1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\usepackage{graphicx}
3: \shorttitle{Candidate post T Tauri Stars}
4: \shortauthors{Bubar et al.}
5:
6: \begin{document}
7:
8: \title{KECK HIRES SPECTROSCOPY OF CANDIDATE POST T TAURI STARS}
9: \author{Eric J. Bubar}
10: \affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University,
11: Clemson, SC 29630-0978}
12: \email{ebubar@clemson.edu}
13: \author{Jeremy R. King}
14: \affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University,
15: Clemson, SC 29630-0978}
16: \email{jking2@ces.clemson.edu}
17: \author{David R. Soderblom}
18: \affil{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218}
19: \email{soderblom@stsci.edu}
20: \author{Constantine P. Deliyannis}
21: \affil{Department of Astronomy, Indiana University, 727 East 3rd Street, Swain Hall West 319, Bloomington, IN 47405-7105}
22: \email{con@athena.astro.indiana.edu}
23: \and
24: \author{Ann M. Boesgaard\altaffilmark{1}}
25: \affil{Institute for Astronomy, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822}
26: \email{boes@ifa.hawaii.edu}
27: \altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, W.M KECK Observatory, jointly operated by the
28: California Institute of Technology and the University of California.}
29:
30: \begin{abstract}
31: We use high-signal-to-noise ($\sim$150-450), high resolution ($R{\sim}45,000$)
32: Keck HIRES spectroscopy of 13 candidate post T Tauri stars to derive basic physical
33: parameters, lithium abundances and radial velocities. We place our stars in the
34: M$_v$-T$_{eff}$ plane for use in determining approximate ages from pre-main sequence
35: isochrones, and confirm these using three relative age indicators in
36: our analysis: Li abundances, chromospheric emission and the kinematic {\it U-V} plane. Using
37: the three age criteria we identify 5 stars (HIP 54529, HIP 62758, HIP 63322, HIP 74045,
38: and HIP 104864) as probable post T Tauri stars with ages between 10 and 100 Myr.
39: We confirm HIP 54529 as an SB2 and HIP 63322 as an SB1 star. We also examine irregular photometric
40: variability of PTTs using the {\it HIPPARCOS\/} photometry annex. Two of our PTT stars exhibit near-IR excesses
41: compared to Kurucz model flux; while recent work suggests classical T Tauri stars evince similar {\it JHK\/} excesses
42: presumably indicative of non-photospheric (disk) emission, our results may be illusory artifacts of the chosen {\it I\/}-band
43: normalization. Near-IR excesses we see in a literature-based sample of PTTs appear to be artifacts of previous spectral
44: type-based $T_{\rm eff}$ values. Indeed, comparison of the homology of their observed and model photospheric SED's suggests
45: that photometric temperatures are more reliable than temperatures based on spectral standards for
46: the cooler temperature ranges of the stars in this sample. We conclude that our age oriented analysis
47: is a robust means to select samples of nearby, young, isolated post T Tauri stars that otherwise
48: masquerade as normal field stars.
49:
50: \end{abstract}
51:
52: \keywords{stars: late type - stars: lithium - stars: post T Tauri}
53:
54: \section{INTRODUCTION}
55:
56: The evolution of young stars is becoming increasingly important given the renewed
57: interest in planet formation driven by the continuing discovery of exoplanets
58: (e.g.\citet{2006ApJ...646..505B}). The extremely young ($< 10^7$ yr)
59: pre-main sequence precursors to stars like
60: our own Sun, known as T Tauri stars, are believed to possess environments conducive to
61: planetary formation. Auspiciously, T Tauri stars have
62: distinct observational characteristics that make them relatively easy to identify.
63: Such characteristics include, but are not limited to, strong infrared excesses, strong
64: H$\alpha$ emission, irregular variability and high surface lithium abundances (for a
65: recent review of T Tauri stars refer to \citet{2003Ap.....46..506P}
66: and references therein). By studying young stellar associations, T Tauri stars are fairly
67: easily identifiable. However, the period of evolution (10$^7$ to 10$^8$ yrs) between the
68: T Tauri and zero-age main-sequence phases remains ambiguous. The late-type stars in this age
69: range, referred to as post T Tauri stars (PTTs), are expected to have some degree of
70: ``intermediary characteristics'' between T Tauri and main sequence stages (\citet{1978ppeu.book..171H}). Consequently, a
71: post T Tauri star should possess, for example, relatively high measures of chromospheric
72: emission and relatively high surface Li abundances compared to main sequence stars of comparable mass.
73: It may seem that finding these stars should be relatively simple. By looking near regions of
74: T Tauri stars, we should
75: find that some have evolved into their post T Tauri stage. In fact, as
76: \citet{1978ppeu.book..171H} noted nearly 30 years ago, there must be many times more
77: post T Tauri stars than there are T Tauri stars. Yet studies of young stars which
78: typically concentrate on regions of active star formation often
79: fail to find the numbers of PTTs that are expected.
80:
81: Several explanations that could resolve this apparent disparity are discussed in
82: \citet{1998ApJ...498..385S}, but here we will concentrate on their second solution: that
83: PTTs exist, but are far from star-forming regions. To summarize their findings,
84: \citet{1998ApJ...498..385S} showed HD98800 to be a unique PTT system. This
85: system of four stars was determined to be a young ($\sim$10 Myr) post T Tauri
86: group that is far from any region of active star formation. The orbital properties of
87: the stars mean the system could not have been violently removed from its birthplace.
88: It departed by a more gentle means, suggesting that it is possible that other post T Tauri
89: candidates evolved similarly and now exist in isolated environments.
90:
91: Most recently, post T Tauri search efforts have uncovered loose associations and moving groups that
92: appear to be of post T Tauri age (the $\beta$ Pictoris moving group, the TW Hydrae Association,
93: the Tucana/Horologium Association, and the AB Doradus Moving Group)(\citet{2004ARA&A..42..685Z} and references therein). In fact,
94: HD98800 is now believed to be a member of just such a group (the TW Hydrae association). While it is
95: beginning to appear that post T Tauri stars exist in associations, the sparseness of these groups and
96: their relatively large spread throughout the sky makes their identification problematic. The salient question, then, is how
97: to find these isolated PTTs in the field, away from any regions of star formation. Without a logical starting point,
98: these stars simply cannot be found other than through serendipitous means. In this paper, though, we
99: use an age-oriented definition drawing from the recommendations of \citet{2001ASPC..244....3J}.
100: For our purposes, we define a post T Tauri star as a young,
101: low mass, pre-main sequence star with an age in the range from 10$^7$ to 10$^8$ years, where emergence of a stellar core at
102: visible wavelengths is taken as an age of zero following the work of \citet{1997MmSAI..68..807D}. This
103: age-based definition is also useful by preventing incorrect classification of a
104: weak-lined T Tauri (wTTS) or naked T Tauri (nTTS), which can have features comparable
105: to a PTTs, but may be significantly younger.
106:
107: The objects studied here are part of our ongoing survey of solar-type stars within 60pc
108: based on low-resolution (R${\sim}2000$) spectra mostly from KPNO Coude Feed. For the
109: purpose of follow-up high resolution spectroscopic programs, we flagged stars
110: a) residing significantly above the {\it HIPPARCOS\/}-based main sequence and/or {\ }b)
111: apparently evincing significant \ion{Ca}{2} HK emission in raw 2-d spectra inspected by
112: eye at the telescope as potential PTT candidates.
113:
114: Here we present high-resolution echelle spectroscopy for 13 of these stars. We will derive
115: qualitative age information from three diagnostics (Li abundance, chromospheric emission,
116: and {\it UVW} kinematics) for use in assigning post T Tauri candidacy. We will also determine
117: approximate ages from pre-main sequence isochrones and masses from pre-main sequence mass
118: tracks, both taken from \citet{1997MmSAI..68..807D} (assuming solar metallicity). For completeness, we will also search
119: for indications of irregular variability, examine infrared excesses, and present equivalent
120: widths for the H$\alpha$ feature: all characteristics noted by \citet{1978ppeu.book..171H}
121: to be useful for identifying post T Tauri stars. We present our interpretations of
122: these three features but choose not to include them in our age-oriented analysis as they typically
123: decay on shorter timescales than our chosen indicators, making them less robust.
124:
125: \section{DATA AND ANALYSIS}
126:
127: \subsection{\emph{Observations and Reductions}}
128: Spectroscopy of our objects was obtained on May 28 and 29, 2000 using the W.M. Keck I 10-m
129: telescope (Table \ref{observing}), the HIRES echelle spectrograph, and a Tektronix $2048{\times}2048$ CCD
130: detector. The instrumental setup yielded a resolution of $R{\sim}$45,000 (3.2 pixel FWHM) and
131: (incomplete) wavelength coverage from 4400 to 6800 {\AA}. Standard reductions including
132: bias correction, flat-fielding, scattered light correction, order extraction, and
133: wavelength calibrations (with rms residuals of ${\sim}0.002$ {\AA}) were carried out
134: using standard routines in the {\sf echelle} package of IRAF{\footnote{IRAF is
135: distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated by the
136: Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative
137: agreement with the National Science Foundation.}. Measured per-pixel S/N values near
138: the \ion{Li}{1} ${\lambda}6707$ region ranged from 150-450 and are listed in Table \ref{observing}.
139: Sample spectra in the lithium region can be seen in Figure \ref{spectra}.
140:
141: \subsection{\emph{Basic Physical Parameters}}
142: Temperatures were determined from photometric calibrations of \citet{2005ApJ...626..465R}.
143: Both B-V color indices from the Tycho catalog \citep{1997hity.book.....P} and V-K$_{2mass}$
144: indices \citep{2003tmc..book.....C} were used to find effective temperatures. Errors for
145: temperatures were found from the errors in the respective color indices and in the polynomial
146: fits (Table 2 of \citet{2005ApJ...626..465R}). A weighted mean
147: was taken for input into Kurucz model atmospheres. Our sample, colors, temperatures and other data are
148: compiled in Table \ref{basic}.
149:
150: Special methods had to be utilized for one of the stars in the sample (HIP 54529) as it was found
151: to be a double-lined spectroscopic binary. Following the analysis of \citet{1986ApJ...303..724B},
152: we performed a least squares fit to the ratio of equivalent widths of two \ion{Fe}{1} absorption
153: lines (W(6703)/W(6705)) versus effective temperature for the stars in our sample (Fig \ref{ewt}). We
154: find the fit is given by the formula
155: \begin{equation}
156: \frac{W(6703)}{W6705}=2.066-2.225(10^{-4})T_{eff}.
157: \end{equation}
158: We used the equivalent widths of these lines in the primary and secondary components to determine their
159: respective temperatures. Multiplicative correction factors to account for unequal continuum flux contributions
160: from the components (as described in \citet{1986ApJ...303..724B}) were found
161: to be approximately unity. We report here on the analysis for
162: only the primary component.
163: This technique was not applied to HIP 63322 as it was not a double-lined star. The double
164: nature of this star was revealed by asymmetry in the cross-correlation peaks of our radial velocity analysis.
165:
166: Our photometric temperatures can be compared to the spectroscopic values of \citet{2004A&A...415.1153S}
167: for 6 stars in the sample (footnote `a' of Table \ref{basic}). We find that our temperatures for warmer
168: stars tend to agree nicely with their spectroscopic estimates but become systematically cooler
169: (by as much as 250 K at 4600 K) with declining temperatures. We suspect the spectroscopic
170: T$_{eff}$ values are afflicted by the effects of overexcitation seen in young cool
171: dwarfs \citep{2006ApJ...636..432S}. For this reason we have chosen to utilize photometric temperatures.
172:
173: Use of Hipparcos parallaxes allowed us to calculate ``physical'' surface gravities using:
174: \begin{equation}
175: log\frac{g}{g_\odot}=log\frac{M}{M\odot}+4log\frac{T_{eff}}{T_{eff,\odot}}+0.4V_o+0.4B.C.+2log{\pi}+0.12
176: \end{equation}
177: where M is the mass in solar masses (determined from the pre-main sequence mass tracks of \citet{1997MmSAI..68..807D}),
178: V$_o$ is the apparent magnitude and $\pi$ is the parallax in arcseconds.
179: The surface gravity is given in Table \ref{basic}. The average uncertainty for the surface gravity
180: parameter was approximately 0.20 dex. We note that mass differences (as discussed in Section 3.2) from using tracks of
181: \citet{2000A&A...358..593S} and \citet{1998A&A...337..403B} result in surface gravities that differ from
182: our adopted ones by 0.01-0.17 dex when using the former and 0.01-0.18 dex when using the latter.
183:
184: The microturbulence parameter was determined from calibrations of
185: \citet{2004A&A...420..183A}. They derived a relationship for determining microturbulence as
186: a function of effective temperature and surface gravity. The error in this parameter was
187: determined by propagating the errors in effective temperature and log\emph{g}. The average error
188: in the microturbulence was found to be 0.01 kms$^{-1}$. In order to examine the extent to which microturbulence
189: would effect our lithium feature we performed lithium synthesis for microturbulent velocities spanning
190: 1 kms$^-{1}$. We find this change to have very little effect on the lithium feature ($\le$ 0.01 dex).
191:
192: Overall metallicities were kindly provided by R. Boone and are given in Table \ref{basic}.
193: These are derived based on $\chi^2$ fitting of low-res blue spectra (R$\sim$2000) with synthetic
194: spectra of varying abundance \citep{2006NewAR..50..526B}. Internal 1-$\sigma$ level uncertainties
195: are believed to be $\sim$ 0.10 dex.
196:
197: \subsection{\emph{Lithium Abundances}}
198: The basic physical parameters for each star were utilized to linearly interpolate model atmospheres
199: from the Kurucz ATLAS9 atmosphere grids. These model atmospheres were then used in
200: conjunction with the comprehensive line list from \citet{1997AJ....113.1871K} to compute
201: synthetic spectra with various Li abundances using the most recent version of the spectral
202: synthesis tool MOOG \citep{1973ApJ...184..839S}. The chosen models introduce an uncertainty into the
203: lithium abundances of 0.03 dex, determined by comparing synthetic lithium synthesis for a standard Kurucz solar
204: model and one developed using our interpolated model atmospheres. The synthetic spectra were smoothed
205: appropriately by convolving them with Gaussians having FWHM values measured from clean,
206: weak lines (continuum depths $\leq$0.2) in multiple orders for each star using the spectrum analysis
207: tool SPECTRE \citep{1987BAAS...19.1129F}.
208:
209: We positively identified lithium in 7 of the 13 stars in the sample. We derive upper limits for
210: the other 6 stars. We attempted to determine equivalent width errors based on the
211: photon noise methods of \citet{1988IAUS..132..345C}, but found 1-$\sigma$ errors $\le$1.0 m\AA, which are
212: significantly smaller than the uncertainty in continuum placement. In lieu of a more rigorous
213: treatment, we choose to adopt a conservative equivalent width error estimate of 4 m\AA.
214: By performing additional lithium syntheses for each of the stars, we translate this
215: equivalent width uncertainty to an upper limit in lithium abundance for each star. Sample syntheses
216: are presented in Figure \ref{spectra}.
217:
218: Appropriate uncertainties in the lithium fits were derived by estimating the goodness of fit by
219: means of an F-test of relative $\chi^2$ values and by adding in quadrature an approximate
220: uncertainty of logN(Li)$\pm$0.08 for a temperature uncertainty of $\pm$100. The typical
221: error in the lithium abundances are found to be $\sim$0.06 dex. The synthetic lithium abundances
222: are given, with their respective errors, in Table \ref{basic}. We also plot our lithium abundances versus effective
223: temperatures for both the stars in our sample and stars in the $\sim$100 Myr Pleiades cluster
224: (Figure \ref{lithium}). The Pleiades data are taken from \citet{1993AJ....106.1059S}, \citet{1996AJ....112..186J},
225: and \citet{2000AJ....119..859K} .
226:
227: \subsection{Radial Velocities and {\it UVW} Kinematics}
228:
229: Radial velocities were derived via cross-correlation analysis using the IRAF packages
230: FXCOR and RVCOR. We used HIP 90485 as our template spectrum and adopted its
231: CORAVEL radial velocity of -17.4 $\pm$ 0.2 kms$^{-1}$ \citep{2004A&A...418..989N}. Whenever possible,
232: we compared our radial velocities with precise determinations from the literature. In all cases, our
233: velocities matched within the adopted errors. These radial velocities and errors are
234: shown in Table \ref{radial}. The quoted errors are the internal uncertainties from
235: fitting the cross-correlation functions. Total radial velocity uncertainties
236: are larger than the cross-correlation fitting uncertainties inasmuch as $\sim$2 kms$^{-1}$
237: intranight telluric line shifts are observed.
238:
239: The cross-correlation peaks used in the radial velocity determinations confirmed that both
240: HIP 54529 and HIP 63322 were members of binary systems. This was readily apparent in the
241: double lined spectrum of HIP 54529, but HIP 63322 showed no indication of double lines. The
242: asymmetry of the radial velocity cross-correlation peaks showed this star's binary nature.
243:
244: Space motions were derived with an updated version of the code used by
245: \citet{1987AJ.....93..864J} which accounts for covariances. The required
246: inputs, {\it UVW} Kinematics, and uncertainties are
247: given in Table \ref{radial}.
248:
249: \section{RESULTS AND DISCUSSION}
250:
251: \subsection{\emph{Post T Tauri Status Evaluation}}
252:
253: We utilize three different indicators to assess the evolutionary classification of
254: our stars (summarized in Table \ref{summary}). First is the lithium abundance. We plot in
255: Figure \ref{lithium} our derived lithium
256: abundances against effective temperatures for each star, and lithium abundances in the
257: Pleiades cluster from \citet{2000AJ....119..859K}; they utilized temperatures and lithium
258: abundances derived from both B-V and V-I color indices which we averaged to find a single
259: temperature and abundance. Those stars with abundances that place them in the observed
260: lithium abundance trend of the Pleiades are qualitatively classified as likely being young.
261: Those stars which have measureable Li, yet lie below the Li trend of the Pleiades have
262: inconclusive results about youth. Finally, those stars which have no measurable lithium
263: (i.e. upper limits) are stipulated to most likely be older stars, and unlikely post T Tauri candidates.
264:
265: Chromospheric activity also provides a useful estimate of youth. In
266: Figure \ref{Rhk} we plot the chromospheric activity index logR$^{\prime}$$_{HK}$ (from the recent
267: chromospheric \ion{Ca}{2} H and K survey of nearby (d $\le$ 60 pc) late F through early K dwarfs of D.
268: Soderblom) versus color index for each of our stars. We separate this plot into four
269: distinct activity levels, following the works of \citet{1996AJ....111..439H} and
270: \citet{2003AJ....126.2048G}. We classify those stars with logR$^{\prime}_{HK}$ greater than -4.75
271: as either active or very active, and therefore, young targets. It can be noted in
272: Fig. \ref{Rhk} that many of the stars have activities resting in the inactive zone, yet
273: are still near to the active part. While it is unlikely that activity variations are entirely due
274: to stellar variability we note that activity can be at least partially diminished by various
275: effects (i.e. Maunder Minimum phases). With this in mind, we label these stars with inconclusive ages based on
276: chromospheric emission. Those stars which rest in the very inactive category are classified
277: as unlikely to be young.
278:
279: Third, we utilize {\it UVW} kinematics to discern additional qualitative age information. We
280: plotted our stars in the {\it U-V} plane (Fig. \ref{UV}) for comparison with locations of both
281: `early-type' groups (young main sequence stars of spectral types B-F) and
282: `late-type' groups (a mixture of young and old main sequence stars of spectral type F-M) in
283: figures 8 and 10 of \citet{1999MNRAS.308..731S}. When a star clearly resides outside of
284: any structures depicted as being young they are classified as likely being older stars.
285: In doing so, we identified several potential members (HIP 47007, HIP 47202, HIP 104903) of the
286: alleged Wolf 630 moving group of \citet{1969PASP...81..553E}. Youth is difficult to confirm
287: from kinematics alone, therefore the {\it U-V} plane was primarily used to exclude older objects.
288: While no conclusive results can be determined, the {\it UVW} kinematics did provide a useful
289: criteria for confirming stars with lower lithium abundance and lower activity as being old.
290:
291: We considered the above 3 criteria in interpreting evolutionary status from the H-R diagram.
292: In order to describe a star as being young we require 1) a measurable lithium abundance at least
293: as high as that observed in the Pleiades 2) classification of
294: chromospheric activity as either very active or active and 3) non-membership in ``old''
295: structures in the {\it U-V} plane. The stars which satisfied these criteria are deemed to likely
296: be young stars and mass and age estimates are determined from pre-main sequence mass tracks
297: and isochrones of \citet{1997MmSAI..68..807D}. The lithium, chromospheric emission, and kinematic
298: criteria suggest that some of our objects (HIP 90004, HIP 90485, HIP 104903, HIP 47007, HIP 47202)
299: are post ZAMS. Ages are not derived for these
300: stars, as we have successfully eliminated them from consideration as post T Tauri
301: candidates.
302:
303: \subsection{\emph{Ages}}
304:
305: Ages were derived in the standard manner from the most recent pre-main sequence isochrones of
306: \citet{1997MmSAI..68..807D}. Examining the positions of our stars in the H-R diagram we
307: found them to lie above or very near the main sequence. We take an age of 100 Myr as
308: indicative of membership on the zero-age main sequence, which is confirmed by the coincidence of
309: single Pleiades stars from \citet{2000AJ....119..859K} with the 100 Myr isochrone.
310:
311: Figure \ref{pttcolormag} contains our PTT candidates, the D'antona isochrones for ages of
312: 10, 20, 30, 50 and 100 Myrs, and the mass tracks from \citet{1997MmSAI..68..807D}. Uncertainties
313: in age are internal and are derived entirely from H-R diagram position and do not account for systematic
314: effects in the models. Errors from convection treatments and opacity effects are not considered.
315: We also examined derived ages and masses using track from both \citet{1998A&A...337..403B} and \citet{2000A&A...358..593S}
316: to determine the consistency of our derived ages. The isochrones all give similar ages within the error bars. The mass
317: tracks from \citet{1998A&A...337..403B} are shifted to lower T$_{eff}$ resulting in higher mass
318: estimates, particularly for the lower mass stars. Mass differences appear to be as great as 0.07 M$\odot$
319: around 0.80 M$\odot$ and diminish to 0.02 M$\odot$ at a mass of 1.05 M$\odot$. The mass estimates
320: from \citet{2000A&A...358..593S} tracks agree well with those from \citet{1997MmSAI..68..807D}.
321:
322: \subsection{\emph{Individual Stars}}
323:
324: We present results for each of the stars in the sample. Those stars which we classify as post T Tauri
325: are given in bold.
326:
327: \emph{HIP 47007/HD 82943}.---The HIP 47007 lithium abundance (logN(Li)=2.33) lies a factor of 5-6 below the
328: Pleiades distribution; the abundance is more consistent with the older ($\sim$ 600 Myr)
329: Hyades distribution (Fig. 5 of \citet{1995ApJ...446..203B}). The chromospheric emission clearly
330: makes this star inactive (logR$^\prime$$_{HK}$=-4.84). The implied older age is confirmed by the {\it U-V}
331: plane, where this star appears to reside in the Wolf 630 moving group region. Its position in
332: the H-R diagram indicates the star is post ZAMS.
333:
334: \emph{HIP 47202/HD 83443}.---This star's Li upper limit (logN(Li)$<$0.40) and low chromospheric
335: emission (logR$^\prime$$_{HK}$=-4.85) suggest an old designation. Indeed, its location in the {\it U-V} plane
336: is in the middle of the Wolf 630 moving group. While the super-solar metallicity (Fe/H = 0.20) may have led to greater
337: standard PMS convective lithium depletion, its evolutionary status as a post ZAMS is heavily implied by its low activity,
338: its kinematic plane position and its HR diagram position.
339:
340: \emph{\textbf{HIP 54529A/BD +83 319A}}.---The Pleiades-like abundance of lithium in the primary was found to
341: be logN(Li)=1.21; we believe the effects of continuum dilution on this abundance to be very small (a
342: few percent). This is the only star for which a chromospheric emission index was not available.
343: However, we compare the level of H$\alpha$ emission with that of other stars in our sample in
344: Figure \ref{halpha}. The high level of H$\alpha$ emission is comparable to the amount of emission
345: seen in the most active star in the sample, leading us to label this object as very active. We
346: derive an age of 25$\pm^{55}_{15}$ Myr and a mass of 0.83 $\pm$ 0.09 M$\odot$ from H-R diagram
347: position. Given the young age and no negative indication of youth from the kinematics, we
348: designate this star as post T Tauri.
349:
350: \emph{HIP 59152/BD +19 2531}.---This star has no measurable lithium. We set an upper limit of logN(Li)$<$0.10.
351: The moderate level of chromospheric emission (logR$^\prime$$_{HK}$=-4.52) places it along the boundary
352: between the active and inactive class; therefore, age results from this criterion are inconclusive.
353: Position in the {\it U-V} kinematic plane is inconclusive. Its location places it inside of the
354: Sirius branch \citep{1999MNRAS.308..731S}. For this star, the lack of evidence of youth from activity
355: and kinematics and the presence of very little lithium make this star unlikely to be a good post T Tauri candidate.
356:
357: \emph{\textbf{HIP 62758/HD111813}}.---This star has a near-Pleiades lithium abundance of \\logN(Li)=1.67; its
358: chromospheric emission (logR$^\prime$$_{HK}$=-4.32) places it in the active category. These two findings suggest
359: possible youth not inconsistent with its location in the {\it U-V} plane. Using the H-R diagram
360: we derive an age of 47$\pm^{30}_{10}$ Myr and a mass of 0.78 $\pm$ 0.02 M$\odot$. Recognizing that, within
361: the errors, this star is nearly on the ZAMS we classify it as a PTT or ZAMS star.
362:
363: \emph{\textbf{HIP 63322/BD+39 2587}}.---We find an appreciable abundance of lithium in this star
364: (logN(Li)=1.60). Its chromospheric emission ties for the highest of any of the stars in the sample
365: (logR$^\prime$$_{HK}$-4.12). Location near the Pleiades branch \citep{2005A&A...443..609S} in the kinematic plane
366: is consistent with youth. The age (45 $\pm^{15}_{13}$Myr)
367: derived from the location in the H-R diagram, coupled with the significant Li and chromospheric emission,
368: leads us to label this star as post T Tauri. We find a rough estimate of the mass, assuming it was a single star, of
369: 0.77 $\pm$ 0.03 M$\odot$. We also note again that the line profiles and the
370: cross-correlation peaks exhibit a notable asymmetry, indicative of this star being a spectroscopic
371: binary.
372:
373: \emph{\textbf{HIP 74045/HD135363}}.---HIP 74045 is the only broad-lined star of the sample, suggesting a moderate projected rotation ($\sim$15 km/s)
374: consistent with youth. The substantial lithium abundance (logN(Li)=1.96) lying in the midst of the Pleiades'
375: distribution is also suggestive of youth. The chromospheric emission (logR$^\prime$$_{HK}$=-4.17) places
376: this star in the very active category. Finally, this object does not reside in any older {\it U-V} kinematic plane structures.
377: The location in the H-R diagram confirms youth and a PTT
378: classification with an age of 36 $\pm^{14}_{6}$ Myr and a mass of 0.78 $\pm$ 0.01 M$\odot$.
379:
380: \emph{HIP 87330/HD162020}.---Our upper limit to the lithium abundance of HIP 87330 \\(logN(Li)$<$-0.30)
381: lies a factor of 10 below the Pleiades trend, suggesting a post ZAMS age. However,
382: the chromospheric emission index (logR$^\prime$$_{HK}$=-4.12) taken from \citet{2005A&A...443..609S}, ties for
383: the highest in the sample. The kinematics of the star yield inconclusive results. With the lack of
384: correlation between the low lithium abundance and high chromospheric emission we hesitate to make any
385: definitive conclusions on the nature of this star.
386:
387: \emph{HIP 90004/HD168746}.---This star has an upper limit to its lithium abundance of logN(Li)$<$0.90. The chromospheric
388: emission index (logR$^\prime$$_{HK}$=-5.11) is the lowest in the sample. While its position in the {\it U-V} plane
389: is inconclusive, the low lithium upper limit, the extremely low emission index and H-R diagram position
390: imply this star is post ZAMS.
391:
392: \emph{HIP 90485/HD169830}.---We set an upper limit on this star of logN(Li)$<$1.5. The chromospheric emission is also
393: extremely low (logR$^\prime$$_{HK}$=-4.93). Although the position in the {\it U-V} kinematic plane is inconclusive,
394: the low lithium upper limit coupled with the low emission index clearly indicate that this star's location
395: above the main sequence on the H-R diagram is due to its status as a post ZAMS star.
396:
397: \emph{\textbf{HIP 104864/HD202116}}.---This star shows a high lithium abundance of
398: \\logN(Li)=2.50, which lies just below the Pleiades trend. The emission index of logR$^\prime$$_{HK}$=-4.37
399: places this star in the active category. The {\it U-V} kinematics do not place this star within any
400: old moving group structures. While these three indications imply youth for the star,
401: the position in the H-R diagram shows that, within the errors, this star could reside on the main sequence.
402: We derive an age of 29 $\pm^{21}_{5} Myr$ and a mass of 1.03 $\pm$ 0.02 M$\odot$. While this age makes the
403: star a post T Tauri candidate, its location in the H-R diagram shows that a ZAMS classification remains plausible.
404:
405: \emph{HIP 104903/HD 202206}.---This star exhibits a low Li abundance (logN(Li)=1.10), placing it well below the Pleiades
406: distribution. The chromospheric emission of logR$^\prime$$_{HK}$=-4.81 places it in the inactive category, implying
407: a slightly older star. Indeed, the position in the {\it U-V} plane leads to
408: classification of this star as a potential member of the alleged 5 Gyr Wolf 630 moving group
409: of \citet{1969PASP...81..553E}. Its position in the H-R diagram indicates the star is post ZAMS.
410:
411: \emph{HIP 114007/BD -07 5930}.---The star has an upper limit lithium abundance of logN(Li) $<$ 0.30 and an extremely
412: low chromospheric emission index (logR$^\prime$$_{HK}$-4.74). The object's position in the kinematic plane is
413: inconclusive. The low lithium upper limit and the low chromospheric emission, coupled with the position
414: on the H-R diagram, lead to this star's classification as ZAMS or older.
415:
416: \subsection{\emph{Irregular Variability}}
417:
418: We used the {\it HIPPARCOS\/} Epoch Photometry Annex to examine photometric variability in the 5 PTT
419: candidates. This tool provided all the photometric measurements from the {\it HIPPARCOS\/}
420: mission for the stars in our sample. We used these to construct histograms of the reduced
421: chi-squared ($\chi_{\nu}^{2}$) and the real dispersion ($\sigma_{real}$) of the V magnitudes about their
422: average. We calculate the difference in the observed and expected variances as the real variance.
423:
424: For comparison, we performed the same analysis on a sample of the 25 best solar analog
425: candidates from tables 5,6 and 7 of \citet{1996A&ARv...7..243C}. These analogs provide
426: a solid baseline of inactive stars that are presumably not subject to irregular variability.
427: Additionally, we performed this analysis for 15 classical T-Tauri stars from the emission line star
428: catalog of Herbig and Bell \citep{1995yCat.5073....0H} with available {\it HIPPARCOS\/} data. The solar analogs
429: and T Tauri stars provide the context of a large range of anticipated variability to
430: fit our post T Tauri stars into. We also include 41 post T Tauri aged stars taken from the literature
431: \citep{2002AJ....124.1670M} to increase the PTT sample size and compare with our candidates.
432: The $\chi_{\nu}^{2}$ and $\sigma_{real}$ can be seen in Figure \ref{bins}.
433:
434: The T Tauri stars clearly show random variability. The majority have both
435: $\chi_{\nu}^{2}$ values and real dispersions nearly an order of magnitude greater than the PTTs
436: and solar analogs.
437:
438: The majority of the solar analogs cluster around $\chi_{\nu}^{2}$ $\sim$ 1. This shows
439: that the analogs tend to have magnitudes close to their average, i.e. that they are much
440: less variable. Furthermore, the dispersion histogram also
441: shows that the analogs stay clustered close to their average magnitudes with the typical
442: dispersion $\sigma_{real}\le$ 0.01 mag.
443:
444: The $\chi_{\nu}^{2}$ and $\sigma_{real}$ of our post T Tauri candidates fit nicely in the
445: range exhibited in the literature sample, between $\chi_{\nu}^{2}$ values of 1 and 4,
446: lending further credence to their selection as candidates. Also, notice the dispersions
447: of the post T Tauri magnitudes are both lower and less widespread than those of the TTs.
448: They are not as variable as their precursors. Examining
449: the overall picture, notice that both the $\chi_{\nu}^{2}$ and $\sigma_{real}$ are intermediate between the
450: values exhibited by T Tauri stars and solar analogs as expected.
451:
452: We performed a Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test of the distributions to quantitatively explore the
453: differences between the histogram distributions. The K-S test comparing the distribution of both the
454: real dispersions ($\sigma_{real}$ and $\chi_{\nu}^{2}$) values for T-Tauri stars and our post T Tauri stars
455: revealed that the two samples were not drawn from the same distribution. Comparing the PTT sample
456: from the literature with the PTTs of this paper, we found them to be drawn from a similar
457: distribution. Finally, the K-S test for our PTTs and solar analogs revealed that the two
458: cumulative samples were drawn from different distributions. The K-S tests then solidify our PTT classications
459: to the extent that they confirm that PTT stars have an intermediate degree of irregular variability between
460: T Tauri stars and solar analogs, as anticipated.
461:
462: \subsection{\emph{Infrared Excess}}
463:
464: For the sake of completeness we conducted a search for any irregularities in the PTT SED's, traced by
465: Johnson BVI$_{C}$ photometry, 2MASS JHK$_s$ photometry and IRAS and SPITZER photometry
466: when available. Considering the proximity of these stars (within 60 parsecs of the Sun), we
467: did not anticipate that they would be affected by insterstellar reddening. However, to determine the extent
468: to which reddening may have an affect we created a reddening sensitive
469: Johnson-band color-color diagram of (J-K) versus (V-K), following \citet{1983AJ.....88..623C}.
470: The stars in our sample were clearly seen to lie along a trend
471: of unreddened, single stars of the Hyades cluster. This implies that they are
472: not susceptible to interstellar reddening.
473:
474: After establishing that reddening corrections were unnecessary, we converted the relevant magnitudes to flux densities (in Jansky) for
475: comparison with Kurucz model photospheric fluxes \citep{2003IAUS..210P.A20C}, normalized at I$_{C}$. We chose
476: to normalize to the I$_{C}$ magnitudes. Two of the 5 PTTs we identified showed significant near-infrared excesses (HIP 63322, HIP 74045).
477: However, we reserve judgement on the authenticity of the observed excess in these two cases because
478: using a J-band normalization yields no sign of excess in any of the stars (Fig.(\ref{kurucz_norm})). Indeed,
479: in contrast to the results of \citet{2005ApJ...635..422C} on JHK excesses in CTTs, we find that a J-band
480: normalization slightly improves the fit to the SED at other wavelengths.
481:
482: In order to examine the likelihood that a PTTs would exhibit a near-IR excess, we performed the same analysis on
483: a literature sample of 16 post T Tauri stars \citep{2002AJ....124.1670M}, who utilize spectral-type based
484: T{\rm eff\/} values. The sample
485: analyzed showed that excess was present in approximately 50 percent of the stars analyzed. To further examine our
486: methodology, we analyzed a sample of presumably unremarkable solar analogs to confirm that no
487: spurious effects were present. None of the solar analogs analyzed exhibited any form of
488: infrared excess. In Figures \ref{blackbody1} and
489: \ref{blackbody2} we present SEDs for our stars as well as a sample of solar analogs and
490: literature post T Tauri stars.
491:
492: The observed SEDs of many objects in the literature sample
493: of post T Tauri stars seemed to match the morphology of our post T Tauri candidates of lower T{\rm eff\/} thus
494: we calculated photometric temperatures for each of the literature stars and performed a Kurucz
495: model flux fit using these photometric temperatures. The model fluxes characterized by photometric temperatures
496: fit the observed SEDs better than those characterized by the literature-based effective temperature values (Fig. \ref{kurucz_MAMAMIA})
497: which are 250-1000 K higher.
498: This indicates that photometric temperatures may be more reliable than those determined from spectral type calibrations
499: for the cooler PMS stars or the log(g)-based decrements used by \citet{2002AJ....124.1670M} are too small.
500:
501:
502: \subsection{\emph{H$\alpha$ Equivalent Widths}}
503:
504: H$\alpha$ emission provides a strong indication of youth in a star. However,
505: if we consider H$\alpha$ emission relative to our other indicators of youth, it has the
506: smallest decay time. So, while high levels of emission imply youth, low levels of
507: emission (or high levels of absorption) do not necessarily discredit youth. For completeness, measurements
508: of the equivalent widths of the H$\alpha$ feature for each of the stars in the sample are
509: presented in Table \ref{eqwidth} since these line strengths are often used in classifying CTTs.
510:
511: We note that the binary star HIP 63322 exhibits a P-Cygni profile in the H$\alpha$ region, a
512: feature that is common in many classical T Tauri stars; however, the EW is too low to suggest such a
513: classification. The blueshifted absorption feature
514: can be attributed to a strong stellar wind, however, a small redshifted absorption feature
515: also appears to be present. Data with the H$\alpha$ line centered away from the edge of the CCD are needed
516: to examine this feature and
517: determine if it is ``real''. If it represents an actual absorption, this could be
518: indicative of infall onto one of the members of the system, making this a particularly
519: interesting example of a post T Tauri system.
520:
521: \section{SUMMARY}
522: We have utilized an age-oriented analysis to identify 5 isolated post T Tauri candidates (HIP 54529,
523: HIP 62758, HIP 63322, HIP 74045, HIP 104864) and analyzed their irregular variability and SEDs. The irregular
524: variability of our candidates, and PTTs in general, appear to be intermediate in nature to T Tauri and solar analog
525: variability. Two of the 5 candidates (HIP 63322 and HIP 74045) exhibit near-IR excesses when normalized to the
526: I$_{C}$, although this same excess is non-existent with a J-band normalization. Subsequent study
527: must be undertaken to determine the nature and validity of these excesses. In our SED analysis, we also find that model
528: fluxes based on photometric temperatures appear to match observed SEDs better than model fluxes using temperatures based
529: on spectral standards. Also of note is the binarity of 2 of our
530: post T Tauri stars: HIP 54529 and HIP 63322 are found to be spectroscopic binaries.
531:
532: Our combination of H-R diagram positions and various qualitative indicators of youth (including lithium abundances,
533: chromospheric emission and kinematics) appears to be a robust means to select samples of nearby, young, isolated post T
534: Tauri stars that would otherwise masquerade as normal field stars. The method that we have developed will be
535: applied to larger samples of stars to further enhance the population of known post T Tauri stars.
536:
537: \acknowledgments
538: We thank Roggie Boone for use of his metallicity determinations. We also wish to thank the anonymous
539: referee whose comments helped to improve and clarify the paper. This
540: research has made use of the NASA/ IPAC Infrared Science Archive, which is operated by
541: the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with
542: the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This publication also makes use of data
543: products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University
544: of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of
545: Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National
546: Science Foundation. JRK and EJB gratefully acknowledge support for this work from NSF grants AST-0086576 and
547: AST-0239518. EJB would also like to acknowledge support from the South Carolina Space Grant Consortium.
548:
549: \begin{thebibliography}{}
550:
551: \bibitem[Allende Prieto et al.(2004)]{2004A&A...420..183A} Allende Prieto,
552: C., Barklem, P.~S., Lambert, D.~L., \& Cunha, K.\ 2004, \aap, 420, 183
553:
554: \bibitem[Balachandran(1995)]{1995ApJ...446..203B} Balachandran, S.\ 1995,
555: \apj, 446, 203
556:
557: \bibitem[Baraffe et al.(1998)]{1998A&A...337..403B} Baraffe, I., Chabrier,
558: G., Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P.~H.\ 1998, \aap, 337, 403
559:
560: \bibitem[Boesgaard \& Tripicco(1986)]{1986ApJ...303..724B} Boesgaard,
561: A.~M., \& Tripicco, M.~J.\ 1986, \apj, 303, 724
562:
563: \bibitem[Boone et al.(2006)]{2006NewAR..50..526B} Boone, R.~H., King,
564: J.~R., \& Soderblom, D.~R.\ 2006, New Astronomy Review, 50, 526
565:
566: \bibitem[Butler et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...646..505B} Butler, R.~P., et al.\
567: 2006, \apj, 646, 505
568:
569: \bibitem[Carney(1983)]{1983AJ.....88..623C} Carney, B.~W.\ 1983, \aj, 88,
570: 623
571:
572: \bibitem[Castelli \& Kurucz(2003)]{2003IAUS..210P.A20C} Castelli, F., \&
573: Kurucz, R.~L.\ 2003, Modelling of Stellar Atmospheres, 210, 20P
574:
575: \bibitem[Cayrel(1988)]{1988IAUS..132..345C} Cayrel, R.\ 1988, IAU
576: Symp.~132: The Impact of Very High S/N Spectroscopy on Stellar Physics,
577: 132, 345
578:
579: \bibitem[Cayrel de Strobel(1996)]{1996A&ARv...7..243C} Cayrel de Strobel,
580: G.\ 1996, \aapr, 7, 243
581:
582: \bibitem[Cieza et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...635..422C} Cieza, L.~A.,
583: Kessler-Silacci, J.~E., Jaffe, D.~T., Harvey, P.~M., \& Evans, N.~J., II
584: 2005, \apj, 635, 422
585:
586: \bibitem[Cutri et al.(2003)]{2003tmc..book.....C} Cutri, R.~M., et al.\
587: 2003, The IRSA 2MASS All-Sky Point Source Catalog, NASA/IPAC Infrared
588: Science Archive.~http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/applications/Gator/,
589:
590: \bibitem[D'Antona \& Mazzitelli(1997)]{1997MmSAI..68..807D} D'Antona, F.,
591: \& Mazzitelli, I.\ 1997, Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana, 68,
592: 807
593:
594: \bibitem[Eggen(1969)]{1969PASP...81..553E} Eggen, O.~J.\ 1969, \pasp, 81,
595: 553
596:
597: \bibitem[Fitzpatrick \& Sneden(1987)]{1987BAAS...19.1129F} Fitzpatrick,
598: M.~J., \& Sneden, C.\ 1987, \baas, 19, 1129
599:
600: \bibitem[Gray et al.(2003)]{2003AJ....126.2048G} Gray, R.~O., Corbally,
601: C.~J., Garrison, R.~F., McFadden, M.~T., \& Robinson, P.~E.\ 2003, \aj,
602: 126, 2048
603:
604: \bibitem[Henry et al.(1996)]{1996AJ....111..439H} Henry, T.~J., Soderblom,
605: D.~R., Donahue, R.~A., \& Baliunas, S.~L.\ 1996, \aj, 111, 439
606:
607: \bibitem[Herbig(1978)]{1978ppeu.book..171H} Herbig, G.~H.\ 1978, Problems
608: of Physics and Evolution of the Universe, 171
609:
610: \bibitem[Herbig \& Bell(1995)]{1995yCat.5073....0H} Herbig, G.~H., \& Bell,
611: K.~R.\ 1995, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 5073, 0
612:
613: \bibitem[Israelian et al.(2004)]{2004A&A...414..601I} Israelian, G.,
614: Santos, N.~C., Mayor, M., \& Rebolo, R.\ 2004, \aap, 414, 601
615:
616: \bibitem[Jensen(2001)]{2001ASPC..244....3J} Jensen, E.~L.~N.\ 2001, ASP
617: Conf.~Ser.~244: Young Stars Near Earth: Progress and Prospects, 244, 3
618:
619: \bibitem[Johnson \& Soderblom(1987)]{1987AJ.....93..864J} Johnson,
620: D.~R.~H., \& Soderblom, D.~R.\ 1987, \aj, 93, 864
621:
622: \bibitem[Jones et al.(1996)]{1996AJ....112..186J} Jones, B.~F., Shetrone,
623: M., Fischer, D., \& Soderblom, D.~R.\ 1996, \aj, 112, 186
624:
625: \bibitem[King et al.(1997)]{1997AJ....113.1871K} King, J.~R., Deliyannis,
626: C.~P., Hiltgen, D.~D., Stephens, A., Cunha, K., \& Boesgaard, A.~M.\ 1997,
627: \aj, 113, 1871
628:
629: \bibitem[King et al.(2000)]{2000AJ....119..859K} King, J.~R.,
630: Krishnamurthi, A., \& Pinsonneault, M.~H.\ 2000, \aj, 119, 859
631:
632: \bibitem[Mamajek et al.(2002)]{2002AJ....124.1670M} Mamajek, E.~E., Meyer,
633: M.~R., \& Liebert, J.\ 2002, \aj, 124, 1670
634:
635: \bibitem[Nordstr{\"o}m et al.(2004)]{2004A&A...418..989N} Nordstr{\"o}m,
636: B., et al.\ 2004, \aap, 418, 989
637:
638: \bibitem[Perryman \& ESA(1997)]{1997hity.book.....P} Perryman, M.~A.~C., \&
639: ESA 1997, The Hipparcos and Tycho catalogues.~Astrometric and photometric
640: star catalogues derived from the ESA {\it HIPPARCOS\/} Space Astrometry Mission,
641: Publisher: Noordwijk, Netherlands: ESA Publications Division, 1997, Series:
642: ESA SP Series vol no: 1200, ISBN: 9290923997 (set),
643:
644: \bibitem[Petrov(2003)]{2003Ap.....46..506P} Petrov, P.~P.\ 2003,
645: Astrophysics, 46, 506
646:
647: \bibitem[Ram{\'{\i}}rez \& Mel{\'e}ndez(2005)]{2005ApJ...626..465R}
648: Ram{\'{\i}}rez, I., \& Mel{\'e}ndez, J.\ 2005, \apj, 626, 465
649:
650: \bibitem[Saffe et al.(2005)]{2005A&A...443..609S} Saffe, C., G{\'o}mez, M.,
651: \& Chavero, C.\ 2005, \aap, 443, 609
652:
653: \bibitem[Santos et al.(2004)]{2004A&A...415.1153S} Santos, N.~C.,
654: Israelian, G., \& Mayor, M.\ 2004, \aap, 415, 1153
655:
656: \bibitem[Schuler et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...636..432S} Schuler, S.~C., King,
657: J.~R., Terndrup, D.~M., Pinsonneault, M.~H., Murray, N., \& Hobbs, L.~M.\
658: 2006, \apj, 636, 432
659:
660: \bibitem[Siess et al.(2000)]{2000A&A...358..593S} Siess, L., Dufour, E., \&
661: Forestini, M.\ 2000, \aap, 358, 593
662:
663: \bibitem[Skuljan et al.(1999)]{1999MNRAS.308..731S} Skuljan, J., Hearnshaw,
664: J.~B., \& Cottrell, P.~L.\ 1999, \mnras, 308, 731
665:
666: \bibitem[Sneden(1973)]{1973ApJ...184..839S} Sneden, C.\ 1973, \apj, 184,
667: 839
668:
669: \bibitem[Soderblom et al.(1993)]{1993AJ....106.1059S} Soderblom, D.~R.,
670: Jones, B.~F., Balachandran, S., Stauffer, J.~R., Duncan, D.~K., Fedele,
671: S.~B., \& Hudon, J.~D.\ 1993, \aj, 106, 1059
672:
673: \bibitem[Soderblom et al.(1998)]{1998ApJ...498..385S} Soderblom, D.~R., et
674: al.\ 1998, \apj, 498, 385
675:
676: \bibitem[Zuckerman \& Song(2004)]{2004ARA&A..42..685Z} Zuckerman, B., \&
677: Song, I.\ 2004, \araa, 42, 685
678:
679: \end{thebibliography}
680:
681: \clearpage
682:
683: \input{tab1.tex}
684:
685: \input{tab2.tex}
686:
687: \input{tab3.tex}
688:
689: \input{tab4.tex}
690:
691: \input{tab5.tex}
692:
693: \clearpage
694:
695: \begin{figure}
696: \plotone{f1.eps}
697: \caption{Sample Keck HIRES spectra in the \ion{Li}{1}${\lambda}6707$ region. The observed spectra
698: are plotted as open circles and varying synthesis of lithium abundances are plotted as solid lines.
699: HIP 59152 (top) has an upper limit (logN(Li)$\le$0.10) on its lithium abundance and HIP 104864 (bottom) is
700: a clear lithium abundance determination (logN(Li)=2.50). The varying lithium synthesis in the positive detection
701: each differ by a factor of 2.}\label{spectra}
702: \end{figure}
703:
704: \begin{figure}
705: \plotone{f2.eps}
706: \caption{Equivalent width ratios of two Fe I lines ($\lambda$=6703 and 6705) versus photometric
707: temperatures for the stars in our sample. The line is a least squares fit to the data which
708: was used for estimating temperatures in the primary and secondary components of the double-lined
709: spectroscopic binary HIP 54529. This follows the method outlined by \citet{1986ApJ...303..724B}.}\label{ewt}
710: \end{figure}
711:
712: \begin{figure}
713: \plotone{f3.eps}
714: \caption{Lithium abundances compared to those of the Pleiades star cluster. The Pleiades stars are
715: plotted as x's. Positive identifications of lithium are shown as open hexagons. Upper limits on
716: lithium are plotted as triangles.}\label{lithium}
717: \end{figure}
718:
719: \begin{figure}
720: \plotone{f4.eps}
721: \caption{Levels of chromospheric emission (logR$^\prime_{HK}$) given as a function of B-V color index. The activities
722: are separated into four classes of activity following \citet{1996AJ....111..439H}. Stars which are very inactive
723: are likely not the young pre-main sequence stars being sought. Those stars which are either very active or active
724: are likely younger stars making them suitable PTTs candidates. Due to fluctuations in activity cycles
725: (i.e. Maunder minimum-like phases) we cannot rule out inactive stars as old. They could potentially be exhibiting
726: uncharacteristically low levels of chromospheric emission.}\label{Rhk}
727: \end{figure}
728:
729: \begin{figure}
730: \plotone{f5.eps}
731: \caption{Plot of our sample in the {\it U-V} kinematic plane. We utilized this plot to compare with
732: figures 8 and 10 from \citet{1999MNRAS.308..731S} to determine membership in moving groups of stars
733: in various evolutionary states.}\label{UV}
734: \end{figure}
735:
736: \begin{figure}
737: \plotone{f6.eps}
738: \caption{H-R Diagram showing positions of the sample with respect to the ZAMS (100 Myr). Mass tracks
739: and isochrones assuming solar metallicity are taken from \citet{1997MmSAI..68..807D}. Ages
740: are estimated only for those stars which are confirmed to be post T Tauri stars
741: based on lithium abundances, chromospheric activity, and {\it UV} kinematics. The isochrone ages
742: are given in Myr. The mass tracks are given in solar masses and increase in increments of 0.1
743: solar masses.}\label{pttcolormag}
744: \end{figure}
745:
746: \begin{figure}
747: \plotone{f7.eps}
748: \caption{Comparison of H$\alpha$ emission of our double lined binary with other active stars. The legend
749: gives the activity levels of each line type. The solid line is the double lined binary HIP 54529.
750: The dotted line is HIP 74045, one of the candidate PTTs. The open hexagons are HIP 87330, a ZAMS object.
751: The triangles are HIP 62758, a PTT candidate with a modest level of chromospheric activity. The
752: double-lined binary clearly has H$\alpha$ in
753: emission, implying both youth and high chromospheric emission when compared with HIP 74045, which likewise
754: is in emission and has extremely high activity.}\label{halpha}
755: \end{figure}
756:
757: \begin{figure}
758: \plotone{f8.eps}
759: \caption{Histograms for $\chi_{\nu}^{2}$ and real dispersions ($\sigma_{real}$) for {\it HIPPARCOS\/} V-magnitude variability. We have
760: presented them in order of theoretically decreasing variability from the top down (i.e. TTs have the highest
761: amount of irregular variability and solar analogs the lowest). The post T Tauri plot includes the 5 candidates
762: we identify (shaded histogram) and a sample of 41 post T Tauri stars identified from the literature (unshaded histogram).}
763: \label{bins}
764: \end{figure}
765:
766:
767: \begin{figure}
768: \plotone{f9.eps}
769: \caption{SEDs for the two post T Tauri stars (HIP 63322 and HIP 74045) that show an infrared excess in the J, H and K bands.
770: The excess appears clearly when the kurucz fluxes are normalized to the Cousins I band (solid line). The excess, however,
771: is essentially non-existant when kurucz fluxes are normalized to the 2MASS J band (dotted line). Errors are no greater
772: than the size of the points.}
773: \label{kurucz_norm}
774: \end{figure}
775:
776: \begin{figure}
777: \plotone{f10.eps}
778: \caption{Kurucz model atmosphere flux curves and photometric data for a selection of our stars and for a sample of solar analogs.
779: The top two rows are the stars in our sample and the bottom row provides curves for a sample of solar analogs. Each plot is
780: labeled with the HIP number of the corresponding star and the Kurucz fluxes are normalized to the I$_{cousins}$ band. Note the apparent excess
781: in the J and H and K bands in the post T Tauri stars (HIP 63322 and HIP 745045).}
782: \label{blackbody1}
783: \end{figure}
784:
785: \begin{figure}
786: \plotone{f11.eps}
787: \caption{Kurucz model atmosphere flux curves and photometric data for a sample of post T Tauri stars taken from the literature.
788: HIP numbers are given inside of each of the respective plots. We present this figure to demonstrate that post T Tauri stars
789: appear to demonstrate many variations of excess. In some cases, the excesses are similar to those of our candidates (HIP 62445), although
790: temperature differences may suggest a different conclusion (Fig.\ref{kurucz_MAMAMIA}).}
791: \label{blackbody2}
792: \end{figure}
793:
794: \begin{figure}
795: \plotone{f12.eps}
796: \caption{Comparison of kurucz model flux fits to photometric data for four literature post T Tauri aged stars \citep{2002AJ....124.1670M}.
797: The solid curves are kurucz models for literature temperatures which were determined from calibrations to standard stars. The
798: fit appears to improve when utilizing the photometric temperatures. We suggest that this demonstrates the usefulness of
799: using photometric temperatures for the cooler stars represented by this sample.}
800: \label{kurucz_MAMAMIA}
801: \end{figure}
802:
803: \end{document}
804:
805:
806: