1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \newcommand{\um}{$\mu$m}
4: \newcommand{\kms}{\mbox{\,km\,s$^{-1}$}}
5: \newcommand{\Kkms}{\mbox{\,K\,km\,s$^{-1}$}}
6: \newcommand{\Msun}{\,$M_{\odot}$}
7: \newcommand{\Lsun}{\,$L_{\odot}$}
8: \newcommand{\Lum}{\,$L_{bol}$}
9: \newcommand{\hii}{\mbox{$\mathrm{H\,{\scriptstyle {II}}}$}}
10: \newcommand{\uchii}{\mbox{UC $\mathrm{H\,{\scriptstyle {II}}}\,$}}
11: \newcommand{\co}{\mbox{\rmfamily $^{12}$CO}}
12: \newcommand{\tco}{\mbox{\rmfamily $^{13}$CO}}
13: \newcommand{\ceont}{\mbox{\rmfamily C$^{18}$O}}
14: \newcommand{\ceo}{\mbox{\rmfamily C$^{18}$O}\,{(1--0)}}
15: \newcommand{\Spitzer}{{\it Spitzer}}
16: \newcommand{\vlsr}{V$_{LSR}$}
17: \newcommand{\sigmav}{$\sigma_{v}$}
18: \newcommand{\degree}{$^{\circ}$}
19: \newcommand{\cms}{${\rm cm}^{-2}$}
20: \newcommand{\cmc}{${\rm cm}^{-3}$}
21: \newcommand{\hh}{H$_{2}$}
22: \newcommand{\hhco}{H$_{2}CO$}
23: \newcommand{\tastar}{T$_{A}^{*}$}
24: \newcommand{\tmb}{T$_{mb}$}
25: \newcommand{\av}{A$_{v}$}
26: \newcommand{\tsys}{T$_{sys}$}
27: \newcommand{\tk}{T$_{\mathrm {K}}$}
28: \newcommand{\tex}{T$_{\mathrm {ex}}$}
29: \newcommand{\ammonia}{NH$_{3}$}
30: \newcommand{\ammoniaoneone}{NH$_{3}$ (1,1)}
31: \newcommand{\ammoniaratio}{NH$_{3}$ (1,1) to (2,2)}
32: \newcommand{\ammoniatwotwo}{NH$_{3}$ (2,2)}
33: \newcommand{\ccs}{CCS (2$_{1}$--1$_{0}$)}
34: \newcommand{\hcfiven}{HC$_{5}$N (9,8)} % 23963.901
35: \newcommand{\hcfivennt}{HC$_{5}$N} % 23963.901
36: \newcommand{\intint}{$\int$\,\tastar\,$\Delta$V}
37: \newcommand{\iras}{{\it {IRAS}}}
38:
39: \slugcomment{}
40: \shorttitle{Pipe cores: an NH$_{3}$, CCS, and HC$_{5}$N survey}
41: \shortauthors{Rathborne et al.}
42:
43: \begin{document}
44:
45: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
46: \title{The nature of the dense core population in the Pipe Nebula: A survey of NH$_{3}$, CCS, and HC$_{5}$N molecular line emission}
47: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
48: \author{J. M. Rathborne, C. J. Lada, A. A. Muench}
49: \affil{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA: jrathborne@cfa.harvard.edu, clada@cfa.harvard.edu, gmuench@cfa.harvard.edu}
50: \and
51: \author{J. F. Alves}
52: \affil{Calar Alto Observatory, Centro Astron\'omico Hispano Alem\'an, c/Jes\'us Durb\'an Rem\'on 2-2, 04004, Almeria, Spain:jalves@caha.es}
53: \and
54: \author{M. Lombardi}
55: \affil{European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, 85748 Garching, Germany: mlombard@eso.org}
56:
57: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
58: \begin{abstract}
59: Recent extinction studies of the Pipe Nebula (d=130 pc) reveal many cores
60: spanning a range in mass from 0.2 to 20.4\,\Msun. These dense cores
61: were identified via their high extinction and comprise a starless
62: population in a very early stage of development. Here we present a
63: survey of \ammoniaoneone, \ammoniatwotwo, \ccs, and \hcfiven\,emission
64: toward 46 of these cores. An atlas of the 2MASS extinction maps is
65: also presented. In total, we detect 63\% of the cores in
66: \ammoniaoneone, 22\% in \ammoniatwotwo, 28\% in CCS, and 9\% in
67: \hcfivennt\, emission. We find the cores are associated with dense gas
68: ($\sim$ 10$^{4}$\,\cmc) with 9.5 $\le$ \tk\, $\le$ 17 K. Compared to
69: \ceont, we find the \ammonia\, linewidths are systematically narrower,
70: implying that the \ammonia\, is tracing the dense component of the gas
71: and that these cores are relatively quiescent. We find no correlation
72: between core linewidth and size. The derived properties of the Pipe
73: cores are similar to cores within other low-mass star-forming regions:
74: the only differences are that the Pipe cores have weaker \ammonia\,
75: emision and most show no current star formation as evidenced by the
76: lack of embedded infrared sources. Such weak \ammonia\, emission could
77: arise due to low column densities and abundances or reduced excitation
78: due to relatively low core volume densities. Either alternative
79: implies that the cores are relatively young. Thus, the Pipe cores
80: represent an excellent sample of dense cores in which to study the
81: initial conditions for star formation and the earliest stages of core
82: formation and evolution.
83: \end{abstract}
84: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
85: \keywords{stars: formation--dust, extinction--ISM: globules--ISM: molecules}
86: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
87:
88: \section{Introduction}
89:
90: The Pipe Nebula, at a distance of 130 pc, is one of the closest
91: molecular cloud complexes in the Galaxy. With a mass of
92: 10$^{4}$\,\Msun, it spans $\sim$ 48 degs$^{2}$ on the sky but
93: contains little evidence for active star formation. In addition to
94: tracing the larger-scale molecular gas associated with the Pipe
95: Nebula, a \co, \tco, and \ceo\, (highly undersampled) survey of the
96: region \citep{Onishi99} detected a small number of dense cores. The
97: densest of these, associated with the dark cloud B59, appears to be
98: the only site within the Pipe Nebula where active star formation is
99: occurring. Indeed, recent \Spitzer\, observations reveal an embedded
100: cluster of young stellar objects within B59
101: \citep{Brooke07}.
102:
103: Recent extinction studies of the Pipe Nebula (\citealp{Lombardi06};
104: Alves, Lombardi, \& Lada 2007) reveal many compact dust cores that
105: likely represent incipient sites of star formation. These cores were
106: identified using 2MASS extinction maps derived from the JHK photometry
107: of over 4.5 million stars (Fig.~\ref{pipe}; \citealp{Lombardi06}). The
108: individual compact cores were extracted from the larger-scale, more
109: diffuse lower-column density material associated with the molecular
110: cloud via a wavelet transform technique (see \citealp{Alves07}). In
111: total, 159 cores were identified and span a range in peak \av\, and
112: core mass and are distributed throughout the Pipe Nebula
113: \citep{Alves07}. This large sample represents a critical data base
114: for measuring the initial conditions for star formation and testing
115: theories of core formation and evolution. Indeed, the dense core mass
116: function (CMF) generated from these cores reveals a similarity to the
117: shape of the stellar initial mass function (IMF;
118: e.g. \citealp{Alves07}) with the profound implication that the stellar
119: IMF is in fact predetermined by the form of the CMF. The origin of
120: the stellar IMF may be, therefore, directly linked to the origin of
121: dense cores.
122:
123: While the Pipe Nebula represents an excellent example of a molecular
124: cloud in a very early stage of star formation, little work has been
125: done to ascertain the dynamical and evolutionary status of its
126: cores. Our aim is to study these cores in detail via the combination
127: of their extinction and molecular line properties; the extinction map
128: reveals measurements of the core masses and sizes while the
129: molecular line observations reveal the kinematics and gas temperatures
130: within the cores. To this end, we are conducting extensive ground-
131: and space-based surveys of the cores located within the Pipe Nebula.
132: The Pipe cores are well suited for studies of core formation and
133: evolution because they are distributed over a large area, are well
134: separated and well defined, and represent a complete sample of dense
135: cores within a single cloud with accurate masses in the mass range of
136: $\sim$ 0.2 to 20.4\,\Msun.
137:
138: To begin, we have obtained \ceo\, observations toward a sample of 94
139: cores distributed throughout the nebula. The details of these
140: observations and results are presented in \cite{Gus-pipe}. In
141: brief summary, all cores show strong
142: \ceont\, emission, have measured linewidths, $\Delta$V, of
143: $\sim$~0.14 -- 0.61\,\kms, and show no size-linewidth correlation.
144:
145: Because \ceo\, emission traces all molecular gas along the line of
146: sight, the measured \ceont\, linewidths will trace both the lower
147: density intercore material in addition to the dense gas associated
148: with the core. To isolate the emission from the dense core, we have
149: also obtained \ammonia\, observations toward a sample of the Pipe
150: cores and report the results of these observations here. Because
151: \ammonia\, requires such high densities to be excited ($>$
152: 10$^{4}$\,\cmc), only the densest gas will exhibit significant
153: \ammonia\, emission. Thus, \ammonia\, observations will reveal the
154: fraction of cores in the Pipe Nebula that contain dense gas.
155: Determination of the dense core fraction and how it varies across the
156: core mass function and with kinematical state will provide crucial
157: data for understanding the evolutionary status of these objects.
158:
159: The combination of the extinction and molecular line studies (\ceont\,
160: and \ammonia), and the implications for core formation and evolution,
161: is discussed in \cite{Lada-pipe}, the third paper in this series on
162: the Pipe Nebula. By accurately measuring the linewidths from the
163: \ammoniaoneone\, emission in each core, and by combining this with
164: measurements of the core masses, one can determine the fraction
165: of cores that are unbound and the core stabilty, which can provide
166: important clues to their formation and evolution. Indeed,
167: \cite{Lada-pipe} find that the majority of Pipe cores are pressure confined,
168: gravitationally unbound objects whose properties are dominated by
169: thermal processes in a pressurized medium.
170:
171: Ammonia has been used extensively to study both high- and low-mass
172: star-forming regions
173: (e.g.\,\citealp{Myers83,Benson89,Jijina99}). Because it is the least
174: depleted species in, and, thus, the most reliable tracer of, cold
175: dense gas within starless cores, we use \ammonia\, to trace the
176: densest gas in the Pipe Nebula. The 18 individual hyperfine
177: components of the \ammoniaoneone\, transitions can be used to measure
178: the intrinsic one dimensional velocity dispersion (\sigmav), optical
179: depth ($\tau$), and excitation temperature (\tex). Observations of
180: the \ammoniatwotwo\, transition were also obtained in order to
181: directly measure the gas temperatures of the brightest cores in the
182: sample. Ratios of the \ammonia\, (1,1) and (2,2) lines reveal the
183: kinetic temperature (\tk) and, therefore, density of the cores.
184:
185: To probe the very densest gas and to determine the chemical evolution
186: of the cores, we also obtained \ccs\, and \hcfiven\,
187: observations. These molecules are found in very dense starless cores
188: (e.g. \citealp{Benson83,Suzuki92}). The abundance of carbon-chain
189: molecules (e.g. CCS and \hcfivennt) compared to \ammonia\, is thought
190: to trace the chemical evolution of cores; carbon-chain molecules being
191: more abundant in the very earliest stages in core evolution, compared
192: to \ammonia\, which is more abundant in the later stages
193: (e.g. \citealp{Suzuki92}). Thus, the combination of these data can
194: reveal the youth and star-forming potential of the cores.
195:
196: In this paper, we present the results of a survey for \ammoniaoneone,
197: \ammoniatwotwo, \ccs, and \hcfiven\, emission toward a sample of 46
198: of the extinction cores identified in the Pipe Nebula. All but one of
199: these cores has been observed as part of the \ceont\, survey
200: \citep{Gus-pipe}. We find that most cores are indeed associated with dense
201: gas. Their measured linewidths are narrow, with several cores having
202: linewidths comparable to their thermal linewidths. The derived
203: properties (\tk, intrinsic $\Delta$V, non-thermal $\Delta$V, radius)
204: of the cores within the Pipe Nebula are similar to cores within other
205: low-mass star-forming regions: the only difference is that the Pipe
206: cores typically have weaker \ammonia\, emission and most show no
207: current star formation.
208:
209: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
210: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
211:
212: The observations were obtained using the 100-m Robert C. Byrd Green
213: Bank Telescope (GBT) from 2006 October to 2007 February. The
214: \ammoniaoneone\, \ammoniatwotwo\, \ccs, and \hcfiven\, transitions
215: were observed simultaneously using the K-band (upper)
216: receiver. Table~\ref{line-info} lists the frequencies for each of
217: these transitions.
218:
219: All spectra were obtained in the frequency switched mode ($\Delta \nu$
220: = 4 MHz). The spectrometer was set up with a bandwidth of 12.5~MHz,
221: which produced a frequency resolution of 1.846~kHz (velocity
222: resolution of 0.023~\kms). The GBT beam width at these frequencies is
223: $\sim$ 30\arcsec.
224:
225: Due to time constraints, a sub-sample of the complete list of cores
226: identified by \cite{Alves07} were observed. In total, 46 of the 159
227: cores were observed and were selected to span a range in peak \av,
228: core mass, and location within the Pipe Nebula. The completeness of
229: our sample based on the original catalog of \cite{Alves07} is shown in
230: Figure~\ref{completeness} as a function of both peak \av\, and core
231: mass. The peak \av\, for the selected cores ranged from 5.3 to 23.7
232: magnitudes, while their masses range from 0.4 to 20.4\,\Msun; all
233: cores in the original sample with peak \av\, $>$ 14 magnitudes and
234: with masses $>$ 4\,\Msun\, were observed.
235:
236: Spectra were obtained toward the position of peak extinction for each
237: core (these positions are listed in Table~\ref{table1}). The cores
238: were originally identified from 2MASS extinction maps ($\Theta_{HPBW}$
239: $\sim$ 1\arcmin\,; \citealp{Alves07}). Because the coordinates listed
240: in the catalog of \cite{Alves07} refer to the centroid and not
241: necessarily the position of peak extinction, the pointing centers for
242: each core where selected by eye to correspond to the true extinction
243: peak. Thus, the coordinates listed here may differ slightly from the
244: positions reported in the catalog of
245: \cite{Alves07}.
246:
247: Toward some of these cores we have also obtained higher-angular
248: resolution extinction maps using the 3.5 m ESO New Technology
249: Telescope (NTT; $\Theta_{HPBW}$ $\sim$~15\arcsec;
250: \citealp{Carlos07}). In many cases, we found sub-structure at
251: higher-angular resolution. Where possible, therefore, we used the
252: higher-angular resolution extinction maps to pinpoint the position of
253: peak extinction. We found that the extinction peaks could differ by as
254: much as $\sim$ 1\arcmin\, from the quoted positions in the
255: \cite{Alves07} catalog. Thus, for the cores in which we have
256: obtained these higher-angular resolution extinction maps, we use the
257: coordinates of the peak extinction derived from them. These cores are
258: marked with an asterisk in Table~\ref{table1}.
259:
260: For the majority of cores, four $\sim$ 5 minute integrations were
261: combined for a total of 18 minutes on source. Toward the brightest 4
262: cores only a single 5 minute spectrum was obtained. For three cores
263: showing very faint \ammoniaoneone\, emission, we combined additional
264: data for an on source integration time of over 70 minutes. The
265: integration times, system temperatures (\tsys), source elevation (El),
266: and 1 $\sigma$ rms for the spectra are listed in Table~\ref{table1}.
267: Because the system temperatures for the individual frequencies varied
268: by $<$ 5\%, we quote a single system temperature and, hence, 1
269: $\sigma$ rms for each core.
270:
271: The pointing and focus were checked at the beginning of each observing
272: session using a nearby, bright pointing source. The pointing
273: corrections were typically $\sim$8\arcsec\, in Azimuth and
274: $\sim$1\arcsec\, in Elevation. The flux density scale was determined
275: from observations of 3C286 (known flux density of 2.38~Jy was taken
276: from \citealp{Ott94}).
277:
278: The spectra were converted from the raw data format into fits files
279: using the SDFITS package. All subsequent data reduction and analysis
280: was performed using the GBTIDL package. The individual polarizations
281: for each spectrum were combined and averaged before opacity and
282: elevation corrections were applied. A first order baseline was removed
283: from all spectra using user-defined baseline windows. All quoted
284: temperatures are \tastar\, (K).
285:
286: The observations were taken at low elevations ($\sim$~19\degree) where
287: the pointing model of the GBT is less reliable. As a result, the
288: temperatures of the observations may be in error, either due to
289: unintended pointing offsets or pointing drifts during the
290: integrations~\footnote{The pointing rms during one of the six hour
291: shifts was 12\arcsec\, in azimuth and 2\arcsec\, in elevation.}. To
292: quantify the repeatability of the observations, we obtained a spectrum
293: toward the core FeSt 1-457 (our core 109) during each observing
294: session. These data show a variation in peak temperature (\tastar) of
295: $\sim$ 10\%, while the linewidths show a variation of $\sim$ 3 \%
296: (these values were estimated by fitting two Gaussians to the blended
297: central hyperfine components). Thus, while the temperatures listed may
298: be uncertain, the linewidths and derived parameters (e.g. $\tau$, \tk,
299: \tex), which are derived from the line ratios and, hence, independent
300: of the absolute scale, will be reliable.
301:
302: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
303: \section{Results}
304:
305: The \ammoniaoneone, \ammonia\, (2,2), \ccs, and \hcfiven\, spectra for
306: each core observed in the Pipe Nebula are shown in the Appendix,
307: together with its 2MASS extinction map. We find many cores show little
308: or no detectable \ammonia, CCS, nor \hcfivennt\, emission (e.g.
309: Fig.~36). Many of the remaining cores show only
310: weak \ammonia\, emission from the central blended hyperfine components
311: (e.g.\, Fig.~41). A number of cores show weak
312: \ammonia\, emission, but strong CCS emission
313: (e.g. Fig.~51). Only a small fraction of the cores
314: show strong \ammonia\, emission. Toward these cores, we clearly see
315: the satellite components in addition to the central blended hyperfine
316: components (e.g.\,~Figs.~30 and 53).
317:
318: \subsection{Determining line parameters: \tastar, \sigmav, \vlsr.}
319:
320: \subsubsection{\ammoniaoneone}
321:
322: We find 12 cores that show bright \ammoniaoneone\, emission from both
323: the central and satellite hyperfine components. To determine their
324: line parameters, we used a forward-fitting routine (for a full
325: description see \citealp{Rosolowsky07}). This forward-fitting routine
326: models the spectrum given input physical properties and then optimizes
327: these values via non-linear least squares minimization. This method is
328: in contrast to the usual way of determinining physical properties
329: directly from the \ammoniaratio\, line ratios. The advantage of this
330: method is that the uncertainties for the physical parameters can be
331: determined in addition to the covariance among the parameters.
332:
333: In this model, the gas is assumed to have a slab geometry with uniform
334: properties and that the velocity dispersions and excitation
335: temperatures of the transitions are the same, i.e. the gas is in Local
336: Thermodynamic Equilibrium (LTE). Assuming the beam filling factor is
337: unity, the spectrum is entirely determined by five parameteres:
338: \tk, \tex, $\tau$, \sigmav, and \vlsr. Because the exinction cores
339: are always several times larger than the GBT beam, the assumption
340: that the beam filling factor is unity is valid.
341:
342: The spectra are easily modelled using this approach when the opacity
343: is high. In the case of low optical depth, however, the parameters
344: \tex\, and $\tau$ become degenerate and it is not possible to solve
345: for them independently. Instead, the fit is optimized for the free
346: parameter {\mbox{$\gamma\equiv$(\tex\,$-$T$_{bg}$)$\tau$}} and, thus,
347: in this case, the spectrum is determined by four free parameters: \tk,
348: $\gamma$,
349: \sigmav, and \vlsr.
350:
351: Table~\ref{line-parameters-1} lists the measured \tastar, \vlsr,
352: \sigmav, and integrated intensity for all cores showing \ammoniaoneone\,
353: emission with detections $>$ 3\,$\sigma$. For the 12 bright cores, the
354: \vlsr\, and \sigmav\, were determined using the forward-fitting routine discussed
355: above (these cores are marked with an asterisk in
356: Table~\ref{line-parameters-1}). The quoted \tastar\, in these cases
357: were measured from a single Gaussian fit to the central blended component. The
358: integrated intensity was calculated by summing the emission across
359: the spectrum (from V=$-$23 to 30\,\kms).
360:
361: Toward the remaining 34 cores observed, we find 17 cores with weak
362: \ammoniaoneone\, detections. Because the emission is considerably
363: weaker in these cases, only the central blended components were
364: detected ($>$ 3$\sigma$). Thus, to characterize this emission, we fit
365: a single Gaussian profile to the observed emission. The \tastar,
366: \vlsr, and integrated intensity {\mbox {(I = \intint)}} measured from
367: these fits are included within Table~\ref{line-parameters-1}.
368:
369: Because the central component is a blend of 8 individual hyperfine
370: components, the velocity dispersion determined from fitting a single
371: Gaussian profile to the emission will be overestimated. To constrain
372: theories of core formation and evolution, we require accurate
373: estimates of the core velocity dispersions. Thus, it was necessary to
374: determine the amount by which this measurement of the velocity
375: dispersion was overestimated.
376:
377: To derive the intrinsic velocity dispersion in the cases where we
378: could not fit the spectra with all 18 hyperfine components, we used a
379: conversion factor calculated from synthetic spectra. The synthetic
380: spectra were generated to cover a range in \sigmav, \tex, and
381: $\tau$. To each of these spectra, we fit a single Gaussian profile to
382: the central blended components and then compared the measured velocity
383: dispersion to that which was used to generate the
384: spectrum.
385:
386: To determine the correction factor for all measured velocity
387: dispersions we interpolated the relation to produce a curve converting
388: the measured velocity dispersion to that of the intrinsic velocity
389: dispersion (our derived relation is similar to that modelled by
390: \citealp{Barranco98}). Thus, the correction factor was determined
391: using this method and then applied to each velocity dispersion
392: measured from a single Gaussian fit to the central blended hyperfine
393: components (17 cores). These corrected velocity dispersions are quoted in
394: Table~\ref{line-parameters-1}.
395:
396: In total, toward the 46 cores observed, \ammoniaoneone\, emission was
397: detected ($>$~3$\sigma$) in 29 cases ($\sim$~63\%). \ammoniaoneone\,
398: emission was detected toward cores spanning the full range of peak
399: \av\, and core mass within our sample. We find no clear correlation between
400: the measured line parameters and either peak \av\, or core mass. Most
401: ($\sim$ 86 \%) of the cores have \tastar~$<$~1~K. The \vlsr\, measured
402: for the cores range from 3 to 6\,\kms\, consistent with the measured
403: \vlsr\, of the molecular gas associated with Pipe Nebula (as traced by
404: \ceont; \citealp{Onishi99,Gus-pipe}). This confirms that these cores are indeed
405: located within the large-scale molecular cloud associated with the
406: Pipe Nebula and not either background or foreground objects. The
407: measured velocity dispersions range from $\sim$ 0.05 to 0.3\,\kms.
408:
409: \subsubsection{\ammoniatwotwo, CCS, and \hcfivennt}
410:
411: For the \ammoniatwotwo, CCS, and \hcfivennt\, emission, we fit a
412: single Gaussian profile to all spectra with a $>$ 3 $\sigma$
413: detection. Although the \ammoniatwotwo\, emission comprise 21
414: individual hyperfine components, in all cases only the central
415: 12 blended components were detected. Tables~\ref{line-parameters-1} and
416: \ref{line-parameters-2} list the peak \tastar, \vlsr, \sigmav,
417: and integrated intensity obtained from these fits.
418:
419: Toward the 46 cores observed, \ammoniatwotwo\, emission was detected
420: in 10 cores ($\sim$~22\%), CCS emission in 13 cores ($\sim$~28\%), and
421: \hcfivennt\, emission in 4 cores ($\sim$~9\%).
422:
423: We find \ammoniatwotwo\, detections toward cores spanning the range of
424: peak \av\, and core mass, with the most massive core showing the
425: brightest \ammoniatwotwo\, emission. In contrast, we only detect CCS
426: emission for cores with peak \av\, $>$ 8 magnitudes and \hcfivennt\,
427: emission toward cores with peak \av\, $>$ 12 magnitudes. This is
428: expected given that the critical densities of the CCS and \hcfivennt\,
429: transitions ($\sim$ 10$^{5}$\,\cmc) are higher than for \ammonia\,
430: ($\sim$ 10$^{4}$\,\cmc) and that there may be differences in their
431: relative abundances due to evolutionary effects.
432:
433: \subsection{Physical properties: \tk, $\tau$, \tex, n(\hh), column densities}
434: \label{ammonia-nhh}
435:
436: The forward-fitting model that was used to derive the \sigmav\, and
437: \vlsr\, for the cores showing bright \ammonia\, emission, also
438: measures the physical properties of the gas. Figure~\ref{phys-av-mass}
439: shows the measured \tk, $\tau$, and \tex\, for the brightest cores as
440: a function of the peak \av\, and core mass.
441:
442: For the 12 cores showing bright \ammonia\, emission we find that the
443: mean \tk\, is $\sim$~12~$\pm$~2~K. However, for the cores with
444: masses $>$~5\,\Msun\, we find \tk\, of $\sim$~10 $\pm$ 1 K, while
445: cores with masses $<$~5\,\Msun\, have \tk\, of $\sim$~13 $\pm$ 3 K
446: (the errors quoted here correspond to the standard deviation).
447: Because \tk\, is measured from the ratios of the \ammonia\, (1,1) to
448: (2,2) lines, this calculation is independent of assumptions about the beam filling factor.
449: The measured opacities for all the cores range from $\sim$~2 to 10,
450: with a single core having a $\tau$ of $\sim$~20 (this is FeSt 1-457,
451: our core 109). The typical \tex\, was $\sim$~5~$\pm$~1~K.
452:
453: In the low optical depth regime, the values of $\tau$ and \tex\,
454: become degenerate, so the fitting routine optimizes the value of the
455: parameter $\gamma$ ($\propto \tau$\tex). For the 5 cores that were
456: found to lie in the optically thin regime, the values of $\tau$\tex\,
457: are plotted in the lower panel of Figure~\ref{phys-av-mass}. These
458: cores all have masses $<$ 5\,\Msun\, and calculated values of
459: $\tau$\tex\, ranging from 0.5 to 2.
460:
461: To verify the values of \tk\, output from the forward-fitting model,
462: we have also calculated the rotation temperature, T$_{R}$, which is
463: related to \tk\, via \citep{Swift05}
464:
465: \[ T_{R} = T_{K} \{ 1 + \frac{T_{k}}{T_{0}} ln \left[ 1 + 0.6 e^{-15.7/T_{k}} \right] \}^{-1} \]
466:
467: \noindent where T$_{0}$ is the energy gap between the two levels (41.5 K).
468: Using this relation we calculate T$_{R}$ for the 7 cores with measured
469: $\tau$ values to be $\sim$ 10.2 $\pm$ 0.9 K. The rotation temperature
470: can also be determined directly from the ratios of the peak
471: \tastar\, for the \ammoniaoneone\, and (2,2) emission via the expression \citep{Ho83}
472:
473: \[ T_{R} = \frac{-41.5}{ln \left[ \frac{-0.282}{\tau} ln \{ 1 - \frac{T_{A}^{*}(2,2)}{T_{A}^{*}(1,1)} (1 - e^{-\tau}) \} \right] }\]
474:
475: \noindent where $\tau$ is the opacity listed in Table~\ref{fitspec} and
476: \tastar (1,1) and \tastar (2,2) are the measured peak
477: temperatures listed in Table~\ref{line-parameters-1}. Using this
478: expression, we derive T$_{R}$ of $\sim$ 9.5 $\pm$ 1.8 K. Thus, while
479: we find that the mean T$_{R}$ measured directly from the line ratios
480: is slightly lower than the T$_{R}$ calculated from the forward-fitting
481: routine, they are consistent within the errors especially considering
482: the peak \tastar\, are measured from a single Gaussian fit to the
483: central blended components.
484:
485: Moreover, we find that the measured T$_{R}$ is comparable to \tk\,
486: within the errors. \cite{Martin82} show that while T$_{R}$ is, in
487: general, lower than \tk, T$_{R}$ is a good indicator of the \tk\, for
488: kinetic temperatures $<$ 20~K. However, T$_{R}$ significantly
489: underestimates \tk\, for higher temperatures. Because our measured
490: \tk\, values are always lower than 20~K, the similarity of the derived
491: T$_{R}$ and \tk\, values is expected.
492:
493: With the determination of \tex\, and \tk, the \hh\, volume density,
494: n(\hh), can be calculated via the expression \citep{Ho83}
495:
496: \[ n(H_{2}) = \frac{A}{C} \left[ \frac{J_{\nu}(T_{ex}) - J_{\nu}(T_{bg})}{J_{\nu}(T_{k}) - J_{\nu}(T_{ex})} \right] \left[ 1 + \frac{J_{\nu}(T_{k})}{h\nu/k} \right]\]% \hspace{0.8cm} ({\rm cm^{-3}})\]
497:
498: \noindent where A is the Einstein A coefficient (1.67$\times$10$^{-7}$
499: s$^{-1}$; \citealp{Ho83}), C is the rate coefficient for collision de-excitation
500: (8.5$\times$10$^{-11}$~cm$^{3}$\,s$^{-1}$;
501: \citealp{Danby88}) and $J_{\nu}(T)$ is the Planck function at the given
502: temperature, where, $J_{\nu}(T) = h\nu/k\,({\rm
503: {exp}}(h\nu/kT)-1)^{-1}$. Table~\ref{column-densities} lists the
504: n(\hh) values for the cores with \ammonia\, emission sufficiently
505: bright enough to reliably calculate both \tk\, and \tex. For these 7
506: cores we find the n(\hh) values ranged from 0.1 to
507: 2.5~$\times~$10$^{4}$~\cmc. The measured n(\hh) derived from the
508: extinction maps for these 7 cores range from 0.5 to
509: 1.3~$\times$~10$^{4}$\,\cmc. In detail, we find that the n(\hh) derived
510: from the \ammonia\, observations reveal densities typically twice those
511: estimated from the extinction maps. Because the n(\hh) derived from
512: the extinction maps represents the mean n(\hh) within the core, we
513: expect these values to be lower than the n(\hh) calculated from the
514: \ammonia\, emission.
515:
516: With the measured opacity and assuming LTE conditions, we calculate
517: the \ammonia\, column density following the method of \cite{Olano88}
518: via the expression
519:
520: \[ N({\rm{NH_{3}}}) = 1.3773 \times 10^{13}\, Z(T_{k})\, \tau\, \Delta V \, T_{ex}\]% \hspace{0.8cm} ({\rm cm^{-2}})\]
521:
522: \noindent where Z(T$_{k}$) is the partition function (4.417 for \tk~=~10~K;
523: \citealp{Olano88}). For this calculation we assume \tk = 10 K and use
524: the measured values of $\tau$, \tex, and $\Delta$V (where $\Delta$V =
525: 2.35\,\sigmav) for each core. Table~\ref{column-densities} lists the
526: values obtained for the cores in which we could determine $\tau$ and
527: \tex\, (or $\tau$\tex). For these cores, the N(\ammonia) was
528: typically $\sim$~4~$\times$~10$^{14}$~\cms.
529:
530: For CCS, \hcfivennt, and \ceont\, we assume the emission is optically
531: thin and calculate the column density via
532:
533: \[ N =\frac{ 3 k^{2}}{8 \pi^{3} h B}\frac{1}{\mu^{2}(J_{1} + 1) \nu}\frac{T_{ex}J_{\nu}(T_{ex})\,{\rm exp}(E_{u}/kT_{ex})}{J_{\nu}(T_{ex}) - J_{v}(T_{bg})}\,\int T_{b} dV\]
534:
535: \noindent where J$_{1}$ is the rotational quantum number of the lower level,
536: T$_{bg}$ is the background temperature (2.7 K), E$_{u}$ is the energy
537: of the upper level of the transition, $\mu$ is the dipole moment, and
538: B is the rotational constant (Table~\ref{line-info} lists the values
539: used for these parameters). The quantity $\int$T$_{b}\Delta$V is
540: simply the integrated intensity listed from
541: Table~\ref{line-parameters-2} (with the appropriate beam efficiency
542: conversion from \tastar\, to T$_{b}$, which is 0.58 for the GBT at
543: these frequencies). For this calculation we assume LTE conditions and
544: that \tex=10~K. We find typical N(CCS) of
545: $\sim$\,5$\times$10$^{12}$~\cms, N(\hcfivennt) of
546: $\sim$\,3$\times$10$^{12}$~\cms, and N(\ceont) of $\sim$ 1 $\times$
547: 10$^{15}$\,\cms\, (see Table~\ref{column-densities}). The derived
548: column densities will be under estimated if the excitation temperature
549: is lower than the assumed value of 10\,K.
550:
551: For the 17 cores that were detected in \ammoniaoneone\, but
552: showed no \ammoniatwotwo\, emission, \tk, $\tau$\, or
553: \tex\, could not be determined using the forward-fitting routine,
554: due to its requirement for emission lines in both spectra. In these
555: cases we also calculate the \ammonia\, column density assuming that
556: the emission is optically thin using the above expression and that
557: \tex=5~K. This value of \tex\, was the typical measured \tex\, for the 7 cores for which it
558: could be determined from the \ammonia\, hyperfine components. For
559: these 17 cores we find the typical N(\ammonia) was $\sim$ 3 $\times$
560: 10$^{13}$\,\cms.
561:
562: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
563: \section{Discussion}
564:
565: \subsection{The dense core detection rate}
566:
567: Figure~\ref{detection-rates} shows the detection rate for the
568: \ammoniaoneone, \ammoniatwotwo, CCS, and \hcfivennt\, transitions
569: as a function of peak \av\, and core mass. Not surprisingly, the
570: detection rate is higher toward those cores with higher peak \av\, and
571: higher mass; in the case of \ammoniaoneone\, we detected emission
572: toward all cores with a peak \av $>$ 15 magnitudes and with
573: masses~$>$~11\,\Msun.
574:
575: Figure~\ref{density} shows the histogram of the mean \hh\, volume
576: densities, n(\hh), for the 46 cores surveyed in \ammonia, obtained
577: from the visual extinction measurements. For this calculation, a
578: spherical volume with radius equal to half the measured size of the
579: core was assumed (as listed in \citealp{Alves07}). The masses were
580: calculated from the background subtracted extinction map (see
581: \citealp{Lada-pipe} and Table~\ref{table1}). We find the n(\hh) for the
582: complete sample of 46 cores range from 0.4 to 1.3 $\times$
583: 10$^{4}$\,\cmc. Based on the critical density of \ammonia\, (n$_{c}$
584: $\sim$ 10$^{4}$\,\cmc), we crudely estimate that the detection rate
585: should be $\sim$ 17\%. Because these volume densities were derived
586: from the extinction maps, they correspond to the mean volume densities
587: within the cores. The fact that we measure a higher detection rate
588: from our observations ($\sim$ 63\%) is not surprising given that
589: \ammonia\, traces the densest inner parts of a compact core and that
590: the cores most likely have inwardly increasing density gradients.
591:
592: The detection rate for the \ammoniatwotwo, CCS, and \hcfivennt\,
593: transitions are much lower compared to \ammoniaoneone\, likely due to
594: the combination of the fact that higher densities are typically needed
595: for their excitation and that differences in their chemical
596: evolutionary stages will effect their relative abundances. In the case
597: of CCS, its relative distribution to \ammonia\, within the cores may
598: differ significantly. In many dense, starless cores the distribution
599: of \ammonia\, and CCS emission is noticably different; the \ammonia\,
600: emission is typically centrally concentrated, while the CCS emission
601: arises from a ring-like structure around the \ammonia\, core
602: (e.g. \citealp{Benson83,Velusamy95,Kuiper96,Hirota02}). Indeed,
603: morphological differences in the distributions of various depleted
604: molecules, typically carbon bearing species, is clearly seen toward
605: the B68 (our core 101) and FeSt 1-457 (our core 109;
606: \citealp{Bergin02,Aguti07}).
607:
608: The non-detection of \ammonia\, emission toward many of the cores
609: could arise because of the short integration time per position or
610: because the spectra were not obtained toward the true density peak of
611: the core. Because we are primarily interested in the \ammonia\, line
612: ratios and velocity dispersions, our results will not be significantly
613: affected by the fact that we may not be pinpointing the peak of the
614: \ammonia\, emission. This will, however, effect the detection rate as
615: we may be missing some emission that falls below our sensitivity
616: limits given the short integration time per point. This is clearly
617: seen in Figure~\ref{comparisons} which compares an 18 minute
618: integration to a 74 minute integration toward the same position in two
619: cores (cores 23 and 89). The spectra obtained with the shorter
620: integration time are noiser and, thus, the emission in these cases
621: would not be considered a 3$\sigma$ detection (upper panels). The
622: longer integrations (lower panels) reveal that indeed \ammoniaoneone\,
623: emission does arise from within these cores, albiet the emission is
624: considerably weaker. Given longer integration times per point, the
625: detection rate for these cores would likely increase.
626:
627: Because only a single spectrum was obtained toward each core, maps are
628: necessary to determine if many of the non-detections may arise due to
629: either inaccurate coordinates from the extinction maps or pointing
630: errors due to the low observing elevations. For 36 of the cores,
631: higher-angular resolution exinction maps, generated from NTT images
632: (15\arcsec\, angular resolution; \citealp{Carlos07}), were used to
633: locate the position of peak extinction. For the remaining 13 cores, we
634: used the lower-angular resolution 2MASS extinction maps (1\arcmin\,
635: angular resolution; \citealp{Alves07}). When comparing the positions
636: of peak extinction between the two maps, we found that the position of
637: peak extinction in the higher-angular resolution maps could differ
638: from that obtained from the lower-angular resolution maps by $\sim$
639: 1\arcmin\, ($\sim$ 2 GBT beams at these frequencies). In some cases,
640: the extinction cores identified from the 2MASS maps actually consisted
641: of several sub-structures in the higher-angular resolution maps. Thus,
642: the positions obtained for the 13 cores from the 2MASS exinction map
643: may not reflect the true position of peak extinction, or density, in
644: the core at the angular scale of the GBT beam. However, because the
645: cores are resolved in the 2MASS extinction map (typical sizes of
646: 6\arcmin), and with respect to the GBT beam, the positions at which
647: the spectra were obtained will still lie within each of the
648: cores. They may not, therefore, necessarily correspond to the true
649: peak of the extinction, density, nor the peak of the \ammonia\,
650: emission. This will be most obvious if the molecular line emission
651: arises from a very compact, dense core. Thus, the non detection in
652: these cases may simply arise due to the fact that we were not pointing
653: at the best position within the core and that the dense cores may be
654: compact relative to the extinction cores. With only a single spectrum
655: toward the cores it is difficult to rule out potential pointing
656: offsets. Obtaining \ammonia\, and CCS maps toward each of the cores
657: will reveal the true density peaks and their relative distributions
658: with respect to the extinction.
659:
660: Nevertheless, the majority of these cores appear to be bona fide dense
661: cores. We find that the fraction of dense cores within the Pipe
662: Nebula, as traced by \ammoniaoneone\, emission, is 100\% for all cores
663: with peak \av\, $>$ 15 magnitudes and mass $>$ 6\,\Msun. This drops to
664: $\sim$ 60\% for cores with masses $<$ 6\,\Msun. Deeper observations
665: and mapping could likely raise the detection rate for \ammonia\,
666: toward these cores.
667:
668: \subsection{Measured velocity dispersions}
669:
670: Figure~\ref{linewidths} shows the measured one dimensional velocity
671: dispersions for cores detected in \ammoniatwotwo, CCS, \hcfivennt, and
672: \ceont\, as a function of the velocity dispersion measured from the
673: \ammoniaoneone\, emission (the \ceont\, data are from \citealp{Gus-pipe}). For
674: gas with \tk = 10~K the thermal velocity dispersions for these
675: molecules are listed in Table~\ref{line-info} and are marked as dotted
676: lines in Figure~\ref{linewidths}.
677:
678: These data reveal a strong correlation between the \ammoniatwotwo, \hcfivennt,
679: \ceont, and \ammoniaoneone\, velocity dispersions. In the case of
680: \ammoniatwotwo, the velocity dispersions are essentially
681: identical to those measured from the \ammoniaoneone\, emission. For
682: the CCS to \ammoniaoneone\, comparison, we see a larger range in the
683: velocity dispersion. We find for \hcfivennt\, the velocity
684: dispersions are typically broader than those measured from the
685: \ammoniaoneone\, emission. Because \hcfivennt\, is heavier than
686: the \ammonia\, molecule (and thus has a smaller thermal velocity
687: dispersion) the fact that the measured velocity dispersion from
688: \hcfivennt\, are typically broader than \ammonia, may indicate that
689: this emission is tracing a larger non-thermal component. With only
690: four detections it is difficult to determine this with certainty.
691:
692: We find the velocity dispersions measured from the \ammonia\, emission
693: are typically narrower than those measured from the \ceont: the \ceont\,
694: velocity dispersions are typically 1.4 times broader than \ammonia.
695: This is expected given the \ceont\, emission will trace all the gas
696: along the line of sight, in contrast to \ammonia, which traces only
697: the gas associated with the dense compact core. As a result, the
698: \ceont\, observations will over estimate the non-thermal
699: component of the velocity dispersion.
700:
701: Most cores have velocity dispersions which are about twice their
702: thermal velocity dispersions; the exception being those traced by
703: \hcfivennt\, and \ceont\, which show that \sigmav\, is $\sim$ 3 to 4 times
704: broader than thermal. This suggests that the \ammonia, CCS, \hcfivennt, and
705: \ceont\, emission is primarily tracing the non-thermal component of the
706: gas. We find that the measured velocity dispersions from the \ceont\,
707: and \hcfivennt\, are the comparable for those cores where emission was
708: detected in both transitions. Because carbon species are more
709: depleted in the densest inner core regions, it is likely that both these
710: species arise in the outer most core edges.
711:
712: We find three cores that have velocity dispersions comparable to the
713: thermal \ammonia\, dispersion (assuming gas at 10 K). Although these
714: cores have low signal to noise detections, it may be that they are
715: purely dominated by thermal processes. Using the unique measurement of
716: \tk\, for each of the 12 cores where the \ammoniaoneone\, and (2,2)
717: lines were sufficiently strong that the spectra could be modelled (the
718: cores listed in Table~\ref{fitspec}), we find that the majority of
719: these cores have measured velocity dispersions $\sim$ 1 to 2 times
720: broader than thermal.
721:
722: With this large sample of cores we can also investigate the
723: size-linewidth relation (e.g. \citealp{Larson81}). The data presented
724: here have the advantage of arising from cores within the same cloud
725: which makes comparisons between these properties independent of
726: distance effects. Figure~\ref{size-linewidth} shows the radius versus
727: linewidth plot for cores detected in both \ceont\, and
728: \ammoniaoneone. While we see the \ceont\, cores (marked with open
729: circles, from \citealp{Gus-pipe}) typically have broader linewidths
730: compared to the \ammonia\, cores (marked as filled circles), the
731: general trend between these two samples is similar: there appears to
732: be no correlation between the core linewidth and size. As will be
733: discussed in more detail in \cite{Lada-pipe}, the relatively flat
734: distribution of the data within Figure~\ref{size-linewidth} suggests,
735: therefore, that the cores are dominated by thermal rather than
736: turbulent motions. This is also seen toward dense cores in other star
737: forming regions (e.g. \citealp{Barranco98,Goodman98}).
738:
739: \subsection{Comparison to other star-forming regions}
740:
741: Past \ammonia\, surveys of star forming regions such as Taurus,
742: Ophiuchus, Perseus, Orion, and Cepheus, reveal that the measured
743: properties within these regions showed general trends based on their
744: star formation activity (see \citealp{Jijina99} for a review). For
745: instance, the regions dominated by dense young clusters (e.g. Orion
746: and Cepheus) tend to have higher measured \tk, linewidths, and core
747: masses. In contrast, Taurus and Ophiuchus have lower values for these
748: properties, however, these cores tend to have higher column
749: densities. Perseus, being intermediate in its star-formation activity,
750: also shows intermediate values for the derived \ammonia\, properties
751: (see \citealp{Jijina99} and referenecs therein).
752:
753: Many of these studies find strong \ammonia\, emission and a high
754: detection rate toward the dense cores. However, many of the \ammonia\,
755: cores within these surveys are associated with \iras\, sources; in the
756: case of Orion, \cite{Benson89} found \iras\, sources coincident with
757: 68\% of the \ammonia\, cores. Such a high fraction of cores with
758: obvious infrared emission suggests that star formation is already
759: occurring within these cores. Thus, the detection of strong \ammonia\,
760: emission in a starless core may imply that the star formation process
761: is imminent. This is consistent with chemical evolutionary models that
762: predict \ammonia\, to be most abundant in the later evolutionary
763: stages of core formation \citep{Suzuki92}.
764:
765: Our lower \ammonia\, detection rate, compared to other \ammonia\,
766: surveys of star-forming regions, is consistent with the fact that the
767: Pipe cores have lower densities and most show little signs of active
768: star formation. Indeed, the core associated with B59, the only site
769: within the Pipe Nebula where current star formation is known to be
770: occurring, is one of the few cores that shows very strong \ammonia\,
771: emission. Although the detected \ammonia\, emission was typically weak
772: toward our sample of cores, these cores do harbor the densest gas
773: within the Pipe Nebula. Moreover, those cores that show strong CCS
774: emission may be the very youngest within the region.
775:
776: Comparing our measured values for \tk, the intrinsic $\Delta$V, the
777: non-thermal $\Delta$V, radius, and column density
778: (Fig.~\ref{property-comparisons}) to those measured in other star
779: forming regions reveals that the cores in the Pipe Nebula are most
780: similar to cores within Perseus (see figures within
781: \citealp{Jijina99}). The obvious difference between the Perseus cores
782: and those within the Pipe Nebula is the derived column densities and
783: the star formation activity: the Pipe cores show lower column
784: densities and very little star formation.
785:
786: The lower \ammonia\, column densities derived for the Pipe cores could arise
787: because of differences in the intrinsic extinction, abundance of
788: \ammonia, or excitation conditions compared to other star-forming regions.
789: Because the cores within the Pipe Nebula span a range in peak
790: extinction and core mass similar to other star-forming regions, it
791: seems unlikey that the lower measured column densities arise simply
792: due to differences in their measured extinction. Moreover, the
793: measured column densities of the cores show an order of magnitude
794: greater range (10$^{13}$--10$^{15}$\,\cms) compared to the peak
795: extinction (5--20\,mags). A more likely scenario is that the
796: intrinsic abundance of \ammonia\, is low within many of these cores,
797: possibly due to their relative chemical youth. It may be, however,
798: that the excitation conditions with these cores are insufficient to
799: significantly populate the levels. It is possible that our derived
800: \ammonia\, column densities are under estimates and that \ammonia\, is more
801: abundant within the cores, but simply not excited to the levels
802: required for strong detections. This is consistent with the relatively
803: low mean densities of the cores ($\sim$ 7 $\times$ 10$^{3}$\,\cmc)
804: compared to that necessary to sufficiently populate the observed
805: levels ($\sim$ 10$^{4}$\,\cmc). Detailed radiative transfer modelling
806: is required to distinguish between these scenarios.
807:
808: If we restrict our sample of cores to those with similar column
809: densities as measured toward other star-forming regions
810: (i.e. N(\ammonia) $>$ 10$^{14}$\,\cmc), we find that the cores within
811: the Pipe share similar properties with cores in both Perseus and
812: Ophiuchus. Given that only 6 cores were detected in the Pipe with such
813: high column densities, it is difficult to determine the distribution
814: in their properties with any certainty. Nevertheless, it appears that
815: the cores in the Pipe Nebula are similar to those found in other
816: low-mass star forming regions. The most noticable difference is that
817: the majority of Pipe cores tend to show weaker \ammonia\, emission and
818: have little star-formation activity.
819:
820:
821: \subsection{Core evolution as traced by column density}
822:
823: The chemical characteristics within dense cold cores can reveal their
824: evolutionary stage. Because they have different production
825: chemistries, the column densities of \ammonia, CCS,
826: \hcfivennt, and \ceont\, can reveal the chemical characteristics in
827: dense cores (e.g. \citealp{Suzuki92}). For instance, models for core
828: evolution \citep{Suzuki92} predict an anti-correlation between the
829: abundance of CCS and \ammonia; with CCS more abundant in the early
830: evolutionary phases.
831:
832: Because of the evolutionary effects of depletion and the differences
833: in the molecular distributions within the cores, a single measurement
834: of the column density within the core can only provide limited
835: information on the chemical structure and evolutionary stage.
836: Nevertheless, we find that the comparisons between the column
837: densities of the various species observed within the Pipe cores are
838: similar to what is seen toward dense cores in Taurus and Ophiuchus
839: \citep{Benson89,Suzuki92}. In particular, we find that: (1) the
840: N(\ammonia) and N(CCS) show no clear correlation, which is consistent
841: with differences in the densities of the cores
842: (0.5--2.5$\times$10$^{4}$\,\cmc); (2) the N(\ceont) is essentially
843: constant for all values of the N(CCS), which implies that the CCS is a
844: more reliable tracer of denser gas; and (3) that N(CCS) and
845: N(\hcfivennt) are correlated, which is expected given that these
846: carbon-chain molecules are produced under the same chemical conditions
847: within a core \citep{Fuente90,Suzuki92}.
848:
849: We also find high abundance ratios of [\ammonia] compared to [\ceont]
850: for the densest cores, confirming that \ammonia\, is a better tracer
851: of dense gas than \ceont\, and that \ceont\, traces the outer core
852: envelope and is depleted in the core centers. Because the chemical
853: abundances trace the evolutionary age of the cores, we can use the
854: fractional abundances of these molecules to estimate the evolutionary
855: ages of the cores. Using the model calculations of \cite{Suzuki92},
856: we estimate the cores are at an evolutionary age of $\sim$ 6 $\times$
857: 10$^{5}$ years.
858:
859: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
860: \section{Conclusions}
861:
862: Using the 100 m GBT we have conducted an \ammoniaoneone,
863: \ammoniatwotwo, \ccs, and \hcfiven\, survey toward a sample of 46
864: cores within the Pipe Nebula. These cores were identified via their
865: high extinction and appear to be dense starless cores which likely
866: represent the initial conditions of star formation. In total, we
867: detect \ammoniaoneone\, emission in 29 cores ($\sim$~63\%), \ammoniatwotwo\,
868: emission in 10 cores ($\sim$~22\%), CCS emission in 13 cores
869: ($\sim$~28\%), and \hcfivennt\, emission in 4 cores ($\sim$~9\%). Not
870: surprisingly, the detection rate is higher toward those cores with
871: higher peak \av\, and higher mass; in the case of \ammoniaoneone\, we
872: detected emission toward all cores with a peak \av $>$ 15 magnitudes
873: and with masses~$>$~11\,\Msun.
874:
875: We find that the cores are associated with dense ($>$10$^{4}$\,\cmc)
876: gas. The \ammonia\, emission revealed n(\hh) typically three times
877: greater than the mean densities measured from the extinction
878: maps. This is expected given that the cores likely have inwardly
879: increasing density gradients; the \ammonia\, is tracing the densest
880: centers of the cores.
881:
882: Using a forward-fitting modelling routine, we estimated the physical
883: properties of the gas (\tk, $\tau$, and \tex) for 12 cores. We find
884: that \tk\, ranges from 9.5 to 17 K, with a median value of $\sim$
885: 12 $\pm$ 2~K. Cores with higher mass tend to have lower \tk\, values
886: (10 $\pm$ 1 K) compared to lower-mass cores (13 $\pm$ 3 K).
887:
888: The measured one dimensional velocity dispersion, \sigmav, for the
889: cores show that the lines are narrow, with several cores having
890: dispersions close to thermal (for a 10 K gas). A comparison between
891: the linewidths measured for the cores from \ceont\, and \ammonia,
892: reveal that while the general trends are the same, i.e.\, neither
893: dataset show a size-linewidth relation, the \ammonia\, linewidths
894: are systematically lower than those measured from the \ceont\,
895: emission. This arises because the \ceont\, traces all emission along
896: the line of sight, whereas \ammonia\, traces only the densest gas
897: associated with the core.
898:
899: The derived properties of the Pipe cores are similar to dense cores
900: within other star-forming regions, i.e.\,Perseus, Taurus,
901: Ophiuchus. The most obvious difference is that the cores within the
902: Pipe Nebula typically have weaker \ammonia\, emission and most show no
903: evidence for current star formation. The weak \ammonia\, emission may arise due
904: to the low abundance of \ammonia\, because the cores are chemically
905: young or because the excitation conditions (densities) within the gas
906: are insufficient to excite the observed transitions. Detailed
907: radiative transfer models are needed to resolve this issue.
908:
909: Although we have a limited number of cores, we estimate their
910: evolutionary ages to be $\sim$ 6 $\times$ 10$^{5}$ years. Thus, the
911: cores within the Pipe Nebula represent an excellent sample of dense
912: cores in which to study the initial conditions of star-formation and
913: the earliest stages of core formation and evolution.
914:
915:
916: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
917: \acknowledgments
918:
919: We are extremely grateful to Erik Rosolowsky for the use of the
920: \ammonia\, forward-fitting routine ahead of publication and for the many
921: informative discussions. We also thank the support staff at the GBT,
922: in particular Frank Ghigo, for help will the observing setup and data
923: reduction. We acknowledge funding support through NASA Origins grant
924: NAG-13041.
925:
926: \appendix
927: \section{Appendix}
928:
929: The 2MASS extinction map and \ammoniaoneone, \ammoniatwotwo, \ccs, and \hcfiven\,
930: spectra for each core are shown in Figs~\ref{appendix-fig-12a} to
931: 55. Labelled in the top left corner of each
932: extinction image is the core number based on the catalog of
933: \cite{Alves07}. In all cases, the extinction images are 0\fdg25
934: $\times$ 0\fdg25 and are centered on the peak extinction for the core
935: (as determined from these maps). The grey scale is from an \av\, of 0
936: to 20 magnitudes. The contour levels are 1.2, 4, 6.8, 9.6, and 12.4
937: magnitudes (3$\sigma$ in steps of 7$\sigma$). The final image in the
938: appendix, Figure~56, summarises the details of the
939: extinction images and includes the sizes of the 2MASS extinction image
940: angular resolution and the GBT beam.
941:
942: Each spectrum is centered on the \vlsr\, of the core (see
943: Tables~\ref{line-parameters-1} and \ref{line-parameters-2}). The
944: \ammoniaoneone\, spectra extend $\pm$ 25 \kms\, while the remaining
945: three spectra extend $\pm$ 8 \,\kms\, around the core's \vlsr. The
946: temperature scale is \tastar.
947:
948: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
949: % References
950:
951: \begin{thebibliography}{27}
952: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
953:
954: \bibitem[{Aguti {et~al.}(2007)Aguti, Lada, Bergin, Alves, \&
955: Birkinshaw}]{Aguti07}
956: Aguti, E., Lada, C.~J., Bergin, E.~A., Alves, J.~F., \& Birkinshaw, M. 2007,
957: \apj, submitted
958:
959: \bibitem[{{Alves} {et~al.}(2007){Alves}, {Lombardi}, \& {Lada}}]{Alves07}
960: {Alves}, J., {Lombardi}, M., \& {Lada}, C.~J. 2007, \aap, 462, L17
961:
962: \bibitem[{{Barranco} \& {Goodman}(1998)}]{Barranco98}
963: {Barranco}, J.~A. \& {Goodman}, A.~A. 1998, \apj, 504, 207
964:
965: \bibitem[{{Benson} \& {Myers}(1983)}]{Benson83}
966: {Benson}, P.~J. \& {Myers}, P.~C. 1983, \apj, 270, 589
967:
968: \bibitem[{{Benson} \& {Myers}(1989)}]{Benson89}
969: ---. 1989, \apjs, 71, 89
970:
971: \bibitem[{{Bergin} {et~al.}(2002){Bergin}, {Alves}, {Huard}, \&
972: {Lada}}]{Bergin02}
973: {Bergin}, E.~A., {Alves}, J., {Huard}, T., \& {Lada}, C.~J. 2002, \apjl, 570,
974: L101
975:
976: \bibitem[{{Brooke} {et~al.}(2007){Brooke}, {Huard}, {Bourke}, {Boogert},
977: {Allen}, {Blake}, {Evans}, {Harvey}, {Koerner}, {Mundy}, {Myers}, {Padgett},
978: {Sargent}, {Stapelfeldt}, {van Dishoeck}, {Chapman}, {Cieza}, {Dunham},
979: {Lai}, {Porras}, {Spiesman}, {Teuben}, {Young}, {Wahhaj}, \&
980: {Lee}}]{Brooke07}
981: {Brooke}, T.~Y., et al., \apj, 655, 364
982:
983: \bibitem[{{Danby} {et~al.}(1988){Danby}, {Flower}, {Valiron}, {Schilke}, \&
984: {Walmsley}}]{Danby88}
985: {Danby}, G., {Flower}, D.~R., {Valiron}, P., {Schilke}, P., \& {Walmsley},
986: C.~M. 1988, \mnras, 235, 229
987:
988: \bibitem[{{Fuente} {et~al.}(1990){Fuente}, {Cernicharo}, {Barcia}, \&
989: {Gomez-Gonzalez}}]{Fuente90}
990: {Fuente}, A., {Cernicharo}, J., {Barcia}, A., \& {Gomez-Gonzalez}, J. 1990,
991: \aap, 231, 151
992:
993: \bibitem[{{Goodman} {et~al.}(1998){Goodman}, {Barranco}, {Wilner}, \&
994: {Heyer}}]{Goodman98}
995: {Goodman}, A.~A., {Barranco}, J.~A., {Wilner}, D.~J., \& {Heyer}, M.~H. 1998,
996: \apj, 504, 223
997:
998: \bibitem[{{Hirota} {et~al.}(2002){Hirota}, {Ito}, \& {Yamamoto}}]{Hirota02}
999: {Hirota}, T., {Ito}, T., \& {Yamamoto}, S. 2002, \apj, 565, 359
1000:
1001: \bibitem[{{Ho} \& {Townes}(1983)}]{Ho83}
1002: {Ho}, P.~T.~P. \& {Townes}, C.~H. 1983, \araa, 21, 239
1003:
1004: \bibitem[{{Jijina} {et~al.}(1999){Jijina}, {Myers}, \& {Adams}}]{Jijina99}
1005: {Jijina}, J., {Myers}, P.~C., \& {Adams}, F.~C. 1999, \apjs, 125, 161
1006:
1007: \bibitem[{{Kuiper} {et~al.}(1996){Kuiper}, {Langer}, \& {Velusamy}}]{Kuiper96}
1008: {Kuiper}, T.~B.~H., {Langer}, W.~D., \& {Velusamy}, T. 1996, \apj, 468, 761
1009:
1010: \bibitem[{{Lada} {et~al.}(2007){Lada}, {Muench}, {Rathborne}, {Alves}, \&
1011: {Lombardi}}]{Lada-pipe}
1012: {Lada}, C.~J., {Muench}, A.~A., {Rathborne}, J.~M., {Alves}, J.~F., \&
1013: {Lombardi}, M. 2007, \apj, submitted
1014:
1015: \bibitem[{{Larson}(1981)}]{Larson81}
1016: {Larson}, R.~B. 1981, \mnras, 194, 809
1017:
1018: \bibitem[{{Lombardi} {et~al.}(2006){Lombardi}, {Alves}, \& {Lada}}]{Lombardi06}
1019: {Lombardi}, M., {Alves}, J., \& {Lada}, C.~J. 2006, \aap, 454, 781
1020:
1021: \bibitem[Martin et al.(1982)]{Martin82} Martin, R.~N., Ruf, K.,
1022: \& Ho, P.~T.~P.\ 1982, \nat, 296, 632
1023:
1024: \bibitem[{{Muench} {et~al.}(2007){Muench}, {Lada}, {Rathborne}, {Alves}, \&
1025: {Lombardi}}]{Gus-pipe}
1026: {Muench}, A.~A., {Lada}, C.~J., {Rathborne}, J.~M., {Alves}, J.~F., \&
1027: {Lombardi}, M. 2007, \apj, submitted
1028:
1029: \bibitem[{{Myers} \& {Benson}(1983)}]{Myers83}
1030: {Myers}, P.~C. \& {Benson}, P.~J. 1983, \apj, 266, 309
1031:
1032: \bibitem[{{Olano} {et~al.}(1988){Olano}, {Walmsley}, \& {Wilson}}]{Olano88}
1033: {Olano}, C.~A., {Walmsley}, C.~M., \& {Wilson}, T.~L. 1988, \aap, 196, 194
1034:
1035: \bibitem[{{Onishi} {et~al.}(1999){Onishi}, {Kawamura}, {Abe}, {Yamaguchi},
1036: {Saito}, {Moriguchi}, {Mizuno}, {Ogawa}, \& {Fukui}}]{Onishi99}
1037: {Onishi}, T., {Kawamura}, A., {Abe}, R., {Yamaguchi}, N., {Saito}, H.,
1038: {Moriguchi}, Y., {Mizuno}, A., {Ogawa}, H., \& {Fukui}, Y. 1999, \pasj, 51,
1039: 871
1040:
1041: \bibitem[{{Ott} {et~al.}(1994){Ott}, {Witzel}, {Quirrenbach}, {Krichbaum},
1042: {Standke}, {Schalinski}, \& {Hummel}}]{Ott94}
1043: {Ott}, M., {Witzel}, A., {Quirrenbach}, A., {Krichbaum}, T.~P., {Standke},
1044: K.~J., {Schalinski}, C.~J., \& {Hummel}, C.~A. 1994, \aap, 284, 331
1045:
1046: \bibitem[{Roman-Zuniga(2007)}]{Carlos07}
1047: Roman-Zuniga, C. 2007, \apj, in prep.
1048:
1049: \bibitem[{Rosolowsky {et~al.}(2007)Rosolowsky, Pineda, Foster, Borkin,
1050: Kauffmann, Caselli, Myers, \& Goodman}]{Rosolowsky07}
1051: Rosolowsky, E., Pineda, J., Foster, J., Borkin, M., Kauffmann, J., Caselli, P.,
1052: Myers, P., \& Goodman, A. 2007, \apjs, in prep.
1053:
1054: \bibitem[{{Suzuki} {et~al.}(1992){Suzuki}, {Yamamoto}, {Ohishi}, {Kaifu},
1055: {Ishikawa}, {Hirahara}, \& {Takano}}]{Suzuki92}
1056: {Suzuki}, H., {Yamamoto}, S., {Ohishi}, M., {Kaifu}, N., {Ishikawa}, S.-I.,
1057: {Hirahara}, Y., \& {Takano}, S. 1992, \apj, 392, 551
1058:
1059: \bibitem[{{Swift} {et~al.}(2005){Swift}, {Welch}, \& {Di Francesco}}]{Swift05}
1060: {Swift}, J.~J., {Welch}, W.~J., \& {Di Francesco}, J. 2005, \apj, 620, 823
1061:
1062: \bibitem[{{Velusamy} {et~al.}(1995){Velusamy}, {Kuiper}, \&
1063: {Langer}}]{Velusamy95}
1064: {Velusamy}, T., {Kuiper}, T.~B.~H., \& {Langer}, W.~D. 1995, \apjl, 451, L75+
1065:
1066: \end{thebibliography}
1067:
1068:
1069:
1070: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1071: % Tables
1072: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1073:
1074: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1075:
1076: \begin{table}
1077: \begin{center}
1078: \caption{\label{line-info}Molecular transition frequencies and constants.}
1079: \begin{tabular}{llccccc}
1080: \tableline \tableline
1081: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Molecule} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Transition} & $\nu$ & $\mu$ & E$_{u}$ & B & Thermal \sigmav \tablenotemark{a} \\
1082: & & (GHz) & (D) & (cm$^{-1}$) & (GHz) & (\kms)\\
1083: \tableline
1084: \ammonia\, & (J,K) = (1,1) & 23.694 & 1.47 & 16.25 & 298.117 & 0.07\\
1085: \ammonia\, & (J,K) = (2,2) & 22.733 & 1.47 & 45.08 & 298.117 & 0.07 \\
1086: CCS & J$_{N}$ = 2$_{1}$--1$_{0}$ & 22.344 & 2.81 & 1.12 & 6.478 & 0.04\\
1087: \hcfivennt & J = 9--8 & 23.963 & 4.33 & 4.00 & 1.331 & 0.03\\
1088: \ceont\,\tablenotemark{b} & J = 1--0 & 109.782 & 0.11 & 3.66 & 54.890 & 0.05 \\
1089: \tableline
1090: \end{tabular}
1091: \tablenotetext{a}{Assuming a gas temperature of 10 K.}
1092: \tablenotetext{b}{These data are from \cite{Gus-pipe}. The parameters are included here for completeness
1093: when discussing the calculation of column density.}
1094: %\tablerefs{need to add in references here.....}
1095: \end{center}
1096: \end{table}
1097:
1098: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1099:
1100: \begin{table}
1101: {\scriptsize{
1102: \begin{center}
1103: \caption{\label{table1}Observing parameters}
1104: \begin{tabular}{rccccccccccc}
1105: \tableline \tableline
1106: Core\tablenotemark{a} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Coordinates} & Peak & Mass & log[n(\hh)]\tablenotemark{b} & Date & Int. & El & \tsys & 1$\sigma$ rms \\
1107: & RA & Dec & \av & & & & time & & & \\
1108: & (J2000) & (J2000) & (mag) & (\Msun) & (cm$^{-3}$) & & (mins) & (\degree) & (K) & (K) \\
1109: \tableline
1110: %\input{Pipe-GBT-tab1_sort.txt}
1111: 6* & 17:10:31.57 & $-$27:25:51.59 & 13.6 & 3.1 & 3.9 & 2006-10-18 & 22 & 22 & 96 & 0.04 \\ %Pipe-12a
1112: 7* & 17:11:36.95 & $-$27:33:27.08 & 12.1 & 4.7 & 3.8 & 2006-11-05 & 18 & 17 & 77 & 0.04 \\ %Pipe-17a
1113: 8* & 17:12:12.59 & $-$27:37:20.94 & 12.2 & 3.3 & 3.9 & 2006-10-18 & 18 & 19 & 102 & 0.06 \\ %Pipe-15a
1114: 11* & 17:10:51.00 & $-$27:22:59.54 & 11.5 & 3.4 & 3.8 & 2006-11-05 & 18 & 22 & 69 & 0.03 \\ %Pipe-22a
1115: 12* & 17:11:20.49 & $-$27:26:28.98 & 18.0 & 20.4 & 3.8 & 2006-10-13 & 5 & 16 & 60 & 0.06 \\ %Pipe-B59c-2
1116: 13\,\,& 17:10:49.69 & $-$27:13:25.01 & 5.3 & 0.5 & 3.9 & 2006-10-29 & 18 & 19 & 77 & 0.04 \\ %Pipe-131
1117: 14* & 17:12:34.03 & $-$27:21:16.24 & 18.5 & 9.7 & 3.9 & 2006-10-13 & 18 & 23 & 52 & 0.02 \\ %Pipe-5
1118: 15* & 17:12:53.38 & $-$27:23:23.98 & 10.4 & 2.6 & 3.8 & 2006-11-05 & 18 & 23 & 70 & 0.03 \\ %Pipe-33a
1119: 17\,\,& 17:14:06.81 & $-$27:28:25.97 & 5.3 & 0.7 & 3.9 & 2006-10-29 & 69 & 20 & 48 & 0.01 \\ %Pipe-129
1120: 20* & 17:15:11.16 & $-$27:35:06.00 & 9.6 & 2.3 & 3.8 & 2006-11-05 & 18 & 21 & 74 & 0.04 \\ %Pipe-44a
1121: 22* & 17:15:48.00 & $-$27:29:32.86 & 7.7 & 1.0 & 3.9 & 2007-02-08 & 18 & 16 & 50 & 0.02 \\ %Pipe-73a
1122: 23* & 17:16:07.19 & $-$27:31:11.97 & 8.4 & 1.9 & 3.8 & 2006-10-25 & 74 & 19 & 75 & 0.02 \\ %Pipe-58a
1123: 25* & 17:16:23.68 & $-$27:10:11.98 & 6.6 & 1.1 & 3.8 & 2007-02-08 & 18 & 18 & 47 & 0.02 \\ %Pipe-104a
1124: 27* & 17:17:07.04 & $-$27:01:48.05 & 6.6 & 3.1 & 3.7 & 2006-11-05 & 18 & 24 & 68 & 0.03 \\ %Pipe-102a
1125: 30\,\,& 17:21:01.87 & $-$27:13:42.65 & 5.3 & 0.4 & 3.8 & 2006-10-29 & 18 & 23 & 68 & 0.03 \\ %Pipe-128
1126: 31* & 17:18:32.07 & $-$26:49:33.57 & 6.6 & 1.9 & 3.7 & 2006-11-05 & 18 & 21 & 77 & 0.04 \\ %Pipe-101a
1127: 33* & 17:19:35.00 & $-$26:55:47.96 & 10.7 & 4.3 & 3.8 & 2006-11-05 & 18 & 21 & 72 & 0.04 \\ %Pipe-31a
1128: 34* & 17:20:18.86 & $-$26:59:18.63 & 8.4 & 2.7 & 3.8 & 2006-11-05 & 18 & 24 & 68 & 0.03 \\ %Pipe-61a
1129: 36\,\,& 17:19:29.25 & $-$26:46:18.90 & 6.6 & 1.7 & 3.8 & 2006-10-29 & 18 & 24 & 66 & 0.03 \\ %Pipe-105
1130: 37* & 17:19:32.21 & $-$26:43:30.06 & 8.8 & 2.0 & 4.1 & 2006-10-24 & 18 & 16 & 76 & 0.04 \\ %Pipe-56a
1131: 40* & 17:21:16.43 & $-$26:52:56.68 & 23.7 & 9.2 & 3.8 & 2006-10-13 & 5 & 24 & 50 & 0.05 \\ %Pipe-1
1132: 41* & 17:22:29.10 & $-$27:04:03.15 & 9.8 & 1.1 & 4.0 & 2006-11-26 & 18 & 20 & 75 & 0.04 \\ %Pipe-40a
1133: 42* & 17:22:42.12 & $-$27:05:00.58 & 21.6 & 2.8 & 4.1 & 2006-10-13 & 18 & 24 & 50 & 0.02 \\ %Pipe-3
1134: 47* & 17:27:29.55 & $-$26:59:05.97 & 10.3 & 1.4 & 3.8 & 2006-10-24 & 18 & 21 & 66 & 0.03 \\ %Pipe-34a
1135: 48* & 17:25:59.04 & $-$26:44:11.78 & 11.1 & 4.2 & 3.7 & 2006-10-18 & 18 & 15 & 120 & 0.07 \\ %Pipe-27a
1136: 51* & 17:27:24.00 & $-$26:44:23.99 & 8.6 & 1.2 & 3.8 & 2006-10-24 & 18 & 14 & 90 & 0.04 \\ %Pipe-57a
1137: 56* & 17:28:10.86 & $-$26:24:01.16 & 11.5 & 5.2 & 3.8 & 2006-10-18 & 18 & 18 & 107 & 0.06 \\ %Pipe-21a
1138: 61* & 17:28:38.31 & $-$26:16:55.20 & 8.9 & 2.6 & 3.8 & 2006-11-26 & 18 & 17 & 84 & 0.04 \\ %Pipe-52a
1139: 62* & 17:28:47.94 & $-$26:18:27.05 & 9.7 & 2.3 & 3.7 & 2006-11-05 & 18 & 24 & 68 & 0.03 \\ %Pipe-42a
1140: 65* & 17:31:20.65 & $-$26:30:36.05 & 11.6 & 0.7 & 4.1 & 2006-10-18 & 18 & 20 & 98 & 0.05 \\ %Pipe-20a
1141: 66* & 17:31:15.79 & $-$26:29:06.03 & 10.9 & 1.0 & 4.0 & 2006-11-05 & 18 & 19 & 84 & 0.04 \\ %Pipe-29a
1142: 70* & 17:29:35.59 & $-$25:54:23.39 & 11.3 & 1.1 & 4.0 & 2006-11-05 & 18 & 17 & 91 & 0.05 \\ %Pipe-24a
1143: 74* & 17:32:35.28 & $-$26:15:54.01 & 12.4 & 3.0 & 3.7 & 2006-11-05 & 18 & 19 & 75 & 0.04 \\ %Pipe-14a
1144: 87* & 17:34:11.47 & $-$25:50:15.01 & 21.0 & 10.3 & 3.9 & 2006-10-14 & 5 & 13 & 67 & 0.07 \\ %Pipe-2a
1145: 89* & 17:33:26.56 & $-$25:40:12.01 & 13.7 & 1.4 & 4.0 & 2006-11-05 & 74 & 25 & 70 & 0.02 \\ %Pipe-11a
1146: 91* & 17:32:15.63 & $-$25:25:02.97 & 11.4 & 1.1 & 4.1 & 2006-11-05 & 18 & 15 & 99 & 0.05 \\ %Pipe-23a
1147: 92* & 17:34:06.15 & $-$25:40:03.02 & 15.1 & 1.6 & 4.0 & 2006-10-18 & 18 & 25 & 87 & 0.04 \\ %Pipe-8a
1148: 93* & 17:34:45.21 & $-$25:46:57.09 & 16.9 & 3.5 & 3.9 & 2007-02-08 & 18 & 23 & 43 & 0.02 \\ %Pipe-7a
1149: 97* & 17:33:30.19 & $-$25:31:11.97 & 14.6 & 5.9 & 3.6 & 2006-11-05 & 18 & 14 & 83 & 0.04 \\ %Pipe-9a
1150: 99* & 17:25:06.50 & $-$24:12:48.37 & 7.3 & 2.2 & 4.0 & 2006-11-05 & 18 & 22 & 76 & 0.04 \\ %Pipe-85a
1151: 101* & 17:22:43.12 & $-$23:50:08.51 & 12.8 & 1.9 & 4.1 & 2006-11-26 & 18 & 21 & 74 & 0.04 \\ %Pipe-13a
1152: 102* & 17:34:17.10 & $-$25:34:12.02 & 19.2 & 6.7 & 3.6 & 2007-02-08 & 18 & 25 & 43 & 0.02 \\ %Pipe-4a
1153: 108\,\,& 17:31:34.13 & $-$24:58:55.22 & 7.4 & 0.8 & 3.8 & 2006-10-25 & 18 & 19 & 68 & 0.03 \\ %Pipe-83
1154: 109* & 17:35:48.49 & $-$25:33:05.76 & 18.3 & 3.6 & 3.9 & 2006-10-13 & 5 & 17 & 58 & 0.07 \\ %Pipe-6
1155: 113* & 17:23:35.71 & $-$23:41:05.63 & 9.2 & 2.4 & 4.0 & 2006-10-24 & 18 & 21 & 68 & 0.03 \\ %Pipe-49a
1156: 132\,\,& 17:37:52.80 & $-$25:14:57.51 & 11.2 & 4.7 & 3.7 & 2006-11-26 & 18 & 17 & 83 & 0.05 \\ %Pipe-26
1157: \tableline
1158: \end{tabular}
1159: \tablenotetext{a}{Asterisks denote cores for which the position and value of the peak \av\, was determined from the higher-angular resolution images obtained with the NTT \citep{Carlos07}. The masses for these cores were, however, determined from the 2MASS background subtracted extinction maps.}
1160: \tablenotetext{b}{Calculated from the visual extinction, assuming a spherical volume with radius equal to half the measured size of the core (as listed in \citealp{Alves07}).}
1161: \end{center}}}
1162: \end{table}
1163:
1164: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1165:
1166: \begin{table}
1167: {\scriptsize{
1168: \begin{center}
1169: \caption{\label{line-parameters-1}Observed line parameters of \ammoniaoneone\, and \ammoniatwotwo.}
1170: \begin{tabular}{rcccccccccc}
1171: \tableline \tableline
1172: Core\tablenotemark{a} & & \multicolumn{4}{c}{\ammoniaoneone} & & \multicolumn{4}{c}{\ammoniatwotwo} \\
1173: \cline{2-6} \cline{8-11}
1174: & & \tastar\, & \vlsr & \sigmav & I & & \tastar\, & \vlsr & \sigmav & I \\
1175: & & (K) & (\kms) & (\kms) & (\Kkms) & & (K) & (\kms) & (\kms) & (\Kkms) \\
1176: \tableline
1177: %\input{Pipe-GBT-tab2a_sort.txt}
1178: 6\,\, & & 0.41 & 3.43 & 0.09 & 0.08 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-12a
1179: 7\,\, & & 0.12 & 3.83 & 0.08 & 0.02 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-17a
1180: 8\,\, & & 0.17 & 3.47 & 0.11 & 0.05 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-15a
1181: 11\,\, & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-22a
1182: 12* & & 4.87 & 3.20 & 0.15 & 1.72 & & 1.37 & 3.20 & 0.18 & 0.58 \\ %Pipe-B59c-2
1183: 13\,\, & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-131
1184: 14* & & 0.42 & 3.47 & 0.14 & 0.14 & & 0.09 & 3.52 & 0.11 & 0.02 \\ %Pipe-5
1185: 15\,\, & & 0.17 & 3.60 & 0.18 & 0.07 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-33a
1186: 17* & & 0.20 & 3.38 & 0.25 & 0.12 & & 0.06 & 3.41 & 0.27 & 0.04 \\ %Pipe-129
1187: 20* & & 0.54 & 3.54 & 0.17 & 0.22 & & 0.15 & 3.55 & 0.19 & 0.07 \\ %Pipe-44a
1188: 22\,\, & & 0.12 & 3.72 & 0.12 & 0.03 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-73a
1189: 23\,\, & & 0.09 & 3.58 & 0.07 & 0.02 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-58a
1190: 25\,\, & & 0.13 & 3.65 & 0.20 & 0.06 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-104a
1191: 27\,\, & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-102a
1192: 30\,\, & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-128
1193: 31\,\, & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-101a
1194: 33\,\, & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-31a
1195: 34\,\, & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-61a
1196: 36\,\, & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-105
1197: 37\,\, & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-56a
1198: 40* & & 0.98 & 3.30 & 0.10 & 0.23 & & 0.14 & 3.34 & 0.12 & 0.04 \\ %Pipe-1
1199: 41* & & 0.39 & 3.69 & 0.12 & 0.11 & & 0.11 & 3.72 & 0.14 & 0.04 \\ %Pipe-40a
1200: 42* & & 0.43 & 3.75 & 0.11 & 0.11 & & 0.10 & 3.87 & 0.09 & 0.02 \\ %Pipe-3
1201: 47* & & 0.22 & 2.81 & 0.14 & 0.07 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-34a
1202: 48\,\, & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-27a
1203: 51\,\, & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-57a
1204: 56\,\, & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-21a
1205: 61\,\, & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-52a
1206: 62\,\, & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-42a
1207: 65\,\, & & 0.22 & 4.98 & 0.26 & 0.13 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-20a
1208: 66\,\, & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-29a
1209: 70\,\, & & 0.14 & 3.82 & 0.23 & 0.08 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-24a
1210: 74\,\, & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-14a
1211: 87* & & 2.28 & 4.47 & 0.14 & 0.75 & & 0.29 & 4.46 & 0.16 & 0.11 \\ %Pipe-2a
1212: 89\,\, & & 0.09 & 4.45 & 0.10 & 0.02 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-11a
1213: 91\,\, & & 0.17 & 4.21 & 0.07 & 0.03 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-23a
1214: 92\,\, & & 0.17 & 5.10 & 0.19 & 0.08 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-8a
1215: 93\,\, & & 0.43 & 5.17 & 0.17 & 0.18 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-7a
1216: 97\,\, & & 0.39 & 3.81 & 0.21 & 0.19 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-9a
1217: 99\,\, & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-85a
1218: 101* & & 1.06 & 3.31 & 0.09 & 0.22 & & 0.22 & 3.33 & 0.09 & 0.05 \\ %Pipe-13a
1219: 102\,\, & & 0.14 & 4.87 & 0.24 & 0.08 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-4a
1220: 108* & & 0.31 & 3.22 & 0.16 & 0.12 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-83
1221: 109* & & 3.90 & 5.75 & 0.08 & 0.73 & & 1.22 & 5.73 & 0.08 & 0.22 \\ %Pipe-6
1222: 113\,\, & & 0.16 & 4.60 & 0.06 & 0.02 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-49a
1223: 132\,\, & & 0.20 & 3.91 & 0.18 & 0.08 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-26
1224: \tableline
1225: \end{tabular}
1226: \tablenotetext{a}{Asterisks mark cores for which the \ammoniaoneone\, \vlsr\, and \sigmav\, were determined via the forward-fitting routine.}
1227: \end{center}}}
1228: \end{table}
1229:
1230: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1231:
1232: \begin{table}
1233: {\scriptsize{
1234: \begin{center}
1235: \caption{\label{line-parameters-2}Observed line parameters of \ccs\, and \hcfiven.}
1236: \begin{tabular}{rcccccccccc}
1237: \tableline \tableline
1238: Core & & \multicolumn{4}{c}{CCS} & &\multicolumn{4}{c}{\hcfivennt} \\
1239: \cline{2-6} \cline{8-11}
1240: & &\tastar\, & \vlsr & \sigmav & I & &\tastar\, & \vlsr & \sigmav & I \\
1241: & & (K) & (\kms) & (\kms) & (\Kkms) & & (K) &(\kms) & (\kms) & (\Kkms) \\
1242: \tableline
1243: %\input{Pipe-GBT-tab2b_sort.txt}
1244: 6 & & 0.23 & 3.50 & 0.07 & 0.03 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-12a
1245: 7 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-17a
1246: 8 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-15a
1247: 11 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-22a
1248: 12 & & 0.35 & 3.47 & 0.19 & 0.15 & & 0.58 & 3.44 & 0.21 & 0.29 \\ %Pipe-B59c-2
1249: 13 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-131
1250: 14 & & 0.14 & 3.45 & 0.09 & 0.03 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-5
1251: 15 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-33a
1252: 17 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-129
1253: 20 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-44a
1254: 22 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-73a
1255: 23 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-58a
1256: 25 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-104a
1257: 27 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-102a
1258: 30 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-128
1259: 31 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-101a
1260: 33 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-31a
1261: 34 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-61a
1262: 36 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-105
1263: 37 & & 0.14 & 3.32 & 0.08 & 0.03 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-56a
1264: 40 & & 0.78 & 3.35 & 0.06 & 0.11 & & 0.30 & 3.34 & 0.14 & 0.10 \\ %Pipe-1
1265: 41 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-40a
1266: 42 & & 0.07 & 3.86 & 0.11 & 0.02 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-3
1267: 47 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-34a
1268: 48 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-27a
1269: 51 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-57a
1270: 56 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-21a
1271: 61 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-52a
1272: 62 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-42a
1273: 65 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-20a
1274: 66 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-29a
1275: 70 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-24a
1276: 74 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-14a
1277: 87 & & 0.23 & 4.50 & 0.25 & 0.14 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-2a
1278: 89 & & 0.06 & 4.87 & 0.26 & 0.04 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-11a
1279: 91 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-23a
1280: 92 & & 0.15 & 5.04 & 0.12 & 0.04 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-8a
1281: 93 & & 0.16 & 5.26 & 0.17 & 0.06 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-7a
1282: 97 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-9a
1283: 99 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-85a
1284: 101 & & 0.55 & 3.37 & 0.07 & 0.09 & & 0.44 & 3.36 & 0.15 & 0.15 \\ %Pipe-13a
1285: 102 & & 0.35 & 4.84 & 0.08 & 0.07 & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-4a
1286: 108 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-83
1287: 109 & & 0.44 & 5.80 & 0.07 & 0.07 & & 0.27 & 5.76 & 0.12 & 0.08 \\ %Pipe-6
1288: 113 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-49a
1289: 132 & & -- & -- & -- & -- & & -- & -- & -- & -- \\ %Pipe-26
1290: \tableline
1291: \end{tabular}
1292: \end{center}}}
1293: \end{table}
1294:
1295: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1296:
1297: \begin{table}
1298: \begin{center}
1299: \caption{\label{fitspec}Derived parameters from the \ammonia\, lines.}
1300: \begin{tabular}{crrrr}
1301: \tableline \tableline
1302: Core & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\tk} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\tau$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\tex} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\tex $\tau$} \\%& $\Delta$V$_{th}$ & $\Delta$V & ratio & $\Delta_{non-th}$ \\
1303: & \multicolumn{1}{c}{(K)} & & \multicolumn{1}{c}{(K)} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{(K)} \\%& (\kms) & (\kms)&$\Delta$V/$\Delta$V$_{th}$ & (\kms)\\
1304: \tableline
1305: %\input{Pipe-GBT-tab3_sort.txt}
1306:
1307: 12 & 11.3 $\pm$ 0.1 &10.2 $\pm$ 0.2 & 7.4 $\pm$ 0.0 & \multicolumn{1}{c}{--} \\%& 0.17 & 0.35 & 2.0 & 0.31 \\%Pipe-B59c-2
1308: 14 & 12.0 $\pm$ 0.4 & 1.0 $\pm$ 0.3 & 4.4 $\pm$ 0.4 & \multicolumn{1}{c}{--} \\%& 0.18 & 0.33 & 1.8 & 0.28 \\ %Pipe-5
1309: 17 & 17.5 $\pm$ 1.3 & \multicolumn{1}{c}{--} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{--} & 0.5 $\pm$ 0.0 \\%& 0.22 & 0.59 & 2.7 & 0.55 \\%Pipe-129
1310: 20 & 15.2 $\pm$ 0.5 & \multicolumn{1}{c}{--} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{--} & 1.7 $\pm$ 0.1 \\%& 0.20 & 0.40 & 2.0 & 0.34 \\%Pipe-44a
1311: 40 & 10.3 $\pm$ 0.5 & 2.4 $\pm$ 0.4 & 5.3 $\pm$ 0.3 & \multicolumn{1}{c}{--} \\%& 0.17 & 0.23 & 1.4 & 0.17 \\ %Pipe-1
1312: 41 & 14.3 $\pm$ 0.7 & \multicolumn{1}{c}{--} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{--} & 1.6 $\pm$ 0.1 \\%& 0.20 & 0.28 & 1.4 & 0.20 \\%Pipe-40a
1313: 42 & 12.4 $\pm$ 0.4 & \multicolumn{1}{c}{--} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{--} & 1.9 $\pm$ 0.0 \\%& 0.18 & 0.26 & 1.4 & 0.18 \\ %Pipe-3
1314: 47 & 12.6 $\pm$ 1.0 & 2.5 $\pm$ 0.8 & 3.2 $\pm$ 0.1 & \multicolumn{1}{c}{--} \\%& 0.18 & 0.33 & 1.8 & 0.27 \\%Pipe-34a
1315: 87 & 9.8 $\pm$ 0.3 & 6.3 $\pm$ 0.3 & 5.4 $\pm$ 0.1 & \multicolumn{1}{c}{--} \\%& 0.16 & 0.33 & 2.0 & 0.29 \\ %Pipe-2a
1316: 101 & 10.4 $\pm$ 0.2 & 5.1 $\pm$ 0.2 & 4.5 $\pm$ 0.1 & \multicolumn{1}{c}{--} \\%& 0.17 & 0.21 & 1.3 & 0.13 \\%Pipe-13a
1317: 108 & 14.1 $\pm$ 0.8 & \multicolumn{1}{c}{--} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{--} & 1.0 $\pm$ 0.0 \\%& 0.19 & 0.38 & 1.9 & 0.32 \\ %Pipe-83
1318: 109 & 9.5 $\pm$ 0.1 &19.8 $\pm$ 0.3 & 6.6 $\pm$ 0.0 & \multicolumn{1}{c}{--} \\%& 0.16 & 0.19 & 1.2 & 0.10 \\ %Pipe-6
1319: \tableline
1320: \end{tabular}
1321: \end{center}
1322: \end{table}
1323:
1324: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1325:
1326: \begin{table}
1327: \begin{center}
1328: \caption{\label{column-densities}Volume and column densities of the brightest cores in the Pipe Nebula.}
1329: \begin{tabular}{cccccc}
1330: \tableline \tableline
1331: Core & log[n(\hh)]\tablenotemark{a} & log[N(\ammonia)] & log[N(CCS)] & log[N(\hcfivennt)] & log[N(\ceont)] \\
1332: & (cm$^{-3}$) & (cm$^{-2}$) & (cm$^{-2}$) & (cm$^{-2}$) & (cm$^{-2}$) \\
1333: \tableline
1334: %\input{Pipe-GBT-tab5_sort.txt}
1335: 6 & -- & 13.7 & 12.4 & -- & 15.1 \\ %Pipe-12a
1336: 7 & -- & 13.2 & -- & -- & 15.1 \\ %Pipe-17a
1337: 8 & -- & 13.3 & -- & -- & 15.1 \\ %Pipe-15a
1338: 12 & 4.4 & 15.2 & 13.1 & 12.9 & -- \\ %Pipe-B59c-2
1339: 14 & 3.7 & 14.0 & 12.4 & -- & 15.3 \\ %Pipe-5
1340: 15 & -- & 13.4 & -- & -- & 15.2 \\ %Pipe-33a
1341: 17 & -- & 13.3 & -- & -- & 14.5 \\ %Pipe-129
1342: 20 & -- & 13.6 & -- & -- & 14.9 \\ %Pipe-44a
1343: 22 & -- & 13.2 & -- & -- & 14.7 \\ %Pipe-73a
1344: 23 & -- & 13.0 & -- & -- & 14.8 \\ %Pipe-58a
1345: 25 & -- & 13.3 & -- & -- & 14.5 \\ %Pipe-104a
1346: 37 & -- & -- & 12.3 & -- & 15.0 \\ %Pipe-56a
1347: 40 & 4.0 & 14.3 & 13.0 & 12.4 & 15.1 \\ %Pipe-1
1348: 41 & -- & 13.4 & -- & -- & 15.0 \\ %Pipe-40a
1349: 42 & -- & 13.5 & 12.2 & -- & 15.2 \\ %Pipe-3
1350: 47 & 3.0 & 14.2 & -- & -- & 15.1 \\ %Pipe-34a
1351: 65 & -- & 13.6 & -- & -- & 15.2 \\ %Pipe-20a
1352: 70 & -- & 13.3 & -- & -- & 15.2 \\ %Pipe-24a
1353: 87 & 4.0 & 14.8 & 13.0 & -- & 15.1 \\ %Pipe-2a
1354: 89 & -- & 13.1 & 12.5 & -- & 15.1 \\ %Pipe-11a
1355: 91 & -- & 13.2 & -- & -- & 14.9 \\ %Pipe-23a
1356: 92 & -- & 13.4 & 12.5 & -- & 15.2 \\ %Pipe-8a
1357: 93 & -- & 13.8 & 12.7 & -- & 15.2 \\ %Pipe-7a
1358: 97 & -- & 13.8 & -- & -- & 14.8 \\ %Pipe-9a
1359: 101 & 3.7 & 14.5 & 12.9 & 12.6 & 14.9 \\ %Pipe-13a
1360: 102 & -- & 13.4 & 12.7 & -- & 14.9 \\ %Pipe-4a
1361: 108 & -- & 13.4 & -- & -- & 14.6 \\ %Pipe-83
1362: 109 & 4.4 & 15.2 & 12.7 & 12.3 & 15.2 \\ %Pipe-6
1363: 113 & -- & 13.2 & -- & -- & 14.9 \\ %Pipe-49a
1364: 132 & -- & 13.4 & -- & -- & 15.1 \\ %Pipe-26
1365: \tableline
1366: \end{tabular}
1367: \tablenotetext{a}{Calculated from the \ammonia\, data as described in \S~\ref{ammonia-nhh}.}
1368: \end{center}
1369: \end{table}
1370:
1371: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1372:
1373: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1374: % Figures
1375: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1376:
1377: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1378: \clearpage
1379: \begin{figure}
1380: \begin{center}
1381: \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{f1.eps}
1382: \caption{\label{pipe}The 2MASS extinction map of the Pipe Nebula \citep{Lombardi06}. This map was
1383: derived from the JHK photometry of over 4.5 million stars. Many
1384: compact cores are clearly seen in this map in addition to the
1385: larger-scale, more diffuse lower-column density material associated
1386: with the molecular cloud. \cite{Alves07} identified 159 compact cores
1387: within this region. The 46 cores that comprise our source list are
1388: marked with circles. These cores were selected to span a range in
1389: peak \av, core mass, and location within the Pipe Nebula. We find that the majority of these
1390: are associated with dense gas.}
1391: \end{center}
1392: \end{figure}
1393: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1394:
1395: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1396: \clearpage
1397: \begin{figure}
1398: \begin{center}
1399: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f2a.eps}
1400: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f2b.eps}
1401: \caption{\label{completeness}The completeness of the observed sample of cores
1402: given the original catalog of \cite{Alves07} as a function of peak \av\, (left) and core mass (right). All cores
1403: from the original catalog of \cite{Alves07} with peak \av $>$ 14 magnitudes
1404: and with masses $>$ 4\,\Msun\, were observed.}
1405: \end{center}
1406: \end{figure}
1407: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1408:
1409: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1410: \clearpage
1411: \begin{figure}
1412: \begin{center}
1413: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.45\textwidth]{f3a.eps}
1414: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.45\textwidth]{f3b.eps}
1415: \caption{\label{phys-av-mass}The derived parameters, \tk, $\tau$, and \tex, output from
1416: the forward-fitting modelling of the cores showing strong \ammonia\,
1417: emission as a function of peak \av\, (left) and core mass (right). For
1418: cores with low opacities, values of $\tau$ and \tex\, can not be
1419: determined independently. The lower panels shows the values of the
1420: parameter $\tau$\tex\, which is used to characterize the emission in
1421: the case of low optical depths.}
1422: \end{center}
1423: \end{figure}
1424: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1425:
1426: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1427: \clearpage
1428: \begin{figure}
1429: \begin{center}
1430: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.45\textwidth,clip=true]{f4a.eps}
1431: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.45\textwidth,clip=true]{f4b.eps}
1432: \caption{\label{detection-rates}The detection rate for each molecular transition as a
1433: function of peak \av\, (left) and core mass (right). We detect all
1434: \ammoniaoneone\, emission toward cores with a peak \av $>$ 15
1435: magnitudes and with masses $>$ 11 \,\Msun.}
1436: \end{center}
1437: \end{figure}
1438: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1439:
1440: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1441: \clearpage
1442: \begin{figure}
1443: \begin{center}
1444: \includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth,clip=true]{f5.eps}
1445: \caption{\label{density}The mean volume \hh\, density, n(\hh), calculated from the visual
1446: extinction measurements for the 46 cores within our sample (open
1447: histogram). The diagonal lines mark the n(\hh) measured from the
1448: extinction maps for the cores detected in \ammoniaoneone. The dotted
1449: line marks the critical density of the
1450: \ammoniaoneone\, transition. We find $\sim$ 17 \% of the cores have
1451: mean volume densities greater than the critical density for
1452: \ammonia. Our higher measured \ammoniaoneone\, detection rate (63\%)
1453: is expected considering that \ammoniaoneone\, traces the densest inner
1454: regions within the cores. This is in contrast to the n(\hh) measured
1455: from the extinction maps which corresponds to the mean volume density
1456: within the larger extinction core.}
1457: \end{center}
1458: \end{figure}
1459: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1460:
1461: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1462: \clearpage
1463: \begin{figure}
1464: \begin{center}
1465: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.45\textwidth,clip=true]{f6a.eps}
1466: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.45\textwidth,clip=true]{f6b.eps}
1467: \caption{\label{comparisons}The comparison between \ammoniaoneone\, spectra obtained with
1468: differing integration times (top: t $\sim$ 18 minutes, bottom: t $\sim$
1469: 74 minutes) for two cores (23 and 89, left and right respectively). The spectra toward the
1470: majority of cores were obtained with an integration time of $\sim$ 18 minutes (c.f. top panels).
1471: In these two cases, therefore, we would not have detected \ammoniaoneone\, emission. Thus,
1472: the non-detection of
1473: \ammoniaoneone\, emission may simply be due to the short integration
1474: times. With longer integration times per point the detection
1475: rate for these cores would likely increase.}
1476: \end{center}
1477: \end{figure}
1478: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1479:
1480: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1481: \clearpage
1482: \begin{figure}
1483: \begin{center}
1484: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.45\textwidth]{f7.eps}
1485: \caption{\label{linewidths}Measured one dimensional velocity dispersion for cores with \ammoniatwotwo, CCS,
1486: \hcfivennt, and \ceont\, emission compared to those measured from
1487: the \ammoniaoneone\, emission. All axes are in units of \kms. The
1488: solid line traces equal values of the dispersions. The dotted lines
1489: trace the thermal velocity dispersion for each molecule (assuming 10 K gas).}
1490: \end{center}
1491: \end{figure}
1492: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1493:
1494: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1495: \clearpage
1496: \begin{figure}
1497: \begin{center}
1498: \includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{f8.eps}
1499: \caption{\label{size-linewidth}Core radius versus linewidth for all cores detected
1500: in \ceont\, (open circles) and \ammonia\,(closed circles)
1501: emission. While the linewidths measured from the \ceont\, are
1502: typically broader than those measured from \ammonia\, emission, there
1503: is no correlation between the radius and linewidth in either species
1504: for the cores within the Pipe Nebula. The dotted and dashed lines
1505: marks the thermal linewidths for \ammonia\,and \ceont\,
1506: respectively.}
1507: \end{center}
1508: \end{figure}
1509: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1510:
1511: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1512: \clearpage
1513: \begin{figure}
1514: \begin{center}
1515: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.45\textwidth]{f9a.eps}\\
1516: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.45\textwidth]{f9b.eps}\\
1517: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.45\textwidth]{f9c.eps}\\
1518: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.45\textwidth]{f9d.eps}\\
1519: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.45\textwidth]{f9e.eps}
1520: \caption{\label{property-comparisons}Histograms of the derived properties for the
1521: cores within the Pipe Nebula. Comparisions between these histograms
1522: and similar ones for other star forming regions (e.g. Taurus,
1523: Ophiuchus, Perseus, Orion, and Cepheus) reveal the Pipe cores are most
1524: similar to cores within Perseus and Opiuchus. The obvious exception is that the
1525: Pipe cores have lower column densities and that the region contains
1526: very little active star formation.}
1527: \end{center}
1528: \end{figure}
1529: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1530:
1531: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1532: % APPENDIX
1533: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1534:
1535: \clearpage
1536:
1537: \begin{figure}[ht]
1538: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f10.eps}
1539: \caption{\label{appendix-fig-12a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 6. See the appendix text for
1540: a description of the image and spectra.}
1541: \end{figure}
1542:
1543: \end{document}
1544:
1545: %\clearpage
1546: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1547: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f11.eps}
1548: \label{appendix-fig-17a}
1549: %\caption{ The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 7. See the appendix text for
1550: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1551: \end{figure}
1552:
1553: \begin{figure}[!hb]
1554: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f12.eps}
1555: \label{appendix-fig-15a}
1556: %\caption{ The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 8. See the appendix text for
1557: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1558: \end{figure}
1559:
1560: %\clearpage
1561: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1562: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f13.eps}
1563: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-22a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 11. See the appendix text for
1564: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1565: \end{figure}
1566:
1567: \begin{figure}[!hb]
1568: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f14.eps}
1569: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-b59} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 12. See the appendix text for
1570: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1571: \end{figure}
1572:
1573: %\clearpage
1574: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1575: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f15.eps}
1576: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-131} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 13. See the appendix text for
1577: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1578: \end{figure}
1579:
1580: \begin{figure}[!hb]
1581: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f16.eps}
1582: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-5} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 14. See the appendix text for
1583: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1584: \end{figure}
1585:
1586: %\clearpage
1587: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1588: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f17.eps}
1589: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-33a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 15. See the appendix text for
1590: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1591: \end{figure}
1592:
1593: \begin{figure}[!hb]
1594: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f18.eps}
1595: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-129} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 17. See the appendix text for
1596: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1597: \end{figure}
1598:
1599: %\clearpage
1600: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1601: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f19.eps}
1602: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-44a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 20. See the appendix text for
1603: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1604: \end{figure}
1605:
1606: \begin{figure}[!hb]
1607: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f20.eps}
1608: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-73} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 22. See the appendix text for
1609: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1610: \end{figure}
1611:
1612: %\clearpage
1613: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1614: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f21.eps}
1615: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-58a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 23. See the appendix text for
1616: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1617: \end{figure}
1618:
1619: \begin{figure}[!hb]
1620: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f22.eps}
1621: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-104} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 25. See the appendix text for
1622: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1623: \end{figure}
1624:
1625: %\clearpage
1626: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1627: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f23.eps}
1628: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-102a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 27. See the appendix text for
1629: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1630: \end{figure}
1631:
1632: \begin{figure}[!hb]
1633: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f24.eps}
1634: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-128} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 30. See the appendix text for
1635: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1636: \end{figure}
1637:
1638: %\clearpage
1639: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1640: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f25.eps}
1641: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-101} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 31. See the appendix text for
1642: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1643: \end{figure}
1644:
1645: \begin{figure}[!hb]
1646: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f26.eps}
1647: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-31a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 33. See the appendix text for
1648: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1649: \end{figure}
1650:
1651: %\clearpage
1652: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1653: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f27.eps}
1654: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-61a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 34. See the appendix text for
1655: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1656: \end{figure}
1657:
1658: \begin{figure}[!hb]
1659: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f28.eps}
1660: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-105} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 36. See the appendix text for
1661: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1662: \end{figure}
1663:
1664: %\clearpage
1665: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1666: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f29.eps}
1667: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-56a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 37. See the appendix text for
1668: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1669: \end{figure}
1670:
1671: \begin{figure}[!hb]
1672: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f30.eps}
1673: \label{appendix-fig-1}
1674: %\caption{The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 40. See the appendix text for
1675: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1676: \end{figure}
1677:
1678: %\clearpage
1679: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1680: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f31.eps}
1681: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-40a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 41. See the appendix text for
1682: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1683: \end{figure}
1684:
1685: \begin{figure}[!hb]
1686: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f32.eps}
1687: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-3} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 42. See the appendix text for
1688: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1689: \end{figure}
1690:
1691: %\clearpage
1692: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1693: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f33.eps}
1694: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-34a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 47. See the appendix text for
1695: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1696: \end{figure}
1697:
1698: \begin{figure}[!hb]
1699: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f34.eps}
1700: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-27a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 48. See the appendix text for
1701: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1702: \end{figure}
1703:
1704:
1705: %\clearpage
1706: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1707: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f35.eps}
1708: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-57a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 51. See the appendix text for
1709: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1710: \end{figure}
1711:
1712: \begin{figure}[!hb]
1713: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f36.eps}
1714: \label{appendix-fig-21a}
1715: %\caption{ The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 56. See the appendix text for
1716: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1717: \end{figure}
1718:
1719: %\clearpage
1720: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1721: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f37.eps}
1722: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-52a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 61. See the appendix text for
1723: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1724: \end{figure}
1725:
1726: \begin{figure}[!hb]
1727: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f38.eps}
1728: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-42a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 62. See the appendix text for
1729: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1730: \end{figure}
1731:
1732: %\clearpage
1733: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1734: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f39.eps}
1735: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-20a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 65. See the appendix text for
1736: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1737: \end{figure}
1738:
1739: \begin{figure}[!hb]
1740: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f40.eps}
1741: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-29a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 66. See the appendix text for
1742: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1743: \end{figure}
1744:
1745: %\clearpage
1746: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1747: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f41.eps}
1748: \label{appendix-fig-24a}
1749: %\caption{ The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 70. See the appendix text for
1750: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1751: \end{figure}
1752:
1753: \begin{figure}[!hb]
1754: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f42.eps}
1755: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-14a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 74. See the appendix text for
1756: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1757: \end{figure}
1758:
1759: %\clearpage
1760: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1761: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f43.eps}
1762: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-2a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 87. See the appendix text for
1763: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1764: \end{figure}
1765:
1766: \begin{figure}[!hb]
1767: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f44.eps}
1768: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-11a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 89. See the appendix text for
1769: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1770: \end{figure}
1771:
1772: %\clearpage
1773: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1774: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f45.eps}
1775: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-23a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 91. See the appendix text for
1776: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1777: \end{figure}
1778:
1779: \begin{figure}[!hb]
1780: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f46.eps}
1781: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-8a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 92. See the appendix text for
1782: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1783: \end{figure}
1784:
1785: %\clearpage
1786: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1787: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f47.eps}
1788: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-7a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 93. See the appendix text for
1789: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1790: \end{figure}
1791:
1792: \begin{figure}[!hb]
1793: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f48.eps}
1794: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-9a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 97. See the appendix text for
1795: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1796: \end{figure}
1797:
1798: %\clearpage
1799: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1800: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f49.eps}
1801: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-85a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 99. See the appendix text for
1802: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1803: \end{figure}
1804:
1805: \begin{figure}[!hb]
1806: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f50.eps}
1807: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-13a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 101. See the appendix text for
1808: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1809: \end{figure}
1810:
1811: %\clearpage
1812: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1813: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f51.eps}
1814: \label{appendix-fig-4a}
1815: %\caption{The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 102. See the appendix text for
1816: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1817: \end{figure}
1818:
1819: \begin{figure}[!hb]
1820: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f52.eps}
1821: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-83} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 108. See the appendix text for
1822: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1823: \end{figure}
1824:
1825: %\clearpage
1826: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1827: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f53.eps}
1828: \label{appendix-fig-6}
1829: %\caption{The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 109. See the appendix text for
1830: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1831: \end{figure}
1832:
1833: \begin{figure}[!hb]
1834: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f54.eps}
1835: %\caption{\label{appendix-fig-49a} The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 113. See the appendix text for
1836: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1837: \end{figure}
1838:
1839: %\clearpage
1840: \begin{figure}[!ht]
1841: %\includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.9\textwidth]{f55.eps}
1842: \label{appendix-fig-26}
1843: %\caption{The extinction image (left) and spectra (right) toward core 132. See the appendix text for
1844: %a description of the image and spectra.}
1845: \end{figure}
1846:
1847: \begin{figure}[!hb]
1848: %\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{f56.eps}
1849: \label{image-key}
1850: %\caption{The image key for the extinction maps shown in Figures~\ref{appendix-fig-12a}--\ref{appendix-fig-26}. All extinction
1851: %maps are centered on the particular core and have the same range in
1852: %Galactic Longitude and Latitude offset as shown here. The color bar
1853: %shows the greyscale range for all images. The contours on the
1854: %extinction images mark six even steps from 0 to 20 magnitudes. The
1855: %size of the GBT beam is marked here, along with the angular resolution
1856: %of the 2MASS extinction image. The scale bar marks 0.1~pc given the
1857: %distance to the Pipe Nebula (130\,pc).}
1858: \end{figure}
1859:
1860: \end{document}
1861:
1862:
1863: