1: %%

2: %% This is file `template-8d.tex',

3: %% generated with the docstrip utility.

4: %%

5: %% The original source files were:

6: %%

7: %% template.raw  (with options: `8d')

8: %%

9: %% Template for the LaTeX class aipproc.

10: %%

11: %% (C) 1998,2000,2001 American Institute of Physics and Frank Mittelbach

12: %% All rights reserved

13: %%

14: %%

15: %% $Id: template.raw,v 1.12 2005/07/06 19:22:14 frank Exp $

16: %%

17: 

18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

19: %% Please remove the next line of code if you

20: %% are satisfied that your installation is

21: %% complete and working.

22: %%

23: %% It is only there to help you in detecting

24: %% potential problems.

25: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

26: 

27: \input{aipcheck}

28: 

29: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

30: %% SELECT THE LAYOUT

31: %%

32: %% The class supports further options.

33: %% See aipguide.pdf for details.

34: %%

35: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

36: 

37: \documentclass[

38:     ,final            % use final for the camera ready runs

39: %%  ,draft            % use draft while you are working on the paper

40: %%  ,numberedheadings % uncomment this option for numbered sections

41: %%  ,                 % add further options here if necessary

42:   ]

43:   {aipproc}

44: 

45: \layoutstyle{8x11double}

46: \newcommand\etal{{\it et~al.~}}

47: \newcommand\apj{ApJ}

48: \newcommand\apjl{ApJL}

49: \newcommand\apjs{ApJS}

50: \newcommand\aap{A\&A}

51: \newcommand\mnras{MNRAS}

52: 

53: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

54: %% FRONTMATTER

55: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

56: 

57: \begin{document}

58: 

59: \title{Cosmic Infrared Background from Early Epochs - Searching for Signatures of the First Stars}

60: 

61: \classification{97.20.Wt,98.80-k} \keywords      {Stars:

62: formation; large-scale structure of the universe; early universe}

63: 

64: \author{A. Kashlinsky}{

65:   address={SSAI and Code 665, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, U.S.A.}

66: }

67: 

68: 

69: \begin{abstract}

70: Cosmic infrared background (CIB) contains emission from epochs

71: inaccessible to current telescopic studies, such as the era of the

72: first stars.  We discuss theoretical expectations for the CIB

73: contributions from the early population of massive stars. We then

74: present the latest results from the ongoing project by our team

75: \cite{kamm1,kamm2,kamm3,kamm4} to measure/constrain CIB

76: fluctuations from early epochs using deep Spitzer data. The

77: results show the existence of significant CIB fluctuations at the

78: IRAC wavelengths (3.6 to 8 $\mu$m) which remain after removing

79: galaxies down to very faint levels. These fluctuations must arise

80: from populations that have a significant clustering component, but

81: only low levels of the shot noise. Furthermore, there are no

82: correlations between the source-subtracted IRAC maps and the

83: corresponding fields observed with the {\it HST} ACS at optical

84: wavelengths. Taken together, these data imply that 1) the sources

85: producing the CIB fluctuations are individually faint with

86: $S_\nu<$ a few nJy at 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m; 2) are located within

87: the first 0.7Gyr (unless these fluctuations can somehow be

88: produced by - so far unobserved - local galaxies of extremely low

89: luminosity and with the unusual for local populations clustering

90: pattern), 3) they produce contribution to the net CIB flux of at

91: least 1-2 nW/m$^2$/sr at 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m and must have

92: mass-to-light ratio significantly below the present-day

93: populations, and 4) they have angular density of $\sim$ a few per

94: arcsec$^2$ and are in the confusion of the present day

95: instruments, but can be individually observable with {\it JWST}.

96: \end{abstract}

97: 

98: \maketitle

99: 

100: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

101: %% MAINMATTER

102: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

103: 

104: \subsection{Introduction}

105: 

106: Cosmic infrared background (CIB) contains emissions produced

107: during the entire history of the Universe, including those arising

108: from the epochs of the first stars (see \cite{review} for review).

109: Isolating the part of the CIB coming mostly from the first stars

110: epochs would provide important information about the emissions,

111: evolution and contents of this era. This paper reviews the recent

112: measurements done by our team in deep Spitzer IRAC data

113: (Kashlinsky, Arendt, Mather \& Moseley - herafter KAMM,

114: \cite{kamm1,kamm2,kamm3,kamm4}) and their interpretation.

115: 

116: The paper is structured as follows: it starts with a brief

117: discussion of the theoretical motivation for our measurements,

118: then presents a summary of the most recent results at the IRAC

119: Channels 1 (3.6 $\mu$m) and 2 (4.5 $\mu$m). Our most recent

120: analysis \cite{kamm4} showed that in the fields observed at {\it

121: both} IRAC and optical ACS {\it HST} bands there are no

122: correlations between the source-subtracted IRAC and the ACS source

123: catalog maps. The absence of these correlations would place the

124: sources producing these fluctuations within the first 0.7 Gyr

125: unless they originate in the more local, but extremely low

126: luminosity galaxies that somehow escaped ACS detection. Finally,

127: we discuss the data requirements on the nature of the populations

128: producing these fluctuations: they have to originate from very

129: faint sources, located within the first Gyr of the Universe's

130: evolution. These require them to have mass-to-light ratio

131: significantly below the present-day stellar populations and their

132: number density is such that they are well within the confusion of

133: the present instruments.

134: 

135: 

136: \subsection{Theoretical expectations}

137: 

138: An early generation of massive stars may have produced a

139: non-negligible contribution to the CIB at the near-IR wavelengths.

140: The net amount of that contribution can account for the entire

141: claimed CIB excess (see review \cite{review} for summary of

142: measurements up to 2005) over the contribution due to the observed

143: galaxy counts between 1 and 4 $\mu$m if only $\sim2-4\%$ of the

144: baryons went through these early stars \cite{grb}. The energy

145: spectrum of the resultant CIB would be cut off below the Lyman

146: limit at the redshift of these stars ($\sim 1\mu$m) and the

147: fraction of the baryons locked in them would decrease linearly

148: with the observed CIB excess flux. The latter would have to be

149: below $\sim 0.2-0.5\%$ if the NIR CIB excess is as low as the

150: NICMOS measurements \cite{thompson} suggest.

151: 

152: The left panel of Fig. \ref{fig:theory} shows a template of early

153: star emission at $z=10$ from \cite{santos}. The IRAC filters are

154: marked with shaded areas; the figure shows that, although the IRAC

155: bands are not centered at the peak of the emission produced by

156: Ly-$\alpha$, their wavelengths cover the region containing much of

157: the cumulative emission. This emission is likely to be reprocessed

158: by the surrounding gas resulting in the model-dependent

159: uncertainty at least as large as shown in the figure. Note that

160: the color of the emission at IRAC channels, while approximately

161: flat, can be either slowly or slowly decreasing with wavelength.

162: 

163: \begin{figure}

164:   \includegraphics[height=.225\textheight]{fig1}

165: \caption{{\bf Left}: SED from Pop~III system is shown for $z$=10.

166: The two solid lines are drawn from \cite{santos} for the case when

167: re-processing of the radiation takes place in the gas inside the

168: nebula and outside in the IGM. Thin dashed-dotted line shows the

169: intrinsic SED prior to the emission re-processing by gas. {\bf

170: Right}: Lines show the fluctuations expected for concordance

171: $\Lambda$CDM model at $z$=5 to 20 for the parameters described in

172: the text. Shaded area shows the angular scales probed by KAMM.

173: \label{fig:theory}}

174: \end{figure}

175: 

176: The first stars should also have left a distinct imprint in the

177: CIB anisotropies, measuring which could give important information

178: about that era and its constituents \cite{cooray,kagmm}. There are

179: intuitive reasons why the anisotropies can be significant: 1)

180: first stars, if massive, emitted a factor $\sim 10^5$ more light

181: per unit mass than the present-day stellar populations, 2) their

182: relative fluctuations would be larger because they span a

183: relatively narrow time-span in the evolution of the Universe, and

184: 3) they formed (presumably) at the high peaks of the underlying

185: density field, which would amplify their clustering properties.

186: 

187: The CIB fluctuations, $\delta F$, on scale $2\pi/q$ are related to

188: the 2-D power spectrum, $P_2(q)$, of the diffuse light via $\delta

189: F \simeq [q^2P_2(q)/2\pi]^{1/2}$. They are related to the CIB

190: produced  by them, $F$, and the underlying 3-D power spectrum of

191: the sources' clustering, $P_3(k)$, via the Limber equation which

192: approximates as $\delta F \simeq F \Delta(qd_A^{-1}(z))$, where

193: $\Delta^2 \equiv \frac{1}{2\pi^2}\frac{k^2P_3(k)}{\Delta t}$ is

194: the mean square fluctuation in the source counts over a cylinder

195: of radius $\sim k^{-1}$ and length $c\Delta t$ assuming the

196: sources span cosmic time $\Delta t$. The right panel of Fig. 1

197: shows the typical relative fluctuation in the CIB produced by the

198: early sources over $z$ from 6 to 20 assuming a (realistic)

199: ``toy"-model with the concordance $\Lambda$CDM initial conditions

200: where the amplification due to biasing is $A\simeq 0.3 (1+z)

201: \sqrt{\Delta t({\rm Gyr})}$. The figure shows the distinct peak at

202: $\simeq 0.2-0.3$ degrees which, for CDM class of models,

203: corresponds to the horizon at the matter-radiation equality

204: redshifted to $z$. The shaded area shows the range of angular

205: scales covered so far by the KAMM measurements. At these scales

206: one can expect fluctuations of no more than $3-10\%$, so the CIB

207: fluctuation level of $\delta F\sim 0.1$ nW/m$^2$/sr would require

208: CIB of at least $F\sim (1-2)$ nW/m$^2$/sr.

209: 

210: \subsection{CIB fluctuations from Spitzer deep images}

211: 

212: The KAMM methodology is summarized in \cite{kamm1,kamm2}. Briefly,

213: the steps are: 1) The maps are assembled using the least

214: calibration method of \cite{fixsen}. It solves for detector

215: properties at the time of observations and for frame-to-frame

216: variations, and does not remove large-scale structure except due

217: to (arbitrary) linear gradients. 2) The assembled IRAC maps are

218: first clipped of resolved sources via an iterative procedure which

219: removes all pixels (with a certain mask) with flux above a certain

220: threshold. 3) The clipped maps are then further cleaned of the

221: remaining emissions from resolved sources using an iterative

222: variant of the clean procedure \cite{clean}. 4) The clipping is

223: stopped so that enough pixels are left (in practice $> 70\%$) for

224: robust computation of the fluctuations spectrum via Fourier

225: transform. 5) When clipping is done to deeper levels, and

226: progressively smaller fractions of pixels remain, we compute

227: instead the correlation function, which is immune to masking

228: \cite{kamm1}. 6) The uncertainties on the resultant power spectra

229: (e.g. due to mask which destroys the strict orthogonality of the

230: basis functions) are verified via simulations. 7) It is verified

231: that, at the iterations used for measuring the final fluctuations,

232: the subtracted sources components do not correlate with the

233: residual diffuse emissions of the maps.

234: 

235: \begin{figure}

236:   \includegraphics[height=.175\textheight]{fig2}

237:   \caption{Shows decrease of the shot noise

238: contribution to the power spectrum vs the iteration number of the

239: KAMM source subtraction model. Horizontal lines show the levels

240: reached in \cite{kamm2}, which are a factor of $\sim 2$ below

241: those in \cite{kamm1}.  Triangles correspond to the HDFN region,

242: diamonds to CDFS region; open symbols to Epoch 1, filled to Epoch

243: 2. \label{fig:sn}}

244: \end{figure}

245: 

246: As of now we have analyzed results from five deep exposure regions

247: in various parts of the sky \cite{kamm1,kamm2}. The latest

248: results, shown here in Figs. \ref{fig:sn},\ref{fig:kamm}, are from

249: analysis of four independent regions mapped in the course of the

250: GOODS project observations. They cover $\simeq 10^\prime$ on the

251: side and have total exposure time of $\sim 23-25$ hours per pixel.

252: The power spectrum of the diffuse emission in the source

253: subtracted maps is made up of two components: 1) small scales are

254: dominated by the shot-noise from the remaining sources, and 2)

255: larger scales are dominated by the component of CIB fluctuations

256: arising from clustering of the contributing sources. As we clean

257: maps of progressively fainter sources, the shot-noise level

258: decreases as shown in Fig. \ref{fig:sn}. At the same level of the

259: shot noise all five regions exhibit the same large-scale

260: fluctuations consistent with their cosmological origin. The figure

261: also shows the shot-noise levels we stop at when presenting the

262: results; they are limited by the floor imposed by the instrument

263: noise levels. Comparing the shot-noise levels with those computed

264: from the observed galaxy counts tells us that individual galaxies

265: have been eliminated to AB magnitudes $>26$.

266: 

267: \begin{figure}

268:   \includegraphics[height=.425\textheight]{fig3}

269:   \caption{{\bf Top panels}: CIB

270: fluctuations from the source-subtracted maps from \cite{kamm4} at

271: the shot-noise levels of \cite{kamm2}. Same symbol notation as in

272: Fig. \ref{fig:sn}. Dotted lines show the shot-noise contribution.

273: Solid line shows the slope of sources at high-$z$ with the

274: $\Lambda$CDM model spectrum of the same amplitude at 3.6 and 4.5

275: $\mu$m. {\bf Lower panels}: CIB fluctuations due to ACS galaxies

276: for the $972\times 972$ 0.6$^{\prime\prime}$ pixel field at

277: HDFN-Epoch2 region for the ACS z-band. Right and left panels show

278: the spectrum for the ACS source maps convolved with the IRAC 3.6

279:  and 4.5 $\mu$m beams. Filled circles correspond to ACS

280: galaxies fainter than $m_0=21$ with the mask defined by the

281: clipping. Filled diamonds, triangles and squares correspond to

282: fluctuations produced by sources fainter than $m_0+2,m_0+ 4,

283: m_0+6$. Open diamonds show the fluctuations produced by galaxies

284: fainter than $m_{\rm AB}$=23 when the clipping mask is not

285: applied; the symbols show that such galaxies were effectively

286: removed from the ACS maps by clipping alone done in KAMM.

287: \label{fig:kamm}}

288: \end{figure}

289: 

290: The upper panels in Fig. \ref{fig:kamm} show the CIB fluctuations

291: from the GOODS data at 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m. Dotted lines show the

292: shot-noise. We demonstrated that these fluctuations do not arise

293: from the various Solar System and Galactic foregrounds and are not

294: produced by the instrument systematics \cite{kamm1,kamm2}. The

295: fluctuations also correlate well with maps at the longest IRAC

296: channels (5.8 and 8 $\mu$m), although at these channels we do not

297: recover CIB fluctuations with the same S/N due to the larger

298: instrument noise and possible cirrus pollution at 8 $\mu$m. The

299: clustering component dominates fluctuations at $>20-30 ^\prime$.

300: The solid line shows the fluctuation spectrum due to the

301: concordance $\Lambda$CDM model at high $z$ assumed for simplicity

302: to have the same amplitude at 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m. The figure shows

303: that the signal is well described by the $\Lambda$CDM model with

304: sources at high-$z$ and the color of these sources is

305: approximately flat at the two IRAC bands.

306: 

307: \subsection{Cross-correlating NIR and optical data}

308: 

309: The GOODS fields have also been observed with the {\it HST} ACS

310: instrument at optical wavelengths from $\sim 0.4$ to 0.9 $\mu$m

311: reaching source detection levels fainter than 28 AB mag. If these

312: fluctuations arise from local populations there should be a strong

313: correlation between the source-subtracted IRAC maps and the ACS

314: sources. Conversely, there should be no such correlations if the

315: KAMM signal arises at at epochs where the Lyman break (at rest

316: $\sim 0.1\mu$m) gets shifted passed the longest ACS z-band at

317: $\simeq 0.9\mu$m. To test for this we \cite{kamm4} have

318: constructed synthetic maps, overlapping with the GOODS fields,

319: using sources in the ACS B,V,i,z bands from the ACS sources

320: catalog \cite{goods}. These maps were then convolved with the IRAC

321: 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m beams. Finally, we applied the clipping mask

322: from the IRAC maps and computed the fluctuations spectrum produced

323: by the ACS sources and their correlations with the IRAC-based

324: maps.

325: 

326: \begin{figure}

327:   \includegraphics[height=.2075\textheight]{fig4}

328: \caption{{\bf Left}: Correlation coefficient between

329: clipped/masked ACS and KAMM data. Large and small symbols

330: correspond to the IRAC Ch 1 and Ch 2. Open symbols correspond to

331: correlations with the maps of the removed sources and filled

332: symbols with the residual KAMM maps. Circles, diamonds, triangles,

333: squares correspond to HDFN-E1, HDFN-E2, CDFS-E2, CDFS-E2. {\bf

334: Right}:  The various thickness solid lines show the dimensionless

335: correlation function between the diffuse light in the ACS and KAMM

336: maps for $B,V,i,z$-bands. Dotted line shows the dimensionless

337: correlation function of the KAMM maps, $C_{\rm

338: KAMM}(\theta)/\sigma_{\rm KAMM}^2$, which remains positive out to

339: $\sim 100^{\prime\prime}$ and is better viewed when presented in

340: log-log plots as in Fig. SI-4 of \cite{kamm1}.  \label{fig:xcor}}

341: \end{figure}

342: 

343: The lower panels in Fig. \ref{fig:kamm} show the spectrum of

344: fluctuations produced by the ACS z-band sources. It is clear from

345: the figure that the ACS sources produce a completely different

346: spectrum of the fluctuations than found by KAMM. This alone shows

347: that they cannot produce the KAMM fluctuations signal shown in the

348: upper panels. In fact, their power spectrum is very similar to

349: that of the CIB fluctuations found in the deep 2MASS data, which

350: arise from galaxies at $z>1$ \cite{2mass}. Fig. 2e of ref.

351: \cite{2mass} shows the gradual evolution of the power spectrum

352: spectral slope towards deeper cut 2MASS data which is consistent

353: with the evolution of the various slices of the ACS sources in the

354: lower panels of Fig. \ref{fig:kamm}.

355: 

356: In ref. \cite{kamm4} we compute both the correlation coefficients,

357: $R_0\!=\!\langle \delta F_{\rm ACS}\delta F_{\rm

358: KAMM}\rangle/\sigma_{\rm ACS}\sigma_{\rm KAMM}$, and the full

359: cross-correlation matrix, $C(\theta)\!=\!\langle \delta F_{\rm

360: ACS}(\vec{x})\delta F_{\rm KAMM}(\vec{x}+\vec{\theta})\rangle$

361: between the ACS and KAMM maps. In this representation, the

362: contributions of any white noise (such as shot noise and/or

363: instrument noise) component to $C(\theta)$ drop off very rapidly

364: outside the beam and for the IRAC 3.6 $\mu$m channel contribute

365: negligibly to the correlation function at $\theta$ greater than a

366: few arcsec. This is best seen from the analog of the correlation

367: coefficient at non-zero lag, defined as

368: $R(\theta)\!\equiv\!C(\theta)/\sigma_{\rm ACS}\sigma_{\rm KAMM}$.

369: The mean square fluctuation on scale $\theta$ is given by the

370: integral $\langle \delta F(\theta)^2\rangle$=$\frac{2}{\theta^2}

371: \int_0^\theta C(\theta^\prime)\theta^\prime d\theta^\prime$.

372: Hence, we evaluated from $R(\theta)$ a related quantity ${\cal R}

373: (\theta)$=$\frac{2}{\theta^2} \int_0^\theta

374: R(\theta^\prime)\theta^\prime d\theta^\prime$, shown in the right

375: panels in Fig. \ref{fig:xcor}.

376: 

377: There are excellent correlations (shown with open symbols) between

378: the ACS source maps and the sources {\it removed} by KAMM prior to

379: computing the remaining CIB fluctuations in Fig. \ref{fig:kamm}.

380: However, practically no correlations remain with the

381: source-subtracted IRAC maps and the correlations are negligible

382: outside the IRAC beam. This means that, at most, the remaining ACS

383: sources contribute to the shot-noise levels in the residual KAMM

384: maps (as discussed by \cite{kamm3}), but not to the large scale

385: correlations in Fig. \ref{fig:kamm}.

386: 

387: \subsection{The nature of the sources.}

388: 

389: Any interpretation of the KAMM results must reproduce the

390: following major aspects: $\bullet$ The sources in the KAMM data

391: were removed to a certain (faint) flux limit, so the CIB

392: fluctuations arise in populations with magnitudes fainter than the

393: corresponding magnitude limit. $\bullet$ These sources must

394: reproduce the excess CIB fluctuations by KAMM on scales $>

395: 0.5^\prime$, {\it both} their amplitude and their spatial

396: spectrum. $\bullet$ The populations fainter than the above

397: magnitude limit must account not only for the correlated part of

398: the CIB, but - equally importantly - they must reproduce the (low)

399: shot-noise component of the KAMM signal, which dominates the power

400: at $<$0.5$^\prime$. $\bullet$ The data show the absence of

401: correlations between the source-subtracted IRAC maps and the same

402: area mapped by ACS. $\bullet$ The CIB fluctuations signal is

403: measured from the source-subtracted IRAC maps at all four channels

404: (although not with the same S/N at the longest wavelengths) and

405: has color which is approximately flat with wavelength across the

406: IRAC bands.

407: 

408: We briefly discuss the constraints in the above order:

409: 

410: 1) {\bf Magnitude limits}. The nominal limit above which sources

411: have been removed in the KAMM analysis is $m_{\rm AB} \simeq 26$

412: at 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m and this by itself implies that the detected

413: CIB fluctuations arise from fainter systems. At this magnitude one

414: is already at the confusion limit for the IRAC beam at 3.6 $\mu$m,

415: so fainter galaxies can be excised only by removing significantly

416: more pixels. This magnitude limit corresponds to $6 \times 10^8

417: h^{-2} L_\odot$ emitted at 6000 \AA\ at $z$=5. A significant

418: fraction of galaxies were thus removed from the data by KAMM even

419: at $z\geq 5$ and the detected CIB fluctuations must be explained

420: by still fainter and more distant systems.

421: 

422:  2) {\bf Clustering component} The relative CIB fluctuations

423: produced by these sources are at most 10\% (see Fig.

424: \ref{fig:theory} and \cite{kamm3}). Fig. \ref{fig:kamm} shows that

425: the clustering strength at $\geq 1^\prime$ requires $\delta F_{\rm

426: CIB}\sim 0.1$ nW/m$^2$/sr. This meaning that the net CIB from

427: sources contributing to the KAMM signal at 3.6 $\mu$m is $>$1-2

428: nW/m$^2$/sr.

429: 

430: 3) {\bf Shot noise constraints}. The amplitude of the shot-noise

431: power gives a particularly strong indication of the epochs of the

432: sources contributing to the KAMM signal \cite{kamm3}. This can be

433: seen from the expressions for the shot noise $P_{\rm SN} =

434: f(\bar{m}) F_{\rm tot}(>\!m_{\rm lim})$, where $f(m)$ is the flux

435: of the source of magnitude $m$ and $F_{\rm tot}(>m)$ is the net

436: CIB flux produced by sources fainter than $m$ \cite{review}. Fig.

437: \ref{fig:kamm} shows the shot noise amplitude evaluated at 3.6 and

438: 4.5 $\mu$m is $P_{\rm SN} \simeq (2,1) \times 10^{-11}$

439: nW$^2$/m$^4$/sr. Above it was shown that the sources contributing

440: to the fluctuations must have CIB flux greater than a few

441: nW/m$^2$/sr and combining this with the values for $P_{\rm SN}$

442: shown leads to these sources having typical magnitudes $m_{\rm AB}

443: > 29-30$ or individual fluxes below a few nJy.

444: 

445: 4) {\bf No correlations with optical ACS data}. Our results show

446: that the source-subtracted CIB fluctuations in deep Spitzer images

447: cannot originate in the optical galaxies detected in the GOODS ACS

448: data. While the $B, V, i, z$-band galaxies are well correlated

449: with those seen {\it and removed} in the 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m data,

450: they correlate poorly with the the residual 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m

451: background emission. These galaxies also exhibit a very different

452: spatial power spectrum than the KAMM maps and the amplitude of

453: their fluctuations is generally also low. Whatever sources are

454: responsible for the KAMM fluctuations, they are not present in the

455: ACS catalog. Since the ACS galaxies do not contribute to the

456: source-subtracted CIB fluctuations, the latter must arise at $z>7$

457: as is required by the Lyman break at rest $\sim 0.1 \mu$m getting

458: redshifted past the ACS $z$-band of peak wavelength $\simeq 0.9

459: \mu$m. This would place the sources producing the KAMM signal

460: within the first 0.7 Gyr. If the KAMM signal were to originate in

461: lower $z$ galaxies which escaped the ACS GOODS source catalog

462: because they are below the catalog flux threshold, they would have

463: to be extremely low-luminosity systems ($< 2\times 10^7

464: h^{-2}L_\odot$ at $z$=1) and these galaxies would also have to

465: cluster very differently from their ACS counterparts as Fig.

466: \ref{fig:kamm} shows.

467: 

468: 5) {\bf Color}. Color gives additional information on the nature

469: of the sources producing these fluctuations. Fig. \ref{fig:kamm}

470: shows that the clustering of the populations producing the KAMM

471: signal at 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m is well described by the concordance

472: $\Lambda$CDM model with sources at high $z$ with the color

473: approximately expected from populations described by SED of the

474: type in Fig. \ref{fig:theory}. The signal is not as clear at the

475: two longest IRAC bands, but the data at all four channels

476: correlate meaning that the same sources contribute to all the

477: wavelengths \cite{kamm1}. The color at shorter wavelengths can

478: prove an interesting diagnostic \cite{thompson2}, but requires

479: additional assumptions on the epochs of the emissions (which

480: determine the location of the Lyman break) and that the

481: differently processed maps leave the same populations.

482: 

483: Additional information on the nature of the populations

484: responsible for these CIB fluctuations, can be obtained from the

485: fact that the significant amount of flux ($>$1-2 nW/m$^2$/sr)

486: required to explain the amplitude of the fluctuations must be

487: produced within the short time available at these high $z$ (cosmic

488: times $<$0.5-1 Gyr). This can be translated into the comoving

489: luminosity density associated with these populations, which in

490: turn can be translated into the fraction of baryons locked in

491: these objects with the additional assumption of their

492: $\Gamma\equiv M/L$ \cite{kamm3}. The smaller the value of

493: $\Gamma$, the fewer baryons are required to explain the CIB

494: fluctuations detected in the KAMM studies. It turns out that in

495: order not to exceed the baryon fraction observed in stars, the

496: populations producing these CIB fluctuations had to have $\Gamma$

497: much less than the solar value, typical of the present-day

498: populations \cite{kamm3}. This is consistent with the general

499: expectations of the first stars being very massive.

500: 

501: For a typical Population III system with an SED such as shown in

502: Fig. \ref{fig:theory}, one expects $\Gamma \sim

503: 10^{-3}-10^{-2}\Gamma_\odot$ at the IRAC bands. Because the (low)

504: shot-noise values at 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m imply that the individual

505: sources have flux below a few to 10 nJy, the bulk of these

506: populations had to have only at most a few times $10^5M_\odot$ of

507: stellar material if they are to explain the KAMM fluctuations

508: \cite{kamm3}. Such sources would be below the detection threshold

509: of the current high-$z$ Lyman-break searches.

510: 

511: Finally, in order to detect the faint sources responsible for the

512: CIB fluctuations with fluxes below a few nJy embedded in the

513: underlying sea of emissions, their individual flux must exceed the

514: confusion limit \cite{kamm3}. If such sources were to contribute

515: to the CIB required by KAMM data, at 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$m they had

516: to have the average surface density of $\bar{n} \sim F_{\rm

517: CIB}^2/P_{\rm SN} \sim 5 \; {\rm arcsec}^{-2}$. In order to avoid

518: the confusion limit and resolve these sources individually at,

519: say, 5-sigma level ($\alpha=5$) one would need a beam of the area

520: $\omega_{\rm beam} \leq \alpha^{-2}/\bar{n} \sim 5\times

521: 10^{-3}{\rm arcsec}^2$ or of circular radius below $\sim$0.04

522: arcsec. This is clearly not in the realm of the currently operated

523: instruments, but the {\it JWST} could be able to resolve these

524: objects given its sensitivity and resolution.

525: 

526: 

527: {\bf Acknowledgements} I thank my collaborators, Rick Arendt, John

528: Mather and Harvey Moseley for many contributions to the KAMM

529: results, and the NSF AST-0406587 grant for support.

530: 

531: \bibliographystyle{aipproc}   % if natbib is available

532: %\bibliographystyle{aipprocl} % if natbib is missing

533: 

534: 

535: \begin{thebibliography}{}

536: \bibitem[Cooray et al (2004)]{cooray} Cooray, A. et al 2004,

537: Ap.J., 606, 611

538: \bibitem[Fixsen et al (2000]{fixsen} Fixsen, D., Moseley, S.H. \&

539: Arendt, R.G. 2000, Ap.J.Suppl., 128, 651

540: \bibitem[Giavilsco et al (2004)]{goods} Giavilsco, M. et al 2004,

541: Ap.J., 600, L93

542: \bibitem[Hogbom (1974)]{clean} Hogbom, J. 1974, A\&AS, 15, 417

543: \bibitem[Kashlinsky (2004)]{review} Kashlinsky, A. 2004, Phys. Rep.,

544: 409, 361

545: \bibitem[Kashlinsky (2005)]{grb} Kashlinsky, A. 2005, Ap.J., 633

546: L5

547: \bibitem[Kashlinsky et al (2002)]{2mass} Kashlinsky, A., Odenwald,

548: S., Mather, J., Skrutskie, M. \& Cutri, R. 2002, Ap.J., 579, L53

549: \bibitem[Kashlinsky et al (2004)]{kagmm} Kashlinsky, A., Arendt,

550: R.G., Gardner, J.P., Mather, J. \& Moseley, S.H. 2004, Ap.J., 608,

551: 1

552: \bibitem[Kashlinsky et al  (2005)]{kamm1} Kashlinsky, A., Arendt, R.G., Mather, J., \& Moseley, S.H. 2005,

553: Nature, 438, 45

554: \bibitem[Kashlinsky et al  (2007)]{kamm2} Kashlinsky, A., Arendt, R.G., Mather, J., \& Moseley, S.H.

555: 2007, Ap.J., 654, L5

556: \bibitem[Kashlinsky et al  (2007)]{kamm3} Kashlinsky, A., Arendt, R.G., Mather, J., \& Moseley, S.H.

557: 2007, Ap.J., 654, L1

558: \bibitem[Kashlinsky et al  (2007)]{kamm4} Kashlinsky, A., Arendt, R.G., Mather, J., \& Moseley, S.H.

559: 2007, Ap.J., 666, L1

560: \bibitem[Santos et al (2002)]{santos} Santos, M., Bromm, V. \&

561: Kaminowski, M. 2002, MNRAS, 336, 1082

562: \bibitem[Thomspon et al (2005)]{thompson} Thompson, R.,

563: Eisenstein, D., Fan, X., Rieke, M. \& Kennicutt, R. 2007, Ap.J.,

564: 659, 667

565: \bibitem[Thomspon et al (2005)]{thompson2} Thompson, R.,

566: Eisenstein, D., Fan, X., Rieke, M. \& Kennicutt, R. 2007, Ap.J.,

567: in press. arxiv:0706.0547.v1[astro-ph]

568: \end{thebibliography}

569: 

570: \end{document}

571: 

572: 

573: %%

574: %% End of file `template-8d.tex'.

575: