1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \documentclass{emulateapj}
3:
4: \newcommand{\kms}{km\,s$^{-1}$}
5: \newcommand{\sqcm}{cm$^{-2}$}
6: \newcommand{\lya}{Lyman-$\alpha$}
7: \newcommand{\lyb}{Lyman-$\beta$}
8: \newcommand{\lyg}{Lyman-$\gamma$}
9: \newcommand{\hi}{\ion{H}{1}} \newcommand{\hw}{\ion{H}{2}}
10: \newcommand{\os}{\ion{O}{6}} \newcommand{\cf}{\ion{C}{4}}
11: \newcommand{\sif}{\ion{Si}{4}} \newcommand{\nf}{\ion{N}{5}}
12: \newcommand{\pf}{\ion{P}{5}} \newcommand{\sit}{\ion{Si}{3}}
13: \newcommand{\ct}{\ion{C}{3}} \newcommand{\siw}{\ion{Si}{2}}
14: \newcommand{\cw}{\ion{C}{2}} \newcommand{\oi}{\ion{O}{1}}
15: \newcommand{\few}{\ion{Fe}{2}} \newcommand{\alw}{\ion{Al}{2}}
16: \newcommand{\cts}{\ion{C}{2}$^*$} \newcommand{\alth}{\ion{Al}{3}}
17: \newcommand{\feth}{\ion{Fe}{3}}
18: \newcommand{\tm}{\tablenotemark}
19: \newcommand{\tn}{\tablenotetext}
20: \newcommand{\nhi}{$N_{\rm H\,I}$}
21: \newcommand{\nhw}{$N_{\rm H\,II}$}
22:
23: \begin{document}
24:
25: \title{Multiphase plasma in Sub-Damped Lyman-Alpha Systems: A Hidden
26: Metal Reservoir\footnote{Based on observations taken under programme
27: IDs 072.A-0442(A) and 078.A-0164(A) with the Ultraviolet and Visual
28: Echelle Spectrograph (UVES) on the Very Large Telescope (VLT) Unit 2
29: (Kueyen) at Paranal, Chile, operated by ESO.}}
30:
31: \author{Andrew J. Fox\altaffilmark{1}, Patrick Petitjean\altaffilmark{1,2},
32: C\'edric Ledoux\altaffilmark{3}, And Raghunathan Srianand\altaffilmark{4}}
33: \altaffiltext{1}{Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris,
34: UMR 7095 CNRS, Universit\'e Pierre et Marie Curie,
35: 98bis, Boulevard Arago, 75014 Paris, France; fox@iap.fr}
36: \altaffiltext{2}{LERMA, Observatoire de Paris,
37: 61 Avenue de l'Observatoire, 75014 Paris, France; ppetitje@iap.fr}
38: \altaffiltext{3}{European Southern Observatory, Alonso de C\'ordova
39: 3107, Casilla 19001, Vitacura, Santiago 19, Chile; cledoux@eso.org}
40: \altaffiltext{4}{IUCAA, Post Bag 4, Ganesh Khind, Pune 411 007, India;
41: anand@iucaa.ernet.in}
42: \shorttitle{Fox et al.}
43: \shortauthors{Plasma in a Sub-DLA}
44:
45: \begin{abstract}
46: We present a VLT/UVES spectrum of a proximate sub-damped \lya\
47: (sub-DLA) system at $z_{\rm abs}=2.65618$ toward the quasar Q0331-4505
48: ($z_{\rm qso}=2.6785\!\pm\!0.0030$).
49: Absorption lines of \oi, \siw, \sit, \sif, \cw, \ct, \cf, \few, \alw, and \os\
50: are seen in the sub-DLA, which has a neutral hydrogen column
51: density log\,$N_{\rm H\,I}=19.82\pm0.05$. The absorber is at a velocity of
52: $1\,820\pm250$\,\kms\ from the quasar; however, its low
53: metallicity [O/H]=$-1.64\pm0.07$, lack of partial coverage, lack of
54: temporal variations between observations taken in 2003 and 2006, and
55: non-detection of \nf\ imply the absorber is not a genuine intrinsic system.
56: By measuring the \os\ column density and assuming equal metallicities
57: in the neutral and ionized gas, we determine the column density of hot
58: ionized hydrogen in this sub-DLA, and in two other sub-DLAs with \os\ drawn
59: from the literature. Coupling this with determinations of
60: the typical amount of warm ionized hydrogen in sub-DLAs,
61: we confirm that sub-DLAs are a more important metal
62: reservoir than DLAs, in total comprising at least
63: 6--22\% of the metal budget at $z\approx2.5$. %*
64: \end{abstract}
65: \keywords{intergalactic medium -- quasars: absorption lines --
66: galaxies: halos -- galaxies: high-redshift}
67:
68: \section{Introduction}
69: Highly ionized gas is ubiquitous in galactic halos at high redshift.
70: This is known from the detection of \cf\ and \os\ absorption in
71: damped \lya\ \citep[DLA, i.e. systems with
72: log\,$N_{\rm H\,I}\!>\!20.3$;][]{Le98, WP00, Fo07a, Fo07b}
73: and sub-DLAs \citep[systems with 19.0$<$log\,$N_{\rm
74: H\,I}\!<\!20.3$;][]{DZ03, Pe03, Pe07}.
75: These studies have found that \cf\ is present in every DLA where data
76: exists, and that \os\ absorption, tracing a hotter phase of gas, is
77: present in at least 40\% of DLAs. Detections of \cf\ and \os\
78: absorption have also been reported \citep{Be94, KT97, KT99} in Lyman
79: Limit Systems (LLSs), a lower \hi\ column density class of QSO
80: absorber that may be tracing the extended outer regions of
81: galactic halos.
82:
83: Physically, there are two principal processes that are expected to
84: generate hot plasma in galactic halos. The first is star formation,
85: which leads to supernovae and the subsequent production of hot,
86: shock-heated interstellar gas, possibly in the form of winds
87: \citep{OD06, KR07, Fa07}. The second is accretion, which results in
88: the shock-heating of infalling intergalactic gas to temperatures of
89: 10$^{5-7}$\,K \citep{Da01, FB03, Ka05}. Given the low metallicities and low
90: densities expected in these hot halo environments, the cooling times
91: will be very long ($\gtrsim10^{10}$\,yr for gas at $T=10^6$\,K, 0.01 solar
92: metallicity, and $n=10^{-3}$\,cm$^{-3}$), enabling metals to become
93: locked up. Indeed, approximately half of the metals produced in stars
94: by a redshift of two are yet to be observed \citep{Bo05, Bo06, Bo07,
95: SF07}, and hot halos represent a potential harbor for these metals.
96:
97: It has recently become apparent that sub-damped \lya\ systems
98: (sub-DLAs, with $19.0\!<\!{\rm log}\,N_{\rm H\,I}\!<\!20.3$, also known as a
99: Super-LLSs) play a significant role in the metal budget
100: \citep{Pe05, Pe07, Pr06, Ku07}, but
101: the contribution of the \os-phase in sub-DLAs has
102: not been studied before; indeed, we are aware of only one other
103: published detection of \os\ in a sub-DLA \citep{Si02}.
104: We present in this paper
105: observations and ionization modelling of a sub-DLA showing
106: a detection of \os.
107:
108: \section{Observations}
109: The spectra of QSO \object{Q0331-4505} were taken with the
110: Ultraviolet-Visual Echelle Spectrograph \citep[UVES;][]{De00} at the
111: 8.2m Very Large Telescope Unit 2 (VLT/UT2) at Paranal, Chile during
112: observing runs in 2003 and 2006. The data reduction was performed
113: using the UVES pipeline described in \citet{Ba00}.
114: The spectra were co-added in wavelength regions covered in both runs,
115: and have a spectral resolution (FWHM) of 6.6\,\kms\ ($R$=45\,000).
116:
117: A strong \lya\ absorber exists in the spectrum at $z_{\rm abs}=2.65618$.
118: This redshift is measured using the velocity of the strongest component of
119: absorption in \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$1304, and defines the
120: velocity zero-point in the following discussion.
121: Using a Voigt profile fit to the damping wings of the \lya\ line, we find
122: log\,$N_{\rm H\,I}=19.82\pm0.05$, identifying the absorber as a sub-DLA.
123: In Figure 1 we show the absorption line profiles of \oi, \cw, \siw,
124: \few, \alw, \feth, \ct, \sit, \sif, \cf, and \os, which all show
125: detections in the sub-DLA. No \cts, \alth, or \nf\ absorption is seen.
126: Both lines of the \os\ doublet display identical optical
127: depth profiles over a velocity range of 175\,\kms, verifying the
128: genuine detection of \os\ absorption, free from blending with the
129: \lya\ forest. Voigt profile fits were conducted
130: using the VPFIT software package\footnote
131: {Available at http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/$\sim$rfc/vpfit.html},
132: and are included in Figure 1.
133: The fits to each ion were completely independent.
134: A summary of the key properties of the sub-DLA is given in Table 1.
135: \input{tab1.tex}
136:
137: \begin{figure*}
138: \epsscale{1.2}
139: \plotone{f1.eps}
140: \caption{VLT/UVES spectra of neutral, low-ion, and high-ion absorption
141: in the sub-DLA at $z_{\rm abs}=2.65618$ toward Q0331-4505.
142: This redshift, where the strongest component of low-ion
143: absorption falls, defines the zero-point of the velocity scale.
144: Our overall Voigt component fits to each profile are shown with
145: solid red lines. Vertical dashed lines illustrate the positions of the
146: three low-ion components (C1, C2, and C3) and two high-ion
147: components (H1 and H2).
148: Note that in some panels, the profiles are shown over a limited
149: y-range, for clarity.
150: We have shaded the \cf\ and \os\ panels to highlight the different
151: structure in the high-ion absorption profiles.}
152: \end{figure*}
153:
154: We identify three principal components of low-ion absorption,
155: at $-$55, 0, and 20\,\kms, which we name C1, C2, and C3,
156: respectively. C2 is the strongest component. C3 is implied by the need to
157: fit the positive-velocity wing of the low-ion lines, but its
158: column density is relatively low, so we ignore it in the following
159: discussion. C1 and C2 are all seen in \oi, \siw, \alw, \few, \cw, \ct,
160: \sit, and \sif, and \cf.
161: We also identify two components of high-ion absorption seen in
162: \os\ and \cf, at $-$100 and $-$60\,\kms, which we designate H1 and H2,
163: respectively. The \cf\ seen near $-$60\,\kms\ may have
164: contributions from both H2 and C1.
165:
166: \section{Proximity to the Quasar}
167: Proximate absorbers separated from the background quasar by
168: d$v\!<$5\,000\,\kms\ [sometimes d$v\!<$3\,000\,\kms, where
169: d$v$=$c|z_{\rm qso}\!-\!z_{\rm abs}|/(1\!+\!z_{\rm abs})$] are
170: often removed from samples of intervening absorbers because they may
171: be either ejected or ionized (or both) by the QSO itself
172: \citep{We79, Fo86}.
173: We measured the observed wavelengths of the \ion{N}{5}, \ion{O}{1},
174: \cf, \ion{He}{2}, and \ion{C}{3}] QSO emission lines in the
175: \object{Q0331-4505} spectrum, and derived the QSO redshift by
176: accounting for the average velocities of these lines (relative to the
177: systemic redshift) as listed in \citet{TF92}.
178: This yielded $z_{\rm qso}=2.6785\!\pm\!0.0030$\footnote{Improving
179: the estimate of $z_{\rm qso}$=2.6 by \citet{Ma93}.},
180: implying the sub-DLA is separated from the quasar by a velocity of
181: d$v=1\,820\!\pm\!250$\,\kms. %*
182: Assuming a WMAP 3-year cosmology
183: \citep[$H_0$=73\,\kms\,Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_{\rm M}$=0.24,
184: $\Omega_{\Lambda}$=0.76;][]{Sp07},
185: we use the relation given in \citet{Ph02} to find that
186: the Hubble parameter at $z=2.65$ is $H(2.65)$=257\,\kms\,Mpc$^{-1}$.
187: Therefore, assuming the sub-DLA motion is
188: purely due to Hubble flow (i.e., ignoring peculiar velocities), we
189: find a separation of $\approx7.1$\,Mpc from the quasar. %*
190:
191: Despite the proximity to the quasar,
192: several lines of evidence suggest this sub-DLA is \emph{not}
193: an intrinsic system arising near the central engine of the AGN:
194: (1) the metallicity is too low \citep{Pe94};
195: (2) \nf, which is expected in intrinsic systems \citep{Ha97}, is not
196: detected;
197: (3) no excited states (e.g. \ion{C}{2}$^*$ or \ion{Si}{2}$^*$) are
198: seen in absorption, as
199: would be detected in intrinsic absorbers \citep[e.g.][]{Sr00};
200: (4) there is no evidence of partial coverage of the background source,
201: which is found in intrinsic absorbers \citep{Ar05};
202: (5) there is no evidence for temporal variability between our two
203: observation epochs in 2003 and 2006.
204:
205: \section{Metallicity and Photoionization Modelling}
206: We use the \oi/\hi\ ratio to determine the metallicity of the
207: gas. Under interstellar conditions, \oi\ is thought to follow \hi\
208: closely due to charge exchange reactions \citep{FS71},
209: implying that the \oi/\hi\ ratio accurately determines
210: O/H without having to apply ionization corrections.
211: Using a Voigt profile fit to \oi\ $\lambda$1302 and
212: $\lambda$1039, we find log\,$N$(\oi)=14.84$\pm$0.05 %*
213: (total over the three components). %*
214: Coupling this with log\,$N$(\hi)=19.82$\pm$0.05, we find
215: [\oi/\hi]=[O/H]=$-$1.64$\pm$0.07\footnote{Throughout this paper we use
216: the solar oxygen abundance (O/H)$_\odot=10^{-3.34}$ from
217: \citet{As04}.}
218:
219: To determine the ionization balance in the photoionized gas,
220: we ran a grid of CLOUDY \citep[version C06.02, described in][]{Fe98}
221: photoionization models to component C2 at different
222: ionization parameter $U\equiv n_{\gamma}/n_{\rm H}$.
223: The models assume the gas exists in a plane-parallel, uniform slab, and take
224: the metallicity [O/H] and $N_{\rm HI}$ as fixed inputs.
225: We assume the fraction of the total \hi\ column that exists in C2 is
226: the same as the fraction of the total \oi\ column in C2, which is 86\%.
227: To specify the radiation field, we take an unattenuated quasar
228: (QSO) spectrum, i.e. a power-law with the form
229: $F_\nu\propto\nu^{-1.5}$ at $\lambda\!<$1216\,\AA\ \citep{HM96}
230: normalized by the measured QSO
231: $V$-band magnitude of 17.9 and $z_{\rm qso}=2.6785$, which yield a total
232: QSO luminosity at the Lyman Limit
233: $L_{912}$=$1.2\times10^{31}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$\,Hz$^{-1}$
234: when extrapolating the $V$-band flux as described in \citet{Gu07}.
235: Making use of the QSO-absorber luminosity distance of 7.1\,Mpc, we
236: then find that the flux of ionizing radiation from the QSO at the
237: absorber is
238: $F_{912}$=$2.0\!\times\!10^{-21}$\,erg\,cm$^{-2}$\,s$^{-1}$\,Hz$^{-1}$, %*
239: \emph{lower} than the extragalactic background (EGB) at $z$=2.65, which
240: has $F_{912}$=$9.6\!\times\!10^{-21}$\,erg\,cm$^{-2}$\,s$^{-1}$\,Hz$^{-1}$
241: \citep{HM96}.
242: The QSO radiation field contains more high-energy photons
243: than the EGB, boosting the production of \sif\ and \cf, so the
244: radiation field we use in the CLOUDY modelling includes both the EGB
245: and the normalized QSO contribution.
246:
247: We found the value of log\,$U$ that matches the \sif/\siw\ column
248: density ratio measured in C2. This value, log\,$U$=$-$3.32$\pm$0.10, %*
249: also matches the observed \oi\ column density. We then found that
250: [C/O]=$-$0.3 was necessary to reproduce the column densities of \cw\
251: and (within a 2$\sigma$ error) \cf. Finally we checked that the model
252: is consistent with the \ct\ and \sit\ lower limits. This model is
253: shown in Figure 2 and is characterized by a hydrogen ionization
254: fraction $x_{\rm H}$=0.64, %*
255: and an ionized hydrogen column density log\,$N_{\rm H\,II}$=20.00. %*
256: We assume the same conditions apply in C1 and C3, giving a total
257: log\,$N_{\rm Warm\,H\,II}$=20.06. %*
258:
259: \begin{figure}
260: \epsscale{1.15}
261: \plotone{f2.eps}
262: \caption{CLOUDY photoionization modelling of component C2, assuming
263: the radiation field has contributions from both the quasar and the
264: extragalactic background. Each series of connected symbols shows the
265: predicted column density of a given ion as a function of ionization
266: parameter (or equivalently, gas density, which increases to the
267: left). The observations are shown in red, plotted at the density
268: of the best-fit model.}
269: \end{figure}
270:
271: The ionization level we derive in the low-ion phase (64\%) %*
272: is no larger than the levels derived in intervening sub-DLAs by other authors
273: \citep{Pr99, Pe07}, reinforcing the idea that this sub-DLA does not
274: show unusual properties because of its proximity to the quasar.
275: The idea that many proximate DLAs (and by extension
276: sub-DLAs) may be representative of the intervening population has been
277: proposed before \citep[e.g.][]{Mo98}, though see \citet{Pr07}.
278:
279: \section{A Highly Ionized Plasma Phase}
280: The \os\ and \cf\ profiles are clearly different from the low-ion
281: profiles, with the strongest high-ion component (H1) separated by
282: 100\,\kms\ from the strongest low-ion component.
283: \os\ and \cf\ show similar profiles at $-$150 to $-$100\,\kms, but
284: the \os\ absorption is smoother and broader than the
285: \cf\ in the range $-$100 to 0\,\kms. This can be seen in Figure 3,
286: where we compare the apparent column density profiles of
287: the two ions.
288: The difference in the profiles implies that the \os\ and \cf\ are not
289: fully co-spatial, i.e. the two ions trace different temperature
290: regions of a multi-phase structure\footnote{Similar differences
291: between the profiles of \cf\ and \os\ have been found before in many
292: other environments, including the Milky Way halo \citep{Fo03},
293: the Large Magellanic Cloud \citep{LH07}, LLSs \citep{KT97, KT99},
294: DLAs \citep{Fo07a}, and some intergalactic absorbers \citep{Si02}.}.
295: We derive a lower limit on $N_{\rm H\,II}$ in the \os-bearing gas
296: using $N_{\rm Hot~H\,II}=N_{\rm O\,VI}/(f_{\rm O\,VI}{\rm O/H})$,
297: with an \os\ ionization fraction $f_{\rm O\,VI}=0.2$
298: \citep[the maximum allowed by collisional ionization models; see the
299: Appendix in][]{TS00}
300: and assuming that O/H in the high-ionization gas is the same
301: as O/H in the low-ionization gas. This method yields
302: log\,$N_{\rm Hot\,H\,II}>$20.09 (total over H1 and H2).
303:
304: \begin{figure}
305: \epsscale{1.2}
306: \plotone{f3.eps}
307: \caption{Comparison of apparent column density profiles of \cf\ and
308: \os\ in the sub-DLA. Both ions show similar profiles at $-$150 to
309: $-$100\,\kms, but the \os\ absorption is smoother and broader than the
310: \cf\ in the range $-$100 to 0\,\kms.}
311: \end{figure}
312:
313: To explore how the \os\ properties of our sub-DLA relate to other systems,
314: we investigated the only intervening sub-DLA with a published \os\
315: detection: the system at $z_{\rm abs}=2.439$ toward
316: \object{Q1442+2931} \citep{Si02}, and the previously unpublished
317: \os\ profile in the sub-DLA at $z_{\rm abs}$=2.139 toward \object{Q1037-270}
318: \citep{Sr01}. The three sub-DLAs are described in Table 2.
319: Following the same calculation as used here,
320: the ratio $N_{\rm Hot H\,II}/N_{\rm H\,I}$ takes the value
321: $>$12 in the \object{Q1442+2931} sub-DLA, and
322: $>$1.0 in the \object{Q1037-270} sub-DLA,
323: vs $>$1.9 for the sub-DLA in this paper. %*
324: From this we conclude that
325: (i) in sub-DLAs, there are more baryons in the \os\ phase than there
326: are in the form of \hi\ atoms, and
327: (ii) there is no evidence that radiation from the quasar is creating
328: more \os\ in the \object{Q0331-4505} sub-DLA than in intervening
329: sub-DLAs.
330:
331: \section{Contribution of Sub-DLAs to $\Omega$}
332: The latest determination of the cosmic density in \hi\ atoms in
333: sub-DLAs is $\Omega_{\rm H\,I}^{\rm sub\,DLA}$=$1.5\times10^{-4}$
334: \citep{OM07}.
335: In order to fully account for the contribution of ionized gas in
336: sub-DLAs, it is necessary to determine the average ionized-to-neutral ratio
337: $\langle N_{\rm Total\,H\,II}/N_{\rm H\,I}\rangle$, where
338: $N_{\rm Total\,H\,II}=N_{\rm Warm\,H\,II}+N_{\rm Hot\,H\,II}$.
339: The value of $N_{\rm Warm\,H\,II}/N_{\rm H\,I}$ has been
340: investigated by \citet{Pe07}, who report a mean ionization fraction of
341: 0.68 in 26 sub-DLAs modelled with CLOUDY, corresponding to
342: $\langle N_{\rm Warm\,H\,II}/N_{\rm H\,I} \rangle$=2.1.
343: The value of the $N_{\rm Hot\,H\,II}/N_{\rm H\,I}$ is not well
344: constrained: as discussed in \S5, the derived values in the three
345: existing sub-DLAs with \os\ are $>$1.0, $>$1.9 and $>$12.
346: Assuming that the mean $N_{\rm Hot\,H\,II}/N_{\rm H\,I}$ in sub-DLAs
347: lies somewhere between these measurements, we find that
348: $\langle N_{\rm Total\,H\,II}/N_{\rm H\,I} \rangle$ is between 3.1 and 14. %*
349: Thus, the total baryon content of sub-DLAs
350: $\Omega_{\rm H\,I+H\,II}^{\rm sub\,DLA}=
351: (1+\langle N_{\rm Total\,H\,II}/N_{\rm H\,I} \rangle)
352: \Omega_{\rm H\,I}^{\rm sub\,DLA}$ is between
353: $6.1\times10^{-4}$ and $2.2\times10^{-3}$. %*
354:
355: The total contribution of sub-DLAs to the metal budget then follows
356: according to:
357: $\Omega_{Z,{\rm H\,I+H\,II}}^{\rm sub\,DLA}=\langle{\rm Z/H}\rangle
358: \Omega_{\rm H\,I+H\,II}^{\rm sub\,DLA}$.
359: Assuming a typical sub-DLA metallicity of
360: $\langle[{\rm Z/H}]\rangle$=$-$0.8 \citep{Ku07},
361: then $\Omega_{Z,{\rm H\,I+H\,II}}^{\rm sub\,DLA}$
362: is between $1.8\times10^{-6}$ and $6.7\times10^{-6}$, %*
363: i.e between 6\% and 22\% of all the metals produced by star formation up to
364: $z\approx2$ \citep*[using a value for the total $\Omega_Z$ from star
365: formation of $3.0\times10^{-5}$;][]{Fe05}. %*
366: For comparison, $\Omega_{Z,{\rm H\,I+H\,II}}^{\rm DLA}\approx6\times10^{-7}$
367: \citep*[including both the neutral and highly ionized phases;][]{Pr05, Fo07a}.
368: This calculation shows that globally there are at least three times
369: more metal atoms in sub-DLAs than DLAs, owing to both the higher mean
370: metallicity and the higher mean ionization level in sub-DLAs. %*
371:
372: There are several reasons why this estimate of $\Omega_{Z}$ in sub-DLAs
373: could rise. First, recent detections of sub-DLAs
374: with super-solar metallicity \citep{Kh04, Pr06, Pe06} may imply
375: the mean sub-DLA metallicity is higher than $-$0.8.
376: Second, the typical temperature of the \os-bearing gas in sub-DLAs
377: may be above $3\!\times10^5$\,K, implying the \os\ ionization fraction will be
378: lower than 0.2 \citep{SD93}.
379: Finally, if the \os-bearing gas was generated by the accretion and
380: shock-heating of intergalactic gas, the ionized gas may have lower
381: metallicity than the neutral gas (increasing $N_{\rm Hot\,H\,II}$).
382: Each of these effects would serve to increase $\Omega_{Z}$ above the 6--22\%
383: level discussed here.
384:
385: \acknowledgments
386: AJF gratefully acknowledges support from a Marie Curie Intra-European
387: Fellowship awarded by the European Union Sixth Framework Programme.
388: We thank Bart Wakker for help in implementing CLOUDY, and Robert Simcoe
389: for clarifying the properties of the Q1442+2931 sub-DLA.
390:
391: \begin{thebibliography}{}
392: \bibitem[Arav et al.(2005)]{Ar05} % Covering Factor
393: Arav, N., et al. 2005, \apj, 620, 665
394: %Arav, N., Kaastra, J., Kriss, G. A., Korista, K. T., Gabel, J., \&
395: %Proga, D. 2005, \apj, 620, 665
396:
397: \bibitem[Asplund et al.(2004)]{As04} % Solar O/H
398: Asplund, M., et al. 2004, \aap, 417, 751
399: %Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., Allende Prieto, C.,
400: %Kiselman, D. 2004, \aap, 417, 751
401:
402: \bibitem[Ballester et al.(2000)]{Ba00} % UVES reduction pipeline
403: Ballester, P., et al. 2002, The Messenger, 101, 31
404: %Ballester, P., Modigliani, A., Boitquin, O., Cristiani, S., Hanuschik,
405: %R., Kaufer, A., \& Wolf, S. 2000, The Messenger, 101, 31
406:
407: \bibitem[Bergeron et al.(1994)]{Be94} % O VI in LLS
408: Bergeron, J., et al. 1994, \apj, 436, 33
409:
410: \bibitem[Bouch\'e et al.(2005)]{Bo05} %MMP in Galaxies
411: Bouch\'e, N., Lehnert, M. D., \& P\'eroux, C. 2005, \mnras, 364, 319
412:
413: \bibitem[Bouch\'e et al.(2006)]{Bo06} %MMP in Galaxies
414: Bouch\'e, N., Lehnert, M. D., \& P\'eroux, C. 2006, \mnras, 367, L16
415:
416: \bibitem[Bouch\'e et al.(2007)]{Bo07} %MMP in Galaxies
417: Bouch\'e, N., et al. 2007, \mnras, 378, 525
418: %Bouch\'e, N., Lehnert, M. D., Aguirre, A., P\'eroux, C., \& Bergeron,
419: %J. 2007, \mnras, 378, 525
420:
421: \bibitem[Dav\'e et al.(2001)]{Da01} % Hydro code,30%of z=0baryons in WHIGM
422: Dav\'e, R., et al. 2001, \apj, 552, 473
423:
424: \bibitem[Dekker et al.(2000)]{De00}
425: %UVES design
426: Dekker, H, et al. 2000, SPIE, 4008, 534
427: %Dekker, H., D'Odorico, S., Kaufer, A., Delabre, B., \& Kotzlowski,
428: %H. 2000, SPIE, 4008, 534
429:
430: \bibitem[Dessauges-Zavadsky et al.(2003)]{DZ03}
431: %Sub-DLA sample, CLOUDY models: fraction of HI ionized = subDLA Paper 1
432: Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., et al. 2003, \mnras, 345, 447
433: %Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., P\'eroux, C., Kim, T.-S., D'Odorico, S. \&
434: %McMahon, R. G. 2003, \mnras, 345, 447
435:
436: %\bibitem[Ellison et al.(2002)]{El02}
437: % PRoximate DLAs
438: %Ellison, S. L., et al. 2002, \aap, 383, 91
439: %Ellison, S. L., Yan, L., Hook, I. M., Pettini, M., Wall, J. V., \&
440: %Shaver, P. 2002, \aap, 383, 91
441:
442: \bibitem[Fang \& Bryan(2003)]{FB03}
443: % WHIM SIM
444: Fang, T., \& Bryan, G. L. 2003, \apj, 561, L31
445:
446: \bibitem[Fangano et al.(2007)]{Fa07}
447: % Wind Signatrues in Absorption Fangano, A. P. M.,
448: Fangano, A. , Ferrara, A., \& Richter, P. 2007, \mnras,
449: submitted %(astro-ph/0704.2143)
450:
451: \bibitem[Ferland et al.(1998)]{Fe98} % CLOUDY
452: Ferland, G. J., et al. 1998, \pasp, 110, 761
453: %Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., Verner, D. A., Ferguson, J. W., Kingdon,
454: %J. B., \& Verner, E. M. 1998, \pasp, 110, 761
455:
456: \bibitem[Ferrara, Scannapieco, \& Bergeron(2005)Ferrara et al.]{Fe05}
457: % Theoretical paper on Missing Metals:hiding in hot IGM at high z
458: Ferrara, A., Scannapieco, E., \& Bergeron, J. 2005, ApJ, 634, L37
459:
460: \bibitem[Field \& Steigman(1971)]{FS71}
461: Field, G. B., \& Steigman, G. 1971, \apj, 166, 59
462:
463: \bibitem[Foltz et al.(1986)]{Fo86}
464: % Definintion of 5000 km\s cutoff for assoc systems
465: Foltz, C. B, et al. 1986, \apj, 307, 504
466: %Foltz, C. B, Weymann, R. J., Peterson, B. M., Sun, L., Malkan, M. A.,
467: %\& Chaffee, F. H. 1986, \apj, 307, 504
468:
469: \bibitem[Fox et al.(2003)]{Fo03} % CIV/OVI mismatch, Gal halo
470: Fox, A. J., et al. 2003, \apj, 582, 793
471: %Fox, A. J., Savage, B. D., Sembach, K. R., Fabian, D., Richter, P.,
472: %Meyer, D. M., Lauroesch, J., \& Howk, J. C. 2003, \apj, 582, 793
473:
474: \bibitem[Fox et al.(2007a)]{Fo07a} % OVI in DLAs
475: Fox, A. J., et al. 2007a, \aap, 465, 171
476: %Fox, A. J., Petitjean, P., Ledoux, C., \& Srianand, R. 2007a, \aap,
477: %465, 171
478:
479: \bibitem[Fox et al.(2007b)]{Fo07b} % CIV in DLAs
480: Fox, A. J., et al. 2007b, \aap, in press (astro-ph/0707.4065)
481: %Fox, A. J., Ledoux, C., Petitjean, P., \& Srianand, R. 2007b, \aap,
482: %in press (astro-ph/0707.4065)
483:
484: \bibitem[Guimar\~aes et al.(2007)]{Gu07}
485: % Ionizing flux from quasar
486: Guimar\~aes, R. et al. 2007, \mnras, 377, 657
487: %Guimar\~aes, R., Petitjean, P., Rollinde, E., de Carvalho, R. R.,
488: %Djorgovski, S. G., Srianand, R., Aghaee, A. , \& Castro, S. 2007,
489: %\mnras, 377, 657
490:
491: \bibitem[Haardt \& Madau(1996)]{HM96} %EGB models
492: Haardt, F., \& Madau, P. 1996, \apj, 461, 20
493:
494: \bibitem[Hamann(1997)]{Ha97} % Ionization in Associated Systems
495: Hamann, F. 1997, \apjs, 109, 279
496:
497: \bibitem[Kang et al.(2005)]{Ka05} % New WHIM models
498: Kang, H., Ryu, D., Cen, R., \& Song, D. 2005, \apj, 620, 21
499:
500: \bibitem[Kawata \& Rauch(2007)]{KR07}
501: %Galactic Wind Signatures around High Redshift Galaxies
502: Kawata, D., \& Rauch, M. 2007, \apj, 663, 38
503:
504: \bibitem[Khare et al.(2004)]{Kh04} %Hi Z sub-DLA
505: Khare, P., et al. 2004, \apj, 616, 86
506: %Khare, P., Kulkarni, V. P., Lauroesch, J. T., York, D. G., Crotts,
507: %A. P. S., Nakamura, O. 2004, \apj, 616, 86
508:
509: \bibitem[Kirkman \& Tytler(1997)]{KT97} % OVI and CIV in LLS I
510: Kirkman, D., \& Tytler, D. 1997, \apj, 489, L123
511:
512: \bibitem[Kirkman \& Tytler(1999)]{KT99} % OVI and CIV in LLS II
513: Kirkman, D., \& Tytler, D. 1999, \apj, 512, L5
514:
515: \bibitem[Kulkarni et al.(2007)]{Ku07}
516: % Sub-DLAs contain 25% and maybe higher of metal budget
517: Kulkarni, V. P., et al. 2007, \apj, 661, L88
518: %Kulkarni, V. P., Khare, P., P\'eroux, C., York, D. G., Lauroesch,
519: %J. T., Meiring, J. D. 2007, \apj, 661, L88
520:
521: \bibitem[Ledoux et al.(1998)]{Le98}
522: % Early analysis of C IV vs neutral line width
523: Ledoux, C., et al. 1998, \aap, 337, 51
524: %Ledoux, C., Petitjean, P., Bergeron, J., Wampler, E. J., \& Srianand,
525: %R. 1998, \aap, 337, 51
526:
527: \bibitem[Lehner \& Howk(2007)]{LH07} % C IV/O VI diff in LMC
528: Lehner, N., \& Howk, J. C. 2007, \mnras, 377, 687
529:
530: \bibitem[Maza et al.(1993)]{Ma93}
531: Maza, J., et al. 1993, RMxAA, 25, 51
532: %Maza, J., Ruiz, M. T., Gonzalez, L. E., Wischnjewsky, M., \& Antezana,
533: %Roberto 1993, RMxAA, 25, 51
534:
535: \bibitem[Moller et al.(1998)Moller, Warren, \& Fynbo]{Mo98}
536: % Proximate absorption systems
537: Moller, P., Warren, S., \& Fynbo, J. 1998, \aap, 330, 19
538: %Moller, P., Warren, S. J., \& Fynbo, J. U.
539:
540: \bibitem[O'Meara et al.(2007)]{OM07}
541: % Lyman Limit System: complete study in SDSS
542: O'Meara, J. M., et al. 2007, \apj, 656, 666
543: %O'Meara, J. M., Prochaska, J. X., Burles, S., Prochter, G., Bernstein,
544: %R. A., \& Burgess, K. M. 2007, \apj, 656, 666
545:
546: \bibitem[Oppenheimer \& Dav\'e(2006)]{OD06}
547: % Wind simulations of IGM metal enrichment
548: Oppenheimer, B., \& Dav\'e, R. 2006, \mnras, 373, 1265
549:
550: \bibitem[P\'eroux et al.(2003)]{Pe03}
551: % =subDLA paper 2: kinematic and chemical properties
552: P\'eroux, C, et al. 2003, \mnras, 345, 480
553: %P\'eroux, C., Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., D'Odorico, S., Kim, T.-S., \&
554: %McMahon, R. G. 2003, \mnras, 345, 480
555:
556: \bibitem[P\'eroux et al.(2005)]{Pe05}
557: % =subDLA paper 3: total omega in neutral gas in DLAs/subDLAs
558: P\'eroux, C., et al. 2005, \mnras, 363, 479
559: %P\'eroux, C., Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., D'Odorico, S., Kim, T.-S., \&
560: %McMahon, R. G. 2005, \mnras, 363, 479
561:
562: \bibitem[P\'eroux et al.(2006)]{Pe06} % Super-solar sub DLA
563: P\'eroux, C., et al. 2006, \aap, 450, 53
564: %P\'eroux, C., Kulkarni, V. P., Meiring, J., Ferlet, R., Khare, P.,
565: %Lauroesch, J. T., Vladilo, G., \& York, D. G. 2006, \aap, 450, 53
566:
567: \bibitem[P\'eroux et al.(2007)]{Pe07}
568: % =subDLA paper 4: global metallicity evolution
569: P\'eroux, C., et al. 2007, \mnras, in press (astro-ph/0707.2697)
570: %P\'eroux, C., Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., D'Odorico, S., Kim, T.-S., \&
571: %McMahon, R. G. 2007, \mnras, in press (astro-ph/0707.2697)
572:
573: \bibitem[Petitjean, Rauch, \& Carswell(1994)]{Pe94}
574: Petitjean, P., Rauch, M., \& Carswell, R. F. 1994, \aap, 291, 29
575:
576: \bibitem[Phillipps et al.(2002)]{Ph02}
577: % translate delta z into luminosity distance
578: Phillipps, S., Horleston, N. J., \& White, A. C., \mnras, 336, 587
579:
580: \bibitem[Prochaska(1999)]{Pr99} % x=97% in LLS z=2.5 from CLOUDY
581: Prochaska, J. X. 1999, \apj, 511, L71
582:
583: \bibitem[Prochaska, Herbert-Fort, \& Wolfe(2005)Prochaska et al.]{Pr05}
584: % SDSS DLA survey
585: Prochaska, J., Herbert-Fort, S., \& Wolfe, A. 2005, \apj, 635, 123
586:
587: \bibitem[Prochaska et al.(2006)]{Pr06} % High Z super LLS
588: Prochaska, J. X., et al. 2006, \apj, 648, L97
589: %Prochaska, J. X., O'Meara, J. M., Herbert-Fort, S., Burles, S.,
590: %Prochter, G. E., \& Bernstein, R. A. 2006, \apj, 648, L97
591:
592: \bibitem[Prochaska et al.(2007)]{Pr07}
593: % Proximate DLAs
594: Prochaska, J. X., et al. 2007, \apj, submitted (astro-ph/0703594)
595: %Prochaska, J. X., Hennawi, J. F., \& Herbert-Fort, S. 2007, \apj,
596: %submitted (astro-ph/0703594)
597:
598: \bibitem[Simcoe et al.(2002)Simcoe, Sargent, \& Rauch]{Si02}
599: % Keck O VI at z=2.5 N(H\,I)>15.2 =in 5 SLs inc 1 sub-DLA
600: Simcoe, R. A., Sargent, W., \& Rauch, M. 2002, \apj, 578, 737
601:
602: \bibitem[Sommer-Larsen \& Fynbo(2007)]{SF07}
603: % Missing metals
604: Sommer-Larsen, J., \& Fynbo, J. P. U. 2007, MNRAS, submitted
605: %(astro-ph/0703698)
606:
607: \bibitem[Spergel et al.(2007)]{Sp07} %WMAP3
608: Spergel, D. N., et al. 2007, \apjs, 170, 377
609:
610: \bibitem[Srianand \& Petitjean(2000)]{Sr00}
611: % Excited states seen in associated systems
612: Srianand, R., \& Petitjean, P. 2000, \aap, 357, 414
613:
614: \bibitem[Srianand \& Petitjean(2001)]{Sr01}
615: % sub-DLA towardQ1037
616: Srianand, R., \& Petitjean, P. 2001, \aap, 373, 816
617:
618: \bibitem[Sutherland \& Dopita(1993)]{SD93} % CIE
619: Sutherland, R. S., \& Dopita, M. A. 1993, \apjs, 88, 253
620:
621: \bibitem[Tripp \& Savage(2000)]{TS00} % f(OVI)<0.2
622: Tripp, T. M., \& Savage, B. D. 2000, \apj, 542, 42
623:
624: \bibitem[Tytler \& Fan(1992)]{TF92}
625: % QSO systemic redshift from emission lines
626: Tytler, D, \& Fan, X.-M. 1992, \apjs, 79, 1
627:
628: \bibitem[Weymann et al.(1979)]{We79}
629: % Definintion of 5000 km\s cutoff for assoc systems
630: Weymann, R. J., et al. 1979, \apj, 234, 33
631: %Weymann, R. J., Williams, R. E., Peterson, B. M., \& Turnshek,
632: %D. A. 1979, \apj, 234, 33
633:
634: \bibitem[Wolfe \& Prochaska(2000)]{WP00} % Obsn of CIV in DLAs
635: %35 DLAs observed w Keck I.
636: Wolfe. A. M., \& Prochaska, J. X. 2000, \apj, 545, 591
637:
638: \end{thebibliography}
639:
640: \clearpage
641: \input{tab2.tex}
642:
643: \end{document}
644:
645: