1: %%

2: %%

3: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the

4: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.

5: 

6: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document

7: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore

8: %% any data that comes before this command.

9: 

10: %% The command below calls the preprint style

11: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.

12: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use

13: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.

14: 

15: \documentclass{emulateapj}

16: 

17: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:

18: 

19: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

20: 

21: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:

22: 

23: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

24: % \usepackage{graphics}

25: \usepackage{psfig}

26: \usepackage{natbib}

27: \bibliographystyle{apj}

28: 

29: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so

30: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before

31: %% the \begin{document} command.

32: %%

33: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts

34: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing

35: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide

36: %% for information.

37: 

38: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}

39: \newcommand{\myemail}{roxana@pha.jhu.edu}

40: \newcommand\oneprime{\mbox{$^{\prime}$}}% 

41: 

42: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.

43: 

44: %\slugcomment{REV1 DRAFT, \today}

45: 

46: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although

47: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.

48: %% The left head contains a list of authors,

49: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.).  The right

50: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.  Running heads

51: %% will not print in the manuscript style.

52: 

53: \shorttitle{The Fourth Positive System of CO in Comet Spectra}

54: \shortauthors{Lupu et al.}

55: %\input{draft}

56: 

57: %% This is the end of the preamble.  Indicate the beginning of the

58: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.

59: 

60: \begin{document}

61: 

62: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than

63: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if

64: %% you desire.

65: 

66: \title{The Fourth Positive System of Carbon Monoxide in the Hubble Space Telescope Spectra of Comets}

67: 

68: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format

69: %% author and affiliation information.

70: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command

71: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address

72: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.

73: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.

74: 

75: \author{Roxana E. Lupu, Paul D. Feldman}%\altaffilmark{1}}

76: \affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University,

77: 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218}

78: \email{roxana@pha.jhu.edu}

79: 

80: \author{Harold A. Weaver}%\altaffilmark{2}}

81: \affil{Space Department, Johns Hopkins

82: University Applied Physics Laboratory, \\

83: 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD 20723}

84: 

85: \and

86: 

87: \author{Gian-Paolo Tozzi}%\altaffilmark{3}}

88: \affil{INAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo E. Fermi 5,

89: I-50125 Florence, Italy}

90:     

91: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which

92: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name.  Specify alternate

93: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each

94: %% affiliation.

95: 

96: %%%These are for extra affiliations at the bottom of page

97: %\altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory.

98: %CTIO is operated by AURA, Inc.\ under contract to the National Science

99: %Foundation.}

100: %\altaffiltext{2}{present address: Center for Astrophysics,

101: %    60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}

102: %\altaffiltext{3}{Patron, Alonso's Bar and Grill}

103: 

104: 

105: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript

106: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the

107: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author

108: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the

109: %% editorial office after submission.

110: 

111: %\pagestyle{myheadings}

112: %\markright{Draft \today}

113: %\markright{\today}

114: 

115: \begin{abstract}

116: 

117: The rich structure of the $A^{1}\Pi-X^{1}\Sigma^{+}$ system of carbon

118: monoxide accounts for many of the spectral features seen in long slit

119: $HST$-STIS observations of comets 153P/Ikeya-Zhang, %(2002-04-20 07:28 UT),

120: C/2001 Q4 (NEAT), %(2004-04-25 20:03 UT), 

121: and C/2000 WM$_{1}$ (LINEAR), %(2001-12-09 21:33 UT), 

122: as well as in the $HST$-GHRS spectrum of comet C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake). %(1996-04-01 13:09 UT). 

123: A detailed CO fluorescence model is developed to derive the CO

124: abundances in these comets by simultaneously fitting all of the observed

125: $A-X$ bands. The model includes the latest values for the oscillator

126: strengths and state parameters, and accounts for optical depth effects

127: due to line overlap and self-absorption. A complete fitting of the CO

128: spectral features using this model leads to the first identification of a

129: molecular hydrogen line pumped by solar \ion{H}{1} Lyman-$\beta$ longward

130: of 1200~\AA\ in the spectrum of comet 153P/Ikeya-Zhang. Pumping by

131: strong solar lines also plays an important role in CO fluorescence, as

132: shown by the detection in the spectrum of comet C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake)

133: of bands from the (14-v\arcsec) and (9-v\arcsec) progressions pumped by

134: solar \ion{H}{1} Lyman-$\alpha$ and \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$1302,

135: respectively.  Using spectra extracted at increasing distances from the

136: comet nucleus or averaging over increasing effective apertures, the

137: model fits yield radial profiles of CO column density that are

138: consistent with a predominantly native source for all the comets

139: observed by STIS. The derived CO production rates are $1.54 \pm 0.09

140: \times 10^{28}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$ for 153P/Ikeya-Zhang, $1.76 \pm 0.16

141: \times 10^{28}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$ for C/2001 Q4 (NEAT), and

142: $3.56 \pm 0.20 \times 10^{26}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$ for C/2000 WM$_{1}$

143: (LINEAR). In the absence of spatial information for comet C/1996 B2

144: (Hyakutake), we estimate a CO production rate of $4.97 \pm 0.07 \times

145: 10^{28}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$, assuming an entirely native source. The CO

146: abundances relative to water in these comets span a wide range, from

147: $0.44 \pm0.03$\% for C/2000 WM$_{1}$ (LINEAR), $7.2 \pm 0.4$\% for

148: 153P/Ikeya-Zhang, $8.8 \pm 0.8$\% for C/2001 Q4 (NEAT) to $20.9 \pm

149: 0.3$\% for C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake).  For comets C/2000 WM$_{1}$ and

150: C/2001 Q4 we can compare these results with those derived from nearly

151: simultaneous observations by the {\it Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic

152: Explorer}.

153: 

154: \end{abstract}

155: 

156: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented

157: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors

158: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine

159: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.

160: 

161: \keywords{comets:individual (153P/Ikeya-Zhang, C/2001 Q4 (NEAT), C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake), C/2000 WM$_{1}$ 

162: (LINEAR))~---~carbon monoxide~---~ultraviolet: solar system}

163: 

164: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%START OF THE PAPER%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

165: \section{INTRODUCTION}

166: 

167: 

168: Cometary ices have undergone little or no processing since their formation in the solar nebula and thus they represent an important clue in understanding the conditions in the early Solar System. However, this interpretation is complicated by the radial mixings in the protoplanetary disk and the dynamical evolution of comets, expelled to the outer Solar System from their original formation site. No pattern for the cometary composition and activity has emerged from the objects studied to date \citep{biver02,crovisier07} and a larger sample is needed. The composition of cometary ices has been studied through spectroscopic observations or {\it in situ} measurements. In the analysis of cometary spectra it is important to establish whether the observed chemical species originate in the nucleus (native source) or in the coma (extended source). For this purpose, spatially-resolved observations are needed to derive the radial composition of the gas outflow. 

169: 

170: Carbon monoxide (CO) is one of the most abundant molecules, whose mixing ratio relative to water varies greatly among comets \citep{biver06,cometsii}. As a highly volatile compound, with a sublimation temperature of 24~K, CO ice is thought to be a sensitive tracer of the temperature in the environment in which the comets formed. However, its origin as a native compound or a daughter product, and the correlation between the two sources is still not understood. Infrared observations of the CO ro-vibrational lines conclude that the CO source was mainly native in comet C/1996~B2~(Hyakutake) \citep{disanti03} and significantly extended for comet C/1995~O1~(Hale-Bopp) \citep{disanti01}. This paper complements previous findings with the first CO radial profiles constructed from ultraviolet spectra. Care must be taken in interpreting the brightness profiles, since saturation close to the nucleus could mimic the presence of an extended source. A comprehensive fluorescence model is developed to derive reliable CO column densities and estimate CO production rates from cometary spectra obtained by the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) and the Goddard High Resolution Spectrograph (GHRS) on the {\it Hubble Space Telescope} ({\it HST}). Using the long-slit capabilities of the STIS instrument, this paper offers evidence that the native source of CO is dominant in three long period comets.

171: 

172: \begin{deluxetable*}{cccccccc}

173: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}

174: \tablecaption{Comet observations. \label{table1}}

175: \tablewidth{0pt}

176: \tablehead{

177: \colhead{Dataset} & \colhead{Date \& Time}   & \colhead{Exposure Time}   &

178: \colhead{r$_{h}$} & \colhead{ v$_{h}$}  & 

179: \colhead{$\Delta$} & \colhead{Instrument}& \colhead{Mode}\\ 

180: 	& (UT) & (s) & (AU) & (km~s$^{-1}$) & (AU) & & }

181: %\tableline

182: \startdata

183: \sidehead{C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake)}

184: Z35FN602T & 1996-04-01  13:09:00 & 1305.600 & 0.885 & --38.51 & 0.259 & $HST$-GHRS & G140L;2.0\\

185: Z35FN604T & 1996-04-01  13:39:00 &  217.600 & 0.885 & --38.51 & 0.260 & $HST$-GHRS & G140L;2.0\\

186: Z35FN702T & 1996-04-01  14:44:00 & 1305.600 & 0.884 & --38.53 & 0.262 & $HST$-GHRS & G140L;2.0\\

187: Z35FN704T & 1996-04-01  15:14:00 &  217.600 & 0.883 & --38.53 & 0.262 & $HST$-GHRS & G140L;2.0\\

188: \tableline

189: \sidehead{C/2000 WM$_{1}$ (LINEAR)}

190: B0500301000 & 2001-12-07  08:50:00 &  &  &  &  &  & \\

191: to B0502401000 & 2001-12-10  06:48:00 & 36,467 & 1.120 & --28.30 & 0.340 & $FUSE$ & LWRS\\

192: O6GR12010 & 2001-12-09  21:33:00 & 1800.194 & 1.085 & --28.26 & 0.357 & $HST$-STIS & G140L;52$\times$0.2\\

193: O6GR03010 & 2001-12-09  23:09:10 & 1440.197 & 1.084 & --28.26 & 0.358 & $HST$-STIS & G140L;52$\times$0.2\\

194: O6GR11010 & 2001-12-10  00:45:00 & 1800.198 & 1.083 & --28.26 & 0.359 & $HST$-STIS & G140L;52$\times$0.2\\

195: \tableline

196: \sidehead{153P/Ikeya-Zhang}

197: O8FY01010 & 2002-04-20  07:28:00 & 1800.199 & 0.887 & 29.07 & 0.426 & $HST$-STIS & G140L;52$\times$0.2\\

198: O8FY02010 & 2002-04-20  10:40:00 & 1800.197 & 0.889 & 29.08 & 0.426 & $HST$-STIS & G140L;52$\times$0.2\\

199: O8FY03010 & 2002-04-21  07:30:00 & 1440.197 & 0.904 & 29.15 & 0.422 & $HST$-STIS & G140L;52$\times$0.2\\

200: \tableline

201: \sidehead{C/2001 Q4 (NEAT)}

202: E1390101000 & 2004-04-24  00:39:00 &  &  &  &  &  & \\

203: to E1390501000 & 2004-04-24  23:09:00 & 68,282 & 1.030 & --10.80 & 0.510 & $FUSE$ & LWRS\\

204: O8VK04010 & 2004-04-25  20:03:00 & 1800.199 & 1.024 & --10.26 & 0.473 & $HST$-STIS & G140L;52$\times$0.2\\

205: O8VK01010 & 2004-04-26  00:49:00 & 1683.008 & 1.023 & --10.18 & 0.468 & $HST$-STIS & G140L;52$\times$0.2\\

206: O8VK07010 & 2004-04-30  00:51:00 & 1800.200 & 1.002 &  --8.37 & 0.386 & $HST$-STIS & G140L;52$\times$0.2\\

207: \enddata

208: \end{deluxetable*}

209: 

210: CO ultraviolet fluorescence in cometary spectra was first detected

211: during sounding rocket observations of comet West %(C/1975 V1)

212: \citep[C/1975 V1,][]{feld76} and has been subsequently observed by $IUE$

213: \citep{tozzi98}, $HST$ \citep{Weaver:1998}, $FUSE$

214: \citep{feld02b}, the Hopkins Ultraviolet Telescope on

215: the {\it Astro-1} Space Shuttle mission \citep{feld91}, and rockets

216: \citep{woods87,sahnow93,mcp99}. The most important spectral features

217: of CO in the ultraviolet (UV) are its electronic transitions

218: belonging to the $A-X$, $B-X$ and $C-X$ systems, or to

219: the forbidden Cameron bands. Fluorescence is the main emission

220: mechanism for the $A^{1}\Pi-X^{1}\Sigma^{+}$ system (1300~--~1900~\AA),

221: $C^{1}\Sigma^{+}-X^{1}\Sigma^{+}$ system (0--0 band at

222: 1087.9~\AA), and $B^{1}\Sigma^{+}-X^{1}\Sigma^{+}$ system (0--0

223: band at 1150.5~\AA). The Cameron bands, $a^{3}\Pi-X^{1}\Sigma^{+}$

224: (1900~--~2800~\AA), are mainly excited by electron impact and

225: photodissociation of CO$_{2}$ \citep{Weaver:1994}.  Although

226: observations of the $A-X$ or Fourth Positive Group of CO in the UV

227: spectra of comets have a long history, their interpretation has been

228: difficult compared to that of the $B-X$ and $C-X$ systems at shorter

229: wavelengths that have been observed more recently.

230: 

231: The spatial information offered by the high resolution long slit

232: $HST$-STIS spectra of comets 153P/Ikeya-Zhang~(C/2002~C1),

233: C/2001~Q4~(NEAT), and C/2000~WM$_{1}$~(LINEAR) shows

234: that close to the nucleus the CO emission in the $A-X$ system is

235: self-absorbed. This follows from the observed change in the relative

236: intensities in various vibrational progressions as the offset from the

237: comet center increases (see \S~3). Self-absorption makes it difficult

238: to derive a reliable value for the CO column density in the absence of

239: a model that takes into account optical depth effects.

240: 

241: 

242: A detailed model of the $A-X$ system is needed to track the effects of

243: saturation and self-absorption. We constructed a database containing

244: $\sim10^{5}$ transitions between the first 50 rotational levels of each

245: of the 37 vibrational levels of $X^{1}\Sigma^{+}$ and the 23

246: vibrational levels of $A^{1}\Pi$, taking into account the energy shifts

247: and mixings of the transition probabilities due to interactions between

248: the different parity sublevels \citep{lefloch87,morton94}. Using a

249: simple approximation for fluorescence in subordinate lines

250: \citep{liu96}, expanded with a comprehensive treatment of self-absorption, our model offers an excellent fit to the data. The $A-X$ fluorescence model is used to derive spatial

251: profiles of the CO column density for the three comets observed by STIS.

252: We find that the column density profiles are consistent with a dominant

253: native source in all comets. The resulting production rates range

254: between $3.56 \times 10^{26}$ and

255: $1.76 \times 10^{28}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$ and are corroborated by the 

256: results from high

257: resolution $FUSE$ observations of C/2001~Q4~(NEAT) and

258: C/2000~WM$_{1}$~(LINEAR) \citep{weaver02}. The $HST$-GHRS observations

259: of comet C/1996~B2~(Hyakutake), a comet with a high CO

260: production rate \citep{biver99,disanti03} and thus

261: strongly affected by large optical depth effects, require the addition of geometrical corrections

262: to the simple plane-parallel atmosphere model in order to reproduce the relative line strengths.

263: 

264: The $HST$ observations are described in \S~2. Details about the model

265: and its simplifying assumptions are found in \S~3. Detailed data

266: analysis follows in \S~4, and a discussion of the results is given in

267: \S~5. We conclude with a summary in \S~6.

268: 

269: \section{OBSERVATIONS}

270: 

271: The $HST$ observations are summarized in Table~\ref{table1}. Comets

272: Ikeya-Zhang and C/2000~WM$_{1}$ (LINEAR) were observed near times of

273: high solar activity, while C/2001~Q4~(NEAT) and Hyakutake were observed

274: closer to solar minimum. The $HST$-STIS observations used the G140L

275: grating and the 52X0.2 aperture (25\arcsec~$\times$~0\farcs2 for L-mode

276: MAMA), resulting in a spatial resolution of $\sim$0\farcs1 and a

277: spectral resolution of $\sim$4~\AA\ in the wavelength range

278: 1150--1730~\AA. The STIS instrument performance is described in

279: \citet{kimble98} and \citet{woodgate98}. The $HST$-GHRS \citep{heap95}

280: observations of comet C/1996~B2~(Hyakutake), covering the

281: 1290--1590~\AA\ bandpass with a spectral resolution of $\sim$4~\AA, do

282: not provide spatial information. The GHRS Large Science Aperture (LSA)

283: translates into a 1\farcs74~$\times~$1\farcs74 post-COSTAR projected

284: area. Given that $FUSE$ and $HST$-STIS observations of comets

285: C/2000~WM$_{1}$~(LINEAR) and C/2001~Q4~(NEAT) were nearly simultaneous,

286: we choose to include in Table~\ref{table1} a summary of $FUSE$

287: observations for completeness \citep{feld02b,weaver02}.

288: 

289: 

290: 

291: 

292: \section{FLUORESCENCE MODEL FOR THE $A^{1}\Pi$~--~$X^{1}\Sigma^{+}$

293: SYSTEM OF CO}

294: 

295: 

296: The Fourth Positive Group of CO, $A^{1}\Pi$~--~$X^{1}\Sigma^{+}$, has

297: non-negligible overlap integrals for most of the non-diagonal

298: vibrational transitions. While for the $C-X$ and $B-X$ systems it is

299: enough to model just the (0--0) and (1--0) bands, for the $A-X$ system we must

300: take into account all bands connecting all 37 vibrational levels of the

301: $X^{1}\Sigma^{+}$ state with all 23 vibrational levels of the

302: $A^{1}\Pi$ state. Using only the first 50 rotational levels, which

303: should be sufficient for typical physical conditions in cometary comae,

304: the final database contains almost $10^{5}$ transitions. The latest

305: values for the parameters of the $A^{1}\Pi$

306: \citep{kurucz76,morton94,lefloch92} and $X^{1}\Sigma^{+}$ states

307: \citep{george94} were used to derive the energy levels and transition

308: wavelengths. Following \citet{morton94}, the rotational

309: transition probabilities $A_{J\oneprime J\arcsec}$ were obtained from

310: the band transition probabilities $A_{v\oneprime v''}$

311: \citep{beegle99,eidelsberg99,borges01,kirby89}. Even though there are

312: three rotational branches (P, Q and R, $\Delta J=0,\pm 1$) possible

313: from the same rotational level of the $A^{1}\Pi$ state ($J'$),

314: due to the parity selection rule, the excitation rates and branching

315: ratios for the P and R branches do not mix with those for the Q branch.

316: Each $J\oneprime$ level of the $A^{1}\Pi$ state is split into 2 opposite

317: parity sublevels ($\Lambda$-doubling) that have different energies and

318: interactions with neighboring levels of other electronic states

319: \citep{morton94}. The energy level shifts and the changes in the

320: lifetimes due to these interactions were taken into account when

321: available \citep{morton94,kittrell93,lefloch87}.

322: 

323: In a first approximation, the fluorescent emission in the Fourth

324: Positive Group of CO is modeled following the prescription

325: from~\citet{liu96}. This model successfully accounts for saturation in the absorption of the

326: exciting radiation, using a Voigt profile with line overlap. A quick look at the data, however, shows that this

327: approach only partially accounts for optical depth effects, and we must

328: extend the model to include self-absorption in the fluorescent cascade.

329: The STIS spectra of comet 153P/Ikeya-Zhang shown in Figure~\ref{vlines}

330: are averaged over effective apertures of increasing size, centered on

331: the comet nucleus. Self-absorption is easily recognized by noting that

332: the bands connecting to the ground vibrational level (0--0, 1--0, 2--0,

333: 3--0, 4--0, 5--0) show little decrease in brightness as we increase the integrated slit area and the average

334: column density becomes lower, while the other bands from the

335: progressions originating in the same upper level (see the unblended

336: 0--1, 1--3, 2--2, 2--3, 4--1 and 5--1) decrease strongly in intensity,

337: so that at low column densities the relative line ratios are in

338: agreement with the optically thin limit.

339: 

340: \begin{figure}

341: \begin{center}

342: \epsscale{0.8}

343: \rotatebox{90}{

344: \plotone{f1.eps} }

345: \caption{ Spectra of comet 153P/Ikeya-Zhang extracted from apertures that are 1, 2, 4 and 6 arcseconds wide in the spatial direction, top to bottom, centered on the comet nucleus, showing the effects of self-absorption (see text). The strong features near 1564~\AA\ and 1657~\AA\ are emissions from atomic carbon.\label{vlines}}

346: \end{center}

347: \end{figure}

348: 

349: 

350: The treatment of self-absorption is made under the assumption of local

351: thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE), using the fact that the photon mean

352: free path corresponds to an optical depth $\tau$ of one. Given that the gas temperature in the coma is less than 100~K for our observations, under LTE

353: conditions we need only to take into account absorption out of the

354: lowest (0) vibrational level of $X^{1}\Sigma^{+}$. Unlike for H$_{2}$ for example,

355: the ro-vibrational levels of the ground state of CO have short

356: lifetimes, making LTE a good approximation. The lines connecting to

357: v\arcsec~=~0 for which $\tau$ at line center is greater than one are

358: considered self-absorbed. Only an effective column density

359: $N_{0}^{ij}=1/\sigma_{line-center}^{ij}$, smaller than the total

360: absorbing column $N$, will contribute to the observed

361: emission in a self-absorbed transition $i-j$. The excess brightness,

362: due to absorption by the total column density $N$, is then redistributed

363: among the optically thin lines originating in the same upper level $i$

364: according to the branching ratios, as seen in Figure~\ref{mod}.

365:  

366:  \begin{figure}

367: \begin{center}

368: \epsscale{0.8}

369: \rotatebox{90}{

370: \plotone{f2.eps} }

371: \caption{ Illustration of the CO fluorescence model. The absorption profile for the $A-X$ (1-0) band is applied to the solar spectrum (upper panel) and the subsequent emission in the ($1-v\arcsec$) progression is shown before and after including self-absorption (middle and lower panels, respectively).\label{mod}}

372: \end{center}

373: \end{figure}

374: 

375:  

376:  

377:  

378: The model is constructed in the approximation of a uniform plane-parallel

379: atmosphere. This approximation is of limited use, due to the spherical

380: symmetry of the comet atmosphere and the Sun-comet-Earth geometry. The

381: breakdown is more apparent for larger column densities, such as in the

382: case of comet C/1996~B2~(Hyakutake), discussed in \S~4.2. In the

383: optically thin regime, valid at larger distances from the comet

384: nucleus, as well as for unresolved objects, such geometrical

385: effects are negligible. Introducing geometrical corrections in our

386: model can be done by allowing the column density entering the

387: absorption step to be different from the column density used for emission

388: and self-absorption. This procedure accounts for the fact that the

389: projected column density along the line-of-sight is larger than the

390: column density towards the exciting radiation source. This difference leads both

391: to the decrease in line saturation and to the enhancement of the

392: optically thin lines versus the optically thick ones due to more

393: self-absorption. The method is very robust, providing line intensities in agreement with the data.

394:  

395:  

396: \section{DATA ANALYSIS}

397: 

398: Although the brightness of the $A-X$ bands for the same comet should

399: differ slightly from one observation to another due to varying comet

400: heliocentric and geocentric distances, as well as due to possible

401: periodic variations in the volatile vaporization rate, this variation

402: is within the error bars of the observations and the use of an averaged

403: STIS spectrum for each comet in order to improve the signal-to-noise

404: ratio is warranted. We also select only the datasets that do not show significant deviations in background and intensity from one another.

405: 

406:  High resolution solar spectra from the Ultraviolet

407: Spectrometer Polarimeter Experiment on the {\it Solar Maximum Mission}

408: \citep{Tandberg-Hanssen:1981} were used, scaled to match the solar

409: activity at the time of comet observations as deduced from {\it

410: UARS}/Solstice solar flux measurements \citep{Rottman:2001}. The solar

411: spectrum is shifted according to the comet motion relative to the Sun

412: \citep[Swings effect,][]{Dymond:1989}.  For the solar \ion{H}{1} 

413: Lyman-$\alpha$ and -$\beta$ lines the {\it SOHO}/SUMER data of

414: \citet{Lemaire:2002} were used.

415: 

416: \begin{deluxetable*}{ccccc}

417: \tablecaption{Model parameters. \label{table2}}

418: \tablewidth{0pt}

419: \tablehead{

420: \colhead{Comet Name} & \colhead{$T_{\rm ROT}$}   & \colhead{Doppler $b$ parameter}   &

421: \colhead{Solar Activity} & \colhead{$N_{\rm CO}$ Range} \\ 

422: 	& (K) & (km~s$^{-1}$) & & (10$^{14}$ cm$^{-2}$) }

423: %\tableline

424: \startdata

425: 153P/Ikeya-Zhang & 82\tablenotemark{a} & 0.91\tablenotemark{b}& max & 61.3--1.49\\

426: C/2001 Q4 (NEAT) & 68\tablenotemark{c} & 0.79\tablenotemark{d} & min & 68.4--1.86\\

427: C/2000 WM$_{1}$ (LINEAR) & 77\tablenotemark{c} & 0.72\tablenotemark{b} & max & 0.935--0.327\\

428: C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake) & 72\tablenotemark{e} & 2.0\tablenotemark{f} & min & 145 \\

429:  \enddata

430: 

431: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before

432: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark

433: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.

434: 

435: 

436: 

437: \tablenotetext{a}{From 74$\times r_{\rm h}^{-0.93}$~K dependence, \citet{dellorusso04}.}

438: \tablenotetext{b}{\citet{biver06}.}

439: \tablenotetext{c}{Temperature of cold component, $FUSE$ observations (see text).}

440: \tablenotetext{d}{Estimated from outflow velocity 0.8$\times r_{\rm h}^{-0.5}$.}

441: \tablenotetext{e}{From 63$\times r_{\rm h}^{-1.06}$~K dependence, \citet{disanti03}.}

442: \tablenotetext{f}{Within the range of values given by \citet{wouterloot98}.}

443: \end{deluxetable*}

444: 

445: 

446: 

447: The only free parameter of the model is the column density,

448: which is varied over a grid of values until the best fit is found. All model parameters used for each comet are summarized in

449: Table~\ref{table2}. The values for the rotational temperature and Doppler $b$ parameter

450: were chosen in agreement with infrared and radio measurements, when available. The Doppler $b$ parameter is given by $b=\sqrt{v_{therm}^{2}+v_{outflow}^{2}}\approx v_{outflow}$, where v$_{outflow}$ is the source of non-thermal line broadening, and the thermal velocities are comparable to the uncertainties in v$_{outflow}$. Molecular lines of water and other molecules are well resolved by radio observations (usually to better than 0.1~km~s$^{-1}$), and have a Gaussian profile, reflecting the symmetric outflow of the gas \citep{lecacheux03,wouterloot98,biver99}. Our observations have too low a resolution to be used to determine the Doppler line widths directly, so we rely on the published values for the expansion velocity of the gas, derived from the line profiles after correcting for thermal and instrumental broadening.

451: 

452: 

453: \subsection{$HST$-STIS Observations}

454:  

455:  \begin{figure}

456: \begin{center}

457: \epsscale{1.2}

458: \rotatebox{0}{

459: \plotone{f3.ps} }

460: \caption{ $HST$-STIS spectral image of comet 153P/Ikeya-Zhang, showing the line brightness variation along the slit. The spectral region containing the strong geocoronal \ion{H}{1} $\lambda$1216 and \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$1302 has been excluded. The carbon multiplets at 1561.0~\AA\ and 1657.6~\AA\ are relatively constant due to the extended source component. The zero point in the vertical direction marks the location of the brightness peak, chosen as the center of our integration bins.   \label{stisim}}

461: \end{center}

462: \end{figure}

463: 

464: The high spatial resolution of the $HST$-STIS instrument is illustrated by the spectrum of comet 153P/Ikeya-Zhang in Figure~\ref{stisim}. The CO $A-X$ lines form the majority of the observed features. Their intensity decreases rapidly along the slit, in contrast with the extended \ion{C}{1}~$\lambda$1561.0 and $\lambda$1657.6 multiplets. 

465: Using the spatial information available, we derive the CO spatial profile for each comet by fitting spectra extracted from regions of 1\farcs5 width

466: at increasing offsets from the comet center. The selected regions sample areas of varying column density, for which

467: our model estimates an average value. The comet nucleus is identified with the center of brightness, located at zero in Figure~\ref{stisim}. The innermost region extracted, centered on

468: the nucleus, is noisier due to the small integrated

469: area. For intermediate regions the signal is better, due to the

470: averaging of two regions, symmetric about the comet center. For each

471: region, the background subtraction is performed by fitting a quadratic

472: polynomial to selected points from feature-free intervals. These points

473: were selected such that the outliers are

474: discarded and the resulting polynomial fit is optimal.

475: 

476:  The best-fit column density for

477: each region and its standard deviation are derived by minimizing the

478: $\chi^{2}$ statistics, taking into account the errors in background

479: subtraction.  The range of column densities obtained for each comet

480: observed by STIS is listed in Table~\ref{table2}, together with

481: the average value for comet C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake). The results are

482: further compared with the Haser native source model

483: \citep{haser57,opal77}, with an outflow velocity of

484: $0.85~r_{\rm h}^{-0.5}$~km~s$^{-1}$, where $r_{\rm h}$ is the comet-Sun

485: distance in AU \citep{budzien94,biver99}, and a CO lifetime of $2

486: \times 10^5$ s. We derive the CO production rate for each comet by a least squares

487: fit of the Haser model to the radial column density profile.  The

488: native source model is integrated over rectangular regions matching the

489: 1\farcs5 spectral extractions along the STIS slit.  The resulting

490: production rates and their magnitude relative to water are

491: listed in Table~\ref{table3}.

492: 

493: \subsubsection{153P/Ikeya-Zhang}

494: 

495: The values for the rotational temperature and Doppler $b$ parameter are

496: 82~K and 0.91~km~s$^{-1}$ respectively, derived from infrared and radio

497: measurements~\citep{dellorusso04,biver06}. Spectra extracted from

498: 1\farcs5 intervals were fitted using CO column densities ranging from

499: 6.13$\times$10$^{15}$ to 1.49$\times$10$^{14}$~cm$^{-2}$, as shown in

500: Figure~\ref{bigplot}. The data shown are obtained by averaging the

501: first and third STIS observations (Table~\ref{table1}), and the best

502: fit model is overplotted in red. The second observation was not

503: included due to the background mismatch with the other two. The derived values

504: for the CO column density in each region are represented by stars in

505: Figure~\ref{izp}, plotted  as a function of the distance from the comet

506: nucleus. The error bars are given by the $1\sigma$ confidence level

507: from the $\chi^2$ statistics. Fitting to this radial profile a native

508: source model integrated over rectangular regions with the same coverage

509: as the extracted spectra~\citep{opal77}, we obtain a production rate of

510: $1.54\pm0.09\times10^{28}$ molecules~s$^{-1}$. The native source model

511: for the derived production rate is shown as a continuous line in the

512: same figure. The resulting CO production rate relative to water is

513: about $7.2\pm0.4\%$. The water production rate ($2.15\times10^{29}$

514: molecules~s$^{-1}$) was obtained from a vectorial model fit to an

515: $HST$-STIS observation of the OH (0-0) band made on 2002 April 21 at

516: 12:19 UT.

517: 

518: 

519: \begin{figure*}

520: \begin{center}

521: \epsscale{0.75}

522: \rotatebox{0}{

523: \plotone{f4.eps}}

524: \caption{ $HST$-STIS spectra of comet 153P/Ikeya-Zhang extracted from 1.5\arcsec\ intervals at increasing offsets from the center of brightness, assumed to be the location of the nucleus. The red line represents the model spectrum of the CO $A-X$ system for the best fit column density for each offset. The corresponding offsets and the best fit column densities are indicated on each panel. Other emission features belong to \ion{C}{2}, \ion{C}{1}, \ion{O}{1}, \ion{S}{1}, and H$_{2}$, as indicated in Figure~\ref{h2}.\label{bigplot}}

525: \end{center}

526: \end{figure*}

527: 

528: \begin{figure}

529: \begin{center}

530: \epsscale{1.0}

531: \rotatebox{0}{

532: \plotone{f5.eps} }

533: \caption{ Spatial profile of the CO column density for comet 153P/Ikeya-Zhang. The stars with error bars represent the column density values derived from averaged spectra using the method presented in the text. The continuous line represents the column density profile predicted by the native source model when averaged over slits covering the same areas as the observations, with a production rate of 1.54$\times$10$^{28}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$.\label{izp}}

534: \end{center}

535: \end{figure}

536: 

537: 

538: 

539: The residuals after subtracting the fluorescence spectrum for the CO $A-X$ system reflect the contributions of atomic species and allow the first detection of H$_{2}$ at wavelengths longward of 1200~\AA. The H$_{2}$ spectrum consists of the P(1) lines of the Lyman (6-v\arcsec) progression pumped by solar \ion{H}{1} Lyman-$\beta$. The H$_{2}$ lines with v\arcsec = 1--3 were first detected in the {\it FUSE} spectrum of comet C/2001~A2 (LINEAR)~\citep{feld02b}. The lines at longer wavelengths, including the strongest one in the progression (v\arcsec = 13 at 1607.5~\AA), remained undetected due to the abundance of CO features and lower resolution of the STIS instrument. The solar maximum value of flux, together with a velocity shift that placed the (6-0)~P(1) line at the peak of the line, made it particularly fortuitous to detect the (6-13)~P(1) line in comet Ikeya-Zhang. Figure~\ref{Lyb} shows the shape and intensity of the solar Ly$\beta$ at minimum and maximum activity and the Doppler shifts of the H$_{2}$ absorption line corresponding to each comet. Although H$_2$ lines pumped by Ly$\beta$ were detected in comet C/2001 Q4 \citep{feld04}, due to the large negative Doppler shift and the low solar activity, in the STIS bandpass the signal-to-noise for the H$_{2}$ lines is too low to warrant a detection. A comparison of the residuals for the two comets after subtracting the CO fluorescence model is shown in Figure~\ref{h2}. The STIS spectrum was integrated over a 4\arcsec\ wide region centered on the comet nucleus, and the CO column density for the two comets ($N=3.07 \times 10^{15}$~cm$^{-2}$ and $3.49 \times 10^{15}$~cm$^{-2}$, respectively) has been obtained through the $\chi^2$ minimization procedure. The residuals for comets C/2000 WM1 and Hyakutake (not included in the figure) show no evidence for H$_{2}$, which can be explained by the large negative Doppler shifts with respect to the solar Ly$\beta$, the low outgassing rate of C/2000 WM1 and the minimum solar activity at the time of Hyakutake observations. 

540: 

541: \begin{figure}

542: \begin{center}

543: \epsscale{1.0}

544: \rotatebox{0}{

545: \plotone{f6.eps}}

546: \caption{ Profile of solar Ly$\beta$ at maximum (August 2001) and minimum solar activity (July 1996). The velocity shifts of the absorbing H$_{2}$ (6--0) P1 line are shown for each comet.\label{Lyb}}

547: \end{center}

548: \end{figure}

549: 

550: 

551: The synthetic H$_{2}$ fluorescence spectra shown in red in Figure~\ref{h2} are constructed under the assumption of an H$_2$O photodissociation source for H$_{2}$. According to the dissociation model, H$_{2}$ is rotationally hot (100-300~K) and its rotational levels are in statistical equilibrium, with an ortho/para ratio of 3, similar to water \citep{budzien94,water00,bonev07}. The uncertainty in the exact value for the rotational temperature has little impact on the emerging spectrum, as the population of the J=1 level of the ground state does not differ significantly for rotational temperatures ranging from 100 to 300~K. The fluorescence efficiencies, or g-factors, used in the model were revised from those cited by \citet{feld02b}, using the solar Lyman-$\beta$ profiles obtained over the past solar cycle by \citet{Lemaire:2002}, and accounting for the comet's heliocentric velocity. The quality of the data does not warrant a $\chi^2$ fit for the H$_{2}$ fluorescence model, so we restrict ourselves to making rough estimates. Using an H$_{2}$ column density of $1.0 \times 10^{14}$~cm$^{-2}$ at a rotational temperature of 200~K we obtain a reasonable agreement with the residuals for 153P/Ikeya-Zhang (Figure~\ref{h2}, upper panel). As was the case for comet C/2001~A2, this value for the H$_2$ column is consistent, within the rather large uncertainties in both the data and the models, with an H$_2$O photodissociation source. Constraining the H$_2$ production helps our understanding of this H$_2$O dissciation channel, for which little laboratory data is available.

552: 

553: Under our choice of parameters, the model for 153P/Ikeya-Zhang predicts about 5.5~R for the v\arcsec = 7,9 and 11 lines, at the level of the errors due to noise and CO subtraction, leaving only the (6--13)~P(1) line detectable at a $\sim$3$\sigma$ level, with 18.4~R. This line is not detected in any other comet from our sample. For comparison, we model the H$_{2}$ fluorescence for comet C/2001 Q4. We use the same column density of H$_{2}$, as both C/2001 Q4 and 153P/Ikeya-Zhang have similar water production rates (see notes to Table~\ref{table3}). Due to the low solar activity and the unfavorable Doppler shift, the predicted line intensities are too low to be detected, consistent with the residuals (Figure~\ref{h2}, lower panel). The discrepancies between the H$_{2}$ models and the residuals are due to the uncertainties in the CO fluorescence model itself as well as to the noise in the data increasing towards longer wavelengths.

554: 

555: \begin{figure}

556: \begin{center}

557: \epsscale{0.9}

558: \rotatebox{90}{

559: \plotone{f7.eps}}

560: \caption{ Residuals from the spectrum of 153P/Ikeya-Zhang and C/2001 Q4 after subtracting the best fit CO model ($N=3.07 \times 10^{15}$~cm$^{-2}$ and $3.49 \times 10^{15}$~cm$^{-2}$, respectively). The comet spectra were extracted from a region of 4\arcsec\ width, centered on the comet nucleus. The red line is the predicted H$_2$ fluorescence spectrum pumped by solar Lyman-$\beta$ for a column density of $1.0 \times 10 ^{14}$~cm$^{-2}$ and a rotational temperature of 200~K.  Other atomic contributions are shown in blue.\label{h2}}

561: \end{center}

562: \end{figure}

563: 

564: 

565: The strongest atomic lines seen in the residuals are also indicated in

566: Figure~\ref{h2}.  In addition to those lines usually seen in comets

567: \citep{mcp99}, we also note the presence of the \ion{S}{1}~($^1\!D -

568: ^1\!D^o$) transition at 1666.7~\AA.  This transition is analogous to

569: \ion{O}{1}~($^1\!D - ^1\!D^o$) at 1152.2~\AA\ \citep{feld02b} and

570: \ion{C}{1}~($^1\!D - ^1\!P^o$) at 1930.9~\AA\ \citep{tozzi98}.

571: Using a g-factor of $1.92 \times 10^{-5}$ photons~atom$^{-1}$~s$^{-1}$

572: at 1 AU, the $\sim$30 rayleigh brightness corresponds to an average

573: column density of \ion{S}{1}~$^1\!D$~atoms in the aperture of $1.24

574: \times 10^{12}$~cm$^{-2}$.  Since the lifetime of the metastable

575: $^1\!D$ state of sulfur is only 28~s, this requires that within the

576: aperture $^1\!D$ atoms be produced at a rate of $1.9 \times

577: 10^{26}$~s$^{-1}$ (0.09\% relative to water).  Collisional de-excitation of $^1\!D$ near the

578: nucleus would raise this number.  The likely source of these atoms is

579: the photodissociation of sulfur-bearing molecules such as H$_2$S or

580: CS$_2$, which must be produced at a rate greater than 0.1\% relative to

581: water.

582: 

583: \subsubsection{C/2001 Q4 (NEAT)}

584: 

585: Adjusting the model parameters to the conditions of NEAT~Q4

586: observations we derive in the manner described for 153P/Ikeya-Zhang a CO production rate of

587: $1.76\pm0.16\times10^{28}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$, or $8.8\pm0.8\%$

588: relative to water. For the water production rate, we derive a value of

589: $2.0 \times 10^{29}$ molecules~s$^{-1}$ from STIS observations on

590: 2004-04-23 21:39 UT. The CO model was fitted to the average of the

591: first two STIS observations (Table~\ref{table1}). For the third

592: observation the detector background level is much higher than for the

593: other two. The adopted values for the rotational temperature and

594: Doppler $b$ parameter are listed in Table~\ref{table2}. $FUSE$

595: observations of the CO $C-X$ Hopfield-Birge system at 1088~\AA\ reveal

596: a band profile consistent with a two component temperature model

597: \citep{feld02b}. The hot component ($\sim$600~K) is believed to

598: describe an extended CO source due to the dissociation of CO$_{2}$

599: \citep{feld06b}. We use for our model the temperature of the cold

600: component, estimated at $\sim$68~K, characteristic of the native CO

601: source which dominates at the smaller cometocentric distances probed by

602: STIS. Lacking direct radio measurements of the line widths, we use a value of 0.79~km~s$^{-1}$ for the Doppler $b$ parameter,

603: based on the outflow velocity 0.8$\times r_{\rm h}^{-0.5}$. The radial

604: profile of the best-fit column densities and the native source model

605: are plotted in Figure~\ref{q4p} as stars and continuous line,

606: respectively.

607: 

608: Using a two-component fit to the CO $C-X$ band observed by $FUSE$ \citep{feld02b} we derive CO column densities of $1.2 \pm 0.3 \times 10^{14}$~cm$^{-2}$ and $2.38 \pm 0.08 \times 10^{13}$~cm$^{-2}$ for the cold and hot component, respectively, averaged over the entire 30\arcsec~$\times$~30\arcsec slit. A native source for the cold component requires a production rate of $1.36\pm0.40\times10^{28}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$, or $6.8\pm2.0\%$ relative to water. The solar flux pumping the $C-X$ fluorescence was based on quiet sun whole disk data from {\it SOHO}/SUMER \citep{Curdt:2001}, normalized, at wavelengths longward of 1200 \AA, to {\it UARS}/SOLSTICE solar flux measurements appropriate to the solar activity at the time of our observation \citep{Rottman:2001}.

609: 

610: \begin{figure}

611: \begin{center}

612: \epsscale{1.0}

613: \rotatebox{0}{

614: \plotone{f8.eps} }

615: \caption{ Same as Figure~\ref{izp}, for comet C/2001 Q4 (NEAT). The production rate for the native source model was $1.76 \times 10^{28}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$.\label{q4p}}

616: \end{center}

617: \end{figure}

618: 

619: 

620: \subsubsection{C/2000 WM$_{1}$ (LINEAR)}

621: 

622: The CO emission detected by STIS in the observation of comet C/2000

623: WM$_{1}$ (LINEAR) was too weak to allow us to repeat the same analysis

624: performed in the case of comets 153P/Ikeya-Zhang and C/2001 Q4 (NEAT).

625: Instead, we chose to integrate the STIS spectrum over increasing widths

626: centered on the nucleus, in order to make use of the stronger signal in

627: the center and to increase the number of contributing pixels. We

628: started with a 4\arcsec\ wide region which was increased progressively

629: up to 16\arcsec. For the rotational temperature we used the 77~K value

630: derived for the cold component using $FUSE$ observations

631: \citep{weaver02}, while the Doppler $b$ parameter value of

632: 0.72~km~s$^{-1}$ was chosen to match the radio observations of

633: \citet{biver06}. All three STIS observations were averaged together to

634: obtain detectable CO emission features. The best-fit column densities

635: over the selected regions are plotted in Figure~\ref{wm1p} as a function of

636: the integrated slit width. Fitting a native source model integrated

637: over the same rectangular regions we obtain a CO production rate of

638: $3.56\pm0.2\times10^{26}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$. This model is shown by a

639: continuous line in Figure~\ref{wm1p}. A CO production rate of

640: $0.44 \pm 0.03$\% relative to water is obtained adopting the favored

641: H$_{2}$O production rate for the $FUSE$ observations 

642: \citep[8.0$\times$10$^{28}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$,][]{weaver02}.

643: This makes C/2000 WM$_{1}$ (LINEAR) the most CO-poor comet of our sample.

644: 

645: \begin{figure}

646: \begin{center}

647: \epsscale{1.0}

648: \rotatebox{0}{

649: \plotone{f9.eps}}

650: \caption{ CO column density profile for comet C/2000 WM$_{1}$ (LINEAR) extracted from regions of increasing widths, centered on the comet nucleus. The continuous line corresponds to the values predicted by the native source model with a production rate of $3.56 \times 10^{26}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$, when integrated over similar slit sizes.\label{wm1p}}

651: \end{center}

652: \end{figure}

653: 

654: 

655: 

656: \begin{deluxetable*}{cccc}

657: \tablecaption{Production rates. \label{table3}}

658: \tablewidth{0pt}

659: \tablehead{

660: \colhead{Comet Name} & \colhead{$Q_{\rm CO}$\tablenotemark{$\star$}}   & \colhead{$Q_{\rm CO}$/$Q_{\rm H_{2}O}$} & {Other $Q_{\rm CO}$ Measurements}\\ 

661: 	& (10$^{28}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$) & (\%) & (10$^{28}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$)

662: }

663: %\tableline

664: \startdata

665: 153P/Ikeya-Zhang & 1.54 $\pm$ 0.09 & 7.2 $\pm$ 0.4\tablenotemark{a} & 0.73 $\pm$ 0.16\tablenotemark{b}\\

666: C/2001 Q4 (NEAT) & 1.76 $\pm$ 0.16 & 8.8 $\pm$ 0.8\tablenotemark{c} & 1.36 $\pm$ 0.40\tablenotemark{d}\\

667: C/2000 WM$_{1}$ (LINEAR) & 0.036 $\pm$ 0.002 & 0.44 $\pm$ 0.03\tablenotemark{e} & 0.035 $\pm$ 0.003\tablenotemark{f}\\

668: C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake) & 4.97 $\pm$ 0.07 & 20.9 $\pm$ 0.3\tablenotemark{g} & 4.84 $\pm$ 0.58\tablenotemark{h}\\

669:  \enddata

670: 

671: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before

672: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark

673: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.

674: 

675: \tablenotetext{$\star$}{The error bars are given by the 1 $\sigma$ interval from the $\chi^{2}$ statistics. In addition, we estimate that systematics amount to a 15\% uncertainty in the production rates for the STIS observations.}

676: \tablenotetext{a}{Water production rate 2.15$\times$10$^{29}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$ from $HST$-STIS observations (see text).}

677: \tablenotetext{b}{Using r$_{h}^{-2.1}$ scaling from \citet{biver06}.}

678: \tablenotetext{c}{Water production rate 2.0$\times$10$^{29}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$ from $HST$-STIS observations (see text).}

679: \tablenotetext{d}{Derived in this paper from $FUSE$ observations (\S 4.1.2). The cited value includes only the cold source component.}

680: \tablenotetext{e}{Water production rate 8.0$\times$10$^{28}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$ used for the $FUSE$ observations \citep{weaver02}.}

681: \tablenotetext{f}{Based on $FUSE$ observations \citep{weaver02}, revised for this paper. The cited value includes only the cold source component.}

682: \tablenotetext{g}{Water production rate 2.38$\times$10$^{29}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$ from \citet{combi98}.}

683: \tablenotetext{h}{Value measured on April 1.2 using JCMT radio telescope \citep{biver99}. From the 4.7$\times$10$^{28}r_{\rm h}^{-2.1}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$ dependence the predicted value is 6.07$\times$10$^{28}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$.}

684: \end{deluxetable*}

685: 

686: 

687: \subsection{$HST$-GHRS Observations: C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake)}

688: 

689: Since the $HST$-GHRS observations do not provide spatial information,

690: we are unable to derive a CO column density profile for comet C/1996 B2

691: (Hyakutake). The CO production rate is obtained by comparing the CO

692: column density derived by fitting our

693: fluorescence model to the GHRS spectrum with the CO column density predicted for the GHRS aperture by the native

694: source model. As model parameters for the synthetic spectrum we used a

695: rotational temperature of 72~K given by the 63$\times r_{\rm h}^{-1.06}$~K

696: dependence from \citet{disanti03}, which is similar to the value given

697: by \citet{lis97}, and a $b$ parameter of 2.0~km~s$^{-1}$, within the

698: range of outflow velocities measured by \citet{wouterloot98} but slighlty higher than derived from the optical line widths of \citet{combi99}. A lower $b$ value is inconsistent with the total amount of absorbed solar

699: radiation (from the conservation of the number of photons), suggesting

700: larger turbulent motions in the 1\farcs74$\times$1\farcs74 area probed

701: by GHRS.

702: 

703: Using the CO $A-X$ fluorescence model with self-absorption we obtain a first estimate

704: for the CO column density averaged over the GHRS slit. However, the

705: predicted line ratios are not in agreement with the data (see the red

706: line in Figure~\ref{hkt}, upper panel). In order to improve the fit and

707: better constrain the column density we adjust the model to account for

708: the geometry of the Sun-comet-Earth system. Starting with the previous

709: estimate on the CO column we can constrain the ratio between the

710: line-of-sight column density and the absorbing column on the comet-Sun

711: direction. Iterating this procedure we obtain a best fit value for the

712: line-of-sight CO column density of

713: $1.45 \pm 0.87 \times 10^{16}$~cm$^{-2}$. This model is shown with a

714: red line in the lower panel of Figure~\ref{hkt}. The blue model in the

715: same figure contains contributions from atomic species

716: \ion{C}{2}, \ion{C}{1}, \ion{O}{1}, and \ion{S}{1}, as labeled,

717: which account for the remaining features in the spectrum. Under the

718: assumption of a native source model with the same lifetime and gas outflow velocity as employed for the STIS observations, we obtain a CO

719: production rate of $4.97 \pm 0.07 \times 10^{28}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$. This

720: represents the highest CO production rate relative to water

721: from our sample, $20.9 \pm 0.3$\%, using the water production rate of

722: 2.38$\times$10$^{29}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$ from \citet{combi98}.

723: 

724: Figure~\ref{hkt} also clearly shows the presence of several bands

725: originating on the v$'=9$ and 14 levels that are pumped by solar

726: \ion{O}{1} $\lambda$1302 and \ion{H}{1} Lyman-$\alpha$, respectively

727: \citep{Wolven:1998}.  \citet{Kassal:1976} first pointed out that

728: scattering of Lyman-$\alpha$ by the (14,0) band is comparable to, if

729: not larger than, the direct solar scattering by all other bands of the

730: CO Fourth Positive system for CO column densities $\ge

731: 10^{17}$~cm$^{-2}$.  The (14,4) band was subsequently identified in

732: the spectrum of Venus \citep{Durrance:1981}.  These bands are not detected

733: in any of the STIS comet spectra.  The high column density in the

734: field-of-view of comet Hyakutake makes them visible, albeit at low S/N,

735: and allows for a determination of column density independent of optical

736: saturation effects.  In evaluating the fluorescence efficiency of these

737: bands, the overlap between the solar lines and the individual lines of

738: the CO bands is a sensitive function of rotational temperature and

739: heliocentric velocity and requires accurate profiles of the solar lines

740: \citep{Lemaire:2002}.  The (14-3), (14-4), and (9-2) bands are included 

741: in the model and are seen to be completely consistent with the CO column

742: density derived above.

743: 

744: \begin{figure}

745: \begin{center}

746: \epsscale{0.9}

747: \rotatebox{90}{

748: \plotone{f10.eps}}

749: \caption{ $HST$-GHRS spectrum of comet C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake), and the model spectrum of the CO $A-X$ system for a line-of-sight column density of $1.45\times10^{16}$~cm$^{-2}$, before (upper panel) and after geometric corrections (lower panel).  The CO model spectrum is shown in red. The blue line contains contributions from atomic lines of \ion{C}{2}, \ion{C}{1}, \ion{O}{1}, and \ion{S}{1}, as indicated. The $A-X$ bands that do not change significantly due to the geometric effects are labeled.\label{hkt}}

750: \end{center}

751: \end{figure}

752: 

753: 

754: We note that the optically thick bands connecting

755: to the v\arcsec~=~0 level of the ground state, namely (1-0) at 1509.8

756: \AA, (2-0) at 1477.6 \AA, (3-0) at 1447.4 \AA, (4-0) at 1419.1 \AA\ and

757: (5-0) at 1392.6 \AA, all labeled in Figure~\ref{hkt}, do not show a significant variation due to

758: geometric corrections. This can be understood from the fact that while

759: the correction adjusts the line-of-sight column density relative to the

760: column absorbing the solar radiation, the emission in the optically

761: thick lines will still be determined by the column corresponding to one

762: optical depth, which depends only on temperature and $b$

763: parameter. The (0-0) band at 1544.5 \AA\ does not seem to follow this

764: pattern due to blending with the (3-2) band at

765: 1542.5 \AA. The same lack of variation is exhibited by the bands

766: belonging to optically thin progressions pumped by solar emission

767: lines, such as (14-3) at 1315.7 \AA\ and (9-2) at 1377.8 \AA. This is a result

768: of the simple linear scaling in the optically thin limit, which makes the absorbing column indistinguishable from the emitting column. 

769: 

770: \section{DISCUSSION}

771: 

772: \subsection{Sources of Uncertainty and Comparison with Other Measurements}

773: 

774: The derived column densities are subject to uncertainties due to the

775: choice of model parameters and background subtraction. A more complete

776: model would involve a multidimensional $\chi^{2}$ minimization to

777: constrain simultaneously the column density, rotational temperature and

778: Doppler $b$ parameter. Aside from the fact that this approach requires

779: rather large computational resources, we expect that given the quality

780: of the data the resulting $\chi^{2}$ 3D surfaces will have rather low

781: contrast minima and the improvement in the resulting production rates

782: would be negligible. More of a concern is the background subtraction in

783: the $HST$-STIS data. The background is variable both in the spatial and

784: spectral directions from one observation to another, making it

785: impossible to give a comprehensive subtraction prescription. The

786: optimal background subtraction is determined on a case-by-case basis.

787: While the background-related uncertainties can lead to $\sim$30\%

788: variations in the values for the column densities, we estimate that the

789: change in the resulting production rates is only about 6\%. These values are only slightly larger than the $1\sigma$ error bars from the $\chi^{2}$ minimization. Similarly, increasing the rotational temperature from 70~K to 100~K results in a $\sim$30\% decrease in production rate. However, the rotational temperatures relevant for our observations were derived from either $FUSE$ observations or from the T$_{rot}$ vs. r$_{h}$ dependences obtained by radio measurements, and are constrained to better than $\pm$6~K. This results only in a $\sim$7\% variation in production rate, as the heliocentric distance of the comet does not vary significantly during our observations. The absolute values of the CO production rate and column density are also sensitive to the STIS calibration pipeline, which

790: is based on point-source stellar standards. The column densities derived from STIS data could be overpredicted by at most 30\% due to calibration offsets. Variations in the parameters used for the native source model, such as the CO lifetime and outlow velocity, could also change the production rate by a few percent. Other less quantifiable uncertainties to which the fluorescence model is particularly sensitive are the oscillator strengths and the UV solar flux, especially due to the variable emission features at

791: high solar activity. Overall, we estimate that the systematic errors in the production rates amount to at most 15\%.

792: 

793: To assess the effects of the error sources mentioned above, it is

794: useful to compare our results to other measurements of the CO production rate in these comets from

795: different spectral regions. The values obtained for comets

796: C/2000 WM$_{1}$ (LINEAR) and C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake) are in excellent

797: agreement with previous measurements. For comet C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake)

798: at similar heliocentric distances \citet{biver99} find vales of

799: $4.98 \pm 0.09 \times 10^{28}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$ (0.952~AU) and

800: $4.84 \pm 0.58 \times 10^{28}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$ (0.894~AU). The

801: production rate relative to water is comparable to previously measured mixing ratios of

802: 14 to 19\% \citep{disanti03} and 22\% \citep{biver99}. For comet C/2000 WM$_{1}$

803: (LINEAR) both $FUSE$ \citep{weaver02} and radio \citep{biver06}

804: observations are consistent with a CO mixing ratio of $\sim$0.4\% and

805: a CO production rate of $\sim$3 to 4$\times$10$^{26}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$. A good agreement is again found when comparing the CO production rate derived for comet C/2001

806: Q4 (NEAT) with the results from $FUSE$ observations ($\S$ 4.1.2),

807: listed in Table~\ref{table3}. We note that the measurements based on $FUSE$ observations

808: used only the cold component of CO (see $\S$~4.1.2) in estimating the CO

809: production rate. The cold component is believed to reflect the native source of CO, which is directly probed by STIS. The two values agree marginally within the error bars, and the mismatch can be attributed to short time variability and pointing instability for the $FUSE$ observations. The count rates for the $C-X$ band in the $FUSE$ data show factor of two variations with a periodicity of $\sim$20 hours. The $FUSE$ observation overlaps with a much shorter STIS exposure, but the exact correlation in comet activity between the two datasets is hard to assess due to the different fields of view of the two instruments.

810: 

811: For comet 153P/Ikeya-Zhang

812: the derived CO production rate

813: is about a factor of 2 higher than the estimate from the range of

814: values given by \citet{biver06} (using the

815: $r_{\rm h}^{-2.1}$ scaling, see Table~\ref{table3}) and \citet{disanti02}. The factor of two difference may be attributed to the uncertainties in the model parameters

816: (rotational temperature and Doppler parameter) and in the

817: background subtraction. However, as discussed above, the combined sources of error should result in less than 15\% uncertainty. On the other hand, the $r_{\rm h}^{-2.1}$ dependence was derived from two measurements, one at 0.51~AU and the other at 1.26~AU, not excluding the possibility of temporal variations affecting our observations at 0.89~AU. Moreover, the uncertainties in the $r_{\rm h}^{-2.1}$ scaling have not been quantified, making our value for the production rate more reliable. The CO abundance relative to water is again higher than other estimates. However, using the water production rate given by the 19.0$\times$10$^{28}r_{\rm h}^{-4.}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$

818: dependence derived by \citet{biver06} from H$_2$O observations made by the

819: {\it Odin} satellite \citep{lecacheux03}, the CO mixing ratio

820: decreases from $7.2\pm0.4\%$ to $5.1\pm0.3\%$. This would place the CO

821: relative abundance in comet 153P/Ikeya-Zhang closer to the value of

822: $3.8\pm0.6\%$ at $\sim$1~AU \citep{biver06} and $4.7\pm0.8\%$ at

823: 0.78~AU \citep{disanti02}.

824: 

825: \subsection{Application to Broad-band Imaging}

826: 

827: The advantage of long-slit spectroscopy with STIS resides in giving us a better understanding of the spatial distribution of CO and the effects of increasing optical depths on the observed line ratios. We show how this information is applicable to broad-band imaging by integrating the

828: brightness of the $A-X$ bands in the STIS bandpass that are not contaminated by atomic lines. We then integrate the fluorescence

829: model over the same bands deriving an equivalent g-factor (as a ratio

830: between the total brightness and the column density). Given the

831: specific optical depth corrections in our model, the resulting g-factor

832: will be in fact a brightness-column density dependence rather than a

833: globally constant ratio. The radial brightness profile of the integrated

834: bands observed by STIS can be then converted into a

835: column density profile. This procedure can be visualized in

836: Figure~\ref{izot}, where the data for comet 153P/Ikeya-Zhang have been

837: used. The brightness profile has been rebinned in 1\arcsec\ bins and

838: background subtracted. The red histogram represents the column density

839: profile obtained using the optically thick brightness-wavelength

840: dependence, while the blue histogram represents the column density

841: profile obtained in the optically thin approximation, using a constant

842: g-factor. The black line is the native source model integrated in

843: 1\arcsec\ $\times$~0\farcs2 bins, for a production rate of

844: 1.54$\times$10$^{28}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$, as derived in \S~4.1.1. This

845: figure illustrates the importance of including optical depth effects in

846: order to predict the correct column density. This method has

847: been used to interpret the imaging data from the {\it HST} Solar Blind

848: Channel of the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS/SBC),

849: and give an estimate of the number of molecules released from

850: comet 9P/Tempel~1 as a result of the {\it Deep Impact} encounter

851: \citep{feld06a}. The uncertainties in this type of measurements come

852: mainly from the additional emission features of atomic lines in the

853: bandpass.

854: 

855: \begin{figure}

856: \begin{center}

857: \epsscale{1.0}

858: \rotatebox{0}{

859: \plotone{f11.eps} }

860: \caption{ Spatial profiles of the CO column density for comet 153P/Ikeya-Zhang, derived from the integrated brightness along the slit in 1\arcsec\ bins, selecting the unblended lines from the $A-X$ system. The red line uses the total brightness-column density dependence associated with the present model, while the blue line is obtained in the optically thin approximation. The continuous black line is the native source model for a production rate of 1.54$\times$10$^{28}$~molecules~s$^{-1}$, integrated in 1\arcsec\ bins.\label{izot}}

861: \end{center}

862: \end{figure}

863: 

864: 

865: \subsection{The Native Source of CO}

866: 

867: The $HST$-STIS observations allow us to constrain the dominant source

868: of CO in the region probed by the 25\arcsec\ $\times$~0\farcs2 slit.

869: Reconstructing the surface column density distribution from the radial

870: profile we estimate that in a 10\arcsec\ $\times$~10\arcsec\ box the native

871: source contribution to the total number of molecules is as high as 80\%

872: for comet C/2000 WM$_{1}$ (LINEAR) and from 90\% to 99\% for comets

873: C/2001 Q4 (NEAT) and 153P/Ikeya-Zhang, respectively. This result suggests that the native source dominates in the inner $\sim 3000$~km from the comet center, while the extended component becomes important at larger distances. However, the native CO observed in the coma is linked to the amount of CO in the nucleus through the outgassing mechanism, which is not well known. Laboratory data suggests that the abundance of CO relative to water in the ice can be a factor of 5 to 10 lower than the one observed in the coma \citep{notesco97,colangeliii}. The exact value depends on the temperature at which the comet is outgassing.

874: 

875: The large variation in the CO production rate relative to water can be understood from the large range of heliocentric distances over which the comets have formed and then migrated to the outer parts of the Solar System through gravitational interactions with the planets. The observed diversity among comets is thought to be related to the local gas and dust composition and temperature where they formed. Under the assumption that CO has been trapped by water ice during comet formation, the local temperature can be estimated from the observed production rate \citep{notesco97}. The formation temperatures in our sample are expected to range from 50~K or less for comets C/2001 Q4, 153P/Ikeya-Zhang and Hyakutake, to more than 60~K for C/2000 WM$_{1}$. If the gas trapping mechanism is more efficient than deposition, as suggested by laboratory studies of CO and water interactions \citep{collings03}, important enrichments for the species with a higher sublimation temperature can occur \citep{notesco97}. This can explain the lack of correlation between the abundance of CO and that of other molecules with a similar sublimation temperature \citep{gibb03,biver02}.

876: 

877: 

878: \section{SUMMARY}

879: 

880: We have developed a fluorescence model for the interpretation of CO

881: $A-X$ emission observed in several recent comets by the {\it

882: Hubble Space Telescope} employing the latest values for the transition

883: wavelengths and oscillator strengths. The radiative transfer

884: approximation takes into account saturation effects using Voigt

885: profiles for each of the $\sim$10$^{5}$ transitions. Self-absorption is

886: introduced using a photon mean free path approximation. This process is

887: significant for column densities above few$\times$10$^{14}$~cm$^{-2}$, encountered close to the comet

888: nucleus. It is shown that the model reproduces the optically thin

889: limit for lower column densities, at larger distances from the

890: comet center. When the column densities are of the order

891: $\sim$10$^{16}$~cm$^{-2}$ or above, a good fit to the data requires a

892: distinction between the absorbing CO column in the Sun-comet direction

893: and the emitting column along the line-of-sight.  The approximations in

894: the radiative transfer model are justified for the quality of

895: the available data. Constraining better the optical depth effects demands an

896: exact treatment, which would be warranted at higher spectral resolution

897: in order to predict the relative strengths of individual lines

898: contained in the $A-X$ bands.

899: 

900: For the comets observed by STIS the fit of the column density profile

901: is consistent with a predominantly native source, with production rates

902: ranging from $3.56 \times 10^{26}$~to

903: $1.76 \times 10^{28}$~molecules s$^{-1}$. The quality and the spatial

904: extent of the STIS data does not allow for a detection of a small

905: extended source component.  We find large variations in the CO abundance

906: relative to water, from 0.4\% for C/2000 WM$_{1}$ (LINEAR) to 21\% for

907: C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake). This diversity among comets is still not well understood, as no clear trend emerges at the current stage of comet observations \citep{cometsii}. In spite of the caveats discussed in \S~5, the absolute values of the

908: CO production rate and column density are better constrained by the

909: introduction of optical depth effects, and give reasonable confidence

910: levels for the CO production rate and a good agreement with previous

911: results. Moreover, the present model proves to be a valuable tool in

912: analyzing broadband imaging data, such as the ACS/SBC observations of

913: comet 9P/Tempel~1 \citep{feld06a}.

914: 

915: 

916: \acknowledgements

917: 

918: This work is based on observations with the NASA/ESA {\it Hubble

919: Space Telescope} obtained at the Space Telescope Science Institute,

920: which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in

921: Astronomy (AURA), Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26555.  We wish to

922: thank Stephan McCandliss for providing us with the H$_{2}$ UV

923: fluorescence model.  PDF wishes to acknowledge the hospitality of

924: Arcetri Observatory during a sabbatical visit in April-May 2003.  This

925: work was supported by NASA grants HST-GO-09185.04-A, HST-GO-09496.04-A,

926: and HST-GO-09906.04-A to The Johns Hopkins University.

927: 

928: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%BIBLIOGRAPHY%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

929: %\clearpage

930: %\bibliography{ms}

931: 

932: \begin{thebibliography}{}

933: 

934: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Beegle} et~al.}{{Beegle}

935:   et~al.}{1999}]{beegle99}

936: {Beegle}, L.~W., {Ajello}, J.~M., {James}, G.~K., {Dziczek}, D.,  \& {Alvarez},

937:   M. 1999, \aap, 347, 375

938: 

939: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Biver} et~al.}{{Biver}

940:   et~al.}{2002}]{biver02}

941: {Biver}, N., et~al. 2002, Earth Moon \& Planets, 90, 323

942: 

943: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Biver} et~al.}{{Biver}

944:   et~al.}{1999}]{biver99}

945: {Biver}, N., et~al. 1999, \aj, 118, 1850

946: 

947: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Biver} et~al.}{{Biver}

948:   et~al.}{2006}]{biver06}

949: {Biver}, N., et~al. 2006, \aap, 449, 1255

950: 

951: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Bockel{\'e}e-Morvan} et~al.}{{Bockel{\'e}e-Morvan} et~al.}{2004}]{cometsii}

952: {Bockel{\'e}e-Morvan}, D., {Crovisier}, J., {Mumma}, M.~J., \& {Weaver}, H.~A. 2004, in Comets II, ed. M. C. Festou, H. U. Keller, \& H. A. Weaver (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press)

953: 

954: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Bonev} et~al.}{{Bonev}

955:   et~al.}{2007}]{bonev07}

956: {Bonev}, N., et~al. 2007, \apjl, 661, L97

957: 

958: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Borges}, {Caridade}, \& {Varandas}}{{Borges}

959:   et~al.}{2001}]{borges01}

960: {Borges}, I.~J., {Caridade}, P.~K.~S.~B.,  \& {Varandas}, A.~J.~C. 2001, J.

961:   Mol. Spec., 209, 24

962: 

963: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Budzien}, {Festou}, \& {Feldman}}{{Budzien}

964:   et~al.}{1994}]{budzien94}

965: {Budzien}, S.~A., {Festou}, M.~C.,  \& {Feldman}, P.~D. 1994, Icarus, 107, 164

966: 

967: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Colangeli} et~al.}{{Colangeli} et~al.}{2004}]{colangeliii}

968: {Colangeli}, L., {Brucato}, J.~R., {Bar-Nun}, A., {Hudson}, R.~L., \& {Moore}, M.~H. 2004, in Comets II, ed. M. C. Festou, H. U. Keller, \& H. A. Weaver (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press)

969: 

970: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Collings} et~al.}{{Collings}

971:   et~al.}{2003}]{collings03}

972: {Collings}, M.~P., {Dever}, J.~W., {Fraser}, H.~J., \& {McCoustra}, M.~R.~S. 2003, \apss, 285, 633

973: 

974: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Combi} et~al.}{{Combi}

975:   et~al.}{1999}]{combi99}

976: {Combi}, M.~R., {Cochran}, A.~L., {Cochran}, W.~D., {Lambert}, D.~L., \& {Johns-Krull}, C.~M. 1999, \apj, 512, 961

977: 

978: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Combi} et~al.}{{Combi}

979:   et~al.}{1998}]{combi98}

980: {Combi}, M.~R., {Brown}, M.~E., {Feldman}, P.~D., {Keller}, H.~U., {Meier},

981:   R.~R.,  \& {Smyth}, W.~H. 1998, \apj, 494, 816

982: 

983: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Crovisier}}{{Crovisier}}{2007}]{crovisier07}

984: {Crovisier}, J. 2007, in Proceedings of the XVIIIemes Rencontres de Blois: Planetary Science: Challenges and Discoveries, 28th May - 2nd June 2006, Blois, France, astro-ph/0703785

985: 

986: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Curdt} et~al.}{{Curdt}

987:   et~al.}{2001}]{Curdt:2001}

988: {Curdt}, W., {Brekke}, P., {Feldman}, U., {Wilhelm}, K., {Dwivedi}, B.~N.,

989:   {Sch{\" u}hle}, U.,  \& {Lemaire}, P. 2001, \aap, 375, 591

990: 

991: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Dello Russo} et~al.}{{Dello Russo}

992:   et~al.}{2004}]{dellorusso04}

993: {Dello Russo}, N., {DiSanti}, M.~A., {Magee-Sauer}, K., {Gibb}, E.~L., {Mumma},

994:   M.~J., {Barber}, R.~J.,  \& {Tennyson}, J. 2004, Icarus, 168, 186

995: 

996: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Disanti} et~al.}{{Disanti}

997:   et~al.}{2001}]{disanti01}

998: {Disanti}, M.~A., {Mumma}, M.~J., {Dello Russo}, N., \& {Magee-Sauer}, K. 2001, Icarus, 153, 361

999: 

1000: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{DiSanti} et~al.}{{DiSanti}

1001:   et~al.}{2002}]{disanti02}

1002: {DiSanti}, M.~A., {dello Russo}, N., {Magee-Sauer}, K., {Gibb}, E.~L.,

1003:   {Reuter}, D.~C.,  \& {Mumma}, M.~J. 2002, in ESA SP-500: Asteroids, Comets,

1004:   and Meteors: ACM 2002, ed. B.~{Warmbein}, 571

1005: 

1006: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{DiSanti} et~al.}{{DiSanti}

1007:   et~al.}{2003}]{disanti03}

1008: {DiSanti}, M.~A., {Mumma}, M.~J., {Dello Russo}, N., {Magee-Sauer}, K.,  \&

1009:   {Griep}, D.~M. 2003, J. Geophys. Res., 108(E6), 5061

1010: 

1011: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Durrance}}{{Durrance}}{1981}]{Durrance:1981}

1012: {Durrance}, S.~T. 1981, \jgr, 86, 9115

1013: 

1014: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Dymond}, {Feldman}, \& {Woods}}{{Dymond}

1015:   et~al.}{1989}]{Dymond:1989}

1016: {Dymond}, K.~F., {Feldman}, P.~D.,  \& {Woods}, T.~N. 1989, \apj, 338, 1115

1017: 

1018: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Eidelsberg} et~al.}{{Eidelsberg}

1019:   et~al.}{1999}]{eidelsberg99}

1020: {Eidelsberg}, M., {Jolly}, A., {Lemaire}, J.~L., {Tchang-Brillet}, W.~U.,

1021:   {Breton}, J.,  \& {Rostas}, F. 1999, \aap, 364, 705

1022: 

1023: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Feldman}}{{Feldman}}{2005}]{feld05}

1024: {Feldman}, P.~D. 2005, Physica Scripta, T119, 7

1025: 

1026: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Feldman} \& {Brune}}{{Feldman} \&

1027:   {Brune}}{1976}]{feld76}

1028: {Feldman}, P.~D.,  \& {Brune}, W.~H. 1976, \apjl, 209, L45

1029: 

1030: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Feldman} et~al.}{{Feldman}

1031:   et~al.}{1991}]{feld91}

1032: {Feldman}, P.~D., et~al. 1991, \apjl, 379, L37

1033: 

1034: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Feldman} et~al.}{{Feldman}

1035:   et~al.}{2006a}]{feld06a}

1036: {Feldman}, P.~D., {Lupu}, R.~E., {McCandliss}, S.~R., {Weaver}, H.~A.,

1037:   {A'Hearn}, M.~F., {Belton}, M.~J.~S.,  \& {Meech}, K.~J. 2006a, \apjl, 647,

1038:   L61

1039: 

1040: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Feldman}, {McCandliss}, \&

1041:   {Weaver}}{{Feldman} et~al.}{2006b}]{feld06b}

1042: {Feldman}, P.~D., {McCandliss}, S.~R.,  \& {Weaver}, H.~A. 2006b, in

1043:   AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts, 20.06

1044: 

1045: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Feldman}, {Weaver}, \& {Burgh}}{{Feldman}

1046:   et~al.}{2002}]{feld02b}

1047: {Feldman}, P.~D., {Weaver}, H.~A.,  \& {Burgh}, E.~B. 2002, \apjl, 576, L91

1048: 

1049: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Feldman} et~al.}{{Feldman}

1050:   et~al.}{2004}]{feld04}

1051: {Feldman}, P.~D., et~al. 2004, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 36, 1121

1052: 

1053: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{George}, {Urban}, \& {Le Floch}}{{George}

1054:   et~al.}{1994}]{george94}

1055: {George}, T., {Urban}, W.,  \& {Le Floch}, A. 1994, J. Mol. Spec., 165, 500

1056: 

1057: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Gibb} et~al.}{{Gibb}

1058:   et~al.}{2003}]{gibb03}

1059: {Gibb}, E.~L., {Mumma}, M.~J., {dello Russo}, N., {Disanti}, M.~A., \& {Magee-Sauer}, K. 2003, Icarus, 165, 391

1060: 

1061: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Haser}}{{Haser}}{1957}]{haser57}

1062: {Haser}, L. 1957, Bull. Acad. R. Sci. Li\`ege, 43, 740

1063: 

1064: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Heap} et~al.}{{Heap} et~al.}{1995}]{heap95}

1065: {Heap}, S.~R., et~al. 1995, \pasp, 107, 871

1066: 

1067: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Huebner}, {Keady}, \& {Lyon}}{{Huebner}

1068:   et~al.}{1992}]{Huebner:1992}

1069: {Huebner}, W.~F., {Keady}, J.~J.,  \& {Lyon}, S.~P. 1992, {Solar photo rates

1070:   for planetary atmospheres and atmospheric pollutants} (Dordrecht: Kluwer

1071:   Academic)

1072: 

1073: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Kassal}}{{Kassal}}{1976}]{Kassal:1976}

1074: {Kassal}, T.~T. 1976, \jgr, 81, 1411

1075: 

1076: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Kimble} et~al.}{{Kimble}

1077:   et~al.}{1998}]{kimble98}

1078: {Kimble}, R.~A., et~al. 1998, \apjl, 492, L83

1079: 

1080: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Kirby} \& {Cooper}}{{Kirby} \&

1081:   {Cooper}}{1989}]{kirby89}

1082: {Kirby}, K.,  \& {Cooper}, D.~L. 1989, J. Chem. Phys., 90, 4895

1083: 

1084: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Kittrell}, {Le Floch}, \&

1085:   {Garetz}}{{Kittrell} et~al.}{1993}]{kittrell93}

1086: {Kittrell}, C., {Le Floch}, A.~C.,  \& {Garetz}, B.~A. 1993, J. Phys. Chem.,

1087:   97, 2221

1088: 

1089: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Kurucz}}{{Kurucz}}{1976}]{kurucz76}

1090: {Kurucz}, R.~L. 1976, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Special Report, 374

1091: 

1092: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Le Floch}}{{Le Floch}}{1991}]{lefloch92}

1093: {Le Floch}, A. 1991, \aaps, 90, 513

1094: 

1095: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Le Floch} et~al.}{{Le Floch}

1096:   et~al.}{1987}]{lefloch87}

1097: {Le Floch}, A., {Launay}, F., {Rostas}, J., {Field}, R.~W., {Brown}, C.~M.,  \&

1098:   {Yoshino}, K. 1987, J. Mol. Spec., 121, 337

1099: 

1100: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Lecacheux} et~al.}{{Lecacheux}

1101:   et~al.}{2003}]{lecacheux03}

1102: {Lecacheux}, A., et~al. 2003, \aap, 402, L55

1103: 

1104: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Lemaire} et~al.}{{Lemaire}

1105:   et~al.}{2002}]{Lemaire:2002}

1106: {Lemaire}, P., {Emerich}, C., {Vial}, J.-C., {Curdt}, W., {Sch{\"u}hle}, U.,

1107:   \& {Wilhelm}, K. 2002, in ESA SP-508: From Solar Min to Max: Half a Solar

1108:   Cycle with SOHO, ed. A.~{Wilson}, 219

1109: 

1110: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Lis} et~al.}{{Lis} et~al.}{1997}]{lis97}

1111: {Lis}, D.~C., et~al. 1997, Icarus, 130, 355

1112: 

1113: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Liu} \& {Dalgarno}}{{Liu} \&

1114:   {Dalgarno}}{1996}]{liu96}

1115: {Liu}, W.,  \& {Dalgarno}, A. 1996, \apj, 462, 502

1116: 

1117: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{McPhate} et~al.}{{McPhate}

1118:   et~al.}{1999}]{mcp99}

1119: {McPhate}, J.~B., {Feldman}, P.~D., {McCandliss}, S.~R.,  \& {Burgh}, E.~B.

1120:   1999, \apj, 521, 920

1121: 

1122: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Morton} \& {Noreau}}{{Morton} \&

1123:   {Noreau}}{1989}]{morton94}

1124: {Morton}, D.~C.,  \& {Noreau}, L. 1989, \apj, 347, 863

1125: 

1126: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Notesco}, {Laufer}, \& {Bar-Nun}, A.}{{Notesco}

1127:   et~al.}{1997}]{notesco97}

1128: {Notesco}, G., {Laufer}, D., \& {Bar-Nun}, A. 1997, Icarus, 125, 471

1129: 

1130: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Opal} \& {Carruthers}}{{Opal} \&

1131:   {Carruthers}}{1977}]{opal77}

1132: {Opal}, C.~B.,  \& {Carruthers}, G.~R. 1977, \apj, 211, 294

1133: 

1134: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Rottman} et~al.}{{Rottman}

1135:   et~al.}{2001}]{Rottman:2001}

1136: {Rottman}, G., {Woods}, T., {Snow}, M.,  \& {Detoma}, G. 2001, Adv.

1137:   Space Res., 27, 1927

1138: 

1139: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Sahnow} et~al.}{{Sahnow}

1140:   et~al.}{1993}]{sahnow93}

1141: {Sahnow}, D.~J., {Feldman}, P.~D., {McCandliss}, S.~R.,  \& {Martinez}, M.~E.

1142:   1993, Icarus, 101, 71

1143: 

1144: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Tandberg-Hanssen} et~al.}{{Tandberg-Hanssen}

1145:   et~al.}{1981}]{Tandberg-Hanssen:1981}

1146: {Tandberg-Hanssen}, E., et~al. 1981, \apjl, 244, L127

1147: 

1148: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Tozzi}, {Feldman}, \& {Festou}}{{Tozzi}

1149:   et~al.}{1998}]{tozzi98}

1150: {Tozzi}, G.~P., {Feldman}, P.~D.,  \& {Festou}, M.~C. 1998, \aap, 330, 753

1151: 

1152: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{van Harrevelt} \& {van Hemert}}{{van Harrevelt} \& {van Hemert}}{2000}]{water00}

1153: {van Harrevelt}, R. \& {van Hemert}, M.~C. 2000, \jcp, 112, 5787

1154: 

1155: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Weaver}}{{Weaver}}{1998}]{Weaver:1998}

1156: {Weaver}, H.~A. 1998, in ASP Conf. Ser. 143: The Scientific Impact of the

1157:   Goddard High Resolution Spectrograph, ed. J.~C. {Brandt}, T.~B. {Ake}, \&

1158:   C.~C. {Petersen}, 213

1159: 

1160: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Weaver} et~al.}{{Weaver}

1161:   et~al.}{2002}]{weaver02}

1162: {Weaver}, H.~A., {Feldman}, P.~D., {Combi}, M.~R., {Krasnopolsky}, V., {Lisse},

1163:   C.~M.,  \& {Shemansky}, D.~E. 2002, \apjl, 576, L95

1164: 

1165: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Weaver} et~al.}{{Weaver}

1166:   et~al.}{1994}]{Weaver:1994}

1167: {Weaver}, H.~A., {Feldman}, P.~D., {McPhate}, J.~B., {A'Hearn}, M.~F.,

1168:   {Arpigny}, C.,  \& {Smith}, T.~E. 1994, \apj, 422, 374

1169: 

1170: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Wolven} \& {Feldman}}{{Wolven} \&

1171:   {Feldman}}{1998}]{Wolven:1998}

1172: {Wolven}, B.~C.,  \& {Feldman}, P.~D. 1998, in ASP Conf. Ser. 143: The

1173:   Scientific Impact of the Goddard High Resolution Spectrograph, ed. J.~C.

1174:   {Brandt}, T.~B. {Ake}, \& C.~C. {Petersen}, 373

1175: 

1176: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Woodgate} et~al.}{{Woodgate}

1177:   et~al.}{1998}]{woodgate98}

1178: {Woodgate}, B.~E., et~al. 1998, \pasp, 110, 1183

1179: 

1180: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Woods}, {Feldman}, \& {Dymond}}{{Woods}

1181:   et~al.}{1987}]{woods87}

1182: {Woods}, T.~N., {Feldman}, P.~D.,  \& {Dymond}, K.~F. 1987, \aap, 187, 380

1183: 

1184: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Wouterloot} et~al.}{{Wouterloot}

1185:   et~al.}{1998}]{wouterloot98}

1186: {Wouterloot}, J.~G.~A., {Lingmann}, A., {Miller}, M., {Vowinkel}, B.,

1187:   {Winnewisser}, G.,  \& {Wyrowski}, F. 1998, \planss, 46, 579

1188: 

1189: \end{thebibliography}

1190: 

1191: \end{document}

1192: 

1193: %%

1194: 

1195: 

1196: 

1197: