1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
3: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
4: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
5: \def\({\left(}
6: \def\){\right)}
7: \def\[{\left[}
8: \def\]{\right]}
9: \def\msun{{\rm ~M}_{\odot}}
10: \def\myr{{\rm ~Myr}}
11: \def\mdot{\dot M}
12: \def\mpy{{\rm ~M}_{\odot} {\rm ~yr}^{-1}}
13: \def\medd{{\rm M_{Edd}}}
14: \def\ledd{{\rm L_{Edd}}}
15: \usepackage{graphicx}
16: \usepackage{natbib}
17: \usepackage[usenames,dvips]{color}
18: \newcommand{\ron}[1]{{\color{red}\bf Ron: #1}}
19: \shorttitle {Inner Cool Disks in the Low Hard State}
20: \begin{document}
21:
22: \title{The Existence of Inner Cool Disks in the Low Hard State of
23: Accreting Black Holes}
24:
25: \author{B. F. Liu}
26: \affil{National Astronomical Observatories/Yunnan Observatory, Chinese
27: Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 110, Kunming 650011, China}
28: \email{bfliu@ynao.ac.cn}
29:
30: \author{Ronald E. Taam}
31: \affil{Northwestern University, Department of Physics and Astronomy,
32: 2131 Tech Drive, Evanston, IL 60208; ASIAA/National Tsing Hua University -
33: TIARA, Hsinchu, Taiwan}
34: \email{r-taam@northwestern.edu}
35:
36:
37: \author{E. Meyer-Hofmeister}
38: \affil{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Astrophysik, Karl Schwarzschildstr. 1,
39: D-85740, Garching, Germany}
40: \email{emm@mpa-garching.mpg.de}
41:
42: \and
43:
44: \author{F. Meyer}
45: \affil{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Astrophysik, Karl Schwarzschildstr. 1,
46: D-85740, Garching, Germany}
47: \email{frm@mpa-garching.mpg.de}
48:
49:
50: \begin{abstract}
51: The condensation of matter from a corona to a cool, optically thick
52: inner disk is investigated for black hole X-ray transient systems in
53: the low hard state. A description of a simple model for the exchange
54: of energy and mass between corona and disk originating from thermal
55: conduction is presented, taking into account the effect of Compton
56: cooling of the corona by photons from the underlying disk. It is found
57: that a weak, condensation-fed inner disk can be present in the low hard
58: state of black hole transient systems for a range of luminosities
59: which depend on the magnitude of the viscosity parameter. For $\alpha
60: \sim 0.1-0.4$ an inner disk can exist for luminosities in the range $\sim
61: 0.001- 0.02 \ledd$. The model is applied to the X-ray observations of the
62: black hole candidate sources GX 339-4 and Swift J1753.5-0127 in
63: their low hard state. It is found that Compton
64: cooling is important in the condensation process, leading
65: to the maintenance of cool inner disks in both systems.
66: As the results of the evaporation/condensation model are independent of
67: the black hole mass, it is suggested that such inner cool disks may
68: contribute to the optical and ultraviolet emission of low luminosity active
69: galactic nuclei.
70: \end{abstract}
71:
72: \keywords{accretion, accretion disks --- black hole physics ---
73: X-rays: stars --- X-rays: binaries --- stars:individual (GX 339-4, Swift J1753.5-0127)}
74:
75: \section{Introduction}
76:
77: Black hole X-ray transient binary systems have attracted increasing attention
78: in recent years since they can be used as a probe of the underlying physics of the
79: accretion process in disks surrounding black holes over a wide range in luminosity.
80: The X-ray spectral behavior of these systems is complex, exhibiting differing states
81: and transitions. In particular, it is well known that two basic X-ray spectral
82: states are present with a soft spectral state occurring at high luminosities and a
83: hard spectral state occurring at low luminosities. The properties of these
84: systems have been reviewed by Tanaka \& Shibazaki (1996) and more recently
85: by Remillard \& McClintock (2006) and McClintock \& Remillard
86: (2006). It is now generally accepted that these two spectral states originate from
87: different accretion modes dependent on the mass accretion rate.
88:
89: At high luminosities, black hole X-ray transients are characterized
90: by a soft thermal spectrum described by a multi-color black body component
91: dominant at about 1 keV. This has been interpreted as arising from an optically
92: thick accretion disk extending to the innermost stable circular orbit (Shakura \&
93: Sunyaev 1973). In contrast, at low luminosities, the systems are characterized
94: by a hard spectral state where the spectrum is described by a power law with
95: a typical photon index of about 1.7. The emission is commonly
96: thought to be produced by the Compton scattering of soft photons with
97: the hot electrons in an optically thin inner disk (Shapiro et al.
98: 1976; Sunyaev \& Titarchuk 1980; Pozdnyaknov et al. 1983). In these models,
99: the ions and electrons are described by a two temperature plasma. Here, the ions
100: are heated to high temperatures by viscous dissipation, the electrons to attain lower
101: temperatures due to their strong interaction with radiation and weak Coulomb coupling
102: with ions. The initial models developed for this
103: state (Shapiro et al. 1976) were thermally unstable, and it has been
104: recognized that the radial advection of internal energy can stabilize the
105: flow (see, for example, Narayan 2005). In this case, the internal energy is advected
106: inward with the flow, resulting in an inefficient conversion of
107: gravitational potential energy to radiation (e.g., Narayan \& Yi 1994; Narayan
108: \& Yi 1995a,b). The radius of transition between the cool outer disk and the
109: hot advection-dominated inner disk was not theoretically determined, but obtained
110: by fits to the observational data (see Esin et al. 1997).
111:
112: The transition between these states occurs at luminosities in the range of
113: $\sim 1-4\%$ of the Eddington value (Maccarone 2003) and is thought to be a
114: consequence of a disk corona interaction (Meyer, Liu, \& Meyer-Hofmeister 2000b).
115: More detailed observations and analyses indicated that, in addition to the soft
116: and hard state, an intermediate state could occur during the rise or
117: decay of an outburst between the hard and soft state. Here, both a soft
118: thermal spectrum and a hard power law spectrum are observed, likely indicating
119: the coexistence of a hot optically thin and cool optically thick disk structure.
120: Such a disk structure can be envisaged if the optically thick disk is truncated
121: by some evaporative process, leading to the formation of an inner hot geometrically
122: thick, optically thin disk surrounded by an outer cool geometrically thin disk. Originally,
123: the idea of a two phase accretion structure was suggested by Eardley et al.
124: (1975) and Shapiro et al. (1976). Such disk geometries have recently been
125: calculated based on a proton bombardment model (Dullemond \& Spruit 2005)
126: and a coronal evaporation model controlled by electron conduction (Liu et al.
127: 1999, R\`o\.za\`nska \& Czerny 2000a,b). In the latter case a maximum evaporation
128: rate was found which allowed an estimate of a smallest transition radius
129: and a maximal mass flow rate for which the evaporation rate into the corona can still exceed the mass flow
130: rate in the cool outer disk (Liu et al. 1999). Alternatively Liu, Meyer,
131: \& Meyer-Hofmeister (2006) and Meyer, Liu, \& Meyer-Hofmeister (2007)
132: have suggested that a remnant cool inner disk formed during the thermally dominant (soft) spectral
133: state, when the accretion rate declines just below the transition rate, can be maintained for times longer than a viscous diffusion time by
134: condensation of matter from the corona. The accretion geometry then would be described as a cool inner and even cooler outer
135: disk separated by a gap filled with an advection dominated accretion flow (ADAF)
136: (Fig. \ref{f:dsk-cor.ps}, see also Mayer \& Pringle 2007). Here, the inner cool
137: disk is responsible for the presence of the soft thermal
138: component coexisting with the hard component formed in the coronal region.
139:
140: Recently, evidence pointing to the possible presence of a cool
141: inner disk during the low hard state of black hole transient systems has been
142: provided by observations of GX 339-4 and Swift J1753.5-0127 (Miller et al.
143: 2006a,b). In particular, Miller et al. (2006a) find that a soft thermal
144: component ($kT \sim 0.2$ keV) is required to fit the spectrum of J1753.5-0127,
145: with a normalization suggesting a small inner disk region. Similarly, a soft
146: thermal component characterized by kT $\sim 0.3$ keV was required for GX 339-4
147: (Miller et al. 2006b). In this latter case, a broad Fe K line was also required to
148: fit the spectrum, providing additional evidence to support the hypothesis of cold matter
149: lying close to the black hole. We note that this interpretation is model dependent
150: since it is possible that the emission line may have formed in an outflowing wind
151: (Laurent \& Titarchuk 2007). Nevertheless, the existence of such an inner cold disk
152: region is very suggestive. Such a picture may be consistent with the accretion geometry
153: envisaged by Liu et al. (2006) and Meyer et al. (2007), or cold clumps in luminous hot accretion flows (Yuan 2003). However, Miller et al.
154: (2006a) find evidence for a soft component from a weak disk extending to the
155: innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) at X-ray luminosities as low as 0.003
156: $\ledd$, significantly less than the luminosity corresponding to the transition
157: between the high soft and low hard states.
158:
159: In this paper, we investigate the properties of a cool inner disk within the framework of
160: the coronal evaporation and recondensation model, extending earlier work
161: by Liu et al. (2006) and Meyer et al. (2007), to determine whether cool
162: disks are present at low X-ray luminosities. In contrast to Liu et al.
163: (2006) and Meyer et al. (2007), we include the cooling effect associated
164: with the inverse Compton scattering of photons emitted by an underlying
165: disk on hot thermal electrons for determining the thermal state of the
166: corona. Assuming that thermal conduction determines the energy and mass
167: exchange between corona and underlying cool disk, we examine the range of
168: conditions under which a cool inner disk forms and is maintained. In the
169: next section we give an overview of the evaporation/condensation model,
170: including the additional input physics. In \S 3 illustrative results are
171: presented for the case where the cooling of electrons is dominated by heat
172: conduction to the underlying disk and for the case where electron cooling
173: is dominated by Compton scattering of cool photons. To illustrate the
174: potential applicability of these concepts to observed sources, we compare
175: the numerical results to the X-ray observations of the black hole candidate
176: source GX 339-4 and the recently discovered system Swift J1753.5-0127
177: (Palmer et al. 2005) in \S 4. Finally, we discuss our results and their
178: implications in the last section.
179:
180: \section{Theoretical Model}
181:
182: The formation of a corona above a geometrically thin disk may result from
183: physical processes similar to those operating in the solar corona or from
184: a thermal instability (e.g., Shaviv \& Wehrse 1986) in the uppermost
185: layers of a disk. As mentioned above, earlier work
186: (Meyer \& Meyer-Hofmeister 1994; Meyer, Liu, \& Meyer-Hofmeister 2000a, Liu
187: et al. 2002; R\`o\.za\'nska \& Czerny 2000a,b) revealed that a disk corona
188: fed by the evaporation of matter from an underlying cool disk can be maintained
189: as an accreting coronal flow. The description of the mechanism responsible for
190: the evaporation is briefly described below.
191:
192: In the corona, the viscous dissipation leads to ion heating, which is partially
193: transferred to the electrons via Coulomb collisions. This energy is assumed
194: to be conducted into a lower, cooler transition layer. If the
195: density in this layer is sufficiently high, the conductive flux is radiated away.
196: On the other hand, if the density is insufficient to efficiently radiate the energy,
197: the underlying cool gas is heated and evaporation into the corona takes place.
198: The evaporated matter carries angular momentum, and it gradually accretes onto
199: the central black hole as a result of viscous transport. As the accreted gas
200: is resupplied by the material evaporated from the cool disk, a steady accreting
201: corona is formed above the disk in which a balance of evaporation and accretion
202: is achieved.
203:
204: While the disk evaporation provides matter for accretion in the corona, the mass
205: accretion through the cool outer disk is decreased and can even vanish at distances
206: where the inflowing rate is lower than the evaporation rate,
207: approximated by $\dot M_{\rm evap}
208: \equiv 4\pi R^2\dot m_0$, where $\dot m_0$ is the evaporation rate per unit area
209: from the disk into the corona. Numerical calculations (Meyer et al. 2000a; Liu et
210: al. 2002) reveal that the evaporation rate increases with decreasing distance
211: to the central object until a maximum evaporation rate of about a percent of the
212: Eddington rate is reached at a distance of several hundred Schwarzschild radii.
213: The existence of such a maximum leads to a change in character of the accretion
214: geometry. If the mass flow in the disk is below this maximum value, as in the
215: quiescent state of black hole X-ray transients, the optically thick disk is truncated
216: at the distance where all matter is evaporated, leaving a pure advection dominated
217: coronal flow. As the mass flow rate increases (e.g., during the rise to an
218: outburst), the edge of the cool optically thick disk moves inward. If the mass
219: flow in the disk increases above the maximal evaporation rate, the disk can not be
220: evaporated completely and, hence, the cool disk extends to the ISCO. During the
221: decline from the peak of the outburst, the inner edge of the cool disk retreats
222: outwards to greater distances from the central black hole. These variations in
223: the accretion process during the outburst of a black hole X-ray transient
224: system provide explanation for the hard and soft states in these systems (Meyer
225: et al. 2000b). Recent investigations (Liu et al. 2006; Meyer et al. 2007)
226: furthermore reveal that when the accretion rate is not far below the maximal
227: evaporation rate an inner disk separated from the outer disk by a coronal region
228: could also exist, leading to an intermediate state of black hole accretion.
229:
230: The onset of an intermediate state occurs as the accretion rate decreases just
231: below the maximal evaporation rate. At this time, disk truncation by evaporation
232: sets in near the region where the evaporation rate is maximal. A coronal gap
233: appears and widens with a further decrease in the accretion rate with the inner
234: cool disk reduced in extent. Because of diffusion, the inner disk can not survive
235: for a time longer than a viscous time (which is only a few days in the inner
236: disk) unless matter continuously condenses from the ADAF onto the cool inner disk.
237: In the following we investigate the interaction between the disk and the corona/ADAF,
238: showing the conditions under which matter condenses onto the inner disk, thereby
239: maintaining a cool disk in the inner region.
240: \subsection{Model Assumptions}
241:
242: The corona lying above an inner cool disk is similar to an ADAF. The main physical
243: differences between these two descriptions stem from the existence of vertical
244: thermal conduction caused by the large temperature gradient between the corona
245: and the disk and the presence of cool disk photons, which upon propagating through
246: the corona remove energy by inverse Compton scattering. At low accretion
247: rates, neither conduction nor Compton scattering is important for energy loss and the corona is
248: described by an ADAF. In this study, we assume that the corona above the cool
249: disk can be described by an ADAF, where the structure (such as pressure, density,
250: and ion temperature) is determined by the mass of the black hole, the mass
251: accretion rate, and the viscosity at a given distance (Narayan \& Yi 1995a).
252: However, the cooling in such an ADAF is assumed to be either dominated by the
253: Compton scattering of the disk photons or dominated by vertical heat conduction. That
254: is, we implicitly assume that non-thermal (e.g., synchrotron) processes
255: are unimportant in the lowest
256: level of approximation. As we shall see, such a simple model contains the
257: ingredients necessary to provide an understanding of the soft spectrum in the
258: low/hard state. The model allows an analytical description, revealing the dependence
259: of the disk size, effective temperature, luminosity, and spectrum on the black hole mass,
260: mass accretion rate, and disk viscosity.
261:
262: \subsection{Conductive Cooling-Dominant Corona}
263:
264: The condensation from a corona where cooling results mainly from conduction has
265: been studied in earlier works by Liu et al. (2006) and Meyer et al. (2007).
266: We introduce the main results here for completeness and for comparison to the
267: case where the cooling by the inverse Compton scattering process is dominant
268: (see \S 2.3). In the bulk of the corona the thermal state of the ions is not
269: significantly affected by conductive cooling of the electrons until the electron
270: temperature has become low enough near the base of the corona so that collisional
271: coupling between the ions and electrons becomes effective. From this coupling
272: interface down to the upper layers of the cool disk the ion temperature,
273: $T_i$, and electron temperature, $T_e$, no longer differ. This results in a dramatic
274: decline of $T_i$, leading to a significant increase in density as the pressure in
275: the vertical extent changes little in comparison to the change in temperature. As a
276: consequence, bremsstrahlung energy losses become much more important in this layer
277: than in a typical ADAF. Henceforth, this layer is referred to as the radiating
278: layer. The pressure in the ADAF is of particular interest since it determines
279: whether evaporation or condensation takes place. For example, at sufficiently
280: high pressure, bremsstrahlung can be so efficient
281: that not only is all the heat drained from the ADAF by thermal conduction radiated
282: away, but also the gas in the radiating layer is further cooled, leading to condensation
283: onto the disk. On the other hand, if the pressure in the upper corona is
284: sufficiently low so
285: that the density in the radiating layer is too low to radiate away the conductive
286: flux, disk matter is evaporated into the corona. We adopt for our analysis the values derived by
287: Narayan \& Yi (1995b). The ADAF pressure, density,
288: viscous heating rate, and sound speed depend on the viscosity parameter, $\alpha$, black
289: hole mass, $m$, the accretion rate, $\dot m$, and $r$ the
290: distance from the black hole in the form (see Narayan \& Yi
291: 1995b),
292: \begin{eqnarray}\label{scaled}
293: p&=&1.87\times 10^{16}\alpha^{-1}m^{-1}\dot m r^{-5/2}
294: \, \rm{g cm^{-1} s^{-2}} \nonumber ,\\
295: n_e& =&5.91\times10^{19}\alpha^{-1}m^{-1}\dot m r^{-3/2} \, \rm{cm^{-3}} \\
296: q^+&=& 2.24\times10^{20}m^{-2}\dot m r^{-4}\, \rm{ergs cm^{-3} s^{-1}}
297: \nonumber,\\
298: c_{\rm s}^2&=&1.67\times 10^{20} r^{-1} \, \rm{cm^2 \,s^{-2}} \nonumber,
299: \end{eqnarray}
300: where $m$, $\dot m$ and $r$ are in units of solar mass, Eddington rate ($\dot M_{\rm Edd}
301: =1.39\times 10^{18}m$ g/s), and Schwarzschild radius, respectively.
302:
303: The ion number density is $n_i=n_e/1.077$, and the ion and electron temperatures closely
304: follow
305: \begin{equation}
306: T_i+1.077 T_e =1.98\times10^{12} r^{-1}\rm K.
307: \end{equation}
308: The energy transfer from ions to electrons is given by Stepney (1983) and is approximated
309: for the two-temperature advection-dominated hot flow (Liu et al. 2002) as
310: \begin{eqnarray}\label {qie}
311: q_{ie} & = & 3.59\times 10^{-32} {\rm{g cm^{5} s^{-3} deg^{-1}}}
312: \, n_e n_i T_i
313: {\left(\frac{k T_e}{m_e c^2}\right)}^{-3/2}
314: \nonumber \\
315: & = & 1.05\times 10^{35}
316: T_e^{-3/2} \alpha^{-2}m^{-2} \dot m^{2}r^{-4} {\, \rm{ g cm^{-1}s^{-3}deg^{3/2}}}.
317: \end{eqnarray}
318: The coupling temperature is reached when viscous
319: and compressive heating are balanced by the transfer of heat
320: from the ions to the electrons, $q_{ie}=q^+ + q^c$, which
321: yields
322: \begin{equation}\label{T_cpl}
323: T_{\rm {cpl}}=1.98\times 10^9 \alpha^{-4/3}\dot m^{2/3}.
324: \end{equation}
325: The heat flux from the typical corona/ADAF to the radiating layer is derived from
326: the energy balance in the corona, $\frac{dF_{\rm c}}{dz}=q_{ie}(T_e)$ assuming that
327: the conductive flux is given by the expression $F_{\rm c}=-\kappa_0 T_e^{5/2}dT_e/dz$ (Spitzer 1962) with $\kappa_0 = 10^{-6}{\rm erg\,s^{-1}cm^{-1}K^{-7/2}}$. (This value might be lower if e.g. chaotic magnetic fields
328: reduce the effective conductivity). This holds when the
329: collisional mean free paths are small compared to the
330: length over which the electron temperature changes.
331: Solving for the conductive flux yields
332: \begin{equation}\label{F_c^2}
333: F_{\rm c}^2(T_e)=(\kappa_0 K n_i n_e T_i)(T_{\rm em}^2-T_e^2)
334: \end{equation}
335: and at the coupling interface
336: \begin{equation}\label{Fc-general}
337: F_{\rm c}^{\rm ADAF}\approx -(\kappa_0 K n_i n_e T_i)^{1/2}T_{\rm em},
338: \end{equation}
339: where ``-'' means a downward directed heat flow, $K= 1.64\times 10^{-17} \rm {g cm^{5}s^{-3}deg^{1/2}}$, $T_{\rm em}$ is the
340: maximum electron temperature at height $z_m$ corresponding to $F_c(z_m)=0$ and
341: can be derived by integration of $F_{\rm c}=-\kappa_0 T_e^{5/2}dT_e/dz$ from $z_m$
342: to the interface by taking $F_c$ in Eq.\ref{F_c^2}, yielding
343: \begin{equation}\label{T_em}
344: T_{\rm em}=2.01\times 10^{10}\alpha^{-2/5}\dot m^{2/5} r^{-2/5}\rm K.
345: \end{equation}
346: The conductive flux from the corona arriving at the interface of the
347: radiation region is then
348: \begin{equation}\label{Fc-cond}
349: F_{\rm c}^{\rm ADAF}=-6.52\times 10^{24} \alpha^{-7/5}m^{-1}\dot m^{7/5} r^{-12/5}.
350: \end{equation}
351: The energy balance in the radiating layer is determined by the incoming conductive flux,
352: bremsstrahlung radiation flux, and the enthalpy flux carried
353: by the mass evaporation/condensation flow,
354: \begin{equation}\label{energy}
355: \frac{d}{dz} \left[\dot m_z \frac{\gamma}{\gamma-1} \frac{1}{\beta}\frac{\Re T}{\mu} +
356: F_c \right] = -n_e n_i \Lambda(T).
357: \end{equation}
358: This determines the
359: evaporation/condensation rate per unit area, which is given by (Meyer et al. 2007)
360: \begin{equation}\label{cnd-general}
361: \dot m_z={\gamma-1\over \gamma} \beta{-F_{\rm c}^{\rm ADAF}\over {\Re T_{i}\over
362: \mu_i}}\(1-\sqrt{C}\)
363: \end{equation}
364: with
365: \begin{equation}\label{C}
366: C \equiv\kappa{_0} b
367: \left(\frac{0.25\beta^2 p_0^2}{k^2}\right)
368: \left(\frac{T_{\rm {cpl}}}{F_c^{\rm{ADAF}}}\right)^2,
369: \end{equation}
370: where $b=10^{-26.56}\,\rm g\,cm^5s^{-3}deg^{-1/2}$ (Sutherland \& Dopita 1993), $\beta$ corresponds to the ratio of gas pressure to total pressure, $p_0={2\over \sqrt{\pi}}p$ the pressure in the radiating layer, $\gamma={8-3\beta\over 6-3\beta}$ (Esin 1997), and $\mu_i=1.23$ for
371: an assumed chemical abundance of $X=0.75$, $Y=0.25$.
372: Using Eqs.\ref{T_cpl} and \ref{Fc-cond} for
373: $T_{\rm cpl}$ and $F_c^{\rm ADAF}$ and taking $\beta = 0.8$,
374: we obtain
375: \begin{equation}
376: C=0.96\alpha^{-28/15}\dot m^{8/15}r^{-1/5}.
377: \end{equation}
378: For $C<1$, mass evaporates from the disk to the corona ($\dot m_z > 0$) since the
379: conduction flux is not completely radiated away. On the other hand, for $C>1$
380: coronal matter condenses into the disk ($\dot m_z < 0$) due to effective cooling
381: by bremsstrahlung. The condition, $C=1$, separates the regions of evaporation and
382: condensation and, hence determines, the outer radius
383: of the inner disk, given as
384: \begin{eqnarray}\label{r_cnd1}
385: r_{\rm d}&=&0.815\alpha^{-28/3}\dot m^{8/3}\nonumber\\
386: &=&5864\({\alpha\over 0.2}\)^{-28/3}\({\dot m\over 0.1}\)^{8/3}.
387: \end{eqnarray}
388: Thus, the determination of the condensation/evaporation region depends on mass accretion rate and viscosity parameter in the ADAF. The integrated condensation rate (in units of
389: the Eddington rate) from $r_{\rm d}$ to any radius ($r_i$) of the disk is
390: \begin{equation}\label{condensation_cnd}
391: \dot m_{\rm cnd}=\int_{R_i}^{R_d} {4\pi R \over \dot M_{\rm Edd}}\dot m_zdR= 3.23\times 10^{-3}\alpha^{-7}\dot m^3 f(r_{\rm i}/r_d),
392: \footnote{Eq.(29) in Meyer et al.
393: (2007) contains an error, without consequences in the paper since
394: the formula was not further used. The true value is $3.23\times 10^{-3}$ as here}
395: \end{equation}
396: with
397: \begin{equation}
398: f(x)=1-6x^{1/2}+5x^{3/5}.
399: \end{equation}
400:
401: The expressions for the size of the inner disk, $r_d$ (eq.\ref{r_cnd1})
402: and the mass condensation rate, $\dot m_{\rm cnd}$ (eq. \ref{condensation_cnd})
403: reveal their sensitivity to the accretion rate and viscosity. Their dependence
404: on the accretion rate ($\dot m$) for $\alpha=0.2$ and $\alpha=0.3$ are shown
405: in Fig.\ref{f:r_d-cnd}. It can be seen that an inner disk with size $r_d<100$
406: only exists in a limited range of accretion rates, and this range strongly depends
407: on $\alpha$.
408:
409: The radiation from the corona is dominated by bremsstrahlung in the radiating layer,
410: $$F_{\rm Brem}=\int_{z0}^{z1}n_e n_i \Lambda(T)dz,$$
411: where $z0$ and $z1$ are the lower and upper boundary of the radiating layer. By
412: combining Eqs.\ref{energy}, \ref{cnd-general} and \ref{C}, the flux is given by
413: \begin{equation}
414: F_{\rm Brem}=-F_c^{\rm ADAF}\sqrt{C}=6.391\times 10^{24} \alpha^{-7/3}m^{-1}\dot m^{5/3}r^{-5/2}\,
415: \rm erg\ s^{-1}\,cm^{-2}
416: \end{equation}
417: and the corresponding luminosity from the two sides of the disk corona is
418: \begin{eqnarray}\label{L_cnd}
419: {L_{\rm Brem}\over L_{\rm Edd}}&=&2\int_{3R_S}^{R_d} 2\pi R F_{\rm Brem}dR=
420: 0.0642 \alpha^{-7/3}\dot m^{5/3}\[1-\({3\over r_d}\)^{1/2}\]\nonumber\\
421: &=&0.0591\({\alpha\over 0.2}\)^{-7/3}\({\dot m\over 0.1}\)^{5/3}\[1-\({3\over r_d}\)^{1/2}\].
422: \end{eqnarray}
423:
424: \subsection{Compton Cooling-Dominant Corona}
425:
426: In the regime at relatively high mass accretion rates or with a luminous
427: soft photon flux, the inverse Compton scattering process could be more
428: effective for cooling the electrons than the vertical thermal conduction in an ADAF-like corona.
429: The electron temperature in the upper coronal region then would be determined
430: by Compton cooling. However, in the presence of an underlying cool disk
431: conduction sets in at some height as the dominant cooling mechanism for the
432: lower coronal layers. The additional Compton cooling within the corona leads to a
433: relatively cool electron component in the corona/ADAF, resulting in a conductive
434: flux from the corona to the radiating layer lower than that estimated in \S 2.2. The electron
435: temperature in the corona is now determined by $q_{\rm ie}=q_{\rm cmp}$
436: where $q_{\rm cmp}$ is the Compton cooling rate given by
437: \begin{equation}\label{q_comp}
438: q_{\rm cmp} = {4kT_e\over m_ec^2} n_e \sigma_T c u
439: \end{equation}
440: where $u$ is the soft photon energy density. By assuming that the soft photons for Compton scattering arise
441: from the local underlying disk, $u$ is expressed in terms of effective temperature in the local disk as
442: $u(r)={1\over 2}aT_{\rm eff}^4(r)$. The factor ${1\over 2}$ for the
443: energy density of an isotropic blackbody photon field is taken since photons from the
444: underlying disk cover only half of the sky of electrons in the corona. The effective
445: temperature of a steady state disk with a constant mass accretion rate, given by
446: $\sigma T_{\rm eff}^4 ={3GM\dot M_{\rm d}\over 8\pi R^3}\[1-\({3R_S\over R}\)^{1/2}\]$,
447: reaches at a maximum $T_{\rm eff, max}$ at $R=(49/36)\times 3R_S$ and is expressed as
448: \begin{equation}
449: T_{\rm eff}(r)=2.05T_{\rm eff,max}\({3\over r}\)^{3/4}\[1-\({3\over r}\)^{1/2}\]^{1/4}
450: \end{equation}
451: With this effective temperature for the soft photon field, the electron temperature of the corona is derived from Eq.\ref{q_comp} as
452: \begin{equation}\label{T_ec}
453: T_{\rm ec}=3.025\times 10^9\alpha^{-2/5} m^{-2/5}\dot m^{2/5}r^{1/5}\[1-\({3\over r}\)^{1/2}\]^{-2/5}\({T_{\rm eff,max}\over 0.3keV}\)^{-8/5}\rm K,
454: \end{equation}
455: This temperature, $T_{\rm ec}$, is
456: characteristic of the upper Compton cooling dominant corona and represents
457: the maximum temperature within a given column at a distance, $r$.
458: The conductive flux from the corona to the coupling interface is calculated
459: from Eq.\ref{Fc-general} by replacing $T_{\rm em}$ with $T_{\rm ec}$ and is
460: given by
461: \begin{equation}\label{Fc-comp}
462: F_c^{\rm ADAF}=-9.816\times 10^{23}\alpha^{-7/5} m^{-7/5}\dot m^{7/5}r^{-9/5}\[1-\({3\over r}\)^{1/2}\]^{-2/5}
463: \({T_{\rm eff,max}\over 0.3keV}\)^{-8/5}
464: \rm erg\,s^{-1}\,cm^{-2},
465: \end{equation}
466: Since the Compton cooling rate is much lower than the bremsstrahlung rate
467: in the radiating layer, the energy balance and, hence, the
468: evaporation/condensation rate is the same as in the conduction dominant
469: cooling case, except for the fact that the conductive flux expressed in
470: Eq.\ref{cnd-general} is replaced by Eq.\ref{Fc-comp}. With this expression
471: for the conductive flux, the critical condensation radius and the integrated
472: condensation rate are derived by setting $C=1$ (in Eq.\ref{C}) and by
473: integrating Eq.\ref{cnd-general} respectively, yielding
474: \begin{equation}\label{r_cnd2}
475: r_{\rm d}\[1-\({3\over r_d}\)^{1/2}\]^{-4/7}=14.417\alpha^{-4/3}m^{4/7}\dot m^{8/21}\({T_{\rm eff,max}\over 0.3keV}\)^{16/7},
476: \end{equation}
477: and
478: \begin{equation}\label{condensation-cmp}
479: \dot m_{\rm cnd}(r)=A\left\{2B\[\({r_{\rm d}\over r}\)^{1/2}-1\]-\int_{r/3}^{r_{\rm d}/3}x^{1/5}\(1-x^{-1/2}\)^{-2/5}dx \right\}
480: \end{equation}
481: where
482: \begin{equation}\label{A}
483: A=6.164 \times 10^{-3}\alpha^{-7/5}m^{-2/5}\dot m^{7/5}\({T_{\rm eff, max}\over 0.3keV}\)^{-8/5}
484: %=2.928\times 10^{-3}\(\alpha\over 0.2\)^{-7/5}\({m\over 10}\)^{-2/5}\({\dot m\over 0.1}\)^{7/5}\({T_{\rm eff, max}\over 0.3keV}\)^{-8/5}
485: \end{equation}
486: and
487: \begin{equation}\label{B}
488: B=3.001\alpha^{ -14/15}m^{2/5}\dot m^{ 4/15}\({T_{\rm eff, max}\over 0.3keV}\)^{8/5}\({r\over 3}\)^{1/2}.
489: \end{equation}
490: There is either no solution or two solutions for $r_d$ in Eq.\ref{r_cnd2}, depending on system parameters. In the case of no solution, mass does not condense into the disk by Compton cooling,
491: but rather evaporates from the disk to the corona. The two solutions $r_{d1}$ and $r_{d2}$
492: determined by Eq.\ref{r_cnd2} lie at both sides of the distance $r=(81/49)\times 3$,
493: yielding a spatial extent for the condensation region described by $r_{d1}<r<r_{d2}$.
494:
495: The total condensation rate to the inner disk is the integral from $r_{\rm d2}$ to
496: $r_{\rm d1}$. Since the accretion rate in the disk increases with decreasing distance
497: until $r=r_{d1}$, the disk effective temperature does not reach its maximum at
498: $r_{\rm tmax}=(49/36)\times 3$, but at some distance slightly smaller than it (depending
499: on the system parameters). However, the true maximal effective temperature is not
500: much larger than the value at $r_{\rm tmax}$.
501: In the following we assume the maximal effective temperature is reached at $r_{\rm tmax}$,
502: which is a good approximation.
503:
504: Thus, for a Compton cooling dominant corona, the region where matter condenses
505: from the corona to the disk and the total condensation rate are determined by
506: the mass of the black hole, the mass accretion rate, effective temperature of
507: the soft photon radiation, and the disk viscosity parameter. Fig.\ref{f:r_d-cmp}
508: shows that for given black hole mass, $m=10$, and disk temperature, $T_{\rm eff,
509: max}=0.3keV$, the size of the inner disk and the condensation rate increase
510: with accretion rate. For larger $\alpha$ values, both the size of the inner disk
511: and the mass condensation rate decrease for a given $m$ and $T_{\rm eff, max}$.
512:
513: If the effective temperature is assumed to originate from disk accretion fed
514: by condensation, the maximal effective temperature at $r_{\rm tmax}$
515: is no longer a free parameter,
516: \begin{eqnarray}\label{T_eff}
517: T_{\rm eff, max}&=&1.3348\times 10^7 \,{\rm K} m^{-1/4}\dot m_{\rm cnd}^{1/4}(r_{\rm tmax}) \nonumber \\
518: &=&0.2046{\rm keV}\({m\over 10}\)^{-1/4}\[{\dot m_{\rm cnd}(r_{\rm tmax})\over 0.01}\]^{1/4}.
519: \end{eqnarray}
520: Replacing $T_{\rm eff, max}$ in Eqs.\ref{r_cnd2}, \ref{A} and \ref{B},
521: Eq.\ref{condensation-cmp} becomes a non-linear equation for $\dot
522: m_{\rm cnd}(r_{\rm tmax})$ and can be numerically solved for given $\alpha$, $m$ and
523: $\dot m$. The integrated condensation rate at any distance $r$ can then also be
524: calculated for a known $T_{\rm eff,max}$ using Eq.\ref{T_eff}.
525:
526: Finally, the luminosity associated with the inverse Compton scattering process
527: in the corona can be calculated as
528: \begin{equation}
529: L_{\rm cmp}=\int_{R_{\rm d1}}^{R_{\rm d2}} 2\pi R H {4kT_e\over m_e c^2} n_e \sigma_T 4\sigma T_{\rm eff}^4 (R) dR.
530: \end{equation}
531: Replacing the temperature $T_e$ by Eq.\ref{T_ec} and the density by
532: Eq.\ref{scaled}, we have
533: \begin{equation}\label{L_cmp}
534: {L_{\rm cmp}\over L_{\rm Edd}}=0.392\alpha^{-7/5}m^{3/5}\dot m^{7/5}\({T_{\rm eff, max}\over 0.3keV}\)^{12/5}\int_{r_{\rm d1}/3}^{r_{\rm d2}/3}x^{-23/10}\(1-x^{-1/2}\)^{3/5}dx.
535: \end{equation}
536:
537:
538: \subsection{Compton Dominant or Conduction Dominant-Cooling?}
539:
540: In general, cooling from both the Compton scattering and thermal conduction
541: processes should be included, however, in order to obtain analytical results
542: we have only considered the cases when one of these processes is dominant.
543: In the
544: following we delineate the physical regime in which Compton cooling is
545: important.
546: One approach for determining the importance of Compton and conduction cooling
547: in the corona is to compare the electron temperatures corresponding
548: to the Compton cooling and conductive cooling regimes. The process resulting
549: in a lower temperature is the more efficient cooling mechanism and thus would
550: be dominant. As shown in previous work (e.g. Meyer et al. 2007), thermal
551: conduction results in a vertical temperature distribution in the corona with
552: the electron temperature decreasing from a maximum value $T_{\rm em}$ (see
553: Eq.\ref{T_em}) at the highest layer $z_m$ to the coupling temperature $T_{\rm cpl}$
554: at the interface between the corona and radiating layer. On the other hand, for
555: inverse Compton scattering, the electrons in the ADAF-like corona cool to a
556: temperature $T_{\rm ec}$, which is independent of the vertical height. If, at
557: any given height $z<z_m$, the electron temperature $T_e(z)$ determined by
558: conduction is larger than the Compton cooling temperature $T_{\rm ec}$,
559: Compton cooling should be more important. In this case, the maximum temperature
560: $T_{\rm em}$ of Eq.\ref{T_em} is no longer relevant and the temperature from $z$
561: to $z_m$ is determined by Compton cooling. That is, $T_e=T_{\rm ec}$, which
562: becomes the maximum temperature in the upper coronal region. As long as the
563: Compton temperature $T_{\rm ec}$ is less than the maximum temperature $T_{\rm
564: em}$ as determined by conduction, Compton scattering should contribute to the
565: coronal cooling. From $T_{\rm ec}\le T_{\rm em}$, the critical radius where
566: Compton cooling sets in is given by
567: \begin{equation}\label{r_cmp}
568: r_{\rm cmp}\[{1-\({3\over r_{\rm cmp}}\)^{1/2}}\]^{-2/3}\le 23.487m^{2/3}\({T_{\rm eff,max}\over 0.3keV}\)^{8/3}.
569: \end{equation}
570: There exists a minimum at $r=(16/9)\times 3$ in the function for $r_{\rm cmp}$ on left-hand side of Eq.\ref{r_cmp}. Thus, for this equation there is either no solution, implying
571: that Compton cooling is unimportant or two solutions exist interior and
572: exterior to $r=(16/9)\times 3$, which determines the Compton dominant region,
573: $r_{\rm cmp1}<r<r_{\rm cmp2}$.
574: This indicates that Compton cooling is non-negligible in the inner region
575: ($r\sim 16/3$) for X-ray binaries if the disk effective temperature is not very low.
576: For given $M$ and $T_{\rm eff, max}$, say, $M=10M_\odot$ and $T_{\rm eff,max}=0.3$keV, the Compton dominant region $3.03<r<96$ follows, whereas for
577: $M=10M_\odot$ and $T_{\rm eff, max}= 0.2$keV, a smaller region $3.16<r<28.5$ follows.
578: Fig.\ref{f:cmp-cnd} illustrates the radial extent where Compton cooling or conductive
579: cooling is important in terms of the disk effective temperature in the innermost
580: region for black hole masses of $m=10$ and $m=6$. It can be seen that, for
581: typical X-ray binaries, the Compton cooling plays a role if the effective
582: temperature in the inner disk is higher than about 0.14 keV.
583:
584:
585:
586: \subsection{Caveats}
587:
588: We wish to point out that the dependence of the ADAF solutions on the viscosity
589: parameter $\alpha$ not only appears explicitly via its power-law dependence, as
590: shown in Eq.\ref{scaled}, but also implicitly through the coefficients of these
591: solutions (Narayan \& Yi 1995b). The values of the coefficients in Eq.
592: \ref{scaled} are derived by assuming $\alpha=0.2$. As this dependence is weak,
593: we neglect the implicit dependence in the following analysis when $\alpha$ is
594: varied. Similarly, the coefficients in the ADAF solution also implicitly depend
595: on the parameterized magnetic field $\beta$. In this work $\beta=0.8$ is assumed
596: based on results of the MHD simulation of Sharma et al. (2006). Compressive
597: heating in the ADAF ($q^c={1\over 1-\beta}q^+$) is also calculated for this value.
598: As remarked earlier, the influence of the magnetic field on the vertical conduction
599: is not discussed in our present analysis.
600: Furthermore, the effects of irradiation and disk reflection are assumed to be
601: unimportant since it is not expected to be significant for the small size of
602: the weakly emitting inner disk that is characteristic for the low/hard state
603: although it can lead to additional heating of the disk (see \S 5). Finally,
604: we do not introduce
605: a color correction factor to describe the spectral hardening factor of the disk
606: in our simple model since such a description is not an adequate description of
607: the spectrum at the low mass accretion rate levels (see Shimura \& Takahara 1995)
608: in the inner disk of our systems in their low hard state.
609:
610: \section{Results}
611:
612: For a system with mass accretion rates lower than the maximum evaporation rate,
613: corresponding to the hard-soft state transition, a gap forms in the disk by the
614: efficient evaporation of matter at about a few hundred Schwarzschild radii. An
615: inner cool remnant disk can be present extending from the ISCO to the critical
616: condensation radius $r_{\rm d}$. This inner disk is fed by the condensing
617: matter from its overlying corona and the accretion rate in the cool disk represents
618: the integrated condensation rate. The coexistence of this inner cool disk and
619: a coronal gap can yield an intermediate state spectrum characterized by
620: both hard and soft components. Here, the strength of the soft component depends
621: on the condensation rate and the inner disk size, both of
622: which are determined by the system parameters, i.e. the mass of the black hole,
623: the mass accretion rate, and the viscosity parameter.
624:
625: \subsection{Illustrative Examples for Conduction Dominant Cooling}
626:
627: For a typical X-ray binary with $M=10M_\odot$ and standard disk viscosity parameter,
628: $\alpha=0.2$, the accretion rate should be less than the corresponding transition
629: rate, 0.02, if the system is in the low or intermediate state. As an example, we adopt
630: a value for the mass accretion rate of $\dot m=0.01$. Based on the analysis
631: presented in Sect.2.2 for the conduction dominant cooling model, a critical
632: condensation radius of $r_d=12.6$, a total condensation rate of $\dot m_{\rm
633: cnd}=4.70\times 10^{-5}$, an inner disk effective temperature of $T_{\rm eff, max}$
634: =0.05keV, and a luminosity of $L/L_{\rm Edd}=6.53\times 10^{-4}$ are found. To
635: check the consistency of the solution, the critical radius for the Compton
636: cooling region was calculated. A Compton dominant cooling region was
637: not found to exist, implying that the conduction dominant model is consistent.
638: For lower mass accretion rates, $\dot m< 0.01$ or larger coronal viscosity
639: parameters, $\alpha > 0.2$, both the disk size and the
640: mass condensation rate rapidly decrease. Although the conductive cooling model
641: remains a valid description, the inner disk vanishes for $\dot m<0.006$ (for
642: $\alpha=0.2$) or $\alpha>0.233$ (for $\dot m=0.01$). For higher mass accretion
643: rates ($\dot m>0.01$) or smaller viscosity parameters, the condensation
644: radius and mass condensation rate increase, leading to higher disk temperatures.
645: Only for sufficiently high mass accretion rates (e.g. $\dot m=0.03$ but standard
646: viscosity, $\alpha=0.2$), or sufficiently small viscosities (e.g. $\alpha=0.14$, but
647: unchanged accretion rate, $\dot m=0.01$), must Compton cooling be taken into account
648: in describing the physical state of the inner region.
649:
650:
651: \subsection{Illustrative Examples for Compton Dominant Cooling}\label{s:cmp}
652:
653: To illustrate an X-ray binary where Compton cooling plays an
654: important role, we consider a system with a black hole mass of $M=10M_\odot$ and
655: a viscosity parameter $\alpha=0.35$, but assume a higher mass accretion
656: rate $\dot m=0.11$. As discussed in \S 3.1, Compton cooling is expected
657: to be an important cooling process in the inner region. Calculations based
658: on conduction alone would yield condensation from the ISCO up to $r=41$, resulting
659: in a condensation rate of $2.79\times 10^{-3}$ times
660: the Eddington rate. This leads to a maximal effective temperature of the
661: inner disk of 0.14 keV (Eq.\ref{T_eff}). At such a temperature, Compton
662: cooling becomes important from $r=4$ until $r=8$ (as calculated from
663: Eq.\ref{r_cmp}).
664:
665: Therefore, in the case of $\alpha=0.35$ and $\dot m=0.11$, cooling in the corona is
666: dominated by the Compton scattering in the inner region and the vertical conduction
667: in the surrounding region. By presuming a value for the disk effective temperature,
668: we calculate the condensation rate from Eqs.\ref{r_cnd2}-\ref{B} and derive the
669: effective temperature from Eq.\ref{T_eff}. If this temperature matches the
670: presumed value, the solution for the condensation rate is self-consistent.
671: By iteration we find a consistent solution for the total condensation
672: rate, $\dot m_{\rm cnd}=3.0\times 10^{-3}$, obtained by integration from an inner Compton
673: dominant region ($3.7<r<10.6$) and an outer conduction dominant region
674: ($10.6<r<41$), with a disk effective temperature $T_{\rm eff, max}$=0.15keV
675: at $r_{\rm tmax}$.
676:
677: In the above example, Compton cooling is not very strong, leading to a slight
678: increase in the rate of condensation. For very efficient Compton cooling, the
679: decrease in the conductive flux results in a significant increase in the
680: condensation rate. To illustrate such a case we assume $\alpha=0.4$, $\dot m=0.16$,
681: and $m=10$. For this set of parameters, calculations based on the Compton cooling
682: model show that the coronal gas condenses into the disk from $r=30.5$ to $r=3.08$,
683: resulting in a mass condensation rate of $\dot m_{\rm cnd}=0.01$. Such a rate leads
684: to a consistent effective temperature of $T_{\rm eff, max}=0.205$keV at $r_{\rm tmax}$.
685: On the other hand, calculation based on the conduction model shows a condensation rate of only 0.003, much smaller than predicted by Compton cooling. Further calculations
686: of the Compton dominant region show that the Compton scattering dominates the coronal
687: cooling nearly throughout the condensation-fed inner disk.
688:
689:
690: Examples for various values of the viscosity and accretion rate are listed
691: in Table~\ref{t:examples}. It is shown that the conduction cooling leads to low
692: condensation rates and hence low disk temperatures, while the Compton cooling
693: results in high condensation rates and hence high effective temperatures. For
694: comparable viscosity values, the Compton cooling becomes efficient at high
695: accretion rates.
696:
697: Neglecting the upper limit to the accretion rates, we show in Fig.\ref{f:comparison}
698: the dependence of the condensation rate on the mass accretion rate for the
699: case of Compton dominant cooling in the inner corona and conduction dominant cooling
700: in the outer corona. Condensation caused by conduction alone is also shown for
701: comparison. It can be seen that the condensation is strong for Compton
702: cooling, though it only dominates over conduction in the inner region.
703:
704: \section{Comparison with Observations}
705:
706: To make a meaningful comparison between observations and theory it is important
707: to recognize that the observations provide information on the luminosity rather
708: than the mass accretion rate. In the case of an optically thick standard thin
709: disk, the mass accretion rate is deduced from the luminosity, $\dot M= L/ \eta c^2$
710: by assuming an energy conversion efficiency of $\eta=0.1$. However, in an
711: ADAF-like corona, $\eta$ is less than 0.1 and its variation depends on the
712: structural disk parameters ($p$, $T_e$, etc), and therefore is implicitly determined
713: by $\alpha$, $m$, and $\dot m$. For a Compton cooling dominant corona the main
714: contribution to the luminosity is due to inverse Compton scattering. Bremsstrahlung
715: radiation from the radiation layer could also contribute, but as a small part. Therefore,
716: with observationally inferred mass and effective temperature, a value for viscosity, and
717: a tentative $\dot m$, we calculate numerically the radiative luminosity from both Compton
718: scattering (Eq.\ref{L_cmp}) and Bremsstrahlung (Eq.\ref{L_cnd}) . If the derived
719: luminosity is not equal to the observed value, the accretion rate is varied
720: and the calculation repeated until a consistent luminosity is obtained. In this way, the
721: accretion rate can be found. The crucial issue in the modeling is whether a value
722: for $\dot m$ exists which predicts condensation rather than evaporation.
723:
724: In the case of a corona dominated by thermal conduction, the luminosity is
725: due to bremsstrahlung radiation, and the mass accretion rate only depends
726: on the observed luminosity and the assumed $\alpha$ in the form
727: \begin{equation}\label{mdot-B}
728: \dot m=5.196\alpha^{7/5}\({L_{\rm Brem}\over L_{\rm Edd}}\)^{3/5}
729: \[1-\({3\over r_d}\)^{1/2}\]^{-3/5},
730: \end{equation}
731: where the the factor $\[1-\({3\over r_d}\)^{1/2}\]^{-3/5}$ is approximately unity
732: as long as $ r_d$ is not very small. The inner disk size $r_d$, the condensation
733: rate, and the effective temperature are thus determined from Eq.\ref{r_cnd1},
734: Eq.\ref{condensation_cnd} and Eq.\ref{T_eff} respectively.
735: We note that the conduction model is based on the assumption that Compton cooling
736: is negligible and would only be consistent with the observations for condensation rates
737: yielding low disk temperatures (from Eq.\ref{T_eff}).
738:
739: A constraint on the viscosity parameter can be obtained from the
740: mass accretion rate corresponding to the transition between spectral states.
741: As shown in previous work by Meyer et al. (2000a), the maximum evaporation
742: rate, representing the hard-soft transition rate, roughly depends on the value of
743: the viscosity parameter as $\dot m_{\rm tr}\propto \alpha^3$. In the intermediate
744: state discussed here, the mass accretion rate cannot be larger than this
745: transition rate for, otherwise, the optically thick disk extends to the ISCO
746: without a coronal gap, resulting in a soft thermal dominated spectrum.
747:
748: \subsection{GX339-4}
749:
750:
751: Based on the optical spectroscopy of GX339-4 during outburst, Hynes et al. (2003)
752: infer an orbital period of 1.7557 days and a mass function of $5.8 \msun$ for the
753: system. For a likely distance we take 8 kpc and for the black hole mass $10 \msun$
754: (see Zdziarski et al. 2004). Recently, Miller et al. (2006b) observed GX 339-4
755: during the low hard state with XMM Newton and found a soft component of $kT=0.3$keV,
756: interpreting it to arise from an inner disk extending to the ISCO. Such a weak disk
757: near the black hole is very difficult to explain within the framework of standard
758: accretion disk models. As the density of the reflecting medium inferred
759: from observations is low (Miller et al. 2006b), the inner disk must be
760: spatially limited in extent. At these low temperatures, in contrast to the 1-2keV
761: spectrum in the soft state, a small inner disk would also be necessary in order that
762: strong irradiation by the corona can be avoided. Given an unabsorbed flux of $5.33\times
763: 10^{-9} {\rm ergs\,s^{-1}cm^{-2}}$ (Miller et al. 2006b), the luminosity is $L/L_{\rm Edd}=
764: 0.03$. At this luminosity and the characteristic power-law spectrum of GX 339-4 in the
765: low hard state, Compton scattering could be dominant. Upon comparing the electron
766: temperature obtained from analysis for the two cooling mechanisms, we confirm that Compton
767: cooling is important from the innermost region $r=3.03$ up to $r_{\rm cmp}=95.7$ (by Eq.\ref{r_cmp}). Even if a colour correction of 1.7 (Shimura \& Takahara 1995) is assumed, the Compton cooling is still dominant in the inner region to the distance of $r=18$. Hence, we consider GX 339-4 in terms of the Compton dominant condensation model.
768:
769: With the black hole mass, luminosity, and effective temperature taken from the observations,
770: and a standard value 0.2 for $\alpha$, it is found that the accretion rate is $\dot m=0.024$.
771: This yields an inner disk extending to a distance of 99.5 Schwarzschild and a luminosity
772: ratio of 21.8\% between the disk and the corona. Adopting a larger viscous value, $\alpha=0.3$,
773: one obtains an accretion rate of 0.037. The disk size is $r_{\rm d}=66.5$ and disk
774: luminosity fraction is 12.7\%, smaller than the case of standard viscosity value. A
775: further increase in the viscosity to $\alpha=0.4$ leads to a smaller inner disk and a lower
776: disk luminosity fraction. Detailed fitting results are presented in Table~\ref{t:fits}, where for
777: a given value of $\alpha$, a value for $\dot m$ is found, which leads to a luminosity
778: consistent with the inferred value. The corresponding spatial extent of the condensation
779: region, the condensation rate, the effective temperature, as well as the ratio of the disk
780: to corona luminosities are also listed.
781:
782: By comparing modeling results, we find that a larger viscosity predicts a smaller disk
783: size and disk contribution to the luminosity.
784: We note that the condensation rate yields an effective temperature (as shown in column 7
785: in Table~\ref{t:fits}), which is lower than observed. This may indicate a need for an additional
786: energy source above that associated with the accretion of condensed gas. For example,
787: other processes, such as irradiation, may lead to additional heating of the gas in the
788: disk surface. Notwithstanding the uncertainties in observationally determining
789: the color temperature of the soft thermal component, the lack of agreement may also
790: imply a need for a color correction factor, although, in that case, Compton cooling may
791: not be as effective.
792:
793: \subsection{J1753.5-0127}
794:
795: We also can compare our model with the recent observations of J1753.5-0127 (Miller
796: et al. 2006a), however there are significant uncertainties in the distance and
797: mass of the black hole. Our comparisons, thus, should be only considered to be
798: indicative and accurate modeling must await determinations of these parameters.
799: XMM Newton observations of J\,1753.5-0127 reveal a X-ray luminosity of $L_X/L_{\rm Edd}=
800: 0.003(D/8.5kpc)^2(M/10M_\odot)$ in the range 0.5keV to 10keV and a hard X-ray
801: spectral index of $\sim 0.66$ (Miller et al. 2006a). Extrapolating the luminosity
802: to 100-200keV yields ${L\over L_{\rm Edd}}\approx 0.01(D/8.5kpc)^2(M/10M_\odot)$.
803: The fit to the X-ray spectrum reveals a cool disk component of $kT=0.2$keV
804: (Miller et al. 2006a). Taking $D=8.5 kpc$ and $M=10M_\odot$, the Compton
805: process would be dominant in the inner region from $r=3.16$ to $r=28.5$ as estimated
806: from Eq.\ref{r_cmp}. Therefore, to model this object, Compton cooling should be
807: taken into account. For the standard viscosity, $\alpha=0.2$, we find a mass
808: accretion rate of $\dot m=0.02$ would suffice to produce the luminosity from
809: both Bremsstrahlung in the radiating layer and Compton scattering in the typical coronal
810: region. The size of
811: the inner disk is $r_{\rm d}=33.4$ (from Eq.\ref{r_cnd2}), while from Eq.\ref{r_cnd1}
812: $r_{\rm d}=80$. This implies that condensation begins at $r=80$ due to conduction,
813: while Compton cooling sets in at $r_{\rm d}=28.5$ and dominates to $r_{\rm d}=3.16$.
814: In this case, the condensation rate is obtained from an integration from the outer
815: conduction dominant region ($28.5\le r\le 80$) to the inner Compton dominant region
816: ($3.16\le r\le 28.5$), yielding $\dot m_{\rm cnd}=1.95\times 10^{-3}$. The disk
817: component contributes a relative large fraction (0.16) to the total luminosity.
818:
819: A fit to J1753.5-0127 with larger viscosities has also been carried out, and
820: the relevant results are listed in Table~\ref{t:fits}. The calculations show that at
821: a fixed effective temperature, for larger viscosities the conduction cooling
822: to the corona is less efficient and hence the Compton cooling becomes more
823: important. Specifically, the inner disk becomes smaller, the condensation rate
824: decreases, and disk becomes weaker relative to the corona. Future measurements of
825: the disk luminosity fraction and the reflection component will provide further
826: constraints on the viscosity.
827:
828: \section{Discussion and implications}
829:
830: The evaporation/condensation picture for the accretion geometry of black hole X-ray
831: transient systems has been investigated to determine its applicability to the weak
832: soft thermal component observed in the low hard states of GX339-4 and J1753.5-0127.
833: The model for the mass and energy exchange between the corona and an underlying disk
834: developed earlier, based on the thermal conduction of energy, has been extended
835: to include the effects of coronal cooling associated with the inverse Compton scattering
836: process of soft X-ray photons. The numerical solutions for the disk structure reveal
837: that the Compton dominated cooling region is more important for higher soft photon
838: fluxes at all radii, with the radial extent $r_{\rm cmp}$ of the region
839: independent of the mass of the accreting black hole component in the system. In
840: addition, it is found that cool inner disks, contributing a small fraction of the
841: total X-ray luminosity ($<20\%$), can exist in the low hard state of black
842: hole transient systems GX 339-4 and J1753.5-0127.
843:
844: The fits to GX 339-4 and Swift J1753.5-0127 reveal that the theoretical
845: disk temperatures are lower than the observationally inferred values, indicating
846: that additional heating of the disk is required. We suggest that this heating
847: is associated with coronal irradiation.
848:
849: Specifically, for a corona in the form of a slab lying above the disk, nearly
850: half of the total coronal emission impinges on the optically thick disk and is
851: reprocessed as blackbody radiation (Haardt \& Maraschi 1991; Liu et al. 2003). The
852: luminosity associated with the irradiation is close to the observed luminosity.
853: For GX 339-4, this irradiating luminosity is about 0.03 times the Eddington value.
854: Its corresponding heating is equivalent to viscous dissipation in the disk with an
855: additional accretion rate of 0.03 of the Eddington value, producing an effective
856: temperature of about 0.27keV (from Eq.\ref{T_eff}). Taking into account the viscous
857: dissipation from the accretion of condensing matter, the inner disk temperature can
858: be similar to the observationally inferred value of 0.3keV. Similarly, for Swift J1753.5-0127,
859: $L/L_{\rm edd}= 0.01$, and the disk is heated by irradiation to about 0.2keV, again,
860: comparable to that observed.
861:
862: The inclusion of irradiation does not affect the fits described in \S 4 since the
863: disk temperature is fixed to the observed value. Although the effective temperature
864: established by viscous dissipation is lower than 0.3keV, the additional heating from
865: irradiation can lead to improved comparisons between the theoretically derived
866: and observed temperatures.
867:
868: \subsection{Range of luminosity over which cool inner disks exist}
869: In the low hard state the luminosity range over which cool inner disks exist depends
870: on whether condensation can occur. To determine the lower limit to the range
871: we make use of the fact that the critical condensation radius should fulfill the
872: condition that $r_d> 3$. In the case that conduction cooling dominates in the corona,
873: this condition requires
874: \begin{equation}\label{lower-L1}
875: \dot m> 1.63\alpha^{7/2}.
876: \end{equation}
877: For a fixed viscosity parameter, $\alpha=0.2$, a lower limit to the accretion rate for
878: an inner disk to exist is $\dot m=0.006$. The corresponding luminosity in this critical
879: case is from a pure ADAF luminosity (rather than Bremsstrahlung), which could be as
880: small as ${L\over L_{\rm Edd}}=0.001$, depending on the radiative efficiency of the
881: ADAF accretion. At an accretion rate slightly higher than the critical value, the disk
882: component, as measured by the disk size or by the disk luminosity fraction for example,
883: could be very weak and hence Compton cooling is negligible. We note that this lower
884: critical mass accretion rate is very sensitive to $\alpha$.
885:
886: For cases in which Compton cooling dominates in the corona, the lower limits
887: to the accretion rate for condensation to a disk are greater than that given by
888: the conduction model for $0.1< \alpha <0.4$. In particular, the lower limit to
889: the accretion rate is 0.0245 (0.07) and to the luminosity is 0.008 (0.016) for
890: $\alpha = 0.2 (0.3)$.
891:
892: Thus, the lower limit on the mass accretion rate or luminosity leading to the
893: formation of an inner disk is set by the conduction model, which is found to
894: depend on the viscosity parameter. For a $10 M_\odot$ black hole, condensation
895: could occur at an accretion rate as low as $\dot m=0.006$ for a standard
896: viscosity parameter $\alpha=0.2$. However, if observations suggest high-temperature
897: soft component (say, $T_ {\rm eff}=0.14$keV), Compton scattering must play a role
898: in cooling of the corona, and the lower limit to the accretion rate is higher,
899: corresponding to about 0.01$L_{\rm Edd}$, depending on the viscosity.
900:
901: Hence, our considerations of the two cooling regimes suggest cool inner disks may be
902: present for systems with X-ray luminosities as low as 0.001-0.01 $\ledd$. This is
903: of particular interest for J1753.5-0127 since it remained in a hard state throughout
904: its outburst, suggesting that a spectral transition from a hard state to a soft state
905: during an outburst is not a necessary condition for the formation of an inner disk
906: in the hard state. Observations of J1753.5-0127 at even lower luminosity levels
907: would be especially valuable in constraining the model parameters further.
908: Of particular interest, we note that the observations of different classes
909: of systems suggest that the viscosity parameter is relatively high ($\alpha \sim 0.1-0.4$, see
910: King et al. 2007; exceeding more than 0.5 from MHD simulation by Sharma et al. 2006),
911: overlapping with the range of values inferred from our modeling.
912:
913: An upper bound on the luminosity for which an inner disk exists in the hard state
914: can also be estimated. The luminosity given by the condensation model increases with
915: increasing accretion rate and decreasing viscosity. Thus, the upper bound is
916: constrained by the highest accretion rate and lowest viscosity. For example, at a
917: transition accretion rate of 0.02 (0.0675), the upper bound to the luminosity is
918: 0.003 (0.009) for $\alpha=0.2 (0.3)$. We point out that at the upper limit of
919: $\dot m=0.1$ suggested by Narayan et al. (1995b) for the existence of an ADAF,
920: the lowest viscosity is 0.342. A lower value for $\alpha$ would correspond to
921: a transition rate lower than 0.1 (from $\dot m_{\rm tr}\propto \alpha^3$), and
922: the system would no longer lie in the low/hard state. Hence, in this limit, an
923: upper bound on the luminosity is 0.02 for this transition accretion rate.
924: This is in good agreement with a hard-to-soft transition luminosity of 1\%-4\% found
925: in X-ray binaries (Maccarone 2003).
926:
927: \subsection{A mass-independent process}
928: It has been shown in previous investigations of the energy and mass exchange
929: between the accretion disk and its corona that the results of both the
930: evaporation process, i.e., the Eddington scaled evaporation rate ($\dot M_{\rm
931: evap}/\dot M_{Edd}$) and its distribution with respect to the scaled distance
932: ($R/R_{\rm S}$) and the condensation process to a truncated inner cool disk are
933: not dependent on the mass of the black hole (Liu et al. 2002; Liu et al. 2006;
934: Meyer et al. 2007; see also Eqs.\ref{r_cnd1} and \ref{condensation_cnd}). By
935: including the effect of Compton cooling in the present study, the condensation
936: rate appears to depend on the mass of the black hole and the disk effective
937: temperature, as shown in Eqs.\ref{r_cnd2} and \ref{condensation-cmp}. If the
938: accretion of the condensing matter is the only energy source for establishing
939: the thermal properties of the disk, the effective temperature is no
940: longer a free parameter, but is determined by Eq.\ref{T_eff}. Replacing $T_{\rm
941: eff,max}$ in Eqs. \ref{r_cnd2}, \ref{A}, and \ref{B} by Eq.\ref{T_eff}, we
942: find that the critical radius where condensation takes place, $r_d$,
943: and the quantities $A$ and $B$ only depend on the disk viscosity parameter
944: and the mass accretion rate as given by
945:
946: \begin{equation}\label{r_cnd3}
947: r_{\rm d}\[1-\({3\over r_d}\)^{1/2}\]^{-4/7}=
948: 311.43\alpha^{-4/3}\dot m^{8/21}\dot m_{\rm cnd}^{4/7},
949: \end{equation}
950: \begin{equation}
951: A=7.174\times 10^{-4}\alpha^{-7/5}\dot m^{7/5}\dot m_{\rm cnd}^{-2/5},
952: \end{equation}
953: \begin{equation}\label{B2}
954: B=25.785\alpha^{-14/15}\dot m^{4/15}\dot m_{\rm cnd}^{2/5}\({r\over 3}\)^{1/2}.
955: \end{equation}
956: With above expression for $r_d$, $A$ and $B$ we obtain from Eq.\ref{condensation-cmp}
957: a non-linear equation describing the condensation rate $\dot m_{\rm cnd}(r)$,
958: which depends on $\alpha$ and the Eddington scaled accretion rate $\dot m$,
959: but independent of $m$. For any given accretion rate and viscosity parameter,
960: the condensation rate is determined by Eq.\ref{condensation-cmp}. Likewise, the
961: extent of the Compton cooling dominant region, the electron temperature in the
962: corona, and the Compton luminosity are determined as
963: \begin{equation}
964: r_{\rm cmp}\[{1-\({3\over r_{\rm cmp}}\)^{1/2}}\]^{-2/3}\le 846.71\dot m_{\rm cnd}^{2/3},
965: \end{equation}
966: \begin{equation}
967: T_{\rm ec}=3.52\times 10^8{\rm K}\alpha^{-2/5}\dot m^{2/5}\dot m_{\rm cnd}^{-2/5}r^{1/5}\[1-\({3\over r}\)^{1/2}\]^{-2/5},
968: \end{equation}
969: \begin{equation}
970: {L_{\rm cmp}\over L_{\rm Edd}}=9.88\alpha^{-7/5}\dot m^{7/5}\dot m_{\rm cnd}^{3/5}\int_{r_{\rm d1}/3}^{r_{\rm d2}/3}x^{-23/10}\(1-x^{-1/2}\)^{3/5}dx.
971: \end{equation}
972: Thus the condensation process and the thermal state of the corona (i.e., the electron
973: temperature) are independent on the mass of the black hole. Taking into account the
974: mass-independent features of the previously developed model and its extension in this
975: study, we conclude that the simple description of the accretion process within the framework
976: of an evaporation/condensation picture can be applied not only to stellar mass black
977: holes in X-ray binary systems, but also to supermassive black holes in active galactic
978: nuclei. The presence of a cool
979: disk in the innermost regions surrounding a supermassive black hole in a low state would
980: directly contribute to the ultraviolet and optical emission and possibly
981: indirectly via reflected X-ray emission from a spatially extended inner disk. In
982: addition, it would provide a natural site of cool material where neutral
983: iron could be present for the production of Fe fluorescent line emission at 6.4 keV
984: (e.g. Tanaka et al. 1995). A more detailed study of the properties of such a cool disk
985: would be especially illuminating for interpretations of Fe line profiles based on general
986: relativistic broadening, though at present it is difficult to observe such a line
987: spectrum from low luminosity active galactic nuclei.
988:
989: \acknowledgments
990: This work was supported, in part, by the Theoretical Institute
991: for Advanced Research in Astrophysics (TIARA) operated under
992: Academia Sinica and the National Science Council Excellence
993: Projects program in Taiwan administered through grant number NSC
994: 95-2752-M-007-006-PAE. B.F. Liu acknowledges the support by
995: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSF-10533050)
996: and the BaiRenJiHua program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
997:
998: \begin{thebibliography}{}
999: \bibitem[]{969} Dullemond, C. P., \& Spruit, H. C. 2005, \aap, 434, 415
1000: \bibitem[]{970} Eardley, D. M., Lightman, A. P., \& Shapiro, S. L. 1975, \apj, 199, L153
1001: \bibitem[]{971} Esin, A. A., 1997, \apj, 482, 400
1002: \bibitem[]{972} Esin, A. A., McClintock, J. E., \& Narayan, R. 1997, \apj, 489, 865
1003: \bibitem[]{} Haardt, F., \& Maraschi, L., 1991, \apj, 380, L51
1004: \bibitem[]{973} Hynes, R.I., Steeghs, D., Casares, J., Charles, P.A., \& O'Brien, K. 2003, \apj, 583, L95
1005: \bibitem[]{974} King, A. R., Pringle, J. E., \& Livio, M. 2007, \mnras, 376, 1740
1006: \bibitem[]{975} Laurent, P., \& Titarchuk, L 2007, \apj, 656, 1056
1007: \bibitem[]{} Liu, B. F., Mineshige, S., \& Ohsuga, K., 2003, \apj, 587, 571
1008: \bibitem[]{976} Liu, B. F., Yuan, W., Meyer, F., Meyer-Hofmeister, E., \&
1009: Xie, G. Z. 1999, \apj, 527, L17
1010: \bibitem[]{978} Liu, B. F., Mineshige, S., \& Meyer, F., Meyer-Hofmeister,
1011: E., \& Kawaguchi, T. 2002, \apj, 575, L117
1012: \bibitem[]{980} Liu, B. F., Meyer, F., \& Meyer-Hofmeister, E. 2006, \aap, 454, L9
1013: \bibitem[]{981} Maccarone, T. J. 2003, \aap, 409, 697
1014: \bibitem[]{982} Mayer, M. \& Pringle, J. E., 2007, \mnras, 376, 435
1015: \bibitem[]{983} McClintock, J.E., \& Remillard, R.A., 2006, In: Compact
1016: Stellar X-ray Sources, eds. W.H.G. Lewin, M. van der Klis, Cambridge
1017: Univ. Press
1018: \bibitem[]{986} Meyer, F., Liu, B. F., \& Meyer-Hofmeister, E. 2000a, \aap, 361, 175
1019: \bibitem[]{987} Meyer, F., Liu, B. F., \& Meyer-Hofmeister, E. 2000b, \aap, 354, L67
1020: \bibitem[]{988} Meyer, F., Liu, B. F., \& Meyer-Hofmeister, E. 2007, \aap, 463, 1
1021: \bibitem[]{989} Meyer, F., \& Meyer-Hofmeister, E. 1994, \aap, 288, 175
1022: \bibitem[]{990} Miller, J. M., Homan, J., \& Miniutti, G. 2006a, \apj, 652, L113
1023: \bibitem[]{991} Miller, J. M., Homan, J., Steeghs, D., Rupen, M., Hunstead,
1024: R. W., Wijnands, R., Charles, P. A., \& Fabian, A. C. 2006b, \apj, 653, 525
1025: \bibitem[]{993} Narayan, R. 2005, \apss, 300, 177
1026: \bibitem[]{994} Narayan, R., Mahadevan, R., \& Quataert, E. 1998, In: The
1027: Theory of Black Hole Accretion Discs, eds. M.A. Abramowicz et al.,
1028: Cambridge Univ. Press, p. 48
1029: \bibitem[]{997} Narayan, R., \& Yi, I. 1994, \apj, 428, L13
1030: \bibitem[]{998} Narayan, R., \& Yi, I. 1995a, \apj, 444, 231
1031: \bibitem[]{999} Narayan, R., \& Yi, I. 1995b, \apj, 452, 710
1032: \bibitem[]{1000} Narayan, R., \& Yi. I. 1995c, \apj, 477, 585
1033: \bibitem[]{1001} Palmer, D. M., Barthelmy, S. D., Cummings, J. R., Gehrels, N.,
1034: Krimm, H. A., Markwardt, C. B., Sakamoto,T.,\& Tueller, J. 2005, Astron. Tel. 546
1035: \bibitem[]{1003} Pozdnyakov, L. A., Sobel, I. M., \& Syunyaev, R. A. 1983,
1036: Astroph. \& Space Phys. Res., 2, 189
1037: \bibitem[]{1005} Remillard, R. A., \& McClintock, J. E. 2006, \araa, 44, 49
1038: \bibitem[]{1006} R\`o\.za\`nska, A., \& Czerny, B. 2000a, \mnras, 316, 473
1039: \bibitem[]{1007} R\`o\.za\`nska, A., \& Czerny, B. 2000b, \aap, 360, 1170
1040: \bibitem[]{1008} Shakura, N. I., \& Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, \aap, 24, 337
1041: \bibitem[]{1009} Shapiro, S. L., Lightman, A. P., \& Eardly, D. M. 1976, \apj, 204, 187
1042: \bibitem[]{1010} Sharma, P., Hammet, W., Quataert, E. et al. 2006, \apj,
1043: 637, 952
1044: \bibitem[]{1012} Shaviv, G., \& Wehrse, R. 1986, \aap, 159, L5
1045: \bibitem[]{1013} Shimura, T., \& Takahara, F. 1995, \apj, 445, 780
1046: \bibitem[]{1014} Spitzer L., 1962, Physics of Fully Ionized Gases,
1047: 2nd edition, Interscience Publ., New York, London
1048: \bibitem[]{1016} Sunyaev, R. A., \& Titarchuk, L. G. 1980, \aap, 86, 121
1049: \bibitem[]{1017} Sutherland, R.S. \& Dopita, M.A. 1993,\apjs, 88, 253
1050: \bibitem[]{1018} Tanaka, Y., Nandra, K., Fabian, A. C. et al. 1995, Nature, 375, 659
1051: \bibitem[]{1019} Tanaka, Y., \& Shibazaki, N. 1996, \araa, 34, 607
1052: \bibitem[]{} Yuan, F., 2003, \apj, 594, L99
1053: \bibitem[]{1020} Zdziarski, A. A., Gierli\'nski, M., Mikolajewska, J. et al. 2004, \mnras, 351, 791
1054: \end{thebibliography}
1055: \clearpage
1056: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}
1057: \tablecaption{\label{t:examples} The condensation features of disk corona
1058: accretion around a $10M_\odot$ black hole. For given values of viscosity
1059: ($\alpha$) and accretion rate ($\dot m$), the inner disk size ($r_d$), the
1060: total condensation rate ($\dot m_{\rm cnd}$) and its corresponding maximal
1061: temperature ($T_{\rm eff,max}$) are listed. The luminosity ($L/L_{\rm Edd}$)
1062: from Bremsstrahlung and Compton scattering (if Compton cooling sets in) and
1063: the dominant cooling mechanism or Compton dominant region are also shown.}
1064: \tablehead{$\alpha$&$\dot m$&$r_d$&$\dot m_{\rm cnd}$&$T_{\rm eff,max}$(keV)&$L/L_{\rm Edd}$&Cooling mechanism}
1065: \startdata
1066: 0.2&0.01&12.6&$4.70\times 10^{-5}$&0.05&$6.52\times 10^{-4}$&Conduction\\
1067: 0.3&0.04&11.6&$1.60\times 10^{-4}$&0.07&$2.45\times 10^{-3}$&Conduction\\
1068: 0.4&0.08&5.0&$3.32\times 10^{-5}$&0.03&$1.83\times 10^{-3}$&Conduction\\
1069: 0.2&0.03\tablenotemark{*}&237&$5.24\times 10^{-3}$&0.17&$1.57\times 10^{-2}$&$3.3<r_{\rm cmp}<18$\\
1070: 0.35&0.11&41&$3.00\times 10^{-3}$&0.15&$2.80\times 10^{-2}$&$3.7<r_{\rm cmp}<10.6$\\
1071: 0.4&0.16&30.5&0.01&0.20&0.069\tablenotemark{**} &Compton\\
1072: \enddata
1073: \tablenotetext{*}{This is shown as an example for Compton cooling with the standard value of $\alpha$, but the accretion rate exceeds the transition rate.}
1074: \tablenotetext{**}{This luminosity is over-estimated by the increase of optical depth of the corona.}
1075: \end{deluxetable}
1076:
1077: \clearpage
1078:
1079: \begin{table}
1080: \begin{center}
1081: \caption{\label{t:fits}The fitting results for GX 339-4 and J1753. For every given
1082: value of $\alpha$, an accretion rate, $\dot m$, is found, which predicts a
1083: luminosity consistent with the observational inferred value. $r_d$, $\dot
1084: m_{\rm cnd}$, $L/L_{\rm Edd}$, $L_{\rm d}/L_{\rm c}$ and $T$(keV) are the
1085: model predictions for the disk size, condensation rate, luminosity,
1086: ratio of the disk and corona luminosities, and the maximal effective temperature
1087: caused by accretion.}
1088: \begin{tabular}{ccccccc}
1089: \tableline\tableline
1090: $\alpha$&$\dot m$&$r_d$&$\dot m_{\rm cnd}$&$L/L_{\rm Edd}$&$L_{\rm d}/L_{\rm c}$&$T$(keV)\\
1091: \tableline
1092: \multicolumn{7}{c}{GX 339-4: $L/L_{\rm Edd}=0.03$, $M=10M_\odot$, $T_{\rm eff, max}=0.3$keV}\\
1093: %\tableline
1094: 0.2&0.024&3.01--99.5&$6.66\times 10^{-3}$&0.03&21.8\%&0.185\\
1095: 0.3&0.037&3.02--66.5&$3.78\times 10^{-3}$&0.03&12.7\%&0.160\\
1096: 0.4&0.051&3.03--50.0&$2.54\times 10^{-3}$&0.03&8.4\%&0.145\\
1097: \tableline
1098: \multicolumn{7}{c}{J1753.5-0127: $L/L_{\rm Edd}=0.01, M=10M_\odot$, $T_{\rm eff, max}=0.2$keV}\\
1099: %$\alpha$&$\dot m$&$r_d$&$\dot m_{\rm cnd}$&$L/L_{\rm Edd}$&$L_{\rm d}/L_{\rm c}$&$T$(keV)\\
1100: %\tableline
1101: 0.2&0.02&3.07--33.4&$1.95\times 10^{-3}$&0.01&18.9\%&0.136\\
1102: 0.3&0.034&3.12--22.5&$9.91\times 10^{-4}$&0.01&9.6\%&0.115\\
1103: 0.4&0.049&3.2--16.7&$5.73\times 10^{-4}$&0.01&5.7\%&0.100\\
1104: \tableline
1105: \end{tabular}
1106: \end{center}
1107: \end{table}
1108: \clearpage
1109: \begin{figure}
1110: \plotone{f1.eps}
1111: \caption{Schematic picture of the truncated outer disk separated from the inner
1112: disk by a coronal gap, indicating the energy and mass flow in the configuration.}
1113: \label{f:dsk-cor.ps}
1114: \end{figure}
1115:
1116: \begin{figure}
1117: \plotone{f2.eps}
1118: \caption{The radial region where Compton or conduction cooling dominates as a
1119: function of the innermost disk temperature. The curves represent the critical
1120: effective temperature of the inner disk, above which Compton cooling should
1121: be taken into account and below which the conduction dominant model is valid.
1122: The solid and dash lines correspond to a black hole mass of $m=10$ and $m=6$
1123: respectively.}
1124: \label{f:cmp-cnd}
1125: \end{figure}
1126:
1127: \begin{figure}
1128: \plotone{f3.eps}
1129: \caption{The dependence of the critical condensation radius ($r_d$) and the
1130: condensation rate ($\dot m_{\rm cnd}$, integrated from $r_d$ to $r_{\rm
1131: tmax}$) on the accretion rate ($\dot m$) for a conductive cooling-dominant
1132: corona. The mass of black hole is fixed to $10M_\odot$. The values of the
1133: viscosity are $\alpha=0.2$ (solid curves) and $\alpha=0.3$ (dotted curves),
1134: respectively.}
1135: \label{f:r_d-cnd}
1136: \end{figure}
1137:
1138: \begin{figure}
1139: \plotone{f4.eps}
1140: \caption{The dependence of the critical condensation radius ($r_d$) and the
1141: condensation rate ($\dot m_{\rm cnd}$, integrated from $r_d$ to $r_{\rm
1142: tmax}$) on the accretion rate ($\dot m$) for a Compton cooling-dominant corona.
1143: The mass of black hole is fixed to $10M_\odot$ and the effective temperature
1144: of the disk $T_{\rm eff, max}=0.3$keV. The values of the viscosity are $\alpha=0.3$
1145: (solid curves) and $\alpha=0.4$ (dotted curves), respectively.}
1146: \label{f:r_d-cmp}
1147: \end{figure}
1148:
1149: \begin{figure}
1150: \plotone{f5.eps}
1151: \caption{Comparison of the critical condensation radius ($r_d$) and the integrated
1152: condensation rate ($\dot m_{\rm cnd}$) for a conductive cooling and Compton
1153: cooling-dominant corona. The mass of black hole is fixed to $10M_\odot$, and the
1154: value of the viscosity is 0.3. The dotted curves refer to a conductive cooling
1155: corona as shown in Fig.\ref{f:r_d-cnd}. The solid curves are for a Compton cooling
1156: dominant corona, where $\dot m_{\rm cnd}$ is integrated from an inner Compton
1157: dominant to an outer conductive dominant region. The smaller critical radius
1158: resulting from Compton cooling reflects the fact that Compton scattering is
1159: important mainly in the inner region. The higher condensation rate in
1160: the case of including Compton scattering also indicates that the Compton
1161: cooling can play an important role in condensation.}
1162: \label{f:comparison}
1163: \end{figure}
1164:
1165: \end{document}
1166:
1167: