1: %\documentclass[11pt,preprint]{/home/wqd/text/aastex502/aastex}
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: %\documentclass[apj]{emulateapj}
4: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
5: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
6: %% \usepackage{mathptmx}, the only difference is in math and Greek symbols.
7: %\documentclass[onecolumn]{emulateapj}
8: \usepackage{graphics}
9: \usepackage{epsfig}
10: %\usepackage{psfig}
11: \usepackage{longtable}
12: \def\gsim{\lower 2pt \hbox{$\, \buildrel {\scriptstyle >}\over
13: {\scriptstyle \sim}\,$}}
14: \def\lsim{\lower 2pt \hbox{$\, \buildrel {\scriptstyle <}\over
15: {\scriptstyle \sim}\,$}}
16:
17: \newcommand{\xmm}{{\em XMM-Newton}}
18: \def\rosat{{\sl ROSAT}}
19: \def\ROSAT{{\sl ROSAT}}
20: \def\asca{{\sl ASCA}}
21: \def\ASCA{{\sl ASCA}}
22: \def\chandra{{\em Chandra\ }}
23: \def\Chandra{{\em Chandra\ }}
24: \def\ha{H$\alpha$}
25: \def\HI{H{\small I}\ }
26: \def\hii{H{\small II}\ }
27: \newcommand{\as}{$^{\prime\prime}~$}
28: \newcommand{\am}{$^{\prime}~$}
29: \def\cor{\widehat=}
30:
31: \def\xs{M31}
32: \shortauthors{}
33: \shorttitle{}
34:
35: \begin{document}
36:
37: \title{{\sl Chandra} detection of diffuse hot gas in and around the \xs\ bulge}
38: %\author{Zhiyuan Li\altaffilmark{1}, Q. Daniel Wang\altaffilmark{1}}
39: \author{Zhiyuan Li, \& Q. Daniel Wang}
40: %\altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, University of Massachusetts, 710 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA 01003, U.S.A.}
41: \affil{Department of Astronomy, University of Massachusetts \\
42: 710 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA 01003, U.S.A. \\
43: Email: zyli@nova.astro.umass.edu, wqd@astro.umass.edu}
44:
45: \begin{abstract}
46: %{\bf \xs\ is well suited for studying various X-ray-emitting components in a
47: %galatic bulge, in particular diffues hot gas, with great sensitivity and
48: %minimal foreground absorption.}
49: We report the detection of diffuse hot gas in \xs, using archival {\sl Chandra} observations
50: which allow us to map out a 30$^\prime \times 30^\prime$ field (covering
51: a galactocentric radius up to 4.5 kpc) and to detect sources in the
52: galaxy down to a 0.5-8 keV luminosity limit of $\sim10^{35}{\rm~ergs~s^{-1}}$. We
53: estimate the remaining stellar contribution from fainter
54: X-ray sources (primarily cataclysmic variables and coronally active binaries),
55: assuming that they spatially follow the stellar distribution. Indeed, the near-IR K-band
56: light of the galaxy closely traces the 2-8 keV unresolved X-rays, indicating
57: a collective stellar X-ray emissivity consistent with those determined for the Galactic ridge and
58: M32, whereas the amount of the 0.5-2 keV unresolved emission is significantly greater than the expected stellar contribution,
59: especially within a galactocentric radius of $\sim$2 kpc.
60: Morphologically, this soft X-ray excess appears
61: substantially rounder than the bulge as seen in K-band and is elongated approximately
62: along the minor-axis at large radii. The excess thus most likely represents
63: the emission of diffuse hot gas in and around the galactic bulge.
64: Furthermore, the near side of the \xs\ disk casts an apparent shadow against
65: the soft X-ray excess, indicating that the hot gas extends to at least 2.5 kpc from
66: the galactic plane. We briefly discuss the implications of these results on
67: the energy balance in the \xs\ bulge and on understanding the large-scale
68: soft X-ray enhancement observed toward the
69: inner region of our own Galaxy.
70: \end{abstract}
71: \keywords{galaxies: general --- galaxies: individual
72: (\xs) -- galaxies: spiral --- X-rays: general}
73:
74: \section{Introduction} {\label{sec:intro}}
75:
76: The bulge of a galaxy, though consisting of mainly old stars, is a mecca of high-energy
77: activities. Low-mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs), in the luminosity range of $\sim 10^{35} -
78: 10^{38} {\rm~ergs~s^{-1}}$, are among the brightest X-ray sources observed in
79: a galaxy like our own. At lower luminosities, typically $\sim 10^{30} - 10^{33}
80: {\rm~ergs~s^{-1}}$, are numorous cataclysmic variables (CVs) and coronally active
81: binaries (ABs) that can be individually detected normally only in the Solar neighborhood.
82: Such stars are most likely responsible for the bulk of the unresolved 2-10 keV emission
83: observed in the Galactic bulge/ridge (Revnivtsev et al.~2006), whereas lower energy X-rays
84: from the same regions are subject to heavy interstellar absorption and hence difficult to
85: detect. One thus needs external perspectives of nearby galaxies.
86: Indeed, Revnivtsev et al.~(2007)
87: have shown that the unresolved emission from the low-mass bulge-dominated galaxy
88: M32 over the entire 0.5-7 keV range is primarily stellar in origin.
89:
90: The interstellar
91: medium (ISM) in a galactic bulge is also expected to be extremely energetic,
92: chiefly due to a concentration of Type Ia supernovae (SNe). The bulk of the
93: mechanical energy release from such SNe is expected to be in shock-heated gas which
94: can be naturally traced by its X-ray emission. However, the observed luminosity of
95: the unresolved (source-removed) X-ray emission from a galactic bulge typically accounts
96: for only a small fraction (a few \%) of the expected SNe energy release. How the remaining
97: energy is dissipated remains unknown. It may be propagated into the large-scale
98: halo of the host galaxy in a mechanical outflow or sound waves, for example. In any case,
99: determining the fate of this ``missing'' stellar feedback energy is fundamentally important in our
100: understanding of its role in galaxy evolution (e.g., Wang 2007).
101: Here we present the first step of such a study.
102:
103: We detect the truly diffuse soft X-ray emission from the bulge of \xs\ ---
104: the nearest spiral galaxy ($d\sim$780 kpc;
105: 1$^\prime\cor$0.23 kpc) that is similar to our own Galaxy.
106: The galaxy contains no AGN, so the non-nuclear X-ray emission can be studied even in
107: the very central region. The \xs\ bulge has little cool gas and
108: star formation, so the X-ray contribution from young stellar populations is minimal.
109: The moderate inclination ($\sim78^\circ$) of the \xs
110: disk and the relatively low Galactic foreground absorption (${\rm N_H }
111: \sim 6.7{\times}10^{20}{\rm~cm^{-2}}$) also allow us to
112: detect extraplanar X-ray emission in the 0.5-2 keV range. Indeed,
113: detections of diffuse soft X-ray emission have been claimed, based on
114: spectral decompositions (Shirey et al.~2001; Takahashi et al.~2004).
115: However, such a decomposition depends
116: sensitively on rather arbitrary choices of spectral models for various components contributing to the spectrum,
117: both diffuse and discrete. Our approach here is to spatially map out the
118: diffuse X-ray emission (in addition to its energy dependence) and to study its
119: relationship to other stellar and interstellar components of the galaxy.
120: While details of the data reduction as well as a comprehensive analysis of
121: the sources and modeling of the hot gas will be presented elsewhere
122: (Li et al.~2007, in preparation), we focus here in presenting the
123: detection of the diffuse hot gas in and around the \xs\ bulge and its
124: immediate implications. We quote our statistical error estimates at the 90\% confidence level.
125:
126: \section{Data preparation} {\label{sec:data}}
127:
128: Our X-ray study was based on 31 \chandra ACIS archival observations of \xs\ taken by 2005.
129: The majority (21 out of 31) of these observations were taken with the ACIS-I array
130: and aimed toward the \xs\ bulge with the aim-points located within 1$^\prime$ from the galactic center. To maximize the coverage and uniformity of the combined field,
131: we utilized data only from the front-illuminated CCDs (the ACIS-I array and the S2
132: chips) of the 21 observations. For same reason, we also included I-chip data from four
133: ACIS-S observations. These data together cover a field of $r\sim$18$^\prime$ around
134: the center of \xs. Furthermore, for local sky background determination, we
135: used six additional ACIS-I observations which were aimed toward an ``off-field''
136: $\sim$$20^\prime$ southwest to the center.
137: %{\bf and were originally proposed to study X-ray transients in the galactic disk.}
138:
139: We reprocessed the data using CIAO (version 3.3), following the {\sl Chandra} ACIS data analysis guide.
140: We generated count and exposure maps for each observation in the 0.5-1, 1-2, 2-4 and
141: 4-8 keV bands. Corresponding instrumental background maps were generated from the ``stowed'' data, after calibrating
142: the 10-12 keV count rate with individual observations.
143: %These maps were then reprojected to a common tangent point of the sky, here the optical center of \xs, to produce combined images in the individual bands.
144: The total effective exposure is $\sim$95 ks in the central region and gradually drops to $\lesssim$ 20 ks at
145: radii $r \gtrsim 10^\prime$.
146:
147: Following a procedure detailed in Wang (2004), we performed source detection
148: in the soft (0.5-2 keV), hard (2-8 keV) and broad (0.5-8 keV) bands. With a local false detection
149: probability $P \leq 10^{-6}$, a total of 305 sources are detected in the field.
150: To study the unresolved X-ray emission,
151: we excluded each of the sources from maps of individual observations with circular regions enclosing $\sim$97\% of the source counts. The residual of this source removal
152: contributes about 10\% of the remaining unresolved X-ray emission in the field.
153: The source-removed maps were then reprojected to generate combined images in the four bands. We further statistically corrected for the variation of the detection incompleteness across the field, to a common detection limit of 8$\times10^{34}{\rm~ergs~s^{-1}}$ (0.5-8 keV).
154: %This correction is based on the luminosity function
155: %of the X-ray sources associated with \xs\ (Li et al. 2007 in preparation; see also Voss \& Gilfanov 2007),
156: %which is assumed to have the same shape across the field and is normalized according to the
157: %2MASS K-band intensity (Fig.~\ref{fig:unr}a; Jarrett et al.~2003).
158: Because of the
159: relatively flat luminosity function of the sources (mostly LMXBs; Li et al. 2007 in preparation; see also Voss \& Gilfanov 2007),
160: the correction (normalized according to the 2MASS K-band intensity; Fig.~\ref{fig:unr}a; Jarrett et al.~2003) typically amounts to less than 6\% of the unresolved emission. For the same reason, the residual contribution
161: from LMXBs at lower luminosities is found to be negligible.
162:
163: \section{Analysis and results} {\label{sec:unresolved}}
164:
165: Fig.~\ref{fig:unr}a shows the 0.5-2 keV unresolved X-ray emission from a 30$^\prime$ by 30$^\prime$ region around the center of \xs, compared with the
166: near-IR K-band image.
167: In the inner bulge and along the major-axis of the disk, the X-ray emission shows morphological similarities with the K-band
168: light, whereas at large radii the X-ray morphology appears substantially rounder and is elongated
169: approximately along the minor-axis, in particular at the southeast side,
170: indicating the presence of diffuse hot gas.
171:
172: \subsection{The collective stellar emission} {\label{subsec:spat_anal}}
173: To quantify the diffuse hot gas, we need to isolate the collective stellar contribution,
174: which presumably spatially follows the K-band light distribution. Optimal for this purpose is to inspect regions
175: along the major-axis, where the soft X-ray emission morphologically mimics the K-band light better than in regions further away from the major-axis (Fig.~\ref{fig:unr}a).
176: Fig.~\ref{fig:rsb}a shows the unresolved X-ray intensity profiles along the major-axis, together with the corresponding K-band intensity profile.
177: Indeed, the K-band profile as a ``model'' fits the hard band profile
178: (triangles in Fig.~\ref{fig:rsb}a) well with a normalization factor
179: $N_K = 4.3\pm0.2{\times}10^{-5}{\rm~cts~s^{-1}~arcmin^{-2}}/({\rm MJy~sr^{-1}})$.
180: Therefore, the hard band X-ray emission is fully consistent with an origin in the old stellar population.
181:
182: The collective stellar emission should also contribute at lower energies.
183: However, while the soft X-ray profile (diamonds in Fig.~\ref{fig:rsb}a)
184: can match that of the K-band light reasonably well at major-axis radii $\gtrsim
185: 8^\prime$, there is a clear excess above the collective stellar
186: contribution in the inner region. This soft excess in the bulge
187: is another indication for the presence of hot gas, although its exact spatial
188: distribution is yet to be determined. We include an exponential law to
189: approximately account for the excess. The resultant fit is satisfactory
190: (solid curve in Fig.~\ref{fig:rsb}a), with a fitted $N_K = (25.0\pm2.4) {\times}10^{-5}{\rm~cts~s^{-1}~arcmin^{-2}}/({\rm MJy~sr^{-1}})$. The fit predicts that the stellar component contributes about 60\% to the soft emission within a major-axis raidus of $\sim$8$^{\prime}$ and becomes dominant further beyond.
191: The fit also reveals an interesting drop of the X-ray to K-band
192: intensity ratio within the central 0\farcm5 (more clearly indicated in a radial intensity profile which is not shown here),
193: with values still comparable to or greater than that at the large major-axis radii.
194: The nature of this ratio drop is currrently being investigated, and we note that it has little effect on the result of the above procedure.
195:
196: \subsection{The diffuse X-ray emission} {\label{subsec:dif}}
197: Fig.~\ref{fig:unr}b shows an image of the truly diffuse emission after
198: subtraction of the collective
199: stellar contribution from the total unresolved X-ray emission of \xs.
200: The emission along the major-axis is confined within a projected distance
201: of $\sim$$8^\prime$ ($\sim$1.8 kpc) from the galactic center to the southwest
202: and is slightly more extended to the northeast. The overall morphology
203: is elongated approximately along the minor-axis, with an extent of more than 15$^\prime$
204: ($\sim$3.5 kpc) on both sides with respect to
205: the center; but the emission appears considerably fainter
206: on the northwest side and somewhat interrupted by the presence of
207: spiral arms. This asymmetry is further illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig:rsb}b, where diffuse X-ray intensity profiles along the minor-axis are shown separately in the 0.5-1 keV and 1-2 keV bands.
208: The asymmetry can be naturally explained by the soft X-ray absorption
209: of the galactic disk, as its near side is to the northwest.
210: In particular, a major spiral arm and the star-forming ring, as traced by the peaks of the
211: {\sl Spitzer} MIPS 24 $\mu$m emission (Gordan et al.~2006), apparently cast deep X-ray shadows on the northwestern side.
212: Estimated from the relative depth of these shadows, the equivalent X-ray-absorbing column densities are $\sim$$1.2{\times}10^{21}{\rm~cm^{-2}}$ and $\sim$$3.6{\times}10^{21}{\rm~cm^{-2}}$, consistent with the hydrogen column densities
213: of the spiral arm and the star-forming ring (Nieten et al.~2006).
214: No similar shadow is apparent on the southeastern side, indicating
215: that the emission on this side is mostly from the bulge region in front of the disk.
216: Therefore, the diffuse emission seems to have an intrinsic (absorption-corrected)
217: overall coherent morphology reminiscent of a bi-polar outflow from the bulge.
218: The soft X-ray absorption by the disk suggests that the vertical
219: extent of the X-ray-emitting gas from the galactic plane
220: is at least 2.5 kpc.
221:
222: We characterize the profiles (Fig.~\ref{fig:rsb}b)
223: at distances of $-7^\prime<z<0^\prime$ off the major-axis
224: with an exponential law: $I(z)=I_g e^{-|z|/z_0}$, where $I_g$ is the central intensity
225: and $z_0$ is the projected scale-height. The best-fit $z_0$, being 2\farcm5$\pm$0\farcm1 ($\sim$0.6 kpc), shows no statistically significant difference between the two bands, indicating that the hot gas in the bulge has
226: little temperature variation.
227: The hardness ratio, $I_{g,1-2 keV}/I_{g,0.5-1 keV}$$\sim$0.25, is consistent with a spectrum from an isothermal
228: gas with a temperature of $\sim$0.4 keV, subject to the Galactic foreground absorption. For comparison, the hardness ratio of the stellar emission is $\sim$0.72;
229: the scale-heigh of the K-band light is $\sim$2\farcm1, if characterized by an exponential law as well. Therefore, the diffuse X-ray emission is both softer and more extended than
230: the stellar contribution.
231: At $|z| \gtrsim 7^\prime$, however, the soft X-ray intensity distribution levels off
232: (Fig.~\ref{fig:rsb}b). Part of this leveling may be related to emission
233: associated with the galactic disk, partially compensating its X-ray absorption. The
234: exact intensity level at such large distances, however, depends on an accurate
235: subtraction of the local sky background which has been estimated in the off-field
236: and may be biased (\S~2). The sky coverage of the present ACIS observations
237: is still too limited to accurately determine both the background and the large-scale distribution of the
238: diffuse emission associated with the bulge.
239: Assuming the above exponential fit and temperature estimate as well as
240: an intrinsic symmetry with respect to the galactic
241: plane, we infer a 0.5-2 keV luminosity of the diffuse emission as
242: $\sim$2.2$\times10^{38}{\rm~ergs~s^{-1}}$. The flat tail parts of the
243: profiles give an additional $\sim$3$\times10^{37}{\rm~ergs~s^{-1}}$.
244:
245: \section{Discussion} {\label{sec:discussion}}
246: %\subsection{Collective stellar X-ray emissivity} {\label{subsec:emissivity}}
247: In \S~\ref{subsec:spat_anal} we have estimated the stellar contribution to the total unresolved X-ray emission,
248: which is a key step in isolating the truly diffuse emission. It is thus instructive to
249: compare our result with independent measurements.
250: Sazonov et al.~(2006) measured the collective X-ray emissivity (per unit stellar mass) of the old stellar populations in the Solar neighborhood
251: to be $9{\pm}3\times10^{27}{\rm~ergs~s^{-1}~M_{\odot}^{-1}}$
252: in the 0.5-2 keV band and $3.1{\pm}0.8\times10^{27}{\rm~ergs~s^{-1}~M_{\odot}^{-1}}$ in the 2-10 keV band.
253: Revnivtsev et al.~(2006) showed that the Galactic ridge X-ray emission closely follows the near-IR light that traces the Galactic stellar mass distribution,
254: and that the X-ray to near-IR intensity ratio is consistent with the collective X-ray emissivity of old stellar populations inferred from the Solar neighborhood.
255: Revnivtsev et al.~(2007) further found that the 0.5-7 keV unresolved X-ray emission
256: and K-band stellar light in M32 have consistent spatial distributions,
257: but they did not explicitly give fitted parameters of the spectral model,
258: which would allow for an immediate comparison with the \xs\ values.
259:
260: We have thus re-extracted the unresolved X-ray spectrum of M32
261: from two {\sl Chandra} ACIS-S observations (Obs.ID.~2017 and 5690) with a total exposure of 160 ks. The spectrum can be adequately
262: fitted by a model consisting of a power-law component (with a photon index of 1.86$^{+0.26}_{-0.21}$) and a thermal
263: plasma component (temperature of 0.45$^{+0.15}_{-0.10}$ keV), with the Galactic foreground absorption. The collective emissivity is
264: $5.8{\pm}1.1 (5.6{\pm}1.0)\times10^{27}{\rm~ergs~s^{-1}~M_{\odot}^{-1}}$ in the 0.5-2 (2-10) keV band, consistent with the values reported by Revnivtsev et al.~(2007). The spectral model-predicted ACIS-I count rate
265: is $\sim$17.1 (3.9) ${\times}10^{-5}{\rm~cts~s^{-1}~arcmin^{-2}}/({\rm MJy~sr^{-1}})$ in the 0.5-2 (2-8) keV band.
266: The hard band value agrees well with the measurement for \xs\ (4.3$\pm0.2 {\times}10^{-5}$),
267: accounting for the residual photons spilling outside the source-removal regions ($\sim 10\%$; \S~\ref{sec:data}). The soft band stellar emissivity of \xs\ (residual LMXB contribution excluded) is a factor of $1.4\pm0.3$ higher than the M32 value, but
268: is consistent with that inferred from the Solar neighborhood. This
269: discrepancy
270: is not totally unexpected, considering various statistical errors and
271: hiden systematic uncertainties (e.g., in the mass-to-light ratio and in
272: the spatial and spectral modeling). We note that adopting
273: the M32 stellar emissivity to remove the stellar contribution
274: in \xs\ would enhance the hot gas contribution in and around the \xs\ bulge,
275: but would not qualitatively alter the picture of the diffuse emission
276: presented in \S~\ref{subsec:dif} and below.
277:
278: %\subsection{Origin of the hot gas} {\label{subsec:origin}}
279:
280: The characterization of the diffuse hot gas sheds important insights
281: into the energy balance in the \xs\ bulge.
282: The estimated luminosity of the hot gas ($2.5\times10^{38}{\rm~ergs~s^{-1}}$) is only about 0.6\% of the expected SNe mechanical energy input,
283: $\sim$$4\times10^{40}{\rm~ergs~s^{-1}}$. As mentioned in \S~\ref{sec:intro},
284: this indicates that the input energy may be removed primarily in an outflow.
285: Dynamically, such an outflow tends to find
286: its way along steeper pressure gradient against the gravity of the galaxy,
287: consistent with the observed bi-polar morphology of the diffuse X-ray emission.
288: If the gas were quasi-static, one would expect its distribution to follow
289: that of the gravitational potential, i.e., more extended along the major-axis.
290: %{\bf However, this outflow may not escape as a galactic wind. The gas does not
291: %seem to be hot enough to escape from the gravitational potential of the galaxy.
292: %At the galactocentric radius $ r \sim 1$ kpc, for example, the required
293: %temperature of the escaping gas needs to be $\gtrsim (5 - 8) \times 10^6$ K,
294: %depending on the equation of state of the gas and
295: %on the exact potential of the galaxy (Wang et al.~1995). A simple supersonic
296: %wind solution is also not consistent with the lack of a
297: %steep temperature drop with the vertical distance away from the galactic plane.
298: %The distribution of the diffuse soft X-ray intensity is flatter than
299: %that of the stellar light, further indicating a subsonic outflow (Ciotti et al.~1991).}
300: However, the gas may not
301: be hot enough to ultimately escape from the deep gravitational potential of \xs;
302: it is also not clear how the outflow interacts with the large-scale halo
303: of \xs\ and how the mechanical energy is dissipated.
304: %The above discussed hot gas properties in the \xs\ bulge also bear similarities with those
305: %observed in low-mass elliptical galaxies (e.g., David et al.~2006).
306: Similar considerations also challenge the studies of
307: X-ray-faint elliptical galaxies (e.g., David et al.~2006).
308: Ongoing numerical simulations would help to understand the nature of the hot gas and its role in the evolution of these systems.
309:
310: %\subsection{Comparison with the Galactic bulge} {\label{subsec:MW}}
311: Our unambiguous detection of the diffuse hot gas in
312: and around the \xs\ bulge also helps to understand the soft X-ray enhancement observed toward the inner
313: region of our Galaxy. The temperature of the hot gas associated with the
314: \xs\ bulge, 0.4 keV, is similar to that with the Galactic bulge, as estimated
315: from the ROSAT all-sky survey (Snowden et al.~1997). Based on
316: a hydrostatic model of the Galactic bulge X-ray emission developed by Wang (1997), Almy
317: et al.~(2000) further inferred a total 0.5-2 keV luminosity of $\sim8 \times
318: 10^{38}{\rm~ergs~s^{-1}}$, about four times greater than
319: our estimated \xs\ bulge luminosity. The relatively high luminosity of the Galactic bulge
320: manifests in the large extent of the soft X-ray enhancement from the Galactic
321: bulge. At Galactic lattitudes $b\sim-15^\circ$ ($\sim$2 kpc from the plane), for example, where both
322: the confusion with the foreground emission features and the interstellar absorption are
323: relatively small, the intensity has an averaged value of $\sim$$6 (4){\times}10^{-4} {\rm~ROSAT~PSPC~cts~s^{-1}~arcmin^{-2}}$ in the 0.75 (1.5) keV band (Snowden et al.~1997). Had this emission been detected from \xs\ by the {\sl Chandra}
324: ACIS-I, it would be measured with an intensity of $\sim$$10 (3){\times}10^{-4}{\rm~cts~s^{-1}~arcmin^{-2}}$ in the 0.5-1 (1-2) keV band, about 2-4 times higher than the observed \xs\ values represented by the tails (Fig.~\ref{fig:rsb}b). The intensity drops slowly and even shows local enhancements at high
325: latitudes ($b\gtrsim-30^\circ$; Snowden et al. 1997). Within $|b| \lesssim 10^\circ$,
326: the interstellar absorption is severe, little can be inferred reliably about the properties
327: of the hot gas. It is in this corresponding region in the \xs\ bulge ($|z| \lesssim 6^\prime$)
328: that the diffuse soft X-ray intensity shows the steepest increase
329: (by about one order of magnitute) toward the galactic center.
330: %Corrected for the imperfect edge-on inclination, the intensity distribution
331: %should peak even more sharply.
332: Such a mid-plane concentration of
333: diffuse soft X-ray emission may also be present instrinsically in our
334: Galactic bulge. Clealy, a more careful comparison and modeling
335: of the X-ray data sets are needed in order to
336: understand the similarity and difference in the hot gas characteristics
337: and their relationship to other galactic properties
338: (e.g., the effect of recent active star formation in the Galactic center).
339:
340: %{\vskip 0.5cm}
341: \acknowledgements
342: We thank D. Calzetti, M. Fardal,
343: %M. Revnivtsev,
344: and S. Tang for
345: helpful comments and discussions. This work is supported by the SAO
346: grant AR7-8006X.
347:
348: \begin{references}
349: \reference{} Almy, R. C., McCammon, D., Digel, S. W., Bronfman, L., \& May, J. 2000, ApJ, 545, 290
350: %\reference{} Barnard, R., Kolb, U., Osborne, J. P. 2003, A\&A, 411, 553
351: %\reference{} Bell E.F., de Jong R.S., 2001, ApJ, 550, 212
352: %\reference{} Beaton, R. L., et al. 2007, ApJ, 658, L91
353: %\reference{} Calzetti D., et al. 2005, ApJ, 633, 871
354: %\reference{} Carignan C., Chemin L., Huchtmeier W.K., Lockman F.J. 2006, ApJ, 641, L109
355: %\reference{} Ciotti, L., D'Ercole, A., Pelegrini, S., \& Renzini, A. 1991, ApJ, 376, 380
356: \reference{} David, L. P., Jones, C., Forman, W., Vargas, I. M., \& Nulsen, P. 2006, ApJ, 653, 207
357: %\reference{} Dickey, J. M., \& Lockman, F.J. 1990, \araa, 28, 215
358: %\reference{} Ellis, S.C., O'Sullivan E., 2006, MNRAS, 367, 627
359: %\reference{} Fabbiano, G. 2006, ARA\&A, 44, 323
360: %\reference{} Ford H.C., Jacoby G.H., Jenner D.C. 1978, ApJ, 223, 94
361: %\reference{} Gilfanov, M. 2004, MNRAS, 349, 146
362: \reference{} Gordon, K. D., et al. 2006, ApJ, 638, L87
363: %\reference{} Grevesse N., Sauval A.J. 1998, Space Science Reviews, 85, 161
364: %\reference{} Irwin, J. A., Athey, A. E., \& Bregman, J. N. 2003, ApJ, 587, 356
365: %\reference{} Kong, A. J. K., Garcia, M. R., Primini, F. A., Murray, S. S., Di Stefano, R., McClintock, J. E. 2002, \apj, 577, 738
366: \reference{} Jarrett, T. H., Chester, T., Cutri R., Schneider, S. E., \& Huchra, J. P., 2003, \aj, 125, 525
367: %\reference{} Li J.-T., et al. 2007, to be submitted
368: %\reference{} Mathews, W. G., Brighenti, F., Faltenbacher, A., Buote, D. A., Humphrey, P. J., Gastaldello, F., Zappacosta, L. 2006, ApJ, 652, L17
369: %\reference{} Moretti A., Campana S., Lazzati D., Tagliaferri G., 2003, ApJ, 588, 696
370: \reference{} Nieten, Ch., et al.
371: %Neininger, N., Gu$\acute{e}$lin, M., Ungerechts, H., Lucas, R., Berkhuijsen, E. M., Beck, R., \& Wielebinski, R.
372: 2006, A\&A, 453, 459
373: %\reference{} O'Sullivan E., Ponman T., Collins R.S., 2003, MNRAS, 340, 1375
374: %\reference{} Paulin-Henriksson S., et al. 2002, ApJ, 576, L121
375: \reference{} Revnivtsev, M., Sazonov, S., Gilfanov, M., Churazov, E., \& Sunyaev, R. 2006, A\&A, 452, 169
376: \reference{} Revnivtsev, M., Churazov, E., Sazonov, S., Forman, W., \& Jones, C. 2007, astro-ph/0702578
377: \reference{} Sazonov, S., Revnivtsev, M., Gilfanov, M., Churazov, E., \& Sunyaev, R. 2006, A\&A, 450, 117
378: \reference{} Shirey, R., et al. 2001, A\&A, 365, L195
379: %\reference{} Snowden S.L., et al. 1995, ApJ, 454, 643
380: \reference{} Snowden, S. L., et al. 1997, ApJ, 485, 125
381: %\reference{} Strickland D.K., Heckman T.M., Colbert E.J.M., Hoopes C.G., \& Weaver K.A. 2004, ApJ, 606, 829
382: \reference{} Takahashi, H., Okada, Y., Kokubun, M., \& Makishima, K. 2004, ApJ, 615, 242
383: \reference{} Voss, R., \& Gilfanov, M. 2007, A\&A, 468, 49
384: %\reference{} Wang, Q. D., Walterbos, R. A. M., Steakley, M. F., Norman, C. A., \& Braun, R. 1995, ApJ, 439, 176
385: \reference{} Wang, Q. D. 1997, in IAU Colloq. 166, The Local Bubble and Beyond, ed. D. Breitschwerdt, M. Freyberg, \& J. Tr$\ddot{u}$mper (Springer: Berlin), 503
386: \reference{} Wang, Q. D. 2004, ApJ, 612, 159
387: \reference{} Wang, Q. D. 2007, EAS Publications Series, 24, 59
388: %\reference{} Wang Q.D., 2005, ASPC, 331, 329
389: \end{references}
390:
391: \begin{figure*}[!htb]
392: \centerline{
393: %\epsfig{figure=X_NIR.ps,width=0.5\textwidth,angle=90}
394: %\epsfig{figure=X_MIR_new.ps,width=0.5\textwidth,angle=90}
395: \epsfig{figure=f1.eps,width=1.0\textwidth,angle=0}
396: }
397: \caption{(a) Background-subtracted, exposure-corrected and smoothed intensity contours of the {\sl Chandra} ACIS-I 0.5-2 keV unresolved emission overlaid on the 2MASS K-band image of \xs. The contours are at
398: %2, 5, 9, 16, 32, 64, 128, 196, and 256 ${\times}10^{-4}{\rm~cts~s^{-1}~arcmin^{-2}}$.
399: 3, 6, 10, 16, 32, 64, 128, 196, 256 and 512 ${\times}10^{-4}{\rm~cts~s^{-1}~arcmin^{-2}}$.
400: The galactic center is marked by a plus sign.
401: %The solid ellipse has a size of $13^\prime{\times}8\farcm8$, within which spectral analyses are performed (\S~\ref{subsec:spec_anal}).
402: (b) Contours of the diffuse (stellar contribution-subtracted)
403: X-ray intensity (solid) and K-band light (dotted) overlaid on the
404: {\sl Spitzer} MIPS 24 $\mu$m image.
405: }
406: \label{fig:unr}
407: \end{figure*}
408:
409: \begin{figure*}[!htb]
410: \centerline{
411: \epsfig{figure=f2.eps,width=1.\textwidth,angle=0}
412: }
413: \caption{(a) 0.5-2 ({\sl diamonds}) and 2-8 keV ({\sl triangles}) keV intensity profiles of the unresolved X-ray emission along the major-axis.
414: A position angle of 45$^\circ$ is adopted.
415: The positive side is toward the southwest.
416: The full width for averaging the intensity is 8$^\prime$.
417: Spatial binning is adaptively ajusted to achieve a signal-to-noise ratio
418: better than 4, with a minimum step of 6$^{\prime\prime}$.
419: The X-ray profiles are characterized by a normalized K-band intensity profile (dashed curves),
420: and an additional exponential law for the soft band (solid curve).
421: (b) 0.5-1 ({\sl crosses}) and 1-2 keV ({\sl diamonds}) intensity profiles of the diffuse emission along the minor-axis; the stellar contribution
422: has been subtracted.
423: The positive side is toward the northwest. The full width for averaging the intensity is 16$^\prime$.
424: The adaptive steps achieve a signal-to-noise ratio better than 3.
425: The solid curves represent a fit with an exponential law.
426: The corresponding 24 ${\mu}$m intensity profile is shown by the dashed curve.
427: The arrows mark the positions of the shadows casted by a spiral arm and the star-forming ring.
428: %{\bf The off-field sky background has been removed for the profiles in both plots.}
429: }
430: \label{fig:rsb}
431: \end{figure*}
432:
433: \end{document}
434:
435:
436: