1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
3: %% \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
4: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
5: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
6: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
7: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
8: %% use the longabstract style option.
9: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
10: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
11: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
12: %% the \begin{document} command.
13: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
14: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
15: \newcommand{\ha}{H$\alpha$}
16: \newcommand{\hb}{H$\beta$}
17: \newcommand{\oiiir}{[O~{\scriptsize III}]~$\lambda$5007}
18: \newcommand{\hii}{H~{\scriptsize II}}
19: \newcommand{\hi}{H~{\scriptsize I}}
20: \newcommand{\oiii}{[O~{\scriptsize III}]}
21: \newcommand{\teff}{$T_{\mathrm{eff}}$}
22: \newcommand{\ebv}{ $E(B-V)$}
23: \newcommand{\cho}{{\sc\footnotesize CHORIZOS}}
24: \newcommand{\stb}{{\sc\footnotesize Starburst99}}
25: \newcommand{\rv}{$R_{5495}$}
26: \newcommand{\ecc}{$E(4405-5495)$}
27: \newcommand{\logoh}{$12 + \log(\mathrm{O/H})$}
28: \newcommand{\hrd}{ Hertzsprung--Russell diagram}
29: \newcommand{\mbol}{$M_\mathrm{bol}$}
30: \slugcomment{Published in the Astronomical Journal}
31: \shorttitle{The young stellar population of NGC 4214.I}
32: \shortauthors{\'Ubeda et al.}
33:
34: %\usepackage{color}
35:
36: \begin{document}
37:
38: \title{The young stellar population of NGC 4214 as observed with
39: HST. I. Data and methods.\footnote{Based on observations made with the NASA/ESA
40: {\it Hubble Space Telescope,} obtained at the Space Telescope Science
41: Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for
42: Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26555.}}
43:
44: \author{ Leonardo \'{U}beda, Jes\'us
45: Ma\'{i}z Apell\'aniz\footnote{Affiliated with the Space Telescope Division of the
46: European Space Agency, ESTEC, Noordwijk, Netherlands.} , \& John W. MacKenty}
47: \email{lubeda@stsci.edu, jmaiz@stsci.edu, mackenty@stsci.edu}
48: \affil{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San
49: Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, U.S.A.}
50:
51:
52: \begin{abstract}
53: We present the data and methods that we have used to perform a detailed UV--optical study of the
54: nearby dwarf starburst galaxy NGC~4214 using multifilter HST/WFPC2+STIS photometry.
55: We explain the process followed to obtain high--quality photometry and astrometry of the
56: stellar and cluster populations of this galaxy. We describe the procedure used to transform magnitudes
57: and colors into physical parameters using spectral energy distributions.
58: The data show the existence of both young and old stellar populations that
59: can be resolved at the distance of NGC 4214 (2.94 Mpc)
60: and we perform a general description of those populations.
61:
62:
63:
64:
65: %The stellar extinction is found to be quite patchy, with some areas
66: %having values of $\ecc < 0.1$ mag and others, associated with star forming regions, much more heavily obscured,
67: %a result which is consistent with previous studies of the nebular extinction. We determined the ratio of
68: %blue--to--red supergiants and found it to be consistent with theoretical models for the metallicity of the SMC.
69: %The stellar IMF of the field in the range $15-100 M_\odot$ is found to be steeper than $\gamma=-2.8$,
70: % when considering
71: %the main sequence population
72: %and not accounting for the evolved massive stars.
73: %A number of massive clusters and associations with ages between a few
74: %and 200 million years are detected and their properties are discussed.
75: \end{abstract}
76:
77: \keywords{galaxies: individual (\objectname{NGC~4214}) --- galaxies: star clusters ---
78: galaxies: stellar content --- stars: early-type ---
79: stars: luminosity function, mass function}
80:
81: \section{Introduction}
82:
83: NGC~4214 is a nearby dwarf IAB(s)m galaxy \citep{Vauc91} in the low--redshift
84: CVn I Cloud \citep{Sand94} located at a distance of $2.94 \pm 0.18 $ Mpc \citep{Maizetal02a}.
85: The galaxy is moderately metal--deficient \citep{KobuSkil96} with \logoh\ between $8.15$ and $8.28$.
86: The optical nebular morphology of NGC 4214 \citep{MacKetal00} shows three differentiated components:
87: (1) two large \hii\ star--forming complexes, known in the literature as NGC 4214--I (or
88: NW complex) and NGC 4214--II (or SE complex); (2) a number of isolated
89: fainter knots scattered throughout the field; (3) an extended,
90: structurally amorphous, Diffuse Interstellar Gas (DIG)
91: surrounding the two main complexes and some of the isolated knots; see Figure~\ref{fig-1}.
92: The individual \ha\ knots have been identified by several authors in
93: the past and \citet{MacKetal00} have provided a more standardized
94: nomenclature with 13 different units, which we adopt for this work.
95:
96: What follows is a summary of this galaxy's morphology. Refer to
97: Figure~\ref{fig-2} for guidance.
98: NGC 4214--I is the largest \hii\ complex in the galaxy and the
99: one with the most intricate morphology. It includes several star clusters and
100: has a complex \ha\ structure dominated by the presence of two cavities or
101: intensity minima.
102: I--As is a massive young Super Star Cluster
103: (SSC) located off--center in a heart--shaped
104: \ha\ cavity. The \ha\ emission surrounding I--As consists of a number of knots joined by
105: filaments.
106: I--Bs is a scaled OB association (or SOBA,
107: \citealt{Hunt99}, \citealt{Maiz01b}): a massive cluster that, as opposed to an SSC, does not show
108: a marked central concentration. I--Bs is also located in the middle
109: of an elongated \ha\ cavity, though not as clearly defined as the I--As one.
110: %
111: NGC~4214--II is the second largest complex in the galaxy (in angular size) and
112: harbors the regions with the highest peak \ha\ intensity. Its morphology is
113: quite different from that of NGC~4214--I. In the first place, there is no
114: dominant SSC but several smaller clusters which are responsible for the ionization
115: of the gas. Also, there are no large cavities present and the clusters are
116: located very close to (or at the same position as)
117: the most intensely \ha\ emitting knots
118: (\citealt{Maizetal98}).
119: II--A and II--B are the two brightest \ha\ knots in NGC 4214--II. They are
120: both located on top of clusters which, at the resolution of WFPC2, appear to be
121: centered at the same positions.
122: %
123: NGC~4214--IIIs is a compact continuum source with weak associated \ha\
124: emission. It is either an older cluster or the nucleus of the galaxy, as suggested
125: by the study of \citet{Faneetal97} in the I band and the FUV.
126: NGC 4214--IVs has a similar appearance to NGC 4214--IIIs and it is
127: probably another intermediate-age massive cluster.
128: \citet{MacKetal00} provides a more detailed description.
129:
130: The high intensity of the recent star and cluster formation rate in NGC~4214 combined with its
131: proximity and its low foreground extinction make this galaxy an excellent target to test several
132: subjects of astrophysical interest regarding young stellar populations.
133: Nearby galaxies, and in particular NGC~4214,
134: provide ideal laboratories to test how stars form, how
135: star formation is triggered, and details of how galaxies assembled.
136: The study of nearby galaxies like NGC~4214 is rather important because
137: most of the information that we infer about high--redshift galaxies relies on
138: what we observe in galaxies in the local universe. Therefore, understanding
139: nearby galaxies is of extreme importance to comprehend what
140: is going on in more distant ones.
141: NGC~4214 is a low--metallicity galaxy, and this gave us the possibility
142: to study the physical conditions in an environment of current astrophysical interest.
143: %with the closest resemblance to the
144: %early universe.
145:
146:
147: In this paper we present the data and the methods that we used to analyze it.
148: We have built detailed photometric lists with the most accurate astrometry.
149: Of particular interest is the new IDL code \citep{Maiz04} that we used
150: to transform
151: observed magnitudes and photometric colors into actual
152: stellar and cluster physical parameters.
153: We also make a brief description of its stellar population.
154:
155: In the accompanying
156: paper [\citep{Ubedetalb06}, hereafter Paper~II] we will study
157: the ratio of blue to red (B/R)
158: supergiants, the initial stellar mass function (IMF),
159: the variable extinction across the galaxy, and the properties of
160: its young-- and
161: intermediate--age cluster populations. This division is needed due to the vast amount
162: of data and results that we have gathered, and to the intricate
163: structure of the object of study: NGC~4214 presents a number of clusters
164: in different stages of evolution, individually
165: resolved stars, and several regions of star formation, characterized by the presence
166: of complex nebulosities. H~{\scriptsize II} regions of
167: different morphology can be clearly seen in our
168: images, showing the distinct nature of this interesting galaxy.
169:
170:
171:
172:
173: The present paper is organized as follows: In Section 2 we provide a description
174: of our observations and data reduction, with emphasis on the creation
175: of the photometric lists and the consistency tests. In Section 2.5 we
176: introduce the method used to translate the observed magnitudes and colors into
177: physical parameters. In Section 3 we provide a general description of the stellar populations
178: visible in our images. A brief summary is provided in Sections 4.
179:
180:
181:
182:
183: \section{Observations and data reduction}
184:
185: \subsection{WFPC2 Observations and reduction}
186:
187: %In this paper we use multifilter optical+UV Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2)
188: %and Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) photometry
189: %to investigate the young stellar population of NGC~4214; here we present
190: %the data, its reduction, as well as the methods that we employed to
191: %analize it. In a future paper we will present the scientific results.
192: Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2) is a two-dimensional
193: imaging photometer which
194: consists of three CCD cameras (WF) with a spatial sampling of
195: $0\farcs1$ per pixel and a smaller CCD camera (PC) with
196: $0\farcs046$ per pixel.
197:
198: The WFPC2 images were acquired in two programs:
199: 6569 (P.I.: John MacKenty) and 6716 (P.I.: Theodore Stecher). Figure~\ref{fig-1}
200: shows the location of the WFPC2 fields for the programs that we
201: have used. All images include complexes NGC~4214--I and NGC~4214--II.
202: Table~\ref{tbl01} lists all the NGC~4214 WFPC2 data that we have
203: used for this paper. The images available in each program can be
204: summarized as follows: 6716, UV and $UVI$; 6569, narrow--band
205: (\oiiir, and \ha) + broad--band $UVI$.
206: The WFPC2 observations of program 6569 were obtained on
207: 22 July 1997, and those of program 6716 were obtained on 29 June and
208: 9 December 1997.
209: For proposal 6569, the pointing of the telescope was chosen in order
210: to minimize charge transfer efficiency (CTE) effects, since in this way
211: no area of interest was separated from its collecting point by low signal
212: areas \citep{MacKetal00}. In the case of proposal 6716, the location
213: was chosen in order to capture the most interesting regions of NGC~4214
214: with the PC, a camera that provides a higher resolution. These images
215: allow us to obtain accurate single star photometry not easily achievable
216: from the ground due to the very complex diffuse emission and crowding.
217:
218:
219: The standard WFPC2 pipeline process takes care of the basic data
220: reduction (bias, dark, flat--field corrections). The reduction of the processed
221: frames was performed using the PSF--fitting package {\sc\footnotesize HSTphot}
222: \citep{Dolp00a}, which yielded calibrated magnitudes in the VEGAMAG system corrected for
223: charge--transfer efficiency (CTE) for all filters.
224: We ran {\sc\footnotesize HSTphot} twice: first using a flag that estimates the
225: sky locally, and later using the flag that refits the sky during photometry. In both runs
226: we used the default aperture corrections for each filter
227: provided by {\sc\footnotesize HSTphot}.
228: The adopted magnitude for each star is the mean obtained from the two executions, and the errors
229: in the magnitudes were estimated from the internal errors in each run.
230: The consistency of the photometry is analyzed in Section 2.3.
231:
232:
233: The WFPC2 CCD windows suffer from a time--dependent
234: contamination which primarily affects UV observations and is
235: negligible at optical wavelengths. The contaminants are largely removed
236: during periodic warmings (decontaminations) of the camera, and the effect upon
237: photometry is both linear and stable and can be removed using values regularly
238: measured in the WFPC2 calibration program \citep{McMaWhit02}. We performed
239: contamination correction for images obtained with filters F170W and F336W.
240: %
241: %
242: The presence of saturated objects was analyzed in all the images, and
243: we found that cluster I--As appears saturated in filter F555W of proposal 6716
244: and in filters F336W, F555W, and F702W of proposal 6569.
245: Cluster IIIs appears saturated in all images obtained using filter F555W.
246: In Section 2.4 we explain how we obtained the magnitudes for these clusters.
247: %
248: %
249:
250: \subsubsection{Astrometry}
251:
252: The geometric distortion of the WFPC2 detectors is well known \citep{CaseWigg01},
253: allowing for precise relative astrometry. However, the absolute astrometry has
254: two problems: First, the Guide Star Catalog, which is used as a reference on board
255: {\it Hubble Space Telescope}, has typical errors of $\sim 1\arcsec$ \citep{Russetal90}.
256: Second, if only one point in one of the four WFPC2 chips can be established as a
257: precise reference using an external catalog, the average error in the orientation
258: induces an error of $\sim 0\farcs03$ in a typical position in the other three chips.
259: In our case, two objects which are present in the
260: WFPC2 fields are included in the USNO--A2.0 catalog as entries 1200--06870167
261: and 1200--06870199. We used the VizieR service \citep{Ochsetal00} to obtain
262: their coordinates using the J2000 epoch and equinox, and we adopted
263: object 1200--06870167 as the astrometric reference point.
264: This star is located
265: in the center of region VIn which lies outside our studied field
266: but which can be clearly seen in Figure~2 in \cite{MacKetal00}.
267: 1200--06870199 is located in a very crowded region filled with many
268: objects in our high resolution images, and therefore, its coordinates
269: correspond to a blend of point sources, making it useless for our purposes.
270: %
271: The procedure that we followed to establish a
272: uniform coordinate system had three steps:
273: %
274: First, we corrected for the difference in plate scale for each filter with respect to
275: F555W using the parameters provided by \citet{Dolp00a} (note that
276: the tasks {\sc\footnotesize mosaic} and {\sc\footnotesize metric}
277: within the {\sc\footnotesize IRAF/STSDAS} package\footnote{The Image Reduction and Analysis Facility
278: ({\sc\footnotesize IRAF} ) is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which is operated
279: by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under
280: cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.
281: {\sc\footnotesize STSDAS} , the Space
282: Telescope Science Data Analysis System, contains tasks complementary
283: to the existing {\sc\footnotesize IRAF} tasks. We used version 3.3.1 (2005 March) for our analysis.},
284: use the non--wavelength--dependent
285: Holtzmann solution, which can introduce $\sim 0\farcs1$ errors for FUV data;
286: errors are up to an order of magnitude smaller if only optical data are involved).
287: %
288: Second, we corrected for the geometrical distortion and built mosaics of the four
289: WFPC2 fields using the {\sc\footnotesize mosaic} utility, which is included in the standard
290: {\sc\footnotesize STSDAS} package for WFPC2 data analysis. We rotated all mosaiced images
291: in order to make them share a common orientation, keeping in mind that
292: this contributes to the astrometric accuracy due to subpixel rebinning.
293: %
294: Third, using 1200--06870167 as a reference object, we corrected for the general
295: displacement in right ascension and declination and compared the positions of the
296: stars of several regions of NGC~4214 using images obtained under different filters.
297: As expected, coordinates differed by a few hundredths of an arcsecond, which we
298: take to be the precision of our absolute astrometry.
299:
300:
301: \subsubsection{Cross--correlation }
302: The field--of--view used for our analysis is shown in Figure~\ref{fig-2} and
303: its dimensions are: 875 pc $\times$ 972 pc or $ 61 \farcs 4 \times 68 \farcs 3$.
304: The region of the galaxy depicted by our field--of--view
305: is clearly the most interesting one to study,
306: because it includes the most prominent star--forming regions, as well as
307: some clusters of importance.
308: This field--of--view represents the overlapping section of several
309: images obtained with HST/WFPC2 and HST/STIS (see next section).
310:
311: The last step in the data reduction, the registration of the images obtained
312: under different programs, was somewhat complicated. We developed
313: custom--made IDL scripts which allowed us to cross--identify stars in the
314: different bandpasses by positional matching. In order to join the lists obtained
315: in different filters, we built two main photometric lists using F336W and F814W
316: as reference filters. The lists are referred to here as {\sc\footnotesize LIST336} and
317: {\sc\footnotesize LIST814}. Even though the individual lists used in the cross--correlation
318: were obtained with the same instrument, the orientation of the cameras
319: was different for each list and the resolution and S/N used to image each
320: object was also different. To combine the final proposal--6569 list with the
321: final proposal--6716 list with filter
322: F336W as reference, we used a cross--correlation procedure with the
323: following characteristics:
324: In the most crowded regions in our images (NGC~4214--I) we only considered
325: objects from proposal 6716 because these images have a higher resolution.
326: Outside that region, the cross--correlation could yield several cases: (a) an
327: object found in proposal 6569 but not found in proposal 6716, (b) an object
328: found in both proposals, (c) an object found in proposal 6569 that corresponds
329: to two or more objects in proposal 6716. Our final list included all objects in
330: case (a); if the object fell in case (b), we would consider the data from proposal
331: 6569 due to its higher S/N, and get rid of its companion from proposal 6716.
332: Finally, if the object fell in case (c) we would consider those objects from
333: proposal 6716 due to the higher resolution of the PC and get rid of its companion
334: from proposal 6569.
335: With all the objects that were not correlated, we built another list
336: using filter F814W as reference. {\sc\footnotesize LIST336} has 14\,389 objects
337: and {\sc\footnotesize LIST814} has 21\,614 objects.
338: % Following this procedure, we built two photometric
339: %lists which we will refer to as {\sc\footnotesize LIST336} (F336W used as reference filter )
340: %and {\sc\footnotesize LIST814} (F814W used as reference filter).
341: %
342: Both lists of objects
343: ({\sc\footnotesize LIST336} and {\sc\footnotesize LIST814}) are
344: available in the electronic edition of this paper.
345: Tables~\ref{tbl02} and \ref{tbl03} contain the first five lines of those lists as a sample.
346: The tables include the equatorial coordinates ($\alpha$, $\delta$) for each object
347: and their corresponding PSF (WFPC2 filters) or aperture (STIS) photometry.
348:
349:
350: We analyzed the photometric errors as a function of magnitude for
351: all the considered filters. The photometric uncertainties are determined for
352: each star based upon statistical errors, sky determination errors and aperture
353: correction errors. We found that some points clearly exceed the statistical errors,
354: especially
355: in the F555W and F814W bands: these are stars deeply embedded
356: in the \hii ~regions where line emission significantly enhances the local background.
357: Figure~\ref{fig-3} presents six plots of the magnitude errors as a function
358: of magnitudes F336W, F555W, and F814W obtained using our
359: photometry lists from proposals 6716 and 6569.
360:
361:
362:
363: \subsection{STIS Observations and reduction}
364:
365:
366: We summarize the STIS data sets analyzed for this study in Table~\ref{tbl01}.
367: All the UV observations employed the STIS near--ultraviolet (NUV)
368: Cs$_2$Te Multi-Anode Microchannel Array (MAMA) detector. This detector has a
369: field of view of $25" \times 25" $ and a pixel size of $\approx 0 \farcs 02468.$
370: The images were obtained from proposal 9096 (P.I.: Jes\'us
371: Ma\'{i}z-Apell\'aniz) and they show the two targets, regions
372: NGC4214--I and NGC4214--II, with higher resolution than the WFPC2 images.
373:
374:
375:
376:
377: Each target was imaged using two different orientations
378: shown in Figure~\ref{fig-4}. This is an RGB mosaic
379: which we made by assigning the F336W image to the blue pixel values,
380: the F555W+\oiiir~ images to the green pixel values, and
381: the F814W+\ha~ images to the red pixel values.
382: %
383: Filter F25CN182 (F25CN270) provides
384: medium--band width imaging with a central wavelength of 1820 \AA\ (2700 \AA) and
385: an FWHM of 350 \AA\ (350 \AA).
386: %
387: %
388: The STIS data were reduced by the STScI calibration pipeline, via the
389: on--the--fly reprocessing
390: which uses the best calibration reference files
391: available at the time of retrieval from the HST archive.
392: This used the latest geometric
393: distortion correction taken from \citet{MaizUbed04}.
394:
395: %
396:
397:
398:
399:
400: Comparing Figures~\ref{fig-1} and~\ref{fig-4} we see that
401: the STIS field--of--view is situated within the WFPC2
402: images of NGC~4214. We obtained the coordinates
403: of all objects in our 11 STIS images using a customized version
404: of the {\sc\footnotesize DAOFIND} task in the
405: {\sc\footnotesize DAOPHOT} software package \cite{Stet87}
406: running under IDL and then we performed
407: aperture photometry on all the images. We cross--correlated the 11 STIS
408: photometric lists with the list obtained from the WFPC2 images using
409: F336W as reference filter ({\sc\footnotesize LIST336}). We found that
410: a few stars % (less than 10 \%)
411: in the WFPC2 list have two or more counterparts in the STIS list.
412: This is the result of the fact that STIS has a higher resolution than
413: WFPC2.
414: At the distance of NGC~4214 (2.94 Mpc),
415: the problem of multiple unresolved systems
416: is unavoidable. For example:
417: \citet{Maizetal05} study the problem derived
418: from stellar multiplicity in the determination
419: of initial mass functions. They present results for
420: Trumpler 14, a massive young cluster in the Carina Nebula
421: that contains at least three
422: very--early O--type stars.
423: If this cluster were located at a distance similar to that of NGC~4214, it
424: would appear as a point source even though
425: we know for certain that it is a multiple system.
426: We use this result to justify our
427: approach to solve this issue, by including
428: a combination of objects as a single object in our final list.
429: %For this reason, we decided to combine the magnitudes
430: % of those objects to include them in our final photometric list.
431: %
432: %
433: %We are aware that this practice may include some contamination
434: %and that strictly speaking this should not be done.
435: %However, since we are
436: %using observations obtained with two instruments of
437: %different resolution, we chose to deal with this issue by combining magnitudes.
438:
439:
440:
441:
442:
443: \subsection{Completeness tests}
444: The detailed analysis of NGC~4214 data (such as
445: the study of the B/R ratio and the derivation of an IMF)
446: require a quantitative evaluation of completeness
447: of the photometric data.
448: We therefore conducted several experiments in
449: which we added artificial
450: stars with known magnitude and position
451: to the images and then attempted to recover them using the
452: same finding procedures
453: that we used for the real stars.
454: %
455: This was done using routines within the {\sc\footnotesize HSTphot} suite of codes.
456: The artificial stars were given
457: random magnitudes and colors in the range $14 \le $F336W $ \le 26$
458: and $-2.0 \le$ F336W -- F555W $ \le 4.0$.
459: Approximately 50\,000 fake stars were added in each image in all four chips.
460: {\sc\footnotesize HSTphot} generates a grid of artificial stars
461: which are distributed according to the flux of the image, so that
462: crowded areas would contain more fake stars than less crowded ones.
463: Then the artificial stars were detected and measured using the
464: same algorithms that we
465: used for the observed data.
466: %
467: To be recovered, a star must have survived the fitting process, having been
468: found automatically and it must have passed the cross--identification test.
469: The ratios of recovered to inserted stars
470: in the different magnitude bins give directly the completeness factor
471: as a function of magnitude.
472: In Figure~\ref{fig-5}, we
473: plotted the results of the artificial star tests for filters F336W, F555W,
474: and F814W in proposals 6569 and 6717 and
475: we observe that, at the bright end, the completeness is about 95\%
476: or higher in all images. For fainter
477: magnitudes, the completeness falls off more quickly with increasing
478: magnitude in the images obtained in
479: proposal 6716 than in those obtained in proposal 6569, as expected
480: from the shorter exposure times of the former.
481:
482: The next step was to map the \hrd ~as a finely spaced grid, and to calculate
483: the completeness values at each point. In order to do this, we
484: used \cho\ (see Section 2.5) to obtain two useful relationships:
485: the relation between
486: F336W -- F555W and \teff;
487: and the relation between F336W -- F555W and \mbol\ for
488: $E(4405-5495) = 0.1 $ mag which is a typical value of the extinction
489: in NGC 4214 as estimated by \citet{Leitetal96}.
490: This
491: procedure was only used to estimate the completeness values
492: which we list on Table~\ref{tbl04}, not
493: to determine stellar or cluster physical properties.
494: %
495: A separate independent study of completeness for the STIS
496: data was not necessary, because we matched
497: all the stars in the STIS lists to stars in {\sc\footnotesize LIST336}. Therefore,
498: the completeness tests conducted for {\sc\footnotesize LIST336}
499: include both WFPC2 and STIS data. Since the STIS images go deeper
500: than the WFPC2 data, our results are limited by the depth of the WFPC2 images.
501:
502: In order to check for the consistency of our data, we used the fact that
503: NGC 4214 was visited twice for proposal 6716: first on June 29, 1997 and later
504: on December 09, 1997. The orientation of the cameras in the sky was
505: different for both visits as can be clearly seen in Figure~\ref{fig-1}. It is
506: important to note that the idea behind this proposal was to obtain the best
507: resolution of regions NGC~4214--I and NGC~4214--II and that is
508: why those complexes are centered in the PC.
509: The fields of view that correspond to both visits in proposal 6716 contain
510: a significant amount of overlap, allowing us to test the internal consistency
511: of the photometry in order to check for possible systematic uncertainties introduced
512: by the CTE or contamination corrections.
513: For each of the four filters in this proposal we obtained two
514: photometric lists, one for each visit to NGC~4214. We then performed a
515: statistical test on all the objects which were identified as the same star in
516: the two lists. We calculated the distribution of $(m_1 - m_2) /
517: \sqrt{ \sigma_{1}^{2} + \sigma_2^{2}} $, where $m_i$ and $ \sigma_i$ are
518: the magnitude and its uncertainty in list $i$. This distribution
519: closely resembles a normal distribution with zero mean and a standard deviation of unity
520: for all the filters used, as we show
521: in the histograms in Figure~\ref{fig-6}. The total number of points (N) considered
522: for the histograms, the average value of $ \Delta m /
523: \sqrt{ \sigma_{1}^{2} + \sigma_2^{2}} $ and its standard
524: deviation are given in Table~\ref{tbl05}.
525: %
526: The same study with filters F25CN182 and F25CN270 was performed
527: for our STIS lists. Again, we obtained histograms that closely resemble
528: a normal distribution with zero mean and standard deviation of unity,
529: showing the agreement between different photometric lists.
530:
531: The completeness values obtained in this section
532: will allow us to better estimate the actual number
533: of blue and red supergiants in the galaxy. We will also use them
534: to infer
535: the initial mass function as we explain in detail in Paper~II.
536:
537:
538: \subsection{Cluster photometry}
539:
540: The {\sc\footnotesize HSTphot} package \citep{Dolp00a}
541: was developed specifically to obtain stellar photometry of point
542: sources on images obtained with HST WFPC2. Our WFPC2 and STIS images contain some
543: objects (I--As, I--Es, IIIs, and IVs)
544: which are known to be unresolved stellar clusters, and which appear as extended
545: sources rather than point--like objects. The position of these clusters is
546: shown in Figure~\ref{fig-2}, and their corresponding blowups are in Figure~\ref{fig-7}.
547: Other clusters are resolved into stars and we also
548: analyzed them using aperture photometry.
549: These clusters are organized in two groups: large complexes
550: (which include smaller clusters): I--A, I--B, and II;
551: and resolved clusters: I--Ds, II--A, II--B, II--C, II--D, and II--E.
552: Their positions in the galaxy are shown
553: in Figure~\ref{fig-2}.
554:
555:
556: We performed detailed aperture photometry of these clusters,
557: carefully selecting the aperture radii and the sky apertures.
558: We used the closest possible radii values to those provided by \citep{MacKetal00}.
559: In all cases we included more than 90\% of the light from each
560: cluster, with the exception of cluster I--As, which presents an extended halo.
561: See Paper~II for a full discussion.
562: We used custom made IDL
563: codes to perform this task on WFPC2 and STIS CCD images. The values of the aperture
564: correction (in magnitudes) that we used to calculate the aperture correction for the STIS images
565: are taken from \citet{Prof03} which refer to point sources.
566: When the cluster was bright enough and no confusion with nearby sources was apparent,
567: we measured the $JHK_s$ photometry from 2MASS data using the same
568: apertures that we had used with the WFPC2 and STIS images.
569: Clusters IIIs and IVs have their $JHK_s$ magnitudes listed in the 2MASS catalogue.
570: We compared the profile fitting and the aperture photometric measurement provided by 2MASS with our own measurements to determine
571: an aperture correction. This correction was required to compare
572: the 2MASS magnitudes with the WFPC2 ones, given the
573: different spatial resolutions.
574: The complete photometry
575: of all the clusters is summarized in Tables~\ref{tbl06} and \ref{tbl07}.
576:
577: \subsubsection{Unresolved clusters}
578:
579:
580: Images from proposal 6716 show cluster I--As on the PC of the WFPC2, while those of proposal
581: 6569 picture this region on the WF3.
582: This cluster is the brightest feature in NGC~4214 at optical wavelengths,
583: and its pixels appear saturated in some images
584: (filter F555W in proposal 6716; filters F336W, F555W, and F702W in proposal 6569.)
585: This object can also be seen in some of our STIS images. Unfortunately,
586: images obtained during programme 6716 on December 1997 show a bad column passing through
587: cluster I--As; in order to get rid of this problem, we interpolated the number of counts in each pixel along
588: the column using the pixels from two adjacent columns of the chip.
589: Aperture photometry was obtained using an aperture radius of 9 PC pixels which is
590: equivalent to $5.84 $ pc at a distance of 2.94 Mpc, or $0\farcs 41. $
591: The adopted equatorial coordinates of the cluster are given in Table~\ref{tbl08}.
592: Once we obtained the
593: magnitudes in all the available images, we calculated a weighted mean for each filter,
594: using their own errors as weights.
595: %
596: %
597:
598: A small cluster can be seen between I--A and I--B: cluster I--Es.
599: It was imaged in proposal 6716 images using filters F170W, F336W, F555W,
600: and F814W on the PC. It was also captured in all the images from proposal 6569 on the WF3
601: camera. This object can also be seen in some of our STIS images.
602: Some images of this cluster show a bad column and we solved this
603: problem using the same technique as we did for cluster I--As.
604: %
605:
606: Cluster IIIs can be found in proposal 6716 images in filters F170W, F336W
607: and F814W on the WF4. It appears as a saturated object in filter F555W. It was also found in
608: all the images from proposal 6569 on the WF3 camera, but the central pixels are saturated in image F702W.
609: On images from proposal 6716, the cluster appears very near the vignetted field between the
610: PC and the WF4. For this reason, we thought that the calculated magnitudes might be affected
611: and we discarded all of them except for the magnitude obtained with filter
612: F170W, and we relied on the magnitudes obtained with images from proposal 6569.
613: Aperture photometry was obtained using an aperture radius of 12 WF pixels which is
614: equivalent to $17.1 $ pc at a distance of 2.94 Mpc. Once we obtained the
615: magnitudes in all the available images, we calculated a weighted mean for each filter.
616: This object is present in the 2MASS All--Sky Catalog of Point Sources \citep{Cutretal06} and is
617: located in a relatively isolated region,
618: which provided us with useful magnitudes in the $J$, $H$ and $K_s$ bands. Nevertheless,
619: an aperture correction was required in order to compare those magnitudes with the WFPC2 ones, given the
620: different spatial resolutions. The field--of--view of the available NICMOS images
621: does not cover the clusters analyzed in this paper.
622: %
623:
624: Cluster IVs falls on the vignetted field between the
625: WF3 and the WF4 on the proposal 6716 images, making it impossible to calculate
626: its magnitude in those images.
627: This object is clearly visible in proposal 6569 images in filters F336W, F555W, F702W and
628: F814W pictured on the WF3.
629: Aperture photometry was obtained using an aperture radius of 11.40 pc or $0\farcs 8. $
630: Cluster IVs is also listed in the 2MASS Catalog. We retrieved its $J$, $H$ and $K_s$ magnitudes and
631: corrected them for aperture effects as we did for cluster IIIs.
632: %
633: The complete photometry
634: of these clusters is summarized in Table~\ref{tbl06}.
635:
636: \subsubsection{Large complexes of smaller clusters or SOBAs}
637:
638: We performed aperture photometry for complexes I--A, I--B, and II
639: using aperture radii very similar to the ones that that \citet{MacKetal00}
640: use to describe the clusters.
641: We centered cluster I--A at a position slightly displaced from cluster I--As.
642: Whenever we found bad columns in our images, we corrected them
643: using the same procedure that we employed for cluster I--As.
644: Some of our images have some saturated pixels within an aperture radius of 150 PC pixels;
645: those filters were discarded. We were able to obtain the photometry of this cluster in
646: images with filters F170W, F336W, F814W, F25CN182, and F25CN270.
647: %
648: %
649: %
650:
651: Another cluster which is part of the large complex NGC~4214--I is
652: cluster I--B, which is located to the south--east of cluster I--A. We
653: used an aperture radius of 42.18 pc ($ 2\farcs 96 $).
654: We were not able
655: to use the images from proposal 6569 because this cluster lies very close to the
656: vignetted section of the chips. Some of the images in proposal
657: 6716 have bad columns across the cluster.
658: %
659: %
660:
661: The other large nebular structure in the galaxy is NGC~4214--II.
662: This complex part of NGC~4214 is very well imaged on the WF4 chip from proposal 6716,
663: on the WF2 chip from proposal 6569, and on some of our STIS images.
664: We used
665: an aperture radius of 200 PC (or 91 WF) pixels to perform the photometry. We encountered some
666: bad columns extending across this cluster, specially through clusters II--A, and II--C.
667: %
668:
669: Using the images provided by the 2MASS All--Sky Survey, we
670: performed aperture photometry in filters $J$, $H$, and $K_s$ for clusters I--A, I--B, and II.
671: We used the centers and aperture radii given in Table~\ref{tbl08}.
672: To calibrate our measurements, we used the magnitudes given by the
673: 2MASS All--Sky Catalog for clusters IIIs and IVs, which were calculated using
674: a $ 4\farcs 0 $ aperture radius.
675: Since the sky in these images is very noisy (the number of counts in the sky
676: is of the order of counts in the clusters), we obtained big errors in our 2MASS photometry.
677: The complete photometry
678: of these clusters is summarized in Table~\ref{tbl06}.
679:
680:
681:
682: \subsubsection{Resolved clusters}
683:
684: Cluster I--Ds is composed of a small group of stars located towards the north of cluster
685: I--A, and has only a small amount of gas in its surroundings \citep{MacKetal00}.
686: A small aperture of 20 PC pixels (12.97 pc) was used for the photometry.
687: This cluster falls out of the field--of--view of our STIS images.
688: It is located near the vignetted area in the WF3 camera chip from proposal
689: 6569. We also found it on the PC in one of the visits from proposal 6716 and
690: on the WF4 in the other visit.
691:
692: We performed a detailed analysis of the structure of
693: cluster II by examining its five components
694: (II--A, II--B, II--C, II--D, and II--E.)
695: These fairly well--resolved clusters are embedded within several \ha ~regions
696: as can be observed comparing Figures~\ref{fig-2} and ~\ref{fig-4}.
697: To perform the aperture photometry, we
698: followed the same routine as for cluster II, taking into account
699: the bad columns in all cases. The aperture radii for these clusters are
700: 50, 37, 57, 32, and 35 PC pixels respectively or
701: 32.49, 23.94, 36.91, 20.81, 22.66 pc respectively.
702: %
703: The complete photometry
704: of these clusters is summarized in Table~\ref{tbl07}.
705:
706: \subsection{SED fits using {\bf\sc\footnotesize CHORIZOS}}
707:
708: Our images provide photometric magnitudes in various filters,
709: which represent the main observable. To translate these observables into
710: fundamental stellar/cluster parameters -- e.g. effective temperature (\teff),
711: bolometric magnitude (\mbol), and cluster age --
712: we used \cho ~\citep{Maiz04}, an IDL package
713: that fits an arbitrary family of spectral energy distribution
714: models (SEDs) to multi--color photometric data.
715: The fundamental parameters are determined simultaneously
716: by a likelihood--maximization technique from the photometric colors
717: calculated from the measured magnitudes.
718: The associated errors for these parameters are
719: computed from the resulting likelihood multidimensional array.
720: We applied \cho\ to stars and clusters separately,
721: using different sets of theoretical models.
722:
723: \subsubsection{Application to stars}
724: We applied \cho\ to our observed stellar magnitudes to measure the effective temperature,
725: monochromatic color excess [ \ecc, see e.g. \citealt{Maiz04} for its relationship to $E(B-V)$ ],
726: and (when possible) extinction law of the stars in our sample.
727: For the stars we
728: used as input SEDs low--gravity Kurucz models with $\log(Z/Z_{\sun})= -0.5$.
729: The stars in {\sc\footnotesize LIST336} were treated in the following way:
730:
731: \begin{description}
732: \item[six and five filters ] All the stars with six and five
733: observed magnitudes were processed through \cho\ first. For these objects \teff, \ecc, and the extinction
734: law were left as free parameters. The extinction law was chosen among the \rv--dependent family
735: of \citet{Cardetal89}, and the MC laws of \citet{Missetal99} and \citet{GordClay98}.
736:
737: %\item[five filters ] We continued our analysis with all objects with five observed
738: %magnitudes (four independent colors). Here, \teff, \ecc, and the extinction law were left as
739: %free parameters as well.
740:
741:
742: \item[four filters ] For the objects with only four observed magnitudes (three independent
743: colors), the extinction law was restricted to three values in three different runs: First we ran
744: the code using
745: an SMC--like extinction law; as a second experiment, we used a Galactic--extinction
746: law with the widely used value $R_{5495}= 3.1$, and for the last experiment
747: we fixed the value $R_{5495}= 5.0$.
748: We compared the values of the goodness of the fit $(\chi^2) $ for each star
749: and kept the results that correspond to the
750: lowest value of $\chi^2. $
751: For this set of objects we had three independent colors and,
752: having fixed the extinction law, only two parameters to be determined:
753: \teff ~and \ecc.
754:
755: \item[three filters ] The remaining objects with only three observed
756: magnitudes were processed through \cho\ leaving only \teff\ and \ecc\ as free
757: parameters and using the extinction law of \citet{Cardetal89}, with
758: $R_{5495}= 3.1$. For this set of objects, we had only two independent colors and we had to
759: fix at least one parameter. This left us with zero degrees of freedom but this is the best
760: that can be done with only three observed magnitudes.
761:
762: \end{description}
763:
764: It is well known from studies of our own and
765: other galaxies that
766: the extinction law can vary in small (less than 1 pc)
767: spatial scales (see \cite{Ariaetal05} for a recent study). We decided to fix $R_{5495}= 3.1$
768: to the objects with three and four filters, because this value is very close to
769: the mean values of $R_{5495}$ calculated for stars with five and six filters, where
770: we left $R_{5495}$ as a free parameter in the fit, and because $R_{5495}= 3.1$
771: is the standard value measured in the Galaxy.
772:
773:
774: %After running \cho\ with objects in {\sc\footnotesize LIST336}, we performed statistics on the values of
775: %\ecc\ and found that the NGC~4214 shows low values for the extinction (see Section 4).
776: Objects in {\sc\footnotesize LIST814} have magnitudes in three WFPC2
777: filters: F555W, F702W, and F814W,
778: with which we built two photometric colors: F555W--F702W and F555W--F814W.
779: In this case, the maximum allowed number of free parameters is two but, for this
780: specific filter combination, there are strong color degeneracies that hamper the simultaneous
781: determination of \teff\ and \ecc. Therefore, we decide to use our extinction results (see Paper~II) by
782: restricting \ecc\ to the range $-0.05 \leqslant E(4405-5495) \leqslant 0.25 $ and by fixing
783: $R_{5495}= 3.1$, as explained above.
784:
785: In order to assess the goodness of the fit we rely on the value of $\chi^2$
786: provided by \cho ~for each star. All objects with $\chi^2 \leq 4.0 $ were
787: considered as good fits throughout our work.
788: We performed a detailed analysis of those objects from lists with six and five
789: filters with $\chi^2 > 4.0$. An inspection of the output plots which shows the
790: theoretical spectrum overplotted on the measured magnitudes, reveals in
791: some of these cases that one or two of the observed magnitudes are not in
792: agreement with the rest. This may be due to several reasons, such as strong nebular
793: contamination in F555W or unresolved multiple systems. Those cases were analyzed on a
794: one--to--one basis. In all these cases, we accordingly removed one or two magnitudes
795: from the list (e.g. F555W for a star with strong nebular contamination or F814W for an early--type star
796: with an apparent late--type companion) and reran \cho\ with the new set of magnitudes.
797:
798: %This is one of the advantages of using a code like \cho.
799: %~This code automatically searches for the theoretical SED that best agrees with the input
800: %photometric colors, and it is extremely useful when one has lists of hundreds of stars
801: %to deal with.
802: %\cho\ also provides a quick way of identifying unresolved systems, by simply
803: %displaying the output spectrum overplotted on the input data. In the
804: %case of binary systems composed of two indistinguishable objects (such
805: %as a red component and a blue component), a typical spectrum will be displayed
806: %by {\sc\footnotesize CHORIZOS}. This method enabled us to identify some binaries in our sample.
807: %Visualizing the best--fit spectrum is also helpful to single out cases
808: %in which magnitudes were wrongly assigned by the cross--correlation code.
809: %In summary, \cho\ is a tool that can be used to measure reddenings
810: %and extinction laws with good precision, even when accurate spectral types are not
811: %available, as in our present case.
812:
813: The output of \cho\ that corresponds to
814: the stellar components of NGC~4214 will be used
815: to analyze various aspects of this galaxy: In this paper we present
816: two Hertzsprung--Russell diagrams from which we infer the galaxy's stellar population.
817: In Paper~II we will implement these results
818: to study the variable extinction throughout our field--of--view,
819: to calculate the blue to red supergiant ratio, and to
820: determine the initial mass function slope using
821: the most direct and reliable method which is based on counts of stars as a function
822: of their luminosity/mass.
823:
824:
825: \subsubsection{Application to clusters}
826:
827: The extended sources in our sample (both resolved and unresolved) were
828: treated in a different way.
829: \cho\ includes precalculated \stb\ \citep{Leitetal99} cluster models, where
830: the intrinsic parameters are the cluster age and its metallicity and the external
831: parameters are the same as in the stellar case: \ecc\ and $R_{5495}$.
832: These models are tabulated for a \citet{Salp55} stellar initial mass function
833: of 1 to 100 $M_\sun$.
834: The exact low mass limit of the IMF is not important for our age determinations
835: because the integrated colors of clusters with ages younger than $10^8$
836: years are dominated by
837: stars with masses greater than 1 $M_\sun$, but it is relevant
838: for the determination of the total mass.
839:
840: %
841: For all our clusters
842: we used \stb\ models of integrated stellar populations
843: with metallicity $Z/Z_{\sun}= 0.4$, appropiate for NGC~4214
844: \citep{KobuSkil96}, and
845: ages of the models varying between $\log({\rm age/yr}) = 6.0$
846: and $\log({\rm age/yr}) = 9$.
847: The available reddening values \ecc ~are in the range $0.0 - 5.0.$
848: For the extinction law, we considered
849: the $R_{5495}-$dependent family of
850: \citet{Cardetal89} (Galactic extinction); the average LMC and
851: LMC2 laws of \citet{Missetal99} (extinction of the LMC), and the SMC
852: law of \citet{GordClay98} (extinction of the SMC).
853:
854: The comprehensive study of the \cho\ output is presented in Paper~II, where
855: we address several issues such as the determination of clusters age, mass,
856: and massive stellar constituents. We analyze the different solutions for each cluster
857: and we present arguments to choose the best possible model that fits
858: our data in each case. In Paper~II, we will also discuss the problems that arise when
859: using large and small aperture radii.
860:
861:
862:
863:
864: \section{General description of the observed stellar populations}
865:
866:
867: With the output values of \cho ~from the stellar analysis, we can build a
868: theoretical \hrd ~for NGC~4214.
869: These diagrams allow us to compare
870: our observations with stellar evolution models and to
871: interpret them in physical terms such as mass, age, composition etc.
872: We used sets of evolutionary tracks provided by \cite{LeSc01}.
873: These use the entire set of non--rotating Geneva stellar evolution models
874: covering masses from $0.8$ to $120 M_{\sun}$.
875:
876:
877: NGC~4214 is moderately metal deficient, with an abundance of
878: $12 + \log(\mathrm{O/H}) = 8.15 - 8.28$ \citep{KobuSkil96} or about $Z = 0.34 Z_\odot = 0.006 $
879: using the results provided by \cite{Massey03} for the MCs and the Galaxy.
880: We bracketed the data between theoretical models with
881: metallicities $Z=0.004$ and $Z=0.008$,
882: which are the closest available to the estimated metallicity of NGC~4214 $(Z\approx 0.006).$
883:
884: These theoretical models provide the luminosity, age, and effective temperature
885: of representative evolutionary points. We calculated seven
886: isochrones by interpolating the bolometric magnitudes as a function
887: of the logarithm of the age along each mass track in steps of $1-5$
888: million years (ZAMS, 1Myr, 2Myr, 3Myr, 5Myr, 10Myr, and 15Myr.)
889: The Hertzsprung--Russell diagrams of NGC~4214 are presented in
890: Figures~\ref{fig-8} and \ref{fig-9}.
891:
892: We have separated the stars in two diagrams:
893: Figure~\ref{fig-8} is a plot of objects from {\sc\footnotesize LIST814} and Figure~\ref{fig-9}
894: is a plot of objects taken from {\sc\footnotesize LIST336}. Instead of representing individual
895: stars, we display contour plots to show the varying density of stars
896: in the [ $\log(T_{\mathrm{eff}}) $, $M_{\mathrm{bol}}$ ] plane also
897: referred to as Hess diagrams. The contour
898: levels correspond to stellar counts of 10, 15, 20, 40, 50, 100, 300, 600, 1200,
899: and 2000 objects per HRD element in Figure~\ref{fig-8}, and 5, 10, 15, 20, 40, 50, 75, 100,
900: 150, and 200 objects per HRD element in Figure~\ref{fig-9}. Each HRD element
901: measures 0.0875 mag in
902: the $M_{\mathrm{bol}}$ axis and 0.0075 in the $\log(T_{\mathrm{eff}}) $
903: axis. Individual stars are shown
904: as small crosses in those regions of the diagrams where the density was
905: lower than 10 and 5 stars respectively .
906:
907: As a dwarf irregular galaxy, NGC~4214 is an interesting
908: laboratory where the process of star formation can be studied. This is
909: a young galaxy which is still processing gas into stars. It is a relatively gas--rich system
910: with a young stellar population of bright, blue stars and \hii ~regions. The star formation
911: regions are concentrated along a bar structure surrounded by a large disk of gas. A second, less
912: intense, region of recent star formation, is located off the northern tip of the bar at a distance of
913: about 2 kpc from the galactic center but is not covered by the HST data (see Figure~\ref{fig-1}).
914: Because the ISM is readily ionized by the intense UV radiation from
915: young stars in \hii\ regions, \ha\ is often used as an indicator of the
916: presence of recent star formation.
917: Figure~\ref{fig-4} pictures
918: the regions of star formation through the \ha\ tracer.
919:
920: Figures~\ref{fig-8} and \ref{fig-9} allow us to analyze the stellar population of NGC~4214.
921: Figure~\ref{fig-8} shows the objects from {\sc\footnotesize LIST814}. The most striking feature
922: present in this plot is the crowded clump in the red part of the
923: diagram. This feature shows a great concentration of stars in the range
924: $ 3.50 \leqslant \log(T_{\mathrm{eff}}) \leqslant 3.75$. It is composed
925: of the red giant locus, the asymptotic giant branch,
926: and, along its blue extent, of intermediate
927: age blue loop stars.
928: Most probably,
929: these stars represent a mixed--age population that has evolved
930: off the zero--age main sequence.
931: %
932: A group of red supergiants stars can be seen at the tip of the red plume.
933: These are stars with initial masses $\gtrsim 40 M_{\odot}$ which
934: had evolved past the main sequence and into the RSG phase.
935: One noticeable fact
936: is that some of the stars are located to the right of the extreme
937: of the evolutionary tracks. This fact has been observed by \cite{MassOlse03} while
938: studying RSGs in the Magellanic Clouds.
939: The evolutionary tracks do not go far enough to the right
940: (cool temperatures) to produce the RSGs that are actually observed.
941: The same problem was mentioned by \cite{Massey03} for Galactic RSGs.
942: %
943: %
944: \cite{Leveetal05} present a new effective temperature scale for Galactic
945: RSGs by fitting MARCS stellar atmosphere models \citep{Gustetal75, Plezetal92} which include an
946: improved treatment of molecular opacity to 74 Galactic $(Z=0.020) $
947: RSGs of known distance.
948: Their main result is that RSGs appear to be warmer than previously thought.
949: This effect shifts the stars to the left in the diagrams (by $\sim 300-400$ K)
950: making them coincide with the end of the tracks.
951:
952:
953: Figure~\ref{fig-9} is characterized by a blue plume of stars.
954: This is the realm of the H--burning (main--sequence) massive stars.
955: The locus of these stars lies above the $5 M_{\odot}$ evolutionary track and extends
956: up to $M_{\mathrm{bol}} \approx -14. $ It is well populated in the range
957: $\approx 12 M_{\odot} - 60 M_{\odot}$, indicating some ongoing star formation.
958: %
959: In the figure we can clearly see a group of objects lying along the main sequence,
960: indicating that these are young objects. However, for large masses, the mean locus of
961: the position of the stars is located to the right (lower temperatures) of this
962: sequence. This is likely to be caused by a combination of two effects: the difficulty
963: of observing ZAMS stars at high mass (because they are in highly extinguished regions)
964: and the existence of unresolved stellar systems (which also has the consequence of
965: producing a number of points above the $120 M_{\odot}$ track).
966: The other feature in this diagram is the group of stars located between the
967: $5 M_{\odot}$ and the $20 M_{\odot}$ evolutionary tracks, and with
968: $\log(T_{\mathrm{eff}}) \lesssim 4.25$. These objects are evolved massive stars
969: with ages greater than 15 Myr.
970:
971: We agree with \cite{Droz02} in that
972: stars appear to populate the \hrd\ of NGC~4214 throughout all
973: of the major phases of stellar evolution, leading one to conclude
974: that the star formation was more or less continuous in recent times,
975: although there could have been some recent starbursts present.
976: %
977: Most of the brightest stars in the galaxy are concentrated towards the two
978: main regions of star formation, which are NGC~4214--I and NGC~4214--II.
979: These are regions characterized by different morphology, which
980: \cite{MacKetal00} interpret as an evolutionary or aging trend. The stellar components
981: of NGC~4214-II are co-spatial with the gas, and individual massive stars
982: can be seen in different stages of stellar evolution. As we show in Paper~II, this
983: is the youngest (age $\approx$ 2 Myr) region in the galaxy.
984: On the other hand, NGC~4214--I (age $\approx 3-5$ Myr)
985: shows some signs of cluster evolution, with
986: evacuated cavities produced by winds and supernova explosions. Younger
987: stars tend to concentrate around the main two clusters (I--A and I--B)
988: in this part of the galaxy.
989: Concentrations of bight stars are also detected outside the central area,
990: outlining a bar structure which is a characteristic of NGC~4214.
991: %
992: The crowded clump in the red part of the
993: diagram in Figure~\ref{fig-8} suggests that the galaxy possesses a
994: significant underlying
995: intermediate--age / old population.
996: This fact is reinforced by the prominent red halo observed in Figure~\ref{fig-1}.
997: The analysis of \cite{Maizetal98} shows that the older population
998: contributes to around 50 \% of the optical continuum. This population
999: does not contribute to the UV continuum, but dominates the emission
1000: in the IR. All this means that the present burst is not the first episode of star formation
1001: in the nucleus of NGC~4214.
1002:
1003:
1004: \section{Summary and conclusions}
1005: In this paper we present the HST/WFPC2 and HST/STIS observations
1006: of the well--resolved nearby galaxy
1007: NGC~4214. We obtained PSF photometry of the stellar
1008: components and aperture photometry of some interesting clusters using high
1009: resolution images. We explain how we managed to translate observed
1010: quantities such as magnitudes and photometric colors into
1011: physical parameters such as \teff, and \mbol ~for stars, and age for clusters, using
1012: \cho ~\citep{Maiz04}.
1013:
1014: The stellar content of NGC~4214 has been discussed using
1015: two [ $\log(T_{\mathrm{eff}}) $, $M_{\mathrm{bol}}$ ]
1016: Hertzsprung--Russell diagrams: one shows the stars from a list
1017: with filter F336W as reference, and the other
1018: was built with filter F814W as reference.
1019: The first diagram shows most objects on the main--sequence, while
1020: the second diagram is characterized by a crowded concentration of
1021: stars in the range
1022: $ 3.50 \leqslant \log(T_{\mathrm{eff}}) \leqslant 3.75$.
1023:
1024: In Paper~II we will present the following results:
1025: the blue to red supergiant ratio, an estimate of the initial mass
1026: function, a study of the variable extinction throughout the galaxy,
1027: and a detailed analysis of the cluster population.
1028:
1029:
1030: \acknowledgments
1031: We want to thank Rupali Chandar, Claus Leitherer, and Henry Ferguson
1032: for reading the first draft of the paper and making
1033: very useful comments.
1034: We would like to thank the
1035: referee (Dr. Richard de Grijs) for the many suggestions that have helped
1036: improve the manuscript.
1037: Support for this work was provided by NASA through grants GO--06569.01--A,
1038: GO--09096.01--A, GO--09419.01--A, and
1039: AR--09553.02--A from the Space Telescope Science Institute, Inc., under NASA contract
1040: NAS5--26555.
1041: This research has made use of the VizieR catalogue access tool, CDS, Strasbourg, France.
1042: This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which
1043: is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and
1044: Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics
1045: and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation.
1046:
1047: Facilities: \facility{HST(WFPC2)}, \facility{HST(STIS)}.
1048:
1049: %\bibliography{ms}
1050: %\bibliographystyle{apj}
1051: %\bibliography{../general}
1052: %\bibliographystyle{apj}
1053: \begin{thebibliography}{35}
1054: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
1055:
1056: \bibitem[{{Arias} {et~al.}(2006){Arias}, {Barb{\'a}}, {Apell{\'a}niz},
1057: {Morrell}, \& {Rubio}}]{Ariaetal05}
1058: {Arias}, J.~I., {Barb{\'a}}, R.~H., {Apell{\'a}niz}, J.~M., {Morrell}, N.~I.,
1059: \& {Rubio}, M. 2006, \mnras, 366, 739
1060:
1061: \bibitem[{{Cardelli} {et~al.}(1989){Cardelli}, {Clayton}, \&
1062: {Mathis}}]{Cardetal89}
1063: {Cardelli}, J.~A., {Clayton}, G.~C., \& {Mathis}, J.~S. 1989, \apj, 345, 245
1064:
1065: \bibitem[{Casertano \& Wiggs(2001)}]{CaseWigg01}
1066: Casertano, S. \& Wiggs, M.~S. 2001, WFPC2 Instrument Science Report 2001-10
1067: (STScI)
1068:
1069: \bibitem[{{de Vaucouleurs} {et~al.}(1991){de Vaucouleurs}, {de Vaucouleurs},
1070: {Corwin}, {Buta}, {Paturel}, \& {Fouque}}]{Vauc91}
1071: {de Vaucouleurs}, G., {de Vaucouleurs}, A., {Corwin}, H.~G., {Buta}, R.~J.,
1072: {Paturel}, G., \& {Fouque}, P. 1991, {Third Reference Catalogue of Bright
1073: Galaxies} (Volume 1-3, XII, 2069 pp.~7 figs..~ Springer-Verlag Berlin
1074: Heidelberg New York)
1075:
1076: \bibitem[{{Dolphin}(2000)}]{Dolp00a}
1077: {Dolphin}, A.~E. 2000, \pasp, 112, 1383
1078:
1079: \bibitem[{{Drozdovsky} {et~al.}(2002){Drozdovsky}, {Schulte-Ladbeck}, {Hopp},
1080: {Greggio}, \& {Crone}}]{Droz02}
1081: {Drozdovsky}, I.~O., {Schulte-Ladbeck}, R.~E., {Hopp}, U., {Greggio}, L., \&
1082: {Crone}, M.~M. 2002, \aj, 124, 811
1083:
1084: \bibitem[{{Fanelli} {et~al.}(1997){Fanelli}, {Waller}, {Smith}, {Freedman},
1085: {Madore}, {Neff}, {O'Connell}, {Roberts}, {Bohlin}, {Smith}, \&
1086: {Stecher}}]{Faneetal97}
1087: {Fanelli}, M.~N., {Waller}, W.~W., {Smith}, D.~A., {Freedman}, W.~L., {Madore},
1088: B., {Neff}, S.~G., {O'Connell}, R.~W., {Roberts}, M.~S., {Bohlin}, R.,
1089: {Smith}, A.~M., \& {Stecher}, T.~P. 1997, \apj, 481, 735
1090:
1091: \bibitem[{{Gordon} \& {Clayton}(1998)}]{GordClay98}
1092: {Gordon}, K.~D. \& {Clayton}, G.~C. 1998, \apj, 500, 816
1093:
1094: \bibitem[{{Gustafsson} {et~al.}(1975){Gustafsson}, {Bell}, {Eriksson}, \&
1095: {Nordlund}}]{Gustetal75}
1096: {Gustafsson}, B., {Bell}, R.~A., {Eriksson}, K., \& {Nordlund}, A. 1975, \aap,
1097: 42, 407
1098:
1099: \bibitem[{{Hunter}(1999)}]{Hunt99}
1100: {Hunter}, D.~A. 1999, in IAU Symp. 193: Wolf-Rayet Phenomena in Massive Stars
1101: and Starburst Galaxies, 418
1102:
1103: \bibitem[{{Kobulnicky} \& {Skillman}(1996)}]{KobuSkil96}
1104: {Kobulnicky}, H.~A. \& {Skillman}, E.~D. 1996, \apj, 471, 211
1105:
1106: \bibitem[{{Leitherer} {et~al.}(1999){Leitherer}, {Schaerer}, {Goldader},
1107: {Delgado}, {Robert}, {Kune}, {de Mello}, {Devost}, \& {Heckman}}]{Leitetal99}
1108: {Leitherer}, C., {Schaerer}, D., {Goldader}, J.~D., {Delgado}, R.~M.~G.,
1109: {Robert}, C., {Kune}, D.~F., {de Mello}, D.~F., {Devost}, D., \& {Heckman},
1110: T.~M. 1999, \apjs, 123, 3
1111:
1112: \bibitem[{{Leitherer} {et~al.}(1996){Leitherer}, {Vacca}, {Conti},
1113: {Filippenko}, {Robert}, \& {Sargent}}]{Leitetal96}
1114: {Leitherer}, C., {Vacca}, W.~D., {Conti}, P.~S., {Filippenko}, A.~V., {Robert},
1115: C., \& {Sargent}, W.~L.~W. 1996, \apj, 465, 717
1116:
1117: \bibitem[{{Lejeune} \& {Schaerer}(2001)}]{LeSc01}
1118: {Lejeune}, T. \& {Schaerer}, D. 2001, \aap, 366, 538
1119:
1120: \bibitem[{{Levesque} {et~al.}(2005){Levesque}, {Massey}, {Olsen}, {Plez},
1121: {Josselin}, {Maeder}, {Meynet}, \& {White}}]{Leveetal05}
1122: {Levesque}, E.~M., {Massey}, P., {Olsen}, K.~A.~G., {Plez}, B., {Josselin}, E.,
1123: {Maeder}, A., {Meynet}, G., \& {White}, N. 2005, ApJ, 628, 973
1124:
1125: \bibitem[{{MacKenty} {et~al.}(2000){MacKenty}, {Ma{\'{\i}}z-Apell{\' a}niz},
1126: {Pickens}, {Norman}, \& {Walborn}}]{MacKetal00}
1127: {MacKenty}, J.~W., {Ma{\'{\i}}z-Apell{\' a}niz}, J., {Pickens}, C.~E.,
1128: {Norman}, C.~A., \& {Walborn}, N.~R. 2000, \aj, 120, 3007
1129:
1130: \bibitem[{{Ma{\'{\i}}z-Apell{\' a}niz}(2001)}]{Maiz01b}
1131: {Ma{\'{\i}}z-Apell{\' a}niz}, J. 2001, \apj, 563, 151
1132:
1133: \bibitem[{{Ma{\'{\i}}z-Apell{\' a}niz}(2004)}]{Maiz04}
1134: ---. 2004, \pasp, 116, 859
1135:
1136: \bibitem[{{Ma{\'{\i}}z-Apell{\' a}niz} {et~al.}(2002){Ma{\'{\i}}z-Apell{\'
1137: a}niz}, {Cieza}, \& {MacKenty}}]{Maizetal02a}
1138: {Ma{\'{\i}}z-Apell{\' a}niz}, J., {Cieza}, L., \& {MacKenty}, J.~W. 2002, \aj,
1139: 123, 1307
1140:
1141: \bibitem[{{Ma{\'{\i}}z-Apell{\' a}niz} {et~al.}(2005){Ma{\'{\i}}z-Apell{\'
1142: a}niz}, {\'{U}beda}, Walborn, \& Nelan}]{Maizetal05}
1143: {Ma{\'{\i}}z-Apell{\' a}niz}, J., {\'{U}beda}, L., Walborn, N.~R., \& Nelan,
1144: E.~P. 2005, in ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. TBA: Resolved Stellar Populations
1145:
1146: \bibitem[{{Ma\'{\i}z-Apell\'aniz} {et~al.}(1998){Ma\'{\i}z-Apell\'aniz},
1147: {Mas-Hesse}, {Mu\~noz-Tu\~n\'on}, {V\'{\i}lchez}, \&
1148: {Casta\~neda}}]{Maizetal98}
1149: {Ma\'{\i}z-Apell\'aniz}, J., {Mas-Hesse}, J.~M., {Mu\~noz-Tu\~n\'on}, C.,
1150: {V\'{\i}lchez}, J.~M., \& {Casta\~neda}, H.~O. 1998, \aap, 329, 409
1151:
1152: \bibitem[{Ma\'{\i}z-Apell\'aniz \& \'{U}beda(2004)}]{MaizUbed04}
1153: Ma\'{\i}z-Apell\'aniz, J. \& \'{U}beda, L. 2004, STIS Instrument Science Report
1154: 2004-01 (STScI)
1155:
1156: \bibitem[{{Massey}(2003)}]{Massey03}
1157: {Massey}, P. 2003, \araa, 41, 15
1158:
1159: \bibitem[{{Massey} \& {Olsen}(2003)}]{MassOlse03}
1160: {Massey}, P. \& {Olsen}, K.~A.~G. 2003, \aj, 126, 2867
1161:
1162: \bibitem[{McMaster \& Whitmore(2002)}]{McMaWhit02}
1163: McMaster, M. \& Whitmore, B. 2002, WFPC2 Instrument Science Report 2002-07
1164: (STScI)
1165:
1166: \bibitem[{{Misselt} {et~al.}(1999){Misselt}, {Clayton}, \&
1167: {Gordon}}]{Missetal99}
1168: {Misselt}, K.~A., {Clayton}, G.~C., \& {Gordon}, K.~D. 1999, \apj, 515, 128
1169:
1170: \bibitem[{{Ochsenbein} {et~al.}(2000){Ochsenbein}, {Bauer}, \&
1171: {Marcout}}]{Ochsetal00}
1172: {Ochsenbein}, F., {Bauer}, P., \& {Marcout}, J. 2000, \aaps, 143, 23
1173:
1174: \bibitem[{{Plez} {et~al.}(1992){Plez}, {Brett}, \& {Nordlund}}]{Plezetal92}
1175: {Plez}, B., {Brett}, J.~M., \& {Nordlund}, A. 1992, \aap, 256, 551
1176:
1177: \bibitem[{{Proffitt} {et~al.}(2003){Proffitt}, {Brown}, Mobasher, \&
1178: Davies}]{Prof03}
1179: {Proffitt}, C.~R., {Brown}, T., Mobasher, B., \& Davies, J. 2003, STIS
1180: Instrument Science Report 2003-01 (STScI)
1181:
1182: \bibitem[{{Russell} {et~al.}(1990){Russell}, {Lasker}, {McLean}, {Sturch}, \&
1183: {Jenkner}}]{Russetal90}
1184: {Russell}, J.~L., {Lasker}, B.~M., {McLean}, B.~J., {Sturch}, C.~R., \&
1185: {Jenkner}, H. 1990, \aj, 99, 2059
1186:
1187: \bibitem[{{Salpeter}(1955)}]{Salp55}
1188: {Salpeter}, E.~E. 1955, \apj, 121, 161
1189:
1190: \bibitem[{{Sandage} \& {Bedke}(1994)}]{Sand94}
1191: {Sandage}, A. \& {Bedke}, J. 1994, {The Carnegie atlas of galaxies}
1192: (Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington with The Flintridge
1193: Foundation, |c1994)
1194:
1195: \bibitem[{{Skrutskie} {et~al.}(2006){Skrutskie}, {Cutri}, {Stiening},
1196: {Weinberg}, {Schneider}, {Carpenter}, {Beichman}, {Capps}, {Chester},
1197: {Elias}, {Huchra}, {Liebert}, {Lonsdale}, {Monet}, {Price}, {Seitzer},
1198: {Jarrett}, {Kirkpatrick}, {Gizis}, {Howard}, {Evans}, {Fowler}, {Fullmer},
1199: {Hurt}, {Light}, {Kopan}, {Marsh}, {McCallon}, {Tam}, {Van Dyk}, \&
1200: {Wheelock}}]{Cutretal06}
1201: {Skrutskie}, M.~F., {Cutri}, R.~M., {Stiening}, R., {Weinberg}, M.~D.,
1202: {Schneider}, S., {Carpenter}, J.~M., {Beichman}, C., {Capps}, R., {Chester},
1203: T., {Elias}, J., {Huchra}, J., {Liebert}, J., {Lonsdale}, C., {Monet}, D.~G.,
1204: {Price}, S., {Seitzer}, P., {Jarrett}, T., {Kirkpatrick}, J.~D., {Gizis},
1205: J.~E., {Howard}, E., {Evans}, T., {Fowler}, J., {Fullmer}, L., {Hurt}, R.,
1206: {Light}, R., {Kopan}, E.~L., {Marsh}, K.~A., {McCallon}, H.~L., {Tam}, R.,
1207: {Van Dyk}, S., \& {Wheelock}, S. 2006, \aj, 131, 1163
1208:
1209: \bibitem[{{Stetson}(1987)}]{Stet87}
1210: {Stetson}, P.~B. 1987, \pasp, 99, 191
1211:
1212: \bibitem[{{\'{U}beda} {et~al.}(2007){\'{U}beda}, {Ma{\'{\i}}z-Apell{\' a}niz},
1213: \& {MacKenty}}]{Ubedetalb06}
1214: {\'{U}beda}, L., {Ma{\'{\i}}z-Apell{\' a}niz}, J., \& {MacKenty}, J.~W. 2007,
1215: \aj, 133, 917 (Paper II)
1216:
1217: \end{thebibliography}
1218:
1219:
1220:
1221: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE1
1222: \clearpage
1223: \begin{figure}
1224: %\includegraphics[width=0.99\textwidth]{imagespaper/figpaper01.pdf}
1225: \includegraphics[width=0.99\textwidth]{f1.jpg}
1226: \caption{$9\arcmin \times 9\arcmin$ (7.7 kpc $\times$ 7.7 kpc)
1227: image of NGC 4214 from an RGB combination
1228: of public {\it B, V} and {\it R} band images obtained with the Isaac
1229: Newton Telescope. HST/WFPC2 fields (green) are overplotted for
1230: proposal 6716. The left field corresponds to the second visit (09 Dec 1997)
1231: and the right field corresponds to the first visit (29 Jun 1997).
1232: The HST/WFPC2 field from proposal 6569 is displayed in red (center field). }
1233: \label{fig-1}
1234: \end{figure}
1235:
1236:
1237: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE2
1238: \clearpage
1239: \begin{figure}
1240: \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{f2.jpg}
1241: \caption{Mosaic of NGC 4214 obtained using images in filter F336W (blue),
1242: F555W ~(green), and F814W ~(red).
1243: We show and label the cluster circular apertures.
1244: The orientation is north pointing up and east pointing to the left.
1245: The field dimensions are 875 pc $\times$ 972 pc or $ 61 \farcs 4 \times 68 \farcs 3$.
1246: }
1247: \label{fig-2}
1248: \end{figure}
1249:
1250:
1251:
1252: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE3
1253: \clearpage
1254: \begin{figure}
1255: \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{f3.jpg}
1256: %\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{f5.ps}
1257: \caption{ Residuals in magnitudes for the WFPC2
1258: filters F336W, F555W, and F814W. The results in the left column
1259: correspond to the lists from proposal 6716.
1260: The plots in the right column are those from proposal 6569.}
1261: \label{fig-3}
1262: \end{figure}
1263:
1264:
1265: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE4
1266: \clearpage
1267: \begin{figure}
1268: \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{f4.jpg}
1269: \caption{HST/STIS fields drawn over a WFPC2 color mosaic of NGC 4214.
1270: Each field corresponds to one visit.
1271: The mosaic was built using original images in filters F336W (blue),
1272: F555W+\oiiir~(green), and F814W+\ha~(red).
1273: The field shown is the same as in Figure~\ref{fig-2}.
1274: }
1275: %1 pixel $\approx$ 0.64 pc. }
1276: %The line at the bottom represents $10\farcs0$. }
1277: \label{fig-4}
1278: \end{figure}
1279:
1280:
1281: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE5
1282: \clearpage
1283: \begin{figure}
1284: \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{f5.jpg}
1285: \caption{ Completeness levels of the WFPC2 photometry based on artificial
1286: star tests performed using {\sc\footnotesize HSTphot}
1287: \citep{Dolp00a}. The fraction of recovered artificial stars is plotted
1288: against the magnitude for filters F336W, F555W, and F814W.
1289: The results in the left column
1290: correspond to the tests performed on images from proposal 6716.
1291: The plots in the right column are the tests performed on images
1292: from proposal 6569. }
1293: \label{fig-5}
1294: \end{figure}
1295:
1296:
1297:
1298: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE6
1299: \clearpage
1300:
1301: \begin{figure}
1302: %\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{imagespaper/figpaper02.pdf}
1303: %\centerline{\includegraphics*[width=0.47\linewidth]{f6a.ps}
1304: % \includegraphics*[width=0.47\linewidth]{f6b.ps}}
1305: %\centerline{\includegraphics*[width=0.47\linewidth]{f6c.ps}
1306: % \includegraphics*[width=0.47\linewidth]{f6d.ps}}
1307:
1308: \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{f6.jpg}
1309: \caption{Histograms for the measured magnitude difference normalized
1310: by the experimental uncertainty ( $ \Delta m / \sqrt{ \sigma_{1}^{2} + \sigma_{2}^{2} } $ ).
1311: Here we are comparing magnitudes of stars observed in two different
1312: visits during proposal 6716. See text for details about the method.
1313: The black curve shows the expected normal distribution.
1314: \label{fig-6}}
1315: \end{figure}
1316:
1317:
1318:
1319:
1320: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE7
1321: \clearpage
1322: \begin{figure}
1323: %\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{imagespaper/figpaper10.pdf}
1324: \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{f7.jpg}
1325: \caption{HST images of star clusters I--As, I--Es, IIIs, and IVs.
1326: The images have been scaled in order to use the same linear size, with the field
1327: being $50$ pc $\times 50$ pc in all cases. North is up and east is left. The circles depict the
1328: apertures used for our photometry.
1329: Cluster I--As is shown on a STIS image in filter F25CN270. We used a WFPC2/PC image in filter F555W to
1330: show cluster I--Es. Clusters IIIs and IVs are depicted on WFPC2/WF F814W images.
1331: These images clearly show the different pixel size (and resolution) of the three cameras that we have
1332: used. }
1333: \label{fig-7}
1334: \end{figure}
1335:
1336:
1337:
1338:
1339:
1340:
1341: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE08
1342: \clearpage
1343: \begin{figure}
1344: \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{f8.jpg}
1345: \caption{ Hess diagram for all stars in {\sc\footnotesize LIST814} (the main photometric
1346: list using F814W as reference filter) with calculated \mbol and
1347: $T_{\mathrm{eff}}$ obtained from the \cho\ output. The contour levels
1348: correspond to stellar counts of 10, 15, 20, 40, 50, 100, 300, 600, 1200,
1349: and 2000 objects per element. Each element measures 0.0875 mag in
1350: the $M_{\mathrm{bol}}$ axis and 0.0075 in the $\log(T_{\mathrm{eff}}) $
1351: axis. Individual stars are shown as small crosses in those
1352: regions of the diagrams where the density was lower than 10 stars. The
1353: red lines represent the evolutionary tracks for stars in the mass--range 5,
1354: 7, 10, 12, 15, 20, 25, 40, and 120 $ M_{\sun}$. The solid black lines
1355: represent the isochrones calculated for ages 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, and 15 Ma.
1356: This diagram also shows two polygons
1357: between tracks labeled 15 and 25 $ M_{\sun}$. These are the regions
1358: that we will use to count blue and
1359: red supergiants in Paper~II. }
1360: \label{fig-8}
1361: \end{figure}
1362:
1363:
1364: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE09
1365: \clearpage
1366: \begin{figure}
1367: \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{f9.jpg}
1368: \caption{ Hess diagram for all stars in {\sc\footnotesize LIST336}
1369: (the main photometric
1370: list using F336W as reference filter)
1371: with calculated \mbol and $T_{\mathrm{eff}}$
1372: obatined from the \cho ~output.
1373: The contour levels correspond to stellar counts of 5, 10,15,20,40,50,75,100,150, and 200 objects
1374: per element. Each element measures 0.0875 mag in
1375: the $M_{\mathrm{bol}}$ axis and 0.0075 in the $\log(T_{\mathrm{eff}}) $
1376: axis.
1377: Individual stars are shown as small crosses in those regions of the diagrams
1378: where the density was lower than 5 stars. The red lines represent the
1379: evolutionary tracks for stars in the mass--range 5, 7, 10, 12, 15, 20, 25, 40,
1380: and 120 $ M_{\sun}$. The solid black lines represent the isochrones
1381: calculated for ages 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, and 15 Ma.
1382: This diagram also shows two polygons
1383: between tracks labeled 15 and 25 $ M_{\sun}$. These are the regions
1384: that we will use to count blue and
1385: red supergiants in Paper~II.}
1386: \label{fig-9}
1387: \end{figure}
1388:
1389:
1390:
1391: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TABLE1
1392: \clearpage
1393: \begin{deluxetable}{cllll}
1394: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1395: \tablecaption{Journal of observations, with filters and exposure times
1396: for WFPC2 and STIS images. The dates of the observations are given in the main text. \label{tbl01}}
1397: \tablewidth{0pt}
1398: \tablehead{ \colhead{Proposal} & \colhead{Filter} &\colhead{Band} &\colhead{Dataset\tablenotemark{a}} &\colhead{Exposure Time (s) } }
1399: \startdata
1400:
1401:
1402: & F336W \dotfill & WFPC2 {\it U} & u3n80101m + 2m + 3m \dotfill & 260 + 900 + 900 \\
1403: & F555W \dotfill & WFPC2 {\it V} & u3n80104m + 5m + 6m \dotfill & 100 + 600 + 600 \\
1404: \raisebox{2ex}[0pt]{6569} & F702W \dotfill & WFPC2 wide {\it R} & u3n80107m + 8m \dotfill & 500 + 500 \\
1405: {\rule [-2mm]{0mm}{0mm} } & F814W \dotfill & WFPC2 {\it I} & u3n8010am + bm + cm \dotfill & 100 + 600 + 600 \\ \tableline
1406:
1407:
1408:
1409: {\rule [0mm]{0mm}{4mm} } & F170W \dotfill & {\it UV} & u4190101r + 102r + 201m + 202m & 400 + 400 + 400 + 400 \\
1410: & F336W \dotfill & WFPC2 {\it U} & u4190103r + 104r + 203m + 204m & 260 + 260 + 260 + 260 \\
1411: \raisebox{2ex}[0pt]{6716} & F555W \dotfill & WFPC2 {\it V} & u4190105r + 205m \dotfill & 200 + 200 \\
1412: {\rule [-2mm]{0mm}{0mm} } & F814W \dotfill & WFPC2 {\it I} & u4190106r + 206m \dotfill & 200 + 200 \\ \tableline
1413:
1414:
1415: {\rule [0mm]{0mm}{4mm} } & F25CN182 \dotfill & & o6bz02isq + 02iwq + 01afq \dotfill & 288 + 288 + 288 \\
1416: & F25CN182 \dotfill& & o6bz04r8q + 04raq + 03afq \dotfill & 288 + 288 + 288 \\
1417: \raisebox{2ex}[0pt]{9096} & F25CN270 \dotfill & & o6bz02j7q + 02jbq + 03awq\dotfill & 288 + 288 + 288 \\
1418: {\rule [-2mm]{0mm}{0mm} } & F25CN270 \dotfill & & o6bz04ruq + 04ryq \dotfill & 288 + 288 \\
1419:
1420: \enddata
1421: \tablenotetext{a}{STScI identifiers.}
1422: \end{deluxetable}
1423:
1424: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TABLE2
1425:
1426:
1427: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccc}
1428: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1429: \tablecaption{ Photometry of stars in {\sc\footnotesize LIST336}. The photometric
1430: uncertainties are determined for
1431: each star based upon statistical errors, sky determination errors and aperture
1432: correction errors. The complete lists is in the electronic version of this paper. \label{tbl02}}
1433: \tablewidth{0pt}
1434: \tablehead{ \colhead{$\alpha$ (J2000)} & \colhead{$\delta$ (J2000)} & \colhead{F336W} & \colhead{F170W} & \colhead{F555W} &\colhead{F702W}&\colhead{F814W} &\colhead{CN182}&\colhead{CN270} }
1435:
1436: \startdata
1437:
1438: 12:15:37.802 & 36:19:44.200 & $17.55 \pm 0.01$ & \dotfill & $19.06 \pm 0.01$ & $18.90 \pm 0.01$ & $18.94 \pm 0.04$ & \dotfill & \dotfill \\
1439: 12:15:39.584 & 36:19:35.376 & $17.66 \pm 0.04$ & $17.67 \pm 0.10$ & $19.08 \pm 0.07$ & \dotfill & $19.03 \pm 0.04$ & $17.43 \pm 0.12$ & $17.22 \pm 0.11$ \\
1440: 12:15:40.561 & 36:19:33.604 & $17.86 \pm 0.02$ & $18.00 \pm 0.10$ & $19.24 \pm 0.01$ & \dotfill & $19.16 \pm 0.02$ & $18.04 \pm 0.14$ & $17.73 \pm 0.12$ \\
1441: 12:15:39.586 & 36:19:29.245 & $17.87 \pm 0.01$ & $17.25 \pm 0.06$ & $19.57 \pm 0.05$ & $19.57 \pm 0.05$ & \dotfill & $17.04 \pm 0.11$ & $17.18 \pm 0.11$ \\
1442: 12:15:40.574 & 36:19:33.422 & $17.88 \pm 0.06$ & $16.78 \pm 0.08$ & $19.62 \pm 0.07$ & \dotfill & $19.74 \pm 0.06$ & $17.28 \pm 0.12$ & $17.65 \pm 0.11$ \\
1443:
1444:
1445:
1446: \enddata
1447: \end{deluxetable}
1448:
1449: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TABLE3
1450:
1451:
1452: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
1453: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1454: \tablecaption{ Photometry of stars in {\sc\footnotesize LIST814}. The photometric
1455: uncertainties are determined for
1456: each star based upon statistical errors, sky determination errors and aperture
1457: correction errors. The complete lists is in the electronic version of this paper. \label{tbl03}}
1458: \tablewidth{0pt}
1459: %\tablehead{ \colhead{ } & \colhead{F170W} & \colhead{F336W} & \colhead{F555W} &\colhead{F814W} }
1460: \tablehead{ \colhead{$\alpha$ (J2000)} & \colhead{$\delta$ (J2000)} & \colhead{F814W} & \colhead{F555W} &\colhead{F702W} }
1461: % m336n , '&' ,m170n , '&' , m555n , '&' ,m702n , '&' ,m814n , '&' ,m182n , '&' ,m270n , '\\' , FORMAT='( 18A40 )'
1462:
1463: \startdata
1464:
1465: 12:15:41.449 & 36:18:59.382 & $18.80 \pm 0.00$ & $20.79 \pm 0.01$ & $19.42 \pm 0.00$ \\
1466: 12:15:39.384 & 36:18:59.959 & $18.83 \pm 0.00$ & $21.16 \pm 0.01$ & $19.59 \pm 0.01$ \\
1467: 12:15:33.382 & 36:19:25.804 & $18.94 \pm 0.00$ & $25.32 \pm 0.16$ & $24.81 \pm 0.22$ \\
1468: 12:15:32.202 & 36:19:36.543 & $18.95 \pm 0.01$ & $20.90 \pm 0.04$ & $19.51 \pm 0.08$ \\
1469: 12:15:38.633 & 36:20:40.951 & $19.06 \pm 0.00$ & $20.51 \pm 0.00$ & $19.18 \pm 0.00$ \\
1470:
1471:
1472:
1473: \enddata
1474: \end{deluxetable}
1475:
1476:
1477: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TABLE4
1478: \begin{table}[htbp]
1479: %\centering
1480: \caption{Completeness values for
1481: each track from \cite{LeSc01} and their corresponding main sequence lifetime ($\tau_{MS}$).
1482: \label{tbl04} \vspace{5mm}}
1483: \begin{tabular}{ l|cccccccccc } \tableline\tableline
1484: Track ($M_{\odot}$) {\rule [-2mm]{0mm}{7mm} }
1485: & 7 & 10 & 12 & 15 & 20 & 25 & 40 & 60 & 85 & 120 \\ \tableline
1486: Completeness
1487: & 0.041 & 0.263 & 0.497 & 0.705 & 0.855 & 0.899 & 0.929 & 0.946 & 0.953 & 1.000 {\rule [0mm]{0mm}{5mm} } \\
1488: $\tau_{MS}$ (Myr)
1489: & 46.50 & 23.98 & 17.84 & 12.95 & 9.12 & 7.17 & 4.82 & 3.71 & 3.48 & 3.01 {\rule [-3mm]{0mm}{0mm} } \\ \tableline
1490: \end{tabular}
1491: \end{table}
1492:
1493:
1494:
1495: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TABLE5
1496:
1497: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
1498: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1499: \tablecaption{Analysis of the consistency of the photometry
1500: using two WFPC2 photometry lists from proposal 6716 (P.I.: Theodore Stecher). \label{tbl05}}
1501: \tablewidth{0pt}
1502: \tablehead{ \colhead{ } & \colhead{F170W} & \colhead{F336W} & \colhead{F555W} &\colhead{F814W} }
1503: \startdata
1504: N & 189 & 1114 & 3219 & 4116 \\
1505: average\tablenotemark{a} & -0.120&-0.013 & 0.119 & 0.049 \\
1506: $\sigma\tablenotemark{b}$ & 0.839 & 0.915 & 0.841 & 0.847 \\
1507: \enddata
1508:
1509: \tablenotetext{a}{Average value of $(m_1 - m_2) / \sqrt{ \sigma_{1}^{2} + \sigma_2^{2}} $.}
1510: \tablenotetext{b}{Standard deviation of the quantity in (a).}
1511:
1512: \end{deluxetable}
1513:
1514:
1515:
1516:
1517:
1518:
1519:
1520: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TABLE6
1521: \clearpage
1522:
1523:
1524:
1525: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}
1526: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1527: \tablecaption{Photometry of unresolved clusters and of large complexes \label{tbl06}}
1528: \tablewidth{0pt}
1529: \tablehead{ \colhead{Filter} & \colhead{Cluster I--As} & \colhead{Cluster I--Es} & \colhead{Cluster IIIs} & \colhead{Cluster IVs}
1530: & \colhead{Cluster I--A} & \colhead{Cluster I--B} & \colhead{Cluster II} }
1531: \startdata
1532: F170W \dotfill & 13.47 $\pm$ 0.07 & 18.82 $\pm$ 0.52 & 16.77 $\pm$ 0.15 & \dotfill &11.81 $\pm$ 0.02 & 13.54 $\pm$ 0.03 & 12.45 $\pm$ 0.04\\
1533: F25CN182 & 13.50 $\pm$ 0.02 & 19.27 $\pm$ 0.10 & \dotfill & \dotfill &11.99 $\pm$ 0.02 &13.60 $\pm$ 0.02& 12.91 $\pm$ 0.02 \\
1534: F25CN270 & 14.00 $\pm$ 0.03 & 19.56 $\pm$ 0.11 & \dotfill & \dotfill & 12.51 $\pm$ 0.01 & 14.17 $\pm$ 0.02 & 13.20 $\pm$ 0.02 \\
1535: F336W \dotfill & 14.46 $\pm$ 0.04 & 19.30 $\pm$ 0.03 & 16.82 $\pm$ 0.05 & 17.17 $\pm$ 0.03 & 12.96 $\pm$ 0.01 & 14.62 $\pm$ 0.01 &13.59 $\pm$ 0.01 \\
1536: F555W \dotfill & \dotfill & 18.98 $\pm$ 0.05 & 16.59 $\pm$ 0.03 &17.30 $\pm$ 0.01 & \dotfill &15.83 $\pm$ 0.23 & 14.37 $\pm$ 0.04 \\
1537: F702W \dotfill & \dotfill & 18.27 $\pm$ 0.04& \dotfill & 16.97 $\pm$ 0.01 & \dotfill & \dotfill & 14.04 $\pm$ 0.08 \\
1538: F814W \dotfill & 15.98 $\pm$ 0.02 & 17.90 $\pm$ 0.03 & 15.67 $\pm$ 0.03 & 16.75 $\pm$ 0.02 & 13.93 $\pm$ 0.01 & 15.55 $\pm$ 0.01& 14.24 $\pm$ 0.01 \\
1539: $J$ \dotfill & \dotfill & \dotfill & 14.74 $\pm$ 0.10 &15.93 $\pm$ 0.13 & 14.43 $\pm$ 0.50 & 15.69 $\pm$ 0.25 & 14.27 $\pm$ 0.63 \\
1540: $H$ \dotfill & \dotfill & \dotfill & 14.30 $\pm$ 0.11 & 15.55 $\pm$ 0.19 & 14.31 $\pm$ 0.88 &15.05 $\pm$ 0.27 &13.65 $\pm$ 0.70 \\
1541: $K_s$ \dotfill & \dotfill & \dotfill &13.87 $\pm$ 0.10 & 15.39 $\pm$ 0.20 & 13.54 $\pm$ 0.66 & 15.27 $\pm$ 0.42 & 13.71 $\pm$ 1.02 \\
1542: \enddata
1543: \end{deluxetable}
1544:
1545: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TABLE7
1546: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}
1547: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1548: \tablecaption{Photometry of resolved clusters \label{tbl07}}
1549: \tablewidth{0pt}
1550: \tablehead{ \colhead{Filter} & \colhead{Cluster I--Ds} & \colhead{Cluster II--A} & \colhead{Cluster II--B} & \colhead{Cluster II--C}
1551: & \colhead{Cluster II--D} & \colhead{Cluster II--E} }
1552: \startdata
1553: F170W \dotfill & 15.51 $\pm$ 0.03 &15.54 $\pm$ 0.18 & 15.26 $\pm$ 0.05 & 14.23 $\pm$ 0.04 &16.39 $\pm$ 0.16&15.97 $\pm$ 0.13 \\
1554: F25CN182 & \dotfill &15.63 $\pm$ 0.06 & 15.50 $\pm$ 0.02 & 14.67 $\pm$ 0.02 &16.66 $\pm$ 0.06 &16.12 $\pm$ 0.04 \\
1555: F25CN270 & \dotfill &15.66 $\pm$ 0.06 &15.70 $\pm$ 0.02 &15.07 $\pm$ 0.02&16.96 $\pm$ 0.07& 16.33 $\pm$ 0.04\\
1556: F336W \dotfill & 16.39 $\pm$ 0.01 &15.87 $\pm$ 0.01 &16.04 $\pm$ 0.01 & 15.52 $\pm$ 0.01& 17.30 $\pm$ 0.02 &16.67 $\pm$ 0.01 \\
1557: F555W \dotfill &17.62 $\pm$ 0.02&16.46 $\pm$ 0.08 & 16.87 $\pm$ 0.03 & 16.76 $\pm$ 0.06 &18.12 $\pm$ 0.12&17.75 $\pm$ 0.06\\
1558: F702W \dotfill & 17.54 $\pm$ 0.04 & 16.09 $\pm$ 0.07& 16.56 $\pm$ 0.06 & 16.50 $\pm$ 0.12&18.00 $\pm$ 0.22& 17.48 $\pm$ 0.05\\
1559: F814W \dotfill & 17.43 $\pm$ 0.03 & 16.46 $\pm$ 0.08 & 17.02 $\pm$ 0.01 & 16.72 $\pm$ 0.01&18.21 $\pm$ 0.01&17.93 $\pm$ 0.01\\
1560: \enddata
1561: \end{deluxetable}
1562:
1563:
1564:
1565: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TABLE8
1566: \clearpage
1567:
1568: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
1569: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1570: \tablecaption{The clusters astrometry and aperture radii. \label{tbl08}}
1571: \tablewidth{0pt}
1572: \tablehead{ \colhead{\raisebox{-0.9ex}[0pt]{Cluster} } & \colhead{ $\alpha$ (J2000)} & \colhead{ $\delta$ (J2000)} &
1573: \colhead{Radius} & \colhead{Radius} \\
1574: \colhead{} & \colhead{ $12^h 15^m +$ } & \colhead{ $36^{\circ} +$ } & \colhead{["]} & \colhead{[pc]} }
1575: \startdata
1576:
1577: I--As \dotfill &39.54& 19 36.49& 0.41 & 5.84 \\
1578: I--Es \dotfill &40.26& 19 39.94& 0.36 & 5.13 \\
1579: IIIs\dotfill &38.27& 19 46.29& 1.20& 17.10 \\
1580: IVs \dotfill &37.34& 19 58.20& 0.80 & 11.40 \\
1581:
1582: I--A\dotfill & 39.53 & 19 37.00 & 6.83 &97.33 \\
1583: I--B \dotfill & 40.40 & 19 33.18 & 2.96 & 42.18 \\
1584: II \dotfill & 40.79 & 19 09.26 & 9.10& 129.68 \\
1585:
1586: I--Ds\dotfill &39.22 & 19 52.96 & 0.91& 12.97 \\
1587: II--A \dotfill &41.20 & 19 05.12& 2.28& 32.49 \\
1588: II--B \dotfill &40.77& 19 11.06& 1.68& 23.94 \\
1589: II--C \dotfill &40.72& 19 15.11& 2.59 & 36.91 \\
1590: II--D \dotfill &40.80& 19 08.25& 1.46& 20.81 \\
1591: II--E \dotfill &40.87& 19 04.71& 1.59 & 22.66 \\
1592: \enddata
1593: \end{deluxetable}
1594:
1595:
1596:
1597:
1598:
1599:
1600: \end{document}
1601:
1602: