1: %24/07/07 rtr minor changes, typos, commas, and the like
2: %21-24/7/7 frf
3: %19/07/07: RTR
4: %17/07/07: Paolo, B&F
5: %15/07/07: B&F
6: %13/07/07: B&F
7: %04/07/07: Barbara
8: %-------------------------------------------------------
9: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
10: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
11: %\documentstyle[emulateapj,apjfonts,epsf,versioncopy]{article}
12: %\def\versionnumber{9} % <-- here the version number
13: %
14: \newcommand{\gras}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
15: \def\etal{{et al.~}}
16: \def\ltsima{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}
17: \def\gtsima{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}
18: \def\lsim{\lower.5ex\hbox{\ltsima}}
19: \def\gsim{\lower.5ex\hbox{\gtsima}}
20: \def\lapp{\ifmmode\stackrel{<}{_{\sim}}\else$\stackrel{<}{_{\sim}}$\fi}
21: \def\gapp{\ifmmode\stackrel{>}{_{\sim}}\else$\stackrel{<}{_{\sim}}$\fi}
22:
23: \def\msol{\,\mathrm{M}_\odot}
24: \def\media#1{\langle #1\rangle}
25:
26:
27: \newdimen\minuswidth %define @ width of minus sign for tables
28: \setbox0=\hbox{$-$}
29: \minuswidth=\wd0
30: \catcode`@=\active
31: \def@{\kern\minuswidth}
32: %\newdimen\digitwidth %define ! a one digit width for tables
33: \setbox0=\hbox{\rm0}
34: %\digitwidth=\wd0
35: %\catcode`!=\active
36: %\def!{\kern\digitwidth}
37:
38: \shorttitle{Surface Density Profile of NGC6388}
39: \shortauthors{Lanzoni et al.}
40:
41: \begin{document}
42: \title{The surface density profile of
43: NGC~6388: a good candidate for harboring an intermediate-mass black hole
44: \footnote{Based on observations with the NASA/ESA {\it HST}, obtained at the
45: Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by AURA, Inc., under
46: NASA contract NAS5-26555. Also based on WFI observations collected
47: at the European Southern Observatory, La Silla, Chile.} }
48:
49: \author{
50: B. Lanzoni\altaffilmark{1},
51: %
52: E. Dalessandro\altaffilmark{1,2},
53: %
54: F.R. Ferraro\altaffilmark{1},
55: %
56: P. Miocchi\altaffilmark{3},
57: %
58: E. Valenti\altaffilmark{4},
59: %
60: R.T. Rood\altaffilmark{5}
61: }
62: %
63: \affil{\altaffilmark{1} Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universit\`a degli Studi
64: di Bologna, via Ranzani 1, I--40127 Bologna, Italy}
65: %
66: \affil{\altaffilmark{2} ASI,Centro di Geodesia Spaziale, contrada Terlecchia,
67: I-75100, Matera, Italy }
68: %
69: \affil{\altaffilmark{3} Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit\`a di Roma ``La
70: Sapienza,'' P.le A. Moro 5, I--00185 Roma, Italy}
71: %
72: \affil{\altaffilmark{4} European Southern Observatory,
73: Alonso de Cordova 3107, Vitacura, Santiago, Chile}
74: %
75: \affil{\altaffilmark{5} Astronomy Department, University of Virginia,
76: P.O. Box 400325, Charlottesville, VA, 22904}
77: %
78: \date{24 July, 07}
79:
80: \begin{abstract}
81: We have used a combination of high resolution ({\it HST} ACS-HRC,
82: ACS-WFC, and WFPC2) and wide-field ({\it ESO}-WFI) observations of the
83: galactic globular cluster NGC~6388 to derive its center of gravity,
84: projected density profile, and central surface brightness profile.
85: While the overall projected profiles are well fit by a King model
86: with intermediate concentration ($c=1.8$) and sizable core radius
87: ($r_c=7\farcs2$), a significant power law (with slope
88: $\alpha=-0.2$) deviation from a flat core behavior has been detected
89: within the inner $1\arcsec$. These properties suggest the
90: presence of a central intermediate mass black hole. The observed
91: profiles are well reproduced by a multi-mass isotropic,
92: spherical model including a black hole with a mass of $\sim 5.7\times
93: 10^3\, M_\odot$.
94: \end{abstract}
95:
96: \keywords{Globular clusters: individual (NGC6388); stars: evolution --
97: black hole physics}
98:
99: \section{INTRODUCTION}
100: The surface brightness (SB) and the projected density profiles of the
101: vast majority of globular clusters (GCs) are well reproduced by a
102: family of simple models characterized by an extended isothermal core
103: and a tidally trucated envelope---the so-called King models (King
104: 1966). However a fraction ($\sim 15$--20\%, see \citet{dk86})
105: of galactic GCs deviate significantly from this behavior. The
106: projected density profiles of these clusters do not exhibit an
107: extended core, showing instead a power law behavior $\Sigma(r)\propto
108: r^\alpha$ with $\alpha$ ranging from $-0.8$ to $-1.0$ . This feature
109: has been thought to arise from the dynamical evolution of stellar
110: systems that have experienced the collapse of the core. These are
111: called post-core collapse clusters, hereafter PCC).
112:
113: However, other processes can affect the shape of a star cluster density
114: profile; among these the existence of an Intermediate Mass Black Hole (IMBH)
115: in the central region has recently received attention. Interestingly enough,
116: detailed collisional $N$-body simulations (Baumgardt et al., 2005, hereafter
117: BMH05; Trenti et al. 2007) and theoretical arguments \citep{heggie07} have
118: shown that the presence of a IMBH yields quite a different SB profile than
119: core collapse does. These studies indicate that in an initially dense
120: cluster a IMBH gives rise to a strong expansion of the central region that,
121: in turn, leads to a quasi-steady configuration resembling that of a medium
122: concentration cluster with a core-like profile. Thus, the clusters most
123: likely to harbor IMBHs are those having the appearance of normal King model
124: clusters except in the very central regions where a power law deviation from
125: a flat behavior is expected. The exponent of this power law is predicted to
126: be significantly lower ($\alpha\sim -0.2$) than in the PCC case (BMH05,
127: Miocchi 2007). Small departures from a King model have been
128: observed in the projected density profile of a
129: few GCs (included NGC6388) by Noyola \& Gebhardt (2006, hereafter
130: NG06).
131:
132: The confirmation of the existence of IMBHs and an estimate of their
133: frequency would be important for a number of astrophysical problems
134: like the formation processes of super massive BH in galaxies,
135: super-Eddington X-ray sources in extragalactic globular clusters
136: \citep{sivakoff07}, the origin of ultraluminous X-ray sources
137: \citep{miller03,fa06}. Despite of their potential importance, the
138: existence of IMBH in GCs is still an open question. For instance, the
139: evidence for an IMBH in M15 reported by \citet{vdm02} and
140: \citet{ger02} has been questioned by \cite{bau03a}. \citet{bau03b}
141: also question evidence for an IMBH in G1 in M31 \citep{ge02} (but see
142: \citet{ge05} and the recent findings by Ulvestad et al (2007)
143: and Green \& Ho, 2007).
144:
145: Here we present accurate surface density and SB profiles obtained with
146: a combination of high-resolution and wide-field observations of the
147: galactic globular cluster NGC~6388, which a number of authors
148: (BMH05; NG06; Drukier \&
149: Bailyn 2003, hereafter DB03; Miocchi 2007) have
150: indicated as a prime candidate to
151: harbor an IMBH. These profiles nicely match the
152: theoretical models of a cluster with a $5.7\times 10^3
153: M_\odot$ BH: having an extended core,
154: intermediate concentration, but also significant deviations from a flat
155: core distribution in the innermost cluster regions ($r\lsim
156: 1\arcsec$).
157:
158: \section{THE DATA}
159: In this paper we make use of a combination of high-resolution and
160: wide-field photometric data sets, obtained with WFPC2 and ACS on board
161: {\it HST}, and with WFI at ESO-2.2\,m, respectively. A detailed
162: description of the observations, photometric reduction and astrometry
163: procedures of the data obtained with WFPC2, ACS-WFC, and WFI is given
164: in a companion paper discussing the Blue Straggler Star and Horizontal
165: Branch populations \citep{ema07}. Here we use only the optical ($B$,
166: $V$, $I$) samples from the entire multi-wavelength data set. These
167: have been all homogenized and transformed to the Johnson magnitude
168: system. All the star positions have been placed on the absolute
169: astrometric system using several hundred astrometric reference
170: stars from the new astrometric 2-MASS catalogue\footnote{Available at
171: {\tt http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu}.},
172: following the procedure described, e.g., in \citet{lan07},
173: with a final astrometric accuracy of the order of $\sim 0\farcs3$ both in RA
174: and Dec.
175:
176: Additional images obtained with the ACS-HRC have been retrieved from the
177: ESO/ST-ECF Science Archive.
178: %(Prop. 10474, P.I. Drukier)
179: These data sample the cluster central region with a field of view
180: (FoV) of $26\arcsec\times 29\arcsec$ and a spatial resolution of
181: $0\farcs027\,{\rm pix}^{-1}$. The HRC data were obtained through
182: filters $F555W$ ($V$) and $F814W$ ($I$), with total exposure times of
183: 620 and 3070\,s, respectively. After corrections for geometric
184: distortions and effective flux \citep{si05}, the photometric
185: analysis was performed
186: by using SExtractor \citep{be96}, adopting a fixed aperture radius of
187: 4 pixels ($0\farcs108$). The sample has then been astrometrized and
188: photometrically calibrated by using the stars in common with the
189: ACS-WFC catalog. The color-magnitude diagrams based on the data from
190: all four data sets are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:cmd}.
191:
192: \section{CENTER OF GRAVITY}
193: \label{sec:cgrav}
194: Given the absolute positions of individual stars in each catalog, the
195: center of gravity, $C_{\rm grav}$, of NGC~6388 has been determined by
196: averaging the coordinates $\alpha$ and $\delta$ of all stars detected
197: in the highest resolution data set (the HRC sample). In order to
198: correct for spurious effects due to incompleteness in the very inner
199: regions of the cluster, we considered only stars brighter than $V=20$
200: (roughly corresponding to the sub-giant branch of the
201: cluster). By following the iterative procedure described in
202: \citet[][see also Ferraro et al. 2004]{mont95}, the center of
203: gravity is located at $\alpha_{\rm J2000} = 17^{\rm h}\,
204: 36^{\rm m}\, 17\fs23$, $\delta_{J2000} = -44\arcdeg\,44\arcmin\,
205: 7\farcs1$, with an uncertainty of $0\farcs3$ in both $\alpha$ and
206: $\delta$. A careful examination of field inside the core radius shows
207: that our determination of the center is
208: biased neither by the presence of very bright stars, nor of a star clump.
209: The derived $C_{\rm grav}$ is located $\sim 2\farcs6$ southeast
210: ($\Delta\alpha = 3\farcs4$, $\Delta\delta=-1\farcs1$) of that
211: derived by \citet{dm93} using the surface
212: brightness distribution.
213: An accurate comparison with the center adopted by NG06 is not
214: possible since the value listed in their Table 1 is just referred
215: to the world coordinate system of a specific WFPC2 image, however
216: a visual inspection suggests that their center is
217: located $\sim 0\farcs5$ SE of ours.
218:
219:
220: \section{PROJECTED DENSITY AND SURFACE BRIGHTNESS PROFILES}
221: \label{sec:prof}
222: We have determined the projected density profile of NGC~6388 using
223: direct star counts over the entire cluster radial extent, from $C_{\rm
224: grav}$ out to $\sim 1400\arcsec\sim23\arcmin$. This
225: distance is significantly larger than the expected cluster extension
226: ($r_t=372\arcsec$, Harris 1996). In order to avoid spurious effects
227: due to possible incompleteness, only stars brighter than $V=20$ have
228: been considered (see Dalessandro et al 2007). There
229: are more than 58,000 stars in the entire (i.e.,
230: the combination of ACS, WFPC2 and WFI) photometric data set.
231: Following the procedure described in \citet[][]{fe99a}, we have
232: divided the sample in 40 concentric annuli, each centered on $C_{\rm
233: grav}$. Each annulus has been split into an adequate number of sub-sectors.
234: The number of stars lying within each sub-sector was counted, and the
235: star density was obtained by dividing these values by the
236: corresponding sub-sector areas. The stellar density in each annulus
237: was then obtained as the average of the sub-sector densities, and the
238: uncertainty in the average values for each annulus was estimated from
239: the variance among the sub-sectors. The radius associated with each
240: annulus is the mid-point of the radial bin. The outermost ($r\gsim
241: 7\arcmin$) measures have an almost constant value and their average
242: has been used to estimate the Galaxy contamination to be
243: $\sim 56$ stars arcmin$^{-2}$. Subtracting this background yields the
244: the profiles shown in Figs.~\ref{fig:nbcounts}.
245:
246: If the innermost ($r<1\arcsec$) points are excluded, the density
247: profile is well fit all over the entire extension by an isotropic,
248: single-mass King model with a core of $r_c=7\farcs2$ and an
249: intermediate concentration ($c=1.8$). These values are similar to
250: those quoted by Trager et al. (1995; $r_c=7\farcs4$ and $c=1.7$),
251: Harris (1996; $r_c=7\farcs2$ and $c=1.7$), and McLaughling \& van der
252: Marel (2005; $r_c=7\farcs8$ and $c=1.71$).\footnote{Note that the
253: higher concentration quoted in the present paper implies a ($\sim
254: 20\%$) larger tidal radius ($r_t=454\arcsec$) than previously
255: determined.} In the inner $\sim 1\arcsec$ the observed profile shows
256: an indication of a deviation from a flat core behavior. With only 7 stars
257: in the innermost bin, the statistical error of the inner bin
258: ($0\arcsec\le r <0\farcs3$) is relatively large. With star counts
259: alone the exact amount of the deviation from the flat core cannot
260: be reliably estimated.
261:
262: Exploiting the exceptional high resolution of ACS-HRC images we have
263: computed the SB profile by direct aperture photometry to more
264: accurately determine the inner shape of the cluster profile. In the
265: innermost region ($r<1\arcsec$) we have used two sets of annuli
266: stepped by $0\farcs3$ and $0\farcs5$, respectively. The SB values have
267: been computed as the sum of the counts in each pixel, divided by the
268: number of pixels in any given annulus. The counts have then been
269: converted to a magnitude scale and calibrated by using a relation that
270: links the ``instrumental'' magnitude to the calibrated one (obtained
271: by performing aperture photometry for a number of high S/N isolated
272: stars). The resulting SB profile for the innermost $10\arcsec$ from
273: the center is shown in Figure \ref{fig:mu}. A steepening of the
274: profile at $r\lsim 1\arcsec$ is clearly apparent, in agreement with
275: what we found above for the surface density distribution. A linear fit
276: to the inner points suggest that the slope of the profile is
277: $0.6\pm 0.06$ in the $\log\Sigma-\log r$ plane.
278: In terms of the surface luminosity
279: density $I(r)$, if $I\propto r^\alpha$ we find $\alpha\simeq -0.23$ .
280: This is steeper (but still marginally consistent within the errors)
281: than the slope $\alpha=-0.13\pm 0.07$ derived from the analysis of
282: WFPC2 images by NG06.
283: The N06 profile is shown for comparison in Figure 3, as can be seen
284: their profile is fully compatible with our data in the common
285: region. The use of high resolution images allow us to probe the
286: innermost region of the cluster where most of the deviation from a
287: flat behavior occurs\footnote{Even the small
288: difference in the center determination can play a role.
289: Simulations have shown that even an offset of only a few $0\farcs1$
290: is sufficient to flatten the profile. An additional difference in the
291: slope determination might arise from the different approach
292: used by NG06, who removed the bright stars and did not fit a power
293: law to the data but instead calculated the derivative of the smooth
294: central profile.}.
295:
296: \section{DISCUSSION}
297: \label{sec:disc}
298: The properties of the projected density and SB profiles derived in the
299: previous section for NGC~6388 are not those of a cluster which has
300: experienced the core collapse. Instead they are just what BMH05
301: suggest as the signatures of a cluster harboring an IMBH in its
302: center: {\it (i)} a typical King profile with intermediate
303: concentration ($c=1.8$) in the external regions, {\it (ii)} a sizable
304: core, and {\it (iii)} a inner logarithmic slope $\alpha\sim -0.2$.
305: These features have been recently confirmed by the predictions of a
306: self-consistent parametric model that includes the presence of a
307: central IMBH \citep{miocchi07}. This model consists of a multi-mass
308: isotropic, spherical King model, which has been extended inside the
309: region of gravitational influence of the BH via the inclusion of the
310: \citet{BW} phase-space distribution function.
311:
312: In order to further support the case for an IMBH in the center of
313: NGC~6388, we have used this model to reproduce the observed density
314: and SB profiles. A Salpeter mass function ($\mathrm{d}N\propto
315: m^{-1.35}\mathrm{d}\log m$) is assumed in the model and seven discrete
316: mass bins are used to approximate the continuum mass spectrum of the
317: real cluster. The stellar mass range in the interval from 0.3 to
318: 0.9\,$M_\odot$ (here and thereafter, where not specified, masses are
319: measured in $M_\odot$) equally subdivided in 6 bins $0.1$ wide. These
320: were populated with main sequence stars. In addition the bins
321: $[0.5,0.6]$ and $[0.7,0.8]$ include WD populations with mass $0.55$
322: and $0.75$, coming from progenitors with mass, respectively, in
323: $[0.9,1.5]$ and $[1.5,4]$ ranges. The seventh mass bin
324: contains a massive WD population with $m=1.2$, hypothosized as
325: remnants of stars with mass 4--8. The $[0.8,0.9]$ bin has
326: $\media{m}=0.84$ and contains the TO stars, plus giants and HB
327: stars. The light-to-mass ratios were taken to be $\{4.9\times
328: 10^{-3},10^{-2}, 2.3\times 10^{-2},6.5\times 10^{-2},0.19,10,0\}$
329: corresponding to the bins ordered in increasing average mass. The
330: velocity dispersion of the seven components is constrained by the
331: requirement of complete energy equipartition at the border of the BH
332: influence region \citep[see][~for details]{miocchi06,miocchi07}, where
333: the adimensionalised potential $W_\mathrm{BH}$, along with the
334: the ratio between the BH mass ($M_\mathrm{BH}$) and
335: the cluster mass ($M$),
336: determine the form of the
337: generated profiles. Besides of the various scale parameters,
338: $W_\mathrm{BH}$ and $M_\mathrm{BH}$ are adjusted to obtain the best fit to
339: the observed profiles. To do this, we
340: conservatively include only data from the central $100\arcsec$
341: in order to avoid possible spurious
342: effects which might affect the most external points of the SB profiles
343: because of the field contamination
344: subtraction.
345: The best fit to the observed SB profile is then
346: found for $r_c=7\farcs2$, $c=1.8$, $W_\mathrm{BH}=11.5$
347: and
348: $M_\mathrm{BH}=2.2\times 10^{-3}M$
349: (yielding $P(\chi^2>\chi^2_\mathrm{fit})>99$\%).
350: The level of confidence remains above 97\% for an IMBH
351: mass in the range $2.1$--$2.4 \times 10^{-3}M$.
352: The $r_c$ and $c$ values are consistent with
353: the value deduced by the parametric fit of the single-mass King model
354: mentioned above.
355: The results of this parametric fit to the projected density and the SB
356: profiles are shown in Figs. \ref{fig:nbcounts} and \ref{fig:mu}
357: respectively.
358:
359: By assuming the total cluster luminosity $V_t=6.72$
360: \citep{har96}, and the distance modulus $(m-M)_V=16.59$
361: \citep{ema07}\footnote{The distance has been obtained differentially
362: with respect to 47 Tucanae, by assuming the distance scale by Ferraro
363: et al. (1999b).}, we estimate a total mass of $2.6\times 10^6 M_\odot$
364: for NGC~6388, yielding $M_{\rm BH}\simeq 5.7\times 10^3
365: M_\odot$.\footnote{Note that this mass is well within the range of
366: values (2.5--$10 \times 10^3$) derived from the $M_{\rm BH}-\sigma$
367: relation (Ferrarese \& Merritt 2000; Gebhardt et al. 2000; see
368: for example equation (10) of DB03), by assuming the low
369: ($\beta=4.02$) and the high ($\beta=4.65$) exponents, respectively.}
370:
371: While the central IMBH is a possible explanation of the shape of the
372: observed profiles, one might question whether this result is
373: unique. In fact, a central concentration of massive remnants (like
374: white dwarfs and neutron stars) has been proposed as an alternative
375: explanation in the case of M15 \citep{vdb06}. However,
376: we have found that a multi-mass King model including a population of
377: such remnants but without central BH is unable to reproduce the
378: observed slope of the profiles in the core region.
379: Since our
380: evidence is based
381: exclusively from the shape of the density profile, the presence of a
382: IMBH at the center of NGC~6388 is still debatable. Accurate
383: kinematical studies of the motion of stars in the central region of
384: the cluster are needed to solidify the case.
385:
386:
387:
388:
389: The region in which to seek for the possible kinematical signatures of
390: a BH is very small. The self-consistent model here employed generates
391: a projected velocity dispersion profile that shows a sharp rise from
392: the ``isothermal plateau'' to a purely Keplerian behavior at $r\sim
393: 0\farcs16$ (i.e., $\sim 0.02\, r_c$). A more promising path to detect
394: the kinematic signature of a BH is by proper motion measurements
395: (DB03). Some stars should move with anomalously high
396: velocities under the influence of the BH. In order to estimate the
397: number of these stars, we first need to evaluate the BH radius of
398: influence $r_h$. A crude estimate of $r_h$ is given by: $r_h =
399: G\,M_{\rm BH}/\sigma_0^2$, where $\sigma_0$ is the velocity dispersion
400: outside $r_h$. By assuming $\sigma_0=18.9\,{\rm km\,s^{-1}}$
401: \citep{pry93}, we find $r_h \simeq 0.07$\,pc, corresponding to
402: $1\farcs1$ with the cluster distance \citep[$d=13.18$\,kpc;][]{ema07}.
403: By using equation (7) of DB03, it is possible to
404: estimate the number of stars ($N$), measurable through proper motions
405: studies, having velocities 3 times the cluster velocity dispersion
406: outside $r_h$: $N=0.27\, \Sigma_0\, r_h^2$, where $\Sigma_0\, r_h^2$
407: is the number of stars within $r_h$. This relation suggests that $\sim
408: 27\%$ of stars within $r_h$ are expected to show anomalously high
409: velocity. We can directly derive this number from the HRC
410: images. Adopting the value of the cluster center presented above we
411: count 28 relatively bright ($V<19$) stars within $r_h=1\farcs1$
412: (out of a total of $\sim 85$ stars detected down to $V\sim 22$),
413: corresponding to a total of $\sim 7$ high-velocity stars. This
414: estimate shows that the presence of $\sim 5\times 10^3 M_\odot$ BH in
415: the center of NGC~6388 can in principle be kinematically confirmed in
416: the near future through accurate proper motion studies
417: or radial velocity measurements with {\it Adaptive Optic}
418: supported instruments. However,
419: these measurements can be quite challenging. According to
420: Figure 1 of DB03, the high velocity stars are expected to be mainly
421: confined within 0.4\,$r_h$ (only $\sim 0\farcs4$ from
422: the center). They would have speeds of order
423: $60\,{\rm km\,s^{-1}}$ which, given projection effects, would give
424: tangental velocities of order $20\,{\rm km\,s^{-1}}$. The distance
425: derived by \citet{ema07} and adopted here is 25\% larger than that
426: from Harris (1996), so the resulting proper motions would be $\sim
427: 0.3\,{\rm mas\,yr^{-1}}$. Given the current estimate for the
428: proper motion measurement error of roughly 0.3\,mas,
429: a baseline of at least
430: 3--5\,yr would be required.
431:
432:
433:
434:
435: \acknowledgements This research was supported by contract ASI-INAF
436: I/023/05/0, PRIN-INAF2006 and by the Ministero dell'Istruzione,
437: dell'Universit\'a e della Ricerca. ED is supported by ASI. RTR is
438: partially supported by STScI grant GO-10524. This research has made
439: use of the ESO/ST-ECF Science Archive facility which is a joint
440: collaboration of the European Southern Observatory and the Space
441: Telescope - European Coordinating Facility.
442:
443:
444: \begin{thebibliography}{}
445:
446: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Bahcall \& Wolf}{1976}]{BW} Bahcall J.N., Wolf R.A,
447: 1976, ApJ, 209, 214
448:
449: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Baumgardt, Makino, \& Hut}{Baumgardt
450: et al.}{2005}]{bmh05} Baumgardt H., Makino J., Hut P., 2005, ApJ, 620, 238 (BMH05)
451:
452: \bibitem[Baumgardt et al (2003a)]{bau03a}
453: Baumgardt, H., Hut, P., Makino, J.,
454: McMillan, S., Portegies Zwart, S., 2003a, ApJ, 582, L21
455:
456: \bibitem[Baumgardt et al (2003b)]{bau03b}
457: Baumgardt, H., Makino, J., Hut, P.,
458: McMillan, S., Portegies Zwart, S., 2003b, ApJ, 589, L25
459:
460:
461:
462: \bibitem[Bertin \& Arnouts(1996)]{be96} Bertin, E., \&
463: Arnouts, S.\ 1996, \aaps, 117, 393
464:
465:
466: \bibitem[Djorgovski \& Meylan(1993)]{dm93} Djorgovski, S.,
467: \& Meylan, G.\ 1993,
468: Structure and Dynamics of Globular Clusters. Proceedings of a Workshop held
469: in Berkeley, California, July 15-17, 1992, to Honor the 65th Birthday of Ivan
470: King. Editors, S.G. Djorgovski and G. Meylan; Publisher, Astronomical Society
471: of the Pacific, Vol. 50, 325
472:
473: \bibitem[Djorgovski \& King (1986)]{dk86} Djorgovski, S.,
474: \& King, I.R.,\ 1986, \apjl, 305, L61
475:
476: %\bibitem[Dubath et al. (1997)]{dub97} Dubath P., Meylan G., Mayor M., 1997,
477: %A\&A, 324, 505
478:
479: \bibitem[Dalessandro et al. (2007)]{ema07} Dalessandro E., et al., 2007
480: in preparation
481:
482: \bibitem[Drukier \& Bailyn (2003)]{db03} Drukier, G.,A., Bailyn, C.D., 2003,
483: ApJ, 597, L125 (DB03)
484:
485: \bibitem[Fabbiano (2006)]{fa06} Fabbiano, G., 2006, ARA\&A, 44, 323
486:
487: \bibitem[Ferrarese \& Merritt (2000)]{fer00} Ferrarese, L., Merritt, D., 2000,
488: ApJ, 539, L9
489:
490:
491: \bibitem[Ferraro et al.(1999a)]{fe99a} Ferraro, F.~R., Paltrinieri, B., Rood,
492: R.~T., \& Dorman, B.\ 1999a, ApJ 522, 983
493:
494: \bibitem[Ferraro et al.(1999b)]{fe99b} Ferraro F. R., Messineo M., Fusi Pecci
495: F., De Palo M. A., Straniero O., Chieffi A.,\& Limongi M.\ 1999b, \aj, 118, 1738
496:
497: \bibitem[Ferraro et al.(2004)]{fe04} Ferraro, F.~R.,
498: Beccari, G., Rood, R.~T., Bellazzini, M., Sills, A., \& Sabbi, E.\ 2004,
499: \apj, 603, 127
500:
501:
502:
503: \bibitem[Gebhardt et al (2000)]{ge00} Gebhardt, K., et al., 2000, ApJ,
504: 539, L13
505:
506: \bibitem[Gebhardt, Rich \& Ho (2002)]{ge02} Gebhardt, K., Rich, R.M., Ho, L.C. , 2002, ApJ,
507: 578, L41
508:
509: \bibitem[Gebhardt, Rich \& Ho (2005)]{ge05} Gebhardt, K., Rich, R.M., Ho, L.C. , 2005, ApJ,
510: 634, 1093
511:
512: \bibitem[Gerssen et al (2002)]{ger02}
513: Gerssen, J., van der Marel, R.P., Gebhardt, K.,
514: Guhathakurta, P., Peterson, R. C.; Pryor, C., 2002, ApJ, 124, 3270
515:
516: \bibitem[Greene \& Ho (2007)]{gh07}
517: Greene, J.E., Ho, L.C., 2007, ApJ, 656, 84
518:
519:
520: \bibitem[Harris (1996)]{har96} Harris, W.E. 1996, AJ, 112, 1487
521:
522: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Heggie et al.}{2007}]{heggie07}
523: Heggie D. C., Hut P., Mineshige S., Makino J., Baumgardt H., PASJ
524: Letters, PASJ Vol. 59 (astro-ph/0611950)
525:
526:
527: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{King}{1966}]{king66} King I.R., 1966,
528: AJ, 71, 64
529:
530:
531: \bibitem[Lanzoni et al. (2007)]{lan07} Lanzoni, B., Dalessandro, E.,
532: Ferraro, F.~R., Mancini, C., Beccari, G., Rood, R.~T., Mapelli, M., \&
533: Sigurdsson, S. \ 2007, ApJ, 663, 1040
534:
535:
536: \bibitem[McLaughlin \& van der Marel(2005)]{ML-vdM05}
537: McLaughlin, D.~E., \& van der Marel, R.~P.\ 2005, \apjs, 161, 304
538:
539: \bibitem[Miller(2003)]{miller03} Miller, C.\ 2003, Dynamics and
540: Evolution of Dense Stellar Systems, 25th meeting of the IAU, Joint
541: Discussion 11, 18 July 2003, Sydney, Australia, 11,
542:
543:
544: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Miocchi}{2006}]{miocchi06} Miocchi
545: P., 2006, MNRAS, 366, 227
546:
547:
548:
549: \bibitem[Miocchi (2007)]{miocchi07} Miocchi, P.\ 2007, in press of
550: \mnras (astro-ph/0702479)
551:
552: \bibitem[Montegriffo et al. (1995)]{mont95}Montegriffo, P., Ferraro, F.~R.,
553: Fusi Pecci, F., \& Origlia, L.\ 1995, \mnras, 276, 739
554:
555:
556: \bibitem[Noyola \& Gabhardt (2006)]{ng06} Noyola, E., Gebhardt, K., 2006,
557: AJ, 132, 447 (NG06)
558:
559:
560: \bibitem[Pryor \& Meylan (1993)]{pry93} Pryor C., \& Meylan G., 1993,
561: Structure and Dynamics of Globular Clusters. Proceedings of a Workshop held
562: in Berkeley, California, July 15-17, 1992, to Honor the 65th Birthday of Ivan
563: King. Editors, S.G. Djorgovski and G. Meylan; Publisher, Astronomical Society
564: of the Pacific, Vol. 50, 357
565:
566:
567: \bibitem[Sivakoff et al.(2007)]{sivakoff07} Sivakoff, G.~R., et
568: al.\ 2007, \apj, 660, 1246
569:
570:
571: \bibitem[Sirianni et al.(2005)]{si05} Sirianni, M., et al.\
572: 2005, \pasp, 117, 1049
573:
574: \bibitem[Trager et al. (1993)]{tra93} Trager, S.C., Djorgovski, S.,
575: \& King I.R., 1993,
576: Structure and Dynamics of Globular Clusters. Proceedings of a Workshop held
577: in Berkeley, California, July 15-17, 1992, to Honor the 65th Birthday of Ivan
578: King. Editors, S.G. Djorgovski and G. Meylan; Publisher, Astronomical Society
579: of the Pacific, Vol. 50, 347
580:
581:
582: \bibitem[Trager et al. (1995)]{tra95} Trager, S.C.,King I.R. \&
583: Djorgovski, S., 1995, AJ, 109, 218
584:
585: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Trenti et al.}{2007}]{trenti07}
586: Trenti M., Ardi E., Mineshige S., Hut P., 2007, MNRAS, 374, 857
587:
588: \bibitem[Ulvestad et al (2007)]{ul07} Ulvestad, J.S., Greene, J.E.,
589: Ho, L.C., 2007, ApJ, 661, L151
590:
591: \bibitem[van den Bosch et al (2006)]{vdb06} van den Bosch, R.,
592: de Zeeuw, T., Gebhardt, K., Noyola, E., van de Ven, Glenn, 2006,
593: ApJ, 641, 852
594:
595: \bibitem[van der Marel et al (2002)]{vdm02} van der Marel, R.P.,
596: Gerssen, J., Guhathakurta, P., Peterson, R.C.,
597: Gebhardt, K., 2002, AJ, 124, 3255
598:
599: \end{thebibliography}
600:
601: \clearpage
602:
603: \begin{figure}[!hp]
604: \begin{center}
605: \includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f1.ps}
606: \caption{Color Magnitude diagrams for the four data sets used. The WFI
607: data are dominated by field contamination.}
608: \label{fig:cmd}
609: \end{center}
610: \end{figure}
611:
612:
613: \begin{figure}[!hp]
614: \begin{center}
615: \includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f2.ps}
616: \caption{Observed surface density profile obtained by star counts from
617: the combined photometric data-set: ACS-HRC ({\it filled circles}),
618: WFPC2 ({\it triangles}), ACS-WFC ({\it squares}), and WFI ({\it empty
619: circles}). The background level (see Sect. \ref{sec:prof}) has been
620: subtracted. The single-mass King model that best fits the profile
621: excluding the innermost ($r\lsim 1\arcsec$) points is
622: shown as a dashed line. It is characterized by a sizable core radius
623: ($r_c=7\farcs2$), and an intermediate concentration ($c=1.8$). The
624: solid line shows the profile of the model (see Sect. \ref{sec:disc})
625: including a $5.7\times 10^3 M_\odot$ BH in the cluster center.
626: The profile from Trager et al (1995) is shown ({\it dotted line}
627: for comparison.
628: }
629: \label{fig:nbcounts}
630: \end{center}
631: \end{figure}
632:
633:
634: \begin{center}
635: \begin{figure}[!p]
636: \includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f3.ps}
637: \caption{Surface brightness profile derived from the ACS-HRC images
638: within $10\arcsec$ from the cluster center. {\it Dots} refer to a radial
639: binning of $0\farcs5$, triangles sample the inner $1\arcsec$ by
640: steps of $0\farcs3$. The {\it solid line} shows the profile of the model
641: obtained by including a $5.7\times 10^3 M_\odot$ BH (the same as in
642: Fig. \ref{fig:nbcounts}). The {\it short-dashed line} corresponds to the King
643: model shown in Fig. \ref{fig:nbcounts}.
644: $\beta =0.6$ is the slope of the linear best fit
645: (see the {\it long-dashed line}) to the innermost points.
646: The profile obtained by NG06 is also shown (see the {\it dotted line} for comparison.}
647: \label{fig:mu}
648: \end{figure}
649: \end{center}
650:
651: \end{document}
652:
653:
654: %\begin{figure}[!hp]
655: %\begin{center}
656: %\includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f1.ps}
657: %\caption{Location of NGC~6388 center of gravity ({\it cross}), as
658: %accurately determined from the high resolution sample obtained with
659: %the ACS-HRC observations. The center {\it asterisk} quoted by
660: %\citet{dm93} is also shown for comparison. The dashed circle marks the
661: %core radius of the cluster ($r_c=7.2\arcsec$), as derived from the fit
662: %of the surface density and SB profile by a single-mass King model.}
663: %\label{fig:cgrav}
664: %\end{center}
665: %\end{figure}
666:
667:
668: %\begin{figure}[!hp]
669: %\begin{center}
670: %\includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f2.ps}
671: %\caption{Observed surface density profile obtained by star counts from
672: %the combined photometric data-set: ACS-HRC (\it{filled circles}),
673: %WFPC2 ({\it triangles}), ACS-WFC ({\it squares}), and WFI ({\it empty
674: %circles}). The single-mass King model that best fits the profile
675: %after the exclusion of the innermost ($r\lsim 1\arcsec$) points is
676: %shown as a solid line, and is characterized by a sizable core radius
677: %($r_c=7.2\arcsec$), and an intermediate concentration ($c=1.8$).}
678: %\label{fig:king}
679: %\end{center}
680: %\end{figure}
681: