1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
29: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
30: %% use the longabstract style option.
31:
32: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
33:
34: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
35: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
36: %% the \begin{document} command.
37: %%
38: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
39: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
40: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
41: %% for information.
42:
43: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
44: \newcommand{\myemail}{lyj@bao.ac.cn}
45:
46: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
47:
48: \slugcomment{submitted to ApJ}
49:
50: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
51: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
52: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
53: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
54: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
55: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
56:
57: \shorttitle{A Substellar Companion to 11 Com}
58: \shortauthors{Liu et al.}
59:
60: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
61: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
62:
63: \begin{document}
64:
65: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
66: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
67: %% you desire.
68:
69: \title{A Substellar Companion to the Intermediate-Mass Giant 11 Com}
70:
71: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
72: %% author and affiliation information.
73: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
74: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
75: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
76: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
77:
78: \author{
79: Y.J. Liu,\altaffilmark{1,2} Bun'ei Sato,\altaffilmark{3} G.
80: Zhao,\altaffilmark{1} Kunio Noguchi,\altaffilmark{4} H.
81: Wang,\altaffilmark{1} Eiji Kambe,\altaffilmark{5} Hiroyasu
82: Ando,\altaffilmark{4} Hideyuki Izumiura,\altaffilmark{5,6} Y.Q.
83: Chen,\altaffilmark{1} Norio Okada,\altaffilmark{4} Eri
84: Toyota,\altaffilmark{7} Masashi Omiya,\altaffilmark{8} Seiji
85: Masuda,\altaffilmark{9} Yoichi Takeda,\altaffilmark{4} Daisuke
86: Murata,\altaffilmark{7} Yoichi Itoh,\altaffilmark{7} Michitoshi
87: Yoshida,\altaffilmark{5} Eiichiro Kokubo,\altaffilmark{4} and
88: Shigeru Ida\altaffilmark{3} }
89:
90: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
91: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
92: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
93: %% affiliation.
94:
95: \altaffiltext{1}{National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
96: A20 Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100012, China;
97: lyj@bao.ac.cn, gzhao@bao.ac.cn, wh@bao.ac.cn, cyq@bao.ac.cn}
98: \altaffiltext{2}{Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,
99: Beijing 100049, China}
100: \altaffiltext{3}{Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku,
101: Tokyo 152-8550, Japan; sato.b.aa@m.titech.ac.jp, ida@geo.titech.ac.jp}
102: \altaffiltext{4}{National Astronomical Observatory of Japan,
103: National Institutes of Natural Sciences, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka,
104: Tokyo 181-8588, Japan; knoguchi@optik.mtk.nao.ac.jp,
105: ando@optik.mtk.nao.ac.jp, okada@design.mtk.nao.ac.jp,
106: takedayi@cc.nao.ac.jp, kokubo@nao.ac.jp}
107: \altaffiltext{5}{Okayama Astrophysical Observatory, National
108: Astronomical Observatory of Japan, National Institutes of Natural
109: Sciences, 3037-5 Honjyo, Kamogata, Asakuchi, Okayama 719-0232, Japan;
110: kambe@oao.nao.ac.jp, izumiura@oao.nao.ac.jp, yoshida@oao.nao.ac.jp}
111: \altaffiltext{6}{The Graduate University for Advanced Studies,
112: Shonan Village, Hayama, Kanagawa 240-0193, Japan}
113: \altaffiltext{7}{Graduate School of Science, Kobe University,
114: 1-1 Rokkodai, Nada, Kobe 657-8501, Japan;
115: toyota@kobe-u.ac.jp, murata@harbor.scitec.kobe-u.ac.jp, yitoh@kobe-u.ac.jp}
116: \altaffiltext{8}{Department of Physics, Tokai University,
117: 1117 Kitakaname, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa 259-1292, Japan;
118: ohmiya@peacock.rh.u-tokai.ac.jp}
119: \altaffiltext{9}{Tokushima Science Museum, Asutamu Land Tokushima,
120: 45-22 Kibigadani, Nato, Itano-cho, Itano-gun, Tokushima 779-0111,
121: Japan; masuda@asutamu.jp}
122:
123: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
124: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
125: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
126: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
127: %% editorial office after submission.
128:
129: \begin{abstract}
130: We report the detection of a substellar companion orbiting the
131: intermediate-mass giant star 11 Com (G8 III).
132: Precise Doppler measurements of the star
133: from Xinglong station and Okayama Astrophysical Observatory (OAO)
134: revealed Keplerian velocity variations with an orbital
135: period of 326.03$\pm$0.32 days, a semiamplitude of 302.8$\pm$2.6 m s$^{-1}$,
136: and an eccentricity of 0.231$\pm$0.005.
137: Adopting a stellar mass of 2.7$\pm$0.3 $M_{\odot}$, the minimum mass of the
138: companion is 19.4$\pm$1.5 $M_{\rm J}$, well above the deuterium burning limit,
139: and the semimajor axis is 1.29$\pm$0.05 AU.
140: This is the first result from the joint planet search program
141: between China and Japan aiming at revealing statistics of
142: substellar companions around intermediate-mass giants.
143: 11 Com b emerged from 300 targets of the planet search
144: program at OAO. The current detection rate of a brown dwarf candidate
145: seems to be comparable to that around solar-type stars within
146: orbital separations of $\sim$3 AU.
147: \end{abstract}
148:
149: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
150: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
151: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
152: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
153:
154: \keywords{stars: individual: 11 Com (HD 107383) --- stars: low-mass,
155: brown dwarfs --- planetary systems --- techniques: radial velocities}
156:
157: \section{Introduction}
158: A ``brown dwarf desert'' is widely known as a deficit in the
159: frequency of brown dwarf companions ($13-80M_{\rm J}$) to
160: solar-type stars (e.g. Marcy \& Butler 2000). The mass distribution
161: of companions rises steeply toward planets at one extreme
162: and stellar masses at the other, with a deficit of brown dwarfs
163: in between (e.g. Grether \& Lineweaver 2006).
164: The presence of such a desert within orbital separation of
165: $\sim$3 AU was revealed and confirmed by the precise radial
166: velocity surveys during the past decade (Butler et al. 2006
167: and references therein), and recent coronagraphic surveys
168: showed that the desert extends to $\sim$1000 AU
169: (McCarthy \& Zuckerman 2004).
170: This bimodal mass distribution of the low-mass
171: companions is considered to be the outcome of distinct
172: formation mechanisms for planets and stellar companions
173: to solar-type stars.
174:
175: On the other hand, it has remained to be cleared whether
176: the brown dwarf desert also exists around massive stars.
177: Few absorption lines in the spectra of massive early-type
178: dwarfs, which are often rotationally broadened, make it
179: difficult to detect low-mass companions by precise radial
180: velocity measurements, and their high luminosity prevents
181: us from directly imaging close and faint companions.
182: Therefore, massive stars had not been major targets of
183: planet/brown dwarf searches compared with lower-mass stars.
184:
185: However, the existence of substellar companions
186: to intermediate-mass stars ($\gtrsim1.6M_{\odot}$)
187: has been gradually uncovered mainly through the precise
188: Doppler surveys of G, K giants (e.g. Setiawan et al. 2005;
189: Sato et al. 2007; Hatzes et al. 2005; Johnson et al. 2007;
190: Lovis \& Mayor 2007; Frink et al. 2002; Niedzielski et al. 2007).
191: These are massive stars in evolved stages and have many sharp
192: absorption lines in their spectra appropriate for radial
193: velocity measurements.
194: The minimum masses of the discovered companions range
195: from 0.6 to 19.8 $M_{\rm J}$, and the semimajor axes are
196: from 0.8 to 2.4 AU. The two of the most massive ones,
197: NGC4349 No127 b (19.8 $M_{\rm J}$; Lovis \& Mayor 2007)
198: and HD 13189 b (14 $M_{\rm J}$; Hatzes et al. 2005)
199: \footnote{HD 13189 b has uncertainty between 8 to 20 $M_{\rm J}$
200: depending on the uncertainty of the host star's mass
201: (2--6 $M_{\odot}$) (Hatzes et al. 2005)},
202: are falling in the brown dwarf regime.
203: Galland et al. (2005) have tried
204: a precise Doppler survey of low-mass companions
205: to A--F dwarfs and found one brown dwarf candidate with
206: the minimum mass of 25$M_{\rm J}$ in a 25-day orbit
207: around the A9 V star HD 180777.
208: Kouwenhoven et al. (2007) found two distant (520 and 1500 AU)
209: brown dwarf candidates to a B star in the Sco OB2 association
210: by direct imaging with the near-infrared camera and the
211: adaptive optics system. They derived a frequency of brown
212: dwarf companions ($\gtrsim30M_{\rm J}$) to 0.5$\pm$0.5\%
213: in the separation range 130--520 AU for late-B and A type
214: stars in the association, which is comparable to the
215: frequency of 0.7$\pm$0.7\% derived by McCarthy \& Zuckerman
216: (2004) for F--M stars in the separation range 120--1200 AU.
217:
218: We here report the detection of a substellar companion to the
219: intermediate-mass G-type giant 11 Com (HD 107383) from Doppler planet search
220: programs at the National Astronomical Observatories (Xinglong,
221: China) and Okayama Astrophysical Observatory (OAO, Japan). This is
222: the third one with the minimum mass falling in the brown dwarf regime
223: discovered around intermediate-mass giants.
224:
225: \section{Observations}
226:
227: \subsection{OAO Observations}
228: The Okayama Planet Search Program started in 2001 using
229: a 1.88 m telescope and the HIgh Dispersion Echelle Spectrograph
230: (HIDES; Izumiura 1999) at OAO. It aims to detect planets
231: around intermediate-mass G-type (and early K-type) giants
232: (Sato et al. 2005) and about 300 targets are now under survey.
233: For precise radial velocity measurements, we set a wavelength range
234: to 5000--6100${\rm \AA}$ and a slit width to 200 $\mu$m
235: ($0.76^{\prime\prime}$) giving a spectral
236: resolution ($\lambda/\Delta\lambda$) of 67000,
237: and use an iodine absorption cell (I$_2$ cell; Kambe et al.
238: 2002) for precise wavelength calibration.
239: Our modeling technique of an I$_2$-superposed stellar spectrum
240: (star+I$_2$) is detailed in Sato et al. (2002), which is based
241: on the method by Butler et al. (1996), giving
242: a Doppler precision of about 6 m s$^{-1}$ over a time span of 6 years.
243: The stellar template used for radial velocity analysis is extracted
244: from several star+I$_2$ spectra with use of the method described
245: in Sato et al. (2002).
246: The reduction of echelle data is performed using the IRAF
247: \footnote{IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy
248: Observatories, which is operated by the Association of Universities
249: for Research in Astronomy, Inc. under cooperative agreement with the
250: National Science Foundation, USA.} software package in the standard manner.
251: For abundance analysis of 11 Com, we took pure (I$_2$-free) stellar
252: spectra of wavebands of 5000--6100 and 6000--7100 ${\rm \AA}$
253: with the same wavelength resolution as that for radial velocity
254: measurements.
255:
256: \subsection{Xinglong Observations}
257:
258: The Xinglong Planet Search Program started in 2005 within a
259: framework of international collaboration between China and Japan
260: aiming to extend the planet search program ongoing at OAO. At the
261: National Astronomical Observatories (Xinglong, China), we have
262: mainly monitored about 100 G-type giants with a visual magnitude of
263: $V\sim6$, which have not been observed at OAO.
264:
265: Before starting the planet search program, we installed an I$_2$
266: cell to the Coude Echelle Spectrograph (CES; Zhao \& Li 2001), which
267: attached to 2.16 m telescope at Xinglong Station in 2004 August. The
268: cell is a copy of those for HIDES at OAO and High Dispersion
269: Spectrograph at Subaru telescope (Kambe et al. 2002). The cell is
270: put in front of the entrance slit of the spectrograph and its
271: temperature is controlled to 60 $^\circ$C. We use a blue-arm and a
272: middle-camera configuration which covers a wavelength range of
273: 3900--7260${\rm \AA}$ with a spectral resolution of $\sim40000$ by
274: two pixels sampling. Although a wide wavelength range can be
275: obtained with a single exposure, only a waveband of 470 ${\rm \AA}$
276: is available for radial velocity measurements due to the small
277: format (1K$\times$1K) of the current CCD, which is a thinned back illuminated
278: blue enhanced TEK CCD whose pixel size is 24$\times$24 $\mu$m$^{2}$.
279:
280: The modeling technique of a star+I$_2$ spectrum and the extraction
281: method of a stellar template are based on Sato et al. (2002)'s code.
282: For CES data, we use 5 Gaussian
283: profiles to reconstruct the instrumental profile and the second
284: order Legendre polynomial function to express the wavelength
285: scale. Entire echelle spectrum is divided into about forty
286: segments (130--150 pixels for each), and Doppler analysis is
287: applied to each segment. The current best short-term ($\sim1$ week)
288: precision for bright stars is about 15 m s$^{-1}$ limited by the
289: low wavelength resolution and the narrow wavelength coverage of
290: the spectrograph. In longer time scale ($\sim$ 1 yr), the precision
291: gets worse to 20--25 m s$^{-1}$ including velocity offsets between
292: different observing runs.
293: In the case of fainter stars, the measurement precision is mainly
294: limited by a signal-to-noise ratio (S/N).
295: We can typically achieve a precision of 30--40 m s$^{-1}$ for a
296: $V=6$ star with a S/N$\sim$150 for an exposure time of 1800 sec.
297:
298: \section{Stellar Properties}
299:
300: 11 Com (HR 4697, HD 107383, HIP 60202) is a G8 III giant star with a
301: $V$ magnitude $V=4.74$, a color index $B-V=0.99$, and a precise
302: astrometric parallax $\pi=9.04\pm0.86$ mas (ESA 1997). The resulting
303: distance is 112 pc from the sun and the absolute magnitude is
304: $M_V=-0.48$. Effective temperature $T_{\rm eff}=4742\pm100$K was
305: derived from the $B-V$ and metallicity [Fe/H] using the empirical
306: calibration of Alonso et al. (2001), and a bolometric correction
307: $B.C.=-0.36$ was derived from the calibration of Alonso et al.
308: (1999) depending on temperature and metallicity. Then the stellar
309: luminosity was estimated to $L=172\pm31L_{\odot}$, and a radius to
310: $R=19.5\pm2R_{\odot}$. Stellar mass $M=2.7\pm0.3M_{\odot}$ was
311: estimated from the star's position in the theoretical H-R diagram by
312: interpolating in the evolutionary tracks of Yonsei-Yale (Yi et al.
313: 2003). Surface gravity $\log g=2.31\pm0.10$ was determined using the
314: relation between temperature, mass, luminosity and gravity (see
315: equation 1 of Chen et al. 2000). Iron abundance was determined from
316: the equivalent widths measured from the I$_2$-free spectrum
317: (5000--6100 and 6000--7100 ${\rm \AA}$) combined with the model
318: atmosphere (Kurucz 1993). We iterated the whole procedure described
319: above until the value of the overall metallicity of the model
320: converged. Finally we got ${\rm [Fe/H]}=-0.35\pm0.09$ and a
321: microturbulent velocity $v_t=1.5\pm0.2$ km s$^{-1}$. The rotational
322: velocity of the star is determined by de Medeiros \& Mayor (1999) to
323: be $v \sin i=1.2\pm1.0$ km s$^{-1}$. {\it Hipparcos} made a total of
324: 99 observations of the star, revealing a photometric stability down
325: to $\sigma=0.006$ mag. The stellar parameters are summarized in
326: Table \ref{tbl-1}.
327:
328: Figure 1 shows Ca {\small II} H line for 11 Com
329: together with those for G8--9 III giants in our sample.
330: Although the calibration to measure chromospheric activity
331: for our spectra and the correlation between chromospheric activity
332: and intrinsic radial velocity ``jitter'' for giants have not
333: been well established yet,
334: the lack of significant emission in the line of 11 Com
335: suggests its low chromospheric activity.
336:
337: \section{Radial Velocities and Orbital Solution}
338: We started observations of 11 Com at OAO in 2003 December.
339: Soon after that, its large radial velocity variations were detected
340: suggesting the existence of a substellar companion.
341: Based on this result, we started observations of this star
342: at Xinglong in 2005 to check the measurement precision with
343: CES and to confirm the variations of the star independently.
344: Until February 2007, we gathered a total of 28 data points of the
345: star at OAO with a typical S/N of 250 per pixel, and a total
346: of 18 data points at Xinglong with a typical S/N of 150--200.
347:
348: The observed radial velocities are shown in Figure \ref{fig2} and
349: listed in Table \ref{tbl-2} (OAO) and \ref{tbl-3} (Xinglong)
350: together with their estimated uncertainties. The best-fit Keplerian
351: orbit was derived using both of the OAO and Xinglong data.
352: An offset of $-$205 m s$^{-1}$ was applied to the Xinglong radial
353: velocities in order to minimize $\chi^2$ when fitting a Keplerian
354: model to the combined OAO and Xinglong velocities.
355: The resulting orbit is shown in Figure \ref{fig2}
356: overplotted on the velocities, and its parameters are listed in
357: Table \ref{tbl-4}. The uncertainty of each parameter was estimated
358: using a Monte Carlo approach. The radial velocity variability can be
359: well fitted by a Keplerian orbit with a period $P=326.03\pm0.32$
360: days, a velocity semiamplitude $K_1=302.8\pm2.6$ m s$^{-1}$, and an
361: eccentricity $e=0.231\pm0.005$. When we determined a Keplerian orbit
362: using only OAO data, the rms scatter of the residuals to the Keplerian fit
363: for OAO data was 17.8 m s$^{-1}$, which is slightly larger
364: than the typical intrinsic radial velocity scatter of late G-type
365: giants in our sample (Sato et al. 2005), but we found
366: no significant additional periodicity in the residuals at this
367: stage. The Keplerian orbit derived by only OAO data fits the Xinglong
368: data with the rms scatter of 33.2 m s$^{-1}$, which is comparable to
369: the observational errors.
370: Adopting a stellar mass of 2.7$\pm$0.3 $M_{\odot}$, we obtained for the
371: companion a mass $m_2\sin i=19.4\pm1.5$ $M_{\rm J}$ and a semimajor
372: axis $a=1.29\pm0.05$ AU. The uncertainties mostly come from that in
373: host star's mass. If we assume the orbit is randomly oriented, there
374: is a 3\% chance that the true mass exceeds 80 $M_{\rm J}$
375: ($i<14^{\circ}$), a border between brown dwarf and star mass regimes.
376:
377: To investigate other causes producing apparent radial velocity
378: variations such as pulsation and rotational modulation,
379: spectral line shape analysis was performed with use of high
380: resolution stellar templates followed by the technique of
381: Sato et al. (2007). We extracted two stellar templates from the
382: star+I$_2$ spectra obtained at OAO: one was from five spectra
383: with observed radial velocities of $250\sim300$ m s$^{-1}$
384: and the other was from those with $\sim-200$ m s$^{-1}$.
385: Cross correlation profiles of the templates were calculated
386: for 50 spectral segments (4--5${\rm \AA}$ width each) in which
387: severely blended lines or broad lines were not included.
388: Three bisector quantities were calculated for the cross correlation
389: profile of each segment: the velocity span (BVS), which is the velocity
390: difference between two flux levels of the bisector; the velocity
391: curvature (BVC), which is the difference of the velocity span of the
392: upper half and lower half of the bisector; and the velocity displacement
393: (BVD), which is the average of the bisector at three different flux levels.
394: We used flux levels of 25\%, 50\%, and 75\% of the cross correlation
395: profile to calculate the above quantities. Figure \ref{fig3}
396: shows the resulting
397: bisector quantities plotted against the center wavelength of each segment.
398: As expected from the planetary hypothesis, both of the bisector velocity
399: span and the curvature are identical to zero ($-$2.3 m s$^{-1}$ and
400: $-$2.4 m s$^{-1}$ in average, respectively), which means that the cross
401: correlation profiles are symmetric, and the average bisector velocity
402: displacement of $-$453.0 m s$^{-1}$ is consistent with the velocity
403: difference between the two templates.
404: Furthermore, these values are irrelevant to wavelength.
405: Based on these results, we conclude that the radial velocity variability
406: observed in 11 Com is best explained by orbital motion.
407:
408: \section{Discussion and Summary}
409: We reported a discovery of a brown dwarf mass companion
410: to the intermediate-mass giant 11 Com. This is the first result
411: from the joint planet search program between China and Japan.
412: We obtained radial velocities of the star over a time span
413: of 3 years at OAO and 2 years at Xinglong. The two sites
414: independently detected the velocity variability of the star,
415: and the agreement of the two data sets assures the reliability
416: of our discovery and the radial velocity measurements at both sites.
417:
418: 11 Com b is the third substellar companion
419: ever discovered to intermediate-mass giants falling in the
420: brown dwarf regime (Fig \ref{fig4}).
421: To date, 10 planetary mass companions ($0.6-10M_{\rm J}$)
422: have been found around intermediate-mass ($\gtrsim1.6M_{\odot}$)
423: giants by precise Doppler surveys, but only 3 brown dwarf mass ones
424: ($\gtrsim14M_{\rm J}$) have been found despite the larger radial
425: velocity amplitudes being easily detectable.
426: These results may suggest a shortage of brown dwarfs
427: relative to planets around intermediate-mass giants
428: within orbital separations of $\sim$3 AU.
429:
430: Brown dwarf companions are generally thought to form by
431: gravitational collapse in protostellar clouds like
432: stellar binary systems (Bonnell \& Bastien 1992; Bate 2000).
433: It is difficult, however, to form close binary
434: systems with large difference in mass between the primary
435: and the secondary (Bate 2000). According to this scenario,
436: fewer brown dwarf companions are expected in higher-mass
437: systems than in lower-mass ones.
438: Around solar-type stars, the frequency of brown dwarf
439: companions is estimated to be less than 0.5\% within
440: 3 AU (Marcy \& Butler 2000)
441: \footnote{Patel et al. (2007) recently discovered five brown
442: dwarf candidates beyond 3 AU by precise radial velocity technique.}.
443: As long as our survey, 11 Com b emerged from a sample of
444: 300 stars at OAO. The current detection rate seems to be comparable
445: to that around solar-type stars, although the exact detection limits
446: for all the targets in our sample have not been derived yet.
447: Detailed statistical analysis will be presented in a forthcoming paper.
448: Ongoing large scale Doppler surveys of G--K giants (Setiawan et al.
449: 2005; Sato et al. 2007; Hatzes et al. 2005; Johnson et al. 2007;
450: Lovis \& Mayor 2007; Frink et al. 2002; Niedzielski et al. 2007)
451: and B--A dwarfs (Galland et al. 2005) around the globe
452: will derive statistically reliable value of the frequency.
453:
454: Gravitational instability in protostellar disks is
455: another scenario to form brown dwarf companions (Boss 2000;
456: Rice et al. 2003).
457: This scenario is also proposed as the formation mechanism
458: for massive gaseous planets.
459: A half of the planetary mass companions discovered around
460: intermediate-mass stars have minimum masses greater
461: than 5 $M_{\rm J}$,
462: so-called ``super planets'' (Hatzes et al. 2005;
463: Sato et al. 2003, 2007; Setiawan et al. 2003, 2005;
464: Lovis \& Mayor 2007).
465: Can these companions and 11 Com b be put into
466: the same context in the point of formation mechanism?
467: One remarkable feature of these companions is that most of
468: them (including 11 Com b) are orbiting stars with subsolar
469: metallicity. This apparently favors gravitational instability
470: scenario as their formation mechanism (Boss 2002), which is
471: less sensitive to metallicity than core accretion scenario is
472: (Fischer \& Valenti 2005; Ida \& Lin 2004).
473: However, if the surface density of dust in the disk scales
474: as $M_{*}^{\alpha}Z$ ($\alpha> 0$), where $M_{*}$ is the stellar
475: mass and $Z$ is the metallicity, massive stars may have higher
476: disk surface densities, which may compensate for lower metalicities.
477: Such disks could form massive solid cores that can accrete huge gas
478: envelope up to 20$M_{\rm J}$.
479: Further investigation of mass and metallicity distribution of
480: substellar companions to massive stars helps discriminate between
481: these formation scenarios.
482:
483: \acknowledgments
484:
485: This research is based on data collected at Xinglong station, which
486: is operated by the National Astronomical Observatories, CAS (NAOC),
487: and Okayama Astrophysical Observatory (OAO), which is operated by
488: National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (NAOJ). We thank Junjun
489: Jia, Jiaming Ai, and Hongbin Li for their expertise and support of
490: the Xinglong observations. We are grateful to all of the staffs of
491: OAO for their support during the OAO observations. Data analysis was
492: in part carried out on ``sb'' computer system operated by the
493: Astronomical Data Analysis Center (ADAC) and Subaru Telescope of
494: NAOJ. We thank the National Institute of Information and
495: Communications Technology for their support on high-speed network
496: connection for data transfer and analysis. This work was funded by
497: the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grants
498: 10521001 and 10433010. B.S., H.I., H.A., and M.Y. are supported by
499: Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research No.17740106, (C) No.13640247,
500: (B) No.17340056, (B) No.18340055, respectively, from the Japan
501: Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). E.T., D.M., and Y.I. are
502: supported by ``The 21st Century COE Program: The Origin and
503: Evolution of Planetary Systems'' in Ministry of Education, Culture,
504: Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). E.K. and S.I. are partially
505: supported by MEXT, Japan, the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research
506: on Priority Areas, ``Development of Extra-Solar Planeary Science.''
507: This research has made use of
508: the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France.
509:
510: \begin{thebibliography}{}
511: % Journals(e.g. A\&A,ApJ,AJ,NMRAS,PASP ...)
512: \bibitem[Alonso (1999)]{alonso99} Alonso, S.,
513: Arribas S., Mart\'{i}nez-Roger C., 1999, A\&AS, 140, 261
514: \bibitem[Alonso (2001)]{alonso01} Alonso, S.,
515: Arribas S., Mart\'{i}nez-Roger C., 2001, A\&A, 376, 1039
516: \bibitem[Bate (2000)]{bate00} Bate, M. R. 2000,
517: MNRAS, 314, 33
518: \bibitem[Bonnell (1992)]{bb02} Bonnell, I. \& Bastien, P. 1992,
519: ApJ, 401, 654
520: \bibitem[Boss (2000)]{boss00} Boss, A. P. 2000,
521: ApJ, 536, L101
522: \bibitem[Boss (2002)]{boss02} Boss, A. P. 2002,
523: ApJ, 567, L149
524: \bibitem[Butler et al. (2006)]{butler06} Butler, R.P. et al. 2006,
525: ApJ, 646, 505
526: \bibitem[Butler et al.(1996)]{butler96} Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W.,
527: Williams, E., McCarthy, C., Dosanjh, P., \& Vogt, S. S. 1996,
528: \pasp, 108, 500
529: \bibitem[Chen (2000)]{chen00} Chen, Y.Q., Nissen, P.E., Zhao, G.,
530: Zhang, H.W., \& Benoni, T., 2000, A\&AS, 141, 491
531: \bibitem[de Medeiros \& Mayor (1999)]{deMed99} de Medeiros, J. R., \&
532: Mayor, M. 1999, \aaps, 139, 433
533: \bibitem[ESA (1997)]{esa97} ESA. 1997,
534: The {\it Hipparcos} and Tycho Catalogues (ESA SP-1200; Noordwijk: ESA)
535: \bibitem[Fischer \& Valenti (2005)]{fischer05} Fischer, D.A. \& Valenti, J.
536: 2005, \apj, 622, 1102
537: \bibitem[Frink et al.(2002)]{frink02} Frink, S.,
538: Mitchell, D. S., Quirrenbach, A., Fischer, D., Marcy, G. W., \&
539: Butler, R. P. 2002, \apj, 576, 478
540: \bibitem[Galland et al. (2005)]{galland05} Galland, F., Lagrange, A.-M.,
541: Udry, S., Chelli, A., Pepe, F., Beuzit, J.-L., \& Mayor, M. 2005,
542: \aap, 444, L21
543: \bibitem[Grether et al.(2006)]{grether06} Grether, D.,
544: \& Lineweaver, C.H. 2006, ApJ, 640, 1051
545: \bibitem[Hatzes et al. (2005)]{hatzes05} Hatzes, A.P., Guenther, E.W.,
546: Endl, M., Cochran, W.D., D$\ddot{\rm{o}}$llinger, M.P., \& Bedalov, A.
547: 2005, \aap, 437, 743
548: \bibitem[Ida and Lin (2004)]{ida05} Ida, S. \& Lin, D.N.C.
549: 2004, \apj, 616, 567
550: \bibitem[Izumiura (1999)]{izumiura99} Izumiura, H. 1999,
551: in Proc. 4th East Asian Meeting on Astronomy, ed. P.S. Chen
552: (Kunming: Yunnan Observatory), 77
553: \bibitem[Johnson et al. (2007)]{john07} Johnson, J.A. et al. 2007, \apj,
554: 665, 785
555: \bibitem[Kambe et al. (2002)]{kambe02} Kambe, E. et al. 2002,
556: PASJ, 54, 865
557: \bibitem[Kouwenhoven et al. (2007)]{kouwen07} Kouwenhoven, M.B.N.,
558: Brown, A.G.A., \& Kaper, L. 2007, A\&A, 464, 581
559: \bibitem[Kurucz 1993]{kuru93} Kurucz, R. L. 1993,
560: Kurucz CD-ROM, No.13 (Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics)
561: \bibitem[Lovis et al. 2007]{lovis07} Lovis, C. \& Mayor, M. 2007,
562: A\&A in press (astro-ph/arXiv:0706.2174v1)
563: \bibitem[Marcy et al. (2000)]{marcy00} Marcy, G.W. \&
564: Butler, R.P. 2000, PASP, 112, 137
565: \bibitem[Marcy et al. (1997)]{marcy97} Marcy, G.W., Butler, R.P.,
566: Williams, E., Bildsten, L., Graham, J.R., Ghez, A.M., \& Jernigan, J.G.,
567: 1997, ApJ, 481, 926
568: \bibitem[McCarthy et al. (2004)]{mc04} McCarthy, C. \& Zuckerman, B.
569: 2004, AJ, 127, 2871
570: \bibitem[Niedzielski et al. (2007)]{nied07} Niedzielski, A. et al. 2007,
571: ApJ preprint doi:10.1086/'521784'
572: \bibitem[Patel et al. (2007)]{patel07} Patel, S.G., Vogt, S.S., Marcy, G.W.,
573: Johnson, J.A., Fischer, D.A., Wright, J.T., \& Butler, R.P. 2007,
574: ApJ preprint doi:10.1086/'519066'
575: \bibitem[Rice et al. (2003)]{rice03} Rice, W.K.M., Armitage, P.J.,
576: Bonnell, I.A., Bate, M.R., Jeffers, S.V., \& Vine, S.G., 2003,
577: MNRAS, 346, L36
578: \bibitem[Sato et al. (2002)]{sato02} Sato, B., Kambe, E.,
579: Takeda, Y., Izumiura, H., \& Ando, H. 2002,
580: PASJ, 54, 873
581: \bibitem[Sato et al. (2003)]{sato03} Sato, B., et al. 2003,
582: ApJ, 597, L157
583: \bibitem[Sato et al. (2005)]{sato05} Sato, B., Kambe, E.,
584: Takeda, Y., Izumiura, H., Masuda, S.\& Ando, H. 2005,
585: PASJ, 57, 97
586: \bibitem[Sato et al. (2007)]{sato07} Sato, B. et al. 2007,
587: ApJ, 661, 527
588: \bibitem[Setiawan et al. (2003)]{setiawan03} Setiawan, J., et al. 2003,
589: \aap, 398, L19
590: \bibitem[Setiawan et al. (2005)]{setiawan05} Setiawan, J., Rodmann, J.,
591: da Silva, L., Hatzes, A. P., Pasquini, L., von der L$\ddot{\rm{u}}$he, O.,
592: de Medeiros, J. R., D$\ddot{\rm{o}}$llinger, M.P. \& Guenther, E. 2005,
593: \aap, 437, L31
594: \bibitem[Yonsei et al.(2003)]{yonsei03} Yi, S. K., Kim, Y. C.,
595: \& Demarque, P., 2003, ApJS, 144, 259
596: \bibitem[Zhao et al. (2001)]{Zhao01} Zhao, G., \& Li, H. B., 2001,
597: ChJAA, 6, 555
598: \end{thebibliography}
599:
600: \clearpage
601:
602: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
603: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
604: %% To embed the sample graphics in
605: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
606: %% \includegraphics commands
607: %%
608: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
609: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
610: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
611: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
612: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
613: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
614: %%
615: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
616: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
617: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
618: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
619: %% journal to journal.
620:
621: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
622: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
623: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
624: %% available in the electronic journal.
625:
626: \begin{figure}
627: \epsscale{.80}
628: \plotone{f1.eps}
629: \caption{Spectra in the region of CaII H lines.
630: HD 120048 and HD 176598 show significant core reversals
631: in the lines suggesting high chromospheric activity.
632: They have relatively large radial velocity scatters of 25--35
633: m s$^{-1}$. $\gamma$ Tau exhibits no emission in the line and show
634: radial velocity stability at a level of $\sim$5 m s$^{-1}$.\label{fig1}}
635: \end{figure}
636:
637: \begin{figure}
638: \epsscale{.80}
639: \plotone{f2.eps}
640: \caption{Radial velocities of 11 Com (dots) observed
641: at OAO (red) and Xinglong (green).
642: The Keplerian orbit (solid line) is determined using
643: both of the OAO and Xinglong data.
644: \label{fig2}}
645: \end{figure}
646:
647: \begin{figure}
648: \plotone{f3.eps}
649: \caption{Bisector quantities of cross-correlation profiles
650: between the templates of 11 Com at peak (250--300 m s$^{-1}$)
651: and valley ($-$200 m s$^{-1}$) phases of observed radial
652: velocities, showing bisector velocity span (BVS, circle),
653: bisector velocity curvature (BVC, triangle),
654: and bisector velocity displacement (BVD, square). The
655: definition of these quantities are described in Section 4.
656: The mean values and their standard errors are shown in the
657: figure. Dashed lines represent mean values of the quantities
658: (an offset of 300 m s$^{-1}$ is added to the BVS).
659: \label{fig3}}
660: \end{figure}
661:
662: \begin{figure}
663: \plotone{f4.eps}
664: \caption{Mass distribution of substellar companions
665: discovered by precise Doppler surveys
666: (including all of the host stars with $\lesssim4M_{\odot}$).
667: The data are based on the list from
668: http://exoplanets.org/planets.shtml.
669: NGC2423 No3 b (10.6 $M_{\rm J}$), NGC4349 No127 b (19.8 $M_{\rm J}$),
670: HD 13189 b (K2 II, 14$M_{\rm J}$), HD 17092 b (K0 III, 4.6 $M_{\rm J}$) and
671: HD 180777 b (A9 V, 25$M_{\rm J}$)
672: are not included in the list but are added to the histogram.
673: \label{fig4}}
674: \end{figure}
675:
676: %% If you are not including electonic art with your submission, you may
677: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command. See the
678: %% User Guide for details.
679: %%
680: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
681: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
682: %% after every seventh one.
683:
684: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before
685: %% each one.
686:
687: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables: the
688: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX
689: %% table environment. Use of deluxetable is preferred.
690: %%
691:
692: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,
693: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.
694:
695: %% In this first example, note that the \tabletypesize{}
696: %% command has been used to reduce the font size of the table.
697: %% We also use the \rotate command to rotate the table to
698: %% landscape orientation since it is very wide even at the
699: %% reduced font size.
700: %%
701: %% Note also that the \label command needs to be placed
702: %% inside the \tablecaption.
703:
704: %% This table also includes a table comment indicating that the full
705: %% version will be available in machine-readable format in the electronic
706: %% edition.
707:
708: \clearpage
709:
710: \begin{deluxetable}{lr}
711: \tabletypesize{\small}
712: \tablecaption{Stellar Parameters for 11 Com\label{tbl-1}}
713: \tablewidth{0pt}
714: \tablehead{
715: \colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{Value}}
716: \startdata
717: Sp. Type & G8 III \\
718: $\pi$ (mas) & 9.04$\pm$0.86 \\
719: $V$ & 4.74 \\
720: $B-V$ & 0.99 \\
721: $M_{V}$ & $-$0.48 \\
722: $B.C.$ & $-$0.36 \\
723: $T_{\rm eff}$ (K) & 4742$\pm$100 \\
724: $\log g$ & 2.31$\pm$0.1 \\
725: $[$Fe/H$]$ & $-$0.35$\pm$0.09 \\
726: $v_{\rm t}$ (km s$^{-1}$) & 1.5$\pm$0.2\\
727: $L$ ($L_{\odot}$) & 175$\pm$31 \\
728: $R$ ($R_{\odot}$) & 19$\pm$2 \\
729: $M$ ($M_{\odot}$) & 2.7$\pm$0.3 \\
730: $v\sin i$ (km s$^{-1}$) & 1.2$\pm$1.0\\
731: \enddata
732: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
733: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
734: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
735:
736: \end{deluxetable}
737:
738:
739: \begin{deluxetable}{ccc}
740: \tabletypesize{\small}
741: \tablecaption{Observed Radial Velocities of 11 Com at OAO\label{tbl-2}}
742: \tablewidth{0pt}
743: \tablehead{
744: \colhead{JD} & \colhead{Radial Velocity} & \colhead{Error}\\
745: \colhead{($-$2,450,000)} & \colhead{(m s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(m s$^{-1}$)}
746: }
747: \startdata
748: 3002.2791 & $-$201.7 & 5.7\\
749: 3101.0241 & 178.7 & 4.6\\
750: 3216.0035 & 74.5 & 7.9\\
751: 3334.3172 & $-$184.5 & 5.5\\
752: 3340.3401 & $-$160.2 & 4.6\\
753: 3364.3191 & $-$76.9 & 7.9\\
754: 3366.2249 & $-$76.6 & 5.2\\
755: 3367.2333 & $-$79.3 & 5.4\\
756: 3376.3243 & $-$12.5 & 4.7\\
757: 3403.2636 & 65.3 & 5.1\\
758: 3424.1132 & 150.7 & 5.1\\
759: 3447.1803 & 232.5 & 4.6\\
760: 3468.0504 & 251.2 & 5.6\\
761: 3495.1120 & 293.4 & 4.5\\
762: 3521.0884 & 212.5 & 7.5\\
763: 3577.9651 & $-$217.7 & 6.2\\
764: 3694.3575 & $-$38.2 & 5.0\\
765: 3728.3204 & 63.2 & 5.1\\
766: 3743.3484 & 127.7 & 5.0\\
767: 3775.2089 & 241.6 & 4.7\\
768: 3810.1629 & 311.6 & 3.9\\
769: 3831.1262 & 301.0 & 4.5\\
770: 3853.1393 & 188.7 & 5.8\\
771: 3887.0520 & $-$148.5 & 5.7\\
772: 4051.3576 & 43.8 & 4.6\\
773: 4088.3683 & 189.0 & 4.8\\
774: 4121.2706 & 239.6 & 5.9\\
775: 4143.2374 & 274.5 & 4.0\\
776: \enddata
777: \end{deluxetable}
778:
779: \begin{deluxetable}{ccc}
780: \tabletypesize{\small}
781: \tablecaption{Observed Radial Velocities of 11 Com at Xinglong\label{tbl-3}}
782: \tablewidth{0pt}
783: \tablehead{
784: \colhead{JD} & \colhead{Radial Velocity} & \colhead{Error}\\
785: \colhead{($-$2,450,000)} & \colhead{(m s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(m s$^{-1}$)}
786: }
787: \startdata
788: 3420.2939 & 195.4 & 33.5\\
789: 3422.2517 & 126.7 & 36.2\\
790: 3422.2627 & 112.0 & 33.1\\
791: 3511.0423 & 281.9 & 29.9\\
792: 3514.0647 & 249.4 & 25.6\\
793: 3514.0779 & 304.8 & 20.6\\
794: 3775.2678 & 243.1 & 30.6\\
795: 3778.3433 & 220.6 & 30.3\\
796: 3839.1013 & 229.1 & 36.6\\
797: 3839.1229 & 204.4 & 18.6\\
798: 3839.1462 & 246.7 & 31.8\\
799: 3841.1569 & 227.5 & 28.9\\
800: 3891.0521 & $-$124.4 & 18.3\\
801: 3894.0998 & $-$178.1 & 22.7\\
802: 4045.3959 & 78.7 & 21.1\\
803: 4046.3706 & 58.3 & 26.7\\
804: 4132.3744 & 249.1 & 30.9\\
805: 4132.3976 & 253.2 & 19.7\\
806: \enddata
807:
808: \end{deluxetable}
809:
810: \begin{deluxetable}{lr}
811: \tabletypesize{\small}
812: \tablecaption{Orbital Parameters of 11 Com determined from
813: both of OAO and Xinglong data.
814: \label{tbl-4}}
815: \tablewidth{0pt}
816: \tablehead{
817: \colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{Value}}
818: \startdata
819: $P$ (days) & 326.03$\pm$0.32\\
820: $K_1$ (m s$^{-1}$) & 302.8$\pm$2.6\\
821: $e$ & 0.231$\pm$0.005\\
822: $\omega$ (deg) & 94.8$\pm$1.5\\
823: $T_p$ (JD$-$2,450,000) & 2899.6$\pm$1.6\\
824: $a_1\sin i$ (10$^{-3}$AU) & 8.848$\pm$0.073\\
825: $f_1(m)$ (10$^{-7}M_{\odot}$) & 8.68$\pm$0.21\\
826: $m_2\sin i$ ($M_{\rm J}$) & 19.4$\pm$1.5\\
827: $a$ (AU) & 1.29$\pm$0.05\\
828: $N$ & 46\\
829: rms (m s$^{-1}$) & 25.5\\
830: Reduced $\sqrt{\chi^2}$ & 2.8\\
831: \enddata
832:
833: \end{deluxetable}
834:
835: \end{document}
836:
837: %%
838: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
839: