1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: 

3: \shorttitle{New H$_2$ Jets in Mon R2}

4: \shortauthors{Hodapp}

5: 

6: % \slugcomment{5-02-2007 submitted to The Astronomical Journal}

7: 

8: \begin{document}

9: 

10: \title{NEW H$_2$ JETS IN MONOCEROS~R2}

11: \author{Klaus W. Hodapp\altaffilmark{1}} 

12: 

13: \altaffiltext{1}{

14: Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii,\\

15: 640 N. Aohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720,

16: \\email: hodapp@ifa.hawaii.edu }

17: 

18: 

19: \begin{abstract} 

20: 

21: We are presenting a wide-field image 

22: of the Mon~R2 star forming region

23: obtained with WFCAM on UKIRT

24: in the 2.12~$\mu$m filter centered on the H$_2$ 1--0 S(1)

25: emission line. We report the discovery of 15 new H$_2$ jets in

26: Mon~R2 and two in L~1646 and confirm most of these discoveries using archival 

27: Spitzer IRAC 4.5~$\mu$m and 8.0~$\mu$m images. We find that many of these protostellar

28: jets are found in projection against the outflow cavities of the

29: huge CO outflow in Mon~R2, suggesting that the jets may

30: be associated with an episode of star formation in Mon~R2 triggered

31: by this large, but now fossil, outflow.

32: We also study the spatial distribution of small, localized reflection nebulae

33: and find that these are distributed in the same way as photometrically identified

34: Class I sources.

35: 

36: \end{abstract}

37: 

38: \keywords{stars: pre--main-sequence --- stars: formation --- 

39: ISM: jets and outflows --- ISM: Herbig-Haro objects}

40: 

41: \section{INTRODUCTION}

42: 

43: The region studied here was first identified by \citet{vdb66}

44: as an association of optical reflection nebulae in their list of such

45: objects and was labeled Monoceros~R2, in short Mon~R2.

46: The Mon~R2 molecular cloud complex extends over 3$\degr$ $\times$ 6$\degr$,

47: and the overall mass of this large molecular cloud has been estimated

48: by \citet{mad86} to be 9~$\times$~10$^4$ M$_\odot$.

49: The Mon~R2 molecular cloud contains several sites of star formation:

50: GGD~11, GGD~12-15 \citep{gyu78}, L~1646 \citep{car00}, 

51: and the Mon~R2 core, the main star formation site

52: that is the subject of this study.

53: The Mon~R2 star forming region lies between the two optical reflection

54: nebulae vdB~67 and vdB~69 \citep{vdb66} and has attracted considerable attention

55: as a site of massive star formation, as a young embedded cluster, and

56: as the source of one of the most powerful CO outflows known.

57: 

58: Even though Mon~R2 lies close to Orion in projection on the sky,

59: its distance

60: of 830$\pm$50~pc based on photometric parallaxes \citep{her76}

61: is almost double that of the Trapezium cluster, e.g. \citep{sta02}.

62: Despite its larger distance,

63: it is still close enough for detailed studies of the embedded

64: young objects. 

65: The mass of molecular gas in the Mon~R2 core has been determined by \cite{rid03} using 

66: $^{13}$CO and C$^{18}$O maps. 

67: The rarer C$^{18}$O traces denser gas and resulted

68: in a gas mass of 1826~M$_\odot$,

69: while the more abundant $^{13}$CO also

70: samples the tenuous outer regions of the molecular core and gave a mass

71: of 2550~M$_\odot$. 

72: The molecular gas distribution is single-peaked

73: with a slight indication of extended filaments to the south and south-west. 

74: To put this region into perspective, 

75: Mon~R2 is smaller than the Orion Trapezium region in spatial 

76: extent, molecular mass, and number and total mass of embedded stars. It is, 

77: however, not far behind in many of these parameters.

78: 

79: Mon~R2 has been noted as a source of a bipolar CO outflow by \citet{lor81}. 

80: This main Mon~R2 molecular outflow was found by \citet{wol90}

81: to be one of the dynamically oldest (1.5$\times10^5$~y), 

82: largest (7 pc), and most massive (100 $M_{\odot}$) molecular outflows. 

83: Based on CO maps with higher spatial resolution than those of

84: \citet{wol90}, \citet{mey91} argued that the Mon~R2 CO outflow must

85: consist of two bipolar outflows: one component seen almost head-on to explain the

86: overlapping red and blue shifted velocity components seen in projection

87: against the central cluster, and one component more

88: inclined against the line of sight, to explain the bipolar outflow features.

89: Both components could be modeled as paraboloidal shells with a

90: linear velocity field that could result from velocity-sorting of

91: clumpy outflow material.

92: The detailed study of CO emission and multiple transitions of CS by \citet{taf97} 

93: showed that the

94: massive outflow has created an hourglass-shaped cavity in the molecular cloud 

95: centered on the cluster

96: of massive young stars. The cavity walls coincide with the limb-brightened shells of

97: the blue-shifted outflow lobe. The axis of the paraboloidal outflow

98: shell and cavity are

99: oriented roughly at a position angle of -30$^\circ$.

100: 

101: The central group of luminous stars and the associated nebulosity

102: were discovered in the near infrared by \citet{bec76}.

103: Much of the attention has been focused on the ring-like reflection

104: nebula around IRS~1 discovered by \citet{bec76} and studied in more detail by \citet{hod87},

105: on the details of the cluster's most luminous individual source (IRS~3) summarized in the most

106: recent work by \citet{pre02}, and on the

107: distribution of molecular matter and the large outflow, summarized in \citet{taf97}. 

108: In embedded young clusters like Mon~R2, near-infrared (J, H, and K) photometry

109: is a very useful tool for identifying young cluster members on the basis of their

110: color excess over the reddened photospheres of old background stars. The first

111: such study of Mon~R2 was done by \citet{car97}.

112: Most recently, the Initial Mass Function (IMF) in the Mon~R2 cluster core was studied in detail

113: by \citet{and06} on the basis of HST/NICMOS data. They find

114: that the ratio of the number of stars below solar mass to the number of objects in the brown

115: dwarf mass range is similar to that found in the Trapezium cluster and in

116: IC~348.

117: 

118: Compared to the widely used J, H, and K images used to characterize the stellar

119: population of young clusters, 

120: the Spitzer IRAC images in four bands ranging from 3.6~$\mu$m

121: to 8.0~$\mu$m allow the identification of younger and more deeply embedded objects.

122: Further, they also allow the identification of objects with purely longer-wavelength infrared excess, 

123: indicating passive reprocessing

124: disks, e. g. \citep{gut05} and \citep{kum07}. 

125: On the basis of near-infrared J, H, and K photometry, and of Spitzer mid-infrared photometry,

126: \citet{gut05} found that Class I objects in Mon~R2 are distributed in a filamentary pattern,

127: while Class II objects are distributed more widely and evenly.

128: However, even these IRAC bands are not sampling the youngest 

129: objects in a cluster completely,

130: in particular those Class 0 and I objects that are oriented with their disks seen edge-on. 

131: Fortunately, those objects can still be found indirectly. 

132: The substantial accretion activity in the Class 0 and I phases of

133: low-mass star formation is invariably associated with outflow activity, as was first

134: noted by \citet{and93}. These outflows

135: easily break out of the dense molecular disk and the envelop enshrouding the young star,

136: and are therefore readily detected in the near-infrared, due to the shock-excited emission

137: at the interface between the outflow and the ambient molecular material, and in

138: shocks within the outflow. The most easily accessible near-infrared shock-excited

139: emission lines are the [FeII] line at 1.644~$\mu$m and the H$_2$~1--0~S(1) line at

140: 2.122~$\mu$m, the line studied here.

141: Of these two emission lines, the H$_2$ 1--0 S(1) line traces lower excitation levels and is excited

142: in virtually all deeply embedded jets propagating in molecular clouds. 

143: Therefore, shock-excited emission of molecular hydrogen is the earliest near-infrared signpost of

144: outflow activity in a very young object and is usually observable long before

145: the central star becomes observable in the near or mid infrared.

146: Molecular hydrogen jets tend to have morphological features that are distinct from

147: other forms of H$_2$ emission in star forming regions, and are therefore easily

148: recognized in imaging surveys.

149: 

150: Powerful jet activity is a byproduct of the short-lived main accretion phase of a forming

151: star. When the accretion and jet activity fades after about 10$^5$ y, 

152: the envelope of molecular gas around a young star

153: usually has formed two outflow cavities. 

154: When properly oriented, scattered light from these cavity walls 

155: gives the object the appearance

156: of a bipolar nebula, or a cometary nebula if only one cavity can be seen. Objects of this

157: morphology overlap with the Class I objects that can be identified photometrically using the

158: Spitzer IRAC bands.

159: Therefore, imaging

160: surveys of star forming regions for protostellar jets and bipolar or cometary nebulae

161: are a powerful tool for

162: discovering very young (Class 0 or I) objects in or soon after their main

163: accretion phase. 

164: Thanks to the recent availability of large-format near-infrared cameras such surveys

165: can now be conducted efficiently.

166: 

167: In this paper, we report the discovery of 17 extremely young objects

168: in and around the Mon~R2 star forming region by means of imaging their

169: collimated outflows in the H$_2$ 1--0 S(1) emission line at 2.12~$\mu$m.

170: By comparison of the 2.12~$\mu$m image and the Spitzer IRAC 4.5~$\mu$m 

171: and 8.0~$\mu$m images we discuss the most plausible identification of the source of each outflow.

172: The large number of outflows indicates that star formation is active all

173: through the Mon~R2 molecular cloud. We will discuss the spatial distribution of the newly

174: discovered extremely young stars in relation to the large, old molecular outflow in Mon~R2.

175: 

176: \section{OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION}

177: 

178: \subsection{UKIRT WFCAM 2.12 $\mu$m Imaging}

179: 

180: The purpose of this project was not the detailed study of any particular

181: jet, but rather the discovery of new objects in the Mon~R2 star forming 

182: region that indicate the presence of

183: stars in their youngest phase of evolution. 

184: Also, completeness in the discovery of H$_2$ outflows was not a realistic

185: goal for this survey of a region with such extensive reflection nebulosity

186: and, most likely, also fluorescently excited H$_2$ emission (e. g., \citet{bla76})

187: that both tend to confuse any search for H$_2$ outflows.

188: Therefore, in the interest of maximizing

189: the scientific return of the observing time used, we did not obtain an image

190: at a continuum wavelength adjacent to the S(1) line, or in a broad K-band

191: filter to distinguish between emission line features and continuum reflection

192: nebulosity. As discussed below, the identification of H$_2$ jets relied

193: on morphological arguments and confirmation, if possible, by archival Spitzer IRAC images.

194: 

195: Wide-field near-infrared images of the Mon R2 region

196: were obtained in the night of October 20, 2005, UT, at the

197: United Kingdom Infrared Telescope (UKIRT). The 

198: Wide-Field Camera (WFCAM) \citep{cas07} was used with a filter 

199: centered

200: at 2.121 $\mu$m with $\Delta \lambda$ = 0.021 $\mu$m

201: that includes the H$_2$ 1--0 S(1) line.

202: The field was roughly centered on

203: the well-studied Mon R2 cluster of infrared sources.

204: The WFCAM uses four Teledyne (formerly Rockwell) HAWAII-2 2048$\times$2048 HgCdTe infrared detector arrays

205: at a pixel scale of 0.4$\arcsec$ pixel$^{-1}$,

206: arranged in the camera focal plane with a spacing of 0.94 of the

207: detector size between the devices. To achieve full coverage of a 0.75 square degrees

208: region of the sky, four telescope pointings are required, which

209: in WFCAM terminology are called a ``tile''.

210: At each tile position, a five-point dither pattern (3.2$\arcsec$ spacing) is used to

211: avoid bad pixels and other detector array artifacts. Finally, at each

212: dither position, a four-point micro-step pattern with a half-pixel (0.2$\arcsec$)

213: step size is used to oversample the image.

214: For our observations, an on-chip exposure time of 40~s was chosen, and the detectors

215: were read out in non-destructive mode, sampling the accumulating signal

216: 41 times during the integration time. The readnoise achieved in this mode

217: of operation is $\approx$~20~e$^-$ rms. 

218: The on-sky integration time was 800~s,

219: except in the overlap regions of the tile. 

220: With a distance to Mon~R2 of 830~pc, one arcminute in our images corresponds to a projected

221: distance of 0.24~pc.

222: 

223: The data were processed by the Cambridge Astronomical Survey

224: Unit (CASU) using the procedures described by \citet{dye06}.

225: Astrometric calibration relative to the 2MASS catalog \citep{skr06} was 

226: performed and a plate solution was written into the file headers.

227: All coordinates in this paper therefore are given in J2000.0 

228: and are indirectly based on the 2MASS coordinate system.

229: After retrieval of the reduced data from the WFCAM Science 

230: Archive the final assembly of the full tile image was done with

231: IRAF scripts that used the image header information

232: to assemble the individual images into a tangential projection

233: image of the full tile.

234: 

235: The central region of the resulting image is shown in Fig.~1.

236: The image shows the well-known Mon~R2 cluster near the center, and the

237: two reflection nebulae to the west (vdB~67) and east (vdB~69) of it. Filamentary 

238: emission extends mostly to the north and east of the main star

239: forming region. The lowest contours of the blue and red shifted CO maps of \citet{wol90} are 

240: superposed on Fig.~1. There is no large-scale feature visible that would

241: be morphologically associated with the main CO outflow 

242: centered on IRS~2 (identified in Fig.~2) that 

243: has a rather poorly defined outflow axis at P.A. $\approx$-45$^\circ$ \citep{wol90}

244: or with the outflow cavity whose axis is oriented at $\approx$-30$^\circ$

245: \citep{taf97} and \citep{cho00}.

246: 

247: \subsection{Archival Spitzer Images}

248: 

249: The IRAC camera is the main near and mid-infrared imaging instrument of

250: the Spitzer cryogenically cooled space telescope \citep{faz04}.

251: All the four IRAC channels contain emission lines of H$_2$. 

252: Of the four IRAC channels, band~2 centered at 4.5 $\mu$m is particularly

253: well suited to detect H$_2$ emission. From a discussion of different shock models, \citet{smi05} concluded

254: that shock-excited H$_2$ emission in

255: the 4.5 $\mu$m band is an order of magnitude brighter than in the other channels

256: for a wide range of shock conditions.

257: The IRAC band 2 (4.5 $\mu$m) contains the H$_2$ 0-0 S(9) line at 4.694 $\mu$m and

258: emission in this line shows morphological features closely identical to those

259: seen in H$_2$ 1--0 S(1) at 2.122 $\mu$m, but is less affected by dust extinction. 

260: Therefore, despite the fact that the

261: broad IRAC band 2 also contains other important molecular features such as CO ($\nu$=1--0

262: at 4.45 - 4.95 $\mu$m) and the atomic Hydrogen Br$\alpha$ line at 4.052 $\mu$m, images

263: in this band often show very similar jet morphology to 2.12~$\mu$m S(1) images

264: \citep{smi06}.

265: By contrast, \citet{smi05} find that IRAC band 1 (3.6~$\mu$m)

266: is dominated by vibrationally excited lines with higher excitation energy than

267: the 1--0 S(1) line, so that shock features appear sharper in band 1 than in a

268: 2.12$\mu$m 1--0 S(1) image.

269: The Spitzer 3.6 $\mu$m, 5.8 $\mu$m, and 8.0 $\mu$m bands also contain bright PAH

270: emission at 3.3 $\mu$m, 6.2 $\mu$m, and 7.7 $\mu$m, respectively. In a region

271: like Mon~R2, this strong

272: and often filamentary emission tends to mask shock-excited emission from jets.  

273: 

274: Spitzer IRAC images were downloaded from the Spitzer archive.

275: The data used here were originally obtained for a program by

276: G. Fazio. Partial results of their study of the distribution

277: of stars based on JHK and Spitzer/IRAC colors have been presented

278: by \citet{gut05}.

279: 

280: The available archival Spitzer data do not cover the whole field of our WFCAM

281: observations, so that we do not have the corresponding longer-wavelength data

282: for all of the outflows discovered here. For those objects where all Spitzer 

283: bands are available, we

284: discuss the 4.5~$\mu$m and 8.0~$\mu$m data. The 4.5~$\mu$m data usually show the 

285: outflows, but at relatively low signal-to-noise ratio and with poorer spatial

286: resolution that the UKIRT data. The 8.0~$\mu$m data do not

287: usually show the outflow itself, but in many cases show the molecular clump

288: around the driving source either in thermal dust emission or in some cases

289: in absorption against PAH background emission. The 8.0~$\mu$m images

290: therefore primarily serve to confirm the identification of the driving source.

291: In some cases the band 2 (4.5~$\mu$m) data were not available and for one object

292: band~1 data

293: (3.6 $\mu$m) data are shown instead for the purpose of source confirmation.

294: 

295: \subsection{Criteria for Identifying H$_2$ Jets}

296: 

297: This simple imaging project was motivated by the success of similar observations

298: in identifying H$_2$ jets,

299: e.~g. the early survey of NGC~1333 by \citet{hod95}, the extensive survey

300: of Orion~A by \citet{sta02}, the survey of the distant massive star forming region

301: W~51 by \citet{hod02},

302: and the recent work on DR21/W75 by \citet{dav07}.

303: Well over one hundred of these collimated H$_2$ jets have now been imaged and

304: their morphology is quite unique and well recognizable. 

305: Empirically, shock excited H$_2$ emission can, in most cases, be distinguished from

306: fluorescently excited H$_2$ emission on the basis of morphological arguments.

307: The physical basis for this is that the cooling time of shock-excited molecular

308: hydrogen is typically only a few years \citep{shu78}, during which time shock fronts travel

309: only a fraction of an arcsecond in typical star forming regions. Shock-excited

310: emission therefore usually appears as small but resolved knots, filaments,

311: and bow shocks. In contrast, fluorescently excited molecular hydrogen emission

312: varies on the scale of typical density inhomogeneities in molecular clouds and

313: therefore tends to be much more smoothly distributed. The same is true for

314: large-scale continuum reflection nebulosity. 

315: 

316: Our criteria for identifying H$_2$ jets in Mon~R2 therefore were that

317: they must consist

318: of a string of resolved H$_2$ emission knots. 

319: If a bow shock is found at the end of a string of emission knots, this

320: is regarded as additional and convincing evidence for the existence 

321: of a jet. In cases where both sides (lobes) of a jet are visible, a high

322: degree of central symmetry in the distribution of emission knots serves

323: as supporting evidence for the identification of a jet.

324: Sometimes, but not always, faint filamentary emission 

325: arising from the outflow cavity walls connects

326: the individual emission knots. 

327: If such filamentary emission is seen, it serves as additional evidence

328: supporting the identification of a jet.

329: The H$_2$ jets identified by these criteria are listed in Table~1, and identified

330: in Fig.~1 as large circles. 

331: 

332: Finally, many young stars show reflection nebulae of

333: bipolar or cometary morphology or nebulae otherwise 

334: clearly associated with individual stars, properties

335: that we summarize by the term ''localized''. 

336: In addition to their characteristic morphology, they show

337: a more pronounced drop in surface brightness

338: away from the illuminating central star than the shock emission knots

339: in H$_2$ jets.

340: In Table~2, we list such localized nebulae

341: that were found on our 2.12$\mu$m image on Mon~R2, but

342: were not classified as likely H$_2$ jets. 

343: Nebulous features that are simply knots 

344: in the large-scale nebulosity permeating the center of the Mon~R2 cluster are not

345: listed in Table~2. 

346: Similar to the situation with the H$_2$ jets,

347: this list cannot be expected to be complete, due to sensitivity limits, high extinction

348: in some parts of the molecular cloud, and confusion with the large-scale reflection 

349: nebulosity and filamentary emission present in the Mon~R2 region. The localized reflection nebulae

350: are indicated as small squares in Figs.~1 and 2.

351: 

352: The K' survey of known CO outflow sources by \citet{hod94}

353: showed that many of these outflow sources are associated with such localized reflection nebulae.

354: Reflection nebulae, in particular of bipolar or cometary morphology, are produced by

355: light scattered from the inside walls of the cavity produced 

356: by an outflow in the molecular material surrounding a young star.

357: While the

358: association of reflection nebulae with young age of an individual star and with outflow

359: activity is less direct 

360: than for H$_2$ jets, the presence of large numbers of these localized reflection nebulae

361: nevertheless indicates a population of very young stars, probably stars just after their main

362: accretion and outflow phase. 

363: 

364: 

365: \section{RESULTS AND DISCUSSION}

366: 

367: \subsection{The Environment of the Mon~R2 Cluster}

368: 

369: Fig.~1 shows an extended system of emission filaments to the north and east of the cluster, 

370: besides the known reflection nebulae vdB 67 and 69, the nebulosity

371: associated with the Mon~R2 cluster, and the individual H$_2$ jets 

372: reported here.

373: 

374: These filaments coincide with the optical reflection nebula

375: vdB~68, and are also strongly visible in all Spitzer IRAC bands,

376: probably indicating a combination of H$_2$ and PAH emission

377: fluorescently excited by the

378: illuminating star of vdB~68, a B2V star \citep{her76}.

379: The filaments seen in Fig.~1 are oriented at a position angle of $\approx$ 35$\degr$ ,

380: similar to some of the filamentary structure seen in the optical

381: reflection nebula. It should be noted that this orientation of the

382: filaments is similar to the polarization angle of background star polarization

383: in the region of vdB~68 as measured by \citet{jar94} in the R band, which

384: indicates the projected direction of the local magnetic field.

385: 

386: On the Digital Sky Survey (DSS) blue and red

387: images, an extensive system of filaments is seen in absorption against the

388: background reflection nebulosity in the area south and east of vdB~67,

389: the Mon~R2 cluster, and vdB~69. These filaments are also oriented along

390: the direction of the local magnetic field, as measured by the R-band polarimetry

391: of \citet{jar94}. Our 2.12~$\mu$m S(1) image does not show any emission from these filaments 

392: located in the south east of the embedded cluster.  

393: 

394: From the fact that these systems of filaments are readily visible at optical

395: wavelengths, we conclude that they lie on the front side of the Mon~R2 molecular

396: core. Since the polarization vectors of more deeply embedded sources in and near

397: the Mon~R2 cluster \citep{hod87} follow the pattern of the magnetic field measured to the south

398: and west of the cluster, and since the cluster is located at the intersection 

399: of the two patterns of magnetic field direction, it can be speculated that the 

400: formation of the Mon~R2 cluster was triggered by a collision to two molecular

401: clouds, as discussed by \citet{jar94}.

402: 

403: The core of the Mon~R2 cluster and the bright reflection nebulosity permeating it

404: are shown in more detail in Fig.~2.

405: From polarization measurements of this ring-like infrared reflection nebulosity

406: near the core of the Mon~R2 cluster by \citet{hod87}, it is clear that IRS~2 is its 

407: dominant source of illumination. The brighter source IRS~3 does

408: not significantly contribute to the illumination (as measured by polarization) of 

409: the ring-like nebula, and therefore must be located either in front or behind the

410: nebula and the core of the Mon~R2 cluster. 

411: Some elongated emission features are seen east of IRS~3 and lie in a direction similar

412: to the filaments observed near vdB~69. This would suggest that IRS~3 is illuminating

413: some of these filaments and that it lies in front of the rest of the Mon~R2 cluster.

414: 

415: \subsection{Previously Known Outflows}

416: 

417: The overwhelming size and total mass of the main Mon~R2 CO outflow \citep{lor81}

418: makes it difficult to find evidence for other outflows in the

419: velocity field measured in $^{12}$CO(2-1) or $^{13}$CO(2-1). 

420: It should be noted that \citet{mey91} have argued that the distribution of

421: high velocity CO gas in this main outflow can only be explained

422: by a superposition of two independent outflows with different 

423: orientations, one almost head-on and the other more inclined to

424: produce the bipolar appearance. 

425: Despite the overwhelming emission from these two main outflows, 

426: two additional possible outflows associated

427: with the Mon~R2 cluster have been discovered by

428: CO emission line mapping by \citet{taf97} and a third

429: possible outflow (a microjet from IRS~3) was found by \citet{pre02}.

430: 

431: The $^{12}$CO(2-1) and $^{13}$CO(2-1) velocity channel maps 

432: of \citet{taf97} (their Figs. 3 and 4)

433: show a redshifted high velocity

434: component (Mon~R2-N) about 80$\arcsec$ to the north of the central cluster,

435: coinciding with ``Object 1'' of \citet{coh77}. This object

436: is the brightest of a group of embedded stars north of the ring-like

437: reflection nebula, and is itself embedded in reflection nebulosity

438: with a complex filamentary structure shown in Fig.~2. 

439: The brightest star in this sub-group of the Mon~R2 cluster is

440: located at 6$^h$7$^m$45$\stackrel{s}{.}$9, -6$\degr$21$\arcmin$47$\arcsec$. 

441: Also, \cite{taf97} discuss a strongly blueshifted $^{12}$CO feature

442: (-100$\arcsec$,-40$\arcsec$) from IRS~1 that also coincides with

443: an enhancement of CS emission, indicating the presence of a deeply

444: embedded object. We refer to this object by the initials of the

445: authors as ''TBWW97 CO-100,-40''. 

446: At its position (6$^h$7$^m$39$\stackrel{s}{.}$2, -6$\degr$23$\arcmin$44$\arcsec$), we note a faint,

447: slightly elongated infrared object on the S(1) image, surrounded by several small

448: patches of nebulosity (Fig.~2 and Fig.~3, upper panels). 

449: 

450: The Spitzer 4.5~$\mu$m image shows the same object morphology

451: and confirms that the marginally extended 2.12~$\mu$m object is not an embedded star.

452: The Spitzer 8.0~$\mu$m image shows extended emission in this region.

453: The high-velocity CO gas and the shock-excited H$_2$ emission

454: indicate a spatially compact outflow, without a clear jet morphology.

455: This object is shown near the western edge of Fig.~2 (labeled ''CO''). and in the first panel

456: of Fig.~3. 

457: 

458: The infrared source IRS~3 was noted by \citep{bec76} to be extended

459: and was later resolved into a number of sources. The highest spatial

460: resolution image are the speckle interferometry results by \citet{pre02}

461: that list point sources IRS~3 A - F, of which A, B, and C are associated with

462: strong reflection nebulosity, and B is possibly associated with a microjet

463: of about 0.5$\arcsec$ length.

464: The detailed CO velocity maps by \citet{gia97} show that IRS~3 is not associated

465: with the big Mon~R2 CO outflow, but that it is a separate source of

466: very high-velocity CO outflow, even though a clear bipolar feature was not

467: detected.

468:  

469: 

470: 

471: \subsection{The Spatial Distribution of H$_2$ Jets}

472: 

473: The newly discovered H$_2$ jets are overlayed on Fig.~1 as open circles with

474: labels. Also overlayed are the lowest contours of the blue and redshifted 

475: features in the CO map of \citet{wol90}. Their map was chosen over the

476: higher spatial resolution maps of \citet{mey91} and \citet{taf97} since

477: it covers a larger area with higher sensitivity to faint extended features.

478: The only sites of star formation lying clearly outside of the CO outflow

479: lobes are the newly discovered HOD07 1 to the west of the main cluster,

480: and the previously known young object GGD~11. The longest of the newly

481: discovered H$_2$ jets (HOD07 13) lies just south of the redshifted CO lobe.

482: 

483: The CO outflows probably have a shell structure with a relatively empty

484: cavity near the outflow axis \citep{mey91}. Since the outflowing material interacts

485: turbulently with the molecular material of the ambient cloud, triggered

486: star formation would be expected near the interface between the shell and the ambient cloud.

487: In projection, the highest density of triggered star formation sites

488: would be expected where we look tangentially

489: along the shell wall, and a smaller number where we look onto the front

490: and back sides of the outflow shells. 

491: The overall distribution of newly found H$_2$ jets outside of the central

492: cluster roughly matches this expectation. Note in particular that the

493: small cluster associated with HH~866 is projected against the tip of the blueshifted 

494: CO contour of \citet{wol90}, and that the group of H$_2$ jets HOD07 2, 3, 6, 8,

495: and 9 lie close to the eastern edge of the blueshifted CO contour, and behind

496: two secondary blue-shifted CO emission maxima.

497: These spatial coincidences strongly suggest that sites of recent star formation

498: outside the main Mon~R2 cluster may have been triggered by turbulent interaction

499: of the massive main Mon~R2 outflow with the ambient molecular material.

500: 

501: In the following, we discuss the newly discovered H$_2$ jets individually

502: on the basis of their morphology and, when available, by a comparison

503: of the near-infrared 2.12 $\mu$m S(1) image to longer wavelength Spitzer images.

504: The objects are numbered in the sequence of increasing R.A., and labeled by the

505: prefix HOD07. All coordinates are given in the J2000.0 system.

506: To allow an easy comparison of their sizes, the overview 2.12 $\mu$m images based

507: on the UKIRT/WFCAM data are all shown on the same spatial scale. Similarly, the detailed

508: views in the figures comparing WFCAM and Spitzer/IRAC results are all on the same, 

509: but finer, spatial scale, with the exception of Fig.~6, where this was not practical.

510: 

511: The small localized reflection nebulae that we found on our 2.12 $\mu$m image, 

512: but did not classify as jets,

513: are listed in Table~2 and are indicated by small squares in Figs. 1 and 2.

514: These localized reflection nebulae are concentrated to the south of the Mon~R2 cluster, closer to the

515: cluster than the H$_2$ jets found to the south and south west of the cluster.

516: Since the reflection nebulae represent a more advanced state of star formation 

517: than the jets, this distribution might indicate a sequence of triggered star

518: formation to the south of the main Mon~R2 cluster, in the region where the

519: blue and red shifted CO contours overlap.

520: 

521: \subsection{Discussion of Individual H$_2$ Jets}

522: 

523: \subsubsection{HOD07 1}

524: % (P3): 

525: The H$_2$ jet HOD07~1 has a very symmetric bipolar appearance, as is shown in Fig.~4. 

526: We note a high degree of similarity in the shape and relative intensity of corresponding

527: knots in the two lobes of the jet.

528: We interpret the two extended patches

529: of nebulosity $\approx 3\arcsec$ east (labeled 1E) and west (labeled 1W) of 

530: the apparent center of symmetry at

531: coordinates 6$^h$7$^m$10$\stackrel{s}{.}$ -6$\degr$26$\arcmin$34$\arcsec$ 

532: (marked by a circle in Fig.~4) as emission or scattered

533: light from the two outflow cavities, and assume that the driving source is hidden 

534: from direct view and located near that position in the

535: dark region between those two emission knots. 

536: From this position, the eastern jet lobe has a position angle of $\approx$~60$\degr$.

537: Since HOD07~1 is not included in the publicly released Spitzer images of the Mon~R2 region,

538: this position of the central source could not be confirmed by longer wavelength data.

539: 

540: Going symmetrically outwards from

541: the assumed position of the driving source, there is a pair of faint emission knots at 

542: 6$^h$7$^m$9$\stackrel{s}{.}$5, -6$\degr$26$\arcmin$44$\arcsec$ (2W)

543: and 6$^h$7$^m$11$\stackrel{s}{.}$6, -6$\degr$26$\arcmin$22$\arcsec$ (2E), respectively. 

544: The next pair of relatively faint emission knots is at

545: 6$^h$7$^m$9$\stackrel{s}{.}$0, -6$\degr$26$\arcmin$46$\arcsec$ (3W) and 

546: 6$^h$7$^m$12$\stackrel{s}{.}$4, -6$\degr$26$\arcmin$16$\arcsec$ (3E).

547: Further away from the central source we find two complex systems

548: of bright emission knots, containing two (west) and three (east) individual knots,

549: centered at 

550: 6$^h$7$^m$8$\stackrel{s}{.}$2, -6$\degr$26$\arcmin$52$\arcsec$ (4W) and 

551: 6$^h$7$^m$12.9, -6$\degr$26$\arcmin$11$\arcsec$ (4E), respectively.

552: Both of these emission regions show a bend of $\approx$ 45$^\circ$ to the left in the direction

553: of motion. 

554: To the west of the central source, at 6$^h$7$^m$7$\stackrel{s}{.}$5, -6$\degr$26$\arcmin$54$\arcsec$ (5W)

555: there is one additional very strong emission knot of approximately triangular shape with no

556: detectable counterpart in the east.

557: Finally, the most distant, approximately symmetric set of faint shock emission features is

558: located at 6$^h$7$^m$6$\stackrel{s}{.}$3, -6$\degr$26$\arcmin$57$\arcsec$ (6W) and 

559: 6$^h$7$^m$16$\stackrel{s}{.}$7, -6$\degr$25$\arcmin$53$\arcsec$ (6E)

560: On the eastern side, this

561: faint extended nebulosity coincides with the images of several stars, 

562: but there is no evidence to suggest

563: that these stars are physically associated with the outflow.

564: 

565: It is noteworthy that the bend in the otherwise straight bipolar jet coincides with the

566: strongest emission knots. Bent or S-shaped jets as a result of disk precession in a binary

567: system were discussed by \citet{ter99} and \citet{bat00}. 

568: We speculate that the main accretion and outflow event that produced

569: these strong systems of emission knots was triggered by a close stellar encounter, most likely with

570: a binary star component on an elliptical orbit, and that this encounter was also responsible 

571: for a change in the disk orientation and therefore the jet direction. 

572: 

573: \subsubsection{HOD07 2}

574: % P16

575: The extended S(1) emission with shock-like morphology labeled HOD07 2

576: in Fig.~5 at 6$^h$7$^m$30$\stackrel{s}{.}$5, -6$\degr$11$\arcmin$51$\arcsec$

577: consists of two distinct knots of emission, suggesting that this is

578: a short jet (P.A. $\approx$~120$\degr$) originating from a star that itself is too obscured to

579: be directly visible. The position of the more compact shock emission knot

580: is the position given above and in Table~1. 

581: The Spitzer 8 $\mu$m image (Fig.~6, bottom panel)

582: shows extended emission centered on a point source 

583: at 6$^h$7$^m$30$\stackrel{s}{.}$9, -6$\degr$11$\arcmin$48$\arcsec$.

584: While this point source indicates other ongoing star formation

585: activity in this region, its position does not coincide with the jet HOD07~2 and it therefore

586: cannot be identified with the driving

587: source of this jet.

588: 

589: \subsubsection{HOD07~3}

590: % P17

591: The bow shock HOD07~3 (Fig.~5) at 6$^h$7$^m$31$\stackrel{s}{.}$6, -6$\degr$12$\arcmin$47$\arcsec$ 

592: is probably driven by a source some distance away

593: to the south east of the shock. 

594: Projecting back from the bow shock in this direction (P.A. $\approx$~147$\degr$)

595: we find a string of faint, slightly extended

596: knots of 2.12~$\mu$m emission.

597: These faint emission features, indicated by arrows in Fig.~5,

598: are located at 6$^h$7$^m$33$\stackrel{s}{.}$2, -6$\degr$13$\arcmin$03$\arcsec$, at 

599: 6$^h$7$^m$34$\stackrel{s}{.}$1, -6$\degr$13$\arcmin$24$\arcsec$, 

600: and at 6$^h$7$^m$39$\stackrel{s}{.}$3, -6$\degr$14$\arcmin$01$\arcsec$.

601: Overall, they appear to form a jet with multiple, faint

602: internal shocks, ending in the bright bow shock.

603: All these emission knots are confirmed by the Spitzer 4.5~$\mu$m data,

604: even though only the knot closest to the bow shock is included

605: in Fig.~6, where we show the bow shock at 2.12~$\mu$m, 4.5~$\mu$m, and 8.0~$\mu$m.

606: However, the position of the driving source of this jet could not

607: be identified, neither on the WFCAM image nor the Spitzer images.

608: We speculate that the jet emerges from deep within the molecular

609: cloud and that only the terminating bow shock moving towards the

610: observer is seen at relatively low extinction.

611: Therefore, as indicated in Fig.~5, the position listed for this jet in Table~1 is that of the 

612: bow shock. 

613: 

614: \subsubsection{HOD07 4}

615: % P12

616: Two knots of H$_2$ emission are visible to

617: the west of the star 

618: at 6$^h$7$^m$35$\stackrel{s}{.}$3, -6$\degr$20$\arcmin$00$\arcsec$ 

619: in Fig.~7 and the top panel of Fig.~8. 

620: However, the extended nebulosity associated with the south-western of these knots

621: is not connected with this star, strongly suggesting that this star may not be physically associated 

622: with the H$_2$ emission. 

623: A second, fainter system of H$_2$ emission with a bow shock morphology is visible

624: at 6$^h$7$^m$35$\stackrel{s}{.}$9, -6$\degr$19$\arcmin$56$\arcsec$, 

625: to the east-northeast of this star.

626: The IRAC 3.6 $\mu$m (not shown here) 

627: and 4.5 $\mu$m images (Fig.~8, top center) show faint curved nebulosity connecting

628: the 2.12~$\mu$m features with a very faint star 

629: at position 6$^h$7$^m$37$\stackrel{s}{.}$6, -6$\degr$19$\arcmin$54$\arcsec$ that is visible on the

630: 2.12~$\mu$m UKIRT image as well as on the two shorter wavelength IRAC images. 

631: There is no evidence for a counterjet, bent or straight,

632: emerging from the position of that faint star. 

633: Unfortunately, the longer wavelength IRAC archival images

634: at this position are not of useable quality. 

635: From the available data we conclude that the S(1) shock emission

636: and the S-shaped feature in the IRAC 3.6 $\mu$m and 4.5 $\mu$m images represent the less obscured parts

637: of a jet emerging from the star at 6$^h$7$^m$37$\stackrel{s}{.}$6, -6$\degr$19$\arcmin$54$\arcsec$. 

638: To explain the bending of the jet, it must be emitted from a precessing disk, similar to the case of

639: IRAS 03256+3055 in NGC~1333 discussed by \citet{hod05}.

640: 

641: 

642: \subsubsection{HOD07 5}

643: % P4

644: The position given here for HOD07~5: 

645: 6$^h$7$^m$38$\stackrel{s}{.}$7, -6$\degr$21$\arcmin$14$\arcsec$, indicated by a circle in

646: Fig.~7 and Fig.~8, middle panel,

647: is that of a faint extended emission 

648: feature near the apparent symmetry center of

649: a system of shocks oriented at a position angle of

650: $\approx$~32$\degr$. 

651: This central object is visible on the UKIRT 2.12~$\mu$m image,

652: but is much brighter on the Spitzer 4.5~$\mu$m image, indicating heavy obscuration.

653: Also, the 2.12~$\mu$m image of this central feature shows a marginally detected bifurcation, 

654: indicating a disk seen

655: in absorption against the extended emission or a disk shadow.

656: We tentatively conclude that the

657: driving source is not directly visible at near-infrared wavelengths, but that emission 

658: and/or scattered light very

659: close to the source has been detected, and that the collimating disk is seen nearly edge-on.

660: From this driving source, the jet extends along a position angle of $\approx$~30$\degr$.

661: The closest pair of shock emission knots is about 5$\arcsec$ to the north and south of the

662: driving source. A second pair of emission features $\approx$20$\arcsec$ to the north and south

663: appears less symmetric, with the southern shock extending further away from the source.

664: 

665: \subsubsection{HOD07 6}

666: To the west of the center of Fig. 9 and in Fig. 10 (top panels), 

667: a faint string of four 2.12~$\mu$m S(1) emission knots (labeled 6) and one larger 

668: emission knot further to the south west

669: at 6$^h$7$^m$38$\stackrel{s}{.}$7 -6$\degr$11$\arcmin$59$\arcsec$ 

670: are all roughly aligned at P.A. $\approx$~45$\degr$. 

671: The position of the central source cannot be determined with any certainty, and the Spitzer

672: images do not provide additional information in this case.

673: For lack of any better information, we list this jet by the coordinate of the approximate

674: center of symmetry of the four northernmost emission knots located at 6$^h$7$^m$41$\stackrel{s}{.}$2, -6$\degr$11$\arcmin$14$\arcsec$, 

675: implicitly assuming this as

676: a plausible position of a central source if these knots are, as in many other cases,

677: symmetric shock fronts in a bipolar jet.

678: 

679: \subsubsection{HOD07 7} 

680: % P5

681: The position given for this object in Table 1

682: is that of a faint star at 6$^h$7$^m$41$\stackrel{s}{.}$5, -6$\degr$21$\arcmin$28$\arcsec$

683: roughly between two bright knots

684: of S(1) emission in Fig.~7 and Fig.~8 (bottom panels) 

685: that define a jet axis along P.A. $\approx$~30$\degr$. 

686: Faint filamentary emission extends back from the shocks

687: to the immediate vicinity of this star, strongly suggesting

688: that it is the source of the jet.

689: On the 2.12~$\mu$m image, the northern jet bends to the east and the southern jet to the west about

690: 8$\arcsec$~-~10$\arcsec$ from the star, suggesting a strongly precessing jet.

691: The two brightest S(1) emission knots are located near the bend in the jet (in the north) and slightly

692: beyond it in the south. 

693: This jet morphology can be understood by assuming that the bent, contiguous jet was formed

694: by a precessing driving source. The two emission knots lying outside of the contiguous jets

695: could be the product of a single burst of higher outflow velocity. 

696: The fact that these higher velocity knots were emitted in the same

697: projected direction as the strongest bend in the jet may indicate that the

698: strong precession of the driving source's accretion disk that caused this

699: bend may also have caused the higher accretion rate that in turn produced the higher

700: outflow intensity and velocity found in the two brighter knots.

701: 

702: The IRAC 3.6 $\mu$m (not shown here) and 4.5 $\mu$m (Fig.~8, bottom center) images

703: show the strongest, and spatially extended emission 

704: associated with the northern of the two S(1) emission regions. 

705: To the east

706: of this object, extended emission is seen both on the S(1) image and 

707: on the IRAC 4.5 $\mu$m and 8.0 $\mu$m images, and this

708: emission appears to be associated with a filament extending from the Mon~R2 central cluster.  

709: Whether this filament is physically close to the driving source of the outflow or whether the

710: outflow interacts with the filament cannot be conclusively determined.

711: However, the different emission flux levels in the northern and southern lobe could be understood

712: if the northern jet ran into denser material.

713: 

714: \subsubsection{HOD07 8}

715: % P6

716: On the 2.12~$\mu$m image in Fig.~9, this jet extends from an unresolved object

717: at 6$^h$7$^m$43$\stackrel{s}{.}$7, -6$\degr$10$\arcmin$46$\arcsec$ 

718: to a knot at 6$^h$7$^m$44$\stackrel{s}{.}$4, -6$\degr$10$\arcmin$11$\arcsec$, a

719: position angle of 16$\degr$ and 

720: distance of 36$\arcsec$, corresponding to a projected length of 0.14 pc.

721: The jet axis is outlined by extended 2.12~$\mu$m emission.

722: The only bright 8.0 $\mu$m object (Fig.~10) associated with this jet is the

723: southern emission knot.

724: It is therefore likely that this

725: 8.0 $\mu$m object is the central star driving a jet where predominantly 

726: only one side is visible. 

727: The position of this bright mid-infrared source is listed as

728: the position of the jet in Table~1 and shown in Fig.~9 and Fig.~10.

729: On the 2.12~$\mu$m image, emission extends about 2.5$\arcsec$ to the 

730: south of the unresolved central source, suggesting that this is

731: part of the jet's southern lobe. 

732: 

733: \subsubsection{HOD07 9}

734: In Fig. 9, 

735: a well developed bow shock 

736: is located to the west of a

737: star at 6$^h$7$^m$44$\stackrel{s}{.}$0, -6$\degr$11$\arcmin$2$\arcsec$.

738: An emission feature behind the bow shock, near the center of the arc formed by the bow, could be a 

739: Mach disk associated with the bow shock.

740: The driving source of this bow shock cannot be determined with certainty from

741: the data available to us. We are discussing two possible identifications for the

742: driving source:

743: The most plausible candidate for the driving source of this bow shock is the star

744: at 6$^h$7$^m$44$\stackrel{s}{.}$0, -6$\degr$11$\arcmin$02$\arcsec$ that 

745: is the second brightest 4.5 $\mu$m and 8.0 $\mu$m source in

746: Fig.~10 and

747: that shows extended emission on the S(1) image indicating an illuminated outflow

748: cavity, opening towards the west. 

749: We use this position 

750: at 6$^h$7$^m$44$\stackrel{s}{.}$0, -6$\degr$11$\arcmin$2$\arcsec$ 

751: as the nominal position of this jet in Table~1.

752: 

753: A much fainter, slightly extended object is visible on the UKIRT S(1) image 

754: at 6$^h$7$^m$43$\stackrel{s}{.}$6, -6$\degr$10$\arcmin$58$\arcsec$ and 

755: is also

756: detectable, partly blended with the object described just above, on the Spitzer

757: 4.5~$\mu$m image.

758: The only reason to consider this object as an alternative candidate for the

759: driving source of the bow shock is that it is more precisely located on

760: the symmetry axis of the bow shock.

761: This object, on the other hand, is also located on

762: the axis of the jet source HOD07~8, and may just be another shock front of the southern

763: part of that jet.

764: The brightest source in Fig.~10 at any of the wavelengths discussed here is a cometary

765: reflection nebula at 

766: 6$^h$7$^m$43$\stackrel{s}{.}$4, -6$\degr$11$\arcmin$16$\arcsec$

767: that we list as reflection nebula R5 in Table~2.

768: 

769: \subsubsection{HOD07 10}

770: % P15

771: Just west of its center Fig.~2 shows 2.12~$\mu$m S(1) emission with the morphology of a jet ending in a

772: bow shock at 6$^h$7$^m$43$\stackrel{s}{.}$0, -6$\degr$24$\arcmin$20$\arcsec$. 

773: This object is also shown in the bottom panels of Fig.~3. 

774: The bow shock is strongly detected in the Spitzer IRAC 4.5 $\mu$m image

775: and is also indicated in the 8.0$\mu$m image.

776: It is not clear where the driving source for this jet is located. The jet can be traced to an

777: extended feature

778: located at 6$^h$7$^m$44$\stackrel{s}{.}$1, -6$\degr$23$\arcmin$59$\arcsec$

779: and detected in both the 2.12~$\mu$m and IRAC 4.5~$\mu$m images. 

780: It is embedded in the emission surrounding the central Mon~R2 cluster.

781: This may be just another knot in a jet

782: emerging from deeply inside the molecular cloud, or this may indicate the position of the

783: driving source. There is no enhanced flux in the 8.0 $\mu$m image at that position.

784: Nevertheless, we adopt the position of this putative 

785: driving source as the formal coordinates of this jet called HOD07~10. 

786: A second shock front, located at 6$^h$7$^m$43$\stackrel{s}{.}$6, -6$\degr$24$\arcmin$11$\arcsec$ 

787: appears as the brightest of a series of internal shocks along the jet axis, which is oriented

788: at a position angle of $\approx$~220$\degr$.

789: 

790: % \subsubsection{HOD07 12}

791: \subsubsection{HOD07 11}

792: % P7

793: The region shown in Fig.~11 contains 2 separate systems of H$_2$ knots shown

794: in more detail in Fig.~12.

795: A well-defined bow shock located at 6$^h$7$^m$48$\stackrel{s}{.}$6, -6$\degr$19$\arcmin$03$\arcsec$ and

796: several fainter knots of 2.12~$\mu$m S(1) emission south-west 

797: from it suggest a jet with an axis oriented at P.A. $\approx$~23$\degr$. 

798: The last S(1) emission knot

799: at 6$^h$7$^m$46$\stackrel{s}{.}$9, -6$\degr$20$\arcmin$6$\arcsec$ 

800: % (P7 put. source, Mon~R2 H$_2$ jet 7)

801: coincides with a faint Spitzer 4.5 $\mu$m object (Fig.~12, center panel), 

802: but is most likely

803: just the 4.5~$\mu$m emission of the same emission knot, and

804: not the driving source itself. 

805: The Spitzer 4.5~$\mu$m and 8.0~$\mu$m images in Fig.~12 show a stronger mid-infrared

806: source at approx. 6$^h$7$^m$46$\stackrel{s}{.}$8, -6$\degr$20$\arcmin$12$\arcsec$ 

807: just south-west of the position of the last observed S(1) knot in

808: this string. 

809: This object is not detected in our

810: near-infrared S(1) image and therefore must be very deeply embedded. 

811: We tentatively identify this mid-infrared source as the driving

812: source of the jet HOD07~11.

813: 

814: % \subsubsection{HOD07 13}

815: \subsubsection{HOD07 12}

816: 

817: The object at 6$^h$7$^m$49$\stackrel{s}{.}$8, -6$\degr$20$\arcmin$43$\arcsec$ in

818: Fig.~11, HOD07~12,

819: % , P8 put. center, Mon~R2 H$_2$ jet 8

820: has the morphology of a faint bipolar nebula seen nearly edge-on, suggesting that it could

821: be the source of a jet. 

822: The Spitzer 4.5~$\mu$m image in Fig.~12 shows this object as an unresolved source,

823: while the 8.0~$\mu$m image does not show the object. 

824: Two other knots

825: of S(1) emission lie to the south-east at 6$^h$7$^m$51$\stackrel{s}{.}$6, -6$\degr$20$\arcmin$58$\arcsec$

826: and at 6$^h$7$^m$54$\stackrel{s}{.}$9, -6$\degr$21$\arcmin$57$\arcsec$, respectively,

827: suggesting a jet axis at a position angle $\approx$152$\degr$. While there are

828: a number of faint emission features to the north-east of the bipolar nebula,

829: e.g., at 6$^h$7$^m$48$\stackrel{s}{.}$8, -6$\degr$20$\arcmin$23$\arcsec$,

830: no clear association of these features with the jet source can be established.

831: We tentatively identify the bipolar nebula as the driving source of

832: HOD07 12 based on its morphology.

833: A much brighter star, also associated with extended emission at 2.12~$\mu$m and in the

834: Spitzer bands, and located

835: at 6$^h$7$^m$49$\stackrel{s}{.}$14, -6$\degr$20$\arcmin$33$\arcsec$, lies also on the

836: jet axis and is surrounded by some 2.12~$\mu$m emission. 

837: It is the brightest source in the area on the Spitzer 8.0 $\mu$m image,

838: indicating that it is a luminous, deeply embedded object. 

839: 

840: % \subsubsection{HOD07 14}

841: \subsubsection{HOD07 13}

842: % P9 (the huge outflow)

843: The nearly symmetric system of H$_2$ shocks labeled HOD07~13

844: and located south of the Mon~R2 cluster is the largest jet

845: found in our survey.

846: The center of the outflow HOD07~13

847: is clearly identifiable by an object

848: on our S(1) image (Figs. 13 and 14) at position

849: 6$^h$7$^m$57$\stackrel{s}{.}$4, -6$\degr$31$\arcmin$6$\arcsec$. 

850: From this object, the northern jet extends along a position angle

851: of $\approx$~-13$\degr$.

852: Unfortunately, the available 4.5~$\mu$m and

853: 8.0~$\mu$m Spitzer images do not extend sufficiently far south to include this object. 

854: However, all 2.12~$\mu$m features of this object are confirmed by the 

855: Spitzer 3.6~$\mu$m image (Fig. 13, right panel) that

856: shows essentially the same outflow shock features. 

857: 

858: A magnified view of the central region of this outflow is shown in Fig.~14.

859: Immediately north of the central

860: object, a faint string of emission knots is visible stretching about 15$\arcsec$ to the

861: north. There is no counterpart to this knotty jet to the south of the central source,

862: indicating the the jet is inclined with its northern part towards the observer, and that

863: the southern counterjet is obscured by molecular material surrounding the central source.

864: However, the IRAC 3.6 $\mu$m image shows a faint outline of a paraboloid outflow cavity wall

865: to the south. 

866: 

867: More distant S(1) emission shock regions show a remarkable level of symmetry, since they are

868: not affected by the obscuring material surrounding the central source. 

869: The first pair of emission regions

870: are two complex regions, each showing two strands of emission knots, centered roughly at

871: 6$^h$7$^m$56$\stackrel{s}{.}$3, -6$\degr$29$\arcmin$39$\arcsec$ (labeled 1N) 

872: and 6$^h$7$^m$57$\stackrel{s}{.}$9, -6$\degr$32$\arcmin$23$\arcsec$ (labeled 1S). 

873: Further out, we find a symmetric pair of fainter shock fronts at

874: 6$^h$7$^m$55$\stackrel{s}{.}$7, -6$\degr$29$\arcmin$4$\arcsec$ (labeled 2N) 

875: and 6$^h$7$^m$58$\stackrel{s}{.}$3, -6$\degr$32$\arcmin$56$\arcsec$ (labeled 2S). 

876: The shock fronts farthest removed from the central source show substructure that is

877: again similar in both the northern and southern jet: A symmetric pair of shock fronts

878: at 6$^h$7$^m$54$\stackrel{s}{.}$1, -6$\degr$27$\arcmin$33$\arcsec$ (labeled 3N) 

879: and 6$^h$8$^m$00$\stackrel{s}{.}$2, -6$\degr$34$\arcmin$30$\arcsec$ (labeled 3S). 

880: Finally, the leading shock fronts are found at 

881: 6$^h$7$^m$53$\stackrel{s}{.}$8, -6$\degr$27$\arcmin$19 (labeled 4N) 

882: and 6$^h$8$^m$01$\stackrel{s}{.}$0, -6$\degr$34$\arcmin$43 (labeled 4S).

883: The total projected length of this jet is $\approx$7.5$\arcmin$, corresponding to 1.8~pc.

884: 

885: % \subsubsection{HOD07 15}

886: \subsubsection{HOD07 14}

887: % P10

888: The compact, bipolar jet HOD07 14~(Fig.~15 and Fig.~16 top panel) 

889: is characterized by two bright shock fronts,

890: at 6$^h$7$^m$57$\stackrel{s}{.}$8, -6$\degr$25$\arcmin$26$\arcsec$ and 

891: 6$^h$8$^m$00$\stackrel{s}{.}$0, -6$\degr$25$\arcmin$40$\arcsec$, respectively,

892: that define a jet axis at position angle $\approx$~114$\degr$.

893: The Spitzer 4.5~$\mu$m image (Fig.~16, top row, center) confirms the emission seen

894: at 2.12~$\mu$m, but also shows additional emission, possibly indicative

895: of a second jet parallel to HOD07~14, but more deeply embedded and therefore not visible

896: in the near-infrared.

897: The only indication of the position

898: of the driving source of HOD07~14 is a flux minimum in the Spitzer 8.0~$\mu$m image,

899: possibly a dense molecular clump seen in absorption against background

900: emission. This argument would place the driving source at approximately

901: 6$^h$7$^m$58$\stackrel{s}{.}$9, -6$\degr$25$\arcmin$31$\arcsec$, the position

902: listed in Table~1 and marked by a circle in Fig.~16.

903: 

904: % \subsubsection{HOD07 16}

905: \subsubsection{HOD07 15}

906: % P11

907: The UKIRT S(1) image (Fig.~15) shows a nearly symmetric, bent system of shock fronts,

908: with two bright shocks both to the north and south of the assumed position of the driving source.

909: In addition, on each side, one fainter, extended shock is visible further away from the

910: center of symmetry.

911: The Spitzer 4.5 $\mu$m image (Fig.~16, bottom row, center) shows two additional emission knots in the jet,

912: closer to the center,

913: while the Spitzer 8.0 $\mu$m image shows a flux minimum in between those

914: two strongly obscured 4.5 $\mu$m shocks. We identify this position, approximately

915: 6$^h$8$^m$10$\stackrel{s}{.}$0, -6$\degr$24$\arcmin$47$\arcsec$, 

916: as the position of the driving source of the jet

917: HOD07 15 in Table~1 and Fig.~15.

918: 

919: \subsection{Other Bipolar and Cometary Nebulae}

920: The area near the Mon~R2 cluster contains numerous small patches of

921: nebulosity, often with bipolar or cometary morphology, that did not

922: fit our criteria for identification as shocks or jets. We list those objects in Table~2

923: and indicate them by small square symbols in Figs.~1 and 2. 

924: The bipolar or cometary shape of many of these objects suggests that these are young,

925: embedded stars still surrounded by disks and that they have just excavated an outflow

926: cavity in the surrounding molecular material. 

927: These objects appear particularly numerous in the area about 2 to 3 arcminutes

928: south of the main Mon~R2 cluster, and just north of the cluster, as is demonstrated in Figs. 1 and 2.

929: This finding is consistent with the result by \citet{gut05} that the Class I sources

930: in Mon~R2, identified by their J, H, and K, and Spitzer IRAC colors, are concentrated in a filamentary

931: distribution to the south of the cluster center, and to the north and north east of the cluster. 

932: While there is no strict relationship

933: between reflection nebulae of bipolar or cometary morphology and SED Class I, the two

934: criteria cover objects of similar evolutionary status at the trailing edge of their 

935: accretion phase. 

936: The main difference between the distribution of reflection nebulae and of the Class I sources

937: identified by \citet{gut05} is that we find fewer individual reflection nebulae in the region

938: dominated by the large, ring-like reflection nebula and the filamentary emission that dominates

939: the center of the cluster. We attribute this difference largely to the difficulty of identifying

940: small reflection nebulae around individual stars by morphological criteria in this crowded central

941: region of the Mon~R2 cluster.

942: 

943: By comparison, \citet{gut05} found that the older Class II sources,

944: identified by J, H, and K-band colors, are more uniformly distributed around the

945: Mon~R2 cluster center, indicating a dynamically more relaxed population of more developed

946: young stars.

947: 

948: \section{OTHER INTERESTING OBJECTS IN THE FIELD}

949: 

950: \subsection{HH 866}

951: The group of Herbig-Haro objects HH~866 found by \citet{wan05} in the L~1646 cloud 

952: was included in our field (Figs. 1 and 17). 

953: The HH objects are associated with the IRAS source 06046-0603. The region was

954: identified by \cite{car00} as a region of enhanced star density in 2MASS data,

955: and was identified as a potential CO outflow source by \citet{xu01}.

956: Our UKIRT/WFCAM 2.12 $\mu$m image shows a system of features that can be morphologically

957: identified as likely H$_2$ shocks. 

958: 

959: The main system of emission knots in the center of Fig.~17 is

960: extended roughly in north-south direction, and is probably physically associated with the

961: bow shock at 

962: 6$^h$7$^m$07$\stackrel{s}{.}$5, -6$\degr$04$\arcmin$36$\arcsec$. 

963: The position of the driving source of this jet cannot be determined with certainty.

964: We tentatively list the center of symmetry of the brightest H$_2$ emission knots

965: at 

966: 6$^h$7$^m$07$\stackrel{s}{.}$9, -6$\degr$03$\arcmin$42$\arcsec$ as the

967: position of the driving source, and name this jet HH 866 Jet W in Table~1. 

968: The central parts of this north-south jet are coinciding closely with

969: knots A, B, and C in the H$\alpha$ and [SII] images of \citet{wan05}.

970: To the east of this position is a large, rather poorly defined bow shock at

971: 6$^h$7$^m$08$\stackrel{s}{.}$1, -6$\degr$03$\arcmin$36$\arcsec$ that appears to

972: be associated

973: with more shock emission knots further east of it. A plausible identification of the driving

974: source is a star embedded in nebulosity at 

975: 6$^h$7$^m$09$\stackrel{s}{.}$8, -6$\degr$03$\arcmin$44$\arcsec$. 

976: The nebulosity around this star was also noted by \citet{wan05} and the star

977: is labeled ''1'' in their H$\alpha$ image. Our image resolves this object

978: into two stars, the eastern and fainter of which is associated with the nebulosity and is the

979: likely outflow source. We list the

980: position of this star as HH 866 Jet E in Table~1. 

981: 

982: \subsection{GGD~11}

983: The bipolar reflection nebula GGD~11 \citep{gyu78} was included in our UKIRT/WFCAM image

984: and in Fig.~1.

985: We show a more detailed view of this object in Fig.~18, because our image is, to our knowledge,

986: the best available near-infrared image of GGD~11. This object has

987: the typical morphology of a bipolar nebula, with the eastern lobe being

988: far brighter than the western lobe, due to inclination of the object.

989: The brightness distribution is fairly smooth,

990: in contrast to the knotty and filamentary appearance of typical H$_2$ jets.

991: 

992: \subsection{NGC~2182}

993: The NGC~2182 reflection nebula was included in our UKIRT/WFCAM image

994: even though it is not included the image section shown in Fig.~1.

995: It is shown in detail in Fig.~19.

996: Different from the smooth appearance of this

997: object on optical photographs, e.~g. on the red plate of the DSS2, and on the K-band 2MASS image, 

998: the UKIRT 2.12 $\mu$m S(1) image shows two

999: filamentary regions of enhanced S(1) line emission to the west of the

1000: illuminating star. We cannot determine the excitation mechanism

1001: of these two filaments just from one image and both fluorescent excitation

1002: and shock excitation are possible. 

1003: 

1004: 

1005: \section{COMPARISON WITH OTHER STAR FORMING REGIONS}

1006: 

1007: In our 2.12~$\mu$m imaging survey of the Mon~R2 molecular cloud for H$_2$ jets associated

1008: with forming stars, we have found a total of 15 new H$_2$ jets in Mon~R2 and two additional

1009: H$_2$ jets in the L~1646 (HH~866) region. Together with the two

1010: outflows detected in CO by \citet{taf97} and the IRS~3 microjet found by \citet{pre02}

1011: this gives a minimum of 20 active jets and outflows in the larger area of Mon~R2 (including

1012: the L~1646 region), in addition to the

1013: huge, but probably inactive, CO outflow found by \citet{lor81}. 

1014: The spatial distribution of the H$_2$ jets in Mon~R2 along the projected edge

1015: of the large CO outflow, in particular the cluster

1016: of H$_2$ jets 12$\arcmin$ north of the Mon~R2 main cluster, suggests

1017: that this star-formation activity was triggered by the huge fossil CO

1018: outflow in Mon~R2, one of the largest outflows known.

1019: 

1020: By comparison, in a similar survey of Orion A, \citet{sta02} found 44 jets with

1021: a high degree of certainty, and 29 less certain cases. Considering that their

1022: survey area was larger than ours, and the Orion A cloud is more massive than the

1023: Mon~R2 cloud, this comparison implies a similar specific star formation rate in

1024: both clouds. 

1025: The level of outflow activity in Mon~R2 is also similar to that found

1026: in the two massive star-forming regions

1027: DR21 and W75, where \citet{dav07} found a combined number of approximately 50 H$_2$ jet sources

1028: based on a similar UKIRT WFCAM.

1029: 

1030: NGC~1333 is one of the most active star-forming regions in the solar vicinity

1031: and \citet{bal96} list 15 optical Herbig-Haro objects, H$_2$ jets, and CO outflows

1032: in this region. This region is closer to the Sun than the other regions discussed

1033: before, and the discovery of jets is therefore easier.

1034: In the Perseus molecular cloud as a whole, of which NGC~1333 is a part, \citet{wal05}

1035: counted a total of 141 optically (H$\alpha$ and [SII]) detectable

1036: Herbig-Haro objects that, at the minimum, belong to 30 individual outflows. 

1037: % The Perseus molecular cloud is a low and intermediate mass star forming region

1038: % with a molecular mass of $\approx 10^4 M$_\odot$.

1039: The smaller Barnard 1 cloud ($\approx$ 1200 M$_\odot$) was found by \citet{wal05b}

1040: to have 8 protostars driving outflows. 

1041: Also, \citet{bal06} found a total of at least 20 outflows in the Chamaeleon I

1042: molecular cloud, mostly by an optical search supported by Spitzer data. Chamaeleon I

1043: is a nearby (165 pc), relatively low-mass (1000 M$_\odot$) cloud.

1044: In light of the different techniques used to search for collimated jets from young stars in these

1045: different regions, we conclude that the number of such jets discovered in Mon~R2 is similar

1046: to that found in the other massive star forming regions.

1047: 

1048: While it may be argued that the presence of reflection nebulosity,

1049: fluorescently excited H$_2$ emission and PAH emission makes the discovery

1050: of shock-excited H$_2$ emission near the central cluster of Mon~R2 difficult, 

1051: this is also the region most intensely studied in the past, and only the IRS~3

1052: microjet was found there.

1053: By contrast, most of our

1054: newly discovered jets are located in the periphery of the central cluster,

1055: and the longest collimated jets were found farthest away from the central

1056: cluster. 

1057: The complete absence of large

1058: H$_2$ jets near the center of the Mon~R2 cluster cannot be explained by observational

1059: selection effects alone and suggests that H$_2$ jets do not form in this environment. 

1060: 

1061: This is in agreement with the finding by \citet{dav07} in DR21/W75

1062: who conclude that the H$_2$ jets in their sample are usually not

1063: associated with young molecular cores detectable at sub-mm wavelengths 

1064: or with compact infrared clusters.

1065: They further conclude that clustering may inhibit disc accretion 

1066: and the production of extensive flows. 

1067: A similar conclusion can also be drawn from the extensive survey of the

1068: Orion A cloud for H$_2$ jets by \citet{sta02}. In Orion A, H$_2$ jets

1069: are predominantly found outside the area of the Trapezium cluster and the

1070: Orion nebula.

1071: Also, \citet{hod94} noted in their K' imaging survey of CO outflow sources that

1072: member objects of large young clusters are less likely to show

1073: jets, or localized reflection nebulosity than young objects in smaller groupings.

1074: 

1075: \section{Conclusions}

1076: 

1077: Our UKIRT WFCAM imaging survey of the Mon~R2 molecular cloud for H$_2$ jets associated

1078: with forming stars was based on a 2.12~$\mu$m H$_2$ 1--0 S(1) plus continuum image. 

1079: Object identification was based on morphology and confirmation by archival 

1080: Spitzer images. We have found a total of 17 new H$_2$ jets, including the two in

1081: L~1646, as well as 27 small reflection nebulae. 

1082: 

1083: We conclude that the number of H$_2$ jet sources in Mon~R2 is similar to that found

1084: in other star forming regions of comparable size. We note that the H$_2$ jets appear

1085: to be concentrated in projection against the walls of the outflow cavity created by

1086: the large Mon~R2 CO outflow. This is indicative of a scenario of sequential star formation

1087: in Mon~R2 triggered by the large outflow.

1088: 

1089: We confirm the finding in other high-mass star forming regions that H$_2$ jets tend to

1090: be found outside of the dense central cluster in such regions. It appears that the 

1091: environment of a dense cluster containing some massive stars prevents the formation of large

1092: H$_2$ jets. 

1093: 

1094: 

1095: \acknowledgments

1096: 

1097: The United Kingdom Infrared Telescope is operated by 

1098: the Joint Astronomy Centre on behalf of the 

1099: U.K. Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council. 

1100: 

1101: This work is based in part on observations made with the

1102: Spitzer Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet

1103: Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology

1104: under a contract with NASA.

1105: 

1106: This publication makes use of data products from the 

1107: Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project 

1108: of the University of Massachusetts and the 

1109: Infrared Processing and Analysis Center / California 

1110: Institute of Technology, funded by the 

1111: National Aeronautics and Space Administration 

1112: and the National Science Foundation.

1113: 

1114: \clearpage

1115: 

1116: \begin{thebibliography}{}

1117: 

1118: \bibitem[Andersen et al.(2006)]{and06}

1119: Andersen, M., Meyer, M. R., Oppenheimer, B., Dougados, C. \& Carpenter, J. 2006,

1120: \aj, 132, 2296

1121: 

1122: \bibitem[Andr\'{e}, Ward-Thompson \& Barsony (1993)]{and93}

1123: Andr\'{e}, P., Ward-Thompson, D., \& Barsony, M. 1993,

1124: \apj, 406, 122

1125: 

1126: \bibitem[Bally, Devine, \& Reipurth (1996)]{bal96}

1127: Bally, J., Devine, D., \& Reipurth, B. 1996,

1128: \apj, 473, L49

1129: 

1130: \bibitem[Bally et al.(2006)]{bal06}

1131: Bally, J., Walawender, J., Luhman, K. L., \& Fazio, G. 2006, \aj, 132, 1923

1132: 

1133: \bibitem[Bate et al. (2000)]{bat00}

1134: Bate, M. R., Bonnell, I. A., Clarke, C. J., Lubow, S. H., Ogilvie, G. I.,

1135: Pringle, J. E., \& Tout, C. A. 2000, \mnras, 317, 773

1136: 

1137: \bibitem[Beckwith et al.(1976)]{bec76}

1138: Beckwith, S., Evans, N. J., Becklin, E. e., \& Neugebauer, G. 1976, \apj, 208, 390

1139: 

1140: \bibitem[Black \& Dalgarno (1976)]{bla76}

1141: Black, J. H. \& Dalgarno, A. 1976, \apj, 203, 132

1142: 

1143: \bibitem[Carpenter (2000)]{car00}

1144: Carpenter, J. M. 2000, \aj, 120, 3139

1145: 

1146: \bibitem[Carpenter et al.(1997)]{car97}

1147: Carpenter, John M., Meyer, Michael R., Dougados, Catherine, Strom, Stephen E., Hillenbrand, Lynne A.

1148: 1997, \aj 114, 198

1149: 

1150: \bibitem[Casali et al.(2007)]{cas07}

1151: Casali, M., Adamson, A., Alves de Oliveira, C., Almaini, O., Burch, K.,

1152: Chuter, T., Elliot, J., Folger, M., Foucaud, S., Hambly, N., Hastie, M.,

1153: Henry, D., Hirst, P., Irwin, M., Ives, D., Lawrence, A., Laidlaw, K.,

1154: Lee, D., Lewis, J., Lunney, D., Mclay, S., Montgomery, D., Pickup, A.,

1155: Read, M., Rees, N., Robson, I., Sekiguchi, K., Vick, A., Warren, S.,

1156: \& Woodward, B. 2007, \aap, 777

1157: 

1158: \bibitem[Cohen \& Frogel (1977)]{coh77}

1159: Cohen, J. G. \& Frogel, J. A. 1977, \apj, 211, 178

1160: 

1161: \bibitem[Choi et al.(2000)]{cho00}

1162: Choi, M., Evans, Neal J. II, Tafalla, M., \& Bachiller, R. 2000, \apj, 538, 738

1163: 

1164: \bibitem[Davis et al.(2007)]{dav07}

1165: Davis, C. J., Kumar, M. S. N., Sandell, G., Froebrich, D., Smith, M. D., \& Currie, M. J. 2007,

1166: \mnras, 374, 29

1167: 

1168: \bibitem[Dye et al.(2006)]{dye06}

1169: Dye, S. et al. 2006, \mnras, 372, 1227

1170: 

1171: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004)]{faz04}

1172: Fazio, G. G. et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 10

1173: 

1174: \bibitem[Giannakopoulou et al.(1997)]{gia97}

1175: Giannakopoulou, J., Mitchell, G. F., Hasegawa, T. I., Matthews, H. E., \& Maillard, J.-P. 1997, 

1176: \apj, 487, 346

1177: 

1178: \bibitem[Gyulbudaghian, Glushkov, \& Denisyuk (1978)]{gyu78}

1179: Gyulbudaghian, A. L., Glushkov, Y. L., \& Denisyuk, E. K. 1978, \apj, L137

1180: 

1181: \bibitem[Gutermuth (2005)]{gut05}

1182: Gutermuth, R. A. 2005, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Rochester

1183: 

1184: \bibitem[Herbst \& Racine (1976)]{her76}

1185: Herbst, W. \& Racine, R. 1976, \aj, 81, 840

1186: 

1187: \bibitem[Hodapp(1987)]{hod87} Hodapp, K.-W.\ 1987, \aap, 172, 304 

1188: 

1189: \bibitem[Hodapp (1994)]{hod94}

1190: Hodapp, K.-W. 1994, \apjs, 94, 615

1191: 

1192: \bibitem[Hodapp \& Ladd (1995)]{hod95}

1193: Hodapp, K.-W. \& Ladd, E. F. 1995, \apj, 453, 715

1194: 

1195: \bibitem[Hodapp \& Davis (2002)]{hod02}

1196: Hodapp, K. W. \& Davis, C. J. 2002, \apj, 575, 291

1197: 

1198: \bibitem[Hodapp et al.(2005)]{hod05}

1199: Hodapp, K. W., Bally, J., Eisl{\"o}ffel, J., \& Davis, C. J. 2005, \aj, 129, 1580

1200: 

1201: \bibitem[Jarrett et al.(1994)]{jar94}

1202: Jarrett, T. H., Novak, G., Xie, T., \& Goldsmith, P. F. 1994, \apj, 430, 743

1203: 

1204: \bibitem[Kumar et al.(2007)]{kum07}

1205: Kumar, M. S. N., Davis, C. J., Grave, J. M. C., Ferreira, B., \& Froebrich, D. 2007,

1206: \mnras, 373, 54

1207: 

1208: \bibitem[Loren (1981)]{lor81}

1209: Loren, R. B. 1981, \apj, 249, 550

1210: 

1211: \bibitem[Maddalena et al.(1986)]{mad86}

1212: Maddalena, R. J., Morris, M., Moscowitz, J., \& Thaddeus, P. 1986, \apj, 303, 375

1213: 

1214: \bibitem[Meyers-Rice \& Lada (1991)]{mey91}

1215: Meyers-Rice, B. A. \& Lada, C. J. 1991, \apj, 368, 445

1216: 

1217: \bibitem[Preibisch et al.(2002)]{pre02}

1218: Preibisch, T., Balega, Y. Y., Schertl, D., \& Weigelt, G. 2002, \aap, 392, 945

1219: 

1220: \bibitem[Ridge et al.(2003)]{rid03}

1221: Ridge, N. A., Wilson, T. L., Megeath, S. T., Allen, L. E. \& Myers, P. C. 2003,

1222: \aj, 126, 286

1223: 

1224: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(2006)]{skr06}

1225: Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., Weinberg, M. D., Schneider, S.,

1226: Carpenter, J. M., Beichman, C., Capps, R., Chester, T., Elias, J., Huchra, J.,

1227: Liebert, J., Lonsdale, C., Monet, D. G., Price, S., Seitzer, P., Jarrett, T.,

1228: Kirkpatrick, J. D., Gizis, J., Howard, E., Evans, T., Fowler, J., Fullmer, L., 

1229: Hurt, R., Light, R., Kopan, E. L., Marsh, K. A., McCallon, H. L., Tam, R.,

1230: Van Dyk, S., \& Wheelock, S. 2006, \aj, 131, 1163

1231: 

1232: \bibitem[Shull \& Hollenback (1978)]{shu78}

1233: Shull, J. M. \& Hollenback, D. J. 1978, \apj, 220, 525

1234: 

1235: \bibitem[Smith \& Rosen (2005)]{smi05}

1236: Smith, M. D. \& Rosen, A. 2005, \mnras, 357, 1370

1237: 

1238: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2006)]{smi06}

1239: Smith, H. A., Hora, J. L., Marengo, M., \& Pipher, J. L. 2006, \apj, 645, 1264

1240: 

1241: \bibitem[Stanke, McCaughrean, \& Zinnecker (2002)]{sta02}

1242: Stanke, T., McCaughrean, M. J., \& Zinnecker, H. 2002, \aap, 392, 239

1243: 

1244: \bibitem[Tafalla et al.(1997)]{taf97}

1245: Tafalla, M., Bachiller, R., Wright, M. C. H., \& Welch, W. J. 1997, \apj, 474, 329

1246: 

1247: \bibitem[Terquem et al.(1999)]{ter99}

1248: Terquem, C., Eisl{\"o}ffel, J., Papaloizou, J. C. B., \& Nelson, R. P. 1999, \apj, 512, L131

1249: 

1250: \bibitem[van den Bergh (1966)]{vdb66}

1251: van den Bergh, S. 1966, \aj, 71, 990

1252: 

1253: \bibitem[Walawender et al.(2005)]{wal05}

1254: Walawender, J., Bally, J., \& Reipurth, B. 2005, \aj, 129, 2308

1255: 

1256: \bibitem[Walawender et al. (2005b)]{wal05b}

1257: Walawender, J., Bally, J., Kirk, H., \& Johnstone, D. 2005, \aj, 130, 1795

1258: 

1259: \bibitem[Wang, Stecklum, \& Henning (2005)]{wan05}

1260: Wang, H., Stecklum, B., \& Henning, Th. 2005, \aap, 437, 169

1261: 

1262: \bibitem[Wolf et al.(1990)]{wol90}

1263: Wolf, G. A., Lada, C. J., \& Bally, J. 1990, \aj, 100, 1892

1264: 

1265: \bibitem[Xu et al.(2001)]{xu01}

1266: Xu, Y., Jiang, D.-R., Yu, Z.-Y. et al. 2001, ChJAA, 1, 60

1267: 

1268: \end{thebibliography}

1269: 

1270: \clearpage

1271: \begin{figure}

1272: \figurenum{1}

1273: \includegraphics[scale=0.8,angle=0]{f1a.eps}

1274: \caption{

1275: Image of the Mon~R2 star forming region in the 1--0 S(1) emission line of H$_2$ at 2.12 $\mu$m, 

1276: obtained with

1277: the WFCAM at UKIRT. The circles

1278: indicate the positions of the newly found H$_2$ jets. The Herbig-Haro object HH~866 is visible

1279: in the north-west corner of the image. The small reflection nebula near the eastern edge of the

1280: image is GGD~11 \citep{gyu78}. Newly found small reflection nebulae are indicated by squares.

1281: Superposed on this image are lowest contours of the 

1282: blueshifted (-2 to 6 km s${-1}$, solid line) and redshifted ( 14 to 22 km s${-1}$, dashed line) 

1283: CO emission from the map by \citet{wol90}. 

1284: }

1285: \end{figure}

1286: 

1287: \clearpage

1288: \begin{figure}

1289: \figurenum{2}

1290: % \includegraphics[scale=1.0,angle=0]{MonR2-outflow-center.eps}

1291: \includegraphics[scale=0.8,angle=0]{f2a.eps}

1292: \caption{

1293: A detailed view of the Mon~R2 center region, based on the same UKIRT/WFCAM

1294: 2.12 $\mu$m S(1) line + continuum image as Fig.~1. 

1295: The two CO outflows identified by \citet{taf97}, Mon~R2~N and CO~100,-40, are indicated,

1296: as well as the newly found outflows HOD07 7 and 10.

1297: The positions of the three dominant infrared sources, IRS 1 - 3 \citep{bec76}, are indicated in

1298: the overexposed central region of the Mon~R2 cluster.

1299: The positions of many of the small reflection nebulae from Table~2

1300: are indicated by squares. 

1301: % MonR2-outflow-center.eps, MonR2-outflow-center.wip, outflow-center.fits[1221,1677]

1302: }

1303: \end{figure}

1304: 

1305: \clearpage

1306: \begin{figure}

1307: \figurenum{3}

1308: % \includegraphics[scale=1.0,angle=0]{MonR2-outflow-center-b.eps}

1309: \includegraphics[scale=0.8,angle=0]{f3a.eps}

1310: \caption{

1311: This figure shows detailed views of the two outflows in the 

1312: Mon~R2 center region in the 2.12 $\mu$m S(1) line + continuum, 

1313: Spitzer IRAC 4.5 $\mu$m, and Spitzer IRAC 8.0 $\mu$m bands.

1314: The top panels show the outflow CO 100,-40 \citep{taf97}, the bottom panels the outflow HOD07 10.

1315: % MonR2-outflow-center-b.eps, MonR2-outflow-center-b.wip, P15-S1.fits[196,271] (bottom)

1316: % PCOwest-S1.fits[225,153] (top)

1317: }

1318: \end{figure}

1319: 

1320: \clearpage

1321: \begin{figure}

1322: \figurenum{4}

1323: % \includegraphics[scale=1.0,angle=0]{MonR2-outflow-P3.eps}

1324: \includegraphics[scale=0.8,angle=0]{f4a.eps}

1325: \caption{

1326: % (P3) 

1327: This 2.12 $\mu$m S(1) line + continuum image shows

1328: outflow HOD07~1. The tentative outflow center (marked by a circle) is located at

1329: 6$^h$7$^m$10$\stackrel{s}{.}$4, -6$\degr$26$\arcmin$34$\arcsec$ in the flux minimum between the

1330: two patches of nebulosity that define the center of symmetry.

1331: The symmetric sets of shocks in the western and eastern jet are labeled. 

1332: % MonR2-outflow-P3.eps, MonR2-outflow-P3.wip, outflow-P3.fits[1001,801]

1333: }

1334: \end{figure}

1335: 

1336: \clearpage

1337: \begin{figure}

1338: \figurenum{5}

1339: % \includegraphics[scale=1.0,angle=0]{MonR2-outflow-P16.eps}

1340: \includegraphics[scale=0.8,angle=0]{f5a.eps}

1341: \caption{

1342: This figure shows the 2.12~$\mu$m image of two 

1343: separate systems of H$_2$ knots:

1344: HOD07~2 at 6$^h$7$^m$30$\stackrel{s}{.}$5, -6$\degr$11$\arcmin$51$\arcsec$

1345: is likely a small jet with several internal shocks.

1346: The bow shock HOD07~3 is located at 6$^h$7$^m$31$\stackrel{s}{.}$6, -6$\degr$12$\arcmin$46$\arcsec$.

1347: Projecting back from the bow shock along its plausible

1348: jet axis, we find a string of faint, slightly extended

1349: knots of emission that are also visible on the

1350: Spitzer 4.5 $\mu$m image. 

1351: These faint emission features, indicated by arrows in Fig.~5,

1352: are located at 6$^h$7$^m$33$\stackrel{s}{.}$2, -6$\degr$13$\arcmin$03$\arcsec$, at 

1353: 6$^h$7$^m$34$\stackrel{s}{.}$1, -6$\degr$13$\arcmin$24$\arcsec$, 

1354: and at 6$^h$7$^m$39$\stackrel{s}{.}$3, -6$\degr$14$\arcmin$01$\arcsec$.

1355: Overall, they appear to form a jet with multiple, faint

1356: internal shocks, ending in the bright bow shock.

1357: % MonR2-outflow-P16.eps, MonR2-outflow-P16.wip, outflow-P16.fits[796,774]

1358: % P16 and P17 

1359: }

1360: \end{figure}

1361: 

1362: \clearpage

1363: \begin{figure}

1364: \figurenum{6}

1365: % \includegraphics[scale=1.0,angle=0]{MonR2-outflow-P16.eps}

1366: \includegraphics[scale=0.7,angle=0]{f6a.eps}

1367: \caption{

1368: This figure compares the 2.12~$\mu$m, IRAC 4.5~$\mu$m and 8.0~$\mu$m images of two 

1369: separate systems of H$_2$ knots:

1370: HOD07~2 at 6$^h$7$^m$30$\stackrel{s}{.}$5, -6$\degr$11$\arcmin$51$\arcsec$

1371: is a small jet with several internal shocks and 

1372: the position given is that of the most compact knot.

1373: The 8.0 $\mu$m Spitzer

1374: image shows extended nebulosity and a point source that, however, cannot be identified

1375: as the central source of the jet.

1376: The bow shock HOD07~3 is located at 6$^h$7$^m$31$\stackrel{s}{.}$6, -6$\degr$12$\arcmin$46$\arcsec$.

1377: The driving source of this bow shock could not be identified.

1378: % MonR2-outflow-P16.eps, MonR2-outflow-P16.wip, outflow-P16.fits[796,774]

1379: % P16 and P17 

1380: }

1381: \end{figure}

1382: 

1383: \clearpage

1384: \begin{figure}

1385: \figurenum{7}

1386: % \includegraphics[scale=1.0,angle=0]{MonR2-outflow-P4.eps}

1387: \includegraphics[scale=0.8,angle=0]{f7a.eps}

1388: \caption{

1389: This 2.12 $\mu$m S(1) line + continuum image

1390: contains 3 separate systems of H$_2$ knots:

1391: HOD07~4 at 6$^h$7$^m$35$\stackrel{s}{.}$3, -6$\degr$20$\arcmin$0$\arcsec$, appears as a star with nebulous knots. 

1392: As shown in Fig. 8, this position is most likely not the central source

1393: of this outflow.

1394: % P12

1395: HOD07~5 at 6$^h$7$^m$38$\stackrel{s}{.}$7, -6$\degr$21$\arcmin$14$\arcsec$, 

1396: is the likely central star of this bipolar jet.

1397: % P4

1398: HOD07~7 at 6$^h$7$^m$41$\stackrel{s}{.}$5, -6$\degr$21$\arcmin$28$\arcsec$, 

1399: is the likely position of the outflow center of that jet.

1400: % P5

1401: % MonR2-outflow-P4.eps, MonR2-outflow-P4.wip, outflow-P4.fits[701,701]

1402: }

1403: \end{figure}

1404: 

1405: \clearpage

1406: \begin{figure}

1407: \figurenum{8}

1408: % \includegraphics[scale=1.0,angle=0]{MonR2-outflow-P4b.eps}

1409: \includegraphics[scale=0.8,angle=0]{f8a.eps}

1410: \caption{

1411: This figure contains the 2.12 $\mu$m S(1), 4.5 $\mu$m and 8.0 $\mu$m images 

1412: of the three systems of H$_2$ knots

1413: found in the area of Fig.~7:

1414: The driving source of HOD07~4 is probably located at 

1415: 6$^h$7$^m$37$\stackrel{s}{.}$6, -6$\degr$19$\arcmin$54$\arcsec$,

1416: marked by a very faint star and the apex of the jet-like 

1417: nebulosity of the Spitzer 4.5~$\mu$m image.

1418: %P12 star with neb. knots, HOD07 4 

1419: HOD07~5 lies at 

1420: 6$^h$7$^m$38$\stackrel{s}{.}$7, -6$\degr$21$\arcmin$14$\arcsec$,

1421: identified by a faint source at the approximate center of symmetry

1422: of the bipolar jet.

1423: % P4 apex of jet, HOD07 5

1424: HOD07~7 at 6$^h$7$^m$41$\stackrel{s}{.}$5, -6$\degr$21$\arcmin$28$\arcsec$, is the likely position of the driving

1425: source of a bipolar jet.

1426: % P5 center, HOD07 7

1427: % MonR2-outflow-P4b.eps, MonR2-outflow-P4b.wip, P5-S1.fits[265,215] bottom,

1428: % P4-S1.fits[228,351] middle, P12-S1.fits[265,234] top

1429: }

1430: \end{figure}

1431: 

1432: \clearpage

1433: \begin{figure}

1434: \figurenum{9}

1435: % \includegraphics[scale=1.0,angle=0]{MonR2-outflow-P6.eps}

1436: \includegraphics[scale=0.8,angle=0]{f9a.eps}

1437: \caption{

1438: This 2.12 $\mu$m S(1) line + continuum image

1439: contains 3 separate systems of H$_2$ knots:

1440: HOD07~6 at 6$^h$7$^m$41$\stackrel{s}{.}$2, -6$\degr$11$\arcmin$14$\arcsec$ is

1441: the center of symmetry of a string of emission knots.

1442: % HOD07 6 Fig. 5a (top)

1443: HOD07~8 at 6$^h$7$^m$43$\stackrel{s}{.}$7, -6$\degr$10$\arcmin$46$\arcsec$ is 

1444: the likely center of a single-sided jet.

1445: HOD07~9 at 6$^h$7$^m$44$\stackrel{s}{.}$0, -6$\degr$11$\arcmin$2$\arcsec$ is 

1446: a star associated with H$_2$ emission and the likely source of a bow shock.

1447: % HOD07 9 (Mon~R2 H$_2$ jet)

1448: % HOD07~11 at 6$^h$7$^m$45$\stackrel{s}{.}$2 -6$\degr$12$\arcmin$18$\arcsec$, 

1449: % the likely source of a faint jet.

1450: %  , HOD07 11 (Fig. 5a bottom)

1451: % MonR2-outflow-P6.eps, MonR2-outflow-P6.wip, outflow-P6.fits[614,830]

1452: }

1453: \end{figure}

1454: 

1455: \clearpage

1456: \begin{figure}

1457: \figurenum{10}

1458: % \includegraphics[scale=1.0,angle=0]{MonR2-outflow-P6b.eps}

1459: \includegraphics[scale=0.8,angle=0]{f10a.eps}

1460: \caption{

1461: This figure shows the S(1), 4.5 $\mu$m, and 8.0 $\mu$m images of three systems of H$_2$ knots:

1462: In the top row, HOD07~6 at 6$^h$7$^m$41$\stackrel{s}{.}$2, -6$\degr$11$\arcmin$14$\arcsec$ 

1463: is the center of symmetry of a string of emission knots.

1464: In the bottem row, HOD07~8 at 6$^h$7$^m$43$\stackrel{s}{.}$7, -6$\degr$10$\arcmin$46$\arcsec$ is 

1465: the likely center of a single-sided jet.

1466: HOD07~9 at 6$^h$7$^m$44$\stackrel{s}{.}$0, -6$\degr$11$\arcmin$2$\arcsec$ is 

1467: a star associated with H$_2$ emission and the likely source of a bow shock.

1468: % HOD07 6 Fig. 5a (top)

1469: }

1470: \end{figure}

1471: 

1472: 

1473: 

1474: \clearpage

1475: \begin{figure}

1476: \figurenum{11}

1477: % \includegraphics[scale=1.0,angle=0]{MonR2-outflow-P8.eps}

1478: \includegraphics[scale=0.8,angle=0]{f11a.eps}

1479: \caption{

1480: This figure is a 2.12 $\mu$m S(1) line + continuum image

1481: and contains two separate systems of H$_2$ knots:

1482: The circle identifying HOD07~11 at 6$^h$7$^m$46$\stackrel{s}{.}$9, -6$\degr$20$\arcmin$6$\arcsec$

1483: marks the putative position of the 

1484: central source of a jet extending to the north-north-east (P.A. $\approx$23$\degr$) and ending

1485: in a well-defined bow shock located at 6$^h$7$^m$48$\stackrel{s}{.}$6, -6$\degr$19$\arcmin$3$\arcsec$.

1486: Several fainter knots of S(1) emission lie between the center

1487: and the bow shock, completing the morphology of a typical jet.

1488: The object HOD07~12 at 6$^h$7$^m$49$\stackrel{s}{.}$8, -6$\degr$20$\arcmin$43$\arcsec$

1489: has the morphology of a faint bipolar nebula. Two other knots

1490: of S(1) emission lie to the south-east at 6$^h$7$^m$51$\stackrel{s}{.}$6, -6$\degr$20$\arcmin$58$\arcsec$

1491: and at 6$^h$7$^m$54$\stackrel{s}{.}$9, -6$\degr$21$\arcmin$57$\arcsec$, respectively. While there are

1492: a number of faint features to the north-east of the bipolar nebula,

1493: no clear association with this jet source can be established.

1494: % MonR2-outflow-P8.eps, MonR2-outflow-P8.wip, outflow-P8.fits[851,1060]

1495: }

1496: \end{figure}

1497: 

1498: \clearpage

1499: \begin{figure}

1500: \figurenum{12}

1501: % \includegraphics[scale=1.0,angle=0]{MonR2-outflow-P8b.eps}

1502: \includegraphics[scale=0.8,angle=0]{f12a.eps}

1503: \caption{

1504: This figure shows images in 2.12 $\mu$m S(1), 4.5 $\mu$m, and 8.0 $\mu$m of 

1505: the central region of the two outflow sources shown in Fig. 11:

1506: HOD07~11 at 6$^h$7$^m$46$\stackrel{s}{.}$8, -6$\degr$20$\arcmin$12$\arcsec$ and

1507: HOD07~12 at 6$^h$7$^m$49$\stackrel{s}{.}$8, -6$\degr$20$\arcmin$43$\arcsec$. 

1508: % P8 put. center, HOD07 13 (Mon~R2 H$_2$ jet)

1509: % MonR2-outflow-P8b.eps, MonR2-outflow-P8b.wip, P8-S1.fits[324,294]

1510: }

1511: \end{figure}

1512: 

1513: \clearpage

1514: \begin{figure}

1515: \figurenum{13}

1516: \epsscale{0.7}

1517: % \includegraphics[scale=1.0,angle=0]{MonR2-outflow-P9.eps}

1518: \includegraphics[scale=0.8,angle=0]{f13a.eps}

1519: \caption{

1520: This figure shows the largest of the newly discovered jets:

1521: HOD07~13 with the central source located at 6$^h$7$^m$57$\stackrel{s}{.}$4, -6$\degr$31$\arcmin$6$\arcsec$ 

1522: % HOD07 13 (Mon~R2 H$_2$ jet).

1523: The jet has a projected length of 7.5$\arcmin$, corresponding

1524: to 1.8 pc.

1525: The left panel shows the UKIRT/WFCAM 2.12 $\mu$m S(1) + continuum image,

1526: the right panel is the Spitzer/IRAC 3.6 $\mu$m image. 

1527: The area of HOD07~13 was not covered by the publicly available

1528: IRAC 4.5 $\mu$m images.

1529: % MonR2-outflow-P9.eps, MonR2-outflow-P9.wip, outflow-P9.fits[825,2587]

1530: }

1531: \end{figure}

1532: 

1533: \clearpage

1534: \begin{figure}

1535: \figurenum{14}

1536: \epsscale{0.7}

1537: % \includegraphics[scale=1.0,angle=0]{MonR2-outflow-P9.eps}

1538: \includegraphics[scale=0.8,angle=0]{f14a.eps}

1539: \caption{

1540: This figure shows the central region of HOD07~13.

1541: The left panel shows the UKIRT/WFCAM 2.12~$\mu$m S(1) + continuum image,

1542: the right panel is the Spitzer/IRAC 3.6~$\mu$m image. 

1543: Both images show a string of shocks north of the position of the central

1544: source of this outflow.

1545: The IRAC 3.6 $\mu$m image shows emission from the southern lobe of the

1546: outflow, indicating the walls of a paraboloidal outflow cavity.

1547: % MonR2-outflow-P9.eps, MonR2-outflow-P9.wip, outflow-P9.fits[825,2587]

1548: }

1549: \end{figure}

1550: 

1551: \clearpage

1552: \begin{figure}

1553: \figurenum{15}

1554: % \includegraphics[scale=1.0,angle=0]{MonR2-outflow-P10.eps}

1555: \includegraphics[scale=0.8,angle=0]{f15a.eps}

1556: \caption{

1557: This 2.12 $\mu$m S(1) line + continuum image 

1558: contains two separate systems of H$_2$ knots:

1559: The likely central source of HOD07~14 is located at 6$^h$7$^m$59$\stackrel{s}{.}$2, -6$\degr$25$\arcmin$33$\arcsec$.

1560: % P10 put. center, HOD07 15 (Mon~R2 H$_2$ jet)

1561: The central source of HOD07~15 is located 

1562: near 6$^h$8$^m$10$\stackrel{s}{.}$0, -6$\degr$24$\arcmin$47$\arcsec$. 

1563: % P14 put. center, HOD07 16 (Mon~R2 H$_2$ jet)

1564: % MonR2-outflow-P10.eps, MonR2-outflow-P10.wip, outflow-P10.fits[1369,669]

1565: }

1566: 

1567: \end{figure}

1568: 

1569: \clearpage

1570: \begin{figure}

1571: \figurenum{16}

1572: % \includegraphics[scale=1.0,angle=0]{MonR2-outflow-P10b.eps}

1573: \includegraphics[scale=0.8,angle=0]{f16a.eps}

1574: \caption{

1575: This figure contains the 2.12~$\mu$m, Spitzer 4.5~$\mu$m, and 8.0~$\mu$m images of two separate systems of H$_2$ knots:

1576: The likely central source of HOD07~14 is located at 6$^h$7$^m$59$\stackrel{s}{.}$2, -6$\degr$25$\arcmin$33$\arcsec$.

1577: % P10 put. center, HOD07 15 (Mon~R2 H$_2$ jet)

1578: Based on the symmetry of the emission features, the central source of HOD07~15 located 

1579: near 6$^h$8$^m$10$\stackrel{s}{.}$0, -6$\degr$24$\arcmin$47$\arcsec$. 

1580: % P14 put. center, HOD07 16 (Mon~R2 H$_2$ jet)

1581: % MonR2-outflow-P10b.eps, MonR2-outflow-P10b.wip, P10-S1.fits[349,176] (top),

1582: % P11-S1.fits[206,352] (bottom)

1583: }

1584: \end{figure}

1585: 

1586: \clearpage

1587: \begin{figure}

1588: \figurenum{17}

1589: % \includegraphics[scale=1.0,angle=0]{MonR2-outflow-P2.eps}

1590: \includegraphics[scale=0.8,angle=0]{f17a.eps}

1591: \caption{

1592: This 2.12 $\mu$m S(1) line + continuum image 

1593: of the nebulosity in L~1646 associated with the optical HH object 866 \citep{wan05}

1594: at 6$^h$7$^m$7$\stackrel{s}{.}$8, -6$\degr$3$\arcmin$49$\arcsec$.

1595: We identify two H$_2$ jets labeled Jet W and Jet E in Fig.~2 and listed in Table~1.

1596: % (outflow P2)

1597: % MonR2-outflow-P2.eps, MonR2-outflow-P2.wip, outflow-P2.fits[1001,1001]

1598: }

1599: \end{figure}

1600: 

1601: \clearpage

1602: \begin{figure}

1603: \figurenum{18}

1604: \includegraphics[scale=0.8,angle=0]{f18a.eps}

1605: \caption{

1606: This 2.12 $\mu$m S(1) line + continuum image 

1607: shows the bipolar reflection nebula GGD~11.

1608: % GGD11-S1.eps,GGD11-S1.wip,GGD11-S1.fits

1609: }

1610: \end{figure}

1611: \clearpage

1612: \begin{figure}

1613: \figurenum{19}

1614: \includegraphics[scale=0.8,angle=0]{f19a.eps}

1615: \caption{

1616: This 2.12 $\mu$m S(1) line + continuum image shows the reflection nebula

1617: NGC 2182, which was recorded in our large WFCAM image but not included

1618: in Fig.~1.  In contrast to optical

1619: and infrared continuum images, this image shows strong, filamentary and

1620: knotty S(1) emission suggesting emission from the shock front of an

1621: expanding shell.

1622: % NGC2182-S1.eps,NGC2182-S1.wip,NGC2182-S1.fits

1623: }

1624: \end{figure}

1625: 

1626: 

1627: 

1628: 

1629: \clearpage

1630: \begin{deluxetable}{ccc}

1631: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1632: \tablecaption{Outflows in Mon R2}

1633: \tablewidth{0pt}

1634: \tablehead{

1635: \colhead{RA (J2000.0)} & \colhead{Dec (J2000.0)} & \colhead{Name}

1636: }

1637: \startdata

1638: 6$^h$7$^m$07$\stackrel{s}{.}$9 & -6$\degr$03$\arcmin$42$\arcsec$ & HH 866 Jet W\\

1639: 6$^h$7$^m$09$\stackrel{s}{.}$8 & -6$\degr$03$\arcmin$44$\arcsec$ & HH 866 Jet E\\

1640: 6$^h$7$^m$10$\stackrel{s}{.}$4 & -6$\degr$26$\arcmin$34$\arcsec$ & HOD07 1\\

1641: 6$^h$7$^m$30$\stackrel{s}{.}$5 & -6$\degr$11$\arcmin$51$\arcsec$ & HOD07 2\\

1642: 6$^h$7$^m$31$\stackrel{s}{.}$6 & -6$\degr$12$\arcmin$47$\arcsec$ & HOD07 3\\

1643: 6$^h$7$^m$37$\stackrel{s}{.}$6 & -6$\degr$19$\arcmin$54$\arcsec$ & HOD07 4\\

1644: 6$^h$7$^m$38$\stackrel{s}{.}$7 & -6$\degr$21$\arcmin$14$\arcsec$ & HOD07 5\\

1645: 6$^h$7$^m$39$\stackrel{s}{.}$2 & -6$\degr$23$\arcmin$44$\arcsec$ & TBWW97 CO -100,-40\\

1646: 6$^h$7$^m$41$\stackrel{s}{.}$2 & -6$\degr$11$\arcmin$14$\arcsec$ & HOD07 6\\

1647: 6$^h$7$^m$41$\stackrel{s}{.}$5 & -6$\degr$21$\arcmin$28$\arcsec$ & HOD07 7\\

1648: 6$^h$7$^m$43$\stackrel{s}{.}$7 & -6$\degr$10$\arcmin$46$\arcsec$ & HOD07 8\\

1649: 6$^h$7$^m$44$\stackrel{s}{.}$0 & -6$\degr$11$\arcmin$02$\arcsec$ & HOD07 9\\

1650: 6$^h$7$^m$44$\stackrel{s}{.}$1 & -6$\degr$23$\arcmin$59$\arcsec$ & HOD07 10\\

1651: 6$^h$7$^m$45$\stackrel{s}{.}$9 & -6$\degr$21$\arcmin$47$\arcsec$ & TBWW97 Mon~R2-N\\

1652: 6$^h$7$^m$46$\stackrel{s}{.}$8 & -6$\degr$20$\arcmin$12$\arcsec$ & HOD07 11\\

1653: 6$^h$7$^m$49$\stackrel{s}{.}$8 & -6$\degr$20$\arcmin$43$\arcsec$ & HOD07 12\\

1654: 6$^h$7$^m$57$\stackrel{s}{.}$4 & -6$\degr$31$\arcmin$06$\arcsec$ & HOD07 13\\

1655: 6$^h$7$^m$58$\stackrel{s}{.}$9 & -6$\degr$25$\arcmin$31$\arcsec$ & HOD07 14\\

1656: 6$^h$8$^m$10$\stackrel{s}{.}$0 & -6$\degr$24$\arcmin$47$\arcsec$ & HOD07 15\\

1657: \enddata

1658: \end{deluxetable}

1659: 

1660: \clearpage

1661: \begin{deluxetable}{cccc}

1662: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1663: \tablecaption{Reflection Nebulae in Mon R2}

1664: \tablewidth{0pt}

1665: \tablehead{

1666: \colhead{RA (J2000.0)} & \colhead{Dec (J2000.0)} & \colhead{Name} & \colhead{Morphology}

1667: }

1668: \startdata

1669: 6$^h$7$^m$11$\stackrel{s}{.}$0 & -6$\degr$26$\arcmin$51$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R1 & reflection neb.\\

1670: 6$^h$7$^m$36$\stackrel{s}{.}$6 & -6$\degr$15$\arcmin$07$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R2 & bipolar neb.\\

1671: 6$^h$7$^m$41$\stackrel{s}{.}$3 & -6$\degr$20$\arcmin$02$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R3 & cometary neb.\\

1672: 6$^h$7$^m$43$\stackrel{s}{.}$3 & -6$\degr$18$\arcmin$27$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R4 & reflection neb.\\

1673: 6$^h$7$^m$43$\stackrel{s}{.}$4 & -6$\degr$11$\arcmin$16$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R5 & cometary neb.\\

1674: 6$^h$7$^m$43$\stackrel{s}{.}$9 & -6$\degr$19$\arcmin$30$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R6 & cometary neb. jet ?\\

1675: 6$^h$7$^m$44$\stackrel{s}{.}$3 & -6$\degr$25$\arcmin$40$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R7 & cometary neb.\\

1676: 6$^h$7$^m$44$\stackrel{s}{.}$8 & -6$\degr$20$\arcmin$31$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R8 & reflection neb.\\

1677: 6$^h$7$^m$45$\stackrel{s}{.}$5 & -6$\degr$25$\arcmin$44$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R9 & reflection neb.\\

1678: 6$^h$7$^m$45$\stackrel{s}{.}$5 & -6$\degr$26$\arcmin$08$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R10 & reflection neb.\\

1679: 6$^h$7$^m$45$\stackrel{s}{.}$9 & -6$\degr$25$\arcmin$29$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R11 & cometary neb.\\

1680: 6$^h$7$^m$46$\stackrel{s}{.}$3 & -6$\degr$25$\arcmin$31$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R12 & reflection nebula\\

1681: 6$^h$7$^m$46$\stackrel{s}{.}$8 & -6$\degr$25$\arcmin$07$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R13 & cometary neb.\\

1682: 6$^h$7$^m$46$\stackrel{s}{.}$9 & -6$\degr$24$\arcmin$17$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R14 & bipolar neb.\\

1683: 6$^h$7$^m$48$\stackrel{s}{.}$1 & -6$\degr$24$\arcmin$05$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R15 & reflection neb.\\

1684: 6$^h$7$^m$48$\stackrel{s}{.}$2 & -6$\degr$25$\arcmin$07$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R16 & reflection neb.\\

1685: 6$^h$7$^m$48$\stackrel{s}{.}$6 & -6$\degr$25$\arcmin$22$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R17 & bipolar neb.\\

1686: 6$^h$7$^m$48$\stackrel{s}{.}$8 & -6$\degr$25$\arcmin$55$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R18 & cometary neb.\\

1687: 6$^h$7$^m$50$\stackrel{s}{.}$7 & -6$\degr$25$\arcmin$53$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R19 & reflection neb.\\

1688: 6$^h$7$^m$50$\stackrel{s}{.}$7 & -6$\degr$26$\arcmin$10$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R20 & reflection neb.\\

1689: 6$^h$7$^m$51$\stackrel{s}{.}$0 & -6$\degr$23$\arcmin$00$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R21 & bipolar neb.\\

1690: 6$^h$7$^m$51$\stackrel{s}{.}$1 & -6$\degr$26$\arcmin$10$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R22 & reflection neb.\\

1691: 6$^h$7$^m$51$\stackrel{s}{.}$3 & -6$\degr$19$\arcmin$47$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R23 & bipolar neb.\\

1692: 6$^h$7$^m$51$\stackrel{s}{.}$5 & -6$\degr$26$\arcmin$23$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R24 & reflection neb.\\

1693: 6$^h$7$^m$51$\stackrel{s}{.}$7 & -6$\degr$23$\arcmin$18$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R25 & reflection neb.\\

1694: 6$^h$7$^m$51$\stackrel{s}{.}$8 & -6$\degr$25$\arcmin$40$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R26 & reflection neb.\\

1695: 6$^h$7$^m$54$\stackrel{s}{.}$7 & -6$\degr$26$\arcmin$36$\arcsec$ & HOD07 R27 & reflection neb.\\

1696: \enddata

1697: \end{deluxetable}

1698: 

1699: 

1700: \end{document}

1701: 

1702: