1: % iaus2esa.tex -- sample pages for Proceedings IAU Symposium document class
2: % (based on v1.0 cca2esam.tex)
3: % v1.04 released 17 May 2004 by TechBooks
4: %% small changes and additions made by KAvdH/IAU 4 June 2004
5: % Copyright (2004) International Astronomical Union
6:
7: \NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}
8:
9: \documentclass{iaus}
10: \usepackage{graphicx}
11:
12: \title[Lopsidedness and sloshing in centres of mergers]
13: {Lopsidedness and Sloshing in Centres of Advanced Mergers of Galaxies}
14:
15: \author[Jog \& Maybhate]
16: {Chanda J. Jog$^1$ \& Aparna Maybhate$^2$}
17:
18: \affiliation{$^1$Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India \break
19: $^2$Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD 21218, U.S.A. \break email:
20: cjjog@physics.iisc.ernet.in, maybhate@stsci.edu}
21:
22: \pubyear{2007}
23: \volume{245} %% insert here IAU Symposium No.
24: \pagerange{-----}
25: \date{?? and in revised form ??}
26:
27:
28: %\setcounter{page}{---}
29: \jname{Proceedings Title IAU Symposium}
30: \editors{M. Bureau, E. Athanassoula, \& B. Barbuy, eds.}
31: \begin{document}
32:
33: \maketitle
34:
35: \begin{abstract}
36: We measure the non-axisymmetry in the luminosity distribution in the central few kpc of
37: a sample of advanced mergers of
38: galaxies, by analyzing their 2MASS images. All mergers show a high central asymmetry:
39: the centres of isophotes show a
40: striking sloshing pattern with a spatial variation of upto 30\% within the central 1 kpc;
41: and the Fourier amplitude for lopsidedness ($m=1$) shows high values upto 0.2 within the central 5 kpc.
42: The central asymmetry is estimated to be long-lived, lasting for $\sim$ a few Gyr
43: or $\sim$ 100 local dynamical timescales. This will significantly affect the
44: dynamical evolution of this region, by helping fuel the
45: central active galactic nucleus, and also by causing the secular growth of the bulge driven by lopsidedness.
46: \keywords{galaxies: evolution - galaxies: kinematics and dynamics - galaxies: interactions}
47: %% add here a maximum of 10 keywords, to be taken form the file <Keywords.txt>
48: \end{abstract}
49:
50: \firstsection
51: \section{Introduction}
52: Interactions and mergers of galaxies are known to be common and these significantly affect
53: their dynamics and evolution.
54: The outer regions of merger remnants covering a radial range of $\sim $ a few kpc to a few $\times$ 10 kpc have
55: been well-studied. These can be fit by an elliptical-like r$^{1/4}$ profile (class I), or a disc-like outer exponential profile (class II), or a no-fit profile (class III)
56: (Chitre \& Jog 2002). The first two can be explained as arising due to equal-mass mergers (e.g., Barnes 1992)
57: or unequal-mass mergers (Bournaud, Combes \& Jog 2004) respectively, while the third case corresponds to younger remnants.
58: However, the central regions of a few kpc in mergers have not been studied in detail so far - which motivated our work (Jog \& Maybhate 2006) presented here, where we study
59: a sample of advanced mergers which show signs of recent interaction such as tidal tails or loops but have a single nucleus.
60:
61: \section {Analysis \& Results }
62: Elliptical isophotes were fit to the K$_s$-band images from 2MASS
63: while allowing the centre, ellipticity and the position angle to vary to get the best fit. Figure 1 (top panel) shows the result for Arp 163 (a class III galaxy) -
64: the isophotes are not concentric, instead the centres (X$_0$,Y$_0$) of consecutive isophotes
65: show a wandering or sloshing pattern with a $\sim 30 \%$ variation within the central 1 kpc, indicating an unrelaxed central region. Further, we measure the lopsidedness of the distribution by Fourier-
66: analyzing the galaxy image
67: w.r.t. a constant centre. The amplitude A$_1$ and the phase p1 for $m=1$ were plotted versus radius- as shown for Arp 163 in the lower panel of Figure 1, which shows high central lopsidedness $\sim 0.15$ over the central 5 kpc region.
68:
69: All the sample galaxies show strong sloshing and lopsidedness in the central regions. The
70: asymmetry does not depend significantly on the masses of the progenitor galaxies, being similar for class I and II cases, but it is higher for younger mergers (class III).
71: The corresponding values
72: are smaller by a factor of few for a control sample of non-merger galaxies,
73: confirming the merger origin of the high central asymmetry in our sample.
74:
75:
76: \begin{figure}
77: \includegraphics[height=4.3in,width=4.3in]{jog_fig1.ps}
78: \caption{Arp 163: The centres of the isophotes vs. the semi-major axis (top panel): the centres show a sloshing pattern indicating an unrelaxed region; the plot of Fourier amplitude $A_1$ and the phase $p_1$ vs. radius (lower panel) shows a high lopsided amplitude
79: and a fluctuating phase.
80: }
81: \end{figure}
82:
83:
84: The ages of remnants are deduced to be $\sim$ 1-2 Gyr as seen from the merger remnants with similar outer disturbed features in the N-body simulations (Bournaud, Combes \& Jog 2004).
85: Thus the central asymmetry lasts for over $\sim 100$ local dynamical timescales, and will have important consequences for the evolution of the central region. First, it can help fuel the central active galactic nucleus,
86: and second, it can lead to the secular growth of the bulge via
87: the lopsided distribution. These need to be studied in detail theoretically. Since this predicted evolution is due to the central asymmetry that is merger-driven, it could be important in the hierarchical evolution of galaxies.
88:
89:
90:
91:
92:
93:
94:
95: \begin{acknowledgments}
96: CJ would like to acknowledge the support from the IAU to attend this meeting.
97: \end{acknowledgments}
98:
99: \begin{thebibliography}{}
100:
101: \bibitem[Barnes 1992]{Barnes02}
102: {Barnes, J.} 1992, \textit{ApJ}, 393, 484
103:
104: \bibitem[Bournaud, Combes \& Jog (1994)]{Bournaud04}
105: {Bournaud, F., Combes, F., \& Jog, C.J.} 2004,
106: \textit{A \& A}, 418, L27
107:
108:
109: \bibitem[Chitre \& Jog (2002)]{Chitre02}
110: {Chitre, A. \& Jog, C.J.} 2002, \textit{A \& A}, 388, 407
111:
112:
113:
114:
115: \bibitem[Jog \& Maybhate]{Jog06}
116: {Jog, C.J. \& Maybhate, A.} 2006,
117: \textit{MNRAS}, 370, 891
118:
119:
120:
121: \end{thebibliography}
122:
123:
124:
125:
126: \end{document}
127: