1: %%

2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'

3: %%

4: %% Modified 2005 December 5

5: %%

6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the

7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.

8: 

9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document

10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore

11: %% any data that comes before this command.

12: 

13: %% The command below calls the preprint style

14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.

15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use

16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.

17: %%

18: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

19: 

20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:

21: 

22: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

23: 

24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:

25: 

26: \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

27: 

28: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the

29: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,

30: %% use the longabstract style option.

31: 

32: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}

33: 

34: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so

35: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before

36: %% the \begin{document} command.

37: %%

38: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts

39: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing

40: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide

41: %% for information.

42: 

43: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}

44: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}

45: 

46: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.

47: 

48: \slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}

49: 

50: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although

51: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.

52: %% The left head contains a list of authors,

53: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.).  The right

54: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.

55: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.

56: 

57: \shorttitle{Neutron star equations of state}

58: \shortauthors{Webb \& Barret}

59: 

60: %% This is the end of the preamble.  Indicate the beginning of the

61: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.

62: 

63: \begin{document}

64: 

65: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than

66: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if

67: %% you desire.

68: 

69: \title{Constraining the equation of state of supra-nuclear dense matter from XMM-Newton observations of neutron stars in globular clusters}

70: 

71: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format

72: %% author and affiliation information.

73: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command

74: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address

75: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.

76: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.

77: 

78: \author{Natalie A. Webb \altaffilmark{1} and Didier Barret\altaffilmark{1}}

79: \affil{Centre d'Etude Spatiale des Rayonnements, 9 Avenue du Colonel Roche, 31028 Toulouse Cedex 04, France}

80: \email{Natalie.Webb@cesr.fr}

81: 

82: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript

83: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the

84: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author

85: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the

86: %% editorial office after submission.

87: 

88: \begin{abstract}

89: We report on the detailed modelling of the X-ray spectra of three

90: likely neutron stars.  The neutron stars, observed with XMM-Newton are

91: found in three quiescent X-ray binaries in the globular clusters:

92: \object{$\omega$ Cen}, \object{M 13} and \object{NGC 2808}.  Whether

93: they are accreting at very low rates or radiating energy from an

94: accretion heated core, their X-ray spectra are expected to be those of

95: a hydrogen atmosphere. We use and compare publicly available hydrogen

96: atmosphere models, with constant and varying surface gravities to

97: constrain the masses and radii of the neutron stars. Thanks to the

98: high XMM-Newton throughput, and the accurate distances available for

99: these clusters, using the latest science analysis software release and

100: calibration of the XMM-Newton EPIC cameras, we derive the most

101: stringent constraints on the masses and radii of the neutron stars

102: obtained to date from these systems. A comparison of the models

103: indicate that previously used hydrogen atmosphere models (assuming

104: constant surface gravity) tend to underestimate the mass and

105: overestimate the radius of neutron stars. Our data constrain the

106: allowed equations of state to those which concern normal nucleonic

107: matter and one possible strange quark matter model, thus constraining

108: radii to be from 8 km and masses up to 2.4 M$_\odot$.

109: \end{abstract}

110: 

111: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented

112: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors

113: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine

114: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.

115: 

116: \keywords{Stars: neutron --- Dense matter --- Equation of state ---

117: globular clusters: individual( $\omega$ Cen, M 13, NGC 2808) --- X-rays:

118: stars }

119: 

120: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.

121: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep

122: %% and \citet commands to identify citations.  The citations are

123: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds

124: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have

125: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus

126: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for

127: %% each reference.

128: 

129: 

130: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper

131: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging

132: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}.  Each macro takes the

133: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket 

134: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification

135: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper.  The text appearing 

136: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper. 

137: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked

138: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers  

139: %%

140: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,

141: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first

142: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).

143: %%  Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error. 

144: 

145: \section{Introduction}

146: 

147: Forty years after their discovery, the nature of the material making

148: up the core of neutron stars remains largely unknown. At densities

149: above a few times the equilibrium density of nuclear matter, models

150: predict the existence of exotic components such as pion or kaon

151: condensates or unconfined quarks  \citep[e.g.][]{latt07}.  The

152: exciting idea that neutron stars may contain exotic forms of matter

153: makes them of prime interest, not only for astrophysics but for

154: physics in general.

155: 

156: Different equations of state of dense matter predict different maximum

157: masses and different mass-radius relationships. So far 

158: accurate mass measurements have been made for radio pulsars giving masses ranging from 1.18$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 0.03}_{\scriptscriptstyle 0.02}$ M$_\odot$, for the case of one of the pulsars in PSR J1756-2251 \citep{faul05} to 1.4414$\pm0.0002$ M$_\odot$, for PSR B1913+16 \citep{weis05}. Such low values can be accommodated by a wide

159: range of equations of states and do not provide a strong constraint

160: on the composition of dense matter. There is however growing evidence

161: that neutron stars, as massive as 2 M$_\odot$, may also exist, in

162: particular in accreting X-ray binaries, as inferred from the study of

163: the properties of kilo-Hz QPOs (Quasi-Periodic Oscillations) (e.g. the

164: neutron star in 4U 1636-536 which is estimated to have a mass of

165: 1.9-2.1 M$_\odot$ \cite{barr05}) and binary millisecond pulsars that

166: are no longer accreting \citep[e.g. PSR J0751+1807, which has a mass

167: measured through relativistic orbital decay of 2.1$\pm$0.2 M$_\odot$,][]{nice05}. If the latter estimates are confirmed (by dynamical

168: mass estimates of the binary components), they would rule out some

169: exotic forms of matter, such as quarks or pion condensates.

170: 

171: While there are some accurate mass measurements already available, the

172: situation is different with radii which are much harder to

173: constrain. X-ray spectroscopy is one promising avenue to follow to

174: tackle this issue. So far, there has been one single (and still

175: debated) measurement of redshifted absorption lines in the combined

176: early and late type I X-ray burst spectra of the X-ray binary EXO

177: 0748-676. The line energies are consistent with FeXXVI H$\alpha$ (n =

178: 2-3) and FeXXV He$\alpha$  (n = 2-3), respectively, both at the same

179: redshift z = 0.350$\pm$0.005 \citep{cott02}. The

180: measured redshift provided a direct estimate of Mass/Radius (M/R)

181: ($M/R=\frac{c^2}{2G}(1-(1+z)^{-2}$).  Assuming a canonical mass of 1.4

182: M$_\odot$, this would imply a radius of about 9 km. Following this

183: result, and using the burst properties, \cite{oeze06} estimated both

184: mass and radius separately. This led to a massive neutron star with a

185: mass M $\ge 2.10\pm 0.28$M$_\odot$ (and R$\ge 13.8\pm1.8$ km) in EXO

186: 0748-676, a result suggesting again that if this system is typical,

187: exotic forms of matter, such as condensates and unconfined quarks do

188: not exist in neutron star cores.

189: 

190: Another promising way of inferring radii is through observations of

191: quiescent X-ray emission from neutron stars for which the distance (d) can

192: be estimated reliably ($F_\infty=(R_\infty/d)^2 \sigma T_\infty^4$,

193: where $F_\infty$, $T_\infty$ are the flux and radiation temperatures

194: redshifted to the Earth and $R_\infty=R/\sqrt{1-2GM/R c^2}$ is the

195: radiation radius). Whether the energy reservoir is the heat deposited

196: deep in the neutron star crust during the outburst phase of the

197: transient \citep{brow98}, or sustained by a low-level of radial

198: accretion \citep{vanp87} (via an advection dominated accretion flow), the X-rays originate from the atmosphere of

199: the neutron star. The spectrum radiated by the atmosphere will depend

200: on its actual composition, the strength and the structure of  the

201: magnetic field. In general, it is thought that the old neutron stars

202: in globular clusters have low magnetic fields and hydrogen-rich

203: atmospheres (gravitational settling of heavier elements occurs

204: rapidly, see \cite{rutl02} and references therein). Early non magnetic

205: hydrogen atmosphere models have been shown to provide adequate fits to

206: the quiescent X-ray spectra of several neutron star systems, all

207: providing plausible values for the neutron star radius

208: \citep[typically around 10 km,][]{rutl02,gend03a,gend03b}.  Compared

209: to neutron stars in the field, those in globular clusters have

210: accurate distance estimates, and the fitting of their very soft

211: spectra is made easier by the fact that at least the value of the

212: interstellar absorption derived from the optical extinction is well

213: known, even if the absorption intrinsic to the system is largely

214: unknown.

215: 

216: Following the work done by \cite{hein06} on Chandra data of the

217: quiescent neutron star X-ray binary X7 in \object{47 Tucanae}, we

218: apply recently improved neutron star atmosphere models, available in

219: the latest release of the XSPEC spectral fitting package

220: \citep[version 12.3.0,][]{arna96}, to three neutron stars in quiescent

221: X-ray binaries that we have observed in three globular clusters with

222: XMM-Newton. This is part of an on-going program to locate, identify

223: and classify faint X-ray sources in globular clusters \citep{serv07,gend03a,gend03b,webb04, webb06},

224: with an aim to determining the internal energy source that slows down

225: the inevitable collapse of globular clusters. Early fitting of the

226: X-ray spectra with the first hydrogen-atmosphere models of \cite{zavl96} assuming  a constant surface gravity (log g$_s$=14.385,

227: corresponding to a 1.4 M$_\odot$ and 10 km radius neutron star), were

228: reported for \object{$\omega$ Cen} and \object{M~13} in \cite{gend03a,gend03b}. However, as emphasised by \cite{hein06},

229: using models with appropriate surface gravity for each fitted value of

230: the mass and radius of the neutron star is important when interpreting

231: high quality X-ray spectra, which is indeed the case for the spectra

232: measured with XMM-Newton. Applying the improved models is the main

233: motivation of this paper, which further benefits from improved data

234: analysis software and calibration of the EPIC instruments compared to

235: the earlier published results on these sources.

236: 

237: In the next section, we describe the observations, recalling the

238: essential parameters of the clusters (distance, extinction,...), the

239: data reduction and present the results of the spectral fitting. We

240: use, for comparison purposes three different models, described

241: hereafter.

242: 

243: \section{Observations and data reduction}

244: \label{sec:obs}

245: 

246: We have observations of the three likely neutron stars in three

247: different globular clusters, \object{$\omega$ Centauri} ($\omega$

248: Cen), \object{M~13} and \object{NGC 2808}.  Observations of each of

249: these clusters were made with the X-ray observatory XMM-Newton.  All

250: three EPIC cameras were used in the full-frame mode with the medium

251: filter.  Further information about these observations can be found in

252: Table~\ref{tab:obs}.

253: 

254: 

255: 

256: \begin{table*}[!t]

257:   \caption[]{Summary of the globular clusters (GC) and their

258:   observations. }

259: \medskip

260:      \label{tab:obs}

261:        \begin{tabular}{lcccccc}

262:          \hline  \hline  \noalign{\smallskip}  GC & Date & Det. &

263:          T$_{obs}$ & GTI & Dist. & n$_H$\\  

264: \hline  

265: $\omega$ Cen & 2001 Aug 13 & M1 & 40 & 40 & 5.3 & 0.067 \\ 

266: & & M2 & 40 & 40 & & \\ 

267: & & pn & 40 & 40 & & \\ 

268: M 13 & 2002 Jan 28 & M1 & 17 & 12 & 7.7 & 0.011\\ 

269:  & & M2 & 17 & 11 & & \\ 

270: & & pn &  14 & 8 & & \\ 

271: M 13 & 2002 Jan 30 & M1 & 18 & 14 & & \\ 

272: & & M2 & 18  & 14 & & \\ 

273: & & pn & 13 & 8 & & \\ 

274: M 13 & 1990 Jun 1 & PSPC & 46 & 46 & & \\ 

275: NGC 2808 & 2005 Feb 2  & M1 &

276:          41 & 41 & 9.6 & 0.128\\ & & M2 & 41 & 41 & & \\ & & pn & 40 &

277:          31 & & \\ \hline

278:   \end{tabular}

279: \begin{minipage}{8cm}

280: \tablenotetext{}{Det. indicates the detector used (M1/M2= MOS 1 or 2),

281:   T$_{obs}$ gives the observation time in ks and GTI gives the good

282:   timing interval (in ks) after filtering for soft proton flares. The

283:   distances (Dist.)  are taken from \cite{harr99} and are given in

284:   kpc.  The column densities (n$_H$, $\times 10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$) to

285:   these clusters are from \cite{harr99,pred95}.}

286: \end{minipage}

287: \vspace*{-0.3cm}

288:  \end{table*}

289: 

290: To reduce these data we used the latest version of the XMM-Newton

291: Science Analysis Software (SAS, version 7.0).  This has many

292: improvements over the earlier versions of the SAS used to reduce

293: \object{$\omega$ Cen} and \object{M~13} (version 5.3.3) such as

294: upgraded EPIC calibration, resulting in a much better cross

295: calibration among the EPIC instruments and which includes modelling of

296: spatial and temporal response dependencies. Improvements to the bad

297: pixel finding algorithms (decreasing the noise at low energies

298: significantly, important for neutron stars which emit mainly at low

299: energies), the  vignetting correction and exposure maps have also been

300: made (see the SAS release notes\footnote{

301: http://xmm.vilspa.esa.es/sas/7.0.0/documentation/releasenotes/}).  The

302: MOS data were reduced using the `emchain'.  The event lists were

303: filtered, so that 0-12 of the predefined patterns (single, double,

304: triple, and quadruple pixel events) were retained and the high

305: background periods were identified by defining a count rate threshold

306: above the low background rate and the periods of soft proton flares

307: were then flagged in the event list.  We also filtered in energy. We

308: used the energy range 0.2-10.0 keV, as recommended in the document

309: `EPIC Status of Calibration and Data Analysis' \citep{kirs02}.  The

310: {\it pn} data were reduced using the `epchain' of the SAS.  Again the

311: event lists were filtered, so that 0-4 of the predefined patterns

312: (single and double events) were retained, as these have the best

313: energy calibration.  We again filtered in energy, where we used the

314: energy range 0.2-10.0 keV and we also filtered for the soft proton

315: flares.  A summary of the observations and good time intervals for

316: each observation and camera is given in Table~\ref{tab:obs}.

317: 

318: We extracted the $\omega$ Cen spectra using circles of radii

319: $\sim$45\arcsec\ (to include at least 90\% of the available flux from

320: the neutron star) centred on the source.  For the neutron star in

321: \object{M 13} we used an extraction radius of $\sim$25\arcsec\ due its

322: close proximity to other sources and excluded a region of radius

323: 15\arcsec\ around a second source that fell in the extraction

324: region (the large region contains at least 80\% of the total source

325: counts from the neutron star and less than 10\% of the counts from the

326: neighbouring source, \citet{ehle06}), see Fig~\ref{fig:M13ext}.  Due to over-crowding in the

327: centre of \object{NGC 2808} we used extraction regions of 8\arcsec,

328: which includes 50\% of the total source counts from the neutron star

329: \citep{ehle06}, see Fig~\ref{fig:NGC2808ext}.  We used a similar neighbouring region, free from

330: X-ray sources to extract a background spectrum.  We rebinned the MOS

331: data into 15 eV bins and the {\it pn}  data into 5eV bins as

332: recommended in \cite{ehle06}.  We used the SAS tasks `rmfgen' and

333: `arfgen' to generate a `redistribution matrix file' and an `ancillary

334: response file', for each spectrum.

335: 

336: \begin{figure}[!t]

337: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.40]{f1.ps}

338: \caption{Image showing the region used to extract the M 13 neutron star spectrum (brighter source) and the region excluded due to the source found at 18.4$\arcsec$

339: from the neutron star, superposed on the MOS 1 data (0.2-10.0 keV).}

340: \label{fig:M13ext}

341: \end{figure}

342: 

343: \begin{figure}[!t]

344: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.40]{f2.ps}

345: \caption{MOS 1 image (0.2-10.0 keV) showing the region used to extract the NGC 2808 neutron star spectrum and it's proximity to the bright cataclysmic variable.}

346: \label{fig:NGC2808ext}

347: \end{figure}

348: 

349: \section{Spectral Analysis}

350: \label{sec:spec}

351: 

352: We exploit three different hydrogen atmosphere models that are

353: publicly available in Xspec 12.3.0.  These are the basic neutron star

354: atmosphere model (nsa) that we used previously in \cite{gend03a,gend03b}.  This model includes a uniform surface (effective)

355: temperature, either a non-magnetised neutron star or with a field B =

356: 10$^{12}$ or B = 10$^{13}$ G and a radiative atmosphere in hydrostatic

357: equilibrium.  The nsagrav model used is similar, but allows for a

358: variety of surface gravitational accelerations, ranging from 10$^{13}$

359: to 10$^{15}$ cm s$^{-2}$, adapted to the masses and radii

360: investigated.  Finally we use the nsatmos model described by \cite{hein06}.  This model includes a range of surface gravities and

361: effective temperatures, and incorporates thermal electron conduction

362: and self-irradiation by photons from the compact object. It also

363: assumes negligible (less than 10$^9$ G) magnetic fields and a pure

364: hydrogen atmosphere.

365: 

366: For each neutron star, we fitted the spectrum obtained from all three

367: cameras simultaneously.  However, for the neutron star in \object{M

368: 13} we also included the ROSAT PSPC archival observations of this

369: source in \object{M 13} \citep{verb01} as in \cite{gend03b}, as the

370: ROSAT data extends below the XMM-Newton data, down to 0.1 keV (only

371: 11.5 ks of data exists in the archives for \object{$\omega$ Cen},

372: which is insufficient to improve our spectra.  No data exist for

373: \object{NGC 2808}). The ROSAT PSPC has a poorer angular resolution

374: than the EPIC cameras (PSPC = 25\arcsec\ and MOS = 6\arcsec) and the

375: spectrum extracted contains data from both the neutron star and the

376: source found at 18.4$\arcsec$ from the neutron star, see Fig.~\ref{fig:M13ext}.  We have

377: extracted the XMM-Newton EPIC MOS spectrum of this source.  The best

378: fit to this spectrum is either a power law,

379: $\Gamma$=1.75$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 0.61}_{\scriptscriptstyle

380: 0.55}$, Cstatistic = 5.96 (8 bins) or a bremsstrahlung model,

381: kT=4.49$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 171.70}_{\scriptscriptstyle 2.60}$,

382: Cstatistic = 5.98 (8 bins).  This source contributes approximately

383: 28\% of the counts in the ROSAT band (0.1-2.4 keV).  To take this

384: source into account, we have allowed the normalisation for the ROSAT

385: data to float, to account for the uncertain cross-calibration between

386: the two observatories.

387: 

388: \begin{table*}[!t]

389: \begin{minipage}{16cm}

390: \caption{Results of the spectral fitting for the three neutron stars

391: with the three different hydrogen atmosphere models, as described in

392: Section~\ref{sec:spec}.  }

393: \medskip

394: \label{tab:res}

395: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}

396: \hline \hline Cluster & NSA & NSAGRAV & NSATMOS & L$_{bol}$ (erg

397: s$^{-1}$)\\ \hline $\omega$ Cen & $N_H$=0.12$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle

398: 0.04}_{\scriptscriptstyle 0.02}$ & $N_H$=0.11$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle

399: 0.05}_{\scriptscriptstyle 0.03}$ &  $N_H$=0.12$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle

400: 0.04}_{\scriptscriptstyle 0.02}$ & 4.91 $\times$ 10$^{32}$\\ &

401: $log(T)$=5.99$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 0.30}_{\scriptscriptstyle 0.04}$

402: & $log(T)$=5.99$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 0.20}_{\scriptscriptstyle

403: 0.11}$ &  $log(T)$=5.98$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle

404: 0.33}_{\scriptscriptstyle 0.10}$  & \\ &

405: $M$=1.76$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 0.74p}_{\scriptscriptstyle 1.26p}$ &

406: $M$=1.40$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 1.1p}_{\scriptscriptstyle 1.10p}$ &

407: $M$=1.66$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 0.84}_{\scriptscriptstyle 1.16p}$ & \\

408: & $R$=11.30$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 7.27}_{\scriptscriptstyle 6.30p}$ &

409: $R$=10.00$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 7.80}_{\scriptscriptstyle 4.00p}$ &

410: $R$=11.66$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 7.03}_{\scriptscriptstyle 4.99}$ &

411: \\ & Cstat= 91.28, 85 dof & Cstat= 91.26, 85 dof & Cstat= 91.35, 85

412: dof & \\ \hline M 13 & $N_H$=0.013$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle

413: 0.005}_{\scriptscriptstyle 0.005}$ &

414: $N_H$=0.013$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 0.005}_{\scriptscriptstyle 0.004}$

415: &  $N_H$=0.012$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 0.004}_{\scriptscriptstyle

416: 0.003}$ & 5.08 $\times$ 10$^{32}$ \\ &

417: $log(T)$=6.00$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 0.01}_{\scriptscriptstyle 0.01}$

418: & $log(T)$=6.00$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 0.04}_{\scriptscriptstyle

419: 0.02}$ & $log(T)$=6.00$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle

420: 0.01}_{\scriptscriptstyle 0.09}$ &  \\ &

421: $M$=1.38$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 0.08}_{\scriptscriptstyle 0.23}$ &

422: $M$=1.39$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 0.51}_{\scriptscriptstyle 0.67}$ &

423: $M$=1.30$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 0.06}_{\scriptscriptstyle 0.12}$ & \\

424: & $R$=9.95$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 0.24}_{\scriptscriptstyle 0.27}$ &

425: $R$=9.95$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 2.21}_{\scriptscriptstyle 0.36}$ &

426: $R$=9.77$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 0.09}_{\scriptscriptstyle 0.29}$ & \\

427: & $\chi^{\scriptscriptstyle 2}_{\scriptscriptstyle \nu}$=1.10, 62 dof

428: & $\chi^{\scriptscriptstyle 2}_{\scriptscriptstyle \nu}$=1.10, 62 dof

429: &  $\chi^{\scriptscriptstyle 2}_{\scriptscriptstyle \nu}$=1.08, 62 dof

430: & \\ \hline NGC 2808 &  $N_H$=0.17$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle

431: 0.05}_{\scriptscriptstyle 0.09}$ & $N_H$=0.18$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle

432: 0.11}_{\scriptscriptstyle 0.07}$ &  $N_H$=0.16$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle

433: 0.14}_{\scriptscriptstyle 0.05}$ & 1.02 $\times$ 10$^{33}$\\ &

434: $log(T)$=6.04$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 0.07}_{\scriptscriptstyle 0.14}$

435: & $log(T)$=6.08$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 0.06}_{\scriptscriptstyle

436: 0.17}$ & $log(T)$=6.03$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle

437: 0.01}_{\scriptscriptstyle 0.25}$  & \\ &

438: $M$=0.67$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 0.59}_{\scriptscriptstyle 0.13}$ &

439: $M$=0.95$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 1.55p}_{\scriptscriptstyle 0.65p}$ &

440: $M$=0.91$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 1.60}_{\scriptscriptstyle 0.41p}$  &

441: \\ & $R$=8.45$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 0.36}_{\scriptscriptstyle 3.45p}$

442: & $R$=7.48$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 3.57}_{\scriptscriptstyle 1.48p}$ &

443: $R$=6.10$\pm^{\scriptscriptstyle 11.47}_{\scriptscriptstyle 1.10p}$  &

444: \\ & Cstat=17.59, 19 dof & Cstat=18.12, 19 dof & Cstat=16.95, 19 dof &

445: \\ \hline

446: \end{tabular}

447: \tablenotetext{}{ The column density, N$_H$ is $\times 10^{22}$

448: cm$^{-2}$, the temperature (T) is given as the logarithm of the

449: temperature in Kelvin, the masses are in solar units and the radii

450: in kilometres.  All errors are given at the 90\% confidence limit for

451: the one interesting parameter. To calculate the errors, the mass and distance were held fixed and all other parameters were allowed to vary, except when calculating the error on the mass, when the radius was held fixed.   A 'p' after the error value indicates that the hard limit of the model was reached.  The estimated unabsorbed bolometric

452: luminosity for each neutron star is also given.}

453: \end{minipage}

454: \end{table*}

455: 

456: 

457: \begin{figure}[!t]

458: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.4]{f3.ps}

459: \caption{Unfolded spectrum of the neutron star in M 13 with the best

460: nsatmos model fit and the residuals to the fit. The different symbols indicate the data from the different instruments used: open diamonds show PSPC data, filled circles and triangles show MOS 1 data, filled squares and empty circles show MOS 2 data and filled diamonds and empty squares show pn data.}

461: \label{fig:m13}

462: \end{figure}

463: 

464: 

465: All the data were binned to contain a minimum of 20 counts per bin

466: where possible and we used the $\chi^2$ technique to judge the

467: goodness of the model fits.  However, for \object{$\omega$ Cen} and

468: \object{NGC 2808} the data were binned with 15 counts per bin (to

469: increase the number of data points).  In these cases we used the

470: C-statistic to judge the goodness of the fit, as the number of counts

471: per bin is no longer strictly in the Gaussian statistics regime but

472: approaches that of the Poissonian statistics regime. Even though we

473: are at the limit between the two regimes, the C-statistic has been

474: shown to work well at even higher counts \citep{nous89} and should

475: therefore give good results.  The inverse is not necessarily

476: true. \cite{nous89} showed that using the Levenberg-Marquardt

477: algorithm (the algorithm used in Xspec) for small numbers of events per bin gives a systematic bias.

478: 

479: \subsection{Absorption in the spectra}

480: 

481: For each

482: model we included (photoelectric) absorption along the line of sight

483: to the object. This was initially fixed at the value determined for

484: each cluster (see Table~\ref{tab:obs}) and then allowed to vary.  In

485: every case we found that we required additional absorbing material,

486: assumed to be additional gas intrinsic to the system.  This was

487: typically 30-60\% more i.e. $\omega$ Cen required an n$_H$$\sim$0.11

488: $\times 10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$, an increase of 60\% with a ftest

489: probability of 0.0099, indicating that it is reasonable to include

490: additional material. The normalisation was fixed to the value

491: corresponding to the distance to the cluster (see Table~\ref{tab:obs})

492: and the masses and radii were initially frozen to 1.4 M$_\odot$ and

493: 10.0 km, but then allowed to vary.

494: 

495: 

496: We then tried to constrain the nature of the additional absorbing

497: material, in the same way as Heinke et al. (2006), by employing the

498: {\it Xspec} model {\em vphabs} and using the abundances corresponding to those

499: of each of the clusters.  For \object{M 13} we chose the iron abundance to be

500: 3\% solar ([Fe/H] = -1.5), the abundances of C, N and O to be 5\%

501: solar ([X/H] = -1.32), the abundances of Ne to Ca to be 4\% solar

502: ([X/H] = -1.38) and that of helium to be of solar abundance, following

503: Cohen \& Melendez (2005).  For $\omega$ Cen the situation is more

504: complicated as there are three distinct populations of stars in this

505: cluster, see e.g. Origlia et al. (2003).  We elected the abundances

506: from the largest population in the cluster, basing our choice on the

507: fact that the highest probability was that the donor star comes from

508: the largest population.  We adopt the iron abundance to be 3\% solar

509: ([Fe/H] = -1.58), the abundances of C, N and O to be 6\% solar ([X/H]

510: = -1.24), the abundances of Ne to Ca to be 6\% solar ([X/H] = -1.19)

511: and again that of helium to be of solar abundance, following Origlia

512: et al. (2003) and Norris (2004).  For NGC 2808 we select the iron

513: abundance to be 9\% solar ([Fe/H] = -1.06), the abundances of C, N and

514: O to be 32\% solar ([X/H] = -0.5), the abundances of Ne to Ca to be

515: 16\% solar ([X/H] = -0.8) and that of helium to be of solar abundance,

516: following Castellani et al. (2006) and Gratton (1982).  Again, however, it is

517: believed that NGC 2808 has as many as three populations of stars, with

518: different abundances (Piotto et al. 2007).  We chose the abundances for the only population with sufficient information in the literature.

519: We then modelled the neutron star spectra fixing the photoelectric absorption

520: (phabs) to be that of the cluster and allowing the

521: photoelectric absorption with variable abundances (vphabs) to vary (using the abundances given

522: above).  The results that we obtained gave very small masses and/or

523: radii, often small enough to hit the lower mass or radius limit

524: allowed in the models (see below for values).  

525: 

526: \begin{figure}[!t]

527: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.4]{f4.ps}

528: \caption{Unfolded spectrum of the neutron star in $\omega$ Cen with

529: the best nsatmos model fit and the residuals to the fit.  The different symbols indicate the data from the different instruments used: filled circles show MOS 1 data, filled squares show MOS 2 data and filled diamonds show pn data.}

530: \label{fig:ocen}

531: \end{figure}

532: 

533: 

534: \begin{figure}[!h]

535: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.4]{f5.ps}

536: \caption{Unfolded spectrum of the neutron star in NGC 2808 with the

537: best nsatmos model fit and the residuals to the fit. The different symbols used are the same as those employed in Fig.~\ref{fig:ocen}.}

538: \label{fig:ngc2808}

539: \end{figure}

540: 

541: We thus decided to

542: determine whether our data are of sufficiently good quality to

543: constrain the nature of the additional absorbing material. We

544: simulated a spectrum similar to that obtained for $\omega$ Cen, using the simple phabs model.  We modelled

545: this spectrum in {\em Xspec} using first the phabs model and then the vphabs

546: model.  We obtained similar $\chi^{\scriptscriptstyle

547: 2}_{\scriptscriptstyle \nu}$ values (1.17, 78 dof when using phabs and

548: 1.29, 78 dof when using vphabs), but again the masses and radii were

549: very low when the vphabs model was employed, only $\sim$80\% of the

550: value given to simulate the spectrum as opposed to values within 10\%

551: when using the phabs model.  We also simulated the same spectrum but using the vphabs model.  Again, modelling

552: this spectrum in Xspec using the vphabs model we found values as low as 33\% of the original value, yet when modelling with the phabs model our values are

553: within 5\% of our original values.  Further, we obtain equally good

554: fits using vphabs to our simulated spectrum ($\chi^{\scriptscriptstyle

555: 2}_{\scriptscriptstyle \nu}$=1.09, 78 dof) when we choose abundances

556: that are different by 300\% to those used in the simulated spectrum,

557: and we still have the problem that either the mass or the radius is

558: very small.  We therefore conclude that the quality of our data is

559: insufficient to constrain the nature of the additional absorbing

560: material and we use the phabs model only.

561: 

562: \subsection{Contribution from neighbouring sources}

563: 

564: We also investigated whether we required an extra power law tail,

565: especially for the two neutron stars found in proximity of other

566: sources i.e. the neutron stars in M 13 and NGC 2808.  This is

567: important as substantial flux from other sources is likely to be the

568: dominant source of counts in the higher energy bands (i.e. above 1

569: keV).  This may tend to systematically bias the spectral fits to

570: higher temperatures, and thus smaller radii.

571: 

572: To do this we extracted the spectra of the neighbouring sources and

573: determined their photon indices ($\Gamma$$\sim$1.75 for M 13 and

574: $\Gamma$$\sim$1.5 for NGC 2808).  We then estimated the contribution from the neighbouring sources 

575: in the extraction region for each neutron star (8\% for M 13 and 20\%

576: for NGC 2808, see Figs~\ref{fig:M13ext} and \ref{fig:NGC2808ext}).  We used these values and refitted our

577: spectra.  Interestingly, we found values very similar to those

578: obtained when no power law was included.  Even allowing the

579: normalisation to increase, increasing the weight of the power law,

580: made little difference to the fits.  Ftests show that adding the power

581: law is not necessary.  Probability results for fitting nsa, nsatmos and

582: nsagrav models with and without the additional power laws to the neutron star in M 13 are

583: 0.31, 0.22 and 0.199 respectively and to the neutron star in NGC 2808 are 0.13, 0.06 and

584: 0.08 respectively.  We therefore conclude that adding a

585: power law is not required by the data. 

586: 

587: 

588: The spectra of the three neutron stars can be found

589: in Figs.~\ref{fig:m13}-\ref{fig:ngc2808}, along with the best fitting

590: nsatmos model.

591: 

592: \subsection{Modelling the spectra}

593: 

594: 

595: The principal goal of our spectral fitting is to self-consistently

596: constrain the allowed space in mass and radius using our three neutron

597: stars, but also to test the reliability and accuracy of the three

598: models examined.  Table~\ref{tab:res} gives the best fits for each

599: neutron star fitted with each of the three models, along with the best

600: fitting values for the column densities, surface temperatures of the

601: neutron stars, masses and radii. Errors are also given at the 90\%

602: confidence limit for the one interesting parameter. To calculate the errors, the mass and distance were held fixed and all other parameters were allowed to vary, except when calculating the error on the mass, when the radius was held fixed instead of the mass.  We also give the

603: estimated bolometric luminosity of the neutron star.  We found that we

604: did not require any additional parameters, such as lines or edges to

605: fit these data. However, this may be due to the quality of the data,

606: where deeper observations may reveal spectral features that will be

607: useful to constrain the gravitational redshift at the NS surface

608: \citep{brow98,rutl02,hein03}.

609: 

610: 

611: \begin{figure}[!ht]

612: \hspace*{-0.5cm}\includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.43]{f6.ps}

613: \caption{Contour plot showing the results of modelling the neutron

614: star in M 13 with the xspec models: nsa (solid/red line), nsatmos

615: (dotted/blue line) and the nsagrav (dashed/green line). The 90\% and

616: 99\% confidence contours for the neutron star masses (M$_\odot$) and

617: the radii (km) are plotted along with neutron star equations of state

618: taken from \cite{latt07} }

619: \label{fig:M13cont}

620: \end{figure}

621: 

622: 

623: 

624: \begin{figure}[!h]

625: \hspace*{-0.5cm}\includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.43]{f7.ps}

626: \caption{Contour plot showing the results of modelling the neutron

627: stars in $\omega$ Cen (solid/red line)  and NGC 2808 (dotted/blue

628: line) with the xspec model nsatmos. The 90\% and 99\% confidence

629: contours for the neutron star masses (M$_\odot$) and the radii (km)

630: are plotted along with neutron star equations of state taken from

631: \cite{latt07} }

632: \label{fig:ocencont}

633: \end{figure}

634: 

635: \begin{figure}[!h]

636: \hspace*{-0.5cm}\includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.43]{f8.ps}

637: \caption{Contour plot showing the results of modelling the neutron

638: stars in M 13 (dotted/blue line), $\omega$ Cen (solid/red line)  and

639: X7 in 47 Tuc (dashed-dotted/green line) \citep{hein06} with the xspec

640: model nsatmos. The 99\% confidence contours for the neutron star

641: masses (M$_\odot$) and the radii (km) are plotted  along with neutron

642: star equations of state taken from \cite{latt07}. The grey hashed

643: region indicates the region not investigated with the models.}

644: \label{fig:3cont}

645: \end{figure}

646: 

647: 

648: 

649: We use the steppar command in XSPEC to vary both the radius and mass

650: parameters simultaneously, allowing the temperature to vary as well to

651: find the best fit. The minimum (and maximum) radii allowed with these

652: models are 5 km (30/20 km) for the nsatmos and nsa models respectively

653: and 6 km (20 km) for the nsagrav model.  We chose an inferior limit of

654: 8 km and a superior limit of 18 km as all three models gave stable

655: results when fitting the data in these regions.  The minimum (and

656: maximum) masses allowed with these models are 0.5M$_\odot$

657: (3.0/2.5M$_\odot$) for the nsatmos  and nsa models respectively and

658: 0.3M$_\odot$ (2.5M$_\odot$) for the nsagrav model.  We chose the

659: region between 0.5 and 2.3M$_\odot$ as again all three models gave

660: stable results in these regions.  We show  90\% confidence, and 99\%

661: confidence ($\Delta \chi^2$ = 4.61, and 9.21 respectively) contours in

662: neutron star mass and radius.  Fig.~\ref{fig:M13cont} shows the

663: results of modelling the neutron star in \object{M 13} with all three

664: neutron star atmosphere models.  This figure indicates that the two

665: models, nsatmos and nsagrav, give comparable results, whereas the nsa

666: model gives differing results.  The nsa model is more accurate in

667: constraining R$_\infty$ than the nsatmos and nsagrav models, due to a

668: degeneracy in spectral shape variations between the surface gravity

669: and the surface temperature.  However, here we calculate a range of

670: neutron star masses and radii, for which the nsatmos and nsagrav,

671: thanks to their variable surface gravities, are better adapted \citep[see

672: the discussion in][]{hein06}.  The use of these fixed gravity

673: models for testing neutron stars with a variety of masses and radii

674: (and therefore gravities) is not therefore strictly appropriate.  This

675: is borne out by the modelling. For this reason and to simplify the

676: following plots, we ignore the nsa model (as it is less accurate) and

677: we plot only the nsatmos model (as the nsagrav and nsatmos models are

678: similar) to show the constraints on mass and radius determined by

679: modelling \object{$\omega$ Cen} and \object{NGC 2808}

680: (Fig.~\ref{fig:ocencont}).  The loci of models for the equations of

681: state for dense matter are those described in \cite{latt07} and

682: \cite{latt01} which include diverse equations  such as: SQM -

683: \cite{prak95}, a Strange Quark Matter model, PAL - \cite{prak88} a

684: neutron and proton model using a schematic potential, GM -

685: \cite{glen91}, a model containing neutrons, protons and hyperons using

686: a field theoretical approach, GS - \cite{glen99}, a model containing

687: neutrons, protons and kaons using a field theoretical approach.

688: 

689: 

690: 

691: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}

692: \label{sec:discuss}

693: 

694: As seen in Section~\ref{sec:spec} even if the nsa model is more accurate in constraining R$_\infty$ than the nsatmos and nsagrav models, when calculating a range of neutron star masses and radii, we find that the nsatmos and nsagrav models  are better adapted.  We

695: conclude that the use of fixed gravity models for testing neutron

696: stars with a variety of masses and radii (and therefore gravities) is

697: not strictly appropriate as previously indicated by \cite{gaen02} and

698: \cite{hein06}.

699: 

700: Using the results from Figs.~\ref{fig:M13cont} and \ref{fig:ocencont},

701: and the results found by \cite{hein06} when fitting Chandra

702: observations of X7 in 47 Tuc, we show the allowed equations of state

703: in Fig.~\ref{fig:3cont}.  Modelling the neutron star in \object{M 13}

704: alone shows that the data do not favour the stiffer equations of

705: state, such as MS0-2 and PAL 1.  We combine these results with those

706: from modelling the neutron star in \object{$\omega$ Cen}. The low

707: quality  data for the neutron star in \object{NGC 2808} results in

708: very poor constraints for this object and hence we disregard this

709: source in the discussion, although the results seem to be similar to

710: those for the neutron star in \object{M 13}.  The equations of state

711: that are satisfied by all three neutron stars fall in the middle of

712: the diagram and includes the equations of state of normal nucleonic

713: matter and one strange quark matter model.  The equations allowed are

714: GS1, PAL 6, AP3 \& 4, GM3, FSU, SQM3, ENG and MPA1, with radii above 8

715: km and masses up to 2.4 M$_\odot$.

716: 

717: 

718: \acknowledgments

719: 

720: This article was based on observations obtained with XMM-Newton, an

721: ESA science mission with instruments and contributions directly funded

722: by ESA Member States and NASA.  The authors thank J. Lattimer for providing them with the mass-radius relationships for the different equations of state shown in Figures~\ref{fig:M13cont}-\ref{fig:3cont} and B. Gendre for help

723: with the ROSAT spectrum.  The authors also acknowledge the CNES for

724: its support in this research and thank the (anonymous) referee for very valuable comments that have enabled us to improve the quality of this paper.

725: 

726: 

727: \begin{thebibliography}{}

728: %\bibitem[Alpar et al.(1982)]{alpa82} Alpar, M. A., Cheng, A. F.,

729: %Ruderman, M. A., Shaham, J. 1982, Nature, 300, 728

730: \bibitem[Arnaud(1996)]{arna96}Arnaud, K.A., 1996, Astronomical Data

731: Analysis Software and Systems V, eds. Jacoby G. and Barnes J., p17,

732: ASP Conf. Series volume 101

733: %\bibitem[Auri\`ere(1982)]{aur82} Auri\`ere, M.  1982, \aap, 109, 301

734: %\bibitem[Canizares et al.(1978)]{can78} Canizares, C. R., Grindlay,

735: %    J. E., Hiltner, W. A., Liller, W., \& McClintock, J. E.  1978,

736: %    \apj, 224, 39

737: \bibitem[Barret, Olive \& Miller(2005)]{barr05} Barret, D.,  Olive,

738: J.-F., \& Miller, M. C. 2005, MNRAS, 361, 855

739: \bibitem[Brown, Bildsten \& Rutledge(1998)]{brow98} Brown, E. F.,

740: Bildsten, L., \& Rutledge, R. E. 1998, ApJ, 504, L95

741: \bibitem[Castellani et al.(2006)]{cast06} Castellani, V., Iannicola, G., Bono, G., Zoccali, M., Cassisi, S., \& Buonanno, R. 2006, A\&A, 446, 569

742: %\bibitem[Chen, Middleditch \& Ruderman(1993)]{chen93} Chen, K.,

743: %Middleditch, J., \& Ruderman, M. 1993, ApJ, 408, 17

744: \bibitem[Cohen \& Mel\'ndez(2005)]{cohe05} Cohen, J. G., \& Mel\'endez, J. 2005, AJ, 129, 303

745: \bibitem[Cottam, Paerels \& Mendez(2002)]{cott02} Cottam, J., Paerels,

746: F., \& Mendez, M. 2002, Nature, 420, 51

747: %\bibitem[Djorgovski \& King(1984)]{djo84} Djorgovski, S., \& King,

748:  %   I. R.  1984, \apjl, 277, L49

749: \bibitem[Ehle et al.(2006)]{ehle06} Ehle, M. and the XMM-Newton

750: consortium 2006, XMM-Newton User's Handbook, v. 2.4, Eds. M. Ehle,

751: M. Breitfellner, R. Gonz\'alez Riestra, M. Guainazzi, N. Loiseau,

752: P. Rodr\'iguez, M. Santos-Lle\'o, N. Schartel, L. Tom\'as, E. Verdugo,

753: M. Dahlem

754: \bibitem[Ehle et al.(2006b)]{ehle06b} Ehle, M., Pollock, A.M.T.,

755: Talavera, A., Gabriel, C., Chen, B., Ballet, J., Dennerl, K.,

756: Freyberg, M., Guainazzi, M., Kirsch, M., Metcalfe, L., Ojero, E.,

757: Osborne, J., Pietsch, W., Saxton, R., Smith, M., Verdugo, E

758: 2006b,User's Guide to the XMM-Newton Science Analysis System, v. 4.0,

759: Ed. N. Loiseau

760: %\bibitem[Friedman \& Pandharipande(1981)]{frie81} Friedman, B., Pandharipande,

761: %V. R. 1981, NuPhA, 361, 502

762: \bibitem[Faulkner et al.(2005)]{faul05} Faulkner, A. J., Kramer, M., Lyne, A. G., \& et al. 2005,  ApJ, 618, L119

763: \bibitem[G\"ansicke et al.(2002)]{gaen02} G\"ansicke, B. T., Braje,

764: T. M., \& Romani, R. W. 2002, A\&A, 386, 1001

765: \bibitem[Gendre et al.(2003a)]{gend03a} Gendre, B., Barret, D., \&

766:   Webb, N.A.  2003a, A\&A, 400, 521

767: \bibitem[Gendre et al.(2003b)]{gend03b} Gendre, B., Barret, D., \&

768:   Webb, N.A.  2003b, A\&A, 403, L11

769: \bibitem[Glendenning \& Moszkowski(1991)]{glen91} Glendenning, N.K., \&

770: Moszkowski, S.K. 1991, Phys. Rev. Lett., 57, 2414

771: \bibitem[Glendenning \& Schaffner-Bielich(1999)]{glen99} Glendenning,

772: N.K., \& Schaffner-Bielich, J. 1999, Phys. Rev., 57, C60, 025803

773: \bibitem[Gratton(1982)]{grat82} Gratton, R.G. 1982, A\&A, 115, 171

774: %\bibitem[Grindlay \& Bailyn(1998)]{grin98} Grindlay, J. \& Bailyn,

775: %C. 1998,  Nature, 336, 48

776: %\bibitem[Hagiwara \& Zeppenfeld(1986)]{hag86} Hagiwara, K., \&

777: %    Zeppenfeld, D.  1986, Nucl.Phys., 274, 1

778: %\bibitem[Haggard et al.(2004)]{hagg04} Haggard, D., Cool, A. M.,

779: %Anderson, J., Edmonds, P. D., Callanan, P. J., Heinke, C. O.,

780: %Grindlay, J. E., Bailyn, C. D. 2004, ApJ, 613, 512

781: \bibitem[Harris(1999)]{harr99} Harris~W. E., 1999, Ap\&SS, 267, 95,

782: rev. (2003)

783: %\bibitem[Harris \& van den Bergh(1984)]{har84} Harris, W. E., \& van

784: %    den Bergh, S.  1984, \aj, 89, 1816

785: %\bibitem[H\`enon(1961)]{hen61} H\'enon, M.  1961, Ann.d'Ap., 24, 369

786: %\bibitem[Heiles \& Troland(2003)]{heiles03} Heiles, C. \& Troland,

787: %T. H., 2003, \apjs, preprint doi:10.1086/381753

788: \bibitem[Heinke et al.(2003)]{hein03} Heinke, C. O., Grindlay, J. E.,

789: Lloyd, D. A., \& Edmonds, P. D. 2003, ApJ, 588, 452

790: \bibitem[Heinke et al.(2006)]{hein06} Heinke, C.0., Rybicki, G.B.,

791: Narayan, R., \& Grindlay, J.E. 2006, ApJ, 644, 1090

792: %\bibitem[Kim, Ostricker, \& Stone(2003)]{kim03} Kim, W.-T.,  Ostriker,

793: %E., \& Stone, J. M., 2003, \apj, 599, 1157

794: %\bibitem[King(1966)]{kin66}  King, I. R.  1966, \aj, 71, 276

795: %\bibitem[King(1975)]{kin75}  King, I. R.  1975, Dynamics of Stellar

796: %    Systems, A. Hayli, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1975, 99

797: %\bibitem[King et al.(1968)]{kin68}  King, I. R., Hedemann, E., Hodge,

798:  %   S. M., \& White, R. E.  1968, \aj, 73, 456

799: \bibitem[Kirsch et al.(2002)]{kirs02} Kirsch, M., and the EPIC

800:   Consortium, 2002, XMM-SOC-CAL-TN-0018

801: %\bibitem[Kramer et al.(2006)]{kram06} Kramer, M., Stairs, I. H., Manchester, R. N., \& et al. 2006,  Sci, 314, 97

802: %\bibitem[Kron et al.(1984)]{kro84} Kron, G. E., Hewitt, A. V., \&

803: %    Wasserman, L. H.  1984, \pasp, 96, 198

804: %\bibitem[Lynden-Bell \& Wood(1968)]{lyn68} Lynden-Bell, D., \& Wood,

805: %    R.  1968, \mnras, 138, 495

806: %\bibitem[Newell \& O'Neil(1978)]{new78} Newell, E. B., \& O'Neil,

807: %    E. J.  1978, \apjs, 37, 27

808: %\bibitem[Lamb \& Boutloukos(2007)]{lamb07} Lamb, F.K. \& Boutloukos,

809: %S. 2007, to appear in "Short-period Binary Stars: Observation,

810: %Analyses, and Results", eds. E.F. Milone, D.A. Leahy, and D. Hobill

811: \bibitem[Lattimer \& Prakash(2007)]{latt07} Lattimer, J.M., \& Prakash,

812: M. 2007, PhR, 442, 109

813: \bibitem[Lattimer \& Prakash(2001)]{latt01} Lattimer, J.M., \& Prakash,

814: M. 2001, ApJ, 550, 426

815: \bibitem[Nice et al.(2005)]{nice05} Nice, D. J., Splaver, E. M.,

816: Stairs, I. H., L\"ohmer, O., Jessner, A., Kramer, M., Cordes,

817: J. M. 2005, \apj, 634, 1242

818: \bibitem[Norris(2004)]{norr04} Norris, J. E. 2004, ApJ, 612, 25

819: \bibitem[Nousek \& Shue(1989)]{nous89} Nousek, J. A., \& Shue, D. R. 1989, ApJ, 342, 1207

820: %\bibitem[Ortolani et al.(1985)]{ort85} Ortolani, S., Rosino, L.,

821: %    \& Sandage, A.  1985, \aj, 90, 473

822: \bibitem[Origlia et al.(2003)]{orig03} Origlia, L., Ferraro, F. R., Bellazzini, M., \& Pancino, E. 2003,  ApJ, 591, 916

823: \bibitem[\"Ozel(2006)]{oeze06} \"Ozel, F 2006, Nature, 441, 1115

824: %\bibitem[Peterson(1976)]{pet76} Peterson, C. J.  1976, \aj, 81, 617

825: %\bibitem[Pandharipandhe \& Smith(1975)]{pand75} Pandharipande, V. R.,

826: %Smith, R. A. 1975, BAAS, 7, 240

827: \bibitem[Piotto et al.(2007)]{piot07} Piotto, G., Bedin, L. R., Anderson, J., King, I. R., Cassisi, S., Milone, A. P., Villanova, S., Pietrinferni, A., \& Renzini, A. 2007, ApJ, 661, 53

828: %\bibitem[Podsiadlowski, Rappaport \& Pfahl(2002)]{pods02}Podsiadlowski, Ph., Rappaport, S. \& Pfahl, E. D. 2002, ApJ, 565, 1107

829: \bibitem[Prakash, Cooke \& Lattimer(1995)]{prak95} Prakash, M., Cooke,

830: J. R., \& Lattimer, J. M. 1995, PhRvD, 52, 661

831: \bibitem[Prakash, Ainsworth \& Lattimer(1988)]{prak88} Prakash, M.,

832: Ainsworth, T.L., \& Lattimer, J. M. 1995, PhRvL, 61, 2518

833: \bibitem[Predehl \& Schmitt(1995)]{pred95} Predehl, P., \& Schmitt,

834: J. H. M. M. 1995, A\&A, 293, 889

835: \bibitem[Rutledge et al.(1999)]{rutl99} Rutledge, R. E., Bildsten, L.,

836: Brown, E. F., Pavlov, G. G., \& Zavlin, V. E. 1999, ApJ, 514, 945

837: \bibitem[Rutledge et al.(2002)]{rutl02} Rutledge, R. E., Bildsten,

838: L. Brown, E. F., Pavlov, G. G., \& Zavlin, V. E. 2002, ApJ, 578, 405

839: %\bibitem[Rudnick et al.(2003)]{rudnick03} Rudnick, G. et al., 2003, \apj, 599, 847

840: %\bibitem[Spitzer(1985)]{spi85} Spitzer, L.  1985, Dynamics of

841: %    Star Clusters, J. Goodman \& P. Hut, Dordrecht: Reidel, 109

842: %\bibitem[Treu et al.(2003)]{treu03} Treu, T. et al., 2003, \apj, 591, 53

843: \bibitem[Servillat et al.(2007)]{serv07} Servillat, M., Webb, N.A., \& Barret, D. 2007 A\&A, submitted

844: %\bibitem[Thorsett \& Chakrabarty(1999)]{thor99} Thorsett, S. E., \& Chakrabarty, D. 1999, ApJ, 512, 288

845: \bibitem[Van Paradijs et al.(1987)]{vanp87} Van Paradijs J., Verbunt F., Shafer R. A., \& Arnaud K. A. 1987, A\&A, 182, 47

846: \bibitem[Verbunt(2001)]{verb01} Verbunt, F. 2001, A\&A, 368, 137

847: \bibitem[Webb et al.(2004)]{webb04} Webb, N.A., Serre, D., Gendre, B., Barret, D., Lasota, \& J.-P., Rizzi, L. 2004, A\&A, 424, 133

848: \bibitem[Webb et al.(2006)]{webb06} Webb, N.A., Wheatley, P.J., \& Barret, D.  2006, A\&A, 445, 155

849: \bibitem[Weisberg \& Taylor(2005)]{weis05} Weisberg, J.M., \& Taylor, J.H. 2005, ASPC, 328, 25

850: %\bibitem[Wiringa, Fiks \& Fabrocini(1988)]{wiri88} Wiringa, R. B., Fiks, V., Fabrocini, A. 1988, PhRvC, 38, 1010

851: \bibitem[Zavlin, Pavlov, \& Shibanov(1996)]{zavl96} Zavlin, V.E., Pavlov, G.G., \& Shibanov, Yu.A. 1996, A\&A, 315, 141

852: \end{thebibliography}

853: 

854: \end{document}

855: 

856: A focal problem today in the dynamics of globular clusters is core

857: collapse.   It has been predicted by theory for decades

858: \citep{hen61,lyn68,spi85}, but observation has been less alert to the

859: phenomenon. For many years the central brightness peak in M15

860: \citep{kin75,new78} seemed a unique anomaly.   Then \citet{aur82}

861: suggested a central peak in \object{NGC 6397}, and a  limited

862: photographic survey of ours \citep[Paper I]{djo84} found three more

863: cases, \objectname{NGC 6624}, \objectname[M 15]{NGC 7078}, and

864: \object[Cl 1938-341]{Terzan 8}), whose sharp center had often been

865: remarked on \citep{can78}.

866: 

867: As an example of how the new AASTeX object tagging macros work, we

868: will cite some of the ``Superlative'' objects mentioned in section 10

869: of Trimble's (1992) review of astrophysics in the year 1991.  The

870: youngest star yet found was \object[\[JCC87\] IRAS 4]{IRAS 4} in

871: \objectname{NGC 1333}.  \object{70 Oph} was found to be the longest

872: period spectroscopic binary.  The most massive white dwarf was

873: \object{GD 50}, estimated at 1.2 solar masses.  The first neutral

874: hydrogen found in a globular cluster was \object{NGC 2808} while the

875: \objectname[SDSS J093401.92+551427.9]{I Zw 18} retained the record for

876: metal deficiency.  However, another low metallicitity galaxy was

877: \object{UGC 4483} in the \objectname{M 83} group. The largest redshift

878: \object[PC 1247+3406]{source} in 1991 was found at z=4.897.  Lastly,

879: what paper would be complete without a mention of the \object[M1]{Crab

880: nebula}!

881: 

882: \section{Observations}

883: 

884: %% In a manner similar to \objectname authors can provide links to dataset

885: %% hosted at participating data centers via the \dataset{} command.  The

886: %% second curly bracket argument is printed in the text while the first

887: %% parentheses argument serves as the valid data set identifier.  Large

888: %% lists of data set are best provided in a table (see Table 3 for an example).

889: %% Valid data set identifiers should be obtained from the data center that

890: %% is currently hosting the data.

891: %%

892: %% Note that AASTeX interprets everything between the curly braces in the 

893: %% macro as regular text, so any special characters, e.g. "#" or "_," must be 

894: %% preceded by a backslash. Otherwise, you will get a LaTeX error when you 

895: %% compile your manuscript.  Special characters do not 

896: %% need to be escaped in the optional, square-bracket argument.

897: 

898: All our observations were short direct exposures with CCD's.  We also

899: have a random {\it Chandra} data set \dataset{ADS/Sa.ASCA\#X/86008020}

900: and a neat \dataset[ADS/Sa.HST#Y0Q70101T]{HST FOS spectrum} that

901: readers can access via the links in the electronic edition.

902: Unfortunately this has nothing  whatsoever to do with this research.

903: At Lick Observatory we used a TI 500$\times$500  chip and a GEC

904: 575$\times$385, on the 1-m Nickel reflector.  The only filter

905: available at Lick was red.  At CTIO we used a GEC 575$\times$385, with

906: $B, V,$ and $R$ filters, and an RCA 512$\times$320, with $U, B, V, R,$

907: and $I$ filters, on the 1.5-m reflector. In the CTIO observations we

908: tried to concentrate on the shortest practicable wavelengths; but

909: faintness, reddening, and poor short-wavelength sensitivity often kept

910: us from observing in $U$ or even in $B$. All four cameras had scales

911: of the order of 0.4 arcsec/pixel, and our field sizes were around 3

912: arcmin.

913: 

914: The CCD images are unfortunately not always suitable, for very poor

915: clusters or for clusters with large cores.  Since the latter are

916: easily studied by other means, we augmented our own CCD profiles by

917: collecting from the literature a number of star-count profiles

918: \citep{kin68,pet76,har84,ort85}, as well as photoelectric profiles

919: \citep{kin66,kin75} and electronographic profiles \citep{kro84}.  In a

920: few cases we judged normality by eye estimates on one of the Sky

921: Surveys.

922: 

923: %% In this section, we use  the \subsection command to set off

924: %% a subsection.  \footnote is used to insert a footnote to the text.

925: 

926: %% Observe the use of the LaTeX \label

927: %% command after the \subsection to give a symbolic KEY to the

928: %% subsection for cross-referencing in a \ref command.

929: %% You can use LaTeX's \ref and \label commands to keep track of

930: %% cross-references to sections, equations, tables, and figures.

931: %% That way, if you change the order of any elements, LaTeX will

932: %% automatically renumber them.

933: 

934: %% This section also includes several of the displayed math environments

935: %% mentioned in the Author Guide.

936: 

937: \section{Helicity Amplitudes}

938: 

939: It has been realized that helicity amplitudes provide a convenient

940: means for Feynman diagram\footnote{Footnotes can be inserted like

941: this.}  evaluations.  These amplitude-level techniques are

942: particularly convenient for calculations involving many Feynman

943: diagrams, where the usual trace techniques for the amplitude squared

944: becomes unwieldy.  Our calculations use the helicity techniques

945: developed by other authors \cite[]{hag86}; we briefly summarize below.

946: 

947: \subsection{Formalism} \label{bozomath}

948: 

949: %% The equation environment wil produce a numbered display equation.

950: 

951: A tree-level amplitude in $e^+e^-$ collisions can be expressed in

952: terms of fermion strings of the form

953: \begin{equation}

954: \bar v(p_2,\sigma_2)P_{-\tau}\hat a_1\hat a_2\cdots \hat

955: a_nu(p_1,\sigma_1) ,

956: \end{equation}

957: where $p$ and $\sigma$ label the initial $e^{\pm}$ four-momenta and

958: helicities $(\sigma = \pm 1)$, $\hat a_i=a^\mu_i\gamma_\nu$ and

959: $P_\tau=\frac{1}{2}(1+\tau\gamma_5)$ is a chirality projection

960: operator $(\tau = \pm1)$.  The $a^\mu_i$ may be formed from particle

961: four-momenta, gauge-boson polarization vectors or fermion strings with

962: an uncontracted Lorentz index associated with final-state fermions.

963: 

964: %% The \notetoeditor{TEXT} command allows the author to communicate

965: %% information to the copy editor.  This information will appear as a

966: %% footnote on the printed copy for the manuscript style file.  Nothing will

967: %% appear on the printed copy if the preprint or

968: %% preprint2 style files are used.

969: 

970: %% The eqnarray environment produces multi-line display math. The end of

971: %% each line is marked with a \\. Lines will be numbered unless the \\

972: %% is preceded by a \nonumber command.

973: %% Alignment points are marked by ampersands (&). There should be two

974: %% ampersands (&) per line.

975: 

976: In the chiral \notetoeditor{Figures 1 and 2 should appear side-by-side

977: in print} representation the $\gamma$ matrices are expressed in terms

978: of $2\times 2$ Pauli matrices $\sigma$ and the unit matrix 1 as

979: \begin{eqnarray}

980: \gamma^\mu  & = & \left(

981: \begin{array}{cc}

982: 0 & \sigma^\mu_+ \\ \sigma^\mu_- & 0

983: \end{array}     \right) ,

984:  \gamma^5= \left(

985: \begin{array}{cc}

986: -1 &   0\\ 0 &   1

987: \end{array}     \right)  , \nonumber \\

988: \sigma^\mu_{\pm}  & = &   ({\bf 1} ,\pm \sigma) , \nonumber

989: \end{eqnarray}

990: giving

991: \begin{equation}

992: \hat a= \left(

993: \begin{array}{cc}

994: 0 & (\hat a)_+\\ (\hat a)_- & 0

995: \end{array}\right), (\hat a)_\pm=a_\mu\sigma^\mu_\pm ,

996: \end{equation}

997: The spinors are expressed in terms of two-component Weyl spinors as

998: \begin{equation}

999: u=\left(

1000: \begin{array}{c}

1001: (u)_-\\ (u)_+

1002: \end{array}\right), v={\bf (}\vdag_+{\bf ,}   \vdag_-{\bf )} .

1003: \end{equation}

1004: 

1005: %% Putting eqnarrays or equations inside the mathletters environment groups

1006: %% the enclosed equations by letter. For instance, the eqnarray below, instead

1007: %% of being numbered, say, (4) and (5), would be numbered (4a) and (4b).

1008: %% LaTeX the paper and look at the output to see the results.

1009: 

1010: The Weyl spinors are given in terms of helicity eigenstates

1011: $\chi_\lambda(p)$ with $\lambda=\pm1$ by

1012: \begin{mathletters}

1013: \begin{eqnarray}

1014: u(p,\lambda)_\pm & = & (E\pm\lambda|{\bf p}|)^{1/2}\chi_\lambda(p) ,

1015: \\ v(p,\lambda)_\pm & = & \pm\lambda(E\mp\lambda|{\bf p}|)^{1/2}\chi

1016: _{-\lambda}(p)

1017: \end{eqnarray}

1018: \end{mathletters}

1019: 

1020: %% This section contains more display math examples, including unnumbered

1021: %% equations (displaymath environment). The last paragraph includes some

1022: %% examples of in-line math featuring a couple of the AASTeX symbol macros.

1023: 

1024: \section{Floating material and so forth}

1025: 

1026: %% The displaymath environment will produce the same sort of equation as

1027: %% the equation environment, except that the equation will not be numbered

1028: %% by LaTeX.

1029: 

1030: Consider a task that computes profile parameters for a modified

1031: Lorentzian of the form

1032: \begin{equation}

1033: I = \frac{1}{1 + d_{1}^{P (1 + d_{2} )}}

1034: \end{equation}

1035: where

1036: \begin{displaymath}

1037: d_{1} = \sqrt{ \left( \begin{array}{c} \frac{x_{1}}{R_{maj}}

1038: \end{array} \right) ^{2} +

1039: \left( \begin{array}{c} \frac{y_{1}}{R_{min}} \end{array} \right) ^{2}

1040: }

1041: \end{displaymath}

1042: \begin{displaymath}

1043: d_{2} = \sqrt{ \left( \begin{array}{c} \frac{x_{1}}{P R_{maj}}

1044: \end{array} \right) ^{2} +

1045: \left( \begin{array}{c} \case{y_{1}}{P R_{min}} \end{array} \right)

1046: ^{2} }

1047: \end{displaymath}

1048: \begin{displaymath}

1049: x_{1} = (x - x_{0}) \cos \Theta + (y - y_{0}) \sin \Theta

1050: \end{displaymath}

1051: \begin{displaymath}

1052: y_{1} = -(x - x_{0}) \sin \Theta + (y - y_{0}) \cos \Theta

1053: \end{displaymath}

1054: 

1055: In these expressions $x_{0}$,$y_{0}$ is the star center, and $\Theta$

1056: is the angle with the $x$ axis.  Results of this task are shown in

1057: table~\ref{tbl-1}.  It is not clear how these sorts of analyses may

1058: affect determination of $M_{\sun}$, but the assumption is that the

1059: alternate results should be less than 90\degr\ out of phase with

1060: previous values.  We have no observations of \ion{Ca}{2}.  Roughly

1061: \slantfrac{4}{5} of the electronically submitted abstracts for AAS

1062: meetings are error-free.

1063: 

1064: %% If you wish to include an acknowledgments section in your paper,

1065: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments

1066: %% command.

1067: 

1068: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the

1069: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]

1070: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,

1071: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the

1072: %% text to be printed in the second.

1073: 

1074: \acknowledgments

1075: 

1076: We are grateful to V. Barger, T. Han, and R. J. N. Phillips for doing

1077: the math in section~\ref{bozomath}.  More information on the AASTeX

1078: macros package is available \\ at

1079: \url{http://www.aas.org/publications/aastex}.  For technical support,

1080: please write to \email{aastex-help@aas.org}.

1081: 

1082: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their

1083: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope

1084: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches

1085: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be

1086: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes

1087: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.

1088: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX

1089: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.

1090: 

1091: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the

1092: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research

1093: %% for the paper.  Each keyword will be checked against the master list during

1094: %% copy editing.  Individual instruments or configurations can be provided 

1095: %% in parentheses, after the keyword, but they will not be verified.

1096: 

1097: {\it Facilities:} \facility{Nickel}, \facility{HST (STIS)},

1098: \facility{CXO (ASIS)}.

1099: 

1100: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.

1101: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix

1102: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.

1103: 

1104: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.

1105: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix

1106: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.

1107: 

1108: \appendix

1109: 

1110: \section{Appendix material}

1111: 

1112: Consider once again a task that computes profile parameters for a

1113: modified Lorentzian of the form

1114: \begin{equation}

1115: I = \frac{1}{1 + d_{1}^{P (1 + d_{2} )}}

1116: \end{equation}

1117: where

1118: \begin{mathletters}

1119: \begin{displaymath}

1120: d_{1} = \frac{3}{4} \sqrt{ \left( \begin{array}{c}

1121: \frac{x_{1}}{R_{maj}}

1122: \end{array} \right) ^{2} +

1123: \left( \begin{array}{c} \frac{y_{1}}{R_{min}} \end{array} \right) ^{2}

1124: }

1125: \end{displaymath}

1126: \begin{equation}

1127: d_{2} = \case{3}{4} \sqrt{ \left( \begin{array}{c} \frac{x_{1}}{P

1128: R_{maj}}

1129: \end{array} \right) ^{2} +

1130: \left( \begin{array}{c} \case{y_{1}}{P R_{min}} \end{array} \right)

1131: ^{2} }

1132: \end{equation}

1133: \begin{eqnarray}

1134: x_{1} & = & (x - x_{0}) \cos \Theta + (y - y_{0}) \sin \Theta \\ y_{1}

1135: & = & -(x - x_{0}) \sin \Theta + (y - y_{0}) \cos \Theta

1136: \end{eqnarray}

1137: \end{mathletters}

1138: 

1139: For completeness, here is one last equation.

1140: \begin{equation}

1141: e = mc^2

1142: \end{equation}

1143: 

1144: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.

1145: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.

1146: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of

1147: %% curly braces.  If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error

1148: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".

1149: %%

1150: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite

1151: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a

1152: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds

1153: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).

1154: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the

1155: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain

1156: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in

1157: %% place of the \cite commands.

1158: 

1159: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.

1160: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.

1161: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.

1162: 

1163: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly

1164: %% different from previous examples.  The natbib system solves a host

1165: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly

1166: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.

1167: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.

1168: 

1169: \begin{thebibliography}{}

1170: %\bibitem[Auri\`ere(1982)]{aur82} Auri\`ere, M.  1982, \aap, 109, 301

1171: \bibitem[Canizares et al.(1978)]{can78} Canizares, C. R., Grindlay,

1172:     J. E., Hiltner, W. A., Liller, W., \& McClintock, J. E.  1978,

1173:     \apj, 224, 39

1174: \bibitem[Djorgovski \& King(1984)]{djo84} Djorgovski, S., \& King,

1175:     I. R.  1984, \apjl, 277, L49

1176: \bibitem[Hagiwara \& Zeppenfeld(1986)]{hag86} Hagiwara, K., \&

1177:     Zeppenfeld, D.  1986, Nucl.Phys., 274, 1

1178: \bibitem[Harris(1999)]{harr99} Harris~W. E., 1999, Ap\&SS, 267, 95

1179: \bibitem[Harris \& van den Bergh(1984)]{har84} Harris, W. E., \& van

1180:     den Bergh, S.  1984, \aj, 89, 1816

1181: \bibitem[H\`enon(1961)]{hen61} H\'enon, M.  1961, Ann.d'Ap., 24, 369

1182: \bibitem[Heiles \& Troland(2003)]{heiles03} Heiles, C. \& Troland,

1183: T. H., 2003, \apjs, preprint doi:10.1086/381753

1184: \bibitem[Kim, Ostricker, \& Stone(2003)]{kim03} Kim, W.-T.,  Ostriker,

1185: E., \& Stone, J. M., 2003, \apj, 599, 1157

1186: \bibitem[King(1966)]{kin66}  King, I. R.  1966, \aj, 71, 276

1187: \bibitem[King(1975)]{kin75}  King, I. R.  1975, Dynamics of Stellar

1188:     Systems, A. Hayli, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1975, 99

1189: \bibitem[King et al.(1968)]{kin68}  King, I. R., Hedemann, E., Hodge,

1190:     S. M., \& White, R. E.  1968, \aj, 73, 456

1191: \bibitem[Kirsch et al.(2002)]{kirs02} Kirsch, M., and the EPIC

1192:   Consortium, 2002, XMM-SOC-CAL-TN-0018

1193: \bibitem[Kron et al.(1984)]{kro84} Kron, G. E., Hewitt, A. V., \&

1194:     Wasserman, L. H.  1984, \pasp, 96, 198

1195: \bibitem[Lynden-Bell \& Wood(1968)]{lyn68} Lynden-Bell, D., \& Wood,

1196:     R.  1968, \mnras, 138, 495

1197: \bibitem[Newell \& O'Neil(1978)]{new78} Newell, E. B., \& O'Neil,

1198:     E. J.  1978, \apjs, 37, 27

1199: \bibitem[Nice et al.(2005)]{nic05} Nice, D. J., Splaver, E. M.,

1200: Stairs, I. H., L\"ohmer, O., Jessner, A., Kramer, M., Cordes,

1201: J. M. 2005, \apj, 634, 1242

1202: \bibitem[Ortolani et al.(1985)]{ort85} Ortolani, S., Rosino, L.,

1203:     \& Sandage, A.  1985, \aj, 90, 473

1204: \bibitem[Peterson(1976)]{pet76} Peterson, C. J.  1976, \aj, 81, 617

1205: \bibitem[Predehl \& Schmitt(1995)]{pred95} Predehl, P. \& Schmitt, J. H. M. M. 1995, A\&A, 293, 889

1206: \bibitem[Rudnick et al.(2003)]{rudnick03} Rudnick, G. et al., 2003, \apj, 599, 847

1207: \bibitem[Spitzer(1985)]{spi85} Spitzer, L.  1985, Dynamics of

1208:     Star Clusters, J. Goodman \& P. Hut, Dordrecht: Reidel, 109

1209: \bibitem[Treu et al.(2003)]{treu03} Treu, T. et al., 2003, \apj, 591, 53

1210: \end{thebibliography}

1211: 

1212: \clearpage

1213: 

1214: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include

1215: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.

1216: %% To embed the sample graphics in

1217: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and

1218: %% \includegraphics commands

1219: %%

1220: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or

1221: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the

1222: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,

1223: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the

1224: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,

1225: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.

1226: %%

1227: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of

1228: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check

1229: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to

1230: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from

1231: %% journal to journal.

1232: 

1233: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to

1234: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption

1235: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be

1236: %% available in the electronic journal.

1237: 

1238: \begin{figure}

1239: \epsscale{.80}

1240: \plotone{f1.eps}

1241: \caption{Derived spectra for 3C138 \citep[see][]{heiles03}. Plots for all sources are available

1242: in the electronic edition of {\it The Astrophysical Journal}.\label{fig1}}

1243: \end{figure}

1244: 

1245: \clearpage

1246: 

1247: %% Here we use \plottwo to present two versions of the same figure,

1248: %% one in black and white for print the other in RGB color

1249: %% for online presentation. Note that the caption indicates

1250: %% that a color version of the figure will be available online.

1251: %%

1252: 

1253: \begin{figure}

1254: \plottwo{f2.eps}{f2_color.eps}

1255: \caption{A panel taken from Figure 2 of \citet{rudnick03}. 

1256: See the electronic edition of the Journal for a color version 

1257: of this figure.\label{fig2}}

1258: \end{figure}

1259: 

1260: %% This figure uses \includegraphics to scale and rotate the still frame

1261: %% for an mpeg animation.

1262: 

1263: \begin{figure}

1264: \includegraphics[angle=90,scale=.50]{f3.eps}

1265: \caption{Animation still frame taken from \citet{kim03}.

1266: This figure is also available as an mpeg

1267: animation in the electronic edition of the

1268: {\it Astrophysical Journal}.}

1269: \end{figure}

1270: 

1271: %% If you are not including electonic art with your submission, you may

1272: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command. See the

1273: %% User Guide for details.

1274: %%

1275: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,

1276: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage

1277: %% after every seventh one.

1278: 

1279: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before

1280: %% each one.

1281: 

1282: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables:  the

1283: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX

1284: %% table environment.  Use of deluxetable is preferred.

1285: %%

1286: 

1287: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,

1288: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.

1289: 

1290: %% In this first example, note that the \tabletypesize{}

1291: %% command has been used to reduce the font size of the table.

1292: %% We also use the \rotate command to rotate the table to

1293: %% landscape orientation since it is very wide even at the

1294: %% reduced font size.

1295: %%

1296: %% Note also that the \label command needs to be placed

1297: %% inside the \tablecaption.

1298: 

1299: %% This table also includes a table comment indicating that the full

1300: %% version will be available in machine-readable format in the electronic

1301: %% edition.

1302: 

1303: \clearpage

1304: 

1305: \begin{deluxetable}{ccrrrrrrrrcrl}

1306: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1307: \rotate

1308: \tablecaption{Sample table taken from \citet{treu03}\label{tbl-1}}

1309: \tablewidth{0pt}

1310: \tablehead{

1311: \colhead{POS} & \colhead{chip} & \colhead{ID} & \colhead{X} & \colhead{Y} &

1312: \colhead{RA} & \colhead{DEC} & \colhead{IAU$\pm$ $\delta$ IAU} &

1313: \colhead{IAP1$\pm$ $\delta$ IAP1} & \colhead{IAP2 $\pm$ $\delta$ IAP2} &

1314: \colhead{star} & \colhead{E} & \colhead{Comment}

1315: }

1316: \startdata

1317: 0 & 2 & 1 & 1370.99 & 57.35    &   6.651120 &  17.131149 & 21.344$\pm$0.006  & 2

1318: 4.385$\pm$0.016 & 23.528$\pm$0.013 & 0.0 & 9 & -    \\

1319: 0 & 2 & 2 & 1476.62 & 8.03     &   6.651480 &  17.129572 & 21.641$\pm$0.005  & 2

1320: 3.141$\pm$0.007 & 22.007$\pm$0.004 & 0.0 & 9 & -    \\

1321: 0 & 2 & 3 & 1079.62 & 28.92    &   6.652430 &  17.135000 & 23.953$\pm$0.030  & 2

1322: 4.890$\pm$0.023 & 24.240$\pm$0.023 & 0.0 & - & -    \\

1323: 0 & 2 & 4 & 114.58  & 21.22    &   6.655560 &  17.148020 & 23.801$\pm$0.025  & 2

1324: 5.039$\pm$0.026 & 24.112$\pm$0.021 & 0.0 & - & -    \\

1325: 0 & 2 & 5 & 46.78   & 19.46    &   6.655800 &  17.148932 & 23.012$\pm$0.012  & 2

1326: 3.924$\pm$0.012 & 23.282$\pm$0.011 & 0.0 & - & -    \\

1327: 0 & 2 & 6 & 1441.84 & 16.16    &   6.651480 &  17.130072 & 24.393$\pm$0.045  & 2

1328: 6.099$\pm$0.062 & 25.119$\pm$0.049 & 0.0 & - & -    \\

1329: 0 & 2 & 7 & 205.43  & 3.96     &   6.655520 &  17.146742 & 24.424$\pm$0.032  & 2

1330: 5.028$\pm$0.025 & 24.597$\pm$0.027 & 0.0 & - & -    \\

1331: 0 & 2 & 8 & 1321.63 & 9.76     &   6.651950 &  17.131672 & 22.189$\pm$0.011  & 2

1332: 4.743$\pm$0.021 & 23.298$\pm$0.011 & 0.0 & 4 & edge \\

1333: \enddata

1334: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before

1335: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark

1336: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.

1337: \tablecomments{Table \ref{tbl-1} is published in its entirety in the 

1338: electronic edition of the {\it Astrophysical Journal}.  A portion is 

1339: shown here for guidance regarding its form and content.}

1340: \tablenotetext{a}{Sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-1} that was generated

1341: with the deluxetable environment}

1342: \tablenotetext{b}{Another sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-1}}

1343: \end{deluxetable}

1344: 

1345: %% If you use the table environment, please indicate horizontal rules using

1346: %% \tableline, not \hline.

1347: %% Do not put multiple tabular environments within a single table.

1348: %% The optional \label should appear inside the \caption command.

1349: 

1350: \clearpage

1351: 

1352: \begin{table}

1353: \begin{center}

1354: \caption{More terribly relevant tabular information.\label{tbl-2}}

1355: \begin{tabular}{crrrrrrrrrrr}

1356: \tableline\tableline

1357: Star & Height & $d_{x}$ & $d_{y}$ & $n$ & $\chi^2$ & $R_{maj}$ & $R_{min}$ &

1358: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$P$\tablenotemark{a}} & $P R_{maj}$ & $P R_{min}$ &

1359: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\Theta$\tablenotemark{b}} \\

1360: \tableline

1361: 1 &33472.5 &-0.1 &0.4  &53 &27.4 &2.065  &1.940 &3.900 &68.3 &116.2 &-27.639\\

1362: 2 &27802.4 &-0.3 &-0.2 &60 &3.7  &1.628  &1.510 &2.156 &6.8  &7.5 &-26.764\\

1363: 3 &29210.6 &0.9  &0.3  &60 &3.4  &1.622  &1.551 &2.159 &6.7  &7.3 &-40.272\\

1364: 4 &32733.8 &-1.2\tablenotemark{c} &-0.5 &41 &54.8 &2.282  &2.156 &4.313 &117.4 &78.2 &-35.847\\

1365: 5 & 9607.4 &-0.4 &-0.4 &60 &1.4  &1.669\tablenotemark{c}  &1.574 &2.343 &8.0  &8.9 &-33.417\\

1366: 6 &31638.6 &1.6  &0.1  &39 &315.2 & 3.433 &3.075 &7.488 &92.1 &25.3 &-12.052\\

1367: \tableline

1368: \end{tabular}

1369: %% Any table notes must follow the \end{tabular} command.

1370: \tablenotetext{a}{Sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-2} that was

1371: generated with the \LaTeX\ table environment}

1372: \tablenotetext{b}{Yet another sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-2}}

1373: \tablenotetext{c}{Another sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-2}}

1374: \tablecomments{We can also attach a long-ish paragraph of explanatory

1375: material to a table.}

1376: \end{center}

1377: \end{table}

1378: 

1379: %% If the table is more than one page long, the width of the table can vary

1380: %% from page to page when the default \tablewidth is used, as below.  The

1381: %% individual table widths for each page will be written to the log file; a

1382: %% maximum tablewidth for the table can be computed from these values.

1383: %% The \tablewidth argument can then be reset and the file reprocessed, so

1384: %% that the table is of uniform width throughout. Try getting the widths

1385: %% from the log file and changing the \tablewidth parameter to see how

1386: %% adjusting this value affects table formatting.

1387: 

1388: %% The \dataset{} macro has also been applied to a few of the objects to

1389: %% show how many observations can be tagged in a table.

1390: 

1391: \clearpage

1392: 

1393: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrcrrrrr}

1394: \tablewidth{0pt}

1395: \tablecaption{Literature Data for Program Stars}

1396: \tablehead{

1397: \colhead{Star}           & \colhead{V}      &

1398: \colhead{b$-$y}          & \colhead{m$_1$}  &

1399: \colhead{c$_1$}          & \colhead{ref}    &

1400: \colhead{T$_{\rm eff}$}  & \colhead{log g}  &

1401: \colhead{v$_{\rm turb}$} & \colhead{[Fe/H]} &

1402: \colhead{ref}}

1403: \startdata

1404: HD 97 & 9.7& 0.51& 0.15& 0.35& 2 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.50$ & 2 \\

1405: & & & & & & 5015 & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.50$ & 10 \\

1406: \dataset[ADS/Sa.HST#O6H04VAXQ]{HD 2665} & 7.7& 0.54& 0.09& 0.34& 2 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $-2.30$ & 2 \\

1407: & & & & & & 5000 & 2.50 & 2.4 & $-1.99$ & 5 \\

1408: & & & & & & 5120 & 3.00 & 2.0 & $-1.69$ & 7 \\

1409: & & & & & & 4980 & \nodata & \nodata & $-2.05$ & 10 \\

1410: HD 4306 & 9.0& 0.52& 0.05& 0.35& 20, 2& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $-2.70$ & 2 \\

1411: & & & & & & 5000 & 1.75 & 2.0 & $-2.70$ & 13 \\

1412: & & & & & & 5000 & 1.50 & 1.8 & $-2.65$ & 14 \\

1413: & & & & & & 4950 & 2.10 & 2.0 & $-2.92$ & 8 \\

1414: & & & & & & 5000 & 2.25 & 2.0 & $-2.83$ & 18 \\

1415: & & & & & & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $-2.80$ & 21 \\

1416: & & & & & & 4930 & \nodata & \nodata & $-2.45$ & 10 \\

1417: HD 5426 & 9.6& 0.50& 0.08& 0.34& 2 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $-2.30$ & 2 \\

1418: \dataset[ADS/Sa.HST#O5F654010]{HD 6755} & 7.7& 0.49& 0.12& 0.28& 20, 2& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.70$ & 2 \\

1419: & & & & & & 5200 & 2.50 & 2.4 & $-1.56$ & 5 \\

1420: & & & & & & 5260 & 3.00 & 2.7 & $-1.67$ & 7 \\

1421: & & & & & & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.58$ & 21 \\

1422: & & & & & & 5200 & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.80$ & 10 \\

1423: & & & & & & 4600 & \nodata & \nodata & $-2.75$ & 10 \\

1424: \dataset[ADS/Sa.HST#O56D06010]{HD 94028} & 8.2& 0.34& 0.08& 0.25& 20 & 5795 & 4.00 & \nodata & $-1.70$ & 22 \\

1425: & & & & & & 5860 & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.70$ & 4 \\

1426: & & & & & & 5910 & 3.80 & \nodata & $-1.76$ & 15 \\

1427: & & & & & & 5800 & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.67$ & 17 \\

1428: & & & & & & 5902 & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.50$ & 11 \\

1429: & & & & & & 5900 & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.57$ & 3 \\

1430: & & & & & & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.32$ & 21 \\

1431: HD 97916 & 9.2& 0.29& 0.10& 0.41& 20 & 6125 & 4.00 & \nodata & $-1.10$ & 22 \\

1432: & & & & & & 6160 & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.39$ & 3 \\

1433: & & & & & & 6240 & 3.70 & \nodata & $-1.28$ & 15 \\

1434: & & & & & & 5950 & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.50$ & 17 \\

1435: & & & & & & 6204 & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.36$ & 11 \\

1436: \cutinhead{This is a cut-in head}

1437: +26\arcdeg2606& 9.7&0.34&0.05&0.28&20,11& 5980 & \nodata & \nodata &$<-2.20$ & 19 \\

1438: & & & & & & 5950 & \nodata & \nodata & $-2.89$ & 24 \\

1439: +26\arcdeg3578& 9.4&0.31&0.05&0.37&20,11& 5830 & \nodata & \nodata & $-2.60$ & 4 \\

1440: & & & & & & 5800 & \nodata & \nodata & $-2.62$ & 17 \\

1441: & & & & & & 6177 & \nodata & \nodata & $-2.51$ & 11 \\

1442: & & & & & & 6000 & 3.25 & \nodata & $-2.20$ & 22 \\

1443: & & & & & & 6140 & 3.50 & \nodata & $-2.57$ & 15 \\

1444: +30\arcdeg2611& 9.2&0.82&0.33&0.55& 2 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.70$ & 2 \\

1445: & & & & & & 4400 & 1.80 & \nodata & $-1.70$ & 12 \\

1446: & & & & & & 4400 & 0.90 & 1.7 & $-1.20$ & 14 \\

1447: & & & & & & 4260 & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.55$ & 10 \\

1448: +37\arcdeg1458& 8.9&0.44&0.07&0.22&20,11& 5296 & \nodata & \nodata & $-2.39$ & 11 \\

1449: & & & & & & 5420 & \nodata & \nodata & $-2.43$ & 3 \\

1450: +58\arcdeg1218&10.0&0.51&0.03&0.36& 2 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $-2.80$ & 2 \\

1451: & & & & & & 5000 & 1.10 & 2.2 & $-2.71$ & 14 \\

1452: & & & & & & 5000 & 2.20 & 1.8 & $-2.46$ & 5 \\

1453: & & & & & & 4980 & \nodata & \nodata & $-2.55$ & 10 \\

1454: +72\arcdeg0094&10.2&0.31&0.09&0.26&12 & 6160 & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.80$ & 19 \\

1455: \sidehead{I'm a side head:}

1456: G5--36 & 10.8& 0.40& 0.07& 0.28& 20 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.19$ & 21 \\

1457: G18--54 & 10.7& 0.37& 0.08& 0.28& 20 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.34$ & 21 \\

1458: G20--08 & 9.9& 0.36& 0.05& 0.25& 20,11& 5849 & \nodata & \nodata & $-2.59$ & 11 \\

1459: & & & & & & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $-2.03$ & 21 \\

1460: G20--15 & 10.6& 0.45& 0.03& 0.27& 20,11& 5657 & \nodata & \nodata & $-2.00$ & 11 \\

1461: & & & & & & 6020 & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.56$ & 3 \\

1462: & & & & & & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.58$ & 21 \\

1463: G21--22 & 10.7& 0.38& 0.07& 0.27& 20,11& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.23$ & 21 \\

1464: G24--03 & 10.5& 0.36& 0.06& 0.27& 20,11& 5866 & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.78$ & 11 \\

1465: & & & & & & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.70$ & 21 \\

1466: G30--52 & 8.6& 0.50& 0.25& 0.27& 11 & 4757 & \nodata & \nodata & $-2.12$ & 11 \\

1467: & & & & & & 4880 & \nodata & \nodata & $-2.14$ & 3 \\

1468: G33--09 & 10.6& 0.41& 0.10& 0.28& 20 & 5575 & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.48$ & 11 \\

1469: G66--22 & 10.5& 0.46& 0.16& 0.28& 11 & 5060 & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.77$ & 3 \\

1470: & & & & & & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $-1.04$ & 21 \\

1471: G90--03 & 10.4& 0.37& 0.04& 0.29& 20 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $-2.01$ & 21 \\

1472: LP 608--62\tablenotemark{a} & 10.5& 0.30& 0.07& 0.35& 11 & 6250 & \nodata &

1473: \nodata & $-2.70$ & 4 \\

1474: \enddata

1475: \tablenotetext{a}{Star LP 608--62 is also known as BD+1\arcdeg 2341p.  We will

1476: make this footnote extra long so that it extends over two lines.}

1477: %% You can append references to a table using the \tablerefs command.

1478: \tablerefs{

1479: (1) Barbuy, Spite, \& Spite 1985; (2) Bond 1980; (3) Carbon et al. 1987;

1480: (4) Hobbs \& Duncan 1987; (5) Gilroy et al. 1988: (6) Gratton \& Ortolani 1986;

1481: (7) Gratton \& Sneden 1987; (8) Gratton \& Sneden (1988); (9) Gratton \& Sneden 1991;

1482: (10) Kraft et al. 1982; (11) LCL, or Laird, 1990; (12) Leep \& Wallerstein 1981;

1483: (13) Luck \& Bond 1981; (14) Luck \& Bond 1985; (15) Magain 1987;

1484: (16) Magain 1989; (17) Peterson 1981; (18) Peterson, Kurucz, \& Carney 1990;

1485: (19) RMB; (20) Schuster \& Nissen 1988; (21) Schuster \& Nissen 1989b;

1486: (22) Spite et al. 1984; (23) Spite \& Spite 1986; (24) Hobbs \& Thorburn 1991;

1487: (25) Hobbs et al. 1991; (26) Olsen 1983.}

1488: \end{deluxetable}

1489: 

1490: %% Tables may also be prepared as separate files. See the accompanying

1491: %% sample file table.tex for an example of an external table file.

1492: %% To include an external file in your main document, use the \input

1493: %% command. Uncomment the line below to include table.tex in this

1494: %% sample file. (Note that you will need to comment out the \documentclass,

1495: %% \begin{document}, and \end{document} commands from table.tex if you want

1496: %% to include it in this document.)

1497: 

1498: %% \input{table}

1499: 

1500: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text

1501: %% that appears after it.

1502: 

1503: \end{document}

1504: 

1505: %%

1506: %% End of file `sample.tex'.

1507: