1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
3: \usepackage{color}
4: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
5:
6: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
7:
8: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
9:
10: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
11:
12: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
13: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
14: %% use the longabstract style option.
15:
16: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
17:
18: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
19: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
20: %% the \begin{document} command.
21: %%
22: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
23: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
24: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
25: %% for information.
26:
27: %\newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
28: \newcommand{\myemail}{requena@damir.iem.csic.es}
29:
30: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
31:
32: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
33:
34: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
35: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
36: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
37: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
38: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
39: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
40:
41: \shorttitle{The largest oxigen bearing organic molecule repository}
42: \shortauthors{Requena-Torres et al.}
43:
44: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
45: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
46:
47: \begin{document}
48:
49: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
50: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
51: %% you desire.
52:
53: \title{The Galactic center, the largest oxigen bearing organic molecule repository}
54:
55: \author{Requena-Torres, M.A.\altaffilmark{1}\email{requena@damir.iem.csic.es}, Mart\'in-Pintado, J.\altaffilmark{1}\email{martin@damir.iem.csic.es},\\
56: Mart\'in, S.,\altaffilmark{2}\email{martin@astro.cfa.edu} \& Morris, M. R.\altaffilmark{3}\email{morris@astro.ucla.edu}}
57:
58: \altaffiltext{1}{Departamento de Astrof\'isica Molecular e Infrarroja-
59: Instituto de Estructura de la Materia-CSIC, C\ Serrano 121, E-28006 Madrid, Spain}
60: \altaffiltext{2}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, MS 78 Cambridge, MA 02138, USA}
61: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1547, USA}
62:
63:
64: \begin{abstract}
65: We present the first detection of complex aldehydes and isomers in three
66: typical molecular clouds located within 200$\,$pc of the center of our Galaxy.
67: We
68: find very large abundances of these complex organic molecules (COMs) in the
69: central molecular zone (CMZ), which we attribute to the ejection of COMs from grain mantles
70: by shocks. The relative abundances of the different COMs with respect to that
71: of CH$_3$OH are strikingly similar for the three sources, located in very different
72: environments in the CMZ. The similar relative abundances point toward a unique
73: grain mantle composition in the CMZ. Studying the Galactic center clouds and
74: objects in the Galactic disk having large abundances of COMs, we find that
75: more saturated molecules are more abundant than the non-saturated ones. We also
76: find differences between the relative abundance between COMs in the CMZ and
77: the Galactic disk, suggesting different chemical histories of the grain
78: mantles between the two regions in the Galaxy for the complex aldehydes.
79: Different possibilities for the
80: grain chemistry on the icy mantles in the GC clouds are briefly discussed.
81: Cosmic rays can play an important role in the grain chemistry. With these new
82: detections, the molecular clouds in the Galactic center appear to be one of the
83: best laboratories for studying the formation of COMs in the Galaxy.
84: \end{abstract}
85:
86: \keywords{astrochemistry --- molecular data --- ISM: molecules ---
87: techniques:spectroscopic --- ISM:individual(CMZ)}
88: \section{Introduction}
89:
90: It has been found that complex organic molecules (COMs) are very abundant in
91: the Galactic center \citep[][hereafter Paper I]{marpin01,req06},
92: where the molecular gas is concentrated in the Central Molecular Zone
93: \citep[CMZ,][]{mor96}.
94: Large COMs in the Galaxy have been mainly associated with hot cores
95: \citep[e.g.][]{ike01}, where they are evaporated from icy mantles of warm dust
96: ($>$100$\,$K) heated by massive proto-stars. The physical conditions in the CMZ
97: are very different from those in hot cores. High gas-kinetic temperatures of
98: $>$100~K, but low excitation temperatures $\sim$10--20~K
99: due to the relatively low H$_2$ densities (few 10$^{4}$ cm$^{-3}$) and cold
100: dust of T$_{d}$$<$20$\,$K \citep[][]{nem00} are typical in the CMZ.
101: Since the dust is too cold for
102: the evaporation of the ice-mantles, it has been proposed that the sputtering
103: of the grains and grain mantles produced by widespread shocks is responsible
104: for the rich chemistry and
105: the high temperatures observed in the CMZ \citep[][Paper I]{marpin97,hut98,che03}.
106: In spite of the different physical conditions in
107: hot cores and GC clouds, Paper I shows that the abundances of the COMs -C$_2$H$_5$OH,
108: CH$_3$OCH$_3$, HCOOCH$_3$, and HCOOH- relative to
109: that of CH$_3$OH (methanol) are surprisingly similar for both
110: types of sources, suggesting a sort of ``universal'' grain mantle composition
111: in the Galactic disk and in the CMZ .\\
112:
113: Recently, even larger COMs like the aldehydes
114: propynal (HC$_2$CHO), propenal (CH$_2$CHCHO), propanal (CH$_3$CH$_2$CHO), and
115: glycolaldehyde (CH$_2$OHCHO), and complex alcohols like ethylene glycol
116: (HOCH$_2$CH$_2$OH) have been detected towards one star forming region in the
117: CMZ, Sgr~B2N \citep{dic01,hol00,hol02,hol04b}. The proposed formation
118: paths for the COMs on grains include the hydrogenation, oxidation and/or carbon
119: addition of
120: small molecules on grain mantles \citep{tie82,cha05}.
121: Carbon addition on grain mantles has been studied by
122: \citet{jam06} but it is unclear if these reactions are as efficient as
123: predicted. \citet{hir04, wat05} and Fuchs et al. (2007, in press) have shown
124: that the
125: hydrogenation of CO can efficiently produce H$_2$CO and CH$_3$OH.
126: Reactions of radicals on
127: grain surfaces constitute another hypothesis for forming large molecules
128: \citep[][Garrod et al., in prep]{gre76,gar06}.
129: Recently \citet{ben07} have formed the isomers
130: CH$_2$OHCHO and HCOOCH$_3$ on grain mantle analogs by irradiation of a mixture
131: of CH$_3$OH and CO ices at 10$\,$K with energetic electrons to mimic the effects
132: of the cosmic rays.
133: Finally, \citet{hal06} showed that in the Sgr~B2N hot core,
134: the formation of CH$_2$OHCHO
135: from H$_2$CO in the gas phase may be possible. So far, most of our knowledge of
136: these COMs is restricted to one source, the Sgr~B2N hot core, which has a very
137: complex core-halo structure \citep{marpin90,hol04a} making it very difficult
138: to establish where (hot core versus envelope) these molecules are formed.\\
139: %I've always been intrigued by the idea advanced long ago by J. Mayo Greenberg:
140: %exploding interstellar grains, as a means of forming complex molecules. See
141: %http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976Ap%26SS..39....9G
142: %In the GC, one can imagine that X-rays play the role that Greenberg considered
143: %for UV radiation. Apparently people aren't thinking about that any more, but
144: %maybe they should. Maybe we should>
145:
146: In this paper, we present the first detections of most of the largest COMs,
147: previously observed only toward Sgr~B2N, in typical
148: molecular clouds in the CMZ without signatures of star formation.
149: These observations show that the Galactic center is one of the best
150: laboratories for understanding the chemistry of COMs and support the idea of a
151: similar grain mantle composition throughout the CMZ but this does not extend to
152: the Galactic disk.
153:
154:
155: \section{Observations and results}
156: Observations were carried in April and May of 2006 with the NRAO
157: \footnote{The National Radio Astronomy Observatories is a facility of the National
158: Science Foundation, operated under a cooperative agreement by Associated
159: Universities, Inc.}
160: 100-m Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope in West Virginia (USA).
161: Ku-band and K-band receivers were used in connection with the spectrometer
162: divided into four spectral windows of 200$\,$MHz each in
163: both bands. We obtained a resolution of 24.4$\,$kHz, 0.6$\,$km s$^{-1}$ for Ku
164: band and 0.3$\,$km s$^{-1}$ for K band. Two polarizations were observed for
165: each spectral window through the use of offset oscillators in the IF.
166: The frequencies and the spectroscopic parameters of the observed molecular
167: transitions
168: are shown in Table \ref{freq}. They were obtained from the Cologne Database for
169: Molecular Spectroscopy \citep[][]{mul01,mul05}, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory
170: catalog \citep[][]{pic98} and from \citet{hol04b}.
171:
172: The observed typical molecular clouds are MC~G--0.11--0.08 (the ``20 km s$^{-1}$
173: cloud''), and MC~G--0.02--0.07 (the ``50 km s$^{-1}$ cloud'') located in
174: Sgr~A$^*$ complex, and MC~G+0.693--0.03 %(SgrB2N[20'',52''])
175: located in the Sgr~B2 complex. Those sources
176: were selected from Paper I due to their large column density of COMs. In
177: Table \ref{poss} we give for the observed sources the position, the velocity,
178: the H$_2$ column density (derived from the
179: C$^{18}$O emission in Paper I), and the CH$_3$OH abundances also from Paper I.
180: The observations were made using the position-switched mode, with the off
181: position free from emission selected from
182: CS maps \citep{bal87}.
183: The two polarization outputs from the spectrometer were
184: averaged in the final data reduction process to improve the signal-to-noise
185: ratio. After smoothing the data, the final resolution was $\sim$3$\,$km s$^{-1}$.
186: Calibration was achieved by using a noise tube, and the line intensities are
187: given in the $T^{*}_{\rm A}$ scale (estimated with 10\%--20\% uncertainties),
188: appropriate for extended sources.
189:
190: Fig. \ref{spec} shows a sample of the line profiles observed toward the
191: different sources. We obtained detections of almost all the
192: transitions in Table \ref{poss}. In MC~G+0.693--0.03 we were able to obtain the most
193: complete set of
194: transitions, including the HCCCHO 2$_{1,1}$$\rightarrow$1$_{1,0}$ line and the
195: extra molecular transitions shown in Fig. \ref{spec2}. In this source all the
196: transitions were detected for all molecules except for propanol (C$_3$H$_7$OH).
197: As shown in Figs. \ref{spec} and \ref{spec2}, together with the complex
198: aldehydes we also detect or derive upper limits for
199: other related molecules like CH$_3$OH, HCOOCH$_3$ (methyl formate), CH$_3$CHO
200: (acetaldehyde), H$_2$CCO (ketene), and c--C$_2$H$_4$O (ethylene oxide).
201: We have also detected, H$_2$COH$^+$, protonated formaldehyde,
202: one of the molecules expected to play a key role in the
203: gas-phase formation of CH$_2$OHCHO in hot cores
204: \citep{ohi96}. For completeness, we have also included
205: data of H$_2^{13}$CO and H$_2$C$^{18}$O from \citet{mar06},
206: to derive the abundance of the chemically related molecule H$_2$CO.
207:
208: \section{Analysis}
209: We obtained the line parameters shown in Table
210: \ref{gauss} by fitting Gaussians to the observed line
211: profiles. The column densities for all the molecules where then derived using
212: the Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium (LTE) approximation, and the
213: excitation temperatures, $T_{\rm ex}$, were derived from the population
214: diagrams when enough rotational lines were available.
215: Fig. \ref{trot} shows a sample of population diagrams for the three
216: sources. We derived $T_{\rm ex}$ between 8--16$\,$K for all the sources, similar
217: to those found in Paper I. \\%\citet{req06}.\\
218:
219:
220: The population diagrams for CH$_2$OHCHO cannot be fit with a single
221: excitation temperature, indicating non-LTE excitation. This is
222: consistent with the findings of \citet{hol04a}, who observed the
223: 2$_{1,1}$$\rightarrow$2$_{0,2}$ and the 4$_{1,3}$$\rightarrow$3$_{0,4}$ lines
224: in absorption and the 1$_{1,0}$$\rightarrow$1$_{0,1}$ in
225: emission toward the Sgr~B2N hot core. For our analysis we have used the
226: 1$_{1,0}$$\rightarrow$1$_{0,1}$ and 4$_{1,3}$$\rightarrow$3$_{2,2}$ emission lines,
227: which yield similar column densities and do not show absorption profiles toward
228: Sgr~B2N. \\
229:
230:
231: The main source of error in our estimated column densities arises from the
232: assumption of the LTE approximation using the single excitation temperature
233: derived from the
234: population diagrams. However, even in the extreme case that the excitation
235: temperature varies by a factor of 2, the error introduced by these uncertainties
236: in our estimated column densities for COMs
237: will be less than a factor of 2. We therefore consider that our estimation of
238: column densities is uncertain by less than a factor of 2 (see also Paper I).
239: To obtain
240: the relative molecular abundances, we have used the H$_2$ column densities
241: derived in Paper I from the C$^{18}$O emission (see Table \ref{poss}).
242: The results of the relative abundances of COMs are shown in Table
243: \ref{abun}.
244:
245:
246: \section{Excitation}
247:
248:
249: As discussed in Paper I, %\citet{req06}
250: the COMs in the GC show very low $T_{\rm ex}$ as compared with those
251: found in hot cores. This is in contrast with the gas kinetic temperatures
252: derived from NH$_3$ and H$_2$ which range from 30 up to 500$\,$K \citep{hut93,nem01}.
253: On average, 30\% of the molecular gas in the GC has kinetic temperatures of
254: $\gtrsim$100$\,$K. From the analysis of all the data, \citet{nem01} concluded that
255: the large abundances of NH$_3$, SiO, and the high kinetic temperatures but
256: low dust temperatures can be explained by C--type shocks with velocities of
257: 10$\,$km s$^{-1}$. The large COM abundances can also be explained by grain
258: mantle sputtering by shocks. Shocks with velocities of $\sim$6$\,$km s$^{-1}$ are
259: very efficient at ejecting molecules from the icy mantles when CO is considered
260: as the sputtering agent \citep{jimenez07}. \\
261:
262: The most likely
263: explanation for the low $T_{\rm ex}$ derived from the various COMs is that the
264: gas has high kinetic temperatures, but the COMs are subtermally excited due to
265: the relatively low H$_2$ column densities. This has been discussed in detail in
266: Paper I with a similar
267: analysis of the excitation of CH$_3$OH. Furthermore, if the gas kinetic
268: temperature were on the order of 10-20$\,$K, in equilibrium with the cold dust,
269: then the COMs would be thermalized, requiring H$_2$ densities of
270: $\sim$10$^6$ cm$^{-3}$ (Paper I). From the H$_2$
271: column densities in Table \ref{poss} the derived size of the molecular cloud
272: along the line of sight would be only $\sim$4.1$\times$10$^{16}$cm, just
273: 2739$\,$AU. This is unlikely since the COM emission is very extended so this
274: would require that the GC molecular clouds be very thin sheets perpendicular to
275: the line of sight.
276:
277: \section{Abundances and relative abundances}
278: We have found very high abundances for all the observed COMs in the CMZ, from
279: 10$^{-10}$ to 10$^{-8}$ except for CH$_3$OH,
280: which shows larger relative abundances of a few times 10$^{-7}$--10$^{-6}$.
281: In our previous work on COMs in the CMZ (Paper I) %\citep{req06}
282: we suggested that this region is affected by the
283: erosion of the dust grain mantles by shocks, and that the
284: gas-phase abundances of large COMs may be large if they are formed
285: on grain mantles. \\
286:
287: To illustrate the possible differences in chemistry, we present the
288: abundances of the different molecules as ratios with respect that that of CH$_3$OH in
289: Table \ref{abun2} (as in Paper I). Errors in
290: the abundance ratios can be estimated by considering the propagation of the
291: errors in the
292: column densities in each molecule. Uncertainties of a factor of $\lesssim$3
293: are expected for these abundance ratios. However, as mentioned in the previous
294: section the main source of uncertainty is the derived $T_{\rm ex}$, which will
295: affect all COMs and CH$_3$OH in a similar way. In this case a factor of 3 must be
296: considered an upper limit to the uncertainties in our estimated abundance ratios.
297: The relative abundance of every molecule with respect to that of CH$_3$OH is
298: rather constant between sources, with changes by only a factor of $\lesssim$3,
299: similar to the uncertainties. As in
300: Paper I, we find similar abundance ratios for all COMs between sources that are separated
301: by hundreds of parsecs. This remarkable result supports the claim
302: of a similar grain mantle composition in the whole CMZ.
303:
304:
305: \section{Comparison between related molecules}
306:
307: Fig. \ref{oxi} summarizes all the observed COMs in the CMZ sources
308: in this paper and in
309: Paper I following the simplest hypothesis that the formation of COMs on grain
310: mantles is due to additions of O, C and H to CO \citep[][]{tie82,cha05}.
311: Chemical complexity starting from CO increases from left to right by adding
312: C, from the center to top and bottom by adding H and in
313: diagonals by adding O.
314: The radicals are shown within ellipses and the molecular species in boxes.
315: The different families of isomers are shown in the figure enclosed in
316: dashed line boxes. The molecules detected in the GC molecular
317: clouds are highlighted in boldface to distinguished them from the undetected species.\\
318: To test the scheme proposed in Fig. \ref{oxi}, we have compared the
319: relative abundances derived between related molecules (see Table \ref{fam}),
320: like the isomers and the aldehyde/alcohol pairs between the CMZ sources,
321: the star forming region Sgr~B2N and a sample of hot cores in the
322: Galactic disk
323: \citep{bis07}.\\
324:
325: \subsection{Isomers}
326:
327: We find that the ratios between the different isomers
328: in the CMZ sources are very similar within a factor of $\sim$3.
329: Only the (CH$_3$)$_2$O:C$_2$H$_5$OH ratio shows some dispersion between
330: sources in the CMZ.
331: For the isomers c--C$_2$H$_4$O:CH$_3$CHO ratio, the CMZ sources show
332: ratios that are in agreement with those measured in hot cores
333: \citep{num98,ben05}. However, for
334: the (CH$_3$)$_2$O:C$_2$H$_5$OH ratio, we find a large difference between
335: the GC clouds and the hot core sources by nearly a factor of 10. The
336: ratios CH$_3$COOH:CH$_2$OHCHO:HCOOCH$_3$, where we have only upper limits for the
337: CH$_3$COOH abundance, is relatively constant for the CMZ sources, but the abundance of
338: CH$_2$OHCHO with respect to that of HCOOCH$_3$ is larger in the CMZ than in hot
339: cores by a factor of 10. The trend observed in the relative abundances between
340: isomers indicates a
341: similar grain mantle composition in the CMZ, but different than in hot core
342: regions. The new detections of COMs
343: clearly show that the chemistry in the CMZ differs substantially from
344: that in hot cores in the Galactic disk.\\
345:
346: \subsection{Aldehyde/alcohol pair}
347: Previous observations of the aldehyde/alcohol pairs in hot cores have shown
348: that the COM chemistry favors the reduced alcohols with respect to their
349: corresponding aldehydes \citep{ike01,hol02,bis07}, i. e. the double bond
350: between the C and the O must be easily broken. In the CMZ we found a similar
351: trend (Table \ref{fam}). However, when we compare the hot cores with the CMZ
352: clouds we find very large differences between their relative abundances. For the
353: H$_2$CO:CH$_3$OH and the CH$_2$OHCHO:HOCH$_2$CH$_2$OH pairs we find small
354: differences and it could be explained by slightly different grain mantle
355: composition between CMZ sources and hot cores. However, for the
356: CH$_3$CHO:C$_2$H$_5$OH pair, the ratio
357: in the CMZ is more than 2 orders of magnitude larger than in hot cores.
358: This might be attributable to the suggestion that the CH$_3$CHO formation in hot cores
359: may be related with a cooler gas in the external part of the hot core
360: \citep{bis07}.\\ % or due to a more efficient hydrogenation of the icy mantles in the
361: %CMZ as discussed below. \\
362:
363: \subsection{Degree of saturation}
364: Finally, we compare the abundances between molecules related by a different
365: degree of saturation, breaking double or triple bonds (columns in Fig.
366: \ref{oxi}).
367: For the pair H$_2$CCO:CH$_3$CHO the relative abundances observed in the CMZ
368: are completely different than observed in hot cores. The relative CH$_3$CHO
369: abundance with respect to that of H$_2$CCO is larger by more that one order of
370: magnitude in the CMZ clouds than that observed by \citet{bis07} in hot cores.
371: The break of the double bond seems to
372: be produced more efficiently in the CMZ% sources than in hot cores as find in the
373: %comparison of the aldehyde/alcohol pairs
374: , maybe
375: because of a more efficient hydrogenation. %, or by different reactions on the
376: %grain mantles.
377: For the aldehydes bearing 3 carbons, we found similar ratios
378: between CMZ sources.
379: Unfortunately, these aldehydes have only been detected toward
380: one hot core, Sgr~B2N. Moreover, we derive similar abundance ratios in the
381: Sgr~B2N hot core than in the other CMZ clouds for these molecules, assuming a
382: low excitation temperatures \citep[10$\,$K, ][]{hol04b}.
383: Their extended emission in the CMZ is a clear indication that these molecules
384: might not arise from the hot core, but from the envelope \citep{marpin90}.
385: Detection of these molecules in other hot cores is required to establish whether
386: the addition of carbon also occurs with the same efficiency in hot cores as in
387: the CMZ.\\
388:
389: \section{The formation of COMs}
390: The formation paths for the observed COMs are
391: not completely understood, either in the gas phase or on grain mantles
392: \citep[][]{cha05, hal06}.
393: From the observational point of view, up to now, our knowledge of the most
394: complex organic molecules has been restricted to just one position toward a hot
395: core, Sgr~B2N, with several velocity components that complicate its study.
396: The detection of very
397: similar abundances of large COMs in several different zones in the CMZ opens the
398: possibility of constraining the formation mechanism for the most complex
399: molecules found in the interstellar medium. \\
400:
401: \subsection{Gas phase}
402: The very high abundances obtained for the COMs and again the similar
403: abundance ratios between the different COMs with respect to that of
404: CH$_3$OH strongly supports the hypothesis that the same chemistry
405: occurs at different locations in the CMZ. Gas phase reactions
406: of simple organic molecules ejected from grain mantles to form the more complex
407: organic molecules \citep[as proposed by ][]{cha92} are unlikely to
408: produce the same, uniform abundance ratios, because the abundances of the
409: daughter species are strongly time dependent and also depend on the temperature and
410: density.
411:
412: The detection of H$_2$COH$^+$ towards the Sgr~B2N hot core has been
413: proposed as an indication of the gas-phase formation of CH$_2$OHCHO
414: \citep{hal06}.
415: However, in the CMZ the abundance of H$_2$COH$^+$ seems to be very low as
416: compared with that of CH$_2$OHCHO (Table \ref{fam}) to explain the formation of
417: this molecule in gas phase.
418: The most likely explanation is that CH$_2$OHCHO, like the other COMs, is formed
419: on grain mantles.\\
420:
421: We stress that the GC molecular clouds are likely to be more affected by
422: different energetic processes, UV radiation, X-rays, supernova remnants,
423: shocks, cosmic
424: rays than the clouds in the Galactic disk. These effects can drive the chemistry in grain mantles
425: and/or increase the available H in the gas phase or in icy grain mantles, making
426: possible a larger degree
427: of hydrogenation in the CMZ. Fast hydrogenation reactions in the
428: gas-phase after the ejection of COMs from the mantles could be also possible,
429: but should affect
430: differently the different clouds. In particular, such a situation should be time
431: dependent since the degree of hydrogenation will depend on the time
432: scales when the parent COMs were ejected from the grain mantles. As discussed
433: in Paper I, we do not find any change in the relative abundances of fully saturated
434: molecules like the C$_2$H$_5$OH, suggesting that gas phase chemistry after the
435: ejection of molecules from grain mantles does not seems to be a fundamental
436: process.\\
437:
438: \subsection{Icy mantles of grains}
439: The constant relative abundances and abundance ratios of the more complex
440: organic molecules observed in the
441: CMZ indicate that the chemistry of all these molecules is likely to be related with
442: common processes taking place throughout the CMZ. The formation of those complex
443: molecules by hydrogenation of CO to form H$_2$CO and
444: CH$_3$OH on grain mantles seems to be very efficient
445: in laboratory experiments \citep[][ and Fuchs 2007, in press]{hir04,wat05}. Similar
446: hydrogenation reactions might then be possible for the formation of more
447: complex molecules by addition of O and C (see Fig. \ref{oxi}). In fact, one of the
448: largest COMs, the HOCH$_2$CH$_2$OH has even been detected in
449: comets by \citet{cro04}.\\
450:
451: In the scheme proposed in Fig. \ref{oxi}, chemical complexity follows from the
452: availability of atomic C, H and O in the gas phase. The C availability results from
453: cosmic ray ionization and primary and secondary electron excitation of
454: H$_2$ followed by fluorescence in the Lyman-Werner bands that produce FUV photons
455: capable to photodissociate CO. The fractional C abundance is
456: C/CO$\sim$6$\times$10$^{-3}$, largely independent of the cosmic ray ionization
457: rate and therefore the carbon addition has to be similar in the different regions
458: \citep{tie05}.%mirar spaans et al....todavía no lo he visto!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
459: Other formation routes from various simple molecules,
460: including hydrocarbons such as acetylene (C$_2$H$_2$), where its triple bond
461: is readily attacked by atomic H, could also lead to COMs such as
462: CH$_2$CHOH as well as C$_2$H$_5$OH. \\
463:
464:
465: Another attractive alternative for the formation of the largest COMs on grains
466: is that energetic processes in the GC fragment the simple molecules formed
467: by hydrogenation of CO like, H$_2$CO and CH$_3$OH triggering further
468: hydrogenation and other reactions on grain surfaces.
469: Following this hypothesis for the formation of COMs, the reactions of
470: radicals at warm dust temperatures \citep{gar06} seems to be important, but the
471: present chemical models do not show any result for the complex aldehydes we
472: have observed in this work and the dust temperatures in the CMZ are relatively
473: low, only 10--20$\,$K. Several COMs, such as the simpler
474: amino acids, can be formed in the solid phase from H$_2$O, CH$_3$OH, NH$_3$ and CO or
475: HCN ices affected by photochemistry \citep{dwo01,ber02}. However, most of the
476: COMs are easily photodissociated by the UV radiation needed to drive the
477: chemistry (see Paper I).\\
478:
479: A very interesting alternative has been investigated by
480: \citet{ben07} who have irradiated a
481: mixture of CH$_3$OH and CO ices at 10$\,$K with energetic electrons to mimic the
482: effects of MeV cosmic rays. As previously mentioned, GC
483: clouds could be affected by an enhanced flux of cosmic rays. Cosmic rays
484: break a C--H bond of CH$_3$OH, generating the hydroxymethyl (CH$_2$OH) and the
485: metoxy
486: (CH$_3$O) radicals, plus H. This H has sufficient energy to overcome barriers
487: on the grain mantles to hydrogenate CO to form HCO. This radical will recombine
488: with CH$_2$OH to form CH$_2$OHCHO and with CH$_3$O to form HCOOCH$_3$. In this
489: scheme, the isomers, CH$_2$OHCHO
490: and HCOOCH$_3$, are efficiently formed while their other isomer CH$_3$COOH was
491: produced with less efficiency than the other two.
492: The same trend predicted by this experiment in the abundances of these isomers
493: is observed in the GC clouds.
494: Furthermore, HCOOCH$_3$ is formed more efficiently that CH$_2$OHCHO by one order
495: of magnitude,
496: just as we observed in the GC clouds. This suggests than cosmic rays
497: can be the driver of grain chemistry in the GC. However, it is unclear if the
498: estimated abundances of the C$_2$H$_4$O$_2$ species on the ices of 1\% of water
499: abundances \citet{ben07} is
500: large enough to account for the abundances estimated
501: from our observation. This would require that the CH$_3$OH abundance in the
502: mantles be similar to that of water in the GC. \\
503:
504:
505: All these arguments emphasize the suggestion made in Paper I that we observe in the
506: CMZ a uniform grain mantle composition ejected directly from the grain mantles
507: to the gas
508: phase. However, the grain chemistry in the CMZ differs substantially
509: from that in hot cores.\\
510:
511: \section{Potential of the CMZ for future searches of COMs}
512: Because of the large number of detections of COMs in the
513: CMZ, as well as their large abundances, this region stands out as one of the promising
514: sources for detecting new molecules and for studying the origin of COMs in
515: the Galaxy. In hot cores, the other prolific sources of COMs,
516: line confusion and large partition functions make the detection/identification
517: of very large molecules very difficult.
518: In the CMZ, the COMs are widespread and show low excitation temperatures
519: ($\lesssim$20$\,$K), partially avoiding the large partition function and the extreme
520: line confusion problems of the hot cores.
521: Moreover, there are molecules like the complex aldehydes which are more
522: abundant in the CMZ clouds affected by shocks than in hot cores.
523: Observations of these molecules in a larger sample of CMZ clouds and hot cores,
524: and new studies of the chemistry for the large aldehydes are necessary to
525: clearly establish the different history of the grain mantles in the GC and in
526: the disk.
527:
528: \section{Conclusions}
529: We have detected the most complex organic molecules,
530: HC$_2$CHO, CH$_2$CHCHO, CH$_3$CH$_2$CHO, CH$_2$OHCHO,
531: HOCH$_2$CH$_2$OH, c--C$_2$H$_4$O, CH$_3$CHO, and HCCCHO in three typical GC molecular
532: clouds. These molecules show
533: very high abundances relative to H$_2$, ranging from 10$^{-10}$ to
534: 10$^{-8}$.
535: The relative abundances of the different molecules with respect to that of CH$_3$OH are
536: very similar within a factor of 3 for the three sources in the CMZ and likely
537: everywhere in this region, as previously observed for a larger sample of sources
538: for other related COMs
539: (Paper I). The new data strengthens our previous claim of a uniform grain mantle
540: composition and similar chemical histories of the grains mantles in the CMZ clouds.
541: However,
542: comparison between the CMZ clouds and hot cores shows very large differences in
543: the relative abundances of some of the molecules presented in this paper,
544: indicating a different
545: grain mantle composition in the Galactic disk hot cores possibly due to a
546: different chemical history. Hydrogenation and carbon addition seem to be more
547: efficient in the GC
548: than in the hot cores of the Galactic disk. The Galactic center
549: is the most extreme environment in the Galaxy with the presence of energetic
550: processes, like UV radiation, X-rays and cosmic rays. These will affect the
551: chemistry on the grain mantles in the CMZ and/or increase the H and C abundances
552: in the gas phase available for fast hydrogenation and carbon addition of unsaturated molecules on grain
553: mantles. Other hypotheses, like the formation from radicals driven by cosmic
554: ray, seem also to be very promising. The CMZ is one of the most promising sources to increment our
555: knowledge of the chemical complexity in the interstellar medium.\\
556:
557:
558:
559: %{\bf A following paper will come for the study of different pathways to
560: %form those complex molecules like the processes that start with the
561: %hydrocarbons.
562: %Moreover, the formation of molecules with N atoms will be interesting for study,
563: %in the GC molecular clouds, due to their importance like precursors for
564: %prebiotic molecules. }
565:
566: \acknowledgments
567: We thank A. G. G. M. Tielens for his comments on Fig. \ref{oxi} and for a
568: discussion of the formation of COMs on grain mantles that contributed
569: substantially to the improvement of the final
570: version of the manuscript.
571: This work has been supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Educaci\'on y Ciencia
572: under projects AYA~2003-02785, ESP~2004-00665, and
573: ``Comunidad de Madrid" Government under PRICIT project S-0505/ESP-0237
574: (ASTROCAM). The participation of M. Morris in this project was supported by NSF
575: award INT-0340750 to UCLA.\\
576: {\it Facilities:} \facility{Green Bank Telescope}
577:
578: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
579: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
580: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
581: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
582: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
583: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
584: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
585: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
586:
587: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
588: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
589: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
590: %% copy editing. Individual instruments or configurations can be provided
591: %% in parentheses, after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
592:
593: %{\it Facilities:} \facility{Nickel}, \facility{HST (STIS)}, \facility{CXO
594: %(ASIS)}.
595:
596: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.
597: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix
598: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.
599:
600: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.
601: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix
602: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.
603:
604: %\appendix
605:
606: %\section{Appendix material}
607:
608:
609: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
610: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
611: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
612: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
613: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
614: %%
615: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
616: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
617: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
618: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
619: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
620: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
621: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
622: %% place of the \cite commands.
623:
624: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
625: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
626: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
627:
628: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
629: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
630: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
631: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
632: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
633:
634: \begin{thebibliography}{}
635: \bibitem[Bally et al.(1987)]{bal87}Bally, J., Stark, A. A., Wilson, R. W., \&
636: Henkel, C. 1987, \apjs, 65, 13
637: \bibitem[Bennett et al.(2005)]{ben05} Bennett, C. J., Osamura, Y., Lebar, M. D.
638: \& Kaiser, R. I. 2005, \apj, 634, 698
639: \bibitem[Bennett \& Kaiser(2007)]{ben07} Bennett, C. J., \& Kaiser, R. I. 2007,
640: \apj, 661, 899
641: \bibitem[Bernstein et al.(2002)]{ber02}Bernstein, Dworkin, Sandford, Cooper, \&
642: Allamandola 2002, Nature, 416, 401
643: \bibitem[Bisschop et al.(2007)]{bis07} Bisschop, S. E., J\o{}rgensen,
644: J. K., van Dishoeck, E. F., \& de Wachter, E. B. 2007, \aap, accepted
645: astro-ph/0702066v1
646: \bibitem[Charnley et al.(1992)]{cha92}Charnley, S. B., Tielens, A. G. G. M., \&
647: Millar, T. J. 1992, \apj, 399, L71
648: \bibitem[Charnley \& Rodgers(2005)]{cha05}Charnley, S. B., \& Rodgers, S. D.
649: 2005, IAU 231 Symposium book ``Astrochemistry: Recent Successes and Future
650: Challenges" Ed. Lis, D. C., Blake, G. A., \& Herbst, E., 237
651: \bibitem[Chengalur \& Kanekar(2003)]{che03}Chengalur, J. N. \&
652: Kanekar, N. 2003, \aap, 403, L43%widespread acetaldehyde
653: \bibitem[Crovisier et al.(2004)]{cro04}Crovisier, J., Bockele-Morvan, D., Biver,
654: N., Colom, P., Despois, D., \& Lis, D. C. 2004, A\&A, 418, L35
655: \bibitem[Dickens et al.(2001)]{dic01}Dickens, J. E., Irvine, W. M., Nummelin,
656: A., et al. %M\o{}llendal, H., Saito, S., Thorwith, S., Hajalmarson, \aa, and Ohishi, M.
657: 2001, Spectrochimica Acta Part A, 57, 643
658: \bibitem[Dworkin et al.(2001)]{dwo01}Dworkin, Deamer, Sandford, \& Allamandola
659: 2001, PNAS, 98, 815
660: \bibitem[Garrod \& Herbst(2006)]{gar06} Garrod, R. T. \& Herbst, E. 2006, \aap,
661: 457, 927
662: \bibitem[Greenberg(1976)]{gre76} Greenberg, J. M. 1976, Ap\&SS, 39, 9
663: \bibitem[Halfen et al.(2006)]{hal06} Halfen, D. T., Apponi, A. J., Woolf, N.,
664: Polt, R., \& Ziurys, L. M. 2006, \apj, 639, 237
665: \bibitem[Hiraoka et al.(2004)]{hir04} Hiraoka, K., Sato, T., Sato, S., Sogoshi,
666: N., Yokoyama, T., Takashima, H., \& Kitagawa, S. 2004, \apj, 577, 265
667: \bibitem[Hollis et al.(2000)]{hol00} Hollis, J. M., Lovas, F. J., \& Jewell, P.
668: R. 2004, \apj, 540, L107%glycoladehyde detection
669: \bibitem[Hollis et al.(2001)]{hol01} Hollis, J. M., Vogel, S. N., Snyder, L. E.
670: Jewell, P. R. , \& Lovas, F. J. 2001, \apj, 554, L81
671: \bibitem[Hollis et al.(2002)]{hol02} Hollis, J. M., Lovas, F. J., Jewell, P.
672: R., \& Courdert, L. H. 2002, \apj, 571, L59%ethylene glycol detection
673: \bibitem[Hollis et al.(2004a)]{hol04a} Hollis, J. M., Jewell, P. R. , Lovas, F.
674: J., \& Remijan, A. 2004, \apj, 613, L45
675: \bibitem[Hollis et al.(2004b)]{hol04b} Hollis, J. M., Jewell, P. R. , Lovas, F.
676: J., Remijan, A., \& M\o{}llendal, H. 2004, \apj, 610, L21
677: \bibitem[H\"uttemeister et al.(1993)]{hut93} H\"uttemeister, S. PhD
678: dissertation, Bonn University
679: \bibitem[H\"uttemeister et al.(1998)]{hut98} H\"uttemeister, S.,
680: Dahmen, G., Mauesberger, R., Henkel, C., Wilson, T. L., \& Mart\'in-Pintado, J.
681: 1998, \aap, 334, 646
682: \bibitem[Ikeda et al.(2001)]{ike01} Ikeda, M., Ohishi, M., Nummelin, A.,
683: Dickens, J. E. et al. 2001, \apj, 560, 792
684: \bibitem[Jamieson et al.(2006)]{jam06}Jamieson, C. S., Mebel, A. M., \& Kaiser,
685: R. I. 2006, \apjs, 163, 184
686: \bibitem[Jim\'enez-Serra et al.(2007)]{jimenez07}Jim\'enez-Serra, I., Caselli, P.,
687: Mart\'in-Pintado, J., Hartquist, T. W. 2007, \aap, submitted
688: \bibitem[Mart\'in et al.(2006)]{mar06} Mart\'in S. 2006, PhD thesis
689: \bibitem[Mart\'in-Pintado et al.(1990)]{marpin90} Mart\'in-Pintado, J., de Vicente,
690: P., Wilson, T. L., \& Johnston, K. J. 1990, \aap, 236, 193
691: \bibitem[Mart\'in-Pintado et al.(1997)]{marpin97} Mart\'in-Pintado, J., de
692: Vicente, P., Fuente, A., \& Planesas, P. 1997, \apj, 482, L45
693: \bibitem[Mart\'in-Pintado et al.(2000)]{marpin00} Mart\'in-Pintado, J, de
694: Vicente, P., Rodr\'iguez-Fern\'andez, N. J., Fuente, A., \& Planesas, P. 2000,
695: A\&A, 356, L5
696: \bibitem[Mart\'in-Pintado et al.(2001)]{marpin01} Mart\'in-Pintado, J., Rizzo,
697: J. R., de Vicente, P., Rodr\'iguez-Fern\'andez, N. J., \& Fuente, A. 2001,
698: \apj, 548, L65
699: \bibitem[Morris \& Serabyn(1996)]{mor96} Morris, M. \& Serabyn, E. 1996,
700: ARA\&A, 34, 645
701: \bibitem[M\"uller et al.(2001)]{mul01} M\"uller, H. S. P., Thorwirth, S., Roth,
702: D. A., \& Winnewisser, G. 2001, \aap, 370, L49
703: \bibitem[M\"uller et al.(2005)]{mul05} M\"uller, H. S. P., Schl\"oder, F.,
704: Stutzki, J., \& Winnewisser, G. 2005, J. Mol. Struct., 742, 215
705: \bibitem[Nummelin et al.(1998)]{num98}Nummelin, A., Dickens, J. E., Bergman,
706: P., Hjalmarson, \AA., Irvine, W. M., Ikenda, M., \& Ohishi, M. 1998,
707: \aap, 337, 275
708: \bibitem[Ohishi et al.(1996)]{ohi96} Ohishi, M., Ishikawa, S.-I., Amano, T., Oka,
709: H., Irvine, W. M., et al. 1996, \apj, 417, L61
710: \bibitem[Pickett et al.(1998)]{pic98} Pickett, H. M., Poynter, R. L., Cohen, E. A.,
711: Delitsky, M. L., Pearson, J. C. \& M\"uller, H. S. P. 1998, J. Quant. Spectrosc.
712: \& Rad. Transfer, 60, 883
713: \bibitem[Requena-Torres et al.(2006)]{req06} Requena-Torres, M. A.,
714: Mart\'in-Pintado, J., Rodr\'iguez-Franco, A., Mart\'in, S.,
715: Rodr\'iguez-Fern\'andez, N. J., \& de Vicente, P. 2006, \aap, 455, 791
716: \bibitem[Rodr\'iguez-Fern\'andez et al. (2000)]{nem00} Rodr\'iguez-Fern\'andez,
717: N. J., Mart\'in-Pintado, J., de Vicente, P., et al.
718: 2000, \aap, 356, 695%h2
719: \bibitem[Rodr\'iguez-Fern\'andez et al. (2001)]{nem01} Rodr\'iguez-Fern\'andez,
720: N. J., Mart\'in-Pintado, J., Fuente, A., de Vicente, P., Wilson, T. L., \&
721: H\"uttemeister, S. 2001, \aap, 365, 174
722: \bibitem[Tielens \& Hagen(1982)]{tie82} Tielens, A. G. G. M. \& Hagen, W. 1982,
723: A\&A, 114, 245
724: \bibitem[Tielens(2005)]{tie05} Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2005, The physics and
725: chemistry of the interstellar medium, Cambridge University Press
726: \bibitem[Watanabe(2005)]{wat05} Watanabe, N. 2005,, IAU 231 Symposium book ``Astrochemistry: Recent Successes and Future
727: Challenges" Ed. Lis, D. C., Blake, G. A., \& Herbst, E., 415
728: \end{thebibliography}
729:
730:
731:
732:
733: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
734: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
735: %\rotate
736: \tablewidth{0pc}
737: %\tablenum{}
738: \tablecolumns{7}
739: \tablecaption{observed frequencies.\label{freq}}
740: \tablehead{molecule&transition &frequency &E$_u$\\
741: & &(MHz)&(K)}
742: \startdata
743: H$_2$COH$^+$ &2$_{1,1}$$\rightarrow$2$_{1,2}$ &15532.99$^1$ &17.49 \\
744: CH$_3$CH$_2$CH$_2$OH * &6$_{15}$$\rightarrow$6$_{0,6}$ &20339.80$^1$ &10.30 \\
745: CH$_2$OHCHO &1$_{1,0}$$\rightarrow$1$_{0,1}$ &13477.17$^1$ &1.20 \\
746: CH$_2$OHCHO &2$_{1,1}$$\rightarrow$2$_{0,2}$ &15176.46$^1$ &2.38 \\
747: CH$_2$OHCHO &4$_{1,3}$$\rightarrow$3$_{2,2}$ &15261.66$^1$ &6.48 \\
748: CH$_2$OHCHO &4$_{1,3}$$\rightarrow$4$_{0,4}$ &22142.67$^1$ &6.48 \\
749: HOCH$_2$CH$_2$OH &3$_{0,3}$(v0)$\rightarrow$2$_{0,2}$(v1)&23393.10$^1$ &2.92 \\
750: HOCH$_2$CH$_2$OH &2$_{0,2}$(v0)$\rightarrow$1$_{0,1}$(v1)&13380.60$^1$ &1.47 \\
751: HC$_2$CHO &2$_{0,2}$$\rightarrow$1$_{0,1}$ &18650.31$^3$ &1.34 \\
752: HC$_2$CHO* &2$_{1,1}$$\rightarrow$1$_{1,0}$ &18978.78$^3$ &4.41 \\
753: CH$_2$CHCHO &2$_{1,1}$$\rightarrow$1$_{1,0}$ &18221.16$^3$ &3.37 \\
754: CH$_2$CHCHO &3$_{1,3}$$\rightarrow$2$_{1,2}$ &26079.45$^3$ &4.56 \\
755: CH$_3$CH$_2$CHO &2$_{1,2}$$\rightarrow$1$_{1,1}$ &19690.43$^3$ &1.97 \\
756: CH$_3$CH$_2$CHO &3$_{0,3}$$\rightarrow$2$_{1,2}$ &21451.57$^3$ &3.00 \\
757: CH$_3$OH &3$_{2,3}$$\rightarrow$3$_{1,3}$ &24928.70$^1$ &36.18 \\
758: CH$_3$OH &4$_{2,3}$$\rightarrow$4$_{1,3}$ &24933.47$^1$ &45.46 \\
759: CH$_3$OH &2$_{2,3}$$\rightarrow$2$_{1,3}$ &24934.38$^1$ &29.21 \\
760: CH$_3$OH &5$_{2,3}$$\rightarrow$5$_{1,3}$ &24959.08$^1$ &57.07 \\
761: CH$_3$OH &6$_{2,3}$$\rightarrow$6$_{1,3}$ &25018.12$^1$ &71.01 \\
762: HCOOCH$_3$-A &2$_{1,1}$$\rightarrow$1$_{1,0}$ &26048.52$^1$ &2.54 \\
763: HCOOCH$_3$-E &2$_{1,1}$$\rightarrow$1$_{1,0}$ &26044.83$^1$ &2.56 \\
764: CH$_3$CHO-A * &1$_{0,1}$$\rightarrow$0$_{0,0}$ &19265.16$^2$ &0.93 \\
765: CH$_3$CHO-E * &1$_{0,1}$$\rightarrow$0$_{0,0}$ &19262.16$^2$ &1.02 \\
766: H$_2$CCO* &1$_{0,1}$$\rightarrow$0$_{0,0}$ &20209.20$^1$ &0.97 \\
767: c--C$_2$H$_4$O &2$_{1,1}$$\rightarrow$2$_{0,2}$ &24923.64$^1$ &6.15
768: \enddata
769: \tablecomments{Transitions observed for each source. the spectroscopic
770: characteristics have been obtained from the Colonia University Database
771: \citep[$^1$ ][]{mul01,mul05}, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory catalog \citep[$^2$
772: ][]{pic98} and from \citet{hol04b} ($^3$). The transitions marked wit a * have
773: been only observed in MC~G+0.693--0.03.}
774: \end{deluxetable}
775:
776:
777:
778:
779: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
780: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
781: %\rotate
782: \tablewidth{0pc}
783: %\tablenum{}
784: \tablecolumns{7}
785: \tablecaption{Parameters of the sources.\label{poss}}
786: \tablehead{Source&$\alpha$[J2000]&$\delta$[J2000]&velocity&n(H$_2$)&X(CH$_3$OH)\\
787: &&&(km s$^{-1}$)&(cm$^{-2}$)&}
788: \startdata
789: MC~G--0.02--0.07 &17$^{\rm h}$45$^{\rm m}$51$^{\rm s}$&--28$^o$59$'$06$''$&47&6.8$\times$10$^{22}$&2.9$\times$10$^{-7}$\\
790: MC~G--0.11--0.08 &17$^{\rm h}$45$^{\rm m}$39$^{\rm s}$&--29$^o$04$'$05$''$&21&1.0$\times$10$^{22}$&1.1$\times$10$^{-6}$\\
791: MC~G+0.693--0.03 &17$^{\rm h}$47$^{\rm m}$22$^{\rm s}$&--28$^o$21$'$27$''$&68&4.1$\times$10$^{22}$&4.5$\times$10$^{-7}$
792: \enddata
793: \tablecomments{Positions, velocities, column densities of H$_2$, and CH$_3$OH
794: abundances for the different sources. Data from Paper I.}
795: \end{deluxetable}
796:
797:
798:
799:
800: \begin{deluxetable}{lc|ccc|ccc|ccc}
801: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
802: %\rotate
803: \tablewidth{0pc}
804: %\tablenum{}
805: \tablecolumns{7}
806: \tablecaption{Gaussian fit parameters.\label{gauss}}
807: \tablehead{Molecule&Transition& Intens. & V& $\Delta$V& Intens. & V& $\Delta$V&
808: Intens. & V& $\Delta$V\\
809: & & K& km s$^{-1}$& km s$^{-1}$
810: & K& km s$^{-1}$& km s$^{-1}$
811: & K& km s$^{-1}$& km s$^{-1}$}
812: \startdata
813: & &\multicolumn{3}{c}{\footnotesize MC~G--0.02} &\multicolumn{3}{c}{\footnotesize MC~G$-$0.11} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{\footnotesize MC~G+0.693} \\
814: \hline
815: H$_2$COH$^+$ & 2$_{1,1}$$\rightarrow$2$_{1,2}$ & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & 0.005(1) & 73(3) & 22(6)\\
816: CH$_3$CH$_2$CH$_2$OH & 6$_{1,5}$$\rightarrow$6$_{0,6}$ & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & $<$0.024 & ... & ...\\
817: CH$_2$OHCHO & 1$_{1,0}$$\rightarrow$1$_{0,1}$ & 0.010(1) & 52(1) & 23(3) & 0.009(1) & 22(1) & 21(3) & 0.023(1) & 69(1) & 24(1)\\
818: CH$_2$OHCHO & 2$_{1,1}$$\rightarrow$2$_{0,2}$ & 0.004(1) & 47(3) & 17(5) & $<$0.006 & ... & ... & 0.013(1) & 69(1) & 15(2)\\
819: CH$_2$OHCHO & 4$_{1,3}$$\rightarrow$3$_{2,2}$ & 0.005(1) & 53(2) & 19(4) & 0.006(2) & 22(2) & 17(3) & 0.007(1) & 67(2) & 21(5)\\
820: CH$_2$OHCHO & 4$_{1,3}$$\rightarrow$4$_{0,4}$ & $<$0.015 & ... & ... & 0.008(1) & 15(2) & 21(6) & 0.011(3) & 71(3) & 24(9)\\
821: HOCH$_2$CH$_2$OH& 3$_{0,3}$(0)$\rightarrow$2$_{0,2}$(1)& 0.02(1)& 47(1) & 20(2) & 0.032(4) & 18(1) & 17(1) & 0.060(6) & 67(3) & 23(8)\\
822: HOCH$_2$CH$_2$OH& 2$_{0,2}$(0)$\rightarrow$1$_{0,1}$(1)& 0.008(1)& 50(2) & 15(4) & 0.013(1) & 18(1) & 14(2) & 0.020(1)& 59(1) & 24(2)\\
823: HC$_2$CHO & 2$_{0,2}$$\rightarrow$1$_{0,1}$ & 0.007(2) & 49(2) & 19(3) & 0.008(3) & 15(2) & 16(7) & 0.019(1) & 64(1) & 23(2)\\
824: HC$_2$CHO & 2$_{1,1}$$\rightarrow$1$_{1,0}$ & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & 0.005(1)& 70(3) & 21(10)\\
825: CH$_2$CHCHO & 2$_{1,1}$$\rightarrow$1$_{1,0}$ & 0.004(1) & 48(3) & 20(5) & 0.009(1)& 19(1) & 14(3) & 0.009(1)& 66(2) & 23(3)\\
826: CH$_2$CHCHO & 3$_{1,3}$$\rightarrow$2$_{1,2}$ & $<$0.015 & ... & ... & 0.010(2) & 20(1) & 17(3) & 0.013(5) & 67(2) & 15(3)\\
827: CH$_3$CH$_2$CHO & 2$_{1,2}$$\rightarrow$1$_{1,1}$ & 0.006(1) & 49(2) & 15(5) & $<$0.006 & ... & ... & 0.006(2) & 65(3) & 21(6)\\
828: CH$_3$CH$_2$CHO & 3$_{0,3}$$\rightarrow$2$_{1,2}$ & $<$0.009 & ... & ... & $<$0.009 & ... & ... & 0.006(3) & 68(3) & 29(6)\\
829: CH$_3$OH & 3$_{2,3}$$\rightarrow$3$_{1,3}$ & 0.39(2) & 46(1) & 21(1) & 0.24(2) & 19(1) & 16(3) & 0.57(4) & 69(1) & 20(1)\\
830: CH$_3$OH & 4$_{2,3}$$\rightarrow$4$_{1,3}$ & 0.330(1) & 46(1) & 21(1) & 0.177(1) & 18(1) & 16(1) & 0.423(2) & 69(1) & 20(1)\\
831: CH$_3$OH & 2$_{2,3}$$\rightarrow$2$_{1,3}$ & 0.373(1) & 46(1) & 21(1) & 0.226(1) & 18(1) & 16(1) & 0.543(3) & 69(1) & 20(1)\\
832: CH$_3$OH & 5$_{2,3}$$\rightarrow$5$_{1,3}$ & 0.176(6) & 45(1) & 21(1) & 0.097(6) & 19(1) & 16(7) & 0.19(2) & 69(1) & 21(1)\\
833: CH$_3$OH & 6$_{2,3}$$\rightarrow$6$_{1,3}$ & 0.118(6) & 45(1) & 22(1) & 0.060(4) & 19(1) & 15(1) & 0.101(8) & 70(1) & 24(1)\\
834: HCOOCH$_3$-A & 2$_{1,1}$$\rightarrow$1$_{1,0}$ & 0.020(6) & 49(2) & 27(6) & 0.021(2) & 19(1) & 19(1) & 0.042(5) & 65(1) & 25(2)\\
835: HCOOCH$_3$-E & 2$_{1,1}$$\rightarrow$1$_{1,0}$ & 0.018(6) & 46(2) & 23(5) & 0.022(2) & 17(1) & 17(1) & 0.041(5) & 67(1) & 22(2)\\
836: CH$_3$CHO-A & 1$_{0,1}$$\rightarrow$0$_{0,0}$ & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & 0.21(2) & 67(1) & 23(1)\\
837: CH$_3$CHO-E & 1$_{0,1}$$\rightarrow$0$_{0,0}$ & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & 0.18(2) & 67(1) & 22(1)\\
838: H$_2$CCO & 1$_{0,1}$$\rightarrow$0$_{0,0}$ & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & 0.043(6) & 64(1) & 17(3)\\
839: c--C$_2$H$_4$O & 2$_{1,1}$$\rightarrow$2$_{0,2}$ & 0.017(5) & 51(1) & 12(3) & 0.018(2) & 17(1) & 17(2) & 0.032(4) & 66(2) & 20(3)
840: \enddata
841: \tablecomments{The intensities are shown in antenna temperature units (K), and
842: the upper limits correspond to 3$\sigma$.}
843: \end{deluxetable}
844:
845:
846:
847:
848:
849: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}
850: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
851: %\rotate
852: \tablewidth{0pc}
853: %\tablenum{}
854: \tablecolumns{7}
855: \tablecaption{Abundance ratios with respect to H$_2$.\label{abun}}
856: \tablehead{molecule&MC G--0.02 &MC G--0.11 &MC G+0.693}
857: \startdata
858: HC$_2$CHO & 0.5E-9& 2.3E-9 &1.6E-9\\
859: CH$_2$CHCHO & 0.3E-9& 2.3E-9 &0.9E-9\\
860: CH$_3$CH$_2$CHO & 1.4E-9& 4.4E-9 &3.9E-9\\
861: CH$_2$OHCHO & 0.3E-8& 1.8E-8 &0.9E-8\\
862: HOCH$_2$CH$_2$OH& 0.4E-8& 2.8E-8 &1.1E-8\\
863: HCOOCH$_3$ & 1.0E-8& 7.8E-8 &4.7E-8\\
864: c--C$_2$H$_4$O & 1.1E-9& 5.6E-9 &3.0E-9\\
865: CH$_3$CHO$^*$ & 1.0E-8& 3.0E-8 &3.6E-8\\
866: H$_2$CCO$^*$ & 0.2E-8& 1.6E-8 &0.7E-8\\
867: H$_2$CO$^*$ & 1.6E-8& 6.5E-8 &0.9E-8\\
868: H$_2$COH$^+$$^*$& $<$1.1E-9& $<$1.3E-9& 2.4E-9\\
869: CH$_3$OH &0.3E-6 &1.1E-6 &0.5E-6
870: \enddata
871: \tablecomments{Relative abundances with respect to that
872: of H$_2$.
873: The H$_2$ column densities used to estimate
874: the abundances are
875: 6.8$\times$10$^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$ for MC~G--0.02--0.07, 1$\times$10$^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$ for
876: MC~G--0.11--0.08, and 4.1$\times$10$^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$ for MC~G+0.693--0.03, from
877: Paper I.
878: For the molecules marked with a $^*$ we have used data from \citet{mar06}.}
879: \end{deluxetable}
880:
881:
882:
883:
884:
885:
886: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}
887: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
888: %\rotate
889: \tablewidth{0pc}
890: %\tablenum{}
891: \tablecolumns{7}
892: \tablecaption{Abundance ratios with respect to CH$_3$OH.\label{abun2}}
893: \tablehead{molecule&MC G--0.02 &MC G--0.11 &MC G+0.693}
894: \startdata
895: HC$_2$CHO &1.6E-3 &2.1E-3 &3.6E-3 \\
896: CH$_2$CHCHO &9.1E-4 &2.1E-3 &2.0E-3 \\
897: CH$_3$CH$_2$CHO &3.9E-3 &$<$4.0E-3 &8.7E-3 \\
898: CH$_2$OHCHO &1.0E-2 &1.5E-2 &2.0E-2 \\
899: HOCH$_2$CH$_2$OH&1.2E-2 &2.0E-2 &2.4E-2 \\
900: HCOOCH$_3$ &3.4E-2 &7.1E-2 &1.0E-1 \\
901: c--C$_2$H$_4$O &3.7E-3 &5.1E-3 &6.7E-3 \\
902: CH$_3$CHO$^*$ &3.5E-2 &2.7E-2 &5.7E-2 \\
903: H$_2$CCO$^*$ &6.4E-3 &1.5E-2 &1.6E-2 \\
904: H$_2$CO$^*$ &5.3E-2 &5.9E-2 &2.0E-2 \\
905: H$_2$COH$^+$$^*$&$<$3.8E-3 &$<$1.2E-3 &5.3E-3 \\
906: C$_3$H$_7$OH &\nodata &\nodata &$\le$1.6E-2
907: %CH$_3$OH %2.91E-7 %1.1E-6 %4.5E-7
908: \enddata
909: \tablecomments{Relative abundances of the different molecules with respect to that
910: of CH$_3$OH. For the molecules marked with a $^*$ we have used data from
911: \citet{mar06}.}
912: \end{deluxetable}
913:
914:
915: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
916: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
917: %\rotate
918: \tablewidth{0pc}
919: %\tablenum{}
920: \tablecolumns{5}
921: \tablecaption{Relative abundances between related molecules\label{fam}}
922: \tablehead{molecular ratios &MC G--0.02 &MC G--0.11
923: &MC G+0.693 &hot cores}
924: \startdata
925: \hline
926: Isomers\\
927: c--C$_2$H$_4$O:CH$_3$CHO &0.1:1 &0.2:1 &0.1:1 &0.08--0.2:1\\%Bennet 2005,nummelin 1998
928: (CH$_3$)$_2$O$^1$:C$_2$H$_5$OH$^1$ &1.3:1 &0.9:1 &0.4:1 &3.2:1\\%req06
929: CH$_3$COOH$^1$:CH$_2$OHCHO:HCOOCH$_3$ &$<$0.05:0.3:1 &$<$0.05:0.2:1 &$<$0.04:0.2:1 &$\sim$0.04:0.02:1\\%hollis 2001
930: \hline
931: Aldehyde/alcohol\\
932: H$_2$CO:CH$_3$OH &0.05:1 &0.06:1 &0.02:1 &0.2:1$^2$\\%Bisschop 2006
933: CH$_3$CHO:C$_2$H$_5$OH &0.9:1 &0.5:1 &0.8:1 &1.5E-3:1$^2$\\%Bisschop 2006
934: CH$_3$CH$_2$CHO:C$_3$H$_7$OH &\nodata &\nodata &$>$0.5:1 &\nodata\\
935: CH$_2$OHCHO:HOCH$_2$CH$_2$OH &0.8:1 &0.8:1 &0.8:1 &0.5-1.4:1\\%hollis 2002, Halfen
936: \hline
937: Hydrogenation\\
938: H$_2$CCO:CH$_3$CHO &1:5.6 &1:1.8 &1:3.6 &1:0.2$^2$\\ %Bisschop 2006
939: HC$_2$CHO:CH$_2$CHCHO:CH$_3$CH$_2$CHO &1:0.6:2.4 &1:1.0:$<$1.9 &1:0.6:2.4 &1:0.8:4.7\\%hollis04a
940: \hline
941: H$_2$CO:H$_2$COH$^+$:CH$_2$OHCHO &1:$<$0.07:0.2 &1:$<$0.02:0.3 &1:0.3:1 &1:$\sim$0.1:0.03%oishi
942: \enddata
943: \tablecomments{CMZ values for $^1$ from Paper I. %\citet{req06}.
944: The values of the Sgr~B2N hot core are obtained
945: from: \citet{hol01,hol02,hol04b,num98,hal06,ohi96}. The values with $^2$ are from \citet{bis07}
946: and are the averaged values of some hot cores,
947: in their work the CH$_3$CHO and H$_2$CCO lie in a cooler gas than the C$_2$H$_5$OH, and the rest of the
948: COMs.}
949: \end{deluxetable}
950:
951:
952: \begin{figure}[h!]
953: \centering
954: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=11cm]{f1.eps}
955: \caption{Spectra of the molecular transitions
956: observed in all the three sources.
957: \label{spec}}
958: \end{figure}
959: \begin{figure}[h!]
960: \centering
961: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=13cm]{f2.eps}
962: \caption{Spectra of the extra molecular transitions
963: observed in MC~G+0.693--0.03. This is the source with the most detections.
964: \label{spec2}}
965: \end{figure}
966: \begin{figure}[h!]
967: \centering
968: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=15cm]{f3.eps}
969: \caption{Population diagrams for H$_2$CCO, HCOOCH$_3$ and CH$_3$OH in
970: the three observed sources.
971: The population diagrams of CH$_3$OH and HCOOCH$_3$ also include data
972: from Paper I. %\citet{req06}.
973: \label{trot}}
974: \end{figure}
975:
976:
977: \begin{figure}[h!]
978: \rotate
979: \centering
980: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=12cm,height=18cm]{f4.eps}
981: \caption{
982: Proposed scheme for the formation of COMs on interstellar grain
983: surfaces by addition of C, O and H on the
984: grain mantles. Complexity increases from left
985: to right by adding C (three areas C, C-C and C-C-C separated by dashed lines),
986: and from center to bottom and to top by adding H and
987: in diagonal by adding O (two areas O and O-O separated by dashed lines).
988: Radicals are encapsulated in elipses and the other molecular species in boxes.
989: The molecules in boldface have been already detected in the GC
990: clouds studied by us. The other molecules have been not detected
991: or their spectroscopic parameters for their search are unkown. The thin dashed
992: boxes separate the families of isomers. Adapted from
993: \citet{cha05,tie82}.
994: \label{oxi}}
995: \end{figure}
996:
997: \end{document}
998: