observed with the SMA does not have maxima 

817: at SMA-N and SMA-S either.)   In addition, an N$_{2}$D$^{+}$ emission maximum 

818: is found between IRS1 and SMA-S.  Finally, no such emission is associated 

819: with SMA-N.  The offset of the N$_2$H$^+$ maxima and deficiencies of 

820: N$_{2}$D$^{+}$ from these objects are possibly caused by the depletion from 

821: the gas phase at densities greater than $10^6$ cm$^{-3}$.  The N$_2$D$^+$ 

822: emission may be identifying a less dense location that has a high enough 

823: temperature to populate significantly N$_2$D$^+$ at J$=$3.  For example, the 

824: J$=$3 level of N$_2$D$^+$ has its maximum population in thermal equilibrium 

825: at $\sim$20 K, and this may be caused by heating by IRS1.  (Note, however, 

826: that the temperature there cannot be greater than 30 K, because otherwise 

827: CO would evaporate off dust grains and reduce the N$_2$D$^+$ abundance.)

828: 

829: Our high-resolution observations of L1251B show further examples of the

830: chemical behavior expected in the presence of nearby protostellar heating.  

831: Once a protostar forms, the surrounding material is heated up to the CO 

832: evaporation temperature ($\sim$25 K in the case of bare SiO$_2$ dust grains).  

833: The desorbed CO destroys N$_2$H$^+$, producing an N$_2$H$^+$ emission 

834: ``hole" around the central heating source, that is potentially observable 

835: with interferometers.  Such holes may explain the lack of N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ 

836: emission coincident with IRS1 and IRS2, as seen in Figures 7a and 8a.  In 

837: contrast, the abundances of other molecules such as CS, H$_2$CO, and HCO$^+$ 

838: can be enhanced due to protostellar heating resulting in the desorption of 

839: CO or the desorption of themselves off of dust grain mantles (Lee, Bergin 

840: \& Evans 2004) as seen in Figure 7b.  In L1251B, IRS1 is luminous enough 

841: to evaporate CO in its inner envelope.  Similar N$_2$H$^+$ emission holes 

842: have been seen toward NGC 1333 IRAS 4A (Di Francesco et al.  2001) and L483 

843: (J{\o}rgensen 2004).

844: 

845: Figure 18 shows the results of a chemical evolution model made specifically 

846: for L1251B to quantify the observed line emission distributions.  For this 

847: model, we used the chemo-dynamical model developed by Lee et al. (2004).

848: We updated the chemical network to include more recent results on the 

849: N$_2$H$^+$ chemistry, however, including a new binding energy of N$_2$, 

850: which is the same as that of CO (\"Oberg et al. 2005), and new rates of 

851: dissociative recombination of N$_2$H$^+$ with electrons (Geppert et al. 

852: 2004).  We also increased the initial abundance of sulfur by a factor of 

853: 3 to fit the CS 5$-$4 line profile in Figure 10a.  The initial abundances 

854: of other species are the same as those in Table 3 of Lee et al. (2004).  

855: For a dynamical model, we adopted the best-fit Shu inside-out collapse 

856: model to the dust continuum emission as described in \S 4.1.  Although 

857: L1251B has several sources, only one internal luminosity source at the 

858: center of a spherically symmetric envelope was assumed in the model.  

859: Since IRS1 is the dominant luminosity source by a factor of $\sim$10, 

860: however (see Paper I), this model is a reasonable first approximation, 

861: especially for interpreting the single dish observations.  For this model, 

862: the infall rate from the disk to central protostar was tuned appropriately 

863: to match the luminosity calculated by observations at the given timescale 

864: (Young \& Evans 2005).  In addition, the interstellar radiation field was 

865: assumed to be attenuated to $G_0=0.3$ for consistency with the dust 

866: continuum modeling.  An outflow was not included.  

867: 

868: We do not compare this chemical model with interferometric observations 

869: quantitatively since the density profile assumed in the 1-D model is not 

870: appropriate for the high resolution observations that reveal multiple sources.

871: The chemical distribution close to the central source, however, is most 

872: sensitive to the temperature environment, so we can look for the effects

873: of temperature increases around IRS1 on the chemical abundances.  As seen 

874: in Figure 18, the model predicts a CO evaporation radius (which accordingly 

875: is also the N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ depletion radius) of $\sim$0.007 pc ($\sim$4\as), 

876: i.e., similar to the observed radius of the N$_2$H$^+$ hole at a 2 $\sigma$ 

877: level of integrated intensity (see Figure 7a).  Furthermore, the model 

878: predicts an H$_2$CO abundance peak at a radius of $\sim$0.003 pc ($\sim$2\as), 

879: similar to the radius of the H$_2$CO emission at the 2 $\sigma$ level of 

880: the integrated intensity (Figure 7b).  A second H$_2$CO abundance peak seen 

881: in Figure 18 caused by CO evaporation does not affect significantly the 

882: H$_2$CO emission distribution likely because of the lower density and 

883: temperature of material at $\sim$0.006 pc relative to material at $\sim$0.003 

884: pc associated with the inner abundance peak.  Therefore, this simple model

885: is in good agreement with our observations close to the central source, 

886: where infall is kinematically dominant, and chemistry mainly depends on the 

887: evaporation of molecules from grain surfaces by heating.   

888: 

889: Near IRS4, the associated H$_{2}$CO emission may not be due to an increased 

890: abundance due to localized dust grain heating.  That source may not be 

891: luminous enough to heat grains above the H$_{2}$CO evaporation temperature 

892: at a projected distance of 600 AU.  The coincidence of the maxima of the 

893: integrated intensity of H$_{2}$CO 3$_{12}$--2$_{11}$ (see Figure 7b) to 

894: one of that of HCO$^{+}$ 1-0 (see Figure 7a) suggests a possible origin 

895: from shocked outflow material.  Note that the H$_{2}$CO emission close to 

896: IRS4 lies at redshifted velocities of $-1.5$ \kms\ to $-3$ \kms, and lies 

897: spatially at a full synthesized beam width (2\arcsec) northeast of IRS4.

898: 

899: \section{DISCUSSION} 

900: 

901: \subsection{L1251B}

902: 

903: L1251B harbors a small group of starless and protostellar objects.  Three 

904: of the latter are classified as Class 0/I candidates, which are associated 

905: with dense envelopes.  The observations of molecular lines around L1251B 

906: have revealed active processes, either dynamical (infall, rotation and 

907: outflow) or chemical (depletion and enhancement). 

908: 

909: The 1.3 mm dust continuum observations of L1251B with the SMA revealed two 

910: condensations (SMA-N and SMA-S) unassociated with any detected near-infrared 

911: source.  (Note that SMA-S may contain a newly formed protostellar object if 

912: an outflow originates from it; see Figs. 14 and 15, and \S 4.3).  

913: Table 4 shows masses along the line of sight towards IRS1, IRS2, SMA-N and

914: SMA-S, determined using the peak intensities of the 1.3 mm image and assuming

915: a dust temperature of 20 K.  We determined masses along the lines of sight

916: rather than total masses from the respective fluxes because the extents of

917: each were difficult to define with certainty in the crowded field, especially

918: for SMA-N and SMA-S.  Furthermore, any differences in mass along the line of

919: sight could be more easily discerned with a single sampling.  Table 4 shows

920: that the peak intensities are quite similar (i.e., within 50\%), suggesting

921: quite similar masses along the line of sight if the temperatures are common.

922: If we assume for SMA-N and SMA-S a lower temperature of 10 K, which is more

923: commonly adopted for starless cores, their masses along the line of sight are

924: greater than those for 20 K (and IRS1 and IRS2) by a factor of $\sim$3.

925: 

926: Given their designations as protostars, the fluxes 

927: of IRS1 and IRS2 likely include emission from their respective disk components. 

928: In particular, IRS2 is not resolved at the $\sim$4\as\ resolution of the data, 

929: which is equivalent to a $\sim$1200 AU linear distance at the 300 pc distance 

930: of L1251B.  Since these sources are also highly embedded, however, the 1.3 mm 

931: fluxes also likely contain emission from their inner envelopes.  In contrast, 

932: the fluxes of SMA-N and SMA-S likely include emission only from envelopes since 

933: these sources are not seen if lower spatial frequences (i.e., $<$11 k$\lambda$) 

934: are excluded, as discussed in Paper I.  To distinguish the disks of IRS1 and 

935: IRS2 (as well as a possible disk of SMA-S) associated with outflows (\S 4.3), 

936: observations with higher resolution are needed.  Note that 1.3 mm continuum

937: emission is not detected towards IRS4, suggesting that it is not associated 

938: with any disk or inner envelope that could be detected at our sensitivity and 

939: resolution.

940: 

941: All objects in L1251B possibly form by fragmentation during gravitational 

942: collapse (Boss 1997; Machida et al. 2005).  Turbulent fragmentation seems 

943: unlikely since the lines observed toward L1251B are not so broad as to be 

944: considered dominated by turbulence.  For example, tracers of very dense gas 

945: such as DCO$^+$ 3$-$2, N$_2$H$^+$ 1$-$0, and H$^{13}$CO$^+$ 1$-$0 have line 

946: widths of $\sim 1$ km s$^{-1}$, consistent with the infall velocity at $n 

947: \sim 10^6$ cm$^{-3}$ in the best fit inside-out collapse model of L1251B.  

948: In addition, CS 5$-$4, which traces much higher densities ($n \geq 5\times 

949: 10^6$ cm$^{-3}$), shows the broadest line width among all the high density 

950: tracers we observed toward L1251B, i.e., $\sim 2.6$ km s$^{-1}$.   Indeed, 

951: our inside-out collapse model shows an infall velocity at $5\times 10^6$ 

952: cm$^{-3}$ of $\sim 2$ km s$^{-1}$.  Also, the infall velocity profile this 

953: model fits the observed CS 5$-$4 and HCO$^+$ 3$-$2 reasonably well, with 

954: constant turbulent widths of 0.6 \kms\ and 0.25 km s$^{-1}$ at radii less 

955: than and greater than the infall radius respectively (see Figure 10a).  The 

956: velocity dispersions implied from such widths are not much greater than the 

957: thermal velocity dispersion before collapse.  (The dotted line in Figure 10 

958: presents the case without the infall velocity structure.)  Therefore, the 

959: dynamics of L1251B seem dominated by gravitational collapse, combined with 

960: rotation and outflows, rather than turbulent motions.

961: 

962: \subsection{The East Core}

963: 

964: The east core seen in Figure 1 at 850 \micron\ and in various molecular lines 

965: has a radius of about 0.1 pc.  The 850 $\mu$m emission shows several sub-cores 

966: inside a larger structure traced by molecular emission.  This difference may 

967: be related to a bias towards imaging smaller-scale emission in the continuum 

968: data and related to high optical depths in the line data.  For the continuum 

969: data, the SCUBA observations were made by chopping onto the sky, effectively 

970: filtering out emission on angular scales greater than the $\sim$120$\arcsec$ 

971: chop throw (see Di Francesco et al. 2007), i.e., those traced by the molecular 

972: line data. 

973: In addition, the 850 \micron\ continuum emission is very likely

974: optically thin, tracing quite dense material within a molecular core.  For the 

975: line data, the molecular emission (see Figure 1) may have high optical depths 

976: and the sub-cores may not be visible, despite the similarities between the 

977: densities these particular lines trace and the mean density of the sub-cores, 

978: i.e., $\sim$10$^{5}$ cm$^{-3}$.  Differences in the positions of maximum 

979: integrated intensities between these lines may also be due to their relative 

980: (but high) optical depths. 

981: (To determine if the $\sim$3$\times$ higher resolution of the 850 $\mu$m map

982: relative to the molecular line maps in Figure 1 contributed to the different

983: appearance of the continuum and line maxima, we smoothed the 850 $\mu$m map

984: to a resolution similar to that of the line maps (60\as).  The smoothed 850

985: $\mu$m map, however, still shows an emission hole near the maxima of the line

986: maps.)

987: 

988: The low optical depth of the 850 \micron\ emission suggests that the much

989: stronger continuum peak toward L1251B ($\sim$1 Jy beam$^{-1}$) relative to 

990: the east core ($\sim$0.2 Jy beam$^{-1}$) is indicative of a larger column

991: density toward L1251B even if L1251B has been heated by internal sources.

992: (Note that the 850 \micron\ emission peaks close to SMA-S, not toward IRS1,

993: as seen in Figure 6 of Paper I) 

994: The 850 $\mu$m fluxes of L1251B and the whole east core are similar, 

995: suggesting that

996: their masses are also similar if their temperatures and dust opacities are 

997: themselves similar, i.e., $\sim 4$ Jy and $\sim 2$ \msun\ if T = 20 K and

998: $\kappa_{1.3 mm}$ = 0.02 cm$^{2}$ g$^{-1}$ (Kr\"ugel \& Siebenmorgen 1994).

999: Since L1251B contains several YSOs but the east core does not, it is likely 

1000: that L1251B is warmer than the east core, however.  Continuum observations 

1001: at multiple wavelengths and modeling are needed to determine better relative 

1002: values of dust temperature.

1003: 

1004: Table 5 lists the integrated intensities of molecular lines observed toward 

1005: the centers of L1251B and the east core.  To probe for any relative chemical 

1006: evolution in the two cores, we compare the relative integrated intensities of 

1007: the 1$-$0 transitions of H$^{13}$CO$^+$ 1$-$0 and N$_{2}$H$^{+}$, molecules 

1008: found to be abundant respectively at earlier and later times in models of 

1009: chemical evolution (e.g., Lee et al. 2003 and references therein).  For 

1010: H$^{13}$CO$^+$ 1$-$0, the integrated intensities of L1251B and the east core 

1011: are similar (i.e., $\sim$1.3 K \kms\ and $\sim$1.1 K km s$^{-1}$ respectively).

1012: For N$_{2}$H$^{+}$, however, the integrated intensity towards L1251B is larger 

1013: than that towards the east core by a factor of two (i.e.,  $\sim$4 K km 

1014: s$^{-1}$ vs $\sim$2 K km s$^{-1}$ respectively).  The relative integrated 

1015: intensity ratio between these lines, i.e., $\sim$6 for L1251B and $\sim$3 for

1016: the east core, may be due to the relative chemical evolution, with L1251B 

1017: being more chemically evolved.  (Note that the difference in N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ 

1018: abundance might be greater than the difference in the N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ 1$-$0 

1019: intensity due to the higher optical depth in L1251B.)  Such differences in 

1020: chemical evolution may result from differences in density since the chemical 

1021: timescale shortens at a higher density.  In addition, H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ and its 

1022: isotopologue HCO$^{+}$ deplete significantly more than N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ in cold, 

1023: dense environments such as in L1251B (except in the immediate vicinities of 

1024: protostellar objects).  Therefore, the higher ratio between the N$_{2}$H$^{+}$

1025: and H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ intensities in L1251B than 

1026: in the east core (Figure 1) may be caused by a denser environment in L1251B.  

1027: 

1028: Various lines toward the east core suggest infall motions.  Therefore, the 

1029: east core may be in earlier states of dynamical and chemical evolution than 

1030: those of L1251B, and may harbor star formation in the future. 

1031: 

1032: \section{SUMMARY}

1033: 

1034: L1251E, the densest C$^{18}$O core of L1251 (Sato et al. 1994), has been 

1035: observed at various molecular line transitions with single-dish telescopes, 

1036: and L1251B, the protostellar group in the C$^{18}$O core, has been observed 

1037: with millimeter interferometers.  We have compared these molecular line data 

1038: to continuum data presented in Paper I to study this region of L1251 more 

1039: comprehensively.  Our results include:

1040: 

1041: 1. L1251E contains at least two cores, one

1042: coincident with L1251B and an east core detected from 850 \micron\ continuum 

1043: emission and various emission lines.  The integrated intensities of these 

1044: lines show primary maxima that are coincident with L1251B and other, secondary 

1045: maxima associated with the east core which are non-coincident.  No embedded 

1046: sources have been detected in the $Spitzer$ IRAC or MIPS bands toward the 

1047: east core (Paper I), suggesting it is starless.  Asymmetric profiles with 

1048: stronger blue peaks have been detected toward the eastern core, however, that 

1049: are suggestive of infall motions.  The east core appears less dense and less 

1050: chemically evolved than L1251B.

1051: 

1052: 2. The large-scale outflow associated with L1251B has been mapped in CO 

1053: 2$-$1 with the CSO.  Red and blue components of the outflow overlap around 

1054: the brightest protostar, IRS1, and the near-infrared bipolar nebula source, 

1055: IRS2.  The CO 2$-$1 and $^{13}$CO 2$-$1 maps observed with the SMA 

1056: resolve the outflow into a few components.

1057: 

1058: 3. HCO$^+$ 3$-$2 line emission observed with the CSO across L1251B shows 

1059: widespread line asymmetry that suggests infall motions towards the central 

1060: group, with evidence for rotational or outflow motions from modifications 

1061: of the line profiles at many off-center locations.  

1062: 

1063: 4. On a large scale, L1251B has a velocity gradient that is half 

1064: the magnitude of that in the starless east core and is opposite in direction.  

1065: Previous low-resolution observations averaged the velocity gradients of both, 

1066: causing rotational motions in the region to be misinterpreted.

1067: 

1068: 5. HCO$^+$ 1$-$0 line emission observed with the OVRO MMA is centered at IRS1 

1069: and distributed linearly along the northwest--southeast direction of the 

1070: larger-scale outflow.  In contrast, the N$_2$H$^+$ 1$-$0 line emission also 

1071: observed with the OVRO MMA is distributed between IRS1 and IRS2 (like the 

1072: position of maximum brightness of the IRAM 1.3 mm continuum emission) and 

1073: extended

1074: perpendicular to the outflow, i.e,. along the southwest--northeast direction. 

1075: A position-velocity diagram of N$_2$H$^+$ 1$-$0 indicates very fast rotation 

1076: in this flattened envelope, i.e., $\Omega \sim 10^{-12}/cos(i)$ s$^{-1}$, 

1077: where $i$ is the inclination of the rotational axis from the plane of sky.  

1078: 

1079: 6. The maxima of N$_2$H$^+$ 1$-$0 and N$_2$D$^+$ 3$-$2 integrated intensity

1080: observed with the OVRO MMA and SMA are offset from locations of maximum 

1081: continuum brightness from the two starless objects, which were newly detected 

1082: at 1.3 mm with the SMA (Paper I).  This offset may be due 

1083: to reduction of N$_2$H$^+$ and N$_2$D$^+$ abundances at very high densities.

1084: 

1085: 7. OVRO MMA and SMA observations reveal a lack of N$_2$H$^+$ emission at

1086: IRS1 (i.e., a ``hole") but C$^{18}$O and the H$_2$CO emission is coincident 

1087: with IRS1.  These results are consistent with a chemo-dynamical evolution 

1088: model where a central protostar heats up surrounding material.  In this model, 

1089: CO and H$_{2}$CO are abundant close to the protostar where they are released 

1090: into the gas phase from grain mantles, but N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ has had its 

1091: abundance sharply reduced since it is depleted by reactions with gas-phase

1092: CO.

1093: 

1094: \acknowledgments

1095: Support for this study was provided by NASA through Hubble Fellowship grant 

1096: HST-HF-01187 awarded by the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is 

1097: operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc.,

1098: for NASA, under contract NAS 5-26555.  This work was also supported by NSF 

1099: grant AST-0307350 to the University of Texas at Austin and by the State of 

1100: Texas.  We are very grateful to an anonymous referee for valuable comments.

1101: We thank Jonathan Williams for allowing us to use his unpublished 

1102: molecular line data, and we also thank Chad Young for his help for the dust 

1103: continuum modeling of L1251B.  

1104: We are also very grateful to Anneila Sargent for 

1105: providing us the opportunity to observe L1251B with the OVRO MMA.  

1106: 

1107: 

1108: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% References %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1109: 

1110: \begin{references}

1111: \reference{}Aikawa, Y., Ohashi, N., Inutsuka, S.-I., Herbst, E. \& Takakuwa, S. 

1112: 2001, ApJ, 552, 639

1113: \reference{}Anglada, G., Sep$\acute{\rm u}$lveda, I., \& G$\acute{\rm o}$mez, 

1114: J.F. 1997, A\&AS, 121, 255  

1115: \reference{}Bergin, E.A. \& Langer, W.D. 1997, ApJ, 486, 316

1116: \reference{}Boss, A.P. 1997, ApJ, 483, 309

1117: \reference{}Caselli, P., Benson, P. J., Myers, P. C., \& Tafalla, M. 2002,

1118: ApJ, 572, 238

1119: \reference{}Caselli, P., Myers, P. C., \& Thaddeus P. 1995, ApJ, 455, L77

1120: \reference{}Choi, M., Evans, N. J., II, Gregersen, E. M., \& Wang, Y. 1995,

1121: ApJ, 448, 742

1122: \reference{}Di Francesco, J., Myers, P. C., Wilner, D. J., Ohashi, N. \&

1123: Mardones, D. 2001, ApJ, 562, 770

1124: \reference{}Di Francesco, J., Andr\'e, P., and Myers, P. C. 2004, ApJ, 617, 

1125: 425

1126: \reference{}Di Francesco, J., Evans, N.J., II, Caselli, P., Myers, P.C., 

1127: Aikawa, Y., \& Tafalla, M. 2006, in Protostars and Planets V, eds. B. 

1128: Reipurth, D.  Jewitt, \& K. Kiel, (University of Arizona: Tucson), in 

1129: press (astro-ph/0602379)

1130: \reference{}Di Francesco, J., Johnstone, D., Kirk, H. M., MacKenzie, T.  

1131: \& Ledwosinska, E. 2007, ApJS, submitted.

1132: \reference{}Doty, S.D. \& Neufeld, D.A. 1997, 489, 122

1133: \reference{}Doty, S.D., van Dishoeck, E.F., van der Tak, F.F.S., \&

1134: Boonman, A.M.S. 2002, A\&A, 389, 446

1135: \reference{}Evans, N.J.II, Rawlings, J.M.C., Shirley, Y., \& Mundy, L.G.

1136: 2001, ApJ, 557, 193

1137: %\reference{}Fukui, Y. 1989, ESO Conf. and Workshop Proc. 33, P. 95

1138: \reference{}Geppert, W. D., Thomas, R., Semaniak, J., Ehlerding, A., Millar, T.,

1139: $\ddot{O}$sterdahl, F., af Ugglas, M., Djuri$\acute{\rm c}$, N., Pa$\acute{\rm a}$l, 

1140: A., \& Larsson, M. 2004, ApJ, 609, 459

1141: \reference{}Goodman, A.A., Benson, P.J., Fuller, G.A., \& Myers, P. 1993, ApJ,

1142: 406, 528

1143: \reference{}Gregersen, E.M., Evans, N.J.,II, Mardones, D.M., \& Myers, P.C.

1144: 2000, ApJ, 533, 440

1145: %\reference{}Hodapp, K. 1994, ApJS, 94, 615

1146: \reference{}Hogerheijde, M.R. \& van der Tak, F.F.S. 2000, A\&A, 362, 697

1147: \reference{}J{\o}rgensen, J.K. 2004, 424, 589

1148: \reference{}Kruegel, E. \& Siebenmorgen, R. 1994, A\&A, 288, 929

1149: \reference{}Kun, M. \& Prusti, T. 1993, A\&A, 272, 235

1150: \reference{}Lada, C.J. \& Lada, E.A 2003, ARA\&A, 41, 57

1151: \reference{}Lee, J.-E., Evans, N.J.,II, Shirley, Y.L., \& Tatematsu, K. 2003,

1152: ApJ, 583, 789

1153: \reference{}Lee, J.-E., Bergin, E.A., \& Evans, N.J.II 2004, ApJ, 617, 360

1154: \reference{}Lee, J.-E., et al. 2006, ApJ, 648, 491

1155: \reference{}Mardones, D., Myers, P. C., Tafalla, M., Wilner, D. J.,

1156: Bachiller, R., Garay, G.  1997, ApJ, 489, 719

1157: \reference{}Machida, M.N., Matsumoto, T., Hanawa, T., \& Tomisaka, K. 2005, 

1158: MNRAS, 362, 382 

1159: \reference{}Morata, O., Estalella, R., L$\acute{\rm o}$pez, R., \& Planesas, P. 

1160: 1997, MNRAS, 292, 120

1161: %\reference{}Momose, M., Ohashi, N., Kawabe, R., Nakano, T., \& Hayashi, M. 1998,

1162: %ApJ, 504, 314

1163: %\reference{}Morgan, J. A., Schloerb, F. P., Snell, R. L., \& Bally, J. 1991, 

1164: ApJ, 376, 618

1165: %\reference{}Mundt, R. \& Fried, J. W. 1983, ApJL, 274, 83

1166: %\reference{}Mundt, R., Brugel, E. W., \& B$\ddot{u}$hrke, T. 1987, ApJ, 319, 

1167: 275

1168: \reference{}Myers, P. C., Evans, N. J., II, \& Ohashi, N. 2000, in ``Protostars

1169: and Planets IV," eds. V. Mannings, A. P. Boss \& S. S. Russell, (University of

1170: Arizona: Tucson), p. 217

1171: \reference{}\"Oberg K. I., van Broekhuizen, F., Fraser, H. J., 

1172: Bisschop, S. E., van Dishoeck, E. F., \& Schlemmer, S. 2005, ApJ, 621, 33

1173: \reference{}Pagani, L., Pardo, J.-R., Apponi, A. J., Bacmann, A. \& Cabrit, S.

1174: 2005, A\&A, 429, 181

1175: %\reference{}Parker, N. D., Padman, R., \& Scott, P. F. 1991, MNRAS, 252, 442

1176: \reference{}H. M. Pickett, R. L. Poynter, E. A. Cohen, M. L. Delitsky, 

1177: J. C. Pearson, and H. S. P. Muller  1998, "Submillimeter, Millimeter, and 

1178: Microwave Spectral Line Catalog," J. Quant. Spectrosc. \& Rad. Transfer 60, 

1179: 883-890

1180: \reference{}Rawlings, J.M.C. \& Yates, J.A., 2001, MNRAS, 326, 1423

1181: \reference{}Rawlings, J.M.C., Redman, M. P., Keto, E. \& Williams, D. A. 2004,

1182: MNRAS, 351, 1054

1183: \reference{}Rebull, L. M., et al. 2007, ApJS, in press (astro-ph/0701711)

1184: \reference{}Sato, F. \& Fukui, Y. 1989, ApJ, 343, 773

1185: \reference{}Sato, F., Mizuno, A., Nagahama, T., Onishi, T., Yonecura, Y., \&

1186: Fukui, Y. 1994, 435, 279

1187: %\reference{}Schwartz R. D. 1975, ApJ, 195, 631

1188: %J. A., Scott, S. L., Tilanus, R. P. J., \& Wang, Z. 1993, PASP, 105, 1482

1189: \reference{}Shu, F.H. 1977, ApJ, 214, 488

1190: %\reference{}Shirley, Y.L., Evans, N.J.II, \& Rawlings, J.M.C. 2002, ApJ, 575, 

1191: %337

1192: \reference{}Shirley, Y.L., Evans, N.J.II, Rawlings, J.M.C. \& Gregersen, E.M.

1193: 2000, ApJS, 131, 249

1194: \reference{}Snell, R. L., Loren, R. B., \& Plambeck, R. L. 1980, ApJ, 239, L17

1195: \reference{}Terebey, S., Shu, F.H., \& Cassen, P. 1984, ApJ, 286, 529

1196: \reference{}T$\acute{\rm o}$th, L.V. \& Walmsley, C.M 1996, A\&A, 311, 981

1197: \reference{}Walker, C.K., Narayanan, G., \& Boss, A.P. 1994, ApJ, 431, 767

1198: \reference{}Ward-Thompson, D. \& Buckley, H.D. 2001, MNRAS, 327, 955

1199: %\reference{}Ward-Thompson, D. Andr\'e, P., Crutcher, R., Johnstone, D.,

1200: %Onishi, T., \& Wilson, C. 2006, in Protostars and Planets V, eds. B. Reipurth,

1201: %D.  Jewitt, \& K. Kiel, (University of Arizona: Tucson), in press

1202: %(astro-ph/0603474)

1203: \reference{}Williams, J.P, Bergin, E.A., Caselli, P., Myers, P.C., \& Plume, R.

1204: 1998, ApJ, 503, 689

1205: \reference{}Wilson, T.L. \& Rood, R.T., 1944, ARAA, 32, 191

1206: \reference{}Young, C.H., Shirley, Y.L., Evans, N.J.II, \& Rawlings, J.M.C. 2003,

1207: ApJS, 145, 111

1208: \reference{}Young, K.E., Lee, J.-E., Evans, N.J.,II, Goldsmith, P.F., \&

1209: Doty, S.D. 2004, ApJ, 614, 252

1210: \reference{}Young, C.H. \& Evans, N.J.II 2005, ApJ, 627, 293

1211: \reference{}Zhou, S., Evans, N.J.II, Koempe, C., \& Walmsley, C.M 1993, 404, 232

1212: \reference{}Zhou, S. 1995, ApJ, 442, 685

1213: 

1214: \end{references}

1215: 

1216: \clearpage

1217: 

1218: 

1219: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Table 1 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1220: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}

1221: \tablecolumns{7}

1222: \footnotesize

1223: \tablecaption{\bf Molecular line observations with single-dish telescopes  

1224: \label{tab1}}

1225: \tablewidth{0pt}

1226: \tablehead{

1227: \colhead{Line}                &

1228: \colhead{$\nu$}    &

1229: \colhead{$\delta v$}              &

1230: \colhead{$\theta_{mb}$}              &

1231: \colhead{$\eta_{\rm mb}$\tablenotemark{a}}              &

1232: \colhead{Observing Dates}              &

1233: \colhead{Observatory}              \\

1234: \colhead{}                      &

1235: \colhead{(GHz)}        &

1236: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)}                      &

1237: \colhead{(arcsec)}                      &

1238: \colhead{}                  &

1239: \colhead{}                  &

1240: \colhead{}

1241: }

1242: \startdata

1243: H$^{13}$CO$^+$ 1$-$0 & 86.754285 & 0.14 & 62 & 0.5 & April 1997, May 2000 & 

1244: FCRAO \\

1245: HCN $1-0$ & 88.631847 & 0.10 & 61 & 0.5 & February 2005 & FCRAO \\

1246: HCO$^+$ 1$-$0 & 89.188523 & 0.13 & 60 & 0.5 & April 1997, May 2000 & FCRAO \\

1247: N$_2$H$^+$ 1$-$0 & 93.176265 & 0.13 & 58 & 0.5 & December 1996 & FCRAO \\

1248: CS $2-1$ & 97.980968 & 0.10 & 55 & 0.5 & February 2005 & FCRAO \\

1249: DCO$^+$ $3-2$ & 216.112605 & 0.13 & 34.7 & 0.74 & July 2003 & CSO\\

1250: CO $2-1$ & 230.53800 & 0.12 & 32.5 & 0.64 & July 2003 & CSO\\

1251: HCO$^+$ 3$-$2 & 267.557526 & 0.12 & 22.5 & 0.67 & June 1997, July 1998 & CSO\\

1252: CS $3-2$ & 146.969048 & 0.10 & 43 & 0.8\tablenotemark{b} & October 1997 & NRAO\\

1253: CS $5-4$ & 244.935606 & 0.12 & 26 & 0.5\tablenotemark{b} & May 1996 & NRAO \\

1254: \enddata

1255: \tablenotetext{a}{

1256: This main beam efficiency is used to convert the antenna temperature ($T_a^*$), 

1257: only corrected for atmospheric attenuation, radiative loss and reward 

1258: scattering and spillover, to the radiation temperature. 

1259: }

1260: \tablenotetext{b}{

1261: These numbers represent the corrected main beam efficiencies ($\eta_{\rm m}^*$) 

1262: to convert the antenna temperature ($T_R^*$), corrected for forward scattering 

1263: and spillover as well as atmospheric attenuation, radiative loss and reward 

1264: scattering and spillover, to the radiation temperature.

1265: }

1266: \end{deluxetable}

1267: 

1268: \clearpage

1269: 

1270: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Table 2 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1271: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccc}

1272: \rotate

1273: \tablecolumns{8}

1274: \tablewidth{0pc}

1275: \tablecaption{OVRO Observational Summary}

1276: \tablehead{

1277: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{Channel} & \colhead{Gaussian} &

1278: \colhead{Synthesized} & \colhead{Synthesized} \\

1279: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{Bandwidth} & \colhead{Spacing} &

1280: \colhead{Taper FWHM} & \colhead{Beam FWHM} & \colhead{Beam P.A.} &

1281: \colhead{1 $\sigma$ rms\tablenotemark{a}} \\

1282: \colhead{Tracer} & \colhead{Transition} & \colhead{(MHz)} &

1283: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(\as\ $\times$ \as)} &

1284: \colhead{(\as\ $\times$ \as)} & \colhead{(\deg)} & \colhead{(Jy beam$^{-1}$)}}

1285: \startdata

1286: H$_{2}$CO  &      3$_{12}$--2$_{11}$ & 7.00  & 0.17     & 1.60 $\times$ 1.60  &

1287: 2.5 $\times$ 2.3   &  304  &  0.1    \\

1288: HCO$^{+}$  &      1--0               & 8.00  & 0.42     & 5.5 $\times$ 5.5    &

1289:  7.5 $\times$ 6.9  &  313  &  0.09   \\

1290: N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ &  1--0               & 7.50  & 0.20     & 4.0 $\times$ 4.0    &

1291:  6.5 $\times$ 5.2  &  334  &  0.07   \\

1292: \enddata

1293: \tablenotetext{a}{1 $\sigma$ rms computed from signal-free regions of the

1294: deconvolved maps.}

1295: \end{deluxetable}

1296: 

1297: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Table 3 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1298: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}

1299: \tablecolumns{8}

1300: \footnotesize

1301: \tablecaption{\bf SMA Line Observations

1302: \label{tab1}}

1303: \tablewidth{0pt}

1304: \tablehead{

1305: \colhead{Line}  &

1306: \colhead{Freq.\tablenotemark{a}}  &

1307: \colhead{S-band}  &

1308: \colhead{Window}  &

1309: \colhead{Chans}  &

1310: \colhead{$\rm \Delta V$}  &

1311: \colhead{Beam FWHM}  &

1312: \colhead{P.A.}\\

1313: \colhead{}  &

1314: \colhead{(GHz)}  &

1315: \colhead{}  &

1316: \colhead{}  &

1317: \colhead{}  &

1318: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)}  &

1319: \colhead{(\arcsec x \arcsec)}  &

1320: \colhead{(degree)}

1321: }

1322: \startdata

1323: CO 2--1            & 230.5380000&USB  & 14& 128 & 1.06 & 4.1 $\times$ 3.1& -26.2\\

1324: $^{13}$CO 2--1     & 220.3986765&LSB  & 13& 512 & 0.26 & 4.3 $\times$ 3.4& -23.5\\

1325: C$^{18}$O 2--1     & 219.5603568&LSB  & 23& 512 & 0.26 & 5.3 $\times$ 5.0

1326: \tablenotemark{b}& 0.50\\

1327: N$_{2}$D$^{+}$ 3--2& 231.3216650&USB  & 23& 512 & 0.26 & 5.1 $\times$ 5.0

1328: \tablenotemark{b}& 10.4\\

1329: SO 5$_{6}$--4$_{5}$& 219.9494420&LSB  & 18& 256 & 0.53 & 8.0 $\times$ 6.3

1330: \tablenotemark{b,c}& 68.3\\

1331: H$_2^{13}$CO $3_{12}$--$2_{11}$ &219.9085250&LSB  & 19& 256 & 0.53 & 8.0

1332: $\times$ 6.3\tablenotemark{b,c}& 68.3\\

1333: \enddata

1334: \tablenotetext{a}{

1335: All line frequencies listed were obtained from Pickett et al. (1998)

1336: }

1337: \tablenotetext{b}{

1338: Beam attained after tapering with a 4\as\ $\times$ 4\as\ FWHM Gaussian

1339: }

1340: \tablenotetext{c}{

1341: Beam attained after tapering with a 6\as\ $\times$ 6\as\ FWHM Gaussian

1342: }

1343: \end{deluxetable}

1344: 

1345: 

1346: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Table 4 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1347: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccc}

1348: %\rotate

1349: \tablecolumns{3}

1350: \tablewidth{0pc}

1351: \tablecaption{SMA 1.3 mm peak intensities and masses}

1352: \tablehead{

1353: \colhead{Source} & \colhead{Peak Intensity, I($\lambda$) 

1354: (Jy beam$^{-1}$)\tablenotemark{a}}

1355: & \colhead{Mass (\msun\  beam$^{-1}$)\tablenotemark{b}}}

1356: \startdata

1357: IRS1  & 0.035 & 0.031 \\

1358: IRS2  & 0.023  & 0.020\\

1359: SMA-N  & 0.023 & 0.020 (0.055)\tablenotemark{c}\\

1360: SMA-S  & 0.029  & 0.026 (0.070)\tablenotemark{c}

1361: \enddata

1362: 

1363: \tablenotetext{a}{Uncertainties on the peak intensities are ~4 mJy beam$^{-1}$.}

1364: \tablenotetext{b}{Masses have been calculated based on the equation,\\

1365: $Mass~ (\msun~beam^{-1})=\frac{I(\lambda)~d^2}{\kappa_{\lambda} B_{\lambda}

1366: (T_{dust})} =0.88 \times I(\lambda)~ (Jy~beam^{-1})$ at $d=300$ pc and 

1367: $\lambda=1.3$ mm, which is derived from

1368: the assumptions of (1) the 1.3 mm opacity ($\kappa_{\lambda}$) of $2\times 

1369: 10^{-2}$ cm$^2$ g$^{-1}$ (Kruegel \& Siebenmorgen 1994) and 

1370: (2) the dust temperature ($T_{dust}$) of 20 K for the Planck function, 

1371: $B_{\lambda}$.}

1372: \tablenotetext{c}{The mass if $T_{dust}=10$ K.}

1373: \end{deluxetable}

1374: 

1375: 

1376: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Table 5 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1377: \begin{deluxetable}{ccc}

1378: %\rotate

1379: \tablecolumns{3}

1380: \tablewidth{0pc}

1381: \tablecaption{Integrated Intensities of Molecular Lines (K km s$^{-1}$)}

1382: \tablehead{

1383: \colhead{Line} & \colhead{L1251B} & \colhead{East Core} 

1384: }

1385: \startdata

1386: HCO$^+$ 1$-$0  & 6.6 & 7.6  \\

1387: H$^{13}$CO$^+$ 1$-$0  & 1.3 & 1.1\\

1388: CS 2$-$1  & 3.2  & 2.8 \\

1389: HCN 1$-$0 & 4.2 (4)\tablenotemark{a} & 3.0 (0.85)\tablenotemark{a} \\

1390: N$_2$H$^+$ 1$-$0 & 7.8 (2.2)\tablenotemark{a} & 3.8 (1.7)\tablenotemark{a} 

1391: \enddata

1392: 

1393: \tablenotetext{a}{The optical depth of the main component obtained by the 

1394: hyperfine structure fit.

1395: }

1396: \end{deluxetable}

1397: 

1398: 

1399: 

1400: \clearpage

1401: 

1402: \begin{figure}

1403: \figurenum{1}

1404: \epsscale{1.0}

1405: \vspace*{-3.0cm}

1406: \plotone{fig1.ps}

1407: \vskip -6.0cm

1408: \caption{

1409: Integrated intensity maps (contours) of CS 2$-1$, HCN 1$-$0,

1410: HCO$^+$ 1$-0$, and N$_2$H$^{+}$ 1$-0$ on top of the 850 \micron\

1411: emission map (grey scale).  The (0,0) position of this map represents

1412: the coordinates of IRAS 22376+7455.  In each panel, the small white

1413: circle, box and triangle denote the positions of IRS1, IRS2 and IRS4

1414: respectively.  In each panel, the grey scale used ranges from 0.084

1415: to 0.420 Jy beam$^{-1}$, roughly 2 $\sigma$ to 10 $\sigma$, where 1

1416: $\sigma$ $\approx$ 0.042 Jy beam$^{-1}$.  In each panel, the large

1417: black circle at lower left shows the beam FWHM.  In each panel, the

1418: dotted rectangle shows the extent of the map in the respective line.

1419: (For CS 2$-$1 and HCN 1$-$0, the map was larger than the area shown.)

1420: a) Integrated intensity map of CS 2$-$1.  The velocity range used is

1421: $-6.5$ to $-0.5$ km s$^{-1}$.  The contours begin at 10 $\sigma$ and

1422: increase by 6 $\sigma$ where 1 $\sigma = 0.06$ K km s$^{-1}$.  b)

1423: Integrated intensity map of HCN 1$-$0.  The velocity range used

1424: is $-13.5$ to 4 km s$^{-1}$.  The contours begin at 10 $\sigma$ and

1425: increase in steps of 5 $\sigma$ where 1 $\sigma$ = 0.106 K km s$^{-1}$.

1426: c) Integrated intensity map of HCO$^+$ 1$-0$.  The velocity range used

1427: is $-6$ to $-2$ km s$^{-1}$.  The contours begin at 6 $\sigma$ and

1428: increase in steps of 1.5 $\sigma$ where 1 $\sigma$ = 0.42 K km s$^{-1}$.

1429: d) Integrated intensity map of N$_2$H$^{+}$ 1$-0$.  The velocity range

1430: used is $-13$ to 4 km s$^{-1}$.  The contours begin at 15 $\sigma$ and

1431: increase in steps of 5 $\sigma$ where 1 $\sigma$ = 0.166 K km s$^{-1}$.

1432: }

1433: \end{figure}

1434: 

1435: \clearpage

1436: 

1437: \begin{figure}

1438: \figurenum{2}

1439: \vspace*{-3cm}

1440: \epsscale{1.0}

1441: \plotone{fig2.ps}

1442: \vskip -6cm

1443: \caption{

1444: Integrated intensity maps (contours) of CS $3-2$, $5-4$, HCO$^+$ 3$-$2,

1445: and DCO$^+$ 3$-$2 on top of the 1.3 mm dust continuum emission map (grey

1446: scale).  The grey scale ranges from 0.025 to 0.125 Jy beam$^{-1}$ or

1447: about 2 $\sigma$ to 10 $\sigma$, where 1 $\sigma$ = 0.0125 Jy beam$^{-1}$.

1448: In each panel, the dotted rectangle denotes the extent of the map in the

1449: respective line.  Symbols are defined as in Figure 1 but here the square-X

1450: symbols indicate positions of peak intensity of prestellar condensations

1451: detected in SMA 1.3 mm observations (see Figure 8 of Paper I).  a) Integrated

1452: intensity map of CS 3$-$2.  The velocity range used is $-6.5$ to $-0.5$ km

1453: s$^{-1}$.  The contours begin at 15 $\sigma$ and increase in steps of 5

1454: $\sigma$ where 1 $\sigma=0.066$ K km s$^{-1}$.  b) Integrated intensity map

1455: of CS 5$-$4.  The velocity range used is $-6.5$ to $-0.5$ km s$^{-1}$.  The

1456: contours begin at 10 $\sigma$ and increase in steps of 4 $\sigma$ where 1

1457: $\sigma = 0.112$ K km s$^{-1}$.  c) Integrated intensity map of HCO$^+$ 3$-$2.

1458: The velocity range used is $-8$ to $0$ km s$^{-1}$.  The contours begin at

1459: 3 $\sigma$ and increase in steps of 3 $\sigma$ where 1 $\sigma = 0.545$ K

1460: km s$^{-1}$.  d) Integrated intensity map of DCO$^+$ 3$-$2.  The velocity

1461: range used is $-5$ to $-2.5$ km s$^{-1}$.  The contours begin at 3 $\sigma$

1462: and increase in steps of 1 $\sigma$ where 1 $\sigma$ = 0.097 K km s$^{-1}$.

1463: }

1464: \end{figure}

1465: 

1466: \clearpage

1467: 

1468: \begin{figure}

1469: \figurenum{3}

1470: \epsscale{1.0}

1471: \plotone{fig3.ps}

1472: \caption{

1473: The spectra of all molecular transitions observed with single dish telescopes 

1474: (Table 1) at the center position. 

1475: To present line profiles better, the order of lines has been 

1476: chosen arbitrarily, and spectra have been shifted up. 

1477: The dotted vertical line indicates the centroid velocity of L1251B, -3.65 \kms.

1478: }

1479: \end{figure}

1480: 

1481: \clearpage

1482: 

1483: \begin{figure}

1484: \figurenum{4}

1485: \plotone{fig4.ps}

1486: \caption{

1487: The spectra of some molecular transitions observed with single-dish telescopes 

1488: toward the starless east core at (150$\as$, 25$\as$). 

1489: To present line profiles better, the order of lines has been

1490: chosen arbitrarily, and spectra have been shifted up.

1491: The dotted vertical line indicates the centroid velocity of the east core, 

1492: -4.13 \kms\, which is derived from the Gaussian line fitting of H$^{13}$CO$^+$ 

1493: 1$-$0.

1494: }

1495: \end{figure}

1496: 

1497: \clearpage

1498: 

1499: \begin{figure}

1500: \figurenum{5}

1501: \vspace*{-4.0cm}

1502: \epsscale{0.6}

1503: \plotone{fig5.a.ps}

1504: \vspace*{-0.5cm}

1505: \plotone{fig5.b.ps}

1506: \vspace*{-1cm}

1507: \caption{

1508: a) The distribution of the outflow in L1251B in CO 2$-$1.  

1509: Symbols are defined as in Figure 1.  

1510: The solid contours and dashed contours represent the blue and 

1511: red components of the outflow, respectively. Contours are every 

1512: 1 K km s$^{-1}$ from 1 K km s$^{-1}$ (1 $\sigma$ = 0.5 K km s$^{-1}$).  

1513: The velocity range used for the blue and red components 

1514: are $-15$ to $-8$ km s$^{-1}$ and 0 to 7.5 km s$^{-1}$, respectively.

1515: b) The spectrum at the center compared with blue- (left) and red-free (right)

1516: spectra. Arrows indicate the velocity ranges for the blue and red components. 

1517: }

1518: \end{figure}

1519: 

1520: \clearpage

1521: 

1522: \begin{figure}

1523: \figurenum{6}

1524: \centering

1525:  \vspace*{7.5cm}

1526:    \leavevmode

1527:   \special{psfile=fig6.ps hoffset=-300 voffset=200 hscale=80

1528:      vscale=80 angle=-90}

1529: \vskip 3.00in

1530: \figcaption{

1531: The spectra of HCO$^+$ $3-2$ across L1251B.  Panels are spaced by 15$\as$ 

1532: in R.A. and Dec.  The horizontal axis is for $V_{LSR}$ whose range is $-12$ 

1533: km s$^{-1}$ to 4 km s$^{-1}$, and the vertical axis is in T$_a^*$ whose 

1534: range is $-0.5$ K to 5 K. }

1535: \end{figure}

1536: 

1537: \clearpage

1538: 

1539: \begin{figure}

1540: \figurenum{7}

1541: \epsscale{0.5}

1542: \vspace*{-0.5cm}

1543: \plotone{fig7.ps}

1544: \vskip -0.0cm

1545: \caption{

1546: Integrated intensities of molecular transitions observed at OVRO, found

1547: by determining the ``zeroth-moment," i.e., summing over channels with

1548: emission $>\mid 2\mid$ $\sigma$.  In all cases, no corrections for primary

1549: beam attenuation have been made.  Each contour set begins at the respective

1550: 2 $\sigma$ level and increases in steps of the respective 2 $\sigma$.

1551: Integrated intensities are overlaid onto an image of the same region as

1552: seen in IRAC Band 2 (inverted grey scale).  In each panel, the ellipse to

1553: the lower right denotes the size and P.A. of the synthesized beam FHWM.

1554: Symbols are defined

1555: as in Figure 2, although the position of IRAS 22376+7455 is shown as

1556: a circle-cross symbol.  a) N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ 1$-$0 (thick contours) and

1557: HCO$^{+}$ 1$-$0 (thin contours) where 1 $\sigma$ = 1.5 K km s$^{-1}$ for

1558: N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ 1$-$0 and 1 $\sigma$ = 1.3 K km s$^{-1}$ for HCO$^{+}$

1559: 1$-$0.  (The beam FWHM shown is that of the HCO$^{+}$ 1$-$0 data.)  The

1560: outer large circle shows the FWHM of the primary beam of the HCO$^{+}$

1561: data while the inner large circle shows the FWHM of the primary beam of

1562: the N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ data.  For the IRAC Band 2 data, the grey scale range

1563: is -0.5$-$100 MJy sr$^{-1}$.  b) Integrated intensities of H$_{2}$CO

1564: 3$_{12}$--2$_{11}$ (contours), where 1 $\sigma$ = 0.54 K km s$^{-1}$.  The

1565: large circle shows the FWHM of the primary beam of H$_{2}$CO data.  For the

1566: IRAC Band 2 data, the grey scale range is -0.5$-$10 MJy sr$^{-1}$.  The

1567: numbers shown identify individual IR sources described in the text.  (IRS1,

1568: IRS2, and IRS4 were classified as Class 0/I objects, and IRS3, IRS5, and

1569: IRS6 were classified as Class II sources in Paper I.)

1570: }

1571: \end{figure}

1572: 

1573: \clearpage

1574: 

1575: \begin{figure}

1576: \figurenum{8}

1577: \vspace*{-4cm}

1578: \epsscale{1.0}

1579: \plotone{fig8.ps}

1580: \vskip -5.5cm

1581: \caption{

1582: Integrated intensities of molecular transitions observed at SMA,

1583: found by determining the ``zeroth-moment," i.e., summing over channels

1584: with emission $>$ $\mid 2\mid$ $\sigma$.  Each contour set begins at

1585: the respective 2 $\sigma$ level and increases in steps of respective

1586: 1 $\sigma$.  In each panel, the ellipse to the lower right denotes

1587: the size and P.A. of the respective synthesized beam FWHM.  In each

1588: panel, the large oval denotes the extent of the half-power sensitivity

1589: of the two-pointing mosaic, obtained from the continuum data obtained

1590: when the lines were observed.  (The primary beam attenuation was

1591: corrected when these mosaics were made.)  Various symbols are defined

1592: as in previous Figures.  a) Integrated intensities of C$^{18}$O 2$-$1

1593: (thick contours) where 1 $\sigma$ $\approx$ 0.5 K km s$^{-1}$.  For

1594: comparison, the integrated intensities of N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ 1$-$0 from

1595: Figure 7a are also shown.  (The outer large circle denotes the primary

1596: beam FWHM of the N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ data.)  b) Integrated intensities of

1597: N$_{2}$D$^{+}$ 3$-$2 where 1 $\sigma$ $\approx$ 0.5 K km s$^{-1}$.

1598: (The contours just south of the half-power sensitivity oval are tracing

1599: amplified noise and not N$_{2}$D$^{+}$ emission.)  Integrated intensities

1600: of $^{12}$CO 2$-$1 where 1 $\sigma$ $\approx$ 7 K km s$^{-1}$.  d)

1601: Integrated intensities of $^{13}$CO 2$-$1 where 1 $\sigma$ $\approx$

1602: 2 K km s$^{-1}$.

1603: }

1604: \end{figure}

1605: 

1606: \clearpage

1607: 

1608: \begin{figure}

1609: \figurenum{9}

1610: \vspace*{-2cm}

1611: \epsscale{1.0}

1612: \plotone{fig9.ps}

1613: \caption{

1614: Density (a) and infall velocity (b) profiles of the best-fit

1615: inside-out collapse model of L1251B for the dust continuum observations

1616: at 450 \micron\ and 850 \micron.  The infall radius is 5000 AU, equivalent 

1617: to an infall timescale of $5\times 10^4$ years.  The kinetic temperature 

1618: profile in (a) has been calculated by balancing the heating and cooling 

1619: of gas from the dust temperature profile obtained from the dust continuum 

1620: modeling (See Young et al. 2003 for details of the dust modeling process.)

1621: At small radii, the kinetic temperature is well coupled with the dust 

1622: temperature, but at large radii, it is higher than the dust temperature 

1623: mainly due to the photoelectric heating.

1624: }

1625: \end{figure}

1626: 

1627: \clearpage

1628: 

1629: \begin{figure}

1630: \figurenum{10}

1631: \epsscale{0.5}

1632: \vspace*{-2.0cm}

1633: \plotone{fig10.a.ps}

1634: \vspace*{-0.5cm}

1635: \plotone{fig10.b.ps}

1636: \vspace*{-1.0cm}

1637: \caption{

1638: Comparisons between observations (histogram) and models with (solid line) 

1639: and without (dotted line) the consideration of infall velocity profile

1640: in CS 5$-$4 (a) and HCO$^+$ 3$-$2 and H$^{13}$CO$^+$ 1$-$0 (b).

1641: For the line radiative transfer calculations, physical conditions in Figure 9 

1642: have been used, and the abundance profiles were adopted from Fig. 18. 

1643: For the H$^{13}$CO$^+$ abundance profile, the abundance ratio, 

1644: $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C$=77$ was assumed, and the HCO$^+$ abundance profile for

1645: HCO$^+$ 3$-$2 has been reduced by a factor of 2 from the profile seen in 

1646: Fig. 18.  The infall velocity profile is important to produce the broad wings 

1647: of CS 5$-$4, which traces very high densities. 

1648: The line wings of HCO$^+$ 3$-$2 and H$^{13}$CO$^+$ 1$-$0 may be also 

1649: affected by outflow, which is not considered in this modeling. }

1650: \end{figure}

1651: 

1652: \clearpage

1653: 

1654: \begin{figure}

1655: \figurenum{11}

1656: \epsscale{1.0}

1657: \plotone{fig11.ps}

1658: \vskip -8cm

1659: \caption{

1660: The centroid velocity distribution of HCN $1-0$ as observed from FCRAO

1661: overlaid onto its integrated intensity map. Centroid velocities were

1662: calculated by fitting the hyperfine structure of HCN $1-0$.  

1663: The interval of contours

1664: is 0.1 km s$^{-1}$ and numbers indicate local extrema of centroid velocity.

1665: The arrows indicate the directions of velocity gradients from blue to red.

1666: The uncertainty of fitting of the centroid velocity is less than 0.1 \kms.

1667: }

1668: \end{figure}

1669: 

1670: \clearpage

1671: 

1672: \begin{figure}

1673: \figurenum{12}

1674: \centering

1675:  \vspace*{6.5cm}

1676:    \leavevmode

1677:   \special{psfile=fig12.a.ps hoffset=-180 voffset=-75 hscale=45

1678:      vscale=45}

1679:   \special{psfile=fig12.b.ps hoffset=-200 voffset=-60 hscale=45

1680:      vscale=35 angle=-90}

1681: \vskip 3.60in

1682: \caption{

1683: (a) The integrated intensity contours overlaid onto the mean centroid velocity 

1684: image of the isolated component (F$=01-12$) of N$_2$H$^+$ 1$-$0 observed at

1685: the OVRO.

1686: The moments were calculated in channels with emission $> 2 \sigma$.

1687: The contours begin at 3 $\sigma$ and increase in steps of 3 $\sigma$, where 1 

1688: $\sigma$ is 1.5 K \kms. Crosses denote the positions of IRS1 and IRS2, and 

1689: the square-X symbols indicate the positions of SMA-N and SMA-S.

1690: The ellipse to the lower left represents the synthesized beam of the 

1691: N$_2$H$^+$ 1$-$0 observation. The overlaid line indicates the direction for the 

1692: position-velocity diagram in (b).

1693: (b) The position-velocity diagram of the isolated component along the cut that 

1694: centers at the emission peak,   

1695: $(\Delta \alpha, \Delta \delta)=(9\arcsec,-2\arcsec)$ with P.A.$=33\degree$.

1696: This cut is basically along the integrated intensity map elongated in the

1697: direction of northeast--southwest crossing the emission peak. 

1698: For these figures, the isolated component has been shifted in velocity by

1699: 8.0 \kms.

1700: The contours begin at 2 $\sigma$ and increase in steps of 2 $\sigma$, where 

1701: 1 $\sigma$ is 0.25 K beam$^{-1}$. 

1702: }

1703: \end{figure}

1704: 

1705: \clearpage

1706: 

1707: \begin{figure}

1708: \figurenum{13}

1709: \epsscale{1.0}

1710: \vskip -3cm

1711: \plotone{fig13.ps}

1712: \caption{

1713: Integrated intensities of red- and blueshifted emission of $^{12}$CO 2$-$1 

1714: overlaid onto the 1.3 mm continuum emission image observed at the SMA.

1715: Red and blue contours denote intensities calculated over 

1716: ``blue" and ``red" velocity ranges, respectively.  

1717: The same velocity ranges as in Figure 5 were used. 

1718: Numbers indicate positions of IRS1, IRS2, and IRS4. Two starless condensations

1719: are named SMA-N and SMA-S.  

1720: The ellipse to the upper left denotes the synthesized beam of the 

1721: CO 2$-$1 observation.

1722: The contours begin at 4 $\sigma$ and increase in steps of 4 $\sigma$, 

1723: where 1 $\sigma$ = 2.14 K \kms. 

1724: The grey scale range is $0.01-0.0275$ Jy beam$^{-1}$.

1725: }

1726: \end{figure}

1727: 

1728: \clearpage

1729: 

1730: \begin{figure}

1731: \figurenum{14}

1732: \vskip -2cm

1733: \plotone{fig14.ps}

1734: \caption{

1735: The channel map of redshifted emission of $^{12}$CO 2$-$1 observed at the SMA

1736: overlaid onto the integrated intensity image of N$_2$H$^+$ 1$-$0 observed at

1737: the OVRO.

1738: The contours begin at 6 $\sigma$ and increase in steps of 9 $\sigma$, 

1739: where 1 $\sigma$ is 0.36 K.

1740: The grey scale range is 1.5 K \kms\ to 15 K \kms.

1741: Two square-X symbols indicate the positions of SMA-N and SMA-S, 

1742: and crosses denote the positions of IRS1, IRS2, and IRS4.

1743: The ellipse to the lower right in each panel denotes the synthesized beam of

1744: the CO 2$-$1 observation.

1745: }

1746: \end{figure}

1747: 

1748: \clearpage

1749: 

1750: \begin{figure}

1751: \figurenum{15}

1752: \vskip -2cm

1753: \plotone{fig15.ps}

1754: \caption{

1755: The channel map of blueshifted emission of $^{12}$CO 2$-$1 observed at the SMA

1756: overlaid onto the integrated intensity image of N$_2$H$^+$ 1$-$0 observed at

1757: the OVRO.

1758: The contour levels and grey scale are the same as in Figure 14.

1759: }

1760: \end{figure}

1761: 

1762: \clearpage

1763: 

1764: \begin{figure}

1765: \figurenum{16}

1766: \vskip -4cm

1767: \plotone{fig16.ps}

1768: \caption{

1769: The channel map of blueshifted emission of HCO$^+$ 1$-$0 observed at the OVRO.

1770: Symbols are the same as in Figure 14 and 15.

1771: The contours begin at 2 $\sigma$ and increase in steps of 2 $\sigma$, where

1772: 1 $\sigma$ = 0.22 K.

1773: }

1774: \end{figure}

1775: 

1776: \clearpage

1777: 

1778: \begin{figure}

1779: \figurenum{17}

1780: \vskip -7cm

1781: \plotone{fig17.ps}

1782: \caption{

1783: A possible explanation of the origin of each outflow. 

1784: The grey image is the same as that in Figure 13.

1785: Black and white numbers denote the positions of IRS1, IRS2, and IRS4. 

1786: Red and blue lobes describe the red and blue components each outflow

1787: identified in the channel maps of CO 2$-$1 and HCO$^+$ 1$-$0 observed at the

1788: SMA and the OVRO, respectively.

1789: Red and blue numbers and texts indicate the red- and blueshifted lobes 

1790: originated from their corresponding sources.

1791: }

1792: \end{figure}

1793: 

1794: \clearpage

1795: 

1796: \begin{figure}

1797: \figurenum{18}

1798: \plotone{fig18.ps}

1799: \caption{

1800: Abundance profiles of various molecules observed for this study. 

1801: The profiles have been calculated 

1802: using an evolutionary chemical model (Lee et al. 2004) defined on the basis 

1803: of the physical parameters of L1251B.  Two vertical lines indicate the infall 

1804: radius of the inside-out collapse and the radius where CO starts to evaporate.

1805: Profiles are shifted up and down for easier comparisons, so the ordinate gives 

1806: correct abundance of only CO.  Abundances of CS and H$_2$CO are shifted up by 

1807: 3.0 and 0.2 orders of magnitude respectively, while those of HCN, N$_2$H$^+$, 

1808: and HCO$^+$ are shifted down by 1.0, 2.5, and 6.0 orders of magnitude 

1809: respectively. 

1810: }

1811: \end{figure}

1812: 

1813: 

1814: \end{document}

1815: 

1816: